JAPAN SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT FUND (JSDF) Grant Funding Proposal (FY2011 – Round 33) A. BASIC DATA Beneficiary Country: Bolivia Grant Name: Integrated Community-Driven Territorial Development for Remote Communities in the Amazon Grant Recipient: FESPAI (Federación Sindical de Productores Agropecuarios de la Provincia Abel Iturralde) & CIPTA (Consejo Indígena del Pueblo Tacana) Name of Implementing FUNDESNAP Agency or Agencies with & Joint Implementation: Conservation International - Bolivia Implementing Agency NGO Type: Main Sector: AZ General agriculture, Main Theme: 86 Other environment and fishing and forestry natural resources management Recipient Grant Amount: US$ 2,215,000 Bank Incremental Costs Grant Amount: US$ 100,000 Total Grant Amount US$ 2,315,000 (Recipient and Bank Incremental Costs): B. PROJECT SUMMARY The Project Development Objective of this grant is to pilot a participatory sustainable territorial planning model for poor indigenous and intercultural communities in the Bolivian Amazon through small investment projects and improved participation in municipal land-use planning in regions where new infrastructure is being planned. This would be achieved through (i) capacity building for communities and municipalities on sustainable land-use planning and designs of sub-projects, (ii) financing small demand-driven and sustainable sub-projects proposed by communities or groups of producers, and (iii) empowerment of rural communities in the implementation of municipal territorial planning. The grant would complement the World Bank’s National Roads and Airport Infrastructure Project (NRAIP) which was approved by the World Bank Board on May 6, 2011. National infrastructure projects in Bolivia have traditionally been developed with some consideration to reducing direct negative impacts on the local population but have not attempted to integrate efforts to strengthen sustainable territorial strategies for the communities located near the developed infrastructure. In the Bolivian Amazon, and other tropical regions in Bolivia, this has adversely resulted in unplanned development with unsustainable socio-economic consequences on local livelihoods. This proposal seeks to develop an innovative model that would encourage environmentally sustainable livelihood improvements for communities near the 113-km road corridor between San Buenaventura and Ixiamas. If successful, the project would provide the Government of Bolivia with a community-driven, bottom-up model to promote sustainable, productive territorial development that can complement large-scale infrastructure projects. Specifically, the model could be scaled-up in the Northern Corridor Infrastructure Project (1664 km) from the Bolivian capital La Paz to the border with Brazil in the Amazon, as well as other large-scale infrastructure projects planned by the Government in the tropical regions of Bolivia. GRANT SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 1. PROJECT INFORMATION 1.1 Strategic Context The project seeks to address two critical challenges facing Bolivia: poverty, and rapid land-use change. With around 60% of the population living below the poverty line, Bolivia is one of the poorest and most unequal countries in Latin America. In rural areas and among indigenous peoples the problem is even more pronounced, with 77.3% of the rural population living in poverty. More than half of Bolivia is covered by tropical forest and the country is considered a biodiversity hotspot. Despite the low population density in the Amazon, Bolivia has one of the highest deforestation rates in the world. As a consequence, rapid land and soil degradation is a major challenge to rural communities’ livelihoods and the ongoing expansion of the agricultural frontier is unsustainable in the different fragile ecosystems. The Bolivian Government has prioritized physical integration of the national transportation system in its National Development Plan. To achieve this, the budget for the National Road Agency ABC has more than quadrupled from US$114.9 million in 2002 to approximately US$566 million in 2010, of which 79% was directly allocated to road construction. Bolivia’s extreme topography and low population density represent a challenge in integrating the country’s nine departments. In particular, infrastructure is limited in the Amazon region and improving the infrastructure network in this region is a Government priority. The World Bank is developing a project to support the expansion of the national transport system through the National Roads and Airport Infrastructure Project (NRAIP), which will improve the year-round capacity for transit between the municipalities of San Buenaventura and Ixiamas (113 km). The road is located in the Amazon near the Madidi National Park, which attracts a significant number of tourists annually. The majority of the land is characterized as forestry land and soil is generally not apt for intensive farming. The Bank-financed infrastructure project forms part of a wider road project known as the Northern Corridor (1664 km), connecting the capital La Paz with Brazil in the North-East. Construction or improvements to the national road network in Bolivia have generally not been integrated in municipal development and land-use plans. Particularly, the participation of the most remote and vulnerable communities in the development of these municipal development plans has been insufficient. As a consequence, unplanned territorial development is often dominant and fails to include the most disadvantaged communities. Both municipalities, San Buenaventura and Ixiamas, have recently formulated Participatory Development and Land-Use Plans but still lack the institutional capacity to implement these plans in coordination with rural communities. The improved road provides an opportunity to demonstrate how the overall municipal land-use framework can be implemented through self-identified community plans and projects that should promote sustainable agro-forestry systems. Land tenure rights in the two Municipalities of San Buenaventura and Ixiamas are overall divided between a collectively managed indigenous territory, small peasant plots of land, a small number of large-scale farms and one of Bolivia’s largest national parks. The peasant land settlement programs began in the 1980s in order to provide landless peasants and unemployed miners with alternative income possibilities. The land rights of indigenous groups in lowland Bolivia to collectively managed territories were recognized in 1996 when the second agrarian reform (Ley INRA) was approved. The Tacana I indigenous territory received its legal title in 2003. No major conflicts exist today regarding land rights and the agrarian reform has solved many of the regional land-conflicts. However, small peasant farmers continue to campaign for the opening up of parts of the Madidi National Park and emphasize that the Tacana indigenous group has been granted too much land for the small amount of people they represent. The Esse-Ejja community has not been granted a territory and depends on 10 hectares of land for the entire community, donated by the New Tribes Mission in 2000. Both indigenous and intercultural peasant communities have expressed an urgent need to receive training and opportunities to develop sustainable land-use projects to improve their livelihood conditions and introduce alternatives to timber extraction and unsustainable slash-and-burn farming. Today many communities produce cash crops with the highest rate of return without considering how these activities contribute to rapid soil degradation. The challenge is that the vast majority of the land in the region is not apt for intensive agricultural and livestock production. Ensuring a high diversity of income-generating activities and integrated agro-forestry systems is the best way to ensure long-term, sustainable development in this fragile environment. The rural communities consider cocoa, fishing, tourism and citrus fruit production to be livelihoods with low environmental impacts. The neighboring municipality Rurrenabaque receives more than 18,000 tourists annually and the road will improve access to potential tourist sites in San Buenaventura and Ixiamas. Bolivia has enormous potential to produce high value cocoa by using native species from the Amazon. Cocoa could be the key cash-crop in integrated agro- forestry systems in the region. The capacity to establish integrated agro-forestry is today very limited. The quality of many products is low and does not generate sufficient income to reduce the high poverty rate in the region or to establish a more sustainable land use. The project will also be coordinated with the Bank’s Rural Alliances Project which is promoting better market access to productive associations. 