Document of The World Bank FOR OFFWlKAL LISE ONLY Report No. 9113-IND STAFF APPRAISAL REPORT INDONESIA YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (BANGUN DESA II) FEBRUARY 22, 1991 .a Regional Office ,ntry Department V cument has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of ficial duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without WorHl Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of January 1991) Currency Unit = Rupiah (Rp) $1.00 = Rp 1,901 RIp I millioni = $526,04 GOVERNtIENT OF INDONESIA FISCAL YEAR April 1 - March 31 WEIGHTS ANDI MEASURES 1 kilometer (kni) = 0.62 wniles (mi) 1 square kilometer (km112) = 100 ha = 0.39 sq miles 1 hectare (ha) = 2.47 acres (ac) 1 kilogramii (kg) = 2.2 pounids (11) 1 metric toti (ton) = 2,206 pounds (lb) GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS AND TERMS AARD - Agency for Agricultural Research and Development BANGDA - Directorate General of Regional Development, Ministry of Home Affairs BANGDES - Directorate General of Rural Development, Ministry of Home Affairs BAPPEDA - Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah (Regional Development Pla.ning Agency) BAPPENAS - Badarn Perencaniaan Pembangunan Nasional (National Development Planning Agency) Bupati - Political and administrative head of a district (kabupaten) BRI - Bank Rakyat Indonesia Dinas Pertaniani - Autonomous provincial or dlistrict agriculture agency DIY - District Istewema Yogyakarta (Special Province of Yogyakarta) Desa - Village Dusun - llamlet GOI - Governnment of Indoniesia INPRES - Presidential lnstruction Kabupaten - District Kecamatan - Subdistrict KUDST - Kabupateni (District) Upland Development Support Team KUPEDES - Kredit Umum Pedesan (General Village Credit Program) Micro DAS - Micro Watershed PDP - Provincial Development Program PY - Project Year RLKT - Agency for Soil Conservation (Ministry of Forestry) Sawah - lrrigated Rice Land Tegalan - Dry Land Fields Setwilda - Office of the Governor/Bupati TK I - Tingkat I (Provincial level) TK II - Timigkat II (District level) UDST - Uplanid Developmenit Support Team YRDP - Yogyakarta Rural DevelopmetnL Project (Cr. 946-IND) - i - FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY INDONESIA YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT STAFF APPRAISAL REPORT Loan and Project Summary Borrower: Republic of Indonesia Loani Amount: $15.5 million equivalent Terms: Repayable in 20 years, including five years of grace, at the Bank's standard variable rate. Project Description and Benefits: The project's overarching goal is to develop a sustainable and replicable approach to soil stabilization atid agricultural development as a basis for improving incomes and living standards in Yogyakarta's upland villages, specifically, and in Java's similarly endangeced upland areas, more generally. Its four major subprograms respond to continuing, articulated needs regarding soil and moisture conservation; upland agricultural productivity; social and physical infrastructure (credit, markets, roads, bridges); and managerial and technical skills of government extension and support services. The project's innovative thrust would be a low-cost, community-directed approach to agricultural development by groups of neighboring farmers in the context of microwatersheds. Over five years, the project would focus on better moisture retention and runoff control and more productive upland farming practices in microwatershed areas, with emphasis on the use of vegetative barriers, perennial crops for ground cover, and higher-yielding, higher-value food, tree, and estate crops. A project-supported research station would be the first permanent station that concentrates on upland agriculture. Concurrently, throughout Yogyakarta's upland villages, a menu of on-farm technology options wouid be demonstrated for farmer selection, more credit facilit.es would be provided, essential social services expanded, and in remote areas, village roads and bridges upgraded. The improved village road network is expected to facilitate access and respond to increasing demand for services, inputs, markets and off-farm employment in upland areas. This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance I of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. - ii - Using existing line agencies and staff, the project would provide skills-based and managerial training support to all implementing agencies to bolster delivery of upland services, strengthen planning, execution, monitoring and continuity of project activities, and improve coordination of Government agencies at all levels, with special emphasis son the local area--village, district and province. Risks: The project's risks are technical and institutional and might lead to constraints to spontaneous replication of new technologies. Low-cost soil conservation and coordinated runoff measures and farming systems that put a larger portion of cultivated area under shrubs or treecrops to ensure adequate ground cover may be slowly adopted by farmers within microwatersheds. Line agencies might also be slow in responding to the project's coordination mechanisms. Research, training, technical assistance, and detailed institutional planning are directed at these concerns, which would be annually reviewed jointly by GOI and the Bank. The risks are considered reasonable. Estimated Costs: la Local Foreign Total ------ -$ million ------- Upland Productivity and Stabilization 4.1 1.0 5.1 Upland Community Development 3.2 0.2 3.4 Village Roads and Bridges 4.7 1.8 6.5 Institution Strengthening 3.4 1.3 4.7 Base Costs 15.4 4.3 19.7 Physical Contingencies 1.5 0.3 1.8 Price Contingencies 3.0 0.6 3.6 Total Costs 19.9 5.2 25.1 Financing Plan: Local Foreign Total ------- $ million ------- Government 9.6 - 9.6 IBRD 10.3 5.2 15.5 Total 19.9 5.2 25.1 /a Inclusive of duties and taxes of $2.0 million equivalent. - lli - Disbursementt IBRD FY ($ '000) 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Annual 500 1,323 3,730 3,525 3,058 2,814 550 Cumulative 500 1,823 5.553 9,078 12,136 14,950 15,500 Rate of Return: 12 percent for the agriculture on soil conservation component, 15 percent for the village roads component. Map: IBRD 22421 - iv - INDONESIA YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (BANGUN DESA II) STAFF APPRAISAL REPORT Table of Contents Page No. I. BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 A. The Agriculture Sector ... . . . . . . .... . 1 B. Development Priorities in Agriculture Sector . . . . . 1 C. Java's Rainfed Uplands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 D. Participating Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 II. BANK EXPERIENCE AND RATIONALE FOR BANK INVOLVEMENT . . . . 5 A. Bank Experience .... . . . . . . . .. . 5 B. Rationale for Bank Involvement . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 III. THE PROJECT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 A. Project Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 B. Project Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 C. Main Feature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 D. Detailed Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 IV. PROJECT COST AND FINANCING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 A. Project Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 B. Financing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 C. Procurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 D. Disbursements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 E. Sperial Account . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 F. Accounts and Audits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 This report is based on the findings of an appraisal mission comprising of Messrs. E. Zimmer-Vorhaus, Wawan Mulyawan (p/t), Wirantc Soehendro (Bank), P. Beeden, M.R. Clapham, G. Edgerton (Consultants) w',ich visited Indonesia in February 1990. Peer reviewers were Ms. A. Molnar, Messrs. A. Cittati, D. Leeuwrik, A. Sindhu. Messrs, R. Cheetham. Director (AS5DR) and A. Cole, Chief (AS5AG) have endorsed the project. Page No. V. PROJEC'T MANAGEHENT AND IMPLEMENTATION . . . . . . . . . . 21 VI. PROJECT BENEFITS, JUSTIFICATION AND RISKS . . . . . . . . 26 VlI. AGREEMENTS REACHED AND RECOMMENDATION . . . . . . . . . . 29 ANNEXES 1. Project Area, Laudform Classes and Phasing Assumptions Aplpendix I Sununary of Upland Village Data 2. ProjecL-Assisted Ttainiug Activities Table 1, Cost Estimates Table 2, Sununary Analysis of Participation Table 3, Detailed Analysis of Participation 3. Technical Assistance Table 1, List of Specialist Services 4. Technical Interventiotis for Teclntology Me;-u Displays 5. Village and Kecamatan Projects Appendix 1, List of Eligible Village Projects Attaclmlent 1, The Regional Planning Mechanism Attaclumient 2, Funding Mechanism for Village Projects 6. Upland Watershed Systems Action-Research 7. Village Roads and Bridges 8. Project Custs alld Financing Table 1, Project Base Costs by Subprograms and Level of Governnmeut Table 2, Project Costs by Components Table 3, Project Costq by Year and Components Table 4, ProJect Costd by Year and Sunmnary Accounts Table 5, FItnancing Plan by Components Table 6, Financing Plan by Summary Accounts Table 7, Finanicing Plan by Disbursement Categories 9. Disbursement Sclhedule 10. Project lmplementation and Coordination l.. Crop Models Table 1, Financial Prices Table 2, Yields and Inputs Table 3, Sunmary of Net Income at Crop Models - vi - 12. Ecous(nie Atialysis 13. Implj)lemenltation St.hedule 14. DocUIIIezitt on Project File CHARTS 1. Relat.tonship with Existinig Government Structures 2. Relationishlip Among Subprograms, Components, Subcomponents, and Levels of Governimlent 3. Project Organization Structure MAP: IBRV 22421 INDONESIA YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (BANGUN DESA II) I. BACKGROUND A. Agriculture Sector 1.1 The agriculture sector continues to be a mcinstay of Indonesia's economy. In 1988-89, agriculture represented 24 percent of GDP and was the livelihood and source of income for 55 percent of the population of 176 million. During the 1980s, the sector made substantial gains in production, although its annual growth rate of 3.1 percent slowed from 3.8 percent in the previous decade. This slowdown has been due primarily to a decline in rapid expansion of rice production and lower prices for Indonesia's agricultural exports. Self-sufficiency in rice and higher yields in other foodcrops, such as maize, cassava, and soybeans were achieved largely due to improved infrastructure and technology, higher-yielding varieties and increased use of fertilizer in more intensive cropping systems, more so in the irrigated subsector. While gains in rainfed agriculture were also achieved, due to better water retention and increased use of inputs, such gains often masked an underlying depletion of the resource base, mainly soil due to erosion, especially in fragile upland areas. 1.2 Increasing population is putting pressure on forested and marginal lands for expansion of agricultural production, and as a result, resource degradation has already put sizeable areas at environmental risk. At the same time, the sector's capacity to absorb some of the 2.3 million new entrants to the work force annually has diminished, especially in the less-endowed rainfed areas where agriculture has traditionally played a key role. Per capita income in the sector is roughly estimated at $450, with a significant portlon earning less in areas with limited natural endowment and remote from inputs, services, and markets. B. Development Priorities in Agriculture Sector 1.3 For more than a decade (Repelita III-V), the Government of Indonesia has maintained its emphasis on poverty alleviation, employment-generation and equitable development. In rural areas where agriculture is the primary determinant of income, it has now shifted (Repelita V, 1989-94) its initial focus on immediate production increases to more long-term sustainable growth, with mutual emphasis on productivity and conserving the resource base that undergirds it. It has pursued these objectives mainly through public investment, credit or subsidies for infrastructure (irrigation, roads, bench terraces), inputs and services, resource management and conservation, and strengthening support institutions. Substantial resources have been directed at intensifying production in both irrigated and rainfed subsectors, diversifying more production into industrial and higher-value food crops, increasing efficiencies in water retention and use, extending agricultural credit, and training large cadres in agricultural extension and related services. 1.4 Recognizing that unsound agricultural practices would undercut its overall policy objectives of generating incomes and husbanding renewable resources over the long term, government is placing renewed emphasis on land- use patterns and watershed management, innovative cropping patterns, vegetative soil conservation techniques, and locally oriented research on agricultural practices that would maintain or enhance the resource base. Coming to grips with these concerns over a widely dispersed archipelago with extreme variations in agroecological conditions has necessitated a move toward decentralized decision-making and greater involvement of the producer communities, and concerted efforts at institution-building and inteLsectoral cooperation through training of relevant government workers. C. Java's Rainfed Uplands 1.5 The issues of agricultural productivity and resource management and conservation in Indonesia are becoming critical, notably in the rainfed uplands of Java. Some 60 percent (106 million) of the country's population is concentrated on the island and virtually all land is in productive use, including 75 percent in agriculture. The pressure on renewable resources is tremendous. Average family farm size on Java is 0.5 ha, and holdings are highly fragmented. Despite population growth of 1.7 percent that is lower than the national average (2.1 percent), about 150,000 farm households are added each year. The annual conversion of 18,000 ha of forest and 40,000 ha of lowlands to urbanization and industrialization in Java puts additional pressure on an agricultural base that has little potential for expansion. Agriculture's capacity to absorb the incremental labor force on Java was only 12 percent during 1980-85 and appears to be less in upland areas. 1.6 About two-thirds of Java's area is hilly to very steep terrain and one-third is flat lowland. The uplands are distinguished from the lowlands by varying soils, slope, rainfall, more diverse cropping patterns, lower productivity, less off-farm employment, lower farm incomes, and lower density of roads, marketing facilities, and government services. These UL.Iditions seriously limit the ability of upland farmers to maintain or enhance productivity and farm income. While data on income distribution in upland and lowland areas of Java are not available, many upland households are among the poorest on Java. 1.7 In the uplands there is increasing depletion of forest resources and protective vegetative cover and degradation of arable land through exploitative production systems. The areas most at risk occur in the upper parts of Java's watersheds. Considered to be in a critical state, i.e., endangered by actual or potential erosion, they comprise 1.9 million ha or 15 percent of Java's arable land area and support 12 percent of its population. While erosion has detrimental effects on downstream riverbeds and irrigation structures, the larger impact Is the loss of agricultural productivity in upland areas due to soil depletion. A recent World Bank study (Indonesia - Forest, Land and Water: Issues in Sustainable Development, 1989), estimated Java's cost of soil erosion at $350-420 million per annum, with 80 percent attributed to on-farm productivity loss and 20 percent to siltation of rivers, dams, and canals downstream. D. Participating Area 1.8 The province of Yogyakarta (DIY) is the smallest of Java's four provinces. About 75 percent (2.5 million) of its 3.3 million population lives in rural areas and depends on agriculture for income or subsist6nce. Population density varies by elevation and soil conditions, ranging from less than 400 persons per km2 in steep limestone areas to 900 per km2 in the more productive lowlands. Farm incomes in DIY increased substantially during the 19809, in large measure due to improved yields of major foodcrops, improved infrastructure, and increased economic activity in villages. As a result, the incidence of rural poverty declined significantly (50 percent), and the province no longer ranks among Indonesia's five poorest provinces, as it did in 1980. However, its growth rate of average per capita income, 2.8 percent annually between 1981 and 1987, remains the lowest of Java's provinces. Statistics comparing upland/lowland income in DIY are not available, but differences are observable between living standards in the uplands and the predominantly rice-growing lowlands. 1.9 The environmental conditions affecting land use and agricultural produc ivity in DIY are topography, soil, and rainfall pattern, all of which factors vary considerably across the province's 317,000 ha. Its topography is dominated, as throughout Java, by a series of active or dormant volcanoes ranging in altitude from a few hundred meters to over 3,500 m above sea level. About 40 percent Df the province is flat or nearly flats the irrigated rice plains (123,000 ha) and the Wonosari plains (50,000 ha) which together comprise the most stable and highly productive of the five landform classes in DIY. The remaining 60 percent is sloping (above 15 percent) to steep to very steep (above 30 percent slope). The sloping 144,000 ha fall into three land form classes characterized by poor soil subject to erosion: the unstable uplands (73,000 ha)--the main watersheds at risk; tne Land of a Thousand Hills (65,000 ha)--a pool area with dark clay soil held in pockets of porous lime stone bedrock; and the volcanic uplands (6,000 ha)--with volcanic soils and debris less susceptible to erosion than sedimentary materials. DIY is subject to a tropical monsoon c.imate with mean monthly temperature in the 22-28 C range. Mean annual rainfall tends to increase with elevation, generally ranging 1,800-2,500 m, except in two mountainous areas where it is 3,500- 4,000 mm. Rainfall intensity, contributing to erosion, can be high and commonly exceeds 5 mm per minute for short periods. More important than rainfall is its distribution. The long dry season (4-6 months, June to November) often restricts the range of crops that can be grown and crop yields. 1.10 Almost all land in DIY, even in the uplands, is under some form of producti- use, albeit at low levels of cropping intensity and productivity. Besides forest lands managed by the Ministry of Forestry, there are three major land-use types: (a) Wetlands (sawah): highly productive, stable resource base used mainly for irrigated paddy in lowland fields. About 15 percent of DIY's wetland is rainfed, with lower productivity. (b) Dryland (tegalan): less productive (20 to 33 percent less than wetland), susceptible to degradation in sloping areas, mainly cultivated with annual foodcrops in multiple or relay cropping arrangements. (c) Home gardens (pekarangan): usually more productive than dryland fields, due to household residues and manure, often stable soils, and intensively cropped with annual and trec crops, as important supplements to family diets. 1.11 In DIY, dryland and home gardens dominate, although about 30 percent of upland farmers have access to small plots of either rainfed or irrigated wetland. About 40 percent of farm households own less than 0.5 ha of land, and 70 percent less than 1.0 ha, with considerable variation across DIY's districts. Upland farms typically comprise about 0.6 ha of dryland (about 0.5 ha of net cropped area), often in two or more separ:ate plots, and a home garden (up to 0.2 ha). 1.12 Almost 90 percent of sloping dryland has been t"rraced at some time in the past, but the condition of terrace structures is often poor, inducing severe soil loss due to uncontrolled runoff. The major rainfed crops are annual foodcrops (cassava, rice, maize, groundnut, and soybean), various grain legumes (ming bean, cowpea, velvet bean), plus a few fruits (jackfruit, banana, mango) and estate crops (mlinjo, cloves, coffee). Most dryland plots contain some fodder and fuelwood trees (Sesbania, Glyricidia and Dalbergia), and often a few timber species (teak, mahogany and Albizzia). 1.13 Annual crop yields vary widely according to local conditione (slope, soil, moisture regime) and cropping system. A productive two-cycle intercrop system is used on about 40 percent of cultivated upland. Crop planting starts in November with the onset of the wet season. Cassava is interplanted with maize, groundnut and upland rice, which latter crops are harvested in February. If fertility and moisture allow, the still-maturing cassava is interplanted with the second cycle of crops, usually maize, groundnut, or soybaan. However, on the poorest soils (about 20 percent of cultivated upland area), only cassava can yield a worthwhile return and it is planted as a sole crop. 1.14 In upland areas, livestock are important as sources of income (about 25 percent of farm income is derived from livestock) and as a source of emergency funds and manure. In 1987, DIY's livestock population was estimated at 188,000 cattle, 260,000 goats, 75,000 sheep and 6 million poultry. Most upland farmers own one or two goats or sheep, and more prosperous farmers own cattle, either for fattening, breeding or draft power. Livestock are stall- fed on crop residues and herbage gathered from terrace risers and wasteland. Foduer for livestock is often in short supply towards the end of the dry season, and liveweight losses are frequent at this time. 1.15 Agricultural Services. DIY has 20 rural extension centers (lower than average density), an agriculture information center and an in-service training center. The province has 434 agricultural extension workers and supervisors, according to the Ministry of Agriculture's ratio of one extension worker per 1,600 farmers. Only about half have the use of motorcycles. Traditionally, the extension services have given more attention to lowland production, to the neglect of upland agriculture, which is aggravated by a lack of training in upland production. An added time consuming task for extension workers has been the need to organize farmers' groups. Agricultural research, conducted by a unit (AARD) of the Ministry of Agriculture, has similarly concentrated on lowland crops at the expense of upland crops, for which there is currently no permanent separate and specialized research station. 1.16 Soil conservation services in DIY, provided by the Ministry of Forestry through a subunit in Yogyakarta with district representatives, mainly carry out indepeadent programs such as GOI's Regreening Program. Although the forestry service participates in the broad-based extension forum organized at the province and district levels, the coordinating mechanisms are not strong ejiough to encourage integrated programs for soil conservation and improvements in agricultural production. 1.17 Rural credit in Indonesia became deregulated in 1983. Subsidized credit for inputs and investments is being phased out, and the transition to unsubsidized sources is progressing well in DIY. A government scheme for unsubsidized lending (Rp 25,000 minimum) by the state-owned Bank for Agriculture (KUPEDES) is operating through 82 village branches, with interest rates ranging 30-44 percent per annum. Credit for crop ,oduction is also available through 44 cooperative branches. For production credit of less than Rp 25,000, the precursor project provided seed money (Rp 100,000) to hamlet revolving funds for onlending to farmers. Recently, NGJs and foreign donors have begun to support self-help groups in setting up savings and loan schemes, and the first NGO-supported rural bank has applied for registration in Yogyakarta. 1.18 Marketing of inputs and production is mainly handled by traders in DIY, and to a lesser extent by cooperatives. Low volumes, long distances, and poor road standards increase marketing costs, especially for fresh food products. Recently established livestock markets, operated by district departments of revenue, have strengthened competitive marketing, ensured correct weights, and broken even from collection of fees. 1.19 Off-farm income is earned by about half of upland farmers through employment on lowland farms, road construction, carpentry, and semi-skilled urban labor. There are indications that the seasonal flow of rural to urban labor markets is increasing, although such movement is currently constrained by the poor upland road network. II. BANK EXPERIENCE AND RATIONALE FOR BANK INVOLVEMENT A. Bank Experience 2.1 To broaden the focus of agricultural development, particularly from irrigated rice (para. 1.3), GOI together with some of its major donors has undertaken a series of initiatives to increase the productivity and sustainability of rainfed upland agriculture. These initiatives, which have been suported under the operations listed below, have aimed at testing and providing the technical, infrastructural, institutional, and social underpinnings to raise incomes and preserve the natural resources of the fragile and densely populated upland areas of Java and some of the poorer islands. They have involved area specific projects as well as a national regreening program. Valuable lessons have been learned. They indicate the potential and some of the difficulties to be resolved to facilitate replication of sustainable upland farming systems within costs that would be attractive for participating farmers, community action groups, and Government institutions. Yogyakarta Rural Development Project (YRDP) (IBRD Cr. 946-IND) 1979 completed Upland Agriculture and Conservation 1l (IBRD Ln. 2474-IND) 1985 Nusa Tenggara Agricultural Support Services (IBRD Ln. 2638-IND) 1986 Forestry Institutions and Conservation (IBRD Ln. 2930-IND) 1986 Citanduy (West Java) USAID 1969 completed Upper Solo Watershed Management and Upland FAO/UNDP 1973 completed Kali Konto Netherlands 1980 completed East Java Rainfed Agriculture IFAD 1990 Regreening Program (IMPRES Penghijauan) GOI 1970 In addition to this project experitnce several OED and Bank sector reports provide some guidance on how Bank operations should approach integrated rural development and some of the typical challenges of upland agriculture. These include: Annual Review of Evaluation Results World Bank/OED 1989 Rural Development World Bank World Bank/OED 1990 Experience 1965-86 Indonesia - Forest, Land and Water: World Bank 1989 Issues in Sustainable Development Philippines - Forestry, Fisheries and World Bank 1989 Agricultural Resource Management Study (FFARM) Watershed Development in Asia, World Bank WP 127 1990 Strategies and Technologies Indonesia - Poverty Assessment World Bank 1990 and Strategy Report For the proposed project past experience has provided useful guidance on the technologies of farming and conservation systems, the impact of infrastructure, the supporting role of community development, and institutional requirements. 2.2 Technology. Progress has been made in developing and testing farming systems suitable for the uplands. From the perspective of soil conservation, experience under the first Yogyakarta Project (project completion report, May 1990) and from elsewhere in Asia has cast doubt on the 1/ Co-financed by USAID. effectiveness of large scale expansion programs for bench terraces that have been a major part of past upland conservation programs. Their construction is costly, labor intensive, and when poorly done and without integration into run-off control systems can accelerate soil degradation. Moreover, in Indonesia farmers have required subsidies of up to $200 per ha as a construction incentive in particular where opportunities for off-farm employment exist. It now appears possible and more appropriate to rely much more on vegetative barriers, such as grasses and shrubs to build up natural terraces and to retain moisture especially when supported by a limited number of physical structures in gullies and areas of water concentration as applied in the Philippines. These techniques are more effective and offer the opportunity of lowering the cost of soil stabilization and facilitating their replication. They also lend themselves to be incorporated into a range of farming systems. These farming systems and their acceptance by the farmers are, as experience of the Indonesian upland projects has demonstrated, determined by a wide range of natural (soils, slopes, rainfall) and economic conditions (markets, off-farm employment). Increasing demand for higher value crops allows diversification into tree crops not only on homeplots - a major success of the first Yogyakarta project- but also in the fields. Consequently, agricultural extension and research has to be diversified to provide a broad menu of advice on cropping and livestock systems that are appropriate for a wide range of farming conditions. The research to support these extension efforts should not, as experience from the first Yogyakarta project and OED findings indicate, be carried out by small project units but only by permanent stations integrated into the national research system. Results to date also indicate that compared to irrigated lands, the uplands have long been neglected in terms of physical and social infrastructure, agricultural research and extension. With the relative decline in the price of rice compared to some of the upland crops, economic returns on investments in the uplands are comparable to those for irrigation rehabilitation ( 12-14 percent). Upland soil stabilization would require public investments of $ 180/ha compared to irrigation rehabilitation costs of $ 1100/ha. Such investments would heip to improve farmers net income by 40 percent in the uplands and by 100 percent in irrigation. While individual benefits from irrigation are higher supporting upland agriculture is becoming more attractive as water resources and suitable land for irrigation in Java are becoming scarce, and the demand for agricultural products more diversified. 2.3 Roads and Water Supplies. There is a growing body of opinion in Asian countries that investments in rural roads brings very high rates of return and that without roads agricultural development is not possible beyond subsistence level. While it is difficult to disaggregate the roles of roads from other promotional activities evidence from the first Yogyakarta project indicates that their combined impact probably had a marked effect in enhancing a process that has already reduced poverty levels considerably and will probably continue to gain momentum. In addition to roads, improvements in house water supplies have been essential to release women's time for productive farming activities. This has been the case for the first Yogyakarta project where the water supply component was supported by a NGO. 2.4 Community Development. As with irrigated farming, sustainable agriculture in the Uplands depends upon concerted community actions to prevent degradation of the hill slopes, and to provide the credit, training and social underpinnings for vibrant development. Many of the upland communities are - 8 - closely knit and self supportive. They have been effective under the first Yogyakarta Project and under Governments Provincial Development Program (PDP) in improving the productive and social infrastructure. Their potential has yet to be fully developed, but they are an essential complement to the official services and have the potential of being a springboard for more spontaneous development. 2.5 Institutions. All watershed projects in Indonesia suffered because soil conservation measures in Indonesia are not normally integrated with farming practices or community development as the three services responsible belong to different ministries. The existing mechanism for the coordination of these services at provincial and district level are weak and poorly utilized. They have the potential to be revitalized through training, and improved structures and procedures. However,the first Yogyakarta project and OED reports have demonstrated that providing these specialized services through special project management units and thus bypassing the line agencies, is nut a sustainable solution. There is growing evidence in Indonesia that, as OED findings indicate, the more sustainable way of strengthening institutions is to increase efficiency and not staff numbers or creating new institutions. B. Rationale for Bank Involvement 2.6 The Bank continues to support the Government of Indonesia's sectoral priorities of accelerating agricultural production and exports, alleviating poverty, conserving natural resources and the environment, and achieving regional balance in development. These goals are inextricably interlinked on Java, where the country's population is concentrated, largely dependent on agriculture, and major components (forests, land, and water) of the resource base are diminishing. The microcosm where agricultural productivity is lowest, poverty is most acute, disparities in living standards most apparent, and resources critically threatened is the upland watersheds. 2. As noted above, much progress has been made in improving agriculture and raising incomes, but challenges remain. These include technology where the Bank can bring lessons from work experience in other upland areas, as well as for institutional and social development for which the Bank san provide GOI with assistance through its multisectoral experience in Indonesia. This includes road developmert, education and health, and improving understanding of the ways in which community development activities must be promoted and sustained. 