GOVERNMENT OF DELTA STATE NIGERIA EROSION AND WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROJECT (NEWMAP) DELTA STATE PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT FINAL REPORT RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP) OBOMKPA GULLY EROSION PROJECT ANIOCHA NORTH LGA, DELTA STATE. NIGERIA June 2019 FINAL REPORT FOR RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP) Credit No.: IDA51050 Project ID: P124905 OBOMKPA GULLY EROSION PROJECT ANIOCHA NORTH LGA, DELTA STATE Delta State NEWMAP 16 Governor’s Street, West End Asaba, Delta State Nigeria June, 2019 Page | ii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ARAP Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan CAI Community Administrative Institutions CBO Community Based Organization CIP Community Involvement Program DTS-NEWMAP Delta State Nigeria Erosion and Watershed Management Project DTSG Delta State Government of Nigeria ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan FBO Faith-Based Organization FGD Focused Group Discussion FGN Federal Government of Nigeria FME Federal Ministry of Environment GEF Global Environmental Fund GIS Geographic Information System GRASS Gully Rapid Action and Slope Stabilization GPS Global Positioning System GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism LGA Local Government Area MOE Ministry of Environment, Beatification and Ecology NEWMAP Nigeria Erosion and Watershed Management Project NGO Non-governmental Organization OP Operation Procedure of the World Bank PAH Project-Affected Household PAP Project-Affected Person PC Project Coordinator PG President General PRS Government’s Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRS) RAP Resettlement Action Plan SCCF Special Climate Change Fund Aurecon Aurecon Consulting Engineers Nigeria Limited SPMU State Project Management Unit ToR Terms of Reference WB World Bank Page | iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................... iii TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................................... iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 11 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................... 11 1.2 Background............................................................................................................................... 11 1.3 Responsible Lead Agencies ......................................................................................................... 12 1.4. Obomkpa Gully Description .................................................................................................. 12 1.4.1 Gully Terrain Features and Properties at Risks: ......................................................... 12 1.5. Project Rationale: ....................................................................................................................... 12 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED INTERVENTION AND PROJECT AREA OF INFLUENCE ................................................................................................... 14 2.1 Site Location ............................................................................................................................. 14 2.2 Project Activities....................................................................................................................... 14 2.3 Perimeter of Project Influence ............................................................................................... 15 3.0 POLICY, LEGISLATIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK.................... 17 3.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................... 17 3.2 Nigerian Land Related Legal Issues ..................................................................................... 17 3.2.1 Customary Land Tenure.................................................................................................. 17 3.2.2 Statutory Tenure ............................................................................................................... 17 3.3 World Bank Involuntary Resettlement OP 4.12 .................................................................. 17 3.4 Gaps between Nigeria Laws and WB Policies on Land Acquisition and Resettlement 18 3.5 Resolution of Gaps between Nigerian and OP 4.12 Policies on Resettlement ............. 18 4.0 SOCIOECONOMIC AND CULTURAL BASELINE CONDITIONS ..................... 20 4.1 Introduction: .............................................................................................................................. 20 4.1.1 Socioeconomic Survey: ................................................................................................... 20 4.1.2 Public Consultation: ......................................................................................................... 20 4.1.3 Use of Maps and GIS: ..................................................................................................... 20 Page | iv 4.2 Cultural Environment............................................................................................................... 21 4.2.1 Population .......................................................................................................................... 21 4.2.2 Ethnic Groups ................................................................................................................... 21 4.2.3 Religion .............................................................................................................................. 21 4.3 Land Use Pattern ..................................................................................................................... 21 4.3.1 Cultural Resources........................................................................................................... 21 4.4 Analysis of Socioeconomic Survey ....................................................................................... 22 4.4.1 Objectives of the Socioeconomic Survey ..................................................................... 22 4.4.2 Respondents to Administered Questionnaire .............................................................. 22 4.4.3 Gender, Age and Household Size Distribution ............................................................ 23 4.4.4 Marital Status of Respondents ....................................................................................... 24 4.4.5 Access to Education ........................................................................................................ 24 4.4.6 Occupational and Income Distribution .......................................................................... 24 4.4.7 Household Waste Disposal ............................................................................................. 25 4.5 Desirability of the Project ........................................................................................................ 25 4.6 Conflict Resolution................................................................................................................... 25 4.7 Community Participation......................................................................................................... 26 5.0 SUMMARY OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND CONSULTATIONS WITH STAKEHOLDERS ............................................................................................ 28 5.1 Objective of Community Consultation .................................................................................. 28 5.2 Public Participation Process .................................................................................................. 28 5.2.1 Stakeholders’ Identification ............................................................................................. 28 5.2.2 Community Consultations and Meetings ...................................................................... 29 5.3 Social Issues/Risks ................................................................................................................. 32 5.4 Guiding Principles .................................................................................................................... 32 6.0 POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF PROPOSED PROJECT ........................................ 34 6.1 Field Findings ........................................................................................................................... 34 6.2 Potential Project Impact Areas .............................................................................................. 34 6.3. Identified Project Impacts ...................................................................................................... 34 6.3.1 Potential Positive Project Impacts ................................................................................. 34 Page | v 6.3.2 Negative Project Impacts ................................................................................................ 35 Socioeconomic Impacts (WB OP 4.12) .................................................................................. 35 6.3.3 Impact Mitigation Measures: ........................................................................................... 36 6.3.4 Summary of Identified Impacts Areas: .......................................................................... 36 6.4 Identification of Project Affected Population ........................................................................ 37 6.5 Vulnerable Group..................................................................................................................... 37 7.0 PROPOSED RESETTLEMENT PLAN ........................................................... 39 7.1 Eligibility .................................................................................................................................... 39 7.1.1 Loss of Assets................................................................................................................... 39 7.1.2 Loss of Livelihood............................................................................................................. 39 7.2 Entitlement Matrix .................................................................................................................... 39 7.3 Valuation Procedures .............................................................................................................. 41 7.4 Compensation for Losses and Other Assistance ............................................................... 42 7.4.1 Resettlement Measures .................................................................................................. 42 7.4.2 Compensation for Land Losses ..................................................................................... 42 7.4.3 Compensation for Displacements .................................................................................. 43 7.4.4 Compensation for Loss of Economic Trees/crops ...................................................... 43 7.5 Dispute Resolution and Grievance Redress Procedure ....... Error! Bookmark not defined. 7.5.1 Dispute Resolution .............................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 7.5.2 Grievance Redress Mechanisms ...................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 7.5.3 Formation of Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) ..... Error! Bookmark not defined. 7.5.4 Training of the Grievance Redress Committees ............ Error! Bookmark not defined. 7.6 ARAP Implementation Committee (AIC) .............................................................................. 43 7.7 Compensation Procedures..................................................................................................... 43 7.7.1 Relocation Times .............................................................................................................. 44 7.7.2 Livelihood Restoration ..................................................................................................... 44 7.8 Monitoring and Evaluation (M & E) .......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 7.8.1 Performance Indicators ...................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 7.8.2 Completion Audit ................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 8.0 ESTIMATED COST OF ARAP .............................................................. 51 Page | vi 9.0 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE .......................................................... 54 DISCLOSURES ............................................................................................... 55 GLOSSARY OF TERMS ................................................................................... 55 REFERENCES................................................................................................. 57 ANNEXURE A ............................................................................................... 58 TERMS OF REFERENCE ............................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. ANNEXURE B....................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. LIST OF CONTACTED STAKEHOLDERS ......................................................................................... 58 ANNEXURE C ................................................................................................ 59 MINUTES OF COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS ............................................................. 59 ANNEXURE D ............................................................................................... 73 SAMPLE SOCIOECONOMIC/CENSUS DATA FORM ............................................................................ 73 ANNEXURE E ................................................................................................ 79 SAMPLE OF AFFECTED ASSETS FIELD VERIFICATION FORM.............................................................. 79 ANNEXURE F ................................................................................................ 81 LIST OF IDENTIFIED VULNERABLE PERSONS AND PROPOSED SUPPORT .......................................... 82 ANNEXURE G ............................................................................................... 84 LIST OF PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS (PAPs) AND COMPENSATIONS ............................................. 84 ANNEXURE H ............................................................................................... 92 PHOTO IDENTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VULNERABLE PERSONS ..................................................... 92 PHOTO IDENTIFICATION OF PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS (PAPs) .................................................. 95 Page | vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The Nigeria Erosion and Watershed Management Project (NEWMAP), initiated by the Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) and funded by the World Bank (WB) and International Development Fund (IDF), is being implemented in Delta State, Nigeria and other participating states to help reduce soil erosion vulnerability in the States and to develop the States’ watersheds. Obomkpa is one of the towns in the State acutely being degraded and destroyed by active gully erosion and perennially suffer huge losses resulting from the impacts of the gully erosion. With each passing year, uncontrolled stormwater flow threatens lives and properties as the existing gullies become widened and more menacing. Through the NEWMAP, Delta State NEWMAP is targeting to remedy and rehabilitate the existing Obomkpa gully and reduce the impacts. The Obomkpa gully erosion control project will address and prevent the perennial exacerbation of existing gully across the three villages of Obomkpa as well as reverse land degradation within the community. The overall objective is to prepare a Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the Obomkpa gully erosion project. The RAP seeks to specifically identify, evaluate and document the set of mitigation, monitoring and institutional actions to be undertaken at the villages to eliminate identified adverse community or individual social and livelihood impacts before commencing the remedial construction and rehabilitation works. The objective of the WB Resettlement Plan is to restore persons affected by the project to a condition equivalent to or better than the pre-project or without project situation. This RAP also provides monitoring and institutional actions to be taken before the remedial construction and rehabilitation works to eliminate or reduce to acceptable levels the identified adverse environmental and social impacts. Project Description The Obomkpa gully erosion project consists of remedial structural and non-structural developments that include civil and bioremediation works along the gully corridor. The proposed ground interventions will address, prevent and reverse land degradation for the long- term and will involve rehabilitation and reconstruction of the existing gully corridor. The rehabilitation and reconstruction activities will involve civil works as well as bio-restoration activities acquisition of land along the gully corridor and will cause involuntary resettlement thereby triggering the World Bank’s OP 4.12 - the World Bank Resettlement Policy. Need for RAP The Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) for NEWMAP indicates that the number of potential project affected persons (PAPs) in the sub-projects would be less than 200. According to World Bank safeguard policy OP 4.12, this would require the preparation of an Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) as the social safeguard documentation for the sub-project. This RAP has been prepared to conform to the requirements of the WB OP 4.12 and the Nigerian national social policies, guidelines and assessment procedures as well as those of Delta State and the Local Agencies. Project Location Delta State is located in the South South geopolitical zone of Nigeria. Obomkpa town is located within the co-ordinates: latitude 60 7’N and 60 150’N and longitude 6050’E and 60 867’E and situated in Aniocha North LGA in the northern part of the Delta State. The project area affected by this RAP is 33,194 square meters. Legal Framework for Land Acquisition The Nigeria Land Use Act of 1978, amended under the Amended Land Use Act of 2004, Chapter L5 provides the legal framework for land acquisition in Nigeria. Under the World Bank, the Operational Policy OP 4.12 addresses land acquisition and involuntary resettlement. The Page | viii differences between the Land Use Act and the Bank’s OP 4.12 are mostly in the rehabilitation measures, which are neither proscribed nor mandated in the Act. It is noted that in the event of divergence between the two policies, the one that better serves the needs of the PAPs takes precedence. Potential Impacts There are both positive and negative impacts associated with this project. On the positive side, this project will provide a huge emotional and economic relief to residents of Obomkpa whose building properties, ancestral lands and livelihoods are under imminent threat of destruction by gully erosion. Additionally, the project will improve flow of traffic in and out of the project area neighborhood upon completion; reduce costs of transport and delays on travelling along the access roads; improve livelihoods for the area residents due to reduced cost of transportation; improve the landscape vista; and provide temporary job opportunities for both skilled and un-skilled labors. The identified major negative socioeconomic impacts of the project include loss of arable land and economic trees/farm crops. Mitigation of these impacts to acceptable levels has been proffered. About 33194 m2 of land acquisition is needed as the setback for stabilizing the gully walls, particularly at the deep sections of the gully corridor and there will be loss of economic trees/ farm crops within this area of land to be acquired. The project does not envisage any involuntary displacement of persons due to destruction of existing structures. However, 123 project-affected persons (PAPs) and 29 persons who are considered vulnerable on account of their age, fragility, disability, etc. have been identified. Also identified are eighteen of the 123 PAPs whose residences are too close to the project impact areas and may be temporarily relocated to allow for safe completion of works. All the land owners whose lands shall be permanently acquired for gully stabilization would be appropriately compensated for the land and improvements on their land as well as any loss of economic trees/crops in accordance with the WB and Nigeria Policies on land acquisition. Mitigation of Potential Impacts It is important that prior to project implementation, resettlement and livelihood restoration for the PAPs should be effected. Owners of acquired land and any economic trees/crops there- on would be compensated. Residents/tenants of building structures who are identified as PAPs and vulnerable persons due to age, fragility, disability, etc. who may likely be adversely impacted by project activities would be temporarily relocated during the construction phase and be compensated for the inconveniences of relocation. Public Participation and Consultations Public participation and stakeholders’ consultations were conducted in the course of this RAP to ensure that the rights and interests of PAPs are considered seriously. Local level consultative forums serve as community voices and these have become part of the entire project process. This RAP documents those that were consulted, dates, concerns raised and the Consultant response to these concerns. Household census of the people identified as PAPs were conducted to establish their socioeconomic profile including their health related status. Only PAPs who registered and met the cut-off date (February 13, 2018) during the baseline survey are considered to be eligible for any form of compensation or assistance. Grievance Redress Mechanism A mechanism through which complaints and disagreements can be smoothly resolved has been devised. Currently, there is a series of customary avenues that exist to deal with dispute resolution in the community and they will be employed as the “court of first appeal�, as necessary. The SPMU has grievance redress structure/committee which has been put in place. The Grievance Redress process was conveyed and discussed extensively with the stakeholders including the PAPs at the stakeholder’s forum. It is anticipated that this will provide a platform for people to express their dissatisfaction over any matter as well as avoid unnecessary legal delays and cost overrun of the project. All grievances or complaints must Page | ix be registered and compiled regularly for project management. The devised mechanisms are fundamental to achieving transparency in the resettlement/relocation and compensation process. RAP Coordination and Implementation The State has appointed a Focal NGO (FNGO) who is expected to serve as part of the RAP implementation process. The FNGO will provide technical support to the SPMU and ensure monitoring & evaluation of the implementation process. The primary responsibility for the RAP implementation is on the SPMU. The SPMU, may therefore appoint consultants/agents to provide necessary awareness, mobilization and facilitation, project appraisal, approval & disbursement, capacity building, monitoring & evaluation reporting to the FPMU and the World Bank. The budget estimate for compensation for the permanent acquisition of land, loss of economic trees/crops and temporary relocations under this RAP, including cost of administration, monitoring and evaluation is N19,081,125.00 only. Since these costs must be borne out of counterpart funds, it should be included in the overall project budget. Monitoring and Evaluation In order to successfully complete the resettlement management as per the implementation schedule and compliance, monitoring and evaluation of the RAP implementation will be a continuous process and will include internal and external monitoring. The Delta NEWMAP Safeguard/Livelihood Officer will play a key role in reporting the progress of implementation as well as compliance to the SPMU and the World Bank. Review and Disclosure This RAP is expected to be subjected to public review and it should be disclosed to the general public for review and comment at designated locations in Delta State, Federal Government and on the World Bank website. Display centers will include Delta NEWMAP SPMU office, NEWMAP FPMU office, EA Department of FMEnv., Office of State Commissioner for Environment, LGA NEWMAP Liaison office, Project Community, and Office of the State Commissioner for Local Government matters. Page | x 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose This Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) has been prepared for the Obomkpa Gully Erosion Project in Aniocha North Local Government Area (LGA) of Delta State in Nigeria. The Obomkpa project is being undertaken as a part of the Nigeria Erosion and Watershed Management Project (NEWMAP). The RAP seeks to identify, evaluate and document the set of mitigation, monitoring and institutional actions to be undertaken for the Obomkpa project to eliminate identified adverse community or individual social and livelihood impacts before commencing the remedial construction and rehabilitation works associated with the project. This Report also includes measures needed to implement the identified actions and address the adequacy of the monitoring and institutional arrangements. It also provides guidelines to stakeholders participating in the mitigation, including rehabilitation/resettlement operations in order to ensure that the project affected persons (PAPs) will not be impoverished by the adverse social impacts of the project. 