BHUTAN
COUNTRY ECONOMIC
MEMORANDUM
 Maximizing Bhutan’s Potential for Economic
 Diversification and Structural Transformation
Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                           © 2024 The World Bank

                           1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433

                           Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org



                           Some rights reserved

                           This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work
                           do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent.
                           The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denomina-
                           tions, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank
                           concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.



                           Rights and Permissions

                           The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because The World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this
                           work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given.



                           Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: “World Bank. 2024. XXX”



                           All queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The World
                           Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; e-mail: pubrights@worldbank.org.

                           Cover picture: © 2017 Sabine Hortebusch/Shutterstock. No use without permission.

                           Design: Alejandro Espinosa / sonideas.com
Bhutan
Country Economic
Memorandum
Maximizing Bhutan’s Potential for Economic
Diversification and Structural Transformation




Macroeconomics, Trade and Investment (MTI) Global Practice




                                                             SEPTEMBER 2024
    Contents
    Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                         Contents


                         Acknowledgements	 
                                          x


                         Abbreviations and Acronyms	                                                                               xi


                         Executive Summary	                                                                                         1



                             1.	 Hydropower Revenue Management for
                                 Economic Diversification	                                                                        22



                                     1.1.	Introduction	                                                                          23
                                     1.2.	 Bhutan’s hydro and non-hydro growth nexus 	                                          25
                                                                               by the publicly led and capital-intensive hydro
                                           1.2.1.	 Past growth has been driven 
                                                   sector	 25

                                                                                          with limited employment opportunities 	 28
                                           1.2.2.	 The private sector has remained small, 

                                                                                            and symptoms of the Dutch Disease 	 31
                                           1.2.3.	 Economy-wide effects of the hydro sector 


                                     1.3.	 Economic diversification in Bhutan: a framework for managing
                                           hydropower rents	                                                                     37
                                                            for investing domestically	
                                           1.3.1.	 The case                                                                     37

                                                                    for economic diversification in Bhutan	
                                           1.3.2.	 Current policies                                                             41

                                                                                      for effectively channeling hydropower
                                           1.3.3.	 A suitable institutional framework 
                                                   rents towards productivity enhancing assets in Bhutan.	                       45


                                     1.4.	 Policy priorities	                                                                   54
                                                                                      the current comparative advantage
                                           1.4.1.	 Hydropower development to leverage 
                                                   and ensure future hydro rents	                                                54

                                           1.4.2.	 Policies to lay the foundationfor (new) comparative advantages in the
                                                   non-hydropower sectors 	                                                      55

                                           1.4.3.	 Institutional setup to frameand implement sector-specific policies	          57



                             2.	 Structural Transformation Through
                                 Agricultural Productivity	                                                                       60


                                     2.1.	Introduction	                                                                          61
                                     2.2.	 Structural shifts in the agricultural sector	                                         61
                                           2.2.1.	 Agriculture continues to be Bhutan’s main employer,especially in rural areas	  61




D
                                                                                                                        Contents
                                                                                               Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                                                        behind other sectors and comparators	
            2.2.2.	 Agricultural value-added has fallen                                               63

                                                                is driven by the reduced
            2.2.3.	 The slow growth in agricultural value-added 
                    production of Bhutan’s traditional crops	                                          65

            2.2.4.	 The agricultural sector is gradually transitioningfrom traditional to higher
                    value products 	                                                                   67


      2.3.	 Productivity as a kick-starter of structural transformation	                              69
                                                                          more productive
            2.3.1.	 Within Bhutan there is a statistical relation between 
                    agriculture and the release of labor	                                              70

                                              in Bhutan is below its potential	
            2.3.2.	 Agricultural productivity                                                         71

                                                    by alleviating production constraints 	
            2.3.3.	 Productivity gaps can be closed                                                   72

                                              can accelerate structural transformation	
            2.3.4.	 Closing productivity gaps                                                         75


      2.4.	 Climate change may increase agricultural output but also lead to
            yield variability	                                                                        79
                                               to raise both temperatures and precipitation
            2.4.1.	 Climate change is expected 
                    levels	 79

                                                  are expected to alter Bhutan’s yield structure 	  81
            2.4.2.	 The impacts of climate change 

            2.4.3.	 Short-term climate-induced yield changes can temporarily increase output,
                    but risk distracting from longer-term diversification opportunities	               84


      2.5.	 Policy priorities 	                                                                       86
            2.5.1.	 Strategic infrastructureinvestments	                                              87

            2.5.2.	 Policy reforms	                                                                   88

                                     to farmers	
            2.5.3.	 Targeted support                                                                  89



  3.	 Bhutan’s Financial Sector: Issues and the
      Way Forward	                                                                                       91



      3.1.	Introduction	                                                                              92
      3.2.	 Concentration and credit allocation in the financial sector	                              93
      3.3.	 Financial sector challenges and recent measures	                                          97
      3.4.	 Policy priorities	                                                                       103
            3.4.1.	 Financial stabilityand governance of FIs	                                        103

                              financial intermediation	
            3.4.2.	 Deepening                                                                        105

                                limate finance	
            3.4.3.	 Bolstering c                                                                      106



Reference List	                                                                                        109


Annexes                                                                                                 112




                                                                                                                                    E
    Contents
    Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                         Figures
                         Figure 1: Impact of hydropower on GDP (percent), 1985-2021	                                                 2

                         Figure 2: Growth rates of hydropower and non-hydropower sectors (percent), 2001-2019	                       2

                         Figure 3: Hydro and non-hydro sector growth decomposition (contribution to growth), 2001-2019 	             4

                         Figure 4: Spillovers from hydro to non-hydro sector, 2001-2019	                                             4

                         Figure 5: Bilateral real exchange rate with India (Index average 1980-2021 = 1), real power exports
                         and real capital inflows from India, 1980-2021	                                                             4

                         Figure 6: Change in sectoral productivity and employment shares, 2013-2021	                                 4

                         Figure 7: Unemployment rate (percent), 2010-2022	                                                           6

                         Figure 8: Monthly migration, Paro International Airport, Jan 2015 – Mar 2023	                               6

                         Figure 9: Pathways for managing resource revenues	                                                          8

                         Figure 10: Agricultural productivity growth is key to facilitate a movement of labor into non-primary
                         sectors… 	                                                                                                  13

                         Figure 11: …Productivity growth in agriculture was significantly lower than for peer countries.	            13

                         Figure 12: Closing yield gaps by augmenting non-labor production inputs raises relative wages of
                         non-agricultural workers…	                                                                                  14

                         Figure 13: …which induces a shift of labor out of agriculture and accelerates structural transformation,
                         especially in the southern part. 	                                                                          14

                         Figure 14: Sectoral composition of credit 	                                                                 16

                         Figure 15: Credit composition by firm size 	                                                                16

                         Figure 16: Share of banks and non-banks in credit and assets (percent), 2012 and 2022	                      17

                         Figure 17: Gross NPL and credit growth (percent), 2012-2023	                                                17

                         Figure 18: Impact of hydropower on GDP in Bhutan (percent), 1985-2021	                                      23

                         Figure 19: Installed capacity, hydropower (MW), 1987-2029	                                                  24

                         Figure 20: Net capital inflows from India and power export revenues (percent of GDP), 1980-2021	            24

                         Figure 21: Growth decomposition, 2001-2019	                                                                 26

                         Figure 22: Labor contribution decomposition, 2001-2019	                                                     26

                         Figure 23: Hydro sector growth decomposition, 2001-2019 	                                                   26

                         Figure 24: Non-hydro sector growth decomposition, 2001-2019	                                                26

                         Figure 25: Hydro investments and TFP growth, 2000-2020	                                                     27

                         Figure 26: Bhutan vs. peers: contributions to growth 2001-2019	                                             27

                         Figure 27: Labor force participation rates by gender, 2013-2022	                                            28
                         Figure 28: Spillovers from hydro to non-hydro sector, 2001-2019	                                            28

                         Figure 29: Sector shares in GDP, constant 2000 prices, 1980-2021 	                                          29

                         Figure 30: Change in sectoral productivity and employment shares, 2013-2021	                                29

                         Figure 31: Establishment size and employment share, 2022	                                                   30

                         Figure 32: Type of employment, by sector (excluding agriculture), 2022	                                     30

                         Figure 33: Comparison between the distribution of expected labor demand and the current labor
                         force and inactive population (percent of total), by education, 2022	                                       30

                         Figure 34: Percent change in power exports and consumption (in constant 2000 prices), 1991-2019	            31




F
                                                                                                                               Contents
                                                                                                      Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Figure 35: Correlation of power exports with consumption and investment (annual data), 1991-2019	             31

Figure 36: BRER with India (Index average 1980-2021 = 1), real power exports and real net capital
inflows from India, 1980-2021	                                                                               32

Figure 37: Correlation of BRER with India with the sum of capital inflows and export revenues, 1986-
2021	 32

Figure 38: GDP growth by economic activity (Index, 1986=100), 1986-2021	                                     33

Figure 39: Hydro and non-hydro goods exports (in million Nu), 2001-2022	                                     33

Figure 40: Additional hydro revenues after 2019 in the reference scenario, 2020-2030	                        34

Figure 41: Dutch Disease-type effects (spending and resource movement), 2030	                                 37

Figure 42: Pathways for managing resource revenues	                                                          38

Figure 43: Bhutan (non-hydro) capital expenditure in international perspective	                              40

Figure 44: Public capital Spending versus quality of infrastructure	                                         40

Figure 45: The projected balance of BESF in percent of GDP, 2023-2040	                                       43
Figure 46: Institution types, objectives, and asset types	                                                   45

Figure 47: Mapping of potential sectors and activities on a complexity/returns matrix	                       52

Figure 48: Education expenditure and LAYS	                                                                   56

Figure 49: DEA Frontier analysis, health	                                                                    56

Figure 50: While agriculture’s contribution to GDP is low, the sector continues to act as the main
employer in Bhutan…	                                                                                         62

Figure 51: …and any decline in agricultural transformation has occurred exclusively through a
reallocation of labor from agricultural to non-agricultural areas.	                                          62

Figure 52: Structural transformation has centered around urban centers and select trading points
at the southern border, whereas more rural regions have witnessed an increase in agricultural labor
shares.	 63

Figure 53: Agricultural productivity growth is key to facilitating a movement of labor to non-primary
sectors…	 64
Figure 54: …but productivity growth in agriculture has lagged in other sectors within Bhutan…	               64

Figure 55: …and was significantly lower than for peer countries…	                                            64

Figure 56: …in stark contrast to productivity developments in the service and industrial sectors. 	          64

Figure 57: Paddy and maize dominate Bhutan’s harvested area. 	                                               65

Figure 58: Harvested area has declined across Bhutan… 	                                                      66

Figure 59:…driven by cereals (maize and paddy). 	                                                            66

Figure 60: Cereal yield changes were heterogeneous across Bhutan, with reductions focused in the
south of the country…	                                                                                       66

Figure 61: …which is also the area where most agricultural production is located. 	                          66

Figure 62: Declines in harvested areas and yields have led to a drop in agricultural output of
traditional crops… 	                                                                                         67

Figure 63: …whereas the number of fruit trees planted has increased due to a rise in areca nut
production.	 67

Figure 64: Bhutan has an export niche in fruits, spices, and a few vegetables…	                              67

Figure 65: …with fruit production dominated by areca nuts, followed by mandarins and bananas.	               68

Figure 66: Spice, fruit and nut exports to global markets have gradually replaced potato exports to
India… 	                                                                                                     68

Figure 67: …allowing Bhutan to capture market shares in select niche products. 	                             68




                                                                                                                                           G
    Contents
    Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                         Figure 68: Over time export intensity of export-oriented products has increased…	                         69

                         Figure 69: …whereas Bhutan increasingly relies on imports for products for which it is at a
                         comparative disadvantage. 	                                                                               69

                         Figure 70: Regions that experienced higher cereal yield growth increase their own agricultural labor
                         share…	 70

                         Figure 71: … while decreasing their share of national employment	                                         70

                         Figure 72: The dzongkhags with the largest drop in harvested area had the largest increases in the
                         number of fruit trees…	                                                                                   71

                         Figure 73: …and the largest decline in agricultural labor share. 	                                        71

                         Figure 74: Current yields are significantly below their potential	                                        72

                         Figure 75: Yield increase potentials vary significantly by crop and region	                               72

                         Figure 76: Irrigation problems, labor shortages, and crop damage are among the main constraints
                         reported by farmers. 	                                                                                    73
                         Figure 77: Ensuring access to water, overcoming labor shortage through productivity, and protecting
                         crops from damage can trigger substantial yield increases. 	                                              74

                         Figure 78: Bhutan’s ranking in trade logistics has decreased in recent years…	                            75

                         Figure 79: …owing to a decrease in infrastructure, international shipments and timeliness ratings, and
                         only a modest improvement in other areas. 	                                                               75

                         Figure 80: Bhutan is ranked 170th among 208 countries in terms of its agricultural land area…	            76

                         Figure 81: …but 68th when the low population density is considered. 	                                     76

                         Figure 82: Production structure for labor saving productivity improvements	                               77

                         Figure 83: Closing 20 percent of the existing yield gaps by augmenting non-labor production inputs…	  78

                         Figure 84: …raises relative wages of non-agricultural workers…	                                           78

                         Figure 85:…and induces a shift of labor out of agriculture…	                                              78

                         Figure 86: …which accelerates structural transformation, especially in the southern part. 	               78

                         Figure 87: Higher agricultural productivity reduces crop prices…	                                         79
                         Figure 88:…which generates an income effect that augments the direct impact of productivity
                         increases and leads to spillovers to the service sector. 	                                                79

                         Figure 89: Minimum temperatures have increased significantly across Bhutan over the last three
                         decades…	 80

                         Figure 90: …and rainfall has become more variable and extreme in the southern parts of the country. 	  80

                         Figure 91: Going forward, minimum temperatures are expected to continue to increase…	                     81

                         Figure 92: …and rainfall variability will increase with climate change severity.	                         81

                         Figure 93: Yields for rainfed maize are projected to increase going forward, but that increase will be
                         temporary if more severe climate change materializes.	                                                    82

                         Figure 94: Irrigation of vegetables, such as carrots, is key to turning climate change into an
                         opportunity. 	                                                                                            82

                         Figure 95: More severe climate change is expected to temporarily benefit maize and rice yields
                         under rainfed conditions, but cause a deterioration in the longerrun…	                                    83

                         Figure 96: …whereas yields under irrigated conditions are expected to systematically benefit from
                         more severe climate change. 	                                                                             83

                         Figure 97: A short-term climate-induced increase in maize and cereal yields…	                             85

                         Figure 98: …induces a modest production shift towards these crops. 	                                      85

                         Figure 99: Lower maize and cereal prices are partially offset by higher prices of crops whose yields
                         decrease, thus leaving wages almost unaffected…	                                                          86




H
                                                                                                                      Contents
                                                                                             Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Figure 100:…and generating practically no spillovers to the non-agricultural sector. 	               86

Figure 101: Overview of the financial sector in Bhutan	                                              92

Figure 102: Banking sector asset size (Nu. Billion), 2015 and 2021	                                  94

Figure 103: Banking sector deposits (Nu. Billion), 2015 and 2021	                                    94

Figure 104: Share of banks and non-banks in financial sector assets, 2022	                           94

Figure 105: Share of banks and non-banks in assets and credit, 2012 and 2022	                        95

Figure 106: Share of state-owned commercial banks assets to total banking system assets, 2017-2019	  95

Figure 107: Distribution of firms and credit as per economic sectors	                                96

Figure 108: Distribution of firms by size (percent), 2018 and 2022	                                  96

Figure 109: Credit composition by firm size (percent of total), 2017, 2019, and 2022	                96

Figure 110: Government Bond issuance, Sep 2020-Jun 2023	                                             97

Figure 111: Gross NPL and credit growth (percent), 2012-2023	                                        98

Figure 112: Sectoral composition of NPLs, 2017, 2019, and 2022	                                      98

Figure 113: Gross NPL, banks and non-banks (percent), 2015-2022	                                     98

Figure 114: Net interest margin (percent), 2015-2021	                                                100

Figure 115: Return on assets of banks (percent), 2015-2022	                                          100

Figure 116: Capital adequacy ratio of banks (percent), 2015-2022	                                    100

Figure 117: Access to finance (per 10,000 adults), 2017 and 2021	                                    101

Figure 119: Impact of the BIG on household income by source, 2030	                                   115

Figure 118: Value and composition of government transfers to households including BIG, 2019-2030	    115




Tables
Table 1: Economic development in different scenarios, 2030	                                           9

Table 2: Policy objectives and priority reform options	                                              20

Table 3: Economic development in different scenarios, 2030	                                          36

Table 4: Factors to consider for the resource revenue management framework	                          39

Table 5: Evolution of Economic Zones 	                                                               50

Table 6: The four do’s and four don’ts of SEZs	                                                      51

Table 6: Share of ownership (equities and bonds), 2021	                                              97

Tabla 7: Economic development in different scenarios, 2030	                                          116




                                                                                                                                  I
    Acknowledgements
    Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                         Acknowledgements


                         This report is a product of the Macroeconomics, Trade and Investment (MTI) Global Practice. The prepa-
                         ration was led by Melanie Trost, Rangeet Ghosh, and Florian Blum, Senior Economists in the MTI Global
                         Practice, with a core team comprising

                         Melanie Trost (author); Rishabh Sinha, Economist at the Development Economics Vice Presidency;
                         Lindsay Shutes, Arndt Feuerbacher, Scott McDonald, Tony Addison, Amir Lebdioui, Pavel Bilek. Tan Sri
                         Azman Mokhtar, Federico Ganz, and Zi Cheng Kok — Consultants in the MTI Global Practice (Chapter 1:
                         Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification).

                         Florian Blum, Senior Economist in the MTI Global Practice (author); Felipe Dizon, Senior Economist
                         in the Agriculture and Food Global Practice; Christine Heumesser, Senior Agriculture Economist in
                         the Agriculture and Food Global Practice; Saad Imtiaz, Consultant in the Agriculture and Food Global
                         Practice; Federico Ganz, Lindsay Shutes, Arndt Feuerbacher, and Scott McDonald – Consultants in the
                         MTI Global Practice; Jorge Alvar Beltrán, Riccardo Soldan, and Gianluca Franceschini from the Office of
                         Climate Change, Biodiversity and Environment of the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United
                         Nations (Chapter 2: Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity).

                         Venkat Sreedhara, Financial Sector Specialist in the Finance, Competitiveness & Innovation (FCI) Global
                         Practice, and Rangeet Ghosh (authors); Dubthob Wangchug, Consultant in the FCI Global Practice
                         (Chapter 3: Bhutan’s Financial Sector: Issues and the Way Forward).

                         The report was prepared under the oversight of Hoon Soh, South Asia Region Practice Manager for
                         MTI and Public Sector, and Mathew Verghis, South Asia Regional Director in the Equitable Growth,
                         Finance and Institutions (EFI) Vice Presidency of the World Bank, in close collaboration with Abdoulaye
                         Seck, World Bank Country Director for Bangladesh and Bhutan; Adama Coulibaly, World Bank Resident
                         Representative for Bhutan; and Souleymane Coulibaly, Lead Country Economist and Program Leader
                         in the EFI Vice Presidency.

                         The team is grateful for the useful comments and suggestions on earlier drafts provided by Jumana
                         Alaref, Senior Economist at the Social Protection & Labor Global Practice; Amer Ahmed, Lead Economist
                         and Program Manager in the Human Development Vice Presidency; Michel Mallberg, Senior Public
                         Sector Specialist, MTI and Public Sector; Fanny Missfeldt-Ringius, Lead Energy Specialist in the Energy
                         & Extractives (EEX) Global Practice; Dzenan Malovic, Senior Energy Specialist in the EEX Global Practice;
                         Joachim Vandercasteelen, Economist in the Agriculture and Food Global Practice; Alexander Pankov,
                         Lead Financial Sector Specialist in the FCI Global Practice; and Sadia Afrin, Financial Sector Specialist
                         in the FCI Global Practice.

                         Zi Cheng Kok, Consultant in the MTI Global Practice, provided support to the overall report. Tshering
                         Yangki, ET Consultant in the Bhutan Country Unit, and Dorji Drakpa, Team Assistant in the Bhutan Country
                         Unit, provided valuable administrative support.

                         The peer reviewers are Marek Hanusch, Lead Economist and Program Leader in the MTI Global Practice,
                         and Emilija Timmis, Senior Economist in the MTI Global Practice.




x
                                                                                               Abbreviations and Acronyms
                                                                                       Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Abbreviations and Acronyms


AED	     Agriculture Engineering Division       CSI	     Cottage and Small Industry

ATM	     Automated Teller Machine               DD	      Dutch Disease

B2B	     Business to Business                   DEA	     Data Envelopment Analysis

BAU	     Business-As-Usual                      DGPC	    Druk Green Power Corporation

BCC	     Bhutan Care Credit                     DHI	     Druk Holding and Investments

BDB	     Bhutan Development Bank                ECB	     External Commercial Borrowing

BESF	    Bhutan Economic Stabilization Fund     EEC	     Eastern Economic Corridor

BIG	     Basic Income Grant                     EPZ	     Export Processing Zone

BIL	     Bhutan Insurance Limited               ESG	     Environmental, Social, and Governance

BLFS	    Bhutan Labour Force Survey             ESSF	    Economic and Social Stability Fund

BNB	     Bhutan National Bank                   EVI	     Environmental Vulnerability Index

BoB	     Bank of Bhutan                         EWI	     Early Warning Indicator

BRER	    Bilateral Real Exchange Rate           FAO	     Food and Agriculture Organiza-
                                                         tion of the United Nations
BTN	     Bhutanese Ngultrum
                                                FDI	     Foreign Direct Investment
C4CS	    Committee 4 Coordinating Secretaries
                                                FI	      Financial Institution
CAD	     Current Account Deficit
                                                FINAP	   Financial Inclusion National Action Plan
CAR	     Capital Adequacy Ratio
                                                FYP	     Five-Year Plan
CBDC	    Central Bank Digital Currency
                                                G2C	     Government to Citizens
CCDL	    Dungsam Cement Company Limited
                                                GDP	     Gross Domestic Product
CCDR	    Country Climate and Devel-
         opment Report                          GHG	     Greenhouse Gas

CDCL	    Construction Development               GLC	     Government-Linked Company
         Corporation Limited                    GLOF	    Glacial Lake Outburst Flood
CDP	     United Nations Committee               GNH	     Gross National Happiness
         for Development Policy
                                                GNHC	    Gross National Happiness Commission
CEM	     Country Economic Memorandum
                                                GNI	     Gross National Income
CGE	     Computable General Equilibrium
                                                GoI	     Government of India
CGRR	    Corporate Governance
                                                GRI	     Global Reporting Initiative
         Rules and Regulations
                                                HAI	     Human Assets Index
CIAT	    International Center for Trop-
         ical Agriculture                       HS	      Harmonized Classification

CIB	     Credit Information Bureau              ICAAP	   Internal Capital Adequacy
                                                         Assessment Process
CIT	     Corporate Income Tax
                                                ICMA	    International Capital Market Association
CMIP5	   Coupled Model Inter-com-
         parison Project Phase 5                IEU	     Investment Evaluation Unit




                                                                                                                            xi
      Abbreviations and Acronyms
      Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                           IFPRI	      International Food Policy              OCASC	 Office of the Cabinet Affairs
                                       Research Institute                            and Strategic Coordination

                           IFRS9	      International Financial Report-        ODA	     Official Development Assistance
                                       ing Standard-9                         P2P	     Peer to Peer
                           ILAAP	      Internal Liquidity Adequacy            PCA	     Prompt Corrective Action
                                       Assessment Process
                                                                              PER	     Public Expenditure Review
                           IMF	        International Monetary Fund
                                                                              PES	     Payment for Ecosystem Services
                           INR	        Indian Rupee
                                                                              PHC	     Population and Housing Census
                           IPCC	       Intergovernmental Panel
                                                                              PIM	     Public Investment Management
                                       on Climate Change
                                                                              PPP	     Public-Private Partnership
                           IPO	        Initial Public Offering
                                                                              PRF	     Pension Reserve Fund
                           IT	         Information Technology
                                                                              PSL	     Priority Sector Lending
                           JV	         Joint Venture
                                                                              R&D	     Research and Development
                           KPI	        Key Performance Indicator
                                                                              RGoB	    Royal Government of Bhutan
                           KRI	        Key Risk Indicator
                                                                              RICB	    Royal Insurance Corporation of Bhutan
                           KWAN	       Kumpulan Wang Amanah Negara
                                                                              RMA	     Royal Monetary Authority
                           LAYS	       Learning Adjusted Years of Schooling
                                                                              RNR	     Renewable Natural Resources
                           LDC	        Least Developed Country
                                                                              RoA	     Return on Assets
                           LLC	        Limited Liability Company
                                                                              RSEB	    Royal Stock Exchange of Bhutan
                           LPI	        Logistics Performance Index
                                                                              RTGS	    Real-Time Gross Settlements
                           MFI	        Microfinance Institutions
                                                                              SAM	     Social Accounting Matrix
                           MoAF	       Ministry of Agriculture and Forests
                                                                              SAR	     South Asia Region
                           MoESD	 Ministry of Education and
                                  Skills Development                          SDF	     Sovereign Development Fund

                           MoICE	      Ministry of Industry Commerce          SEZ	     Special Economic Zone
                                       and Employment                         SME 	    Small and Medium Enterprise
                           MSME	       Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprise    SOE	     State-Owned Enterprise
                           MYR	        Malaysian Ringgit                      SOFI	    State-Owned Financial Institution
                           NAS	        Statistical National Accounts          SWF	     Sovereign Wealth Fund
                           NBFI	       Non-Banking Financial Institution      TFP	     Total Factor Productivity
                           NCGS	       National Credit Guarantee Scheme       TVET	    Technical and Vocational
                           NCSI	       National CSI Development Bank                   Education and Training

                           NDB	        National Development Bank              UAE	     United Arab Emirates

                           NGFS	       Network for Greening the               UN	      United Nations
                                       Financial System                       UNCTAD	 United Nations Conference on
                           NPL	        Non-Performing Loan                            Trade and Development

                           NPPF	       National Pension and Provident Fund    WB	      World Bank

                           NRF	        National Resilience Fund               WDI	     World Development Indicators

                           NSB	        National Statistics Bureau




xii
                                        Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                            Executive
                            Summary
© Ipek Morel/Shutterstock




                                                                             1
    Executive Summary
    Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                Bhutan has made significant strides in diminishing poverty and advancing human development,
                supported by strong economic growth and its unique development approach.

                Bhutan’s economy is intricately linked to its geography, mountainous landscape, and its special relationship with
                India. Situated deep in the eastern Himalayas, Bhutan is a small landlocked country that shares borders with India to the
                south, east, and west, and with China to the north. Bhutan has capitalized on its mountainous topography and abundant
                water resources to develop and export hydroelectric power, a sector that has grown since the mid-1980s with signifi-
                cant support from the Government of India (GoI). Despite these advantages, Bhutan contends with high transportation
                and trade costs that hinder access to international markets. The challenges of providing infrastructure and services are
                amplified by its small population of around 800,000 and the difficulty in achieving economies of scale.

                The country’s pursuit of Gross National Happiness (GNH) reflects a unique development strategy that prioritizes the
                well-being of its citizens and the environment. This philosophy underpins a commitment to sustainable and equitable
                socioeconomic growth. Bhutan’s environmental stewardship and sustainable development initiatives have earned it
                recognition as a leader in climate change. With nearly half of its territory under protection to safeguard its rich biodiversity
                and forest cover exceeding 70 percent, Bhutan stands out as one of the few nations with a negative carbon footprint.

                Over the past two decades, the country has experienced high real GDP growth, averaging 7 percent from 2001 to
                2019, supported by the hydropower sector. Hydropower plays a significant role in the economy, contributing for more
                than a third of goods exports and domestic revenues, and constituting 16 percent of GDP in 2021.1 Since the inauguration
                of the first large hydropower project in 1987 (Chhukha), Bhutan’s installed hydropower capacity has increased seven-
                fold, reaching 2,326 MW. The Tala and Mangdechhu projects, commissioned in 2007 and 2019 respectively, are among
                the largest projects (Figure 20). Notably, periods of high GDP growth have coincided with the commissioning of major
                hydropower projects (Figure 1). However, the growth in the hydro sector was considerably higher from 2001 to 2008, at
                21.6 percent, compared to a mere 0.4 percent between 2009 and 2019. (Figure 2).



                Figure 1: Impact of hydropower on GDP                                                                                                           Figure 2: Growth rates of hydropower and
                (percent), 1985-2021                                                                                                                            non-hydropower sectors (percent), 2001-2019
                     35                                                                                                                                           25.0
                                                  Chhukha (1987)
                     30
                                                                                          Tala (2007)                                                                                                          21.6%
                     25
                                                                                                                                                                  20.0
                     20
                                                                                                                         Mangdechhu (2019)
                      15

                      10                                                                                                                                          15.0

                      5

                      0                                                                                                                                                           9.3%
                                                                                                                                                                  10.0
                                                                                                                                                                                                        8.6%
                      -5
                                                                                                                                                                          7.0%           6.9%                          6.5%                       7.2%
                     -10                                                                                                                                                                                                            5.8%
                                                                                                                                                                   5.0
                     -15

                     -20
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           0.4%
                           1985
                                  1987
                                         1989
                                                1991
                                                       1993
                                                              1995
                                                                     1997
                                                                            1999
                                                                                   2001
                                                                                          2003
                                                                                                 2005
                                                                                                        2007
                                                                                                               2009
                                                                                                                      2011
                                                                                                                             2013
                                                                                                                                    2015
                                                                                                                                           2017
                                                                                                                                                  2019
                                                                                                                                                         2021




                                                                                                                                                                   0.0
                                                                                                                                                                                 2001-19                   2001-08                        2009-19
                                     GDP growth                               GDP growth, excluding electricity and water
                                                                                                                                                                                         Total growth          Hydro          Non-hydro

                Source: National Statistics Bureau.                                                                                                             Source: Penn World Table, World Bank staff calculations.




                1	         This excludes the construction sector, which is partly hydropower construction. The agriculture sector accounts for 19 percent of GDP, the industry sector (including hydro) for 34
                           percent, and the service sector for 47 percent of GDP in 2021. Measures in current prices.




2
                                                                                                                                                                            Executive Summary
                                                                                                                                                       Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Bhutan has achieved impressive gains in economic growth and reducing poverty over the past two decades. From
1980 to 2021, GDP per capita expanded at a relatively high rate of 6.3 percent annually. By 2021, Bhutan’s GNI per
capita reached US$3,040, bringing the country close to the World Bank’s threshold for upper-middle-income status.
Extreme poverty based on $2.15/day was eliminated by 2022, and the population living below the $6.85/day, poverty
line for upper-middle-income countries, decreased from 39.5 percent to 8.5 percent between 2017 and 2022, despite
the challenges posted by the COVID-19 pandemic, although Bhutan had one of the lowest infection rates in the South
Asia Region (SAR).2 The Gini index, which measures income inequality, declined from 37 in 2017 to 28 in 2022. Despite
these achivements, Bhutan still faces significant challenges related to vulnerability to poverty and spatial inequality.

The country has also made substantial progress in human development. Bhutan’s hydropower revenue has funded
significant improvements in education and healthcare, and access to basic utilities. The country has achieved nearly
universal primary school enrollment, increased literacy rates from 55.5 percent in 2005 to 70.6 percent in 2022,
achieved universal access to electricity since 2019, and attained nearly universal access to piped water by 2022. These
accomplishments are particularly notable given the logistical challenges posed by Bhutan’s topography and scattered
population, which make public service delivery more costly. However, issues persist in service quality and equitable
access, especially in higher education. 3

Despite these stellar achievements, structural transformation has been slow and job opportunities
have been limited, especially for the educated and youth.

 The non-hydro economy is predominantly service-oriented, complemented by a narrow range of resource-intensive
manufacturing industries. Annual non-hydro sector growth averaged 6.9 percent from 2001 to 2019, driven by services
and non-hydro industry. The service sector, which constituted 47 percent of GDP in 2021, has been a key growth driver,
with public administration (including health and education), trade, transport, and the financial sector (including real
estate) contributing significantly. Since the beginning of tourism in 1974, Bhutan has strategically focused on attracting
high-value tourists to mitigate environmental impacts. The hotel and restaurant industry, excluding the pandemic year,
grew at an impressive average rate of 16 percent annually between 2001 and 2019. The non-hydro industry, accounting
for 19 percent of GDP, primarily comprises construction and manufacturing industries like ferro-alloy and ferro-silicon.
Agriculture accounted for 19 percent of GDP in 2021 and remains vital for nearly half the population, especially the rural
poor, who depend on it for their livelihoods.

Productivity gains have been limited, with labor predominantly employed in the low productivity agricultural and
public sectors. The share of agriculture in GDP has significantly declined, and the share of services has increased
from 37 to 50 percent. The contribution of the non-hydro industry sector, excluding electricity, has remained relatively
stable at about 25 percent before the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the decreasing share of agriculture, the labor
force continues to be largely confined to the agricultural sector. In 2022, the labor market was mostly dominated by
low-productivity agricultural employment (40 percent), followed by the public sector (25 percent, including education
and health). Although more productive sectors like electricity, transport and communication, financial intermediation,
and mining, have experienced an increase in their share of total employment between 2013 and 2022, they still have
a relatively small presence in terms of employment. Sectors like construction have grown but have lower productivity
levels compared to smaller and slowly growing sectors.

Over-reliance on hydropower has hampered economic diversification and job creation. The hydropower sector has
contributed significantly to the economy, but its capital-intensive nature has provided limited employments opportunities,
employing less than 1 percent of the labor force. The reliance on foreign labor, as well as machinery and raw material
imports for hydropower projects, has led to minimal direct spillover effects on the non-hydro economy (Figure 4).4 But
with rising hydro investments since 2009, the spillover has contributed 2.1 percentage points to the 7.2 percent growth


2	   Forthcoming World Bank Poverty and Equity Assessment.
3	   WBG Country Partnership Framework (CPF) FY21-24 discussed by the Board on January 14, 2021 (Report No. 154927-BT); World Bank Bhutan Systematic Country Diagnosis (SCD),
     2020.
4	   To quantify the effect of hydro sector investments on the growth of the non-hydro sector, it is assumed that the hydro sector’s capital expenditures generate income in the
     non-hydro sector through the supply of goods (e.g., construction materials) and services (e.g., labor used in construction). The incremental growth of the non-hydro sector is
     then assessed by comparing its actual output against a counterfactual scenario where hydro sector investments are absent. See Annex 1 for more details on the calculation of
     hydropower spillovers.




                                                                                                                                                                                                3
    Executive Summary
    Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                Figure 3: Hydro and non-hydro sector growth                                                                                                                                                        Figure 4: Spillovers from hydro to non-hydro
                decomposition (contribution to growth),                                                                                                                                                            sector, 2001-2019
                2001-2019
                                12.0%                                                                                                                                                                                                         7.5%
                                                                                                                   9.3%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         6.5%                                      1.1%
                                10.0%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          2.1%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         5.5%
                                         8.0%                                 7.0%
                                                                                                                                                            6.9%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          4.5%
                                         6.0%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          3.5%                                                               6.9%
                                          4.0%                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     5.8%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         2.5%                                                                                             5.1%

                                         2.0%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               1.5%

                                         0.0%                                                                                                                                                                                            0.5%


                                  -2.0%                                       Total                               Hydro                             Non-hydro                                                                   -0.5%                                                                       -0.3%

                                                                          TFP                                Total growth                                  Labor                                                                                                                 2001-19                  2001-08                     2009-19
                                                                          Capital                            Interaction                                                                                                                                                                         Core            Hydro spillover
                Source: Growth accounting, World Bank staff calculations.                                                                                                                                          Note: To assess spillovers from the hydro to non-hydro sector, the non-hydro
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   sector output is split into a core and hydro-driven part. See Annex 1 for more
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   details.