2.8 The Yogyakarta Province, while no longer among the poorest or most critical watersheds, provides a basis and environment in which refined technologies and administrative processes can be developed most rapidly for possible wider replication. It thus offers an early opportunity to obtain results of broader significance than interventions in another upland area would produce. Over the medium-term, the Bank can help GOI to develop the processes, institutions and technologies to develop a national program to foster sustainable development throughout Indonesia's most critical upland watersheds with the objectives of protecting critical watershed environments from erosion and of reducing the number of people living below poverty levels. While data on the extent of the critical watersheds and of the occurrence of poverty of Java is limited, it is probable that about twelve million people - 9 - live on its upper watersheds, of whom between 30 and 40 percent have incomes below the poverty level. Programs such as proposed in this project, together with income growth through spontaneous development, indicate that, based on experience with the first Yogyakarta project, these levels of poverty could be halved in five to ten years at a cost of about $80 per capita. Such investments would bring annual income increases of about $11 per capita which are very similar to per capita ;investment costs and returns for irrigation scheme rehabilitation, and are significantly more viable than investments in new irrigation for rice cultivation. If the levels of costs and benefits were to be extrapolated to cover the areas and populations in Java with similar conditions, this would show that a sustainable development program reducing the costs of soil erosion (para. 1.7) and raising the incomes of about twelve million people and thus reducing the poverty incidence from 40 to 20 percent of Java's upland population could be implemented at a cost of about $1 billion. The proposed project would help the government to support and test the soundness of this strategy. III. THE PROJECT A. Project Objectives 3.1 The project's main objective is to improve the incomes and living standards of upland residents, mainly farmers, on a sustainable basis through better resource management. As the sequel to the earlier upland development project (YRDP, Cr. 946-IND), it aims at addressing the major needs of upland areas: effective and affordable soil and moisture conservation measures, increased farm productivity leading to higher farm incomes, essential social services and infrastructure, and institutional support for plarnning and implementing site-specific change. It would tackle the major threat to upland produc'ivity over the long term--the degradation of a fragile and eroding resource base--through an innovative and low-cost approach to soil stabilization within microwatersheds. It involves the delivery of on-farm technology options geared to local conditions, physical infrastructure and government services that would enhance productivity in upland hamlets and villages while conserving, possibly enhancing soil, water and ground cover retention. The project would also provide extensive on-the-job training to implementing agencies to improve capacity at all levels to execute cross- sectoral upland development activities, supported by research on conservation/productivity technology specific to upland conditions. It would also provide essential experience over the medium term to support nation-wide watershed programs. B. Project Area 3.2 The project area covers all 140 upland villages in Yogyakarta province. Upland villages are defined generally as those where at least 30 percent of the land has slopes exceeding 15 percent. Approximately 720,000 people live in the 160,000 ha of upland located across 26 subdistricts of DIY's four districts. Seventeen subdistricts fall within the landform class most at risk from erosion with thin-to-medium depth sedim- arv soils. The remaining nine subdistricts, while less at risk from erosiin, ave not benefitted from previous upland development programs. The special focus on microwatershed stabilization would be confined, initially, to 2,500 ha - 10 - covering 500 microwatersheds. Each microwatershed is generally less than 10 ha. (Annex 1 for details). C. Main Features 3.3 Over five years, the project would implement four interrelated subprograms at the district, province, and national levelst * Upland productivity and stabilization, involving intensive activity and research on soil stabilization in 500 microwatersheds and extensive on-farm displays of conservation/productivity improvements across all upland villages. * Upland community development, largely centered on the extension of credit and grants for hamlet- and village-level investments in infrastructure and productive (farm and non-farm) activities to improve incomes and living standards. * Village roads and bridges (173 km roads and 22 bridges) to remote, but intensively cultivated upland villages to facilftate participation in and benetit from the rural econcmy. - Institution strengthening, through in-service training and some technical assistance to improve the capacity of government at all levels to plan, implement, monitor, evaluate and sustain locally based initiatives for upland development. D. Detailed Features Upland Productivity and Stabilization 3.4 This subprogram involves three major components--microwatershed stabilization, upland watershed systems action-research, and on-farm technology displays--supported by extension services and grants to participating communities and training to implementing agencies (Table 4.2 and Chart 2). 3.5 Microwatershed stabilization (subccmponent 2.1) introduces microwatershed-based management of soil water resources and conservation/productivity options to stabilize soil conditions in 500 microwatersheds, located in 80 upland hamlets. It uses the hydrological unit of the microwatershed as the management unit for soil stabilization and production technology. Under the project, farmers on contiguous fields who are mutually dependent for runoff control would be organized in microwatershed activity groups for the following activities: (a) local planning and construction of runoff control structures, such as drainage and absorption canals across plot boundaries, and improved drop structures to drain terraces; (b) terrace rehabilitation using vegetation (multipurpose trees, grasses and legumes) to reinforce terrace risers and modest earth moving to reduce lateral and horizontal slope; (c) ground cover improvement through higher plant density, mulches, minimum tillage practices and changes from annual crops to perennials (fruit trees, estate crops, fodder, fuel and timber trees, grasses and fodder legumes). - 11 - 3.6 The project would fund grants to the 80 participating hamlet councils for development of hamlet nurseries (trees, grasses and legumes to be used for terrace rehabilitation and soil stabilization) and for runoff control measures (subcomponent 1.1). The typical grant would be Rp 0.8 million for hamlet nurseries and Rp 1.5 million for runoff control over a 5 ha area. DIY hamlet councils implementing the grants and farmers organized into microwatershed activity groups would receive support in microwatershed planning and development as well as nursery development from existing forestry (for runoff control) and agricultural extension workers (farm planning and diversification, subcomponent 2.2) who would receive on-the-job training under the project. 3.7 A newly formed Upland Development Support Team, (UDST, Component 6) would provide overall support for project participation, select the 500 microwatershed sites and conduct rapid rural appraisal of local conditions. The team would consist of multidisciplinary (land-use, community development, agronomy, soil conservations (forestry, RLKT) and tree crops specialists) and multiagency groups to be based in the foodcrops agency, Dinas Pertanian, at the province level. In PY3, the multidisciplinary support would be decentralized to three districts (with Sleman district being serviced from Gunung Kidul) and district-level (kabupaten) teams constituted for upland development support (KUDST, subcomponent 2.3). 3.8 An uplands watershed systems action-research program (component 8) would be initiated to develop and test improved slope stabilization technology for DIY's uplands, with the potential for replication throughout Java. Staffing would involve a multidisciplinary unit of Indonesian agricultural scientists and socioeconomists (4 full-time and 12 part-time). The program would test a range of vegetative soil stabilization techniques, including the use of vetiver and signal grasses, to stem runoff and develop more productive land use practices for smallholders that are sustainable over time. It would use the 500 microwatershed sites as field laboratories. Under AARD, a unit of the Ministry of Agriculture, the new station would be the first permanent station in Indonesia to focus on upland agriculture. It would be supported by the provincial working group on watershed systems action-research which has been appointed. Assurances were obtained that research facilities in Yogyakarta would be upgraded to full research station status by April 1, 1993, [para. 7.1(a)]. 3.9 On-farm technology displays (subcomponent 2.4) would be set up throughout the 140 upland villages, starting with 30 villages in PYl and 30-40 additional villages in successive years. By presenting an array or "menu of technology options" on a farmer-managed display plot, local farmers could choose the elements of technology packages that suit their specific farm conditions, finance and labor constraints. Demonstrated would be innovative or promising land-use options (shifting to high-value estate or spice crops), planting materials (higher-yielding, faster-maturing or disease-resistant foodcrops such as maize, groundnut and soybean), vegetative conservation (grasses and fodder legumes to stabilize slopes, and risers), and cultural practices (balanced or split dressing of fertilizer, alley-cropping, integration with livestock fodder). Drawing upon the action-research and pilot micto-fatershed stabilization components, the on-farm technology displays would strengthen the technical basis for subsequent intensive microwatershed development throughout the uplands. - 12 - 3.10 The displ..ys would be conducted by subject matter programmers at rural extension centers under subject matter specialists in the foodcrops agency, Dinas Pertanian, at the district level. The cost of the eacb display, with 140 at full development, would be about Rp 150,000 per annum, including materials and inputs. Additionally, a 16-seater transport to convey local farmers to the display plot would be provided to each district under the project. Upland Community Development 3.11 The community development subprogram involves two components that would extend credits/grants to upland hamlets and villages to promote both increased agricultural productivity in ways compatible with conservation goals and off-farm earnings through the development of village infrastructure (Subcomponent 1.2). A training and support component would focus on improved community participation, administering credit, and generating baseline socioeconomic data for monitoring and evaluating impact of the project (component 5). 3.12 Hamlet revolving funds would be enlarged by grants to a level of Rp 1.0 million ($557) for each of the 1,400 hamlets in DIY's upland areas. The credit would be onlent to individuals at commercial rates, mainly for the purposes of purchasing seasonal inputs and developing alternative sources of income. Assurances were obtained that these funds would charge interest rates not lower than those charged by the BRI KUPEDES scheme (para 7.1(b)]. 3.13 Village Projects would be financed by matching grants to 140 upland villages to supplement Government's current allocation of Rp 2.5 million to each village per annum under its INPRES DESA program. In response to village initiatives on productive investment for farm and off-farm activities, according to agreed criteria (Annex 5), the project would finance about 475 separate village grants over five years, averaging Rp 5.0 million per grant. The village's self-help contribution would be not less than 20 percent in kind. Each grant would support 4-5 separate projects for a total of some 2,000 village projects over five years. While grant allocation would be flexible, it would emphasize village and hamlet nurseries and fruit and vegetable production in home gardens and house water supply. Special grants to hamlet councils for nurseries and runoff control measures under the microwatershed stabilization component would be additional to the village matching grants under this component (para. 3.9). Assurances were obtained that hamlet, village and subdistrict projects would be selected in accordance with criteria listed in Annex 5 and would be subject to the physical and financial supervision by the district agencies [paras. 7.1(b)]. 3.14 Both the hamlet credit and village grant components would be administered by the rural development agency BANGDES at the district level, working closely with subdistrict BANGDES staff, rural extension centers, and village and hamlet councils. Design for house watersupply would be based on known standards. 3.15 Community development training and support (component 5) would be provided to BANGDES at the province level in order to train rural development staff at the district level and below in: participatory planning techniques, administering self-help credit schemes, and generating village baseline data - 13 - on village-level socioeconomic conditions (Potensi Desa) to enable interactive monitoring and evaluation of project activities and their impact on upland communities. The agreed implementation program stipulates that the design for courses for (i) hamlet council microwatershed planning, (ii) microwatershed activity group mobilization; and (iii) village level planning and management be completed by November 30, 1991 (para. 7.1(c)]. Village Roads and Bridges 3.16 Village roads and bridges of an all-weather standard are required in upland villages, particularly those remote from inputs and markets, in order to facilitate the delivery of public services that would upgrade living conditions and access to economic opportunity (farm and off-farm) that would improve incomes in the rural economy. The subprogram involves three components: road and bridge construction; maintenance of previously improved and newly improved roads; and strengthening of public works agencies through training in selection criteria, construction methods, and maintenance and monitoring of road construction and maintenance projects. 3.17 Road and bridge construction (subcomponent 3.1) would entail upgrading 173 km of existing village tracks and roads and 22 bridges (about 362 m running length). Roads would be upgraded from gravel to all-weather surface, mostly macadam but asphalt where slope exceeds 15 percent and the surface is prone to flooding. The minimum camber would be 4 percent with proper drainage. Gunung Kidul, the district with the largest area and population and greatest length of roads in poor condition, would be the site of 40 percent of road construction. The remaining three districts would get 20 percent each of the road length to be constructed. Part of a five-year work program, selection criteria would be that: the road be the only all- weather link to a village, minimum 2 km in length, serving 5,000 people, no technical or land acquisition problems, reasonable cost in relationship to traffic and population served, and not subject to other investment (Annex 7). Labor-intensive construction methods would be tused. Construction progress would be monitored at each site. As in the precursor project standard designs would be used and no substantial engineering would be required. Environment assessment would precede any road construction that requires major realignment cutting into slopes. 3.18 Village road maintenance (subcomponent 3.2) of the 364 km built under the previous project (YRDP, Cr. 946-IND) and 173 km to be upgraded under the project would require an institutionalized approach, based on regular monitoring of road and bridge conditions at the district l'vel. With larger traffic volume and more asphalt surface, maintenance wo-lid increasingly be shifted from the usual method of village maintenancc through unpaid self-help (gotong royong) to larger involvement of the public works agency at the district level. Activities would include technical guidance from the province-level public works agency to district and local staff on road maintenance, maintenance of asphalted village roads and monitoring of road maintenance activities by the district-level public works agency, and preparation of subdistrict road maintenance plans. The satisfactory maintenance of the roads built or to be built under both projects would be a condition for continuation of disbursement for road construction (para. 7.2). - 14 - 3.19 Public works agency strengthening (subcomponent 3.3) would entail improvements in the capacity of province-and district-level public works staff to select road and bridge projects, construct roads, monitor both construction and maintenance activities, through training. Sequential training of district and subdistrict staff in the aforementioned would follow. About 120 public works agency supervisors at the province level and 420 village leaders would be trained in labor-intensive road construction methods. Vehicles, road construction and maintenance equipment, and modest computer installations would be provided for each district public works agency office. Office space would be constructed and renovated in two districts, Gunung Kidul and Kulon Progo. Assurances were obtained that the resources provided to Gunung Kidul under this program would be no less than 40 percent; that the village road selection criteria as outlined in Annex 7 would be applied; that a system to monitor costs and physical progress of construction work of village roads and bridges be developed by December 31, 1991 and applied by the provincial public works agencies; that a system of regular monitoring of the requirements for road repair together with subdistrict plans for village road maintenance be established by December 31, 1991 and that asphalt village roads be maintained by the public works agencies of the district, that realignment of roads that cut into slopes be preceded by a satisfactory environmental impact assessment [para. 7.1(d)J. Institution Strengthening 3.20 This subprogram involves the expansion of local-to-national capacity to support and service upland communities and to plan and manage decentralized upland development programs across aifferent ministries (home affairs, planning, agriculture, forestry, public works). The project would provide in- service training for staff, improved planning procedures and coordinating mechanisms and management information systems, technical assistance, equipment, and transport over three components at the district, province, and national levels, respectively. 3.21 District-level (kabupaten) planning, coordination, and support services (component 4) would increase the capacity of the planning agency (BAPPEDA II), technical agencies, district administrator (Bupati) and district administration (Setwilda II) to coordinate and monitor district-level delivery of support services to upland communities. It would introduce improved methodology for local program and project planning. Under the planning agency (BAPPEDA) at the district level, medium-term development plans for sub districts covered by the project would be developed, with a focus on clusters of upland villages. The district administrator's office would selectively allocate resources to district-level technical agencies to support and service the projects. Funds would be provided to plan and implement subdistrict and village projects, according to agreed selection and design criteria (Annex 5). Annual work programs by each implementing agency, constituting a management information system for project activities, would be coordinated by liaison of the district administration, rural extension centers, and district-level technical agencies. Three new rural extension centers (two in Gunung Kidul and one in Kulon Progo) would be constructed. Office equipment, furniture and operating funds would be provided to the district-level planning agency (BAPPEDA) and district administration (Setwilda II). - 15 - 3.22 Province-level planning, coordination, and support services (component 7) would increase the capacity of the planning agency (BAPPEDA I) at the province level and the Governor's secretariat (Setwilda I) to coordinate upland development activities in the province and support district- level agencies in implementing them. At the outset, it would involve the completion of activities leading to loan effectiveness: identity and analysis of upland villages, final guidelines for subdistrict and village projects, and conduct of a pilot erosion study in one upland village. Major activities would relate to implementation capacity, training and technical assistance, and baseline mapping and land titling in upland villages. 3.23 Management studies of the planning agency (BAPPEDA I) at the province level and of the Governor's secretariat would be conducted, as would the assessment of the implementation capacity of key agencies. Work programs and budgets for project-related activities for each work unit would be formulated, in order to generate a management information system. 3.24 Several training-related objectives would be required: a preliminary design of the first-year training program; detailed plans and curricula for the program; recruitment of specialist and contract staff, including technical assistance; contracting of NGOs for specialized training, surveys, and project implementation (to be funded through $571,000 in discretionary funds to BAPPEDA I); and contracting of government and NGOs for design and delivery of in-service training to implementing agencies in planning and management, management information systems and computers. 3.25 The National Land Board (BPN) would be required to provide maps and map overlays at the province level for project planning, monitoring and evaluation; surveys on erosion in upland villages at the beginning and end of project; and issuance of land titles, targeted at farmers participating in the microwatershed activities groups of the microwatershed stabilization component. 3.26 Area development and planning support (component 9) would assist the directorate general for regional development (BANGDA) in the Ministry of Home Affairs to provide effective implementation support to decentralized programs and area development projects and policy guidance in planning other area development projects. During PY1, the component's overall design, detailed activities, and cost estimates for PY2 and subsequent years would be jointly reviewed by BANGDA and the Bank. To be implemented by BANGDA, it would initially involve preparation activities prior to loan effectiveness, including management improvement workshops for BANGDA staff, a study of existing MIS systems in seven provinces, and completion of BANGDA's computerized local-area network. Technical assistance (international and local) would be provided for: internal management (filing, database management and office layout); information/data needs in developing an MIS for regional development, using the project as a pilot; in-house and selected overseas training; training materials (publications and audiovisuals); and support and coordination of project activities in DIY and other provinces (procurement, recruitment, annual reviews, mid-term reviews, and final evaluations). See Annex 3, terms of reference for TA 9 (a)-(i); and for assurances para. 5.7. - 16 - IV. PROJECT COST AND FINANCING A. Project Cost 4.1 Total project costs are estimated at about $25.07 million (Rp 47,671 million), of which $1.95 million (Rp 3,707 million) would be duties and taxes, and $5.22 million (Rp 9,923 million) would be foreign exchange (Annex 8). Physical contingencies averaging 9 percent per annum were added and price contingencies based on estimated annual local inflation of 9.5 percent for 1990 and 6 percent thereafter, and estimated foreign inflation of 6.3 percent for 1990 and 3.2 percent thereafter. Civil Works costs are based on standard design and cost estimates from the Public Works agencies. Cost of equipment and furniture are based on recent quotation from suppliers. Costs of village projects, training and technical assistance were based on recent experience. Table 4.1 summarizes cost estimates. Table 4.1: PROJECT COST SUMMARY Percent Percent Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total Foreign Base ----- (Rp Million) ----- ------- (8 '000) ------ Exchange Cost Upland Productivity end Stabilization Microwaterohed stabilization 1,088.4 296.7 1,882.1 648.6 167.1 700.7 24 4 Hamlet mobilization 1,080.4 -- 1,806.4 667.2 -- 667.2 - 8 Uplond development support team (UDST) 618.6 690.6 1,804.1 822.6 868.8 686.0 6s 8 Upland waterahod action-ressorch 4,274.6 668.8 4,642.8 2,246.6 298.9 2,647.6 12 i6 On-form technology displays 628.0 280.7 668.7 827.7 121.4 449.1 27 2 Subtotal 7?860.9 1,70.8 9,689.1 4.129.9 940.7 6.070.6 26 Upland Comunity Development 6o089.8 874.4 6,468.7 3.20s.2 197.0 8,400.2 6 17 Village Roada and Bridges 8,667.1 8.607.9 12,86.0 4,659.2 1,846.8 6.504.6 28 88 Institution Strengthening District level 1,866.6 811.2 2,176.0 982.0 168.7 1,146.7 14 6 Province level 8,227.8 1,401.1 4,626.8 1,697.7 787.0 2,484.7 8o 12 Area devolopment planning 1,880.9 761.0 2,112.0 700.1 410.9 1,111.0 87 6 Subtotal 6,425.0 2,498.8 s,91.8 3a.79.9 1,811.6 4.691.4 24 Total Base Cost 29,222.8 8,168.9 87,886.2 16,872.1 4,294.6 19,666.6 22 100 Physical contingencies 2,814.0 641.8 8,466.4 1,480.8 887.4 1,817.6 19 9 Price contingencies 6,708.9 1,120.1 6,829.0 8,008.1 669.2 8,692.8 16 16 Total Project Coat 87,746.2 9,926.8 47,670.6 19,865.4 5,221.1 25,076.6 21 128 Project costs by subprograms, levels of Covernment and different agencies involved [districts (Kabupaten), province, national] are shown Table 4.2. B. Financing 4.2 The proposed Bank loan of $15.5 million would finance 70 percent of project costs, 100 percent of foreign exchange costs and 62 percent of local INWNESIA YOCYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DeAE.DmET PRDJEBT (9bgun Dee. il) Table 4.2 Poject 8as Co-ts /a _ _ _________ _____---- -------- --- -_ ---__ -_____________ __________--------------------------------------------- -------------SPOR - - ------------------------------ ---- - ----- ---------- ------------ ------------------------- --- I I I FUPLN PRDJCTrVITV AM STABILIZTION I PLAW CUhKMrr't DEVELOPMENT VILLAGE ROD" AND ORMDE I I? TrIRJICAL STRECTMENIDC TOTAL (US'OOO) 1 I (lSooo) I I (USIOlO) S I ('OODO) S I ( '000) S ____________________________------_---------------------------I. ca (S DLErD WrTHIN EACH OF FR K A ATEN ------------------------------ - --------------------------------------- --- _________________----1. Cnity Mlobilization (SAtlDES Tk II)---------------------------- 13. Village Road- and ridg. 6,504.5 33.S11 4. Kabupaten Pt anning. 1.145.7 S-.6 12,Se2.4 64.0O i I (Public Work. Tk rz) Coordination Support 1.1 Dueun iobilizatimn 687.2 3.51 11.2 Village Mobilization 3,095.2 15.711 I A Support Services I i I (8APPEDA Tk II) 2. Slope Stabilization Technicol Service. I I I (Dines Pertenian T.P. Tk II) 1,149.8 5.1 81 2.1 Runwof Control and Soil Con-ervation /b I 2.2 Par. Planning and Oivaersification 2.3 Stbupstan Upland Devt. Support Tea o" 2.4 On-Fare Technology I I I Diepl,y (tPP.) --------------------------------- -. CO ES T Y PROVIIAL A -------------------------------- - - - ----------------------------------- - - - -- --… I I I I _2 S. Upland Devalaopent 66.0 3.S1 S 5. Community Davt. Training 305.0 1.61 I 1 7. Provincial Planrning. 2.434. 7 12.411 3,425.7 17.41 Support Team (Dines I I I Pertanian T.P. Tkl) I A Support Service. Coordination & Support I (BANES Tk 1) I Services (BAPEDA TnI) I -------------------------------------------------------------------III. O TS T BY NATIA AC CIE ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. Upland Watersbed System 2,547.5 13.05 i i 1 9. Area Det. Planning 1, 11.0 5. es 3,65 .5 18.6V Action Roeearch (AARD) A I I * Support (bANOA) I Upland Productivity and Stabilization: 5,070.5 25.81 IUplend Comanity Dent.: 3,400.2 17.31 I Village Road* and Bridgae: 6,504.5 3.S1il Institutional Strengthening: 4,691.4 2S.9T1 19,666.6 100.0a /a Related to subprograa, components and level of government. Excluding contingncies. lb In teat called Microwaterehed Stabilization. FILE: JOCYAMS (Lotu-) 26-Feb-91 - 18 - costs (excluding reserved procurement of $0.99 million and duties and taxes of $1.95 million). The loan would be at the Bank's standard variable interest rate for 20 years, with a five-year grace period. The Government of Indonesia would provide the equivalent of $9.57 million and excluding duties, taxes and reserved procuremFat its net contribution would be about 30 percent of project costs. The financing plan is summarized below. Table 4.3: FINANCING PLAN ($ '000) Government of IBRD Indonesia Total Amount Z Amount Z Amount 2 Buildings 232.5 80.0 58.1 20.0 290.6 1.2 Roads and bridges 5,362.8 80.0 1,340.7 20.0 6,703.5 26.7 Vehicles - - 992.3 100.0 992.3 4.0 Equipment and furniture 1,216.9 90.0 135.2 10.0 1,352.1 5.4 Land titling and surveys 210.2 90.0 23.4 10.0 233.6 0.9 Technical assistarce and studies 2,429.0 90.0 280.3 10.0 2,709.3 10.8 Training and courses 1,709.5 85.0 301.7 15.0 2,011.2 8.0 Village projects, revolving funds, research funds 4,339.1 80.0 1,069.5 20.0 5,408.6 21.4 Recurrent costs - - 5,375.2 100.0 5,375.2 21.6 Total 15,500.0 61.7 9,576.4 38.3 25,076.4 100.0 4.3 To facilitate an early start of project implementation retroactive financing of eligible expenditures (technical assistance, civil works and equipment), incurred after February 1, 1990, and estimated at $1 million would be provided. C. Procurement 4.4 The proposed procurement arrangements are summarized below. - 19 - Table 4.4: PROCUREMENT ARRANGEMENTS ($ '000) LCB Other N.A. Total Buildings 291 291 (233) (233) Village roads and bridges 3,352 3,352 6,704 (2,682) (2,681) (5,363) Equipment and furniture 811 541 1,352 (730) (487) (1,217) Vehicles /a 992 992 Technical assistance 2,709 2,709 and studies (2,429) (2,429) Training 2,011 2,011 (1,710) (1,710) Local projects, 5,409 5,409 revolving and research funds (4,338) (4,338) Incremental staff salaries 1,195 1,195 and allowances Staff travel, operation and 4,180 4,180 maintenar,ce Land titling and surveys 234 234 (210) (210) Total 4,454 7,594 A 3,029 25,077 (3,645) (5,597) '6,258) (15,500) /a Reserved procurement. Note: Figures in parenthesis indicate amounts financed by t'L Bank. 4.5 Buildings ($0.3 million) (3 rural extension cent3rsr Apland research station, and office buildings) would be built at different tire; and locations, would not attract international bids, and would the etore be procured under local competitive bidding procedures acceptable to the Bank. 4.6 Village Roads and Bridges ($6.7 million) would be partly built by force account with the participation of local communities with labor-intensive methods and partly by local contractors in small contracts. Becau3e of contract size and scattered locations they would not attract international bids and would therefore be procured under local competitive bidding procedures acceptable to the Bank. 4.7 Vehicles ($1.0 million). Government regulations, prohibiting the importation of vehicles, restrict ICB. Vehicles would, therefore, come under reserved procurement, and would not be financed from the loan. Computers, equipment (farm laboratory, office) and furniture ($1.4 million) would be required in small batches by different agencies. They would not be suitable - 20 - for international competitive bidding and would be procured under local competitive bidding procedures acceptable to the Bank. Items costing less than $20,000 per contract .ould be procured, up to an aggregate amount of $500,000 on basis of price quotations from at least three suppliers in accordance with procedures acceptable to the Bank. Technical assistance and studies ($2.7 million) would be procured under Bank guidelJnes for use of consultants. Foreign and local training ($2.0 million) would be at institutions acceptable to the Bank, whereas short course for village cadres and village planning councils would be conducted on force account. Funds for village and hamlet projects, hamlet revolving funds ($4.7 million), research funds ($0.7 million), and incremental staff salaries, allowances, travel costs, office operating costs ($5.6 million) would be spent under Government procedures. 