1.2 Background NEWMAP was initiated by the Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) to help reduce soil erosion vulnerability and to develop watersheds in some States of Nigeria. The project is funded by the World Bank (WB). Delta State is located in the South-South geopolitical zone of Nigeria and is known to be under flood and erosion impacts. Obomkpa is located within the co-ordinates: Longitudes N6024’55� and N06041’52� and Latitudes E006029’29� and E006049’13� and situated in Aniocha North LGA in the northern part of Delta State. The town is located about 34.5km south of Asaba. Obomkpa is one of the many towns in Delta State whose communities are perennially devastated by erosion gullies resulting from storm water flow. With each passing year, uncontrolled storm water flow creates new gullies that threaten lives and properties while existing gullies are deepened and widened. In an effort to reduce the impacts of erosion on Obomkpa town, the Delta State Government (DTSG) has proposed to rehabilitate and remedy one of the existing gullies – Obomkpa gully erosion corridor through the NEWMAP opportunity. Figure 1.1 shows the location of Delta State within the South-south of Nigeria. Figure 1.2 shows the location of Aniocha North LGA in Delta State. Aniocha North LGA Delta State Fig. 1.1: Map of Nigeria Showing Delta State Fig. 1.2: Map of Delta State showing Aniocha North LGA Page | 11 The project intervention at the Obomkpa erosion corridor is expected to have widespread positive impacts on overall socio-economic status and livelihoods of the residents of the area. The project will however, also have some negative impacts especially to those who are resident in the immediate vicinity of the project area. The project intervention activities and the associated socioeconomic impacts trigger the WB Safeguard policies that include involuntary resettlement (OP 4.12). The Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) for NEWMAP indicates that the number of potential project affected persons (PAPs) in the NEWMAP sub-projects would be less than 200. However, because of the significantly high level of social impacts resulting from land acquisition, it becomes necessary that a full RAP should guide the operations of this project. This RAP has been prepared to conform to the requirements of the World Bank Safeguard Policy, OP 4.12 and the Nigerian National Social Policies, Guidelines and Assessment procedures as well as those of Delta State and the Local Agencies. 1.3 Responsible Lead Agencies The lead Agencies for NEWMAP at the federal and state tiers of government are as follows: Federal Lead Agency: Federal NEWMAP Federal Project Management Unit (FPMU) The Federal Ministry of Environment Abuja, Nigeria State Lead Agency: Delta State NEWMAP State Project Management Unit (SPMU) State Ministry of Environment, Asaba, Delta State 1.4. Obomkpa Gully Description 1.4.1 Gully Terrain Features and Properties at Risks: The Obomkpa Gully Erosion Site is located in Obomkpa town in Aniocha North LGA. The gullied areas lie within the co-ordinates: Longitudes N6024’55� and N06041’52� and Latitudes E006029’29� and E006049’13�. The gully system consists of an active Main Gully (MG) with an average width of 18 meters at the top and average height of 10 meters and one finger gully (FG) having an average width of 10 meters at the top and an average height of 8 meters. The area of the gully sub-watershed is estimated at 449,601 m2 with a slope gradient of 10-17%. The gully-head is located at Ogbe Obi while the outfall is located at Iyi Ocha River, meandering through a total distance of about 2.5 kilometers. The Obomkpa erosion project site is located about two kilometers off the Asaba - Benin Express Road exiting at the Issele Ukwu junction. The gullies traverse the three villages of Obomkpa namely, Ogbe-Obi, Ogbe Onie and Ukpatu. The gully corridor can be seen from the satellite view of the Obomkpa gully area shown in Figure 1.3. Major destruction has occurred along the gully banks. Additionally, the gully bank failures have continued to occur at several locations subjecting buildings and land masses to the imminent risk of collapsing. The upper village areas continue to release their surplus water directly to the main collector trunk over the gully bank resulting in sloughing of the gully bank walls. 1.5. Project Rationale: The Obomkpa gully corridor runs through the populated areas of the town with critical infrastructure resulting in continued damage to existing infrastructure (roads, drainage Page | 12 channels and utilities). Within the upper watershed are located the rural people, major farmlands and residential properties. Several infrastructure exist along the corridor of the gullies and are seriously threatened. The inter-community roadways have been dislodged by the gullies resulting in long detours for the people and their goods. Large areas of farmlands have been majorly impacted with many homes and families losing their means of livelihoods. Many residential and business properties may collapse without timely intervention. People are afraid of losing lives, particularly children, to caving gully banks or landslides while economic activities are often disrupted with increased cost of movement as more land areas and properties are destroyed by the gullies. Involuntary resettlement can cause loss of income, assets, and community ties. Community ties, especially among the poor, can be essential for survival and well-being. In extreme cases, involuntary resettlement can lead to the dissolution of families, impoverishment and health problems. Consequently, urgent intervention is needed to salvage the environment, save lives, property and government infrastructure and to restore the people’s confidence in Government. Page | 13 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED INTERVENTION AND PROJECT AREA OF INFLUENCE 2.1 Site Location Obomkpa is located within the co-ordinates: Longitudes N6024’55� and N06041’52� and Latitudes E006029’29� and E006049’13� in Aniocha North Local Government Area (LGA) in the northern part of the State. The project site is located about two kilometers off the Asaba- Benin Express Road, and accessed through the Idumogo-Issele-Uku Road. 2.2 Project Activities Based on the engineering design reports prepared by Aurecon Consulting Engineers Nigeria Limited for Obomkpa gully erosion project the proposed remedial structural and non-structural developments include civil works (drop structures, drainage channels, check dams, etc.) and vegetative works (gabion protection, tree planting, etc.) to prevent erosion and provide aesthetic view along the gully corridor as well as prevent further encroachments of the floodplain. The proposed erosion control measures include the main structures for the main road, gully bed system and the bank stabilization measures. The designed main road and gully bed system comprise of the following structures: • Concrete side drains and asphalt roads; • Drain Inlet Structure; • Lined canal for a total length of 2.5 km; • Baffled chute drop structure with stilling basins; • Trapezoidal articulated concrete drainage channel; and, • Discharge culvert system/outlet structures The designed bank stabilization measures include: • Gabion retaining wall; • Slope cutting with geo-textile and Vetiver grass; and, • Bio-remediation using Vetiver grass. The principal features of the above remedial measures include: 1) Construction of 1500 mm x 1000 mm rectangular concrete channel with asphalt road for 1.8km (includes main road and bypass road) 2) Construction of concrete and Reno-mattress drainage canals, gully bank protection works using stone pitching and Vetiver grass, provision of toe protection, provision of box culverts, chutes alignment, energy dissipaters, stilling basin and drop structures for the Main Gully and the Finger Gully. 3) Stabilization of the existing components of the Main and Finger Gullies using reinforced concrete canals, bio-remediation using Vetiver grass; The proposed work for gully slope stabilization consists of planting fast growing Vetiver grass used as a natural and effective bio-engineering tool to control erosion and stabilize slopes against sheet flow erosion. 4) Cutting of the slopes in 1:1.5 on both sides with 3 m berms in some areas and bio- remediation measures will be used to stabilize and protect the gully bank walls and prevent erosion. The interlocking bedding, gabion, concrete lined canals and Vetiver grass protection all help to provide important resistance to erosion forces and will be more aesthetic and environmentally friendly than other structures. Civil Construction Works: • The key activities in putting up the civil works include: ➢ cutting and filling for percentage recovery Page | 14 ➢ concrete casting ➢ assembling of structures and, ➢ slope stabilization. • The foundations of the lattice structures and concrete casting may be dug mechanically. The depth will be consistent with the geotechnical study and the engineering designs. • Vegetation clearing will be done manually. • A number of transport vehicles shall be employed in the project but there will be no on-site maintenance of vehicles. • Powered equipment is expected to be used in the construction (as required) as well as earth moving equipment such as excavators, compactors, bulldozers and pay loaders; • Skilled and unskilled labour shall be employed in the project. 2.3 Perimeter of Project Influence Obomkpa is an agrarian community whose residents are generally involved in agricultural pursuits. The residents and land users in the immediate vicinity of the gully corridor live in constant fear of not knowing whether with the next heavy rainfall, building structures, farm lands, economic trees and crops, and their basic means of sustaining their livelihoods will be washed away by collapsing gully walls and heavy stormwater flows. The project is designed to rehabilitate the degraded access and bypass roads and restore drainage channels, and provide a combination of structural channelization and vegetative gabion rehabilitation of the gully corridor. Based on the project engineering designs, an average of about six meters of land will be required as Setback on each side of the gully for the stabilization of the gully walls along the corridor, particularly at the deep sections of the gully. Consequently, it is envisaged that any building structures, farm lands, tree crops or farm produce, and any residents of buildings within 20 m of the gully wall along the corridor may be adversely impacted during construction depending on the specific nature of activity at the particular location. The gully corridor outfall is the Iyi Ocha River. This river has been overly silted partly from the deposition of all kinds of debris from erosion. The siltation and high levels of contamination of the river affects the aquatic life in Iyi Ocha River as well as the River Niger into which Iyi Ocha ultimately empties. The impact on aquatic life affects the fishery business that runs along the River Niger coastlines. With the fishery business majorly impacted by the gully, fish supply to the urban centers of Asaba and Onitsha is principally affected. The effects of this project, on a regional scale, are therefore significantly felt far beyond the boundaries of Obomkpa. Page | 15 Page | 16 3.0 POLICY, LEGISLATIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK 3.1 Overview In developing this RAP, the various laws in Nigeria and Delta State, the WB Safeguard Policies and international conventions which are relevant to land use and resettlements were reviewed. The RAP has been developed in line with these laws and regulations. It is also a requirement of the World Bank that any Bank assisted project/program must comply with the provisions of OP 4.12 on involuntary resettlement for impacts associated with land acquisition and displacement. The several statutes that handle the issue of land, infrastructure development and resettlement are summarized below. Section 3.2 and the sub-sections give a brief description of what constitutes land related legal issues in Nigeria. 3.2 Nigerian Land Related Legal Issues Interests in land broadly fall into two groups - rights that are held through Nigerian traditional systems and rights that derive from the Nigerian legal system introduced and maintained through laws enacted by Nigerian governments. The former is loosely known as customary tenure bound through traditional rules (customary law). The latter body of law is referred to as statutory tenure, secured and expressed through the Land Use Act of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. 3.2.1 Customary Land Tenure Customary Land Tenure refers to the unwritten land ownership practices by various communities under customary law. Such tenure still exists in large parts of Southern Nigeria where land has not been adjusted and registered. Its management falls under the respective traditional families and members. 3.2.2 Statutory Tenure The basic legal framework for the acquisition of land in Nigeria is the Land Use Act 1978 as amended under the Amended Land Use Act of 2004, Chapter L5 under the laws of the Federation of Nigeria. The Part 1 of the amended Act 2004 vests all land within the urban areas of any Nigerian State in the Executive Governor of that state. Land within the rural areas of the state is vested in the Local Government. The law provides for compensation to the holder of any land title when such land is to be acquired for public purposes. For developed land, the Governor (in the case of urban areas) or Local Government (in the case of rural areas) may, in lieu of compensation, offer resettlement in any other place as a reasonable alternative accommodation and in acceptance of resettlement, the holder’s right to compensation shall be deemed to have been duly satisfied. 3.3 World Bank Involuntary Resettlement OP 4.12 The World Bank’s Involuntary Resettlement Policy (IRP) outlines the conditions under which the World Bank will fund a project if it displaces persons or affects their social and economic well-being. The objective of the Bank’s resettlement policy is to ensure that population displaced by a project receives benefits from it. As a pre-requisite, the WB requires the preparation, in advance of the project implementation, of a Resettlement Action Plan/Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan (RAP/ARAP) where impacts are known or a Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) where impacts are not known before project appraisal. This RAP document is based on the best practices and criteria of involuntary resettlement provided in the OP 4.12. The gully rehabilitation project may potentially cause the displacement of some residents of the project area leading to loss of income and other forms of livelihood impacts. The main objective of this RAP is to identify any project affected persons (PAPs) and provide guidelines for compensating the PAPs so as to ensure that their livelihoods are improved or are restored as much as possible to the pre-impact level. Housing, infrastructure, and other compensation Page | 17 should be provided to the adversely affected population and pastoralists who may have customary rights to the land or other resources taken for the project. The absence of legal title of land by such groups should not be a limitation to compensation. 3.4 Gaps between Nigeria Laws and WB Policies on Land Acquisition and Resettlement There are similarities between key precepts of the WB OP 4.12 and Nigerian legislation. The legislation recognizes the need to offer compensation to those whose land is affected by government activities, such as compulsory acquisition where such land is envisaged to be used for the public good. Despite that, the current Nigerian legislation is however, silent on resettlement. The scope of coverage of Nigerian legislation and the WB OP 4.12 differs as well. The World Bank Safeguards favor a policy of avoidance or minimization of involuntary resettlement and recommends the design of appropriate mitigation provisions in case avoidance or minimization is not possible. Whereas both policies recognize customary tenure as equivalent to legal title, the WB OP 4.12 extends beyond this principle and recognizes informal occupancy as a form of customary tenure so long as such informal occupancy can be established prior to the project cut-off date. Therefore, in accordance with the legal agreement of the credit for the development of the project, the preparation of this RAP has been executed in line with the policies and guidelines as set out in the WB OP 4.12 which emphasizes that the affected persons be provided with compensation at replacement cost and supported during the transitional period to improve or at least restore their living standards to pre-displacement levels. Under WB OP 4.12, lack of legal title is no barrier in extending assistance and support to those affected by the project development. To abide by the requirements of the WB OP 4.12, the DTSG/Delta NEWMAP must take the following into consideration during the resettlement and compensation of the PAPs: • Depending on tenure category, PAPs will be provided transition assistance (such as moving allowances) during relocation; and be offered support after displacement, for a transition period, based on a reasonable estimate of the time likely to be needed to restore their livelihood and standards of living. • In cases where in-kind replacement is not the preferred option of the PAPs, then the cash compensation will be based on the replacement cost. The PAP without legal land documents should also be given considerations which should include the following: • Notice to vacate land prior to development; • Right to harvest crops in case the affected land is agricultural; • Tenants are provided with cash compensation in lieu of unexpired lease if agricultural land is acquired; and, • In case of loss of standing trees, owners should be compensated with cash compensation based on the market value. In case of loss of community property resources the resource should be provided afresh or relocate to new site. For unidentified impacts, mitigation measures will be proposed based on the Best Practices or Guiding Principle of involuntary resettlement and other regulating laws. 3.5 Resolution of Gaps between Nigerian and OP 4.12 Policies on Resettlement The resettlement process of PAPs must recognize both provisions of the Nigerian policy on land acquisition as stated in the constitution and its legal provisions and the policy provisions of the World Bank (as provided for in OP 4.12). Where there are differences between the Bank and Nigerian requirements, Bank policy shall be applied. The provisions of RPF developed for NEWMAP provide necessary guidelines to harmonizing the Nigerian legal requirements and the WB requirements for this project. Under the RPF provisions, any loss of livelihoods or Page | 18 displacement resulting from this project shall be fully compensated for in accordance with the provisions of WB OP 4.12. Page | 19 4.0 SOCIOECONOMIC AND CULTURAL BASELINE CONDITIONS 4.1 Introduction The cultural/socioeconomic elements and characteristics of the project area considered in this Consultancy include population, land use and tenure system, social setups, economic activities, education, vulnerability profile, gender, religion, settlement and migration patterns and health services system. Qualitative and quantitative mixed method of assessment was adopted in this project. This offered an effective means of interacting widely with the stakeholder groups, the Delta NEWMAP team, as well as individual stakeholders and affected persons. Participatory community meetings, public discussions as well as discussions with key informants (Community elders, Local leadership, and Delta NEWMAP Officers, among others) were held in the course of the Consultancy. 4.1.1 Socioeconomic Survey This involved detailed enumerations/inventories of households/persons resident or doing business within the project area as well as formal and informal discussions with focus groups, including the community traditional and administrative leadership. A comprehensive questionnaire for data collection was used for this purpose. The questionnaire captured the following information: a) Household bio-data (demographic information); b) Livelihoods; c) Inventory of structural and nonstructural assets including land, common properties, houses, economic trees and cash crops. Also, census of the PAPs was also conducted to fully characterize the impact on each affected person. 4.1.2 Public Consultation This was conducted as part of the participatory approach aimed at gaining good knowledge of the social issues/risks associated with the project as perceived by the communities. Public meetings were held in one location within the project immediate impact area. The meeting location was the Ogbe Obi Hall. Minutes of, and attendance to, these meeting are included in Annexure B. 4.1.3 Use of Maps and GIS Survey maps as well as high resolution imagery were used to identify and map out the project area identifying any locations of structures relative to the project corridor. The qualitative analysis involved an assessment of information obtained during the stakeholders’ consultations and public participation forums and discussions. The socioeconomic study provided necessary primary quantitative data for the project assessment. This quantitative data included: • Household census of the people identified as PAPs; • Establishing the socioeconomic profile of the project area population including health related status of respondents; • Establishing the structural assets to be affected by project; • Establishing area of land to be affected and the associated livelihood issues. Page | 20 4.2 Cultural Environment 4.2.1 Population Based on a 2017 population projections using the 2006 national population census records and the 2.9% annual population growth factor recommended by the national population commission (NPC), Aniochia North LGA has a projected population of 133,636 4.2.2 Ethnic Groups The people of Obomkpa consist of one of Nigeria’s major ethnic groups – the Igbos of the Enuani dialect. The ethnic group has its unique culture, social organization and traditions. The social and cultural aspects in the project area are closely intertwined with the ethic grouping. The Igbos have elaborate cultural practices that include strong kinship linkages with organizations spanning from localized social groups to strong clan relations. The cultural associations and social interactions are epitomized during cultural and religious ceremonies and festivities. The people generally speak and write mainly the Igbo and English languages. Obomkpa town and its villages is essentially a rural community whose residents are agrarians. The local dwellers rear domestic animals such as goats and sheep, and maintain chicken farms, most of which are carried out within their residential compounds. The village traces its origin from genealogical ties. Politics in the villages are done within the framework of clans. Clans are the basic point of cultural and political identity for the citizens. Clans and kinship are the elemental forces in control of political and cultural institutions as well as service points. The town consists of groups of households whose families are inter-related via marriages. 4.2.3 Religion The people of Obomkpa are predominantly of Christian religion, mostly Catholics and Anglicans. There are however a few traditionalists in the community. 