1.2 Main The main beneficiaries will be indigenous and poor intercultural peasant communities located near the Beneficiaries San Buenaventura-Ixiamas Road. According to the 2001 Census, poverty affects 83% of San Buenaventura’s total population and 75.5% of Ixiamas’ total population, compared to Bolivia’s national average of 70.7%. The communities are organized in the Federación Sindical de Productores Agropecuarios de la Provincia Abel Iturralde (FESPAI), encompassing 47 communities with more than 6,300 inhabitants, and the Consejo Indígena del Pueblo Tacana (CIPTA), encompassing 19 communities with close to 3,000 inhabitants. The main exception is the Esse Ejja community Eyiyoquibo with 160 inhabitants, which will receive special attention due to its semi-nomadic traditions and disadvantaged access to land. The project will focus exclusively on rural poor communities in the municipalities of San Buenaventura and Ixiamas, as these rural indigenous and migrant peasant communities are the poorest and most vulnerable in the region. The urban centers of Ixiamas and San Buenaventura and larger livestock and agricultural farms will not be eligible as beneficiaries in the project, though involved in the integrated municipal territorial planning processes. Indigenous peoples and intercultural peasant families from the Andean highlands are both considered to be poor and vulnerable groups. Yet, they are very different in their organizational form and traditional land use practices. The project will therefore establish different approaches to working with these two groups. The Tacana indigenous communities have commonly managed indigenous territory (TCO) covering 549,464 hectares (ha.), through some Tacana families have chosen to have individual land titles. The migrant peasants from the Andean highlands generally have individually titled plots of land of about 50 ha. each, which has been granted by the Government through different land reform programs since the 1980s. An Indigenous Peoples Plan (based on the IPP from the NRAIP project) would be elaborated before a grant agreement is signed. The plan would focus on the Tacana and Esse-Ejja indigenous peoples that will be direct beneficiaries of the project. 25 communities (totaling approximately 3,600 inhabitants) will be the beneficiaries of the project’s local land-use planning and sub-grants. Additionally 2,000 people will benefit from improved access to municipal decision making related to integrated territorial planning. In total, the project estimates to benefit 5,600 people in the two municipalities. This is a significant percentage of the total population in this remote and sparsely populated region of Bolivian 1. To avoid elite capture, access to basic services will be used as one proxy indicator to select the poorest 1 Beneficiaries include all benefitting family members of the project activities, including children. communities. Out of the 66 identified rural communities, 40 communities have been pre-identified as particularly vulnerable with less than three basic services out of nine possible basic services2. The established proxy indicators will be complemented by information provided by the matrix organizations. The final selection of communities will be made by the Steering Committee based on a competitive approach, considering poverty indicators and the quality of the project proposal. The presentation of proposals will respect organizational structures of both CIPTA and FESPAI. 1.3 Project The project area is located in the northern part of the Department of La Paz, in the municipalities of San Location Buenaventura and Ixiamas. The two municipalities cover more than 4 million hectares (374,811 in San Buenaventura and 3,626,334 in Ixiamas). The majority of the region is covered by forests (2.9 million ha) and savannas (780,000 ha). The municipalities also enclose one of the most important protected areas in Bolivia, the Madidi National Park, which covers around 900,000 ha across both municipalities. The Madidi Park is known for having more than 5,000 plant species, more than 2,000 vertebrate species, and contains the most diverse area for birds in the country. The total population in the region is approximately 16,000 (2009), 45% women and 55% men, with 57% of the total population living in rural communities. Population density is low and rural communities generally have less than 300 inhabitants. Land rights are divided between Indigenous Community-Owned Territories, small-scale private land plots, a few large-scale farms, fiscal lands and protected areas. The region is classed as poor, with a 0.6 Human Development Index and less than 50% coverage of basic services. The main economic activities are subsistence farming, some cash crops, timber, cattle ranching and fishing. These activities occupy the majority of the population (around 67%), while 33% of the economically active population is employed in other activities. 1.4 Project Duration: 3 years Project Start : 2/1/2012 Project End 1/31/2015 Date: 1.5 Task Team Leader Morten Blomqvist 1.6 GRANT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE The Project Development Objective of this grant is to pilot a participatory sustainable territorial planning model for poor indigenous and intercultural communities in the Bolivian Amazon through small sustainable investment projects and improved participation in municipal land-use planning in regions where new infrastructure is being planned. This would be achieved through (i) capacity building for communities and municipalities on sustainable land-use planning and projects, (ii) financing small demand-driven and sustainable sub-projects proposed by communities and groups of producers, and (iii) empowerment of rural communities in the implementation of municipal territorial planning. The integrated territorial planning model will strengthen environmentally sustainable land-use practices and promote participatory processes in order to establish realistic local development planning across different sectors. The project will benefit 3,600 people directly in the selected communities, and 2000 people additionally through capacity building related to participating in the municipal territorial planning. In total, 5,600 people will benefit from the project. 1.7 DEVELOPMENT OUTCOME INDICATORS QUANTIFIED TARGET 1.7(a) Percentage of rural communities in San Buenaventura and Ixiamas who have 75% of the participating prepared local sustainable land-use plans and presented them to their communities have presented respective municipalities. local land-use plans to the 2 The nine basic services considered are: potable water, basic sanitation, electricity, distance to main road, community centers, as well as access to radio, phone, television and internet. municipalities, totaling a minimum 25% of the rural communities in the region. 1.7(b) Expected increase in land under sustainable land-use (such as cocoa, fishing, At least 10% increase in land tourism, honey, citrus fruits) in the participating communities as part of the under sustainable land-use consolidation of community territorial agreements. management in the 25 selected communities. 