CC CELLULE DE COORDINATION DU PROJET CREDIT NUMBER IDA-6132-CM Cameroon-World Bank Cooperation MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT GENERAL SECRETARIAT - SECRÉTARIAT GÉNÉRAL COORDINATION UNIT - CELLULE DE COORDINATION CAMEROON INCLUSIVE AND RESILIENT DEVELOPMENT CITIES PROJECT PROJET DE DEVELOPPEMENT DES VILLES INCLUSIVES ET RESILIENTES PDVIR CREDIT NUMBER IDA – 6132 - CM PRELIMINARY RESSETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP) REPORT KUMBA II 1st Floor Nangah Building, Ring Way Street Contact information: Mankon Bamenda – North West Region, P.O. Box +237 243004288 5185, Bamenda, E-mail: program.youth@gmail.com 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................... 1 LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................... 6 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .................................................................................. 7 LIST OF ANNEXES ................................................................................................................................... 9 NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 10 RESUME NON-TECHNIQUE ................................................................................................................ 16 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 22 1.1. HISTORICAL PROFILE OF THE PROJECT’S DIRECT IMPACT AREA ............................ 22 1.2. PURPOSE AND CONTENT OF THIS REPORT .......................................................................... 22 1.3. PREPARATION AND VALIDATION PROCESS OF THIS PRESENT RAP AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE METHODOLOGICAL NOTE ...................................................................... 23 1.3.1. RAP validation procedure .............................................................................................................. 24 1.3.2. Publication of the RAP ................................................................................................................... 25 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................. 25 2.1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT.......................................................................... 25 2.2. IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AREA .................................... 25 3. POTENTIAL IMPACTS...................................................................................................................... 26 3.1. COMPONENTS OF THE PROJECT LEADING TO LOSS OF PEOPLE’S PROPERTY AND THE DIRECT IMPACT AREA .............................................................................................................. 26 3.2. IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES................................................................................ 26 3.3. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED TO MINIMIZE RESETTLEMENT .................................... 30 4. SOCIOECONOMIC STUDIES ........................................................................................................... 31 4.1. CHARACTERISTICS OF PAP HOUSEHOLDS........................................................................... 31 4.2. SOCIAL ORGANIZATION OF THE COMMUNITY .................................................................. 33 4.3. LAND SITUATION OF THE PROJECT AREA ........................................................................... 35 4.4. POPULATION ................................................................................................................................... 35 4.5. PAP IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENTS ........................................................................................ 35 4.6. LEVEL OF EDUCATION OF PAPs ............................................................................................... 36 4.7. MAIN ACTIVITIES OF PAPs ......................................................................................................... 37 4.8 VULNERABILITY OF THE PAP .................................................................................................... 39 1 4.9 PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES AND SOCIAL SERVICES ........................................................ 40 4.10. SOCIAL AND CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF DISPLACED COMMUNITIES ...... 41 5. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ...................................................................................................................... 43 5.1. The Operational Policy 4.12 OF THE WORLD BANK AND NATIONAL LEGISLATION .... 43 5.2. NATIONAL LEGISLATION ........................................................................................................... 47 5.4. OPERATIONAL POLICY. 4.12 OF THE WORLD BANK ......................................................... 50 5.5. THE METHODOLOGICAL NOTE (MN) GOVERNING THE OPERATION OF THE CEC 51 6. INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................... 57 6.2 RAP IMPLEMENTATION ACTORS ............................................................................................. 59 6.3. STRENGTHENING THE CAPACITIES OF INSTITUTIONS ................................................... 60 6.4. INSTITUTIONAL STEPS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................................ 60 7. ELIGIBILITY ....................................................................................................................................... 67 7.1. CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY ....................................................................... 67 7.2. COMPENSATION ............................................................................................................................ 67 7.3. CENSUS OF POPULATIONS AND PROPERTY ......................................................................... 68 7.4. PAP CATEGORIES .......................................................................................................................... 70 7.5. NUMBER OF VULNERABLE PAPs .............................................................................................. 71 8. ESTIMATION OF LOSSES AND THEIR COMPENSATION ...................................................... 72 8.1. LOSS ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................... 72 8.1.1. PLANTS ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ......................................................................... 72 8.1.2. CONSTRUCTION EVALUATION METHODOLOGY ......................................................... 74 8.1.3 Methodology for assessing wells ............................................................................................... 76 8.1.4. Evaluation of landed properties methodology: ......................................................................... 76 8.1.5. ASSESSMENT OF GRAVES METHODOLOGY .................................................................. 76 8.1.6. Economically Displaced Evaluation methodology ................................................................... 77 8.1.7. WELLS EVALUATION METHODOLOGY .......................................................................... 79 8.2. SUMMARY OF THE COST OF COMPENSATION .................................................................... 80 8.3. INDIVIDUAL NEGOTIATIONS..................................................................................................... 80 8.4. RAP IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ....................................................................................... 80 9 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS ............................................................................................... 81 9.1. FIRST PHASE OF CONSULTATION DURING THE DATA COLLECTION PERIOD ............ 81 9.2. SECOND PHASE OF CONSULTATION RELATING TO PUBLIC HEARINGS....................... 82 2 10. COMPLAINT RESOLUTION AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT MODALITIES ................ 82 10.1. TYPES OF COMPLAINTS AND CONFLICTS TO BE ADDRESSED .................................... 82 10.2. COMPLAINT MANAGEMENT MECHANISM IMPLEMENTATION ACTORS ................ 83 10.3. ELIGIBILITY OF COMPLAINTS ............................................................................................... 85 10.4. DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION STEPS OF THE GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM (GRM) LINKED TO THE RAP .................................................................................. 85 11. MONITORING-EVALUATION SYSTEMS ................................................................................... 87 11.1. INTERNAL MONITORING OF RAP .......................................................................................... 88 11.2. CONCURRENT AUDIT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION, MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF THE RAP ................................................................................................................ 89 11.3. INDICATORS FOR THE FINAL EVALUATION ...................................................................... 90 11. COST AND BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES .......................................................... 92 BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCE .................................................................................................... 94 ANNEXES ................................................................................................................................................. 95 3 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Summary of Kumba RAP ............................................................................................................. 12 Table 2: RAP preparation steps .................................................................................................................. 24 Table 3: Category of property ..................................................................................................................... 27 Table 4: Number of community infrastructure ........................................................................................... 27 Table 5: The age of PAP ............................................................................................................................. 31 Table 6: Ethnic group of PAP ..................................................................................................................... 33 Table 7: The literacy level of PAP .............................................................................................................. 37 Table 8: Primary activities of PAP ............................................................................................................. 37 Table 9: Secondary activity of PAP ............................................................................................................ 38 Table 10: Average monthly income of PAP ............................................................................................... 38 Table 11: Average monthly household expenses ........................................................................................ 39 Table 12: Contribution of PAP to household income ................................................................................. 39 Table 13: Other types of vulnerability of the PAP...................................................................................... 40 Table 14: Access distance to health services .............................................................................................. 40 Table 15: Access distance to education facilities........................................................................................ 41 Table 16: Belonging to associative groups ................................................................................................. 42 Table 17: Types of associative groups ........................................................................................................ 42 Table 18: Comparison between Cameroonian legislation and World Bank OP 4.12 ................................. 44 Table 19: Comparative table of procedures and processes for preparing and compensating PAPs for structuring sub-projects and local sub-projects ........................................................................................... 52 Table 20: RAP implementation actors ........................................................................................................ 59 Table 21: Stages, responsible persons and role of institutional actors ........................................................ 61 Table 22: Number of property affected by category ................................................................................... 68 Table 23: Different types of constructions affected in Kumba II ............................................................... 68 Table 24: List of plants affected by the implementation of local projects in the town of Kumba .............. 69 Table 25: List of wells affected by the implementation of local projects in Kumba II ............................... 70 Table 26: List of graves affected by the implementation of local projects in Kumba II............................. 70 Table 27: List of vulnerable PAPs in Kumba II.......................................................................................... 71 Table 28: Annual inflation rates from 2003 to 2024 ................................................................................... 73 Table 29: Updated prices of perennial crops............................................................................................... 73 Table 30: Price per square meter of different house standards in 2024 in Kumba ..................................... 75 Table 31: Compensation cost for constructions .......................................................................................... 75 Table 32: PAPs impacted by loss of graves ................................................................................................ 77 Table 33: The distribution of the tax regime of economically displaced PAPs .......................................... 78 Table 34: Costings for evaluations of loss of wells .................................................................................... 79 Table 35: Compensation cost for impacted types of wells ......................................................................... 80 Table 36: Implementation schedule for RAP activities .............................................................................. 81 Table 37: Summary of actors and role in the implementation of the CMM ............................................... 83 Table 38: Activities and responsibilities for internal RAP monitoring....................................................... 88 Table 39: Vulnerable PAP .......................................................................................................................... 90 Table 40: Indicators for monitoring the implementation of the RAP ......................................................... 90 4 Table 41: Total RAP implementation budget ............................................................................................. 92 5 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Satellite image of structuring roads for the PDVIR Sub projects in Kumba II ............. 26 Figure 2: Nationality of PAP: ....................................................................................................... 32 Figure 3: Marital status of PAP .................................................................................................... 32 Figure 4: PAP religion .................................................................................................................. 33 Figure 5: Traditional administrative setup of Kumba II ............................................................... 34 Figure 6: Identification papers of PAP ......................................................................................... 36 Figure 7: Educational background of PAP ................................................................................... 36 Figure 8: Vulnerability of PAP ..................................................................................................... 40 Figure 9: Spatial distribution of properties/ businesses affected in Kumba II RAP ..................... 72 6 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CAMWATER Cameroon Water Utilities Corporation CCP Cellule de Coordination du projet CPR Resettlement Policy Framework DD Divisional Delegate DLA Decentralized local authorities DPU Declaration of Public Utility DTA Decentralized Territorial Authorities EMM Environmental Management Manager ENEO Energy of Cameroon ESA Exploitation and Sexual Abuse ESMP Environmental and social management plan FEICOM Special Council Support Fund for Mutual Assistance GBV Gender Based Violence GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism HME Head of Monitoring and Evaluation IDA International Development Association IDP Internally Displaced Person KBL Kumba Bare land KCC Kumba City Council KCO Kumba constructions KED Kumba Economically Displaced KGr Kumba Graves KPl Kumba plants LCT Local Compliance Team MGP Mécanisme de gestion des plaints MINADER Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development MINAS Ministry of social affairs MINDCAF Ministry of State property and Land Tenure 7 MINDHU Ministry of Housing and Urban Development MINEE Ministry of Water and Energy MINPROFF Ministry of Women's Empowerment and the Family MN Methodological note OP Operational policy PAP Project Affected Person SCP Social Communication Program PDVIR Inclusive and Resilient Cities Development Project PM Prime Minister PV Procès verbal RAP Resettlement Action Plan RPF Resettlement Policy Framework SH Sexual Harassment SMM Social Management Manager SRP Succinct Resettlement Plan TOR Terms of Reference UTL Technical Liaison Unit WB World Bank 8 LIST OF ANNEXES Annex 1: Constructions Evaluation for Kumba RAP ................................................................... 95 Annex 2: Bare Land Evaluation for Kumba RAP ...................................................................... 103 Annex 3: Plants Assessment for Kumba RAP ............................................................................ 107 Annex 4: Economically Displaced for Kumba RAP .................................................................. 111 Annex 5: Well for Kumba RAP .................................................................................................. 112 Annex 6: Consolidated table for Kumba RAP ............................................................................ 114 Annex 7: Bill of quantities and cost estimates for ordinary Standing ........................................ 114 Annex 8: Bill of quantities and cost estimates for wooden structures ........................................ 122 Annex 9: Bill of quantities and cost estimates for hard fence without metallic gates ................ 124 Annex 10: Bill of quantities and cost estimates for hard fence with metallic gate ..................... 125 Annex 11: Bill of quantities and cost estimates for the construction of a septic tank ................ 128 Annex 12: Communique setting up Ad-hoc committee for the Kumba RAP ............................ 129 Annex 13: Photos of training of stakeholders in Douala for the Kumba RAP ........................... 131 Annex 14: Attendance sheet for stakeholders involved in the training for the Kumba RAP ..... 132 Annex 15: Launching of RAP Kumba PDVIR Sub-project in Kumba ...................................... 135 Annex 16: Attendance sheet for the launching of RAP Kumba PDVIR Sub-project in Kumba 136 Annex 17: Field work with Delegates after launching of the RAP Kumba project ................... 141 Annex 18: Photos of socio-economic survey.............................................................................. 142 Annex 19: Consultation Meeting With PAPs ............................................................................. 143 Annex 20: Attendance sheet for consultation meeting with PAP ............................................... 147 Annex 21: Photos from Consultation meeting with PAPs for the Kumba II RAP ..................... 153 9 NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY The Government of the Republic of Cameroon plans to use part of the resources of the Development of Inclusive and Resilient Cities Project (PDVIR) to finance the development of certain facilities and infrastructures identified as part of the Proximity Program, with a view to effectively improve the living conditions of populations in the under-equipped neighborhoods concerned Kumba II council, with a view to increase urban mobility. The aim of the project is to achieve a sustainable improvement in urban populations' access to basic services for the purposes of conservation and sustainable development, in particular by providing assistance to communities living in precarious or under-structured neighbourhoods. The local sub-projects to be implemented in Kumba II council area (Meme Division, South West Region), which will affect people's assets, are as follows: Two sections of tertiary roads in the Fiango quater (Section 1: Ntoko street to Gare. (2800ml) section 2: Cameroon Street to Hausa Quarters (2100 ml). The road shall have a width of 7m, parking of 3m width shoulder of 2m banquette of 1m, gutters of 1.2m and space of network of 3m. The total length of the road is 17.5m. All these works will require land in the private or national domain, which will entail the physical or economic displacement of assets. Consequently, the World Bank's OP 4.12 on involuntary resettlement has been activated, and a Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) must be prepared, consulted and agreed with the people affected. The main aim of the RAP is to address impacts arising from direct economic and social consequences that both result from the Bank-financed investment projects and are caused by involuntary land withdrawal resulting in: a) relocation or loss of habitat; b) loss of assets or access to assets; or c) loss of sources of income or livelihood, whether or not those affected have to relocate to another site. This RAP includes, among other things - The legal framework to be applied to implement the RAP - The socio-demographic survey of displaced people and an estimate of their assets; - A description of the evaluation of losses caused by resettlement - The amount of compensation and other forms of resettlement assistance to be provided as appropriate; - Consultations with displaced persons on acceptable resettlement alternatives; - Institutional responsibility for RAP implementation; - Arrangements for monitoring and implementation; - Timetable and budget. 10 The RAP was prepared in accordance with OP4. 12, the Methodological Note describing the operating procedures of the Survey and Evaluation Commission set up for the expropriation surveys of the Inclusive and Resilient Cities Development Project PDVIR (the MN)) which was authorized by the Government of Cameroon on September 05, 2018; the descriptive note of the procedure for the valuation of property/appraisal and compensation of persons affected by the works of the proximity sub-projects within the framework of the PDVIR of March 2022; Where there are gaps between national legislation and OP 4. 12, OP 4.12 applies. Semi-structured interviews, surveys and public and individual consultations were carried out in February 2024 with the administrative and traditional leaders of the town of Kumba, including the SDO, the DO of the Kumba subdivision, the City Mayor, the traditional chiefs of the quaters, the heads of the ministerial departments and decentralized State services in charge of expropriation issues (MINDCAF, MINAS, MINADER, MINDHU; MINEE). Systematic visits to the project site for direct observations and surveys were carried out in the presence of members of the Ad hoc Committee and the people affected. The RAP was returned to the PAPs in Kumba on the 7th of March 2024. During this meeting, PAPs presented their demands. Finally, the PAPs were consulted individually on the nature of the compensation available to them, i.e. cash compensation and/or compensation in kind through survey questionnaires. Amongst the 237 PAPs, 232 opted for payment is cash while 5 preferred bank transfer. The implementation of the PDVIR's local sub-projects faces a major constraint linked to the long delay in expropriation and payment of indemnities and compensation to those affected by the Project. To alleviate this constraint, and in accordance with the financing agreement, the Project has undertaken, in conjunction with MINDCAF, the Prime Minister's Office and the World Bank, to adopt the most appropriate of the existing legal procedures to reduce the delays imposed by the usual expropriation procedure, which in terms of prerequisites for payment: - requesting and issuing a DPU order to MINDCAF, - AVC expropriation appraisals, - MINDCAF central analyses, - the Primature's regulatory appraisals, - issuance of the expropriation decree and approval by the Presidency of the Republic of the draft compensation decree, and - signature of the compensation decree by the Prime Minister. This led the Project to ask itself how it could succeed in paying compensation to PAPs and carrying out local sub-projects within the remaining funding deadlines, hence the Methodological Note validated by the World Bank in August 2021, which is the legal framework that has been applied in this RAP. The survey work is carried out by the ad hoc Committee set up by the City Mayor, joined by the DAJ/MINHDU and the Consultant in charge of drawing up the RAP, and will have three main components: (i) Field work; (ii) Deliberative sessions; (iii) Public hearings or consultation of those affected. 11 The socio-political organization of the neighborhoods is highly hierarchical, with quarter heads. • This RAP concerns 237 people affected by the Project (PAP) - heads of families - individually (identified as individuals) who represent their respective families affected by 121 constructions, 68 plants, 36 bare properties, 49 wells, 3 graves and 61 businesses who will receive compensation for the disruption of their activities. That is to say, a total of 338 properties and development affected by the works belonging to 237 PAPs. It should be noted that there are PAPs that have several developments affected by the work. This is therefore a consolidated PAP workforce. • These PAPs lose a small part of: their homes or shelters, fences, sheds or stores, land and plants. It should be noted that, under this RAP, these crops, dwellings or shelters, sheds and partially and permanently affected land do not represent the main source of income or livelihood of these people. Only companies that have been identified represent sources of income for the people concerned, and they are therefore considered economically displaced. It is also important to note that no physical displacement has been identified under this RAP, as all affected people are partially displaced and will remain at their same sites. These PAPs are broken down as follows: • People lose their property permanently. These are i) crops (trees) planted in front of their roadside dwellings (oil palms, mangoes, bananas, avocados, guava trees); (ii) a small portion of their land or (iii) a small portion of their buildings (buildings covered by this RAP include houses/sheds, sheds, fences, porches, paved yards, stairways). No PAP loses all of these constructs. All these PAPs will be maintained at the same sites. These are not cases of physical relocation to new locations. It should be recalled here that under this RAP, crops, land, buildings do not represent their means of subsistence, nor their source of income. They are therefore not economically displaced within the meaning of OP 4.12 of the World Bank. • PAPs whose commercial activities represent their main sources of income (sale of clothing, school supplies, flea markets, plastic shoes, etc.) will be temporarily disrupted while work is carried out on the roads to be improved (work in progress). Depending on the field operations, the activities of these PAPs will be maintained at the same sites. Details on these companies are presented in Appendix 4 of this report. Table 1: Summary of Kumba RAP Total Constructions Plants Lands Economically Wells(FCFA) Graves number of (FCFA) (FCFA) (FCFA) displaced (FCFA) PAP/affected (FCFA) property Cost 415,665,884 351,231,914 9,257,010 19,655,200 27,421,760 6,600,000 1,500,000 12 Number 338 121 68 36 61 49 03 of properties affected by category Annex 6 shows the consolidated list of PAPs and their appraised properties and developments. The bare properties, constructions (constructions in this RAP refer to houses/sheds, sheds, fences, verandas, paved courtyards, staircases), crops, were valued in accordance with the provisions of the methodological note and the descriptive note of the procedure for the valuation of assets/enhancements, and compensation of persons affected by the works of the proximity sub- projects within the framework of the PDVIR of March 2022, made available to the Ad hoc Committee in particular: • In accordance with the PDVIR methodological note, the buildings are evaluated at their new-build value, as established by the expert member of the authorized ad hoc committee. This valuation was based on the results of the cost estimates drawn up taking into account the cost of materials in Kumba on 15th February 2024 and adding 30% labour required for construction; • To obtain the replacement value of the plants, we updated the plants compensation scale set out in Decree No. 2003/418/PM of 25th February 2003. The value of each crop was calculated year by year (from 2003 to 2024) by applying the annual national inflation rate. These inflation rates are obtained following field surveys of local market costs, conducted by the National Institute of Statistics in every town in Cameroon; • Current land sales practices in Kumba report that prices vary between 2,000 and 6,000/m2, despite Decree N°2014/3211/PM of September 29, 2014, which sets the minimum prices applicable to transactions on land under the State's private domain at 4,000 FCFA/m2. In the context of the replacement value of the PDVIR Methodological Note, it was estimated at 4,000 FCFA/m2. To this was added the cost of administrative transactions (250,000 FCFA). These costs were obtained from the services of the departmental delegation of domains. It should be pointed out that this price was obtained by the consultant after a land survey in the project area, to ensure that the cost applied reflected the local reality; • In accordance with the guidelines set out in the PDVIR financing agreement between Cameroon and the World Bank, and in particular with the World Bank's OP 4.12 on involuntary resettlement, compensation for economic losses or loss of livelihood for those affected is mandatory. They are caused by the disruption and slowdown of certain economic activities (selling clothes, school supplies, second-hand clothes, plastic shoes, etc) during the construction period. Some economic PAP might not be able to continue to carry out their activities after the works on these sites. The negative impact will be short- 13 term, for the duration of the works, since in the context of this RAP, these impacts (disruption of economic activities) are not definitive, but will only last during the execution of the works for some, others will be relocated or provided with means to change economical activities. In fact, a positive long-term impact is expected once the lanes have been upgraded, as access will become easier with the improvements to be made by the PDVIR, so these businesses will have more customers and make better sales. The people affected by these disruptions will benefit from compensation corresponding to the income accumulated over the period of disruption. This lost income, recognized as the livelihood of the person affected, is determined according to the level of taxation of the disrupted activity and the duration of the disruption. In addition to the above-mentioned compensation, PAPs in a situation of economic displacement whose structures are fixed, receive compensations that are calculated and paid. In the case of mobile structures, PAPs will be assisted in moving their structures. • For