                Figure 5: Bilateral real exchange rate with India                                                                                                                                                  Figure 6: Change in sectoral productivity and
                (Index average 1980-2021 = 1), real power exports                                                                                                                                                  employment shares, 2013-2021
                and real capital inflows from India, 1980-2021
                                                          1.4                                                    Depreciation                                      6,000                                                                                              3.0

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      2.5                               Electricity/water
                                                          1.3                                                                                                      5,000
                BRER (Nu/INR), index avg. 1980-2021 = 1




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      2.0
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Financial interm
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Log(Sector value added/ Sector employment), 2021




                                                          1.2
                                                                                                                                                                            Nu. Millions in constant 1980 prices




                                                                                                            Appreciation                                                                                                                                               1.5
                                                                                                                                                                   4,000
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Real estate/                           Mining
                                                          1.1                                                                                                                                                                                                          1.0   bus service
                                                                                                                                                                   3,000
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      0.5                          Transport/info and comm
                                                          1.0                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Construction
                                                                                                                                                                   2,000                                                                                              0.0
                                                      0.9                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Public admin/                      Whole/retail
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      -0.5 educ/ health
                                                                                                                                                                   1,000
                                                      0.8                                                                                                                                                                                                             -1.0                                    Manufacturing
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Agriculture
                                                                                                                                                                   0                                                                                                  -1.5
                                                          0.7
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      -2.0
                                                      0.6                                                                                                          -1,000                                                                                                                           Hotel/rest
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      -2.5
                                                                       1983
                                                                              1986
                                                                                     1989
                                                                                            1992
                                                                                                   1995
                                                                                                          1998




                                                                                                                                             2013
                                                                1980




                                                                                                                                                    2016
                                                                                                                                                           2019
                                                                                                                 2001




                                                                                                                                      2010
                                                                                                                               2007
                                                                                                                        2004




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          -50%              0%                 50%                 100%            150%

                                                           Power exports                           Net capital flows, India                            BRER (Nu/INR)                                                                                                                Change in employment share, percent, 2013-2021
                Source: National Statistics Bureau and World Bank staff calculations.                                                                                                                              Source: National Statistics Bureau and World Bank staff calculations.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Note: The size of each circle reflects sector employment in 2021. Productivity is
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   measured as the sector-level value-added, per worker in 2021.




                recorded by the non-hydro sector in the second period. Growth in the non-hydro sector has been driven by both capital
                and labor inputs, but contributions from productivity improvements have been limited. Human capital has been the
                dominant growth driver, though its contribution has declined over time. Changes in labor force participation have had a
                minimal impact on non-hydro sector growth. The private sector remains relatively small, with jobs concentrated primarily
                in agriculture, followed by the public sector (Figure 6).5



                5	                                         Agriculture accounted for 43 percent of employment in 2022, followed by services (41 percent), and the industry sector (15 percent).




4
                                                                                                                                                                                Executive Summary
                                                                                                                                                          Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Large foreign currency inflows during the construction and export phase of hydropower projects caused the real
exchange rate to appreciate, negatively impacting the competitiveness of the non-hydro sector (Figure 5). This
phenomenon, known as the Dutch Disease, is similar to the effects observed in resource-rich economies. While hydro
exports generally avoid certain oil-related symptoms (i.e., shocks after resource depletion, volatile tariffs, and compe-
tition for a fixed amount of resources), the expansion of hydropower production in Bhutan shares characteristics with
the discovery of fossil reserves since it involves large inflows of foreign currency. In Bhutan, the output of the tradable
sector, including agriculture, mining, and manufacturing, has remained below the non-tradable sector and the booming
electricity sector. Growth in non-hydro exports has been driven by mineral products such as boulders and base metals,
while other exports have shown limited progress, indicating a lack of economic diversification. This suggests that hydro-
power exports and hydro-related capital inflows may have impeded the growth of the lagging tradable sector relative
to the non-tradable sector.

There is significant scope for the private sector, which is largely comprised of low-productivity
microenterprises, to diversify and grow.

To diversify beyond hydropower and generate employment, Bhutan has promoted a development strategy that
emphasizes environmental sustainability, with a focus on major investment projects through state-owned enterprises
(SOEs). The Government has attempted to promote economic diversification through various initiatives that support
sustainable growth in sectors such as organic farming, green industry and manufacturing, and sustainable tourism. SOEs
have played a significant role in providing critical infrastructure services and developing strategic sectors to support
economic diversification. More recently, the state holding company Druk Holding and Investments (DHI) has made a
substantial national investment in cryptocurrency mining to accelerate digital transformation and create new revenue
streams. Furthermore, Bhutan has launched an ambitious initiative, the Gelephu Mindfulness City project, aimed at
transforming the southern city Gelephu into a Special Administrative Region that emphasizes ‘mindfulness’, mirroring
the unique Bhutanese identity and fostering the establishment of conscious and sustainable businesses that are in line
with the values of GNH.

In contrast to the SOE sector, the private sector has remained small and is largely comprised of low-productivity
microenterprises, with limited dynamism, diversification, and productive job opportunities. In 2022, only 2.7 percent of
firms were new, indicating a lack of entrepreneurial activity. Very small firms tend to remain small, likely due to restrictions
on growth, and inefficient firms do not exit. Between 2018 and 2022, firms became older and smaller, with the share of
long-established firms increasing from 24 percent to 26 percent, and the share of cottage firms rising from 89 percent
to 96 percent.6 Most firms (nearly 97 percent) are owned as individual proprietorships. In terms of employment, the
average number of workers hired by firms decreased from 1.1 in 2019 to 0.7 in 2020 and 2021, indicating declining job
opportunities in the private sector. Wholesale and retail trade, and accommodation and food services sectors account
for nearly 80 percent of firms, indicating a lack of economic diversification.

Compared to the public sector, the private sector employs more low- and middle-paying occupations, leading to
fewer employment opportunities and high unemployment for the educated workforce. Private employment is most
prevalent in construction (60 percent), administrative and support service activities (60 percent), and arts, entertainment,
recreation and other service activities (66 percent). Most employed workers are in low to mid-skilled positions, creating
relatively few opportunities for educated job seekers. In 2022, approximately 58 percent (24 percent) of job seekers
held a secondary degree (university degree), compared to 29 percent (9.5 percent) of employed workers, indicating an
oversupply. As a result, unemployment rates are high for individuals with a secondary diploma (11.5 percent in 2022) and a
tertiary diploma (11.8 percent in 2022). The lack of productive jobs that offer competitive wages for educated individuals is
likely contributing to emigration, especially among the most skilled workers, including those employed in the public sector.




6	   The Ministry of Industry, Commerce and Employment defines cottage-scale industries as those industries, whose initial fixed capital investment is less than Nu1 million and employ
     up to 4 people.




                                                                                                                                                                                                    5
    Executive Summary
    Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                The COVID-19 pandemic and the global impact of geopolitical crisis have disrupted Bhutan’s growth
                trajectory and exacerbated structural challenges.

                The pandemic highlighted the country’s vulnerability to external shocks and structural challenges. The COVID-19
                pandemic had a significant impact on Bhutan’s economy, causing a contraction of 2.5 and 3.3 percent in FY19/20 (June
                2019 to July 2020) and FY20/21.7 The hydropower sector experienced positive growth, due to the commissioning of
                the Mangdechhu hydropower plant in 2019, but the non-hydro industry and services sectors were adversely affected.
                Disruptions in supply chains, shortages of foreign labor, and a decline in tourism-related activities led to a contraction of
                7.8 and 5.9 percent in industry in FY19/20 and FY20/21, respectively, and 1.2 percent in the services sector in FY20/21.
                Despite these challenges, Bhutan has graduated from the United Nations’ (UN) Least Developed Country (LDC) status
                in 2023. However, it did not meet the LDC graduation threshold for economic and environmental vulnerability.

                Unemployment has surged since the COVID-19 pandemic, and emigration has increased. Unemployment rates in
                Bhutan rose from an average of 2.8 percent between 2015 and 2019, to 5.9 percent in 2022, with urban areas, and
                particularly young and educated individuals, experiencing the highest increase (Figure 7).8 According to media reports, the
                average number of Bhutanese emigrating increased significantly with the reopening of the borders in mid-2022, to more
                than 5,000 per month in early 2023 compared to less than 500 per month before the pandemic (Figure 8).9 Various factors
                may have contributed to the surge in emigration, including push factors such as limited job opportunities. Vacancies in
                the civil service, the biggest employer in Bhutan, have also been increasing in recent years. Pull factors, including relaxed
                visa restrictions by Australia to address its labor market challenges and social pressure to follow successful migrants,
                may have also played a role. This has raised concerns about brain drain, which can hinder economic diversification and
                export sophistication, which require skilled human capital for knowledge-intensive activities.



                Figure 7: Unemployment rate (percent),                                                           Figure 8: Monthly migration, Paro International
                2010-2022                                                                                        Airport, Jan 2015 – Mar 2023
                     40                                                                                                           6,000
                                                                                                                                  5,500
                     35
                                                                                                                                  5,000
                     30                                                                                 28.6                      4,500

                                                                                                                                  4,000
                     25                                                        22.6
                                                                                                                  No. of people




                                                                                         20.9                                     3,500
                     20                                                                                                           3,000
                                                          15.7                                                                    2,500
                     15               13.2       12.3               11.9
                           10.7                                                                                                   2,000
                     10                                                                                                           1,500
                                                                               5.0                      5.9
                                                                                          4.8                                     1,000
                      5                           3.1      3.4       2.7
                            2.5        2.1                                                                                         500
                      0                                                                                                              0
                           2015       2016       2017    2018      2019      2020        2021          2022
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Jan-20




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Jan-22


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Jan-23
                                                                                                                                      Jan-15


                                                                                                                                                        Jan-16




                                                                                                                                                                                            Jan-18


                                                                                                                                                                                                              Jan-19




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Jan-21
                                                                                                                                                                          Jan-17




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Jul-20




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Jul-22
                                                                                                                                               Jul-15


                                                                                                                                                                 Jul-16




                                                                                                                                                                                                     Jul-18


                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Jul-19




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Jul-21
                                                                                                                                                                                   Jul-17




                                  Youth, urban            Youth, total               National, total
                Source: National Statistics Bureau.                                                              Source: Kuensel (May 20, 2023).



                Macroeconomic vulnerabilities have increased amid the pandemic due to a significant deterioration of the external
                balance and international reserves. Macro-fiscal sustainability was maintained over the past two decades because of
                large hydro revenues and external grants. However, increased spending to fund the COVID-19 relief measures for indi-
                viduals and businesses, coupled with subdued revenue performance, resulted in high fiscal deficits and rapid non-hydro


                7	        The fiscal year runs from June to July.
                8	        Unemployment is significantly higher among youth (28.6 percent), educated workers (11.5 and 11.8 percent for workers with a secondary and tertiary diploma, respectively), in
                          urban areas (10.4 percent compared to 3.4 percent in rural areas), and among females (7.9 percent compared to 4.4 percent for males).
                9	        Migration is assumed for Bhutanese who exited but have not reentered the country. Data is restricted to Paro Airport and does not include other land exits. See https://kuensel-
                          online.com/migration-of-bhutanese/




6
                                                                                                                                                                                  Executive Summary
                                                                                                                                                            Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




public debt since FY20/21, with limited fiscal space to absorb additional shocks. Vulnerabilities in the financial sector,
with high levels of non-performing loans (NPL), have increased fiscal risks, given that about 60 percent of assets of
the financial sector are controlled by the public sector.10 The national investment in cryptocurrency mining operations
resulted in a significant decline in international reserves in FY21/22 and a widening of the current account deficit (CAD)
due to imports of information technology (IT) equipment and related goods for cryptocurrency mining. While the reserve
decline is set to be partially replenished through coupon payments, the reserve level remains low

Bhutan faces high vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change, necessitating a focus on adaptation and resil-
ience. Climate change poses significant risk to Bhutan’s development, with potentially significant impacts on the economy
and people. The rugged terrain and unique climatic conditions of the Himalayas contribute to challenges such as flash
floods, glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs), landslides, forest fires, and windstorms. Climate models predict rising tempera-
tures, irregular precipitation patterns, and more frequent extreme weather events. These factors pose significant risks
to the economy, natural resources, and people. However, Bhutan has opportunities to leverage its leadership on climate
change and net-zero carbon status. Building on the CEM, the World Bank will prepare a Country Climate and Development
Report (CCDR), which will analyze the country’s development and climate change challenges and opportunities in an inte-
grated manner. It will identify trade-offs, such as maintaining carbon negativity while promoting growth and job creation,
by promoting, for example, climate financing, supporting a just transition for people, and enhancing institutional capacity.

The current growth model is not sustainable.

Bhutan expects to double its hydropower capacity over the next decade, which is expected to have significant effects
on the economy. Estimates using a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model (“the business-as-usual (BAU) scenario”)
indicate that the anticipated doubling of the hydropower generation capacity is expected to result in higher growth.
However, in keeping with past experience, this growth will not be accompanied by a diversification of the economy.
The economy is expected to shift towards electricity and closely related sectors. The appreciation of the real exchange
rate is expected to reduce output in non-hydro tradable sectors, especially tourism-related exports. This suggests that
there is scope to strengthen the Government’s current approach for managing and distributing hydropower revenues
to support the development of non-hydro sectors and address the negative effects of the Dutch Disease.

The availability of hydropower rents provides the Government with an opportunity to actively support non-hydro
productivity growth and generate employment. The CEM identifies three key areas that require urgent policy focus for
achieving more robust and broad-based growth and creating more and better jobs while bolstering climate resilience:
(I) facilitating economic diversification, (II) enhancing agricultural productivity and crop diversification, and (III) reforming
the financial sector to support economic diversification.

I. Facilitating economic diversification to expand beyond the hydropower and agriculture sectors.

Economic diversification is crucial to increase resilience and generate more and higher quality jobs within the economy.
Greater economic and export diversification is associated with lower growth volatility and higher long-term average growth
in smaller economies such as Bhutan. 11 Bhutan is especially vulnerable to shocks because of its trade openness, economic
concentration, and susceptibility to natural disasters and climate change. By diversifying its economy, Bhutan can reduce
its dependence on the hydropower sector and generate more employment opportunities, making the economy and its
people more resilient to shocks.

Effective management of hydropower rents is crucial in preventing the adverse effects of Dutch Disease and in
supporting economic diversification. The allocation of these resource rents can take various forms: (i) they can be used
to boost domestic consumption through public or private spending, such as citizen dividends or subsidies; (ii) they can
be saved in financial assets, either domestically or abroad, to smoothen expenditure of natural resources or act as a
buffer for future generations, thereby mitigating Dutch Disease-type effects (for instance, through a fiscal stabilization or


10	   The financial sector is dominated by SOEs, which at end-2020 accounted for 60 percent of the assets of the banking system and 51 percent of the assets of the non-banking
      financial institutions (NBFIs), including the pension fund. This includes assets of financial institutions where the RGoB has 50 percent of shares or more. The assets are weighted
      with the RGoB’s share in the companies.
11	   World Bank. 2023a. “Global Economic Prospects”. January 2023. World Bank, Washington, D.C:




                                                                                                                                                                                                      7
    Executive Summary
    Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                sovereign wealth fund); or (iii) they can be invested in tangible assets to stimulate the public or private sectors by means
                of subsidized credits, production or export subsidies, The latter can also counter Dutch Disease-type effects by promot-
                ing economic diversification into new sectors and industries. This Report highlights economy-wide and sector-specific
                policies as well as complementary institutional reforms that can lead to greater diversification. International payments
                for ecological services, high-value tradable services, eco-tourism, high-value IT services are identified as some of the
                sectors that can contribute to sustainable diversification of the Bhutanese economy.

                Bhutan’s high resource dependence, low per capita resource rents, and domestic investment shortfall underscore the
                necessity of utilizing hydropower resources to invest in economic diversification. Natural resource management should
                consider various factors, such as the extent of resource dependence, per capita resource rent levels, domestic investment
                rates, and deficits. Notable trade-offs exist, particularly the high opportunity cost associated with excessive investment in stabi-
                lization funds at the expense of social spending and domestic productive capacity development. Fiscal savings in stabilization
                funds, typically held as liquid financial assets abroad, come at a significant opportunity cost, as these funds are not available for
                domestic investment in productive capabilities that could promote economic diversification. Bhutan’s reliance on hydropower
                is substantial, yet its per capita hydro resource rents are modest at US$400, in contrast to the higher rents of resource-rich
                nations like Norway and the UAE. Bhutan also faces considerable investment needs in essential social and infrastructure sectors.

                In order to promote diversification, Bhutan could allocate more of its resource rents towards long-term investments. Currently,
                the majority (54 percent) of domestic revenues, 40 percent of which comes from hydropower, is consumed by public spending
                on wages, goods and services, rather than financing investments. Private spending accounted for 18 percent and was directed
                to social transfers, including allowances and contributions to the National Provident Fund. A minimal amount (0.2 percent) is
                allocated to fiscal stabilization, which is insufficient to cushion the volatility of hydro revenues and public expenditure during down-
                turns. The remaining domestic revenues (28 percent) have been allocated towards investments. With Bhutan’s capital spending
                largely supported by external grants and the anticipated decline in Official Development Assistance following its graduation
                from the LDC status, it is crucial to reallocate domestic resources, including resource rents, towards capital investments. Such
                strategic public investment can enhance productivity in non-resource tradable sectors and mitigate the effects of Dutch Disease.

                Figure 9: Pathways for managing resource revenues

                             Bhutan's current model of                        Scenario 2: expanded                         Scenario 3: spending on                       Scenario 4: transfers to
                             investment of hydro rents                      government expenditures                       human and physical capital                      citizens through BIG


                                                                                                  Resource revenues
                                                                      Investment                                                                                    Consumption


                                        Real assets                                                    Financial assets
                                                                                                                                                        Public                Private spending
                                                                                                                                                       spending
                         Abroad                        Domestically                    Domestically                          Abroad
                                                                                                                                                         Bhutan:
                                                                                                                                                       Goods and         Untargeted          Targeted
                                                                                                                                                        services,         spending           spending
                                  Public sector                             Private sector                       Safe assets        High yielding       interest,
                                                                                                                    Bhutan:            assets          transfers,         Citizen              Bhutan:
                                                                                                               Investments of                            wages           dividend,             Current
                                                                                                                  the Bhutan                                           schemes, nota        transfers to
                                                                    General          Sector- specific                                                                    applicable to       individuals,
                                                                                                                   Economic
                                                                  capabilities         capabilities                                                                       Bhutan           contributio ns
                         General          Sector- specific                                                        Stabilization
                       capabilities         capabilities                                                         Fund (BESF)                                                                 to national
                                                                 Bhutan: Bank          Conditional                                                                                            provident
                                                                    lending,          support upon                                                                                              fund,
                          Bhutan:             Bhutan:
                                                                   subsidized            certain                                                                                            allowances
                      Infrastructure,      Investments to
                                                                 credit, Bhutan         activities
                      human capital      promote the non-
                                                                 Development
                         spending          hydro tradable
                                                                      Bank
                                         sector, SOE sector



                                                  Economic diversification                                    Fiscal stabilization
                Source: Adaptation from Chang, H. J., and Lebdioui, A. 2020.12




                12	    Chang, H. J., and Lebdioui, A. 2020. “From Fiscal Stabilization to Economic Diversification: A Developmental Approach to Managing Resource Revenues”. WIDER Working Paper
                       2020/108. UNU-WIDER. Helsinki, Finland.




8
                                                                                                                                                                                 Executive Summary
                                                                                                                                                           Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Furthermore, to enhance fiscal stabilization, it is necessary to reserve more hydropower resources. As indicated in
the Bhutan Public Expenditure Review (PER), Bhutan’s government spending is among the most procyclical compared
to its peers, largely due to the fluctuating nature of hydropower revenues. Allocating a portion of the resource rent to the
Bhutan Economic Stabilization Fund (BESF) could help stabilize these volatile hydro revenues and public expenditures
in the face of negative shocks. This would mitigate the need for spending reductions during economic downturns that
could exacerbate the growth decline, particularly in areas such as infrastructure and human capital investment.

Channeling additional hydropower revenues to improve physical and human capital can result in higher growth
and diversification compared to the business-as-usual (BAU) scenario. Estimates from the CGE model indicate that
channeling additional hydropower revenues into physical and human capital leads to labor productivity improvements
and enhances capital accumulation.13 Under the physical and human capital scenario, the economy becomes more
diversified, as shown by a lower economic concentration index compared to the BAU scenario (Table 1). The industrial
and construction sectors, which rely heavily on labor, are estimated to benefit the most in terms of value-added. More-
over, all sectors experience higher growth due to the direct impact on factors of production and the indirect effect of
increased household spending. As a result, all households benefit from these investments, with higher consumption
growth compared to the BAU scenario. On the other hand, distributing additional hydropower revenues directly to house-
holds through fiscal transfers, such as through a Basic Income Grant (BIG), is estimated to result in greater economic
diversification (reflected by a smaller economic concentration index) but at the cost of slower growth. However, such a
fiscal transfer program may be easier to implement but may not guarantee the necessary investments for diversification
in case such transfers are channeled to consumption.

Table 1: Economic development in different scenarios, 2030

                                                                                  2019            Scenario 1: No           Hydro-led            Scenario 3:          Scenario 4:
                                                                                                     hydro                scenario 2:          Physical and             BIG
                                                                                                                             BAU              human capital

  GDP                                                                             180.9                260.8                 280.6                 293.3                 277.1

  Domestic Absorption                                                             205.2                292.8                 271.3                 292.7                 264.1

  Savings                                                                          69.2                 98.2                  98.2                 107.8                 98.2

  Hydro production (real)                                                          20.2                 23.5                  44.7                  45.6                  45.1

  Non-hydro production (real)                                                     257.0                354.6                 331.3                 350.3                 334.4

  Economic concentration index                                                    623.0                685.8                 725.6                 722.2                 719.5

  Government consumption                                                           32.6                  47.7                 56.1                   50                  34.7

  Household consumption per-capita (in thousands of Nu)                           129.8                 184.5                 147.3                169.8                 165.3

Source: Shutes, Feuerbacher, and McDonald. 2022. CEM Background Paper. Note: All figures in Nu billions unless otherwise indicated. Please note that estimates are
indicative and should not be interpreted as actual growth estimates.




Investments in physical and human capital may not be sufficient to ensure economic diversification. Bhutan faces
inherent structural challenges such as being landlocked, having a small labor force, and a small domestic market. High
fixed costs for establishing and operating businesses, along with labor market rigidities, hinder competitiveness and
typically discourage diversification efforts in smaller economies.14 For instance, the small labor force hampers Bhutan’s
ability to engage in labor-intensive manufacturing that generally requires a larger workforce, and the small domestic
market limits economies of scale. Such economies can significantly benefit from harnessing external (global) demand,


13	   Compared to the BAU scenario, additional hydropower rents are redirected from general government spending towards investments in human and physical capital. A stylized
      approach is taken in which additional revenues are split equally between spending on training, resulting in labor productivity improvements, and spending on capital investments
      via government savings. The CGE scenarios are indicative and aim to demonstrate broad trends and trade-offs.
14	   World Bank. 2023a. “Global Economic Prospects”. January 2023. World Bank., Washington, D.C.




                                                                                                                                                                                                     9
     Executive Summary
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                 given the limited scale of internal (domestic) demand. The non-hydro sector also suffers from the effects of the appre-
                 ciation in the real exchange rate, which further undermines its competitiveness. Although they are critical, conventional
                 policies such as macro stability, trade openness, investments in physical and human capital, and a favorable business
                 environment can be insufficient to ensure economic diversification. Given the early stage of development of the private
                 sector, sector specific policy interventions will be required to achieve this objective.

                 Bhutan has implemented sector-specific policies to facilitate economic diversification, but the measures have had
                 limited success in stimulating export diversification and creating new job opportunities. Notable policy measures
                 have included reliance on SOEs in competitive sectors, tax incentives, directed lending, skills development programs,
                 and the establishment of special economic zones (SEZs). However, profitability of SOEs is lower in competitive sectors
                 such as manufacturing, retail, and transport in comparison to non-competitive sectors. Fiscal incentives have primarily
                 favored medium and large businesses in manufacturing, finance, and tourism. Directed lending programs targeting the
                 agriculture and Cottage and Small Industries (CSI) sectors have contributed to high NPLs, while limited credit availability
                 remains a significant constraint to their development.

                 Sector-specific policies have been implemented in many countries as part of their growth strategies, but there
                 are many examples of failed and ineffective policies. Governance failures, including state capture by rent-seeking
                 interests and short-term electoral considerations, can result in suboptimal outcomes. In order to mitigate these risks, it
                 is crucial to establish strong institutional mechanisms that incentivizes beneficiaries to engage in market competition
                 with clear performance criteria for selective interventions. Policy support could focus on export promotion to leverage
                 international competition and target sectors instead of specific firms for the policy support. Additionally, independent
                 and appropriately qualified experts in the selection of projects that qualify for public support can further enhance the
                 effectiveness of these policies.15

                 The hydropower sector could be developed further, given untapped potential and opportunities in the regional
                 electricity market in South Asia. Establishing stronger backward linkages with the hydro sector, for instance through
                 enhancing domestic capabilities for hydropower maintenance and engineering, could lead to greater spillovers to the
                 non-hydro sector. This, in turn, could stimulate demand for goods, services, and labor from various sectors. The forth-
                 coming Bhutan CCDR will assess the impact of climate change on hydropower assets and electricity generation, the
                 potential to expand hydropower, options for the end-use of the additional generation capacity (domestic consumption
                 or export), and quantify investment needs and financing options, including from the private sector.

                 Policies that create a conducive environment for the development of the non-hydropower sector will be key to sustain
                 future growth. Over the past two decades, productivity growth in the non-hydropower sector has been relatively weak.
                 Policies that strengthened macroeconomic stability, improve institutions and business environment, facilitate flexible
                 and efficient labor market regulations, reduce barriers to trade, and investments in infrastructure and human capital,
                 remain critical for promoting continued growth in the non-hydro sector.

                   ⊲	 The capacity and performance of SOEs could be improved given their significant role in the economy. SOEs in the
                      electricity sector have consistently reported profits, but the performance of SOEs in other sectors has been mixed.
                      The 2023 Public Expenditure Review (PER) recommends strengthening SOE oversight and corporate governance
                      by implementing a more centralized ownership model with clear reporting lines and responsibilities.16 Additionally,
                      it suggests reviewing the current Annual Performance Compacts system and performance-based compensation of
                      Druk Holding and Investments (DHI) and MoF to improve performance management. Promoting the professionaliza-
                      tion and diversification of SOE Boards and enhancing SOE investment management are also crucial steps towards
                      improving the overall performance of SOEs.




                 15	   See, for instance Cherif, R. et al. 2022. “Industrial Policy for Growth and Diversification: A Conceptual Framework”. IMF, Washington D.C., and Cherif, R. and Hasanov, F. 2019.
                       “The Return of the Policy That Shall Not Be Named: Principles of Industrial Policy”. IMF, Washington D.C. and Cherif, R. et al. 2022. Industrial Policy for Growth and diversification:
                       a conceptual framework. Washington DC: IMF.
                 16	   The current SOE ownership model current ownership model has multiple actors and is complex. MoF, in addition to holding shares in socially oriented SEs, holds shares directly
                       and indirectly in commercially oriented companies, including companies where DHI holds shares.




10
                                                                                                                                                                               Executive Summary
                                                                                                                                                         Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




  ⊲	 The efficiency of public expenditure in health and education could be improved. Bhutan spends more than
     its peers on education and health, but there is room for efficiency gains in both sectors. According to the 2023
     Bhutan PER, the country ranks 68th out of 131 countries in education expenditure per school-age child, and 86th
     based on learning adjusted years of schooling. Bhutan is facing a relatively low efficiency level for education
     spending compared to other middle-income countries. In health, Bhutan’s per capita spending in purchasing
     power parity terms is significantly higher than its regional peers and countries in a similar income group. A
     stochastic frontier analysis suggests that Bhutan’s health expenditure is relatively efficient, but it could still
     achieve the same health outcomes with 6 to 9 percent less spending it matched the most efficient countries in
     the sample.

  ⊲	 Upskilling policies, including vocational training and more demand-driven Technical and Vocational Education
     and Training (TVET) programs could help integrate the youth and low-skilled individuals (particularly women)
     into the labor market and emerging industries. Strengthening the linkages between public TVET institutions and
     the labor market is crucial, as highlighted in the World Bank Labor Market Assessment Report. Reforms in the labor
     market, including labor regulations that facilitate job switching, a functional Labor Market Information System (LMIS)
     to identify available skills, and skill-related policies to enhance managerial practices and soft skills, can support
     workers’ mobility and firms’ access to labor. Additionally, on-the-job assistance can be provided to self-employed
     and family workers with low education levels, helping them find wage employment opportunities in different
     regions. Employment service centers under the Ministry of Industry Commerce and Employment (MoICE) can play
     a significant role in facilitating these efforts.

  ⊲	 Strengthening the Public Investment Management (PIM) system can help expand high quality infrastructure
     services and crowd in private investments. The contribution of physical capital to non-hydro sector growth has
     declined over the recent decade. Bhutan has one of the highest levels of public capital spending as a percent of
     GDP (excluding hydro investments) in the world, but there are significant investment deficits, including in infrastruc-
     ture. The quality of infrastructure remains below many comparator countries.17 A recent diagnostic assessment
     of the PIM system highlighted that Bhutan has not yet established a fully operational PIM system that aligns with
     international standards.18

Sector-specific policies could support diversification, provided they are targeted, transparent and minimize budget-
ary costs. Given the critical role of human capital in economic diversification, and to avoid further brain drain, several
initiatives could be implemented in the short term as outlined below.

  ⊲	 Bhutan could create strategic partnerships with universities to establish tailored executive programs to meet
     specific needs in the Bhutanese context. Strategic partnerships with universities can provide the Government with
     more leverage over the training content, aligning it with the national objectives and reducing the dependence on
     foreign technical assistance. Such programs have been critical for the development of competitive sectors across
     the globe, for instance, the fruit sector in Chile through the Chile and University of California Program.19

  ⊲	 The skills of non-resident Bhutanese could be leveraged for the transfer of learning, technology, and social
     capital back to Bhutan. The Government could liaise with non-resident Bhutanese to explore channels through
     which they can contribute to the emergence of new activities. For example, Malaysia established TalentCorp in 2011
     to attract talent back from abroad and bring in foreign talent to address the shortage of technical skills in science
     and ICT (Mukherjee et al., 2011).

  ⊲	 The existing incubation and acceleration centers could be strengthened to promote entrepreneurship
     and innovation. These centers have the mandate to drive economic growth and create job opportunities for
     educated workers. However, they currently face funding uncertainties. Improving the quality of their services,


17	   WB. 2023b. “Bhutan Public Expenditure Review.” WB, Washington, DC.
18	   RGoB. Ministry of Finance. 2021. Strategic Diagnostic Assessment of the Public Investment Management System in Bhutan.
19	   In Chile, to remedy the absence of adequate human capital, which was for a long time the obstacle for the development of the fruit sector, an exchange program was established
      in 1965 with the University of California, which sent more than 80 Chilean graduate students to study agricultural economics in California to learn how to cultivate and export
      fresh fruits in Chile. This appears to have been an extremely successful and impactful grant considering the growth of the sector during the following decades (Bravo-Ortega and
      Eterovic, 2015).




                                                                                                                                                                                                   11
     Executive Summary
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                         including access to financing, market validation, business plan development, research and development support,
                         mentorship, and connections to supply chains and markets are critical for effective promotion of entrepreneur-
                         ship and innovation.

                 The Government could strengthen the institutions for designing and implementing sector-specific policies.

                  ⊲	 A new fiscal strategy outlining a long-term vision could introduce a minimum share of reinvestment of hydro-
                     power rents to support economic diversification away from the overreliance on the hydropower sector. In parallel,
                     the Bhutan Economic Stabilization Fund (BESF) and the fiscal stabilization measures that regulate contributions to
                     and uses of the BESF could be operationalized to smooth volatile hydro revenues and public spending. One option
                     could be to apply the Hartwick rule, which suggests that the value of (net) investment needs equal the value of rents
                     on extracted resources at each point in time.20

                  ⊲	 Given the importance of effectively allocating resources, concentrating resources on a select few development
                     finance institutions and initiatives can be beneficial. Public development finance institutions can bring in private
                     and foreign investments, but they require adequate managerial and regulatory capacity. Bhutan has various institu-
                     tions such as the Bhutan Development Bank (BDB), DHI, the Bank of Bhutan (BoB), and the BESF. The government
                     could consolidate the total number of these institutions, while broadening the scope of select entities to invest
                     hydropower rents in productivity-enhancing assets. One option to channel hydropower revenues into domestic
                     investments for export diversification is to broaden the mandate of DHI from a holding company to a development
                     fund, in line with the experience of Khazanah in Malaysia. Alternative options include an expansion of the mandate
                     of the Bank of Bhutan (BoB) to include development banking, increasing the capacity of the BDB, which is currently
                     engaged in providing loans to Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in the agriculture sector, and reorienting BESF
                     into a development fund.

                  ⊲	 Irrespective of the institutional setup, improving the ability to appraise, monitor, and evaluate investments is
                     essential for the success of utilizing hydropower revenues for productive diversification. The establishment
                     of an autonomous and technically equipped public Investment Evaluation Unit (IEU) is key to supporting the
                     development of strong analytical capacity to evaluate development projects and policies. The existence of a
                     strong IEU could send a market signal to potential investors regarding the quality of economic management.
                     The IEU could evaluate the existing sector-specific policies to determine whether they are sufficiently targeted,
                     transparent and minimize budgetary costs (and risks). When considering new policies and projects, emphasis
                     could be placed on identifying those with the greatest potential returns and manageable financial, environmental
                     and social risks.

                 II. Enhancing agricultural productivity and crop diversification to “push” workers out of agriculture

                 Bhutan’s agricultural sector has undergone a significant transformation in recent decades. This shift, occurring across
                 three dimensions (macro, spatial, sectoral), is driving the specialization of the agriculture sector.

                  a.	 On a macro level, the contribution of agricultural to total output has started to decline but the decline in agricultural
                      employment has been much smaller. The movement of labor from agriculture to other sectors has been slow.
                      Between 2005 and 2017, the share of agricultural labor only decreased by 1 percentage point.

                  b.	 However, there are variations in the pace of structural transformation across different geographic areas. At a spatial
                      level, Bhutan has witnessed a reallocation of workers from more to less agricultural areas, which has increased
                      agricultural labor shares in labor shedding areas. Areas close to India, urban centers, and regions connected to
                      urban centers and the Indian market through road infrastructure have experienced faster structural transformation.
                      This has led to a significant decline of the share of agricultural labor. Conversely, rural and mountainous areas,


                 20	   The Hartwick Rule suggests that countries should invest resource rents into other types of assets, and that a constant level of consumption can be sustained if the value of
                       investment equals the value of rents on extracted resources at each point in time (Hartwick, 1977). Malaysia is one of the few countries that has followed the Hartwick rule. Other
                       countries that have established mechanisms similar to the Hartwick rule, aiming to invest resource rents into long-term assets include Norway (Pension Fund), or Botswana (Pula
                       Fund). See Hartwick, J.M. 1977. “Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from Exhaustible Resources.” American Economic Review, 66, 972-74.




12
                                                                                                                                                                                                     Executive Summary
                                                                                                                                                                                Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                                          particularly in the Northwest of the country, have witnessed an increase in agricultural labor share. This spatial
                                          polarization has resulted in economic activity being concentrated in urban and connected centers, while rural areas
                                          remained focused on agriculture.

                   c.	 Within the agricultural sector, there has been a significant shift with a decrease in the production of traditional
                       crops like maize and paddy rice and increase in the growth of higher value-added products such as spices and
                       fruits. This shift has reoriented agriculture towards its export-oriented comparative advantage. Overall productivity
                       has remained stagnant but there are significant spatial heterogeneities.