4.8 Review of Procurement. Standard tender and contract documents acceptable to the Bank would be prepared by BAPPEDA at the province level for buildings, equipment and furniture to be procured by the agencies involved. The different agencies responsible for implementation of and procurement for the different project components are given in table 4.2 and para. 5.2. Overall internal monitoring and supervision of procurement would be exercised by BAPPEDA (Project Coordinator). The Bank would review contracts exceeding $300,000 prior to tendering and award, while the remaining contracts would be reviewed on a post-&ward basis. D. Disbursements 4.9 Disbursements under the Bank loan would be made for: (a) 80 percent of expenditure on civil works, roads and bridges; (b) 100 percent of foreign expenditure for directly imported equipment, 100 percent of local expenditures (ex-factory prices) for locally manufactured equipment and furniture, and 65 percent of the costs of locally procured off-the-shelf items; (c) 100 percent of cost of foreign technical assistance and 100 percent of the costs of local consultants; (d) 100 percent of expenditure on foreign training and 70 percent of expenditures on local training; (e) 65 percent of grant-fund expenditure for village projects (covering 80 percent of individual project costs); and (f) 90 percent of expenditure for hamlet projects, hamlet revolving funds, subdistrict funds, discretionary funds, land titling, and research funds; 4.10 Disbursements are expected to be completed by 1997, about six years after Loan Effectiveness (Annex 9). A six-year disbursement for the proposed loan is considered reasonable because it is a follow-up project. Disbursements would be made on the basis of statements of expenditure (SOEs) for equipment, training, research grants and recurrent costs less than $100,000 equivalent and civil works contracts for less than $300,000 - 21 - equivalent. For other components and contracts above these thresholds, disbursement would be made on the basis of standard documentation. SOEs would be prepared by BAPPEDA at the province level and detailed documentation woul(d be maintained at BANGDA headquarters in Jakarta. To facilit_te disbursement administration, loan withdrawal applications would be aggregated as far as possible and would not be for less than $100,000 equivalent for reimbursements and $50,000 equivalent for direct payments. The satisfactory maintenance of roads built under the first project and this project would be a condition for continuation of disbursement for road construction (para. 3.18). E. Special Account 4.11 In order to expedite disbursements, Government would establish a special account at the Bank of Indonesia, to be maintained in US Dollars. The authorized allocation of Rupiah equivalent of $1.0 million, representing an estimated average of four months' expenditures, would cover all categories financed by the Bank. Except for large expenditures that would deplete the Special Account, all project expenditures would be channeled through this account and be withdrawn in proportion to the percentage being financed. GOI would set up the Special Account in Bank of Indonesia for disbursements from the proceeds of the Bank loan, following procedures and under terms and conditions satisfactory to the Bank. F. Accounts and Audits 4.12 Separate project accounts clearly indicating the various sources of monies received (including revenues generated at research locations) and monies expended, by functional categories for the respective project components, would be maintained by BAPPEDA. Accounting procedures presently utilized by BAPPEDA are expected to change during the project period with the improvements being introduced by GOI under the Accountancy Development Project (Loan No. 2940-IND). These include, inter alia, introduction of a uniform chart of accounts, double-entry accounting and balance sheet accounting. This should facilitate improved management reporting on project activities. Assurances were obtained that unaudited project accounts, including receipts and expenditure statements and SOEs, would be submitted for audit and forwarded to the Bank within four months of fiscal year-end and that supporting documentation would be made available to the Bank for inspection during supervision. The audit reports would be made available to the Bank within nine months of the end of the fiscal year. The audit report would include a separate auditors' opinion on special account and SOEs, verifying that the related expenditures were made for the agreed purposes of the project (para. 7.1(e)]. V. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION 5.1 The project implementation schedule is detailed in Annex 13. Project management and implementation are based on the principles of: decentralizing most responsibility for project implementation to the district level and below; use of existing government agencies and mechanisms to ensure institutional strengthening and sustainability of project activities; allocation of project activities to match, as far as possible, existing - 22 - mandates and functions of implementing agencies at each government level; overall responsibility for project activities by the administrative head of each governmental level, i.e., Governor of DIY and district administrator (Bupati) in each district; and community-based planning under which district line agencies would support project initiatives and preferences shown by local communities and farmers. 5.2 Institutions. The network of national, provincial, district, subdistrict and village institutions in DIY is complex, with multitiered matrix-reporting relationships and a multiple line agency structure at each level of government. The proposed project organizational structure is designed to fit into the existing patterns and procedures of government. The lead agencies for project components spanning three levels of government are: District level * Slope stabilization technical services (Dinas Pertanian) (Component 2) * Community mobilization (BANGDES) (Component 1) * Village roads and bridges (Public Works) (Component 3) * District (kabupaten) planning, coordination and support services (BAPPEDA) (Component 4) Province level * Upland Development Support Team 2/ (Dinas Pertanian) (Component 6) X Community development training and support services (BANGDES) (Component 5) X Provincial planning coordination and support services (BAPPEDA) (Component 7) National level * Upland watershed systems action-research (AARD) (Component 8) * Area development planning and support (BANGDA) (Component 9) A project manager (PIMPRO) would be appointed in each lead agency for that specific project component. In some cases, the responsibility for implementing a subcomponent would be delegated by the lead agency to a separate agency, although financial reporting and oversight responsibility would remain with the lead agency. (See Charts 1,2,3 for project organization and structure.) 5.3 The only new organizational units proposed under the project are: (a) policy, steering, and coordination committees at the national, province and district levels; (b) an Upland Development Support Team at the province level, to be later decentralized to the district level; and 2/ Including staff of BANGDES and the Forestry Department (RLKT). - 23 - (c) a unit for upland watershed systems action-research to be loter institutionalized in Yogyakarta as a research station of MARD's Cente. for Soil Research. The national steering committee and national technical committee have been established (Annex 10, Appendix 1). A provincial coordinator; a provincial steering committee; a provincial project technical support team to coordinate planning and implementation; and a provincial working group for watershed systems action-research have been appointed. Details for project coordination and implementation are in Annex 10. 5.4 Budgeting. The project would be a centrally assisted regional project. Funds required would be included in regular budgets of DIY and its four districts. The managers responsible for project components (PIMPRO) would include all project expenses in their normal budget requests (DUPDA) which are then submitted through BAPPEDA I to the director general of BANGDA and the Ministry of Finance, The funding would be approved and released in the framework of INPRES DATI I for project activities implemented by the province, and INPRES DATI II for activities implemented by the districts (including village roads). Village projects would be funded through the INPRES Bantuan Desa Program, which is similar to INPRES DATI II but under whir;, approval of a village project is not followed by physical and financial supervision. 5.5 Staffing Requirements. Most components are consistent with existing functions and capabilities of the agencies involved, with technical assistance to provide needed expertise to introduce new methodologies and approaches. Increased capacity would be generated by a combination of improved procedures, staff training, incentive improvements, and mobilization with coordinated work programs and improved transport. About 1,100 staff would be involved in project implementation: approximately 900, 170, and 30 at the district, province, and national levels, respectively. Typically, provincial and district agencies are operating at levels well below full establishment strength. The project is not predicated on increased numbers of staff, except in specific instances, as follows: (a) Upland Development Support Team in PY1 (4 senior staff, para. 3.7); (b) Kabupaten (district) Upland Development Support Teams (KUDST) in PY3 (three teams, each with 4 staff, para. 3.7); (c) a contracted Project Training Officer to BAPPEDA I in PYl (Annex 3, TA 7(k)); and (d) project unit (later, research station) for upland watershed systems action-research (12 senior full-time, 4 part-time, para. 3.8). 5.6 Staff Development and Training. Over the course of the project, some 9,500 village leaders/farmers, and some 1,900 civil servants, (1,300 district, 300 province, and 300 national staff, respectively) would receive short-term training in project-related skills (Annex 2, Table 3). Total cost of project-related training (baseline costs without contingencies) is estimated at $2.0 million (Rp 3,138 million). (Annex 2, Table 1). Training activities would be organized by four line agencies; - 24 - (a) BANGDES (rural development) at the province and district levels would expand training of community leaders and local government and field cadres. Some 1,400 village planning council members would be trained in planning and management and 6,400 hamlet leaders in microwatershed planning and mobilization. At the province level, BANGDES would expand training of community organizing skills to some 1,100 subdistrict, also village and hamlet leaders, and training in improved methodology socioeconomic surveys (Potensi Desa) to some 30 subdistrict and village staff. (b) BAPPEDA (regional development planning) at the province level would arrange for the training of some 340 extension staff in technical matters and 710 of its province and district staff in planning and management; 90 in computer applications, and additional staff in MIS. It would contract curriculum design and delivery tc existing training agencies, such as the Ministry of Home Affairs training center at Woncatur (near Yogyakarta) and selected NGOs. (c) The public works agencies at the district level would arrange for the training of some 420 village leaders and 120 staff in labor- intensive road construction and maintenance techniques. Training would be provided by the public works training center in Jakarta or by the public works center in Bandung. (d) About 190 BANGDA (regional development) staff would receive training in planning and management and some 100 would receive technical training, organized by the planning division of the BANGDA Secretariat. Twelve staff would be funded to undertake short o.verseas courses in development planning and management, and four staff would be seconded to field assignments within province and district field offices for a period of six months each . 5.7 Technical Assistance. The project would provide 300 staff-months of technical assistance (112 international and 188 local, Annex 3), at a cost of $2.5 million (Rp 4,793 million). It would be concentrated in project components that require initial assistance in designing and testing innovative approaches: the Upland Development Support Team (para. 3.7); upland watershed system action-research unit/station (MARD) (para. 3.8); provincial planning coordination and support (para. 3.22); and BANGDA [area development and support (para. 3.26)]. The units implementing these components have the capacity to put the technical assistance to good use. The BANGDA component (65 staff-months) would be implemented in BANGDA in the Ministry of Home Affairs and affect all area development activities in the country. The research component (13 staff-months) would soon also affect areas outside the province. Of the total staff-months required 73 (24 percent) would be for project support and 227 (76 percent) for capacity building. Terms of reference for key positions are in Annex 3. The agreed project implementation program (para. 7.02(c)] stipulates that the following specialists would be in place by November 30, 1991: land and water management advisor (TA 6(a)]; community development advisor (TA 6(b)]; outreach program design specialist [TA 6(i)]; research methodology specialist [TA 8(a)]; socioeconomist [TA 8(c)]; upland agronomist/soil conservation planner (TA 8(b)]; area development advisor (TA 7(e)]; the village development monitoring and evaluation advisor (TA 5(a)]. - 25 - 5.8 Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs). The project would provide discretionary funds (para. 3.24), to be managed by the project coordinator in BAPPEDA, primarily to engage locally based NGOs on a contractual basis for studies and infrastructural projects (e.g., water supply). Proposals for use of these funds would be included in annual budget requests as part of GOI's normal budgetary process. NGOs would assist in conducting baseline surveys and analysis, ongoing evaluation surveys, and training of field cadres and community leaders. Where appropriate, the Yogyakarta-based NGO Forum would assist BAPPEDA in liaison with the sizeable and diverse NGO community in the province. 5.9 Monitoring and reporting of project activities would involve: (a) quarterly reporting of physical and financial progress by each implementing agency, including special accounting categories to trace project-related expenditures; (b) a project management information system to be developed in detail in PY1 as an extension of the analysis of institutional capacity under taken prior to appraisal (para. 3.23). Project agencies in the province and each district would generate input/output worksheets, specifying key activities, performance indicators, (outputs), and resource requirements. BAPPEDA at the province level would further refine this framework into quarterly targets and resource specifications, to form the basis of quarterly physical reporting and a "management by objective and deviation" approach to project coordination. Quarterly reports collated by BAPPEDA would be used as the basis of review by the provincial project steering committee. An annual summary report of project progress would be presented to the national project steering committee; and (c) the introduction of computerized monitoring and evaluation techniques into the relevant provincial and district agencies to track the diverse portfolio of village, hamlet and subdistrict projects. These techniques have been developed over the past 10 years under the Government's Provincial Development Program (PDP, in part supported by USAID). Much of the project-sponsored management training for provincial and district staff would be focused on delivery of existing training materials from PDP on planning, budgeting, monitoring and evaluation techniques. 5.10 Evaluation of the project would rely on three sources of quantitative data to establish benchmarks for subsequent impact evaluation: (a) an updated survey of erosion in the upland villages by the National Land Board (BPN), following a survey in the early 1980s. Such a survey demarcating areas showing marked soil loss would be repeated at the end of the project; (b) detailed physical and socioeconomic data collected by the upland watershed system action-research unit/station before and after development of microwatershed areas taken as its field laboratories. Ongoing socioeconomic studies would use nonproject areas as control sites in assessing progress; and - 26 - (c) village socioeconomic data collected by BANGDES staff, using an improved methodology (Potensi Desa) to be introduced and tested under the project. BANGDES would put these baseline data into an interactive computerized database, arrange for its annual updating, and develop a competent data analysis and evaluation capability in its provincial office. A mid-term review would assess progress and problems experienced during implementation, assisted by six months of internationally recruited specialist assistance [Annex 3 TA 7(i)]. VI. PROJECT BENEFITS, JUSTIFICATION AND RISKS 6.1 Most project benefits include stabilizing the soil in DIY's upland areas by methods that ensure the productivity base and increase yields and incomes for farmers under rainfed conditions. Focus and research concentration on microwatersheds as the organizing unit for stabilization and production should yield benefits beyond the 2,500 ha where project activities would be most intense. On-farm technology displays that demonstrate improved agronomy, planting materials, and the benefits of shifting to perennial crops in order to retain soil and moisture should have a wide-ranging effect on production and incomes in all upland villages. A permanent research station with an upland focus should validate technical and sociological recommendations for application in upland areas throughout Java. Supported by improved extension services, credit facilities, and social and physical infrastructure (roads and bridges), living standards in upland villages should likewise benefit. With an estimated five persons per family, the project's benefits by component are likely to affect: microwatershed stabilization, 4,200 households; on-farm technology displays, 12,000 households; roads and bridges to 49 villages, 49,000 households; village projects, 40,000 households; overall, some 60,000 households with 300,000 upland residents, often oy more than one component. 6.2 Production and marketing. The project's incremental production will mainly be cassava, maize, upland rice, groundnuts (foodcrops), fodder and firewood (trees), fruits, vegetables and coffee. Although some decline in yields is likely in the 'without project" scenario (for example, a recent World Bank study estimates that losses in soil productivity in DIY cause a 4.7 percent dent in yields per annum), no decrease has been assumed. The present and expected yields of major crops are shown below: - 27 - Yields ton/ha Present At full development Cassava (poor soils) 4.0 5.50 Cassava (better soils) 5.0 7.00 Maize 0.8 0.95 Dry paddy 0.9 1.15 Groundnut (dry in shell) 0.4 0.60 Grass 5.0 15.00 Avocado - 3.20 Banana 0.40 A competitive system of local, subdistrict and district markets is in place and would become more c-fficient under the project with improvements in village roads and special marketing facilities (e.g., weighing stations and holding pens for livestock). Under the precursor project, markets adjusted quickly to absorb the increased production of fruits and tree products, and would likely do so under the proposed project. Reliance on the existing trader system is justified, and it can only become more competitive with the project's features. 6.3 Farmer's Income. Two indicative models (Annex 11) were used to estimate the project's impact on upland farmers' incomes under the project's two sets of proposed agricultural innovations and improvements. tlbing a typical 0.6 ha upland farm in each case, one model looked specifically at conditions in critical upland watersheds where the microwatershed stabilization component would be introduced. The second model looks at farms outside the microwatershed area, which are partly terraced and are expected to benefit from the on-farm technology displays. In both cases, benefits from other project-related activities (homegardens, livestock, roads) have been excluded. 6.4 In the financial analysis, all farm inputs and outputs are valued at constant 1990 farmgate prices, based on sample checks. Incremental family labor on farm is valued at wage rates prevailing for off-farm activities in the project area in early 1990. The phasing out of the fertilizer subsidy has been taken into account. The results of the models are shown below in Table 6.1. No rate of return has been calculated. Given the small investments by farmers, it would not adequately express the development of farmers' incomes. For farmers under the project's microwatershed improvements, the net present value (at 10 percent over 10 years) of net farm income would increase by 41 percent. Cn farms outside microwatershed areas, but exposed to on-farm technology displays, the net present value of the net farm income would increase by 22 percent. - 28 - Table 6.1: SUMMARY OF NET FARM INCOMES FOR 0.6 HA FARM Form Model Outside Farm Model in MicroWatershed Microwatershed Per Per Total capita Total capita Rp'000 Rp'OOO X X Rp'OOO Rp'OOO X X Present 210 42 100 210 42 100 Future without Project Lb 202 40 100 202 40 100 Future with Project Lb 259 S2 128 128 882 68 158 164 Incremental To prosent level 49 10 122 24 To future level Lb 67 11 180 28 Incremental net present value in % Uc 21 22 89 41 L. Excluding some gardens. lb After phasing out of fertilizer subsidy. c Discounted at 10 percent over 10 years 6.5 Economic analysis. (Annex 12). The economic rate of return for the proiect's upland productivity and stabilization components (excluding the cost of the research component) is 12 percent over 30 years. No economic analysis was made for support and training services for upland community development, as their benefits would extend beyond the project's activities. Economic benefits have been estimated on the basis of incremental production of cassava, maize, upland rice, groundnuts, grass, bananas, avocadoes and coffee. Outputs were valued at market prices. For subsidized fertilizer, a conversion factor of 1.82 was used. For incremental unskilled rural labor, a conversion factor of 0.7 was applied to wage rates for off-farm employment. The costs of project investment include varying degrees of unskilled upland labor, and therefore an aggregate conversion factor of 0.85 was used. Given the anticipated 12 percent rate of return, costs could increase 10 percent and benefits decrease 9.1 percent to maintain a 10 percent rate of return, the estimated opportunity cost of capital in Indonesia. 6.6 The village roads and bridges would affect 49 of the 140 project villages. Benefits would come from reduced transport costs for inputs end outputs, better access to markets in the rainy season, less spoilage duting transport and improve production through better extension coverage. Further benefits would come from easier access to services (health, credit) and to employment outside the village, and the stimulation of non-agricultural activities in the villages. These aggregate benefits were assumed to improve farmers income by 10 percent. To the cost of village roads an aggregate conversion factor of 0.865 was applied resulting in an economic rate of return for 30 years of 15 percent. An increase in costs of 45 percent or a decrease in benefits of 31 percent would reduce the ERR to 10 percent. 6.7 Environmental Impact. The stabilization of critical uplands and control or reduction of rainwater runoff would reduce erosion in the project area and later in other areas adopting project approaches. The major thrust - 29 - of the project is to conserve and enhance the resource and productivity base of the upland economy. Without the project, it is likely that fragile slopes would be brought under increasing pressure to be cultivated. With the project, better yields combined with sounder environmental practices without expansion into vulnerable areas are likely. An environmental risk conceivably could involve the realignment of village roads in fragile slope areas. However, safeguards against such activity are built into project assurances that any village road realignment cutting into slopes would be preceded by an assessment of environmental impact (para. 3.19). 6.8 Impact on Women. Indonesia's progress in slowing population growth, raising health and nutritional standards of women and children, and in increasing the enrollment rites for women in primary and secondary education has affected the uplands, albeit t- a lesser degree than in the lowlands. Access to social services would be improved with the upgrading of the village road network. The role of Java's women in making farm and financial decisions is reportedly stronger than in many south Asian countries. They share the field work for annual crops with men. Larger harvests under the project would increase their workload for harvesting, transport and processing. The gradual shift to perenrial crops, however, would reduce the workload for soil preparation and planting. Better roads would ease women's burden of marketing. Provision of house watertanks under village projects would eliminate women's heavy burden of carrying water. Women would also benefit from the greater security which increased production and the issue of land titles would bring about. This applies even as women do not share their husband's land title although they retain title to land they inherited. 6.9 Risks. The project's risks are technical and institutional and might lead to constraints to spontaneous replication of new technologies. Farmers might be slow in accepting the low-cost soil conversation measures and adopting farming systems that put a larger portion of cultivated areas under tree crops. Further, the diversity of farmers' interests and microwatershed conditions might slow down the implementation of coordinated runoff control measures in microwatersheds. The institutional risks are that the line agencies might be slow in responding to the project's coordination mechanisms. Research, technical assistance, training efforts and detailed institutional planning are directed at these two areas which would be reviewed in detail during annual review jointly undertaken by GOI and the Bank. The risks are, therefore, considered reasonable. They would be monitored and the project could be adjusted accordingly. VII. AGREEMENTS REACHED AND RECOMMENDATION 7.1 Agreements were reached that: (a) research facilities of AARD's Center for Soil Research in Yogyakarta be upgraded to a full research station by April 1, 1993 (para. 3.8); (b) hamlet (dusun) revolving funds charge interest rates not lower than those charged by the BRI KUPEDES scheme (para. 3.12); hamlet, village and subdistrict projects funded under the project be selected in accordance with criteria listed in Annex 5; and village - 30 - projects funded under the project be subject to physical and financial supervision by the district agencies (para. 3.13); (c) the project would be implemented in accordance with an implementation program agreed with the Bank (paras. 3.15, 5.7); (d) the proportion of resources provided to Gunung Kidul under the village roads and bridges subprogram would be no less than 40 percent (para. 3.19); village road selection criteria as outlined in Annex 7 would be applied (para. 3.19); a system for monitoring costs and physical progress of village roads and bridges be developed and applied by the public works agency (PU Tk I) at the province level (para. 3.19); a system of regular monitoring of village road and bridge conditions and subdistrict road maintenance plans be established; asphalted village roads be maintained by the public works agencies (PU Tk II) at the district (para. 3.19); and realignment of roads that cut into slopes be preceded by a satisfactory environmental impact assessment (para. 3.19); (e) unaudited project accounts would be submitted to the Bank within four months of fiscal year end, followed by audit reports nine months after fiscal year end (para. 4.12). 7.2 The satisfactory maintenance of roads built under the Yogyakarta Rural Development Project and this project would be a condition for continuation of disbursement for road construction (para. 3.18). 7.3 With the above agreements and conditions, the project would be suitable for a Bank loan of $15.5 million with 20 years maturity at the Bank's standard variable rate, including a grace period of five years. The Borrower would be the Republic of Indonesia. 31 ANNEX 1 Page 1 INDONESIA YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ('BANGUR DESA II') Proiect Area, Land Form Classea and Phasing Assumptions Pro1ect Area 1. The project area covers all 140 upland villages 1/ in Yogyakarta Province, distributed between all four kabupatens. The total land area of these upland villages is 1,586 km2, of which approximately 1,132, or 712, has a slope exceeding 152. Appendix 1 presents summary data for all upland villages, together with an analysis of area and population by kabupaten. Landform Classes and Proiect Kecamatane 2. The 140 upland villages lie with 26 kecamatans, which in turn are associated with three of the five major Landform Classes in the province (Map 1). Landform Classes I and IV comprise the relatively flat or gently sloping land not considered at serious risk from erosion in the Wonosari Plain and in the irrigated lowlands of Sleman and Bantul respectively. Kecamatans within these Landform Classes are not considered for inclusion in the project. 3. Landform Class III comprises the often shallow and unstable soils of north and west GK, east Sleman and Bantul, and north and west KP. Areas where these soils occur on slopes greater than 152 are considered to be seriously at risk from erosion. Fifteen kecamatans were identified with more than 1,000 ha of Landform Class I1I. These kecamatans would form the focus of the intensive Microwatershed Stabilization sub-program. A further three kecamatans were identified with less than 1,000 ha of this Landform Class, and would also be included in the project but with a lower priority. 1/ An 'upland village, is defined in two separate ways: i) for Landform Class II and III (most of the-project area) an Upland Village is defined as a village whose total area consists of at least 302 upland area (i.e. land with more than 152 slope). ii) for Landform Class V (the volcanic soil area in northern Sleman), an Upland Village is defined as a village whose total area consists of at least 301 rainfed dryland (i.e. 'tegalan' land, above the spring line at the base of Mt. Merapi). - 32 - ANNEX 1 Page 2 4. Landform Class II comprises the "karst" limestone areas of Gunung Seribu in southern GK, and Landform Class V the volcanic slopes of Gunung Merapi in Sleman. N-Jther Landform Class is considered to be seriously at risk from soil erowion, but both areas have suffered from the general lack of attention given to upland development. Kecamatans with more than 1,000 ha of Landform Class II or V, together with those in La.idform Class III, are included in the extensive Upland Community Development sub-program. Table 1 shows the breakdown of the 26 Kecamatans proposed for inclusion in the project by Landform Class and by Kabupaten. Kecamatan Phasing 5. Project start-up activities would commence in all four kabupatens in PY1, but would be restricted to only six kecamatans. It is proposed that the remaining 20 kecamatans would be included in a phased manner over the next three years of the project. All upland kecamatans would be included by PY4. The proposed (indicative) phasing of kecamatans by Landform Class is shown in Table 2, and the breakdown b' kabupatens in Table 3. The proposed phasing would allow for a gradua. build-up of kabupaten experience and capacity to implement the program in PY1 and 2, without adversely affecting on-going and non-project programs. Experience during implementation may suggest that a more rapid entry of kecamatans to project activities is possible, or alternatively that kecamatan phasing should be further spread out into PY5. The indicative phasing shown in Tables 2 and 3 has been used in the derivation of project costs. 6. Further breakdowns of kecamatan phasing by kabupaten in Landform Class III, and Landform Classes II and V respectively, are shown in Tables 4 and 5. These are necessary since the Microwatershed Stabilization program be implemented only in Landform Class III. Village Phasing 7. A breakdown of upland villages (desa) entering the program from each kabupaten in each year, is given in Table 6a, with the cumulative totals in Table 6(b). The phasing of On-Farm Technology displays at one per upland desa per year, and the phasing of the grants for village projects in the Cost Tables were der0.'d from Table 6(b). During the project period, all 140 upland villagts would receive such additional grants, with a cumulative total of 475 additional annual grants. 8. The entry of Landform Class III upland desas is shown in Table 7, indicating that a total of 82 desas would have microwatershed stabilization and related activities. Dusing PhasinR 9. The total number of upland dusuns (hamlet) involved in the project is estimated to be 1,4C0. The breakdown by Kabupaten and by annual phasing of entry to project activities is shown in Table 8. In the absence of - 33 - ANNEX 1 Page 3 detailed village and dusun analysis, it has been assumed that each upland village would contain 10 upland dusuns. This Table has been used to calculate training costs for KKLKMD members. Microwatershed Phasing 10. The assumptions leading to the number of Micro-DAS (Microwater- sheds) that are proposed (Table 9), relate to the implementation capacity of the Upland Development Support Team (Province) in PY1 and 2, UDST (Kabupaten) in PY3 and 4, PLPs/PPLs in PY4 and 5. A total of 500 Micro-DAS are proposed, with a very slow implementation rate during the early years of the project, and with almost 702 to be planned and implemented during PY5. It is also assumed that the planning activities for Micro-DAS (both for slope stabilization and farm planning and diversification) would be refined, simplified and streamlined as experience is gained in the techniques involved. The assumed phasing of the dusuns involved in the Microwatershed program is shown in Table 10(a) for all kabupatens. Table 10(b) and l0(c) show a breakdown of the assumed phasing by kabupaten, by year of entry and cumulative, respectively. PLP and PPL Phasing 11. The phasing of field extension staff for the Microwatershed stabilization program follows the phasing of Micro-DAS in the early project years, and then depends on the estimated numbers of field staff available within Landform Class III. It has been assumed that a total of 120 PLPs (Regreening program field staff from Forestry) are currently deployed in DIY, and a brief analysis suggests that only 55 are working in the Landform Class III uplands. Sub-Balai RLKT in Yogyakarta have suggested that redeployment of PLPs within a kabupaten is possible (although redeployment between kabupaten is unlikely). By redeploying field staff within a kabupaten to Landform Class III, it is assumed that the number of PLPs would increase from 55 to 82 PLPs by PY5, or one PLP for each upland desa in the project (see Table 11). PPLs (agricultural field staff from BIMAS) are already deployed at almost this level and Table 12 assumes a similar phasing to that of PLPs. Technology 'Menu* Displays 12. As each upland desa is phased into the project, a technology menu display is implemented in that desa. The number of technology displays therefore corresponds with the number of upland villages (all Landform Classes) in any year. 18 October, 1990 MASSl1 SAR 213 Annex - 34 - ANNEX 1 Table 1 Table 1 Proiect Kecamatans, by Landform Class Land Class Kabupaten Total III II V No. Name No. Name No. Name Gunung Kidul (GK) 6 Nglipar, 5 Tepus, _ _ 11 Semin, Paliyan, Ngawen, Panggang, Ponjong, Rongkop, Patuk, Semanu Playen Kulon Progo (KP) 6 Kalibawang, - - - _ 6 Samigaluh, Girimulyo, Kokap, Pengasih, Temon Bantul (B) 4 Imogiri, 1 Pundong - - S Pleret, Piyungan. Dlingo Sleman (S) 1 Prambanan - - 3 Cangkringan, 4 Pakem, Turi Totals 17 6 3 26 ANNEX 1 Tables 2, 3. 