cases of destruction or movement of a grave, the provisions of OP 4.11 on grave exhumation protocol, framed by Decree 74-199 of March 14, 1974 will be applied in addition to other legal provisions in force in Cameroon. Indeed, apart from compensation for the material loss of the grave, costs linked to the organization of funeral rites generated by the exhumation and reburial of the remains will be covered by the project. The costs of operations and administrative and logistical procedures will also be covered by the project promoters. To this end, funeral costs linked to the movement of graves of 500,000 FCFA per grave will be integrated into the budget for the implementation of this RAP, i.e. 250,000 FCFA for administrative costs and 250,000 FCFA for families relating to the reorganization funerals, i.e. an amount of 1,500,000 FCFA for the management of the three graves. • The compensation for wells in Kumba II was realized taking into account the actual cost of materials and activities in the year of evaluation i.e. 2024 and based on the different types of wells encountered in the area. Economic losses are caused by the relocation, disruption and/or slowdown of certain economic activities (stores, call-boxes, shoe repair shops, trade sheds, garages, etc.) during the construction period. This impact will depend on the duration of the work (8 months). People affected by this impact will receive compensation corresponding to the income accumulated over the period of disruption. This lost income, recognized as the livelihood of the person affected, is determined according to the level of taxation of the disrupted activity and the duration of the disruption. In addition to the above-mentioned compensation, PAPs in a situation of economic displacement whose structures are fixed, receive compensation which is calculated and paid. In the case of mobile structures, PAPs will be assisted in moving their structures. The Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) will make it possible to effectively capture and process complaints and claims related to resettlement, and those related to GBV. A special procedure is provided by the GRM for the management of GBV complaints: ESA/SH. The GRM will be 14 popularized among communities, chiefdoms, companies in charge of the works, through popularization campaigns, posters in places of high human presence, within companies, at the UTL, at the mission headquarters control and any other place where need will be. Each of the companies responsible for the work will develop a GRM which will be validated by the MDC and the CCP, then will also be the subject of publication. RAP implementation will be audited by an independent consultant. The RAP implementation milestones are: - Milestone 1: Verify the proper identification of PAPs or their beneficiaries; - Milestone 2: Examine and rule on PAP payment files; - Milestone 3: Rule on the payment of compensation to PAPs (in cash or in kind) in accordance with the conclusions of the negotiations recorded in the minutes signed for this purpose. - Milestone 4: Ruling on the conformity of the procedures, deadlines and quality of the GRM's response to the RAP in accordance with the RAP's provisions; - Milestone 5: Final evaluation of the RAP. The overall budget for the implementation of the Resettlement Action Plan in Kumba II amounts to 438,949,178 CFA francs (four hundred and thirty eight million nine hundred and fourty nine thousand one hundred and seventy eight francs), distributed as follows: (i) Constructions 351,231,914 FCFA (ii) plants 9,257,010 CFA francs; (iii) Economically displaced persons 27,421,760 FCFA, (iv) Wells 6,600,000 FCFA and (v) Bare land 19,655,200FCFA (vi) Graves 1,500,000 FCFA, Commission 2,500,000 FCFA, 5% Miscellaneous 20,783,294.19 FCFA. 15 RESUME NON-TECHNIQUE Le Gouvernement de la République du Cameroun envisage d'utiliser une partie des ressources du Projet de Développement de Villes Inclusives et Résilientes (PDVIR) pour financer le développement de certains aménagements et infrastructures identifiés dans le cadre du Programme de Proximité, en vue d'améliorer efficacement la condition de vie des populations des quartiers sous-équipés relevant de la commune de Kumba II, en vue d'accroître la mobilité urbaine. L'objectif du projet est d'améliorer durablement l'accès des populations urbaines aux services de base dans un but de conservation et de développement durable, notamment en apportant une aide aux communautés vivant dans des quartiers précaires ou sous-structurés. Les sous-projets locaux à mettre en œuvre dans la commune de Kumba II (Département de Meme, Région du Sud-Ouest), qui affecteront les biens des populations, sont les suivants : Deux tronçons de routes tertiaires dans le quartier Fiango (Section 1 : rue Ntoko jusqu'à Gare. (2800 ml) section 2 : rue Cameroun jusqu'aux quartiers Hausa (2100 ml). La route aura une largeur de 7 m, un parking de 3 m et un épaulement de 2 m. banquette de 1m, gouttières de 1,2m et espace de réseau de 3m La longueur totale de la route est de 17,5m. Tous ces travaux nécessiteront des terrains appartenant au domaine privé ou national, ce qui entraînera des déplacements physiques ou économiques de biens. Par conséquent, le PO 4.12 de la Banque mondiale sur la réinstallation involontaire a été activé, et un plan d'action pour la réinstallation (PAR) doit être préparé, consulté et convenu avec les personnes affectées. L’objectif principal du PAR est de remédier aux impacts découlant des conséquences économiques et sociales directes qui résultent à la fois des projets d’investissement financés par la Banque et du retrait involontaire des terres entraînant : a) déplacement ou perte d'habitat ; b) perte d'actifs ou accès à des actifs ; ou c) perte de sources de revenus ou de moyens de subsistance, que les personnes touchées soient obligées ou non de déménager vers un autre site. Ce PAR comprend entre autres - Le cadre juridique à appliquer pour mettre en œuvre le PAR - L'enquête sociodémographique des personnes déplacées et une estimation de leurs patrimoines ; - Une description de l'évaluation des pertes causées par la réinstallation - Le montant de l'indemnisation et des autres formes d'aide à la réinstallation à fournir, le cas échéant ; - Consultations avec les personnes déplacées sur les alternatives de réinstallation acceptables ; - Responsabilité institutionnelle de la mise en œuvre du PAR ; - Dispositions de suivi et de mise en œuvre ; - Calendrier et budget. 16 Le PAR a été préparé conformément à l’OP4. 12, la Note Méthodologique décrivant les modalités de fonctionnement de la Commission d'Enquête et d'Evaluation mise en place pour les enquêtes d'expropriation du Projet de Développement de Villes Inclusives et Résilientes (PDVIR (le MN)) qui a été autorisée par le Gouvernement du Cameroun le 05 septembre 2018 ; la note descriptive de la procédure d'évaluation des biens/expertise et indemnisation des personnes affectées par les travaux des sous-projets de proximité dans le cadre du PDVIR de mars 2022 ; Lorsqu'il existe des lacunes entre la législation nationale et la PO 4.12, la PO 4.12 s'applique. Des entretiens semi-directifs, des enquêtes et des consultations publiques et individuelles ont été réalisés en février 2024 auprès des chefs administratifs et traditionnels de la ville de Kumba, dont le SDO, le DO de l'arrondissement de Kumba, le Maire de la Ville, les chefs traditionnels des quaters. , les chefs des départements ministériels et des services déconcentrés de l'Etat en charge des questions d'expropriation (MINDCAF, MINAS, MINADER, MINDHU ; MINEE). Des visites systématiques du site du projet pour des observations directes et des enquêtes ont été réalisées en présence des membres du Comité Ad hoc et des personnes affectées. Le RAP a été restitué aux PAP à Kumba le 7 mars 2024. Lors de cette réunion, les PAP ont présenté leurs revendications. Enfin, les PAP ont été consultées individuellement sur la nature de la compensation qui leur est offerte, à savoir une compensation en espèces et/ou une compensation en nature à travers des questionnaires d'enquête. Parmi les 237 PAP, 231 ont opté pour le paiement en espèces tandis que 5 ont préféré le virement bancaire. La mise en œuvre des sous-projets locaux du PDVIR se heurte à une contrainte majeure liée au long délai d'expropriation et de paiement des indemnités et compensations aux personnes affectées par le Projet. Pour alléger cette contrainte, et conformément à l'accord de financement, le Projet s'est engagé, en collaboration avec le MINDCAF, la Primature et la Banque Mondiale, à adopter la plus appropriée des procédures juridiques existantes pour réduire les délais imposés par les procédures habituelles. procédure d'expropriation, qui en termes de conditions de paiement : -- La demande et la délivrance d’un arrêté de DUP au MINDCAF, - Les expertises d’expropriation de la CCE, - Les analyses du MINDCAF central, - Les expertises de réglementation de la Primature, - La délivrance du décret d’expropriation et le visa de la Présidence de la République sur le projet de décret d’indemnisation et - La signature du décret d’indemnisation par le Premier Ministre. Ceci a amené le Projet à se demander comment il pourrait réussir à verser des indemnisations aux PAP et à réaliser des sous-projets locaux dans les délais de financement restants, d'où la Note Méthodologique validée par la Banque Mondiale en août 2021, qui est le cadre juridique 17 qui a été appliquées dans ce PAR. Les travaux d'enquête sont réalisés par la Commission ad hoc mise en place par le Maire de la Ville, auquel participent la DAJ/MINHDU et le Consultant chargé de l'élaboration du PAR, et comprendront trois composantes principales : (i) Travaux de terrain ; (ii) Séances délibératives ; (iii) Audiences publiques ou consultation des personnes concernées. L'organisation sociopolitique des quartiers est très hiérarchisée, avec des chefs de quartiers. • Ce PAR concerne 237 personnes affectées par le Projet (PAP) - chefs de famille - individuellement (identifiés comme individus) qui représentent leurs familles respectives affectées par 121 constructions, 68 usines, 36 nues-propriétés, 49 puits, 3 tombes et 61 commerces qui recevront une compensation pour la perturbation de leurs activités. Soit un total de 338 biens et aménagements concernés par les travaux appartenant à 237 PAP. Il convient de noter qu’il existe des PAP qui ont plusieurs évolutions affectées par les travaux. Il s’agit donc d’un effectif PAP consolidé • Ces PAP perdent une petite partie de : leurs habitations ou abris, leurs clôtures, hangars ou magasins, leurs terrains et plantes. Il convient de noter que, dans le cadre de ce PAR, ces cultures, habitations ou abris, hangars et terres partiellement et définitivement affectées ne représentent pas la principale source de revenus ou de subsistance de ces personnes. Seules les entreprises identifiées représentent des sources de revenus pour les personnes concernées, elles sont donc considérées comme économiquement déplacées. Il est également important de noter qu'aucun déplacement physique n'a été identifié dans le cadre de ce PAR, car toutes les personnes affectées sont partiellement déplacées et resteront sur leurs mêmes sites. Ces PAP se répartissent comme suit : • Les gens perdent définitivement leurs biens. Il s'agit i) des cultures (arbres) plantées devant leurs habitations en bord de route (palmiers à huile, manguiers, bananiers, avocatiers, goyaviers) ; (ii) une petite partie de leur terrain ou (iii) une petite partie de leurs bâtiments (les bâtiments couverts par ce PAR comprennent les maisons/remises, les remises, les clôtures, les porches, les cours pavées, les escaliers). Aucun PAP ne perd toutes ces constructions. Toutes ces PAP seront maintenues sur les mêmes sites. Il ne s’agit pas de cas de déménagement physique vers de nouveaux emplacements. Il convient de rappeler ici qu'au titre de ce PAR, les cultures, les terres, les constructions ne représentent pas leurs moyens de subsistance, ni leur source de revenus. Ils ne sont donc pas économiquement déplacés au sens de l’OP 4.12 de la Banque Mondiale. • Les PAP dont les activités commerciales représentent leurs principales sources de revenus (vente de vêtements, fournitures scolaires, brocantes, chaussures en plastique, etc.) seront temporairement perturbées le temps des travaux sur les routes à améliorer (travaux en cours). En fonction des opérations de terrain, les activités de ces PAP seront maintenues sur les mêmes sites. Le détail de ces sociétés est présenté en Annexe 4 du présent rapport. Tableau 2 : Résumé du PAR Kumba 18 Nombre Constructions Plantes Terrains déplacées Puits(FCFA) Tombes total de (FCFA) (FCFA) nus Économique (FCFA) PAP/biens (FCFA) (FCFA) concernés 237 351,231,914 9,257,010 19,655,200 27,421,760 6,600,000 1,500,000 Nombre 338 121 68 36 61 49 03 de propriétés concernées par catégorie L'annexe 6 présente la liste consolidée des PAP et de leurs propriétés et développements évalués. Les nues propriétés, les constructions (les constructions dans ce PAR désignent les maisons/hangars, les hangars, les clôtures, les vérandas, les cours pavées, les escaliers), les cultures, ont été valorisées conformément aux dispositions de la note méthodologique et de la note descriptive de la procédure d'évaluation. valorisation des actifs/valorisations, et indemnisation des personnes affectées par les travaux des sous-projets de proximité dans le cadre du PDVIR de mars 2022, mis à la disposition de la Commission Ad hoc notamment : • Conformément à la note méthodologique PDVIR, les immeubles sont évalués à leur valeur à neuf, telle qu'établie par le membre expert de la commission ad hoc habilitée. Cette valorisation s'est basée sur les résultats des estimations de coûts établies en tenant compte du coût des matériaux à Kumba au 15 février 2024 et en ajoutant 30% de main d'œuvre nécessaire à la construction ; • Pour obtenir la valeur de remplacement des plants, nous avons mis à jour le barème de compensation des plants prévu par le décret n°2003/418/PM du 25 février 2003. La valeur de chaque culture a été calculée année par année (de 2003 à 2024) en appliquant le taux d’inflation national annuel. Ces taux d'inflation sont obtenus à la suite d'enquêtes de terrain sur les coûts du marché local, menées par l'Institut National de la Statistique dans chaque ville du Cameroun ; • Les pratiques actuelles de vente de terrains à Kumba font état de prix variant entre 2 000 et 6 000/m2, malgré le décret N°2014/3211/PM du 29 septembre 2014 qui fixe à 4 000 le prix minimum applicable aux transactions sur les terrains du domaine privé de l'Etat. FCFA/m2. Dans le cadre de la valeur de remplacement de la Note Méthodologique PDVIR, elle a été estimée à 4 000 FCFA/m2. A cela s'ajoute le coût des démarches administratives (250 000 FCFA), ce coût a été obtenu grâce aux recherches de terrain auprès de certaines PAP. Il convient de souligner que ce prix a été obtenu par le consultant après une étude foncière dans la zone du projet, afin de s'assurer que le coût appliqué reflète la réalité locale ; 19 • Conformément aux lignes directrices énoncées dans l'accord de financement PDVIR entre le Cameroun et la Banque mondiale, et en particulier avec la PO 4.12 de la Banque mondiale sur la réinstallation involontaire, l'indemnisation des pertes économiques ou de la perte de moyens de subsistance des personnes affectées est obligatoire. Ils sont provoqués par la perturbation et le ralentissement de certaines activités économiques (vente de vêtements, de fournitures scolaires, de fripes, de chaussures en plastique, etc.) pendant la période de construction. Cet impact négatif sera de courte durée, pendant la durée des travaux, puisque dans le cadre de ce PAR, ces impacts (perturbation des activités économiques) ne sont pas définitifs, mais ne dureront que pendant l'exécution des travaux. En fait, un impact positif à long terme est attendu une fois les voies améliorées, car l'accès deviendra plus facile grâce aux améliorations qui seront apportées par le PDVIR, de sorte que ces entreprises auront plus de clients et réaliseront de meilleures ventes. Les personnes affectées par ces perturbations bénéficieront d'une indemnisation correspondant aux revenus accumulés sur la période de perturbation. Cette perte de revenus, reconnue comme moyen de subsistance de la personne concernée, est déterminée en fonction du niveau de taxation de l'activité perturbée et de la durée de la perturbation. • Pour les cas de destruction ou de déplacement de tombe, les dispositions de l'OP 4.11 relative au protocole d'exhumation des tombes, encadrées par le décret 74-199 du 14 mars 1974, seront appliquées en complément des autres dispositions légales en vigueur au Cameroun. En effet, outre l'indemnisation de la perte matérielle de la tombe, les frais liés à l'organisation des rites funéraires générés par l'exhumation et la réinhumation des dépouilles seront pris en charge par le projet. Les coûts de fonctionnement et de démarches administratives et logistiques seront également pris en charge par les promoteurs du projet. A cet effet, des frais funéraires liés au déplacement des tombes de 500 000 FCFA par tombe seront intégrés au budget de mise en œuvre de ce PAR, soit 250 000 FCFA pour les frais administratifs et 250 000 FCFA pour les familles relatifs à la réorganisation des funérailles, soit un montant de 1 500 000 FCFA pour la gestion des trois tombes. • La compensation pour les puits de Kumba II a été réalisée en tenant compte du coût réel des matériaux et des activités de l'année d'évaluation soit 2024 et en fonction des différents types de puits rencontrés dans la zone. Le Mécanisme de Gestion des Plaintes (MGP) permettra de capturer et traiter efficacement les plaintes et réclamations liées à la réinstallation, ainsi que celles liées aux VBG. Une procédure particulière est prévue par le MGP pour la gestion des plaintes VBG : ESA/SH. Le MGP sera vulgarisée auprès des communautés, chefferies, entreprises en charge des travaux, à travers des campagnes de vulgarisation, des affiches dans les lieux à forte présence humaine, au sein des entreprises, à l'UTL, au quartier général de contrôle de la mission et tout autre endroit où le besoin s'en fera sentir. Chacune des entreprises responsables des travaux élaborera un MGP qui sera validée par la MDC et la CCP, puis fera également l'objet d'une publication. La mise en œuvre du PAR sera auditée par un consultant indépendant. Les étapes de mise en œuvre du PAR sont : - Jalon 1 : Vérifier la bonne identification des PAP ou de leurs bénéficiaires ; 20 - Jalon 2 : Examiner et statuer sur les dossiers de paiement PAP ; - Jalon 3 : Règle relative au versement des indemnisations aux PAP (en espèces ou en nature) conformément aux conclusions des négociations consignées dans les procès-verbaux signés à cet effet. - Jalon 4 : Juger de la conformité des procédures, des délais et de la qualité de la réponse de le MGP au PAR conformément aux dispositions du PAR ; - Jalon 5 : Évaluation finale du PAR. Le budget global pour la mise en œuvre du Plan d'Action de Réinstallation à Kumba II s'élève à 438 949 178 francs CFA (quatre cent trente-huit millions neuf cent quarante-neuf mille cent soixante-dix-huit francs), réparti comme suit : (i) Constructions 351 231 914 FCFA (ii) plantes 9 257 010 francs CFA ; (iii) Personnes déplacées économiquement 27 421 760 FCFA, (iv) Puits 6 600 000 FCFA et (v) Terrains nus 19 655 200 FCFA (vi) Tombes 1 500 000 FCFA, Commission 2 500 000 FCFA, 5% imprévues 20 783 294,19 FCFA. 21 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1.1. HISTORICAL PROFILE OF THE PROJECT’S DIRECT IMPACT AREA Kumba is metropolitan city in Meme Division in South West Region, Cameroon, Kumba is the divisional headquarters of Meme, and is colloquially referred to as “K-Town”. It is the largest and most developed city in Meme Division and sits at the foot of the Rumpi Mountains, 4o 38’ N and 9o 27’ E on an altitude of between 210m and 250m above sea level. The estimated population in 2019 was 466,331 with a population density of 435 inhabitants/km2. The name 'Kumba' derives from the Bafaw 'Bakumbè' or ‘umbrella tree’. The local legend projects a certain a hunter named Midiki Bokeng as founder of Kumba. In his honour a monument was raised around the Town Green. Originally a Bafaw tribal capital setting following the Mediki wars, this largest of the cities in South West Region is the regional economic hub comprised of four tribes: the Bafaws, Balongs, Bakundus and the Barombis. Numerous settlers populate it, however, including Nigerians (mostly Ibos), Hausas, Bamelikes, and various groupings from North West Region. On the 17th of January 2008, Kumba was made a City Council (KCC) by the Presidential Decree No 2008/026, the City Master Plan covering 286km2. Kumba is the headquarters of Meme Division and is broken up into three Sub-Divisional Councils: Kumba I (which runs from Kumba Town to Kake and takes up part of Buea-Road), Kumba II (which covers Kossala, Hausa Quarters, and Fiango), and Kumba III (that stretches from Three Corners Fiango to Mambanda and a part of Buea-Road). The structuring roads shall be constructed in Kumba II council area. Kumba is really a young town that, just about fifty years ago, was a forest fief of mostly elephant hunters. However, as its animal population thinned down because of hunting, farmers took over and planted crops like cocoa, oil palms, and food crops. This settled farming activity brought in more people to settle there, making community leaderships necessary. Gradually, the settling population transformed the network of footpaths into roads, with modern houses sprang up as well. Initially, leadership devolved on three quarter heads only, but as more quarters were created, more quarter-heads were needed for leadership. In the background of this flourishing of the town is the hospitality and welcoming demeanour of the Bafaw people as they welcome the different ethnic groups, including the Bamilike, Metta, and Hausa to peacefully settle in their land. 1.2. PURPOSE AND CONTENT OF THIS REPORT The objective here is to present the report of the Resettlement Action Plan (PAR) for the roads in Kumba II which will affect the property of the populations. This RAP is therefore seen as a planning tool which includes: - The demographic survey of displaced people and an estimate of their assets; - Loss assessment; - A description of the compensation and other forms of resettlement assistance to be provided; 22 - Consultations with affected people on acceptable compensation alternatives; - Institutional responsibility for execution and procedures promising to repair damages; - The arrangements made for monitoring and implementation; - The schedule and budget. The objective of the RAP is: (i) to address impacts relating to direct economic and social consequences which, at the same time, result from investment projects financed by the Bank and are caused by the involuntary withdrawal of land causing: a) Relocation or loss of habitat; (b) Loss of property or access to property; or (c) A loss of sources of income or livelihood, whether or not the affected persons have to move to another site. (ii) describe the potential impacts of the project due to displacement; (iii) present the types of compensation agreed with the affected people and the related costs; (iv) specify the eligibility criteria for Project Affected Persons (PAP) and the Grievance Redress Mechanisms; (v) to propose an implementation and monitoring-evaluation schedule specifying organizational responsibilities, the level of community participation, possible developments on resettlement sites, etc. The RAP thus makes it possible to ensure that the affected people will be able to regain at least the same standard of living that they had before the start of the work, or improve this standard of living so that it is much better than before the execution of the work. The content of this RAP presents i) a description of the project, the potential impacts resulting from the implementation of the project and their mitigation measures, ii) socio-economic studies concerning affected households, iii) the legal and institutional framework for preparation of the document, iv) the eligibility criteria for compensation, v) the methodology for estimating losses and their compensation, vi) the methods for resolving complaints, vii) the monitoring-evaluation system, viii) the costs and budget. The proposed solutions aim to raise awareness/ownership of the project, both by the populations and other users benefiting from the compensation (liberation of the project rights-of-way). Vulnerable populations (women heads of households, elderly people, and people with disabilities) were consulted constructively and given the opportunity to participate in the planning and implementation of resettlement programs. 1.3. PREPARATION AND VALIDATION PROCESS OF THIS PRESENT RAP AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE METHODOLOGICAL NOTE The RAP was prepared in accordance with OP 4.12 and OP 4.11, the Methodological Note describing the operating methods of the observation and evaluation commission established for expropriation investigations of the PDVIR Inclusive and Resilient Cities Development Project 23 (The MN) which was authorized by the Government of Cameroon on September 5, 2018; the descriptive note of the procedure for evaluating assets/development, and compensating people affected by the work of local sub-projects as part of the PDVIR of March 2022; Where gaps exist between national legislation and OP4.11, OP4.12 applies The standard plan for drafting a RAP was presented in the terms of reference of the study. Its development was done in seven stages as presented below. Table 2: RAP preparation steps Stages Activities Responsible for the activity Period Stage 1 Establishment by municipal City Mayor of Kumba decree of the Ad hoc Committee Recruitment of the consultant PDVIR Stage 2 Training of members of the Ad PDVIR 4th to 5th January hoc committee 2024 Stage 3 Information for affected City of Kumba, District Kumba II 12th January 2024 populations and communities council and UTL of Kumba Stage 4 Carrying out socio-economic Consultant, managers of 18th January 2024 studies and public decentralized services consultations (DDMINDCAF, DDMINAS, DDMINADER, DDMINEE, DDMINADER, DDMINDUH). Stage 5 Preparation of the provisional Consultant March 18 2024 RAP report Stage 6 Validation of the provisional PDVIR April 2024 RAP report Stage 7 Validation of the RAP pre-final world Bank May 2024 report 1.3.1. RAP validation procedure The RAP developed by the Consultant was validated at the level of the PAPs who approved the conclusions on the basis of the recommendations following the public consultations. It will also be subject to institutional validation by a Commission responsible for monitoring its development and validation. The World Bank will ultimately approve the RAP, after verifying that its requirements have been taken into account. 24 1.3.2. Publication of the RAP The final version of the RAP will be published at all levels from the bottom up in paper and electronic version on the Project and PDVIR websites and on the World Bank Infoshop website. The summary of the RAP will be deposited in the three councils and all the traditional chiefdoms for consultation by the PAPs. 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT The local sub-projects which affect the property and development of the populations and therefore subject to this resettlement action plan are essentially the development works of two structuring roads in the Municipality of Kumba II. As part of the strategy of re-engagement of activities in the city of Kumba, two sections of structuring roads in the Fiango district were selected as works to be carried out. These are the following sections: - Section 1: Ntoko street to Gare. (2800ml) - Section 2: Cameroon Street to Hausa Quarters (2100 ml) A total of 4,900 m of roads to be developed by the PDVIR. 2.2. IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AREA The Resettlement Action Plan will therefore cover sections of these two roads in the Fiango district of the Kumba II council area. The map below shows in green the two roads which will be developed as part of the PDVIR. 25 Figure 1: Satellite image of structuring roads for the PDVIR Sub projects in the city of Kumba II 3. POTENTIAL IMPACTS 3.1. COMPONENTS OF THE PROJECT LEADING TO LOSS OF PEOPLE’S PROPERTY AND THE DIRECT IMPACT AREA The activities of the local sub-projects justifying the development of this RAP are the development work on tertiary roads in the Fiango district, Kumba II council, South-West region. The direct impact zone of these activities is made up of the spaces along the various sections of road planned in Kumba II. 3.2. IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES The different impacts generated by the activities mentioned above are: 3.2.1. Impacts 3.2.1.1. Positive impacts The structuring roads works as part of the PDVIR proximity sub-projects in Kumba II council areas will impact the population of the area positively in the following ways: the price of land will significantly increase in the area, access into the neighbourhood from other areas will be relatively easier, access to public facilities will be rendered easy as these good roads will greatly enhance 26 displacement, farm products can easily reach the market. Furthermore the local population will be temporally employed during the project as some local labour force will be recruited to carry out specific tasks. . The table 3 presents the individual losses identified on the different project areas. Table 3: Category of property Category of property Number of property/ Observations enhancement Individual property Plants 68 19 types for 480 feet young people and adults Constructions 121 111 (ordinary standard construction, fences, wooden structure and septic tanks) Wells 49 1 modern well, 1 semi modern and 34 traditional wells. Land 36 36 bare properties have been identified and assessed on the right-of-way of the works. Graves 3 1 is constructed and 2 are earth graves Economically displaced 61 Those whose businesses and livelihood will be affected It should be noted that in Kumba II community collective property was also affected as shown in table 4: Table 4: Number of community infrastructure Category of property Number of property/ Observations enhancement Community Infrastructures Religious denominations 03 Integrated into construction assessments Construction hall 01 Integrated into construction assessments Schools 02 Integrated into construction assessments 27 3.2.1.2. Negative impacts - Loss of land and constructions on the works rights-of-way Depending on the current state of the right-of-way of the sections, these are mainly crops, fruit trees, water supply infrastructure and buildings. These properties that will be destroyed, represent losses for those affected. Such destruction in the public interest gives entitlement to compensation. However, conflicts may arise due to dissatisfaction of victims or destruction of property not identified as being impacted by the project during the work following poor manoeuvring. Graves that shall be displace could have some traumatic effects on the families of the concerned. - Loss of livelihood The development works on the two road axes will lead to the disruption of economic activities identified in the various areas of the project. Indeed, during the surveys, numerous commercial activities were identified which will be impacted. The impacts include loss of revenue, and economical displacement. To this end, those who carry out these activities will be deprived of their sources of income and therefore will lose their means of subsistence. 