Productivity growth of the agriculture sector has been significantly lower than in peer countries (Figure 11). The
process of specialization is still at an early stage, with agricultural productivity gaps remaining large and stemming
primarily from inadequate access to irrigation, crop damages, labor shortages, difficult transport and export logistics,
and challenging topography. Lack of adequate irrigation facilities leads to substantial reduction in yields for paddy rice
and maize. Estimates show that addressing issues related to irrigation could raise average yields for these crops by
about 6 percent each, and for cardamom by 11 percent. Protecting crops from damages could raise maize and paddy
yields by 15 and 9 percent, respectively. Removing the impact of labor shortages – for instance through the adoption of
labor-saving technology – could increase paddy, cardamom and areca nut yields significantly.

Closing agricultural productivity gaps would accelerate structural transformation. In the past, areas that have experi-
enced larger yield growth have also experienced declining agricultural labor shares, which suggests that yield increases
drive spatial specialization (Figure 12, Figure 13). This is consistent with the literature that highlights the importance of
labor-saving technologies in agriculture to free excess labor for non-agricultural enterprises (Figure 10). Estimates from
a spatially disaggregated CGE model calibrated to Bhutan corroborates this assessment. Simulations involving a 20
percent reduction in existing yield gaps through policies to improve the quality of agricultural capital (better machines)
and expand access to fertilizers and pesticides (more effective chemicals) and fuel (better quality fuels) would result in
agricultural wages increasing by less than low-skilled and unskilled wages, prompting households to seek employment
outside agriculture. This would reduce the supply of agricultural labor and increase the supply of unskilled and low-skilled
labor, which benefits both the service sector and households that switch sectors.

Figure 10: Agricultural productivity growth                                                                            Figure 11: …Productivity growth in agriculture was
is key to facilitate a movement of labor into                                                                          significantly lower than for peer countries.
non-primary sectors…
                                                                                                                                          Agriculture value added per worker (1997=100)
                                         8                                                                               300

                                         7
Annual change in productivity, percent




                                                                                        Bhutan
                                         6                                                                               250
                                         5

                                         4                                                                               200

                                         3

                                         2                                                                               150
                                          1

                                         0                                                                               100
                                         -1

                                         -2                                                                               50
                                         -3
                                              -5   -4     -3       -2      -1     0      1      2      3       4   5
                                                                  Annual change in employment share, percent               0
                                                                                                                               1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019
                                                    Agriculture              Industry              Services                      Bhutan           Peru               Paraguay             Cambodia

Source: World Development Indicators.                                                                                  Source: World Development Indicators.
Note: The left-hand side figure presents average annual changes (in percent-
age points) for the period from 2000 to 2017 using the World Bank Group’s Job
Structure Tool.




                                                                                                                                                                                                                         13
     Executive Summary
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                 Figure 12: Closing yield gaps by augmenting non-labor production inputs raises relative wages of
                 non-agricultural workers…

                   0.8%
                   0.6%
                   0.4%
                   0.2%
                   0.0%
                  -0.2%
                  -0.4%
                  -0.6%
                  -0.8%
                           HighSkilledLab


                                            SemiSkilledLab


                                                             LowSkilledLab


                                                                             UnskilledLab


                                                                                            C_AgriLab


                                                                                                        C_Cropland


                                                                                                                     C_Pastureland


                                                                                                                                        E_AgriLab


                                                                                                                                                    E_Cropland


                                                                                                                                                                    E_Pastureland


                                                                                                                                                                                           SE_AgriLab


                                                                                                                                                                                                          SE_Cropland


                                                                                                                                                                                                                         SE_Pastureland


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          SW_AgriLab


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              SW_Cropland


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               SW_Pastureland


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                W_AgriLab


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             W_Cropland


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           W_Pastureland
                                                         National                                       Central                                     East                                                SouthEast                                       SouthWest                                           West
                                                                                                                                     Labour                      Cropland                                     Pastureland


                 Source: World Development Indicators.




                 Water supply is a critical constraint to agricultural                                                                                                 Figure 13: …which induces a shift of labor
                 productivity and is likely to be exacerbated by climate                                                                                               out of agriculture and accelerates structural
                 change. Currently, inadequate water supply reduces                                                                                                    transformation, especially in the southern part.
                 crop yields by 4 to 11 percent. While climate change may                                                                                                           1.0%
                 temporarily increase rainfed yields for traditional crops
                 like maize, it will also lead to increased rainfall variability
                                                                                                                                                                                0.5%
                 in the medium term, highlighting the need for irrigation
                 infrastructure. However, climate change also presents
                                                                                                                                                                                0.0%
                 an opportunity to specialize in higher value-added crops
                 such as vegetables, fruits, and spices, as favorable climatic
                 conditions will support their production and create export                                                                                                  -0.5%
                 opportunities. To realize this potential in full, it is crucial to
                 consider the medium-term impacts of climate change and                                                                                                        -1.0%
                 invest in irrigation infrastructure accordingly. Failure to do
                 so may delay necessary investments and hamper the agri-
                                                                                                                                                                               -1.5%
                 cultural sector’s ability to specialize in higher value-added
                 products and capitalize on export opportunities.
                                                                                                                                                                             -2.0%
                                                                                                                                                                                                   National             Central                        East                 SouthEast SouthWest                           West
                 The analysis leads to three principles that can guide agri-
                 cultural policy:                                                                                                                                      Source: World Development Indicators.



                  d.	 As structural transformation progresses, agricultural
                      labor shortages will increase as people move towards
                      urban and connected centers. The goal of growth policy is to facilitate this movement while enabling investments
                      in technologies that compensate for the labor loss.

                  e.	 Avoiding investments into traditional rainfed crops with limited growth prospects is key to supporting the transition
                      towards Bhutan’s comparative advantages and to enable the country to benefit from crops that are likely to expe-
                      rience increasing yields with climate change in the longer run.

                   f.	 Investing and enabling private investment into irrigation is critical to increase yields, adapt to climate change and
                       enhance structural transformation.




14
                                                                                                                        Executive Summary
                                                                                                        Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Policy interventions could focus on promoting private investments, access to technology and production inputs, and
targeted assistance to farmers.

 ⊲	 Attracting additional Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) to agriculture can help boost productivity growth. Foreign
    Direct Investment provides the capital needed for investments and facilitates technology transfers that can help
    agricultural producers make better use of their resources and land. Bhutan has made significant progress in the
    liberalization of its FDI regime, but investment in the agriculture sector is still subject to minimum project cost and
    a cap on foreign ownership, which precludes investment into smaller scale and niche farming operations with
    potential for high growth. To attract more FDI, Bhutan could consider eliminating the foreign ownership cap and
    reducing the minimum investment threshold. It could also consider providing free visas to prospective investors.

 ⊲	 Marketing Bhutan’s unique global brand can help attract foreign investment and promote agricultural exports.
    Branding Bhutanese agricultural products with the country’s focus on environmental conservation and sustainable
    development can stimulate global demand and help attract investments. A dedicated investment promotion agency
    can participate in international trade fairs, initiate marketing campaigns, and identify and approach prospective
    investors.

 ⊲	 Providing farmers with guidance and financial incentives to adopt sustainable land management practices is
    crucial for increasing productivity and ensuring climate-resilient agricultural production. While temporary short-
    term yield changes induced by climate change may encourage farmers to invest in traditional crops with limited
    long-term profitability, it is important to promote the adoption of higher value-added crops such as vegetables, fruits,
    and spices. These crops can benefit from favorable climatic conditions and create export opportunities. However,
    transitioning to sustainable and climate-resilient practices may require upfront costs and changes in production
    methods. To support farmers in overcoming this timing inconsistency, targeted support measures such as guaran-
    tees for loans, matching grants, or direct, well-targeted subsidies can be implemented.

III. Financial sector reforms to support economic diversification and finance private non-hydro
investments

State Owned Financial Institutions (SOFIs) dominate the financial sector in Bhutan and the banking system is highly
concentrated. In 2020, SOFIs accounted for 60 percent of the banking system’s assets and 51 percent of the assets of
Non-Banking Financial Institutions (NBFIs), including the National Pension and Provident Fund (NPPF). The BoB, which
is mostly government-owned, is the largest bank in terms of asset size and deposits. It holds 44 and 48 percent of the
banking sector’s assets and deposits.

The allocation of credit in the economy remains skewed, with the majority directed towards ‘non-enterprises’. Prior to
the pandemic, the financial sector expanded to provide the necessary credit and financing for hydropower projects. Even
though there was a rapid increase in credit for the non-hydro sectors, it was not broad-based. The tourism and housing
sectors accounted for nearly 50 percent of the total credit in 2022. Conversely, the share of trade and manufacturing
sectors declined in recent years (Figure 14). Cottage firms, defined as firms that employ less than five workers, account
for more than 95 percent of firms but receive less than 10 percent of the total credit in the economy. The credit share
of small and medium firms declined significantly in recent years, while the share of non-enterprises, including housing,
transport, personal, employee loans, and education loans, increased to nearly 60 percent of total credit in 2023 (Figure
15). This is in line with the lack of economic diversification and the absence of a thriving private sector. Limited access
to finance is cited as one of the top constraints for small and medium-sized companies.




                                                                                                                                             15
     Executive Summary
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                 Figure 14: Sectoral composition of credit                                                            Figure 15: Credit composition by firm size
                 (percent of total), 2017, 2019, and 2022                                                             (percent of total), 2017, 2019, and 2022
                   35                                                                                                       70

                   30                                                                                                   60

                   25                                                                                                   50

                   20                                                                                                       40

                       15                                                                                                   30

                       10                                                                                               20

                       5                                                                                                    10

                       0                                                                                                    0

                                                                                                                                   o



                                                                                                                                            ge




                                                                                                                                                      all



                                                                                                                                                               ium




                                                                                                                                                                            e



                                                                                                                                                                                        e
                                                            m
                                       ce




                                                                         g
                             re




                                                                                 rt


                                                                                            ns


                                                                                                     rs
                                                  f




                                                                                                                                                                         rg



                                                                                                                                                                                     ris
                                                   u




                                                                                                                                    cr
                                                                     sin


                                                                               po
                                                          ris




                                                                                                                                                    Sm
                                                                                                    he
                                                an
                            ltu




                                                                                                                                         tta
                                       r




                                                                                          oa




                                                                                                                                 Mi




                                                                                                                                                                       La
                                    me




                                                                                                                                                                                   rp
                                                                                                                                                                d
                                                          ou




                                                                                ns
                                                                     u




                                                                                                  Ot




                                                                                                                                                             Me
                                              /M
                       icu




                                                                                                                                         Co
                                                                                        lL




                                                                                                                                                                                   te
                                                                  Ho
                                  om




                                                       s/T




                                                                             Tra
                                            od




                                                                                      na




                                                                                                                                                                                en
                     r
                  Ag


                                  /C




                                                     ce




                                                                                     so
                                          Pr




                                                                                                                                                                                n-
                              de




                                                   rvi




                                                                                                                                                                              No
                                                                                    r
                                                                                 Pe
                            Tra




                                                 Se




                                                   2017           2019          2022                                                             2017       2019     2022
                 Source: Royal Monetary Authority (RMA).
                 Note: Sectoral shares in figures add up to 100. “Others” include education loans. Non-enterprises include housing, transport, personal, staff, and education loans.




                 Banks mostly provide traditional lending products and have not adopted risk-based pricing. The range of financial
                 instruments offered by commercial banks has expanded but is still dominated by traditional banking products. Banks
                 typically offer basic credit products with fixed interest rates and terms.21 Loan requests are primarily evaluated based on
                 collateral rather than the borrower’s financial viability. Risk-based pricing, which links the borrower’s credit score to the
                 loan’s interest rate, is not commonly used by financial institutions. The bank’s strong preference for collateral over longer-
                 term cashflow projections has resulted in borrowers seeking alternative sources of financing from non-bank lenders.

                 Capital markets remain shallow, with limited liquidity and trading activity. One contributing factor is the small number of
                 listed companies compared to other regional markets. The limited development of the capital market can be attributed to
                 various factors, including issuer and investor-related issues, and the absence of regulations and capabilities for underwrit-
                 ing in the market. Due to the lack of deep capital markets and investment opportunities, insurance and pension funds are
                 engaging in credit business with individuals and firms and competing with banks. As a result, the share of the non-bank
                 sectors in total financial sector assets has increased between 2012 and 2022 (Figure 16). However, non-banks are more
                 susceptible to maturity mismatches and are subject to weaker supervision and possess lower capacity to absorb losses.

                 Asset quality has deteriorated following the pandemic, especially in the non-banking sector. The significant credit
                 expansion from 2014 to 2019, without robust credit appraisal practices, has worsened asset quality. Credit growth sharply
                 declined during the pandemic before recovering in recent years (Figure 17). Non-banks, in particular Royal Insurance
                 Corporation of Bhutan (RICB) and Bhutan Insurance Limited (BIL), reported higher NPLs compared to commercial banks.
                 Lax credit management, monitoring, and recovery practices contributed to NPLs. By June 2020, the ratio of NPLs to
                 total loans increased to nearly 15 percent as micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) struggled to meet debt
                 repayments. In December 2021, NPLs had declined to 9 percent, primarily due to the moratorium on loan repayments
                 and other measures introduced by the Royal Monetary Authority (RMA). The NPL ratio declined further in 2022, largely
                 due to the lack of recognition of potentially stressed assets. The majority of NPLs are concentrated in the services and
                 tourism sectors (33 percent), followed by trade, production and manufacturing, and housing sectors.




                 21	        Since 2016, they have also started to offer some credit products with floating interest rate.




16
                                                                                                                                                          Executive Summary
                                                                                                                                 Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Figure 16: Share of banks and non-banks in                          Figure 17: Gross NPL and credit growth (percent),
credit and assets (percent), 2012 and 2022                          2012-2023
                                                                       16                                                                                  30%
                                                                                                                              14.6
 Assets, 2012                                                          14
                                                                                                                                                           25%
                                                                                                              10.9
                                                                       12
                                                                                                                10.4
                                                                                                                                                           20%
 Assets, 2022                                                          10
                                                                                                                                     8.9            8.7
                                                                                                         8.0                                 7.9
                                                                       8                                                                                   15%
                                                                                6.6   6.3          6.5
                                                                                            6.0
  Credit, 2012                                                         6 5.2
                                                                                                                                                           10%
                                                                       4

                                                                                                                                                           5%
 Credit, 2022                                                          2


                                                                       0                                                                                   0%
            0%         20%           40%       60%     80%   100%




                                                                                                                             20



                                                                                                                                           22

                                                                                                                                                   *
                                                                         12




                                                                                            15

                                                                                                  16




                                                                                                                       19
                                                                                                               18




                                                                                                                                     21
                                                                               13

                                                                                      14




                                                                                                         17




                                                                                                                                                   23
                                                                       20

                                                                            20

                                                                                  20

                                                                                        20

                                                                                             20

                                                                                                    20

                                                                                                          20

                                                                                                                     20

                                                                                                                           20

                                                                                                                                 20

                                                                                                                                       20
                                                                                                                                              20
                             Banks         Non-banks                                   NPL ratio                       Credit growth (RHS)
Source: Royal Monetary Authority..                                  Source: Royal Monetary Authority, World Bank annual reports.




Measures to tackle rising NPLs in the aftermath of the pandemic need to be strengthened. In 2022, the RMA adopted
a Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) Framework to facilitate early supervisory intervention and mitigate risks that could
jeopardize the stability of financial service providers. It is crucial that financial institutions implement the NPL resolution
framework, ensuring that only viable accounts are restructured, and establish a robust early warning, monitoring, and
recovery system. Strengthening credit information systems and enhancing governance of financial institutions can
prevent the emergence of new NPLs. Specific steps are highlighted below.

 ⊲	 Ensuring the implementation of the guidelines for credit underwriting will reduce risks during loan origination.
    While the Risk Management Guidelines 2019 provide an overview of the procedures for assessment, review,
    approval, disbursement, and administration of credit, the rise in NPLs in recent years indicates uneven compliance
    with these guidelines. All lenders have comprehensive credit manuals that cover essential areas of credit under-
    writing and monitoring. However, further examination is needed to evaluate the implementation of these internal
    manuals.

 ⊲	 Financial institutions could develop internal procedures and reporting mechanisms to identify and manage
    potential non-performing customers at an early stage. They could monitor credit risk using Early Warning Indicators
    (EWIs) and Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) at loan origination and throughout the loan’s lifespan. Conducting sensitivity
    analysis and stress testing can mitigate the likelihood of adverse impacts in the future. The RMA could issue a
    guideline outlining the fundamental principles for establishing an early warning system and incentivize financial
    institutions to assess and address any gaps based on these guidelines.

 ⊲	 The loan pricing mechanism could be modified to reflect borrower risks. The absence of risk-based pricing
    highlights the need for a framework that aligns loan pricing with risk appetite, business strategies, profitability,
    and risk perspective. Financial institutions could define pricing approaches based on the type and credit quality of
    borrowers, allowing for different loan prices to be offered based on these attributes.

 ⊲	 The Government could further develop the bankruptcy and insolvency framework to facilitate prompt resolu-
    tion of NPLs. The Bankruptcy Act could be reviewed and amended to establish a comprehensive framework that
    enables businesses to effectively address insolvency and reinforce the rights of secured creditors. So far, there
    has never been a filing for protection under the Bankruptcy Act. Instead, financial institutions are opting for out-of-
    court settlement for faster settlement of insolvency cases under the provisions of the NPL resolution framework.



                                                                                                                                                                              17
     Executive Summary
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                 Expanding the coverage of service providers and data systems in the Credit Information Bureau (CIB) can reduce
                 collateral-based lending. Currently, only financial institutions, some microfinance institutions, and utility companies
                 report to the CIB. As a result, the utilization of credit information by lenders is limited. To provide a comprehensive credit
                 history and a new credit scoring system, it is critical to expand the coverage of information by including a wider range
                 of financial service providers in the CIB.

                 Ensuring a level playing field between state-owned commercial banks and other banks can address risks to financial
                 stability. State-owned commercial banks hold a majority of deposits in the economy. For example, the BoB benefits from
                 a significant advantage in cost of funds compared to other banks, due to its large public sector demand deposit, resulting
                 in a substantial increase in the BoB’s market share. Promoting competition among banks by establishing a level playing
                 field will help distribute risks more evenly across the financial system.

                 Developing the domestic capital market and facilitating access to external capital is a priority. This can be achieved
                 by extending the range and maturity of marketable government securities, which would deepen the securities market.
                 This would improve monetary policy implementation, create a yield curve for a corporate bond market, and support
                 better loan pricing and long-term investment opportunities for the non-banking sector. The role of domestic and foreign
                 private sector capital is limited. Bhutan has one of the most restricted capital accounts in the world, with long-standing
                 capital controls in all categories of transactions. While the FDI framework has been gradually liberalized, it still includes
                 relatively high minimum thresholds, local participation rules, and sectoral restrictions. As a result, the number of approved
                 FDI projects and their aggregate size has been declining. The Government has recently eased access to External
                 Commercial Borrowings (ECBs) for the real sector (i.e., non-equity capital flows) to improve access to international finance
                 for domestic firms but continues to limit ECB for the banking sector. Medium-term reforms could include opening the
                 banking sector to ECB under strict regulatory oversight, raising the debt-equity ratio for ECB beyond the current 3:1 limit
                 to support projects with higher leverage, potentially with sector-specific variations, and allowing shorter-term ECBs for
                 borrowers with a natural hedge in foreign exchange earnings.

                 To promote private finance and develop green financial instruments, the Government can develop a detailed plan
                 based on its Green Finance Roadmap. Bhutan is highly vulnerable to climate change impacts and faces various natural
                 hazards. Investment at scale is required to meet climate-related goals, as public funding alone is insufficient. The Govern-
                 ment has adopted the Green Finance Roadmap and the Green Taxonomy to increase lending and investment in climate
                 objectives. The Government has also introduced reporting requirements and environmental standards. Blended finance
                 tools such as risk-sharing instruments, guarantees, and funds leveraging philanthropic capital can be used to combine
                 public and concessional finance with private capital. Blended finance, tailored to the local context, can mitigate risks
                 associated with new technologies or pioneering projects by shifting the investment risk-return profile through flexible
                 capital and favorable terms. Enhancing market transparency and embedding the national green taxonomy in regulatory
                 frameworks can further strengthen climate finance in Bhutan.

                 Digital technologies are critical for promoting financial inclusion, especially in Bhutan where cash still dominates
                 the payment system. Citizens face challenges in accessing finance, with limited access to credit due to banks’ reliance
                 on collateral rather than financial viability. Many rural communities lack access to formal remittance services and digital
                 payment systems, due to low presence of bank branches and ATMs. To promote financial inclusion, digital technologies
                 are crucial, enabling faster and affordable payments, promoting collateral-free lending, and introducing innovative
                 capital market and insurance products for retail customers. Investment in digital technologies, including blockchain, can
                 drive innovation, manage risks, reduce fraud, and facilitate secure transactions. The emergence of digitized assets and
                 technologies has the potential to transform the financial services industry.




18
                                                                                                                        Executive Summary
                                                                                                        Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Summary of policy options

The report suggests three areas of policy focus to diversify Bhutan’s economy and add resilience to growth going forward:

  i.	 Bhutan will continue to harness its hydropower resources. However, economic diversification will benefit from
      allocating a much larger share of hydropower revenue towards domestic investment in tangible assets including
      infrastructure and industries. This can be achieved by improving the intermediation of hydro resources through
      the appropriate choice of institutional arrangements. Chapter 1 provides a detailed analysis of this issue and high-
      lights institutional choices that can help achieve this objective by directing a significant share of hydro revenue for
      investments rather than consumption.

 ii.	 Raising agricultural productivity by diversifying into high-value crops as per Bhutan’s comparative advantages can
      support the broader process of diversification by releasing labor for non-agrarian sectors and boosting agricultural
      exports. Greater investments into irrigation to increase yields and removing existing barriers to FDI can contribute
      to this.

iii.	 Modernizing the financial sector by strengthening risk management practices, creating a level playing field between
      public and private players, and ensuring greater contribution from private finance will be critical to support the
      process of economic diversification.

Table 2 presents a detailed summary of policy actions for sustained and inclusive growth. This table distinguishes
between policies which aim to create a favorable environment for the non-hydropower sector, and policies which support
specific sectors. Additionally, there are options to strengthen the institutional framework for implementing sector-spe-
cific policies. The recommendations for the agriculture sector (Chapter 2) and the financial sector (Chapter 3) can be
implemented in the short- and medium-term to achieve the objective. Table 1 also includes information on the timeline,
complexity, and probable development returns associated with each policy option.

Sector-specific policies are further arranged in three categories – foothills, mountains, and peaks – each with vary-
ing levels of rewards and risks. Foothills offer attainable rewards with low risks, such as strategic branding initiatives
like “Made in Bhutan” or export promotion agencies. Mountains, while still feasible, require more financial commitment
and carry higher risks, such as government intervention in the agriculture and CSI sectors. Peaks have the potential for
transformative growth but come with significant risks, such as the Government’s strategic investments in cryptocurrency
mining and the Gelephu Mindfulness City. These projects require substantial financial investments and careful consid-
eration of environmental, technical, and financial risks. The policies outlined here are illustrative and based on existing
initiatives, such as hydropower and directed lending.




                                                                                                                                             19
     Executive Summary
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                 Table 2: Policy objectives and priority reform options

                                                    Policies                                             Timeline   Degree of complexity   Development returns


                  Policies to promote a conducive environment for the development of the non-hydropower sector

                  Strengthen the PIM system to expand high quality infrastructure services                 ST               Low                   High
                  and crowd in private investments

                  Improve efficiency of health and education expenditure to improve                        MT             Medium                  High
                  human capital

                  Strengthen oversight and performance of the SOE sector                                  ST-MT            High                  Medium

                  Support workers’ mobility and firms’ access to labor, including through                  ST             Medium                  High
                  a functional LMIS and strengthened linkages between public TVET
                  institutions and the labor market

                  Policies to enhance agricultural productivity (Chapter 2)

                  Enhance irrigation infrastructure and eliminate regulatory obstacles to                  ST             Medium                  High
                  cultivate export-oriented crops on paddy land and irrigate non-paddy
                  crops to boost productivity, enable climate change adaptation, and drive
                  structural transformation in agriculture

                  Promote a fair and competitive environment in the agricultural input                     MT              High                  Medium
                  industries by leveling the playing field between SOEs and the private
                  sector

                  Policies to enhance financial sector stability and financial intermediation (Chapter 3)

                  Prevent the emergence of new NPLs by strengthening credit appraisal                      ST             Medium                 Medium
                  and pricing mechanisms and enhancing governance of financial
                  institutions

                  Ensure a level playing field between SOFIs and other banks to support                    MT              High                  Medium
                  financial sector stability and

                  Promote access to finance and financial inclusion by strengthening the                   ST             Medium                 Medium
                  CIB, implementing a robust collateral valuation system, and adopting
                  digital technologies

                  Promote private finance and develop green financial instruments                          ST             Medium                  High


                  Policies to support specific sectors: Peaks             Mountains          Foothills

                  Create strategic partnerships with universities to establish tailored                    ST                                    Medium
                  executive programs for the development of competitive sectors

                  Leverage Bhutanese living abroad for the transfer of learning, technol-                  ST                                    Medium
                  ogy, and social capital back to Bhutan

                  Strengthen incubation and acceleration centers to promote entrepre-                      ST                                    Medium
                  neurship and innovation

                  Hydropower (Chapter 1): Leverage additional hydropower resource rents

                  Develop the hydropower sector further, subject to economic, environ-                    ST-MT                                   High
                  mental, and social impact analysis

                  Establish stronger backward linkages with the hydro sector to increase                   MT                                    Medium
                  spillovers to the non-hydro sector (i.e., hydro maintenance and
                  engineering)




20
                                                                                                                                         Executive Summary
                                                                                                                         Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                                  Policies                                     Timeline           Degree of complexity   Development returns


Agriculture: Specialize in higher value-added products and capitalize on export opportunities (Chapter 2)

Attract additional FDI, including for smaller-scale and niche farming             ST                                           Medium
operations with potential for high growth

Initiate a proactive investment and export promotion campaign, and                ST                                           Medium
leverage Bhutan’s brand to boost agricultural exports

Provide (digital) extension services and financial incentives to farmers to       ST                                           Medium
adopt sustainable land management practices to increase productivity
and ensuring climate-resilient agricultural production

Review directed and direct lending to enhance its effectiveness (Chapter 3)

Review the design of the PSL and NCGS schemes to effectively alleviate            ST                                           Medium
credit constraints in risky sectors, such as CSI or MSMEs

Institutional framework to frame and implement sector-specific policies

Develop a fiscal strategy with a long-term vision and a minimum share of          MT                        Medium             Medium
re-investment of hydro rents for productive capacity building in tradable
sectors

Consolidate development finance institutions to avoid the spreading of            MT                        Medium             Medium
available resources too thinly

Improve the ability to appraise, monitor, and evaluate investments, for           ST                         High                High
instance through the establishment of an autonomous and technically
equipped public Investment Evaluation Unit (IEU)

Evaluate existing sector-specific policies to determine whether they are          ST                        Medium             Medium
sufficiently targeted, transparent and minimize budgetary costs (and
risks)




                                                                                                                                                              21
                                Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                                                                     1.	   Hydropower
                                                                           Revenue
                                                                           Management
                                                                           for Economic
© Mathias Berlin/Shutterstock




                                                                           Diversification

          22
                                                                                                                                         Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
                                                                                                                                                                                          Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




1.1.	 Introduction

Bhutan’s growth is heavily dependent on hydropower Figure 18: Impact of hydropower on GDP in
generation and exports. Real GDP growth averaged 7 Bhutan (percent), 1985-2021
percent from 1980 to 2020, but episodes of high growth
largely coincided with the operationalization of hydro-         35
                                                                                 Chhukha (1987)
power projects (Figure 18). The economy contracted in           30
                                                                                                      Tala (2007)
2019, despite the commissioning of the Mangdechhu plant,        25
due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Since the           20
first large hydropower project came into operation in 1987                                                                Mangdechhu (2019)
                                                                 15
(Chhukha), Bhutan has increased the country’s installed
                                                                 10
hydropower capacity seven-fold, from 336 MW to 2,326
                                                                  5
MW, with Tala (2007) and Mangdechhu (2019) being the
largest projects (Figure 19). Moreover, there are several         0

plants under construction and the Puna I and II projects,        -5
on completion, will more than double the current installed      -10
capacity.22 The hydropower projects are mostly financed         -15
through commercially priced loans and capital grants from
                                                               -20
the GoI, with the surplus electricity exported to India.23
                                                                                                     1985
                                                                                                            1987
                                                                                                                   1989
                                                                                                                          1991
                                                                                                                                 1993
                                                                                                                                        1995
                                                                                                                                               1997
                                                                                                                                                      1999
                                                                                                                                                             2001
                                                                                                                                                                    2003
                                                                                                                                                                           2005
                                                                                                                                                                                  2007
                                                                                                                                                                                         2009
                                                                                                                                                                                                2011
                                                                                                                                                                                                       2013
                                                                                                                                                                                                              2015
                                                                                                                                                                                                                     2017
                                                                                                                                                                                                                            2019
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   2021
Bhutan is also planning to add substantial capacity through
                                                                          GDP growth             GDP growth, excluding electricity and water
the 1125 MW Dorjilung project. According to the Power
                                                             Source: National Statistics Bureau (NSB)
System Master Plan 2040, Bhutan to date has an installed
hydroelectric power capacity of about one-tenth of its tech-
nically feasible potential. However, hydropower already accounts for more than one-third of the country’s goods exports
and domestic revenues and constitutes 26 percent of its GDP.

Bhutan’s fiscal accounts and debt dynamics are intrinsically tied to its hydropower sector. From FY10/11 to FY21/22,
the country’s revenue as a percentage of GDP maintained an average of around 30 percent, bolstered by income from
hydropower and substantial external grants, with India contributing two-thirds of these grants. Public expenditure during
this period averaged 34 percent of GDP, with the fiscal deficit averaging a modest 0.3 percent of GDP. Capital spending
was a major component of government expenditure, accounting for nearly half of it over the past decade, supported
by external grants. Bhutan’s spending patterns are more procyclical than those of comparable economies. Hydro-
power revenue is volatile, with annual profits and dividends from SOEs fluctuating based on the commissioning of new
hydropower plants and weather conditions.24 Public and publicly guaranteed increased significantly from 69.1 percent
of GDP in FY10/11 to 133.3 percent in FY21/22, largely due to external loans for hydropower development. Despite this
substantial increase in external debt, the risk of debt distress is expected to be remain moderate, as the majority of this
debt is linked to hydropower project loans from India, which are expected to be repaid with future hydro revenues and
carry low refinancing and exchange rate risks.25

Hydropower exports have generated large foreign currency inflows, raising concerns about the Dutch Disease.
Additionally, there have been significant inflows related to hydro investments since the 1980s, primarily through grants
and loans during the construction phase, with most of the investments funded by inflows from India (Figure 20). If the
increased foreign exchange is used solely for imports, it would not directly affect the money supply or demand for
domestic goods. However, if the foreign currency is converted into local currency and spent on nontraded goods within
the country, it can increase the money supply and lead to higher domestic prices under a fixed exchange rate regime.


22	   Four hydropower projects—Nikachhu (118 MW, expected in 2024), Punatsangchhu 2 (1,020 MW, expected in 2024), Punatshangchhu 1 (1,200 MW, expected in 2027) and
      Kholongchhu (600 MW, expected in 2029)—will significantly expand the installed generation capacity between 2023 and 2031, from 2,334 MW to 5,273 MW. The Government
      also commenced work on eight smaller hydro plants in 2022, which will come onstream between 2025 and 2028 (with total capacity of 1501.69 GWh). The smaller hydro plants
      are financed by Druk Green Power Corporation, the hydropower SOE.
23	   The hydropower projects are implemented under a special inter-governmental agreement between Bhutan and India, in which the GoI covers both financial and construction
      related risks and commits to buying all surplus electricity at a price reflecting cost plus a net return.
24	   While Bhutan’s Public Finance Act stipulates that the cost of current expenditure must be met from domestic resources, this rule does not constrain the growth of current spending
      when there is a temporary increase in domestic revenues.
25	   WB. 2023b. “Bhutan Public Expenditure Review.” WB, Washington, DC.




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          23
     Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                 Figure 19: Installed capacity, hydropower (MW), 1987-2029
                  6,000


                  5,000


                  4,000


                  3,000


                  2,000


                   1,000


                         0
                             2000

                             2002



                             2005
                             2006

                             2008
                             2009




                             2020
                             2003
                             2004




                             2022



                             2025
                             2026

                             2028
                             2029
                             2023
                             2024
                             2007




                             2027
                             2001




                             2010
                             1990




                             2012



                             2015
                             2016

                             2018
                             2019

                             2021
                             1989



                             1992



                             1995
                             1996



                             1999
                             1988




                             1998




                             2013
                             1993




                             2014
                             1994




                             2017
                             1987




                             1997




                              2011
                              1991




                                    Kholongchhu (2029)            Punatsangchhu II (2024)       Mangdechhu (2019)            Tala (2007)                   Basochhu I (2002)          Chhukha (1986)
                                    Punatsangchhu I (2027)        Nikachhu (2024)               Dagachhu (2015)              Basochhu II (2004)            Kurichhu (2001)
                 Source: National Statistics Bureau and World Bank staff calculation.



                 Figure 20: Net capital inflows from India and power export revenues (percent of GDP), 1980-2021

                               Chukka                                                          Tala                             Puna I          Puna II              Kholongchhu
                               (1980)                                                         (1997)                            (2008)          (2010)                  (2015)
                       50
                                                     Chukka                                                                             Tala              Mangdechhu                   Mangdechhu
                                                      (1986)                                                                           (2007)               (2012)                       (2019)
                       40


                       30


                       20


                       10


                        0
                             1980     1982    1984   1986      1988   1990   1992    1994   1996     1998   2000 2002 2004 2006 2008                 2010     2012     2014    2016     2018   2020

                       -10                      Power exports                Net capital flow India                Only hydro-related              Construction start               Comissioning

                 Source: National Statistics Bureau and World Bank staff calculations.
                 Note: Power exports vary due to changes in generation and domestic consumption given that all surplus generation is exported to India. Net capital inflows include
                 budgetary grants, grants for hydropower development, and hydropower loans (disbursements minus reimbursement) from India. Net capital inflows, which consist of
                 budgetary grants, grants for hydropower development, and hydropower loans from India, decrease with the commissioning of a new hydropower plant due to reduced
                 inflows and increased outflows caused by debt servicing starting the year after commissioning.




                 The large capital inflows from the construction of hydropower projects and the subsequent export revenues have caused
                 the Bhutanese Ngultrum to appreciate against the Indian Rupee. This has raised concerns about the Dutch Disease,
                 where tradable sectors become less competitive compared to the booming hydropower sector due to appreciation of
                 the real exchange rate. The contraction in the lagging tradable sector is known as the “spending effect”. Simultaneously,
                 a “resource movement effect” occurs when resources (capital and labor) shift towards producing non-traded goods to
                 meet the increase in domestic demand and the booming export sector, leading to a reduction in production in the lagging
                 tradable sector (Corden and Neary, 1982).26




                 26	     Corden, W.M., and Neary, P.J. 1982. ”Booming Sector and Deindustrialization in a Small Open Economy”.. Economic Journal, 92, 825-48.




24
                                                                                                                              Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
                                                                                                                                                              Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




The hydropower-led growth model is characterized by the lack of economic diversification and adequate employment
opportunities. While the hydropower sector contributed significantly to the economy, its capital-intensive nature led to
the creation of very limited gainful employment opportunities, employing less than 1 percent of the labor force, despite
accounting for 16 percent of GDP in 2021.27 The reliance on hydropower has led to limited private sector development,
with the bulk of the jobs concentrated in low-productivity agriculture and public administration. Large private-sector
firms are rare; only 2 percent of firms hold limited liability company (LLC) status, and only 2 percent of firms attract foreign
ownership.28 Unemployment increased from an average of 2.8 percent between 2015 and 2019 to 5.9 percent in 2022
(Figure 6). The rise in unemployment rates since 2020 was mostly witnessed in urban areas, especially amongst young
and educated women and men.29 Bhutan’s topography, landlocked and mountainous terrain, coupled with a small popu-
lation (around 800,000), entails high transport costs, market fragmentation, and a limited size of the domestic market
for goods and services.