4 Table 2 Phasing of Recamatan Entry By Landfonm Class PY Landfonm Class 1 2 3 4 5 Total III 5 7 3 2 - 17 II - - 2 4 - 6 V 1 1 1 - - 3 Totals 6 8 6 6 - 26 Table S Kecamatan Phasing By Kabupaten (All Landforms) 1 2 3 4 5 Total GK 2 2 3 4 - 11 KP 2 2 1 1 - 6 Bantul 1 2 1 1 - 5 Sleman 1 2 1 - - 4 Totals 6 8 6 6 - 26 Table 4 Landfom Class III Kecamatan Phasing By KabuDaten 1 2 3 4 5 Total GK 2 2 1 1 - 6 KP 2 1 2 1 - 6 Bantul 1 1 2 - - 4 Sleman - - 1 - - 1 Totals 5 4 6 2 - 17 - 36 - ANNEX 1 Tables 5, 6 Table 5 Landform Classes II and V Kecamatan Phasing By Kabupaten 1 2 3 4 5 Total GK - 1 3 1 - 5 KP - - - - - 0 Bantul - - - 1 - 1 Sleman 1 1 1 - - 3 Totals 1 2 4 2 - 9 Table 6 Phasing of Entry of Upland Desa By Kabupaten (a) By Year of Entry 1 2 3 4 5 Total GK 10 14 35 31 - 90 KP 10 9 3 2 - 24 Bantul 4 5 5 1 - 15 Sleman 4 5 2 - - 11 Totals 28 33 45 34 - 140 Cumulative 28 61 106 140 140 475 (b) Cumulative Cumulative Numbers of Upland Desa in Project By Kabupaten 1 2 3 4 5 Total ---------------------------------------------------------------------__--- GK 10 24 59 90 90 273 KP 10 19 22 24 24 99 Bantul 4 9 14 1S 15 57 Sleman 4 9 11 11 11 46 Totals 28 61 106 140 140 475 ANNEX 1 TaDles .', 8, 9 - 37 - Table 7 Phasing of Entry of Upland Desa in Landfomn Class III By Kabupaten 1 2 3 4 5 Total GK 10 14 14 3 - 41 KP 10 4 10 - - 24 Bantul 4 5 5 - - 14 Sleman - - 3 - - 3 Totals 24 23 32 3 - 82 Table 8 Phasing of Entry of Upland Dusuns By Kabupaten (From Table 6(a)) 1 2 3 4 5 Total GK 100 140 350 310 - 900 KP i00 90 30 20 - 240 Bantul 40 50 50 10 - 150 Sleman 40 50 20 ^ - 110 Totals 280 330 450 340 - 1,400 Table 9 Micro-DAS Phasing By Kabupaten 1 2 3 4 5 Total GK 2 8 12 30 115 167 KP 2 4 16 30 115 167 Bantul 1 3 12 24 92 132 Sleman - - 5 6 23 34 Totals 5 15 45 90 345 500 ANNEX 1 - 38 - Table 1 Table 10 Phasing of Dusuns Involved in Micro-DAS Development (Landform Class III) (a) All KabuDatens 1 2 3 4 5 Total No. of Micro-DAS (new) 5 15 45 90 345 500 (cum) 5 20 35 155 500 Average Micro-DAS/Dusun 1 1.3 1.4 2.6 6.1 No. of Dusuns (new) 5 10 30 15 22 75 Cumulative Dusuns 5 15 45 60 82 (b) By Kabupaten (By Year of Entry) (Dusuns with Micro-DAS) GK 2 6 8 10 15 41 KP 2 2 12 2 6 24 Bantul 1 2 9 1 1 14 Sleman - - 1 2 - 3 Totals 5 10 30 15 22 82 (c) By Kabupaten (Cumulative) (Dusuns with Micro-DAS) GK 2 8 16 26 41 KP 2 4 16 18 24 Bantul 1 3 12 13 14 Sleman - - 1 3 3 Totals 5 15 45 60 82 Assumes: 1. Existing 55 PLPs in Landform Class III (see Table 11). 2. PLP Numbers will rise over project period as field staff are reallocated to Landform Class III within kabupatens. 3. 82 PLPs are working within 82 Landform Class III desas by PY5, and within each of these desas only one dusun is involved in Micro-DAS development. Within each of these dusuns, an average of 6.1 Micro-DAS areas are developed by PYS, leading to a total of 500 Micro-DAS areas being developed. ANNEX 1 - 39 - Table 11 Table 11 Phasing of PLP (RLKT) Entry Into the Runoff Control and Soil Conservation Sub-Component (2.1) 1 2 3 4 5 GK 2 8 16 26 41 KP 2 4 16 18 24 Bantul 1 3 12 13 14 Sleman - - 1 3 3 Totals 5 15 45 60 82 Note: Assumes 120 PLPs in DIY and a total of 55 available in Landform Class III (For Micro-DAS activities) in 1991, rising to 82 by PY5 as staff are redistributed within each kabupaten, by sub- Balai RLKT. Table 12 Phasing of PPL (BIMAS) Entry Into the Farm Planning and Diversification Sub-Component (2.2) 1 2 3 4 5 GK 2 8 16 26 41 KP 2 4 16 18 24 Bantul 1 3 12 13 14 Sleman - - 1 3 3 Totals 5 15 45 60 82 - 40 - upvills3.,kl INDONESIA APPENDIX 1 3.19.90 YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPHENT PROJECT ("Bangun Desa II') Page 1 Summary of Upland Village Data /a Total Landform kv.in Class Population Land area Population Area )15% S 6abupaten No. Kecaaatans Class Kecam. Desa June 1989 ks2 density slope (km2) Upland GuDung lidul 11 III 6 41 185,501 372.3 498 235.6 /a 63 /a II 5 49 221,740 690.2 330 568.7 /a 82 /a Subtotal, Gunung Kidul 11 90 413,247 1062.5 389 804.3 /a 16 /a Kulon Progo 6 III 6 24 145,407 275.6 528 216.4 79 Subtotal, Kulong Progo 6 24 145,407 275.6 528 216.4 79 Bantul 5 III 4 14 98,696 130.0 759 68.1 52 II I 1 9,323 11.1 840 4.5 41 Subtotal, Bantul 5 15 108,019 141.1 766 72.6 51 Sleman 4 III 1 3 10,890 19.7 553 15.8 80 v 3 8 43,933 81.2 504 22.8 26 Subtotal, Slesan 4 11 54,823 106.9 513 38.6 36 Total D.lY. 26 III 17 82 440,500 797.5 552 535.8 /b 67 /b II 6 50 237,063 701.3 338 573.2 82 V 3 8 43,933 87.2 504 22.8 26 TOTAL D.I.Y. 26 140 721,496 1586.0 455 1131.9 /b 71 /b /a Data are approximate only, based on first approximations of upland area for three villages in kecamatan Playen, GI (50S upland area has been assumed for each) /a Based on detailed data presented in Appendix 1, Pages 2-5. - 41 - I wkl INDONISIA APPINDIX I YOGYAKART0 UPLAND ARIAEVHELOPNSNT PROJECT ( Bangun Desa I) Page 2 Summary of Upland Village Data Landforu Population Land area Population Area >15% % I lecamatan Class Desa June 1989 k12 density slope (kh2) Upland ,idul Nglipar /a III Pengkol 5018 8.8 568 4.1 47 Redungpoh 5758 10.8 533 3.4 31 Natah 4395 8.0 551 2.9 36 Pilangrejo 3590 8.8 410 5.9 67 berteQu 3978 9.7 408 9.0 93 Watugajab 4648 8.0 584 6.3 19 Hargomulyo 7137 11.5 622 9.6 84 Sevin /a III Sesin 9126 12.0 759 11.5 96 Pundungsari 4356 7.3 598 6.1 84 larangsari 6381 9.4 680 7.2 77 Egawen III Kaapung 6857 8.8 777 3.4 38 Jurangiero 4610 8.1 566 4.2 51 Tegalrejo 6556 10.0 654 6.3 62 tancep 4587 5.0 912 1.9 38 Ponjong III Uabulrejo 6886 13.9 497 9.0 65 Sawahan 4956 9.7 509 5.1 53 Taubakroso 4071 11.4 356 7.3 63 Kenteng 3278 9.1 359 6.6 72 Susbergiri 5993 12.1 496 6.5 54 Ponjong 5465 6.3 872 2.1 33 Bedoyo 3817 9.9 386 8.8 89 larangases 2670 7.9 337 6.0 75 Sidorejo 8667 13.2 659 4.5 34 Gonbang 2876 6.4 449 4.1 63 Patuk III Salam 2416 5.2 464 3.7 71 Sesoyo 2216 5.8 385 4.8 84 Penook 3023 4.6 659 2.2 48 Beji 2478 7.4 334 5.2 70 Bunder 2698 9.8 275 6.7 68 Putat 3112 7.2 434 4.2 59 Nglanggeran 2088 7.6 274 6.5 85 Ngoro-oro 3268 7.5 433 5 4 72 Terbah 2410 5.9 408 4.4 74 Serut 4782 8.6 557 7.6 88 Sanpang 3048 5.6 549 3.8 69 Nglegi 3172 10.0 317 8.3 83 Ngalang 6687 14.8 452 8.7 58 Patuk 2254 2.9 775 0.9 29 Playen III Igleri 3218 9.9 326 4.9 /b 50 /b Banyu Soco 6022 20.4 296 10.2 /b 50 /b Gading 6939 13.1 529 6.6 /b 50 /b par and Semin kecamatans bave been prioritized for the first year of operation. reation re upland area still awaited: as a first approximation, it has been assumed that each village ha6 upland area. - 42 - Sumuary of Upland Village Data aPie 3 Landform Population Land area Population Area >15 S Class Desa June 1989 km2 density slope (kW2) Upland II Giripanggung 6716 20.4 330 15.7 77 Sumberuungu 6840 18.3 374 13.3 73 Bargosari 5279 11.0 480 8.1 74 leairi 4669 11.3 415 7.6 68 Kemadang 5774 19.3 299 13.2 68 Banjarej o 5487 16.7 330 11.1 67 Nteatirejo 5102 13.5 379 9.2 68 Sidoharjo 6366 16.0 397 9.4 59 Tepus 8373 28.6 293 21.6 76 Puruodadi 7859 21.7 362 16.7 77 l1 larangduwet 6282 17.4 360 6.2 36 larangases 6533 12.7 515 6.3 49 hulusan 4405 7.8 565 3.0 39 Nonggol 4402 9.7 455 8.0 83 Giring 2916 10.1 288 7.0 69 Planjan 5736 12.5 460 9.9 80 Kanigoro 5523 24.9 222 21.4 86 Kepek 5523 9.8 563 8.1 82 Jetis 4485 8.9 506 7.8 88 Kraubilsavit 5081 14.8 344 12.7 86 .gloro 2781 7.3 380 6.0 82 11 GiriUati 2138 7.7 279 6.7 88 Giricabjo 4124 16.4 252 16.2 99 Giriasih 1637 8.4 194 7.8 93 Giritirto 3807 12.1 316 12.1 100 GiribarJo 3235 11.4 285 11.4 100 Giripurwo 8361 27.3 307 26.9 99 Glrivungu 2380 11.2 212 11.0 98 Girisoka 6031 25.8 233 24.8 96 Girikarto 3720 13.9 267 13.9 100 Girisekar 7029 21.2 332 20.5 97 II Pucanganom 3648 13.5 270 13.5 100 Petir 3922 10.6 370 10.5 99 Semugib 4679 11.5 408 11.3 99 laranguoni 3522 9.0 390 9.0 99 Helikan 3457 10.6 326 10.5 98 Pringosbo 3718 10.2 364 10.1 99 Botodayakan 4994 12.9 389 12.8 99 Bohol 1414 5.2 273 5.2 100 Rglindur 2443 7 2 341 7.2 100 Jerokvudel 1806 6.2 292 6.2 100 Pucung 3392 14.4 235 14.1 98 Songbanyu 3531 15.8 223 15.8 100 Tileng 4294 17.0 253 17.0 100 Karangawen 1777 6.3 282 6.3 100 Jepite 4226 16.7 253 16.7 100 Balong 3817 10.9 349 10.8 99 II Candirejo 7242 22.0 329 8.4 38 Dadapayu 7264 22.4 324 9.8 44 - 43 - Susmary of Upland Village Data Age 4 Landfore Population Land area Po ulation Area )15% S labupaten lecauatan Class Desa June 1989 kb2 Lesity slope (ku2) Upland lulon Progo Kalibauang /a III Ban aroyo 8588 16.8 511 14.9 89 Bani aarjo 7534 12.3 611 8.0 65 Ban asar 6066 11.4 531 8.2 72 Samigalub /a III Sidohadjo 5355 13.8 389 12.2 89 Gerbosari 5118 10.8 475 10.7 99 Ngargosari 4007 7.2 553 7.0 97 Pagerharjo 5184 11.4 454 11.4 100 PBanjarbsartt 53953 17465 5 leboahario 28 1 381 7: 1 0 Purvobarjo 4186 10 1 9.7 96 Jatinulo 7989 16.3 410 1 .6 96 Purvosari 5422 13.7 397 10.0 73 lokap III Hargorejo 9674 15.4 627 10.9 71 Bargonuijo 8639 15.2 568 7.3 48 Kail reio 6075 13.0 469 11.2 86 largotirto 8052 14.7 547 12.8 B7 largovilis 7126 15.5 461 15.1 98 Pengasib III Karangeari 9335 11.7 798 4.3 36 largosari 5227 5.3 979 1.5 27 Sidoaulyo 5477 14.9 367 11.4 76 ?elon III Kulur 3103 2.8 1108 0.8 30 Temon Wetan 1723 2.2 773 1.0 44 Dhotel IWWg1ri /b III Selopaaioro 11770 22.8 517 14.7 65 larangtengah 4191 2.9 1455 1.1 37 Girirejo 4051 3.2 1250 1.5 47 Wukiruari 12964 15.4 842 8.6 56 Pleret III Dawuran 4754 5.0 957 2.3 45 Segoro1oso 5375 4.9 1104 1.9 38 Wonole o 3652 4.5 804 2.8 62 PilyugaD III Sri bulyo 13374 14.6 919 4.3 29 Sri Bartani 10521 8.6 1226 3.3 39 /a lalibavang and Sasigalub lecamatans have been prioritised for the first year of operation. /b Iogiri lecamatan has been prioritized for the first year of operation. - 44 - ANNEX 2 INDONESIA YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (uBangun Desa II") Proiect-Assisted Training Activities Table 1: Detailed Cost Estimates (5 pages) Table 2: Summary Analysis of Participation (1 page) Table 3: Detailed Analysis of Participation (5 pages) train4.v1l YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (PAWSUN DESA 11) AVIe 2 22.3.90 Table 1 Detailed Cost Estimates Project-assisted Training Activities Page I Course No. of unit Source of Estiwated COMPONENT, Course type, (and Duration Particip- Definition Unit Physical Ruantity (No. Units) Total No. Unit Total Cost Participant Category) (days) ants/course Projections…---------------------------- ------------- Cost… (Annex 1) 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Courses Partpts. Rp000 Rp mill US$000 1. COMITY MODILISATION 1.1 Nicrowatershed Planning (KKLKID) 6 20 11 course per dusun) 6unung Kidul Dusun courses Table 10(b) 6 8 1Q 15 41 820 Kulon Progo 2 2 12 2 6 24 480 Bantul * * * 1 2 Q 1 1 14 280 Sleuan * * ' 1 2 3 69 Iver coursel 82 1640 2.400 196.8 109.6 1.1 Microutersbed Activity 6roup 2 10 (1 course fobilisation (Dusun cadre A per group) 1'sbed.Act.6p. leaders) 61lwng kidul lI'sked Act.6t. Table 9 2 8 12 30 115 167 1670 Kulon Progo ' ' ' ' 2 4 16 30 115 167 1670 9antul I 3 12 24 92 132 1320 Sleun 5 6 23 34 340 (per --- --- course! 500 50 400 200 111.4 1.1 Follow-up 'raininglextension visits 5 (5 visits 10 per year) 6unung Kidul Dusun Table lOc) 2 B 16 26 41 93 930 Kulon Progo p 2 4 16 18 24 64 64o Bantul * 1 3 12 13 14 43 430 (per Slesan * * * 1 3 3 7 70 dusun per --year) 207 207? 250 51.75 28.8 1.2 Project Planning I Managewnt (LICMDs) 6 20 Sununu Vidul Desa Table 6tal 10 14 35 31 90 900 KlulonProgo * 10 9 3 2 24 240 B0ntbl - * 4 5 5 1 15 150 Sluan n * 4 5 2 11 1;O (per - -- course) 1.2 Biokekping (KKILKD representatives) 6 10 140 1400 2.400 336 187.2 1umi Kidul Desa Table 6'a) 10 14 35 31 90 900 KIbl Progo 10 9 3 2 24 240 Det.l * 4 5 5 1 15 150 SICSMI ' 5 4 5 2 11 llQ per -- course) 140 1400 1.200 168 93.6 COM60 T I Sub-totals 1069 11510 953 530.7 trainl4.el SrYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELDPEIINT PROJECT (BAMSU DESA III hIEl 2 22.3.90 Table I DetaiJed Cost Estimates Project-Assisted Training Activities Pae 2 Course No. ot Unit Source of Estimated COMPlIENT. Course type, (and Duration Particip- Definition Unit Physical Quantity (INo. Unitsn Total No. Unit Total Cost Participant Category) (days) ants/course Projections ………C----- -------------- Crst ----------------- (Annex I' 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 I45 Corses Partpts. Dp00 Pp mill US40000 2. SLOPE STA8ILISATION TECHINICAL SERVICES 2.1 Microutersted Orientation Course tPLPs) 10 Variable 6unung Pidul PLP Table 11 2 6 0 10 15 n.a. 41 KUIon PropD* 2 2 12 2 6 P.a. 24 BaKtul ! 1 2 e I I n.a. 14 Slewn 1 2 n.a. 3 8: 5'0 41 T3.6 2.1 Nicromatershed Orientation, Refresher (PLP '3 days/yr Variable Sunung Kidul PLP Table 11 0 l, 26 41 v.a. UnIon Progo 4 16 18 4 rn4 Bastal - 12 it v.a. U: Seantu 3 3 n.a. 7 072 150 30.3 54.4 2.2 Micronatershed Orientation Course IPPLsl 10 Variable Sunung Kidul PpL Table 12 2 6 0 10 15 n.a. 41 Ktlon Propg 2 2 12 2 6 ,.a. 24 6antul * 1 2 Q I I n.a. 14 Sleman * 1 2 n.a. 02 5T 41 73.6 2.2 Microwatershed Orientation. RefresherlPPtLs 3 daysivr Variable ounwg KUdul PPL Table 12 8 16 26 41 v.a. 91 Kunon Progo * 4 16 18 24 n.a. 62 Batul * 2* 12 13 14 n.a. *2 Slemsn .I 1 3 v.a. 2.2 Nursery Manageent IfFLsI 10 Variable I 2 150 30.1 54.4 4 Kunag Kidul PPC Table 12 a 8 10 15 n.a. 41 0' BnIuo Proo * 4 12 2 6 n.a. 24 lt ntrl * * 3 9 1 1 r,.a. 14 Slen * 1 2 s.a. 82 500 01 73.6 2.2 Nurry Ummymmeet, Refresher IPPts) 2 days/Jr Variable 6me; tide) PPL Table 12 0 16 26 41 n.a. 91 Kulen Proip 4 16 10 24 n.a. 62 Intel * 3 12 13 14 n.a. 42 Slown * I 3 3 n a. 7 202 100 20.2 36.; 2.3 'ricroNatershed Orientation (Kabupaten UDST) 10 4 lune"e idul UDST stall 4 1 4 Kalon Progo 4 4 Dental 4 1 4 3 12 5Qo 6 10.8 2.4 Technology henu Display IPPUPs and PPSs) 5 Variable 6ununa Kidul PPUPs PPSs 2 6 0 6 2 n.a. 24 Kulnm Progo * 2 6 4 10 2 n.a. 24 Ibstal * 1 3 4 2 n.a. 10 Slean * 1 3 4 2 n.a. 10 68 250 17 30.5 2.4 Tecbnology Menu Display Management )PMPs) S Variable Sunung Kidul PiPs 2 2 1 n.a. 5 Kulon Progo 2 1 1 I n.a. S Bintul 2 1 1 P.a. 4 Slenm 2 1 I n.a. 4 18 250 4.5 8.1 2.4 Iecbnologn mm hDisplay Workshop IPPUPs. 3 40 'orkshop I I I 1 4 1fO 5OO 20 11.1 COWOIENT 2 Sub-totals 7 1110 2S1.3 426.3 train4.PkIt YO6YAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELDrlENT PROJECT IBAN6UN DESA 1) ANNEI 2 22.3 l90 Tablr I Detailed Cost Estimates Project-Assisted Training Activities Pa'3 Course No. of Unit Source of Estimaten COICONENT, Course type, (and Duration Particip- Definition Unit Physical guantity (ND. Units) Total No. Unit Total CDst Participant Category) (days) antsicourse Projections------------------------------- ---------- Cost ------------------ (Annei 1) 1990 1991 1992 1993 1594 IQ5 Courses Partots. Rp0o0 Pp ill USS000 3. RURAL ROADS AND BRIDGES 3.0 Village Road Sang Leadership (approx. 3 3 40 village leaders per desa) 6unung Pru Participants Table 6 30 42 105 93 7 270 12.5 3.4 1.9 KulI Prgo30 27 9 6 2 72 12.5 0.9 0.5 Bantul 12 15 15 3 1 45 12.5 0.6 0.3 Sleman * 12 15 6 1 33 12.5 0.4 0.2 3.0 Road Project lIplementatior (PU Ttl 7 40 11 4:' supervisory staff) 6unung Vidul Staff 20 7 7 7 1.0 41 210 9 4.8 Kulon Progo 16 4 3 0.7 26 210 5 3.0 Bantul * 16 3 4 3 Q.7 26 210 5 3.0 Sleean 16 3 3 4 0.7 26 210 3.0 I.0 119 25 13.* COMIPONENT 3 Sub-totals 13 539 30 16.8 5. COMMUNITY DEVELDPMENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT 5.1 Community Organising IKecatatan staff) 3 10 Kecamatan Table 3 6 6 6 6 26 260 600 16 8.7 (per course) 5.1 Commnity Organisina Refresher I 10 Kecamatan Table 3 6 B 6 6 26 260 '?2 5 2.9 (Kecamatan staf ) Istaggered) et course) 5.1 Community Organising (Key LKMD & KKLKMD 3 10 Dusun Table lOlal 5 10 30 15 22 82 820 600 49 27.4 staff Plus dusun cadrp)(targetted at (per caursel dusuns involved in 1 watershed devt.) 5.1 *Potensi ksa' Survey Methodology (Kabu- 2 15 Kabupaten 4 4 60 600 2 1.3 pates & W taat staff) (per course) 5.1 *Potensi Desa Survey Conduct (LKMD staff) 2 10 Desa (2 part- Table 6(a) 2B 33 45 34 140 280 400 56 31.2 icipants/desa) (per course) 5.1 Data Processing (Kabupaten and provincial 30 10 Course I 1 10 15.000 15 8.4 Staff) (per course) COIIPONEPT 5 Sub-totals 279 1690 143 79.9 ttael.Otl SYM1AK4B4 UPLAOD ARE4 DE9ELINE1T PRWEtT AUM DES4 1i) IIIE 2 22.3.90 Detailed Cost Estimatn Project-Assisted Training kctivitis Table I Course lio. Of unit Source of IstiXt COMPlIIt, Cwrs type, (and Duration Partico- Definition Wit Pbysical Oeantity (No. Units) Total No. Unit Total Cest Particiwnt Category (days) antsucoure Precttims ----------------- ------------- -------------- tost --------------- I4nne 1) 1990 1991 1992 1993 l191 195 Courses PartDts. RDO00 Re sill 05000 7. IIOVIIIIb. Mlil, COIN. t SUPPONI 7.2.3 ltchoical essintace Training swialist - lotal n.e. n.a. Persolmth 2 n.S. A.m. 8975 1S 10.0 Trainiog scialist - ItnIl n.A. a .n. Person/year 3 n.a. n.. 251'0 n 42.0 93 52.0 7.4.1 Creristi tovarh s n.a. r.a t_tet thc Unit I n.. w 3 500 4 1.S Catrctt Prject Training Officer /a Persoyear 1 I I I I n.a. n. a. 6000 330 167.1 Sb rt Staff Pern/year 1 2 2 2 2 n.a. n.a. 4S0 4 2.4 309 171.5 7.4.1 Irduua prtW D Ogsin lb n .. n.a. Dtailed Planing for first year /c t. , n.. D.a. 15440 15 9.c fficrouatershed Orlentation Corss /d Course 2 2 I f.a. n,. 5' 25 :;. Naul _agmt Courss * 2 n.a. n.a. 500 10 5.6 TKh m Display Coursa le * 2 n.a. n.e. 5000 10 5.6 Villae Sriou Leadership course *I Qo. n.. 5000 5 2.9 ee project lmpleetation Coarse * I n.a. n.a. 5000 5 2.8 PP Planing Nethodology course /f * 1 na. n.j. 5000 5 2.9 ProjKt hiagmnt Training Courses /g * 2 2 2 2 7 n.a. n.a. 5000 50 27.9 fcal t Cosres lb 2 2 2 2 2 n.a. n.a. 5000 50 27.9 1 4Na nt Iafo-eation Systee Course * I I n.a. n.. 5000 10 5.6 Coputew applications n 5000 5 i . 190 106.1 7.4.2 PIP P3imm Itooloe /f 6 20 Provincial, ts /ob i Participant 10 10 1 20 300 6 3.3 ae tines staff Ii * 5 5 0.5 10 300 3 i.7 aopaten, Ap.ofice j . 40 2 40 390 12 6.7 .. re t ey ihals stff /Jj 40 2 40 300 12 6.7 7.4.2 Pnjst lw_t trungu 13 20rOD Provincil, iin b /i* 20 20 20 20 4 E0 650 52 29.0 Key Dia staff ii 10 10 10 10 2 40 oso 26 14.5 S Kieptem, .wITEuIRh.Ofice It 40 40 40 40 a 160 650 104 57.9 lily finae staff /n 40 40 40 40 8 160 650 104 57.9 7.4.2 itber SP cal ose /h Veriable Variable minil, lWE /hbset li lan. 13) lav.10) ' 10 10 10 3 30 650 19.5 10.9 e limos staff i* 5 5 5 1.5 15 650 9.75 5.4 Kahpetam, WlflAJDee.office TI 20 20 20 6 60 650 39 21.7 y Dms staff l 20 20 20 6 60 650 39 21.7 7.4.3 l_t xttite Sytem 6 20 PVUint IC,DWPUAIh i 20 20 2 40 300 12 6.7 e lines *staff /i . 10 10 1 20 300 6 3 3 tabupaten, IWPIDA/epe.1ftce /j 40 40 4 s0 300 24 13.4 e Pleast atff i0 * 40 40 4 B0 300 24 13.4 7.t.3 C_ompte apllcutiom 30 Variale Previecial,lAPPIIAIhleeb Ii 10 10 n.a 20 500 10 5.6 *terylieesstaff li 5 5 n.c 10 500 5 2.8 Kabuate, lIlIhiA poffice lj * I 8 E 9 n.a 32 500 16 8.9 Kel Dima$ tafflI * 8 @ 8 n.e 32 500 16 8.9 UENlT 7 Sub-totals 55 1,029 1.132 630.0 Is Fmll-tiw private contract Train Specialist lb traisiag Prem desi to le vadertab by eristing govrnmnt trinirg istitutions, USls, and/or unaniersites. Nortking agreemnts/contracts muld be rneotiated and mitored by tbe contracted Projtct Training ftticer. Unit costs bonn are indicative only. tbey are based on an avere of 6 staff weks of profesional tin required to deign a tpical course. tourr to be provided by ANKSES ould use existing training materials, and/or be diseloed by technical assistne. IC proposed in tmn 7 of Feb. 1990 Appraisal lission Aide-Nesoire. Estimate includes 6 wets of lcal training consultant tiee. 6 ets of local staff time. 3 ratuw JktlTog airfare, and uterz.ls/puoblcations costs. 2d2 courses 11 initial and I refresher tfor PLPs, 2 course for Pns: and one course for (buopaten UDST staff (in Ml re bOe course for PfPUs d PPSs and I course for hs /f Training of provincial and tabuptttn staff from 8PPE.DA Sebmilds, and be dineses in annual and aediui-term Planning methodologies. Courses moid utilise materials md traini fro the USAID-supported Provincial Deelopmnt Program (PIP) projects /9 Variou short course, awrgg 2 unes in duration covering projtct financial mnaent. monitering and evaluation. staff suovision stills. evironmntel analyis, irnstitutional capity analysis, etc. Staff mould receive one such course tab year. Ib ISeialised courses ir scth subjects as fminnial n aaan t, eniroumntntl iact assessent, research methodoloes report writing, office anagmnt. English, etc. for relevat staff. kctual cours lengths ould vary. Iit R M txl ai and sebsi heads; ke APPEDA secretariate staff; key staff from bover n s Seretaro ate; hey staff fro DAES Tkl, Dines Pertanian Tk 1, hNiS, PD Tb! San ^IT. Ii ElfiN It viang sebsi eads key WPEDA sertariate staff key erupatis office staff: plus tny staff fro P.U. Tkil, IIDES 7611. SSUT, Siwrt t11. BIS A DPs. Staff 1n im It, plus ey staff fro releant agnie (aWoN. 101 trainM4.&, YO9TMKrf UPtLAD AREA DEVELIPEINT PROECT (BIU DESA 11) UINEI 2 22.3.90 Table I Detailed Cost Estinates Project-Assisted Training ktivities Page 5 Course No. of Unit Source of Estimated CPFINENT, Course type, (and Duration Particip- Definition Unit Physical huantity (No. Units) Total No. Unit Total Cost Participant Category) Idays) ants/course Projections…-------- Cost ------------------ fAnnex 1) 190 1991 192 193 1994 1995 Courses Partpts. Rp000 Rp sil 11US 000 9. EA DIELPFEU1 PLAIIN6 & SUPPORT 9.3 INen Rnource D"elopant Overheads n.a. n.a. Training Speciast (Locl) Person/month 6 n.. n.m. 8975 54 30.0 Administration Luspue I I I I I n.a. n.. 15000 75 41.8 129 71.8 9.3 Rgional Dvelomt and Planning 30 20 Persons 20 20 2 40 2250 90 50.1 9.3 Public Policy Evaluation an Planning 14 20 Persens 20 10 2 30 1050 32 17.5 9.3 Policy Studies on Poverty Alleviation 30 20 Persons 20 10 1.5 30 2250 68 37.6 9.3 City Planning and Urban Affairs 21 30 Persons 20 20 1.3 40 1575 63 35.1 9.3 Area Selection and Identification Systes 14 20 Persons 20 1 20 1050 21 11.7 9.3 Environmntal ProtKction and anagement 10 30 20 20 1.3 40 750 30 16.7 9.3 Project Design Ad Evaluation 14 30 Persons 20 10 1.5 30 1050 32 17.5 9.3 Project naemnt Systm 14 30 Persons 20 10 1.5 30 1050 32 17.5 9.3 NIS Training 14 20 Persons 20 20 2 40 1050 42 23.4 9.3 Administratio Planing ad OWrations 14 20 Persons 20 1 20 1050 21 11.7 9.3 Lan d e ad Z.img Variable 6 6 n.a. 6 5400 30 16.7 9.3 Decentraiistion Variable 6 6 n.a. b 5000 30 16.7 9.3 Staff Field Second ent too 1 2 2 4 4 3000 12 6.7 CHOII 9 htotals 19.2 336 630 350.9 6RID TOTAL, ALL CWO S : 1443 16214 3,138 2,034.6 Note: Total Participants iludes double- counted refreosr course participants train4.klI YO6TAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPltENT PROJECT IDANSUN DESA Ill A M XE 2 Table 2 Summary Analysis ot Participation in Project-assisted Training Village 4o. of Participants, by category linitial courses only) ------- ---------------------------------- TOTAL Lead agency and type leaders & Kabupaten Provincial National ------------------ of trainmng farmers BINAS SBRLKIT Key Dinas BAPPi/Bup Key BAPPEDAi BRMW0D N 17 Dinases 6ubsei NDWES IlK 11) Planning I flanage m t 1400 1400 Community development 6400 6400 Sub-total 7800 7800 68 B111DS (ITl) Comtunity Organising 1080 1080 Potensi Desa Surveys 280 60 ;40 Data processing a 2 10 Subtotal 1360 69 2 1430 12 PUBLIC MORNS T 11 Villae Road 6ang Leadership 420 420 Road Project loplewntation 119 119 Subtotal 420 119 539 5 APED TlK I Technical 250 85 9 344 Planning I Nlnageant 260 *260 65 130 715 HIS and Computer 112 112 30 60 314 Subtotal 250 85 381 372 9q 190 1313 12 Technical 106 106 Planning & Hanagemnt 190 190 H.I.S. iComputer 40 40 Subtotal 336 336 3 TOTAL 9580 250 85 569 372 97 190 336 11478 100 Total village leaders and firmers 9580 83 Agency staff, Kabupaten 1275 , Provincial 287 National 33 1 Total 198 17 train4.wnl YD6Y1KMRIA UPLAND REA KEVELOPtlENT PtRWECT (PANSIN DES4 III AII 2 2Z2..90 -able Detailed Analyi;s of Participation in Project-assisted Training Page 1 Uo. of participants, bG typeCof traailng No. of participants, by categorylnitiial cours- onlyl la. Po rticic rtsm by st COMMIT. Course type, /antd Technical Planning II. . S ot onIty Dest. Village Fabupaten agency staff Frovincill staff National respsmzbiJity, zniTia *Dur9t s only Participant Category) -- -----------I tlgt. Coeputer ------------------ leaders 1 - -------------- - ---------- Staff Initial Follow-up foxtial Follow-up (arseros PNS SBPLKT Key DlnasBAnPIBup. teyDmnasBhPlStbsek 19A152A1 BOW15S PU bOA Tki b34 1. COIUMITY 3DILIS4TION 1.1 Nicrowaterhed Planning (KKLfDl) 1640 1640 160 6unung tidul Solon Progo Bantul Slan 1.1 litrwatersW ktivity 6roup 5000 5000 obilisat ion IDusun cadre I IIsbed.kt.6p. leaders) Snung Kidul talon Prpgo amntul Slaun 11 Follow-up trainingittension visits 2070 6eung Kidul Xalon Propo bntul Sinn 1.2 PrOJKt Pluife I inaeem et tL..ADsI 1400 1400 1400 Gm" tidul lim Prop Banthl Slin 1.2 bootteepieg (111 represntatinesl 1400 1400 1400 l idol tulen Prope Sltun CCIV(llEIIT I Sub-totals 1.400 6.400 2,070 7,600 7,800 trail.l&1 YOGtYWRIA IPLAD PREA PEVELD'IET PAJEtl B16 DESA IlI E 2 22.3.90 Table S Detailed Analysis of Participation in Project-assisted Training Page 2 No. of participants, by type of training No. of participants, by categoryf initial courses only) Ih. Participit, by t gt. Cl TEUT, Courh type, (and Technical Planing 11.1.. Community Devt. Village Itaupatn agency staff Provincial staff Rational responsibility, initial co rs snl Partics t Category ------- --------- & gt. Co…pter ----------- leaders … ------- - Staff aInitial Follorop Initial FolIos-up farmers AlIAS SBPLKT fey DAnasPPPnup. KeyDinasW/ubet (IBAI BoomDES PU BtPP Tl NM 2. 9WPE STAIILISATION TECtICAL SERVICES 2.1 licroatersted rientation Course IBLPsl 82 82 82 8e1en Kidal ulon Progo 2.1 Wicrosat D rientation, Refresher IPLPs1 202 KStlo Prop festal Slwn 2.2 Nicraterds Orientatdi Course IPPL. 82 Q2 Ensn Diuel Soloe Prep Slin 2.2 Pdcrates Orientation. Rifrieshr(Pftsl 202 KIs. Prop * antul lital Slow 2.2 irsey =|t IPPls 82 32 SWl" Prep Slmm s1m 2.2 gw w smtq b1resbr 11111. 202 2.3 licratr Oriestatim (Dlsoaten UDST 12 3 9 12 Omen Kibi sbl Prop bob) 2.4 Tecbolop Nine lisplay PnP and PPSsI 68 18 he Colon Prep Slema 2.4 Technology Nos Display Ranagsemet (PNPs) 19 is 1 AnIon Prop 2.4 ecKkol Ne lsplay "lorshop IPPPs, 160 11T 2 SeW-totals 34 768 250 es 9 3so traia.lI tSiDAKARTA WIMID AREA DEELPIINI PROECT UmI OESA II) MM 2 22.3.0 tabil 3 utailed ulysis of Participation in Proijct-assisted TraIung Pan 3I No. of partitipants, by tip of training No. of partinppats, y tateorWyinitil cotrt only) lb Participants y at. C SIN. Courw type, land Technical Plmnnng RII.S. I Coamity Dent. Village Kabapaltn agent staff ProVnIal staff latiol rponsibility, 1s1ti8 cutose oaly Participnt Category --------- - gt. Coeapter ----------------- leaders &------ ----------- --------------- Stafl 3. M ROAS D s ES Initial Followup Initial Follot-up lfarers BIARS SIRUCT Key DinasBAPPup. XqvD1insllGubsek (soft) S$S PU IPP Tkl BP" 3.0 Village Rod Bag Leadership (appON. 3 420 420 420 villa" leaders per deua lulon Prays slemas 3.0 IbWd Projett laPlmtation IPU tll 119 119 119 sopersisory staff)I turn> Prop bntul 191110 3 Sob-totals 539 420 119 539 5. COURITY KDELOPlET TININGS RD SIRPIRT 5.1 Commity Orgaisiug (teaatan staffl 260 260 260 5.1 Co_mlty kpaesin Refrstther 260 11aatba statl) 5.1 Commenit; llrvisiag (Key 1 & *InK on 820 saf tP I" sm cdre)(tarntted at his inolmd in Heatershd dnt.) 5.1 - _-eAnd he. Survey Rothedology (rabo- 60 60 60 Pta I hKmtta stiff) 5.1 -tu,I he' Strvey Conduwt (LI staff) 2a0 290 290 5.1 hot prosia (Kabkpatue and provincial 10 3 2 10 COIlIIT 5 Sub-totals 10 1420 260 1100 68 260 2 1430 tra2 n4.m1 t"6YARARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPUENT PROJECT (BANAN DESA 11) AMEX 2 22.3.90 Detailed Analysis of Participation in Project-assisted Training Table 3 Page 4 No. cf participants, by type of training No. at participants. by cateqory(isitial courses only) Io. Participants by qt. CIUW T, Course type, land Technical Plannng I.I. S. Community Divt. Village Kabupaten agency staff Provincial staff National responsibility, inital courses only Par'icipant Category) ---------- I Pgt. Compster ---------- leaders ----- ------- - - - - Staff 7. PRDtVIlCKIAL PLANING.ill WORD. I suP r Initial Follow-up Initial Follow-up farmses BIMWS SBMRLT Kev DinassAPPLup. eytinasAPstWubsek IBDASDAI BatSDES PU BAPP Til ROM1005 7.2.3 Ttchnical assistancr Training specialist - local Training specialist - Int'l 7.4.1 Coordinoation verhelads Coo ter eurchase Contract Proect Training Officer /a Support Staff 7.4.1 Training Progras Design lb Detaileo Planning for first year /c ficromatershed Orientation Courses /d Nurserry Managewent Courses Technology Plenu Display Courses le Village Rad Sang Leadership course Road Project Implemntation Course PIP Planning Methodologs course /f Project lanagement Training Courses Ig Special COUTSeS lb Itanagtent Information System Courses Comnutyr applications 7.4.2 PUP Planning Methoodol y /f P'ovincial. BPPPED/Subseb 'I 20 20 20 Key Dinas staff Ii Io 10 10 Kabupaten, BAPPEDA/Bup.office 1/ 45 at Key Dinas staff iJ 40 40 40 7.4.2 Project tatagent Training / Provincial, BAPPED416ubseh It Bo 8 so Ke Dias staff ii 40 40 40 Kabopaten. DAPEDPup.office /k 160 160 160 Key Dinas staff 1k 160 160 160 7.4.2 Other Spcial Courses /h Provincial, DAPEDALPubsek Li 30 30 30 Key Dinas staff Ii is 15 15 thats, PAPPEDA/Sup.office /i 60 60 60 Key ulnas staff /1 60 60 60 J.4.3 1|mp t Infcrmation Systm tmtncial, BllPDR/Subsek II 40 40 40 Key Dmnas staff 1i 20 2^ 20 Kabd ten, BAPPEPAtB9p.office Ii 80 el so Key DOmas staff ;J DO so DO 7.4.3 Computer applications Provincial. BPPED4/ubset it 20 20 20 K snan staff II 10 10 1f Eabopaten. WPEDA/Dip.o1fice 1J 32 12 S2 Key Divas staff Ij 32 32 32 COWFIIET 7 Sib-totals 715 314 372 372 95 190 1029 Is Full-time private contract Training SpecilAist tb Training program desifn tD be undertaken by existing government training institutions. NOs. and/or ueiversities. boring agreetents/contracts mould be neoctiated an monitored hb the con rActed Project Training Officer. Unit costs show are indicative only. They are based on an average ot 6 staff wtes of profestional tine regUired to design a typical course. Courses to be p,ovided by BtlNDES would use existing training taterials. and/or be developed by technical assistance. /c As proposed in Annex 7 of Feb. 1990 Appraisal Missinr Aide-flNoire. Estimate includes 6 meks of local training consultant tise, 6 weeks of local staff time, 3 return Jtt/tog airfares, and eaterials'pubilicaticns costs. /d 2 courses I1 initial and I refres,er) for PLPs' 2 courses for PPLs; and one course for Fabupaten UDST staff (in PY31 le One course for PPUPs I PPSs and I course for hPs /f Training of provincial and abuPaten staff from DAPPEDA, Seimilda, and key dinases is annual and medium-tere planning mthodologies. Courses ould utilhse materials end trainers from the LIS4D-sopported Provincial Develveopnt Progras (PDP) projects /g Various short courses, aveaging 2 weeks in duration covering project fitancial manageent, monitoring and evaluation, staff supervision skills, environmental analysis, institutioPnl capalciy analysis, etc. Staff mould receive one such course each year. /h Specialised courses in such subjects as financial management, environmental impact assessment, research oetthodologies, report writing, office sanageent, English, etc. for relevant staff. Actual course lengths wuld vary. II PPDA Ttt Bidang and setsu heads; key 4APPEDA secretariate staff; hey staff from Governor's Secretariate; hey staff from PANDES Tkl, Einas Pertanian T 1, DIMAS. P.11. Tkl. and SDRLKT. Lj In each kabopaten: BAPPEDA Till Bidang and seksi heads key DAPPEDA secretariate staff; key staff from Pupati s office, plus tey staff from P.U. TklU, BMSPES Tkil, /t Staff as in ii. plus key staff from relevant aqencies iapproi. It) tralnl.0a1 VOSYAaRTA UPLAND aREA DEYELDPEt P CT BA lW DESA II) owl 22.3.90 Tabl-; D.etaled Analysis of Participaticn n Pro)ect-assisted Trainirm Pl5 5 No. of pearticpants, by type of training No. of particlyants. by categoryinitial courses nlyl lo. Participaits, by sgt. CtPNET. tou,se type, land Technical Plansan, 19.1. . Co umn ty -et. V-llala e atupbaten agency staff Provincial staff National respomsibility, initial course only Participant Categoryl -- ------- A nqt. Coipate ---------- leaders i ------------------ -------- - Staff - - - - - - - Initial FolIlo-up Initial follow-up larsers Bllt45 S8RLIT Key tanasiAPPVILiv. VevlDnasWlfSabseo f?AN0DA3 BA1MS Pt EWP Tki BA1 9. AREA DE9ELOPIEIIT PL41011tS I SUPPORI 9.3 Huun Resource DeveloPnent Overheads Traingn Specalist ILocall 9.3 Regional Develop ent and Planning 40 40 40 9.3 Phblic Policy Evaluation and Planning 30 30 30 9.3 Policy Studies on Poverty Alleviation 30 0 30 9.3 City Planning and Urban Affairs 40 9.3 Arna Selection and Identification Systems 20 20 20 9.3 Environwental Protection and hlanagesent 40 40 40 9.3 Project tesign and Evaluation '0 30 30 (4n 9.3 Project tanagnent Systems 30 30 30 ' 9.3 Nis Trs ie 40 40 40 9.3 