4.3 Land Use Pattern There are three major types of customary land tenure system in Igbo land: (1) individual land ownership; (2) family land ownership; and. (3) communal land ownership. Individual ownership may be for indigenes or for residents of the community. Family lands (as well as individual lands) are inherited from generational relatives. Communities retain family lands which may never be sold. Such family lands are generally retained for communal development and sometimes are rotationally shared among the members of the community for agricultural purposes but are not for sale. Obomkpa can be characterized as a rural area with residential and commercial properties occupying a section of the community while the hinterland is predominantly used for agricultural purposes. Over 80% of the community land use is however still committed to agricultural production of food crops. The crops include maize, cassava, yams, plantain, vegetables, etc. A review of the land use pattern within the project areas reveals the following: i) There are several residential structures in close proximity to sections of the gully corridor. These structures are proposed and designed to be appropriately protected during the remedial construction phase of the project. ii) The land areas along the gully corridor in the hinterland and towards the Iyiocha River outfall are essentially dominated by agricultural farmlands and protective bamboo trees. 4.3.1 Cultural Resources There are no known designated historical, archaeological or cultural resources within the project area. Page | 21 4.4 Analysis of Socioeconomic Survey The measurement of precise impacts of the project on persons living or earning their living along the flood corridor cannot be effectively established without appropriate and accurate social and economic baseline data. The socioeconomic study will help to assess the social economic changes that may occur in the living conditions of the project area population as a result of the project impacts. 4.4.1 Objectives of the Socioeconomic Survey The primary objectives of the socioeconomic survey are as follows: 1. To collect information regarding existing socioeconomic conditions of the Obomkpa population; 2. To use the collected socioeconomic information to develop baseline data for the assessment of the social and economic impacts of the project; 3. To analyze the patterns of relationships that exist among various socioeconomic or demographic components of the project area; 4. To obtain perceived views of respondents on the effects of project on the environment and their vulnerability to socioeconomic changes due to the project; and, 5. To provide a benchmark for any further information needed to monitor and evaluate improvements in the future. The respondents to the socioeconomic survey included the following: (1) Owners of any buildings or structures located within 20 meters from the edges of the Obomkpa Gully Erosion corridor; (2) Owners of any buildings or structures located in areas to be used as construction staging areas during the construction phase of the project; (3) Residents/tenants of the buildings or structures identified in items (1) and (2) above whether the structures are permanent or temporary; residential or commercial; (4) Land owners along the proposed gully rehabilitation corridor whose lands would be required for the purpose of the project; (5) Residents/tenants of any buildings or structures along the access road which lead to the FG sections of the project area, irrespective of whether the structures are permanent or temporary, residential or commercial; (6) Economic trees/crops owners along the gully banks whose lands would be required permanently as Setback for the purpose of stabilizing the gully walls. The socioeconomic survey was conducted in conjunction with the census of the project affected persons to profile the impacted project area and provide baseline data against which mitigations measures and support will be measured. The analysis is based on the responses to the questionnaire administered to the group of persons listed above who are most likely to be impacted by the project. On the basis of the responses obtained in the exercise, the following determinations are made. 4.4.2 Respondents to Administered Questionnaire The residents of the project area (respondents) were requested to respond to the socioeconomic survey questionnaire that was administered to them and members of their households. Page | 22 Each survey questionnaire was completed by the head of the household. A total of 136 questionnaires were administered with a 100% return. The total number of household members for Fig. 4-1: Gender Distribution of Households the 136 respondents was 752. 4.4.3 Gender, Age and Household Size Distribution 41% The survey data indicated a household 59% male/female ratio of 59:41 for the project area as shown in the Figure 4-1. Some of the women in Obomkpa operate retail Fig. 4-2: Age Distribution of Households Male Female stores and are also storekeepers at the few 12% merchandizing outlets in the town. The men 28% 18% however, are generally more mobile than the women as the men are more involved in general pursuits to provide for the family. 43% Women in the project area are also largely involved in traditional agriculture. The age distribution data of the household 21years & Less 22-45years members (Figure 4-2) indicate that 28% of 46-60years Above 60years the household members are 21 years of age or less while 12% are 60 years or more. The survey further shows that 43% of the household members are within the youthful Fig. 4-3: Household Size Distribution for Obompka ages of between 22 and 45 years, and 18% of the household members are between the ages of 46 and 60 years. The percentage of household members of ages 60 or more is 11.8% 9.6% 1-2 consistent with the population trend in the 20.6% 25.0% 3-4 community and also reflective of urbanization effect in the area. 5-6 33.1% 7-8 The household size distribution from the Above 8 survey ranged from a minimum of one person to a maximum of 11 persons. The average size of households is 6 persons for the respondents. Households with one to two members are 9.6% while household sizes of more than 8 persons are 11.8% (Figure 4- 3). A majority (33.1%) of the households have sizes of 5 or 6 persons while 20.6% has sizes of 7 or 8 persons. The data shows 25% of the households have sizes of between 3 and 4 persons. Page | 23 4.4.4 Marital Status of Respondents Fig. 4-4: Marital Status Of Households Figure 4-4 shows the marital status of respondents in the project area. About forty one percent (41.1%) of the respondents are married 54.9% while about 54.9% are single. Approximately six percent (3.9%) of the respondents are widowed 41.1% while less than one percent (0.1%) of the respondents is divorced or separated. Fig. 4-5: Educational Distribution of Households 3.2% 38% 0.7% 0.1% 0.0% 26% 23% 9% 2% 1% 4.4.5 Access to Education The survey responses indicate that only 2% of the population of schooling age never attended school (Figure 4-5). The level of basic education for the surveyed households is relatively high with 98% of the surveyed population having attained the basic primary (FSLC) level of education or higher. The data further shows that 98% of the population has attended and/or Fig. 4-6: Occupational Distribution of graduated from primary and secondary Households education. This high literacy level within the project affected area is also a reflection of 7% the literacy rate in the Obomkpa community 13% as a whole. Generally, education in 48% 13% Obomkpa and indeed the entire LGA seem to be strengthened by the existing 20% educational infrastructure support within the area. There are several primary and secondary schools located within and around Obomkpa village. Farming Service Provider Civil Servant 4.4.6 Occupational and Income Trading/Business Other (Student/Jobless) Distribution The occupational distribution data from the survey indicate that 48% of Obomkpa households are either unemployed or are in school. Approximately, 7% are engaged in farming, 20% are self-employed (trading/business) while 13% are employed in the private sector and in the civil service, respectively (Figure 4-6). Page | 24 The main financial sources for the households Fig. 4-7: Monthly Income Distribution of surveyed are income from trading/business Households across the community. About 33% of the respondents reported owning a business or 66.9% being self-employed. A significant number of persons (27%) in the community are unemployed. Based on the income data provided by respondents in the survey, 19.9% 19.9% of households in Obomkpa earn over N60,000 10.3% monthly with 13.2% earning between N21,000 2.2% 0.7% and N60,000 monthly (Figure 4-7). About 66.9% of the households in the community earn less than N21,000 per month. The margin of error in the information provided on incomes may be significant considering that some of the respondents may have provided grossly inflated data with the intent to receive compensations in accordance with the level of incomes they indicate in the survey. The data provided could not be independently verified. 4.4.7 Household Waste Disposal Most of the respondents indicated that their household wastes are disposed at convenient locations including natural or man-made crevices. In many areas, the wastes are also indiscriminately dumped inside the drainage channels, gullies or at illegal dumpsites created only as a matter of convenience. Solid waste management in the project area is a considerable health hazard to the residents and also impedes the effective functioning of the storm water drainage systems. The dumped refuse usually causes regular obstruction to storm water flow and the drainage network, resulting in cases of flooding in the affected areas. Most residents dispose their domestic refuse randomly outside their residential homes and flood-prone areas are also treated as de-facto waste disposal sites. The situation in the project area indeed is a reflection of the poor waste management and waste disposal mechanisms in most part of the state. As with other parts of Nigeria, majority of households typically dispose of their domestic refuse inappropriately outside their residences. During the wet season, solid waste is transported by flowing stormwater through unplanned drainage paths leaving behind unsightly trails of refuse. 4.5 Desirability of the Project All the respondents in the survey (100%) Fig. 4-8: Project Desirability indicated immense desirability for the project to proceed as proposed (Figure 4-8). Most of them YES NO INDIFFERENT also expressed a desire for the project to proceed before the next cycle of rainfall. 100% 4.6 Conflict Resolution Most respondents in the survey (99%) prefer and find it most convenient to have conflicts resolved through informal traditional modes of conflict 0% 0% resolution which currently exist within the communities. The court system is seen as an alternative means of resolving issues but no respondent considered it as a first mode of conflict resolution. One percent (1%) of the respondents remained indifferent to the preferred approach as shown in Figure 4-9. Page | 25 4.7 Community Participation The direct involvement and active participation Fig. 4-9: Preference for Conflict of relevant stakeholders and the local Obomkpa Resolution residents in the planning and management processes of the project assures that any 99% potential disharmonious issues within the community are resolved speedily. There will also be maximization of resource use, increased benefits and expanded opportunities for the community in the project area. 0% 1% Community participation improves Informal Court System Indifferent understanding of the project and System communication between the SPMU, the consultants or contractors and the community. The decision-making process for the project will also be enhanced by actively involving relevant stakeholders, especially the project affected persons and organizations that have a stake in the project. The Community and Stakeholder involvements are discussed in more details in Section 5. Table 4.1: Summary of Findings for all Socioeconomic Indicators Socioeconomic S/No Findings Indicator 1 Population Based on the 2006 national population census records and the 2.9% annual population growth factor recommended by the national population commission (NPC), Aniocha North LGA has a projected population of 133,636 for 2017. The survey data indicates that Obomkpa has about 18% difference in the male-female population ratio at the household level. It is noted that the women appeared to be grossly involved with petty trading activities and farming. 2 Ethnic Groups and The people of Obomkpa consist of one major Nigerian ethnic group – the Igbos. Language Spoken The people generally speak and write mainly the Ibo and English languages. Clanism and kinship are strong elements and driving forces in control of political and cultural institutions and service points. The villages consist of groups of households whose families are inter-related through marriages. 3 Religion The members of Obomkpa community are predominantly of the Christian faith, mostly Catholics and Anglicans with some traditionalists. 4 Land Use System Three major types of customary land tenure system exist in Obomkpa, viz: – (1) individual land ownership; (2) family land ownership; and. (3) communal land ownership. Individual ownership may be for indigenes or for residents of the community. Family lands (as well as individual lands) are inherited from generational relatives. Communities retain family lands which may never be sold but mostly used for agricultural purposes. About 80% of land is committed to agricultural production of food crops which include maize, cassava, yams, plantain, vegetables, etc. 5 Household Based on the survey, 136 respondents with 752 households were documented in Distribution in Project Obomkpa. Area 6 Gender, Age and The survey shows that about 28% of the households in the community are below Household Size of the age of 21 years while about 43% are between the youthful ages of 22 and 45 Respondents years. The percentage of the respondents’ household members that are above the age of 60 years is about 12%. Household size distribution in the project area ranges from 1-11 persons with an average household size of 6 persons for the community. 7 Marital Status of About 41.1% of household members in Obomkpa community are married while Respondents about 54.9% are single and about 3.9% of the households are widowed. One percent (0.1%) of the respondents is divorced. 8 Access to Education There is a relatively moderate literacy level within Obomkpa community with 98% of the surveyed population having attained the FSLC level of education and Page | 26 Socioeconomic S/No Findings Indicator higher. Only about 2% of respondents have not attained the basic primary education 9 Occupational and The occupational distribution data shows a moderately high rate of unemployment Income Distribution of (48%) in the community. This situation could pose some serious social risk when Respondents not properly managed. The community however, in recent times, has witnessed an influx of persons from other parts of the state/country who have settled in the area mainly for trading purposes. 10 Household Waste Household wastes are indiscriminately dumped at illegal points or dumpsites Disposal adjacent to the gully corridor. Solid waste management is a considerable hazard to health and the effective functioning of the storm water drainage systems. Dumped wastes/refuse in the project area causes regular obstruction of the storm water drainage systems. 11 Health Services There is a primary health care centre along the project corridor serving Obomkpa residents. Records show that common diseases in project area include diarrhea, malaria, typhoid, pneumonia, cough, skin diseases, deficiency diseases, eye diseases, ear diseases, and waterborne diseases due to malnutrition and lack of hygiene. The quality of the health services in the project area is generally poor. Most people go to quacks and medicine shops for minor medical treatment. 12 Desirability of Project 100% of survey respondents indicated immense desirability for the project to proceed expeditiously. 13 Conflict Resolution 99% of survey respondents prefer that their conflicts be resolved through informal Mechanism traditional modes of conflict resolution. While no respondent favoured resolution through the court system, 1% of the respondents expressed indifference. Page | 27 5.0 SUMMARY OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND CONSULTATIONS WITH STAKEHOLDERS 5.1 Objective of Community Consultation The objectives of the public participation and consultation process are: 1. Solicit inputs, views and concerns from the affected Obomkpa community as they relate to the project and obtain local and traditional knowledge that may be useful for decision-making; 2. Facilitate consideration of alternatives, mitigation measures and trade-offs, and ensure that important impacts are not overlooked and that benefits are maximized; 3. Reduce conflict through the early identification of contentious issues; and increase public confidence in the project. 4. Provide opportunity for the public to influence the project designs and implementation in a positive manner and improve transparency and accountability in decision-making; 5.2 Public Participation Process The potential project affected individuals and group of persons identified as stakeholders in this project include those who live in close proximity to the channelization corridor; those who by virtue of their proximity to the project site will be directly affected by noises, odors or activities; those who may be forced to temporarily relocate because of the project; those who have interest either traditionally or administratively, over developmental activities or policy changes in the project area (they may or may not necessarily live in the proximity of the project); and, those who infrequently use the land on which the project is located. Community consultation was driven in a manner that encouraged active and sustained participation of the Obomkpa community members, through which the active gully transverses. This was to promote community ownership of the project and to enhance sustainability. A socio-economic questionnaire at the household level was administered to the Obomkpa village community. The consultations in this project expectedly will remain an ongoing exercise throughout the duration of the project to give the community the opportunity to make contributions aimed at strengthening the development while avoiding negative impacts as well as reducing possible conflicts. Issues relating to project displacements and compensations, particularly with the project affected persons will continue to be handled to minimize chances of possible conflicts. 5.2.1 Stakeholders’ Identification Generally, five broad categories of stakeholders were identified by the Consultant for this project based on the degree to which the project activities may affect or involve such persons or group of persons. These stakeholders are grouped as shown in Table 5-1. The adopted process consists of: i) Identification of any parties whose line of duties whether officially, socially, economically or culturally have direct or indirect bearing on any aspects of project activities. These parties may include individuals, groups, institutions or organizations that may be affected by the gully remedial activities; ii) Establishment of the stakeholders list and identification of specific stakeholder interests in relation to the project. The issues considered include: (a) the project's benefit(s) to the stakeholders; (b) potential changes to the routine activities of the stakeholders that may occur due to the project; and, (c) the project activities that may cause damage or conflict for the stakeholder; Page | 28 Table 5-2 gives an initial list of identified stakeholders including their activities and operational areas in the communities traversed by the project. The list includes government functionaries, NGOs, FBOs and CBOs, among others. Table 5-1: Identified Stakeholder Groups GROUP DESCRIPTION ROLE(S) IN COMMUNITY PROCESS Group-1 Individuals or group of persons whose day-to-day The identified persons or group of persons in lives/livelihoods may be directly affected by project this category may ultimately represent the activities. These are people who either reside within 20 m project potentially-affected persons (PAPs) or from the gully edge or carry out their daily livelihood households (PAHs) activities within the gully corridor. Group-2 Individuals or group of persons whose day-to-day This category of persons serves as traditional or administrative functions include oversight of mobilization points around which the developmental activities within the project area. Consultant will reach out to the other members of the community. Group-3 Individuals or group of persons whose daily activities This category of persons may or may not be (including farming) bring them in close proximity to the affected by the project but may be significant project area. These are people who either reside or carry contributors to the long term sustainability of out their daily livelihood activities outside the gully corridor the project. but within the communities in which the project is located. Group-4 CBOs, FBOs and NGOs who provide frequent interface This group of organizations essentially with the community members who may be directly or provides on a continuous basis spiritual and indirectly affected by the project activities. physical welfare as well as environmental health of the community. Group-5 Individuals or group of persons who are political office This group of individuals is collectively holders and have significant responsibilities toward responsible for the political and general community members and developments within the project socio-economic development of the areas. community, among others within their respective geo-political zones. Table 5-2: List of Stakeholders and Their Responsibilities GROUPS IDENTIFIED STAKEHOLDER AREA OF INTEREST IN PROJECT Group-1 Residents of Obomkpa Village living/farming near the gully corridor PAPs/PAHs Office of the Chairman of Obomkpa Watershed Management Environmental welfare of Obomkpa Committee Community Office of the President General, Obomkpa Development Union Development and welfare of Obomkpa Group-2 Community Office of the Obomkpa Traditional Ruler, HRM Onyemaechi Joshua Development and welfare of Obomkpa Jonathan Community Group-3 Residents of Obomkpa town Individualized livelihood issues Community-based Organizations (CBOs) Watershed protection and management Faith-based Organizations in the Village (churches) Community spiritual and physical welfare Group-4 Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs) Protection of environmental health of the community Office of the Chairman – Aniocha North LGA Development of the Aniocha North LGA Office of the Hon. Member – Delta State House of Assembly Development of the Aniocha North in state constituency Group-5 Office of the Hon. Member – Aniocha North & South Federal Development of Aniocha North & South Constituency federal constituency Office of the Distinguished Senator – Delta Central Senatoral Zone Development of Delta Central Senatoral Zone 5.2.2 Community Consultations and Meetings The Consultant team conducted a physical inspection of the gully erosion corridor through Obomkpa on Tuesday January 28, 2018 and subsequently held a consultation meeting with the respective community leaders of Obomkpa village and Obomkpa Development Page | 29 Association. The meeting discussed how best to effectively approach the mobilization of the community members towards the proposed project and consequently scheduled a public mobilization/sensitization meeting within the community on Wednesday January 31, 2018. A total of three public/stakeholder consultation sessions were held between January 28 and February 28, 2018. Additionally, three focus group discussions (FGD) were also held on March 3, 2018 involving the community elders, women and the youths, respectively. At the community meetings, the need for the project and the associated potential impacts to the community members living or farming within the project corridor were discussed. The community members’ concerns and general thoughts were solicited and noted. The minutes of these meetings and the list of attendees are included as Annexure B. The community members particularly welcomed the project and expressed anxiety that remedial work should commence expeditiously to prevent occurrence of further gully erosion and flooding damages from the next rainy season. It is expected that additional meetings will be held prior to the commencement of field construction work. Such meetings will include the project-affected persons and households. Issues pertaining to relocations and compensations for losses (means of livelihoods and properties) shall be discussed at such meetings. The community consultation meetings helped to structure the participation of the stakeholders and segments of the community including the PAPs in the project process. The community members were actively and enthusiastically engaged in all matters relating to the project and eagerly assisted the Consultant in identifying pertinent socio-cultural issues relevant to the project. Page | 30 Page | 31 5.3 Social Issues/Risks The RAP aims at ensuring the PAPs are not worse off than they would have been without the project. It seeks to ensure that any losses incurred by the PAPs are addressed in a manner that gets them to share from the project benefits. These people should be assisted to develop their social and economic potential so as to improve or restore their incomes and living standards to pre-project levels. In developing this RAP, consideration was particularly given to the peculiarities of need for disabled persons, women, children and other vulnerable groups. The key social issues that emerged through the above processes include: 1. Community safety – Concerns regarding community safety with the next cycle of the rainy season was keenly expressed. The community is quite apprehensive of the advancement of the gullies particularly in relation to safety risks posed to existing homes, human lives and farmlands; 2. Further gully erosion and flooding in the area would lead to damages and loss of crops and livestock, personal possessions, spread of diseases such as typhoid, cholera, diarrhea, and malaria, and cause pit latrines to overflow; 3. Livelihoods – loss of access to roadways, crop lands and pasture. 