The non-hydro sector largely consists of services and a narrow set of resource-intensive manufacturing. Annual
non-hydro sector growth averaged 6.9 percent from 2001-2019, driven by services and non-hydro industry, mainly
construction and manufacturing (ferro-alloy and ferro-silicon). Growth in services was driven equally by public administra-
tion (including health and education), trade and transport (accounting for 75 percent of growth), followed by the financial
sector (including real estate). Since the beginning of tourism in 1974, Bhutan has targeted high value tourists to minimize
the impact on the environment. The hotel and restaurant sector grew at an average rate of 16 percent per annum from
2001-2019, excluding the COVID-19 pandemic year when the tourism industry was severely hit.

This chapter focuses on the macroeconomic impacts of different diversification policies on managing the growing
hydropower revenue. The rest of the chapter is organized as follows: Section 1.2 presents an analytical review of the
hydro and non-hydro growth nexus, including a review of the current growth model, and its impact on the labor market
and job creation. The section also analyzes the overall impact of the planned expansion in hydropower on the economy
under a BAU scenario. In addition to the BAU scenario, two policy scenarios are simulated to examine the impact of the
utilization of the additional hydro revenue for promoting economic diversification. Section 1.3 examines options to manage
resource revenues and discusses economic diversification policies, as well as the institutional set-up for effectively chan-
neling hydropower rents towards productivity-enhancing assets in Bhutan. Section 1.4 provides policy recommendations.




1.2.	 Bhutan’s hydro and non-hydro growth nexus

                                     y the publicly led and capital-intensive hydro sector
1.2.1.	 Past growth has been driven b

Growth was capital and labor intensive, with limited productivity improvements. A growth accounting analysis over
two periods — (i) 2001-2008, which coincided with the commissioning of the Tala hydropower project in 2007, and (ii)
2009-2019, which witnessed the construction of several major hydro plants, up to the commissioning of Mangdechhu
project in 201930 — indicates that capital accumulation and labor contributed 3.7 and 2.5 percent, respectively, on average,
over the first period (Figure 21). However, the contribution of both capital and labor declined over the second period,
and growth slowed from 8.6 percent to 5.8 percent. Total Factor Productivity (TFP) growth played only a minor role in
driving growth and was lower than structural and aspirational peers, except Botswana, from 2000-2019 (Figure 26).




27	   This excludes the construction sector, which is partly hydropower construction. The agriculture sector accounted for 19 percent of GDP, the industry sector (including hydro) for
      34 percent, and the service sector for 47 percent of GDP in 2021. Measures in current prices.
28	   According to the economic census, 90 percent of the firms in the country are small firms with 1-5 workers, while large firms with more than 100 workers are very limited (0.6 percent
      of total firms). Excluding household-based businesses in agriculture, the majority of establishments (91 percent) belong to the service sector, followed by the industry sector (7
      percent).
29	   Unemployment is significantly higher among youth (28.6 percent), educated workers (11.5 and 11.8 percent for workers with a secondary and tertiary diploma, respectively), in
      urban areas (10.4 percent compared to 3.4 percent in rural areas), and among females (7.9 percent compared to 4.4 percent for males). Alaref, J., et al. Forthcoming. “Bhutan
      Labor Market Assessment Report. Social Protection & Jobs Global Practice”. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
30	   The growth accounting does not include the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, given the unique situation. The economy contracted by 10 percent in 2020.




                                                                                                                                                                                                   25
     Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                 Figure 21: Growth decomposition, 2001-2019                                  Figure 22: Labor contribution decomposition,
                                                                                             2001-2019
                   10.0%                                                                       3.5%

                    9.0%                                   8.6%
                                                                                               3.0%
                    8.0%
                                   7.0%                                                        2.5%
                    7.0%
                                                                                    5.8%
                    6.0%                                                                       2.0%

                    5.0%
                                                                                                1.5%
                    4.0%
                                                                                               1.0%
                    3.0%

                    2.0%                                                                       0.5%

                    1.0%
                                                                                               0.0%
                    0.0%
                                 2001-19                2001-08                    2009-19    -0.5%         2001-19                    2001-08                   2009-19
                                TFP                  Total growth                  Labor
                                Capital              Interaction                                       Human capital            WAPR              Population             LFPR

                 Source: Growth accounting, World Bank staff calculations.                   Source: Penn World Table, World Bank staff calculations.




                 Hydro sector growth was driven by capital accumulation and increases in productivity once new projects were
                 commissioned. The growth accounting exercise assumes that the output of the hydro sector is a function of capital and
                 productivity (labor is only used temporarily during the construction period), while the output in the non-hydro sector is a
                 function of labor, capital, and productivity (see Annex 1 for details). The analysis indicates that growth in the hydro sector
                 from 2001-2008 (21.6 percent) was considerably higher than during the 2009-2019 period (0.4 percent) (Figure 23). Phys-
                 ical capital accumulation contributed 9.3 percent to this growth, on average, each year, in both periods, but productivity
                 loss (measured by TFP as a residual) caused hydro output to decline by 9.2 percent each year from 2009-2019, as no
                 new hydropower projects were commissioned over this period. Hydro projects are multi-year projects and new hydro
                 investments are utilized after a significant time lag. The productivity growth in later years partially reflects this increase
                 in capital utilization (Figure 25).

                 Figure 23: Hydro sector growth decomposition,                               Figure 24: Non-hydro sector growth
                 2001-2019                                                                   decomposition, 2001-2019
                   25%                                   21.6%                                25.0%

                   20%                                                                        20.0%

                   15%                                                                         15.0%
                                  9.3%
                   10%                                                                         10.0%           6.9%                                                7.2%
                                                                                                                                         6.5%

                    5%                                                                         5.0%
                                                                                    0.4%
                    0%                                                                         0.0%

                                                                                               -5.0%
                   -5%

                                                                                              -10.0%
                   -10%

                                                                                              -15.0%
                   -15%         2001-19                2001-08                     2009-19                            2001-19           2001-08                2009-19
                                           TFP                      Total growth                            TFP                    Total growth                   Labor
                                           Capital                  Interaction                             Capital                Interaction

                 Source: Growth accounting, World Bank staff calculations.                   Source: Penn World Table, World Bank staff calculations.




26
                                                                                                                            Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
                                                                                                                                                         Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Figure 25: Hydro investments and TFP growth,                                                Figure 26: Bhutan vs. peers: contributions to
2000-2020                                                                                   growth 2001-2019

                  Rapid productivity growth is recorded as unutilized                           9%
 3000                  capital starts getting used in production                 100%                                   7.6%
                                                                                                8%                                 7.2%
                                                                                                         7.0%
 2500                                                                            80%            7%

                                                                                                6%
                                                                                 60%
 2000                                                                                                                                                        4.6%         4.3%
                                                                                                5%                                              4.3%
                                                                                 40%            4%
 1500
                                                                                                3%
                                                                                 20%
                                                                                                2%
 1000
                                                                                 0%
                                                                                                1%
  500                                                                            -20%           0%

                                                                                                -1%
      0                                                                          -40%
                                                                                               -2% Bhutan
          2000
          2001
          2002
          2003
          2004
          2005
          2006
          2007
          2008
          2009
          2010
           2011
          2012
          2013
           2014
          2015
          2016
           2017
          2018
          2019
          2020




                                                                                                                     Tajikistan   Mongolia     Bolivia    Paraguay     Botswana

              Hydro investment spending                  TFP growth contribution                      Total Factor Productivity      Labor          Capital Stock         Real GDP

Source: Growth accounting, World Bank staff calculations.                                   Source: Penn World Table, World Bank staff calculations.




Non-hydro growth was capital and labor intensive, with limited productivity improvements. Non-hydro sector growth
from 2001-2019 was 6.9 percent, lower than hydro sector growth in the same period (9.3 percent) (Figure 24). Non-hy-
dro capital accumulation, driven by public investments using the hydro rents and sizable external grants, contributed
3.4 percent on average from 2001-2019, but its contribution has waned over time. Labor contributed less than capital
and the contribution declined over time (from 2.9 percent to 2.3 percent). Non-hydro sector growth increased from 6.5
percent in 2001-2008 to 7.2 percent in 2009-2019, mainly due to an increase in TFP, which offset the decline in capital
and labor contributions.31

Among labor components, human capital was the dominant growth driver, though its contribution has declined over
time. Human capital, measured by returns to level of schooling, accounted for about half of the overall increase in labor
input but decreased in the second period (2009-2019). The other half was attributed to the growth in population and the
working-age population ratio. Conversely, On the other hand, changes in labor force participation had a minimal impact
(Figure 22). Labor force participation rates in Bhutan show significant disparities, particularly with lower participation
among low-skilled women in urban areas (Figure 27). The labor force participation of prime-aged women is strongly
influenced by factors such as marital status, the presence of young children, and the participation of other women in
their family and community. Further, women in Bhutan tend to work in sectors with low productivity, and often as own
account or family workers, and have limited access to private employment or public sector jobs.32

Spillovers from hydropower investments on non-hydro growth have been limited. Hydro investments can generate
income in the non-hydro sector through the supply of goods (e.g., construction materials) and services (e.g., labor used
in construction). To assess spillovers from the hydro to non-hydro sector, the non-hydro sector output is split into a core
and hydro-driven part (see Annex 1 for more details).33 Over the past two decades, spillovers from hydro investments to
non-hydro growth in Bhutan are estimated to be small, about 0.8 percentage points of 5.8 percent. But with rising hydro
investments since 2009, the spillover has contributed 1.5 percentage points to the 5.3 percent growth recorded by the
non-hydro sector in the second period (Figure 28). Spillovers remain limited because the hydro projects are mostly



31	   Bhutan currently does not have granular firm-level productivity data to assess possible explanations for the lagging productivity performance in the non-hydro sector.
32	   Alaref, J., et al. Forthcoming. “Bhutan Labor Market Assessment Report. Social Protection & Jobs Global Practice”. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
33	   To quantify the effect of hydro sector investments on the growth of the non-hydro sector, it is assumed that the hydro sector’s capital expenditures generate income in the
      non-hydro sector through the supply of goods (e.g., construction materials) and services (e.g., labor used in construction). The incremental growth of the non-hydro sector is
      then assessed by comparing its actual output against a counterfactual scenario where hydro sector investments are absent. See Annex 1 for more details on the calculation of
      hydropower spillovers.




                                                                                                                                                                                              27
     Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                 developed with (temporary) foreign labor from India and the majority of machinery and raw materials are imported.34
                 More recently, some SOEs have provided goods and services to hydro projects, in particular for the plants developed
                 under the Public Private Partnership (PPP) and Joint Venture (JV) models (Dagachhu, Nikachhu, Kholongchhu),35 and
                 some projects have used domestic labor during the COVID-19 pandemic due to restrictions on foreign workers.

                 Figure 27: Labor force participation rates by                                                                    Figure 28: Spillovers from hydro to non-hydro
                 gender, 2013-2022                                                                                                sector, 2001-2019
                                           80                                                                                       7.5%


                                                                                                                                    6.5%
                                                                                                                                                     1.1%
                                                                                                                                                                                                          2.1%
                                           70
                                                                                                                                    5.5%

                                                                                                                                    4.5%
                  Participation rate (%)




                                           60

                                                                                                                                    3.5%                                       6.9%
                                                                                                                                                    5.8%
                                           50                                                                                       2.5%                                                                  5.1%


                                                                                                                                    1.5%
                                           40
                                                                                                                                    0.5%
                                                                                                                                                                                        -0.3%
                                                                                                                                   -0.5%
                                           30                                                                                                     2001-19                    2001-08                    2009-19
                                                2013 2014      2015 2016 2017         2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
                                                                        Female               Male                                                                    Core        Hydro spillover
                 Source: Alaref, J., et al. Forthcoming. “Bhutan Labor Market Assessment Report:                                  Source: Growth accounting, World Bank staff calculations.
                 Social Protection & Jobs Global Practice”. World Bank, Washington, D.C.




                                                                 ith limited employment opportunities36
                 1.2.2.	 The private sector has remained small, w

                 Limited productivity gains have hindered structural transformation, and labor remains predominantly employed in the
                 low productivity agricultural and public sectors. While the share of agriculture in GDP has declined significantly over the past
                 two decades, dropping from 25 percent of GDP in 2000 to 12 percent in 2021, the share of services has increased from 37 to
                 50 percent. The contribution of the non-hydro industry sector, excluding electricity, has remained relatively stable at about 25
                 percent (Figure 29). Despite the decreasing share of agriculture in value-added, the labor force continues to be largely confined
                 to the agricultural sector. In 2022, the labor market was mostly dominated by low-productivity agricultural employment (40
                 percent), followed by the public sector (25 percent, including education and health). Although more productive sectors like
                 electricity, transport and communication, financial intermediation, and mining, have seen an increase in their share of total
                 employment between 2013 and 2022, they still have a relatively small presence in terms of employment (Figure 30). Sectors
                 like construction have grown in size but have lower productivity levels compared to smaller and slowly growing sectors.

                 The labor market is segmented based on gender, location, and education. Men and high-skilled workers in urban
                 areas dominate public sector employment, while women are more likely to remain employed in agriculture and work as
                 own-account or family workers. Workers with no education dominate agricultural employment and workers with tertiary
                 education tend to self-select into the public sector.

                 The private sector in Bhutan largely comprises low-productivity microenterprises, lacking dynamism, diversification,
                 and productive job opportunities. In 2022, only 2.7 percent of firms were new, indicating a lack of entrepreneurial activity.
                 These very small firms tend to remain small, likely due to restrictions on growth, and inefficient firms are not exiting the


                 34	                       See Intergovernmental Agreement between the GoI and the RGoB, which states under Article 5 that “Except in regard to lower categories of staff and the labour force, the
                                           recruitment of technical, administrative and other personnel of the Authority will be confined to the nationals of either country.” https://www.mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.
                                           htm?dtl/6349/Agreement
                 35	                       See Annual Report 2021 CDCL (Construction Development Corporation Limited). (file:///C:/Users/wb506822/Downloads/CDCL%20AR%202021.pdf), a fully owned SOE under
                                           DHI, and Annual Report 2021 Dungsam Cement Company Limited (CCDL) (file:///C:/Users/wb506822/Downloads/Annual%20Report%202021%20Final_compressed.pdf), a DHI
                                           controlled SOE.
                 36	                       Based on Alaref, J., et al. Forthcoming. “Bhutan Labor Market Assessment Report. Social Protection & Jobs Global Practice”. World Bank, Washington, D.C.




28
                                                                                                                                                               Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
                                                                                                                                                                                            Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Figure 29: Sector shares in GDP, constant 2000                                        Figure 30: Change in sectoral productivity and
prices, 1980-2021                                                                     employment shares, 2013-2021
 100%                                                                                                                                    3.0

                                                                                                                                         2.5                           Electricity/water




                                                                                      Log(Sector value added/ Sector employment), 2021
 80%                                                                                                                                     2.0
                                                                                                                                                                         Financial interm
                                                                                                                                          1.5
                                                                                                                                                Real estate/                      Mining
 60%                                                                                                                                      1.0   bus service
                                                                                                                                         0.5                         Transport/info and comm
                                                                                                                                                                                                Construction
                                                                                                                                         0.0
 40%                                                                                                                                          Public admin/                  Whole/retail
                                                                                                                                         -0.5 educ/ health

                                                                                                                                         -1.0                                Manufacturing
 20%                                                                                                                                                Agriculture
                                                                                                                                         -1.5

                                                                                                                                         -2.0
   0%                                                                                                                                                                Hotel/rest
    1980             1990               2000             2010              2020                                                          -2.5
                Agriculture                         Power/water                                                                              -50%              0%             50%              100%            150%

                Industry, excl. power/water         Services                                                                                          Change in employment share, percent, 2013-2021

Source: National Statistics Bureau and World Bank staff calculations.
Note: The circle size in the right hand graph reflects sector employment in 2013. Productivity is measured as the sector-level value-added per worker in 2021.




market. Between 2018 and 2022, firms became older and smaller, with the share of long-established firms increasing
from 24 percent to 26 percent, and the share of cottage firms rising from 89 percent to 96 percent (Figure 31). Further,
most firms (nearly 97 percent) are owned as individual proprietorships. In terms of employment, the average number
of workers hired by firms decreased from 1.1 in 2019 to 0.7 in 2020 and 2021, indicating a decline in job opportunities
within the private sector. Additionally, there is a lack of diversification in terms of economic activity, with the wholesale
and retail trade, and accommodation and food services sectors accounting for nearly 80 percent of firms. These sectors
typically have low labor productivity and employ low-skilled workers.

The private sector hires more individuals in low- and middle-paying occupations, in comparison to the public sector.
Own-account workers outside agriculture are mostly service and sales workers, whereas employers are mostly in
high-skilled occupations, such as managers. The private sector accounted for 14 percent of total employment in 2022.
Private employment was the most prevalent in construction (60 percent), administrative and support service activities (60
percent), and in arts, entertainment, recreation, and other service activities (66 percent). Apart from public administration
and defense, public employment dominated in human health and social work activities (97 percent), and education (87
percent). Employees also worked in SOEs in the energy, water, and waste management activities, and financial and real
estate activities (Figure 32).

The limited development of the private sector has resulted in a shortage of productive jobs for educated individuals.
The majority of employed workers are in low to mid-skilled positions, creating a disparity between the profile of job
seekers and the available jobs. In 2022, approximately 58 percent (24 percent) of job seekers held a secondary degree
(university degree), compared to 29 percent (9.5 percent) of employed workers, indicating an oversupply of educated
workers (Figure 33). As a result, unemployment rates were high for individuals with secondary diplomas (11.5 percent in
2022) or tertiary diplomas (11.8 percent in 2022). This lack of productive jobs that offer competitive wages for educated
individuals is likely contributing to emigration, especially among the most skilled workers, including those employed in
the public sector.

As a result, unemployed workers, especially the youth, tend to prefer the public sector. In 2021, a higher percentage
of youth (86 percent) compared to non-youth (75 percent) expressed a preference for public sector employment. The
reasons for preferring public sector employment mostly relate to job security and working conditions. Youth place more
emphasis on job security, with 83 percent citing it as the main reason for preferring public sector employment, compared
to 74 percent of non-youth.



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 29
     Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                 Figure 31: Establishment size and employment                                            Figure 32: Type of employment, by sector
                 share, 2022                                                                             (excluding agriculture), 2022

                      100.0%       95.9%                                                                       100%



                                                                                                                   80%
                           80.0%

                                                                                                                   60%




                                                                                                         Percent
                           60.0%
                                                                                                                   40%

                           40.0%           36.8%
                                                                                             31.9%                 20%


                           20.0%                         19.6%
                                                                                                                    0%
                                                                            11.7%
                                                                                                                                er ring

                                                                                                                                    tru r
                                                                                                                                            on

                                                                                                                         te po e

                                                                                                                           ma taur n
                                                                                                                        an n/c s
                                                                                                                                            m.

                                                                                                                                            te

                                                                                                                                 nis e

                                                                                                                                              n
                                                                                                                                 Ed blic
                                                                                                                                           ion

                                                                                                                                              h
                                                                                                                                            es
                                                                                                                                 ns ate




                                                                                                                     Fin tio ant
                                                                                                                     Inf /res tatio




                                                                                                                                         tio




                                                                                                                                          alt
                                                                                                                                            d




                                                                                                                              mi enc
                                                                                                                                         ta




                                                                                                                                        vic
                                                                                                                            ce om
                                                                                                                                        cti
                                                                                                                                       Tra




                                                                                                                                        at
                                                                                                                                       Pu



                                                                                                                            ot He
                                                                                                                                      tra
                                                                                                                    tu




                                                                                                                                      es
                                                                                                                             Co y/w




                                                                                                                          Ad Sci




                                                                                                                                    uc



                                                                                                                                     er
                                                                                                                            ls r
                                                                                                                   fac




                                                                                                                                   al




                                                                                                                                 rs
                                                     2.9%            0.9%             0.3%                                        g




                                                                                                                               /re
                                                                                                            nu




                                                                                                                      Ho ns




                                                                                                                              he
                                                                                                                    En

                            0.0%
                                                                                                         Ma




                                                                                                                          Tra




                                                                                                                        ts/
                                                                                                                        or
                                    Cottage            Small           Medium            Large




                                                                                                                     Ar
                                                                                                                              Self-employed                  Salaried worker (public)
                                              Establishment          Employment
                                                                                                                              Salaried worker (private)      Employer



                 Figure 33: Comparison between the distribution of expected labor demand and the current labor
                 force and inactive population (percent of total), by education, 2022

                            70
                                   Undersupply
                            60
                                                                                          ply




                            50
                                                                                        rsup
                                                                                      Ove




                            40
                 Percent




                            30                        Important to activate, esp.
                                                      among women
                                                                                                                                                                       ply
                                                                                                                                                                      up




                            20                                                                                           Un
                                                                                                                                                                    ers




                                                                                                                           der
                                                                                                                               sup
                                                                                                                                                                  Ov




                                                                                                                                  ply
                            10


                             0
                                   No education                  Primary                     Secondary              Certificate                     Diploma         University and above
                                                   Future demand              Working-age population         Employed                      Job-seekers          Inactive


                 Source: Bhutan Labour Force Survey (BLFS) 2021, 2022. Establishment Survey, World Bank Labor Market Assessment Report. Forthcoming.




                 Conversely, the private sector is facing labor shortages due to a mismatch in skills and spatial distribution, which can
                 impede growth and result in low productivity. Firms in Bhutan require workers with specific technical skills and lower
                 levels of education, particularly in the services sector. However, accessing this labor is challenging because there is a high
                 proportion of lower-educated workers, especially women, who are not in the labor force but could potentially fill these
                 vacancies with appropriate training and support. The labor shortages also have a spatial dimension, where job seekers
                 with the required qualifications, especially those with lower levels of education, are not located in regions experiencing
                 supply shortages. For example, regions like Samdrup Jongkhar and Trashigang, both close to the Indian border, face the
                 most hiring difficulties, with tight labor markets for non-educated workers and graduates with primary education. Firms
                 also struggle to find workers with the necessary technical skills because of a lack of linkages with vocational training
                 institutes. While some firms may consider hiring foreign workers to address the shortages, the percentage of firms doing
                 so has declined over time, with only 7 percent hiring at least one foreign worker in 2022. Many firms have expressed
                 that hiring difficulties have a negative impact on their performance and potential for growth.



30
                                                                                                                                    Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
                                                                                                                                                                Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                                                  nd symptoms of the Dutch Disease
1.2.3.	 Economy-wide effects of the hydro sector a

Despite limited spillovers from the hydro to the non-hydro sectors, large hydro resource rents could have impacted
the competitiveness and diversification of the non-hydro economy. While hydro avoids certain oil-related symp-
toms (i.e., shocks after resource depletion, volatile tariffs, competition for a fixed amount of resources), the expansion
of hydropower production in Bhutan shares characteristics with the discovery of fossil reserves due to the large
foreign currency inflows from hydropower exports. Resource-dependent economies are known to experience Dutch
Disease with large foreign currency inflows leading to an appreciation of the real exchange rate that adversely affects
(non-booming) export sectors. This section assesses the economy-wide effects of the booming hydro sector, and its
impact on the growth of the non-hydro sector, by examining past trends and projecting a forward-looking scenario
using a CGE model.37

Hydro rents have been absorbed by the economy through an increase in private and public consumption. Hydro-
power export revenues are transferred from the hydro SOE Druk Green Power Corporation (DGPC) to the Central
Government as general government revenue in the form of Corporate Income Tax (CIT), royalties, dividends, and profit
transfers. A small fraction is transferred into the Bhutan Economic Stabilization Fund (BESF), and the majority is used to
cover the current and capital expenditure of the general Government (i.e., public sector wages, health, education, public
investment). Meanwhile, a portion of the rents accrues to Druk Holding and Investments (DHI), which uses a part of it to
cross subsidize and invest in other SOEs. Both private and public consumption correlate positively with power exports
(Figure 34). Public investment is negatively correlated, and private investment and imports demonstrate no correlation
with power exports (Figure 35). This indicates that hydro-related revenue has not resulted in significant increases in
private investment or imports.



Figure 34: Percent change in power exports and                                                    Figure 35: Correlation of power exports with
consumption (in constant 2000 prices), 1991-2019                                                  consumption and investment (annual data),
                                                                                                  1991-2019

 100                                                                                                           60.0


  80
                                                                                                               30.0
  60
                                                                                                   Growth rate (%)




  40
                                                                                                                     0.0

  20

                                                                                                            -30.0
      0


 -20
                                                                                                            -60.0
                                                                                                               -30.0              0.0            30.0             60.0            90.0
           2000
           2002

           2005
           2006
           2008
           2009
           2003
           2004

           2007
           2001




           2010
           1990




           2012

           2015
           2016
           2018
           2019
           1992

           1995
           1996
           1998
           1999




           2013
           2014
           1993
           1994




           2017
            1997




            2011
            1991




  -40                                                                                                                                Hydropower export growth rate (%)
                          Consumption                        Power export                                                  Consumption           Investment              Import

Source: National Statistics Bureau and World Bank staff calculations                              Source: World Bank staff calculations.
                                                                                                  Note: The correlation coefficients for private and public consumption are 0.26
                                                                                                  and 0.21, respectively. The correlation coefficient for private investment is 0.02,
                                                                                                  while for public investment it is -0.39. The correlation coefficient for imports is
                                                                                                  -0.07. These coefficients remain relatively stable even when considering lags.




37	       While the first economic census from 2018 includes data on establishments, such as size and economic activity, it does not include firm-level output data.




                                                                                                                                                                                                     31
     Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                 The Bhutanese Ngultrum (BTN) has experienced an appreciation against the Indian Rupee (INR) due to capital inflows
                 and export revenues. The starting point for examining Dutch Disease effects is to estimate the resultant change in the
                 real exchange rate. Under Bhutan’s fixed exchange rate regime, the large inflows are expected to increase domestic
                 demand and prices, leading to an appreciation of the real exchange rate. Figure 36 and Figure 37 illustrate the bilateral
                 real exchange rate (BRER) with India, power exports to India, and net capital flows from India.38 There is a negative correla-
                 tion between hydro-related inflows and the BRER with the INR. From 1980 to 2000, the BTN appreciated vis-à-vis the
                 INR, coinciding with the construction of the Chhukha project (the first large hydropower project) and subsequent hydro
                 exports. The BRER remained relatively stable until 2012, despite a significant increase in hydro exports. However, in the
                 last decade, the rate of appreciation has accelerated, coinciding with significant net capital flows for the construction of
                 Mangdechhu, Puna I and Puna II projects.

                 Figure 36: BRER with India (Index average                                                                                                                                                         Figure 37: Correlation of BRER with India with
                 1980-2021 = 1), real power exports and real net                                                                                                                                                   the sum of capital inflows and export revenues,
                 capital inflows from India, 1980-2021                                                                                                                                                             1986-2021
                                                           1.4                                                    Depreciation                                     6,000                                                                         2

                                                           1.3                                                                                                     5,000                                                                         2
                 BRER (Nu/INR), index avg. 1980-2021 = 1




                                                                                                                                                                                                                   BRER (Nu/INR), standardized




                                                           1.2                                                                                                                                                                                    1
                                                                                                                                                                            Nu. Millions in constant 1980 prices




                                                                                                             Appreciation
                                                                                                                                                                   4,000

                                                           1.1                                                                                                                                                                                    1
                                                                                                                                                                   3,000
                                                           1.0                                                                                                                                                                                   0
                                                                                                                                                                   2,000
                                                       0.9                                                                                                                                                                                       -1

                                                                                                                                                                   1,000
                                                       0.8                                                                                                                                                                                       -1


                                                           0.7                                                                                                     0                                                                             -2


                                                       0.6                                                                                                         -1,000                                                                        -2
                                                                        1983
                                                                               1986
                                                                                      1989
                                                                                             1992
                                                                                                    1995
                                                                                                           1998




                                                                                                                                              2013
                                                                 1980




                                                                                                                                                     2016
                                                                                                                                                            2019
                                                                                                                  2001




                                                                                                                                       2010
                                                                                                                                2007
                                                                                                                         2004




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 -3
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   -2           -1               0             1              2          3
                                                            Power exports                           Net capital flows, India                            BRER (Nu/INR)                                                                                    Real net capital flows from India + Power exports, standardized
                 Source: National Statistics Bureau and World Bank staff calculations.                                                                                                                             Source: World Bank staff calculations.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Note: The correlation coefficient for real power exports and real net capital inflows
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   from India is 0.76.




                 In Bhutan, both the non-tradable and tradable sectors have exhibited lower growth and output levels compared to
                 the booming electricity sector. Dutch Disease-type effects typically lead to a shift towards non-tradable services and a
                 reduction in the size of the lagging tradable sectors. In Bhutan, the output of the tradable sector, including agriculture,
                 mining, and manufacturing, has remained below that of the non-tradable sector as well as the booming electricity sector
                 (Figure 38). Although there has been notable growth in non-hydro exports, this growth has been driven by mineral
                 products such as boulders and base metals like ferro-alloy and silicon. In contrast, other exports have shown limited
                 progress, indicating a lack of economic diversification (Figure 39). This suggests that hydropower exports and hydro-re-
                 lated capital inflows may have stymied the growth of the lagging tradable sector relative to the non-tradable sector. An
                 earlier study by Kojo (2005) did not find evidence of contraction or stagnation in the tradable sector. 39 However, the
                 study suggested that the non-tradable sector may have experienced faster growth if the BTN had not appreciated and
                 that future expansion of hydro exports or aid inflows could further pressure the BTN and negatively impact the tradable
                 sector. The evidence in the previous paragraph shows that this has indeed been the case.



                 38	                                        The real exchange rate, RER, is defined as the nominal exchange rate, ER, multiplied by the ratio of the index of non-domestic prices, pw_ind, to the index of domestic prices, ​
                                                                        [_        ]
                                                                          pw _ ind
                                                            RER = ER *​   pd _ ind 
                                                                          ​        
                                                                                  ​ ​
                                                                                    . A fall in the real exchange rate index is an appreciation in the real exchange rate.
                 39	                                        Kojo (2005) investigated the Dutch Disease effects in Bhutan and found that hydro exports led to the appreciation of the BTN. While there was no evidence of contraction or
                                                            stagnation in the tradable sector, the study highlighted important caveats. First, the lagging non-tradable sector may have grown faster without the real appreciation of the BTN.
                                                            Second, limited labor mobility between the tradable and non-tradable sectors, especially for farmers in remote areas, may have hindered relocation to the capital city. Third,
                                                            agriculture’s subsistence-based nature may exclude it from being considered a tradable sector in Bhutan. The study also suggested that future expansion of hydro exports or aid
                                                            inflows could further pressure the BTN and negatively impact the tradable sector. See Kojo, N. 2005. ”Bhutan: Power Exports and Dutch Disease”. The Centre for Bhutan Studies,
                                                            Thimphu, Bhutan.




32
                                                                                                                           Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
                                                                                                                                                         Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Figure 38: GDP growth by economic activity                                                   Figure 39: Hydro and non-hydro goods exports
(Index, 1986=100), 1986-2021                                                                 (in million Nu), 2001-2022
 3000                                                                                          70,000


                                                                                               60,000
 2500

                                                                                               50,000
2000
                                                                                               40,000

 1500
                                                                                               30,000


 1000                                                                                          20,000


                                                                                                10,000
  500

                                                                                                      0
                                                                                                          2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021
      0
       1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019                                     Total exports         Non-hydro total            Non-hydro, minerals/metals
                      Boosted             Non-Tradable               Tradable                          Hydro                 Non-hydro, other
Source: NSB and World Bank staff calculation.                                                Source: NSB.
Note: Boosted: electrcity and water; Tradable: crops, livestock, mining, manufac-            Note: Non-hydro goods exports consist of minerals and metals exports (Bhutan
turing; Non-tradable: forestry, construction, services.                                      Trade Classification, Section V and XV, respectively), as well as other exports.




Four scenarios are simulated to analyze how hydro revenues impact the real economy, taking into account assump-
tions about their future utilization. A CGE model, calibrated to a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) for Bhutan in 2019, is
used to simulate the following scenarios:40

 ⊲	 Scenario 1: No additional hydropower. This scenario assumes that investments in hydropower end in 2020.

 ⊲	 Scenario 2: Additional hydropower investments. This scenario includes the construction and commissioning of
    four planned hydropower projects: Punatsangchhu I, Punatsangchhu II, Nikachhu, and Kholongchhu. The additional
    planned investment results in an expansion in hydro capacity and production after 2023 and 2025 (Figure 41). The
    Puna I and Puna II projects are expected to generate additional revenue per capita, from 12,652 Nu (US$164) during
    the construction phase to 25,702 Nu (US$334) during the revenue phase. While there are other hydropower proj-
    ects in the pipeline, including the Dorjilung hydropower project that will likely come online after 2030, this scenario
    assumes that no additional projects are planned after 2025.

 ⊲	 A comparison of Scenario 1 and Scenario 2 demonstrates the impact of the planned hydropower projects on
    the economy (the Dutch Disease).

 ⊲	 Scenario 3: Scenario 2 with hydropower rents invested in physical and human capital. This scenario is identical
    to Scenario 2, but with the assumption that public policy is used to diversify the economy by investing additional
    hydro revenues in human and physical capital accumulation, rather than in general public spending on wages,
    goods and services. Additional revenues are split equally between (i) focused education expenditures such as
    skills training to improve labour productivity; and (ii) capital investments through government savings. A compar-
    ison between Scenario 3 and the reference Scenario 2 shows the impact of allocating additional hydropower
    revenues towards a diversification policy. 41




40	   The detailed results are reported in Shutes, F., and McDonald. 2022. CEM Background Paper. World Bank, Washington, DC.
41	   Compared to the BAU scenario, additional hydropower rents are redirected from general government spending towards investments in human and physical capital. A stylized
      approach is taken in which additional revenues are split equally between spending on training, resulting in labor productivity improvements, and spending on capital investments
      via government savings. The CGE scenarios are indicative and aim to demonstrate broad trends and trade-offs.




                                                                                                                                                                                              33
     Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                 Figure 40: Additional hydro revenues after 2019 in the reference scenario, 2020-2030
                                    400                                                                                                                                                                     160000

                                    350                                                                                                                                                                     140000

                                    300                                                                                                                                                                     120000
                 Nu ('00s) or USD




                                    250                                                                                                                                                                     100000




                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Nu (millions)
                                    200                                                                                                                                                                     80000

                                    150                                                                                                                                                                     60000

                                    100                                                                                                                                                                     40000

                                     50                                                                                                                                                                     20000

                                     0                                                                                                                                                                      0
                                            2020          2021           2022           2023           2024           2025          2026           2027           2028           2029           2030

                                                                    Additional revenues per capita (Nu, '00s)                    Additional revenues per capita (USD, 1Nu = 0.013 USD)
                                                                    Additional revenues cf 2019 (Nu, millions)                   Cumulative additional revenues (Nu, millions)

                 Source: Shutes, F., and McDonald. 2022. CEM Background Paper, World Bank.




                        ⊲	 Estimates from the CGE model indicate that channeling additional hydropower revenues into physical and human
                           capital, specifically through focused educational expenditures such as skills training, leads to labor productivity
                           improvements and enhances capital accumulation.

                        ⊲	 Scenario 4: Scenario 2 with hydropower rents distributed through fiscal transfers – a Basic Income Grant (BIG).
                           A least cost allocation of hydro rents is assumed, whereby the Grant is assumed to be untargeted and unweighted,
                           such that all individuals receive an equal per capita payment. No explicit welfare objective is associated with the
                           allocation of rents. A comparison of this scenario with the reference Scenario 2 shows the impact on the econ-
                           omy of targeting additional hydropower revenues on fiscal transfers, instead of funding government efforts to
                           create human or physical capital.42

                        ⊲	 Scenarios 3 and 4 capture the impacts stemming from two different policies related to the utilization of hydro-
                           power revenues with the aim to diversify the economy.