3*ulstratin Plannming and Opewations 20 20 20 9.3 Land VW . Zoning 6 6 6 9.3 ODcentralistion 6 6 6 9.3 Staff Field Secondwnt 4 4 4 CtoET 9 Sub-totals 106 190 40 336 33 M411D TOTAL, ALL COPPDEPlTS 909 766 2305 364 7820 2330 9320 250 B5 569 632 97 190 336 9230 539 137 336 = == == =::= := = ====:== ==== =====================:=====…=====_===--===-==========n=======:222=822 =C____ ___ _ - 56 - ANNEX 3 Page 1 of 11 INDONESIA YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ("Banpun Desa II") Technical Assistance Introduction 1. Under the project, some 338 staff-months of technical assistance would be provided to support the more innovative and technically complex aspects of project implementation. Table 1 provides details of the proposed individual technical assistance inputs for each component. In sumnary, the following quantities of technical assistance are proposed for BANGDA, AARD, rnd Yogyakarta province, respectively (in staff-months): Internationally Locally Total recruited recruited BANGDA 29 48 77 AARD 20 - 20 Yogyakarta Province 101 140 241 Total 150 188 338 Terms of Reference 2. Terms of reference for the key advisors and specialists proposed are presented below. For easy reference, a code number has been assigned to each as follows, matching the component under which the technical assistance inputs have been costed: 5(a) Village Development Monitoring and Evaluation Advisor 6(a) Land Use and Water Management Advisor 6(b) Community Development Advisor 6(g) Outreach Technology Assistance 7(c) Planning/MIS Design Specialist 7(e) Area Development Advisor 7(1) Project Training Officer 8(a) Research Methodology Advisor 8(b) Upland AgronomistlSoil Conservation Planner - 57 - ANNEX 3 Page 2 of 11 5(a). Village Development Monitoring and Evaluation Advisor Role: Advisor to the provincial directorate of Rural Development (BANGDES Tk. I) for the establishment of a capacity to monitor and evaluate the village development activities in upland communities financed by the project. Reports to: Kepala BANGDES Tk. I. Main Duties: Over a period of 12 months, to: (a) assist BANGDES i-. the introduction, assessment, and refinement of an improved 'Potensi Desal methodology for village data collection; (b) review existing physical and financial reporting and monitoring systems for village projects; (c) assist in the development of a project-specific monitoring and evaluation system for village projects, dusun revolving funds, and village leadership training; and (d) advise and assist in the establishment of data processing capabilities within BANGDES Tk. I and Tk. II rnfices, including the procurement of appropriate equipment, arranging for the training of relevant staff, development of an interactive computerized database, and development within BANGDES Tk. I of a capability to interrogate this database and produce reports in response to the needs of project managers. Qualifications: (a) at least 10 years experience managing or supervising community development and/or rural and area development programs; (b) familiarity with Indonesian rural conditions and institutions at the provincial, kabupaten, and village levels; (c) demonstrated capability to work flexibly with spreadsheet and database computer applications; (d) background in social sciences, with experience in survey design, conduct, and analysis; and (e) preferably with working knowledge of Bahasa Indonesia. - 58 - ANNEX 3 Page 3 of 11 6(a). Land Use and Water Management Advisor Roles Senior technical adviser to the Upland Development Support Team Tk. I, based within Dinas Pertanian Tanaman Pangan, Sub-Din Perlindungan, Seksi Konservasi Air dan Tanah. The UDST is responsible for the planning, implementation and training of staff within the Microwatershed Stabilization sub-program. Reports to: Kepala Dinas Pertanian Tanaman Pangan. Main Duties: In a series of short visits of 4-6 weeks duration totalling 17 staff-months: (a) advise and assist the UDST to further develop strategies and methods of microwatershed stabilization, including the steps necessary to plan coordinated water runoff management measures and farm development, featuring more appropriate land use options, as well as the most appropriate method of implementation of these measures; (b) assist in the identification of selection criteria for the development of microwatersheds; (c) assist in the design and delivery of field-based training in microwatershed strategy and techniques for UDST members and extension field staff; (d) jointly with the Communi:y Development Adviser, assist in the training of UDST and extension field staff in day-to-day methods of interacting with microwatershed activity groups (of 5-10 farmers) and KKLIMD members participating in micro- watershed activities within the framework of dusun projects; and (e) participate in defining the technical aspects of the Upland Watershed Systems Action Research Program (through the Upland Watershed Research Working Group and relevant seminars) and the slope stabilization elements to be dem'.Lstrated in the On- farm Technology Display program. Qualifications: (a) at least 10 years experience working as an upland agriculturalist in rural and area development programs; (b) major experience in land t.se planning and soil conservation; (c) preferably with experience of microwatershed (3-10 ha) planning strategies; and (d) experience working with upland farmers and local comunity groups. - 59 - ANNEX 3 Page 4 of 11 6(b). Community Development Advisor Role: Adviser to the Upland Development Support Team Tk. I on Community Development issues relating to the Microwatershed Stabilization sub-program. This team is based within Dinas Pertanian Tanaman Pangan, Sub-Din Perlindungan, Seksi Konservasi Air dan Tanah. The UDST is responsible for the planning, implementation and training of staff within the Microwatershed Stabilization sub-program. Reports to: Kepala Dinas Pertanian Tanaman Pangan. Main Duties: In a series of short visits of 4-6 weeks duration totalling 7 staff-months: (a) advise and assist BANGDES in the design and conduct of community organizer training for the BANGDES cadre (at the dusun level), with particular reference to the Microwatershed Stabilization sub-program; (b) assist with identification of selection criteria for microwatershed development activities; (c) assist with the development of techniques enabling dusun communities in general, and microwatershed activity groups in particular, to participate fully in the development planning of microwatersheds at all stages; and (d) jointly with the Land Use and Water Management Adviser, take responsibility for the design and implementation of the training of the Upland Development Support Team, with particular regard for community development aspects. Qualifications: (a) background in applied anthropology or rural sociology, with at least five years experience working with small communities; (b) experience with community development activities in Indonesia; and (c) fluency in Bahasa Indonesia. - 60 - ANNEX 3 Page 5 of 11 6(g). Outreach Program Desisn Specialist Role: Advisor to the technical and extension services for the design and implementation of the On-farm Technology Display program. This technique is designed to allow farmers to see the range of available and innovative farming technology, as undertaken by other smallholder farmers. Reports to: Kepala Dinas Pertanian Tanaman Pangan. Main Dutiest During a series of 4-6 week visits totalling 7 staff-months, the Outreach Program Design Specialist would: (a) advise and assist in developing an appropriate methodology for the on-farm technology 'menu' displays including: technology selection procedure; farmer and site selection; display design; system of farmer visits, etc. (b) assist in the initial selection of technical interventions for display; Sc) assist in the development of the training needs of PPL, PPUP, and PPS staff involved in the technology displays; (d) assist in the design of the linkages between the Upland Watershed Action Research Program and technical and extension field staff. This would include assistance in the design of the proposed annual workshops involving research workers, technicians and extension workers; Ce) develop a monitoring and evaluation system for assessing the effect of individual items within technology displays; and *f) advise on the development of input supply mechanisms to suit the demand for individual interventions in technology displays. Qualifications: (a) a general tropical agriculturalist; (b) at least 10 years experience in smallholder extension methodologies, with particular emphasis on demonstration techniques; and (c) a knowledge of Indonesian agricultural research and extension agencies, and upland farming systems is essential. - 61 - ANNEX 3 Page 6 of 11 7(c). Planning/MIS Design SDecialist Role: To facilitate the conduct of Institutional Capacity Analysis (SAKK) workshops with all Tk. I and Tk. II agencies involved in implementation of the project in order to generate: a basic project Management Information System (input/output worksheets); data on key implementation capability constraints; and information regarding key staff training needs. Reports to: Chairman, BAPPEDA Tk. I. Main Duties: Over a period of two months, and working jointly with a lccally-recruited Planning/MIS Design Specialist: (a) review the SAKK methodology and workshop documentation generated during the Joint FAO/BAPPEDA project preparation in 1990, and the project logical framework; (b) review the project documentation, and prepare draft checklists of key activities to be undertaken by each of the Tk. I and Tk. II agencies during the project; (c) assist in the recruitment of a core team of workshop facilitators drawn from relevant Tk. I and Tk. II agencics, and their training/retraining in the SAKK methodology; (d) supervise the conduct of the necessary SAKK workshops by the core group of facilitators, ensuring consistency of approach and presentation of workshop outputs; and (e) review and summarize the workshop outputs in a written report and in the form of computerized spreadsheets forming the basis of a project MIS. Qualifications: (a) at least five years experience in participatory planning of rural and area development programs; (b) demonstrated skills and experience in use of logical framework analysis and computer spreadsheet applications; (c) thorou"h knowledge of Indonesian rural conditions and institutions at the provincial and kabupaten levels; and (d) preferably with working knowledge of Bahasa Indonesia. ANNEX 3 - 62 - Page 7 of 11 7(e). Area Development Advisor Role: Senior Advisor to BAPPEDA Tk. I and the Governor's Secretariat in the ongoing planning, coordination, monitoring, and evaluation of all project activities implemented within the province. Reports to: Chairman, BAPPEDA Tk. I. Main Duties: Over a period of two years, and working jointly with a locally-recruited Area Development Officer: (a) assist and advise BAPPEDA Tk. I and the Governor's Secretariat to undertake a wide range of project start-up activities, especially the recruitment of other advisers and specialists proposed for technical assistance to the project; (b) arrange for and assist in the introduction to the province and kabupaten of annual and medium-term planning methodoiogies developed under the Provincial Development Program (especially in Central Java), with special application to the detailed design of upland development programs; (c) assist and advise relevant provincial and kabupaten agencies in the development of a project Management Information System, based where possible on the use of existing reporting and monitoring systems, supplemented by input/output worksheets developed for each agency using the Institutional Capacity Analysis (SAKK) methodology developed by the Joint FAOIBAPPEDA Project Preparation Team; (d) advise and assist in the development of terms of reference and contract negotiation for, conduct of, and follow-up to, a management study of BAPPEDA Tk. I and the Governor's Secretariat; (e) assist in the preparation of project quarterly and annual reports and disbursement applications, and the conduct of Joint World Bank/BAPPEDA annual reviews of the project; and (f) assist in the preparation for, and conduct of, a comprehensive mid-term review of the project. Qualifications: (a) at least 10 years experience in managing or supervising rural development projects and programs, including significant involvement in the Indonesian Provincial Development Program; (b) fluency in Bahasa Indonesia; (c) demonstrated ability to work congenially and productively with Indonesian counterparts in a team context; - 63 - ANNEX 3 Page 8 of 11 (d) demonstrated skills in computer applications, especially spreadsheets: and (e) working knowledge of project monitoring, evaluation and/or Management Information Systems. - 64 - ANNEX 3 Page 9 of 11 7(1). Prolect Training Officer (Local) Role: Direct executive responsibility for the design, implementation/supervision and evaluation of all project-assisted training activities for Tk. I and Tk. II agency staff. Reports to: Secretary, BAPPEDA Tk. I. Main Duties: Over the five years of project implementation: (a) conduct initial and ongoing training needs assessments, and ensure that the project-assisted training program is responsive to the key needs identified; (b) identify appropriate institutions (such as government training agencies, non-government organizations, universities, institutes, etc.) for the design and delivery of project- assisted training; (c) assist BAPPEDA Tk. I in the negotiation of, and establishment of clear working agreements with, selected institutions for the design and delivery of project-assisted training activities; 'd) prepare detailed annual work programs, and progress and evaluation reports on the project training activities as required; Ce) assist in the planning and facilitation of policy, planning, evaluation, and other workshops as may be required for project implementation; and (f) assist as required in the delivery of project-assisted training programs. Qualifications: (a) at least five years experience in the design and delivery of staff training programs (both technical and management) in Indonesia, including at least two years participation in training aspects of the Inidonesian Provincial Development Program; (b) fluency in English as well as Bahasa Indonesia; (c) demonstrated competence in workshop facilitation and report writing; and (d) demonstrated initiative, and orientation toward practical, field-based, experiential training methodologies. - 65 - ANNEX 3 Page 10 of 11 8(a). Research Methodology Advisor Role: Advise and assist scientists from AARD's Centre for Soil Research, to establish appropriate on-farm research methodologies for the Upland Watershed Action Research sub-program. Reports to: The Director, Centre for Soil Research, Bogor. Main Duties: For three months at project initiation, define an overall research methodology for the Upland Watershed Action Research program to include: (a) identification of key social and technical parameters likely to be effected by the implementation of project activities and their monitoring at three "laboratory' field sites; (b) identification and selection of technical and social interventions likely to be of benefit to the ongoing Microwatershed Stabilization program; and (c) advise and assist in the detailed design of the PYl on-site work program, including specification of skilled and professional personnel requirements, on-site trial and testing layout and treatments, farmer-researcher relationships (including provision of inputs, incentives and compensation), data collection and processing methods, report preparation and other methods of result dissemination (including field days and demonstration etc.). Qualifications: (a) at least 10 years involvement in field-based tropical farming systems research, with a particular bias towards socio- cultural aspects and participant-observance methodologies; (b) at least five years experience in designing and overseeing applied agricultural research programs in developing countries; and (c) experience in tropical upland farming systems and slope stabilization methodologies would be a definite advantage. - 66 - ANNEX 3 Page 11 of 11 8(b). Upland Agronomist/Soil Conservation Planner Roles The senior advisor to the Upland Watershed Action Research sub-program to establish appropriate technical interventions for both physical and vegetative slope stabilization, as well as related crop improvement and diversification measures. Reports to: The Director, Centre for Soil Research, Bogor. Main Duties: During a series of 4-6 week visits, this upland specialist would: (a) at project initiation, together with the Research Methodology Adviser, assist with the development of the overall design of research methodologies for the Upland Watershed Action Research sub-program; (b) assist in the detailed design of the on-farm work program, particularly important for PY1; (c) provide insight and advice on the introduction of possible alternative technical improvements, with particular emphasis on vegetative soil stabilization techniques; (d) assist in the design of training programs for extension field staff involved in the Microwatershed stabilization sub- program; (e) assist with the development of the technology display program; and (f) assess the technical aspects of the proposed soil erosion re- survey to be undertaken by BPN, and advise on the introduction of a modified Inderosi erosion monitoring technique for use in the field research sites. Qualifications: (a) a postgraduate degree (preferably Ph.D), in soil conservation or related topic; (b) at least 10 years experience in tropical farming systems and soil conservation research; and (c) experienced in upland slope management, with particular emphasis on smallholder agriculture. INDONESIA YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (BANGUN DESA II) Proposed Specialist Services (Technical Assistance) (Staff-months) Component/specialist services Component ------Project-Year ------ --Total-- Cat.ll ----------------------------- No. 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Int'l Loc ------ 1. Comnunity Mobilization 2. Technical Support Services 3. Rural Roads and Bridges 4. Kabupaten Planning, Coord. and Support 5. Coumunity Devt. Training and Support (a) Village development monitoring and and evaluation advisor 5.3 4 6 10 PS PS 10 6. Upland Development Support Team (a) Land use and water management advisor 6.2 4 5 3 2 14 CB (b) Community development advisor (int'l) 6.2 2 2 1 1 6 CB (c) Community development specialist (local) 6.2 5 5 5 15 PS (d) Livestock/fodder specialist (int'l) 6.2 2 1 3 PS (e) Livestock/fodder specialist (local) 6.2 2 1 3 PS' (f) Tree crops/forestry specialist (int'l) 6.2 1 1 1 3 PS (g) Tree crops/forestry specialist (local) 6.2 1 1 1 3 PS (h) Rapid rural appraisal specialist (local) 6.2 6 6 6 2 20 PS (i) Outreach program design specialist (int'l) 6.2 3 2 1 6 CB 32 41 CB 26 - PS 6 41 7. Provincial Planning, Coordination and Support (a) Management consultants (local institute) 7.1 6 2 2 10 (b) Recruitment specialist (local) 7.2.3 2 2 (c) Planning/MIS design specialist (int'l) 7.2.3 2 2 (d) Planning/MIS design specialist (local) 7.2.3 2 2 (e) Area development advisor (int'l) 7.2.3 8 12 20 (f) Area development advisor (local) 7.2.3 9 12 7 28 (g) Training specialist (int'l) 7.2.3 3 3 (h) Training specialist (local) 7.2.3 2 2 (i) Mid-term/PR team (int'l) 7.2.3 5 5 10 (j) Mid-term/PR team (local) 7.2.3 3 3 6 mm (k) Project training officer (local) 7.4.1 6 12 12 12 12 54 . X x 35 104 CB 35 104 N PS - - Component ------Project-Year ------ --Total-- Cat.I1 No. 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 lnt'l Loc ------ Component/Specialist Services _____________________________ 8. Upland Watershed Systems Action-Research (a) Research methodology specialist (int'l) 8 2 1 3 CB (b) Upland agronodist/soil conserv. planner (int'l) 8 3 2 1 1 7 PS (c) Socioeconouist (int'l) 8 2 1 3 PS 13 - CB 3 - PS 10 - 9. Area Development Planning and Support (a) Institutional management specialist (local) 9.1 6 6 (b) Development administrative advisor (int'l) 9.1 4 4 (c) MIS specialist (int'l) 9.2 4 12 16 (d) MIS specialist (local) 9.2 12 6 18 (e) Computer/technical specialist (int'l) 9.2 2 2 (f) Audio-visual specialist (local) 9.2 1 1 1 3 (g) Training specialist (local) 9.3 4 2 6 (h) Recruitment and procurement advisor (local) 9.4 4 4 (i) Project evaluation specialist (local) 9.4 6 6 PS 22 43 CB 22 37 PS 6 Total S CB 86 141 227 76? PS 26 47 73 24Z Total, all components 112 188 300 100? Yogyakarta Province: 77 145 AIRDs 13 0 BSAGDA: 22 43 /1 CB-Capacity Building; PS-Project Support- PD-Policy Development 2 43 0 techass2 .vkl 02120191 - 69 - ANNEX 4 Page 1 of 5 INDONESIA YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ("Banpun Desa II') Technical Interventions for the Technology Menu Displays Introduction 1. Agricultural extension in the upland areas is based on the traditional T&V system. Each PPL (BIMAS field extension worker] is responsible for a particular area or WKPP, which may include varying proportions of sawah, tegalan and forest. In theory at least, each PPL has formed 16 groups of farmers within his WKPP, each of which he visits during the course of a two-week cycle and discusses the latest agricultural information and advice. In practice apparently, many groups exist in name only and, since there is no formalized upland program, there is seldom much of interest to upland farmers with mainly dryland tegalan. Uplavd Extension 2. Development programs in DIY have followed the standard national approach in persuading farmers to change current farming practice. The Regreening Program of RLKT and Bangun Desa I both employed demonstration plots [for Regreening of 10 ha, often much smaller for Bangun Desa I], on which recommended packages of interventions were demonstrated, and which farmers were expected to imitate. Farmers seldom adopt whole packages, prefering to take up only those elements of the package that suit their particular farming system and financial and labor resources. The demonstration of package technology in large demonstration plots would therefore appear to be too narrow an approach to reaching significant numbers of potential new adopters. 3. Senior BIMAS extension staff at both the provincial and national level admit that there i. no meaningful program of activities for the upland areas. As a resalt, an extension worker's activities may be confined largely to the sawah in his WKPP, with little or nothing programmed for the tegalan. Technology Displays 4. Unlike other upland development projects, YUADP has been designed on the assumption that increases in the numbers of extension staff available for project activities are unlikely to increase significantly during the project period. Any increases that do occur would be largely as -70 - ANNEX 4 Page 2 of 5 a result of redeployment of staff within a kabupaten, as a result of a perceived success of the project program. This reality has been confirmed by senior staff of both BIMAS and RLKT. In addition, project activities would be additional to existing programs, at least until project activities had proved to be of greater value. 5. Given a continuing shortage in the numbers of extension staff in upland areas, and their part-time availability only for project activities, a change in approach was needed to enable a significant proportion of the farming population to be reached with as yet unseen technical interventions. Technology displays have been proposed as an alternative to the traditional demonstration methodology. 6. A technology display attempts to provide farmers with a view of the range of technical interventions which misht be suitable or useful for adoption in that area. The display has been likened to a 'supermarket' or *buffet" where interested farmers can see for themselves how well suggested techniques fit the prevailing agro-economic circumstances. Since technology displays would be undertaken on average farmer land and would be farmer managed, visiting farmers would have the valuable opportunity of talking to the farmer manager himself, rather than to a government official. 7. As each upland village is phased into the project program, a technology display would commence in each village. Entries for technology display would be decided for each agro-ecological area, during the annual workshop between the Upland Watershed Systems Action Research Team at the Centre for Soil Research sub-station in Yogyakarta and the various technical and extension agencies. Entries for a particular area might, for example, concentrate on annual crop improvements, demonstrating an improved quick maturing groundnut variety; several of the improved soya bean varieties treated with seed dressing to control shootfly and using the integrated pest management technique involving pigeon pea for podborer control; and the mulching of soya bean and mung bean with rice straw. In addition, slope stabilization techniques could be demonstrated, perhaps the use of vetiver and Brachiaria decumbens [Signal grass] for bench terrace stabilization, together with possible livestock production improvements. Each potentially useful intervention would be compared with the farmer's normal practice, so that the comparison is both easily visible and assessable by visiting farmers. 8. It is proposed that PPUPs (Subject Matter Programmers] would take responsibility for day-to-day display activities, although coordinated by the PPSs [Subject Hatter Specialists] based at the kabupaten level. PPUPs are supporsed to spend about 30Z of their time engaged in research and development activities, but currently have only a small experimental program. The PPUP would select and discuss the possibilities of holding a technology display with farmers who satisfy the following criteria: - full-time farmers; - farming to an average standard only; - land readily visible and easily accessible by road; - willing to follow a demonstration program, with assistance and compensation from extension staff; and - willing and able to be available to talk to visiting farmers on pre-arranged demonstration visits. - 71- ANNEX4 Page 3 of 5 9. For each technology display (total 125 displays each year at full development), several display sites may be selected on the basis of individual farmer-cooperator's particular interests. For example, a farmer vith predominantly annual cropping interests might cooperate with food crop displays, while other farmers nearby, might be asked to cooperate with displaying livestock interventions. Each village display has been costed at Rp 150,000 per annum, to include materials and inputs. Each Kabupaten is provided with a 16-seater transport to bring farmers on pre-arranged visits. Responsibility for inter-agency coordination will devolve on the FKPP Tk. II (Forum for Agricultural Extension Coordination), and program execution would rest with the sub-Dinas Penyuluhan (Extension) in Dinas Pertanian. Technical Assistance 10. A flexible approach to the development of technology displays is essential, since the technique is untried in Indonesia. A pilot approach is necessary and build-up of the program follows that of other phased village activities and is deliberately slow in the early years of the project. Of critical importance will be the input of the Outreach Program Design Specialist, with proposed inputs amounting to 7 staff-months during PYI-3. The TOR for the Outreach Technologist are given in Annex 3. Possible Ihterventions 11. A wide range of technical interventions might be considered for inclusion in the 30 technology displays during the first year of project implementation. The following interventions might be included: Maize - Use of hybrid variety C-1 or CPl-l (352 advantage over Arjuna); - Placement of phosphatic fertilizer in the root zone at or before sowing; - Use of rice straw mulch for moisture conservation and shootfly control; and - Use of split nitrogen dressings. Upland Rice - Use of variety Sagi. tolerant to Pyricularia; - Use of quick maturing varieties (Sentani, Singkarak, 115 days; Gati and Ranau, 105 days); - Placement of phosphatic fertilizer in the root zone; and - Use of split nitrogen dressings. - 72 - ANNEX 4 Page 4 of 5 Groundnut - Use of quick maturing, better yielding varieties (Kelinci, 95 days compared to the standard Gajah at 115 days, with 252 yield advantage]; and - Increase application of phosphatic fertilizer and placement in the root zone at or before planting. Soya Bean and Other Grain Legumes - Mulching of soya with rice straw for moisture conservation; - Use of beanfly tolerant soya variety Galunggung; - Intercropping of soya with pigeon pea for integrated pest management of podborer; - Use of rapid maturing soya varieties (Tidar at 75 days compared with standard Wilis at 90 days]; - Use of very high yielding Tainung soya bean variety; - Use of higher levels of phosphatic fertilizer in the seedbed; - Use of carbofuran or thiodicarb seed dressing for beanfly control; - Use of pigeon ?ea variety Mega yielding over 1,000 kg/ha; - Mung beans tolerant to rust and leafspot; and - Use of cassava stems as climbing frame for velvet beans. Grass and Fodder Crops - Use of Signal grass (Brachiaria decumbens] on terrace risers; - Use of vetiver as soil stabilizer on terrace risers; - Use of fodder legumes on uncultivable slopes and risers, including centro (Centrosema] and siratro (Macroptilium]; - Alley cropping with Albizzia, Leucaena, Glyricidia etc.; and - Use of Dolochos and quick maturing cowpea as a third cycle of cropping. Perennial Crops - Manual fertilization of salak; - Production of dwarf, rapid maturing pepper; - Receatly introduced Indian varieties of cashew; - Possible introduction of macadamia nut; - Use of siwalan palm for sugar production; - Improved varieties of ginger and cardamon; - Zanzibar 12 clove variety; - High yielding cocoa hybrid from Kalimantan; - Development of tea above 1,000 m asl; and - High yielding P534 coffee variety. ANNEX 4 Page of 5 Cultivation Technique - Use of tied ridges on the contour for moisture conservation; and - Mulches of cut vetiver grass or MPTC for moisture conservation and soil conditioning. - 74 - ANNEX 5 Page 1 of 4 InDONESIA YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (Vangun Desa 11) Village and Xecamatan Proiects Background 1. The Village Development Program which is popularly known as 'INPRES Bantuan Desa" (or Inpres Desa), was initiated in FY1969/1970 with a Presidential Instruction for Village Development Support. The program is intended: (a) to educate and to motivate village communities to actively participate in the development of their own villages; (b) to stimulate contributions (financial) c_ the village community to the development of their own villages; and .c) to assist development activities initiated, prepared and implemented by the village community. 2. Implementation of this program has benefited village communities throughout the country by: i) constructing of village facilities, i.e. production, transportation, marketing and social facilities; ii) improving community skills and capabilities in planning, implementing and supervising development projects; iii) strengthening the 'gotong-royong" and self-reliance efforts in improving the community's welfare; and iv) stimulating the development of economic activities in the villages. 3. Although at this stage the program is being successfully implemented, typically draws contributions from the community at an average of more than 100Z of the subsidy, there are still poor villages with limited capability to contribute. In such villages, the scope of projects is usually limited. This is reflected in the implementation of the INPRES Desa in Kabupaten Gunung Kidul for FY1988/1989, where the community could - 75 - ANNEX 5 Page 2 of 4 only contribute less than 50Z of the subsidy. (Total government subsidy Rp 216 million, community contribution Rp 98 million, for 144 projects). Therefore, it is the intention of the project to allocate addition matching grants to the poor upland villages. Objectives 4. The objectives of the "village projects" activity in the Village Mobilization Subcomponent (Subcomponent 1.2) is to provide upland villages with additional matching grants to the existing Inpres Desa allocation, so that these villages could handle/implement bigger projects, thereby speeding up the developmenL of the villages. The project would cover all upland villages as defined in the project description. Project Implementation 5. Project Implementation will follow current guidelines (for any coming fiscal year) issued b'y the government for implementation of the Inpres Desa program (for example MHA letter No. 412.6/573 dated March 17, 1988 for FY1988/1989, which is acceptable to the Bank). 6. Preparation and Planning. With guidance from the Kabupaten (district) and Kecamatan (sub-district) levels on development policy, priority, and the selection criteria for the "village projects", LKMD will initiate and prepare project proposal. The proposal should include the justification of the project, the cost of the project, contribution of the community, the estimated benefits of the project, and estimated number of beneficiaries. This proposal should be included in the annual project proposal of the village for discussion and approval at the UDKP forum, and follows the us-.1 review process for all other projects (Rakorbang Tk. II, Rakorbang Tk. I and Nationpl Consultation - Chart 1). The Bank will receive the summary of the proposals and the final DIP approval. 7. Selection Criteria. To be eligible for loan financing, proposed village projects should meet the following criteria: (a) the project is for public utility or for group _ctivities, which is beneficial for the comn.mnity, and not solely for personal/individual/single family benefit; (b) the project will st4'.:ulatc economic activities of the community and will give economic benefit to the community; (c) the project will have a heneficial impact on the poverty target group; and (d) the project is technically feasible, and will have assured sustainability after the subsidy and proj'ct assistance have ceased. ANNEX 5 - 76 - Fage e of 4 The project will exclude the cultural, religious and unproductive investment such as the construction of village offices, monuments, mosques, etc. The scope of 'ligible village projects is listed in _he Appendix 1. 