4. Resettlement – impacts and compensation measures for economic and physical displacement during project implementation. 5. Awareness creation was necessary for the long-term success of the project; and manpower development should be included in the program to enhance project sustainability. 5.4 Guiding Principles In order to ensure that this RAP complies with the WB OP 4.12 and international best practices regarding resettlement, the Consultant and the Delta State NEWMAP are guided by the following principles: Principle 1: Resettlement must be avoided or minimized The project civil and biological works have been designed so as to cause the least possible displacement and/or disruption while maximizing the effect of flood and erosion control in the project. Principle 2: Genuine consultation must take place The primary concern of MOE and Delta NEWMAP is to ensure that the rights and interests of the PAPs are considered seriously as it places focus on resettlement. For this reason, local level consultative forums serve as community voices and become part of the entire project process. Principle 3: Establishment of a pre-resettlement baseline data To support the successful reestablishment of affected property, the following activities will be undertaken prior to displacement. • An inventory of assets (landholdings and economic trees/crops) to determine fair and reasonable levels of compensation or mitigation. • A census detailing household composition and demography, and other relevant socio- economic characteristics. The asset inventories and census information were used to determine entitlements. The information obtained from the inventories and census shall be entered into a database to facilitate resettlement/relocation planning, implementation and monitoring. Principle 4: Assistance in relocation must be made available DTSG will guarantee the provision of any necessary compensation for people whose lands will be disturbed to ensure appropriate rehabilitation of the gully corridor, or any other disturbances of productive land associated with the project in proportion to their loss. Page | 32 Principle 5: A fair and equitable set of compensation options must be negotiated Compensation will be paid for land and economic trees/crops that are disturbed in accordance with the World Bank policy and rates derived from market value comparable for trees/crops. Principle 6: Vulnerable social groups must be specifically catered for Members of vulnerable groups will include people who are physically weaker, and may need special help, female-headed households, aged persons and very young children. Account was taken of this group in the consultation and planning processes, as well as in establishing grievance procedures. Principle 7: Resettlement must be seen as an upfront project cost Global experience shows that unless resettlement is built in as an upfront project cost, it tends to be under budgeted, that money gets whittled away from the resettlement budget to ‘ more pressing’ project needs, and that it tends to be seen as peripheral to the overall project. Delta NEWMAP will ensure that compensation costs, as well as those resettlement costs that fall within their scope of commitment, are built into the overall project budget as up-front costs. Principle 8: An independent monitoring and grievance procedure must be in place In addition to internal monitoring that will be provided by Delta NEWMAP, an independent team comprising local administrators and the community members will undertake monitoring of the resettlement aspect of the project. Grievance procedures will be made fully accessible to all affected parties, with particular concern for the situation of vulnerable groups. Monitoring will specifically take place via measurement against the pre-resettlement database. Principle 9: World Bank’s operational procedure on forced resettlement The World Bank’s operational policy 4.12 on involuntary resettlement will be adhered to. Displaced persons should be meaningfully consulted and should have opportunities to participate in planning and implementing resettlement programs. The Delta NEWMAP and this RAP aim to adhere to these standards. Page | 33 6.0 POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF PROPOSED PROJECT 6.1 Field Findings The primary project objective is the remediation and rehabilitation of the gully erosion corridor traversing Obomkpa town. Access to the upper and middle segments of the project location is through the Idumogo Road leading to Obomkpa from Issele-Uku. The paved road is moderately good although there are some potholes along the way. Some segments of the road are currently undergoing rehabilitation/upgrade to support heavy duty road construction equipment. The rehabilitation of this road involves re-grading of the existing paved roadway and the construction of appropriate drainage channels. The road serves as a major transportation and trading links between the residents of the Obomkpa village and the other neighboring communities whether on social and business interfaces. The intra-community roadways within Obomkpa are currently in disrepair resulting from the gully existence and years of soil erosion and roadway degradation. Based on the project engineering designs and Consultant field observations, several direct and indirect impacts on the population groups were identified. The impacts include potential physical, socioeconomic and cultural effects. The designs indicate however that no existing building structures along the entire gully corridor will be structurally damaged by the project since appropriate and necessary remedial steps will be taken to ensure the safety of such building structures. 6.2 Potential Project Impact Areas The remediation and rehabilitation activities to be undertaken along the gully corridor involves civil construction and biological works that include: cutting and filling for percentage recovery; compaction of soils; concrete casting; assembling of structures, gabion-based slope stabilization, terracing; structured vegetation; specific trees planting with known root strength; and, economic trees planting. The identified project impacts are detailed under Section 6.3 below. 6.3. Identified Project Impacts The proposed project, based on the engineering designs, will potentially create both negative and positive social impacts. This section discusses these impacts and proposes mitigation measures and their management in order to reduce the negative impacts to levels of acceptance as well as enhance the positive impacts. 6.3.1 Potential Positive Project Impacts The following positive social impacts are identified for this project: i) Arresting soil erosion and the degradation of available land; ii) Emotional and psychological relief from potential damage to, or loss of properties as well as loss of remaining ancestral lands; iii) Improved flow of traffic in and out of the project area neighborhood upon completion of project; iv) Reduced costs of transport and delays on travelling along these access roads; v) Improved livelihoods for Obomkpa residents due to reduced cost of transportation and business penetration; vi) Opening of the affected area to potential investors; vii) Improved landscape vista is anticipated with a sustained corridor of economic trees within the project area; viii) Several temporary employment opportunities will be created by the project. During the construction phase, both skilled and un-skilled laborers will benefit from job opportunities. Page | 34 6.3.2 Negative Project Impacts Socioeconomic Impacts (WB OP 4.12) Component 1A activities for this sub-project entails land acquisition which has direct social and economic impacts on PAPs. Impacts include loss of agricultural land, disruptions to convenient access to market, interruptions to communities’ social, trading and cultural interactions as well as school children traveling longer distances to go to school. Identification of impacts on project affected population/persons was based on the review of the gully rehabilitation designs, digital satellite imageries, the projected road rehabilitation activities, and the field observations by the RAP team along the project corridor. The identified population groups which were considered as targets that may be affected by the different project activities include the following: i) Owners of building structures located within the 20 meters of the gully edge on both sides of the gully; ii) Owners of building structures located in areas to be used as construction staging areas during the construction phase of the project; iii) Residents/tenants of the buildings structures identified in items (a) and (b) above whether the structures are permanent or temporary; residential or commercial; iv) Land owners within the 12.0 meters (6.0 m on each gully wall side) of acquired setback for the gully wall stabilization, particularly at the deep sections of the gully corridor; v) Residents/tenants of buildings structures along the access roads which lead to the upper and middle sections of the project areas, whether the structures are permanent or temporary, residential or commercial; and, vi) Economic trees/crops owners along the 12 meters setback for the gully wall slope stabilization; In determining the actual number of project affected assets, households and persons, consideration was given to the potential impacts that may result from the activities of the proposed project bearing in mind the actual distance of the household to the gully edge along the corridor and the nature of work to be done in the particular area closest to the household. Specifically, for each building structure where the household lives or carries out daily routine activities, the questions considered relating to potential impacts are: • Is asset currently affected by the gully? If so, will the asset be subsequently restored? • Is asset within 20 m of the edge of gully corridor? • Will asset be impacted by project activities? • Are persons associated with asset impacted by project activities? A “yes� to all the above questions marks the household as a target for potential resettlement, relocation (whether permanent or temporary) or some form of compensation. Loss of land About 6 meters of land is required as setback on both sides of the gully edge for the stabilization of the gully walls, particularly at the deep sections of gully corridor and for necessary construction activities. The required land shall be permanently acquired for the project and, where necessary, shall be maintained by the community at the completion of the construction works. Displacement of persons The engineering designs for this project provide for a minimal impact on building structures abutting the gully at all points. This implies that existing building structures abutting the gully will not suffer structural damage but shall first be strengthened to gain structural stability where necessary. However, residents/tenants of such building structures and other building structures within 20 meters of the gully edge on both sides with fragile health conditions, such as asthma or advancement in age, etc., may likely be adversely impacted by the project Page | 35 activities. Such identified persons will be considered as project affected persons and/or vulnerable persons, and may be required to be temporarily relocated during the construction phase of the project. Additionally, some residents/tenants of the building structures within 20 meters of the gully edge on both sides may suffer disruptive life inconveniences for which some compensation may need to be made. Loss of Economic Trees/Farm Crops During the construction phase, economic trees/farm crops within the acquired Setback land required for construction activities and for the gully wall gabion stabilization may be destroyed. 6.3.3 Impact Mitigation Measures: Loss of land: Owners of acquired land shall be compensated for land in accordance with the WB and Nigerian Policies on land acquisition. Where however, there are any improvements to the land, compensations will also be considered for those improvements including any economic trees and farm crops. Displacement of persons: Identified PAPs with fragile health conditions, such as asthma or advancement in age, etc., living within 20 meters of the gully edge on both sides who may likely be adversely impacted by the project activities shall be either temporarily relocated during the construction phase of the project or appropriately compensated for the inconveniences. Temporary relocation shall not exceed six months overall within which period the major aspect of the project intervention works ought to have been complete in accordance with construction schedule. If the critical aspect of the project intervention is not completed within the period of six months, the assistance to the relocated persons and vulnerable people will continue until such a period the project intervention critical phase is completed. Loss of Economic Trees/Farm Crops Owners of damaged economic trees/farm crops shall be compensated based on fair market values. 6.3.4 Summary of Identified Impacts Areas: Impact No.1: Owners of buildings/structures within the 20 meters construction zone from the edge of the gully; Impact No.2: Owners of land within the 12 m of the gully edge required for gully wall stabilization; Impact No.3: Owners of land located in areas to be used as construction staging areas during the construction phase of the project; Impact No.4: Residents/tenants of the buildings structures identified in items (1) above whether the structures are permanent or temporary; residential or commercial; Impact No.5: Residents/tenants of buildings structures along the three Access Roads which lead to the upper and lower sections of the project areas, whether the structures are permanent or temporary residential or commercial; Impact No.6: Residents/tenants of building structures located within 20m of the gully edge who may be considered vulnerable persons; and, Impact No.7: Economic trees/crops owners along the 12 m along the gully corridor required for gully stabilization. Based on the above considerations, the project impact significance and the potential need for resettlement/compensation was developed. This is summarized in the following Table 6.1 below. Table 6.1: Summary of Project Impact Significance and Potential Need for Resettlement Page | 36 Impact Identified Impact Population Group Impact Significance** Need for Resettlement No Description Owners of buildings/structures Loss/damage to existing Resettlement/ compensation 1 within the 20m from the gully edge Significant buildings/structures required construction zone Owners of land within the 12m Permanent loss of land Compensation required as 2 setback required for gully Significant and/or economic trees/crops part of this RAP stabilization Significant but reduced Compensation may be Owners of land located within Temporary loss of land 3 to less than significant required for temporary land construction staging areas and/or economic trees/crops with mitigation measures use based on agreement Permanent loss of shelter Resettlement/ compensation Residents/tenants of buildings (whether rental or non-rental) required for permanent 4 Significant identified in (1) above and difficulty to find a new displacement in accordance place with WB Policy Residents/tenants of buildings Vulnerable persons based on Significant but reduced along the main and bypass access Vulnerability provisions 5 age, disability, woman head to less than significant roads who may be considered required as part of this RAP of household, etc. with mitigation measures vulnerable persons Residents/tenants of buildings/ Vulnerable persons based on Significant but reduced structures located within 20m of Vulnerability provisions 6 age, disability, woman head to less than significant the edge of the gully who may be required as part of this RAP of household, etc. with mitigation measures considered vulnerable persons Owners of trees/farm crops within Loss of economic trees/farm 7 Significant Compensation required the setback for gully stabilization crops ** = “Significance� (Social and Economic) is an objective judgment measure (threshold) about importance of Social impacts on people and communities, and economic impacts on material wellbeing and economic activities (Burdge, 2002; Vanclay, 2002). 6.4 Identification of Project Affected Population The maximum land area required for the gully setback is 33194m2. The identified project affected persons based on project activities and the various impact areas are summarized in Table 6.2. A total of 123 project affected persons (PAPs) within the 20 m setback, and 27 vulnerable persons have been identified. Of these, 103 persons have farmlands that would be affected and 29 persons have economic trees/crops (ETC) along the gully corridor. The identified PAPs represent owners/residents/tenants of buildings located within 20m of the gully edge, and vulnerable persons living in close proximity to the construction corridor. 6.5 Vulnerable Group Vulnerable group refers to the people who by virtue of gender, age, physical or mental disability, economic disadvantage, or social status may be more adversely affected by resettlement than others and who may be limited in their ability to claim or take advantage of resettlement assistance and related development benefits. Twenty seven persons are identified and considered particularly vulnerable by virtue of age (elderly person over 70 years old) and disability. The 27 persons are: (1) vulnerable on account of physical disability; and, (2) vulnerable on account of age (elderly person over 70 years old) In addition to the compensation to be paid to the 123 PAP group, special provision for the vulnerable group has been made to enhance their livelihood through subsistence allowance at a rate N10,000.00 per month for a total of six months within which period the major aspect of the project intervention works ought to have been complete. If the project intervention is not completed within the period of six months, the assistance to vulnerable people will continue until such a period the project intervention is completed. A summary of the PAPs and the different impacts are given in Table 6.2 below. Page | 37 Table 6.2: Summary of PAPs and the Various Impacts PAPs with over PAPs for Total No. of S/N Impact Area Description 20% Loss of Physical PAPs farmland Relocation Concrete block fence 1 Buildings/Structures 1 NA NA wall 2 Loss of land (Owners) - 103 NA NA 3 Loss of land (Renters) - 0 NA NA Permanent displacement of NA NA NA persons (Owners & Damage to Renters) 4 Structures/Buildings Temporary displacement of NA NA NA persons (Owners & Renters) Loss of economic 5 - 29 NA NA trees and crops (ETC) Temporary Vulnerability (due to 6 displacement of 27 NA 3 age, illness, etc.) vulnerable persons 7 Relocation Discomfort - 18 NA 18 NA = Not Applicable. Page | 38 7.0 PROPOSED RESETTLEMENT PLAN 7.1 Eligibility The only persons who will be considered as qualified for compensation must be pre-identified PAPs. To qualify as PAP, the individual must be identified as a candidate for any of resettlement, relocation, loss of land, loss of building/structure and/or loss of economic trees/crops. Resettlement refers to the involuntary displacement of a person from his/her regular place of residence or business/livelihood/income as a result of demolition of a structure or acquisition of land to allow for project activities. Relocation refers to the involuntary temporary or permanent displacement of a person from his/her regular place of residence or business as a result of an adverse condition/requirement of the project. Vulnerable persons for this project are considered to include women, children and elderly persons, as well as people with disabilities. Acquisition of land for the project will adversely affect the livelihood of persons, who live, work or earn their living on the land that will be acquired for the project. Only PAPs who registered and met the cut-off date during the baseline survey are considered to be eligible for any form of compensation or assistance. Before the commencement of the project, compensation of PAPs should be completed to avoid household economic difficulties that may result from loss of land and/or economic trees/crops. 7.1.1 Loss of Assets Compensation will be for assets on the land, as well as other assistance in order to mitigate the adverse consequences that affect people and communities when they give up property for public good. In this project, there is loss of mainly agricultural lands resulting from the project. The process of mitigating the project impacts on PAPs will involve only cash compensation. The project does not envisage permanent destruction of any structural assets. Consequently, there will not be any physical permanent relocation of the PAPs. All persons who own economic trees/crops on the affected lands proposed for permanent acquisition regardless of their legal status are considered eligible for compensation as described in Table 6-3. 7.1.2 Loss of Livelihood It is noteworthy that some PAPs have grown economic trees and crops within the land required as Setback for gully side slope stabilization, particularly at the deep sections of the gully corridor. Consequently, these PAPs will not only suffer loss of income from the trees and crops but may also suffer permanent loss of livelihood. As part of the Livelihood mitigation measures the Community Interest Group (CIG) program being developed by the SPMU is designed to provide the livelihood cushion to PAPs whose livelihoods are affected by the project. 7.2 Entitlement Matrix Acquisition of land for the project will adversely affect the livelihood of persons, who live, work or earn their living on the land that will be acquired for the project. Before the commencement of the project, a mechanism for compensation of PAPs should be in place to avoid household economic difficulties that will result due to loss of land and/or economic trees/crops. For the purpose of this report and bearing in mind that land ownership is statutorily vested in government, the entitlement list will include persons appropriately defined as follows:- • Persons who have a right to the needed land; • Persons who use and cultivate the needed land on any form of arrangements; or • Persons whose standards of living are adversely affected as a consequence of the project activities. Page | 39 Table 7-1: The Entitlement Matrix for Various Identified Categories of PAPs Type of Loss Entitled Person Description of Entitlement 1. Permanent loss of land 1.1 (a)Legal owners of 1.1 (a) Land for land compensation is neither 1.1 Cultivatable/residential/ land practicable nor desirable due to nature of commercial land (b)Occupancy/Hereditar project. Cash compensation at replacement y tenant value based on market rate plus 10% compulsory acquisition surcharge as second option (b) Compensation will be paid as a one-time lump sum grant for restoration of livelihood and assistance for relocation. . 