                 Scenario 3 presents a growth model that utilizes hydropower rents to finance key investments, while Scenario
                 4 simulates a situation where the rents are channelled to households through direct fiscal transfers. Scenario 3
                 captures policies to facilitate the availability of factor inputs, including human capital, infrastructure, and physical capital,
                 technological know-how, institutional quality such as macro stability and the regulatory environment, removal of trade
                 barriers, and access to financing.43 In Scenario 4, the idea is to make growth more inclusive through a universal BIG.
                 The concept of distributing resource revenues directly to citizens through cash transfers is often advocated as a means
                 to improving accountability; it encourages citizens to monitor resource income and widens the opportunity for citizens
                 to invest in human capital. A few resource-rich states, such as Alaska or Alberta (Canada), have implemented citizen
                 dividend schemes.

                 Scenario 1, with no additional hydropower investments, exhibits the lowest growth rate. The primary sectors expand
                 without the additional hydropower projects, resulting in a broader economic base (Figure 42). As a result, real house-
                 hold consumption per capita increases because capital growth is distributed more evenly across the economy, even
                 though it is lower without the additional investment in hydropower. The shift in labor demand resulting from greater


                 42	                 The implementation of the Basic Income Grant (BIG) does not account for administration costs as these are unknown. As such the results should be viewed as an outer bound
                                     on the likely impacts of the policy.
                 43	                 Lian, W, et al. 2021. “A Diversification Strategy for South Asia”. IMF, Washington, DC. While the scenario does not specify where and how to invest the resources (see section 1.3.2
                                     for discussion on sector-specific policies), it can assess whether the growth model can outweigh the impact of the hydropower expansion through the real exchange rate effects
                                     (Dutch Disease-type effects) by comparing the economy with the reference scenario, as well as the no-additional hydro scenario.




34
                                                                                                                                  Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
                                                                                                                                                              Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




diversification leads to a more balanced rate of wage growth across sectors compared to Scenario 2. Urban households
benefit from higher capital returns, which boosts their consumption growth. Where additional hydropower is present, all
households experience higher consumption levels compared to Scenario 2. 44 However, without additional hydropower
plants, electricity production and exports decrease significantly, leading to lower hydropower revenues and government
consumption growth. This, in turn, affects education and health spending, resulting in a slower rate of future human
capital accumulation.

The results from Scenario 2 align with Bhutan’s previous experience, indicating that the economy would grow more
rapidly with the additional hydropower investments, but diversification would be limited. The heavy reliance on
hydropower has stymied economic diversification and job generation. In Scenario 2, the anticipated doubling of the hydro
generation capacity is expected to result in higher growth, albeit at the cost of higher economic concentration due to
Dutch Disease-type effects. This includes higher net exports, appreciation of the real exchange rate, and constraints on
the growth of non-hydro sectors (except construction), as well as lower domestic absorption and household consumption.
This is reflected in an increase in the index of economic concentration, indicating a less diversified economy by 2030
compared to Scenario 1, where no additional hydropower is assumed.45

The CGE model shows that Dutch Disease-type effects are evident in the tradable service sectors. The non-hydro
export sectors related to tourism, such as airport transport, hotels and restaurants, and travel agencies, are significantly
affected by spending and resource movement effects. The contraction in the tourism sectors is led by a strong reduc-
tion in export demand, compounded by falling intermediate demand from interlinked contracting sectors.46 Electricity
production is projected to increase by 122 percent from 2019 to 2030, with a significant portion of the additional supply
being directed towards meeting export demand, which is expected to grow by 138 percent (8.2 percent per annum)
(Figure 122, Annex 2). The remaining three sectors to benefit from the expansion in hydropower are all non-tradables
linked to the hydropower sector: electricity distribution, hydropower construction, and public administration (Figure 43). 47

GDP growth is highest in Scenario 3. Higher government spending in human as well as physical capital results in an
increase in productivity through higher supply of labor and capital. The economy is more diversified as indicated by the
lower concentration index compared to Scenario 2 (Figure 42, and Annex 2). The labor intensive industrial and construc-
tion sectors benefit most in terms of value-added, but there is also higher growth in all sectors through the direct factor
effect and indirect spending effect via higher household consumption (as evident in the higher growth of domestic
absorption compared to both Scenario 2 and Scenario 4). Households benefit from the investments, with higher growth
in consumption across all household types compared to Scenario 2.

Scenario 4 results in a more diversified economy but also results in lower growth compared to reference Scenario 2
and Scenario 3. Many sectors that stagnate in Scenario 2 receive a boost, which results in a more diversified economic
base. Agriculture, natural resources, food and beverages, and industry sector exhibit higher growth due to the pattern
of household consumption. This is so because non-poor agricultural households receive a boost to agricultural incomes
through higher land and capital returns, in addition to the large BIG transfers. The service sector experiences lower growth
compared to Scenarios 2 and 3 due to reduced government service spending. However, export-led services increase,
compared to Scenario 2, albeit to a smaller extent compared to Scenario 3. Given that non-poor agricultural households


44	   Scenario 2 leads to an increase in real household consumption per capita, but the distribution of benefits is uneven. Wage rates and returns to capital grow moderately, except in
      agriculture. Agricultural households experience the lowest consumption growth due to slower growth in the agricultural sector. Urban households, which contribute significantly
      to private savings, experience income growth but increase their savings, keeping consumption levels close to 2019 levels. Urban households play a key role in raising private
      investment funds as total non-hydro investment increases.
45	   An index of economic concentration, akin to the Herfindahl-Hirschman index used to measure market concentration. The index of economic concentration is equal to the squared
      share of each activity’s output, QXa, in total output expressed as an integer, summed across all activities. For the 29 activities considered, the limits of the index are 344 if all
      activities contribute equally to production, and 10,000 if only one activity produces all output.

                                                                                                  a [​               * 100]​
                                                                                                                             2
                                                                                                     (_            )
                                                                                                               QXa
                                                                                                               ​ ​
                                                                                                                   ,s,t​
                                                                    ​                     ​
                                                                                           ,t​
                                                                    Economic concentrations     ∑ 
                                                                                              = ​  ​   ​
                                                                                                           ​ QX​   
                                                                                                       ​
                                                                                                       ∑        a
                                                                                                                    ​
                                                                                                                   ​
                                                                                                                   ​ a,s,t
                                                                                                                            ​​.

46	   The manifestation of Dutch Disease effects in the CGE model is in the export-led service sectors. This is in line with the findings of Benjamin et al. (1989), who show that it is the
      exportable sector that suffers, whether that be manufacturing in developed countries, agriculture in developing countries, or, for Bhutan, tourism services. The non-tradable sectors
      will also see a slowdown in growth, although lesser compared to the export sectors. This is in line with the Dutch Disease-type effects where non-tradable sectors which do not
      compete with imported goods and services are less affected from the appreciation of the real exchange rate and benefit from the growth in national income from the booming
      resources sector. Exceptions to this are the finance, telecommunications, and utilities non-tradable sectors. Bhutan’s strategy of high value, low volume tourism is sensible as
      it focuses on tourists that are likely to be less sensitive to price increases from the appreciation of BRER. See Benjamin, N.C., Devarajan, S., and Weiner, R. 1989. “The ‘Dutch’
      Disease in a Developing Country. Oil Reserves in Cameroon.” Journal of Development Economics, 30, 71-92.
47	   The expansion of the hydro projects would lead to an almost doubling of labor demand and share of labor in the electricity sector by 2030 (albeit from a small share of labor in
      2019 to 4.6 percent in 2030). The movement of labor into public administration following hydropower investment is in line with the findings of Norbu, N. 2017. “Diagnosing the
      Dutch Disease: Are the Symptoms Present in Bhutan?” Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MRPA) Paper No. 93249. Munich, Germany.




                                                                                                                                                                                                   35
     Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                 comprise approximately half the population, this impact, alongside the induced diversification of the economy, makes
                 BIG an attractive policy to consider, if the slower growth in the services sector can be addressed (see Annex 2 for more
                 details on BIG).48

                 However, the interventions outlined in Scenarios 3 and 4 are not sufficient to outweigh the adverse effects of the
                 Dutch Disease on the non-hydro sectors. The performance of non-hydro sectors including the export-oriented service
                 sector, which was significantly affected by the Dutch Disease-type effects, is stronger compared to the hydro-led refer-
                 ence Scenario 2, but weaker compared to the no additional hydro Scenario 1. The type of policies modeled in Scenario
                 3 need to be supported by other policies to foster economic diversification in Bhutan. First, Bhutan’s landlocked nature
                 and the mountainous local topography result in high transport costs and market fragmentation. Transport costs can be
                 reduced by investments in transport infrastructure but the absence of a coastline limits scope for export opportunities.
                 Second, the population is small, resulting in a small domestic market for goods and services. Such economies need to
                 look more to the engine of external (global) demand than internal (domestic) demand for their prosperity. Additionally,
                 while a fiscal transfer program may be easier to implement, it does not necessarily ensure the required investments for
                 economic diversification, as it may predominantly encourage higher consumption rather than investment.

                 Therefore, Bhutan may need to implement targeted policies to foster the development of tradable sectors instead
                 of relying solely on creating an enabling environment for the spontaneous emergence of a sophisticated export
                 sector. In this spirit, the next sections discuss options to effectively utilize additional hydro rents for enhancing domes-
                 tic investment, followed by a discussion on complementary policies to mitigate the effects of the Dutch Disease and
                 promote economic diversification.

                 Table 3: Economic development in different scenarios, 2030

                                                                                                    2019             Scenario 1: No            Hydro-led            Scenario 3:         Scenario 4: BIG
                                                                                                                        hydro                 scenario 2:          Physical and
                                                                                                                                                                  human capital

                  GDP                                                                               180.9                 260.8                  280.6                 293.3                   277.1

                  Domestic absorption                                                               205.2                 292.8                  271.3                  292.7                 264.1

                  Savings                                                                            69.2                  98.2                   98.2                  107.8                  98.2

                  Hydro production (real)                                                            20.2                  23.5                   44.7                  45.6                   45.1

                  Non-hydro production (real)                                                       257.0                  354.6                 331.3                 350.3                  334.4

                  Economic concentration index                                                      623.0                 685.8                  725.6                  722.2                 719.5

                  Government consumption                                                             32.6                   47.7                  56.1                   50                    34.7

                  Household consumption per-capita (in thousands of Nu)                             129.8                  184.5                  147.3                 169.8                 165.3

                 Source: Shutes, Feuerbacher and McDonald. 2022. CEM Background Paper, World Bank.
                 Note: All figures in Nu billions unless otherwise indicated. Please note that estimates are indicative and should not be interpreted as actual growth estimates.




                 48	   Services sector includes trade, hotels and restaurant, land transport, air transport, travel agency, telecommunication, finance, public admin, education, health, and other services.




36
                                                                                                                                                    Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
                                                                                                                                                                                Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Figure 41: Dutch Disease-type effects (spending and resource movement), 2030
                                                                         100%

                                                                                                                                                                                        ElecGen
                                                                          80%


                                                                          60%
Resource movement e ect (%)




                                                                                                                                                     ElecDnT
                                                                          40%                           ConstrHydro



                                                                          20%                    PublicAdmin
                                                               Agric
                                                         Mining                  FoodBevTob
                                                                           0%
                              -40.0%                  -20.0%                0.0%               20.0%                         40.0%                   60.0%                  80.0%            100.0%
                         LandTrans                                              ConstrNonHydro
                 HotelsRestaurant                                        -20%
                    OtherServ                                                      TravelAgency
                     TeleComm                                                       Utilities
                                           AirTrans        Finance       -40%
                                                                                                  Spending e ect (%)

Source: Shutes, Feuerbacher and McDonald. 2022. CEM Background Paper, World Bank.
Note: green – booming resource sector, orange lagging export sector, purple – non-tradable sector.




1.3.	 Economic diversification in Bhutan: a
framework for managing hydropower rents

                  or investing domestically
1.3.1.	 The case f

There are different options to manage resource rents (Figure 42). Resource revenues can be consumed or invested.
First, the Government can use the resource revenue for public or private spending through citizen dividends, subsidies,
and the tax/benefits system, which would increase domestic consumption. Second, resource revenues can be invested
in financial assets domestically or abroad, which can be used as savings for future generations or as a means of fiscal
stabilization if invested in low-risk assets (as has been done by Chile’s government, Botswana’s Pula Fund and Norway’s
Pension Fund, and as anticipated by Bhutan’s BESF). Third, resource revenues can be invested in real assets through the
public sector or private sector in the form of subsidized credits, production or export subsidies, or by reducing public debt.

The framework for the efficient management of natural resource revenues to mitigate potential Dutch Disease-effects
needs to consider several factors. There are two broad strategies to address Dutch Disease-effects: (i) smoothening
of the spending of revenues earned from the export of natural resources, which can be achieved through the creation
of a fiscal stabilization or sovereign wealth fund; (ii) promoting economic diversification into new sectors and industries.
Greater economic diversification, in turn, is associated with lower growth volatility and higher long-term average growth
in small states.49 This is important for small economies like Bhutan, which are especially vulnerable to external shocks
because of their remoteness, trade openness and economic concentration, and susceptibility to natural disasters and
climate change. There is no consensus in the literature on the optimal resource revenue management framework, but
several factors have been identified as important:




49	                           McIntyre, A., et al. 2018. “Economic Benefits of Export Diversification in Small States.” IMF Working Paper WP/18/86, IMF, Washington, D.C.




                                                                                                                                                                                                                     37
     Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                 Figure 42: Pathways for managing resource revenues

                               Bhutan's current model of                        Scenario 2: expanded                         Scenario 3: spending on                       Scenario 4: transfers to
                               investment of hydro rents                      government expenditures                       human and physical capital                      citizens through BIG


                                                                                                    Resource revenues
                                                                        Investment                                                                                    Consumption


                                          Real assets                                                    Financial assets
                                                                                                                                                          Public                Private spending
                                                                                                                                                         spending
                           Abroad                        Domestically                    Domestically                          Abroad
                                                                                                                                                           Bhutan:
                                                                                                                                                         Goods and         Untargeted          Targeted
                                                                                                                                                          services,         spending           spending
                                    Public sector                             Private sector                       Safe assets        High yielding       interest,
                                                                                                                      Bhutan:            assets          transfers,         Citizen              Bhutan:
                                                                                                                 Investments of                            wages           dividend,             Current
                                                                                                                    the Bhutan                                           schemes, nota        transfers to
                                                                      General          Sector- specific                                                                    applicable to       individuals,
                                                                                                                     Economic
                                                                    capabilities         capabilities                                                                       Bhutan           contributio ns
                           General          Sector- specific                                                        Stabilization
                         capabilities         capabilities                                                         Fund (BESF)                                                                 to national
                                                                   Bhutan: Bank          Conditional                                                                                            provident
                                                                      lending,          support upon                                                                                              fund,
                            Bhutan:             Bhutan:
                                                                     subsidized            certain                                                                                            allowances
                        Infrastructure,      Investments to
                                                                   credit, Bhutan         activities
                        human capital      promote the non-
                                                                   Development
                           spending          hydro tradable
                                                                        Bank
                                           sector, SOE sector



                                                    Economic diversification                                    Fiscal stabilization




                 Source: Adaptation from Chang, H. J., and Lebdioui, A. 2020.50




                       i.	 Nature of resource rent (temporary or permanent): If resources are expected to be depleted rapidly, policymakers
                           may want to protect the vulnerable sectors through fiscal stabilization and the buildup of official foreign exchange
                           reserves to insulate the economy from the time-bound and short-run disturbances of Dutch Disease. If resources
                           are likely to be permanent, policymakers may want to boost productivity in the nontraded goods sector and diversify
                           exports to reduce dependence on the booming sector and make them less vulnerable to external shocks, such as
                           a sudden drop in commodity prices (IMF, 2023).51

                   ii.	 Degree of resource dependence: The more dependent a country is on a resource, the more urgent the need for
                        diversification, as the economy is vulnerable to the fortunes of the resource sector.

                  iii.	 Levels of resource rents per capita: Low resource rents per capita (i.e., below US$600) can often entail a high
                        opportunity cost of investing in financial assets overseas, given that their returns are unlikely to free up sufficient
                        capital for domestic investment, in contrast to high resource rents per capita countries (e.g., Norway, Canada, United
                        Arab Emirates (UAE), and Australia).

                  iv.	 Institutional capacity to invest: The efficiency of ‘riskier’ investments in domestic real assets is heavily influenced
                       by the domestic capacity to appraise, monitor, and evaluate investment projects. Weak capacity carries the risk that
                       the resource rents will not be invested effectively and would have been better saved.

                   v.	 The level of public savings: The savings rate determines the ability of the country to invest domestically. A country
                       with high savings has greater protection against shocks and can allocate more revenues to investments.



                 50	     Chang, H. J., and Lebdioui, A. 2020. “From Fiscal Stabilization to Economic Diversification: A Developmental Approach to Managing Resource Revenues”. WIDER Working Paper
                         2020/108. UNU-WIDER. Helsinki, Finland.
                 51	     IMF. 2023. “Dutch Disease: Wealth Managed Unwisely.” Back to Basics Compilation, IMF, Washington, DC.




38
                                                                                                                     Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
                                                                                                                                                   Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




 vi.	 Domestic investment rates and deficit: Investment deficits (including low spending on human capital, education
      or Research and Development [R&D]) increase the opportunity costs of saving resource revenues (e.g., in financial
      assets overseas) as funds would not be available for domestic investments to improve productive capabilities.

There are important tradeoffs, including high opportunity costs of over-investing in stabilization funds at the expense
of social spending and investment in domestic productive capabilities. Fiscal savings in stabilization funds (often in the
form of holding liquid overseas financial assets) have a high opportunity cost given that the funds would not be available
for domestic investment in the acquisition of productive capabilities that can foster economic diversification. Although
increased government spending can generate demand pressures on non-traded goods, leading to a real appreciation
and a decline in traded-good production, efficient public investment can also raise productivity in non-resource tradable
sectors, counteracting the Dutch Disease. Box 1 discusses the contrasting resource management frameworks in Malaysia
and Chile. While Malaysia has converted natural wealth into productive capital assets, Chile has used its natural resource
rents to pursue fiscal stabilization and savings for future generations.

Bhutan’s high resource dependence, low resource rents per capita, and a domestic investment deficit indicate the
importance of using hydropower resources to invest in economic diversification. Despite Bhutan’s high dependence
on natural resources, the country has a relatively low resource rent per capita of US$400, compared to other resource-
rich countries like Norway and UAE (Table 4). Although Bhutan has a high share of gross fixed capital formation, which
serves as a proxy for investment, it masks the significant investment needs in key social and infrastructure sectors. The
human capital index for Bhutan reveals that a child’s productivity in adulthood is only 48 percent of what it could have
been with access to complete education and better healthcare.52 Additionally, Bhutan ranks 97th out of 139 countries
in the World Bank’s 2023 Logistics Performance Index (LPI), indicating lower infrastructure quality compared to other
nations. Given the urgent need for economic diversification and the country’s modest savings rates, there is substantial
potential for investing hydropower rents domestically.

Table 4: Factors to consider for the resource revenue management framework

        Factors                                        Description                                     Bhutan         Malaysia         Chile        Norway           UAE

 Degree of Resource        Total natural resource rents (% of GDP) (average; 2017-2021)1              2.6+10.12          6.2            7.2            6.6           15.8
 dependence                                                                                             (12.7)

 Levels of resource        Total natural resources rents (US$ per capita) (average;                   84+3202            671           1,113         5,326          6,931
 rents per capita          2017-2021)                                                                  (404)

 Domestic                  Gross capital formation (percent of GDP) (2017-2021)                          41.3           22.5           23.8           28.3           23.4
 investment rates
 and deficit               Gross savings rate (percent of GDP) (2017-21)                                 21.3           25.8           19.6           34.7             --

                           Government expenditure on education (% of GDP) (2017-2021)                    6.6             4.3            5.5            2.7            7.4

                           Government expenditure on health (% of GDP) (2017-2021)                       2.8             2.0            4.9            9.0           2.5

                           Human capital index (2020)                                                   0.48             0.61          0.65           0.77           0.67

                           Learning adjusted years of schools (years) (2020)                             6.3             8.9            9.4           11.2            9.6

                           LPI score (and rank, out of 139 countries), 2022                            2.5 (97)        3.6 (26)       3.0 (61)       3.7 (19)       4.0 (7)
Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators, Human Capital Project, Logistics Performance Index (LPI) 2023, and World Bank staff calculation.
Note: 1Total natural resource rents are the sum of oil rents, natural gas rents, coal rents (hard and soft), mineral rents, and forest rents. 2 For Bhutan, hydropower exports
have been included




Bhutan’s current hydropower revenue management involves a mix of consumption and investment. Over the past
five years, the majority (54 percent) of domestic revenue, 40 percent of which is generated from hydropower, was
consumed through public recurrent spending in the form of wages and the provision of goods and services. Private
spending accounted for 18 percent and was directed to social transfers, including allowances and contributions to the


52	   Human Capital Project. World Bank. 2020. “Human Capital Index Report”. Human Capital Project, World Bank, Washington, DC. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/
      human-capital




                                                                                                                                                                                        39
     Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                 National Provident Fund.53 The remaining resources (28 percent) have been allocated towards investments. This includes
                 domestic investments in the public sector (in infrastructure and human capital) and the private sector (for instance directed
                 lending through subsidies to state-owned financial institutions and development finance institutions, such as the BDB).
                 A small fraction was channeled to the BESF for fiscal stabilization purposes (0.2 percent), mainly foreign assets in INR.
                 The Government’s current revenue management model is highlighted in Figure 44.

                 However, to promote economic growth and diversification, Bhutan needs to allocate more of its resource rents
                 towards investments. Currently, Bhutan has one of the highest levels of public capital spending in the world (excluding
                 hydro investments), which has been largely financed by external grants (Figure 43). These grants have covered almost
                 50 percent of capital spending over the past five years. However, there has been a decrease in external grants, from 14.0
                 percent of GDP in 2012 to 7.1 percent in 2022. This decline is expected to continue as Bhutan is projected to graduate
                 from the status of Least Developed Country (LDC) by 2023, which is expected to reduce Official Development Assistance
                 (ODA).54 Given the current high allocation of domestic resources to public spending, Bhutan has the potential to allocate
                 more of its domestic resources, including resource rents, towards real assets. This would involve directing more funds
                 towards investments in tangible assets such as infrastructure, industries, and other productive sectors.

                 Further, Bhutan has ample scope for improvement in the efficiency of government-funded public investment. Despite
                 having one of the highest levels of public capital spending globally, there are notable investment deficits, particularly in
                 soft and hard infrastructure, and the quality of infrastructure remains below that of many other countries (Figure 44). A Data
                 Envelopment Analysis (DEA) conducted as part of the Bhutan Public Expenditure Review (PER) revealed opportunities
                 for efficiency gains, with an overall efficiency score of 60 for infrastructure. Additionally, a recent diagnostic assessment
                 of the Public Investment Management (PIM) system highlighted several issues in government-funded investment proj-
                 ects, including: a lack of strategic guidance, ambiguity in project appraisal and independent review of project proposals,
                 weaknesses in project selection and review processes, inadequate identification and management of high-risk projects,
                 shortfalls in funding for current expenses and maintenance, and a lack of ex-post evaluation or impact assessments.55

                 Figure 43: Bhutan (non-hydro) capital                                                                                             Figure 44: Public capital Spending versus quality
                 expenditure in international perspective                                                                                          of infrastructure
                                                                                                                                                                                   6.5
                                                        20%
                                                                                                                                                                                   6.0

                                                                                                                                                                                   5.5
                  Average capital spending (% of GDP)




                                                                                                                                                    Infrastructure quality (WEF)




                                                                                                                                                                                   5.0

                                                                                                                                                                                   4.5
                                                        10%                                                                                                                                                                          Bhutan
                                                                                                                                                                                   4.0

                                                                                                                                                                                   3.5

                                                                                                                                                                                   3.0

                                                                                                                                                                                   2.5
                                                        0%
                                                                 Bhutan             South Asia         Upper-middle       Lower-middle
                                                                                                         income             income                                                 2.0
                                                                                                                                                                                      0%   5%                   10%                       15%
                                                   Infrastructure          Education          Health        Agriculture        Agriculture                                                 Capital spending (% GDP)
                 Source: Bhutan Public Expenditure Review. 2023..56




                 53	                                    The Bhutan BOOST expenditure database was used to approximate allocation of domestic revenues, of which 40 percent is from hydropower revenues in the form Corporate
                                                        Income Tax (CIT), royalties, dividends, and profit transfers. Public spending includes wages, goods and services, interest and debt amortization payments, select transfers, and
                                                        other expenditure. Private spending includes select transfers, including contributions to the provident fund, current grants to individuals and non-profit organizations, and pensions.
                                                        Investments include capital goods and services, net acquisition of fixed assets, plant and equipment, structures, training, and transfers, equities, and on-lent loans (mainly to
                                                        SOEs).
                 54	                                    Officla Development Assistance (ODA) accounts for approximately 30 percent of total grant receipts. The remainder is received from India and is not expected to be affected by
                                                        the Least Developed Country (LDC) status. However, grant receipts from India are subject to uncertainty, as they are renegotiated as part of the (Five Year Plan) FYP cycle and
                                                        are tied to the Royal Government of Bhutan’s (RGoB’s) ability to execute spending under the FYPs.
                 55	                                    RGoB. Ministry of Finance. 2021. Strategic Diagnostic Assessment of the Public Investment Management System in Bhutan.
                 56	                                    World Bank. (2023b). “Bhutan Public Expenditure Review.” World Bank, Washington, DC.




40
                                                                                                                           Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
                                                                                                                                                          Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




To promote economic growth and diversification, Bhutan can consider investing some of the future hydropower rents
in the progressive accumulation of productive capabilities in tradable sectors. These investments could help overcome
domestic structural constraints such as its small domestic market and mountainous topography, while also mitigating
the risks associated with resource revenues, including public investment inefficiency, absorptive capacity constraints,
and Dutch Disease-type effects. The principle underlying this course of action is the Hartwick rule that suggests that
the value of (net) investment needs equals the value of rents on extracted resources at each point in time. 57 Bhutan
could opt for a two-pronged approach comprising (i) a gradual scaling up of domestic investments in real assets along
with the expanding capacity to invest, and (ii) supporting sectors that are affected by Dutch Disease-type effects. In this
sense, Bhutan can benefit from a resource management framework that is, in principle, more akin to Malaysia (Box 1).

Going forward, more hydropower resources will need to be set aside to promote fiscal stabilization. As highlighted
in the Bhutan PER, Bhutan has one of the most procyclical government spending among its peers, primarily due to
the volatility of hydropower revenues. Profit transfers and dividends from SOEs fluctuate from year to year based on
factors such as the commissioning of new plants and weather patterns. Therefore, some of the resource rent should
be allocated to the BESF to help smoothen volatile hydro revenues and public spending in the face of negative shocks,
thereby reducing the need to undertake expenditure cuts with adverse growth development effects (on infrastructure
and human capital investment in particular) (Box 2).

                          or economic diversification in Bhutan
1.3.2.	 Current policies f

Bhutan has been actively conducting sector-specific policy interventions to support economic diversification and
job generation. These interventions aim to address the unique structural constraints, including being landlocked, having
a small labor force, and a limited domestic market. Bhutan has been implementing diversification policies to facilitate
the availability of factor inputs, including investments in human capital, infrastructure, physical capital, technological
know-how, institutional quality, removal of trade barriers, and access to financing. However, as illustrated in Section 1.2,
these policies alone may not be sufficient to stimulate economic diversification. Market failures, specifically informa-
tion and coordination externalities, can pose significant constraints to the development of specific sectors. 58 Firms in
Bhutan may not fully internalize the productivity gains from potential activities due to information externalities, where
they lack knowledge about which products are likely to succeed. Additionally, coordination externalities can hinder the
development of new sectors that require specialized intermediate goods, skills, or infrastructure to achieve a critical
scale and scope to be viable.

In the case of a small landlocked economy like Bhutan, market failures can be more pronounced due to several
reasons. The limited market size and infrastructure constraints contribute to coordination failures, making it challenging
for industries to effectively coordinate their activities. The lack of economies of scale further compounds this issue, as
firms struggle to achieve cost efficiencies and compete with larger economies. Bhutan’s geographical location presents
challenges in terms of transportation and logistics, leading to higher costs and limited access to international markets.
These constraints can impede the development of industries, hinder scalability, and make it difficult for them to compete
globally. Bhutan may also face difficulties in acquiring and adopting advanced technologies due to limited access to
knowledge networks and innovation hubs.

The Royal Government of Bhutan (RGoB) uses a wide range of tools to implement targeted sectoral interventions
in the product, capital, labor, and land markets with different degrees of complexity. The most prominent example is
the State’s role as a producer and consumer in the economy, reflected in the large SOE sector. SOEs are concentrated
in strategic sectors, including hydropower and electricity, manufacturing, the financial sector, and also industries in
which private firms operate, such as, air transport, mining, agriculture, communication, Information Technology [IT], and
healthcare. The number of SOEs increased from 18 in 2005 to 39 in 2020, driven by the Government’s dual strategy to
(i) harness the hydropower potential by developing new hydropower plants and associated services, and (ii) promote
economic diversification and job creation through investments in SOEs.


57	   The Hartwick Rule suggests that countries should invest resource rents into other types of assets, and that a constant level of consumption can be sustained if the value of
      investment equals the value of rents on extracted resources at each point in time (Hartwick, 1977). See Hartwick, J.M. 1977. “Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents
      from Exhaustible Resources.” American Economic Review, 66, 972-74.
58	   Cherif, R., et al. 2022. “Industrial Policy for Growth and Diversification: A Conceptual Framework.” IMF, Washington, D.C.




                                                                                                                                                                                               41
     Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




         Box 1: Two contrasting frameworks: resource management in Malaysia and Chile

         Active domestic reinvestment of resource rents - the case of Malaysia. Malaysia’s resource revenue management practices
         are oriented towards achieving structural transformation and diversification objectives. During most of the period from 1970-
         1998, Malaysia’s overall fiscal management was characterized by very high fiscal deficits to finance public investments, with
         transformative effects on the export basket in the long run.59 Malaysia’s impressive economic performance is closely tied to
         its sound management of natural resource revenues and that it is one of the few countries that has followed the Hartwick rule,
         according to which the value of (net) investment needs to equal the value of rents on extracted resources at each point in
         time.60 Malaysia has converted natural wealth into productive capital assets (namely infrastructure, machinery, human capital
         and institutions) that have supported economic diversification towards manufacturing and services.

         Oil and gas revenues in Malaysia have been mostly spent domestically, either through re-investments by Petronas (the national
         oil corporation), government expenditures, or subsidies.61 After paying dividends to the Government, Petronas also retains
         between 25 percent and 50 percent of its oil and gas revenues, which it reinvests in different segments of the oil and gas supply
         chain, as well as in petroleum-related sectors and non-petroleum-related sectors such as car manufacturing and property devel-
         opment (International Monetary Fund, 2015).62 Because of its mandate and significant resource-revenue investments, it can be
         argued that Petronas has in some instances played a similar role to a resource fund (ibid). It has provided some insulation to the
         budget against volatility in oil prices, especially in the 1980s, with oil price changes only partially transmitted to the budget (ibid.).

         Meanwhile, the share of the revenues allocated through the annual budget is primarily spent on development projects, although
         there is no exact way to calculate how much oil revenues feed into specific projects because revenues from all industries
         are “pooled” together.63,64 The Federal Government decides how to manage and divide the revenues into three broad areas:
         expenditure (both recurrent and investments) and savings.

         A much smaller portion of oil and gas revenues (about US$25 million a year) also goes into the National Trust Fund, also called
         Kumpulan Wang Amanah Negara (KWAN) – set up in 1988 with the purpose of securing national wealth for future generations
         – in which they are earmarked for future investments and savings.

         In addition, while Khazanah Nasional Berhad, unlike Petronas, does not manage resource revenues and receives no ‘sovereign’
         wealth per se, it acts as a strategic investment fund to spur structural transformation and to create strategic value, understood
         both in terms of commercial profit, as well as potential for knowledge intensity, transformative effects, and spillovers for the
         national economy.

         Over-emphasis on fiscal stabilization at the expense of domestic investment: the case of Chile. Chile’s copper-financed
         sovereign wealth funds do not invest domestically. Since the 1980s, copper windfalls, which have represented around 50
         percent of Chile’s export revenues in the past decade, have mainly been used for fiscal stabilization and savings for future
         generations. Chile has indeed implemented a successful counter-cyclical fiscal policy. However, this fiscal stabilization agenda
         was followed at the expense of financing for structural transformation.

         The copper price boom in the 2000s led to an increase in state revenues and allowed the creation of three funds in 2006:
         the Economic and Social Stability Fund (ESSF), the Pension Reserve Fund (PRF) and the Innovation for Competitiveness Fund
         (ICF), which is much smaller in size. The ESSF replaced the original Copper Stabilization Fund (created in 1985) and inherited its
         assets (of around US$5 billion). Its objective was to finance potential fiscal deficits, therefore avoiding the negative effects on
         government income associated with copper price volatility. The PRF is a savings fund that receives between 0.2 and 0.5 percent
         of GDP, depending on the size of Chile’s overall surplus each year.65 Both the PRF and the ESSF funds are administered by the
         Central Bank and invested in international markets in low-risk financial instruments (financial assets with a high level of liquidity
         and low credit risk and volatility), and consequently do not contribute to the local economy through domestic investments.


         59	   Di John, J. 2009. “From Windfall to Curse? Oil and Industrialization in Venezuela, 1920 to the Present.” Penn State University Press, University Park, PA.
         60	   World Bank. 2013. “Malaysia Economic Monitor: Harnessing Natural Resources”. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
         61	   Lebdioui, A. 2019. “Economic Diversification and Development in Resource-dependent Economies: Lessons from Chile and Malaysia.” Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository, Cambridge,
               UK.
         62	   IMF. 2015. “Malaysia: Selected Issues”. Selected Issues Paper on Malaysia, January 30, IMF, Washington, D.C.
         63	   Yeoh, T. 2008. “Promoting Revenue Transparency in Malaysia”. Centre for Public Policy Studies, London. UK.
         64	   Centre for Public Policy Studies. 2017. “CPPS Policy Factsheet: Oil and Gas”. London. UK.
         65	   Ruiz-Dana, A. 2007. “Commodity Revenue Management: The Case of Chile’s Copper Boom.” International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Canada.




42
                                                                                                                                   Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
                                                                                                                                                          Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Chile’s fiscal stabilization agenda has been successful in smoothing expenditures over time. However, it falls short in effectively
supporting local economic development goals. The country’s persistent high income inequality is evident, with a peak poverty
headcount ratio of 25 percent in the past decade.66 The management of copper revenue in Chile reveals the significant oppor-
tunity costs associated with excessive investment in stabilization funds at the expense of social spending and investment in
productive capabilities.67 The current assets of the ESSF, PRF, and copper-funded defense fund represent nearly 10 percent
of GDP, while public spending on education, health, pensions, and other social sectors consistently lags behind that of OECD
and other Latin American economies.