1.7(c) Increase in direct participation of rural communities in the implementation of At least 50% increase in municipal territorial planning. participation of rural communities in municipal territorial planning. 1.7(d) Increase of the percentage of women involved in cash-income generating At least 10% increase in rural activities based on the baseline study observations. women involved in cash- income activities. 2. GRANT RECIPIENT AND IMPLEMENTING AGENCY 2.1 Recipient Name: Federación Sindical de Productores Agropecuarios de la Provincia Abel Iturralde (FESPAI) and Consejo Indígena del Pueblo Tacana (CIPTA) 2.2 Recipient Background: Federación Sindical de Productores Agropecuarios de la Provincia Abel Iturralde (FESPAI) is one of the two recipient organizations of the grant. It is the legal organization for the “intercultural” peasants which mainly consists of Quechua and Aymara families who migrated to the region from the highlands with assistance from Government- sponsored land programs. FESPAI has six sub-centrals (Ixiamas, Alto Madidi, 16 de Julio, 2 de Agosto, Marcelo Quiroga Santa Cruz and Esperanza de Madidi) and covers 47 communities and associations across the two municipalities. According to its Strategic Plan developed in 2004, FESPAI’s mission is to promote agriculture and livestock production, support the formation of productive associations, promote rational and sustainable uses of natural resources and ensure the construction of new roads to the communities. FESPAI forms part of the national organization of Intercultural Communities (La Confederación Sindical de Comunidades Interculturales de Bolivia, or CSCIB). 12-14 communities from FESPAI will be selected as direct beneficiaries in the project. A higher number of intercultural communities will be selected as direct beneficiaries because FEPSAI represent two-thirds of the communities. Grant Agreements will be signed with the individual community. Communities with minimum capacity and Personal Juridical Certificate will manage the sub-grants directly under close supervision. If not, FUNDESNAP will manage the financial aspects of the sub-grants. Consejo Indígena del Pueblo Tacana (CIPTA) was established in 1993 as the legal organization representing the Tacana indigenous peoples. CIPTA gained the title to the Tacana I indigenous Territory (TCO) of 549,464.83 ha. from the National Institute of Agrarian Reform (INRA) in 2003. A 1994-1995 census funded by international donors indicated that the total Tacana population in Bolivia is approximately 5,135. In the project region, the Tacana population is approximately 3,000, though not all Tacanas live within the territorial boundaries. The 19 communities in the Tacana I Territory are either located near the San Buenaventura-Ixiamas road or near the River Beni. A few communities are located within the Madidi National Park and include a few Tsimane and Mosetén families. CIPTA is known for advanced territorial planning but still lacks the capacity to consolidate its territorial management plan at the community level. CIPTA forms part of the Indigenous Confederations for Lowland Indigenous Peoples in Bolivia (CIDOB). 10-12 communities from CIPTA will be selected. Grant Agreements will be signed with the individual community. Communities with minimum capacity and Personal Juridical Certificate will manage the sub-grants directly under close supervision. If not, FUNDESNAP will manage the financial aspects of the sub-grants. The Esse-Ejja community Eyiyoquibo is poorly organized and has extremely limited access to land and natural resources. Traditionally, the Esse-Ejja is a semi-nomadic indigenous group that depends on several Amazon rivers in Peru and Bolivia for subsistence fishing and farming on the river banks. In 2000, the New Tribes Mission founded the Eyiyoquibo community and donated 10 hectares of land to the community when they approached the two semi-nomadic communities living near the river banks of River Beni. The Eyiyoquibo community is located near the towns of San Buenaventura and Rurrenebaque, which leaves them with limited possibilities to maintain their traditional livelihood. Today the Eyiyoquibo community has approximately 160 inhabitants and faces severe problems with mal-nutrition and alcoholism. The New Tribes Mission is no longer operating in Bolivia and the community is left with very limited organizational capacity. During the consultation process, the community highlighted fishing, handicrafts, tourism and subsistence farming as some areas in which they would like to receive training and project support. Due to the extreme vulnerability of the Eyiyoquibo community, the Esse-Ejja have been pre-selected to benefit from the project sub-grants and will also receive additional training and support in order to participate in the municipal territorial planning. Fiduciary aspects of the sub-grants will be managed by FUNDESNAP due to the limited administrative capacity of the community. 2.3 Implementing Agent Details Agency Name: Fundación para el Desarrollo del Sistema Nacional de Áreas Protegidas (FUNDESNAP) & Conservation International - Bolivia (CI) Address FUNDESNAP, Prolongación Cordero, no 127, Casilla 3667, La Paz, Bolivia CI, Calacoto, Calle 13, No. 8008, La Paz, Bolivia Contact Person in Proposed FUNDESNAP: Imke Oetting Implementing Agency CI: Eduardo Forno Phone: FUNDESNAP: +591 (2) 2 11 33 64 CI: +591 (2) 279 77 00 Email: FUNDESNAP: ioetting@fundesnap.org CI: e.forno@conservation.org 2.4 Implementing Agency Background FUNDESNAP is a National Foundation. It was established in 2000 by a variety of NGOs, civil society, public institutions and international donors in order to provide financial and administrative support to protected areas in Bolivia. FUNDESNAP has significant expertise in setting up the administration of projects providing sub-grants to different actors, including peasant associations, indigenous organizations, municipalities and NGOs. FUNDESNAP has more than 10 years of experience in organizing community-driven productive activities aiming to ensure sustainable development. FUNDESNAP is currently implementing a project in the region and has established close collaboration with FESPAI and CIPTA. FUNDESNAP has 13 full-time staff and its budget in 2010 was US$ 1,357,440. It has experience managing funds from the World Bank and other donor agencies. The largest project they have managed was a US$ 6,4 million project financed by the German Restoration Bank (Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau KfW). FUNDESNAP will be responsible for the implementation of Components 1 and 4. Overall financial management of the project will also be handled by FUNDESNAP. Conservation International - Bolivia (CI-Bolivia) is part of Conservation International, a leading global environmental organization working in over 30 countries. CI’s mission is to empower societies to responsibly and sustainably care for nature, our global biodiversity, for the well-being of humanity. CI-Bolivia was one of Conservation International’s first field offices and CI has worked continuously in Bolivia since 1987. CI’s many achievements over the past 24 years of work in Bolivia include: the world’s first “debt-for-nature” swap (1988); the first Rapid Biological Assessment in CI’s history (1989), which laid the scientific basis for creating the Madidi National Park; and the development of the Vilcabamba-Amboro Conservation Corridor (2001). Over the last decade, CI-Bolivia’s activities have been directed more towards community development, including the creation and support of indigenous businesses in ecotourism, agro-biodiversity and handicrafts. Earlier this year, CI Bolivia supported the preparation of the Municipal Land Use Plans for the Ixiamas and San Buenaventura municipalities as well as the Life Plans for the Uchupiamonas and Tsimane Mosetene ethnic groups. This unique work and profound knowledge of the region qualifies CI as an Implementing Agency that can support community-driven projects and the development of territorial plans based on