2. Damage to land (such 2.1. (a)Legal owner/s 2.1 (a) & (b) Restoration of land to pre- as abutting sub-project (b) Village/s or clan/s construction condition or cash compensation site) with customary at prevailing rates for necessary bulldozer/ 2.1. By excavation from ownership tractor hours to restoring level and/or borrows for earth for 2.2. No project impact is truckloads of earth for fill. construction use. envisaged 2.2 By severance of agricultural holding 3. Loss of income and 3.1 Cultivator occupying 3.1. Estimated net income for each lost livelihood land cropping season, based on land record 3.1. Temporary loss of averages of crops and area planted in the access to land for previous four years cultivation 3.2. Loss of agricultural 3.2 (a) Owner/s of crops 3.2 (a) Cash compensation for loss of crops, and fruit and wood or trees. Includes agricultural crops at current market value of trees. crops/trees owned by mature crops, based on average production. encroachers/squatters Compensation for loss of fruit trees for (b) Tenant average fruit production years to be computed at current market value. Compensation for loss of wood-trees at current market value of wood (timber or firewood, as the case may be). 3.3 Loss of income by 3.2 (b) Partial compensation to tenants for agricultural tenants 3.3 Persons working on loss of their crops/trees as per due share or because of permanent loss the affected lands agreement (verbal or written) of land they were 3.3 One-time lump sum grant to agricultural cultivating tenants (permanent, short-term or long-term agricultural labor (this will be in addition to their shares in crop/tree compensation) a) Tree/perennial crops: Harvesting of the crops will be given a first priority but where harvesting is not possible, counting of the affected crops will be done in the presence of the owner. Computation of the costs will be done according to market rates b) Annual crops: Crops will be harvested by the owner and therefore no compensation will be paid for crops. Where crops cannot be harvested, compensation at the market rate will be paid 4. Permanent loss of 4.1. One block fence Compensation is expected for the owner of Structures wall may be impacted this structure 4.1 Residential and by the project commercial structures Page | 40 Type of Loss Entitled Person Description of Entitlement 4.2. Cultural, Religious, 4.2 Persons officially Compensation will be paid as a one-time and community structures responsible for the up lump sum grant for restoration of livelihood /facilities School, church, keep of any identified and assistance for relocation. water channels, pathways, facility. However no and other community facilities were identified structures/installations that may be impacted. 5. Special provision for 5.1 Women headed 5. Needs-based special assistance to be vulnerable APs households, disabled or provided either in cash or in kind. 5.1.Re-establishing and/or elderly persons and the enhancing livelihood landless 5.2 Change in Livelihood 5.2 (a) Vulnerable APs, 5.2 (a) &(b).Restoration of livelihood for women and other particularly Women (vocational training) and subsistence vulnerable Affected enrolled in a vocational allowance @ agreed rate per day for a total Persons (APs) that need to training facility of 6 months while enrolled in a vocational substitute their income 5.2. (b) owner/s whose training facility because of adverse impact landholding has been reduced to less than 5 acres Unanticipated adverse The Project team will deal with any unanticipated consequences of the impact due to project Project during and after project implementation in the light and spirit of intervention or associated the principle of the entitlement matrix. activity 7.3 Valuation Procedures The valuation process adopted in developing this RAP complies with the Laws of Nigeria and the World Bank guidelines. This process is summarized in Table 7-2. Table 7.2: RAP Valuation Process ASSET PROCESS RECOMMENDATIONS Land with Steps: a) The required land without Structures There is only one fence wall identified that will be structures needed for affected by the project. Compensation shall be paid for project is approximately the fence wall at replacement value. about 33194 m2. Land without a) Inventory: As part of the RAP, the names and contact structures details of all persons affected by the project have been b) Delta NEWMAP/DTSG will documented. pay compensation for land b) Compensation: The RAP data sheet spells out how without structures acquired each person is affected and indicates how much for project in accordance compensation will be paid for crops and trees lost. with the WB and Nigerian c) Payment: The project requires about 33194 m2 of land Policies. privately owned land without structures to be permanently acquired as Setback for gully side slope c) Delta NEWMAP/MOE will stabilization. Delta NEWMAP/DTSG is therefore provide transportation expected to compensate the PAPs on Land. support for the PAPs that Lost business Obomkpa is essentially an agrarian community. will be temporarily relocated profits and Permanent loss of their land implies permanent loss of for necessary construction employee the business outlets or their means of livelihood. works and back to their earnings Compensations for business profit losses or earnings residences after completion may be expected. of works. Cash Crops/Trees on Economic Trees/Crops: Harvesting of the crops by the compensation in lieu of the fields owners will be given a first priority. However, to assure transportation could also be cultivated by safety of the people such trees/crops shall be made to the affected those affected considered lost to the project. Consequently, persons. compensation will be paid to owners for their Page | 41 ASSET PROCESS RECOMMENDATIONS trees/crops. Computation of the costs has been done d) The owners of economic according to market rates and payments hereafter will trees/crops on acquired made either at DTSG offices, or through the offices of lands will be entitled to an appointed NGO. safely remove any crops Temporary a) Inventory: The names and contact details of all they wish to salvage within relocation to persons who may be affected by activities of the project one week of notification to allow for and need to be temporarily relocated have been do so. construction documented as part of this RAP. activities b) Compensation: The RAP data sheet spells out how e) Notwithstanding the each person is affected and indicates how much provisions in item (d) compensation will be paid for relocation/inconvenience above, owners of affected and for what periods of time. economic trees/crops will c) Payment: The Delta NEWMAP/DTSG is expected to be entitled to compensation pay the relocation costs of these PAPs and also provide for those trees/crops within the transportation support to move these persons to the acquired land for project. new locations and back to their homes when the Compensation will be at the construction activities have been completed. prevailing market rates and as outlined in Table 7-1. 7.4 Compensation for Losses and Other Assistance Cash compensation is adopted as the mitigation measure for the needed agricultural land and the economic trees/crops which will be affected. Necessary assistance will also be provided to PAPs for temporary relocation to allow for necessary construction activities to take place during project implementation. To qualify as project affected person (PAP), the individual must be identified as a candidate for any of the following: resettlement, relocation, loss of land, and/or loss of economic trees/crops. Resettlement refers to the involuntary displacement of a person from his/her regular place of residence or business as a result of demolition of a structure to allow for project activities. Relocation refers to the involuntary temporary displacement of a person from his/her regular place of residence or business as a result of the need to allow project construction activities to take place. These displacements shall require some compensation in accordance with the provisions of WB OP 4.12 and other statutory requirements. Vulnerable persons for this project are considered to include women, children, elderly people and persons with disability. Only PAPs who registered and met the cut-off date during the baseline survey are considered to be eligible for any form of compensation or assistance. 7.4.1 Resettlement Measures There are no permanent relocations identified for this project since no structures whether residential or commercial are expected to be damaged by the project with the exception of one concrete fence wall. 7.4.2 Compensation for Land Losses The total land size estimated for acquisition is approximately 33,194m2. This is calculated as a product of the total length of the Setback required for gully wall stabilization and the width of land required (12meters) as Setback. Appropriate compensation will be paid for the Setback land marked for permanent acquisition. The WB Policy OP4.12 requires that appropriate compensation be paid to involuntarily displaced persons to a level that improves or at least restores their income and living standards after displacement. In accordance with this policy, all persons whose lands shall be acquired for the purpose of establishing the Setback for gully side slope stabilization in the Page | 42 project shall be compensated according to the Entitlement Matrix for various categories of PAPs (Table 7-1). 7.4.3 Compensation for Relocations The names and contact details of all persons whose health may be affected by activities of the project have been documented as part of this RAP. The RAP data sheet spells out how each person is affected and indicates how much compensation will be paid for relocation and for what periods of time. The Delta NEWMAP/DTSG is expected to pay the relocation costs of these PAPs and also provide the transportation means of moving these persons to the new locations and back to their homes when the health risk elements have been completely removed. 7.4.4 Compensation for Loss of Economic Trees/crops Harvesting of the crops by the owners will be given a first priority. However, to assure safety of the people, such trees/crops shall be considered lost to the project. Consequently, compensation will be paid to owners for their trees/crops. Compensation will be based on the size of cultivated land by the PAP and the computed unit cost of the cultivated crops. Payments will be made either at DTSG offices or through an SPMU-identified NGO or CBO with the office of the Traditional Ruler and President General of the Obomkpa Town serving as facilitators for effectiveness. 7.5 RAP Implementation Committee (AIC) The NEWMAP SPMU has established an implementation/resettlement committee to coordinate and facilitate the Obomkpa RAP implementation. The function of this committee shall include: • To hold meetings with PAPs, site committee and community associations on the processes for carrying out resettlement and compensation; • Engage with stakeholders and ensure successful land acquisition, residential construction and assistances required for livelihood restoration of PAPs according to the entitlement listed in this RAP report; • Provide assistances required for livelihood restoration of PAPs according to the entitlement listed in this RAP report; • Implement, monitor and review the progress of the implementation of the RAP and, • Carry out post implementation audit and reporting. The composition of this committee shall include: • Representative of the PAPs; • Representative of the Site Committee; • Representative of Community Association; • Representative of the Ministry of Environment; • Representative of Focal NGO; • Social and Livelihood Officer from the SPMU; and, • Project Accountant from the PMU The Committee shall be headed by the Representative from the Ministry of Environment while the Social and Livelihood Officer shall be the secretary to the committee. 7.6 Compensation Procedures The compensation process and procedure shall be as set out by the RAP Implementation Committee (AIC) under the supervision of the NEWMAP SPMU and the FPMU Social/livelihood Officer. The AIC will verify the affected households against the list of eligible persons enumerated at cut-off date to ensure that the correct compensation amount is paid to eligible persons. The AIC will acknowledge the compensation offers in addition to acknowledgement of receipt of compensation by the PAPs. Page | 43 Copies of the respective identity cards of all identified PAPs were provided as part of the PAP Census exercise and should be used to identify the PAPs to be compensated. These identity cards are now on record. 7.6.1 Relocation Times The PAPs to be temporarily relocated will be given a relocation time of at least two weeks and will be assisted in the process. This process and timing will be properly chosen to minimize transfer disturbances. 7.6.2 Livelihood Restoration The main objective of the RAP is to develop programs that aim to improve the livelihoods of PAPs or restore them to the pre-displacement levels. In this project, the impact on land with economic trees/crops is such that sustainability of livelihoods will be affected including some vulnerable persons. Cash-for-land compensation is adopted because state land is not available for compensation. This will apply to people who are not necessarily physically displaced but are affected by a land loss. Other factors considered in relation to livelihood restoration include: • Development of the capacity building programs to train PAPs and other community members on self–employment skills and enterprise development • Development of programs for provision of assistance to the entire community in areas requiring development of soil erosion prevention and control programs, sustainable watershed management and environmental sustainability programs. • Adequate compensation to all the PAPs for lost assets, relocation inconveniences and income loss Page | 44 8.0 DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND GRIEVANCE REDRESS PROCEDURE 8.1 Dispute Resolution It is for the benefit of the State, the project and the PAPs to devise a mechanism through which complaints and disagreements can be smoothly resolved. All disputes arising from implementation of this RAP shall be handled by the Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) which will take all necessary steps to ensure speedy and effective resolution of any disputes. Currently, there is a series of customary avenues that exist to deal with dispute resolution in the community and they will be employed as the “court of first appeal�, where relevant. The resettlement and compensation process will ensure that, if necessary, corrective action is taken expeditiously. Such mechanisms are fundamental to achieving transparency in the resettlement process. The GRC will be housed within the community and will document and facilitate the dispute resolution process, ensure effective and timely resolution thereby reducing the risk of escalation of conflicts and avoiding unnecessary delays. If and where necessary, the community Traditional Leadership shall be asked to provide recommendations as to how an issue is to be addressed. The Committee shall ensure careful documentation of grievances and remedial actions to enhance accountability and to reduce liability. 8.2 Dispute Over Land Matters The GRC shall ensure that any disputes arising from land matters are amicably resolved. During the community consultation process of this RAP, it was understood from the community that there are established traditional mechanism by which land ownership disputes are resolved. The GRC may adopt this mechanism if considered effective and timely. This mechanism borders on the community’s historical knowledge of every family within each village and the family’s ancestral land heritage. Consequently, all land ownership disputes are normally resolved along the lines of known family heritage and the well-established and entrenched traditional norms. In the event of multiple land ownership disputes, the matter should be referred to the Community Traditional Leadership which will facilitate a speedy resolution of the matter. 8.3 Grievance Redress Mechanisms Grievance redress mechanisms (GRM) are essential tools for allowing affected persons to express their concerns about the resettlement and compensation process as they may arise and, if necessary, for corrective action to be taken expeditiously. Obomkpa community has its traditional land dispute resolution system that hinges on historical knowledge of family descendants. The grievance framework recommended for this RAP is built on the already existing structures as well as the grievance redress committee (GRC) framework approved by the World Bank. The recommended land system together with the WB-approved grievance redress committee framework is depicted in the Grievance Redress Procedure shown in Figure 8.1. If negotiated settlement of grievances cannot be achieved through the normal procedural steps outlined in the mechanism of the committee, the complainant has the right to approach the court. A detailed information booklet on the GRM procedure will be included in the community engagement plan to ensure that all PAPs know and understand the process and are able to access it whenever they feel the need. The effectiveness of the GRM will be one of the crucial monitoring indicators. Page | 45 Figure 8.1: Grievance Redress Procedure AFFECTED PARTY Grievance Resolved DECLARES A SPMU GRIEVANCE Recommendations GRIEVANCE COMMUNITY REDRESS Grievance Resolved NO FURTHER TRADITIONAL Grievance Not Resolved COMMITTEE ACTION STRUCTURE (GRC) LEGAL ACTION 8.4 Formation of Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) The objective of the GRC is to respond to the complaints of the PAPs in a timely and transparent manner and to provide a mechanism to mediate conflict and cut down on lengthy litigation, which often delays projects. It will also provide people who might have objections or concerns about their assistance a public forum to raise their objections and through conflict resolution, address these issues adequately. The committee will provide ample opportunity to redress complaints informally, in addition to the existing formal administrative and legal procedures. The major grievances that might require mitigation include: • PAPs not listed; • Losses not identified correctly; • Inadequate assistance; • Dispute about ownership; • Delay in disbursement of assistance and improper distribution of assistance. The NEWMAP SPMU has established a Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) overseen by NEWMAP to address complaints from this RAP implementation. The GRC shall provide specific necessary support and resolution of the potential PAP related grievances in accordance with provisions of this RAP. The Committee will be coordinated as provided for at each level and the compositions of each level of the GRC comprises as follows: FIRST LEVEL: COMMUNITY GRIEVANCE REDRESS COMMITTEE (COM-GRC) The first stage of the GRC shall grievance process shall be the community-based GRC (Community GRC) which shall be coordinated by the Focal NGO (FNGO) and shall be made up of the following: • 1 Representative from each of the Community Associations • 1 Representative from the traditional ruler of the Community • 1 Representative of the Local Government Area • 1 Representative of Ministry of Lands, Survey and Physical Planning. • 1 Representative of the Project Affected Persons (PAPs) • Social and Livelihood Officer in SPMU as the Secretary • 1 Representative from the Focal NGO as coordinator Page | 46 This committee shall be the place of first recourse for anyone who has a grievance matter related to the site. The timeline for addressing/resolving the issues raised by a complainant by this GRC shall be at most 15 days from the last day allowable for grievance and complaints submission following the end of RAP disclosure. SECOND LEVEL: PMU GRIEVANCE REDRESS COMMITTEE (PMU-GRC) Where the Com-GRC is unable to resolve the matter, the Complainant may seek redress from the Project Management Unit – Grievance Redress Committee (PMU-GRC). This Committee shall be coordinated by the Project Coordinator of the SPMU and made up of the following: • 1 Representative from the department of Flood and Erosion Control in the Ministry of Environment • 1 Representative from the Ministry of Lands and Survey • 1 Representative of the Project Affected Persons (PAPs) • 1 Representative from the Focal NGO • Social and Livelihood Officer in SPMU as the Secretary • Project Accountant in the SPMU • Project Coordinator of the SPMU as the Coordinator This committee shall be the second place of recourse for anyone who has a grievance matter related to the site. The timeline for addressing/resolution of the issues raised by a complainant by this PMU-GRC shall be at most 15 days from the last day allowable for grievance and complaints submission following the inability of the Com-GRC to resolve the matter. THIRD LEVEL: NEWMAP STEERING/TECHNICAL COMMITTEE (STATE-GRC) Where the PMU-GRC is unable to resolve the matter at this level, the Complainant may seek redress from the NEWMAP Steering and Technical Committee GRC (STATE-GRC). This Committee will be coordinated by the Chairman of the Steering Committee, who is the Honourable Commissioner of the Ministry of Environment. The timeline for addressing/resolving Issues raised by a complainant by this Committee shall be at most 15 days from the last day allowable for grievance and complaints submission following the inability of the PMU-GRC to resolve the matter. The composition of this Committee shall be as follows: • The Federal Social and Livelihoods Specialist • Representative of the Umbrella NGO • Social and Livelihood Officers from 2 neighboring NEWMAP states who have experience in handling grievance matters • Project Coordinator of the SPMU as the Secretary The timeline for addressing/resolving issues raised by a complainant by this STATE-GRC shall be at most 15 days from the last day allowable for grievance and complaints submission following the inability of the PMU- GRC to resolve the matter. FOURTH LEVEL: THE COURTS Where the Complainant is not satisfied with the decisions of the STATE-GRC, he/she may seek redress in the law Courts. All grievances will first of all be address at the First Level. It will only move on to Second Level if the first level agreement was not accepted by the party involved and then to third and forth under similar situations. If negotiated settlement of grievances cannot be achieved through the normal procedural steps outlined in the grievance mechanism, the complainant has the right to approach the courts. The GRM procedure will be included in the community engagement plan to ensure that all PAPs know and understand the process and are able to access it whenever they feel the need. The effectiveness of the GRM will be one of the crucial monitoring indicators. Page | 47 8.5 Training of the Grievance Redress Committees The various Grievance Redress Committees shall be provided with training to enable them adequately perform their responsibilities. The training shall be organized by the SPMU who shall provide logistics such as: writing materials, per diem, transportation, training venue and time. The details of the training including time and date shall be adequately communicated to all members for their attendance. At the end of the training, members of the intervention community shall be adequately sensitized on the procedure for submission of complaints and grievances. Page | 48 9.0 MONITORING AND EVALUATION (M & E) One of the potential risks associated with displacement and resettlement is the subtle break up of social cohesion resulting from inordinate and inappropriate spending of compensation money by the head of households to the detriment of other members of the household. It is necessary that the Safeguard Officers of the SPMU through the appointed focal NGO carry out independent monitoring and evaluation to strengthen implementation consistency and follow-up of the whole project process. The FNGO will work in consultation with the SPMU and the RIC and report regularly to the SPMU and DTSG. Through the RAP community consultation process, effective framework has already been established with the local community. This provides an objective sounding board for the PAPs to relate concerns to the SPMU staffers or their appointed M & E Agent(s). The M & E officers will also work closely with the appropriate community organizations, such as the local churches to continuously identify and evaluate any problems and difficulties that may occur after the process of implementation. The SPMU and the M & E officers will also pay special attention to the vulnerable groups, such as the aged and women headed families. Monitoring will focus on: • Information about PAPs post compensation and entitlement spending; • Relevance of relocation and RAP implementation timetable to overall project effectiveness; • Content of grievances, efficiency of procedures and accountability in handling the grievance; • Use of compensation money for those who invested it in profit-making enterprises; and • Site conditions and progress in the post construction activities at the site. 9.1 Performance Indicators Monitoring and evaluation will be carried out focusing on the following key performance indicators: Table 9.1: Monitoring and Performance Indicators Monitoring Aspects Potential Performance Indicators Institutional set-up and • RAP implementation and monitoring institutional set-up is in place. resource allocation • Budgeted RAP costs released and placed at disposal of RAP implementation entities. • Grievance redress mechanism established and explained to the PAPs and affected communities. • Coordination initiative implemented and PAPs committees notified for continued consultations and participation of PAPs in RAP implementation and monitoring. Delivery of • Compensation entitlements disbursed, compared with number and Entitlements category of losses set out in the entitlement matrix. • Relocation and rehabilitation costs and income restoration support provided as per entitlements and schedule. • Social infrastructure and services restored as and where required. • Entitlements against lost business including transitional support to reestablish enterprises delivered. • Income and livelihood restoration activities being implemented as set out in the income restoration plan. Restoration of living • Affected residential structures reconstructed/restored along the standard and income intervention corridors and at relocation sites outside intervention Page | 49 limits. • Impacted business structures (shops/stalls) constructed/relocated outside construction limits and business/income activity restored. • Number and percentage of displaced persons covered under livelihood restoration and rehabilitation programs (women, men, and vulnerable groups). • Number of displaced persons who have restored their income and livelihood patterns (women, men, and vulnerable groups). • No of PAPs (especially vulnerable) provided opportunities in project related employment. Consultation and • Consultations organized as scheduled including meetings, groups, Grievances and community activities. • RAP disclosure and information dissemination activities implemented and knowledge of entitlements by the displaced persons. • Community awareness about grievance redresses mechanism and its use. • Progress on grievances recorded and resolved including information dissemination to PAPs on the resolution of the grievances. • Information on implementation of special measures for vulnerable groups Communications and • Number of meetings held with PAPs (male and female) to explain Participation RAP provisions, grievance redress mechanism and compensation disbursement mechanism. • Assessment about Level of information communicated—adequate or inadequate. • Number of PAPs (male & female) participated in the meetings. • Number of meetings and consultations held with vulnerable people with number of participants and level of information communicated. Benefit Monitoring • Noticeable changes in patterns of occupation, production, and resource use compared to the pre-project situation. • Noticeable changes in income and expenditure patterns compared to the pre-project situation. • Changes in cost of living compared to the pre-project situation • Changes in key social and cultural parameters relating to living standards • Changes occurred for vulnerable groups benefiting from the project. 