Box 2: Bhutan Economic Stabilization Fund

The BESF was set-up to stabilize hydro inflows (and other revenue from natural resources) into the Budget, but proceeds
have been largely used to finance current expenditures. The Government established the BESF in 2018 as per the Royal
Charter and defined fiscal stabilization rules in 2020 that regulate
contributions to and uses of the Fund (mainly covering royalties Figure 45: The projected balance of BESF in
from hydro and other natural resources and lumpy profit transfers percent of GDP, 2023-2040
from hydro projects and the Central Bank). Hydropower reve-              18%
nue fluctuates year-to-year depending on the power generated.            16%
Hydropower revenue is volatile, as profit transfers and dividends
                                                                         14%
from SOEs fluctuate year-to-year depending on the commis-
sioning of new plants and weather patterns. Over the period              12%

2001-2021, the standard deviation of the real annual value of
                                                                                                       BESF (% of GDP)




                                                                         10%
total hydropower revenues, excluding the newly commissioned
                                                                          8%
Mangdechhu hydropower plant, was 17 percent or 1.9 percent
of GDP. On the other hand, current expenditures are structurally          6%

more rigid. The Public Finance Act states that current expendi-           4%
tures should be met entirely with domestic resources. This rule           2%
does not constrain the growth of current spending when there
                                                                          0%
is a temporary increase in domestic revenues from hydropower.
As a result, domestic revenue increases from the hydropower              -2%
                                                                                                                                 30
                                                                                                                                25
                                                                                                                                 26



                                                                                                                                 29
                                                                                                                                 28




                                                                                                                                 40
                                                                                                                                 36



                                                                                                                                 39
                                                                                                                         23




                                                                                                                                 32



                                                                                                                                 35



                                                                                                                                 38
                                                                                                                                 24




                                                                                                                                 33
                                                                                                                                 34
                                                                                                                                 27




                                                                                                                                 37




sector have typically been accompanied by increased current
                                                                                                                                 31
                                                                                                                         20
                                                                                                                          20




                                                                                                                              20



                                                                                                                              20




                                                                                                                              20
                                                                                                                              20
                                                                                                                              20
                                                                                                                              20
                                                                                                                              20
                                                                                                                              20
                                                                                                                              20
                                                                                                                              20


                                                                                                                              20
                                                                                                                              20


                                                                                                                              20
                                                                                                                              20
                                                                                                                              20
                                                                                                                              20




expenditures, leading to a procyclical fiscal policy stance. Thus,                        Inflows        Outflows       Stock

volatility in hydropower poses fiscal risks as they create moments   Source: MoF Medium-term  Macroeconomic Framework (MTMF), World Bank
                                                                     estimates
of fiscal space that allow the expansion of outlays that are not
easy to roll back when the cycle is reversed.

The BESF could accumulate significant funds if the stabilization measures are operationalized. The Fund held 825 million
Nu as of March 2022 or approximately 0.44 percent of GDP. The contribution to the Fund was stopped during the COVID-19
pandemic and withdrawals are not planned from it in the near term. Assuming a resumption of contributions by the Government,
the BESF balance would reach about 16 percent of GDP in the medium term (Figure 47). The investment policy stipulates that the
assets of the Fund should be invested in relatively liquid foreign assets with low risks (INR and convertible currency) managed
by the RMA. While the implementation of the BESF could help achieve a more sustainable fiscal path, it would be important to
reconsider the investment policy if the Fund attains a critical size. The BESF rules and regulations specify that once the BESF
reaches 10 percent of GDP, additional revenues shall be transferred to a newly created savings fund, which the Government
may choose to establish.




66	   Lebdioui, A. 2019. “Economic Diversification and Development in Resource-Dependent Economies: Lessons from Chile and Malaysia.” Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository, Cambridge,
      UK.
67	   Solimano, A, and Calderon Guajardo, D 2017. “The Copper Sector, Fiscal Rules, and Stabilization Funds in Chile: Scope and Limits.” WIDER Working Paper 2017/53. United Nations University
      – World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), Helsinki, Finland.




                                                                                                                                                                                                  43
     Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                 Other sector-specific interventions include marketing boards and strategies, tax incentives, directed and direct
                 lending, skills development programs, and SEZ. The Government has launched several initiatives to promote prod-
                 uct quality and complexity and help boost export, for instance “Brand Bhutan”, which supports premium quality and
                 sustainably made agricultural products, manufactured goods, and high value tourism. Further, the Government has
                 been providing fiscal incentives since 2010 in the form of tax holidays and exemptions to promote investment in priority
                 sectors, including agriculture, tourism, and energy. Capital market interventions include the Priority Sector Lending (PSL)
                 program,68 the National Credit Guarantee Scheme (NCGS), and two national development banks, and the BDB, mainly
                 promoting access to finance for the agriculture and CSI sector (see Chapter 3). Additionally, Bhutan has a wide range of
                 skills development and employment promotion services to address shortages of skills. Finally, Bhutan has established
                 several SEZs to spur industrialization, exports, youth employment opportunities, and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI).

                 These policies have yielded mixed results, with limited impact on job creation. While SOEs contribute to a significant
                 part of economic activities and budget revenues – primarily driven by the electricity sector – the profitability of SOEs
                 across sectors has exhibited mixed and volatile performance. The profitability of SOEs is lower in competitive sectors
                 (manufacturing, retail, construction, and transport) compared to non-competitive sectors, which could reflect conflicting
                 objectives and a lack of competition (World Bank, 2023b). Fiscal incentives have benefitted mostly medium and large
                 businesses in the manufacturing, financial, and tourism sectors (World Bank, 2023b). Credit to the agriculture and CSI
                 sector has remained stagnant, and access to credit remains a key constraint to private sector development (see Chapter
                 3). Finally, a recent World Bank firm-level survey suggests that firms inside Bhutanese SEZs tend to have significantly larger
                 exports and employment than those outside these zones. However, there are no significant positive impacts on FDI (Box 5).

                 Sector-specific policies have been implemented in many countries as part of their growth strategies, but many have
                 been ineffective and inefficient. Governance failures, including state capture by rent-seeking private interests and
                 short-term electoral considerations, can result in suboptimal outcomes. This can result in disappointing returns in terms
                 of growth, job creation, and high financial, environmental, and social costs and, in the worst case, hinder growth and
                 destabilize economies and societies. The following principles can mitigate these risks: 69

                  ⊲	 Establish strong institutional mechanisms that incentivize beneficiaries to engage in market competition, with
                     clear performance criteria for selective interventions. The implementation of governance mechanisms, trans-
                     parency, and public disclosure can help enhance spending efficiency of resource rents and promote effective
                     allocation of resources. Appropriate benchmarks for the support received can be set up (i.e., specific performance
                     targets such as export market shares).

                  ⊲	 Focus on export orientation (rather than import-substitution) to leverage international competition, and target
                     sectors rather than specific firms. Countries that implement successful sectoral interventions rely on market signals
                     to hold themselves accountable, sustain competitive pressures, and drive innovation in the development and export
                     of new products. In contrast, import-substitution policies through high tariffs and other barriers to entry can limit
                     competition in the domestic market and the incentive to innovate, export and compete in international markets.

                  ⊲	 Using independent, appropriately qualified experts to select projects for public support. Since there are financing
                     constraints as well as constraints in implementation capacity, investments must be carefully analyzed to determine
                     their feasibility and rate of return. Balancing social, political, and economic considerations in investment evaluation
                     is complex. Therefore, it is crucial to set up the necessary institutions to evaluate potential investments and loans,
                     in addition to the essential transparency and oversight that yields effective governance of development finance
                     institutions.

                 The next section lays out institutional options to improve sector-specific policy interventions in Bhutan, focusing on
                 public finance institutions, evaluation and reporting arrangements, and coordination with education and territorial
                 policies.


                 68	   The RMA prescribes lending targets for the banks, and ceiling preferential lending rates for lending to the agricultural and non-agricultural CSI sectors. Financial institutions which
                       have any shortfalls in meeting their priority sector targets may allocate their funds for on-lending to a microfinance institution or BDB.
                 69	   Cherif, R. & Hasanov, F. 2019. “The Return of the Policy That Shall Not Be Named: Principles of Industrial Policy.” IMF, Washington, DC. and Cherif, R. et al. 2022. “Industrial Policy
                       for Growth and Diversification: A Conceptual Framework.” IMF, Washington, DC.




44
                                                                                                                           Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
                                                                                                                                                      Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Box 3: Institutional options

Fiscal stabilization funds can provide a fiscal buffer in case of a shock, reduce exchange rate volatility, and help mitigate
the Dutch Disease. Sovereign Development Funds and NDBs can encourage national development by providing financ-
ing and investing in domestic infrastructure and local enterprises with growth potential. In principle, an SDF makes equity
investments in companies, while NDBs provide loans, but in practice, some SDFs also make loans and some NDBs take
equity positions, and the difference between the two can be indistinct.

National Development Banks and SDFs can issue bonds to draw on private capital (which also contributes to growing
domestic financial markets) and establish partnerships with foreign firms and investors. Sovereign Development Funds
might also be able to attract investment from larger global Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs), including those of the Gulf
nations and Singapore’s Temasek, which have large international investment portfolios. Sovereign Development Funds
can assist in privatization programs if government shares in SOEs are put into the fund, with the goal of attracting private
investment to help reform them and turn the former SOEs into profitable commercial enterprises. Finally, NDBs and SDFs
can also extend loans to enterprises during downturns and ease back during booms (to reduce over-heating), thereby
acting as counter-cyclical instruments.

Figure 46: Institution types, objectives, and asset types

      Typeo institution                                                       Objectives                                                      Asset types        Examples

                                • Provide a fiscal bu er ni the case of a shock, to avoid increasing debt, or at least cushion
                                  the impact                                                                                           Liquid &low yielding
 Stabilisation Fund             • Dampen the exchange rate volatility associated with shocks                                              (e.g. sovereign
                                • Aims to prevent the 'resource curse' and the Dutch disease more specifically                                 bonds)


                                •   Encourage national development by providing financing for domestic infrastructure and firms
                                •   Can draw on private capital by issuing bonds, and partner with foreign investors.                  Illiquid &low yielding
 National Development           •   Helps overcome market failures preventing investments ni productive activities                      (e.g. loans or equity
 Banks                          •   NDs face more scrutiny than SDFs as the former have commercial credit ratings fi they issue                positions)
                                    bonds


                                •   Encourage national development by investing in domestic infrastructure & equity of
                                                                                                                                         Relatively illiquid
                                •   companies with growth potential
 Development Fund               •   Transfer and manage 'privatised' assets                                                           (e.g. equity in unlisted
                                •   Invest ni equity abroad to foster technology transfer and JVs with domestic partners                     start-ups)



Source: Lebdioui et. al. (2023). CEM Background Paper.




                                            or effectively channeling hydropower rents
1.3.3.	 A suitable institutional framework f
        towards productivity enhancing assets in Bhutan.70

Public development institutions – building one well-managed and well-regulated institution is
preferable to having multiple weak ones.

Public development finance institutions play a crucial role in attracting private and foreign investments, but their
effectiveness depends on having adequate managerial and regulatory capacity. Box 3 provides an overview of the
different types of development finance institutions, their objectives, and the types of assets they manage. Fiscal stabili-
zation funds can serve as a buffer during economic shocks, reduce exchange rate volatility, and help mitigate the Dutch
Disease-type effects. Sovereign Development Funds (SDFs) and National Development Banks (NDBs) can contribute to
national development by providing financing and investing in domestic infrastructure and local enterprises with growth
potential. However, the mere establishment of NDBs and SDFs is not enough to ensure the proper management of



70	   Based on Lebdioui, A., et al. 2023. CEM Background Paper. World Bank, Washington, D.C.




                                                                                                                                                                                           45
     Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                 Box 4: From a Government Holding Company to a Sovereign Development
                 Fund: The Case of Malaysia’s Khazanah Nasional Berhad

                 Khazanah Nasional Berhad (“Khazanah”) was incorporated in 1994 as the strategic investment arm of the Government
                 of Malaysia. This was initially to house the Government’s shareholding in industries deemed strategic to the nation,
                 such as in the provision of electric utility, telecommunications and airports services that had been corporatized from
                 government departments into public companies. Its initial objective was to manage and turn around those SOEs that
                 were underperforming but overtime also transitioned to an SDF and a Sovereign Venture Fund.

                 For the first ten years, Khazanah’s investment style was principally custodial and passive, with more than 90 percent of the
                 value of assets under management being in Malaysia. In the aftermath of the Asian Financial Crisis of 1997/1998, several
                 other companies deemed strategic to the nation were added, including in airlines, infrastructure, banking, and telecom-
                 munications. In 2004, a radical change in strategy was undertaken as Khazanah was mandated with the multiple tasks of:
                 (i) uplifting the erstwhile poor performance of what became known as Government-Linked Companies (GLCs, essentially
                 SOEs wholly or partially owned or guaranteed by the Government); (ii) to restructure companies and industries affected by
                 the Asian Financial Crisis; (iii) to expand the investment footprint into new sectors and geographies; and (iv) to build human
                 capital and talent in the area of investment, corporate management and development management for the state-owned
                 sector and the nation at large. In order to undertake this significant shift in its mandate, several key measures were under-
                 taken. These included (i) changing its investment style to become significantly more active and hands-on; (ii) revamping the
                 management team and board (civil servants were replaced with leading talent from the relevant fields, including from asset
                 management, investment banking, and strategy consulting); and (iii) upgrading and strengthening its core systems, including
                 risk management, investment evaluation and execution, operational management, human capital management, and strategy.

                 From 2004-2018, Khazanah’s portfolio grew to Malaysian Ringgit (MYR) 157 billion (US$40 billion), while net assets rose signifi-
                 cantly from MYR 33.3 billion (US$ 8.5 billion) to MYR 115.6 billion (US$ 29.5 billion), an increase of 3.5 times. This translated
                 into a compounded annual growth rate of approximately 9.6 percent per annum over this period, which was significantly
                 higher compared to many of its peers. These improvements in financial performance were achieved with essentially no new
                 equity capital injections from the Government and with risk tolerance set at appropriately prudent levels. Equally importantly,
                 Khazanah also pioneered an investment style that has been described as not just executing a Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF)
                 investment strategy, but also achieving developmental outcomes in delivering strategic outcomes. These include investing
                 in and driving industrial policy (in industries including healthcare, life sciences and biotechnology, sustainable development,
                 creative industries among others), developing new SEZs (a US$100 billion, Iskandar Malaysia), significantly restructuring GLCs
                 under a 10-year GLC Transformation Program (2005 to 2015), and expanding its regional and international investment footprint.

                 Today, Khazanah, remains a key national institution in delivering financial, economic, and socio-developmental outcomes
                 for Malaysia. In various studies analysing its performance, the key drivers for success have been identified under three
                 categories—(i) a clear and empowered mandate; (ii) critical capacity in key enablers, including the right talent, manage-
                 ment systems, and program management capabilities; and (iii) sound execution and consequence management systems.




                 hydropower revenues. There are many examples of resource revenues wasted through ill-conceived investments; NDBs
                 and SDFs can be subject to political capture, increasing the risk of investments being directed away from projects that
                 benefit national development.

                 Given the importance of effectively allocating resources, concentrating resources on a select few institutions and
                 initiatives can be beneficial. Bhutan already has several development institutions, including BDB, DHI, BoB, and the
                 BESF. The state-owned National CSI Development Bank Limited was merged with the BDB in 2023 due to financial losses
                 and overlapping mandates. Drawing from international experiences, one option to channel hydropower revenues into
                 domestic investments for export diversification could involve expanding the mandate of DHI from a holding company to
                 an SDF, similar to the model of Khazanah in Malaysia (Box 4). Other alternatives include expanding the mandate of the
                 BoB, increasing the capacity of the BDB, or re-orienting the BESF into an SDF.



46
                                                                                                                      Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
                                                                                                                                                    Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Setting up a public Investment Evaluation Unit for efficient evaluation and monitoring

The establishment of an autonomous and technically equipped public Investment Evaluation Unit (IEU) is crucial
to supporting the development of strong analytical capacity to evaluate development projects and policies. An IEU
comprises well-qualified economists and other specialists who evaluate projects and policy reforms in all their dimen-
sions: costs and benefits, economic rates of return, risk assessment, financing, and environmental and community
impacts. Ideally, an IEU is independent and maintains a long-term vision of economic transformation, irrespective of the
macroeconomic cycle. An IEU has a broader mandate than a PIM unit within the central government, which is tasked
with aiding government agencies in the preparation of investment projects. In addition to strengthening investment
project decisions, setting up an IEU can also send a strong market signal to potential investors regarding the quality of
economic management. A strong IEU has the following characteristics:

  ⊲	 Technical integrity and independence, with some degrees of autonomy from day-to-day political influence; a
     commitment from other government branches to provide information and data and avoid ‘lobbying’.

  ⊲	 A pool of well-trained professionals with analytical capacity to assess investment projects, including environmental
     and community impacts (human development, poverty, and social inequality effects). Experience can be drawn from
     outside government and foreign expertise when required.

Efficient evaluation and monitoring require transparent reporting. Transparency can be enforced in multiple ways, both
ex-ante (about how decisions get authorized) and ex-post (evaluation). In addition, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms
can derive from top-down authority, bottom-up pressure from citizens and their representatives, civil society groups, as
well as norms internalized by the public sector workforce .71 Sovereign Wealth Funds that are permitted or mandated to
invest domestically should issue publicly available reports on a timely basis, covering their activities, assets, and returns,
as well as allowing themselves to be audited both internally and externally.72 While all funds embody “vertical account-
ability” (reporting to the government), some also mandate “horizontal accountability” to a wider audience, by making
information on balances, earnings, and deposits and withdrawals publicly available, or by sharing decision-making power
among a range of interest groups independent of the government.73 A good example is Norway’s wealth fund, which is
administered by the Central Bank, but decisions on transfers must be approved by Parliament.

The altitude economy – an approach to balance ambitions with risks and identify sectors

Bhutan’s sector-specific support policies could be formulated around the concept of the altitude economy, which
balances ambitions with risks. The principle of the altitude economy identifies different ‘elevations’ with the aim of
ascending to higher levels over time. Some policies and projects are readily attainable with current financial and human
resources and have good returns with few risks — the ‘foothills’. A more ambitious policy effort beyond the foothills
requires more resources and preparation to mitigate the risks. ‘Mountains’ are initiatives with potentially high rewards
for economic development but significant financial and environmental risks. ‘Peaks’ could be transformative in achieving
a much higher growth path, quality job creation and increased government revenue, but the risks can be the highest
and must be carefully weighed alongside the rewards. The principle of the altitude economy is illustrated below, using
examples from Bhutan’s current policy measures and select policies proposed in the draft 13th Five Year Plan (FYP):

  1.	 Foothills – relatively attainable rewards with low risks: Such policies or projects have high rewards, low costs,
      and low risks. They are readily achievable without too much effort or cost and policymakers can be almost
      certain of success. Examples in Bhutan include strategic branding such as ‘Made in Bhutan’ or ‘Bhutan Believe’,
      export promotion agencies to match buyers with suppliers, and skill development programs to address skills
      mismatches.




71	   Collier, P., et al. 2010. “Managing Resource Revenues in Developing Economies.” IMF Staff Papers, 51(7): 84-118, IMF, Washington, D.C.
72	   Gelb, A., Tordo, S. and Halland, H. 2014a. “Sovereign Wealth Funds and Domestic Investment in Resource-Rich Countries: Love Me or Love Me Not?” Economic Premise, Poverty
      Reduction and Economic Management Network (PREM), World Bank, 133, 1-5.
73	   Gelb, A. and Grasmann, S. 2009. “Déjouer la alediction pétrolière”, Afrique Contemporaine, 229 (1), 87-135..




                                                                                                                                                                                         47
     Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                  2.	 Mountains – high potential rewards and high risks: Such initiatives can be realistically developed with rela-
                      tively modest financial commitment but are costlier to achieve and carry greater risks compared to foothills.
                      The Government’s capital market interventions, including direct and directed lending to the agriculture and CSI
                      sector could be considered mountains. While interventions like the NCGS and the National CSI Development
                      Bank (NCSI) offering government guarantees and subsidized microloans can enhance credit accessibility for
                      respective firms, stimulate production, and boost employment, they can also pose risks to financial sector
                      profitability and entail fiscal costs and contingent liabilities. For instance, the NCSI had to be recapitalized and
                      subsequently merged with BDB in 2023 due to high NPLs.

                  3.	 Peaks – potentially transformative but with the most significant risks: These policies or projects offer consid-
                      erable rewards and may be transformative in achieving higher growth and government revenue, and quality
                      job creation. Yet, the risks can also be high and must be carefully weighed alongside the rewards. They may
                      lock up very large amounts of finance, thereby risking public finances if the returns are disappointing. Such
                      projects may also carry environmental risks, resulting in damage to natural capital, which could be irreversible
                      if not well-identified and managed. An example of a peak initiative is the government’s strategic involvement
                      in the hydropower sector, which involves large fixed-capital investments and a long-term horizon.74 While the
                      sector has significantly contributed to economic growth, government revenues, and exports, it is important to
                      consider environmental, technical, and financial risks associated with such projects.

                 The Gelephu Mindfulness City (MC) initiative could be considered another peak as it represents a significant and
                 transformative investment with the potential for substantial impact, yet it carries considerable risks. Gelephu is a
                 town in Sarpang district, about 30 km from the southern border with India. It is envisaged that the new megacity project
                 will be a Special Administration Region (SAR) of 1000+ km2, with legal autonomy. The project is envisaged with, inter alia,
                 the following features: construction with the help of foreign capital and expertise; development of a green city; incorpo-
                 ration of research and energy efficient data centers for expanded data hosting capacity and with a vision to serve as a
                 hub for digital innovations including emerging technologies such as blockchain and artificial intelligence; and provision
                 of world-class infrastructure and amenities.

                 The Gelephu MC is envisioned to be one-of-a-kind, anchored in the values of GNH and grounded on the Bhutanese
                 identity. Businesses will operate only on invitation to ensure alignment with this vision. Like other economic hubs, the goal
                 will be to stimulate economic growth by developing new industries, host an international airport to serve as a gateway to
                 South Asia, boost trade, create employment to arrest outmigration and encourage the return of the Bhutanese diaspora.
                 The SAR is not expected to be densely populated, and farmlands and forest coverage will be retained.

                 The ambitious vision will require significant investments, including from the private sector, in energy, digital connec-
                 tivity, and infrastructure. Given its location, Gelephu has potential to be developed as a freight consolidation center
                 and trade gateway, with multimodal transport links. Significant FDI and expertise will be required to fulfill this vision. FDI
                 is expected to bring opportunities, particularly for the youth, increase access to technology and innovation; an attempt
                 to address the outmigration challenges facing the country.

                 Economic zones are often a “high-risk, high reward” endeavor with mixed results. Global experiences offer lessons
                 and good practices that could be considered for the Gelephu SAR. Box 5 lists good practices and examples from SEZ
                 experiences globally and in Bhutan. The proposed SAR includes interesting features, including a focus on blockchain
                 technologies, research and data centers, and environmental compliance. Therefore, global lessons from smart city
                 projects, highlighted below, are relevant as well:

                   1.	 Leveraging benefits of agglomeration economies: World Bank analytical work on Regional Development and
                       Economic Transformation in Bhutan has highlighted that settlements with locational advantages and nascent
                       economic clusters like Gelephu should focus on improving the conditions for private investment in emerging
                       sectors such as agribusiness, agro-processing and manufacture and scaling up SMEs and cottage industries by



                 74	   As of FY21/22, the project cost (loan component) of Puna I, Puna II, and Mangdechhu hydropower projects represents approximately 25 to 30 percent of GDP.




48
                                                                                                                               Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
                                                                                                                                                              Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




       improving connectivity.75 Connectivity has both physical and policy dimensions. This could include addressing
       demand-side obstacles, including limited access to finance, constrained linkages in product value chains, and
       impeded spillover of knowledge, skills, and technology. Cities like Gelephu also need to boost capacity in urban
       planning and land administration as well as strengthen infrastructure, service delivery and ICT connectivity to
       catalyze growth. Instead of an “enclave” approach centered on Gelephu, a “corridor” approach that connects
       Gelephu to other urban centers (such as Thimphu and Paro) and their hinterlands, as well as to the regional
       Indian market, can help harness agglomeration economies and benefit lagging regions.

 2.	 Ensuring strategic planning: This, based on rigorous market demand assessment, will be the key to determine
     the extent of private sector (especially overseas) interest and participation. Once demand is ascertained, a
     detailed economic feasibility analysis should be undertaken to target the type of businesses that can be invited.
     A purely supply-driven approach can be problematic. It is also important to adopt a long-term planning mindset,
     as there can often be political pressure to achieve quick-win results.

 3.	 Efforts to maximize potential positive spillovers: The SAR could aim to boost quality jobs (direct and indirect),
     investment, exports, and support the inclusion and sustainability agendas. To accomplish these goals, spill-
     over effects such as technology transfer, skills upgrading, backward and forward linkages, and productivity
     enhancement must be kept in mind.

 4.	 Implementing a robust policy, institutional, and legal framework: Success would require timely and mean-
     ingful policy, regulatory, and legal reforms to address critical market failures (such as infrastructure and
     connectivity) and government failures (such as effective coordination and implementation). This would require
     willingness as well as the capacity of the relevant authorities to undertake such reforms. Many economic hubs
     have failed as they were disrupted by political interference, corruption, and lack of transparency. Regulatory
     ring-fencing to address these will contain risks and promote agility in planning and management. Clarity on
     roles and responsibilities as well as a transparent and predictable legal, institutional, and policy framework will
     provide certainty for investors. Since developing an economic zone is an expensive undertaking, many end
     up as “white elephants” without sufficient planning, capacity, and management.

 5.	 Clarity on modality, financing, and risk mitigation: Further clarity is required on the business model and
     modality of the zone and on whether it will be developed by the government, or through public-private
     partnerships (PPPs), or by private investors (private capital, bank lending, capital markets). The role of the
     government will be critical (including, implementation of a regulatory framework, provision of land and public
     services), modes of financing (general government budget, domestic or external debt issuance) and fiscal risks
     management. Risks and mitigation measures need to be properly identified.

The models of zones have evolved over time (Table 5). Fourth generation zones focus on higher value-added service
sectors (such as finance and trade service) and are more business-friendly in terms of laws and regulations. A successful
example is the Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone (FTZ) launched in 2013. In 2017, Malaysia launched the world’s first Digital
Free Trade Zone to facilitate the entry of SMEs into the e-commerce market via a conducive business environment. Fifth
generation zones are centered around emerging digital technologies and strong integration with urban development.
An example is the NEOM giga-city under construction in Saudi Arabia.76

Gelephu could aspire to be a fifth generation economic zone For instance, it could aim to become a regional data and
innovation hub by attracting private investments in green data centers.77 Enabling cloud computing technology and
services in these centers could help Gelephu position itself as an innovation hub by offering, as-a-service, emerging
technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), distributed ledger technology, and blockchain, to leap-frog digital solu-
tions. Blockchain can also help track and validate carbon emissions and environmental impacts of the data center.78


75	   World Bank. Bhutan Urban Policy Notes: Regional Development and Economic Transformation, World Bank, 2019 (https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/epdf/10.1596/31816).
76	   The Past, Present, and Future of Special Economic Zones and Their Impact. Douglas Zeng. World Bank; Journal of International Economic Law (2021).
77	   The “Green Data Center Strategy” (2017) concluded that Bhutan’s cold climate, negative carbon footprint, and low cost of electricity makes it an ideal location to attract investments
      in green data centers.
78	   Green Data Centers: Towards a Sustainable Digital Transformation. A Practitioner’s Guide. World Bank and ITU (2023).




                                                                                                                                                                                                   49
     Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                 Another possibility is to provide services as a disaster recovery data center for non-critical data/systems for neighboring
                 countries such as India. However, gaps remain, for instance, high price and low reliability of high-speed internet, lack of
                 human capital, policy and regulatory gaps that might not be conducive to FDI facilitation, and weak digital safeguards to
                 protect data and systems from the rapidly evolving risks such as cyber-attacks and data leaks. If not addressed, these
                 risks can lead to low investor confidence.

                 Table 5: Evolution of Economic Zones

                          Zone type               Generation                                                     Characteristics

                  Export Processing Zone         First            Focusing on FDI and exports; little linkage to local economy.

                  Multi-functional SEZ           Second           Larger, multisectoral, multifunctional; better linkage to local economy.

                  Eco-Industrial Parks           Third            Emphasizing both economic competitiveness and environmental sustainability, with an integrated approach.

                  Modern Free Trade Zone         Fourth           Focusing on high value-added modern service sectors and more business-friendly reforms.

                  Intelligent City               Fifth            Also called ‘digital zone’ or ‘smart city’, where digital technologies are embedded in production and services,
                                                                  and industrial and business activities are fully integrated with urban and eco-development concepts.

                 Source: World Bank; Journal of International Economic Law (2021).




                 To achieve economic diversification, Bhutan can focus on high value-added and tradable low carbon activities,
                 particularly in the services sector, while taking advantage of the country’s track record in ecological preservation
                 and commitment to sustainable development. Some examples of foothills, which are relatively easy to implement,
                 include international payments for ecological services and eco-tourism (see Box 6). These activities have low complexity
                 but can still generate economic benefits. More complex activities like value-added agriculture offer higher development
                 returns and knowledge spillovers. There are also high peaks, such as value-added IT services and biodiversity-based
                 innovation, which have a potential for significant returns. These sectors can be prioritized to create a virtuous circle
                 of sustainable diversification. For instance, ecotourism, especially in the emerging high-tech retreat industry, can be
                 linked with the local start-up and IT services sector to foster economic growth. However, these activities would require
                 improvements in basic capabilities, including country-wide high-speed internet access, access to clean and reliable
                 electricity, as well as the development of necessary infrastructure. While selecting sectors and activities, the following
                 indicative criteria can be considered:

                  ⊲	 Proximity to existing productive structures: How easy would it be to repurpose existing capabilities for this new
                     activity?

                  ⊲	 Global technology trends: How could innovations cause disruptions to some activities and related supply chains
                     but also open up opportunities for others?

                  ⊲	 Regional market demand: What are the goods neighboring countries import, which Bhutan could export
                     competitively?

                  ⊲	 Degree of market competition regionally and globally: Even if there is demand for a product, are there other
                     nations that can meet this demand more competitively than Bhutan?

                  ⊲	 Conformity with Bhutan’s geographic conditions and trade costs

                  ⊲	 Potential for value addition and job creation: Are those activities sufficiently labor intensive to reduce unemploy-
                     ment in Bhutan, in particular for youth and women?

                  ⊲	 Alignment with Bhutan’s ecological sustainability agenda: Do these activities cause ecological damage that is
                     incompatible with Bhutan’s environmental agenda?



50
                                                                                                                     Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
                                                                                                                                                  Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Box 5: Special economic zones – global results and recent evidence from
Bhutan

SEZ have been used by many developing countries as a policy tool to promote industrialization and economic trans-
formation, but global results of SEZ in developing countries have been mixed. A SEZ is supposed to complement
market forces by helping to overcome market and policy failures such as malfunctioning land market, deficient industrial
infrastructures, or a poor business environment. Results from SEZ vary significantly; some regions or countries (espe-
cially in East Asia) are generally more successful while others (especially in Sub-Saharan Africa) struggle to make zones
work.79 Even in the same country, it is normal to have both successful and failed zones. SEZ “poster children” countries
include Korea, Malaysia, China, Mauritius, and UAE (Jebel Ali). There are also examples of “white elephants” as well, for
instance in Nigeria, several zones in India, and even a few in China.

Bhutan has established an economic zone program in 2010 and an economic zones policy (“Business Infrastructure
Policy”) in 2018. Bhutan has six industrial parks, including five in the South (Pasakha, Bondeyma, Dhamdum, Jigmeling,
and Motanga), and one near Thimphu (Bjemina). In addition, Thimphu TechPark was established in 2012. A recent World
Bank report assessed the performance of economic zones within the Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, and India’s Eastern
Economic Corridor (EEC) by interviewing 122 Bhutanese firms (60 inside the zones and 62 outside zones) in three indus-
trial parks: Motanga, Bjemina, and Pasakha. The results are as follows:

 ⊲	 Bhutanese firms inside zones perform reasonably well relative regional peers. On employment generation, exports,
    and FDI, they outperform India and Nepal, but fall short of Bangladesh.

 ⊲	 Firms inside zones tend to have significantly larger exports and employment than those outside zones. However,
    there are no significant positive impacts on FDI.

Expanding zone programs could seem a promising direction for policies aimed at promoting greater exports and
job creation. Among the lessons learnt for the successful implementation of SEZ include having a strategic location;
integrating the zone strategy with the overall development strategy; (ii) increasing the market contestability through a
rigorous market demand assessment focusing on comparative advantages and private sector participation und; (iii) and
ensuring that zones are “special” in terms of piloting reforms for a business-friendly environment and are resilient to
various external shocks. The lessons can be broadly classified into four do’s and four don’ts (see Table 6).

Table 6: The four do’s and four don’ts of SEZs

                                        DOS                                                                                   DON’TS

 	 1.	 Choose the right location                                                        	 1.	 Lack of strategic planning and demand-driven approach

 	 2.	 Foster a conducive business environment with a reform-oriented                   	 2.	 Fail to address the critical market and government failures (such as
       mindset (use SEZs to pilot policy reforms)                                             infrastructure and government coordination)

 	 3.	 Increase the market contestability through a rigorous market demand              	 3.	 Poor policy and legal environment and weak implementation capacity
       assessment and private sector partici- pation

 	 4.	 Maximize the positive spillovers through an inclusive and sustainable            	 4.	 Inability to mitigate the environmental and social risks
       approach

Source: Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, and Nepal: How can economic zones contribute to the 200 million job challenge80; World Development Report. Trading for Devel-
opment in the Age of Global Value Chains81; The Dos and Don’ts of Special Economic Zones.82




79	   World Bank. 2019. “World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains.” WB, Washington, DC.
80	   WB. 2022. “Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, and Nepal: How can economic zones contribute to the 200 million job challenge.” WB, Washington, DC.
81	   WB. 2020. “World Development Report: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains.” WB, Washington, DC.
82	   WB. 2021. “The Dos and Don’ts of Special Economic Zones.” WB, Washington, DC.




                                                                                                                                                                                       51
     Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                 Box 6: Mapping of potential sectors and activities

                   ⊲	 International payments for ecological services: a valuable foothill. Biodiversity and natural ecosystems are among
                      the country’s most valuable assets, and policy efforts exist to marketize and compensate for the protection of such
                      assets. Given that Bhutan is one of the first carbon negative countries in the world, monetizing ecosystem services
                      and engaging in carbon emissions trading could represent a low hanging fruit as part of Bhutan’s diversification
                      strategy. To achieve this objective, Bhutan would need to engage in international carbon trading systems and
                      develop bilateral frameworks with other countries or firms, aiming to offset their carbon emissions. Such objective
                      will require considerable diplomatic action and international negotiations. The revenues from such trade could
                      help finance a domestic Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) program, which would enable the Government to
                      remunerate communities involved in conservation across the country.83

                   ⊲	 High value tradable services; another foothill. High value tradable services constitute a promising area for produc-
                      tive diversification as they can circumvent the high trade costs associated with traditional merchandise exports.
                      However, improving the provision of basic capabilities (especially universal, country-wide high-speed internet
                      access, and access to clean, reliable and affordable electricity) will be important to attract investment in energy
                      intensive services (i.e., low carbon data centers).

                   ⊲	 Hydrogen: a peak - opportunities but also important challenges. Given Bhutan’s ambitious increases in installed
                      hydropower capacity, Bhutan is exploring the use of excess hydropower generation for green hydrogen production
                      (a roadmap was expected to be completed by end-2023).84 However, careful analysis is needed to avoid poten-
                      tial bad investments. Green hydrogen production costs are still high and may not align with Bhutan’s long-term
                      development strategies. Additionally, using green hydrogen for electricity generation has high conversion and
                      storage losses. In the transport sector, hydrogen-powered mobility may be too expensive or better substituted
                      with electro-mobility.85 Investing in green hydrogen requires a well-coordinated strategy that considers opportunity
                      costs and infrastructure needs. Export potential to India should also be assessed, considering India’s own green
                      hydrogen strategies.

                 Figure 47: Mapping of potential sectors and activities on a complexity/returns matrix

                                                                                                                            Degree of complexity

                                                                            (Low Hanging fruits: foothils)                                                             (High hanging fruits: high peaks)



                                                         (Low)              International Payments for
                       Developmental Returns &                                  Ecological Services
                                                                                                                                  Value-added
                        knowledge spill overs                                Textile &Crafts / cottage                      Textile & creative crafts
                                                                                     industries                             Value-added Agriculture

                                                                       Ecotourism and established retreat                                                                      Green Hydrogen
                                                                          services for high-tech firms                          Zero Carbon Data
                                                                                                                            centres & cloud services                       Value added IT services

                                                         (High)                                                                                                     Biodiversity-based innovation services


                 Source: Lebdioui et. al. (2023). CEM Background Paper.
                 Note: The mapping of potential sectors and activities serves as an illustration. More in-depth analysis would be required to explore and validate potential sectors and
                 activities, including consultations with sector experts.