3.2.2. Mitigation measures To minimize negative impacts, the following measures should be implemented: - Compensate the land, impacted assets and/or loss of income at replacement cost before the start of work in accordance with OP 4.12 and also to avoid possible conflicts with local residents and also to allow them to develop a new living environment for those who lose houses (house affected totally or partially with an unviable remainder assessed by the expert in charge of evaluations of the buildings); - Direct falling trees away from homes when falling; - Respect the road right-of-way as defined in the technical specifications of the project; - Compensate owners according to the scale provided in the event that trees destroy property located on the outside of the rights-of-way; - Inform the population of the start of the work at least three months in advance; Raise awareness among site employees so that they avoid damaging property outside the work area as much as possible; - Assist families whose graves are subject to displacement with administrative and cultural supports. This covers the provision of timely information about steps to be undertaken in this regard, cost of exhumation and re-inhumation operations. this assistance will also cover cultural rituals defined as per results of consultations with families based on the cultural backgrounds. Also based on a national observations the PDVIR as defined a cost for funerals to be used. In case the amount provided by PDVIR is lower than the cultural requirement a consultation with stakeholders will be carried out and an appropriate cost will be set To minimize the impacts linked to the loss of means of subsistence, the municipality of Kumba II must: 28 - Inform the population of the start of the work at least three months in advance; - Assist the relocation of PAPs losing their complete construction. This assistance will be define in consultation with PAPs and may include documentation of ownership or occupancy and compensation payments will be issued in the names of both spouses or single heads of households as relevant, and other forms of resettlement assistance. - Pay eight months of average monthly income that the activity generates to the affected people. - Assist the relocation of economical displaced PAP. This will include the provision of another commercial site by the council, in consultation with PAPs. - Ensure full payment of agreed compensation before work begins. 3.2.3. Assistance and provision to be provided in the RAP for vulnerable groups OP 4.12 provides resettlement assistance for this category of PAP. In addition to this its guidelines also include moving assistance, food aid, health assistance and psycho-social assistance during the resettlement process. To the extent that these people, although affected by the Project, will not be called upon to resettle on another site requiring specific support in terms of relocation costs, moving assistance, etc., the Technical Liaison Unit (UTL) will take steps to facilitate the creation of payment files for these vulnerable people (female heads of households, people aged over 60, people with motor disabilities). During the payment ceremony, the UTL will accompany them to collect their compensation. Cases of abuse will be reported through the Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM). The company's environmental and social management plan (ESMP) will take into account the impacts on these people and implement the necessary measures. The measures will include, for example, that the company will not be able to restrict the access of pedestrians and vehicles to their homes and/or businesses during the work, avoiding this or not as much as possible. Where the restriction cannot be avoided, a management plan including adequate temporary access and previously agreed with the parties concerned will be prepared for approval by the Contracting Party. The company will implement the ESMP, once approved by the control mission. Also, the company will prepare a Social Communication Program (SCP) which will aim to inform the surrounding population on the aspects inherent to the work before it begins. The SCP will inform (i) the work execution schedule and their needs (e.g. access time restrictions, etc.); (ii) the progress of the works and the scheduling of the openings of new fronts, the need to stop the works or the interruption of traffic; (iii) preventive measures to be adopted to guarantee the protection of the environment and local populations; and (iv) channels and means of communication through which the population can express their doubts, complaints and suggestions. The Technical Liaison Unit (UTL) will take charge of the procedures for obtaining papers to gain possession of the dues of vulnerable people (elderly women and men, head of household under the age of 18, PAP below the poverty line, disabled women and men, heads of household, or due to family conflict risk losing access their compensation), people aged over 60 years, people with 29 physical disabilities) and, during the payment ceremony, she will accompany them to receive their compensation. The UTL will organize field outings after payment with the aim of identifying possible difficulties encountered by vulnerable people. In the event that particular difficulties linked to the resettlement of these people are identified, the UTL will be responsible for resolving them immediately in collaboration with the people concerned. 3.3. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED TO MINIMIZE RESETTLEMENT To minimize the resettlement of populations as much as possible, the project shall make sure it respect the rights of way as defined by technical studies and in between 15m to 17m as much as possible, so that fewer people will be affected. The length loads totalling 4.9km of the local sub- projects shall be delimited by making maximum use of the existing road. Furthermore, regarding the quarry sites, the companies will exploit those which are currently active at the current ground level. The aggregates, on the other hand, will be supplied from an existing quarry in Ekona and Ombe which are out of Kumba. This avoids opening new quarries that will require impacts on populations 30 4. SOCIOECONOMIC STUDIES As part of the development of this resettlement action plan, a socio-economic survey was conducted by the consultant in accordance with the requirements of OP 4.12 of the World Bank. This survey concerns a socio-economic report produced by the consultant and therefore constitutes volume 2 of this report. Details of the socio-economic situation of the project area are recorded in this socio-economic report. This section of the PAR report only gives a few elements to take into account. 4.1. CHARACTERISTICS OF PAP HOUSEHOLDS 4.1.1 Demographic Information This section presents basic demographic data about the PAPs participating in the survey, that is, the persons who will be directly affected by the activities of the sub project in Kumba II. 4.1.2 Gender distribution in Kumba II Gender distribution in Kumba II varies, depending on demographics and societal dynamics. The participants in the focus group discussion carried out during this socioeconomic study indicated that in Kumba II there are currently more women, followed by children, youths and then men. This is explained by the fact that because of the crisis, many men and youths have moved out of the community. Hence, the role of this RAP is to alleviate social impact of work to be taken on this vulnerable group. 4.1.3 Age of PAP The mode and mean of the ages of the PAP in Kumba II indicate that the affected persons are in the working age group of the population (15 – 64 years) who constitute the work force of the community. By implication, this sub project will greatly impact on the livelihood of the inhabitants of this community. Table 5: The age of PAP Mean Median Mode Standard deviation 54.52 55.00 60.00 14.99 4.1.4 Nationality of PAP Nationality of PAP 1% 1% Cameroonian Nigerian 98% Others 31 Figure 2: Nationality of PAP: Population wise, out of the total number of respondents interviewed 98% of the inhabitants of Kumba 2 are Cameroonians. Nigerians constitute 1% of the respondents while 1% is made up of persons from Niger. The project will therefore meet its objectives of effectively improving on the living conditions of the Cameroonian citizens of the under-equipped neighbourhoods of the Kumba II Council concerned and will increase urban mobility. 4.1.5 Marital status of PAP Marital status of PAP 41,2% Percentage of respondents 12,7% 10,3% 3,0% 1,2% Married Widow Bachelor Married Divorce monogamously /widower polygamously Values Figure 3: Marital status of PAP The marital status gives an insight into the family structure within Kumba II, a high percentage being monogamous marriages and indicating strong bonding within families. It may also correlate with the economic factor because married couples are more likely to have dual incomes and thereby contribute to higher household incomes. This contrasts with and proves to be more favourable than the income of single individuals. 4.1.6 PAP Religion The population of Kumba II being mostly Christian, implies that the majority of the PAPs are Christians. A significant Muslim population, though in the minority, is found in Hausa Quarters, which is also a project-affected area. 32 PAP religion Is not pronounced 0,9% Values Muslim 8,0% Christian 91,1% 0,0 20,0 40,0 60,0 80,0 100,0 % of respondents Figure 4: PAP religion 4.2. SOCIAL ORGANIZATION OF THE COMMUNITY 4.2.1 PAP ethnic group Table 6 provides foundation information for understanding the composition of the affected population. The PAPs of Kumba II are made up of 25 different ethnic groups. These have lived peacefully for the past decades, credit to the hospitable nature of the municipality. Table 6: Ethnic group of PAP S/N Ethnic group Frequency Percentage 1. Bamileke 18 20.7 2. Bangnwa 12 13.8 3. Bayangi 10 11.5 4. Hausa 7 8.0 5. Metta 4 4.6 6. Akum 3 3.4 7. Bakossi 3 3.4 8. Bali 3 3.4 9. Bamunka 3 3.4 10. Oroko 3 3.4 11. Baba 2 2 2.3 12. Bafaw 2 2.3 13. Balong 2 2.3 14. Batibo 2 2.3 15. Ngie 2 2.3 16. Nigerian 2 2.3 17. Awing 1 1.1 33 18. Bakweri 1 1.1 19. Bamessing 1 1.1 20. Bawock 1 1.1 21. Befang 1 1.1 22. Mbo 1 1.1 23. Ndu 1 1.1 24. Nkwen 1 1.1 25. Wimbum 1 1.1 4.2.2 Traditional administrative setup of Kumba II Kumba is one of the about 10 communities that make up the Bafaw clan. The Bafaws are said to be the the first community installed on the land of Kumba. The Bafaw clan has a paramount leader who is the superior of all the villages or communities that make up the clan. The population of Kumba and especially Kumba I is now made up more of people from different clans other than the Bafaw people. This weakens the administrative control of the Bafaw people over Kumba II. Kumba II has a well-organized traditional administrative setup. It is comprised of the quarter heads, the block leaders and the households. This set up offers a system in which law and order is born and providing a stable system of governance in the community. It is a traditional council of quarter heads and block leaders. It settles most disputes related to land issues and conflicts, and also organizes communal work to ensure hygiene and sanitation in their community Traditional administrative setup of Kumba II Quarter head Block leader Block leader Block leader Block leader House House House House House House hold hold hold hold hold hold heads heads heads heads heads heads Figure 5: Traditional administrative setup of Kumba II 34 4.3. LAND SITUATION OF THE PROJECT AREA Kumba II. The land tenure law in its preamble states that: “individual property is the right to use, enjoy and dispose of property guaranteed to everyone by law. No one can be deprived of it except for reasons of public interest, and subject to compensation, the terms of which are established by law. ". According to Ordinance No. 74-1 and 74-2 of July 6, 1974 establishing respectively the land tenure and the state tenure, in Cameroon, the different categories of land are: the national domain, the public domain, the private domain of the State or other persons of public law and land under private property. Most land in Kumba II is classified under the national domain. This consists of lands which are not classified in the public or private domain of the State or other legal entities under public law. This category of land is acquired through (i) tribal ownership (in which the community has customary or ancestral rights to the land); (ii) communal ownership (whereby the land is owned and (managed by the council); (iii) private ownership, with individuals or entities privately owning land and having the right to possess, use, and transfer it as fitting within the bounds of applicable laws and regulations; (iv) leasehold ownership, with individuals or entities having the right to occupy and use land through a leasehold arrangement, meaning that they have ownership for a specific period as stipulated in the lease agreement with the land owner. 4.4. POPULATION Kumba is a metropolitan city in Meme Division in South West Region, Cameroon, Kumba is the divisional headquarters of Meme, and is colloquially referred to as “K-Town”. It is the largest and most developed city in Meme Division and sits at the foot of the Rumpi Mountains, 4o 38’ N and 9o 27’ E on an altitude of between 210m and 250m above sea level. According to the Communal Development Plan of the District Municipality of Kumba II, the estimated population of the neighborhoods affected by the PDVIR works in 2024 is estimated at 33,933. 4.5. PAP IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENTS Identification papers of the PAPs are official documents issued by the government to help in establishing the identity and citizenship of the affected individual. In Kumba II, 69.05% of the PAPs interviewed had National Identity Cards as their identification documents, while 24.6% had receipts of identity cards. Those who presented other identifying documents like driver’s license, and AES-SONEL bills constituted 6.35%. 35 Figure 6: Identification papers of PAP 4.6. LEVEL OF EDUCATION OF PAPs It is likely that the educational backgrounds of the PAPs in Kumba II could influence their employment prospects, income levels, and their overall socioeconomic status. The higher literacy level can be associated with acquiring specialized skills, knowledge and expertise that are valued in the job market. Educational background is also likely to foster life skills development, critical thinking, problem solving skills, communication, and teamwork. The diverse educational level of the PAPs in Kumba II relates also to the wellbeing of its population. Yet, while education may significantly impact employment prospects and income levels, it is not the sole determinant. Factors like skills, experience, personal networks and some socioeconomic factors may contribute to the PAPs employment outcomes and income levels. `4.6.2 Educational Background of PAP Educational background of PAP % of respondents 47,2% 60,0 35,2% 40,0 15,7% 20,0 1,9% 0,0 Secondary Primary University None and high Indicators Figure 7: Educational background of PAP 36 4.6.2 Literacy level of PAP Table 7: The literacy level of PAP Literacy level Frequency Percentage Can read and write 94 85.5 Can neither read nor write 8 7.3 Can only read 8 7.3 4.7. MAIN ACTIVITIES OF PAPs This section seeks to establish data on the sources of income or livelihood activities PAPs. The numerous activities that generate income and provide livelihood for the PAPs in Kumba II are categorized into primary and secondary. This categorization is based on the amount of income which each generates and the time and complexity involved. 4.7.1 Primary activities of PAP Table 8: Primary activities of PAP Activities Frequency Percentage Trade 37 33.0 Other 31 27.7 Agriculture 22 19.6 None 9 8.0 Craft (welders, mechanics, tailors, hairdressers, etc.) 5 4.5 Builder 3 2.7 Salary and wage earners (public or private sector) 2 1.8 Transporters (bike, taxi, bus drivers) 2 1.8 Breeding (rearing animals) 1 0.9 Primary income generating activities here refers to the main sources of revenue or earnings for the PAPs in Kumba II. It is typically related to the primary occupation or business activity that generates most of the income for the PAPs. These vary according to the contexts and individuals involved. Table 8 shows that 33% of the income of the PAPs is generated from trade. This is understandable, given that Kumba is the economic hub of the entire South West Region. Meanwhile, 27.7% of the PAPs carry out accumulated activities which collectively provide income, whether seasonal, periodical, or just impromptu. 37 4.7.2 Secondary activity of PAP Table 9: Secondary activity of PAP Activities Frequency Percentage None 36 35.3 Agriculture 26 25.5 Trade 18 17.6 Other 12 11.8 Craft (welders, mechanics, tailors, hairdressers, etc.) 4 3.9 Salary and wage earners (public or private sector) 2 2.0 Breeding (rearing animals) 2 2.0 Transporters (bike riders, taxi and bus drivers) 1 1.0 Builder 1 1.0 The secondary activities of the PAPs are their means of generating income in addition to their primary source of income, or what they consider as their fulltime jobs or businesses. The secondary activity provides an extra stream of revenue, potentially helping the PAPs to achieve their financial goals or improve on their financial stability. On record, 35.3% of PAPs indicated that they carry out various activities as secondary income sources that collectively give them income. Some of the activities are seasonal, some periodical, and others impromptu. Subsistence farming (predominantly the production of food crops for consumption) is carried out by 25.5% of the PAPs contacted. They are especially pulled to this by the rich volcanic soils around Meme Division. 4.7.3 Average monthly income of PAP (in FCFA) Table 10: Average monthly income of PAP Mean Median Mode Standard deviation 151130.14 80000.00 100000.00 351427.55 Table 11 shows that the mean income of the PAPs stands at 151,130FCFA, i.e., the average income earned by the PAP over a specific period, typically on a monthly basis. This is far above both the Cameroon minimum wage of 41,875FCFA per month and the Cameroon poverty line of 2,080FCFA per day. Thus, the PAPs in Kumba II live above the national poverty limit. 4.7.4 Average monthly household expenses (in FCFA) 38 Table 11: Average monthly household expenses Mean Median Mode Standard deviation 131678.93 100000.00 150000.00 189841.37 Table 9 indicates that the PAPs spend an average of 131,678FCFA monthly for their households of six persons on the average. The standard deviation of 189,841FCFA implies that there is great variation from the central tendency. The household expenses are the regular and inevitable costs of maintaining the household and covering its basic needs. The mean monthly expenses for the PAPs indicate that the concerned have little to save after settling the family expenses. However, the household expenses vary, depending on factors like family size, lifestyle, and personal preferences. 4.7.5 Contribution of the PAP to household income (in FCFA) Table 12 shows that 59% of the PAPs spend the totality of their monthly earnings on their household expenses, which means that they do not save anything after the monthly expenses. Only 1.2% of the PAPs spend less than 25% of their income on household expenses, allowing for probability that they save more. Table 12: Contribution of PAP to household income Percentage contribution Frequency Percentage Totality (100%) 49 59.0 Half (50%) 17 20.5 More than half (75%) 16 19.3 Less than half (25%) 1 1.2 4.8 VULNERABILITY OF THE PAP Vulnerability here refers to the susceptibility of individuals or groups to experience negative effects or be disproportionately impacted upon by social, economic or environmental changes caused by the project. The categories of vulnerable people identified in Kumba II include: elderly persons, widows and widowers, persons living with disabilities. Although the level of vulnerability is generally low in Kumba II, it is still important for the project to identify the potential risks, come up with mitigation strategies, and ensure that the project’s impact is equitable and sustainable. This will enable the policy makers and stakeholders to design interventions and support systems that will address the specific needs of the vulnerable groups and minimize negative consequences. 39 Elderly (over 65 years old); 17,5 Vulnerability of PAP Others; 7,8 Widow/widower; 4,9 Cripple; 3,9 Autre; 9,7 Motor disabled; 3,9 No vulnerabilities; 60,2 Young person under 35; 1,9 No vulnerabilities Elderly (over 65 years old) Others Widow/widower Figure 8: Vulnerability of PAP 4.8.1 Other types of vulnerability of the PAP include: Table 13: Other types of vulnerability of the PAP Nature of disability disability in the lower left limb disability on leg due to sickness inability to walk well a shortened left hand 4.9 PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES AND SOCIAL SERVICES This information helps in the assessment of the adequacy of the current living conditions of the PAPs such as accessibility to essential services like schools and healthcare facilities. The ease with which the PAPs can access the social amenities in Kumba II enhances their quality of life and well- being. The availability and proximity of social amenities have a significant impact on the livability and overall development of Kumba II. Also, roads works will help access to basic social services and public infrastructures 4.9.1. Access distance to health services Table 14: Access distance to health services Distance Frequency Percentage < 1 km 42 47.2 1 to 5 kms 30 33.7 40 >5 kms 17 19.1 Table 14 shows that 47.2% of the PAPs reside less than 1 Km from health facilities. They can easily reach and use healthcare services in Kumba II. On the other hand, 19.1% of the PAPs reside more than 5 Kms from health facilities. These may face some challenges in fully accessing and using the community’s healthcare services. However, apart from physical distance, there are other factors like transportation options and affordability of the healthcare services which affect their usage by the individuals. 4.9.2 Access distance to educational services Table 15: Access distance to education facilities Distance Frequency Percentage <1 km 55 67.9 1 to 5 km 17 21.0 > 5 km 9 11.1 Table 15 shows that 67.9% of PAPs reside within 5 kms of educational facilities. This suggests that children can easily reach and make use of educational institutions – nursery, primary, and secondary schools found in Kumba II. On the other hand, 11.1% of the PAPs reside more than 5 Km from educational facilities and are likely to face some challenges with fully accessing and using these community services. Again, other factors like financial accessibility, inclusive education, availability of resources like teachers, classrooms, laboratories, libraries affect the extent to which educational facilities are accessed and put to use. 4.10. SOCIAL AND CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF DISPLACED COMMUNITIES This section explores the PAP' social and community networks in their current location. The public consultation will ensure the participation of local residents, including vulnerable groups (women, young people, the elderly, the disabled, IDPs, etc.) from the various development agencies, NGOs, public bodies and all those affected or interested in the project. 4.10.1 Associative grouping of PAP Associative grouping is a process in which communities are organized on the basis of shared interests or goals. It focuses on connecting individuals who have a common bond or purpose. 41 Table 16: Belonging to associative groups Indicator Frequency Percentage No 85 79.4 Yes 22 20.6 Table 16 shows that 79.4% of the PAPs do not belong to any associative grouping, which means that the PAPs work more as individuals than in groups. A mere 20.6% of the PAPs are in associative groupings. 4.10.2 Type of associative grouping of PAP Table 17: Types of associative groups Type of associative group Frequency Percentage Development Association 15 68.2 CIG 3 13.6 Others 2 9.1 Cooperative 1 4.5 NGO 1 4.5 Table 17 shows that 68.2% of PAPs who belong to associative groupings are in Development Associations. In most of the villages of grass field regions in Cameroon, belonging to such associations is an imperative to indigenes. CIGs are also important in such communities because a lot of assistance to farmers comes through such groupings. This partly explains why 13.6% of the PAPs belong to CIGs 42 5. LEGAL FRAMEWORK The RAP was prepared in accordance with OP 4.11 and OP 4.12, the methodological note describing the operating methods of the Assessment and Valuation Commission (AVC) established for expropriation investigations of the Inclusive and Resilient Cities Development Project (PDVIR) (The MN)); the descriptive note of the procedure for evaluating assets/development, and compensating people affected by the work of local sub-projects within the framework of the PDVIR (Evaluation Note); The methodological note served in a non-exhaustive manner as a basis for the work of identifying and listing PAPs and their property, and assessing the losses of these PAPs; the hybrid procedure for resettling people defined the negotiation framework on the mode of compensation between the PAPs and the decentralized local authorities; national legislation for its part was used to give an overall view of the texts and regulations applicable to the resettlement of populations. 5.1. The Operational Policy 4.12 OF THE WORLD BANK AND NATIONAL LEGISLATION The legal environment which governs PDVIR local sub-projects is subject firstly to the Cameroonian Constitution of 1996, then to national texts, and agreements entered into by the Government of the Republic of Cameroon and the World Bank. Compliance with operational policies 4.11 and 4.12 of the World Bank is required for projects financed by this financial institution as part of the activities carried out by the PDVIR. Also, the Census Policy Framework applicable to the PDVIR, the methodological note of the operating modalities of the Assessment and Valuation Commission established for expropriation investigations of the Inclusive and Resilient Cities Development Project (PDVIR) authorized by the President of the Republic on July 13, 2018, also constitute legal instruments implemented within the legal framework. The Project applies OP 4.12 under the relevant provisions of Article 45 of the Constitution of Cameroon which stipulates that international treaties or agreements regularly approved or ratified have, upon their publication, an authority superior to that of laws, subject to each agreement or treaty, its application by the other party. Examination of World Bank OP 4.12 and national legislation indicates points of convergence and difference. The points of convergence relate to: 43 Table 18: Comparison between Cameroonian legislation and World Bank OP 4.12 Element OP 4.12 of the WB Law 85/009 of 04/07/1985 and others Dispositions applicable to SRP Types of a) Physical displacements (relocation, loss of a) Loss of title and loss of assets is recognized by Compliance with the displacement residential land or loss of shelter); national legislation; however, loss of income and provisions of OP 4.12, then b) Economic displacement (loss of land, assets economic displacement are not anticipated. a) and b) are recognized by or access to assets, resulting in loss of sources b) Economic rehabilitation. this RAP of income or other means of livelihood). c) Note: In fact, in article 7, the 1985 law speaks of compensation for immediate and certain direct material damage caused by eviction / it then lists what is compensated. Economic damage is not in this list which includes bare land, crops, constructions, and any other development whatever its nature, provided that said development is noted by a so-called Reporting Commission and evaluation. From a strictly legal point of view, it is possible to consider the economic loss as the loss of effective development. The law speaks of “any other development, whatever its nature”. This wording leaves room for interpretation. Why, economic loss would not be part of it. Classification Affected people are those who • Affected people are those who own land with title Compliance with the of eligibility of a) those who have formal legal rights to land deeds (only these are included in the compensation provisions of OP 4.12, then affected (including customary and traditional rights decrees). a) and b) and c) are persons recognized by the laws of the country);; • Customary lands and lands under registration are not recognized by this RAP. a) have no formal legal rights to the land or part of the compensation decree. property in question, but have claims to that • The repression of land offenses is effective and land or this property which are or could be extends to the illegitimate occupation of the private 44 Element OP 4.12 of the WB Law 85/009 of 04/07/1985 and others Dispositions applicable to SRP recognized under national legislation; Or domain of the State. Land that has been occupied b) have no legal rights or claims to the land or must be vacated at the expense of the occupant(s). property which they occupy or use. Compensation a) Compensation for replacement cost, as well as − At the current net value of the property (the rate takes Compliance with the assessment any other assistance necessary to at least into account the state of depreciation only for provisions of PO 4.12; then restore or improve the standard of living or buildings) the replacement cost and livelihood of those affected. − No form of assistance detailed in the descriptive b) Compensation sufficient to replace the assets, − The assessment must be carried out by the note of the procedure for plus necessary transaction costs Commission for the assessment of the assets in evaluating the (administrative fees, registration or title fees, question. assets/development, and reasonable moving expenses, and any similar compensating people costs imposed on affected individuals). affected by the work of the c) Replacement cost is defined as a valuation local sub-projects within method that establishes sufficient the framework of the compensation to replace the assets, plus the Project necessary transaction costs associated with Land Compliance with the replacing said assets. Where functioning The value of the land subject to expropriation is equal to provisions of PO 4.12; then markets exist, replacement cost is the market that allocated as compensation. the land was valued at value established from an independent and In the event that the value of the land allocated is greater replacement cost. competent property valuation, plus than that affected by expropriation then the balance is transaction costs. Where functioning markets paid by the beneficiary are lacking, replacement cost may be Buildings Compliance with the determined by other means, such as Building appraisal does not equal replacement value. A provisions of OP 4.12, then calculating the production value of land or depreciation coefficient is applied. Inflation is not taken no depreciation value has productive assets, or the undepreciated value into account. The assessment compensation corresponds been applied. of the substitute material and the labor to be to the net current value of the property, including used in constructing structures or other fixed depreciation (official scales in m², established according 45 Element OP 4.12 of the WB Law 85/009 of 04/07/1985 and others Dispositions applicable to SRP assets, plus transaction costs. In all cases to: i) the classification (six categories), ii) the age (rate of where physical displacement results in the obsolescence), iii) of size and surface area, reassessed loss of housing, the replacement cost must be rate of 7.5%/year until 1990. at least sufficient to allow the purchase or No compensation for buildings that are dilapidated, or construction of housing that meets the threatened with ruin, or built in violation of town minimum standards of quality and safety planning rules. acceptable to the community. The valuation Reconstruction of the house or building is considered the method applied to determine the replacement best development result if the PAPs agree cost should be documented in the relevant Rate taking into account: resettlement planning documents. - The cost of construction materials at the time of the Transaction costs include administrative fees, operation; registration or deed fees, reasonable moving - The cost of labor at the time of the operation costs and any other similar costs imposed on Crops: According to the types of crops Official scales Compliance with the the persons concerned. To ensure (rates fixed in 2003) provisions of OP 4.12 compensation at replacement cost, it may be Tree species/crop Age (productivity) necessary to update planned compensation Price of products in high season (at the best cost) Time rates in project areas where inflation is high or needed to re-establish productivity the time lag between calculation of compensation rates and payment of compensation. compensation is important 46 5.2. NATIONAL LEGISLATION 5.2.1. The Cameroonian constitution of 1996 The Cameroonian Constitution highlights the fundamental principles of the protection of individual rights, particularly the right to property. The following appears from the preamble of the Constitution: “Individual property is the right to use, enjoy and dispose of property guaranteed to everyone by law. No one can be deprived of it except for reasons of public interest, and subject to compensation, the terms of which are established by law.” 5.3. Scope of application of the right of expropriation It should be noted that within the framework of these local sub-projects, the project does not use a Declaration of Public Utility (DPU) much less a compensation decree which constitutes the preliminary instruments for the payment of compensation in the framework of usual procedures. For these local sub-projects, it is planned to obtain a regularization compensation decree. It is in this spirit that a methodological note on the operating modalities of the Assessment and Valuation Commission established for expropriation investigations of the Inclusive and Resilient Cities Development Project (PDVIR) authorized by the President of the Republic July 13, 2018 E., developed by the working group constituted by MINDCAF, the Prime Minister's Office, MINHDU, and the CCP, and validated by the World Bank in August 2021. Also, this RAP used the descriptive note of the procedure for evaluating assets/development, and compensating people affected by the work of local sub-projects within the framework of the PDVIR. However, to remain compliant with regulatory requirements, the development of this resettlement action plan was based on the provisions below: 5.3.1. National texts governing expropriation It consists of: • Law No. 85/09 of July 4, 1985 relating to expropriation for reasons of public utility and its implementing texts in particular Application Decree No. 87-1872 of December 18, 1987; • Decree No. 87/1872 of December 16, 1987 (articles 15 and 16) implementing Law No. 85/9 of July 4, 1985 relating to expropriation for reasons of public utility and the terms of compensation; • Decree No. 2003/418/PM of February 25, 2003 setting the rates to be allocated to owners who are victims of destruction for public purposes of cultivated crops and trees; • Decree No. 2014/3211/PM of September 29, 2014 setting the minimum prices applicable to transactions on land in the private domain of the State; • Order No. 00832/Y.15.1MINUH/D000 establishing the bases for calculating the market value of buildings subject to expropriation for utility reasons; 47 5.3.1.1. The Constitution of 1972, revised on January 18, 1996 It establishes the fundamental principles of the protection of individual rights, including the right to property and states in its preamble that: “individual property is the right to use, enjoy and dispose of property guaranteed to everyone by law. No one can be deprived of it except for reasons of public utility, and subject to compensation, the terms of which are established by law. ". 