8. Funding and Funding Mechanism. The proposed village projects eligible for loan financing would be funded through a mix of different sources as follows: (a) Inpres Desa funds from the government; (b) community's self-help contribution, which would cover a minimum 20Z of the project cost less Inpres Desa funds; and (c) loan financing 80Z of the project cost less Inpres Desa funds. The allocation of funds for village projects would be subject to a ceiling of Rp 7 million for each village per year, but is not necessarily to be used for only one project per village per year. 9. In principle the funding mechanism for the Inpres Desa is direct from the BRI Branch of the Kabupaten to the Village Head's account, and it follows the MHA instruction No. 26/1984. But to actually release the funds, the following procedures should be followed: (a) after following the usual planning mechanism, the approved project should be submitted to the Bupati through Directorate BANGDES office at the Kabupaten (called DURP - Daftar Usulan Rencana Proyek - Project Planning Proposal); (b) the approved DURP would be signed by the Bupati and copied to the BRI branch arid would act as an authorization for the release of funds; (c) the BRI would then inform the Village Head that the funds for Inpres Desa are reaay and have been transferred to the Village Head's account; and (d) the Village Head would then withdraw the funds from BRI Dranch at the Kabupaten, or at BRI VIllage unit. 10. The release of funds from the loan proceeds would follow the joint decree of the Minister of Finance and MinisterlChairman of BAPPENAS No. 048/KMK.012/1989 for special account procedures, and also the procedures for the funding of Inpres Desa. Therefore, after the SPABP issued and signed by DG Budget, the signed DURP would be used to transfer the funds from BRI branch to the Village Head's account as it is with the Inpres Desa funds. The funds will be administered by Directorate BANGDES office at Kabupater using statement of expenditures (SOE) procedures (see Chart 2). - 77 - ANNEX 5 Page 4 of 4 11. Proiect Management. The Directorate BANGDES offices at the Kabupaten will be responsible for managing this subcomponent. They will initiate the planning process and the preparation of DURPs by providing training to Village Development Cadre (Kader Pembangunan Desa - KDP) and other village and LKMD officials. The BANGDES office will review and technically approve the proposal (DURP) before the signing by the Bupati. The BANGDES office will also be responsible for the supervision and monitoring of the implementation of the village projects. Beside the regular reporting system which should be followed for the Inpres Desa projects, semi-annual and annual reports should be prepared separately for the village projects by BANGDES office at Kabupaten and sent to the Project Coordinator at the provincial level, and copied to DG BANGDA, the overall project holder. Monitoring and Evaluation 12. In addition to the regular monitoring of the implementation of the village projects carried out by the BANGDES offices at the Kabupaten, the monitoring and evaluation of the village project, particularly on the impact and the benefit of the village project, is the responsibility of the Directorate BANGDES office at the Province. Simple and limited monitoring and evaluation will be conducted annually, and an indepth review will be carried out during the mid-term review. The basic data to be used for the monitoring and evaluation is the proposed potensi desa3 data to be collected for every village, which is being introduced and initiated by Directorate BANGDES. Kecamatan Proiecta 13. A Kecamatan project is a project which will benefit more than one village where the project will be implemented, for example a water supply project which will cover two or three villages. Planning and approval procedures for Kecsmatan projects will follow the planning mechanisms for the village projects. However, because there are no special funds allocated from GOI for the Kecamatan projects, the funding mechanism will follow the usual procedures for the foreign assisted project using special account. The selection criteria for the village projects will also be used for Kecamatan projects. Loan financing for Kecamatan projects would be 60Z of the total project cost, and 40Z will come from GOI budget (National- Provincial or Kabupaten). BANGDES offices at the Kabupaten would also be responsible for managing this sub-project. - 78 - ANNEX S Appendix 1 INDNESIA YOGYAKARTA UPLAND ARLA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (Banaun Des. 11 LIST OF ELIGIILE VILLAGE PROJECTS 1. Production Facilities (a) Village dams (b) Culverts (c) Irrigation canal and structures (d) Run-off control and soil conservation (e) Others 2. Communication Facilities (a) Village streets (b) Village bridges 5c) Rodd drainage sd) Others 3. Marketing Facilities (a) Village markets (b) Village kiosks 5C) Village warehouses sd) Others 4. Social Facilities Ca) Health and sanitation (b) Drinking water supply (c) Group land titling (d) Others 5. Other Economic Activities (a) Nurseries for food crops, tree crops, fodder crops and horticulture tb) Livestock and fisheries (c) Agricultural product processing (d) Home industries and small- cale industries (e) Skill training and literacy courses (f) Others - 79 - ATTACHMENT 1 YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVEOPMENT PROJK,i THE REGIONAL PLANING MECHANISM BAPPWA NATIONAL CONSUTATION 1 Organised by BAPPENAS a. to dI.m n reWw Ob.p popal I Partlcipsted by: km the Firnces based on the. On. f Home Affairs (I deve *p policy In the PELTA -MIm. of financ (10 cooadiiaHon and synchn 'Other Technical Mlnlt i wnh aer seorol prolet, to aVo F appedo 6fm th PAlnces aveflap and duplcatn, and __ fuhJnds owviability. b. To cgre on the prpoe proied to be Includ in the APBD 1. RAKORBANG TNI/PROV1NCE Organized by Governor / BappedoI 1 !To dic the ppopals from KabIupain Forpoted by: e =wmendation for AP3D U * Bupans and apped. 11 iQ Pin fr APBD I * Dias Oiciaos al the PruAnce 110 Proets pr for APON fund!nW . Bangd3 DO BanW des, and ft Noarel CI mlthn DpUYV BAPPENAS RAX(ORBO Tk.I1/KABUPATEN nhgnilsd by Bupcl/BeppW 11 To disus ihe pwpoa fm Kecaiaan Paricpated by: end puparo: . ;mob I0 PMWfIoir APBD 11 * Dnos Ofdcal at Kbae n III) Peed proped f APBD f undiw , appedc I and Dit. Songides 1ii Prje prope r APIN funding co___ _r_ hng TVPrv'nce. KECAMATAN UOKP METINO Organied by KIcamomtn Offic Parlktiped by: to dius I p= b nn the village - Yilge Heads and KMD Chioinren ond to agr anproea to be pro. Dinme OR;cl el Kcamolan posed atl-am4ng /Kupitn. Bappeta 11 and BaSngdo Offie ot Kobwpaten. MLAGE PLANNING MEETING OvWAit by U4W Organised by U(MD ~~With the guldemn fimm Kmacaman Olfial aWn> dwif ct upd e qa, * ' 1 '% * btKH1D mwtibet whll " an Wi 1 e to be prpod * ID mmbw alt Ke oamun U Dl hSng. - V,lOap Offia.. - 80 - ~~~~~~ATTACHMENT 2 | j *1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | i'litH 'I' ANNEX 6 Page 1 of 3 -81- INDONESIA YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT [BANGUN DESA II] Upland Watershed Action Research Program (as agreed with CSR at RSI, 16.2.901 A. PY 0 [1990-91]. Cost RD '000 1. Establishment of 3/4 man Core Team. Travel: 12 staff by Rp25.000 300 2. Establishment of Upland Watershed Research Steering Committee and Working Group at the provincial level (Condition for Negotiations] 3. Coordination with Provincial Agencies: obJectives, scope and scale of PYl activities and workprogramme. Travel: 4 staff to DIY, 2 visits 2.000 Per diem: 4 by 2 by 3 days 1,320 Misc. 680 4. Meet with local leaders at Dusun Nawangan 1, Selopamioro, Bantul, to discuss researcher/community cooperation. (costs in 2.] 5. Collection and analysis of benchmark RRA data, (basic socio-economic/physical data for Nawangan. Travel: to DIY, 4 by Rp250 1.000 in DIY, 6 by Rp5O 300 Per diem: 4 by 7 by Rp55 1,540 Local staff: 4 by 5 by Rp25 500 Misc: 200 6. Finalise policy plans for enlargement of AN14EX 6 -82- Page 2 of 3 existing DIY sub-station, or move to Wonocatur. Prepare detailed plans for civil works, obtain cost estimates for construction. 7. Prepare detailed TOR for PY1 Technical Assistance, identify individual consultants, prepare contracts to be ready for recruitment at project implementation. For activities 6 and 7. Travel: to Jakarta, 5 pers by 2days = 10 by Rp25,000 250 Per diem: 10 by Rp65,000 650 Miscellaneous: 100 8. Purchase of grass slips, selective planting of slope stabilisation grasses (esp. vetiver) at lst field research site,Nawangan,Selopamioro. Various: travel, purchases, per diem, 5,000 9. Prepare a more detailed workplan for 1991-92, TOTAL 13,840 B. PY 1 [1991-921. 1. Briefly review previous upland research activities in Indonesia. 2. Establish the senior staff Core Team in Yogyakarta. 3. Prepare contracts and tender documents for civil works construction at existing sub-station site [Jl. Mrlca Baru] or at Wonocatur, issue contract and oversee wor-s.. 4. Prepare temporary office accomodation at the Bangun Desa I TDC office at Wonocetur. 5. Arrange procurement documentation for purchase of vehicles and equipment. 6. Advertise and recruit supporting staff for Yogyakarta sub- station. 7. Finalise the Technical Assistance recruitment procedure (particularly for the Research Methodology Adviser and Upland Soil Conservation Plannner] for their early deployment to DIY. 8. Utilising TA above, prepare both short and long term field trial programme. 9. Organise national workshop on "Slope Stabilisation Technology" ANNEX 6 - 83 - Page 3 of 3 (July 1991?], at which the philisophy of the UWAR programme in DIY would be presented, and discussions held on the appropriateness of the proposed workprogramme [activity 8]. 10. At Field Site 1 [Nawangan 1, Selopamiorol and using the BPN series of 1:5,000 cadastral maps and 1:12,500 land use maps, prepare detailed topographic maps of the dusun area. 11. Undertake a detailed soil survey [at 1:1,000 or 1:5,0001 for the dusun Nawangan 1. 12. Complete selection process for remaining 2 dusun field laboratory sites; in Kulon Progo and northern Nglipar, and undertake topographic and soil survey. 13. Undertake Rapid Rural Appraisal of dusuns at the 3 Field sites, using local Technical Assistance (KEPAS ?]. 14. Using data collected during RRA in activity 13 above, adapt the Inderosi [Erosion index] technique for use on selected sites within the 3 laboratory areas. 15. Establish village nurseries early in 1991, so as to have material available [grasses, fodder trees, fruit and estate crop seedlings] for planting out in 1991/92 wet season. 16. Following approval by the Research Steering Committee at the provincial level, initiate both short and long term field trial programme, based on Workshop discussions in activity 9 above. 22 February 1990. - 84 - ANNEX 7 Table 1 INDONESIA YOGYAIhRTA UPLAND ARNA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (CBanaun Desa II) Selection Criteria for Village Roads and Bridge A road or bridge project should: (a) serve an existing rural community within the project area (i.e.. one of the upland villages); Cb) provide an all-weather surface, macadam, where presently there is none; (c) serve an area of predominantly small-scale farmers; (d) be the only suitable motorable route to the community; (e) be at least 2.0 km long unless part of a longer route or serve a community of 5,000 people; (f) be within cost estimates (construction and maintenance) which relate positively to estimated benefits; (g) not present any major technical difficulty; (h) not have any land ownership or right of way problems; Ci) not be the subject of any other proposed improvement; (j) be acceptable to the concerned parties and committees; (k) connect to an existing all-weather road; and (1) not endanger the environment. - 85 - ANNEX 7 Table 2 INDONESIA YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (BANGUN DESA II) Proposed Design Criteria for Village Roads 4.0 m Standard /a 3.0 m Standard /g Normal lb Severe /b Normal Severe Specification Unit Terrain Terrain Terrain Terrain Design speed km/hr 30-50 15-30 30-50 15-30 Single axle loading /c tons 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 Formation width m 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Surfaced width m 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 Shoulder width m 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 Macadam thickness A /d cm 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 Hacadam thickness B /d cm 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Asphalt thickness cm 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Camber macadam Z 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Camber asphalt Z 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Desirable min. radius m 30.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 Desirable max. gradient Z 12.0 18.0 12.0 18.0 Absolute max. gradient 1 15.0 20.0 15.0 20.0 Laybys no/km 1.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 Bridge width A /e m 6.0 6.0 - - Bridge width B /e m 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Culvert width /f m 5.0 *5.0 5.0 5.0 /a 4.0 m standard to be used only where road is to be upgraded to kabupaten road, or where traffic demands. /b Normal terrain defined as rolling topography with slopes up to 15 percent, severe terrain defined as hilly topography with slopes more than 15 percent. Ic Current public works standard. Ld Macadam th'!:kness for poor or natural subgrade soils 28.0 m, for good subgrade soils 23.0 cm. e National standard bridge width 6.0 m, recommended width 3.5 m. /f Distance between headwalls. I8 To be used on all roads funded under the project except as recorded in foofnote /a - 86- ANNEX 7 Tables 3-4 INDONESIA YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENIT PROJECT (BANGUN DESA II) Analysis of Work Plan Submissions Table 3. Costs By Year (Xp Pillion) Year of Program Total Kabupaten 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 Gudung Kidul 1.217 1.064 0.867 1.049 0.749 4.946 Kulon Progo 0.660 0.498 0.476 0.451 0.388 2.473 Bantul 0.679 0.508 0.492 0.434 0.360 2.473 Sleman 0.734 0.485 0.401 0.499 0.353 2.473 Total 3.290 2.555 2.236 2.433 1.850 12.365 3 26.6 20.6 18.1 19.7 15.0 100.0 Comments: (a) The total disbursement by each kabupaten is in accordance with the budget allocation. (b) The relatively heavy expenditure in the first year (26.62) reflects the purchase of most of the equipment in the first year. Table 4. Costs By Sub-Component (Rp Billion) Sub-Component Total Kabupaten Roads Bridges Haint. Bldgs Equip. Admin. Train. Gudu'g Kidul 2.404 1.048 0.371 0.040 0.576 0.495 0.012 4.946 Kulon Progo 1.481 0.389 0.105 0.031 0.216 0.245 0.006 2.473 Bantul 1.452 0.343 0.184 0.031 0.210 0.247 0.006 2.473 Sleman 1.208 0.699 0.185 Nil 0.127 0.248 0.006 2.473 Total 6.545 2.479 0.845 0.1Oz 1.129 1.235 0.030 12.365 -87- AUINEX 7 Tables 5-6 Table 5. Costs by Sub-Componeht (%) Sub-Component Total Xabupaten Roads Bridges Maint. Bldgm Equip. Admin. Train. Gunung Klidul 48.61 21.18 7.50 0.81 11.64 10.00 0.25 100.00 Kulon Progo 59.88 15.74 4.25 1.25 8.73 9.91 0.24 100.00 Bnattul 58.70 13.88 7.44 1.25 8.50 9.99 0.24 100.00 Sleman 48.84 28.26 7.48 Nil 5.15 10.03 0.24 100.00 Average 52.93 20.05 6.83 0.82 9.13 9.99 0.25 100.00 Comuentss (a) The disbursement by sub-component, being generally within the guidelines. (b) Kulon Progo and Bantul have a higher priority for roads and lower priority for bridges than the other two kabupatens. (C) The maintenance percentage for Kulon Progo at 4.25 is substan- tially less than for the others but still adequate for the necessary maintenance. (d) The equipment needs for Gunung Kidul is a reflection of the greater need for institutional building. Table 6. Length of Roads Proposed (km) Year of Program Total Kabupaten 1991192 1992193 1993194 1994195 1995196 Gudung Xidul 14.5 10.5 14.5 11.0 10.5 60.5 Kulon Progo 10.0 7.5 15.0 14.0 9.0 55.5 Bantul 4.0 3.1 3.5 4.0 3.5 18.1 Sleman 11.0 4.0 6.5 5.2 12.0 38.7 Total 39.5 25.1 39.5 34.2 34.5 172.8 - 88 - ANNEX 7 Tables 7-8 Table 7. Average Unit Cost of Road (Rp Yillion/km) Cost of Length Unit Cost Kabupaten Roads Proposed (Rp milliion/km) Gunung Kidul 2404.37 60.5 39.742 Kulon Progo 1480.80 55.5 26.681 Bantul 1451.49 18.1 80.193 Sleman 1207.67 38.7 31.206 Total 6544.33 172.8 37.872 Conments: (a) The high unit cost for Bantul reflects a very high propor- tion of earthworks, culverts, and retaining walls. (b) The unit cost for Kulon Progo appears to be low but earth- works are minimal and requires shorter lengths of asphalt than elsewhere. (c) The costs for all roads are estimates only at this stage and need to be adjusted after detailed design. Table 8. Number and Total Lengths (m) of Bridges Year of Program 1991/92 1992193 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 Kabupaten _ Total No.(m) No.(M) No.(a) No.(m) No.(m) (m) Gudung Kidul 2(26) 1(30) 1(11) 1(52) 1(15) 6(154) Kulon Progo 2(8) 2(36) 0(-) 1(4) 1(17) 6(65) Bantul 2(24) 2(13) 1(10) 0(-) 0(-) 5(47) Sleman 2(42) 1(20) 1(4) 1(30) 0(-) 5(47) Total 8(100) 6(99j 3(25) 3(86) 2(32) 22(362) - 89 - ANNEX 7 Table 9 Table 9. Analysis of Upland Villages Affected There are 140 identified upland villages within the 26 kecamatan. From the submitted work plans, which identify the villages affected. The results ares Kabupaten No. of Villages 2 Gunung Kidul 19 out of 90 - 21.12 Kulon Progo 12 out of 24 - 50.0Z Bantul 8 out of 15 - 53.32 Sleman 10 out of 11 m 90.92 Total 49 out of 140 - 35.02 Thus 352 of the upland villages can be said to derive some benefit from the roads and bridges component. 90 - ANNEX 7 Table 10 Table 10. Summary of Equipment Needs Each kabupaten has submitted lists of equipment required as part of the institution building sub-component. The individual lists are included with the five-ye:r work plan in Annexes 2-5 but a summary of both construction a&nd office equipment needs is: K A B U P e T E N Total I T E H Gunung Kulon (No.) Kidul Progo Bantul Sleman Road Roller 2 2 1 1 6 Dump Truck 3 1 - - 4 Tractor 1 - - - 1 Trailer 5 - - - 5 Water Tank 5 - - - 5 Jeep 1 1 1 1 4 Pick Up 4 1 1 1 7 Station Wagon 1 - - - 1 Motorcycle 13 2 4 3 22 Concrete Mixer 4 - 1 - 5 Concrete Vibrator - I - 1 Asphalt Sprayer 3 - - - 3 Plate Compactor 6 - 4 - 10 Handtools - - LS - LS Theodolite 3 - 1 - 4 Tape Measure - - - 6 6 Computer 1 1 1 1 4 Typewriter 2 - - 4 6 Stencil Machine - - - 1 1 Drawing Table 3 - - 2 5 Filing Cabinet 4 - - 2 6 Furniture 12 - - - 12 Camera - - - 1 1 Slide Projector 1 - - - 1 Cash Box 1 - - 1 2 Cost (Rp. Million) 576 216 210 127 1,129 I}tE- / K KCKO', 1$a tA:1k ;;4 rr1;:1 $ 0 4 flI 3SO.~O 1 aJ.V usI D 4 amli * InJa Usm ma do U3J.UW 33UWS MOUWAU MOSS OSM *~~~~~N am r nowx ""ISOM OYWUS (dfldO) i WW 1111111m WDAM ____ 3M~ jO * ~WUU II a L - , c "Dum"" I amwo , _ _ n , ~moo" g l L I l°"1 01 owfiIsxa| I I | ORGANIZATION OF THE KASUPATEN PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY ( OPUK ) HEAD OF DPUK OUWLOINO w.m.w._ruJ, u^ .ROADS . AT REGIONAL 1 . REGULATIONS PLANNING AND SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION . jLOINjS WATER SUPPLY TOWN PLANNING J EW | RtESIDIENTIAL. MAINTENANCE HOUSING REGIONAL PANNII WORKSHOP DESIGN AND INVENTORY J SUPPLIES SOURCE: MuSTER OF lOME AFFARS SISTRUCTION No. 14 of 0U6. OATED 20 OCTOBER ISIS 1@ 19j 94 ANNEX 8 S l! | U @ t | l| Table 1 91 ~~~~---------------~ ------- ---- - 21|!1la. 3 1s ---'-- - -- ---------- - -- ---- I : 9 : 0 z~~~~a .4~~~~~~r i~~; .. q S I JII iiC! 94 C4 ei~~~ INOONESIA YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPUENT PROJECT IBANGUN DESA [II PROJECT COST SUNNARY (Ip. Million) (US$ '0001 I Total ------------ -_- - ------------------------- I foreign 8B ss Local Foreign total Local Foreign Total Exchtngs Costs 1. CONIlUITY NOSILIZATION 1.1 WSEN NOSILIZATION CONMUNITY DEVELOPHENT - TRAINING 471.6 - 471.5 248.1 - 248.1 - 1 DUSUN PROJECTS 834.8 - 834.8 439.1 - 439.1 - 2 Sub-Total DUSUN NOBILIZATION 1.306.4 - 1.306.4 687.2 - 687.2 - 3 1.2 VILLAGE OBILIZATION INSTITUTIONAL COSTS 739.3 122.2 861.5 388.9 64.3 453.2 14 2 OUSUN REVOLVING FUNOS 980.0 - 980.0 515.5 - 515.5 - 3 VILLAGE PROJECTS 3.562.5 - 3,562. 5 1.874.0 - 1.874.0 - 10 VILLAGE LEADERSHIP TRAINING 480.0 - 480.0 252.5 - 252.5 - Sub-Total VILLAGE WNBILIlATION 5,761.8 122.2 5.884.0 3,030.9 64.3 3,095.2 2 16 Sb-Total COINUNITY NOSILIZATION 7.068.2 122.2 7,190.4 3.718.1 64.3 3.782.4 2 1S 2. SLOPE STABILIZATION TECHNICAL SERVICES 2.1 RUNOFF CONTROL 8 SOIL CONSERVATION/a 383.3 125.3 508.6 201.6 65.9 267.5 25 t 2.2 FIAC PLANNING S DIVERSIFICATION 510.1 124.8 635.0 268. 4 . 65. 7 334.0 20 2 2.3 PUJPATEN UPLAND DEVELOPHENT SUPPORT TEAM 140.0 48.6 188.5 73. 6 25.5 99.2 26 1 2.4 ONFARN TECHNOLOGY DISPLAYS 623.0 230.7 853.7 327.7 121.4 449.1 27 2 Sub-Total SLOPE STABILIZATION TECHNICAL SERVICES 1,656.4 529.4 2 185.8 871.3 278.5 1,149.8 24 6 3. RURAL ROADS AND BRIOGES 8.857.1 3.507.9 12, 365. 0 4. 659. 2 1, 845. 3 6.504. 5 28 33 4. KASUPATEN PLANNING. COORDINATION 8 SUPPORT SERVICES 4.1 BAPPEDA Tt IL STRENGTHENING 433.9 105.6 539.5 228.2 55.5 283.8 20 I 4.2 SEKNILOA TK 11 STRENGTHENING 286.5 20.6 307.1 150.7 10.8 161.5 7 1 4.3 RABUPATEN AGENCY STRENGTHENING EXTENSION CENTERS 155.2 18.8 174.0 81.6 9.9 91.S 11 0 STRENGTHENING OF KABUPATEN DINASES 71.3 166.3 237.5 37.5 87.5 124.9 70 1 FUNDS FOR UDKP PROJECTS 920.0 - 920.0 484.0 - 484.0 - 2 Sub-Total KABUPATEN AGENCY STRENGTHENING 1.146.5 185.; 1.331.5 603.1 97.3 700.4 14 4 Sb-Total KABUPATEN PLANNING, COORDINATION 8 SUPPORT SERVICES 1,866.8 311.2 2,178.0 982.0 163.7 1,145.7 14 6 5. CONNUNITY DEVELOPNENT. TRAINING S SUPPORT 5.1 HUANN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT 143.4 143.4 75.4 - 75.4 - 0 0 5.2 BATA BASE DEVELOPNENT 78. 1 31.3 109.5 41.1 16.5 57.6 29 0 5.3 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 106.0 220.9 326.9 55.8 116.2 172.0 68 1 _ .D X S*-Total COIJNITY KEVELOPMENT. TRAINING 8 SUPPORT 32t.S 252.2 579.7 172.3 132.7 305.0 44 2 6. UPtUr DEVEtOPNEUT SUPPOT T TEON 6.1 INSTITUTIONAL COSTS 108.9 23.1 132.0 57.3 12.2 69.4 18 0 6.2 fOREIGN .ECNNICAt ASSISTMNCE 504.7 667.5 1.172.1 265.5 351. 1 616.6 57 3 S,b-Totel UPtAND DEVELOP1ENT SUPPORT TEAO 613.6 690.6 1.304.1 322.8 363.3 686.0 53 3 7. PROVINCIAL PLANNING. COORDINATION A SUPPORT 7.1 ANAGNENT STUOY 116.1 - 116.1 61.0 - 61.0 - 0 7.2 BAPPEOA TK I STRENGTHENING INSTITUTIONAL COSTS 304.6 94.0 398.6 160.2 49.4 209.7 24 1 OISCRETIONARY FUNDS 1.000.0 - 1,000.0 526.0 - 526.0 - 3 TECNNICAL ASSISTANCE 254.6 1.186.4 1.441.0 133.9 624.1 758.0 82 4 Sub-Total BAPPEDA TN I STRENGTHENING 1.559.2 1.280.4 2,839.6 820.2 673.6 1.493.7 45 a 7.3 SETNILDA STRENGTHENING 178.7 43.0 221.7 94.0 22.6 116.6 19 1 7.4 HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION 250.8 4.1 254.8 131.9 2.1 134.0 2 1 UMAGEMENT TRAINING 426.3 - 426.3 224.2 - 224.2 - I CONPUTER TRAINING so.0 - 80.0 42.1 - 42.1 - 0 Sub-total WUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT 757.0 4.1 761.1 398.2 2.1 400.3 1 2 7 .5 LAND USE PLANNING 8 TITLING MAPPING 8 EROSION SURVEY 144.6 - 144.6 76.1 - 76.1 - 0 SYSTEMATIC TITLING 335.2 73.6 408.8 176.3 38.7 215.1 18 I cn Sub-Total LAND USE PLANNING 8 TITLING 479.8 73.6 553.5 252.4 38.7 291.1 13 1 7.6 PROVINCIAL AGENCY STRENGTHENING KANNIL PERTANIAN 19.5 - 19.5 10.3 - t103 - 0 TK I DINAS 97.5 - 97.5 51.3 - 51.3 - 0 SBRLKT 19.5 - 19.5 10.3 - 10.3 - 0 Sub-Total PROVINCIAL AGENCY STRENGTHENING 136.5 - 136.5 71.8 - 71.8 - 0 Su.b-Total PROVINCIAL PLANNING. COORDINATION 3 SUPPORT 3.227.3 1.401. 1 4.628.3 1. 697.7 737.0 2.434.7 30 12 8. UPLAND NATERSHED SYSTEN ACTION RESEARCH IAARO) 4.274.5 568.3 4,842.8 2.248.6 298.9 2.547.5 12 13 9. AREA OEVELOPMENT PLANNING SUPPORT 9.1 MANAGEMENT STRENGtHENING 236.7 128.1 364.9 124.5 67.4 191.9 35 1 9.2MANAGMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS 213.3 535.6 748.9 112.2 281.8 394.0 72 2 9.3HUNAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT 585.2 44.7 629.9 307.8 23.5 331.3 7 2 9.4OPERATIONS 295 8 72. 6 368.4 15i.6 38.2 193. 8 20 1 Sub-Total AREA DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SUPPORT 1.330.9 781.0 2. 112.0 700. I 410.9 1. 111.0 37 6 Total BASELINE COSTS 29. 222.3 8. 163.9 37.386.2 15. 372. t 4,294.5 19. 666. 6 22 100 Physical Contingencies 2.814.0 641.3 3.455.4 1.480.3 337.4 1. 817. 5 19 9 Price Contingencies 5. 708.9 1. 120. 1 6, 829.0 3.003. 1 589.2 3,592.3 16 18 __________ ----- _--_--- -------- ------- -------- --------- ------- (D F Total PROJECT COSTS 37.745.2 9.925.3 47.670.5 19.855.4 5,221.1 25.076.5 21 128 tJ X La In project description: Microwatershed Stabilization. rBWA WM 1u A UEWWN MECT I(NM KSA 11) Proit Cinunts bu Year Totlh lnludirc Continggroies TotaIt Illud,re Coinhovwra lRP. fillimn) (S1 '1000 199 1 1992 1993 1 1995 1n9 Total 19 199 1992 9 1 19 Tota -_= P = ,,,-_--,,_ __ 1. IRUUlTy NOSLILATIUN 1.1 NM IUIIZATIIIN nIlTT VEWPNENT - RMLINS - 17.2 40.3 134.4 126.2 316.9 635.0 - 9.0 21.2 70.7 6.4 166.7 334.0 MOM PRJECTS - 14.7 37.3 110.0 179.0 654.7 94.6 - 7.7 19.6 57.9 93.6 344.4 M.2 Su*b-Total MlMMOBILIZATION - 31.9 77.6 244.4 304.2 971.6 1,629.) - 16.8 40.8 129.5 160.0 511.1 957.3 1.2 VILtUE MILIZATIO I6TITUtlif COSTS - 150.3 316.0 257.5 23;.3 139.0 1,101.0 - 79.1 166.2 135.5 125.4 73.1 579.2 IUSUM W VLYJNS FMS - 233.5 275.2 375.3 293.6 - 1t167.7 - 122.8 144.8 197.4 149.2 - 614.2 VILULASPOCTS - 250.2 545.1 947.2 1,251.1 19251.1 4,244.6 - 131.6 286.7 mB.3 659.1 659.1 2,232.9 UIUlAGE LEAlRHP TRAINING - 96.6 142.0 205.3 164.4 - 59.4 - 45.6 71.7 109.0 86.5 - 311.8 Sub-Total VIlLLAG NILtiNTIUN - 720.7 1t218.3 1t785.4 1937.3 I,390.0 7,111.7 - 379.1 6f2.1 939.2 19019.1 731.2 3,7C1.0 Sub-Tot3l COWINITY NGILIZATION 752.5 2.356.0 2,029.7 24241.6 2,361.6 8.711.4 - 395.8 713.3 1,067.7 1,179.1 121'.3 4.53.93 2. StNE STABILIZATION TECHICALI SERMIMS 2.1 RUOFF CONATROI I SOII CUSYTIIN - 38.7 70.9 187.9 160.5 222.1 679.9 - 20.4 37.:' 39.6 24.5 116.1 37?. 2.2 FZ PLIING S DIVERSIFICATIO - 49.9 95.4 229.2 19.l 271.1 9c4.8 - 26.3 50.7 170.6 104.6 147.& 444.4 2 - 3 iWATEN WM IEWEIM SpM9T EANI - 3.4 9.6 140.? 45.8 50.1 249.0 - 1.8 5.0 73.7 ?4.1 1.4 1iI.0 2.4 IFI TEO6OGy DISAyS - 88.6 278.2 240.0 225.9 233.0 1t115.7 - 46.6 116.3 126.3 115.7 17'.6 596.9 SubTotal SIWE STUILIZATIN TECDICAL SERICES - 180.6 453. 797.2 681.4 776.3 28W.5 - 95.0 238.8 419.4 358.5 408.4 1520.0 3. RMSt RooS me IRIDES - 4.096.2 3,343.0 3091.7 3,552.8 2r..1.7 16,935.4 - 27154.9 1,759.5 1,626.4 1868.9 1.50.1 9909.7 4- LKAnIE PIMIIs. ocnOInno I SUmI SEwimES 4.1 WPM1X it 51TIENZINS - 104.2 264.6 99.0 104.2 110.5 6W2.6 - 54.3 139.2 52.1 54.8 58.1 359.1 4.2 iNO nK 11 STlENEIIl - 59.6 109.0 70.6 73.5 77.9 309.6 - 1.9 57.4 37.1 38.6 11.0 204.9 4.3 WWMO AIMC STIENIINB EXEIT51 CEINTERS - - 112.7 119.1 - - 231.7 - - 59.3 62.6 - - t21.9 SIEJIBTINIINIF a KWAlTEN D1SES - 16.8 38.0 68.6 94.1 97.7 315.2 - 8.8 20.0 36.1 49.5 51.1 265.8 FtOS FOR lili PUiOTS - 71.5 143.0 262.1 309.8 309.8 1,096.2 - 37.6 75.2 137.9 163.0 163.0 576.6 Sub-Total WWALTEII DICT STRENGTHENINI - 88.3 2S3.6 449.8 403.9 407.5 1 643.1 - 46.4 154.5 236.6 212.4 ?14.4 864.3 Sub-Total KAWATEN PLMINt aIDDINATION I SUPPORT SERVICES - 251.1 667.3 619.3 581.6 595.9 2 715.2 - 132.1 351.0 325.8 305.9 313.5 1429.3 It f 5. CINITY WENT, TRAINING I SIIRT x D _ _ _ _ _ _~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _____ tD~ 5.1 HMI RESI DUEWGPT 39.7 30.1 52.2 36.8 20.5 In.3 - 20.S 15.8 27.5 19.4 10.8 94.3 > 5.2 1TAlAI DNEEIJT - 64.5 19.9 16.5 17.6 15.6 137.2 - 33.S 10.5 8.7 9.2 9.8 72.2 o w c 5.3 TECOCAL ASSISTIU - 121.1 17.7 203.9 19.9 21.1 383.9 - 63.7 9.3 107.3 10.5 11.1 201.9 t..4..i r I - 2m.4 67.8 M2.7 74.3 60.3 700.4 - 118.5 35.7 143.4 39.1 31.7 36.4 6. UFLU UEilWT hPPI TIM 6.1 INSTITUTIINK COSTS - 73.1 15.6 29.5 31.2 12.6 162.3 - 38.5 8.3 15.5 16.' S.7 85.4 6.2 FIMEIIRN1 T CIg ASSISTICE - 295.7 438.2 351.8 204.9 25.6 1,366.2 - 155.6 256.8 185.1 107.8 13.4 718.7 Sub-Total UID IlELEIIT StiEURT TEAM - 368. 504.1 381.3 236.2 39.2 1,528.5 - 194.0 265.2 200.6 124.2 20.1 804.1 7. PRWIIICl nAmING, CMIN3TIu : SU1PRT 7.1 TUflENT Sll - 76.2 31.7 27.9 - - 135.7 - 40.1 16.7 14.7 - - 71.4 7.2 7AW M TX I STNENTIEIING INSTIIITIIUII CO S - 156.0 12,4 73.9 72.0 76.4 503.7 - 32.0 66.0 38.9 37.9 40.2 265.0 DISCRETIINMT FIIDS - 239.3 239.3 238.3 238.3 238.3 1,191.5 - 125.4 125.4 125.4 12i.4 125.4 626.1 TEOIICII ASSISTIIC! - 551*3 727.3 30.2 3.2 267.5 1,629*6 - m.0 3W2.6 42.2 1.7 140.7 857.2 S ltal WPE6A 1 I STREn11ENINB - 945.6 11Mfll0 3e4 313.6 532*? 39324*7 - 4n7.4 573.? 20644 164.9 306.3 1,748.9 7 .3 SETILEDA STRlREII s - 27.9 110.9 46.4 49.2 52.2 236,5 - 11.7 50.3 24.1 25.9 27.4 150.7 7.4 Nm RESUIECE EWLIFT CINATIPh1ON 16*2 92*2 62*9 47.6 50.5 46.4 315.8 8.5 48.5 33.1 25.1 26.6 24.' 166.1 6ENAIEENT TRAINING - 5.1 119.6 135.9 144.1 152.7 557.3 - 2.7 62.9 71.5 75.8 80.3 M.2 CNU'TER TRAININ - - 58.0 19.6 10.7 11.4 99.8 - - 30.5 10.3 5.7 6.0 52.5 Sub-Totol MIM hECE FELWIFIENT 16.2 97.2 240.4 203.2 205.3 210.5 97V.9 3.5 51.1 126.5 106.9 106.0 110.7 511.9 7.5 LAND USE PLMUINI 3 TITLING HPAING I EROSIOE SIWY 2.0 171.2 1.9 1.? 1.8 1.7 lIP.2 2.0 90.1 0.9 0.9 1.6 6.9 9". SYSTEIIATIC TITLING - 90.9 153.5 95.2 100.9 107.0 547.4 - 17.8 80.7 W.1 53.1 U.3 MU.0 Sub-Total LAND USE PLMING I TITLING 2.0 262.2 155.2 96.9 102.7 108.6 m.7 1.0 137.9 81.7 51.0 54.0 57.1 t?.0 7.6 PROVINCiAL AECr STUENGTIEN1T1 KAUlL PERTANIAN - 4.4 4.7 4.9 5.2 5.6 24.9 - 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.1 2.9 13.0 TR I DINAS - 22.0 23.3 24.7 26.2 27.8 124.0 - 11.6 12.3 13.0 11.8 11.6 65.2 SNllKT - 4.4 4.7 4.9 5.2 5,6 24.8 - 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.8 2.9 13.0 SubTotal PROIAI L AM STR ING - 30.8 32.6 34.6 36.7 30.9 173.6 - 16. 17.? 1tP.? 19.3 20.. 91.3 SdtTotal TUNTCIA KNIRIIING, COORINATION ISUPPORT 18.1 1 .8 2,661.? 301.4 707.5 Mt.4 5621.1 9.5 757.4 171.: ':1.6 V7.? V?.0 2.9%.9 8. w A ATESIE SYSTFn ArTIII RESEARCR (MD) 14.5 9.t1 1,610.9 1201.9 14194.1 1212.2 6/05t.81 7.6 110.9 347.3 612.1 603.1 637.6 3,114.0 9. MA EtWlFIINT PLAIING II9T 9.]. IMh6AEMENT STRENYTWNING 4.1 128.5 225.5 38.0 l13 14.2 423.8 2.1 67.6 118.6 20.0 7.1 7.5 M.9 9.2 1ElT IJwrImNIuO SYSTEMS 33.3 151.7 546.2 35.5 13.4 14.2 834.3 17.5 79.0 297.3 45.0 7.1 7.5 444.1 9.3 NIM RESIRBCE [EWLIFINT - 181.0 329.6 205.3 20.1 21.4 756.4 - 95.2 172.8 10D.0 10.6 11.2 397.9 9.4 WI T1uS 6.8 190.2 43.7 4.0 29. 1 07.3 461.7 3.6 100.0 23.0 44.? 15.4 56.7 242.? SATotaI ARA DE8LLOPIElNT PLMINNG 9991T 14.2 65t.3 1,143.9 412.8 76.4 157.6 SAl 23.3 342.6 601.7 217.2 40.2 32.9 1,387.3 Total PROJECT COSTS 76.8 8784.9 10,806.6 9,69.1 9,26.0 9,046.1 47,670.5 40.4 4621.2 5635.7 5,054.2 4,96.4 ,758.6 259076.5 x Feiutys 13. 1991 12:33 INOONESIA YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPhENT PROJECT (BANGUN OESA III SUNNARY ACCOUNTS COST SUMARY IRp. Million) 1US$ 000 I Total __ ___ __ ___ _-- ----_-------------------- S Foreign Be$ local Foreign Total Local foreign Total Exchange Costs 1. INVESINENT COSTS A. FURTHER PREPARAT ON COStS 80.2 - 80.2 42.2 - 42.2 - 0 8 CIVIL WORKS 8ui ldings 387.5 43.1 430.5 203.8 22.6 226.5 10 1 Roads and bridges 6. 316.5 2. 707. 1 9.023.5 3.322.7 1.424.0 4. 746. 7 30 24 Sub-Total CIVIL WORKS 6.703.9 2,750.1 9.454.0 3.526.5 1.446.7 4.973.2 29 25 C. VEHICLES 4x4 wheel-drive 153.9 359. 1 513.0 81.0 188.9 269.9 tO 1 motorcycles 251. 1 586.0 837. 1 132. 1 308.2 440.3 70 2 Pick-up Truck t2.0 28.0 40.0 6.3 14.7 21.0 70 0 Nini-bus 31.2 72.8 104.0 16.4 38.3 54.7 70 0 Sub-Total VEHICLES 448.2 1.045.9 1.494.1 235.8 550.2 786.0 70 4 q0 0. EQUIPMENT AND fURNITURE field equipment 388.4 906.2 1.294.6 204.3 476.7 681.0 70 3 Office equipment 111.9 111.9 223.8 58.9 58.9 117.7 SO 1 tab equipment 164.0 164.0 327.9 86.2 86.2 172.5 50 1 Office furniture 67.8 17.0 84.8 35.7 8.9 44.6 20 0 Information technology 15.1 135.9 151.0 7.9 71.5 79.4 sO 0 Sub-Tot*l EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE 747.2 1,334.9 2,082.1 393.0 702.2 1,095.3 64 6 E. LANO TITLING ANO SURVEYS 328.6 - 328.6 172.9 - 172.9 - 1 F. IECHNICAt ASSISTANCE 1. Specialist Services Foreign consultants 621.2 3,033.0 3.654.2 326.8 1,59B.5 1.922.3 83 10 Local consultants 552.8 - 552.8 290.8 - 290.8 - I Sub-Total Specialist Services 1.174.0 3.033.0 4.207.0 617.6 1,595.5 2,213.0 72 if 2. Studies 288.0 - 288.0 151.5 - 151.5 - I Sub-Total TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 1.462.0 3,033.0 4.495.0 769.1 1,595.5 2,364.5 67 12 G. PROJECT-SUPPORTED COURSES Courses for village leaders 1.452.6 - 1,452.6 764.1 - 764.1 - 4 t a) Training for project staff tl88 - 1.18. G09. - 0. ' Workshops 376.0 - 376.0 197.8 - 197.8 - 1 9' X Publications 38.4 - 38.4 20.2 - 20.2 - 0 oD Suib Total PROJECT-SUPPORTED COURSES 3.025.8 - 3.025.8 1.591.7 - 1.591.7 - 8 R. FUNDS BangDes dusun agriculture project 834.8 - 834.8 439.1 - 439.1 - 2 Hamelet revolving funds 980.0 - 980.0 515.5 - 515.5 - 3 Inpres Desa projects 3.562.5 - 3.562.5 1,874.0 - 1.874.0 - 10 Kecamatan Projects 920.0 - 920.0 484.0 - 484.0 - 2 Discretionary funds 1.000.0 - 1,000.0 526.0 - 526;0 - 3 Research Funds 1.260.0 - 1,260.0 662.8 - 662.8 - 3 Sub-Total FUNDS 8.557.3 - 8.557.3 4.501.5 - 4,501.5 - 23 Total INVESTMENT COSTS 21.353.2 8.163.9 29.517.1 11,232.6 4.294.5 15.527.2 28 79 If. RECURRENT COSTS A. SALARIES Supervision 177.2 - 177.2 93.2 - 93.2 - 0 Staff allowances 1,585.2 - 1,565.2 833.9 - 833.9 - 4 Sub-Total SALARIES 1.762.5 - 1.762.5 927.1 - 927.1 - S B. OPERATION AND hAINTENANCE 0 1. Field trips 0 Travel alloannces 491.9 - 491.9 258.8 - 258.8 - 1 Fuel 481.3 - 481.3 253.2 - 253.2 - 1 Sub-Total field trips 973.2 - 973.2 512.0 - 512.0 - 3 2. Maintenance 3,047.5 - 3,047.5 1.603. 1 - 1,.503.I - 8 3. Office seWplies 1,329. 5 - 1.329,5 699.4 - 699.4 - 4 Sub-Total OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 5.350.2 - 5.350.2 2,814.4 - 2,814.4 14 C. OTHER Meetings 97.2 - 97.2 51.1 - 51.1 - O Reporting 31.3 - 31.3 16.4 - 16.4 - 0 Surveys 10.8 - 10.8 5.7 - 5.7 - 0 Translation 3.6 - 3.6 1.9 - 1.9 - 0 Adninistrative Costs 613.5 - 613.5 322.7 - 322.7 - 2 Sub-Total OTHER 756.4 - 756.4 397.9 - 39,.9 - 2 Total RECURRENT COSTS 7. 