9.2 Completion Audit SPMU shall commission an external party to undertake an evaluation of RAP’s physical inputs to ensure and assess whether the outcome of RAP complies with the involuntary resettlement policy of the World Bank. The completion audit shall be undertaken after RAP inputs. The audit shall verify that all physical inputs committed in the RAP have been delivered and all services provided. It shall evaluate whether the mitigation measures prescribed in the RAP have the desired effect. The completion audit should bring to closure SPMU’s liability for resettlement. Page | 50 10.0 ESTIMATED COST OF RAP The overall cost for compensation and resettlement for land, economic trees/crops and temporary relocations under this RAP, including cost for, administration, monitoring and evaluation is N19,081,125.00. A breakdown of the compensation and resettlement costs is shown Table 10-1. The underlying assumptions, consistent with the WB resettlement Policy framework (RPF) developed for NEWMAP sub-projects, upon which the RAP costs were developed are included in Table 10-2. Details of the cost estimates are shown in Table 10-3. Table 10-1: Compensation and Resettlement Cost ITEM (BREAK DOWN AND DETAIL AS NO NIGERIA NAIRA US DOLLARS % APPROPRIATE) A COMPENSATION A1 LAND ACQUISITION 8,298,500.00 A2 DESTRUCTION AND DAMAGES TO CROP 1,884,000.00 A3 STRUCTURES 540,000.00 A4 COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE A5 DISTURBANCE ALLOWANCE 1,080,000.00 A6 CONTINGENCIES-OTHER COMPENSATION TOTAL COMPENSATION N11,802,500.00 61.17% B RESETTLEMENT B1 RESETTLEMENT LAND PURCHASE B2 RESETTLEMENT LAND DEVELOPMENT B3 HOUSING CONSTRUCTION TOTAL RESETTLEMENT 0.00 0.0% C ADDITIONAL MITIGATION Provided through C1 LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION MEASURES CIG C2 VULNERABLE GROUPS 1,620,000.00 COORDINATION OF ADDITIONAL C3 MITIGATIONS C4 GRIEVANCE MANAGEMENT 500,000.00 TOTAL ADDITIONAL MITIGATIONS N2,120,000.00 11.94% D IMPLEMENTATION COSTS D1 SURVEYING AND ASSET VALUATION 0.00 D2 IMPLEMENTATION LOGISTICS 1,550,000.00 D3 MONITORING AND EVALUATION 600,000.00 D4 CAPACITY BUILDING 1,750,000.00 D6 END-OF-PROJECT AUDIT 350,000.00 TOTAL IMPLEMENTATION N4,250,000.00 22.13% E CONTINGENCIES (5%) 908,625.00 4.76% GRAND TOTAL N19,081,125.00 100.0% Page | 51 Table 10-2: Underlying Assumptions for Cost Estimation S/No ITEM COST (NAIRA) ASSUMPTIONS For land acquisition purposes, based Compensation for land 1 Per hectare on cost realized in projects involving acquisition similar issues in Nigeria Include cost of labor invested and Compensation for loss of Per hectare of farm 2 average of highest price of staple crops lost food Compensation for 3 N/A N/A buildings and structures Cost of relocation 4 Per household This cost is to facilitate transportation assistance income Cost of restoration of 5 N/A N/A individual income Cost of restoration of 6 N/A N/A household income Depends on the number of 7 Cost of training Per participant stakeholders selected for training Incurred by MDA stakeholders such 8 Cost of management Per sub-project site as ministries and local agents Cost of monitoring and Dependent on the each sub-project 9 Per sub-project site evaluation site 10 TOTAL Per sub-project site Addition of all cost incurred 11 Contingency Per total cost 5% of the total cost 12 GRAND TOTAL N/A Sum of the total and contingency cost Page | 52 Table 10-3: Breakdown of Cost Estimates TOTAL S/NO ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY RATE (N) COMPENSATION COST (N) Damage to Compensation for 1 LS 1 540,000 540,000.00 structures damages to structures Compensation for temporary displacement 2 Displacement No. 18 50,000 900,000.00 (disturbance) from residence Compensation for transport and Relocation 3 resettlement expenses No. 18 10,000 180,000.00 expenses and allowances for affected units Land Compensation for 4 M2 33,194 250 8,298,500.00 Acquisition ‘setback’ land acquisition Destruction and Economic 5 damages to economic Varied 1 1,884,000 1,884,000.00 trees/crops trees/crops (29 persons) Provided Livelihood Compensation to enable 6 through - Restoration livelihood restoration CIG Vulnerable Compensation for 7 Group vulnerability (6mos No. 27 60,000.00 1,620,000.00 Consideration maximum) Preparatory resettlement forums and awareness to LS 1 650,000 650,000.00 affected persons Trainings on enterprise development and job LS 1 650,000 650,000.00 creation Capacity Trainings on community 8 building for skill project participation and LS 1 450,000 450,000.00 development sustainable management Grievance Management LS 1 500,000 500,000.00 Implementation logistics LS 1 1,550,000 1,550,000.00 Monitoring and Personnel 3 200,000 600,000.00 evaluation costs End of project audit cost LS 1 350,000 350,000.00 Sub-total 18,172,500.00 10 Contingency 5% 908,625.00 GRAND TOTAL N19,081,125.00 Page | 53 11.0 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE The implementation and management of the RAP schedule should be designed to facilitate necessary temporary relocation and compensation of PAPs. The RAP activities also need to be implemented within an agreed timeframe and budget. Appropriate timing should be adhered to in order to avoid false claimants for compensation especially if the situation arises where site clearing is to begin before the resettlement end date. The RAP activities will be executed in accordance with the schedule shown in Table 11-1 below. The period of the first week will be used to develop and set up all structures necessary to support all aspects of the programs. Table 11-1: Implementation Schedule – Development Phase DURATION IN MONTHS DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY 1st Month 2nd Month 3rd Month 4th Month Disclosure of RAP Report Formation of Project Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) Formation of RAP Implementation Committee (RIC) Identification of Contractor Hold Stakeholders Meetings and Consultations Listen to Grievances/ Complaints and Address Them Execute Capacity Building Programmes Compensate All PAPs Supervision of RAP Implementation Monitoring & Reporting on RAP Implementation Programme Administration Page | 54 DISCLOSURES This Resettlement Action Plan will be disclosed by Delta NEWMAP and DTSG which will make copies available at its head office in Asaba and copies distributed to the leadership of the community (the offices of the Traditional Ruler and President General of Obomkpa Community Association) prior to implementation of the project. Display centers will also include NEWMAP FPMU office, EA Department of FMEnv., Office of State Commissioner for Environment, LGA NEWMAP Liaison office, the Palace of the Traditional Ruler, and Office of the State Commissioner for Local Government matters. The RAP will be subjected to reviews and comments of the FPMU and the WB, and should be disclosed on the World Bank’s website. GLOSSARY OF TERMS Involuntary resettlement: Resettlement is involuntary when it occurs without the informed consent of the displaced persons or if they give their consent without having the power to refuse resettlement. Cut–off date: The date the enumeration begins. Persons occupying the project area after the cut- off date are not eligible for compensation and/or resettlement assistance. Similarly, fixed assets (such as built structures, crops and trees) established after the date of completion of the assets inventory or an alternative mutually agreed date will not be compensated Displaced persons: Persons who are affected by the involuntary taking or clearing of land or resulting in: i. Relocation or loss of shelter ii. Loss of assets or access to assets; or iii. Loss of income sources or means of livelihood whether or not the affected persons must move to another location. Land expropriation: Process whereby a public authority, usually in return for compensation, requires a person, household, or community to relinquish rights to land that it occupies or otherwise uses. Project-affected person: Any person who, as a result of the implementation of a project, loses the right to own, use, or otherwise benefit from a built structure, land (residential, agricultural, or pasture), annual or perennial crops and trees, or any other fixed or moveable asset, either in full or in part, permanently or temporarily. Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan (ARAP): The document in which a project sponsor or other responsible entity specifies the procedures that it will follow and the actions that it will take to mitigate adverse effects, compensate losses, and provide development benefits to persons and communities affected by an investment project. Resettlement assistance: Support provided to people who are physically displaced by a project. Assistance may include transportation, food, shelter, and social services that are provided to affected people during their relocation. Assistance may also include cash allowances that compensate affected people for the inconvenience associated with resettlement and defray the expenses of a transition to a new locale, such as moving expenses and lost work days. Structure owner PAPs: Project Affected Persons who own structures within the project area. Tenant PAPs: Project Affected persons who lease either residential or business premises within the project area. Page | 55 Stakeholders: Any and all individuals, groups, organizations, and institutions interested in and potentially affected by a project or having the ability to influence a project. Vulnerable groups: People who by virtue of gender, ethnicity, age, physical or mental disability, economic disadvantage, or social status may be more adversely affected by resettlement than others and who may be limited in their ability to claim or take advantage of resettlement assistance and related development benefits. Page | 56 REFERENCES Darghouth S., Ward C., Gambarelli G., Styger E., and Roux J. (2008): Watershed Management Approaches, Policies, and Operations: Lessons for Scaling Up, Water Sector Board discussion Paper Series Paper No. 11, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) Federal Republic of Nigeria Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission (ICRC) (2009): Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) for Nigeria Public Private Partnership (PPP) Project, prepared by ERML, December Federal Republic of Nigeria, Federal Ministry of Commerce and Industry (2010): Resettlement Policy Frame Work for Growth and Enterprises and Markets in States (GEMS) Project, Prepared by Earth Guard, March Government of India, Ministry of Urban Development (2008): Environment and Social Management Framework for Global Environment Facility Sustainable Urban Transport Project, September ITUA, E.O. (2011). Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) for the Nigeria Erosion and Watershed Management Project. Federal Ministry of Environment, Nigeria NEWMAP Project Appraisal Document (PAD) NEWMAP Project Implementation Manual (PIM) O.K. Agagu, E.A. Fayose, S.W. Petters; (1985); Stratigraphy and sedimentation in the Senonian Anambra Basin of Eastern Nigeria; Journal of Mineralogy and Geology, 22, pp. 25–36 Obomkpa Gully Erosion Site Intervention Design World Bank Safeguards Policies Page | 57 ANNEXURE A LIST OF CONTACTED STAKEHOLDERS The following persons were contacted during the course of the Consultancy: Table AN-1: List of Contacted Stakeholders MODE OF GROUPS CONTACTED STAKEHOLDER CONTACT Individuals or group of persons whose daily General meetings, activities (including farming) bring them in close phones and Group-1 proximity to the project area OR whose day-to-day personal contacts lives/livelihoods may be directly affected by using a facilitator. project activities. Office of the Chairman of Obomkpa Watershed Phone and personal Management Committee contacts Group-2 Office of the President General, Obomkpa Phone and personal Development Union contacts Office of the Chairman – Aniocha North LGA Phone contacts Office of the Hon. Member – Delta State House of Phone contacts Group-3 Assembly Office of the Hon. Member – Aniocha North & Phone contacts South Federal Constituency Page | 58 ANNEXURE B MINUTES OF COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS MINUTES OF MEETING WITH TRADITIONAL RULER AND ADMINISTRATIVE LEADERSHIP ITEM DESCRIPTION 1. Project: Delta NEWMAP: RAP 2. Community: Obomkpa Aniocha North L.G.A. 3. Date: 27 January, 2018 4. Language of Igbo and English Communication: 5. Introductions and The meeting started at about 1:25 pm in the palace of the traditional ruler Protocols: HRM. Onyemaechi Joshua Ironta. HRM welcomed the visiting consultants team and all present with traditional kola-nuts ceremonies. 6. Remarks by the Mr Lucky Oyibo–the SPMU Communication Officer (CO), spoke on SPMU: behalf of the SPMU. He introduced and presented the consultant, Dr. Odili Ojukwu to the leaders informing them that the consultant would brief them on the reasons for the meeting. Also present at the meeting was the State NEWMAP Social and Livelihood Officer–(SLO), Mrs Theodora Oyibo. 7. Remarks of Dr. Odili Ojukwu, the principal consultant introduced the members of his Principal Consultant, project consultant team and thanked HRH for his words of welcome. Dr. Odili Ojukwu • He explained that the purpose of the meeting was to pay homage to HRH and inform him formally of the commencement of the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for his community under the Delta State NEWMAP with the assistance of FGN and World Bank. • He informed the attendees that it was the challenges of the Obomkpa gully erosion, with its consequent displacements of homesteads, businesses, farmlands and other assets that precipitated the meeting. • Specifically, the study will identify and document those whose assets and means of livelihood would be impacted by the proposed works. Also an appropriate capacity building programme would be recommended to enable the beneficiaries use the projects in a responsible and sustainable manner. • The consultant teams would meet with a larger segment of the benefiting community and settlements to sensitize them on the study and solicit their supports and input. These would include administering a socio-economic questionnaire to the attendees. After which Focal group discussions would also be held for the men, women and youth. • He also told them that his team would be in the community for 7 days to document all who would potentially be affected and that those who would be coming to fill out the forms should come with a passport photograph for identification purposes and a photocopy of any form of government accepted identification cards. • The community was enjoined to take ownership of the project by proactive engagement and instituting community-based monitoring and evaluation activities in the course of implementation, and to Page | 59 ITEM DESCRIPTION maintain the projects when completed, to know and understand their roles in the project. He went on to add that the GRM process has been established by the SPMU. He encouraged them to use the platform to resolve complaints. • He kindly solicited the blessing and support of HRM and his community towards the success of the study pleading that the work is a time based work as such they should accommodate him when he calls and turn out for the betterment of the community 8.Questions by the Three questions were raised: Community • How can you know the areas to be affected? • What would happen to the identified assets and livelihood? • Can they get a copy of the design to be able to follow up on the construction works? 9.Remarks of HRM: HRM once again welcomed the consultants and expressed his happiness as well as that of his community with the study. He said that he wants development and progress for his community but the erosion issues pose great constraints. He promised the full support and offered his royal blessings for the success of the exercise. Various community leaders expressed their gratitude that their cries have been heard and promised to work as his HRM has said in cooperation with the consultant to make the work move smoothly. 10.Response of the The Consultant thanked the community members for the questions Consultants asked and responded to the each question as follows: a) Areas that will be affected by the project are determined from the engineering designs planned for the project; b) Any identified assets or livelihood of persons that will be impacted by the project shall be compensated for to the extent of the impact on the assets or individual livelihoods; c) The community association may formally request for a copy of the project design from the SPMU to assist community follow-up on the construction works 11.Closing: The meeting closed at about 3:15pm. It was attended by 25 persons. Page | 60 Page | 61 Page | 62 Page | 63 MINUTES OF THE FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS (FGD) MEN’S GROUP ITEMS DESCRIPTION 1. Project: Delta State NEWMAP RAP Project 2. Title: Elders’ Focus Group Discussion (FGD) 3. Community: Obomkpa, Aniocha North L.G.A 4. Date: March 3, 2018 5. Language of Igbo and English Communication: The meeting started at about 10.00pm at Ogbe-Obi hall, with opening prayers led by Mr. Uduje Ekene and a brief welcome speech was also made by Mr. Uduje Ekene, who is the site committee secretary of the community. 6. Introduction and Protocols: The Consultant, Dr. Odili Ojukwu was represented by Mrs. Okwusiunor Ngozi. and Ms. Adaeze Oba who formally introduced themselves as well as some of the community leaders present Mrs. Okwusiunor Ngozi in her remarks: • Explained that the purpose of the meeting was to follow up on the initial larger community sensitization meeting held earlier regarding the RAP project in Obomkpa. • The study will specifically document both the positive and negative impacts of the project on the social and Livelihood elements of the beneficiary community. Appropriate mitigation measures would be recommended for the negative impacts that are assessed to be significant. • Also relevant menu of capacity building activities would be recommended to enable the community use and maintain the projects when completed in a responsible and sustainable manner. • She stated that as elders in the community, it is their responsibility to ensure 7. Remarks of the that there is peace and tranquility in the community Consultant: • She reminded them on the need to take advantage of every peace and conflict mechanism/ architecture already in place in the community to settle disputes. Furthermore, the elders were also enjoined to make out time to preach the message of peace and mentor their respective families especially the youths on the need to embrace peaceful dispositions at all times. • She enjoined the elders as custodians of the customs and traditions of the land to guide their visitors on the norms and values of the community and also to be fair in their dealings with the outsiders. • The community was advised to take ownership of the project and mount a robust M & E activities during the implementation. • She then invited the community to ask questions or relate their concerns regarding the project as it affects them more than anyone else. The community remarks are summarized as follows: • What is the fate of those who were not able to meet up with the registration and verification of the properties within the time provided by the RAP 8. Remarks of the consultant? Community: • The fate of those who refused to register? • The issue representation of persons who were not physically present during registration and the implication on compensation, if need arises ? Page | 64 ITEMS DESCRIPTION The consultant gave the following responses to the questions asked by the community: • The attention of the elders was drawn to the responsibilities of the Grievance Committee and Community Association Committee which are in place and very functional in the community. Community members missed out during registration and verification exercises, were kindly advised to approach these committees with assurances that they will definitely be 9. Response of the accommodated Consultants: • On the fate of those who refused to register, the consultant is putting measures in place with FNGO and the existing committees to reach out to them on the importance of this exercise • On the representation of persons who asked some of their kinsmen to represent them, during the registration and verification exercise, letters of authorization would be required for the purposes of compensation from the traditional ruler. The meeting closed at about 12:00pm. The meeting was attended by 31 10. Closing: persons. Page | 65 Page | 66 Page | 67 MINUTES OF THE FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS (FGD) WOMEN GROUP ITEMS DESCRIPTION 1. Project: Delta State NEWMAP RAP Project 2. Title: Women Focus Group Discussion (FGD) 3. Community: Obomkpa, Aniocha North L.G.A 4. Date: 3rd March, 2018 5. Language of Igbo and English Communication: 6. Introduction and The meeting started at about 12.00pm at Ogbe-Obi hall, with opening prayers led by Protocols: Mrs Nonye Akor. A brief welcome speech was made by Mr. Uduje Ekene, who is the site committee secretary of the community. The Consultant, Dr. Odili Ojukwu was represented by Mrs Okwusiunor Ngozi. and Ms. Adaeze Oba who formally introduced themselves as well as some of the community leaders present 7. Remarks of the Mrs Okwusiunor Ngozi in her remarks: Consultant: • Explained that the purpose of the meeting was to follow up on the initial larger community sensitization meeting held earlier regarding the RAP project in Obomkpa. • The study will specifically document both the positive and negative impacts of the project on the social and Livelihood elements of the beneficiary community. Appropriate mitigation measures would be recommended for the negative impacts that are assessed to be significant. • She stated that as elders in the community, it is their responsibility to ensure that there is peace and tranquility in the community • She mentioned that as women and mothers, their roles and responsibilities in the society cannot be over emphasized. Women-specific perspectives to the study and their perception about the project are considered important. Hence the need for the meeting. • Speaking further on the importance of the role of women with respect to RAP activities, she said that it was obvious the women and children are the worst affected during disasters and such women should be seen playing frontline roles in issues affecting their immediate environment. Accordingly, she advised that they should support their respective families to apply due diligence in identifying those properties that fall within the erosion corridors for proper documentation. • She also told them that the project has a capacity to boost their economic income during the construction phases of the project such as buying and selling of food and other day to day needs of the incoming laborers’. • Sexual risks (HIV/AIDs etc.): She implored the women to advise their children on the need to guide themselves against unwholesome acts that would lead to sordid cases like; unwanted pregnancies, STIs/HIV/AIDS infections, kidnappings, robberies etc. • She then invited the community to ask questions or relate their concerns regarding the project as it affects them more than anyone else. 8. Remarks of the The concerns raised by the women are summarized as follows: Community: 1. Would NEWMAP embark on any other activity apart from gully rehabilitation? 