5.3.1.2. Land tenure in Cameroon It establishes the fundamental principles of the protection of individual rights, including the right to property and states in its preamble that: “individual property is the right to use, enjoy and dispose of property guaranteed to everyone by law. No one can be deprived of it except for reasons of public interest, and subject to compensation, the terms of which are established by law. ". According to Ordinance No. 74-1 and 74-2 of July 6, 1974 establishing respectively the land tenure and the state tenure, in Cameroon, the different categories of land are: the national domain, the public domain, the private domain of the State or other persons of public law and land under private property. The national domain: it consists of lands which are not classified in the public or private domain of the State or other legal entities under public law. The public domain: it includes all movable and immovable property which, by nature or by destination, is allocated either for direct use by the public or for public services. It is subdivided into natural public domain and artificial public domain. The natural public domain includes: the maritime public domain, the river public domain, and the land and air public domain. The artificial public domain includes: Highways and a right-of-way of one hundred (100) meters on either side of the axis of the roadway. This right-of-way is reduced to ten (10) meters in town from the outer edge of the sidewalk; National and provincial roads and a right-of-way of forty (40) meters on either side of the axis of the roadway. This right-of-way is reduced to ten (10) meters from the outer edge of the sidewalk in built-up areas and to five (5) meters in town; Departmental roads and a right-of-way of twenty-five meters (25) on either side of the axis of the roadway. This right-of- way is reduced to ten (10) meters from the outer edge of the sidewalk in built-up areas and to five (5) meters in town; Vehicle tracks of local interest and a right-of-way of ten (10) meters on either side of the axis of the roadway. This right of way is reduced to five (5) meters in towns and cities”; The railways and a right-of-way of thirty-five (35) meters on each side from the axis of the track; Military maritime or river ports; Commercial, maritime or river ports; Monuments and public buildings created and maintained by the State; monuments and public buildings created and maintained by the State or other legal entities under public law, in particular halls, markets, cemeteries, museums; and the concession of traditional chiefdoms. The private domain of the State or other persons governed by public law: it consists of movable and immovable property acquired by the State free of charge or for a fee; land which supports buildings, construction, works, and developments carried out and maintained by the State; Rural or urban concessions subject to forfeiture or the right of recovery as well as the property of associations dissolved for acts of subversion, attacks on the internal or external security of the 48 State; levies decided by the State on the national domain by application of the provisions of article 18 of the ordinance establishing land tenure. Land under private property: it consists of registered land; “freehold lands”; land acquired under the transcription regime; definitive land concessions; and land recorded in the “Grundbuch” This order makes it possible to distinguish between properties eligible for compensation and those which are not. • Law No. 85-09 of July 4, 1985 relating to expropriation for reasons of public utility and the terms of compensation. This law repeals the contrary provisions of previous legislative and regulatory texts, in particular those of Ordinance No. 74/3 of July 6, 1974 relating to the expropriation procedure for reasons of public utility. In its first paragraph 1, the law provides that “for the achievement of objectives of general interest, the State may resort to the expropriation procedure for reasons of public utility”. • Implementing decree No. 87-1872 of December 16, 1987 implementing the Law No. 85-09 of July 4, 1985 relating to expropriation for reasons of public utility and the terms of compensation defines the expropriation procedure. Thus, in its Chapter 2, Article 15, this decree recommends before resorting to expropriation for reasons of public utility in favor of public authorities, public service concessionaires or state companies with a view to carrying out construction works. General interest, carry out prior negotiations with the owners or rights holders concerned. In the event of disagreement, the results of said negotiations are subject to arbitration by the Minister responsible for lands. In the event of unsuccessful arbitration, expropriation will be carried out at the expense of the beneficiary under the conditions provided for above. The expropriation procedure for reasons of public utility is generally triggered by a request for expropriation from the public service, the public establishment or any other legal entity under public law which wishes to carry out the expropriation, to the MINDCAF which, after a certain number of verifications can by order, declare the project of public utility. Decree No. 2003/418/PM of February 25, 2003 setting the rates of compensation to be allocated to owners for reasons of public utility for cultivated crops and trees It sets the rates allocated to people who are victims of the destruction of crops and trees planted for public purposes. At the level of article 12 of the Decree referred to above, it is stipulated that in the event of a dispute over the amount of compensation, the expropriated person sends his complaint to the Administration in charge of Lands. If he does not obtain satisfaction, he is authorized to seize the competent court within one month, from the date of notification of the contested decision, to repair the damage. Decree 2014/3211/ PM of September 29, 2014 This decree sets the minimum prices per square meter for the sale of land in the State domain. It can be used as a basis for evaluating the cost of bare land if the scales currently applied by the AVCs prove insignificant for the fair compensation of the PAPs. 49 Order No. 0832/Y.15.1/MINUH/D000 of November 20, 1987 This decree sets the bases for calculating the market value of constructions subject to expropriation for reasons of public utility. This text, and for compensation purposes, classifies constructions into 6 categories or standings, depending on the nature of the materials used. Each category benefits from compensation at a particular rate which also takes into account the dilapidated state of the investment. Existing compensation rates run between 1960 and 1990. During this period, they were revalued annually based on a rate of 7%, certainly to take into account inflation. 5.3.2. The legal basis which allows the City Mayor to conduct expropriation negotiations Before resorting to expropriation for reasons of public utility in favor of local public authorities, public establishments, public service concessionaires or state companies with a view to carrying out works of general interest, the latter must carry out prior negotiations with the owners or beneficiaries concerned. In the event of disagreements, the results of said negotiations are subject to arbitration by the Ministry of Lands. In the event of unsuccessful arbitration, expropriation will be carried out at the expense of the beneficiary under the conditions provided for above. The public law legal entities in question must, in the event of successful negotiations, comply with the acquisition rules of common law. (Decree No. 87/1872 of December 16, 1987 (articles 15 and 16) implementing Law No. 85/9 of July 4, 1985 relating to expropriation for reasons of public utility and compensation arrangements) 5.4. OPERATIONAL POLICY. 4.12 OF THE WORLD BANK Operational policy (OP) 4.12 of social safeguard on the involuntary resettlement of populations is applicable within the framework of development projects whose activities affect the populations in particular the destruction of their production systems or the loss of their sources of income, restrictions access or use of natural resources and which require the movement of these populations. OP 4.12 establishes that in the event of involuntary displacement of populations, appropriate measures must be planned and implemented to prevent involuntary resettlement from causing harmful long-term consequences, impoverishment of populations and environmental damage. OP 4.12 aims to: - Avoid or minimize involuntary resettlement as much as possible by considering variations in Project design; - When resettlement of the population cannot be avoided, resettlement activities must be designed and executed in the form of sustainable development sub-projects intended to provide people displaced by the project with sufficient investment means to enable them to profit from the benefits of the project. In this case, displaced populations must be consulted and participate in the planning and execution of resettlement projects; 50 - Displaced persons must be assisted in their efforts to improve their standard of living or at least to restore their livelihoods to their level before resettlement or the implementation of the Project. It takes into account the economic and social consequences of activities which are caused by: - The involuntary removal of land causing resettlement or loss of habitat, loss of assets or access to assets, loss of sources of income or means of livelihood, whether or not the affected people have to move on another site; - The involuntary restriction of access to parks defined as such legally, and to protected areas leading to consequences on the livelihoods of displaced people. OP 4.12 determines the measures required to address the impacts of involuntary resettlement, namely the development of a resettlement plan or a resettlement policy framework. This framework requires that the populations subject to resettlement are: - Informed of the possibilities offered to them and the rights relating to their resettlement; - Consulted, subjected to several choices and informed of the technically and economically feasible alternatives; and - Provided promptly with effective compensation at full replacement cost for losses of property directly attributable to the Project. The resettlement plan must take into account resettlement compensation, aid for the reconstruction of housing, for the acquisition of building land and agricultural land. Where possible to achieve the objectives of the policy, the resettlement plan provides for displaced persons post-resettlement assistance for a transitional period of duration based on a reasonable estimate of the likely time required for recovery of their livelihoods and their income. It should provide development aid for the development of land, credit mechanisms, training or job creation which would be added to the compensation measures. OP 4.12 requires that the needs of vulnerable groups within displaced populations be specifically considered when developing and implementing the resettlement plan. Overall, the fundamental principle of policy 4.12 is to at least safeguard, if not improve, the living conditions of populations affected by project activities. To ensure that the compensation and aid to be granted to affected populations will be effective, this policy requires, within the framework of the SRP/RAP, a monitoring/evaluation project for the plan. 5.5. THE METHODOLOGICAL NOTE (MN) GOVERNING THE OPERATION OF THE CEC The experimental application of the Methodological Note within the framework of PDVIR activities was instructed to MINDCAF by letter No. 0534/d/PM of September 5, 2018 and is innovative in the sense that: The methodological note governing the operation of the observation and evaluation commission ) developed within the framework of the PDVIR was approved by the Prime Minister to govern the 51 resettlement process. This Methodological Note constitutes progress, because it attempts to reconcile the requirements of the World Bank and Cameroonian legislation. As we have already mentioned above, the methodological note was used to simplify the process of identification and compensation of people affected by local sub-projects because it does not require a Declaration of Public Utility (DPU) and a compensation decree prior to payment of compensation. For these local sub-projects it is planned to obtain a compensation decree for regularization Table 17: Comparative table of procedures and processes for preparing and compensating RAP for structuring sub-projects and local sub-projects). To better meet the requirements of OP 4.12, an additive note on a hybrid resettlement process was developed by the project. This is the descriptive note of the procedure for evaluating property/development, and compensating people affected by the work of local sub-projects within the framework of the PDVIR. As part of the PDVIR local sub-projects, the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development has adopted this procedure for evaluating property/development including land and loss of income as well as the compensation procedure which will ensure full compliance with the provisions of World Bank OP 4.12 applicable to PDVIR. Table 19 presents the differences between the hybrid process applied to local sub-projects and the classic expropriation procedure which was used within the framework of structuring sub-projects. It highlights the specificities of the hybrid approach compared to the traditional approach. Table 19: Comparative table of procedures and processes for preparing and compensating PAPs for structuring sub-projects and local sub-projects N° Procedure Procedure implemented for local Observations applied to sub-projects, basis for this RAP structuring sub- projects 1 Signature of a No decree declaring public utility As part of the procedure declaration of (DPU) by MINDCAF prior to applied to local sub-projects, public utility evaluation operations the DPU is convened after the decree (DPU) by failure of negotiations between MINDCAF the Mayors and the PAP. 2 Establishment of Establishment of an ad hoc Payment will be made within an Observation committee by municipal decision the framework of proximity by and Evaluation at the departmental level by the same ad hoc committee set Commission municipal decision. It is made up up by the Mayor who is its (AVC) by of sectoral members of the AVC, president. Prefectural decree members of the local GRM at the compliance team, and the RAP departmental level 52 and chaired by the consultant. It is chaired by the Prefect. Mayor. 3 The procedure for The procedure for evaluating In the context of proximity, the assessing property property and paying compensation mandate of the ad hoc and paying is led by the Mayor through the ad committee extends to the compensation is hoc committee set up. payment of compensation to conducted by the the PAP. While within the DO. framework of structuring organizations, the prefect sets up a payment commission different from the AVC. 4 Payment of Compensation payments are made Negotiation minutes are compensation is on the basis of the results of the concluded between the Mayor made on the basis evaluations carried out by the ad and the PAP. of a compensation hoc committee and the RAP The procedure for evaluating decree previously consultant. and paying compensation is signed by the The method of payment is chosen established and gives right to a presidency of the by the PAP after classification decree after republic. consultation/negotiation between payment. payment in cash and payment in kind 5.5.1. The evaluation of impacted lands, goods and developments and the principles of the descriptive note of the procedure for evaluating goods/developments, and compensating people affected by the work of local sub-projects within the framework of the PDVIR - March 2022 This hybrid approach is based on the following principles: - The assessment of impacted land, property and development, including losses and shortfalls of income of economically displaced persons, will be carried out in accordance with OP 4.12 and the requirements of the methodological note for expropriation expertise which applies to the PDVIR. More precisely, the project will ensure compliance with the following principles relating to OP 4.12 and reiterated by the RPF and the Methodological Note; a) Replacement cost based on market price cost without transaction cost and depreciation for houses, structures, land, crops, trees and other assets. b) Compensation levels (in cash) will be sufficient to finance the replacement of lost land and other assets at full replacement cost in local markets. In-kind compensation for land or structures will also be made at the replacement cost of the affected land and structures. 53 5.5.2. Provision of compensation - Depending on the individual choice of the PAP, access to a combination of compensation (cash/kind) so that the total is equal to the replacement cost of the affected elements. The national legal framework provides two forms of compensation: in cash or in kind. World Bank OP 4.12 also provides for assistance or resettlement aid, which consists of assistance provided to people physically displaced by the Project. This assistance will include transportation, accommodation, and/or various services to those affected during the move and resettlement. It may also include compensation to cover moving and resettlement costs, such as moving expenses and lost working time. In addition, the resettlement assistance provided for vulnerable people will include moving assistance, food aid, health assistance and psycho-social assistance during the resettlement process. It must nevertheless be clarified that the scale and complexity of the resettlement of the sub- projects subject to this RAP do not require all of these elements which are more appropriate for projects where PAPs are relocated from their environment to new sites. In our scenario, all the PAPs will remain on their respective sites, but will just lose part of their property. - In accordance with the provisions of Decree No. 87/1872 of December 16, 1987 (articles 15 and 16), by virtue of their legal personality, the decentralized local authorities (DLA) will initiate negotiations with the PAPs on the mode of compensation (cash or in kind) of the amounts established in the expert evaluation report validated by the Bank, in accordance with the requirements of OP 4.12. The amounts determined in the expert evaluation report will not be subject to negotiations. - Compensation can be in kind or in cash depending on the choice of the PAP. To do this, the commission in charge of leading the negotiations must first present the different compensation variants to the PAPs, and give them the opportunity to make a choice; According to OP 4.12 “replacement cost” is defined as a valuation method that establishes sufficient compensation to replace the assets, plus the necessary transaction costs associated with replacing said assets. Where functioning markets exist, replacement cost is the market value established from an independent and competent property valuation, plus transaction costs. Where functioning markets are lacking, replacement cost may be determined by other means, such as calculating the production value of land or productive assets, or the undepreciated value of the substitute material and the labor to be used in constructing structures or other fixed assets, plus transaction costs. In all cases where physical displacement results in the loss of housing, the replacement cost must be at least sufficient to allow the purchase or construction of housing that meets the minimum standards of quality and safety acceptable to the community. The valuation method applied to determine the replacement cost should be documented in the relevant resettlement planning documents. Transaction costs include administrative fees, registration or deed fees, reasonable moving costs and any other similar costs imposed on the persons concerned. To ensure compensation at replacement cost, it may be necessary to update planned compensation rates in project areas where inflation is high or the time lag between calculation of compensation rates and payment of compensation. 54 - The cost of compensation for graves and exhumation and reburial ceremonies of bodies will be taken into account in the overall cost of resettlement, in accordance with operational policy OP/PB 4.11 on “physical cultural heritage” of the World Bank and Order No. 74/199 of 03/14/1974 regulating the operations of burial, exhumation and transfer of bodies. 5.5.3. The principles of negotiating compensation methods - Negotiations will be conducted freely and in good faith with the participation of all parties. This involves i) making efforts to reach an agreement; ii) conduct constructive and good faith negotiations; iii) avoid unjustified delays; iv) respect the agreements concluded and apply them in good faith; v) give the parties sufficient time to discuss collective disputes and reach a settlement; - The duration of negotiations will not exceed 3 months across all of their operations; - The values of compensation in kind must correspond to the amounts defined in the expert report of the bare properties, crops, constructions, and economic losses, established by the ad hoc Commission and the consultant responsible for developing the RAP in accordance with the requirements of OP 4.11 and 4.12 and the project RPF which are transcribed in the methodological note; - A report on the progress of all land acquisition and PAP resettlement operations through negotiation will be drawn up in triplicate and transmitted to the Government (Prime Minister, Minister in charge of land) for further administrative procedure, as well as the World Bank; 5.5.4. Triggering of the classic expropriation procedure in the event of failure in negotiations - The negotiation is a failure if the PAPs do not accept the proposals made to them. Under these conditions, recourse to MINDCAF arbitration is essential for all PAPs. If part of the PAP accepts the negotiation and its conclusions, only the remaining PAP who have not accepted the negotiation clauses will be subject to MINDCAF arbitration; - If the failure persists, the Decentralized Local Authorities (DLA) may resort to the declaration of public utility (DPU) in accordance with the provisions of Decree No. 87/1872 of December 16, 1987 (articles 15 and 16); Article 15: Before resorting to expropriation for reasons of public utility in favor of local public authorities, public establishments, public service concessionaires or state companies with a view to carrying out works of general interest, the latter must carry out prior negotiations with the owners or beneficiaries concerned. In the event of disagreements, the results of said negotiations are subject to arbitration by the Ministry responsible for Lands. In the event of unsuccessful arbitration, expropriation will be carried out at the expense of the beneficiary under the conditions provided for above. Article 16: The public law legal entities referred to in the preceding article must, in the event of successful negotiations, comply with the acquisition regulations under common law. 5.5.5. Taking into account economically displaced persons Affected people carrying out commercial activities (means of livelihood and source of income) on the rights of way of the planned infrastructures are eligible for compensation. In this regard, fixed 55 and semi-fixed installations (including those which are informal) as well as permanent sellers recognized as such even without fixed and semi-fixed installations will be covered by this provision. The project will work with local leaders and other resource persons during the Internally Displaced Person (IDP) census and prior communications to avoid opportunists being included in compensation lists. Losses of economic income are assessed on the basis of the monthly turnover estimated according to the tax regime corresponding to the disrupted economic activity, taking into account the duration of the disruption. This assessment approach was presented to and agreed with the PAPs during public consultations, so that they know how economic activities should be assessed within the framework of this RAP. This lost income, recognized as the livelihood of the affected person, is determined according to the level of taxation of the disrupted activity and the duration of the disruption. In addition to the above-mentioned compensation, PAPs in a situation of economic displacement whose structures are fixed, receive compensations that are calculated and paid. In the case of mobile structures, PAPs will be assisted in moving their structures. The council says it has commercial space to accommodate them. 5.5.6. Implementation and monitoring of the procedure - The RAP consultant will support all stages of the procedure. The entire process will be closely supported and monitored by the CCP and the UTL; - The appeal procedure is that defined in the complaints management mechanism set up within the framework of the Project. 5.5.7. Carrying out the property valuation survey The President (in this context the City Mayor of Kumba designates the observation and evaluation commission, notifies it to the other administrative authorities who are also members of the ad doc Committee (Senior Divisional Officer of Meme and the Divisional Officer of Kumba II) of the locality concerned. Once notified, the SDO ensures publicity by posting at the SDO’s office, at the Departmental Land Service, at the council, at the Do’s office, and at the chiefdom of the location of the land, as well as by any other means deemed necessary due to the importance of the operation. To enable them to participate in all phases of the investigation, the populations concerned must be informed at least thirty (30) days in advance of the day and time of the investigation, by summons addressed to village and quarter chiefs by appropriate means. The commission may, after having previously established itself the exhaustive list of owners of the property to be destroyed, constitute a technical subcommittee of at least three members for the purpose of assessing a category of this property. The work of the subcommittee is carried out under the responsibility and control of the entire commission which countersigns the documents. At the end of the investigation, the observation and evaluation commission produces: - An investigation report reporting all possible incidents or observations of the evicted persons, signed by all its members present, 56 - A demarcation report and the plot plan of the land selected, established by the surveyor who is a member of the commission, - A statement of expertise of the constructions and any development signed by all the members of the commission, - A statement of crop expertise signed by all members of the commission, - A statement of expertise of any other development signed by all members of the commission. All these elements as well as the order designating the members of the commission are transmitted by the president of the commission to the Minister responsible for domains for the preparation of the classification decrees. 6. INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK Concerning land management in Cameroon, and precisely in the context of involuntary resettlement of populations linked to project activities, several administrations are concerned. In accordance with the Methodological Note, the City Mayor of the Kumba by Communal Decree set up an Ad Hoc Committee responsible for the evaluation of properties. The said Commission is composed of: - DD/MINHDU - DD/MINDCAF - DD/MINADER - DD/MINEE DD/MINAS - Mayor of Kumba II; - Fiango Quater heads; - RAP consultant Etc. 6.1.1. Ministry of Housing and Urban Development (MINHDU) He is responsible for the implementation of national policy on urban development and housing. It is this Ministry which determines the compensation rates for constructions. Its responsibilities extend to: (i) planning and control of city development; (ii) the development and monitoring of the implementation of city planning and restructuring strategies; (iii) the implementation of the social housing policy, the development and implementation of the housing improvement plan, both in urban and rural areas, (iv) the definition and monitoring the application of housing standards. 6.1.2. Ministry of State Property and Land Tenure 57 MINDCAF is at the center of the national involuntary resettlement policy. In charge of the management of national heritage, he is responsible for land allocation proposals, the acquisition and expropriation of real estate for the benefit of the State, public administrative establishments and public capital companies, in collaboration with the administrations and organizations concerned. Its regional and departmental managers are rapporteurs within the Property Assessment and Evaluation Commissions at different levels. Its Minister is the President of the National Commissions. 6.1.3. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MINADER) MINADER within the framework of the PDVIR is concerned through the evaluation of plants during the process of census of people and affected goods. 6.1.4. Ministry of Water and Energy (MINEE) Drinking water supply, sanitation, public lighting and electrification infrastructure could be moved as part of the implementation of the project. This sector being under the responsibility of the MINEE, it will then be decisive in the observation and evaluation of these affected infrastructures and will constitute a major player in achieving the objectives of the Project. 6.1.5. Local complaints and litigation management committees The MINHDU Decision of December 28, 2020 established local compliance teams to manage the Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) as part of the implementation of the PDVIR. 