community participation. CI has operated for more than a decade in the region and has recently re-confirmed the region as a priority. CI-Bolivia currently has nine full-time staff and its average annual budget in the period 2008 – 2010 was $2,148,068. CI has managed several large-scale projects supported by different donors. The largest and most complex project was the Landscape Conservation Program, an $8.3 million three-year program financed by USAID, under which CI-Bolivia led a six-member consortium of national and international NGOs working to foster the conservation of the Amboró Madidi Conservation Corridor. The project was successfully completed in March 2010. CI-Bolivia will be responsible for the implementation of Components 2 and 3. The two Implementing Agencies have been selected because no single agency had the capacity and experience to implement all activities, including sub-grants, local territorial management and municipal planning. The two agencies have worked together before on other projects. A clear division of work and coordination has been established. This will be included in the Operational Manual. The World Bank FM Team will perform a Financial Management Capacity Assessment prior to grant approval and supervise the formulation of the Operational Manual. 2.5 Other institutions/NGOs that will be involved in implementation A steering committee will be established to make overall decisions, supervise project advancement, ensure transparency and analyze possibilities scaling up the territorial model as well as new pilot projects. The committee will meet twice per year and it is proposed that it will include the following institutions: - Ministry of Development Planning - The National Road Agency (ABC) - Ministry of Rural Development - Federation of Municipalities in Bolivia (FAM) - Municipality of Ixiamas - Municipality of San Buenaventura - CIPTA - FESPAI - Representative from the Esse Ejja community Eyiyoquibo Besides the steering committee, the project aims to establish close coordination and dialogue with other agencies working in the region, such as JICA, UNDP, Fundación Puma, GIZ, DED, and the Wildlife Conservation Society. Though the project will be focused on the most disadvantaged and poorest communities in the two municipalities, it is considered a necessity to include other local stakeholders such as larger land-owners and people living in urban centers in the broader dialogue in order to consolidate the municipal sustainable land-use planning. The involvement of other local stakeholders will be considered relevant during the implementation of Component 3 and when decided by the Steering Committee. 3. INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY 3.1 Innovation Today the rapid expansion of Bolivia’s rural transportation network is disjointed, and little attention is paid to regional territorial development or inclusion of the poorest and most disadvantaged groups. The proposed project will promote an innovative approach to strengthening the participation of indigenous and peasant communities in municipal decision making and decentralized territorial planning, dealing with the rapid extension of the national transport systems in fragile eco-regions. In Bolivia, it is currently assumed that improved rural infrastructure will have an automatic trickle-down effect on the poorest and most vulnerable communities in these remote regions. Though communities generally support the goal of having year-round road accessibility, they rarely have sufficient capacity to influence regional territorial planning nor do they have access to financial resources to secure better market access through establishing more sustainable production systems. Therefore, it is short-term investments with adverse long-term impacts that tend to dominate. The proposed project seeks to promote an innovative community-driven land-use mapping model that should contribute to the implementation of a participatory and transparent municipal territorial planning. Such a community-driven and cross- sector approach is new in Bolivia. Rural municipal territorial planning is rarely developed and never turns into practice in rural communities. Illegal land-use planning and settlements tend to dominate in the most remote areas. Furthermore, the project aims to improve the quality and sustainability of productive projects promoted by the municipality and productive associations through a competitive and award-giving process. Both communities and municipalities will receive training to develop and implement productive projects within a sustainable land-use planning. 3.2 Sustainability The project will be implemented in close coordination with the Ixiamas and San Buenaventura municipalities. The decentralized governance structure in Bolivia ensures that considerable financial resources are allocated to the municipalities, which would allow the municipalities to co-finance the subprojects and scale-up the subproject activities if they increase institutional capacity in sustainable rural development. The participating communities will receive training in how to participate in local decision-making and present project proposals, which they can use in future negotiations with the municipality. The municipal territorial planning will be aligned with community priorities and the day-to-day land management of peasant and indigenous communities. This participatory approach will reduce gaps between municipal planning and individual agro-forestry practices, and thereby provide more sustainable and aligned land-use planning. The municipalities will also be receiving training in order to continue supporting the subprojects and increase the possibilities of scaling up the experiences. The municipalities have also expressed interest in co-financing different project activities. The project design proposes the creation of a Steering Committee. This committee will include several national institutions that would be able to scale up the experience in other municipalities and near other infrastructure projects. The integrated territorial planning model promoted by the project is highly relevant in Bolivia; a country experiencing one of the highest deforestation rates per capita in the world and where a rapid expansion of national infrastructure projects is promoted in fragile environments and forestry regions. A high potential exists to scale up the integrated territorial model in other vulnerable and poor rural regions in Bolivia. This potential will be strengthened further through a coordination with the Participatory Working Group established by the NRAIP project aiming to promote a sustainable development of the area Environmental Safeguard issues will be covered by an Environmental Assessment focusing on environmental impacts, forest, pest management and natural habitats. Furthermore, an Environmental Management Framework will be developed describing in detail what sub-projects can be financed. An Indigenous Peoples Planning Framework (IPPF) will also be developed focusing particularly on the vulnerability of the Esse-Ejja. 4. CONSULTATION WITH JAPANESE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4.1 Name of Yoko Nakamura Date of Meeting 3/3/2011 Representative 4.2 Summary of Consultation: The project outline and objectives were presented to Japanese representatives. Special attention was paid to the participatory structure, the innovations, and collaboration with other Bank projects in the region. Furthermore, it was discussed how collaboration could be established between the JSDF-financed project and the JICA project promoting rice and cocoa production in the region of Rurrenabaque, San Buenaventura and Ixiamas. 4.3 Potential Collaboration: It was agreed that dialogue between JICA staff and the JSDF project should be established on the technical level and possible collaborations be investigated if the project will work with the same communities as the JICA project. The Japanese Embassy should be invited to milestone events such as the inauguration of the project and supervision missions. 