                 83	     PES, which were pioneered in Costa Rica, are financial mechanisms whereby landowners receive direct payments for the ecological services that their lands produce when they
                         adopt environmentally friendly land uses and forest management techniques (Malavasia, E.O. and Kellenberg, J. 2002). Such mechanisms to marketize the value of ecosystem
                         services provided by local communities have often been limited to national boundaries and local communities often struggle to receive remuneration from the international
                         community for this ‘tradable’ service (Lebdioui, 2022), which is why linking this agenda with an international carbon trading system is key to ensure its financial sustainability
                         in the long term. A project such as this would represent a foothill in the sense that it requires relatively low financial investments, while creating jobs and providing revenues in
                         remote rural areas without compromising Bhutan’s ecological agenda. See Malavasi, E.O. & Kellenberg, J., 2002. “Program of Payments for Ecological Services in Costa Rica.” In
                         Building Assets for People and Nature: International Expert Meeting on Forest Landscape Restoration, 27, 1-7. Heredia, Costa Rica and Lebdioui, A. 2022. “Inequality and Trade
                         Diversification: How can Income Inequality in Latin America be Reduced Beyond Commodity Booms?” Canning House, LSE, London, UK.
                 84	     End-use possibilities may include decarbonizing various sectors (e.g., industry, transportation), using hydrogen to generate electricity in periods of low hydro production or
                         exporting hydrogen products (e.g., ammonia) to neighboring countries.
                 85	     Not only for passenger vehicles, but also two- and three-wheelers, public transportation, and long-haul trucks. While there are significant infrastructural requirements, the tech-
                         nologies in general are further developed with promise of further cost reductions due to economies of scale and well-funded technological innovation.




52
                                                                                                                          Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
                                                                                                                                                         Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Box 7: Costa Rica’s experience attracting FDI in green activities and impact
on inequality

Costa Rica is often cited as an example of successful diversification from commodities to knowledge-intensive electronics
and medical goods exports. In the 1980s, Costa Rica abandoned a development model based on import substitution
industrialization and started implementing new policies to foster export diversification. Such policies included the creation
of Export Processing Zones (EPZs) to attract FDI in high value-added and high-tech sectors, introduction of export tax
reduction, and government subsidies. Such policies were largely successful, as Costa Rica’s exports experienced high
and almost uninterrupted growth from the mid-1980s to 2020 (with the exceptions of the 2009 financial crisis and the
COVID-19 crisis in 2020).

Costa Rica’s well designed public policies to support diversification enabled the country to benefit from major
investments in the industrial sector, including Intel’s investment in a microprocessor plant in 1997, which remains one
of the largest FDIs in Costa Rica’s history. This investment has been important to Costa Rica, as it helped reverse
the drop in Costa Rica’s terms of trade due to low world prices of its most traditional exports and was responsible
for a surplus in Costa Rica’s trade balance.86,87. Costa Rica went from being highly reliant on commodity exports to
having booming high-tech and medical equipment manufacturing exporting industries. By 2000, computer parts
alone accounted for almost 40 percent of total value of the country’s exports. In 2019, Costa Rica’s largest exports
were medical Instruments and appliances (around US$4 billion, which represents almost one-third of Costa Rica’s
exports).

Additionally, Intel’s investment had a subsequent “signaling” effect on other potential investors, and the country’s export
promotion agency, CINDE, used this “stamp of approval” to launch an aggressive campaign to attract other electronic
manufacturers (ibid). In more recent years, Costa Rica’s export promotion has also successfully leveraged the country’s
natural capital to attract new types of investments in decarbonized services and activities. Benefiting from an electricity
matrix that is 99 percent reliant on renewable energies, Costa Rica has become a world leader in attracting eco-con-
scious foreign investors.

However, it is worth highlighting that while diversification was accompanied by a high growth rate, reduction in poverty,
and large social investments in public health care and education, income inequality has persisted.88 This has notably
been the result of the increasing wage premium for skilled workers, whereas unskilled workers have not been able to
benefit as much from the emerging high-tech manufacturing sectors. Another issue is that Costa Rica’s industrial clusters
are mostly located in the center of the country, while people living in coastal areas remain dependent on commodities
and tourism as a means of livelihood. The dynamics of rebalancing regional growth and promoting a more socially
inclusive diversification model by ensuring that workers excluded from the labor market also benefit from employment
opportunities arising out of new industries, therefore, remain key considerations in Costa Rica and ones that bear high
relevance in Bhutan’s context.




Coordination between diversification, education, and territorial policies

Coordination between diversification, educational and territorial policies is crucial to ensure that job creation from
economic diversification does not increase inequality or result in spatial misalignments. Sector-specific policies may
increase inequality if they focus exclusively on sophisticated sectors that only create better jobs for a few high-skilled
people (see example of Costa Rica in Box 7). Additionally, there is a risk of spatial misalignments if new job opportunities
arise in communities or regions that do not have high unemployment rates. This can lead to disparities and uneven
development across different areas. Ensuring that low-income groups can benefit not only from unskilled employment


86	   World Bank. 2006. “The Impact of Intel in Costa Rica: Nine Years After the Investment.” World Bank, Washington, D.C.
87	   Ferreira, G.F.C, Fuentes, P.A.G., and Ferreira, J.P.C. 2018. “The Successes and Shortcoming of Costa Rica Exports Diversification Policies.” Background Paper to the UNCTAD-FAO
      Commodities and Development Report. 2017. FAO, Rome, Italy.
88	   Lebdioui, A. 2022. “Inequality and Trade Diversification: How can Income Inequality in Latin America be Reduced Beyond Commodity Booms?” Canning House, LSE, London, UK.




                                                                                                                                                                                              53
     Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                 opportunities in labor intensive sectors but also from the skilled employment opportunities that arise from Bhutan’s
                 diversification towards value-added sophisticated sectors, emphasizes the importance of coordinating industrial and
                 education policy.

                 Special incentives and investments can target high-unemployment areas to allow for regional rebalancing. If hydro-
                 power rents are invested in different areas compared to where higher unemployment rates prevail, measures can be
                 implemented to encourage labor reallocation. This means incentivizing individuals to move to areas with priority invest-
                 ment projects that cannot be located elsewhere. These measures can take various forms, such as providing financial
                 incentives for individuals to relocate, offering training and skill development programs specific to the needs of the
                 investment projects, or establishing support systems to facilitate the transition and integration of workers into new areas.

                 Bhutan needs to create attractive job prospects for its growing number of young university graduates, while also
                 making low-skilled positions appealing and accessible to the unemployed and inactive population, particularly
                 women in urban areas. Given the skills and mismatches in Bhutan in the low-skilled segment, several sector-specific
                 policies could be supported, including (i) upskilling policies such as vocational training after secondary education
                 (through certificates and diplomas) and more demand-driven TVET (e.g. on-the-job training) to support employers with
                 their training and vacancy needs, (ii) activation policies to stimulate the supply from uneducated individuals currently
                 out of the labor force, especially women, and (iii) adequate job intermediation and matching systems to connect people
                 to jobs and to track where the new jobs are created.




                 1.4.	 Policy priorities

                 This chapter has examined the growth trajectories of the Bhutanese economy under different resource revenue
                 management models. The findings from this chapter translate into three principles that economic policy could follow
                 to stimulate economic diversification:

                  ⊲	 Bhutan is encouraged to capitalize on its existing comparative advantage in the hydropower sector, ensuring
                     continued benefits for the country. The CGE model with no expansion of the hydropower sector has the lowest
                     GDP as compared to the other three models with expansion of the hydropower sector, but it differs in how the extra
                     hydropower revenues are being utilized.

                  ⊲	 The growing hydropower rents could be re-invested in non-hydro sectors to support economic diversification.
                     A diversified economy will be resilient towards shocks that could adversely affect the economy – for example,
                     prolonged drought due to climate change (see Chapter 2 for discussion on climate change and agriculture in
                     Bhutan).

                  ⊲	 A successful diversification strategy should encompass both sector-neutral and sector-specific policies, and a sound
                     institutional framework for supporting the latter.

                 The recommendations are categorized into hydropower, non-hydropower, and institutional options for managing hydro
                 rents.

                                                             he current comparative advantage and ensure
                 1.4.1.	 Hydropower development to leverage t
                         future hydro rents

                 The hydro sector could be developed further (subject to economic, environmental, and social impact analysis) given
                 the untapped potential and opportunities in the regional electricity market in South Asia. The results of the CGE
                 model indicate that the planned investment in additional hydropower leads to higher growth and government revenues.




54
                                                                                                                       Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
                                                                                                                                                    Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




As a carbon neutral country, Bhutan is in a unique, win-win position to positively contribute to its neighbors’ Nationally
Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement on Climate Change by exporting its green hydropower. In addition,
Bhutan’s untapped potential can contribute to a regional power market fueled by clean power.89 However, additional
hydro investments require careful feasibility and impact assessments, including financing aspects (and macro-fiscal
implications, including debt sustainability), in line with the Government’s sustainable hydropower development strat-
egy. Important trade-offs, including whether additional hydro capacity should be used to increase electricity exports or
ensure adequate supply for domestic industries could be clarified by an IEU, as explained below. While serious technical
issues can be a challenge even for the most advanced utilities, the capacity of the hydro sector institutions could be
strengthened to effectively manage operations and trade.90

The financing for future hydro projects will have to increasingly come from the private sector. Hydropower projects,
so far, have been mostly financed through commercially priced loans and capital grants from the GoI, implemented
under a special agreement between Bhutan and the GoI, in which the GoI covers both financial and construction related
risks and commits to buying all surplus electricity at a price reflecting cost plus a net return. This has supported debt
sustainability in the past.91 To date, three hydropower project have been developed under the Joint Venture (JV) and
PPP model.92 Future projects will have to increasingly rely on private sector financing, given limited fiscal space and
elevated public debt. Since guarantees from the GoI are not available, it will be necessary to have sufficient capacity to
assess and handle the risks associated with these projects.

By establishing stronger backward linkages with the hydro sector, Bhutan could facilitate greater direct spillovers
to the non-hydro sector and stimulate the demand for goods, services, and labor. Spillovers from the hydro sector to
the non-hydro sector have been small due to the former’s limited linkages with the rest of the economy, constraining
the distributive effects of growth. The DGPC has established three subsidiaries to build domestic capabilities for hydro
maintenance and engineering, and to construct small hydro plants.93 Advancing these initiatives, possibly by increasing
private sector involvement, has the potential to reinforce production linkages with other sectors and foster structural
transformation.

The forthcoming Country Climate and Development Report (CCDR) will complement the analysis presented in the
CEM by conducting an assessment on the potential to expand hydropower generation and exploring financing
options. It will also evaluate the impact of climate change on hydropower generation and assets, examine the nexus
with the agriculture sector and water availability and management, and identify climate resilient measures.

Positive spillovers from the hydro sector and the emergence of new sectors in the non-hydro sector will require
adequate human and physical capital to diversify the economy further. Section 1.4.2 complements the macro agenda
on economic diversification.

1.4.2.	 Policies to lay the foundationfor (new) comparative advantages in the
        non-hydropower sectors

Policies to create a conducive environment for the development of the non-hydropower sector will help to sustain
future growth. Over the past two decades, productivity growth in this sector has been relatively weak. This has become
more prominent with the recent emigration. Policies that strengthen macroeconomic stability, improve institutions and
the business environment, facilitate flexible and efficient labor market regulations, reduce barriers to trade, and invest-
ments in infrastructure as well as human capital remain critical for promoting continued growth in the non-hydro sector,
as shown in CGE Scenario 3 (policies were proxied by human capital and infrastructure investments). A focus on the
following areas, in particular, will help to achieve these objectives:



89	   World Bank. 2021. “Program Document: Sustainable Hydropower Development Project”. Project ID: P174327, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
90	   The hydropower projects so far developed in Bhutan (and currently under preparation) have suffered complications due to unexpected complex geology and other technical
      challenges, which have resulted in significant cost-overruns and delays in commissioning.
91	   The share of capital grants in the total capital cost is about 30 to 60 percent depending on the project (with the remainder being financed by commercially priced loans).
92	   Dagachhu (126 MW) and Nikachhu (118 MW, ongoing) have been implemented under the PPP model with the support of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the Government
      of Austria. Kholongchhu (600 MW, ongoing), which was initially implemented under the JV model between DGPC and an Indian SOE, has recently been taken over by DGPC.
93	   DGPC has established three subsidiaries since 2012: (i) Bhutan Hydropower Services Limited to repair and manufacture hydro turbine runners and associated components; (ii)
      Bhutan Automation to manufacture automation systems for hydropower plants; and (iii) Druk Hydro Energy Limited to construct small hydro projects up to 150 MW.




                                                                                                                                                                                         55
     Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                   ⊲	 The capacity and performance of SOEs could be improved given their significant role in the economy. While
                      SOEs overall have consistently reported profits, driven by the electricity sector, SOEs in other sectors have shown
                      a mixed performance. The 2023 Public Expenditure Review (PER) recommends strengthening SOE oversight and
                      corporate governance by implementing a more centralized ownership model with clear reporting lines and respon-
                      sibilities. Additionally, it suggests reviewing the current compact system and performance-based compensation of
                      DHI and MoF to improve performance management. Promoting the professionalization and diversification of SOE
                      Boards, as well as enhancing SOE investment management, are also crucial steps towards improving the overall
                      performance of SOEs.

                   ⊲	 The efficiency of public expenditure in health and education could be improved. The contribution of human
                      capital to non-hydro sector growth has declined in the recent decade. While Bhutan spends more than most peers
                      on education and health, there is significant scope for efficiency gains in both sectors. According to the Bhutan
                      PER, Bhutan ranks 68th in education expenditure per school-age child among 131 countries with available data,
                      while its ranking based on Learning Adjusted Years of Schooling (LAYS) is 86th (Figure 48). Bhutan’s current health
                      expenditure per capita in purchasing power parity terms is significantly higher than its regional peers and countries
                      in the similar income group.94 A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) using data from 164 countries shows that Bhutan
                      could have achieved the same level of health outcomes with approximately 6 to 9 percent fewer resources if health
                      expenditures were as efficient as the most efficient countries in the sample (Figure 49).



                 Figure 48: Education expenditure and LAYS                                                     Figure 49: DEA Frontier analysis, health
                  3,000                                                                                10                                                100


                  2,500
                                                                                                       9                                                 90
                                                                                                                Health: Multi-dimentional health index




                  2,000
                                                                                                       8                                                 80                           Bhutan 0.91
                  1,500
                                                                                                       7                                                 70
                  1,000

                                                                                                       6                                                 60
                       500

                        0                                                                              5                                                 50
                             Pa a
                           Mo a

                            Na a

                              Bh a
                            Es n
                           Pa tini

                             Le y
                            rg o
                                        n

                                      lic

                                         l
                           Ta nin
                                      an
                                     pa
                                      a
                                    an

                                    m

                                    oli

                                     bi

                                      a




                        La zsta
                          Ky th


                                  ub
                                 gu
                                   ut




                                  ist
                                 mi



                                wa




                                Ne

                                Be
                                na




                                so
                                ng
                              tsw




                              ep




                              jik
                              ra



                               y
                       Bo




                          oR




                                                                                                                                                         40
                                       Education expenditure per school going population                                                                       0   2   4       6          8         10   12   14
                                       LAYS (right axis)                                                                                                                   Spending: Public, 2010-20

                 Source: Bhutan Public Expenditure Review (2023)




                   ⊲	 In view of the potential skills mismatches in the low-skill segment, upskilling policies including vocational train-
                      ing after secondary education (through certificates and diplomas) and more demand-driven TVET programs,
                      could help integrate the youth and low-skilled (particularly women) into the labor market and emerging indus-
                      tries. While Bhutan has many public TVET institutions under the Ministry of Education and Skills Development
                      (MoESD), their linkages with the labor market could be strengthened. In addition, labor activation policies and job
                      intermediation and matching policies are essential for connecting job seekers with employers. Many self-employed
                      and family workers, particularly those with low education and engaged in low-quality livelihood activities, could
                      be provided with on-the-job assistance to cover some of their search costs and place them directly in regions with



                 94	     Healthcare expenditures are predominantly financed by the Government and citizens receive free access to basic public health services, resulting in lower out-of-pocket expen-
                         diture than in upper middle-income countries.




56
                                                                                                                             Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
                                                                                                                                                            Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




       available wage employment opportunities. Employment service centers under the Ministry of Industry Commerce
       and Employment (MoICE) can play a strong role in this respect.95

  ⊲	 Improving the efficiency in the PIM system is crucial to provide high quality infrastructure services and crowd in
     private investments. The contribution of physical capital to non-hydro sector growth has declined over the recent
     decade, and there are significant investment deficits, including both soft and hard infrastructure. To improve the
     efficiency of public investments, the government could issue PIM guidelines, prepare and appraise new public
     investment projects in line with the guidelines, publish prioritization and selection criteria for projects, and designate
     a central entity to prioritize projects based on the criteria prior to their inclusion in the budget. Module 3 discusses
     some options for strengthening the financial sector to better channel hydro rents to non-hydro sector.

Sector-specific policies could complement other policies to support diversification, provided they are targeted,
transparent and minimize budgetary costs. Given the critical role of human capital and talent for the diversification
process, and to avoid further brain drain, several initiatives could be implemented in the short term as outlined below.

  ⊲	 Bhutan could create strategic partnerships with universities to set up tailored executive programs adapted to
     the Bhutanese context. Instead of relying on the provision of sector-neutral scholarships for Bhutanese citizens
     to study overseas, strategic partnerships with universities could constitute a promising way forward. This would
     provide the Government with greater leverage over the content of the training provided, to ensure it is aligned to
     government objectives and thereby reducing the need for foreign technical assistance over time. Such programs
     have been critical for the development of competitive sectors across the globe – for instance in the fruits sector in
     Chile through the Chile and University of California Program.96

  ⊲	 The Bhutanese living abroad could be leveraged for the transfer of learning, technology, and social capital back
     to Bhutan. The IEU could identify and liaise with the Bhutanese living abroad to assess how they can contribute to
     the emergence of new activities in Bhutan. For instance, in Malaysia, to counter the shortage of technical skills for
     science and ICT, the Government set up the TalentCorp in 2011 to attract Malaysian talent back from abroad and
     to bring in foreign talent.97

  ⊲	 The existing incubation and acceleration centers could be strengthened to promote entrepreneurship and
     innovation. These centers have the mandate to drive economic growth and create job opportunities for educated
     workers. However, they currently face funding uncertainties. Improving the quality of their services, including
     access to financing, market validation, business plan development, research and development support, mentorship,
     and connections to supply chains and markets, can better connect entrepreneurs to the broader entrepreneurial
     ecosystem.

1.4.3.	 Institutional setup to frameand implement sector-specific policies

A new fiscal strategy outlining a long-term vision and a minimum share of re-investment of hydro rents for produc-
tive capacity building in tradable sectors, could ensure that such rents support economic diversification away from
over-reliance on the hydro sector. At the same time, the BESF and the fiscal stabilization measures that regulate contri-
butions to and uses of the BESF could be operationalized to smoothen volatile hydro revenues and public spending in
the face of negative shocks. One option could be the Hartwick rule, which suggests that the value of (net) investment
needs equal the value of rents on extracted resources at each point in time.




95	   Alaref, J., et al. Forthcoming. “Bhutan Labor Market Assessment Report”. Social Protection and Jobs Global Practice. World Bank, Washington, D.C
96	   In Chile, to remedy the absence of adequate human capital, which was for a long time the obstacle for the development of the fruit sector, an exchange program was established
      in 1965 with the University of California. More than 80 Chilean graduate students were sent to study agricultural economics in California to learn how to cultivate and export
      fresh fruits in Chile. This appears to have been an extremely successful and impactful grant considering the growth of the sector during the following decades (Bravo-Ortega
      and Eterovic, 2015). See Bravo-Ortega, C. and Eterovic, N. 2015. “A Historical Perspective of a Hundred Years of Industrialization: From Vertical to Horizontal Policies in Chile.”
      Working Paper No. 399. Department of Economics, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
97	   Mukherjee, H., et al. 2011. “Affirmative Action Policies in Malaysian Higher Education”. Draft report submitted to the World Bank, Washington, D.C.




                                                                                                                                                                                                 57
     Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                 Given limited institutional capacity and human resources, it may be beneficial to consolidate different development
                 finance institutions instead of spreading available resources too thinly. The CEM report highlights the different exist-
                 ing institutions, whose mandate could be expanded to invest hydropower rents in productivity-enhancing assets. While
                 such a decision is political, the advantages and possible challenges of the different institutions are summarized below:

                  ⊲	 BDB: The Bank has experience providing loans to SMEs. National development banks usually face more scrutiny
                     than SDFs as the former have commercial credit ratings if they issue bonds. However, the current mandate and
                     expertise of BDB is centered around SMEs in the agricultural sector and the Bank has limited capacity to take on a
                     larger scope for funding structural transformation across various sectors and business types.

                  ⊲	 DHI: There are various international experiences of government holding companies turning into development funds
                     (e.g., Malaysia), and using DHI could avoid the creation of another fund and associated institutional costs. However,
                     this would require a clear strategy to separate SOE management functions from the mandate of new investments
                     (including in private companies) to stimulate structural transformation.

                  ⊲	 BoB: The (state-owned) commercial bank has a track record of efficient lending and could expand its mandate to
                     include development banking. However, this would require some restructuring and setting up legal frameworks to
                     take on a broader mandate on behalf of the government.

                  ⊲	 BESF: Expanding the mandate of the BESF to an SWF or SDF would enable it to attract private capital and engage in
                     partnerships with foreign investors. However, SWFs and SDFs face less scrutiny than national development banks
                     as the latter have commercial credit ratings if they issue bonds.

                 Irrespective of the institutional setup, it is crucial to enhance the capacity for investment appraisal, monitoring, and
                 evaluation.

                 The establishment of an IEU-type structure in Bhutan could improve investment project decisions and efficiency.
                 Ideally, an IEU should not only be high quality, but also be independent of the day-to-day pressures of policymaking as its
                 aim is to work on the achievement of the long-term development vision. Possible candidates are the Ministry of Finance,
                 given its central role in managing the nation’s budget. Another potential home for the IEU is the newly created Office of
                 the Cabinet Affairs and Strategic Coordination (OCASC) under the Committee for Coordinating Secretaries (C4CS), which
                 replaced the Gross National Happiness Commission (GNHC). Among other responsibilities, OCASC oversees a strategic
                 planning division, national policy coordination division, strategic evaluation division, and is in charge of the preparation
                 of the FYP Strategic Planning. The C4CS is led by four coordinating secretaries (governance, economic, security, and
                 social cluster), headed by the Cabinet Secretary, which could help improve cross-government coordination (especially
                 when the project’s impacts cross the boundaries of ministries), and also build a culture of evaluation across government.

                 The existence of a strong IEU could send a strong market signal to potential investors regarding the quality of
                 economic management. An IEU could generate benefits such as larger FDI as well as greater portfolio investments, and
                 policy credibility for international ratings agencies. For instance, further strengthening the capacity of the hydropower
                 institutions to ensure that the development and construction, environmental and social stewardship, maintenance, dam
                 safety regulations, and inspections of hydropower plants are line with international best practices, could attract more
                 foreign investment in other sectors. It could also assist multilateral agencies and bilateral donors in identifying poten-
                 tial ways to assist Bhutan with concessional finance and speed up their final decisions on committing funds, as there
                 would eventually be a pipeline of rigorously assessed projects awaiting funding. In this way, a strong IEU would further
                 strengthen Bhutan’s international ‘brand’, and over time help establish a global reputation in delivering key investments,
                 in line with the 13th FYP objective “To Rank Among the Top 20 Countries on Trust, Credibility and Integrity Indices” by
                 2030”. This could attract additional FDI, venture and philanthropic capital, portfolio capital with an Environmental, Social
                 and Governance (ESG) mandate, through, for example, ‘green-tech’.

                 The IEU could grow in an incremental way, focusing on the peaks that have potentially the greatest returns, but
                 which also pose the greatest risks. The IEU would need to carefully prioritize the allocation of its expertise across the
                 evaluation of projects, especially in its early years when it is still building its own institutional capacities and will have a



58
                                                                                    Hydropower Revenue Management for Economic Diversification
                                                                                                           Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




limited number of staff. Initially, experts from other ministries, including sector ministries, could be seconded for limited
periods of time to work with an IEU in the Ministry of Finance (or whichever institution provides the IEU’s home) on eval-
uations that concern their sector focus, or for periods of training in evaluation techniques. Such secondments would
also help sector ministries prepare requests for evaluation by the IEU when these involve large budgetary allocations or
are likely to have complex effects (including larger than usual project risks). The IEU could prioritize the following tasks:

The IEU could evaluate existing policies to determine whether they are targeted, transparent and minimize budget-
ary costs (and risks). The recent PER has highlighted that several policy measures in Bhutan could be improved. For
instance, tax incentives could be better targeted as they are costly and benefit mostly large and medium businesses in
the manufacturing, financial, and tourism sectors. Similarly, TVET programs and their linkages with the labor market could
be strengthened. SOEs generate substantial revenues (mainly through the hydro sector) but there are also opportunities
to reduce fiscal costs and risks, including from loss-making real sector SOEs and SOEs in the financial sector. Strength-
ening the fiscal risk assessment, better SOE oversight, reporting and performance management, strong governance,
and improved SOE investment management, could improve the performance of SOEs.

When considering new policies and projects, emphasis could be placed on evaluating those with the potentially
greatest returns and risks (financial risks, but also environmental and community risks). These are the ‘high peaks’
discussed earlier in the report: they are projects that have the potential to be truly transformative for the economy but
have a notable risk for failure, which can lead to large financial losses for the public sector (including debt service if the
project is to be partly debt-financed) or irreversible environmental and social damage. The evaluation can also identify
means to mitigate these risks if available.




                                                                                                                                                 59
                                Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                                                                     2.	   Structural
                                                                           Transformation
                                                                           Through
© Mathias Berlin/Shutterstock




                                                                           Agricultural
                                                                           Productivity
   60
                                                                                                                                 Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
                                                                                                                                                           Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




2.1.	 Introduction

Bhutan’s development path is characterized by a disparity between the composition of value-added and employment.
While Bhutan’s growth has been driven by an expansion of industry and services, the country’s population continues to
be employed predominantly in the agricultural sector. Structural transformation has been much slower than that expe-
rienced in peers. Economists have long documented that structural transformation is the result of an interplay between
agricultural productivity growth that reduces demand for agricultural labor and growth in industrial or service sectors
that attracts former agricultural workers. Bhutan has not experienced this pattern because growth has been driven by
hydropower, which is not labor-intensive, and thus does not tempt workers to leave agriculture. It does not directly impact
agricultural productivity, leaving labor demand in agriculture unaffected. As the linkages of hydropower to the remainder
of the economy are limited (see Chapter 1), Bhutan is yet to experience the forces of structural transformation that have
helped other countries ignite high growth spells.

This Chapter explores whether efforts to increase productivity in agriculture can help kick-start structural transfor-
mation. The Chapter thus complements Chapter 1 by exploring factors that ‘push’ workers out of agriculture. It argues
that while structural transformation has been slow, Bhutan has experienced a gradual reallocation of workers from rural
to urban areas. This shift has been associated with industrialization and service sector expansion in destination areas and
increasing agricultural labor shares in the regions of origin. At the same time, agricultural production has remained rudi-
mentary, with large productivity gaps and a decline in both yields and harvested areas of Bhutan’s staple crops, rice and
maize, on average. Simultaneously, however, pockets of modernization, such as increasing cereal yields in some areas,
have emerged, and the sector has gradually reoriented itself towards its comparative advantages. This Chapter shows that
precisely those areas, which have experienced cereal yield growth, have released workers into non-agricultural employ-
ment. Simulations from a CGE model also show that continued investment in agricultural productivity can be a driving
force for structural transformation and can generate spillovers to wages and the service sector if production constraints
– especially related to irrigation – can be overcome. Climate change may, however, present a challenge to this transition.

The Chapter is organized as follows: Section 2.2 provides an overview of the agricultural sector in Bhutan, examining
both its contribution to employment, production structures and trends towards diversification. Section 2.3 explores the
link between agricultural productivity and structural transformation, highlighting the existence of productivity gaps,
identifying the constraints that drive the productivity gaps, and simulating the impact of their closure on the country’s
economic structure. Section 2.4 focuses on climate change, its impact on yields and on the sector’s broader production
structure. Section 2.5 concludes with a policy discussion.




2.2.	 Structural shifts in the agricultural sector

2.2.1.	 Agriculture continues to be Bhutan’s main employer,especially in rural areas

The composition of value-added in Bhutan’s economy has changed dramatically in recent years. The contribution
of agriculture to output has declined significantly over the last two decades, from 25 percent of GDP in 2000 to only 12
percent in 2021. In contrast, the share of services in GDP has increased by 13 percentage points over the same period,
from 37 to 50 percent.

Despite the decreasing share in value-added, labor continues to be confined to the agricultural sector. Structural
transformation, defined as the movement of labor out of agricultural into industrial or service sectors, has been slow,
with agricultural labor share declining by only 1 percentage point between the 2005 and 2017 census98, from 45 to 44


98	   This analysis relies on census data for the labor shares as subsequent analysis relies on a decomposition of labor shares at low geographic levels. Alternative, more frequent and
      recent data sources, such as the Labor Force Surveys, are not representative at the village level.




                                                                                                                                                                                                61
     Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                  percent (Figure 50). This highlights that Bhutan has experienced an asynchronous process of structural transformation,
                  in which economic output has effectively transitioned out of agriculture but workers continue to be engaged in the sector.

                  The low overall figure of labor movement out of agriculture masks differences across geographic areas. The spatial
                  pattern of structural transformation indicates four types of areas that have experienced more rapid structural transfor-
                  mation than the rest of the country:

                    1.	 Areas close to India benefit from reduced trade costs and access to a larger market, which facilitates structural
                        labor market shifts. For instance, the gewog of Samrang in the south-east borders the Indian state of Assam
                        and has experienced a 60 percentage point reduction in agricultural labor share between 2005 and 2017, the
                        largest reduction in Bhutan.

                   2.	 Urban centers, including those surrounding Paro, Thimphu, and Punakha in the center of the country, can
                       produce agglomeration effects and economies of scale, and have seen substantial reduction in agricultural
                       employment. These areas are also the most frequented by tourists, which has driven a reallocation towards
                       services.

                   3.	 Large hydropower developments produce localized spillovers during construction and after commissioning.
                       Examples include the Chukhha district, south of Thimphu, where the Tala hydropower plant was commissioned
                       in 2007, and Trongsa district in the center of the country, where the Mangdechhu plant was commissioned
                       in 2019.

                   4.	 Areas connected to urban centers and the Indian market through road infrastructure, such as Trashigang
                       district in the south-east, have also experienced a modest movement of labor out of agriculture.

                  In contrast, rural and mountainous areas, such as in the north-west of the country, have increased their agricultural labor
                  share (Figure 51).

                  Figure 50: While agriculture’s contribution to                                              Figure 51: …and any decline in agricultural
                  GDP is low, the sector continues to act as the                                              transformation has occurred exclusively through
                  main employer in Bhutan…                                                                    a reallocation of labor from agricultural to
                                                                                                              non-agricultural areas.
                   50%                                                               48%                       47%
                           45%                                                             46%
                   45%           44%
                                                                                                               46%
                                                                                                        40%
                   40%
                                                                                                               45%
                   35%                                                                            34%
                                         31%                                                                   44%
                   30%

                   25%                                                                                         43%
                                                  20%
                                               20%    20%           19%
                   20%                                                                                         42%
                                   16%
                   15%                                                    14%
                                                                                                               41%
                   10%
                                                             6%                                                40%
                    5%
                                                                                                               39%
                    0%
                           re


                                       es


                                               try


                                                        rs



                                                                    re



                                                                                 es




                                                                                                   try




                                                                                                               38%
                                                        he
                         ltu




                                                                  ltu
                                     c




                                                                                   c
                                             us




                                                                                                  us
                                  rvi




                                                                                rvi
                                                      Ot




                                                                                                                          Actual            Actual            Spatial          Regional
                            u




                                                                     u
                                          Ind




                                                                                                 Ind
                        ric




                                                                 ric
                                 Se




                                                                                Se
                     Ag




                                                              Ag




                                       Labor Shares                      Shares in Value Added                                                              Reallocation    Transformation
                                                       2005       2017                                                    2005                                 2017
                  Source: World Development Indicators and Bhutan National Accounts Statistics.               Source: World Bank staff calculations using data from the Population and Housing
                  Note: The right-hand side graph uses gewog-level data. Due to changes in                    Census 2005 and 2017, and the decomposition proposed by Eckert and Peters
                  some gewog boundaries between 2005 and 2017, it only incorporates data of                   (2022).
                  unchanged gewogs, which means that the figure on the aggregate change in the
                  labor share differs from the national average highlighted in this section.




62
                                                                                                                          Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
                                                                                                                                               Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Structural transformation has occurred through a spatial reallocation of workers rather than through a homogenous
transition across space. Eckert and Peters (2022) show that the change in the agricultural labor share over time can be
decomposed into two factors.99 The first one – termed spatial reallocation component – is the share of structural transfor-
mation driven by workers moving from more to less agricultural areas, thus increasing the share of these areas in national
employment. The second component is called regional transformation component; it measures the contribution of with-
in-region changes in agricultural employment. Applying this decomposition methodology to gewog-level data from the 2017
and 2005 waves of Bhutan’s Population and Housing Census (PHC) shows that structural transformation was exclusively
driven by a reallocation of workers from more to less agricultural areas. In the absence of within-region structural trans-
formation, the reallocation of labor that occurred between 2005 and 2017 would have reduced the national agricultural
labor share by almost 3 percentage points below its actual level in 2017 (Figure 51). By contrast, had there been no internal
reallocation of workers, the agricultural labor share would have exceeded the 2017 value by over 2 percentage points.


Figure 52: Structural transformation has centered around urban centers and select trading points
at the southern border, whereas more rural regions have witnessed an increase in agricultural labor
shares.



                                                                                                                                                Change in agricultural
                                                                                                                                                labor share (2005-17)
                                                                                                                                                    -0.620 - -0.160
                                                                                                                                                    -0.160 - -0.072
                                                                                                                                                    -0.072 - -0.038
                                                                                                                                                    -0.038 - 0
                                                                                                                                                    0- 0.02
                                                                                                                                                    0.020 - 0.080
                                                                                                                                                    0.080 - 0.138
                                                                                                                                                    0.138 - 0.170
                                                                                                                                                    0.170 - 0.266
                                                                                                                                                    0.266 - 0.750



Source: World Bank staff calculations using data from the Population and Housing Census 2005 and 2017.
Note: Gewogs for which no data was available are shaded in white.




The heterogeneous progress in structural transformation aligns workers with emerging cross-regional differences in
comparative advantages. The structural transformation experienced by Bhutan has resulted in (i) a relative polarization
of agricultural labor in rural areas and (ii) a modest absolute reduction in agricultural activity. The reallocation of workers
and the associated polarization of labor are a central mechanism that enables Bhutan’s economy to overcome inherent
characteristics that inhibit its competitiveness, including its mountainous terrain, high transport costs, and a low population
density. This is because it allows for an accumulation of factors in areas that are relatively more competitive and have a
comparative advantage in industry or service activities. This implies that economic policy should provide incentives and
opportunities for labor to move from more to less agricultural regions, rather than attempting to achieve homogenous
structural change throughout the country. The discussion in Chapter 1 aims to achieve this objective. It also implies that
supporting growth in more agricultural regions will hinge on strengthening their comparative advantage in agriculture.
The discussion in this module focuses on this aspect.

                                             ehind other sectors and comparators
2.2.2.	 Agricultural value-added has fallen b

Bhutan has experienced only slow gains in agricultural value-added per worker. Agricultural productivity growth
averaged just 1 percent per year between 2000 and 2017, which puts Bhutan among the lower half of its peer countries
(Figure 53). Between 1997 and 2019, value-added per worker in agriculture increased by only 26 percent, much less
than in industry (84 percent) and services (178 percent; Figure 54).