6.1.6. City Council/PDVIR The City council/PDVIR is primarily responsible for the design, planning and implementation of the resettlement policy. As such, he must: - Ensure that PAPs receive compensation; - Inform the World Bank on all developments in the implementation of the release of the site; - Follow the RAP development process; - Verify regulatory compliance and operational policies of the World Bank in the RAP report; - Follow the procedure for signing expropriation and compensation decrees; - Organize and coordinate the RAP implementation process (payment of compensation); - Prepare and implement a mechanism for managing complaints and claims from PAPs; - Monitor the implementation of the Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) in relation to RAP activities; - Support the resettlement of vulnerable PAPs; - Monitor the implementation of the RAP in relation to the monitoring indicators. 58 The Municipalities concerned, by virtue of the powers transmitted to them, have a fundamental responsibility, due to their role as representatives of the beneficiary populations and their proximity to them. Within the framework of the PDVIR, they will constitute the main interlocutors of the Project, but also of the World Bank and will be relays of the land needs and development aspirations of the populations. 6.1.7. Traditional chiefdoms Auxiliaries of the administration in their constituencies, it is the traditional chief of Fiango who will play the role of facilitator, particularly through the mobilization of the populations during consultations relating to the choice of infrastructure to be carried out by the Commune of Kumba II, but also as part of monitoring their creation and commissioning. Traditional chiefdoms will also have a role to play in raising awareness among populations and in their participation in the resettlement process. 6.1.8. Advisory and support bodies The main advisory and support bodies within the framework of the PDVIR are the neighborhood organizations or civil society organizations operating in the said Municipalities. All these structures, through their good knowledge of the problems facing the populations, will constitute important relays between the project and the populations and will also play a role in mobilizing and raising awareness of the communities for the proper use and sustainability of the infrastructures which will be carried out. All of these actors, whether they are ministerial departments or decentralized local authorities, must be made aware of and trained in the environmental and social safeguards measures advocated by the World Bank. 6.2 RAP IMPLEMENTATION ACTORS The actors implementing the RAP are presented in table 20: Table 20: RAP implementation actors Actors Role Prime Minister Signature of the compensation decree after payments City Mayor of Kumba Provision of funds to the payment commission UTL/OSC Advisory assistance to the PAP Payment commission Payment of PAP Local Compliance Team Management of complaints during the implementation of the RAP and (LCT) and PDVIR throughout the execution of the project Consultant/PDVIR External evaluation of the implementation of the RAP 59 6.3. STRENGTHENING THE CAPACITIES OF INSTITUTIONS The PDVIR organized a training workshop for all members of the Ad hoc Committee on the procedure for evaluating losses and property/development/economic assets/means of livelihood and compensation for people affected by the work of the proximity sub-projects in the town of Kumba. 6.3.1. Specific objectives - Specify the procedures for assessing economic losses (means of existence and sources of income) as well as losses of land and other assets (constructions, crops); - Specify the procedures for assessing losses of cultural heritage, in light of the requirements of OP 4.11 of the World Bank; - Specify the terms of negotiation between the DLA and the PAP; - Specify the terms of payment of compensation to formally identified PAPs; - Determine a consensual working approach between the RAP consultant and the ad hoc committee. 6.3.2. Expected results -the regulatory provisions which govern the approach to compensation carried out by Decentralized Territorial Authorities (DTA), within the framework of public utility operations, are specified and assimilated by all stakeholders; - the stages of implementation of the said compensation approach are controlled by all stakeholders; - the census approaches, the eligibility criteria and the evaluation of properties, decreed by the methodological note of the expropriation expert work, authorized for the PDVIR by the Government in September 2018, are mastered by the participants; - the procedures for assessing economic losses (means of existence and sources of income) as well as losses of land and other assets (constructions, crops) are known and assimilated by the participants; - the terms of negotiation between the DTA and the PAPs provided for in the procedure are adopted by all; - the terms of payment of compensation to the formally identified PAPs are known to all stakeholders; - a consensual working approach between the RAP consultant and the ad hoc committee is determined. 6.4. INSTITUTIONAL STEPS AND RESPONSIBILITIES The following table presents the steps and institutional responsibilities. 60 Table 21: Stages, responsible persons and role of institutional actors N Stages Responsi Roles Observations Financin Implementa ° ble g tion status person 1 Establishment of the ad hoc The City Preparation and signing The Mayor obtains, if necessary, a committee in charge of the Mayor of the decision municipal deliberation authorizing census, the evaluation of establishing and him to organize and conduct property and the payment of functioning of the ad hoc negotiations for land acquisitions, compensation Committee including in relation to economically displaced persons within the framework of PDVIR NA Executed local sub-projects. The ad hoc Committee is made up of members of the AVC, the RAP Consultant, the DAJ/MINHDU, the UTL or CLS Chief and the GRM compliance teams. 2 Recruitment of the consultant CCP/UTL Preparation of Social Manager of the CCP (RGS) responsible for developing the and CLS consultant's TOR RAP PDVIR/ Preparation and MINHD Executed publication of ASMIs U Contracting of the consultant 61 N Stages Responsi Roles Observations Financin Implementa ° ble g tion status person 3 Training of the ad hoc The CCP Programming, The actors involved in the Committee, including the RAP in organization and evaluation of properties have been consultant, in the requirements collaborati financing of training informed of the requirements of OP of OP 4.11 and 4.12 and the on with 4.11 and 4.12 and the provisions of provisions of the the World the Methodological Note in order to Methodological Note Bank guarantee that these evaluations are carried out with the same principles (OP 4.12, OP 4.1) PDVIR/ MINHD Executed The key aspects of the training U focused on: -The Methodological Note) by the ad hoc Committee (including the RAP consultant); And -The hybrid resettlement procedure for local sub-projects 4 Census of property, losses and The ad Identification of PAPs, The census was carried out on the development of PAPs, hoc inventory of assets, areas clearly defined by the Project including losses of cultural committee losses and development (CCP /UTL et CLS) DTA/PD Executed heritage (displacement of and the (including economic VIR graves, community lands, etc.) RAP activities) of the different and economic activities consultant PAPs 62 N Stages Responsi Roles Observations Financin Implementa ° ble g tion status person 5 Valuation of property, losses The ad Assessment of This evaluation was carried out and development (including hoc constructions, properties, simultaneously by the ad hoc losses of cultural heritage and committee crops, losses of cultural Committee and the RAP consultant, economic losses) and the heritage and economic in accordance with the DTA/PD Executed RAP losses requirements of OP 4.11 and 4.12, VIR consultant of the RPF and the requirements of the Methodological Note and the hybrid procedure. 6 Negotiations with PAPs on the The ad Conduct negotiations in These negotiations were organized method of payment of hoc accordance with the note by the Mayor and were carried out compensation (cash or kind)) committee on the hybrid in accordance with the provisions and the resettlement procedure of decree n°87/1872 of December RAP 16, 1987 and the requirements of Prepare and sign the consultant PO 4.12 and the RPF. negotiation minutes/memorandum of The CCP through the UTL/CLS understanding participated in these negotiations NA Executed which clarified not only the choice of the PAP on the two proposed variants, but also on the implementation deadlines. The amounts determined in the expert evaluation report were not subject to negotiation. 63 N Stages Responsi Roles Observations Financin Implementa ° ble g tion status person 7 Production and validation of The ad The ad hoc committee The expert report was validated by Currently the evaluation report hoc and the RAP consultant the ad hoc committee. The report being committee for the production of the will be validated by the Bank validated by and the expert report before the start of negotiations with the Bank and RAP the PAPs. The Bank may, if it will be The Mayor for validation consultant deems it necessary, carry out NA followed by of the report before verifications of the elements of the validation The City transmission to IDA expert report in the field. from the mayor World Bank for Mayor World validation of the expert Bank report. 8 Production of the RAP report The RAP Drafting of the RAP The RAP was developed by the consultant report in accordance with consultant and submitted for the TOR validation by the World Bank and will provide information, among other things, on: the PDVIR Executed consultation/negotiation procedure that was conducted; the report of the negotiations with PV; payment deadlines corresponding to the PAP's choices, etc. 9 Validation of the RAP report CCP and Verification of the The final validation will be done PDVIR/ Reviewed World conformity of the report through an ANO of the Bank MINHD and validated Bank with the TOR and in U by the CCP; 64 N Stages Responsi Roles Observations Financin Implementa ° ble g tion status person particular with OP 4.11 but currently and 4.12, in order to being declare its acceptability reviewed for by the CCP and an ANO ANO by the by the World Bank Bank team 1 Payment of compensation The ad Payment of The CCP, member of the ad hoc Waiting for 0 hoc compensation (monetary committee and the compliance validation of committee or in kind) following the teams, participates in these the RAP by conclusions of the payments. The external evaluator DTA the Bank negotiations recorded in consultant for the implementation the minutes signed for of the RAP is also associated with this purpose this operation. 1 Preparation and publication of MINDCA Transmission of the The different stages will be carried Waiting for 1 the classification decree F expert report to the Prime out after payment of compensation. compensatio Classification decree for the Minister’s Office n payments. regularization of compensation (demarcation report, payments: This is a regulatory expert report, etc.), act taken by the President of payment report. N/A the Republic which aims to Transmission of the draft classify a private domain as the classification decree to national domain of the State the Presidency of the and is framed by: Republic. Ordinance No. 74/1 of July 6, 1974 establishing the land 65 N Stages Responsi Roles Observations Financin Implementa ° ble g tion status person tenure system, modified and Signature of the decree supplemented by Ordinance by the Prime Minister No. 77/1 of January 10, 1977; after the visa of the presidency Ordinance No. 74/2 of July 6, 1974 establishing the state Publication of the regime, modified and classification decree by supplemented by Order No. the Prime Minister's 77/2 of January 10, 1977; service Decree No. 76/166 of July 6, 1976 establishing the terms of management of the national domain 66 7. ELIGIBILITY 7.1. CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY Are eligible for compensation: (i) Affected persons holding a property right (possession legally recognized by the land law including customary rights and current rights (current titles)), (ii) persons holding affected property (plants, constructions and other developments, etc.); (iii) Affected persons carrying out commercial activities on the road’s rights-of-way (fixed and semi- fixed installations (including those which are informal - even those who are squatters) as well as permanent sellers recognized as such even without fixed and semi-fixed installations -fixed). It is important to specify here that property owned by PAP within the framework of this RAP do not represent the main means of subsistence, however, those carrying economic activities take it as their main source of income and solely depend on it for subsistence. However, plants identified during the preparation of the RAP and which have already been harvested before the start date of the work will not be eligible for compensation. In fact, it is the goods which are affected by the work which are likely to be compensated. Deadline (19th January, 2024): date when data collection started: This date corresponds to the start date of the census. The systematic and permanent dissemination of this date avoids an additional influx of people onto the project areas. People who have settled on the project site after this deadline will not be eligible for compensation. This information was communicated to the populations during the process of developing this RAP, so that they are informed of the eligibility criterion for compensation. Awareness-raising will be carried out throughout the process in order to inform the public about the eligibility criteria for compensation to limit these new installations. 7.2. COMPENSATION The acquisition or occupation of land by the project gives rise to compensation for the rights holders over this land. As indicated in the previous paragraph. Compensation can take the form of: - Cash compensation. - Compensation in kind which consists of making materials available to the PAP for the rehabilitation of impacted habitats. This type of compensation only concerns constructions. This method of compensation is decided after consultation with the PAPs who have the choice that suits them. The compensation principles are as follows: - Whatever the form (in kind or in cash), compensation is equal to the full replacement value and paid before the start of the work. - With regard to buildings, the full replacement value includes the full cost of materials at the local market in Kumba, necessary to rebuild a building of similar size and standard. - With regard to perennial crops, the full replacement value must take into account not only the value of the crops lost due to the destruction of the crop, but also an increase of this cost at the applicable inflation rate of the city. - With regard to economically displaced persons, the compensation is equal to the average income per month of each tax category multiplied by the duration of the work. 67 7.3. CENSUS OF POPULATIONS AND PROPERTY A total of 237 PAPs were identified during the property inventory mission, including 61 economically displaced persons. These 237 PAPs have a total of 338 properties. Appendix 6 provides details on the inventory of goods and persons. The tables below give the list of properties affected by the implementation of local projects in Kumba II. The results of the expert assessment and assessment report are presented in the tables below: Table 22: Number of property affected by category Property affected Number of PAP Constructions 121 Plants 68 Land 36 Economically displaced 61 Wells 49 Graves 03 Total 336 Table 23: Different types of constructions affected in Kumba II Type of property Number Fence 32 Grave 01 Residential buildings 73 Story building 02 Septic tanks 05 Hall 01 stores 03 Wooden building 03 Tap 01 Total 121 68 Table 24: List of plants affected by the implementation of local projects in the town of Kumba Speculation Age Quantity 1 Apple Tree Mature 1 2 Bitter Cola Young 1 3 Mature 3 Bitter leaf Young 1 4 CasiMango Mature 2 5 cassava Mature 1 6 Mature 14 cocoa Young 1 7 Coconut tree Mature 23 8 Grape Mature 4 9 Mature 9 Guava tree Young 2 10 Kolanut Mature 4 11 lemon Mature 2 12 Mango tree Mature 8 13 Mature 1 Medicinal Tree Young 1 14 Moringa Mature 1 15 Mature 9 Orange tree Young 3 16 Mature 1 Ornamental Tree Young 1 17 Mature 8 palm tree Young 2 18 Mature 20 Paw Paw Young 1 19 Mature 4 Pear tree Young 1 20 Mature 10 Plantain Young 9 21 Plum Tree Mature 12 22 Shade Tree Mature 1 23 Soursours Mature 2 24 Sugar Cane Mature 4 Total 167 69 Table 25: List of wells affected by the implementation of local projects in Kumba II Type of well Number Modern well 1 Semi modern well 1 Traditional Well 47 Total 49 Table 26: List of graves affected by the implementation of local projects in Kumba II Type of grave Number Constructed 01 Unconstructed 02 Total 03 7.4. PAP CATEGORIES This RAP concerns 237 people affected by the Project (PAP) - heads of families - individually (identified as individuals) who represent their respective families affected by 121 constructions, 68 plants, 36 bare properties, 49 water supply points, 3 graves and 61 businesses who will receive compensation for the disruption of their activities. That is to say, a workforce of 336 properties and development affected by the works belonging to 237 PAPs. It should be noted that there are PAPs that have several developments affected by the work. This is therefore a consolidated PAP workforce. These PAPs lose a small part of: their homes or shelters, their fences, their sheds or their shops, their land, their crops. It should be noted that under this RAP, these crops, dwellings or shelters, sheds, land that are partially and permanently affected do not represent the main source of income or the main means of subsistence of these people. Only the identified companies represent the sources of income of the persons concerned and are therefore considered economically displaced. It is also important to note that no physical displacement is identified under this RAP, as all affected individuals are partially affected and will remain at their same sites. So we have two broad categories of people who have affected real estate and development: - People who permanently lose i) some plants (trees) planted in front of their homes along the road (palm trees, mango trees, pear trees, guava trees etc.); ii) a small part of their land or iii) a small part of their buildings. None of these PAPs lose all of these constructions. They will all be maintained on the same sites. These are therefore not cases of physical reinstallations on new sites. It should be remembered here that within the framework of this RAP, plants, land, constructions do not represent the main means of subsistence or the main source of income of the PAPs, which is why they are not in the category of economically displaced persons in the sense of the World Bank OP 4.12. 70 - People whose businesses represent their main sources of income (sale of clothing, school supplies, second-hand clothes, plastic shoes, landlords etc.) will be temporarily disrupted during the execution of work on the roads to be improved (work from now on). According to field operations, the activities of these PAPs will be maintained on the same sites. Alongside these two main categories, we must add vulnerable people (people aged over 60, widowed women heads of households) who are in reality already counted among these two categories mentioned above. 7.5. NUMBER OF VULNERABLE PAPs Vulnerable people are those who risk becoming more vulnerable as a result of displacement, or the compensation process. They may include, but are not limited to, the following types of people: - People with a physical or intellectual disability. - Elderly people, particularly when they live alone. - Heads of households, male or female, without resources, without family help and/or without a solidarity network. - Widows and orphans who do not receive any assistance from families or other humanitarian organizations. To assist these vulnerable people especially those who are economically displaced, the City council should find a space for these vulnerable PAPs to continue their economic activity, and this new site should not be far from their previous business site and their home. The surveys that was carried out as part of the preparation of this RAP identified 20 vulnerable people who are affected by the affected property and already counted among the physically and economically displaced. Table 27 shows the list of vulnerable PAPs identified are: Table 27: List of vulnerable PAPs in Kumba II No PAP code Vulnerability 1 KCO14 Over 65 2 KCO30 Over 65 3 KCO41 Over 65 4 KCO47 Over 65 5 KCO73 Over 65 6 KCO74 Over 65 7 KCO83 Over 65 8 KCO84 Over 65 9 KCO88 Over 65 10 KCO63 Over 65 11 KCO107 Widow 12 KCO11 Widow 13 KCO36 Widow 14 KCO03 Cripple 71 15 KGr02 Over 65 16 KED58 Widow 17 KED15 Cripple 18 Kwe05 Widow 19 KED21 Widow 20 KED01 Widow 8. ESTIMATION OF LOSSES AND THEIR COMPENSATION This section presents the evaluation methodology that the consultant applied. It relied on the provisions provided for in the methodological note which applies to the PDVIR. The figure 9 shows the spatial distribution of properties and businesses affected Kumba II. Figure 9: Spatial distribution of properties/ businesses affected in Kumba II RAP 8.1. LOSS ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY This section presents the evaluation methodology that the consultant applied. It relied on the provisions provided for in the methodological note which applies to the PDVIR. 8.1.1. PLANTS ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY As part of this project, the categories of affected crops retained are perennial crops and food crops located within the work area. For these categories of crops the project follows the decree No. 2003/418/PM of February 25, 2003 in its classification of plant maturity between young and adult. 72 In accordance with the methodological note, the consultant retained the unit costs of agricultural speculation from Decree No. 2003/418/PM of February 25th 2003 setting the rates to be allocated to owners who are victims of destruction for public purposes of cultivated crops and trees, while taking into account the inflation rate. This inflation rate was determined year after year from 2003 to February, 2024 to arrive at the rate applicable in 2024. The cost of each plant was multiplied by the total inflation rate of 59.71% presented in table 28. The details of these evaluations are presented in the database which accompanies this report. Table 28 presents the cost of the crops listed and updated: Table 28: Annual inflation rates from 2003 to 2024 Year Annual Average Year Annual Average Inflation rate Inflation rate 2024 5.1 2013 2.05% 2023 7.80% 2012 2.74% 2022 6.25% 2011 2.94% 2021 2.27% 2010 1.28% 2020 2.44% 2009 3.04% 2019 2.45% 2008 5.34% 2018 1.07% 2007 0.92% 2017 0.64% 2006 5.12% 2016 0.87% 2005 2.01% 2015 2.68% 2004 0.23% 2014 1.85% 2003 0.62% Total inflation rate since 2024 59.71% 8.1.1.1. Perennial crops Table 29: Updated prices of perennial crops Legal Qty Inflation Compensation Speculation Age compensation cost rate in 2024 2003 Lemon, orange, mandarine, pomelo and young 5,000 1 2,986 7,986 grapefruit trees Adult 35,000 1 20,899 55,899 young 5,000 1 2,986 7,986 Mango tree, avocado tree Adult 35,000 1 20,899 55,899 young 1,000 1 597 1,597 Pawpaw Adult 3,000 1 1,791 4,791 young 20,000 1 11,942 31,942 Kola nut tree and safoutier Adult 50,000 1 29,855 79,855 young 7,500 1 4,478 11,978 Other fruit trees Adult 25,000 1 14,928 39,928 73 young 10,000 1 5,971 15,971 palm tree and coconut palm Adult 35,000 1 20,899 55,899 young 2,500 1 1,493 3,993 Palm tree and coconut palm (local variety) Adult 10,000 1 5,971 15,971 young 20,000 1 11,942 31,942 Voacanga Adult 50,000 1 29,855 79,855 young 5,000 1 2,986 7,986 Shade trees Adult 10,000 1 5,971 15,971 young 10,000 1 5,971 15,971 Other cultivated trees Adult 20,000 1 11,942 31,942 8.1.1.2. Plants compensation costs The total cost of compensation for the various factories affected by the project amounts to eight million three hundred and eight thousand six hundred and thirty-seven CFA francs (8,308,637 CFA francs). The list of PAPs affected by the loss of plants is presented in Annex 3. Said list presents for each PAP the impacted speculation(s), the number plants, age and the total amount of compensation. 8.1.2. CONSTRUCTION EVALUATION METHODOLOGY Buildings and other improvements are valued at their replacement value as established in January 2024 by the expert member of the ad hoc Committee. The calculations were based on the price of building materials at local level in January 2024. This approach was used to ensure compliance with the PDVIR methodological note. It should be noted, however, that on the various rights-of-way in Kumba, there are different types of constructions. Some are in plank; others are with concrete with some covered by tiles. The evaluations were made by considering the viability of the remaining part of the construction. In the event that the remaining part was not viable (risk of collapse), the construction is evaluated as if it was completely affected. In the database, the allocation rate for each construction was specified. This is also the place to indicate that in Kumba, almost all constructions evaluated will be rebuilt on the same site, because the PAP have the space on these sites, which does not force them to resettle elsewhere on another site. However, there is one building where the PAP does not have land to build on as the house is almost completely affected. He will be forced to move to another area. Hence his structure will be evaluated as affected by 100%. The municipality will be responsible for identifying a new site in collaboration with the PAP and making it available to the latter in providing all documentation and as per consultations the requirements to have a construction of at least the same standing. The database also presents the overall surface area of each concession, which sufficiently shows that the PAPs have space available to rebuild. This was done in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 6 and 25 of World Bank OP 4.12. 74 The replacement prices obtained per m2 are presented in table 30: Table 30: Price per square meter of different house standards in 2024 in Kumba Cost of material 30% cost of Cost of N° Designation Unit in February 2024 Labour in replacement in in FCFA FCFA FCFA 1 Ordinary standing m2 167,101 50,130.30 217,231 2 Wooden structure m2 55,196 16,558.80 71,755 3 Hard fence with metallic gate m2 144,194 43,258.20 187,452 2 4 Hard fence without gate m 94,194 28,258.20 122,452 2 5 Septic tank and soakaway m 150,696 45,208.80 195,905 Source: evaluation report of construction firm LUSTER Prints 8.1.2. Compensation costs for constructions The total cost of compensation for individual built assets affected by the project amounts to three hundred and fifty one million two hundred and thirty one thousands nine hundred and fourteen francs (351,231,914) CFA Francs. The details of the costs by type of impacted property are summarized in table 31: Table 31: Compensation cost for constructions Type of construction Number Amount (FCFA) Residential buildings 61 225,521,395 Fence 37 74,396,860 Grave 01 729,897 Story building 02 27,371,144 Septic tanks 04 694,233 Hall 01 14,826,036 stores 03 2,063,849 Wooden building 02 5,429,743 Tap 01 204,750 Total Amount 351,231,914 121 PAP are affected by loss of constructions. The list of these PAPs are presented in annex 14.1 of this report 75 8.1.3 Methodology for assessing wells To obtain the estimated bill of quantities for a septic tank and suck away pit, the construction firm first determined the quantities of the different tasks to be carried out for which current market prices were applied to obtain the total amount excluding VAT for a pit with a depth of 5 m with a length of 1.55 m and a width also of 1.55 m. 8.1.4. Evaluation of landed properties methodology: characteristics, evaluation method and compensation cost In order to better take into account, the provisions of OP 4.12, the assessment of the land affected by the works was carried out through a land survey on land sales practices at the local level. According to the surveys carried out, the sales practices for plots of land with a m2 title in the city of Kumba vary between 2,000 and 6,000 CFA francs; while the sale of untitled land is 1,500 CFA francs/m2. On the other hand, Decree No. 2014/3211/PM of 29 September 2014, which sets the minimum prices applicable to land transactions in the private domain of the State, sets the square meter at 2,000 CFA francs. In a context that requires PAPs to be compensated according to the replacement value, the consultant estimated it at 4,000 CFA francs, which represents the average land speculation practiced by the sellers of titled land and 1,500 CFA/m2 sellers of untitled land in the Project area. To this, a lump sum of 250,000 CFA francs was added representing the cost of administrative transactions was applied for the updating of land titles. This amount is obtained with the support of the departmental delegation of the Ministry of Land Registry on the basis of an evaluation of the various administrative costs relating to these operations. 8.1.5. ASSESSMENT OF GRAVES METHODOLOGY Field surveys revealed that three (3) graves, one of which was tiled and two of which was undeveloped, were identified on the ground. 8.1.5.1. Graves evaluation methodology The evaluation of the constructed grave was taken into account in the evaluation of the constructions. The costs of exhumation and reburial will be borne by the project. As the earthen graves have not been the subject of any visible development that could justify an evaluation, its management will be taken into account by the project at the time of the work for the modalities of exhumation and reburial. These costs also cover the work to be carried out for said movements (exhumation and re-burial). 