4.4 Name of Takashi Nishimura Date of Meeting 3/1/2011 Representative 4.5 Summary of Consultation: The World Bank presented the overall project objectives and the outline of the components. Mr. Nishimura presented the JICA project promoting cocoa and rice production in the region. Though the JICA project is still at an early stage, several potential collaborations were identified. It was agreed that contact with JICA would be maintained if the JSDF project advances. A second consultation was held on May 12, 2011. It was agreed to work together where interesting synergies could be established between the JSDF financed project and the JICA project also working in the area. Both rice and cocoa, which the JICA project is promoting through investigation and improved crop management, are expected to be important in the integrated community land-management plans. The possibility of using experiences from the JICA project as well as coordinating the implementation of the land-use planning with the JICA team was considered highly relevant. The JSDF Project Proposal could also support the integration of the JICA project in the Municipal land-use planning. 4.6 Potential Collaboration The JICA project and the JSDF proposal share the common objective of supporting regional development and productive sectors near San Buenaventura. Cocoa will most likely be a key crop in the JSDF project because it is both profitable and conducive to sustainable production. It would therefore be possible to establish interesting synergies related to cocoa, e.g. to ensure high-quality cocoa bean production. JICA is also promoting a more intensive production of rice (under water) on a pilot scale, which could demonstrate how to promote a more intensive production of rice, reducing demand for expanding the agricultural frontier. In the second consultation these potential collaborations were confirmed. Furthermore, it was underscored that the integrated territorial plans could serve as a framework for different donor agencies working in specific sectors in the area. 5. JAPANESE VISIBILITY 5.1 Confirm that a grant signing ceremony will take place in the recipient country, including Agreed representatives from the Embassy of Japan, and that a press release would be issued in local newspapers 5.2 Confirm that the Embassy of Japan in the recipient country will be invited to participate in field Agreed visits and project events, and will receive copies of progress review mission reports 5.3 Describe the measures, other than the above, to be taken to ensure the visibility of Japan’s contribution : It was also agreed that the Japanese Embassy will be invited to participate in supervision missions and that the JSDF Logo will be displayed in project areas. 6. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF GRANT COMPONENTS 6.1. Component 1: Competitive Sustainable Community Investment Projects $ 1,010,000 This component would finance the implementation of small-scale investment sub-projects presented by rural communities in San Buenaventura and Ixiamas, responding to the priorities identified in the local land-use plans. It is expected that most projects will be related to agro-forestry systems, but given the demand-driven nature of the sub-grants, communities would also be able to present non-agricultural projects. Communities are expected to co-finance a minimum of 10 percent (normally in kind) of the cost of their sub-projects. During the consultation process, the indigenous and peasant organizations emphasized that the sustainable income- generating activities would most likely be linked to the development of tourism, handicrafts, fishing and environmental services as well as to the promotion of more integrated agro-forestry systems combining the production of cocoa, coffee, honey and citrus fruits with other crops such as rice, sugar and cassava. Sub-grants will be awarded based on a competitive selection process. The Steering Committee will award the sub-grants to the most innovative projects proposed by the communities and productive associations. The sub-projects will be selected early in the project cycle in order to ensure sufficient time for their implementation. The calls for sub-project proposals will be coordinated with both FESPAI and CIPTA in order to respect their organizational structures. The project will be presented to all communities identified as vulnerable through participatory workshops where the call for proposals will be explained. The most disadvantaged communities can receive support in formulating the project profile. The implementation of the sub-projects will be achieved by two overall activities (i) identification of project ideas, selection of sub-projects by the Steering Committee and implementation by the communities; (ii) capacity building in project management as well as training in administration and financial management throughout the implementation of the sub-projects. Training in sustainable land-use will be supported through the technical capacity building in Component 2. The selection criteria of the sub-projects will include but not be limited to; (i) environmentally sustainable land use; (ii) impacts on income and/or local livelihoods of participating families; (iii) consideration of gender equity; (iv) project approval by the community; (v) consolidation of sustainable community-based land-use planning, and (vi) poverty level of the community based on access to basic services in the community and other proxy indicators. A single sub-project can receive a maximum of US$ 35,000, except tourism projects that could receive up to US$ 50,000, depending on the character of the project and the number of beneficiaries. Timber harvesting and land-use change that involves deforestation would not be eligible for sub-projects. Finally, it will be ensured that all sub-projects will comply with the Bank’s minimum fiduciary requirements, including safeguards and anti-corruption guidelines, as well as the national, municipal and community norms and legislation. Tailor-made sub-grant agreements will be signed with selected communities. Selected communities will manage sub- grants directly if they possess a Personal Juridical Certificate and minimum fiduciary and organizational capacity. FUNDESNAP will manage the sub-grants where communities do not comply with legal requirements or do not meet the minimum fiduciary or organizational capacity requirements. It is expected that all communities will have very limited fiduciary capacities as the project is targeting the most disadvantaged communities. Thus, a training module to strengthen the administrative and organizational capacity of the remotely located communities has been identified as crucial during the preparation and implementation of the sub-grants. The selection of communities and sub-grant beneficiaries will be made by the Steering Committee as early as possible in the process in order to ensure sufficient time for the implementation of the sub-grants and to demonstrate the immediate impacts from the pilot sustainable land-use activities in order to compete with less sustainable cash crops. The Eyiyoquibo Community has been pre-selected as a beneficiary of a sub-grant due its extreme poverty and disadvantaged situation, and will receive special support to formulate and implement its project. Outputs: - 25 projects approved through an open competitive and award-giving process respecting the organizational structure of the indigenous and peasant organizations. - 25 projects implemented promoting a sustainable land-use model with low environmental impact benefitting approximately 1,800 people. - 25 communities strengthened in project administration 6.2 Component 2: Participatory Designs of Sustainable Land-Use Plans $ 435,000 This component will support community-driven designs of local sustainable land-use plans as well as the development of sub-projects promoting sustainable production systems in the poorest rural families near the San