2. What may be the implications of not being able to control their grown up daughters? 9. Response of the The consultant gave the following responses to the questions asked by the community: Consultants: • Within the gully rehabilitation, NEWMAP will carry out livelihood enhancement activities. RAP she noted is one of such activities by NEWMAP designed to improve the general well-being of people in all the affected communities. • It our responsibility to develop a behavioral change communication. Issues relating to sexual education should be taken seriously and modern/acceptable disease control and Gender Base Violence should be taught. 10. Closing: The meeting closed at about 2:15pm. The meeting was attended by 22 persons. Page | 68 Page | 69 Page | 70 MINUTES OF THE FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS (FGD) YOUTH GROUP ITEMS DESCRIPTION 1. Project: Delta State NEWMAP RAP Project 2. Title: Youth Focus Group Discussion (FGD) 3. Community: Obomkpa, Aniocha North L.G.A 4. Date: March 3, 2018 5. Language of Igbo and English Communication: 6. Introduction and The meeting started at about 2.00pm at Ogbe-Obi hall. A brief welcome speech was Protocols: made by Mr. Uduje Ekene, who is the site committee secretary of the community. The Consultant, Dr. Odili Ojukwu was represented by Mrs Okwusiunor Ngozi. and Ms. Adaeze Oba who formally introduced themselves as well as some of the community leaders present 7. Remarks of the Mrs Okwusiunor Ngozi in her remarks: Consultant: Explained that the purpose of the meeting was to follow up on the initial larger community sensitization meeting held earlier regarding the RAP project in Obomkpa. The study will specifically document both the positive and negative impacts of the project on the social and Livelihood elements of the beneficiary community. Appropriate mitigation measures would be recommended for the negative impacts that are assessed to be significant. Speaking to them and stressing on the importance of youths as tools to drive the developmental process, she mentioned that the responsibility of providing security throughout the life cycle of the project lies on the youths. She said that in every society, youths are the drivers of developmental processes. She charged the youths to come up with very useful ideas and channel them through the appropriate quarters to foster the smooth implementation of RAP and other NEWMAP activities in the community. She appealed to them to shun acts like cultism, kidnapping, stealing and other social vices that are inimical to growth and development of the society. She then invited the community to ask questions or relate their concerns regarding the project as it affects them more than anyone else. 8. Remarks of the The concerns raised by the youth are summarized as follows: Community: How many committees in the village are involved in NEWMAP RAP project? What happens to affected properties without Certificate of Occupancies (C of O ’s)? 9. Response of the The consultant gave the following responses to the questions asked by the community: Consultants: Currently NEWMAP works with the Site Committee and the Community Association Committee already set up in the community as a liaison with the community people. A letter of attestation signed by the Traditional Ruler and Community Association would suffice for attestation purposes. 10. Closing: The meeting closed at about 4:20pm. The meeting was attended by 16 persons. Page | 71 Page | 72 QUESTIONAIRE NO.: ANNEXURE C SAMPLE SOCIOECONOMIC/CENSUS DATA FORM OBOMKPA GULLY EROSION PROJECT DATA COLLECTION CONSENT FORM Questionnaire Number CONSENT: We are conducting an assessment for the Delta State Project Management Unit (SPMU) of Nigeria Erosion and Watershed Management Project (NEWMAP)` under the Ministry of Environment, Delta State to enable us determine the people and assets that will be affected by the remediation and rehabilitation of Obomkpa erosion gully corridor under NEWMAP. Your consent for this assessment is required. Respondent Phone Number(s):_______________________________________ Name of Property Owner Village: Kindred Residential Address: Consent (Sign): YES NO Interviewer: Date: PLACE PASSPORT-SIZE PHOTO OF RESPONDENT HERE Page | 73 QUESTIONAIRE NO.: ANNEXURE OBOMKPA GULLY EROSION INTERVENTION PROJECT SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE SURVEY GENERAL INFORMATION Name of Interviewer…………………..……………………………………………………………………………….Date……………………………… Name of Village/Town and Address……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… What is likely to be affected by the project?........................... Structure-1; Land-2; Structure and Land-3; Cash Crop-4; Others-5 (specify)…………………….. HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD (H.H)……………………………………………………………Years of Occupation of Affected Property………….Years NAME OF RESPONDENT: ………………………………………………………… RELATIONSHIP TO THE H.H...…………………………………………. STATUS OF USER OF PROPERTY: A) Title holder; B) Tenant; C) Non-Title Holder; D) Trust; E) Govt; F) NGO; G) Squatter AFFECTED PROPERTY INFORMATION Affected Structure Details: Distance to Type of Construction Structure Property Monthly Utility No of Total Area Type of Use Gully Edge Floor Level Length Width Height User Status Rent Connections Rooms (m2) Roof Wall Floor (m) (m) (m) (m) Type of Use = Residence-1; Commercial-2; Residential-cum-Commercial-3; Animal Shed/Poultry-4; Other (specify)-5………………………………. User Status = Own-1, Rent-2, Caretaker-3, Squatter-4, Encroachers-5, Other (specify)-6………………….…………….. Type of Construction: Wall = Mud-1, Thatched-2, Brick-3, Plank-4, Zinc-5 Roof = Zinc/Asbestos-1; RCC-2; Thatched-3; Tiles-4 Floor = Cement-1; Mud-2; Tiles-3 Floor Level = Bungalow-1, Storey Building-2 Utility Connection = Electricity-1; Water-2; Phone-3 AFFECTED LAND DETAILS SIZE OF AFFECTED LAND………………………………….. TYPE OF LAND………………………………. Agriculture-1; Residential-2; Commercial-3; Barren-4; Grazing Land-5 If Agriculture, is land ……………………... Wet-1; Dry-2; Other-3 What are the crops grown on land?.................................................................................................................................................. What are other immovable assets likely to be affected: Trees………..; Orange……….; Mango……….; Apple………; Other………… In your view, what is the yearly monetary benefit you gain from lost land?....N................................ HOUSEHOLD INFORMATION Household Composition and Personal Information Household Relationshi Marital Educational Monthly Skill Surname Other Names Gender Age Disability Occupation Members p With H.H Status Level Income Possessed HH Spouse Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Member 4 Member 5 Member 6 Member 7 Disability = Blind-1; Crippled-2; Mentally Disabled-3; Physically Challenged-4, Other-5 Relationship = Self -1; Wife-2; Son/Daughter-3, Nephew/Niece-4, Son-in-law/Daughter-in-law-5, Grand Child-6, Parent-7, House Help-8, Others-9 Marital Status = Single-1, Married-2, Widow-3, Widower-4, Divorcee-5, Separated-6, Single Parent-7. Literacy Level = Illiterate-1, Primary School-2, Secondary School-3, Undergraduate-4, Graduate-5, Post Graduate-6, Others-7. Occupation = Crop Farming-1, Animal Husbandry-2, Service Provider-3, Civil Servant-4, Craftsmanship/Artisanship-5, Trade/Business-6, Industrial Worker-7, Daily Wage Labour-8, Other-9. Page | 75 Household Income from Various Sources during Last One Year (Naira): Agriculture Industry Dairy Goatery Business Sheep Rearing Service Others (specify) Others (specify) Others (specify) Others (specify) Others (specify) INFORMATION OTHER THAN AFFECTED PROPERTIES Assets Ownership – Immovable Assets (other than the affected ones): Description Unit A Total area of immovable property owned by the Head of Household (acre) B Built up area used for dwelling/shop (sq m) C Area used for agricultural production, if any (acre) D Area used for grazing (acre) E Area under backyard production F Area under tree G Other (specify) H Other (specify) Assets Ownership (Please Record Numbers) Vehicles Any Other Any Other Any Other Any Other TV Fridge Radio Bus/Truck Cars Motor Keke Cooker (specify) (specify) (specify) (specify) cycle Napep Page | 76 Live Stock Assets (Please Record Numbers) Classification Cows Goats Poultry Sheep Others Others Others Give Number Household Health Status Was any member of your family affected by any major illness in the past one year? Yes-1; No-2 If YES, Indicate the details: Treatment Taken Type of Distance Type of S/No. No. of Cases Treatment Travelled for Disease/Illness Yes No Preferred Treatment PROJECT RELATED Are you aware of the proposed gully intervention project? Yes-1; No-2 If yes, what is the source?................ TV-1; Newspaper-2; Govt Official-3; Friend/Relative-4; Other-5 What is your opinion about the project?................ Good-1; Bad-2; Can’t Say-3 If good, what positive impacts do you perceive (can have multiple choice)? 1- Increase in employment opportunity; 2- Emotional relief 3- Increase in land price; 4- More value for local product; 5- Better infrastructure facility; 6- Increase in business opportunity. If bad, what negative impacts do you perceive (can have multiple choice)? 1- Loss of land and income opportunity; 2- Pressure on existing infrastructure; 3- Influx of population; 4- Conflict with outsiders; 5- Increase in antisocial elements Page | 77 RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION OPTIONS OF THE PAPs Are you willing to resettle voluntarily?........................ Yes-1; No-2 (Residence getting displaced) i) How far do you prefer to be relocated? 1- Within the village or town; 2- Outside the village/town ii) If outside the village/town, kindly give the name of the other place………………………………………………… iii) How far is this place from the present location?................................... iv) What is your preferred rehabilitation measure? (only one choice): • Replacement value & Rehabilitation grant • Plot on cost basis, Replacement value and Rehabilitation grant • Free plot and construction allowance (vulnerable) • Others (specify)……………………………………………………………………………………. v) Infrastructure enjoyed by the household or entrepreneur at present moment………………………………………………………… vi) Infrastructure facilities expected at the relocation site……………………………………………………………………………………… (Commercial Structure is getting displaced) i) How far do you prefer to be relocated? 1- Within the village or town; 2- Outside the village/town ii) If outside the village/town, kindly give the name of the other place………………………………………………… iii) How far is this place from the present location?................................... iv) What is your preferred rehabilitation measure? (only one choice): • Replacement value & Rehabilitation grant • Plot on cost basis, Replacement value and Rehabilitation grant • Free plot and construction allowance (vulnerable) • Others (specify)……………………………………………………………………………………. TENANT (Residence getting affected) i) What do you prefer for rehabilitation?............................ • Shifting allowance and rental allowance • Self relocation • Others (specify) (Commercial structure getting affected) i) What do you prefer for rehabilitation?............................ • Shifting allowance and rental allowance and training • Others (specify) Page | 78 ANNEXURE D SAMPLE OF AFFECTED ASSETS FIELD VERIFICATION FORM Page | 79 Page | 80 ANNEXURE E LIST OF IDENTIFIED VULNERABLE PERSONS AND PROPOSED SUPPORT Page | 81 TOTAL OTHER CONTACT VULNERABILITY S/NO SURNAME GENDER AGE REF NO VULNERABILITY NAMES PHONE CONDITION SUPPORT (N) 1 JIDEONWU PATRICK. A M 80 08037394124 OBM/001 BY AGE 60,000.00 NNEKA 2 OBIEZEKA F 80 07037970446 OBM/007 BY AGE 60,000.00 ANGEL 3 ISIKWEI THERESA F 73 OBM/010 BY AGE 60,000.00 4 OKAFOR JOSEPH A. M 74 08102694956 OBM/012 BY AGE 60,000.00 5 CHIEJINA ERNEST T. M 75 08133518719 OBM/017 BY AGE 60,000.00 6 MONVE FIDELIS M 73 08037715789 OBM/022 BY AGE 60,000.00 7 EBOLUM EPHRAIM M 71 OBM/024 BY AGE 60,000.00 8 OKORIE UCHEBUAKO M 75 07066637668 OBM/030 RHEUTHISM 60,000.00 9 AFAM ISAAC M 71 07054363664 OBM/034 BY AGE 60,000.00 10 MOKWUNYE PETER M 86 08167976430 OBM/037 BY AGE 60,000.00 11 OSIEGBU ALICE F 75 OBM/038 BY AGE 60,000.00 12 ANIKWE BRIDGETH F 71 08130542347 OBM/038 BY AGE 60,000.00 13 DUMKWU JOHN M 75 OBM/049 BY AGE 60,000.00 14 OLIKA FESTUS M 80 07033740400 OBM/053 BY AGE 60,000.00 15 EZE EMMANUEL M 70 07032492437 OBM/076 BY AGE 60,000.00 16 OGBUE HELEN F 74 08064703017 OBM/078 BY AGE 60,000.00 17 UYANWANNE EDWARD M 71 07037960855 OBM/083 BY AGE 60,000.00 MARY PHYSICALLY 18 OGBUE F 62 08056802255 OBM/087 60,000.00 OTUBO CHALLENGED 19 ANINOICHA OKEMUFUNA M 74 OBM/105 BY AGE 60,000.00 20 NKWUNYE ALICE F 74 07034799736 OBM/106 BY AGE 60,000.00 21 ONYEMA ANDREW M 74 08162694274 OBM/120 BY AGE 60,000.00 22 OGEDI FRANCIS M 89 08136437848 OBM/122 BY AGE 60,000.00 AFOLA 23 OKWUTE M 70 08130087068 OBM/131 BY AGE 60,000.00 JOSEPH STEPHEN PHYSICALLY 24 CHUKWUEMEKA M 33 08063977100 OBM/132 60,000.00 IFEANYI CHALLENGED 25 AWANYA NKABU M 70 09069725426 OBM/135 BY AGE 60,000.00 Page | 82 26 UDUJE VICENT M 86 08034201765 UDC/005 BY AGE 60,000.00 27 KMOAFA JAMES M 72 08106199275 UDC/015 BY AGE 60,000.00 N 1,620,000.00 Page | 83 ANNEXURE F LIST OF PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS (PAPs) AND COMPENSATIONS OBOMKPA COMPENSATION LIST ECONOMIC TREES & CROPS (ETC) LOCATION AFFECTED STRUCTU TEMPORARY PARTICULARS (C) TOTAL TOTAL TYPE OF GEND PHONE COORDINAT STATUS OF LAND AREA RE/ TOTAL COST TOTAL COST RELOCATION S/N NAME AGE REF NO OF NEXT OF COST COMPENSATIO ACQUISITION ER NUMBER ES OF PAP PROPERTY/ IN SQM BUILDING (A) (C) SUPPORT KIN (B) N (N) / COMMENT ASSET (A) (B) DESCRIP (D) QTY TION N062450.022 ACHI OTITO E0062932.405 LAND 1 ACHI EBELE JOSEPH M 35 08066000237 OBM/018 08145655127 N062450.441 OWNER OGBE-OBI 168 42,000.00 - 42,000.00 E0062932.932 AGADINWANYI OSITA EZEKA N062451.504 CHIEF 2 SHRINE M UDC/030 08061682481 E0062920.560 PRIEST OGBE-OBI 0 - 50,000.00 - 50,000.00 N062501.901 AGWUDU E0062940.333 LAND 3 AGWUDU FELICIA F 68 UDC/013 UCHIEMDI N062504.233 OWNER OGBE-ONEI 231 57,750.00 - 57,750.00 E0062939.703 N062440.4 AJUMUKA E0062902.2 LAND 4 AJUMUKA FAMILY M UDC/008 JOSEPH N062442.3 OWNER OGBE-OBI 140 35,000.00 - 35,000.00 08032587732 E0062902.6 N062452.0 MARTIN E0062912.0 LAND 5 AJUMUKA MARTINS M 60 08069544677 OBM/113 OLUCHUKWU N062451.7 OWNER OGBE-OBI 280 70,000.00 - 70,000.00 08130732941 E0062910.51 N062451.864 AJUMUKA E0062915.138 6 AJUMUKA MICHAEL M 52 09034641085 UDC/028 DESTINY N062451.870 0 - 60,000.00 08142192624 E0062915.564 N062452.0 AJUMUKA E0062912.0 7 ODENIGWE M 61 08036710096 OBM/032 N062451.7 OGBE-OBI 217 54,250.00 - 54,250.00 E0062910.23 N062452.0 AJUMUKA E0062912.0 LAND 8 AJUMUKA SUNDAY M 40 08060784244 OBM/005 OKECHUKWU N062451.7 OWNER OGBE-OBI 455 113,750.00 - 113,750.00 08038382513 E0062910.9 N062451.800 AKOR E0062913.468 LAND 9 AKOR FELICIA F 36 08034205455 OBM/014 EMMANUEL N062452.980 OWNER OGBE-OBI 175 43,750.00 - 43,750.00 E0062913.389 N062452.841 LAND/CR E0063006.026 10 AKUDI RAPHAEL M 50 08064985598 UDC/025 N062453.832 OP OGBE-OBI 294 CASSAVA 20 73,500.00 7,200.00 80,700.00 OWNER E0063005.939 N062458.020 LAND/CR E0062955.157 11 AKWUDI OZIOMA M 43 09032919913 UDC/012 AKWUDI NGOZI N062458.180 OP OGBE-OBI 1092 BAMBOO 50 273,000.00 120,000.00 393,000.00 OWNER E0062956.203 N062501.901 PLANTAI OKAFOR LAND/CR ANEMEKA E0062940.333 N 20 12 PHILOMENA F 40 09066129225 UDC/017 OBINNA N062504.233 OP OGBE-ONEI 70 COCONU 2 17,500.00 72,000.00 89,500.00 08105835165 OWNER E0062939.703 T N062450.208 LAND/CR ANIONICHA NGAJU ANIONICHA E0062938.881 PLANTAI 13 JOY F 74 08134939547 OBM/105 ONUWA N062450.357 OP UKPATU 196 N 10 49,000.00 12,000.00 61,000.00 OWNER E0062938.058 ASIWA AZUKA N062447.130 14 ASIWA ANTHONY M 61 07063972389 OBM/123 07062290484 E0062927.673 0 - - 60,000.00 ASIWA UDENE ASIWA LUCKY N062446.830 15 DANIEL M 60 08037420754 OBM/125 08034557311 E0062928.803 0 - - 60,000.00 Page | 84 ECONOMIC TREES & CROPS (ETC) LOCATION AFFECTED STRUCTU TEMPORARY PARTICULARS (C) TOTAL TOTAL TYPE OF GEND PHONE COORDINAT STATUS OF LAND AREA RE/ TOTAL COST TOTAL COST RELOCATION S/N NAME AGE REF NO OF NEXT OF COST COMPENSATIO ACQUISITION ER NUMBER ES OF PAP PROPERTY/ IN SQM BUILDING (A) (C) SUPPORT KIN (B) N (N) / COMMENT ASSET (A) (B) DESCRIP (D) QTY TION N062456.1 ODIAKAOSE E0062950.0 LAND 16 AWANYE ROSELINE F 60 09034716698 UDC/003 08064419814 N062456.3 OWNER OGBE-OBI 140 35,000.00 - 35,000.00 E0062950.6 N062456.3 BABUNDO BABUNDO E0062950.6 LAND 17 JOSEPHINE F 60 08163845686 UDC/002 UZOCHUKWU N062456.6 OWNER OGBE-OBI 84 21,000.00 - 21,000.00 08022982272 E0062951.3 N062450.3 BAKWUYI BAKWUYI E0062921.4 LAND 18 JOSEPHINE F 48 UDC/007 PROMISE N062450.4 OWNER OGBE-OBI 56 14,000.00 - 14,000.00 08101007744 E0062921.8 N062452.0 CHIEJINE E0062912.0 LAND 19 CHIEJINE ERNEST M 75 08133518719 OBM/017 KANAYO N062451.7 OWNER OGBE-OBI 105 26,250.00 - 26,250.00 08137381047 E0062910.16 AWOKE N062455.818 LAND/CR CHRIST HOLY OKECHUKWU E0062949.074 PLANTAI 20 CHURCH INTER. 08038313929 OBM/128 B. N062456.231 OP OGBE-OBI 280 N 3 70,000.00 3,600.00 73,600.00 OWNER 07034330364 E0062950.030 N062445.746 LAND/CR CHUKWUDIUFU E0062942.120 21 HENRY M 48 07067978204 OBM/013 N062457.136 OP OGBE-ONEI 371 GMELINA 2 92,750.00 240,000.00 332,750.00 OWNER E0062942.505 N062452.0 UDUJE EKENE E0062912.0 LAND 22 DUMKWU CHARLES M 55 08038202518 OBM/031 08100288936 N062451.7 OWNER UKPATU 224 56,000.00 - 56,000.00 E0062910.22 N062450.809 MOKWUNYE DUMKWU E0062937.212 LAND 23 ELIZABETH F 63 07068331368 OBM/049 KODILI N062450.917 OWNER 0 - - 60,000.00 09065024556 E0062937.380 N062452.0 EBOAGWU EBOAGWU E0062912.0 LAND 24 FAMILYLAND 08034484351 OBM/060 STEPHEN N062451.7 OWNER UKPATU 245 61,250.00 - 61,250.00 08034484351 E0062910.33 N062452.0 EBOAGWU LAND/CR E0062912.0 25 EBOAGWU ISICHEI M 44 08069030081 OBM/019 ONYINYE N062451.7 OP UKPATU 182 PAWPAW 1 45,500.00 10,800.00 56,300.00 08100373753 OWNER E0062910.17 N062451.463 E0062918.618 LAND 26 EGWUENU GEORGE M 67 08164073089 OBM/065 N062450.905 OWNER OGBE-OBI 434 108,500.00 - 108,500.00 E0062920.628 N062452.0 EKWUMANGBO EKWUMANGBO E0062912.0 LAND 27 PETER M 44 08027483665 OBM/061 JUDE N062451.7 OWNER UKPATU 154 38,500.00 - 38,500.00 08030907219 E0062910.34 N062428.723 EMEKA E0067858.763 LAND 28 EMEKA UDO M 34 UDC/039 VICTORY N062433.311 OWNER OGBE-OBI 630 157,500.00 - 157,500.00 E0062855.188 EMELUE N062452.0 EMELUE HENRY CHUKWUNONS E0062912.0 LAND BLOCK 390,000.0 29 UCHE M 66 8034000225 OBM/055 O N062451.7 OWNER OGBE-OBI 854 FENCE 213,500.00 0 - 603,500.00 08034000225 E0062910.32 N062450.131 ENEANYA ENEANYA E0062925.069 LAND 30 OZOEMEZIE M 62 08100084728 OBM/056 CHEKUBE N062450.191 OWNER OGBE-OBI 56 14,000.00 - 14,000.00 08035303282 E0062925.410 N06244.371 CASSAVA ENUDIOLU LAND/CR 40 ENUDIOLU FELIX E0062849.236 PALM 31 ATUINYI M 54 08035212391 OBM/072 NNAMDI N062434.2 OP OGBE-OBI 700 TREE 1 175,000.00 92,400.00 267,400.00 07037612319 OWNER 1 E0062853.5 CASHEW N062452.0 EZE IFEANYI EZE IKEOSE E0062912.0 LAND 32 EMMANUEL M 70 07032492437 OBM/076 08136978369 N062451.7 OWNER OGBE-OBI 749 187,250.00 - 187,250.00 E0062910.38 Page | 85 ECONOMIC TREES & CROPS (ETC) LOCATION AFFECTED STRUCTU TEMPORARY PARTICULARS (C) TOTAL TOTAL TYPE OF GEND PHONE COORDINAT STATUS OF LAND AREA RE/ TOTAL COST TOTAL COST RELOCATION S/N NAME AGE REF NO OF NEXT OF COST COMPENSATIO ACQUISITION ER NUMBER ES OF PAP PROPERTY/ IN SQM BUILDING (A) (C) SUPPORT KIN (B) N (N) / COMMENT ASSET (A) (B) DESCRIP (D) QTY TION N062452.0 ISIKA PROMISE E0062912.0 33 EZEH NGOZI F 52 08133914198 OBM/104 08100903520 N062451.7 0 - - 60,000.00 E0062910.47 N062452.0 ODOZIEZE E0062912.0 LAND 34 EZEH NKENCHOR M 58 07061930556 OBM/054 GLADYS N062451.7 OWNER OGBE-OBI 595 148,750.00 - 148,750.00 07036043119 E0062910.31 IHUOKPUOSEBUA OSITA EZEKA N062450.963 CHIEF AKPU 35 SHRINE UDC/029 08061682481 E0062920.130 PRIEST OGBE-OBI 0 TREE 1 50,000.00 90,000.00 150,000.00 N062452.0 IKEAKANM E0062912.0 LAND 36 IKEAKANM EPHRAIM M 67 08065174866 OBM/046 GOODNEWS N062451.7 OWNER UKPATU 210 52,500.00 - 52,500.00 08063219024 E0062910.28 N062459.9 ISIKWEI E0062941.1 LAND 37 ISIKWEI GODDEY M 23 07034670362 UDC/033 CATHERINE N062500.8 OWNER OGBE-ONEI 140 35,000.00 - 35,000.00 08132080028 E0062940.7 N062452.0 NATIVE ISIKWEI LAND/CR E0062912.0 PEAR 1 38 ISIKWEI THERESA F 71 08060514411 OBM/010 SUNDAY N062451.7 OP OGBE-ONEI 420 PLANTAI 5 105,000.00 18,000.00 123,000.00 08066003341 OWNER E0062910.12 N N062452.0 ISONG IFEANYI E0062912.0 39 ISONG PEACE F 25 07039770807 OBM/134 08132121162 N062451.7 0 - - 60,000.00 E0062910.55 N062451.612 JIDEONWO E0062916.020 LAND 40 JIDEONWO ANN F 66 08161309732 UDC/031 JUDE N062451.552 OWNER OGBE-OBI 140 35,000.00 - 35,000.00 07067509912 E0062916.662 N062452.0 JIDEONWO LAND/CR JIDEONWO E0062912.0 41 CHARLES M 53 08037048500 OBM/041 FORTUNE N062451.7 OP OGBE-OBI 154 CASSAVA 240 38,500.00 86,400.00 124,900.00 08037803615 OWNER E0062910.27 N062451.492 NWABUEZE LAND/CR JIDEONWO E0062916.482 42 DESMOND M 25 09038392048 UDC/016 WILLIAMS N062451.240 OP OGBE-OBI 133 KOLANUT 1 33,250.00 48,000.00 81,250.00 08057583739 OWNER E0062917.117 NATIVE N062452.201 JIDEONWO LAND/CR PEAR 1 JIDEONWO PATRICK E0062913.476 43 I.A M 80 08037394124 OBM/001 KELVIN AZUKA N062452.427 OP OGBE-OBI 427 UGIRI 1 106,750.00 123,000.00 229,750.00 08037394124 OWNER PALM 2 E0062911.880 TREE N062450.460 JIDEONWOR JIDEONWOR PETER E0062923.292 LAND 44 NWABUEZE M 52 08143659429 OBM/066 CHIAZOR N062450.131 OWNER OGBE-OBI 371 92,750.00 - 92,750.00 08143659429 E0062924.804 KPOMAFA ONYEJE N062445.947 45 KPOMAFA FAMILY 09060076812 OBM/108 WILLIAMS E0062931.405 0 - - 60,000.00 09060076812 KPOMAFA N062445.007 46 KPOMAFA JAMES M 72 08106199275 UDC/015 IKECHUKWU E0062931.001 0 - - 60,000.00 09033229442 KPOMAFA N062445.468 47 KPOMAFA SUNDAY M 68 07039061845 UDC/014 EMEKA E0062930.402 0 - - 60,000.00 08145667578 N062452.0 KURUE NNEKA E0062912.0 LAND 48 KURUE NZEMEKE M 30 07034853677 OBM/110 08031926460 N062451.7 OWNER OGBE-OBI 147 36,750.00 - 36,750.00 E0062910.49 N062451.432 MADUAEMAGO MADUAEMAGO E006917.093 LAND 49 PATRICIA F 51 08162793056 OBM/048 EGBOCHINA N062451.234 OWNER OGBE-OBI 140 35,000.00 - 35,000.00 AWELE 08038822562 E0062517.862 Page | 86 ECONOMIC TREES & CROPS (ETC) LOCATION AFFECTED STRUCTU TEMPORARY PARTICULARS (C) TOTAL TOTAL TYPE OF GEND PHONE COORDINAT STATUS OF LAND AREA RE/ TOTAL COST TOTAL COST RELOCATION S/N NAME AGE REF NO OF NEXT OF COST COMPENSATIO ACQUISITION ER NUMBER ES OF PAP PROPERTY/ IN SQM BUILDING (A) (C) SUPPORT KIN (B) N (N) / COMMENT ASSET (A) (B) DESCRIP (D) QTY TION N062452.0 MADUBUOGOR MADUBUOGOR E0062912.0 LAND 50 KINGSLEY M 43 