8.1.5.2. Moving the graves For cases of destruction or movement of a grave, the provisions of OP 4.11 on grave exhumation protocol, framed by Decree 74-199 of March 14, 1974 will be applied in addition to other legal provisions in force in Cameroon. Indeed, apart from compensation for the material loss of the grave, costs linked to the organization of funeral rites generated by the exhumation and reburial of the remains will be covered by the project. The costs of operations and administrative and logistical procedures will also be covered by the project promoters. To this end, funeral costs linked to the movement of graves is 500,000 76 FCFA per grave as stipulated by the PDVIR sub-projects in Cameroon will be integrated into the budget for the implementation of this RAP, i.e. 250,000 FCFA for administrative costs and 250,000 FCFA for families relating to the reorganization funerals, i.e. an amount of 1,500,000 FCFA for the management of the three graves. This amount is made available to the consultant by the PDVIR central coordination unit. These are the amounts set for administrative operations supporting the exhumation and re-inhumation of graves. Table 32 presents the PAP’s impacted by graves Table 32: PAPs impacted by loss of graves Grave PAP code Localisation N° CNI / Tél Number characteristics Catholic Grave not KGr01 ////// 1 cemetery constructed Club SW31080I5J3JHOC0IXS3 Grave KGr02 1 Number 1 constructed Catholic Grave not KGr03 ////// 1 cemetery constructed 8.1.6. Economically Displaced Evaluation methodology In accordance with the directives resulting from the PDVIR Financing Agreement between Cameroon and the World Bank, compensation for economic losses or livelihood losses of affected people is recommended, in particular through OP 4.12 of the World Bank on involuntary resettlement populations; these losses are caused by disruptions and/or slowdowns in certain economic activities (shops, call boxes, shoemaking, commercial sheds, garages, rents, etc.) during the duration of the work. This could result in the loss of usual customers through relocation of the initial site. This impact will depend on the duration of the work (approximately 8 months for local works in Kumba II). People affected by this impact will benefit from compensation, in accordance with the requirements of OP 4.12 of the World Bank. The lost income, recognized as the means of existence of the affected person, depends on the level of taxation of the disrupted activity and the duration of the disruption. If we stick to the 2024 finance law: Losses of economic income are assessed on the basis of the tax regime corresponding to the disrupted economic activity. - PAPs subject to payment of daily municipal tickets worth 100 FCFA correspond to a tax regime of flat-rate municipal tax of 5000 FCFA per quarter which refers to an average daily income between 500 and 2000 FCFA, i.e. an average income of 37,500 FCFA per month. - PAPs subject to the discharge regime are subject to the payment of quarterly taxes of four possible orders: 77 - Category A withholding tax: Between 5,000 and 9,999 FCFA/quarter, corresponding to an annual income between 100,000 and 999,000 FCFA, or an average income of 45,792 FCFA per month; - Category B withholding tax: 10,000 and 12,499 FCFA/quarter, corresponding to an annual income between 1,000,000 and 5,000,000 FCFA, or an average income of 250,000 FCFA per month; - Category C withholding tax: 12,500 FCFA/quarter, corresponding to an annual income between 6,000,000 and 8,000,000 FCFA, or an average income of 583,333 FCFA per month; - Category D withholding tax: 20,000 FCFA/quarter, corresponding to an annual income between 8,000,000 and 10,000,000 FCFA, or an average income of 750,000 FCFA per month; Table 33 present the distribution of the tax regime of economically displaced PAPs PAPs subject to the patent regime are subject to the payment of annual taxes exceeding 100,000 FCFA, depending on the scale of the economic activity. This tax regime corresponds to an annual income greater than or equal to 10,000,000 FCFA. It should be noted here that the use of the tax category is a means that allows us to classify commercial activities in order to determine their turnover in order to clearly assess in a factual manner the disruption of activity during the duration of the work. Therefore, whether the person is in compliance with taxes or not, we do not take that into account. Table 33: The distribution of the tax regime of economically displaced PAPs S/N Tax category Average monthly income Number of PAPs 1 Ticket of 100 37,500 22 2 Category A 45,792 34 3 Category B 250,000 4 60 This approach was retained in these evaluations for the simple reason that it is based on a categorization already made by the tax system which determines, depending on the nature of the commercial activities, the type of taxation which in itself is depending on the income from this activity. The commercial activities carried out by the PAPs are therefore already included in the register allowing them to discharge tax responsibilities, which is based on their daily or monthly income. Reason why, to calculate the compensation for economic activities, we considered it necessary to exploit this categorization of commercial activity as a factual element (instead of considering the declarations of the affected traders who could judge the opportunity to make speculation through false declarations), which makes it possible to determine the monthly income from each activity, and multiply this monthly income by the number of months of work to be carried out. 78 However, it is important to specify that in this process, the assessment is made independently of the tax situation of the PAP, that is to say, whether it is in good standing with the tax authorities or not, the assessment is made without taking it into account, because this approach is just used to determine the monthly income from the activity and to deduce the corresponding compensation based on the existing legal elements. During the public consultations, the method for assessing economic losses was presented to the PAPs, so that they know how compensation will be determined. No objections were raised, especially since it is a new paradigm which in the past was not taken into account. 8.1.6.1. Compensation costs The cost of compensation for the disruption of business activities amounts to an amount of twenty- seven million, four hundred twenty-one thousand, seven hundred sixty (27421760) CFA francs for sixty one (61) economically affected persons (Economic displacement is defined as the loss of land, property or access to property resulting in the loss of sources of income or other means of subsistence, or both) that travel along the routes of the various routes and will receive monetary compensation for the disruptive activities. The duration underlying the calculation of the cost of cash compensation is 8 months, relative to the duration of the work. Overall, these losses are temporary during construction. The following measures will be implemented by the social team of the UTL in charge of implementing this RAP in order to ensure the smooth running of merchants' travel and relocation activities: - Inform merchants two weeks before the right-of-way is vacated and work begins; - Help merchants move their counters with municipal equipment; - Continue to inform and raise awareness among merchants about the start of work and the release of rights-of-way; The list of economically displaced persons (who will receive financial compensation) is contained in annex 4 to the present report. 8.1.7. WELLS EVALUATION METHODOLOGY The DD of MINEE estimated the various costs linked to compensation for wells. They take into account the actual cost of materials and activities in the year of evaluation. These different costs are represented in the table below: These different quotes for wells are presented in table 34. Table 34: Costings for evaluations of loss of wells Type of well Cost Modern well 200,000 Semi modern well 150,000 Traditional Well 135,000 8.1.7.1. Cost of compensations 79 The cost of compensation for wells amounts to an amount of Six million six hundred thousand (6,600,000) CFA francs presented in table 35: Table 35: Compensation cost for impacted types of wells Type of well Number of PAP Average Unit Total cost cost Modern well 1 200,000 200,000 Semi modern well 1 150,000 150,000 Traditional Well 47 133,000 6,250,000 General Total 6,600,000 8.2. SUMMARY OF THE COST OF COMPENSATION The compensation budget necessary for the payment of compensation to the people affected by the local sub-projects in the city of Kumba amounts to 415,665,884 FCFA francs (four hundred and fifteen million six hundred and sixty five thousands eight hundred and eighty four francs), distributed as follows: (i) Constructions 351,231,914FCFA (ii) plants 9,257,010 FCFA (iii) conomically displaced persons 27,421,760 FCFA, (iv) wells 6,600,000 FCFA (v) Bare land 19,655,200 FCFA (vi) graves 1,500,000 FCFA. Details are presented in the appendices. 8.3. INDIVIDUAL NEGOTIATIONS The individual negotiations aimed to: - Raise awareness and obtain the agreement of PAPs on the need to shorten resettlement times; - Present and obtain the agreement of the PAPs on the interest of the negotiation process which is planned and regulated by national legislation while specifying the constraints of the classic expropriation procedure by the Declaration of Public Utility and Decree; - Present and obtain agreement from the PAPs on the results of the evaluation assessments on which the negotiations are based; - Collect PAP preferences regarding the desired compensation method among the options (cash or kind). For the 237 PAPs 232 opted for payment in cash while just 5 chose payment by bank transfer. 8.4. RAP IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE In terms of timing, the Cameroonian Government and the World Bank will first have to separately approve the resettlement action plan, as specified in the Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF). Once the final RAP is approved, the PDVIR must implement it immediately so that the displacement operation is completed before construction works begin, which is a fundamental condition. 80 When the PAPs are compensated, a monitoring of the process must be carried out in order to check whether the set objectives are achieved. The approximate implementation schedule for the RAP is outlined in table 36: Table 36: Implementation schedule for RAP activities Activities Date/Period Training of the consultant on the methodological note by the January 2024 PDVIR at the Douala workshop Preparatory activities for the data collection mission January 2024 Field data collection mission January 2024 Analysis, synthesis of data and preparation of the RAP report February 2024 Public hearings to communicate RAP results to FMPs February 2024 Finalization of RAP report and transmission to PDVIR March 2024 IDA and CCP Exchanges on RAP Report April 2024 Validation of the RAP report by the WB June 2024 Payment of compensation 3 weeks after the validation of the report by the WB Do not obtain an objection from the WB on the implementation After validation of the audit of the RAP and the start of work report following the development of the Kumba RAP 9 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS The stakeholder consultation in this section includes the interviews and focus groups carried out by the consultant during the data collection period from 18th February 2024, and the public hearings to present the results of the findings and evaluations of the properties impacted by the implementation of the project in the PAPs. 9.1. FIRST PHASE OF CONSULTATION DURING THE DATA COLLECTION PERIOD Stakeholder consultations were carried out during the period from 18th to 7th of February 2024, a period covering data collection in the field. The aim of this approach is to explain to them in detail the objective of the project, the impacts of the project, but also to collect their opinions, fears, expectations and recommendations for a harmonious implementation of the project. The various stakeholders consulted were: the heads of decentralized services (DDMINDCAF, DDMINAS, DDMINADER, DDMINEE, DDMINADER, and DDMINDHU); quarter heads, block leaders, 81 prominent business men, head of associations, and head of religious institutions. The implementation of these local sub-projects is the beginning of a solution to this problem. As part of this phase, the affected people were also consulted through the organization of focus groups. It should be noted that the Consultant had planned to hold public consultations with people affected by the project. 9.2. SECOND PHASE OF CONSULTATION RELATING TO PUBLIC HEARINGS As part of the project to develop the Resettlement Action Plan for people affected by the PDVIR local sub-projects in Kumba II, public hearings were organized on the 7th March 2024 to present the results of the evaluation reports of the property in question. These hearings brought together the PAPs of the two road stretches, The public restitution hearings of the RAP aim to put the PAPs at the same level of information with the project with regard to the assets affected by the implementation of the project, to inform and raise awareness on the principles and the process of compensation/compensation for impacted properties but also to give populations the opportunity to express their opinions, fears and expectations within the framework of the implementation of the project, but also to confirm their choice relating to the method of compensation. They also came out with the following expectations: - Implementation of projects as soon as possible and under better conditions; - Compensation for impacted assets before implementation of the project. 10. COMPLAINT RESOLUTION AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT MODALITIES The lines relating to the management of complaints linked to resettlement, taken from the project Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) are presented below. It should be noted that the PDVIR has a GRM which deals with all types of complaints inherent to project activities, including complaints related to the implementation of the RAP and therefore to resettlement. This section therefore specifically presents the elements related to the RAP. 10.1. TYPES OF COMPLAINTS AND CONFLICTS TO BE ADDRESSED Complaints and disputes may relate to the following points: • Omissions. • Undervaluation of property. • Errors in the identification of PAPs and goods. • Contestation of the amounts of compensation. • Disagreement over plot boundaries, • Conflict over ownership of property (two or more affected people declare that they are the owner of the same property); • Disagreement over the valuation of a plot or other property. • Disagreement on resettlement measures; • Wrong allocation of houses/merchant sheds (errors on size, unplanned neighborhood); • Access to information concerning the operation of the complaint filing and management system; • Others related to resettlement. 82 10.2. COMPLAINT MANAGEMENT MECHANISM IMPLEMENTATION ACTORS The actors implementing the complaints management mechanism are as follows: • The complainant. • Neighborhood Quarter head and Blocks leaders. • Sector members of the local compliance team (LCT) • The UTL chief, coordinator of the LCT; • The socio-environmental manager of UTL, rapporteur of the LCT; • The City Mayor; • The municipal collector Table 37: Summary of actors and role in the implementation of the GRM PROCESSI ACTOR ROLE OBSERVATIONS NG STAGE INVOLVED Collect Complainant Submit his grievance/complaint An 8500 popularization either to the quarter head and blocks campaign is underway among leaders, to the UTL, or through 8500 the communities surrounding the project. Quarter head and Collect the grievance/complaint Blocks leaders Transmits to UTL UTL social Collects the grievance/complaint manager/ECL from the complainant or from the rapporteur district manager Receives calls through 8500 Records grievances and forwards them to the CCP. LMT Group (call After processing, a return to the center operator) complainant is made through 8500. CCP Complaints that arrive directly at the As the CCP does not have the CCP either through the call center or capacity to directly deal with by other means are systematically resettlement complaints, it redirected to the ECL for transfers them to the LCT for jurisdiction. further procedures (verifications, field surveys, etc.) Registration UTL social Registers the complaint in the and delivery manager/ LCT register and database of rapporteur Issues an acknowledgment of acknowledgm receipt to the complainant ent of receipt LMT Group (call Records the call in the platform center operator) Issues an acknowledgment of receipt by SM/call to the complainant 83 Transfer grievances/complaints to the CCP Sorting and UTL social Sorts and directs complaints by orientation manager/ LCT transmission slip according to their and handling rapporteur nature to the sectoral members of the of complaints LCT for competence Verification/i LCT member Carry out the necessary checks nvestigation sectors Carry out property assessments where applicable Produce an expert report for the attention of the LCT coordinator/Chief UTL Transmission UTL social Contacts the complainant and gives In the event that the complaint of manager/ LCT him the status of his complaint and does not require payment, the feedback/Res rapporteur the resolutions taken after the explanations and resolutions ponse to LMT Group (call verifications/expertise adopted at the end of the Complaint. center operator) verification investigations are communicated to the complainants. Monitoring Mayor, Payment of compensation if In the event that the complaint and Municipal applicable does not require payment, the evaluation Collector explanations and resolutions adopted at the end of the verification investigations are communicated to the complainants. Closure of UTL social Signature of a closing report In accordance with the Project complaint manager/ LCT Referral to legal proceedings in the GRM, the complainant is given rapporteur event of non-satisfaction with LCT the possibility of initiating a legal treatment appeal procedure in the event of dissatisfaction with the processing of his request by the LCT. Reporting UTL social Systematically fill the database and manager/ LCT the complaints register rapporteur Transmit the updated database to the CCP each time the processing status of a complaint has changed. 84 10.3. ELIGIBILITY OF COMPLAINTS In order to ensure the relevance and veracity of the complaints to be taken into account as part of the implementation of this GRM, three main criteria must be respected to judge whether or not a complaint is admissible. It's about: • Criterion for identifying the complainant. The complaint must be filed by a PAP or its successor, or any other person linked to the PAP; • Criterion of causality. The complaint must be linked to the RAP implementation process within the meaning of the types of complaints presented in section 10.1; • Criterion of objectivity. The complaint must be able to be supported by factual and verifiable elements (effective existence of the property which is the subject of the complaint having a connection with the project activities). 10.4. DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION STEPS OF THE GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM (GRM) LINKED TO THE RAP 10.4.1. Absorption or collection of complaints PAPs or their beneficiaries have the possibility of filing their complaints or claims by the following means: • By calling the PDVIR toll-free number 8500; • With the chiefdom of their neighborhoods; • With the UTL; • With the CCP. 10.4.2. Registration and delivery of acknowledgment of receipt After receipt, complaints must be systematically recorded in the register and in the digital database. An acknowledgment of receipt must be notified to the complainant specifying the registration of the complaint in the mechanism while specifying the next steps that the complaint will follow, the date on which feedback will be provided. 10.4.3. Sorting, orientation and handling of complaints In order to better direct complaints to the sectors responsible for handling them, sorting will be done at the secretariat level of the local or central Compliance Team. This sorting will make it possible to determine the eligibility of the complaint, but also to determine the sector to which the complaint should be directed for processing MINDCAF, MINADER, MINHDU, MINPROFF, MINAS or even the CCP. Only complaints deemed eligible according to the criteria defined by the mechanism will be processed. Complaints deemed ineligible will be immediately notified to the complainant, specifying the reason for ineligibility. The processing of complaints after segregation concerns those who are eligible. It consists of categorizing complaints according to their type and their nature and purpose (construction, plants, bare land, etc). After this categorization, each complaint must follow the most appropriate circuit 85 for the continuation of its processing (MINHDU for constructions, MINDCAF for the land, MINADER for plants etc.). These sectors are members of the local compliance team and therefore have responsibility for carrying out the necessary verifications, investigations or expertise. 10.4.4. The audit/investigation Complaints transferred to the sector must be the subject of verification or investigation, because it will be a question of verifying whether the omission, undervaluation, partial payment of the property or any other subject of request. Subsequently, if the declarations are true, the sector must evaluate the property and transmit the report to the LCT coordinator who is the head of the UTL. The latter will bring to the attention of the City Mayor and the Municipal Collector the sectoral expertise report for payment. In the event that the complaint does not require payment, the sector will include in its report the exact situation to be communicated to the complainant by the project team. In the event of dissatisfaction, recourse to judicial institutions remains an option open to the complainant. This legal option must be clearly presented to him in order to make the choice with complete conscience and freedom. 10.4.5. Transmission of feedback/Response to Complaint. At the end of all the previous steps and the measures taken with a view to resolving a complaint, it is good practice for the complainant to be formally informed of the decision that has been taken and the possibilities available to him. The complainant has the possibility to appeal if he does not feel satisfied with the decision rendered to his complaint. This option must be clearly presented to him while leaving him free to choose the outcome he wishes to give to the procedure. It is nevertheless important to specify that the complaints which are the subject of legal proceedings introduced by the complainant go beyond the responsibilities of this mechanism, therefore no possibility of intervention in the legal proceedings can be considered by the project staff. The judicial power going beyond that of the project. Feedback can be given through the PDVIR 8500 toll-free number for complainants through calls, text messages, for complaints recorded through this channel. Complaints recorded via a filing form will also receive formal feedback initiated by the LCT rapporteur. In the event that the complaint does not require payment, the explanations and resolutions adopted at the end of the verification investigations are communicated to the complainant. 10.4.6. Monitoring and evaluation At this level, monitoring and evaluation consists of ensuring the effective implementation of the solutions that have been adopted in order to resolve the complaint. As diverse as they vary depending on the case, it is important that the LCT ensures compliance with these commitments, the aim of which is to close the complaint. 10.4.7. Closing the complaint 86 Having reached the end of the Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) implementation process, the last step consists of closing the complaint. This closure is pronounced in the following circumstances: • The complaint lodged was resolved; • The solution has actually been implemented; • The complainant was made aware of the entire process; • The complainant is satisfied with the solution to his complaint; • The complainant is not satisfied and initiates legal proceedings which are no longer within the jurisdiction of the Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM); • A report closing the complaint is signed by the different parties and archived. At the end of the process, the UTL socio-environmental manager must update the status of the complaint in the digital database and make a systematic monthly report to the CCP. 10.4.8. Specific case for GBV: SEA/SH and vulnerable people For this category of complaints, once the denunciation is registered, the case is immediately transmitted to the consultant in charge of taking survivors into account. The latter is responsible for triggering the entire management procedure for these cases (free consent of the survivors, referral to care structures depending on the nature of the need and care, monitoring of care, production support reports etc.). It will also ensure that care is fundamentally based on the survivor. As soon as the denunciation is made, communication is made immediately with the World Bank and continuous monitoring is maintained with the consultant. 11. MONITORING-EVALUATION SYSTEMS Monitoring and evaluation arrangements are designed to ensure that the proposed actions are implemented as planned and within the set deadlines, and that the expected results are achieved. When deficiencies or difficulties are observed, monitoring and evaluation enable appropriate corrective action to be taken. Monitoring/evaluation of the resettlement action plan will focus on the following objectives: monitoring and evaluation. • Monitoring - Continuously check that the RAP work program and budget are being implemented as planned. - Continuously verify that the quality and quantity of expected results are achieved within the prescribed timeframe. - Identify any unforeseen factors and developments likely to influence the organization of the RAP, the definition of its measures, reduce its effectiveness or present opportunities to be exploited. - To recommend as soon as possible to the relevant authorities 87 - Appropriate corrective measures, within the framework of ordinary or exceptional programming procedures. • Assessment - Establish and interpret the baseline socio-economic and health situation of the affected populations before the start of the Project (the census carried out as part of this mandate was used to draw up the baseline situation). - Define, at regular intervals, all or some of the above parameters in order to assess and understand their evolution. - Establish, at the end of the project, a new baseline situation to assess the socio-economic and health impacts of the RAP. - Analyze, on a scheduled basis or in response to monitoring/evaluation findings, certain elements of the human environment or certain measures with a view to improving the effectiveness of the RAP. 11.1. INTERNAL MONITORING OF RAP It consists of constantly ensuring that: - The actions included in the work programs of the PDVIR on the one hand, and of the contractual operators on the other hand, are carried out, and on time; - The costs of the measures are in line with the budgets. This monitoring is determined by the PDVIR work programs, by subcontractor contracts and by protocols entered into with third parties (local authorities, for example). These documents will define the monitoring objects and the quantitative, qualitative, temporal and budgetary indicators (performance indicators) used for this monitoring. This type of monitoring will be predominant in preparing for the movement of populations. Monitoring the implementation of the RAP is the responsibility of the PDVIR and more particularly the SMM, which will be accompanied by the EMM and the HME. In short, it must be rigorous and regular because of the significant social risk posed by PAP displacement operations. The internal monitoring activities of the RAP are presented in table 38. Table 38: Activities and responsibilities for internal RAP monitoring Activities Period Responsible Indicator Provision of funds to the Before the implementation of KCC Funds available payment commission the RAP Examination of the PAP During RAP implementation UTL/CCP Verification report identity verification report 88 Verification of payment file During RAP implementation UTL/CCP Verification report review report Payment of PAP During RAP implementation Payment Payment minutes signed by commission members of the Payment Commission Complaint management During the implementation of LCT, Complaints management report / the RAP and throughout the SMM/PDVIR, Payment execution of the Project RSE/PDVIR Review of final payment During RAP implementation UTL/CCP Verification report report 11.2. CONCURRENT AUDIT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION, MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF THE RAP The audit contributing to the implementation of the RAP will go through the milestones of implementation of the RAP which are: Milestone 1: Verify adequate identification of PAP or their beneficiaries. The activity will include verification of the PAP lists in relation to the resettlement impacts caused by the works (gap analysis; and conclusion on the situation of the PAPs); Milestone 2: Examine and rule on the PAP payment files which will be prepared by the Project. This involves verifying whether the amounts provided for compensation comply with the provisions of the RAP. Also, if these amounts are adjusted to the losses/impacts of PAP (land, structures, plants, others, as provided for in the RAP) observed on the ground. Indicate cases of compliance and non-compliance. Milestone 3: Rule on the payment of compensation to the PAPs (in cash or in kind) following the conclusions of the negotiations recorded in the minutes signed for this purpose. The CCP, member of the ad hoc committee and the compliance teams, participates in these payments. The method of payment is chosen by the PAP after consultation/negotiation between payment in cash and payment in kind. Negotiation minutes are concluded between the Mayor and the PAP. The procedure for evaluating and paying compensation is established and gives right to a classification decree after payment. Milestone 4: Rule on the compliance of the procedures, deadlines and quality of response of the GRM linked to the RAP in accordance with the provisions of the RAP. The Consultant will verify that the GRM of the RAP is operational, that the channels for receiving complaints provided for in the RAP are actually available and that information on those responsible for the GRM, response times and resolution of complaints are known by potential complainants. The consultant will also check compliance with response deadlines to complainants and the quality of responses. Milestone 5: Final evaluation of the RAP. This evaluation will include: 89 Verification of full payment of compensation for land, housing, and other assets to PAPs; Verification of the effectiveness of compensation and support for PAPs, particularly vulnerable people and women, in order to enable PAPs to replace affected assets; Verification of the effectiveness of compensation and support for economically displaced persons; Evaluation of the procedures implemented for compensation; Evaluate the level of satisfaction of the different categories of PAP with regard to the compensation modalities; Evaluation of the operation and results of the complaints procedures linked to the implementation of the RAP in order to verify whether the Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) is functioning correctly and whether grievances are handled effectively and in a timely manner to ensure that the objective of the RAP is achieved. The evaluation of possible corrective actions to be taken as part of the monitoring and evaluation of modifications to be made to the strategies and methods used for resettlement; Evaluation of the implementation of measures to prevent the risks of violence or GBV, in particular the denial of resources to women and vulnerable groups owed compensation. Table 39: Vulnerable PAP Number of vulnerable people to be List of PAPs Consultation of the Once during the RGS compensated RAP report Project Number of vulnerable people to be List of PAPs Consultation of the Once during the RGS supported in resettlement RAP report Project 11.3. INDICATORS FOR THE FINAL EVALUATION In order to determine to what extent the objectives are achieved, the following verifiable indicators will be used to measure the performance of the RAP: Table 40: Indicators for monitoring the implementation of the RAP Follow up Indicators Verification Data collection Measurement Responsible Source methods period/frequenc for y measuremen t 90 Number of PAPs identified by List of PAPs Consultation of the Once during the RGS category and having been RAP report project compensated (construction, bare property, crops, economically displaced persons, vulnerable people, number of vulnerable people, Number of PAPs receiving additional compensation for buildings; Number of PAP women by category (construction , bare Nombre séances d’information property, de crops, economically Awareness Awareness reports Semester RGS et people,des vulnerable sensibilisation displaced PAP au reports processus people) d’indemnisations Standard of living and types of Baseline Consultation of the Once during the RGS income of PAPs before situation baseline situation project compensation investigation investigation PAP report report Post- Standard of living of PAPs after Evaluation Consultation of the Annual RGS compensati compensation report on the evaluation report on implementation on the monitoring of the RAP implementation of Standard of living of PAPs one year Evaluation Consultation the RAP of the Annual RGS then two years after the work report on the evaluation report implementation on the of the RAP implementation of PAP having knowledge of Register of Consultation of the Monthly RGS the PAR MGP complaints GRM implementation report Number of complaints related to Register of Consultation of the Monthly RGS compensation recorded complaints GRM implementation Monitoring report of Number of complaints related to Register of Consultation of the Monthly RGS complaints compensation processed by complaints GRM related to category/type implementation RAP report Number of complaints filed by Register of Consultation of the Monthly RGS women or other vulnerable groups complaints GRM related to compensation recorded implementation report 91 Number of complaints filed by Register of Consultation of the Monthly RGS women or others complaints GRM implementation Vulnerable groups linked to closed Register of report Monthly compensation complaints Number of complaints closed by Register of Consultation of the Monthly RGS category/type complaints GRM implementation report Number of complaints referred to Register of Consultation of the Monthly RGS court. complaints GRM implementation report To this end, each PAP will have a file monitoring its compensation where the following will be recorded: • Initial situation; • All subsequent uses and improvements of property by the project; • The amount, nature or form of compensation agreed and received. Furthermore, the Project Owner will maintain a comprehensive database on each individual affected by the land requirements of the project including resettlement, compensation, impacts on land and other affected assets. PAPs who did not have identification documents were urged to produce one especially ID cards prior to compensation, for they shall not be compensated without an identification document. 