Buenaventura-Ixiamas road. The community-formulated land-use plans will provide a framework for the sub-grants and they will be implemented and monitored within the local land-use plans. The benefitting communities will be the most disadvantaged communities demonstrating a strong interest in participating in the project. The selection will respect the structure of the social organizations and ultimately be approved by the Steering Committee. Specifically, this component will provide training and technical support to develop participatory territorial planning and increase skills in integrated agro-forestry systems and in project preparation. The improved road and access to new markets will considered in community land-use plans in order to promote a long-term sustainable growth. This will be achieved through two overall activities. (i) The first activity would promote community-driven land-use mapping by using participatory methodologies combined with GIS information systems. The mapping would support more sustainable land use in different parts of the community through the promotion of reduced soil erosion, lowering the current deforestation rate in the most vulnerable areas and protecting main water sources in different parts of the community territories. Based on the community micro-zoning, sub-projects will be designed by the communities with the needed technical support being provided. The impacts of the improved road would be considered in this process. (ii) The second activity would provide capacity building in the specific innovative and sustainable income-generating activities prioritized by the communities. Integrated agro-forestry is expected to be the main activity targeted by training, but it is likely that other sustainable income-generating projects would also be prioritized. All interested community members will receive training, but local promoters will be selected and receive additional training to support the implementation. It is expected that this component will improve natural resources management and diversify production systems through the introduction of integrated agro-forestry systems and other sustainable income-generating activities. This component would enable the communities to present and manage the sub-project financed in Component 1. The Eyiyoquibo community will receive more intense training and the local land-use plan will focus on ensuring access to common- property resources such as fishing and the nearby island in the Beni River. This will be coordinated closely with the municipality and CIPTA. - 600 people trained in integrated management of their individual properties. - At least 25 communities (with approximately 3,600 inhabitants) have contributed to consolidate local Outputs: territorial land-use agreements aimed at reducing the current deforestation rate, protecting critical areas such as micro water-catchments and riverbeds, and promoting integrated agro-forestry production systems. - 40 sustainable income-generating productive projects developed and 25 projects approved for the sub- grants in Component 1 reflecting community priorities. 6.3 Component 3: Community Participation in Municipal Territorial Planning $ 445,000 This component would promote a governance platform between rural communities and the municipalities of San Buenaventura and Ixiamas in the process of developing an operational municipal territorial planning. This will allow the poorest and most vulnerable rural communities to participate more directly in municipal decision-making at a time when rapid socio-economic changes are likely to occur as a result of the improved road financed by NRAIP. This process will be implemented within the recently developed Municipal Land Use and Development Plans and the local land-use plans. To achieve this, the component will promote two main activities; (i) develop local capacity in rural communities to influence decision-making in the municipalities linked to land-use planning and implementation of the selected sub- projects; and (ii) strengthen the capacity of the two municipalities to promote sustainable land-use activities and establish more participatory methodologies to encourage more inclusive processes when territorial planning and norms will be put into operation. The two proposed activities aim to establish a governance platform promoting a more inclusive municipal territorial planning process aligned to community priorities. This should strengthen the implementation of the territorial plans through a combination of legal and social control as well as a promotion of sustainable productive activities. This will be achieved through direct dialogue between the municipalities and the communities. The capacity building of both communities and municipalities in sustainable land-use planning will increase possibilities for the municipality to support and finance community demands of sustainable land-use projects in the future. The two municipalities will both receive a sub-grant in order to develop and implement sustainable productive municipal norms and legislation promoting the participation of the most remote and disadvantaged communities. This should motivate and strengthen municipality capacities to prioritize and promote sustainable rural productive projects in these communities. The municipal sub-grant activities will be approved by the Steering Committee. Dialogue. Municipal co- financing will be promoted by the project. Part of the work in this component will also include people in some of the larger urban settlements (1,000 – 3,000 inhabitants) and more large scale farmers in order to ensure an inclusive participatory municipal land-use planning process, though always focused on supporting the voice of the most vulnerable and poorest groups. The participation of the Eyiyoquibo community in the workshops will be given special attention and the project will aim to ensure that the vulnerability of the Esse-Ejjas is being reflected in the municipal territorial planning. In the training of community representatives, special attention will be paid to the capacity building of women. This will be achieved through organizing training workshops with the women’s organizations CIMTA and FESMAI, which form part of CIPTA and FESPAI respectively. Women’s participation and voice will also receive special attention in other training modules, meetings and workshops. This component will also contribute with inputs to the Participatory Working Group established by the NRAIP project to promote a Sustainable Development of the Region, and in general consider the new territorial dynamic likely to take place with the all-year road access and easier access to new markets. Outputs: - 300 community leaders and representatives trained from 30 communities in municipal decision- making, indirectly promoting the voice of 5,600 people in rural communities. - 10 workshops have been held between rural communities and the municipalities in order to consolidate and implement an integrated territorial development planning. - The Municipalities of Ixiamas and San Buenaventura have strengthened two institutional frameworks related to sustainable development and established new procedures to improve the participation of rural communities in territorial planning and developments. - Two participatory operational manuals have been developed related to the implementation of the Participatory Land Use Plans (PMOT) and Municipal Development Plans (PDM) based on the 25 community land-use plans. 