869. 0 - 7. 869. 0 4.139.4 - 4,139.4 - 21 Total BASELINE COSTS 29.222.3 8.163. 9 37.386.2 15. 372. 1 4.294.5 19, 666.6 22 100 Physical Contingencies 2.814. 0 6A1.3 3.455.4 1.480.3 337.4 1,817.6 19 9 Price Contingencies 5.708.9 1.1 .1 6.829.0 3.003.1 589.2 3,592.3 16 18 ^ 1 t Total PROJECT COSTS 37.745.2 9.925.3 47,670.5 19,855.4 5,221.1 25,076.5 21 128 0 0 fit Fe-------r ----ar------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7 February 7. 1991 13:58 1r4 INDOOESIA YOGYAUAR1A UPLAND AREA DEVELOPNET PROJECT (BUM K11SA Il) Financing Plan by Project CoXfnmnts IUSS I 00I° Governmwtt of Morld Bank Indor*sia Total -- - --------^ ------------- --------------- Local (Excl. Duties 3 aount I mount 1 Amount F ew. Exch. Taxesl Taxes 1. CONMUNITY NIBILIZATION 1. WUSUN NOBILIZATION CONHUNITY DEVELOPMENT - TRAINING 28. 9 85.0 50.1 15.0 334.0 1.3 - 283.9 50.1 DUSUN PROJECTS 470.9 90.0 52.3 10.0 523.2 2.1 - 470.9 52.3 Sub-Total DUSUN MOBILIZATION 754.8 88.1 102.4 11. 9 857.3 3.4 - 754.8 102.4 1.2 VILLAGE MOBILIZATION INSTITUTIONAL COSTS 185.8 32.1 393.4 67.9 579.2 2.3 78.6 431.2 69.4 OUSUN REVOLVING FUNDS 552.8 90.0 51.4 10.0 614.2 2.4 - 552.8 61.4 VILLAGE PROJECTS 1.451. 4 65.0 781.5 35.0 2.232.8 8 9 - 2. 009.6 223.3 VILLAGE LEADERSHIP TRAINING 267.5 85.0 47.2 15.0 314.8 1.3 - 257.5 47.2 Sub-Total VILLAGE MOBILIZATION 2.457.5 65.7 1.283.5 34.3 3.741t0 14.9 78.6 3.261.1 401.3 Sub-Total COMMUNITY NOBILIZATION 3.212.4 69.9 1.385.9 30.1 4.598.3 18.3 78.6 4.016.0 503.8 C> 2. SLOPE STABILIZATION TECHNICAL SERVICES 2.1RUNOFF CONIROt 3 SOIL CONSERVATION /a 46.4 13.0 311.3 87.0 357.7 1. 4 84.7 236.8 36 2 2.2FARN PLANNING S DIVERSIFICATION 82.6 18.6 361.8 81.4 444.4 I.8 84.3 310.8 49.3 .K AUPATEN UPLAND DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT TEAM 6.0 4.6 125.0 95.4 131.0 0.5 31.8 87.8 11.4 2. 4ONFARN TECHNOLOGY DISPLAYS 128.4 21.9 458.5 78.1 586.9 2.3 149.9 378.3 58. 6 Sub-Total SLOPE STABILIZATION TECHNICAL SERVICES 263.4 17.3 t.256.6 82.7 1,520.0 6.1 350.7 1.013.7 S55.5 3. RURAL ROADS AND BRIDGES 6.082U 1 58.3 2.826.5 31.7 8.908.7 35.5 2.384.3 6.302.9 221.5 4. KABUPATEN PLANNING. COORDINATION S SUPPORT SERVICES 4.1 BAPPEDA 1K 11 STRENGTHENING 42.2 11.8 316.9 88.2 359.1 1.4 67.3 253.5 38.3 4.2 SEKNILDA TK 11 STRENGTHENING 21.3 10.4 183.6 89.6 204.9 0.8 13.5 165.8 25.5 4.3 KABUPATEN AGENCY STRENGTHENING EXTENSION CENTERS 98.4 80.7 23.5 19.3 121.9 0.5 12.2 97.6 12.2 STRENGTHENING OF KABUPATEN DINASES - - 165.8 100.0 165.8 0.7 113.0 36.2 15.6 FUNDS FOR UDKP PROJECTS 519.0 90.0 57.7 10.0 576.6 2.3 - 519.0 57.7 Sub-Total KABUPATEN AGENCY STRENGTHENING 617.4 71.4 246.9 28.6 864.3 3.4 125.1 652.8 86.4 SUb-Total KABUPATEN PLANNING, COOROINATION 3 SUPPORT SERVICES 680.9 47.7 747.4 52.3 1.428.3 5.7 206.0 1.072. 1 150.3 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, TRAINING I SUPPORT 5-1HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT 80.2 85.0 14.2 15.0 94.3 0.4 - 80.2 14.2 DIEX 5.2DATA BASE DEVELOPMENT 13.5 18.8 58.6 81.2 72.2 0. 3 t9.7 45.0 7.5 F Go 5.3TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 142.3 70.4 59.7 29.6 201.9 0.8 130.4 54.1 17,4 o Sub-TotaI CONMRNITY DEVELOPMENT. TRAINING I SUPPORT 236.0 64.1 132.5 35.9 368.4 1.5 150.1 179.3 39.0 6. UPLAND DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT TEAM 6.1 INSTITUTIONAL COSTS 34.3 40.2 51.t 59.6 85.4 0.3 14.3 60.5 to 6 6.2 FOREIGN TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 646.8 90.0 71.9 10.0 718.7 2.9 393.8 253. 0 71. 9 Sub-Total UPLAND DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT TEAM 681. 1 84.7 122.9 15. 3 804. 1 3.2 408.2 313.5 82.4 7. PROVINCIAL PLANNING. COORDINATION 6 SUPPORT 7.1 MANAGENENI STUDY 58.8 82.3 12.6 17.7 71. 4 0.3 - 64.5 6.9 7.2 BAPPEDA TK I STRENGTHENING INSTITUTIONAL COStS 33.7 12.7 231.2 87.3 265.0 1. 1 59.9 177.0 28.0 OISCRETIONARY FUNDS 564. 1 90.0 62.7 10.0 626.8 2.5 - 564.1 62.7 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 764.3 89.2 92.9 1e.8 857.2 3.4 700.8 70.3 86. 1 …------- … _ Sub-lotal BAPPEDA 1K I STRENGTHENING 1.362.1 77.9 386.9 22.1 1.748.9 7.0 760.7 811.4 176.8 7.3 SETNILDA STRENGTHENING 8.2 5.4 142.5 94.6 150.7 0.6 27.7 108.5 14.6 7 .4 HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPNENT COORDINATION 106.0 63.8 60.2 36.2 166.1 0.7 2.6 143.0 20.5 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 249.2 85.0 44.0 15.0 293.2 1.2 - 249.2 4.3 I COMPUTER TRAINING 44.6 85 0 7.9 15.0 52.5 0.2 - 44.6 7.9 Sub-Total HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT 399.8 78.1 112.0 21.9 511.8 2.0 2.6 436.8 72.3 7.5 LAND USE PLANNING S TITLING MAPPING 6 EROSION SURVEY 85.3 90.0 9.5 10.0 94.e 0.4 - 85.3 9.5 SYSTEMATIC TITLING 163.5 56.8 124.5 43.2 288.0 1.1 46.7 212.2 29.0 Sub-Total LAND USE PLANNING 6 TITLING 248.8 65.0 134.0 35.0 382.8 1.5 46.7 297.6 38.5 7.6 PROVINCIAl AGENCY STRENGTHENING KANNIL PERTANIAM - - 13.0 100.0 13.0 0.1 - 11.7 1.4 TK I DINAS - - 65.2 100.0 65.2 0.3 - 59.0 6.2 SBRLKT - - 13.0 100.0 13.0 0.1 - 11.7 1.4 Sub-7otal PROVINCIAL AGENCY STRENGTHENING - - 91.3 100.0 91.3 0.4 -82.4 8.9 Sub-Total PROVINCIAL PLANNING. CO1RDINATION 8 SUPPORT 2.077.6 70.3 879.3 29.7 2,956.9 11.8 837.7 1.801.2 3180 8. UPLAND NATERSHED SYSTEM A4CION 'ESEARCH IAARDI 1.303.8 40.9 1.880.3 59.1 3.184.0 12.7 346 4 2.497.9 339 7 9. AREA DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SUPPOR. 9.1 MANAGEMENT STRENGTHENING 165 6 74.3 57.4 25.7 222.9 0.9 74 3 121 4 27 3 9.2 mANIAGMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS 362.6 81.6 81.5 18.4 444.1 1 8 313.5 88.4 42 2 9.3 HUMAN RESOURCE OEVELOPHENT 297.1 74.7 100.8 25.3 397.9 1.6 25. 7 321 6 50 6 9.4 OPERATIONS 105.6 43.5 137.3 56.5 242.9 1.0 45.6 179 3 17 9 ________ ---- ------- ----- -------- ----- ---------- ------------ -------- ?7 F Sub-Total AREA DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SUPPORT 930.9 71. 2 377.0 28.8 t.307.8 5. 2 459.1 710.7 138.0 OQ jo z lotal Disbursement 15.468.2 61. 7 S.608. 4 38.3 25.076.5 100.0 5.221. 1 17.907.2 1.948.2 x /a In project description: Microwatershed Stabilization. INDONESIA YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IBANGUN DESA II) Financing Plan by Swuary Accounts (U0$ 000) Goverrment of World Bank Indonesia Total ------------- ------------- -------------- Local (Excl. Duties 8 Amount 2 Amount X Amount I For. Exch. Taxes) Taxes 1. INVESTHENT COSTS A. FURTHER PREPARAtION COSTS 38.4 85.0 6.8 15.0 45.2 0.2 - 38.4 6.8 B. CIVIL NORKS Bui ldings 232.5 80.0 58. 1 20.0 290.6 1.2 27.5 234.0 29.1 Roeds and bridges 5. 362. 8 80. 0 1. 3#00 7 20.0 6t 703. 5 26. 7 1. 878.4 4.825. 0 - Sub-Total CIVIL WORKS 5.595.2 80.0 1.398.8 20.0 6.994. 1 27.9 1.905. 5. 059.1 29.1 C. VEHICLES 464 heil-drive - - 327.9 100.0 327.9 1.3 226.1 69.0 32.8 Motorcycles - - 575.5 100.0 575.5 2.3 393.2 124.8 57.6 Pick-up Truck - - 24.6 100.0 24.6 0.1 17.0 5.1 2.5 I Nini-bus - - 64.5 100.0 64.5 0.3 44.5 13.5 6.4 _ - ---- ------- ----- -------- ----- ---------- ------------ _ Sub-Total VEHICLES - - 992.4 100.0 992.4 4.0 680.7 212.4 99.2 O. EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE Field equiprmnt 747.0 90.0 83.0 10.0 830.1 3.3 573.8 173.2 83.0 Office equipment 136.5 90.0 15.2 10.0 151.6 0.6 73.0 63.4 15.2 Lab equipment 196.2 90.0 21.8 10.0 218.0 0.9 105.6 90.6 21.8 Office furniture 47.4 90.0 5.3 10.0 52.6 0.2 10.0 37.4 5.3 Informtion technology 89.8 90.0 10.0 10.0 99. 8 0. 4 89. 8 -0. 0 10. 0 Sub-Total EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE I 216.9 90.0 135.2 10.0 1.352.1 5.4 852.3 364.6 135.2 E. LAND TITLING AND SURVEYS 210.2 90.0 23.4 10.0 233.6 0.9 - 210.2 23.4 F. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 1. Specialist Services Foreign consultants 1.943.9 90.0 216.0 10.0 2.159.8 8.6 1.782.2 161.7 216.0 Local consultants 325.2 90.0 36.1 10.0 361.4 1.4 - 325.2 36.1 Sub-Totel Specialist Services 2.269.1 90.0 252.1 10.0 2.521.2 10.1 1. 782.2 486.9 252.1 2. Studies 160.0 85.0 28.2 15.0 188.2 0.8 - 160.0 28.2 Sub-Total TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 2.429.0 89.7 280.3 10.3 2.709.4 10.8 1. 782.2 646.9 280.3 G. PROJECT-SUPPORTED COURSES Courses for village leaders 820.7 85.0 144.8 15.0 965.5 3.9 - 820.7 144.8 Training for project staff 660.7 85.0 116. b 15.0 777.3 3.1 - 660.7 116.6 workshops 208.1 85.0 36.7 15.0 244.8 1.0 - 208.1 36.7 0 cdc Publications 20.1 85.0 3.5 15.0 23.7 0.1 - 20.1 3.5 1f _- 301_ 7 _307 H. FUNDS BangDes dusun agriculture project 470.9 90.0 52.3 10.0 523.2 2.1 - 470.9 52. 3 Namelet revolving funds 552.8 90.0 61.4 10.0 614.2 2.4 - 552.8 61.4 Inpres Dess projects 1.451. 4 65. 0 781. 5 35.0 2,232. 8 8.9 - 2.009. 6 223.3 Kecamotan Projects 519.0 90. 0 57. 7 10.0 576.6 2. - 519. 0 57. 7 Discretionary funds 564.1 90.0 62.7 10.0 626.8 2.5 - 564.1 62.7 Research Funds 710.8 90.0 79.0 10.0 789.7 3.1 - 710.8 79.0 Sub-Total FUNDS 4,268.9 79.6 1.094.6 20.4 5,363.4 21.4 - 4.827.1 536.3 Total INVESTMENT COSTS 15.468.2 78.5 4.233.1 21.5 19.701.3 78.6 5, 921. 1 13,068.2 1,412.0 II. RECURRENT COSTS A SALARIES Supervision - - 118.4 100.0 118.4 0.5 - 100.6 1?.8 Staff allowances - - 1.076.7 100.0 1,076.7 4.3 - 915.2 161.5 Sub-Total SALARIES - - 1. 195.0 100.0 1. 195.0 4.8 - 1,015.8 179.3 S. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE - o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- 1. Field trips Travel allowances - - 333.4 100.0 333.4 1.3 - 283.4 50.0 fuel - - 366.5 100.0 366.5 1.5 - 365.5 - Sub-Total Field trips - - 699.8 100.0 699.8 2.8 - 649.8 50.0 2. Maintenance - - 2.095.8 100.0 2.095.8 8.4 - 1,886.2 209.6 3. Office supplies - - 879.5 100.0 879.5 3.5 - 791.6 88.0 Sub-Total OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE - - 3.675.2 100.0 3,675.2 14.7 - 3,327.6 347.5 C. OTHER Meetirns - - 64.5 100.0 64.5 0.3 - 58.0 S.4 Reporting - - 20.8 100.0 20.8 0.1 - 18.8 2.1 Surveys - - 6.5 100.0 6.5 0.0 - 5.9 0.7 Translation - - 2.1 100.0 2.1 0.0 - 1.9 0.2 Aninistrative Costs - - 411.0 100.0 411.0 1.6 - 411.0 - Sub-Total OTHER 505 0 100.0 505.0 2.0 - 495.6 9.4 Total RECURRENT COSTS -.375 2 100.0 5.375.2 21.4 - 4,839.0 536.2 Total Disbursemnt 15,468.2 61. 7 9.608.4 38.3 25.076.5 100.0 5.221. 1 17,907.2 1.948. 2 0 3 tD I-A 1a February 7. 1991 13: 58 0% C INDONESIA TOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPHENT PROJECT (BANGUN DESA 11) Financing Plan By Disbursement Category (US$ ' 000) Government of World Bank Indonesia Total ------------- ------------- -------------- Local lExcl. Duties 8 Amount % Amount % Amount S For.k Exch. Taxes) Taxes A. Civil Works Buildings 232.5 80.0 58. 1 20.0 290.6 1.2 27.5 234.0 29. 1 Roads and bridges 5. 362. 8 80.0 1 340.7 20.0 68 703.5 26.7 1. 878. 4 4.825.0 - Sub-Total Civil Works 5.595.2 80.0 1. 398.8 20.0 6.994. 1 27.9 1. 905.9 5. 059. 1 29.1 B. Vehicles - - 992.4 100.0 992.4 4.0 680.7 212.4 99.2 1 C. Equipment Office equipment and furniture 469.8 90.0 52.2 10.0 522.0 2.1 278.4 191.4 52.2 Field equipment 747.0 90.0 83.0 10.0 830.1 3.3 573.8 173.2 83.0 Sub-Total Equipment 1.216.9 90.0 135.2 10.0 1.352.1 5.4 852.3 364.6 135.2 D. LAND TITLING AND SURVEYS 210.2 90.0 23.4 10.0 233.6 0.9 - 210.2 23.4 E. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND STUDIES Local and Foreign Consultants 2.429. 0 89.7 280.3 10.3 2.709.4 10.8 1.782.2 646.9 280.3 Sub-Total TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND STUDIES 2 429.0 89.7 280.3 10.3 2,709.4 10.8 1, 782. 2 646.9 280.3 F. Courses 1 709.5 85.0 301.7 15.0 2, 011.2 8.0 - 1.709.5 301.7 G. Funds 4,307.3 79.6 1 101.3 20.4 5.408.6 21.6 - 4. 865.5 543.1 H. Renurrent costs - - 5. 375.2 100. 0 5.375.2 21.4 - 4,839.0 536.2 Total Disbursement 15. 468.2 61. 7 9. 608. 4 38.3 25. 076.5 100.0 5.221.1 17.907.2 1.948. 2 February 7. 199t 13:58 m X4 '- c - 106 - ANNEX 9 INDONESIA YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (Bangun Desa II") Disbursement Schedule IBRD Fiscal Year Project and Semester Profile /a Semester Cumulative Cumulative (US$'000) (US$'000) 2 1991 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 500 500 3.2 1992 1 4 500 1000 6.4 2 8 851 1851 11.3 1993 1 15 1795 3646 22.3 2 23 1935 5581 34.2 1994 1 31 1935 7516 46.0 2 38 1590 9106 55.8 1995 1 45 1590 10696 65.5 2 52 1468 12164 74.5 199v 1 60 1468 13632 83.5 2 68 1346 14978 91.7 1997 1 76 550 15500 100.0 2 84 1998 1 92 2 100 /a Standard disbursement profile for Indonesia, Agricultural Projects, Semester after Board approval, CODDR April 22, 1988. Disbursements are expected to be faster than profile as this is the second area developn.ent project in Yogyakarta province which would accelerate project implementation. ANNEX 10 - 107 - Page 1 INDONESIA Yogyakanta Upland Area Development Project (Bangan Desa II Project Implementation and Coordination 1. Details of the organization and management design, the way in which project activities would be allocated to particular agencies and the mechanisms which would be used to coordinate these activities, are described below. The components are described in clusters corresponding to the three levels of government involved, i.e., national, provincial and districts. National Level 2. Overall responsibility for implementation of the project would rest with the Director General of Regional Development (BANGDA) in the Ministry of Home Affairs. The Project Director, responsible for the overall planning, supervision, monitoring and evaluation of the project, would be the Director of Area Development in BANGDA. A national Project Steering Committee (for policy matters) and a national Project Technical Committee have already been established and would be chaired by Director General of BANGDA in the Minister of Home Affairs (details in Appendix 1). 3. The Director General of BANGDA would assume responsibility for the implementation of Component 9, Area Development Planning and Support, which would strengthen BANGDA's institutional capacity. The Director General's Secretariat would be responsible for the Management Strengthening, Management Information System design, and Human Resource Development subcomponents. The fourth sub-component, Operations, would be under the responsibility of the Directorate of Area Development. 4. BANGDA would participate with World Bank staff in an annual project review, which would assess progress in project implementation and agree on detailed work programs and budgets for the forthcoming year. BANGDA staff would also play an active part in the conduct of the mid-term review of the project (para. 5.10). 5. Component 8, Upland Watershed Systems Action-Research would implemented by Agency for Agriculture Research and Development (AARD), of the Ministry of Agriculture through its Center for Soils Research (CSR) at Bogor CSR would oversee the construction of new research facilities on the site of the existing Soils Research substation in Yogyakarta. Pending the formal establishment of the station, the program would be undertaken initially in DIV by a CSR project unit the project unit and the new facilities would be upgraded into a full CSR research station by April 1, 1993. Provincial Level 6. The Governor, DIY, would be responsible for the components to be implemented at the provincial level. He would appoint a P--iect Coordinator within BAPPEDA Tk I to act on his behalf in day-to-day ove aig . of these components. A Provincial Steering Committee would be appointed to coordinate ANNEX 10 - 108 - Page 2 project activities in the province and among districts. This committee would be coordinated by Secretary of the Province (Sekwilda) and chaired by Chairman BAPPEDA Tk I details are in Appendix 1. Under the Provincial Steering Committee, two coordinating bodies would be appointed: (a) a Technical Team, chaired by the Project Coordinator, responsible for coordinating project planning and implementation within the province (details in Appendix 1); and (b) a Working Group for Watershed Systems Action-Research, meeting as necessary to oversee the annual research program and advise on the dissemination of research results. 7. Component 7, Provincial Planning, Coordination and Support Services, would be the responsibility of BAPPEDA Tk I. It comprises a wide range of staff functions in support of project activities. Certain staff functions would be allocated to divisions (Bidangs) within BAPPEDA Tk I; others to relevant bureaus (Biros) within the Governor's Secretariat; land-use planning and systematic titling services would be allocated to the National Land Board (BPN). Supervision and technical guidance responsibilities for components implemented at the district level would be allocated to the office of the local representative of the Ministry of Agriculture (Kanwil Pertanian), and to the relevant technical Agencies (Dinas) at the provincial level. Project- specific staff development (training) activities for all implementing agencies within the province would be coordinated by a full-time contract Project Training Officer within BAPPEDA Tk I (Annex 3, TA 7(1)]. The Project Coordinator within BAPPEDA Tk I would have access to discretionary funds, designed to facilitate the engagement of outside agencies (including nongovernment organizations) for the conduct of special studies, surveys and other support activities (para. 3.27). 8. Component 6, Upland Development Support Team (UDST), would be under the responsibility of the provincial food crop agency (Dinas Pertanian Tk I). The team would be comprised of full-time seconded staff from Dinas Pertanian Tk I, BANGDES X, sub-office RLKT, and provincial estate crop agency (Dinas Perkebunan Tk I). Staff from other agencies would be seconded to the team on a part-time basis as required. The provincial UDST would provide planning, training, and implementation support services to district staff involved in planning and implementation of the proposed microwatershed stabilization subprogram. The provincial UDST would also liaise closely with the Upland Watershed Systems Action-Research team, and would assist in the design and evaluation of the proposed program of on-farr. technology displays. In project year 3 of the project, the functions of the provincial UDST would be decentralized to three districts. (see para. 11). 9. Component 5, Community Development Training and Support Services, would be under the responsibility of the Provincial Directorate of BANGDES. The component would include support for the community mobilization activities in the districts; coordination of training and orientation activities for staff and community leaders; assisting with the introduction of an improved data collection methodology in upland villages; and the development of a database to support community development activities. ANNEX 10 - 109 - Page 3 Activities within Districts 10. All project activities implemented within each districts would be under the overall responsibility of the relevant district administrator (Bupati). The Bupati would appoint a Kabupaten Project Coordinator within BAPPEDA Tk II to act on his behalf in oversight of these activities. On behalf of the Bupati, the head (Camats) of each of the subdistricts (kecamatans) included in the project would oversee activities within their kecamatan on a day-to-day basis. The Camat's staff would also prepare plans for the kecamatan projects to be financed by the project, and would implement these on behalf of the Bupati. They would also be intensively involved in the development of medium-term development plans for the upland areas within their kecamatans. 11. Component 4, Kabupaten (District) Planning Coordination and Support Services, would be under the responsibility of BAPPEDA Tk II. This component would consist of a range of staff functions, to be allocated to divisions (Bidangs) within BAPPEDA Tk II and to relevant bureaus (Biros) in the Bupati's office. (Setwilda Tk I). Construction of three new extension centers (para. 3.24) would be undertaken by district BIMAS staff. The component would provide supplementary mobilization resources to other kabupaten agencies. These resources would be allocated at the discretion of the Bupati, in order to improve the capacity of the respective agencies to support the village projects. Allocations would be included in regular budget request for the forthcoming year. Kecematan projects would be planned and managed by Camats on behalf of the Bupati. 12. Component 3, Village Roads and Bridges. Public works agency (Dinas PU Tk II) within each district would take responsibility for the village roads and bridges component. PU Tk II staff and village leaders would receive training in labor-intensive road maintenance techniques. PU Tk I and BAPPEDA Tk I staff would be involved in motoring activities in the districts. 13. Component 2, Slope Stabilization Technical Services, would be under the responsibility of district food crop agency (Dinas Pertanian Tk II). It would manage a decentralized Kabupaten Upland Development Support Team (KUDST) from project year 3 of the project in Gunung Kidul, Kulon Progo and Bantul districts. The limited UDST services required in Sleman district would continue to be provided by the provincial UDST or by the Gunung Kidul KUDST. In close liaison with the district BIMAS staff and the rural extension centers (BPP), the Dinas would also coordinate a program of on-farm technology displays in each upland village. These would be undertaken by subject matter programmers (PPUP) at each BPP, supported by subject matter specialists (PPS) from BIMAS at the kabupaten level. Microwatershed activity groups mobilized by BANGDES Tk II staff, would be advised on runoff control and soil conservation by government conservation offices (PPL) from sub-offices of RLKT, and on farm planning and diversification by field extension workers (PPL) from BIMAS. The day-to-day activities and work programs of the subject matter programmes (PPUP), government conservation offices (PPL), and field estimate workers (PLP) would be coordinated by the heads of the relevant BPPs, to which the PLPs would be seconded under the authority of the Bupati. - 110 - ANNEX 10 Page 4 14. Component 1, Community Mobilization. BANGDES Tk II in each district would be responsible for implementing this component. It would consist of two subcomponents: (i) village mobilization, to be implemented in each of the 140 upland villages in the province; and (ii) hamlet mobilization, to be im?ple- mented in selected dusuns only, as a crucial first activity for the watershed stabilization subprogram. At the village level, BANGDES staff would supervise the introduction of an improved methodology for collection of village statis- tics ("Potensi Desa"); they would train the village planning councils (LKMDs) in improved situation analysis and planning methods; they would assist the LKMDs in the planning of village projects and manage the budgeting and financing of such projects (in a manner similar to the ongoing INPRES DESA program). BANGDES staff would also introduce and monitor the expanded dusun revolving funds to be financed under the project. Within those villages selected for inclusion in the microwatershed stabilization subprogram, BANGDES staff would assist in the selection of hamlet to be targeted. They would arrange for the training of hamlet councils (KKLKMD) in microwatershed planning; and the training and support of selected residents as specialized hamlet cadres. These hamlet cadres, with appropriate community organization training and with supervision from the BANGDES staff working from the Camat's office, would organize microwatershed activity groups for participation in the project. BANGDES staff would assist in coordinating the timely visits of field and soil conservation staff (PPLs and PLP) from the rural extension centers. They would also assist the hamlet boards (KKLKMD) to plan and manage hamlet projects, especially by arranging for timely technical support from PLPs and PPLs through use of existing coordinating mechanisms in the appropriate subdistrict office. ANAnE 10 Appendix 1 Page 1 of 5 MINISTRY OF ROME AFFAIRS Ministerial Decree No.: 410.05.250 dated September 8, 1989 on: The Establishment of Steering Committee for Yogyakarta Rural Development Project II. 1. Terms of Reference for the Steering Committee are: - To give guidance in the implementation of the YRDP II, and the preparation for its handling over to Yogyakarta provincial government in due time. - To give direction/assistant for the successful preparation and implementation of the project. - To solve problems/issues arises during the preparation and implementation of the project. - The committee is responsible to and under the Minister of Home Affairs in line with the existing law and regulations. 2. Members of the Committeet Chairman : Director General BANGDA Secretary: Director of Area Development, DG BANGDA Members s - Deputy V BAPPENAS - Director General BANGDES, MHA - Director General Cipta Karya, MPW - Director General Foreign Monetaire, MOF - Director General Budget, MOP - Director General AARD, MOA - Governor of Yogyakarta SR - Chairman, BAPPEDA I, Yogyakarta - Director for City and Regional Planning, MPW - Chief, Bureau Regional II, BAPPENAS ANNEX 10 Appendix 1 Page 2 of 5 MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS Ministerial Decree No.: 410.05249 dated September 8, 1989 on: The Establishment of Technical Committee for Yogyakarta Rural Development Project. 1. Terms of Reference for the Technical Committee ares - To carry out the preparation of the YRDP, including to provide guidance for the improvement of the study result. - To provide guidance in the planning and implementation of the project, and to carry out monitoring and evaluation of the project. - To prepare periodical reports on the implementation of the project for the Steering Committee. - To carry out other tasks related to the implementation of project activities. 2. Membership of the Technical Committee Chairman : Director of Area Development, DG BANGDA Members : - Chairman, BAPPEDA I, Yogyakarta - Chief, Bureau of Regional II, BAPPENAS - Chief, Subdirectorate of Regional Planning, MPW - Chief, Subdirectorate of Swadaya, DG BANGDES - Chief, Subdirectorate of Backward, Critical and Minus Region, DG BANGDA - Staff, Bureau of Economic and Spatial Development BAPPENAS ANNEX 10 Appendix 1 Page 3 of 5 GOVERNOR OF YOGYAKARTA SPECIAL REGION Governor's Decree No.: 79/TIM/1990 dated November 29, 1990 on: The Establishment of Provincial Steering Committee and Technical Support Team for Yogyakarta Upland Area Development Project. 1. Membership of the Steering Committee: Responsible Officer : Acting Governor of Yogyakarta SR Coordinator s Sekwilda, Yogyakarta SR (Secretary of the Province) Chairman I s Chairman BAPPEDA I DIY Chairman II s Assistant II to the Sekwilda, DIY Secretary I s Secretary of the BAPPEDA I, DIY Secretary II s Head of Provincial Development Bureau Members s - Assistant I to the Sekwilda, DIY - Assistant III to the Sekwilda, DIY - Assistant IV to the Sekwilda, DIY Chief, Kanwil Land Board BPN, DIY - Chief, Kanwil MPW, DIY - Chief, Kanwil MOA, DIY Chief, Kanwil Ministry of Forestry, DIY - Chief, Kanwil BRI, DIY - Chief, Directorate BANGDES, DIY - Chief, Dinas Public Works, DIY C Chief, Dinas Food Crops Agriculture, DIY - Chief, Dinas Horticultural Crops, DIY C Chief, Bureau of Finance, Setwilda, DIY 2. Membership of Technical Support Team Chairman : Head of Economic Division, DIY (Project Coordinator) Secretary Representative of the BAPPEDA, DIY Members : - Head of Research Division of the BAPPEDA, DIY - Head of Social and Culturea Division of the BAPPEDA, DIY - Head of Physical Infrastructure Division of the BAPPEDA, DIY - Head of Statistics and Reporting Division of the BAPPEDA, DIY - Head of the Village Administration Bureau, Regional Secretariat, DIY ANUNE 10 ADpendix 1 Page 4 of 5 - Head of the Regional Office of BRI, DIY - Respectlve Project Managers concerned consistlng of3 - Upland Development Support Team under the Provincial Agrlculture Servlce, DIY - Community Moblilzation under the Directorate of Rural Development, DIY - ProvincLal Planning, Coordlnation and Support Servlces under the BAPPEDA Tk. 1 - Human Resource Development under the BAPPEDA Tk. 1 - Budget and Financial Management under the ProvincLal Finance Bureau, Regional Secretariat, DIY - Implementation Control and Support Services under the Provlnclal Development Bureau, RegLonal Secretariat, DIY - Upland Watershed Systems Action Research under the ARD. ANNDC 10 Aippendix 1 Page 5 of 5 Decree of the Governor of the Special Province of Yogyakarta ,80TIM/1990 of November 29, 1990 on: Establishment of Working Group on e;nd Watershed Systems Action Research: Advisor s Head of Regional Office of the Ministry of Agriculture, DIY Chairman i Head of Research Division of the BAPPEDA, DIY Vice Chairman a Project Manager of Upland Watershed Systems Action Research Component Secretary i Head of Soil Research Station Members a - Representative of the Regional Office of the Ministry of Agriculture, DIY - Representative of the Regional Office of the Ministry of Forestry, DIY - Representative of the Provincial Agriculture and Food Crops Service, DIY - Representative of the Provincial Horticulture Service, DIY - Representative of the Provincial Livestock Service, DIY - Representative of the BIMAS Secretariat, DIY - Representative of the Sub-Balai RLKT - Representative of the Gadjah Mada University _ Representative of the AARD Ministry of Agriculture - Representative of the Soil Research and Agroclimate Center - Representative of the Livestock Research Center - Representative of the Food Crops Research Center - Representative of the Component 2 and 6 - Member of the Working Group ANNEX 11 - 114 - Table 1 INDONESIA YOGYAY%ARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Crop Models Financial Prices (Annual) ('.n Rp.) Croppitng sear Unit I to 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 to 30 0utputs Haizet dre grain Kg 175 175 175 175 175 175 175 175 175 Rice, drv Padde Kg 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 Cassava, fresh root Kg 45 45 45 45 45 4S 45 45 45 Groundnut, drv in shell Kg 560 560 560 560 560 560 560 560 560 Banana Stalk 2,000 29000 2,0000 ,000 2,000 20 2M000 2000 2M000 Coffee, drv bean Kg 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1f500 1,500 1s500 1,500 Avocado, fresh fruit Kg 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Fue!lood e3 5000 5000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5S000 5w000 5,000 Grass todder, fresh Kg 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Inputs Urea Kg 180 200 220 235 252 270 288 306 324 TSP Kg 195 214 234 254 279 293 310 330 350 KCL Kg 185 205 226 241 259 277 296 315 333 Rice seed Kg 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 haize seed Kg 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 6roundnut seed Kg 650 650 650 650 650 650 650 650 650 Grass slips '000 slips 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 O10000 10,000 Cassava cutting '000 29000 2,000 2,000 2P000 29000 2,000 2,000 2,000 29000 Pesticide KG 10,000 100000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,'0,0 10,000 10t.00 10,000 Banana sucker Seedling 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Coffee seedling Seedling 150 150 150 150 !50 150 150 150 150 Leuc./Glr. seedling Seedling 50 50 50 50 s0 50 50 S0 50 Avocado seedling Seedlins 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 Labor Unskilled labour Persondav 1,500 19500 IFs00 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1'500 1,500 August 23, 1990 19:10 - lU' - Annexil Table 2 INDONESIA Page 1 of 3 YOGYAKARTA l'PLAND AREA DEVELOPt4EINT PROJECT Crop Models YIELDS AND INPIUTS (Per Ha) 1. Caesava Existing Techtnologs kmy Technolodu Unit I to 30 1 2 3 to 30 Yield Kg 4.000 4.500 S.000 5.500 Dperating Inputs [frea Kg 20 20 30 40 tSP Ks 20 20 20 20 Cassava cutting '000 12 12 12 12 Lahor Unskilled labout Persondwy 40 43 50 2. Maize, Cassava Existing Tectuology NM Teholoi Unit I to 30 1 2 3 4 5 to 30 Main Production Cassava fresh root Kg 5.000 5500 60000 6h50 7.000 7r130 Naizeo drsi grain Kg 600 650 700 750 750 I Operatins Inputs Urea Kt 50 60 75 75 75 7S TSP Kg 25 35 50 50 5e i0 11aize seed Kg 25 25 25 25 25 75 Cassava cutting 1000 10 10 10 10 10 t0 Labor Unskilled labour Perundes 14. 