11. COST AND BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES This section presents all the costs associated with the implementation of the Resettlement Action Plan. The scales set by Decree No. 2003/418/PM of February 25, 2003 setting the rates to be allocated to owners who are victims of destruction for public purposes of cultivated crops and trees were previously updated (from 2003 to 2023) on the basis of inflation rates at the national level. Details of these assessments are presented in the database that accompanies this report. Regarding constructions and other developments, they were estimated at their new reconstruction value (February 2024). The estimates take into account the compensation provided to compensate for the losses assessed. The total budget is presented in tables 40: Table 41: Total RAP implementation budget 92 Number of Amount of N° Assets affected PAP compensation (FCFA) 1 Land/bare ownership 36 19,655,200 2 Plants 67 9,257,010 3 Constructions 121 351,231,914 4 Economically displaced 60 27,421,760 5 Wells 47 6,600,000 6 Graves 03 1,500,000 7 Functioning of the commission 2,500,000 8 Miscellaneous 5% 20,783,294 GRAND TOTAL 438,949,178 It should be noted that the cost of moving the CAMWATER and ENEO networks is not included in the cost of the PAR. The destroyed network will be replaced by the company in charge of the work. This amount, calculated in constant currency of 2024, is devoted to: compensation for lost property. The overall budget for the implementation of the RAP in Kumba II amounts to 438,949,178CFA francs (four hundred and thirty eight million nine hundred and fourty nine thousands one hundred and seventy eight francs). 93 BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCE 1. Order N°050/A/MINEFOP OF FEBRUARY 28, 2011: Setting out specifications specifying the technical conditions and modalities for exercising the powers transferred by the State to the municipalities in terms of participation in the establishment, maintenance and administration of Professional Training centers 2. Decree No. 2014/3211/PM of September 29, 2014 setting the minimum prices applicable to transactions on land in the private domain of the State; 3. Decree No. 2003/418/PM of February 25, 2003 setting the rates of compensation to be allocated to owners for reasons of public utility of cultivated crops and trees; 4. Decision No 01/KCC/CM/SG/DAF/COSPM/2024 creating an ad hoc committee charged with the expropriation of properties in relation to the inclusive and resilient cities project in Fiango –Kumba II Sub Division in the Kumba municipality. 5. Decree No 2006/3023/of the PM OF 29 DECEMBER 2006 fixing modalities for administrative evaluation of buildings in fiscal matters 6. Order No. 0832/Y.15.1/MINHDU of November 20, 1987 establishing the bases for calculating the market value 7. World Bank, World Bank Environmental and Social Standards, Draft Review and Update, Framework Document, October 2012. 8. World Bank, Operational Policies 4.12, Involuntary Resettlement of People, December 2001. 9. World Bank, Operational Policies 4.01, Environmental Assessment, January 999 10. PDVIR methodological note: 11. PDVIR Environmental and Social Management Framework; 12. PDVIR Resettlement Policy Framework; 13. Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for people affected by the development work on certain structuring roads in the town of Kumba (municipality of Kumba II) 14. Detailed Preliminary Project (PDA) of local projects in the town of Kumba; 15. The environmental and social impact study of local projects in the city of Kumba; 16. Compensation decrees; 17. Municipal orders establishing commissions for the assessment and evaluation of property 18. Ministerial order No 00832/Y.15.1/MINHDU/D of 20th November 1987 fixing the bases for calculation of value of construction due to expropriation for public utility. 19. Communal Development Plan (CDP) for Kumba II subdivisional council 94 ANNEXES Annex 1: Constructions Evaluation for Kumba RAP Total Dimensions Impacted Replace Replac imp Labor ment ement Replace Total Constructi Tota acte Price force value in value ment compensati Code on type Description L W l d per m2 30% m2 in m2 value on Observations The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 18.5 54.5 146 19.3 144,194 43,258 187,452 0.7 2,532,479 13.22% property evaluated pillars and cement block walls iron gates and gill ,well finish but 2,532,479 KCO01 fence no painting The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 31.3 26.3 115.2 34.61 144,194 43,258 187,452 0.6 3,892,632 30.04% property evaluated pillars and cement block walls iron gates and gill ,well finish but 3,892,632 KCO02 fence on painting The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 26.1 38 128.2 28.91 94,194 28,258 122,452 0.4 832,675 832,675 22.55% property evaluated pillars and cement block walls iron gates and gill ,well finish but KCO03 fence on painting Concrete pillars cement Block walls part painted and plastered, 21 8.6 180.6 9.116 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.6 1,188,168 5.05% property evaluated zinc roof, ceiling, Floor , windows equipped with glass louvers 1,188,168 Residential and metal window projector , electrical and plubering work done KCO04 building etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars cement Block walls painted and plastered, zinc 18.26 8.9 162.5 54.78 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.5 5,949,965 33.71% property evaluated Residential roof, ceiling, Floor , wooden window and doors and , electrical 14 5,949,965 KCO05 building and plubering work done etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars cement Block walls painted and plastered, zinc 16.1 9.42 151.6 96.46 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.4 8,381,652 63.6% property evaluated Residential roof, ceiling, Floor , wooden window and doors and , electrical 62 8,381,652 KCO06 building and plubering work done etc(portion of the building) Residential 20.3 13.1 265.9 5.2 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.3 338,881 338,881 1.96% property evaluated KCO07 building A veranda,with 6 pillars and extension of the roof 3 Concrete pillars cement Block walls painted and plastered, zinc 19.7 12.1 238.3 23.83 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.4 2,071,257 10.00% property evaluated Residential roof, ceiling, Floor , wooden window and doors and , electrical 7 7 2,071,257 KCO08 building and plubering work done etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars cement Block walls painted and plastered, zinc 7.1 11.2 79.52 8.591 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.3 559,870 559,870 10.8% property evaluated Residential roof part damage, ceiling, Floor , wooden window and doors and , KCO09 building electrical and plubering work done etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars cement Block walls painted and plastered, zinc 11.1 11.2 124.3 35.52 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.3 2,314,817 28.57% property evaluated Residential roof part damage, ceiling, Floor , wooden window and doors and , 2 2,314,817 KCO10 building electrical and plubering work done etc(portion of the building) Residential veranda with 3 concrete pillars and zinc roof extension ,with a 15 12.7 190.5 6.35 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.5 689,709 689,709 3.33% property evaluated KCO11 building pave block floor The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 17.2 10 54.4 16.72 94,194 28,258 122,452 0.5 1,023,700 30.74% property evaluated KCO12 fence pillars and cement block walls plastered etc 1,023,700 Concrete pillars cement Block walls painted and plastered, zinc 16.6 9.3 154.3 4.14 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.3 269,801 269,801 2.68% property evaluated Residential roof, ceiling, Floor , wooden window and doors and , electrical 8 KCO13 building and plubering work done etc(portion of the building) 95 Total Dimensions Impacted Replace Replac imp Labor ment ement Replace Total Constructi Tota acte Price force value in value ment compensati Code on type Description L W l d per m2 30% m2 in m2 value on Observations The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 84 56 280 10.4 94,194 28,258 122,452 0.4 509,401 509,401 3.71% property evaluated KCO14 fence pillars and cement block walls plastered etc The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 37.9 27 129.8 29.33 144,194 43,258 187,452 0.4 2,199,189 22.60% property evaluated KCO15 fence pillars and cement block walls plastered etc 2,199,189 The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 35.6 27 125.2 7.09 94,194 28,258 122,452 0.5 434,093 434,093 5.66% property evaluated KCO16 fence pillars and cement block walls plastered etc Concrete pillars cement Block walls painted and plastered, zinc 3.4 2.5 8.5 4.182 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.5 454,231 454,231 49.2% property evaluated Residential roof, ceiling, Floor , wooden window and doors and , electrical KCO17 building and plubering work done etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars cement Block walls painted and plastered, zinc 6.2 4.7 29.14 7.626 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.5 828,303 828,303 26.17% property evaluated Residential roof, ceiling, Floor , wooden window and doors and , electrical KCO18 building and plubering work done etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars cement Block walls painted and plastered, zinc 33.2 5.2 172.6 4.472 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.6 582,875 582,875 2.59% property evaluated roof, ceiling, Floor , wooden window and doors and , electrical 4 KCO19 STORE and plubering work done etc(portion of the building) RESIDEN 37 11.3 418.1 376.2 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.3 24,516,725 89.98% property evaluated TIAL Concrete pillars cement Block walls painted and plastered, zinc 24,516,72 BUILDIN roof, ceiling, Floor , wooden window and doors and , electrical 5 KCO20 G and plubering work done etc(portion of the building) RESIDEN 12.6 10.5 132.3 12.65 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.5 1,846,466 9.56% property evaluated TIAL Concrete pillars cement Block walls painted and plastered, zinc 1,846,466 BUILDIN roof, ceiling, Floor , wooden window and iron doors and , KCO21 G electrical and plubering work done etc(portion of the building) Residential 15.9 13.1 208.2 23.85 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.5 2,590,483 11.45% property evaluated KCO22 building veranda with concrete pillars and zinc roof extension 9 2,590,483 Concrete pillars cement Block walls painted and plastered, zinc 3.4 3.2 10.88 10.88 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.8 1,890,781 100% property evaluated Residential roof, ceiling, Floor , wooden window and doors and , electrical 1,890,781 KCO23 building and plubering work done etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars cement Block walls painted and plastered, zinc 24.93 12.6 314.1 151.6 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.5 16,472,867 48.28% property evaluated Residential roof, ceiling, Floor , wooden window and doors and , electrical 18 62 16,472,86 KCO24 building and plubering work done etc(portion of the building) 7 Concrete pillars cement Block walls painted and plastered, zinc 16.9 7.1 119.9 0.91 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.4 79,072 79,072 0.76% property evaluated Residential roof, ceiling, Floor , wooden window and doors and , electrical 9 KCO25 building and plubering work done etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars cement Block walls painted and plastered, zinc 19.7 12.1 238.3 23.83 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.5 2,589,071 10.00% property evaluated Residential roof, ceiling, Floor , wooden window and doors and , electrical 7 7 2,589,071 KCO26 building and plubering work done etc(portion of the building) 20.5 11.3 231.6 136.5 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.5 14,826,036 58.93% property evaluated Concrete pillars cement Block walls ,erected to tie beam wall not 5 14,826,03 KCO27 HALL plastered.window protector are fixed 6 96 Total Dimensions Impacted Replace Replac imp Labor ment ement Replace Total Constructi Tota acte Price force value in value ment compensati Code on type Description L W l d per m2 30% m2 in m2 value on Observations The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 20.6 18.1 56.8 29.1 144,194 43,258 187,452 0.6 3,272,915 51.23% property evaluated pillars and cement block walls iron gates and gill ,well finish but 3,272,915 KCO28 FENCE no painting Residential Concrete pillars cement Block walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 15.6 15.5 241.8 20.28 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.6 2,643,270 8.39% property evaluated KCO29 building Floor , iron window, door and electrical work done etc 2,643,270 Residential The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 5.3 4.2 22.26 1.716 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.6 223,661 223,661 7.7% property evaluated KCO30 building pillars and cement block walls plastered etc The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 18.8 13.8 65.2 21.14 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.4 1,836,908 32.42% property evaluated KCO31 FENCE pillars and cement block walls finish but no painting 1,836,908 Concrete pillars cement Block walls painted and plastered, zinc 16.68 11 183.4 64.9 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.4 1,468,484 35.37% property evaluated Residential roof, ceiling, Floor , wooden window and doors and , electrical 8 1,468,484 KCO32 building and plubering work done etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars cement Block walls painted and plastered, zinc 29 3.7 107.3 11.6 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.4 1,007,953 10.81% property evaluated Residential roof, ceiling, Floor , iron windows and doors, electrical and 1,007,953 KCO33 building plumbering work done etc(portion of the building) The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 15.2 21 72.4 33 94,194 28,258 122,452 0.5 2,020,461 45.58% property evaluated KCO34 fence pillars and cement block walls plastered etc 2,020,461 Concrete pillars cement Block walls painted and plastered, zinc 19 15 285 247 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.4 21,462,452 86.67% property evaluated Residential roof, ceiling, Floor , wooden window and doors and , electrical 21,462,45 KCO35 building and plubering work done etc(portion of the building) 2 Residential 12.6 9.3 117.1 12.6 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.3 821,134 821,134 10.75% property evaluated KCO36 building A veranda,with 7 pillars and extension of the roof 8 Residential Concrete pillars cement Block walls painted and plastered, zinc 16 9 144 14.4 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.6 1,876,878 10.00% property evaluated KCO37 building roof, ceiling, Floor , iron window, door, electrical work done etc 1,876,878 Residential the building is made up of wood with a roof wooden door and 12.3 7.7 94.71 10.01 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.5 1,087,243 10.57% property evaluated KCO38 building window 1,087,243 wooden the building is made up of wood with a roof wooden door and 15 9 135 135 55,196 16,559 71,755 0.5 4,843,449 100% property evaluated KCO39 building window 4,843,449 The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 23 10.7 67.4 32 94,194 28,258 122,452 0.3 1,175,541 47.48% property evaluated KCO40 fence pillars and cement block walls plastered etc 1,175,541 Concrete pillars, cement Block, plastered walls, zinc roof, ceiling, 11.4 8 91.2 14 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.5 1,520,619 15.35% property evaluated Residential Floor, iron window and doors, electrical and plubering work done 1,520,619 KCO41 building etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 10.2 9.5 96.9 96.9 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.6 12,629,828 100% property evaluated Residential Floor , iron windows protectors and doors, electrical and plubering 12,629,82 KCO42 building work done etc(portion of the building) 8 Concrete pillars cement Block walls painted and plastered, zinc 13.75 12.2 167.7 48.4 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.8 8,411,196 28.85% property evaluated Residential roof, ceiling, Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical and 5 8,411,196 KCO43 building plubering work done etc(portion of the building) 97 Total Dimensions Impacted Replace Replac imp Labor ment ement Replace Total Constructi Tota acte Price force value in value ment compensati Code on type Description L W l d per m2 30% m2 in m2 value on Observations Concrete pillars cement Block walls painted and plastered, zinc 19.4 15.44 299.5 29.18 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.7 4,437,410 9.74% property evaluated Residential roof, ceiling, Floor , wooden windows and doors, electrical and 36 16 4,437,410 KCO44 building plubering work done etc(portion of the building) The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 19.3 13.7 66 21.64 94,194 28,258 122,452 0.4 1,059,946 32.79% property evaluated KCO45 fence pillars and cement block, walls finish but no plastering. 1,059,946 Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 14.47 14.15 204.7 27.34 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.7 4,158,635 13.36% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical and plubering work 505 83 4,158,635 KCO46 building done etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 10.6 10.45 110.7 38.58 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.7 5,867,157 34.83% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical and plubering work 7 4 5,867,157 KCO47 building done etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 10.6 6.3 66.78 38.58 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.7 5,867,157 57.78% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical and plubering work 4 5,867,157 KCO48 building done etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 2.85 2.25 6.412 6.412 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.4 557,198 557,198 100% property evaluated Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical and plubering work 5 5 KCO49 STORE done etc(portion of the building) The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 19.35 17.1 72.9 25.7 144,194 43,258 187,452 0.3 1,445,256 35.25% property evaluated KCO50 fence pillars and cement block, walls finish but no plastering. 1,445,256 Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 8.4 3.4 28.56 9.827 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.4 853,893 853,893 34.41% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical and plumbering KCO51 building work done etc(portion of the building) The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 39.5 26.89 132.7 25.7 94,194 28,258 122,452 0.3 944,106 944,106 19.36% property evaluated KCO52 fence pillars and cement block, walls finish with metallic grids 8 Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 17.9 10.85 194.2 31.68 161,551 48,465 210,016 0.4 2,661,579 16.31% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical and plumbering 15 3 2,661,579 KCO53 building work done etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 10.8 8.6 92.88 19.11 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.4 1,661,037 20.58% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical and plumbering 6 1,661,037 KCO54 building work done etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 6.3 3.37 21.23 11.35 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.5 1,233,537 53.49% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical and plumbering 1 69 1,233,537 KCO55 building work done etc(portion of the building) The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 27.3 22.5 99.6 14.57 144,194 43,258 187,452 0.5 1,365,589 14.63% property evaluated KCO56 fence pillars and cement block, walls finish with metallic grids 1,365,589 Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 10.9 7.7 83.93 30.72 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.6 4,004,398 36.61% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical and plumbering 3 4,004,398 KCO57 building work done etc (portion of the building) Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 3.15 2.25 7.087 7.087 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.6 923,776 923,776 100% property evaluated Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical and plumbering 5 5 KCO58 STORE work done etc (portion of the building) 98 Total Dimensions Impacted Replace Replac imp Labor ment ement Replace Total Constructi Tota acte Price force value in value ment compensati Code on type Description L W l d per m2 30% m2 in m2 value on Observations Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 18.7 13.5 252.4 20.7 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.5 2,248,344 8.20% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical and plumbering 5 2,248,344 KCO59 building work done etc (portion of the building), with basement The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 28.4 16.2 89.2 20.3 144,194 43,258 187,452 0.4 1,522,112 22.76% property evaluated pillars and cement block, walls finish with metallic grids . No 1,522,112 KCO60 fence plastering The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 26.4 18.67 90.14 22.67 144,194 43,258 187,452 0.6 2,549,725 25.15% property evaluated pillars and cement block, walls finish with metallic grids 2,549,725 KCO61 fence plastering and painting done The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 36.8 20 113.6 22.64 144,194 43,258 187,452 0.5 2,121,959 19.93% property evaluated KCO62 fence pillars and cement block, walls finish with metallic grids and gate. 2,121,959 The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 53 36.8 179.6 54.32 144,194 43,258 187,452 0.5 5,091,202 30.24% property evaluated pillars and cement block, walls finish with metallic grids and gate. 5,091,202 KCO63 fence Plastering done The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 53 36.8 179.6 54.32 94,194 28,258 122,452 0.5 3,325,802 30.24% property evaluated pillars and cement block, walls finish with metallic grids and gate. 3,325,802 KCO64 fence Plastering done Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 9 6.3 56.7 7.497 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.6 977,150 977,150 13.22% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical and plumbering KCO65 building work done etc (portion of the building), with basement The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 34 7.5 83 11.32 144,194 43,258 187,452 0.6 1,273,175 13.64% property evaluated pillars and cement block, walls finish with metallic grids and gate. 1,273,175 KCO66 fence Plastering done The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 57.7 30.18 175.7 35.2 144,194 43,258 187,452 0.2 1,319,663 20.03% property evaluated pillars and cement block, walls finish with metallic grids and gate. 6 1,319,663 KCO67 fence Plastering done Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 21.7 8.3 180.1 39.59 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.5 4,300,202 21.98% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical and plumbering 1 1 4,300,202 KCO68 building work done etc (portion of the building), with basement The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 43.6 17.5 122.2 27.5 94,194 28,258 122,452 0.3 1,010,231 22.50% property evaluated KCO69 fence pillars and cement block 1,010,231 Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 13.2 12 158.4 12.40 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.4 1,078,162 7.83% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical and plumbering 8 1,078,162 KCO70 building work done etc (portion of the building), with basement The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 17.15 17.5 34.65 0.94 94,194 28,258 122,452 0.3 34,532 34,532 2.71% property evaluated KCO71 fence pillars and cement block wooden the building is made up of wood with a roof wooden door and 11.15 3.2 35.68 4.736 55,196 16,559 71,755 0.3 101,949 101,949 13.27% property evaluated KCO72 building window Residential 11.15 9.5 105.9 13.3 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.4 1,155,671 12.56% property evaluated KCO73 building A veranda,with extension of the roof 25 1,155,671 99 Total Dimensions Impacted Replace Replac imp Labor ment ement Replace Total Constructi Tota acte Price force value in value ment compensati Code on type Description L W l d per m2 30% m2 in m2 value on Observations Residential 12.7 10 127 29.33 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.7 4,461,040 23.10% property evaluated KCO74 building A veranda,with extension of the roof 7 4,461,040 The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 18.3 17.12 70.84 22.61 144,194 43,258 187,452 0.5 2,119,147 31.92% property evaluated KCO75 fence pillars and cement block, walls finish 2,119,147 Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 13.7 12.2 167.1 75.21 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.7 11,437,032 45.00% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical, plumbering and 4 3 11,437,03 KCO76 building painting work done etc(portion of the building) 2 Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 15.5 7.6 117.8 10.56 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.4 917,933 917,933 8.97% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical, plumbering and 4 KCO77 building painting work done etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 19.15 5.25 100.5 15.32 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.2 665,597 665,597 15.24% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical, plumbering and 375 KCO78 building painting work done etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 14 8.4 117.6 22.26 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.4 1,934,227 18.93% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical, plumbering and 1,934,227 KCO79 building painting work done etc(portion of the building) The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 28.6 28.2 113.6 41.94 144,194 43,258 187,452 0.6 4,717,047 36.92% property evaluated KCO80 fence pillars and cement block, walls finish 4,717,047 The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 100 50 300 50 94,194 28,258 122,452 0.1 612,261 612,261 16.67% property evaluated KCO81 fence pillars and cement block, walls finish Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 20.5 12.4 254.2 7.38 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.5 801,583 801,583 2.90% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical, plumbering and KCO82 building painting work done etc(portion of the building) The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 27 24 102 28 94,194 28,258 122,452 0.3 1,028,598 27.45% property evaluated KCO83 fence pillars and cement block 1,028,598 The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 27 14 82 22 144,194 43,258 187,452 0.3 1,237,185 26.83% property evaluated KCO84 fence pillars and cement block, walls finish iron grid 1,237,185 The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,Concrete 27 20.5 95 29.5 144,194 43,258 187,452 0.7 3,870,888 31.05% property evaluated KCO85 fence pillars and cement block, walls finish iron grid 3,870,888 Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 15.8 10.6 167.4 41.39 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.4 3,597,003 24.72% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical, plumbering and 8 6 3,597,003 KCO86 building painting work done etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 11.3 9.5 107.3 27.55 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.3 1,795,417 25.66% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical, plumbering and 5 1,795,417 KCO87 building painting work done etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 20.4 3.7 75.48 44.88 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.5 4,874,670 59.46% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical, plumbering and 4,874,670 KCO88 building painting work done etc(portion of the building) The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,ten Concrete 25.5 19.2 89.4 29.5 144,194 43,258 187,452 0.4 2,211,936 33.00% property evaluated KCO89 fence pillars and cement block, walls finish with gate and iron grid 2,211,936 100 Total Dimensions Impacted Replace Replac imp Labor ment ement Replace Total Constructi Tota acte Price force value in value ment compensati Code on type Description L W l d per m2 30% m2 in m2 value on Observations Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 20.35 7.26 147.7 3.72 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.5 404,050 404,050 2.52% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical, plumbering and 41 KCO90 building painting work done etc(portion of the building) concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 1.4 3 4.2 4.2 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.8 729,897 729,897 100% property evaluated Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical, etc(portion of the KCO91 Grave building) The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,ten Concrete 27.6 25 105.2 31.88 144,194 43,258 187,452 0.4 2,390,390 30.30% property evaluated KCO92 fence pillars and cement block, walls finish with gate and iron grid 2,390,390 The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,ten Concrete 43.6 21.8 130.8 24.44 144,194 43,258 187,452 0.8 3,665,065 18.69% property evaluated KCO93 fence pillars and cement block, walls finish with gate and iron grid 3,665,065 The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,ten Concrete 43.6 32 151.2 34.64 144,194 43,258 187,452 0.8 5,194,675 22.91% property evaluated KCO94 fence pillars and cement block, walls finish with gate and iron grid 5,194,675 Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 10.9 4.9 53.41 12.93 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.7 1,967,073 24.22% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical, plumbering and 6 1,967,073 KCO95 building painting work done etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 5.6 4.2 23.52 14.78 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.6 1,926,929 62.86% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical, plumbering and 4 1,926,929 KCO96 building painting work done etc(portion of the building) The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,ten Concrete 25 18.8 87.6 22 144,194 43,258 187,452 0.8 3,299,159 25.11% property evaluated KCO97 fence pillars and cement block, walls finish with gate and iron grid 3,299,159 Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 18.7 7.1 132.7 19.66 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.3 1,281,686 14.81% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical, plumbering and 7 7 1,281,686 KCO98 building painting work done etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 15 8.3 124.5 16.8 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.3 1,094,846 13.49% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical, plumbering and 1,094,846 KCO99 building painting work done etc(portion of the building) Concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 8.7 8.3 72.21 38.54 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.5 