6.4 Component 4: Project Management, Monitoring and Evaluation, and Knowledge Dissemination $ 325,000 This component would support the establishment of an efficient and transparent operation of the project, comprising a lean team responsible for the technical, administrative and fiduciary management of the project. It will also include the operation and maintenance of the project office, including utilities and telecommunications, the operation and maintenance of office and field equipment, and rent of transportation needed for project supervision. To achieve this, the following specific activities have been established; (i) Project Management and Administration, which will include overall management, operations and administration of the project. The first activity will also finance organizing meetings in the Steering Committee as well as contracting technical and financial audits. (ii) Monitoring, evaluation and project dissemination, including establishing a participatory monitoring and evaluation system based on information gained from the field work with the communities. The second activity will also be responsible for contracting consultancies for the baseline study and outcome evaluation, as well as promoting dissemination through a national workshop and small publication. The Project Management Team will be responsible for formulating an Operational Manual and supervising its implementation in order to clarify responsibilities between the different Implementing Agencies and explicitly define the flow of funds, the fiduciary duties (financial and procurement management), and the role of the Steering Committee. This manual will also consider the management of the sub-grants by the communities. The Steering Committee will play a crucial role in promoting the scaling-up of this pilot bottom-up model integrating rural communities into territorial planning in areas where the national road network is being improved. A baseline study will be conducted which will provide baseline information in order to monitor and evaluate the results and the projected outcomes and outputs. Outputs: - Semi-annual report of project completed - Submission of annual audit reports and implementation completion memorandum - One mid-term review and one final independent review - Steering Committee is operating and willing to support the dissemination of the pilot project. - An efficient M&E system has been established that can be used by the municipalities and that could be scaled up. - One national dissemination workshop and publication 7. ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES List all applicable eligible expenditures below in one or more categories as necessary. Eligible expenditures include consultant services (including audits), local training and workshops, small civil works, goods, sub-grants, and Bank incremental costs. Category Amount (US Dollars) Percentage of Percentage of Expenditures to Grant Total be Financed Disb-Training 580,460 100% 26,2 Disb-Goods 34,360 100% 1,6 Disb-Consulting 417,380 100% 18,8 Disb-Operating Cost 206,200 100% 9.3 Disb-Other 976,600 100% 44,1 Allowed Expenses Total Grant to Recipient $2,215,000 Bank Incremental Costs 100,000 Total Grant Amount: 2,315,000 OPERATIONAL RISKS ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK Risk Category Risk Risk Description Proposed Mitigation Rating Medium-L Project Beneficiaries Organizational and cultural differences The project will highlight the cultural and and Stakeholders between the intercultural migrant socio-economic differences between the Risks peasants, the Tacana Indigenous Peoples organizations and cultures as a regional and the Esse-Ejja community might be a strength. The design of the community- challenge to consolidate integrated driven territorial plans will reflect this sustainable municipal territorial planning diversity, and not promote pre-defined across the different ethnic groups. models. The poorest and most vulnerable The pre-selection of communities and communities will not be able to present subprojects will respect organizational qualified project proposals and hereby structures of both peasant and indigenous not benefit from the project. peoples. The two overall main organizations FESPAI and CIPTA will be directly involved in defining the poorest and most vulnerable communities. This qualitative pre-selection will be complemented with quantitative proxy indicators such as number of basic services available in the communities. Communities with a limited capacity to develop project proposals will receive basic support to formulate the project profiles in the initial phase of the project. A strong commitment to develop sustainable land- use plans and introduce sustainable income- generating activities will be a demand for all communities in order to participate. The Esse-Ejja community is extremely vulnerable and is the only community that will be pre-selected to benefit from a subproject. The Esse-Ejja community will receive additional technical assistance to establish sustainable livelihood strategies as their access to land and organizational capacity is very limited. Municipalities lack the capacity to Municipalities will receive capacity building integrate the community-driven land-use on how to integrate community-driven land- plans into the municipal territorial plans. use plans into municipal territorial planning and receive training in the promotion of sustainable agro-forestry systems and other alternative sectors. Municipalities are not willing to include community-driven land-use planning and Municipalities will receive training and tools decisions into Municipal Territorial to develop participatory processes. This will Development. support the implementation of a bottom-up territorial planning in agreement with the norms of the rural communities. Dialogue spaces in the rural communities will be established with the municipalities. Implementing Agency Medium- There is a risk that the members of the The Steering Committee is expected to Risks I Steering Committee will have make strategic decisions and not enter into contradictory interests which could day-to-day administration, which could results in conflicts and difficulties during reduce the efficiency of project decision making. implementation. Distribution of grant funds has been consolidated before the The project outcomes depend on close implementation with the stakeholders. coordination between the two Implementing Agencies. The project has established an overall framework for the steering committee in order to avoid conflicts over the allocation of projects to different organizations and Targeting the poorest and most municipalities, etc. vulnerable groups for the subprojects will probably mean limited administration, Training and capacity building are core fiduciary, and organizational capacities activities in all three components of the within the communities. project. In general, subproject designs will be kept simple to be manageable. Project Risks: Design Low External factors such as Government The Grant is promoting integrated land-use promoted food programs and changes in which will allow a diversification of crops. crop prices could influence the Based on the micro-zoning, families and sustainability of subprojects. communities can adjust their production to different opportunities. The subprojects should consolidate the land-use plans and promote new alternative crops. The aim is to diversify productivity rather than promote monoculture to ensure that productivity will be less vulnerable to external shocks. Other donor agencies may enter the Component 3 aims to increase community region with new development programs. and municipal capacities to lead territorial planning and will therefore strengthen territorial donor coordination. New donor agency programs are expected to strengthen the integrated land-use plans. Impacts if NRAIP should be delayed in The project is designed in a way that it effectiveness or not become effective at would still promote an innovative all. participatory territorial approach in Bolivia without the NRAIP. Under the current project design, delays in NRAIP effectiveness would not impact project implementation directly, though the implementation of local territorial planning would be less urgent. Social and Medium- The project will be implemented in a All subprojects will be screened before Environmental L region with a fragile environment and presented to the Steering Committee as where unplanned slash-and-burn sustainable and complying with World