145 155 U60 165 165 3. Casaav ia. ize, Rice/Grotmdnuts Existing Toesloiw Ob Teelolog, Unit I to 30 1 2 3 4 to 30 alin Production Naize. dre grain Km 0 0 go00 900 9e Rice, drs Paddy Kg 90o 1.000 low50 I.loo .1l50 Cnssava. fresh root Kg 5.000 5.50 600 65D0 7.000 Groautdrut dir in shell Kg 400 450 500 O 600 Operatirn Inputs Urea Kg 100 120 123 140 in TSP Kg 60 75 so 'i to asize seed K11 25 25 25 25 25 Rice seed Kg 35 35 35 35 35 Cassava cutting l00 10 10 to 10 i0 6roundnut s.d Kg 60 60 60 s0 60 Labor Ubskilled labour nrsadW 310 325 335 340 362 …-- --- - --- --- - ---- - - - -- -- -------------…~ - 116 - Annex 11 Table 2 Page 2 of 3 4. Grass Existing TecholoUw Now TochnoloUw Unit I to 30 1 2 3 to 30 C:==C-Cu _-:1z:u no asszug:u e:zswr Yield Kg 5,000 8 000 150000 15.000 Investment Inputs Urea Kg - 40 - - TSP Kg - 40 Labor Unskilled labour Persondav - 30 - - Operating Inputs Urea Kg - - 50 S0 TSP Kg - - 50 50 Labor Unskilled labout Penrsda 12 20 25 30 5. Coffee/Fuewood intercropped ExtinJ Terrnolo * New Tedvnologw Unit I to 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 to 30 Main Production Coffeet dry bean Kg - - - 200 400 500 600 Fuelwood e3 - - 3 6 7 7 8 Cassava, fresh root Kg - *u125 3M000 1,625 - - - Maize, drn grain Kg - 462 325 162 - - Investment lnPuts Urea Kg - 40 - - - - - TSP KU - 40 - - - - KCL Kg - 20 - - - - Coffee seedlins Seedling - 1000 200 - - - LeucfGlvIr. seedling Seedling - 800 B0 - - - - Labor Unskilled labour Persondaw - 120 12 - - - - Operating Inputs Urea Kg - 45 7.5 79 do 60 60 TSP Ks - 26 65 52.5 40 40 40 KCL Kg - - 20 30 30 30 30 Pesticide KG - - 1.5 2 2 2 2 Maize seed Kg - 10.8 12.5 6.3 - - - Cassava cutting '000 - 7.5 5 2.5 - - - Labor Unskilled labour Persondaw - 109 97.5 120 100 120 140 ----- ---- ----- ---_ - -- -- - ---- __ --- --- -- -_ - -* _ _ -_ _ _ _ -* _ _ Annex 11 - 117 - Table 2 Page 3 of 3 6. Avocado intercropped Existinl Technologw New Technolosw … … Unit I to 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 to 30 ~~~~~~c=::===== -==CZ=::r=======::_,:. ==,== :2C :::c: ====ZC :=:=:=cg C=C ==ccS= ==: ...........................................aus Main Production Avocado, tresh fruit Kg - - - - - 400 600 19000 Ir800 24600 29600 3#200 Cassava' fresh root Kg - 4t125 3,000 1625 - - - - Maize, dry grain Kg - 462 325 162 - - - - - Investment Inputs Urea Kg 40 - - - - - - TSP Kg - 40 - - - - - - - KCL Kg - 40 - - - - - - - Avocado seedl.ng Seedling - 100 20 - - - - - Labor Unskilled labour Persondaw - 30 3 - - - - - Operating Inputs Urea Kg - 45 77.5 58.8 40 - - - TSP Kg - 26 75 37.5 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 KCL Kg - - 25 25 25 - - - - - - - haize seed Kg - 18.8 12.5 6.3 - - - - - - - - Cassava cuttins '000 - 7.5 5 2.5 - - - - - - - Labor I Unskilled labour Persondav - 109 107.5 70 30 40 50 60 70 BO 90 95 7. Ba-ana intercropped Existins Technology New TeUcIoIov Unit I to 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 to 30 __=- =uzrsaus aC,g2 C ccs * = a 55- = " Main Production Banana Stalk - - 300 700 900 900 I,OO 900 600 400 Cassava. fresh root Kg - 4,125 3,0OO I625 - - - - - - Maize, drv grain Kg - 462 325 162 - - - - - - Investeent Invuts Urea Kg - 100 - - - - - - TSP Kg - 120 - - - - - - - - KCL Kg 120 - - - Banana sucker Seedling - 800 90 - - Labor Unskilled labour Persondaw - 9O 8……… … operating Inputs Urea Kg - 45 137.5 118.8 100 100 IvO tvO 100 100 TSP Ks - 26 145 132.5 120 120 120 120 120 120 KCL Kg - - 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 Maize seed Kg - 18.8 12.5 6.3 - - - - - - Cassava cutting '000 - 7,5 5 2.5 - - - - - - Labor Unskilled labur Persnd - 109 107.5 100 90 95 100 1 o 100 100 - 118 - Annex 11 Table 3 INDONESIA YOGYAKARTA UWLAN AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (BANOW DESA Il) SUMMARY NET INCOME OF CROP MODELS Without Project/2 -----------------At Full Development-- Before After Before After Increase In Crope/i Cost of Cost of Cost of Cost of Cost of Cost of Net Present (Interplanted) Labor Labor/A Labor Labor Labor/3 Labor Incremental Value/4 ---kg/h------ ----- -Re Oh/h*- -- ----- X 1. Cassava 143 60 83 204 76 129 46 47 2. Cassava ) ; 280 210 70 388 248 141 71 72 Maize ? 3. Cassava ) Maize 636 486 170 880 643 387 168 73 Rice ? Oroundnut ? 4. Grass s0 18 32 116 46 71 89 111 5. Coffee/6 ) ) - - - 877 200 877 - - Fu-lwood m3) 8. Avocado/6 - - - 961 148 809 - - 7. Banana/6 - - - 688 150 638 /1 For different soil types. / In Year 10. /8 All labor costed. /4 At 10% over 10 years. /6 Replacing gradually cassava and maize. - 119 - ANNEX 12 Page 1 INDONESIA YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (*Bangun Desa 11) Economic Analysis 1. Two separate economic analyses was carried out for the Project activities: for soil stabilization and on-farm technology displays, inclo ing the components and sub-components: 1.1 Hamlet (Dusun) mob-.ization; 2. Soil Stabilization Technical Services; and 6. Upland Development Support Team, and for village roads and bridges (component 3). Soil Stabilization On-Farm Technology Displays (Table 1) 2. Benefits. Two models were established, based on crop models given in Annex 11 to quantify the effects of micro-watershed improvements and on- farm technology displays. About 500 micro-watersheds would be improved under the project covering 2,500 ha and benefitting about 4,000 farmers. The stream of benefits was delayed by one year to allow for the completion of the water run-off control measures. About 60,000 farmers would be exposed to annual on-farm technology displays and related extension service activities. Of these 20 percent or 12,000 farmers are expected to adopt the improvements to farming practices (Annex 4). These adoptions are expected to start in project Year 2 and to teach 12,000 farmers in Year 6 with a build up of benefits on individual farms over five years from start of adoption. 3. A recent reportl/ estimated the loss of soil fertility in the critical uplands of Yogyakarta at 4.7 percent p.a.. For this economic analysis, however, it was assumed that yields would remain stable without the project. The farm-gate prices (early 1990 constant) used for inputs and outputs do not reflect the improvements expected from the upgrading of 1/ Indonesia, Forest, Land and Water: Issues in Sustainable Development, World Bank, 1989. ANNEX 12 Page 2 the road network. For farm inputs and outputs a conversion factor of 1.0 was applied, with the exception of subsidized fertilizer (CF 1.82). Incremental labor requirements were costed at the ongoing wage rate in these areas (representing off-farm income foregone) and a conversion factor for unskilled upland based labor of 0.7 was applied. The incremental farm family benefits include only the basic crop improvements and exclude additional benefits from improvements of home gardens, livestock and off- farm activities. Fodder crops were valued at farm-gate prices. 4. Investments. The costs for Hamlet (Dusun) Mobilization, Run-off control and soil conservation, Farm Planning and Diversification, Kabupaten Upland Development Support Team, Provincial Upland Development Support Team, and On-Farm Technology Displays (early 1990 constant) include varying elements of upland based unskilled labor. Therefore, an aggregate conversion factor of 0.85 has been applied. Because of an anticipated effect of the work of the foreign consultants for the Provincial Upland Development Support Team beyond the Yogyakarta province only 50 percent of their costs were applied here. While it is expected that after the Project the micro-watershed developments and on-farm technology displays will be continuously expanded, neither the costs for maintaining the achieved development standards have been included. 5. Under these conservation assumptions the economic rate of return is 12.0 percent over a 30-year period. Cost could increase by 10 percent and benefits could decrease by 9.1 percent to maintain an economic rate of return of 10 percent the assumed opportunity cost of capital in Indonesia. Village Roads and Bridges (Table 2) 6. Benefits. Village roads and bridges would affect 49 of the 140 project villages. Benefits would come from reduced transport costs for inputs and outputs, better access to markets in the rainy season, less spoilage during transport, and improved production through better extension coverage. Further benefits would come from easier access to services (health, credit) and to employment outside the village, and from the stimulation of non-agricultural activities in the villages. In line with studies on the impact of rural roads in Bangladesh and the Philippines2/ these aggragate benefits were assumed to improve farmers net income by 10 percent. 2/ Developmental Impact of Rural Infrastructure: Bangladesh, Raisuddin Ahmed, Mahabub Hossain, IFPRI, Washington, 1990. Rural Roads Evaluation Report/Philippines Provincial Development, USAID, 1978. - 121 - ANNEX 12 Page 3 7. Costs. The following elements of project costs were excluded from the calculation: (a) improvement of bridges, as this would be required without the project to maintain the benefits from the existing roads; (b) equipment, as its depreciation is part of the costs of road construction; (c) training, as it would produce benefits beyond the project activities; and (d) maintenance, as the maintenance requirements of the improved roads would not exceed those required for the existing roads. To the costs of village roads construction, including 15 percent physical contingencies, an aggregate conversion factor of 0.865 was applied based on the assumption that cost of equipment, material and public works staff would amount to 55 percent of total costs and rural unskilled labor to 45 percent (CF 0.7). 8. Under these assumptions, the economic rate of return for the village roads and bridges component for 30 years would be 14.8 percent. A cost increase of 45 percent or a benefit decrease of 31 percent would reduce the ERR to 10 percent, the estimated opportunity cost of capital in Indonesia. DCWMIA YO07AKARTA UPLAND AREA OBVa.GPMET PRJC Qw11ngun Dews 110) Nkcrowaerstwd S,tabilIization ond On-Peru TachnloIo Display Celcquletion of Internal Econom ic Rat, of Return (Ap million) 1 2 a 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 it 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25-8026 27 A. eCMIC UENE!TS 1. W4crowatershed Stabilimmtion Expected benefits per siecroetrsraAd 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Phasing of microest.ralse" (No. per y,r.) 0 5 15 48 90 348 Total empcted benefits: from P7 () 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P.2 (5) 1.5 1.8 2.5 4 5 5.8 6.2 6.275 6.19S 5.97 5.925 5.9 5.96 6.01 6.01 6.01 6.01 6.01 6.01 6.01 6.01 6.01 6.01 6.01 6.01 6.01 6 PY3 (13) 4.5 4.5 7.5 12 IS 17.4 15.6 16.62 16.56 17.91 17.77 17.7 17.66 16.03 18.08 18.03 18.03 18.03 18.03 18.03 18.03 16.03 18.03 16.03 10.03 16 PY4 (45) 13.5 13.5 22.5 36 48 52.2 33.8 56.47 .S.75 83.73 53.32 83.1 83.64 54.09 54.09 34.09 54.09 54.09 54.09 54.09 54.09 54.09 54.09 54.09 54 Py5 (90) 2? 27 45 72 90 104.4 111.6 112.9 111.5 107.4 106 6 106.2 107.2 106.1 106.1 108.1 106.1 108.1 106.1 106.1 106.1 108.1 108.1 lot PTO (545) 105.3 103.5 172.5 276 345 400.2 427.8 482.9 427.4 411 9 408.8 407.1 411.2 414.6 414.6 414.6 414.6 414.6 414.6 414.6 414.6 414.6 41. Total A.1 0 1.5 6 20.5 52 68.5 101.8 140.6 167.0 185.2 192.6 192.5 186.9 184.4 183.6 13.8 185.4 1N36I.3 186.3 186.3 1816.3 138 .3 18831111.8 18.3 11581.3 13811.3 lb 2. O,,-Fwrm Tectnologa Disp lay Subcomponent 0 is 98 204 348 499 635 703 748 76 786 736 736 78 786 786 76 786 756 786 786 786 786 756 786 786 736 TOTAL ES@UC 0WITS: 0.0 18.5 106.0 224.5 400.0 563.5 736.8 848.8 915.1 941.2 940.6 9481.5 944.9 940.4 939.6 959.9 941.4 942.3 942.3 942.3 942.3 942.3 942.3 942.3 942.8 942.3 942.3 Q4: NrE PREU4T VALLIE AT 106 5.431 8. ECMIC CosT. Financial Costs: Osusn eobilIimatuon 28 63 1I" 243 772 Runoff control & aoilI cosearvation 33 SO 148 118 154 Fare planning and divwrs.eficstion 48 78 178 148 189 Ksbupatan Upland Development Support Teams 3 8 110 33 35 P,ovincial Upland De.slopemnt Support Taai 251 230 190 115 21 On-Fore Technology Diaslay 77 229 18 252 161 Subtotal 4T, 666 1006 935 133 TOrTAL ECONOIC COST: (CF.85) 371 568 85W 79 1132 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 40 400 400 400 NET PRE4T VALIJE AT 106 4.949 C. NET EW@4C 8BFrTS CA-U) -371 -55 -781 -571 -732 166 33Y 444 515 541 549 549 845 540 540 540 541 842 542 5 542 542 5 42 542 542 542 . 542 34 0. INTEN01. ECOPUC RATE OF fRETI* 12.03 Note: Conversion factor for ufakUk lePd uplsnd labor is 0.7 of Pew rats end for fort;Iiiga 1.82. PILE: 70011I (Lotus) 17-Oct-GO" 03:14 PR1) * - 123 - ANX 12 i - I ^ 3 ^~~ !!i' 11 '|1 a o i gi. l i ! X I U! || i( INDONESIA ANNEX 13 YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (Bangun Desd 11) Page 1 of 4 Project Implementation Schedule : Overview of Key Activities for Project Stdrt-up (Coiponent Code Key Actions, by component and sub-component 1991 1992 JanFebMar AprMayJunJuiAuqSepOctNovDec JanFebMar --1-1--1--1-1----1-X----1-1----1--1--1 A. UPLAND PRODUCTIVITY AND STABILIZATION SUB-PROGRAM <- PYO-> <- ---- PYl --------- <_ PY2 -> 1. COMMUNITY MOBILIZATION (BANGOES Tk II) 1.1 Dusun Mobilization 1.1.1 Community Development Training a. Designi KKLKMD Microwatershed Planning Course :XXXXXXXXX: b. Design Microwatershed Activity Group Mobilization course ::XXXXXXXXX: c. Traln, and assist dusun leaders to plan dusun projects :: :XXXXXXXXXXX: :: 1.1.2 Dusun Projects d. Identify 5 dusuns for pilot Microwatershed development :XX b. Microwatershed Activity Groups formed : ... XXXXX: ir each pilot dusun : c. 5 dusun councils prepare dusun project plans : : .:XXXXX d. Implement first 5 dusun projects :X> ?. SLOPE STABILIZATION TECHNICAL SERVICES : ?.I Runoff Control and Soil Conservation (SBRLKT) 2.1.1 Istitutional Costs : a. PLPs provide planning assistance to pilot dusuns : :XXXXXX b. PLPs provide implementation assistance for pilot dusun : : : : : :XXXXXXXXXXXXXX> projects 2.1.2 Technical Training a. Send PLPs to Microwatershed Orientation courses : .... XX: b. Send PLPs to Technology Menu Display courses : :XX: : : 2.2 Farm Planning and Diversification (DIPERT Tk II) : ?.2.1 Institutional Costs a. PPLs provide planning assistance to pilot dusuns : .:.:XXXXXXXXX: b. PPLs provide assist. to implement pilot dusun projects :>: :::.: ?.2.2 Technical Training : a. Send PPLs to Microwatershed Orientation courses : .... XX: b. Send PPLs to Technology Menu Display courses : : : : : : XX: c. Send PPLs to nursery management training : :XX :: :: 6. UPLAND DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT TEAM (DIPERT Tk II) : 6.1 Institutional Costs :: a. Recruit full-time members of team : : : :XX: b. Complete detailed planning of first pilot Microwatershed : .. XXXXXXXXX: c. Complete detailed planning of four further pilot : :.:XXXX> Microwatersheds for PYI : : 6.2 Technical Assistance :: a. Recruit short-term Land-use and Water Management : : XXXXX: : Adviser, Community Development Advisers, and Outreach : : Program Design Specialist : : b. Land Use and Water Management Advisor in place : :. :XX c. International Community Development Adviser in place : :: : : : : : :XXXXXX: 8. UPLAND WATERSHED SYSTEMS ACTION-RESEARCH (AARD) : : 8.1 Research Facilities Construction :: a. Complete detailed plans for civil works : : XXXXXXXX: XXX:: 8.2 Research Program : : : a. Establish Upland Watershed Systems Action Research Steering : : XX: : : : : : : : Committee and Working Group (condition for negotiations) : : : : ::: : b. Establish core team : XXXXX: X::: : : c. Complete collect. of bench data for pilot Microwatershed :: XXXXXXXX: : : : d. Complete selective planting of slope stabil. grasses :: :XX: :: ::: : : 8.3 Technical Assistance a. Technical Assistance for PYl: Prepare detailed Terms of Reference and advertise : : XX: :: :: Receive and review proposals : : : :XX:: Complete contract negotiations : : ::: :XX: : : : Technical assistance in place : :.:.:XXXXX : INDONESIA ANNEX 13 YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (Bangun Desa 11) Page 2 of 4 Project Implementation Schedule : Overview of Key Activities for Project Start-up C)fIl)opnent Code Key Actions, by component and sub-component 1991 1992 JanfebMar AprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovOec JanFebMar IM UPIAND COMMUNITY DLVELOPMENl SUB-PROGRAM - PYO - < K---- - ! --------- -PY2 I COMMUNIIY MOBILISATION (BANGDES Tk II)(Continued) : : I.? Villaqe Mobilisation ::X :: ::. d. "Potensi Desa survey in PYI villages :XXXXX:: b. Assist LKMD and kecamatan staff to monitor and support :XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX> village project Implementation : : 1.I .1Institutional Costs a. Participatory planninig of village projects in PYI villages : : :XXXXXXXX: : : : I.Z.Z Dusun Revolving Funds a. Creation/expansion of dueun revolving funds In PYI villages :XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 1.?.3 Village Projects : : : : : a. Funds provided for PYI village projects : : : : :XX: 1.2.4 Village Leadership Training : : a. Training of village and dusun leaders in project : : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX planning and dusun revolving fund management . . SIOPE STABILISATION TECHNICAL SERVICES (Continued) : ?.1 On-farm Technology Displays (BPP) a. Outreach Program Design Specialist in place : :XXXXXX: b. Prepare detailed program design : : : :XXXXXX: c. Install technology displays in all PYI villages XXXXXXXA 2.1.1 Dinas Pertanian Tk II z.1.2 Dinas Perternakan Tk II 2.4.3 Sub-Cabang RLKT 2.4.4 Technical Training a. Design Technology Display training program : XXXXXX : . b. Deliver Technology Display training program . : * XXX . 5 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TRAINING & SUPPORT SERVICES (BANGDES TKI) : 5.1 Human Resource Development a. Complete design of Community Organising courses for : :XXXXX: kecamatan staff and village leaders : : : b. Deliver training to PYI village and kecamatan leaders : : : :XXXXXXXX: c. Finalise methodology and training materials for "Potensi :XXXXX Desa" survey training : : d. Deliver "Potensi Desa" training to Tk II and village staff XX: 5.2 Database Development a. Develop an interactive data base for village-level data :. . . : ::XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX: 5.3 Technical Assistance a. Village Development Monitoring and Evaluation Adviser: : Prepare detailed Terms of Reference and advertise : : XX: Receive and review proposals : :XXXXXXXX: : : Complete contract negotiations : : : : :XXXXX: Adviser in place : : : : :XXXXXX: C. RURAL ROADS AND BRIDGES SUB-PROGRAM : : 3. RURAL ROADS AND BRIDGES (PU TKII) . . 3.1 Road Construction : : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > 3.2 Bridge and Culvert Construction : : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > 3.3 Road Maintenance : : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > 3.4 Institutional Costs : a. Complete detailed design of first year work program XXXXXXXX . . .. . I NIONI S IA ANN(X " YO0YAKARIA UPI AND ARI A DV1tt 01l INI P lRO.I( I (I. IOr Lit D (",,I II) Page 3 of 4 Project Implemerntation Schedule: Overview .,f Key A, . ivite>, . PIojvct 'tart-up i 'Ilent (1, Key ALtions, b) componeut and sub-iomponent 1991 199? ------------------------- ii etbM!prFliMyJunJiulAuigSepOctNovl0er Jani ebMar - I- I-- ' I--I-- I- 1-- 11 --1-+ I --+I -- I--I---- I - I-I 1'. INSIIIUIIONAI DtVtlOPMtNI SUB-PROGRAM - l'Y - < < - --- PYI -PY 1. KA13UPAIIN PIANNING, COORDINAIION & SUPPORI StRVICIS 1.1 BAPPIDA Ik 11 Strengthening (BAPPEDA Ik 11) : : a. Brief PYI villdges and kecdmatans on pidnninq guidelinies : x: : . b. Select village and kecamatan projects for PYI : t. P. Prepare medlum-term devt. plan for each PYI kecamatanll ::xxXxxxx:: d. Prepare detailed input/output worksheets for eaCh dgeilly : IA: 1I. sl IWlI)A Ik 11 Strercgtheiilng (Sf IWIIDA 1k 11) : : 1. I Kablipaten Agen y Strengthienilng : : : : 1.I I tevnion Centers., 1. Prepare pldits and budget,. for new Rural Ixtenisionr Centet. :XXXXX: 1.1.' Strenqthening of KdbUpatenl agencles .. a. Identi fy priority needs for agency strengthening foe r: : service delivery to upland village projects ti. Proside strengtlieniirig i-esources to selecte(d agerd les : : I XX:.:: i I,3 I tuds for Kecamatani (UDKP) Projects a. Provide funds for kecamatan projects : : : : : XX: /. iPROVINCIAL PLANNING, COORDINATION & SUPPORI SERVICES /.I Manragenment Study (BAPPEDA Tk 1) ; a. Management study for BAPPEDA I/Sekwilda 1: : Draft terms of Reference and advertise :XX : : Prepare short list and clear with Bank :: : : Receive and review proposals : :: :XXXXX: :: Clear review with Bank : : : : : : :XX: Complete contract negotiations : :: ::: :XXXXX: Undertake management study :.:XXXXXXXXXX > 1.7 BAPPEDA 1k I Strengthening (BAPPEDA Tk 1) : /.?.I Institutional Costs a. First meeting of Provincial Steering Committee : :XX b. Complete project negotiations with World Bank XX:: : :: c. Prepare and issue project implementation guidelines : :XXXXXXXXX: X: d. Undertake detailed planning (SAKK workshops) of Tk I and : :XXXXX: : fk IT agency programs and MIS design : : : e. Ccmplete analysis and identification of upland villages : : : XX9: f. Finalise guidelines for village and kecamatan projects :: :: XXX :: : 1.7.? Discretionary Funds 1.2.3 Technical Assistance a. Recruit local consultant for pre-recruitment/procurement ; ; XX ; . b. Recruitment Specialist in place, and undertakes : : :XXX pre-recruitment activities for technical assistance c. Recruit Area Development Adviser (foreign): : Draft terms of Reference and advertise : XX: :: : : Receive and review proposals : : : :XXXXX: : : Complete contract negotiations . *. * : * XX: , . Adviser in place . ; : . ;XXXXX XXXXXX > d. Recruit Area Development Officer (local): : Draft terms of Reference and advertise : : XX : Recelve and review proposals : :XXXXX: Complete contract negotiations :: ;XX:;;; ; Officer in place : :: : :XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > e. Recruit short-term local Training Specialist :: XX: f. Local Training Specialist in place . :XXX g. Recruit full-time local Project Training Officer . Draft terms of Reference and advertise ; XX: ;;;;;;;; .. Receive and review proposals : :XXX Complete contract negotiations : : :: :XX . Officer in place : : : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > h. Recruit short-term Institutional Planning and Assessment :XX: XX: :: '. consultants to help prepare detailed agency work programs ; ; : : : : : ; * i. Institutional Planning and Assessment consultants in place :: : :XXXXX . j. Recruit International Training Specialist to assist in :XXXXX: : preparation of detailed first year training program . . k. International Training Specialist in place * XX XXXXXX 7.3 SETWILDA Tk I Strengthening (SETWILDA Tk I) ; a. Prepare guidelines for project implementation, financial :: XXXXX: :. management, and monitoring :: :: b. Appoint Project Coordinator and project Pinpros . . XX: * * . 7.4 Human Resource Development (BAPPEDA Tk I) . 7.4.1 Coordination a. Complete review of training proposals and training needs : :XXiXXX: : : . b. Negotiate with agencies/NGOs for design of PYI courses : : :XX: :. c. Design first year training program . . :XXXXX:: d. Design Technology Oisplay courses ; XX: : ;. e. Deliver lechnology Display courses :: : :XX: :XX: :: : f. Design Microwatershed Orientation courses : : : :: :: : XX: : : g. Deliver Microwatershed Orientation courses . . . .XX: 7.4.2 Planning and Management Training : a. Design Planning & Mgt courses for PDP planning methodologies ; ; : ;XXXXX . b. Deliver Planning and Management courses : :. . . . . XX: 7.4.3 M.I.S. and Computer Training . INDONI SIA ANNEX 13 YOGYAKARIA UPIAND ARIA DfVIIOIMINT PROJECI (Iariguin Dos%a 11) Pdge 4 of 4 Project Implementation Sc.hedule: Overview of Key Activities for Project Start-up oIilp(melit Key Actloris, by component arid sub-component 1991 1992 .,-------------------------------------- JdniebMar Ap rMayJunJulAu? SepOctNovDec JanFebMar --1 --1--- I--1--1--1- --1--1--1--1-- --1--1-- O. INSIIIUIIONAI DtVEIOPMENT SUB-PROGRAM (Cont,) - PYO -> <-PYI--------- PY2 PROVINCIAL PtANNING, COORDINATION & SUPPORT SERVICES (Cont.) : : ::: :: '.s aInd-use pidlitiling and titling (i3PN) : .').,I Mppinq and Frosion Survey a. Complete pilot erosion survey for Desa Selopamioro, Imogirl XX: b. Coniduct erosion survey in all other Landfornm Class II! : : :XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX: uil land viiI ages 5.Z Systematic litlir:ig a. Implement pilot systematic land titlinig program ini PYI : : : :XXXXXXXXXXXX pi iot dusuns : lrovirn( ial Agency Strenigthening (BAPPIDA IKI) : : a. Iieritify priority agency needs and prepare budget requests XX:: : .6. I Karnwi I Pertanidnlar /6.? XK I Dinas Dinas XXXXXXXX X .6.3 Sub-Balai RLKI *1. ARIA OEVELOPMENI PLANNING & SUPPORT (BANGDA) u,.1 Mandgenrent Strengthening : : d. Conduct initial management iniproveinent workshops and : :XXXXXXXXX: X::: :: meetings :: : b. Conduct management improvement workshops with assistance :: : :XXXXX: :XXXXX of institutional Management Specialist c. Conduct joint review of BANGDA component with World Bank : : :XX:. review mission : : 9.? Management Information System Design : : a. Complete comparative study of MIS systems : : XXXXX: : : b. Determine information/data needs for all agencies : : :XXXXX: :: c. Design appropriate Management Information System : : :: : :XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9.3 Human Resource Development : :: : : : a. Prepare detailed staff training program :: : :XXXXX: b. Commence in-house staff training activities : :: ::: : :XXXXX 9.4 Operations : a. First meeting of National Project Steering Committee : :XX b. Issue project policy guidelines : XX:: : : : c. First meeting of National Technical Committee : XX: :: d. Undertake pre-recruitment activities for technical : :XXXXX: X: assistance required in PYI :: : e. Provide implementation assistance and coordination :: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx services for provincial project activities : : 9.5 Technical Assistance :: a. Recruit Pre-recruitment and procurement adviser: : : Draft terms of Reference and advertise :: XXXXX: :. Receive and review proposals :: :: :XX: : : : Complete contract negotiations :: ::: :XXXXX: Adviser in place : ::::: : XXXXX b. Recruit local Institutional Management Specialist :: Draft terms of Reference and advertise :: XX: : Receive and review proposals :XX: : :XX:: Complete contract negotiations :: :: :XX: : : Specialist in place : : :XXXXXXXXXXXXXX c. Recruit Management Information Specialist : : Draft terms of Reference and advertise : : XX: * Receive and review proposals : : : ;XX: Complete contract negotiations :: :: :XX: Specialist in place : : :: : XXXXX: e. Recruit local Training Specialist : : Draft terms of Reference and advertise :: XX: ::::: . . Receive and review proposals :XX: : :XX: Complete contract negotiations :: :: :XX: : Specialist in place : :::: :XXXXXXXX: JANUARY 31, 1991 - 128 - ANNEX 14 Page 1 of 3 INDONESIA YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ("Bangun Desa 11) Documents on Project File 1. Appraisal Documents 1.1 Detailed Project Cost Tables 1.2 Farm Budgets 1.3 Working Paper on Project Management and Implementation, 1990 1.4 Working Paper BANGDA Strengthening Component, BANGDA, March 1990 1.5 MARD Research Component, AARD, October 1989 1.6 Working Paper, Rural Roads and Bridges, Mr. M. Clapham, 1990 1.7 GOI Funding Mechanism 2. FAO World Bank Cooperative Program, Preparation Team Working Papers. 2.1 Aide Memoire - World Bank Mission; March 27 - April 14, 1989 2.2 Summary of project oojectives, components, and sub- components 2.3 Logical Framework (Fifth Draft) 2.4 Upland Agricultural Experiences in Java (Working Paper 1) 2.5 Institutional Capacity Analysis (Working Paper 2) 2.6 Roads and Bridges (Working Paper 3) 2.7 Summary of Decision Process for the Selection of Project Areas - 1i9 - ANNEX 14 Page 2 of 3 2.8 Watershed Systems Action - Research Component (Working Paper 4 (a) AARD Report and (b) Consultant's Report) 2.9 Improving Upland Extension (Working Paper 5) 2.10 Agriculture Development Proposals (Working Paper 6) 9.11 Watershed Development Strategies (Working Paper 7) 2.12 Land Use Planning (Working Paper 8) 2.13 Project Cost Estimate (Working Paper 9) 2.14 Community Mobilization Project Feasibility Study by Unisystems P.T. Utama and ENEX of New Zealand Inc. 3.1 Main Report 3.2 Appendices 3.21 Appendix I: Land Use Survey and Evaluation Report 3.22 Appendix II: Financial and Economic Cost Support Tables 3.23 Appendix III: Socio-Economic Survey of 360 Respondents: Main Conciusions, draft only 3.24 Appendix IV: Adaptive Research 3.25 Appendix V: Agricultural Extension 3.26 Appendix VI: Credit 3.27 Appendix VII: NGO's Active in DIY 3.3 Working Paper Annexes 3.31 Annex I: Crops and Fishery Component 3.32 Annex II: Livestock Component Working Paper 3.33 Annex III: Small Industry Component 3.34 Annex IV: Roads and Bridges Component 3.35 Annex V: Water Component 3.36 Annex VI: Health Community Component 3.37 Annex VII: Community Participation Development Component 3.38 Annex VIII: Farm Technology Development Component 3.39 Annex IX: Marketing 3.3.10 Annex X: Land Titling Component 3.3.11 Annex XI: Organization and Management Project - 130 - ANNEX 14 Page 3 of 3 Indonesia, Village Development Project 4.1 World Bank, Staff Appraisal Report No. 2994-IND, 1980 4.2 Working Paper C-14-2, Economic Evaluation of Village Projects 4.3 Economic Impact of the Project Special Study, Project Preparation for Rural Development Stage II, Yogyakarta, Directorate General for Regional Development (BANGDA), Regional Development Agency (BAPPEDA) and Gajah Mada University, Yogyakarta, 1988. An Overview of the Yogyakarta Rural Development Project, Component Completion Reports, Regional Development Planning Board (BAPPEDA), 1989. - 131 - YUADP/ anOI INDO NESIA annex /f chart 1 ~~~~~~PROPOSIED YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECTCH R 1 Relalooship with Exiting Governmnt Structur CHART 1 D.G. al.ono. I.PROJ. .H.OLDER _ D.G AARD ........ STEERING D.G D N (Minl A,aric.i Comn i r A T 0 n or N Sa Research A DII. yogyo.P.r.iame. .... ..... Team. P I AcfoQn Koeann Ii SETWI R IWorking Group | To V . ~~~~No°nnDeplt.oAmteociesl R laqnal OFes IProSerics iDirecteroles 0~~~~~~~~~~ N e ,. # _ i orc # Itaiexdst I S n I . _hI I C I Yo;..-- ACW* A cooriom0 - U P ATI ........... ........ F =, K A B E N [J I ltab. rNlic s ,Knbus>plen I Aulonomous Aubno~Lieus om .. br ASr,Extension K~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ & Consevatio rI-DDFr F- ..... C A M A ITR<.d11 K |Kec.* De,l &I I Ka ~. Apencr E AC 17I- A v A N LEGEND | Gf HEAD - * .*_ P1-L | PPLs | UDST =UPLAND DEVELOPMENT 'i SUPPORT TEAM =xPropsedNew Projed A I g [| I # Primaryr ,Work Unit b(or ll Project Irxplemelntatbn E_ |=Cornmornd line H I I ...... . t C=,1.;a= ?9d ....... I M , _ 1 DUSUN HAD| CaOtdnrJlOn lne IE r0ID l Formner GraUS i Parmer Gra,sI T g ~~DuunD7v.J COMPROG7 YOGYAKIARTA UPL.AND AREA DEVEtOPMENT PROJECT 1CRong.n C- ff') 1 1.2.90 6.*Ion ,.*oNeOn M.b.p,ogo. -apooeh. sob-COMnPon...e 0nd L'.l. of Gomw.nnn UPLA.ND PRODUCTIVITY AND UhPLAND CC UNITY LEEO, PMENT INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMNIN STABILIZATION VILLAGE ROADS AND BRIDGES I. COMPONENTS IMPILEMENTED WITHIN LACH Of 4 K.ABUPATENS 1.COMMUNITY MOBIUSAIION 1BANODES Tk RI 3 . RURAL ROADS AND BRIDGES.- ....4. XARUPATEN PLANNING. COORDINATION i [Pobik Work6 Tk II[ SUPPORT SERVICES IBAPPEDA 1k 11) 1.1 DUSVJN MORIUSATION 1.2 VILLAGE MOBILUSATtON 3.1 ROAD CONSTRUCTION A.1I BAP'PEDA 1k I STIEENGTHENrNG .1.1 Co.n~n;Py D.velopo..n Tmi.i.9 1.2.1 h'Io,hA-.nI -at. 3.2 BRIDGE AND CUI.VERT CONSTRUCTION 4.2 SETWILDA Tk l STRENGTHENING 1. 1.2 Dn,.. p.eict, 1.2.2 Dane. -.,onnn (nd. 3.3 ROAD MAINTENANCa A.3 IEARUPATEN AGENCY STRENGTHENING 1.2.3 V1610. r.*chI 3.4 INSTITUTIONAL COSTS 4.3.1 Enf-oio -o.,- 1.2.4 VIlla8. EeoJsrnl.p tr.ininq 3.4.1 Bo1dd,ngs 4.3.2 Str.ntlne;%n of Kobn~pw-oq*K 9~n _________-______________ ~ ~ .. - 3.4.2 Eq.ipmnen 4.3.3 F.nd, IK--f- m tn UDKP; pnnj.n 3.4.3 A n . n n o_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3.A.4 Troin.ng -2. SLOPE STABIJSATION TECHNICAL SERAICES (Dioco Pvlonlon IFP. 1k Ml 2.1 RUNOFF CONTROL AN4D SOIL CONSERVYATION /a ~2.4 ON-FARtM TECHNOLOGY 2.1.1 Imfiklimlno a.% DtSPAYS (BPN3 2.1.2 Tec6knol Tmiintg 2.4.1 Dk. Fenorklo 1kBA 2.2 FARM P'LANNING AND DIVERSIFICATION 2.4.2 DIe.. Pen.makoa 1k II 2.2.1 Inltatkokol cOth 2.4.3 SuIi.Cbonq ELK? 2.2.2 Tnknkol Io.W.9n 2.4.3 1nk6wl T.niin. 2.3 KABUPATEN UPLAND DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT TEAM 2.3.1 In.0mIonol con's 2.3.3rT@ hlo tkaining - J_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I. COMPONENTS IMPLEMENTED BY PROVINCIAL AGENCIES I. -6. UPlAND DEVILOPMENT SUPPORT TEAM. S. COMMUNITY DEVLOPMAENT TRAINING .7. PROVINCIAL PLANNING. COORDINATION I - (Dims, Penionion T.P. Tk IJ SUPORT SERVICES IBANGDES 1k ) SUPPORT SERVICES IRAPTEDA Tk I] 6.1 INSTtTUIIONAL COSTS s.1 H umAN REsouRCE DEVELOPMENT 7.1 MANAGEMENT STUDY 6.2 TECHNICA ASSITANCE 5.2 DATABASE DEVLOPMENT 7.2 RAPPEDA Tk I STRENGTHENING 5.3 TECHNICA AS.SISTANCE 7.2.1 I- rlNsn., nay, 7.2.2 DI,nntio.,y Inod, 7.2.3 T-hnk.1n OtoNOn- 7.3 SETWILDA Th I STRENGTHENING 7.A HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT 7.A.1 Condncnon 7.4.2 Pigning -nd -9ogon tmli.ng 7-4.3 M.I.S nod n- ~,r.. rin 7.5 LAND-USE PLANNING AND TITUNG 7.5.1 Mopping & enotin %.mye 7.5.2 SpiontoK firilog 7.6 PROVINCIAL AGENCY STRENGTHENING 7.6.) IKon.4i PerIonio- 7.6.2 Ik I Di-,n Din- 7.6.3 Sn.66o6, RLKI RI. COMPONENTS IMPIMENTED BY NATIONAL AGENCIES -.0..... UPLAND WATERSHED SYSTEMS ACTI. ....9. AREA DEVELOPMENT PLANNING & SUPPORT........ RESEARCH IAARDI IRANGOAJ B. 1 RESEARCH FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION 9.1 MANAGEMENT STRENGTHENING 8.2 RESEARCH PROGRAM 9.2 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM0 B.3 TECHNICAL ASSITANCE DESIGN 9.3 HUMAN IEEsou.aC DEVLOfPMENT /a Inproject description: Microwatershed Stabilization. 9.5 OPERHIATIONS NC yrdp2.05 INDO NESIA revised,02/90 YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PROPOSED PROJECT ORGANISATION STRUCTURE N AGENCY or AGRIC. IDIRECTORATE GENERAL a RESEARCH and DEV. Notional Pmoed cREGIONAL DEVELOPAA" o Technical Team j|___ P GOVE RNOR r I rovineicl riqect o Steenrg Committee _ _ _ PPEDAl/EWILDAT v I Comnent 7 n t c Team in Yonla _ |Watenshed SyitemnDrcod tBNDS TnmnPnmTQ …-. _ _ _ _ _ __.. --. -_-.-.----------- -..-----…- - .-.-.-.… . -..-. - …--- .-----.... . ...…-----...--.-. .--...------------- aK BUATI__ P teik ife APD I DI a a Kau Pten CUNee W | Dinas Pertanion D o n of BANGDES T Penen Tk.I cmpova Ad. ese66Cmon 1 | Comlonen 2 7 Con r o KabuaUen UDST T -- -- -- - - - -- - - - -- -- -- - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- - -- -- -- - -- -- -- - -- -- - .... . - -- -- -- - -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- -- - -- - --- -- -- - K BUPATI~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ YOGYAKARTA UPLAND AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT / : -' \ (BANGUN DESA 11I JAWA TENGAH 7 s/ )Project Area Ele-vtions in meters: Lendform Classes 2900 ' . ....... ...- .l Xempel oTuri cngkingo Isohyets in mm/yr 1000 \.~~~~~~ / / --'.. Reads ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~500 ''\\z~~~~~~\*\ ~~~~~'J( / , \~~~~~~~~Sleasae: \ ~~~~~~~~Railroads20 / : rom oenai KILOMEOeSt I/as) Uestla,le Upleds (ci5% slope) alas E-onice Plans ''~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~TN A 0 ^^"°e eman _ ed y v. 'pssce Pleret~ /Noglipor~ nio n- I Be T)' e 2,000 '-'- SULAWESI I-IA-N'vAa I t_t t_ t , t' _ . _ __7 i i 1 , . :,.T . XLed h i a ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r nos 0 Bri a ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r Llr BRUNEi 1epugLiur dae' 11 A I AYS I A~/ Snde IRIAN~ JAWA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ AATNA