4,186,156 53.37% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical, plumbering and 1 4,186,156 KCO100 building painting work done etc(portion of the building) The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,ten Concrete 4 0 8 4 94,194 28,258 122,452 0.5 244,904 244,904 50.00% property evaluated KCO101 fence pillars and cement block, walls finish with gate and iron grid STOREY 21 11 231 105 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.6 13,685,572 45.45% property evaluated BUILDIN concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 13,685,57 G (Ground Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical and tiled externally 2 KCO102 floor) etc(portion of the building) STOREY 21 11 231 105 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.6 13,685,572 45.45% property evaluated BUILDIN concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 13,685,57 G (Upper Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical and tiled externally 2 KCO103 floor) etc(portion of the building) 101 Total Dimensions Impacted Replace Replac imp Labor ment ement Replace Total Constructi Tota acte Price force value in value ment compensati Code on type Description L W l d per m2 30% m2 in m2 value on Observations concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 13.4 6 80.4 40.2 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.5 4,366,349 50.00% property evaluated Residential Floor , wooden windows and doors, electrical, etc(portion of the 4,366,349 KCO104 building building) concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 12.4 9.7 120.2 49.6 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.4 4,309,869 41.24% property evaluated Residential Floor , metallic windows and doors, electrical, etc(portion of the 8 4,309,869 KCO105 building building) concrete pillars, cement Block, walls plastered, zinc roof, ceiling, 11.2 7 78.4 15.34 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.6 1,999,918 19.57% property evaluated Residential Floor , wooden windows and doors, electrical, etc(portion of the 4 1,999,918 KCO106 building building) The foundation was made up of block of 15*20*40,ten Concrete 24.85 24.85 99.4 22.79 94,194 28,258 122,452 0.3 837,206 837,206 22.93% property evaluated KCO107 fence pillars and cement block, walls finish with gate and iron grid 1.3 1.3 1.69 1.69 150,696 30,000 180,696 0.6 183,226 183,226 19.57% property evaluated KCO108 Septic tank well dug and still in good state 1.2 1.2 1.44 1.44 150,696 30,000 180,696 0.5 130,101 130,101 19.57% property evaluated KCO109 Septic tank well dug and still in good state 1.3 1.3 1.69 1.69 150,696 30,000 180,696 0.4 122,150 122,150 19.57% property evaluated KCO110 Septic tank well dug and still in good state 2.1 0.9 1.89 1.89 150,696 30,000 180,696 0.4 136,606 136,606 19.57% property evaluated KCO111 Septic tank well dug and still in good state KCO112 wooden the building is made up of wood with a roof wooden door and 18 12 216 22.5 55,196 16,559 71,755 0.3 484,345 484,345 13.27% property evaluated building window KCO113 Residential Varanda affected with stone pillars 12 15 180 18 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.2 782,033 782,033 24.22% property evaluated building KCO114 Residential Varanda of house afffected with 5 steps rising to the floor level of 12 10 120 12.93 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.3 843,031 843,031 24.22% property evaluated building wooeden 6 KCO115 Residential Building with varanda affeted with iron bars holding the roofs that 15 10.5 157.5 13.5 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.3 879,787 879,787 24.22% property evaluated building ovrhangs the varanda KCO116 Residential Building with varanda affeted with iron bars holding the roofs that 18 10.5 189 22.5 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.2 977,541 977,541 24.22% property evaluated building ovrhangs the varanda KCO117 Tap Tap for public consuption with 3 head taps tilled with concrete 3 1.75 5.25 5.25 100,000 30,000 130,000 0.3 204,750 204,750 24.22% property evaluated pavement at the front KCO118 Residential house with mulitple steps leading into different sections of the 12 15 180 18 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.3 1,173,049 24.22% property evaluated building house with metallic doors and window protectors 1,173,049 KCO119 septic tank septic tank newly constructed and still in good shape 1.3 1.3 1.69 1.69 150,696 30,000 180,696 0.4 122,150 122,150 19.57% property evaluated KCO120 Fence newly constructed fence partially affected at the side protruding 15 2 30 10.5 94,194 28,258 122,452 0.3 385,724 385,724 22.93% property evaluated towards the road KCO121 Residential Varanda of building affected with varanda having 5 pillars with 15 8.5 127.5 12.75 167,101 50,130 217,231 0.7 1,938,789 1,938,789 24.22% property evaluated building steps at 2 sides of the builiding leading to the varanda 351,231,914 102 Annex 2: Bare Land Evaluation for Kumba RAP Surface price per area m2 replacement Preplacement Cost of Cost of Code Observation/Cas. Ref impacted according to value in m2 value transactions compensation (m2) decree KBL01 55 Belcon k129/13; owner 4,000 220,000 200,000 420,000 non available 2,000 Belcon k137/14; owner 4,000 148,000 200,000 348,000 KBL02 37 non available 2,000 Belcon k205/16; owner 4,000 40,000 200,000 240,000 KBL03 10 non available 2,000 KBL04 93.8 2,000 4,000 375,200 200,000 575,200 KBL05 34 2,000 4,000 136,000 200,000 336,000 KBL06 52 2,000 4,000 208,000 200,000 408,000 KBL07 84 2,000 4,000 336,000 200,000 536,000 KBL08 159.1 2,000 4,000 636,400 200,000 836,400 KBL09 175 2,000 4,000 700,000 200,000 900,000 KBL10 25 2,000 4,000 100,000 200,000 300,000 KBL11 247 2,000 4,000 988,000 200,000 1,188,000 KBL12 11 2,000 4,000 44,000 200,000 244,000 Belcon K164/81; owner 4,000 132,000 200,000 332,000 KBL13 33 non available 2,000 KBL14 253 2,000 4,000 1,012,000 200,000 1,212,000 KBL15 51 2,000 4,000 204,000 200,000 404,000 Belcon K64/11; owner 4,000 516,000 200,000 716,000 KBL16 129 non available 2,000 103 KBL17 29 2,000 4,000 116,000 200,000 316,000 Belcon K193/14; owner 4,000 192,000 200,000 392,000 KBL18 48 non available 2,000 KBL19 25 2,000 4,000 100,000 200,000 300,000 Belcon K35/87; owner 4,000 4,000 200,000 204,000 KBL20 1 non available 2,000 KBL21 19 2,000 4,000 76,000 200,000 276,000 KBL22 51 2,000 4,000 204,000 200,000 404,000 KBL23 8 2,000 4,000 32,000 200,000 232,000 KBL24 37 2,000 4,000 148,000 200,000 348,000 KBL25 5 2,000 4,000 20,000 200,000 220,000 KBL26 26 2,000 4,000 104,000 200,000 304,000 KBL27 64 2,000 4,000 256,000 200,000 456,000 KBL28 103 2,000 4,000 412,000 200,000 612,000 KBL29 47.1 2,000 4,000 188,400 200,000 388,400 KBL30 129 2,000 4,000 516,000 200,000 716,000 KBL31 119.2 2,000 4,000 476,800 200,000 676,800 KBL32 56 2,000 4,000 224,000 200,000 424,000 KBL33 93.9 2,000 4,000 375,600 200,000 575,600 KBL34 122.5 2,000 4,000 490,000 200,000 690,000 KBL35 176.4 2,000 4,000 705,600 200,000 905,600 KBL36 54.8 2,000 4,000 219,200 200,000 419,200 17,855,200 Surface price per area m2 replacement Preplacement Cost of Cost of Code Observation/Cas. Ref impacted according to value in m2 value transactions compensation (m2) decree KBL01 55 Belcon k129/13; owner 4,000 220,000 250,000 470,000 non available 2,000 104 Belcon k137/14; owner 4,000 148,000 250,000 398,000 KBL02 37 non available 2,000 Belcon k205/16; owner 4,000 40,000 250,000 290,000 KBL03 10 non available 2,000 KBL04 93.8 2,000 4,000 375,200 250,000 625,200 KBL05 34 2,000 4,000 136,000 250,000 386,000 KBL06 52 2,000 4,000 208,000 250,000 458,000 KBL07 84 2,000 4,000 336,000 250,000 586,000 KBL08 159.1 2,000 4,000 636,400 250,000 886,400 KBL09 175 2,000 4,000 700,000 250,000 950,000 KBL10 25 2,000 4,000 100,000 250,000 350,000 KBL11 247 2,000 4,000 988,000 250,000 1,238,000 KBL12 11 2,000 4,000 44,000 250,000 294,000 Belcon K164/81; owner 4,000 132,000 250,000 382,000 KBL13 33 non available 2,000 KBL14 253 2,000 4,000 1,012,000 250,000 1,262,000 KBL15 51 2,000 4,000 204,000 250,000 454,000 Belcon K64/11; owner 4,000 516,000 250,000 766,000 KBL16 129 non available 2,000 KBL17 29 2,000 4,000 116,000 250,000 366,000 Belcon K193/14; owner 4,000 192,000 250,000 442,000 KBL18 48 non available 2,000 KBL19 25 2,000 4,000 100,000 250,000 350,000 Belcon K35/87; owner 4,000 4,000 250,000 254,000 KBL20 1 non available 2,000 KBL21 19 2,000 4,000 76,000 250,000 326,000 KBL22 51 2,000 4,000 204,000 250,000 454,000 KBL23 8 2,000 4,000 32,000 250,000 282,000 KBL24 37 2,000 4,000 148,000 250,000 398,000 KBL25 5 2,000 4,000 20,000 250,000 270,000 KBL26 26 2,000 4,000 104,000 250,000 354,000 KBL27 64 2,000 4,000 256,000 250,000 506,000 KBL28 103 2,000 4,000 412,000 250,000 662,000 105 KBL29 47.1 2,000 4,000 188,400 250,000 438,400 KBL30 129 2,000 4,000 516,000 250,000 766,000 KBL31 119.2 2,000 4,000 476,800 250,000 726,800 KBL32 56 2,000 4,000 224,000 250,000 474,000 KBL33 93.9 2,000 4,000 375,600 250,000 625,600 KBL34 122.5 2,000 4,000 490,000 250,000 740,000 KBL35 176.4 2,000 4,000 705,600 250,000 955,600 KBL36 54.8 2,000 4,000 219,200 250,000 469,200 19,655,200 106 Annex 3: Plants Assessment for Kumba RAP Unit price Replacement Total Growth Code Speculation Quantity in 2003 value as of Total cost compensation to State (FCFA) 2023(FCFA) be paid coconut Mature 2 50,000 79,855 159,710 239,565 KPl01 kolanut Mature 1 50,000 79,855 79,855 Paw Paw Mature 1 3,000 4,791 4,791 164,501 KPl02 colanut Mature 1 50,000 79,855 79,855 coconut Mature 1 50,000 79,855 79,855 KPl03 coconut Mature 4 50,000 79,855 319,420 319,420 Paw Paw Mature 1 3,000 4,791 4,791 60,690 KPl04 lemon Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Pawpaw Mature 1 3,000 4,791 4,791 164,501 KPl05 Kolanut Mature 1 50,000 79,855 79,855 coconut Mature 1 50,000 79,855 79,855 KP106 Orange Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 55,899 KPl07 Grape Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 55,899 Cocoa Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 168,893 palm tree Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 KPl08 Sugar Cane Mature 2 375 599 1,198 Grape Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 KPl09 Pear Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 55,899 KPl10 Coconut Mature 1 50,000 79,855 79,855 79,855 plantain Mature 1 1,509 2,410 2,410 138,164 KPl11 Cocoa Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Coconut Mature 1 50,000 79,855 79,855 Cocoa Mature 2 35,000 55,899 111,797 199,638 KPl12 palm Mature 2 10,000 15,971 31,942 Plum Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 plum Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 137,408 orange Young 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 KPl13 cocoa Young 1 10,000 15,971 15,971 plantain Young 4 1,509 2,410 9,640 Mango Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 150,357 KPl14 Plantain Mature 4 6,036 9,640 38,560 Plum Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Plantain Mature 3 1,509 2,410 7,230 67,920 KPl15 Mango Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Pawpaw Mature 1 3,000 4,791 4,791 Plantain Mature 2 1,509 2,410 4,820 24,784 KPl16 Bitter Leaf Mature 5 1,000 1,597 7,986 Cocoyam Mature 5 1,500 2,396 11,978 KPl17 Pawpaw Mature 3 3,000 4,791 14,374 14,374 KPl18 Palm tree Young 1 10,060 16,067 16,067 16,067 Sugar Cane Mature 9 75 120 1,078 10,900 KPl19 Bitterleaf Mature 2 375 599 1,198 107 Unit price Replacement Total Growth Code Speculation Quantity in 2003 value as of Total cost compensation to State (FCFA) 2023(FCFA) be paid Paw Paw Mature 1 3,000 4,791 4,791 cassava Mature 12 200 319 3,833 KPl20 ornamental tree Mature 5 10,060 16,067 80,334 80,334 Pawpaw Mature 1 3,000 4,791 4,791 60,690 KPl21 Orange tree Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Cocoa Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 95,826 KPl22 Guava Mature 1 25,000 39,928 39,928 Mango tree Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 71,870 KPl23 Orange Young 1 10,000 15,971 15,971 Palm tree Mature 3 35,000 55,899 167,696 335,391 Mango Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 KPl24 35,000 55,899 55,899 Apple Tree Mature 1 Soursours Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Plantain Mature 1 1,509 2,410 2,410 82,265 Kpl25 Coconut tree Mature 1 50,000 79,855 79,855 KPL26 Coconut Mature 2 50,000 79,855 79,855 79,855 Coconut tree Mature 1 50,000 79,855 79,855 95,826 KPl27 Cocoa Mature 1 10,000 15,971 15,971 KPl28 coconut Mature 1 50,000 79,855 79,855 79,855 KPl29 Mango tree Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 55,899 KPl30 Plum Tree Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 55,899 KPl31 Pear tree Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 55,899 KPl32 Mango tree Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 55,899 Paw Mature 1 3,000 4,791 4,791 20,762 KPl33 Guava Young 1 10,000 15,971 15,971 Paw Paw Mature 1 3,000 4,791 4,791 79,855 Pear Young 1 10,000 15,971 15,971 KPl34 Bitter Leaf Young 2 1,000 1,597 3,194 Palm Tree Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Coconut Mature 1 50,000 79,855 79,855 151,725 KPl35 Grape Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Palm Tree Young 1 10,000 15,971 15,971 Pear Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 132,559 Paw Paw Mature 1 3,000 4,791 4,791 KPl36 Moringa Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Guava Young 1 10,000 15,971 15,971 plantain Young 5 1,000 1,597 7,986 135,849 KPl37 Pear Mature 2 35,000 55,899 111,797 Shade Tree Mature 1 10,060 16,067 16,067 Coconut Mature 2 50,000 79,855 159,710 257,133 Plantain Mature 2 1,500 2,396 4,791 KPl38 Paw Paw Mature 1 3,000 4,791 4,791 Cocoa Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 108 Unit price Replacement Total Growth Code Speculation Quantity in 2003 value as of Total cost compensation to State (FCFA) 2023(FCFA) be paid Palm Tree Young 1 10,000 15,971 15,971 Bitter Cola Young 1 10,000 15,971 15,971 Plum Mature 3 35,000 55,899 167,696 447,188 KPl39 Cocoa Mature 5 35,000 55,899 279,493 Coconut Mature 1 50,000 79,855 79,855 116,684 Paw Paw Mature 1 3,000 4,791 4,791 KPl40 Orange Young 1 10,000 15,971 15,971 Ornamental Tree Young 1 10,060 16,067 16,067 Cocoa Mature 10 35,210 56,234 449,871 960,943 KPl41 Coconut Mature 5 50,000 79,855 399,275 Palm Tree Mature 2 35,000 55,899 111,797 Orange Mature 3 35,000 55,899 167,696 247,551 KPl42 Coconut Mature 1 50,000 79,855 79,855 KPl43 Paw Paw Mature 1 3,000 4,791 4,791 4,791 KPl44 Paw Paw Mature 2 3,000 4,791 9,583 9,583 Paw Paw Mature 4 3,000 4,791 19,165 49,523 KPl45 Plantain Mature 12 1,509 2,410 28,920 SugarCane Mature 12 75 120 1,437 Coconut Mature 1 50,000 79,855 79,855 135,754 KPl46 Orange Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Plantain Mature 2 1,509 2,410 4,820 44,748 KPl47 Guava Mature 1 25,000 39,928 39,928 Guava Mature 1 25,000 39,928 39,928 151,725 KPl48 Orange Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Palm Tree Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Kolanut Mature 1 50,000 79,855 79,855 159,710 KPl49 Coconut tree Mature 1 50,000 79,855 79,855 Coconut tree Mature 1 50,000 79,855 79,855 148,530 KPl50 Plum Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Plantain Young 8 1,000 1,597 12,777 Coconut Mature 1 50,000 79,855 79,855 150,214 KPl51 Plum Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Plantain Mature 6 1,509 2,410 14,460 50,000 79,855 79,855 191,652 Coconut Mature KPl52 1 Cocoa Mature 2 35,000 55,899 111,797 Plantain Mature 1 1,509 2,410 2,410 4,007 KPl53 Plantain Young 1 1,000 1,597 1,597 Coconut Mature 1 50,000 79,855 79,855 135,754 KPl54 Medicinal Plant Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Plum Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 60,690 KPl55 Paw Paw Mature 1 3,000 4,791 4,791 Paw Paw Mature 2 3,000 4,791 9,583 257,133 KPl56 Grape Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Guava Mature 2 25,000 39,928 79,855 109 Unit price Replacement Total Growth Code Speculation Quantity in 2003 value as of Total cost compensation to State (FCFA) 2023(FCFA) be paid Cocoa Mature 2 35,000 55,899 111,797 Mango Mature 2 35,000 55,899 111,797 177,997 Plum Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Paw Paw Young 4 1,000 1,597 6,388 KPl57 Plantain Young 1,000 1,597 1,597 1 Sugar Cane Mature 75 120 719 6 Bitter leaf Mature 1 1,000 1,597 1,597 Orange Mature 2 35,000 55,899 111,797 116,588 KPl58 Plantain Young 3 1,000 1,597 4,791 Cocoa Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 335,487 Plum Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Guava Mature 1 25,000 39,928 39,928 KPl59 Orange Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Palm tree Mature 2 35,000 55,899 111,797 Medicinal Tree Young 1 10,060 16,067 16,067 CasiMango Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 167,791 Guava Mature 1 25,000 39,928 39,928 KPl60 Lemon Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Coconut Young 1 10,060 16,067 16,067 CasiMango Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 122,977 KPl61 Plantain Young 7 1,000 1,597 11,180 Plum Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 KPl62 Coconut Mature 1 50,000 79,855 79,855 79,855 Paw Paw Mature 2 3,000 4,791 9,583 49,510 KPl63 Guava Mature 1 25,000 39,928 39,928 Palm Tree Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 281,090 Cocoa Mature 2 35,000 55,899 111,797 KPl64 Soursours Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Orange Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Plantain Young 1 1,000 1,597 1,597 Mango Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 193,249 Cocoa Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 KPl65 Paw Paw Mature 4 3,000 4,791 19,165 Plum Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 Plantain Young 4 1,000 1,597 6,388 orange Mature 1 35,000 55,899 55,899 212,414 Cocoa Mature 2 35,000 55,899 111,797 KPl66 Guava tree Mature 1 25,000 39,928 39,928 Paw paw Mature 1 3,000 4,791 4,791 coconut Mature 1 50,000 79,855 79,855 119,783 KPl67 guava Mature 1 25,000 39,928 39,928 KPl68 Plantains Young 1,000 1,597 15,971 15,971 10 9,257,010 110 Annex 4: Economically Displaced for Kumba RAP PAP code Business type Tax regime Cost Months Amount KED01 Mini Restaurant Ticket 100 37,500 8 300,000 KED02 Mini Restaurant Ticket 100 37,500 8 300,000 KED03 mini provision store Ticket 100 37,500 8 300,000 KED04 Shop Ticket 100 37,500 8 300,000 KED05 Shop Category B 250,000 8 2,000,000 KED06 Road side Restaurant Ticket 100 37,500 8 300,000 KED07 Shop Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED08 Restaurant Ticket 100 37,500 8 300,000 Restaurant and off Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED09 licence KED10 washing point Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED11 Table Market Ticket 100 37,500 8 300,000 KED12 Shop Ticket 100 37,500 8 300,000 KED13 Mini Restaurant Ticket 100 37,500 8 300,000 KED14 Dresses Category A 45,792 8 366,336 Shoe Repair Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED15 Workshop KED16 shop Category B 250,000 8 2,000,000 KED17 Off licence Category B 250,000 8 2,000,000 KED18 Shop Category A 45,792 8 366,336 Mini Provision Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED19 Store KED20 Restaurant Ticket 100 37,500 8 300,000 Mini Provision Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED21 Store and off licence KED22 Garage Ticket 100 37,500 8 300,000 KED23 Shop Ticket 100 37,500 8 300,000 KED24 Off licence Category A 45,792 8 366,336 Mini Provision Ticket 100 37,500 8 300,000 KED25 Store KED26 Mini Restaurant Ticket 100 37,500 8 300,000 Mini Provision Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED27 Store KED28 Shop Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED29 Other Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED30 Hair Salon Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED31 Shop Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED32 Mini provision store Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED33 Mini provision store Category A 45,792 8 366,336 111 PAP code Business type Tax regime Cost Months Amount Building Material Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED34 store KED35 Provision Store Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED36 Provision Store Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED37 Provision Store Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED38 Inn/Hotel Category B 250,000 8 2,000,000 KED39 shop Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED40 general sales Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED41 shop Ticket 100 37,500 8 300,000 KED42 shop Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED43 shop Ticket 100 37,500 8 300,000 KED44 shpt Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED45 shop Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED46 mechanic garage Ticket 100 37,500 8 300,000 KED47 glass man Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED48 repair shop Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED49 cafetariat Ticket 100 37,500 8 300,000 KED50 Tailoring Workshop Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED51 electronics Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED52 petit restaurant Ticket 100 37,500 8 300,000 KED53 Tailoring Workshop Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED54 Mini Restaurant Ticket 100 37,500 8 300,000 KED55 Provision Store Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED56 Pharmacy Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED57 Bar Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED58 Provision Store Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED59 Petit Business Ticket 100 37,500 8 300,000 KED60 Provision store Category A 45,792 8 366,336 KED61 Fuel sales (zoa zoa) Ticket 100 37500 8 300,000 27,421,760 Annex 5: Well for Kumba RAP Compensation Code type of well Qty Cost cost KWe01 Traditional Well 1 140,000 140,000 KWe02 Traditional Well 1 140,000 140,000 KWe03 Traditional well 1 130,000 130,000 KWe04 Traditional well 1 130,000 130,000 KWe05 Traditional Well 1 130,000 130,000 KWe06 Traditional Well 1 140,000 140,000 KWe07 Traditional Well 1 140,000 140,000 112 Compensation Code type of well Qty Cost cost Kwe08 Traditional Well 1 140,000 140,000 KWe09 Semi modern well 1 150,000 150,000 KWe10 Traditional Well 1 130,000 130,000 KWe11 Traditional Well 1 150,000 150,000 KWe12 Traditional Well 1 160,000 160,000 KWe13 Traditional Well 1 130,000 130,000 KWe14 Traditional Well 1 130,000 130,000 KWe15 Traditional Well 1 130,000 130,000 KWe16 Traditional Well 1 130,000 130,000 KWe17 Traditional Well 1 140,000 140,000 KWe18 Traditional Well 1 130,000 130,000 KWe19 Modern well 1 200,000 200,000 KWe20 Traditional Well 1 130,000 130,000 KWe21 Traditional Well 1 130,000 130,000 KWe22 Traditional Well 1 140,000 140,000 KWe23 Traditional Well 1 130,000 130,000 KWe24 Traditional Well 1 160,000 160,000 KWe25 Traditional Well 1 120,000 120,000 KWe26 Traditional Well 1 160,000 160,000 KWe27 Traditional Well 1 160,000 160,000 KWe28 Traditional Well 1 130,000 130,000 KWe29 Traditional Well 1 140,000 140,000 KWe30 Traditional Well 1 130,000 130,000 KWe31 Traditional Well 1 130,000 130,000 KWe32 Traditional Well 1 140,000 140,000 KWe33 Traditional Well 1 130,000 130,000 KWe34 Traditional Well 1 140,000 140,000 KWe35 Traditional Well 1 140,000 140,000 KWe36 Traditional Well 1 100,000 100,000 KWe37 Traditional Well 1 100,000 100,000 KWe38 Traditional Well 1 100,000 100,000 KWe39 Traditional Well 1 130,000 130,000 KWe40 Traditional Well 1 130,000 130,000 KWe41 Traditional Well 1 160,000 160,000 KWe42 Traditional Well 1 100,000 100,000 KWe43 Traditional Well 1 130,000 130,000 KWe44 Traditional Well 1 130,000 130,000 KWe45 Traditional Well 1 140,000 140,000 KWe46 Traditional Well 1 140,000 140,000 KWe47 Traditional Well 1 130,000 130,000 KWe48 Traditional Well 1 100,000 100,000 KWe49 Traditional Well 1 130,000 130,000 6,600,000 Annex: Grave for Kumba RAP 113 Nature of grave Administrative cost Rites cost FCFA compensation Code FCFA cost FCFA KGr01 Earthen 250,000 250,000 500,000 KGr02 Tiled 250,000 250,000 500,000 KGr03 Earthen 250,000 250,000 500,000 Total 1,500,000 Annex 6: Consolidated table for Kumba RAP S/N PAP Constructions Plants Wells Economically Graves Land Total Code Dis 1 KCO01 2,532,479 280,000 2,812,479 2 KCO02 3,892,632 3,892,632 3 KCO03 832,675 130,000 962,675 4 KCO04 1,188,168 1,188,168 5 KCO05 5,949,965 5,949,965 6 KCO06 8,381,652 130,000 366,336 8,877,988 7 KCO07 338,881 338,881 8 KCO08 2,071,257 366,336 2,437,593 9 KCO09 2,874,687 300,000 3,174,687 10 KCO100 4,431,060 4,431,060 11 KCO102 27,371,144 27,371,144 12 KCO104 4,366,349 4,366,349 13 KCO105 4,309,869 4,309,869 14 KCO106 1,999,918 1,999,918 15 KCO108 183,226 183,226 16 KCO11 689,709 689,709 17 KCO110 122,150 122,150 18 KCO111 136,606 120,000 256,606 19 KCO112 484,345 366,336 850,681 20 KCO113 782,033 14,374 130,000 926,407 21 KCO114 843,031 843,031 22 KCO115 1,857,328 20,762 1,878,090 23 KCO118 1,173,049 1,173,049 24 KCO12 1,023,700 1,023,700 25 KCO120 385,724 366,336 752,060 26 KCO121 1,938,789 130,000 2,068,789 27 KCO13 673,851 673,851 28 KCO14 509,401 509,401 29 KCO15 2,199,189 2,199,189 30 KCO16 1,716,627 1,716,627 31 KCO19 582,875 582,875 32 KCO20 24,516,725 950,000 25,466,725 114 S/N PAP Constructions Plants Wells Economically Graves Land Total Code Dis 33 KCO21 1,846,466 1,846,466 34 KCO22 2,590,483 60,690 2,651,173 35 KCO23 1,890,781 119,783 150,000 2,160,564 36 KCO24 16,472,867 164,501 16,637,368 37 KCO25 2,668,143 55,899 366,336 3,090,378 38 KCO27 14,826,036 14,826,036 39 KCO28 9,215,345 150,000 9,365,345 40 KCO30 223,661 223,661 41 KCO31 1,836,908 1,836,908 42 KCO32 1,468,484 1,468,484 43 KCO33 1,007,953 1,007,953 44 KCO34 23,482,914 23,482,914 45 KCO36 821,134 821,134 46 KCO37 1,876,878 140,000 454,000 2,470,878 47 KCO38 1,087,243 1,087,243 48 KCO39 6,018,990 6,018,990 49 KCO41 1,520,619 1,520,619 50 KCO42 12,629,828 199,638 12,829,465 51 KCO43 8,411,196 247,551 8,658,746 52 KCO44 4,437,410 4,791 4,442,201 53 KCO45 1,059,946 454,000 1,513,946 54 KCO46 4,158,635 4,158,635 55 KCO47 6,424,355 9,583 366,336 6,800,274 56 KCO48 5,867,157 5,867,157 57 KCO50 2,299,149 2,299,149 58 KCO52 944,106 49,523 993,629 59 KCO53 2,661,579 2,661,579 60 KCO54 1,661,037 1,661,037 61 KCO55 3,436,332 130,000 3,566,332 62 KCO57 4,928,174 4,928,174 63 KCO59 2,378,445 44,748 366,336 2,789,529 64 KCO60 1,522,112 1,522,112 65 KCO61 2,549,725 159,710 270,000 2,979,435 66 KCO62 2,121,959 2,121,959 67 KCO63 5,091,202 5,091,202 68 KCO64 3,325,802 148,530 3,474,332 69 KCO65 2,250,325 2,250,325 70 KCO67 1,319,663 1,319,663 71 KCO68 4,300,202 240,000 4,540,202 72 KCO69 1,010,231 1,010,231 73 KCO70 1,112,694 1,112,694 74 KCO72 101,949 177,997 100,000 379,946 75 KCO73 1,497,027 177,278 250,000 1,924,305 76 KCO74 4,461,040 160,000 4,621,040 115 S/N PAP Constructions Plants Wells Economically Graves Land Total Code Dis 77 KCO75 13,556,180 13,556,180 78 KCO77 917,933 917,933 79 KCO78 665,597 67,920 366,336 326,000 1,425,853 80 KCO79 1,934,227 82,265 140,000 2,156,493 81 KCO80 4,717,047 150,214 4,867,261 82 KCO81 612,261 612,261 83 KCO82 1,830,182 1,830,182 84 KCO84 1,237,185 140,000 1,377,185 85 KCO85 3,870,888 3,870,888 86 KCO86 5,514,570 5,514,570 87 KCO88 4,874,670 2,000,000 294,000 7,168,670 88 KCO89 2,211,936 2,211,936 89 KCO91 3,120,288 500,000 3,620,288 90 KCO93 12,753,742 12,753,742 91 KCO98 2,376,532 2,376,532 92 KPl01 239,565 239,565 93 KPl02 164,501 164,501 94 KPl03 319,420 319,420 95 KPl07 55898.5 55,899 96 KPl08 168,893 955,600 1,124,493 97 KPl09 55898.5 55,899 98 KPl10 79,855 79,855 99 KPl11 138,164 138,164 100 KPl13 137,408 137,408 101 KPl14 150,357 150,357 102 KPl16 24,784 24,784 103 KPl18 16,067 16,067 104 KPl19 10,900 10,900 105 KPl20 80,334 80,334 106 KPl21 60,690 60,690 107 KPl22 95,826 130,000 225,826 108 KPl23 71,870 71,870 109 KPl24 335,391 335,391 110 KPL26 79,855 79,855 111 kPl27 95,826 95,826 112 Kpl28 79,855 79,855 113 kPl29 55,899 55,899 114 kPl30 55,899 55,899 115 kPl31 55,899 100,000 155,899 116 kPl32 55,899 55,899 117 kPl34 79,855 100,000 766,000 945,855 118 kPl35 151,725 151,725 119 kPl36 132,559 132,559 116 S/N PAP Constructions Plants Wells Economically Graves Land Total Code Dis 120 kPl37 135,849 135,849 121 kPl38 257,133 257,133 122 kPl39 447,188 447,188 123 kPl40 116,684 116,684 124 kPl41 960,943 960,943 125 kPl46 135,754 160,000 295,754 126 kPl48 151,725 130,000 281,725 127 kPl52 191,652 191,652 128 kPl53 4,007 4,007 129 kPl54 135,754 300,000 435,754 130 kPl56 257,133 257,133 131 kPl59 335,487 335,487 132 kPl60 167,791 167,791 133 kPl61 122,977 122,977 134 kPl62 79,855 79,855 135 kPl63 49,510 49,510 136 kPl64 281,090 281,090 137 kPl65 193,249 130,000 323,249 138 kPl66 212,414 212,414 139 KWe04 130,000 625,200 755,200 140 KWe05 270,000 270,000 141 KWe07 140,000 140,000 142 Kwe08 140,000 140,000 143 KWe10 130,000 130,000 144 KWe12 160,000 160,000 145 KWe13 130,000 130,000 146 KWe14 130,000 130,000 147 KWe16 130,000 130,000 148 KWe18 130,000 130,000 149 KWe19 200,000 200,000 150 KWe20 130,000 130,000 151 KWe21 130,000 130,000 152 KWe23 130,000 130,000 153 KWe27 300,000 300,000 154 KWe28 130,000 130,000 155 KWe29 140,000 140,000 156 KWe30 130,000 130,000 157 KWe32 140,000 140,000 158 KWe33 130,000 130,000 159 KWe34 140,000 140,000 160 KWe41 160,000 160,000 161 KWe42 100,000 100,000 162 KED01 300,000 300,000 163 KED02 300,000 300,000 117 S/N PAP Constructions Plants Wells Economically Graves Land Total Code Dis 164 KED03 300,000 300,000 165 KED04 300,000 300,000 166 KED05 2,000,000 2,000,000 167 KED06 300,000 300,000 168 KED08 300,000 300,000 169 KED09 366,336 366,336 170 KED10 366,336 366,336 171 KED11 300,000 300,000 172 KED12 300,000 300,000 173 KED13 300,000 300,000 174 KED14 366,336 366,336 175 KED15 366,336 366,336 176 KED16 2,000,000 2,000,000 177 KED19 366,336 366,336 178 KED21 366,336 366,336 179 KED22 300,000 300,000 180 KED23 300,000 300,000 181 KED24 366,336 366,336 182 KED25 300,000 300,000 183 KED26 300,000 300,000 184 KED27 366,336 366,336 185 KED28 366,336 366,336 186 KED29 366,336 366,336 187 KED30 732,672 732,672 188 KED31 366,336 366,336 189 KED32 366,336 366,336 190 KED34 366,336 366,336 191 KED35 366,336 366,336 192 KED38 2,000,000 2,000,000 193 KED39 366,336 366,336 194 KED41 300,000 300,000 195 KED44 366,336 366,336 196 KED45 366,336 366,336 197 KED46 300,000 300,000 198 KED47 366,336 366,336 199 KED49 300,000 300,000 200 KED50 366,336 366,336 201 KED52 300,000 300,000 202 KED53 366,336 366,336 203 KED54 300,000 300,000 204 KED55 366,336 366,336 205 KED56 366,336 366,336 206 KED57 366,336 366,336 207 KED58 15,970 366,336 382,306 118 S/N PAP Constructions Plants Wells Economically Graves Land Total Code Dis 208 KED59 300,000 300,000 209 KED60 366,336 366,336 210 KED61 300,000 300,000 211 KGr01 1,000,000 350,000 1,350,000 212 KBL01 470,000 470,000 213 KBL02 398,000 398,000 214 KBL03 290,000 290,000 215 KBL05 386,000 386,000 216 KBL06 458,000 458,000 217 KBL07 586,000 586,000 218 KBL08 886,400 886,400 219 KBL10 350,000 350,000 220 KBL11 1,238,000 1,238,000 221 KBL13 382,000 382,000 222 KBL14 1,262,000 1,262,000 223 KBL16 766,000 766,000 224 KBL17 366,000 366,000 225 KBL18 442,000 442,000 226 KBL20 254,000 254,000 227 KBL23 282,000 282,000 228 KBL24 398,000 398,000 229 KBL26 354,000 354,000 230 KBL27 506,000 506,000 231 KBL28 662,000 662,000 232 KBL29 438,400 438,400 233 KBL31 726,800 726,800 234 KBL32 474,000 474,000 235 KBL33 625,600 625,600 236 KBL34 740,000 740,000 237 KBL36 469,200 469,200 351,231,914 9,257,010 6,600,000 27,421,760 1,500,000 19,655,200 415,665,884 119 Annex 7: Bill of quantities and cost estimates for ordinary Standing 120 121 Annex 8: Bill of quantities and cost estimates for wooden structures 122 123 Annex 9: Bill of quantities and cost estimates for hard fence without metallic gates 124 Annex 10: Bill of quantities and cost estimates for hard fence with metallic gate 125 126 127 Annex 11: Bill of quantities and cost estimates for the construction of a septic tank and suckaway 128 Annex 12: Communique setting up Ad-hoc committee for the Kumba RAP 129 130 Annex 13: Photos of training of stakeholders in Douala for the Kumba RAP 131 Annex 14: Attendance sheet for stakeholders involved in the training for the Kumba RAP 132 133 134 Annex 15: Launching of RAP Kumba PDVIR Sub-project in Kumba 135 Annex 16: Attendance sheet for the launching of RAP Kumba PDVIR Sub-project in Kumba 136 137 138 139 140 Annex 17: Field work with Delegates after launching of the RAP Kumba project 141 Annex 18: Photos of socio-economic survey 142 Annex 19: Consultation Meeting With PAPs 143 144 145 146 Annex 20: Attendance sheet for consultation meeting with PAP 147 148 149 150 151 ] 152 Annex 21: Photos from Consultation meeting with PAPs for the Kumba II RAP 153