08164774183 OBM/020 CYNTHIA N062451.7 OWNER 0 - - 60,000.00 09031128944 E0062910.18 N062449.895 MOBOSI BASIL E0062928.159 LAND 51 MOFU M 56 08052611755 OBM/043 N062450.016 OWNER OGBE-OBI 154 38,500.00 - 38,500.00 E0062928.861 N062450.328 MOBOSI E0062931.554 LAND 52 MOBOSI FAMILY 08035775232 OBM/051 EMEKA N062450.424 OWNER OGBE-OBI 140 35,000.00 - 35,000.00 07031330846 E0062932.160 N062450.034 MOBOSI PASCHAL E0062926.334 LAND 53 O. M 54 08038639094 OBM/073 N062449.895 OWNER OGBE-OBI 434 108,500.00 - 108,500.00 E0062928.159 N062450.321 MOBOSI ROSE E0062929.724 LAND 54 NGBONKWOR F 68 07067657122 OBM/045 N062450.340 OWNER OGBE-OBI 147 36,750.00 - 36,750.00 E0062930.347 N062450.203 MOBOSI SOLOMON E0062929.285 LAND 55 UDOKA M 42 07037433626 OBM/044 N062450.016 OWNER OGBE-OBI 189 47,250.00 - 47,250.00 E0062928.861 N062452.0 MOEMEKE E0062912.0 56 MOEMEKE UZU M 42 07038267589 OBM/085 EBELE N062451.7 0 - - 60,000.00 08148902837 E0062910.44 N062452.0 E0062912.0 57 MOKWUNYE PETER M 86 08167976430 OBM/037 N062451.7 OGBE-OBI 105 26,250.00 - 26,500.00 E0062910.26 N062452.0 MONYE ANGELA MONYE E0062912.0 58 IFEOMA F 51 07030100627 OBM/111 STEPHEN N062451.7 0 - - 60,000.00 E0062910.50 N062500.000 PLANTAI LAND/CR E0062941.466 N 8 59 MONYE FIDELIS M 73 08037715789 OBM/022 N062501.901 OP OGBE-ONEI 469 NATIVE 1 117,250.00 21,600.00 138,850.00 OWNER E0062940.333 PEAR N062452.0 MORDI NDUDI E0062912.0 LAND 60 MORDI UCHE M 55 08023573442 OBM/068 08024004378 N062451.7 OWNER UKPATU 140 35,000.00 - 35,000.00 E0062910.36 N062449.8 NDUBUOKWU NDUBUOKWU E0062925.8 LAND 61 CLETUS M 48 07037540521 UDC/011 SUNDAY N062449.8 OWNER OGBE-UDI 294 73,500.00 - 73,500.00 07068227688 E0062926.8 N062449.9 MAGRET NDUBUOKWU E0062924.2 LAND 62 PATRICK M 56 08161739778 UDC/035 NDUBUOKWU N062449.8 OWNER OGBE-OBI 196 49,000.00 - 49,000.00 07064529226 E0062924.9 N062454.324 E0062945.337 LAND 63 NGALA ONYINYE F 36 08133518713 OBM/027 NGALA NDUKA N062454.631 OWNER UKPATU 245 61,250.00 - 61,250.00 E0062446.284 N062458.0 NGENE DADA NGENE ROSE E0062955.4 LAND 64 PETER M 62 08137001488 UDC/001 08137001488 N062454.9 OWNER OGBE-OBI 609 152,250.00 - 152,250.00 E0062956.6 N0624457.965 E0062954.438 LAND 65 NGENE ELIZABETH F 68 08069848280 UDC/023 NGENE OSITA N062458.020 OWNER OGBE-OBI 168 42,000.00 - 42,000.00 E0062955.157 N0624457.552 NGENE E0062958.254 LAND 66 NGENE FAMILY M 38 08033675235 OBM/121 JEFFREY N062457.085 OWNER OGBE-OBI 315 78,750.00 - 78,750.00 08033675235 E0063000.000 Page | 87 ECONOMIC TREES & CROPS (ETC) LOCATION AFFECTED STRUCTU TEMPORARY PARTICULARS (C) TOTAL TOTAL TYPE OF GEND PHONE COORDINAT STATUS OF LAND AREA RE/ TOTAL COST TOTAL COST RELOCATION S/N NAME AGE REF NO OF NEXT OF COST COMPENSATIO ACQUISITION ER NUMBER ES OF PAP PROPERTY/ IN SQM BUILDING (A) (C) SUPPORT KIN (B) N (N) / COMMENT ASSET (A) (B) DESCRIP (D) QTY TION N062452.0 NJOKE NNAMDI E0062912.0 LAND 67 NJOKE THERESA F 60 08060252034 OBM/006 08132567776 N062451.7 OWNER OGBE-OBI 147 36,750.00 - 36,750.00 E0062910.10 N062452.0 NKABU AZUKA E0062912.0 LAND 68 NKABU AWANYE M 48 09069725426 OBM/135 08060389764 N062451.7 OWNER UKPATU 231 57,750.00 - 57,750.00 E0062910.56 N062453.555 E0062943.764 LAND 69 NKOSIANYI FELIX M 44 08033414738 UDC/021 N062654.577 OWNER OGBE-OBI 413 103,250.00 - 103,250.00 E0062445.168 N062452.0 NKWUNYE E0062912.0 70 NKWUNYE ALICE F 74 07034799736 OBM/106 JOHN N062451.7 0 - - 60,000.00 08089171582 E0062910.48 N062445.967 NNABUIFE ATUNYE E0062931.425 LAND 71 MICHEAL M 60 UDC/041 N062449.811 OWNER OGBE-OBI 140 35,000.00 - 35,000.00 E0062924.912 N062440.4 NSUEBO FAITH E0062902.2 LAND 72 NSUEBO EMMANUEL M 34 08096105709 UDC/010 08069456930 N062438.0 OWNER OGBE-OBI 686 171,500.00 - 171,500.00 E0062901.8 N062452.0 NWABUEZE E0062912.0 73 NWABUEZE FAMILY 08089780517 OBM/084 PETER N062451.7 0 - - 60,000.00 08089780517 E0062910.43 N062452.0 NWABUEZE NWABUEZE E0062912.0 74 THOMAS M 64 08064179216 OBM/116 PATRICIA N062451.7 0 - - 60,000.00 07065429683 E0062910.52 N062451.191 LAND/CR E0062920.659 AKPU 75 NWACHI SIOKWU M 50 08169522900 OBM/023 NWACHI ONYISI N062450.705 OP OGBE-OBI 252 TREE 1 63,000.00 90,000.00 153,000.00 OWNER E0062921.888 PLANTAI OKOLO LAND/CR N062504.602 N 10 76 NWANZE ERIC M 57 08033126614 OBM/062 STEPHEN E0062937.962 OP OGBE-ONEI 630 PALM 2 157,500.00 108,000.00 265,500.00 08107333607 OWNER TREE N062450.4 NWACHAI E0062934.1 LAND 77 NWOKO FAMILY 08061632199 UDC/006 STEVEN N062450.3 OWNER UKPATU 91 22,750.00 - 22,750.00 08068610735 E0062934.3 NZEDIUNOR NZEDIUNOR N062444.952 78 UZOCHUKWU M 61 08105107026 UDC/019 IKECHUKWU E0062931.212 0 - - 60,000.00 09071005707 N062440.914 NGOZI-CHIKA C E0062901.663 LAND- 79 OBI EPHRAIM M 63 08132556421 UDC/020 STEPHEN N062445.192 OWNER OGBE-OBI 840 210,000.00 - 210,000.00 08037417612 E00602.550 N062450.6 EZEKA NKEM E0062919.5 LAND 80 OBI ONYEMACHI M 30 09064700535 UDC/009 08086871781 N062450.5 OWNER OGBE-OBI 399 99,750.00 - 99,750.00 E0062920.9 N062452.0 CHIDI E0062912.0 LAND 81 OBIEZEKA NNEKA F 58 07037970446 OBM/007 ANTHONY N062451.7 OWNER OGBE-OBI 140 35,000.00 - 35,000.00 07068410051 E0062910.11 N062432.316 OSITA EZEKA E0062900.018 CHIEF 82 OBINABO SHRINE UDC/026 08061682481 N062433.708 PRIEST OGBE-OBI 308 77,000.00 50,000.00 - 127,000.00 E0062900.167 N062452.182 EMELUE OBOMKPA ACTION E0062907.432 LAND 83 CONGRESS 07032492437 UDC/032 HENRY N062451.372 OWNER OGBE-OBI 315 78,750.00 - 78,750.00 08034000225 E0062906.318 EMELUE OBOMKPA N062448.750 LAND 84 COMMUNITY LAND 07032492437 UDC/042 HENRY E0062904.135 OWNER OGBE-OBI 882 220,500.00 - 220,500.00 08034000225 Page | 88 ECONOMIC TREES & CROPS (ETC) LOCATION AFFECTED STRUCTU TEMPORARY PARTICULARS (C) TOTAL TOTAL TYPE OF GEND PHONE COORDINAT STATUS OF LAND AREA RE/ TOTAL COST TOTAL COST RELOCATION S/N NAME AGE REF NO OF NEXT OF COST COMPENSATIO ACQUISITION ER NUMBER ES OF PAP PROPERTY/ IN SQM BUILDING (A) (C) SUPPORT KIN (B) N (N) / COMMENT ASSET (A) (B) DESCRIP (D) QTY TION N062445.091 E0062902.687 N062450.646 EMELUE OBOMKPA MARKET E0062936.270 LAND 85 SQUARE 07032492437 UDC/027 HENRY N062450.718 OWNER OGBE-OBI 952 238,000.00 238,000.00 08034000225 E0062935.947 N062452.0 OBUZOEME E0062912.0 LAND 86 OBUZOEME SUNDAY M 58 07033890031 OBM/082 CAROLINE N062451.7 OWNER OGBE-OBI 805 201,250.00 - 201,250.00 07035944939 E0062910.41 N062450.9 E0062925.3 LAND 87 OFILI ANDREW M 33 08099903509 UDC/034 N062449.8 OWNER OGBE-OBI 147 36,750.00 - 36,750.00 E0062925.8 PLANTAI N062450.99 OFILI LAND/CR N 15 OFILI DARLINGTON E0062937.566 88 SUNDAY M 62 08100034211 OBM/015 NKEMDILIM N062452.201 OP OGBE-OBI 616 UGIRI 1 154,000.00 45,000.00 199,000.00 07067007083 OWNER NATIVE 1 E0062939.936 PEAR N062453.184 LAND/CR E0062942.564 GMELINA 2 89 OGBECHIE ISAAC M 71 07054363664 OBM/034 N062453.543 OP OGBE-ONEI 280 UGIRI 1 70,000.00 255,000.00 325,000.00 OWNER E0062943.721 N062452.0 CHUKWUDELU E0062912.0 LAND 90 OGBUE BASIL M 57 08033200260 OBM/069 08060232820 N062451.7 OWNER OGBE-ONEI 112 28,000.00 - 28,000.00 E0062910.37 N062503.462 OGBUE LAND/CR E0062939.330 91 OGBUE CYPRIAN M 63 07067306948 OBM090 PATIENCE N062504.967 OP OGBE-ONEI 119 ORANGE 1 29,750.00 9,000.00 38,750.00 07063564607 OWNER E0062938.850 N062452.0 OGBUE NGOZI E0062912.0 LAND 92 OGBUE HELEN F 74 08064703017 OBM/078 08131552820 N062451.7 OWNER OGBE-ONEI 70 17,500.00 - 17,500.00 E0062910.40 N062452.0 LAND/CR E0062912.0 PLANTAI 93 OGBUE SUNDAY M 68 08061608368 OBM/087 N062451.7 OP OGBE-ONEI 217 N 10 54,250.00 12,000.00 66,250.00 OWNER E0062910.45 N062503.108 OGEDI JUDE E0062939.049 LAND 94 OGEDI FAMILY M 89 08136437848 OBM/122 07035740729 N062503.276 OWNER OGBE-ONEI 112 28,000.00 - 28,000.00 E0062939.030 N062452.0 OJIE LAND/CR E0062912.0 PLANTAI 95 OJEI ANDREW M 64 07038952636 OBM/004 EKWUTOZIAM N062451.7 OP OGBE-ONEI 336 N 6 84,000.00 7,200.00 91,200.00 08135429191 OWNER E0062910.8 N062452.0 LAND/CR PLANTAI E0062912.0 40 96 OKAFOR IFEANYI M 32 08065948371 OBM/012 N062451.7 OP UKPATU 483 N 1 120,750.00 168,000.00 288,750.00 OWNER GMELINA E0062910.14 N062452.0 E0062912.0 97 OKOH ANTHONY IKE M 46 07081207476 OBM/026 N062451.7 OGBE-OBI 280 70,000.00 - 70,000.00 E0062910.20 N062452.0 OKOLIE LAND/CR E0062912.0 98 OKOLIE FAMILY 08135993217 OBM/036 GREGORY N062451.7 OP OGBE-OBI 490 MANGO 1 122,500.00 14,400.00 136,900.00 08135993217 OWNER E0062910.25 N062452.0 OKOLIE OKOLIE E0062912.0 LAND 99 NKEMUDILIM M 45 08063087161 OBM/002 EVELYN N062451.7 OWNER OGBE-OBI 329 82,250.00 - 82,250.00 09038087041 E0062910.7 N062400.556 OKOLO FRANCIS OKOLO CYPRIL E0062921.972 LAND 100 ILOBA M 60 08032899613 OBM/071 07038870477 N062450.441 OWNER OGBE-OBI 119 29,750.00 - 29,750.00 E0062922.518 Page | 89 ECONOMIC TREES & CROPS (ETC) LOCATION AFFECTED STRUCTU TEMPORARY PARTICULARS (C) TOTAL TOTAL TYPE OF GEND PHONE COORDINAT STATUS OF LAND AREA RE/ TOTAL COST TOTAL COST RELOCATION S/N NAME AGE REF NO OF NEXT OF COST COMPENSATIO ACQUISITION ER NUMBER ES OF PAP PROPERTY/ IN SQM BUILDING (A) (C) SUPPORT KIN (B) N (N) / COMMENT ASSET (A) (B) DESCRIP (D) QTY TION N062455.351 OKOLIE LAND/CR CASHEW E0063004.037 2 101 OKORIE U. SUNDAY M 79 07066637668 OBM/030 AUGUSTINE N062454.762 OP OGBE-OBI 217 PALM 1 54,250.00 108,000.00 162,250.00 07033740403 OWNER TREE E0063004.752 N062452.0 OKWUOFU E0062912.0 102 INNOCENT M 59 08165516034 OBM/033 N062451.7 UKPATU 301 75,250.00 - 75,250.00 E0062910.24 N062452.0 OKWUTE AFOHA AFOHA E0062912.0 LAND 103 JOSEPH M 45 08130087068 OBM/131 SUNDAY N062451.7 OWNER OGBE-ONEI 259 64,750.00 - 64,750.00 E0062910.54 N062451.930 LAND/CR OKWUWUZO E0062939.881 104 CHRISTIPHER M 55 07060424292 OBM/101 MBO NKWO N062452.379 OP OGBE-OBI 336 ORANGE 1 84,000.00 9,000.00 93,000.00 OWNER E006941.081 N062451.228 LAND/CR OLIKA MICHEAL E0062918.564 BAMBOO 20 105 OLIKA FESTUS M 80 07033740400 OBM/053 07063400127 N062451.487 OP OGBE-ONEI 1246 MANGO 1 311,500.00 62,400.00 373,900.00 OWNER E0062917.610 OLIKA RICHARD N062451.228 LAND 106 DIKE M 35 UDC/018 OLIKA SUSANA E0062918.564 OWNER OGBE-OBI 147 36,750.00 - 36,750.00 N062503.738 LAND/CR OMEGAI OGOR E0062938.802 PLANTAI 107 OMEGAI PIUS M 57 08037973791 OBM/119 08062471892 N062504.758 OP OGBE-ONEI 301 N 10 75,250.00 12,000.00 87,250.00 OWNER E0062937.818 N062452.0 E0062912.0 LAND 108 ONYEDIGBO FELIX M 55 08060882710 OBM/130 N062451.7 OWNER UKPATU 308 77,000.00 - 77,000.00 E0062910.53 N062451.547 ONYEKEONWE ONYEKEONWEA E0062916.800 LAND 109 FAMILY OBM/067 A NGOZI N062451.780 OWNER OGBE-OBI 238 59,500.00 - 59,500.00 08137456231 E0062915.989 N062451.018 ONYEMA E0062918.485 LAND 110 ONYEMA ANDREW M 74 08162694274 OBM/120 CHICHI N062451.234 OWNER OGBE-OBI 203 50,750.00 - 50,750.00 07052982690 E0062517.862 N062451.852 ANIKWE E0062913.476 LAND 111 OSIEGBU ALICE F 75 08068392166 OBM/038 BRIDGET N062452.997 OWNER OGBE-OBI 882 220,500.00 - 220,500.00 07036993717 E0062913.397 N062452.367 LAND/CR E0062911.676 COCONU 112 OSIEGBU DANIEL M 52 08065634564 OBM/008 N062452.932 OP OGBE-OBI 371 T 1 92,750.00 24,000.00 116,750.00 OWNER E0062910.235 N062450.1 EBOAGWU E0062930.9 113 OWEZIEM JUSTINE I. M 48 08139329679 OBM/102 PHILOMINA N062450.3 0 - - 60,000.00 08133518733 E0062931.2 N062453.555 E0062943.764 114 SAMUEL MONDAY M 42 08105504401 UDC/022 ANNA MONDAY N062654.577 0 - - 60,000.00 E0062445.168 N062450.507 ST.STEPHEN'S REVEREND E0062933.168 LAND 115 ANGLICAN M 08063883687 OBM/115 PETER OKOJIH N062450.484 OWNER OGBE-OBI 420 105,000.00 - 105,000.00 CHURCH 08063883687 E0062934.776 N062452.0 E0062912.0 LAND 116 UDEH EMMANUEL M 68 08132730397 OBM/077 UDEH UMEBYI N062451.7 OWNER UKPATU 84 21,000.00 - 21,000.00 E0062910.39 N062452.0 UDEH PAUL E0062912.0 LAND 117 UDEH FAMILY 08109769002 OBM/063 08109769002 N062451.7 OWNER UKPATU 203 50,750.00 - 50,750.00 E0062910.35 UDEH STELLA N062452.0 LAND 118 UDEH STEPHEN M 45 08060246602 OBM/029 09068182482 E0062912.0 OWNER UKPATU 511 127,750.00 - 127,750.00 Page | 90 ECONOMIC TREES & CROPS (ETC) LOCATION AFFECTED STRUCTU TEMPORARY PARTICULARS (C) TOTAL TOTAL TYPE OF GEND PHONE COORDINAT STATUS OF LAND AREA RE/ TOTAL COST TOTAL COST RELOCATION S/N NAME AGE REF NO OF NEXT OF COST COMPENSATIO ACQUISITION ER NUMBER ES OF PAP PROPERTY/ IN SQM BUILDING (A) (C) SUPPORT KIN (B) N (N) / COMMENT ASSET (A) (B) DESCRIP (D) QTY TION N062451.7 E0062910.21 N062454.6 UDUJE GIFT E0062946.3 LAND 119 UDUJE EKENE M 55 08100288936 UDC/004 09068781327 N062455.1 OWNER OGBE-OBI 350 87,500.00 - 87,500.00 E0062947.4 N062453.8 UDUJE E0062944.6 LAND 120 UDUJE VINCENT M 86 08034201765 UDC/005 EMMANUEL N062454.2 OWNER OGBE-OBI 266 66,500.00 - 66,500.00 08052953281 E0062945.5 N062451.821 LAND/CR UKWUDIA MATTHEW UKWUDIA E0062913.777 121 O. M 30 08069667420 OBM/025 LILIAN N062451.870 OP OGBE-OBI 126 OGBONO 1 31,500.00 15,000.00 46,500.00 OWNER E0062914.316 N062434.2 E0062853.5 LAND 122 UMUNNA UGO M 37 07069438083 UDC/040 UMUNNA NKEM N062433.3 OWNER UKPATU 350 87,500.00 - 87,500.00 E0062855.2 N062452.0 UYANWANNE UYANWANNE E0062912.0 LAND 123 THERESA F 71 07037960855 OBM/083 OKAMADU N062451.7 OWNER OGBE-OBI 70 17,500.00 - 17,500.00 08052433258 E0062910.42 540,000. 1,884,000.0 1,080,000.0 11,802,500.0 COMPENSATION TOTALS 33,194 8,298,500.00 00 0 0 0 Page | 91 ANNEXURE G PHOTO IDENTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VULNERABLE PERSONS OBOMKPA COMPENSATION LIST CONTACT VULNERABILITY VULNERABILITY PHOTO S/NO SURNAME GENDER AGE REF NO PHONE CONDITION SUPPORT (N) IDENTIFICATION AFAM 1 M 07054363664 71 OBM/034 BY AGE 60,000.00 ISAAC ANIKWE 2 F 08130542347 71 OBM/038 BY AGE 60,000.00 BRIDGETH ANINOICHA 3 M 74 OBM/105 BY AGE 60,000.00 OKEMUFUNA AWANYA 4 M 09069725426 70 OBM/135 BY AGE 60,000.00 NKABU CHIEJINA 5 M 08133518719 75 OBM/017 BY AGE 60,000.00 ERNEST T. CHUKWUEMEKA PHYSICALLY 6 STEPHEN M 08063977100 33 OBM/132 60,000.00 CHALLENGED IFEANYI LETTER OF ATTESTATION FROM DUMKWU TRADITIONAL 7 M 75 OBM/049 BY AGE 60,000.00 RULER REQUIRED JOHN FOR ANY COMPENSATION TO BE PAID LETTER OF ATTESTATION FROM EBOLUM TRADITIONAL 8 M 71 OBM/024 BY AGE 60,000.00 RULER REQUIRED EPHRAIM FOR ANY COMPENSATION TO BE PAID EZE 9 M 07032492437 70 OBM/076 BY AGE 60,000.00 EMMANUEL ISIKWEI OBM/010 10 F 73 BY AGE 60,000.00 THERESA Page | 92 CONTACT VULNERABILITY VULNERABILITY PHOTO S/NO SURNAME GENDER AGE REF NO PHONE CONDITION SUPPORT (N) IDENTIFICATION JIDEONWU 11 M 08037394124 80 OBM/001 BY AGE 60,000.00 PATRICK. A KMOAFA 12 M 08106199275 72 UDC/015 BY AGE 60,000.00 JAMES MOKWUNYE 13 M 08167976430 86 OBM/037 BY AGE 60,000.00 PETER MONVE 14 M 08037715789 73 OBM/022 BY AGE 60,000.00 FIDELIS NKWUNYE 15 F 07034799736 74 OBM/106 BY AGE 60,000.00 ALICE OBIEZEKA OBM/007 16 F 07037970446 80 BY AGE 60,000.00 NNEKA ANGEL OGBUE 17 F 08064703017 74 OBM/078 BY AGE 60,000.00 HELEN OGBUE PHYSICALLY 18 F 08056802255 62 OBM/087 60,000.00 MARY OTUBO CHALLENGED OGEDI 19 M 08136437848 89 OBM/122 BY AGE 60,000.00 FRANCIS OKAFOR 20 M 08102694956 74 OBM/012 BY AGE 60,000.00 JOSEPH A. OKORIE 21 M 07066637668 75 OBM/030 RHEUTHISM 60,000.00 UCHEBUAKO Page | 93 CONTACT VULNERABILITY VULNERABILITY PHOTO S/NO SURNAME GENDER AGE REF NO PHONE CONDITION SUPPORT (N) IDENTIFICATION OKWUTE 22 M 08130087068 70 OBM/131 BY AGE 60,000.00 AFOLA JOSEPH OLIKA 23 M 07033740400 80 OBM/053 BY AGE 60,000.00 FESTUS ONYEMA 24 M 08162694274 74 OBM/120 BY AGE 60,000.00 ANDREW OSIEGBU 25 F 75 OBM/038 BY AGE 60,000.00 ALICE UDUJE 26 M 08034201765 86 UDC/005 BY AGE 60,000.00 VINCENT LETTER OF ATTESTATION FROM UYANWANNE TRADITIONAL 27 M 07037960855 71 OBM/083 BY AGE 60,000.00 RULER REQUIRED EDWARD FOR ANY COMPENSATION TO BE PAID TOTAL VULNERABILITY SUPPORT N 1,740,000.00 Page | 94 PHOTO IDENTIFICATION OF PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS (PAPs) OBOMKPA COMPENSATION LIST TOTAL PHONE PHOTO S/N NAME GENDER AGE REF NO COMPENSATION NUMBER IDENTIFICATION (N) ACHI EBELE 1 M 35 08066000237 OBM/018 42,000.00 JOSEPH LETTER OF ATTESTATION AGADINWANYI FROM TRADITIONAL SHRINE 2 M 08061682481 UDC/030 50,000.00- RULER REQUIRED (OSITA EZEKA – FOR ANY CHIEF PRIEST) COMPENSATION TO BE PAID LETTER OF ATTESTATION FROM TRADITIONAL 3 AJUMUKA FAMILY M 08032587732 UDC/008 35,000.00 RULER REQUIRED FOR ANY COMPENSATION TO BE PAID AJUMUKA 4 M 60 08069544677 OBM/113 70,000.00 MARTINS AJUMUKA 5 M 52 09034641085 UDC/028 60,000.00 MICHAEL AJUMUKA 6 M 61 08036710096 OBM/032 54,250.00 ODENIGWE 7 AJUMUKA PIUS M 40 08060784244 OBM/005 113,750.00 8 AKOR FELICIA F 36 08034205455 OBM/014 43,750.00 9 AKUDI RAPHAEL M 08064985598 UDC/025 80,700.00 10 AKWUDI FELICIA F 68 UDC/013 57,750.00 11 AKWUDI OZIOMA M 43 09032919913 UDC/012 393,000.00 ANEMEKA 12 F 40 09066129225 UDC/017 89,500.00 PHILOMENA Page | 95 TOTAL PHONE PHOTO S/N NAME GENDER AGE REF NO COMPENSATION NUMBER IDENTIFICATION (N) ANIONICHA NGAJU 13 F 74 08134939547 OBM/105 61,000.00 JOY 14 ASIWA ANTHONY M 61 07063972389 OBM/123 60,000.00 ASIWA UDENE 15 M 60 08037420754 OBM/125 60,000.00 DANIEL 16 AWANYE NKABU M 48 09069725426 OBM/135 57,750.00 AWANYE 17 F 60 09034716698 UDC/003 35,000.00 ROSELINE BABUNDO 18 F 60 08163845686 UDC/002 21,000.00 JOSEPHINE BAKWUYI 19 F 48 UDC/007 14,000.00 JOSEPHINE 20 CHIEJINE ERNEST M 75 08133518719 OBM/017 26,250.00 LETTER OF ATTESTATION FROM TRADITIONAL CHRIST HOLY 21 M 08038313929 OBM/128 73,600.00 RULER REQUIRED CHURCH INTER. FOR ANY COMPENSATION TO BE PAID CHUKWUDIFU 22 M 48 07067978204 OBM/013 332,750.00 HENRY TRIUMPH DUMKWU 23 F 63 07068331368 OBM/049 60,000.00 ELIZABETH 24 EBOAGWU ISICHEI M 44 08069030081 OBM/019 56,300.00 EBOAGWU 25 M 60 08034484351 OBM/060 61,250.00 STEPHEN Page | 96 TOTAL PHONE PHOTO S/N NAME GENDER AGE REF NO COMPENSATION NUMBER IDENTIFICATION (N) EGWUENU PASSPORT OF GEORGE (LATE) NEXT-OF-KIN (HIS 26 M 08164073089 OBM/065 108,500.00 (Information of Next- SON GEORGE of-Kin Provided) CHARLES CHIDI) EKWUMANGBO 27 M 44 08027483665 OBM/061 38,500.00 PETER 28 EMEKA UDO M 34 UDC/039 157,500.00 EMELUE HENRY 29 M 66 08034000225 OBM/055 603,500.00 UCHE ENEANYA 30 M 62 08100084728 OBM/056 14,000.00 OZOEMEZIE ENUDIOLU FELIX 31 M 54 08035212391 OBM/072 267,400.00 ATUINYI EZE IFEANYI 32 M 70 07032492437 OBM/076 187,250.00 EMMANUEL 33 EZEH NGOZI F 52 08133914198 OBM/104 60,000.00 34 EZEH NKENCHOR M 58 07061930556 OBM/054 148,750.00 LETTER OF ATTESTATION IHUOKPUOSEBUA FROM TRADITIONAL SHRINE (OSITA 35 M UDC/029 90,000.00 RULER REQUIRED EZEKA – CHIEF FOR ANY PRIEST) COMPENSATION TO BE PAID IKEAKANM 36 M 67 08065174866 OBM/046 52,500.00 EPHRAIM 37 ISIKWEI GODDEY M 23 07034670362 UDC/033 35,000.00 Page | 97 TOTAL PHONE PHOTO S/N NAME GENDER AGE REF NO COMPENSATION NUMBER IDENTIFICATION (N) 38 ISIKWEI THERESA F 71 08060514411 OBM/010 123,000.00 39 ISONG PEACE F 25 07039770807 OBM/134 60,000.00 IZEDIUNO 40 M 61 08105107026 UDC/019 60,000.00 UZOCHUKWU REFUSED TO PROVIDE Efforts still ongoing to 41 JIDEONWO ANN F 66 08161309732 UDC/031 35,000.00 PASSPORT FOR obtain PAP’s passport SOME UNKNOWN photo REASONS JIDEONWO 42 M 53 08037048500 OBM/041 124,900.00 CHARLES JIDEONWO 43 M 25 09038392048 UDC/016 81,250.00 DESMOND JIDEONWO 44 M 80 08037394124 OBM/001 229,750.00 PATRICK I.A JIDEONWOR 45 M 52 08143659429 OBM/066 92,750.00 PETER NWABUEZE 46 KPOMAFA JAMES M 72 08106199275 UDC/015 60,000.00 LETTER OF ATTESTATION KPOMAFA ONYEJE FROM TRADITIONAL 47 WILLIAMS FAMILY M 09060076812 OBM/108 60,000.00 RULER REQUIRED LAND FOR ANY COMPENSATION TO BE PAID 48 KPOMAFA SUNDAY M 68 07039061845 UDC/014 60,000.00 49 KURUE NZEMEKE M 30 07034853677 OBM/110 36,750.00 Page | 98 TOTAL PHONE PHOTO S/N NAME GENDER AGE REF NO COMPENSATION NUMBER IDENTIFICATION (N) MADUAEMAGO 50 F 51 08162793056 OBM/048 35,000.00 PATRICIA AWELE MADUBUOGOR 51 M 43 08164774183 OBM/020 60,000.00 KINGSLEY MBUKANMA 52 M 55 08038202518 OBM/031 56,000.00 CHARLES N. MOBOSI BASIL 53 M 56 08052611755 OBM/043 38,500.00 MOFU LETTER OF ATTESTATION FROM TRADITIONAL 54 MOBOSI FAMILY M 08035775232 OBM/051 35,000.00 RULER REQUIRED FOR ANY COMPENSATION TO BE PAID MOBOSI PASCHAL 55 M 54 08038639094 OBM/073 108,500.00 O. MOBOSI ROSE 56 F 68 07067657122 OBM/045 36,750.00 NGBONKWOR MOBOSI SOLOMON 57 M 42 07037433626 OBM/044 47,250.00 UDOKA 58 MOEMEKE UZU M 42 07038267589 OBM/085 60,000.00 MOKWUNYE 59 M 86 08167976430 OBM/037 26,500.00 PETER MONYE ANGELA 60 F 51 07030100627 OBM/111 60,000.00 IFEOMA 61 MONYE FIDELIS M 73 08037715789 OBM/022 138,850.00 Page | 99 TOTAL PHONE PHOTO S/N NAME GENDER AGE REF NO COMPENSATION NUMBER IDENTIFICATION (N) 62 MORDI UCHE M 55 08023573442 OBM/068 35,000.00 NDUBUOKWU 63 M 48 07037540521 UDC/011 73,500.00 EMMANUEL NDUBUOKWU 64 M 56 08161739778 UDC/035 49,000.00 PATRICK 65 NGALA ONYINYE F 36 08133518713 OBM/027 61,250.00 NGENE DADA 66 M 62 08137001488 UDC/001 152,250.00 PETER The passport is that 67 NGENE ELIZABETH F 68 08069848280 UDC/023 42,000.00 of the next of kin - Ngene Osita LETTER OF ATTESTATION FROM TRADITIONAL 68 NGENE FAMILY M 08033675235 OBM/121 78,750.00 RULER REQUIRED FOR ANY COMPENSATION TO BE PAID 69 NJOKE THERESA F 60 08060252034 OBM/006 36,750.00 70 NKOSIANYI FELIX M 44 UDC/021 103,250.00 71 NKWUNYE ALICE F 74 07034799736 OBM/106 60,000.00 NNABUIFE ATUNYE 72 M 60 UDC/041 35,000.00 MICHEAL NSUEBO 73 M 34 08096105709 UDC/010 171,500.00 EMMANUEL Page | 100 TOTAL PHONE PHOTO S/N NAME GENDER AGE REF NO COMPENSATION NUMBER IDENTIFICATION (N) 74 NWABUEZE PETER M 47 08089780517 OBM/084 60,000.00 NWABUEZE 75 M 64 08064179216 OBM/116 60,000.00 THOMAS 76 NWACHI SIOKWU M 50 08169522900 OBM/023 153,000.00 77 NWANZE ERIC M 57 08033126614 OBM/062 265,500.00 LETTER OF ATTESTATION FROM TRADITIONAL 78 NWOKO FAMILY M 08061632199 UDC/006 22,750.00 RULER REQUIRED FOR ANY COMPENSATION TO BE PAID 79 OBI EPRIAM M 63 08132556421 UDC/020 210,000.00 80 OBI ONYEMACHI M 30 09064700535 UDC/009 99,750.00 81 OBIEZEKA NNEKA F 58 07037970446 OBM/007 35,000.00 LETTER OF ATTESTATION OBINABO SHRINE FROM TRADITIONAL 82 (OSITA EZEKA – M 08061682481 UDC/026 77,000.00 RULER REQUIRED CHIEF PRIEST) FOR ANY COMPENSATION TO BE PAID LETTER OF ATTESTATION FROM TRADITIONAL OBOMKPA ACTION 83 M 07032492437 UDC/032 78,750.00 RULER REQUIRED CONGRESS FOR ANY COMPENSATION TO BE PAID LETTER OF ATTESTATION OBOMKPA FROM TRADITIONAL 84 COMMUNITY M 07032492437 UDC/042 220,500.00 RULER REQUIRED FOREST FOR ANY COMPENSATION TO BE PAID LETTER OF ATTESTATION FROM TRADITIONAL OBOMKPA 85 M 07032492437 UDC/027 238,000.00 RULER REQUIRED MARKET SQUARE FOR ANY COMPENSATION TO BE PAID Page | 101 TOTAL PHONE PHOTO S/N NAME GENDER AGE REF NO COMPENSATION NUMBER IDENTIFICATION (N) OBUZOEME 86 M 58 07033890031 OBM/082 201,250.00 SUNDAY 87 OFILI ANDREW M 33 08099903509 UDC/034 36,750.00 OFILI DARLINGTON 88 M 62 08100034211 OBM/015 199,000.00 SUNDAY 89 OGBECHIE ISAAC M 71 07054363664 OBM/034 325,000.00 90 OGBUE BASIL M 57 08033200260 OBM/069 28,000.00 91 OGBUE CYPRIAN M 63 07067306948 OBM090 38,750.00 92 OGBUE HELEN F 74 08064703017 OBM/078 17,500.00 93 OGBUE SUNDAY M 68 08061608368 OBM/087 66,250.00 LETTER OF ATTESTATION FROM TRADITIONAL OGEDI FRANCIS 94 M 08136437848 OBM/122 28,000.00 RULER REQUIRED FAMILY FOR ANY COMPENSATION TO BE PAID 95 OJEI ANDREW M 64 07038952636 OBM/004 91,200.00 96 OKAFOR JOSEPH M 08065948371 OBM/012 288,750.00 OKOH ANTHONY 97 M 46 07081207476 OBM/026 70,000.00 IKE Page | 102 TOTAL PHONE PHOTO S/N NAME GENDER AGE REF NO COMPENSATION NUMBER IDENTIFICATION (N) 98 OKOLIE GREGORY M 50 08135993217 OBM/036 136,900.00 OKOLIE 99 M 45 08063087161 OBM/002 82,250.00 NKEMUDILIM OKOLO FRANCIS 100 M 60 08032899613 OBM/071 29,750.00 ILOBA OKORIE U. 101 M 57 07033740403 OBM/030 162,250.00 SUNDAY OKWUOFU 102 M 59 08165516034 OBM/033 75,250.00 INNOCENT OKWUTE AFOHA 103 M 45 08130087068 OBM/131 64,750.00 JOSEPH OKWUWUZO 104 M 55 07060424292 OBM/101 93,000.00 CHRISTOPHER 105 OLIKA FESTUS M 80 07033740400 OBM/053 373,900.00 OLIKA RICHARD 106 M 35 UDC/018 36,750.00 DIKE LETTER OF ATTESTATION FROM TRADITIONAL OMEGAI PIUS 107 M 08037973791 OBM/119 87,250.00 RULER REQUIRED FAMILY FOR ANY COMPENSATION TO BE PAID 108 ONYEDIGBO FELIX M 55 08060882710 OBM/130 77,000.00 LETTER OF ATTESTATION FROM TRADITIONAL ONYEKEONWEA 109 M 08139050362 OBM/067 59,500.00 RULER REQUIRED FAMILY FOR ANY COMPENSATION TO BE PAID 110 ONYEMA ANDREW M 74 08162694274 OBM/120 50,750.00 Page | 103 TOTAL PHONE PHOTO S/N NAME GENDER AGE REF NO COMPENSATION NUMBER IDENTIFICATION (N) 111 OSIEGBU ALICE F 75 08068392166 OBM/038 220,500.00 112 OSIEGBU DANIEL M 52 08065634564 OBM/008 116,750.00 OWEZIEM JUSTINE 113 M 48 08139329679 OBM/102 60,000.00 I. 114 SAMUEL MONDAY M 42 08105504401 UDC/022 60,000.00 LETTER OF ATTESTATION ST.STEPHEN'S FROM TRADITIONAL 115 ANGLICAN M 08063883687 OBM/115 105,000.00 RULER REQUIRED CHURCH FOR ANY COMPENSATION TO BE PAID 116 UDEH EMMANUEL M 68 08132730397 OBM/077 21,000.00 LETTER OF ATTESTATION FROM TRADITIONAL UDEH PAUL 117 M 08109769002 OBM/063 50,750.00 RULER REQUIRED FAMILY FOR ANY COMPENSATION TO BE PAID 118 UDEH STEPHEN M 45 08060246602 OBM/029 127,750.00 119 UDUJE EKENE M 55 08100288936 UDC/004 87,500.00 120 UDUJE VINCENT M 86 08034201765 UDC/005 66,500.00 UKWUDIA 121 M 30 08069667420 OBM/025 46,500.00 MATTHEW O 122 UMUNNA UGO M 37 07069438083 UDC/040 87,500.00 Page | 104 TOTAL PHONE PHOTO S/N NAME GENDER AGE REF NO COMPENSATION NUMBER IDENTIFICATION (N) UYANWANNE 123 F 71 07037960855 OBM/083 17,500.00 THERESA Page | 105