Bank practices are the most common means of safeguards. This will be done by elaborating increasing productivity. an Environmental Assessment (focus on forest, natural habitat and pest management) and establishing an Environmental Management Framework for the sub-grants. Land-use change that includes deforestation is not eligible for the subprojects nor is increased slash-and-burn agriculture for cash crops such as rice. Sustainable timber extraction is not eligible for the subprojects but is likely to be part of the community land-use plans. The project will benefit both indigenous The project will respect the organizational and peasant communities that have structure of the indigenous peoples. A different development visions for the specific Indigenous Peoples Planning region. Framework (IPPF) will be developed to ensure a culturally appropriate implementation of the project. The IPPF will be based on the IPP developed for the NRAIP Project. The indigenous population will be direct beneficiaries of the grant. It is not expected that the project will have adverse effects on the indigenous population. Duplication of IP safeguard mitigation activities is unlikely, though IP safeguard will be well coordinated to avoid any confusion. Communities not selected in the award- Communities that are not benefitting from giving process for the sub-grants will be the sub-grants will be able to participate in disappointed and not support the part of the training in Component 3. broader scope of an integrated municipal Coordination with other donors and the territorial management. municipalities will be established in order to finance activities with the communities not benefitting from the sub-grants. The selection of communities will be discussed and coordinated closely with CIPTA and FESPAI in order to reduce potential conflicts over the final selection. JSDF Program No risks expected and Donor Delivery Medium- Individual families do not comply with All community land-use plans are expected Quality L the community-defined land-use plans. to be approved by the community and establish some kind of social control. Local land-use plans are expected to be formally linked to the municipality’s territorial planning, which will make them more official. However, the project does not aim to impose norms on individual families. Communities lack capacity to continue Local promoters will be receiving special the introduced sustainable income- training to ensure local technical expertise generating activities when the project after the end of the project. ends. Municipalities will also be receiving training in order to continue supporting the subprojects and increase possibilities of scaling up the experiences. Community-demanded sub-projects do Brief environmental assessments will be not comply with Bank environmental conducted with each sub-grant beneficiaries safeguards. before signing grant agreements. JSDF -- DETAILED COST TABLE COUNTRY: BOLIVIA Integrated Community-Driven Territorial Development for Remote Communities GRANT NAME: in the Amazon DATE: 27.05.2011 Components & Activities Expenditure Procurem Quanti Unit Unit Total Cost /a Category ent ty Label Cost (US$) Method (US$) 1/ COMPONENT 1: COMPETITIVE SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PROJECTS 2/ ACTIVITY A: IDENTIFICATION OF PROJECT IDEAS AND SELECTION OF SUBPROJECTS IN THE STEERING COMMITTEE Workshops to share project idea and to select Worksho sub-projects 3/ 10 ps 2,500 25,000 TRAINING TRG 25,000 Sub Sub Grants 4/ 25 grants 34,000 850,000 SUBPROJECTS SUB-P 850,000 Subtotal Activity 1.A: 875,000 ACTIVITY B. COMUNITY TRAINING IN ADMINISTRATIVE AND FIDUCIARY PROJECT MANAGEMENT Consultant fees - Sub-project consultant national IC 36 Months 1,850 66,600 CONSULTANTS CONS 66,600 Worksho Training workshops in Project Management 5/ 60 ps 1,140 68,400 TRAINING TRG 68,400 Subtotal Activity 1.B 135,000 TOTAL COMPONENT 1 1,010,000 COMPONENT 2: PARTICIPATORY DESIGNS OF SUSTAINABLE LAND-USE PLANS ACTIVITY A: COMMUNITY-DRIVEN LAND-USE MAPPING Participatory Communal base line diagnostics & Consultant fees - monitoring (National) national IC 240 Days 160 38,400 Consultant fees - Participatory mapping (National) national IC 280 Days 100 28,000 Consultant fees - GIS analysis support (National) national IC 240 Days 130 31,200 CONSULTANTS CONS 97,600 Training Package for Community-driven land-use mapping as basis for a sustainable productive Worksho activities and conservation agreements 6/ 50 p 2,170 108,500 TRAINING TRG 108,500 Machine Laptop Computers Goods Shopping 2 s 2,600 5,200 Shopping/ Satellite Images/Aerial Photography Goods dc 25 Images 410 10,250 Program Software Goods Shopping 3 s 1,500 4,500 Machine GPS systems Goods Shopping 2 s 605 1,210 GOODS GOODS 21,160 Subtotal Activity 2.A: 227,260 ACTIVITY B: CAPACITY BUILDING IN SUSTAINABLE INCOME-GENERATING ACTIVITIES Improvement of agricultural & natural resources Consultant fees - practices (National) national IC 15 Months 3,160 47,400 Business management support in communities Consultant fees - (National) national IC 8 Months 3,230 25,840 CONSULTANTS CONS 73,240 Training Package to support Capacity building in the specific innovative and sustainable income- Worksho generating activities 7/ 50 ps 2,690 134,500 TRAINING TRG 134,500 Subtotal Activity 2.B 207,740 TOTAL COMPONENT 2 435,000 COMPONENT 3: COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN MUNICIPAL PLANNING A. RURAL COMMUNITIES PARTICIPATION IN MUNICIPAL LAND USE PLANNING Consultant fees - CIPTA sub activity facilitator (National) national IC 180 Days 100 18,000 Consultant fees - DESPAIR sub activity facilitator (National) national IC 200 Days 100 20,000 Communal and organizational norm consultant Consultant fees - (National) national IC 137 Days 220 30,140 CONSULTANTS CONS 68,140 Training Package to support the Development of local capacities in rural communities and social organizations to influence decision-making in the Worksho municipalities 8/ 60 ps 3,951 237,060 TRAINING TRG 237,060 Program Software Goods Shopping 1 s 400 400 Hardware Goods Shopping 2 Machine 2,000 4,000 GOODS GOODS 4,400 Subtotal Activity 3.A: 309,600 ACTIVITY B: STRENGTHEN MUNICIPAL CAPACITIES TO PROMOTE SUSTAINABLE LAND-USE ACTIVITIES Sub grants to Ixiamas and San Buenaventura municipalities to promote sustainable land-use activities and establish more participatory Sub 126,60 methodologies 1 grants 0 126,600 SUBPROJECTS SUB-P 126,600 Program Software 1 s 800 800 Machine Hardware 2 s 4,000 8,000 GOODS GOODS 8,800 Subtotal Activity 3.B 135,400 TOTAL COMPONENT 3 445,000 COMPONENT 4: PROJECT MANAGEMENT, MONITORING AND EVALUATION, AND KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION ACTIVITY A. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION Technical and Financial Audits (National) LCS 3 Audits 4,000 12,000 CONSULTANTS CONS 12,000 Steering committee meetings 9/ 6 Global 5,300 31,800 Operating Costs Components 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B (CI) 10/ 1 Global 88,200 88,200 Operating Costs Components 1A, 1B, 4A, 4B (F) 11/ 1 Global 86,200 86,200 OPERATING COSTS OCS 206,200 Subtotal Activity 4.A 218,200 ACTIVITY B. MONITORING & EVALUATION AND KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION Consultant fees - Agronomy consultant (National) national IC 225 Days 160 36,000 Consultant fees - Environmental consultant (National) national IC 225 Days 160 36,000 Consultant fees - Accountant (National) national IC 35 Months 480 16,800 Consultant fees - Local Consultant 1 (Base line study) (National) national IC 50 Days 110 5,500 Local Consultant 2 (Final technical impact Consultant fees - evaluation) (National) national IC 50 Days 110 5,500 CONSULTANTS CONS 99,800 Symposi Symposium event and dissemination 12/ 1 um 7,000 7,000 TRAINING TRG 7,000 Subtotal Activity 4.B 106,800 TOTAL COMPONENT 4: 325,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST (RECIPIENT GRANT) 2,215,000 TOTAL BANK SUPERVISION GRANT 100,000 PROPOSED TOTAL JAPAN GRANT 2,315,000