99	   Eckert, F. and Peters, M. 2022. “Spatial Structural Change” Working Paper W30489. National Bureau of Economic Research, Massachusetts.




                                                                                                                                                                                        63
     Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                  Figure 53: Agricultural productivity growth                                                                                Figure 54: …but productivity growth in
                  is key to facilitating a movement of labor to                                                                              agriculture has lagged in other sectors within
                  non-primary sectors…                                                                                                       Bhutan…
                                                                                                                                                                 Bhutan value added per worker, by sector (1997=100)
                                                               8                                                                              300

                                                               7
                  Annual change in productivity, percent




                                                                                                               Bhutan
                                                               6                                                                              250

                                                               5

                                                               4                                                                              200

                                                               3

                                                               2                                                                               150

                                                                1

                                                               0                                                                               100

                                                               -1

                                                               -2                                                                              50
                                                                                                                                                     1997
                                                                                                                                                    1998
                                                                                                                                                    1999
                                                                                                                                                    2000
                                                                                                                                                    2001
                                                                                                                                                    2002
                                                                                                                                                    2003
                                                                                                                                                    2004
                                                                                                                                                    2005
                                                                                                                                                    2006
                                                                                                                                                    2007
                                                                                                                                                    2008
                                                                                                                                                    2009
                                                                                                                                                    2010
                                                                                                                                                     2011
                                                                                                                                                    2012
                                                                                                                                                    2013
                                                                                                                                                     2014
                                                                                                                                                    2015
                                                                                                                                                    2016
                                                                                                                                                     2017
                                                                                                                                                    2018
                                                                                                                                                    2019
                                                               -3
                                                                    -5   -4     -3       -2      -1     0      1      2      3       4   5
                                                                                                                                                     Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
                                                                                        Annual change in employment share, percent
                                                                                                                                                     Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant
                                                                          Agriculture              Industry              Services                    Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
                  Source: World Development Indicators.                                                                                      Source: World Development Indicators.
                  Note: Figure 52 presents average annual changes (in percentage points) from 2000 to 2017 using the World Bank’s Job Structure Tool.




                  The productivity gains were dwarfed by the performance of aspirational peer countries, which have undergone a
                  successful structural transformation process. Paraguay and Cambodia, for instance, were able to more than double
                  value-added per worker in the agricultural sector over the same period (Figure 55). Peru’s value-added per worker in agri-
                  culture exceeded Bhutan’s level by 42 percent only in 1992 but had diverged by almost 100 percent by 2019 (Figure 56).


                  Figure 55: …and was significantly lower than for                                                                           Figure 56: …in stark contrast to productivity
                  peer countries…                                                                                                            developments in the service and industrial sectors.
                                                                                  Agriculture value added per worker (1997=100)                                      Service value added per worker (1997=100)
                             300                                                                                                              300


                             250                                                                                                              250


                            200                                                                                                               200


                                  150                                                                                                          150


                                 100                                                                                                           100


                                          50                                                                                                    50

                                                           0                                                                                     0
                                                                1997
                                                               1998
                                                               1999
                                                               2000
                                                               2001
                                                               2002
                                                               2003
                                                               2004
                                                               2005
                                                               2006
                                                               2007
                                                               2008
                                                               2009
                                                               2010
                                                                2011
                                                               2012
                                                               2013
                                                                2014
                                                               2015
                                                               2016
                                                                2017
                                                               2018
                                                               2019




                                                                                                                                                      1997
                                                                                                                                                     1998
                                                                                                                                                     1999
                                                                                                                                                     2000
                                                                                                                                                     2001
                                                                                                                                                     2002
                                                                                                                                                     2003
                                                                                                                                                     2004
                                                                                                                                                     2005
                                                                                                                                                     2006
                                                                                                                                                     2007
                                                                                                                                                     2008
                                                                                                                                                     2009
                                                                                                                                                     2010
                                                                                                                                                      2011
                                                                                                                                                     2012
                                                                                                                                                     2013
                                                                                                                                                      2014
                                                                                                                                                     2015
                                                                                                                                                     2016
                                                                                                                                                      2017
                                                                                                                                                     2018
                                                                                                                                                     2019




                                                                                         Bhutan               Paraguay                                                     Bhutan               Paraguay
                                                                                         Peru                 Cambodia                                                     Peru                 Cambodia
                  Source: World Development Indicators.                                                                                      Source: World Development Indicators.




                  An empirical cross-country comparison showed that countries with larger agricultural productivity gains experienced
                  more rapid structural transformation. Comparing Bhutan to the set of structural and aspirational peers revealed a strong
                  negative association between agricultural productivity growth and agricultural employment share (Figure 55). Bhutan
                  stands out as one of a few countries to have experienced slow productivity growth and a slow movement of labor out
                  of agriculture.



64
                                                                                                                          Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
                                                                                                                                                       Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                                                     s driven by the reduced production of
2.2.3.	 The slow growth in agricultural value-added i
        Bhutan’s traditional crops

Bhutan’s traditional crops are irrigated and rainfed paddy and rainfed maize. These two crops account for almost half
of Bhutan’s harvested area, with paddy occupying a 25 percent and maize a 21 percent (Figure 57) share. Cardamom
(12 percent) and potato (9 percent) are the third and fourth largest crops produced. Within broader product groups,
cereals account for most of the harvested area at 57 percent, followed by spices and vegetables. Most cereal produc-
tion in Bhutan operates on a small scale, with farm sizes averaging about 2.5 acres and less than 18 percent of irrigated
harvested area. Bhutan also limits irrigation to paddy, with most other crops produced under rainfed conditions or using
wetland farming.

Figure 57: Paddy and maize dominate Bhutan’s harvested area.
   Cereals                                                                           Spices                              Vegetables




                                                                                                                                                 Beans,
                                                                                                                         Chili, 3.6              1.7




                                                                                                                         Cabbage, Turnip,        Raddish,
                                                                                                                         1.4      1.3            1.2
                                                                                                                         Cauliflower,            Carrot,
                                                                                     Cardamom, 12.1                      1.0                    0.5
                                                                                                                                        Cucumber,
                                                                                                                                        0.6
                                                                                                               Garlic,
                                                                                                                 0.3                                              Bunching Onion, 0.3
                                                                                                                                        Onion,                    Tomato, 0.2
                                                                                                            Tumeric,                    0.4
                                                                                                                 0.2                                              Eggplant, 0.2
                                       Maize, 21.2                                                         Coriander, Broccoli,          Peas,                    Asparagus, 0.2
                                                                                     Ginger, 3.2                 0.2 0.9                 0.4
                                                                                                                                                                  Beetroot, 0.0
                                                                                     Roots and Tubers                                 Oilseeds
                                                                                                                                      and Legumes
                                                                                                                   Casava, 0.2



                                                                                                                                      Mustard,                    Mung Beans, 1.1
                                                                   Millet, 2.4                                                        1.2
                                                                                                                         Taro, 0.1                                Soya Beans, 0.3


                                                                                                                  Tumeric, 0.2                                    Groundnut, 0.2
                                       Buckwheat,       Wheat,     Barley,                                                                                        Perilla, 0.1
   Paddy, 25.1                         3.9              2.4        1.7               Potato, 8.6                  Tumeric, 0.2
                                                                                                                                                                  Sunflower, 0.0

                                                                                                                         Beans Dry, 0.8             Lentil, 0.0
                                                                                                                             Rajma Beans, 0.7
Source: Agriculture Statistics Reports, National Statistics Bureau. Note: The numbers show shares of a specific crop in total harvested area in 2021.




The area dedicated to these crops has declined in recent years. Bhutan’s harvested area has declined consistently
over the last decade, from a high of 214,000 acres in 2009 to 96,000 acres in 2021. This decline occurred across most
districts but was most pronounced in the southern (e.g., in Samtse and Sarpang) and the eastern part (e.g., Trashigang;
Figure 58) of the country. Underlying this development was a 57 percent reduction in the harvested area for cereals
between 2004 and 2021 (Figure 59).



                                                                                                                                                                                            65
     Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                  Yields of maize and paddy also decreased. Using data from two rounds of Bhutan’s Renewable Natural Resource (RNR)
                  Census, Dizon, Imtiaz and Yu (2022)100 documented that irrigated paddy yields decreased over the last ten years. Between
                  2009 and 2019, the years of the RNR census, irrigated paddy yields decreased from 1.6 tons per acre to 1.1 tons per acre.
                  A similar picture emerged for maize, for which yields decreased from 0.94 to 0.89 tons per acre.


                  Figure 58: Harvested area has declined across                                                         Figure 59:…driven by cereals (maize and paddy).
                  Bhutan…
                                                               -56
                                            Trashigang -70
                                                                                                                                     Bhutan              -41
                                                               -56
                                              Dagana                 -44
                                                                      -43
                                              Mongar                    -40                                              Oilseeds_Legumes                -44
                                                                                  -30
                                             Lhuentse             -50
                                                                                 -33                                           Roots_Tuber                                 1
                  Wangdue Phodrang                                                       -20
                                                                                   -28
                                              Trongsa                       -35
                                                                                                                                 Vegetables                                    12
                                                                                       -25
                                             Thimphu                 -45
                                                                              -33
                                            Bumthang                                                                                  SPices                                                     96
                                                                                             -16
                                                                                               12
                                                 Gasa                      -39
                                                                                                            20                       Cereals       -57
                                               Chukha                                                       20
                                                     -80       -60          -40              -20    0     20       40                     -100            -50          0            50        100       150
                                                        Change in harvested ares (% of 2004 value)                                                       Change in harvested area (% of 2004 value)
                  Source: Agriculture Statistics Reports, National Statistics Bureau.                                   Source: Agriculture Statistics Reports, National Statistics Bureau.




                  Changes in cereal yields differ across the country. Decreases in paddy and maize yields were concentrated in the
                  southern regions, whereas the rest of the country experienced rising yields (Figure 60). With most arable land located
                  in the south (Figure 61), this resulted in an overall decline in cereal yields.


                  Figure 60: Cereal yield changes were                                                                  Figure 61: …which is also the area where most
                  heterogeneous across Bhutan, with reductions                                                          agricultural production is located.
                  focused in the south of the country…


                                      150                                                                                     Gasa District




                                      100
                   Number of gewogs




                                      50




                                                                                                                                               Share in percent
                                       0
                                       -1000          -500            0             500          1000            1500                                             0                       5
                                                   Change in weighted cereal yields b/w 08/09 and 18/19

                  Source: World Bank staff calculations using data from the Renewable Natural                           Source: World Bank staff calculations using data from Agriculture Statistics Reports
                  Resources (RNR) Censuses 2009 and 2019.                                                               and Statistical Yearbook 2022, National Statistics Bureau.




                  100	 Dizon, F., Imtiaz, S., & Yu, J. 2022. “Water Constraints to Agricultural Productivity in Bhutan.” Background Paper to the Bhutan CEM. World Bank, Washington, DC.




66
                                                                                                                                                              Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
                                                                                                                                                                                            Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Lower harvested areas and lower yields for paddy, maize and other cereals resulted in reduced production. Between
2004 and 2021, paddy and maize output declined by 25 and 66 percent, respectively (Figure 62). This is symptomatic of
a broader development for cereals, for which output declined across the board and was most pronounced in the case
of wheat, for which output decreased by 72 percent over the same period.


Figure 62: Declines in harvested areas and                                            Figure 63: …whereas the number of fruit trees
yields have led to a drop in agricultural output of                                   planted has increased due to a rise in areca nut
traditional crops…                                                                    production.
                                                                                                                        4.0
Oil seed
            Mustard       -81.2                                                                                                                                                                            3.4
and legumes
                                                                                                                        3.5
Roots           Potato                       -18.6
and Tubers                                                                                                                                                                                                 0.4
                                                                                                                        3.0                                        2.8
                Ginger                               14.9
                                                                                                                                                                         0.1
Spices                                                                                 Million of fruit bearing trees   2.5
             Cardamom                                                    97.5
                                                                                                                                                                                      2.1                  0.8
                                                                                                                        2.0                                                                    0.1
                Wheat       -72.1
                                                                                                                                         1.5
                 Millet             -52.6                                                                               1.5                         0.0
                                                                                                                                                                   1.6
                                                                                                                                                                                     0.8
Cereals      Buckwheat                      -26.1                                                                       1.0
                                                                                                                                                                                                            1.8
                                                                                                                                         1.0
                Paddy                       -25.4                                                                       0.5
                                                                                                                                                                                     0.8
                                                                                                                                                                   0.6
                 Maize      -65.8                                                                                                     0.2
                                                                                                                        0.0
                                                                                                                                     2004                      2009                  2015                 2021
                      -100        -50          0         50        100          150
                      Change in production b/1 2004 and 2021 (percent)                                                        Areca nut               Mandarin           Banana           Apple        Other fruit

Source: Agriculture Statistics Reports, National Statistics Bureau.                   Source: Agriculture Statistics Reports, National Statistics Bureau.




2.2.4.	 The agricultural sector is gradually transitioningfrom traditional to higher value
        products

In contrast to maize and paddy, agricultural production-                              Figure 64: Bhutan has an export niche in fruits,
64for select spices and fruits increased in recent years.                             spices, and a few vegetables…
The harvested area for spices increased by 96 percent
                                                                                                                                           White Bean
between 2004 and 2021 (Figure 59), driven by increased                                                                  120
                                                                                                                                           Pineapple                                                              Lentil
cardamom production, the output for which increased                                                                     110                Eggplant
by 98 percent over this period (Figure 64). Fruit-bearing                                                               100                Tomato
                                                                                                                                           Onion bulb
trees also increased substantially, rising by 126 percent                                                                                  Paddy
                                                                                      Import/Production, in percent




                                                                                                                        90
(Figure 64). Fruit production is concentrated among three                                                               80                 Mango
products (areca nut – 52 percent, mandarin – 24 percent,                                                                70 Import Oriented (9)
and bananas – 8 percent; Figure 65), with expanded                                                                      60
output driven by an expansion of areca nut production,                                                                  50
which increased from 200,000 trees in 2004 to almost 2                                                                  40        Maize  Papaya                                                   Export Oriented (8)
million trees in 2021 (Figure 65).                                                                                      30
                                                                                                                                            Peas
                                                                                                                                   Cucumber    Cabbage                           Carrot
                                                                                                                        20         Banana            Potato
Increased production of cardamom and areca nuts has                                                                               Chili
                                                                                                                                                                               Areca nut
                                                                                                                         10                                                        Mandarin
allowed Bhutan to increase its global market share                                                                                Buckwheat               Ginger                   Apple             Cardamomo
                                                                                                                         0         Millet
in these products. Bhutan’s agricultural exports have                                                                         0     10         20    30      40 50 60 70 80 90                       100 110         120
remained relatively constant over time and stood at 1.7                                                                                                     Exports/Production, in percent
percent of GDP in 2021 (Figure 68). Cereals, even though
they account for 57 percent of total harvested area, are                              Source: World Bank Staff calculations based on “Self-sufficiency and Dietary
                                                                                      Energy Supply of Food Crops in Bhutan” report, October 2021.
negligible in terms of exports and most of them are used



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 67
     Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                  Figure 65: …with fruit production dominated by areca nuts, followed by mandarins and bananas.




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Banana, 7.7                               Apple, 3.9

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Tree
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Others,              tomato,
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           1.6                  1.4
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Pineapple,
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    3.1                    Guava,             Pear,                 Peach,
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           1.3                0.7                   0.7
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Hazelnut,              Mango,             Litchi,               Lemon,
                                                    Areca nut, 52.4                                                                       Mandarin, 23.6                                                                            1.8                    0.8                0.6                   0.3

                  Source: Agriculture Statistics Reports, National Statistics Bureau.
                  Note: The numbers show shares of a specific tree in the total number of fruit trees in 2021.



                  for domestic consumption. In contrast, exports under Harmonized Classification (HS classification) chapter 9 (including
                  coffee, tea, maté, and spices) account for 60 percent of agricultural exports (with 61 percent for India). This has been
                  driven by an increasing market share in global cardamom production, with Bhutan supplying 1.5 percent of the global
                  market in 2021 (Figure 67). Exports under chapter 8 (edible fruits and nuts) account for 22 percent of total agricultural
                  products exports, with only 40 percent destined for India. Most nut exports are accounted for by areca nut production,
                  for which Bhutan has consistently increased its global market share in recent years, supplying almost 1 percent of the
                  total global production in 2021 (Figure 65). In contrast, vegetable exports are highly concentrated and declining, with
                  most accounted for by potatoes destined for India.



                  Figure 66: Spice, fruit and nut exports to global                                                                         Figure 67: …allowing Bhutan to capture market
                  markets have gradually replaced potato exports                                                                            shares in select niche products.
                  to India…
                                                        2.5                                                                                                                         4.5

                                                                                           2.0                                                                                      4.0
                                                                                                                                          Bhutan's share in total tonnes produced




                                                        2.0
                                                                                                                                                                                    3.5
                   Bhutan's agricultural export (% of GDP)




                                                                       1.7                               1.7                1.7
                                                                                                                                                                                    3.0
                                                                                                                                                    worldwide (percent)




                                                             1.5
                                                                                                                                                                                    2.5

                                                             1.0                                                                                                                    2.0

                                                                                                                                                                                    1.5

                                                        0.5                                                                                                                         1.0

                                                                                                                                                                                    0.5
                                                        0.0
                                                                     2005                2009           2015                2021                                                    0.0
                                                                                                                                                                                          2004
                                                                                                                                                                                                 2005
                                                                                                                                                                                                        2006
                                                                                                                                                                                                               2007
                                                                                                                                                                                                                      2008
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             2009
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    2010
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           2011
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  2012
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         2013
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                2014
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       2015
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              2016
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     2017
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            2018
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   2019
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          2020




                                                             Chapter 10: Cereals                 Chapter 9: Co ee, tea, mate and spices
                                                             Chapter 8: Edible fruit and nuts;   Chapter 7: Edible vegetables
                                                             peel of citrus fruit or melons      and certain roots and tubers                                                                                           Areca nuts                               Cardamoms
                  Source: Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database                                                  Source: Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database
                  (FAOSTAT).                                                                                                                (FAOSTAT).




                  The move towards export niches indicates a broader re-orientation of the agricultural sector towards its compara-
                  tive advantages. Bhutan’s agricultural production can be classified into three groups — (i) Import-dependent crops, for
                  which the import to production share exceeds 50 percent. These include, among others, paddy and wheat (Figure 66).
                  These are items for which Bhutan has a revealed comparative disadvantage; (ii) Export-oriented crops, for which over



68
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




25 percent of production is exported. This includes high-value goods such as cardamom, areca nuts, and mandarins, in
which Bhutan has a comparative advantage; and (iii) Other products in which Bhutan is self-sufficient, including maize.
Over time, Bhutan has moved towards its comparative advantage, exporting more of its export-oriented production and
importing more of its import-dependent products (Figure 68, Figure 69).



Figure 68: Over time export intensity of export-                                                                                                    Figure 69: …whereas Bhutan increasingly relies
oriented products has increased…                                                                                                                    on imports for products for which it is at a
                                                                                                                                                    comparative disadvantage.
                                             80                                                                                                                                                  700


                                             70                                                                                              67
                                                                                                                                                                                                 600



                                                                                                                                                    Imports as a share of production (percent)
Exports as a share of production (percent)




                                             60
                                                                                                                                                                                                 500
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  502
                                             50
                                                                                                                                                                                                 400
                                             40
                                                                                                                                                                                                 300
                                             30
                                                  22
                                                                                                                                                                                                 200
                                             20


                                             10                                                                                                                                                  100 78


                                              0                                                                                                                                                   0
                                                  2006

                                                         2007

                                                                2008

                                                                       2009

                                                                              2010

                                                                                     2011

                                                                                            2012

                                                                                                   2013

                                                                                                          2014

                                                                                                                 2015

                                                                                                                        2016

                                                                                                                               2017

                                                                                                                                      2018

                                                                                                                                             2019




                                                                                                                                                                                                       2006

                                                                                                                                                                                                              2007

                                                                                                                                                                                                                     2008

                                                                                                                                                                                                                            2009

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   2010

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          2011

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 2012

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        2013

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               2014

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      2015

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             2016

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    2017

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           2018

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  2019
Source: World Bank Staff calculations based on Self-sufficiency and Dietary Energy                                                                  Source: World Bank Staff calculations based on Self-sufficiency and Dietary Energy
Supply of Food Crops in Bhutan report, October 2021.                                                                                                Supply of Food Crops in Bhutan report, October 2021.




2.3.	 Productivity as a kick-starter
of structural transformation

The literature has long documented a link between agricultural productivity and the movement of labor out of agri-
culture. On the one hand, increasing agricultural productivity directly supports growth in areas that have a comparative
advantage in agriculture and can generate positive spillover effects to the livelihoods of predominantly rural popula-
tions.101 On the other hand, agricultural productivity growth can reduce labor demand in the sector and help harmonize
marginal returns to labor between agricultural and non-agricultural activities, thus providing an incentive for workers to
seek employment in industries and services.102

This section shows that agricultural productivity increases in Bhutan have driven structural transformation in the past
and will be crucial to accelerating it going forward. It shows – using two separate sources of geographic variation – that
those areas which experienced yield growth or transitions towards higher value products also experienced changes in
their agricultural labor shares. The section then uses an econometric estimation technique to argue that current yields
in Bhutan remain below their potential due to production constraints. Simulating the closure of these productivity gaps
using a CGE model shows that such a policy intervention has the potential to rapidly increase structural transformation
and generate significant spillovers to non-agricultural sectors.



101	 There is, for instance, evidence that the adoption of higher productivity crops during the Indian green revolution significantly enhanced agricultural employment and incomes.
     See Moscona, J. (2018). “Agricultural Development and Structural Change Within and Across Countries”. Mimeo, MIT.
102	 See Bustos, P., Caprettini, B., and Ponticelli, J. 2016. “Agricultural Productivity and Structural Transformation: Evidence from Brazil”. American Economic Review, 106(6), 1320-65.




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         69
     Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                                                                                 ore productive agriculture and
                  2.3.1.	 Within Bhutan there is a statistical relation between m
                          the release of labor

                  A relation between agricultural labor shares and productivity in the sector exists both on the intensive and the exten-
                  sive margin. On the intensive margin, areas that have experienced cereal yield growth have increased their agricultural
                  labor share and have experienced an outward movement of workers. A similar pattern, albeit less pronounced, is visible
                  in the extensive margin shift from cereals towards fruit trees. Both patterns indicate that productivity improvements
                  release labor to other sectors.

                  Cereal yield increases are associated with increasing agricultural labor shares and an emigration of workers. Figure
                  62 in section 2.2.3 has documented substantial heterogeneity between gewogs in yield changes between the 2009
                  and 2019 RNR census. Combining the data on yield changes with information on changes in employment changes from
                  the PHC shows that those gewogs, which experienced a larger change in cereal yields between 2009 and 2019, experi-
                  enced an increase in their own agricultural labor share (Figure 70) and a decrease in their share of national employment
                  (Figure 71).

                  A regression approach confirms that the visual relation is statistically significant. A 1 ton per acre increase in yields is
                  associated with a 0.04 percentage point reduction in a gewog’s share in national employment. At the same time, gewogs
                  that experience cereal yield increases become more agricultural, with a 1 ton per acre increase associated with a 2.7
                  percentage point increase in agricultural labor share. Both estimates are statistically significantly different from zero
                  at conventional levels of confidence. The increase in cereal yields is also concentrated among those regions that had
                  relatively higher agricultural labor shares in 2005. These factors provide prima facie evidence that the geographically
                  focused structural transformation experienced by Bhutan is linked to agricultural productivity growth.



                  Figure 70: Regions that experienced higher                                                 Figure 71: … while decreasing their share of
                  cereal yield growth increase their own                                                     national employment
                  agricultural labor share…
                                                   1.0                                                                                              0.010
                                                                                                             Change in national employment shares




                                                  0.5
                   Infrastructure quality (WEF)




                                                                                                                                                    0.005




                                                  0.0
                                                                                                                                                    0.000




                                                  -0.5
                                                                                                                                                    -0.005
                                                     -1000   -500        0            500      1000   1500                                                -1000   -500         0           500            1000   1500
                                                                    Capital spending (% GDP)                                                                             Change in weighted cereal yields
                  Source: World Bank staff calculations based on data from the PHCs 2005 and                 Source: World Bank staff calculations based on data from the PHCs 2005 and
                  2017 and the RNR censuses 2008 and 2018.                                                   2017 and the RNR censuses 2009 and 2019.
                                                                                                             Note: The scatter plot excludes outliers where change in employment share
                                                                                                             exceeds 3 percent and -0.5 percent. The linear fit line includes these outliers.




                  Similarly, districts that reduced their harvested area from crops in favor of fruit trees are more likely to have expe-
                  rienced a reduction in their agricultural labor share. Section 2.2.4 has documented a reduction of harvested area in
                  some parts of Bhutan and an increased reliance of production on fruit trees for areca nuts. These two developments




70
                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




are linked, as those gewogs which experienced a reduction in harvested area are also more likely to experience an
increased number of fruit-bearing trees (Figure 72). At the same time, the two districts – Samtse and Sarpang – which
experienced the largest reduction in harvested area and increase in fruit-bearing trees, also experienced consider-
able increases in their agricultural labor shares of 3.8 and 7.7 percentage points between the 2005 and 2017 census
(Figure 73). Samtse’s share in national employment decreased by 1 percentage point and Sarpang’s share marginally
increased by 0.6 percentage points over the same period.

Figure 72: The dzongkhags with the largest drop                                                                                                       Figure 73: …and the largest decline in agricultural
in harvested area had the largest increases in the                                                                                                    labor share.
number of fruit trees…
                                                                     0.7                                                                                                                               25
 Change in fruit – bearing trees b/w 2004 and 2021 (million trees)




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Zhemgang
                                                                                       Samtse     Sarpang
                                                                     0.6                                                                                                                               20

                                                                     0.5                                                                              Share of agricultural employment in Dzonghag's   15
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Chukha
                                                                                                                                                            total employment, delta 2005-2017
                                                                     0.4                                                                                                                               10                             Mongar         Gasa

                                                                                                                                     Pema Gatshel                                                                           Sarpang                      Bumthang
                                                                     0.3                               Dagana                                                                                           5                                   Samdrup Jongkhar
                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Samtse
                                                                                                                    Punakha
                                                                                                     Tsirang                                                                                                                              Lhuentse             Haa
                                                                     0.2                                               Trongsa                                                                          0
                                                                                                  Mongar                                                                                                             Trashigang                              Trashi Yangtse
                                                                                                                                     Zhemgang                                                                                                      Paro
                                                                                       Samdrup Jongkhar                                                                                                                               Dagana              Thimphu
                                                                     0.1                                                             Trashi Yangtse                                                     -5
                                                                                        Trashigang                                   Gasa                                                                                                Tsirang
                                                                                                 Lhuentse                            Haa
                                                                     0.0                                                                                                                               -10                        Wangdue Phodrang           Pema Gatshel
                                                                                         Wangdue Phodrang                            Bumthang
                                                                                                                Paro
                                                                                                            Thimphu                                                                                    -15                                 Punakha
                                                                     -0.1
                                                                                                            Chukha                                                                                                                          Trongsa
                                                                 -0.2                                                                                                                            -20
                                                                    -20          -15            -10            -5                0               5                                                  -20      -15            -10            -5            0               5
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Change in harvested area by Dzongkhag,
                                                                            Change in harvested area b/w 2004 and 2021 (1000 acres)                                                                                     in thousand acres, 2004-2021

Source: Agriculture Statistics Reports, National Statistics Bureau




These patterns are consistent with the broader experience of structural transformation in South Asia. Asher et al.
(2022) studied irrigation canals in India over 150 years and found that canal areas have higher land productivity and
population density relative to neighboring non-canal areas, but that there is no long-run change in the share of the work-
force outside of agriculture or even in agro-processing. Instead, structural transformation occurs via higher growth rates
in nearby towns, suggesting that the transformation is one that occurs in movement across space as opposed to across
sectors (within the same area). Related work in India by Blakeslee, et al. (2023) found that large-scale irrigation increased
agricultural output, population, and wealth in the program areas, but there was a decline in population, non-agricultural
employment, and firm activity in nearby towns.

                                   n Bhutan is below its potential
2.3.2.	 Agricultural productivity i

Yield potential can be estimated through a regression that predicts potential yields at the chiwog-level based on
reported constraints and controlling for local conditions.103 This exercise highlights that Bhutan has substantial poten-
tial to increase yields and kick-start structural transformation. Yield potential growth is largest for maize, for which the
predicted potential yield is over 1.3 tons per acre, 44 percent more than the average current yield (Figure 74). Irrigated
paddy also has substantial yield potential at 1.6 tons per acre, 39 percent more than the actual average. In addition to
cereals, vegetables – including chili, beans, cauliflower, and potato – also hold significant potential to increase yields.




103	 The analysis presented in this section uses data from the two RNR censuses and compares yield differentials across neighboring chiwogs, thus controlling for differences in
     exogenous production determinants that are fixed for neighboring villages and for other, observable, production characteristics. In addition, the analysis controls for self-reported
     production constraints through a regression approach. Yield potential is then defined as the predicted yield of the top 10 percent of holdings when production constraints are
     alleviated.




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     71
     Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                  Figure 74: Current yields are significantly below their potential
                             Cardamom
                     Spinaches and sags
                                     Cabbages
                                        Radish
                                     Mandarin
                                       Ginger
                                         Potato
                                    Cauliflower
                                           Beans
                                            Chili
                          Paddy (Irrigated)
                                     Maize
                                                            0%                                                         10%                                                      20%                                                          30%                                                          40%                                                               50%
                  Source: World Bank staff calculations based on data from the Renewable Natural Resources (RNR) Census.
                  Note: The figure shows the estimated yield gaps by crop.



                  Yield potentials vary by region. The regressions highlight that there is substantial potential to increase maize production
                  in the south-eastern region104, with potential increases amounting to 52 percent of current yields (Figure 75). Similarly,
                  growth potential in the central region105 amounts to 29 percent of current yields. While the data also suggests large growth
                  potential for the Western region106, these estimates are associated with a large variance due to a limited sample size. In
                  contrast to maize, irrigated paddy potential is more focused on the eastern region107. The south-western region108 has large
                  yield gaps for select vegetables, such as potatoes, beans, and cabbage, in addition to considerable growth potential in rice.

                  Figure 75: Yield increase potentials vary significantly by crop and region
                   160%

                   140%

                   120%

                   100%

                    80%

                    60%

                    40%

                    20%

                     0%
                          Central
                                    East
                                           South-East
                                                        South-West
                                                                     West
                                                                            Central
                                                                                      East
                                                                                             South-East
                                                                                                          South-West
                                                                                                                       West
                                                                                                                              Central
                                                                                                                                        East
                                                                                                                                               South-East
                                                                                                                                                            South-West
                                                                                                                                                                         West
                                                                                                                                                                                Central
                                                                                                                                                                                          East
                                                                                                                                                                                                 South-East
                                                                                                                                                                                                              South-West
                                                                                                                                                                                                                           West
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Central
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            East
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   South-East
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                South-West
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             West
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Central
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              East
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     South-East
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  South-West
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               West
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Central
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                East
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       South-East
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    South-West
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 West




                                    Rice (Irrigated)                                         Maize                                         Potato                                                Beans                                         Spinach                                               Chili                                      Cabbages
                  Source: World Bank staff calculations based on data from the Renewable Natural Resources (RNR) Census.
                  Note: The figure shows the potential increase in yields by crop and region.




                                                           y alleviating production constraints
                  2.3.3.	 Productivity gaps can be closed b

                  Productivity gaps arise because farmers face production constraints. To estimate the importance and impact of different
                  constraints on yields, this section presents results from an econometric analysis that compares average yields between
                  villages with higher and lower shares of households reporting a given constraint.109 This approach controls for factors that
                  are similar between neighboring villages, such as climatic conditions or soil suitability. In addition, the estimates control



                  104	   The south-eastern region as defined here contains Samdrup Jongkha, Sarpang and Zhemgang dzongkhags.
                  105	   The central region has Bumthang, Gasa, Punakha, Trongsa and Wangdue Phodrang dzongkhags.
                  106	   The western region comprises Haa, Paro and Thimphu dzongkhags.
                  107	   The eastern region includes Lhuentse, Mongar, Pema Gatshel, Trashigang, and Trashi Yangtse.
                  108	   The south-western region comprises Chukja, Dagana, Samtse, and Tsirang dzongkhags.
                  109	   The detailed econometric results are reported in Dizon, F., Imtiaz, S., and Yu, J. 2022. “Water Constraints to Agricultural Productivity in Bhutan”. Background Paper to the Bhutan
                         CEM. This spatial first difference approach is based on Druckenmiller, H., and Hsiang, S., 2018. “Accounting for Unobservable Heterogeneity in Cross Section Using Spatial First
                         Differences”. NBER Working Papers 25177, National Bureau of Economic Research.




72
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




for a set of farm-level characteristics. The production constraints considered in the analysis are those reported in the RNR
censuses, including irrigation problems, drought, unproductive land, shortage of land, labor shortage, limited access to
market, excessive rain, hailstorm or winds, landslides, crop damage by wild animals, and crop damage by insects or diseas-
es.110 The section first discusses the prevalence of these constraints and then presents estimates of their impact on yields.

Challenges related to water supply are frequently reported by farmers. Problems with irrigation are consistently the
most frequently reported problem across all crop-producing villages. Among rice-producing chiwogs, about 40 percent
of holdings reported irrigation problems as a constraint in the 2019 RNR census (Figure 76). Similarly, about 6 percent
of holdings reported drought as a constraint. These shares are similar for other crops, ranging from 37 percent for
maize-producing to 49 percent for areca nut-producing chiwogs.

Human-wildlife interactions also reportedly result in production constraints. Crop damage by wild animals was
reported more frequently in 2019 compared to 2009, with 68 percent of rice-producing holdings and 71 percent of
maize-producing holdings reporting it as a constraint in 2019. This was 5 and 7 percentage points more for rice-producing
holdings and maize-producing holdings, respectively, than in the previous census round. In contrast, crop damage by
insects and disease is now less prevalent, with only 23 percent of households in rice- and 24 percent of households in
maize-producing villages reporting it as a constraint. Similarly, about three-quarters of cardamom- and areca nut-pro-
ducing holdings report crop damage by wild animals as a major concern.

Labor shortages are another constraint reported by farmers. Between 42 and 45 percent of holdings producing
paddy, maize, cardamom, and areca nuts report that labor shortages impede their production. While labor shortages
thus remain a challenge, the share of holdings reporting it as a key obstacle dropped by about 6 percentage points on
average between the 2009 and 2019 RNR census.


Figure 76: Irrigation problems, labor shortages, and crop damage are among the main constraints
reported by farmers.
80%
 70%
60%
50%
 40%
 30%
20%
 10%
  0%
       Irrigation problem
                            Drought
                                      Unproductive land
                                                          Shortage of land
                                                                             Labour shortage
                                                                                               Limited access to markets
                                                                                                                           Crop damage by wild animals
                                                                                                                                                         Crop damage by insects and diseases
                                                                                                                                                                                               Irrigation problem
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Drought
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Unproductive land
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Shortage of land
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Labour shortage
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Limited access to markets
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Crop damage by wild animals
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Crop damage by insects and diseases
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Irrigation problem
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Drought
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Unproductive land
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Shortage of land
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Labour shortage
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Limited access to market
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Crop damage by wild animals
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Crop damage by insects /diseases
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Irrigation problem
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Drought
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Unproductive land
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Shortage of land
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Labour shortage
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Limited access to market
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Crop damage by wild animals
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Crop damage by insects /diseases




                                        Irrigated Paddy                                                                                                                                                                                           Maize                                                                                                                                                                                   Cardamom                                                                                                                                                                            Areca Nut
Source: World Bank staff calculations based on data from the Renewable Natural Resources (RNR) Census.
Note: The figure shows the percentage of farmers reporting a given constraint.




The estimation results show that these challenges result in significant yield losses for farmers. Irrigation problems
cause a substantial reduction in yield for paddy rice. Removing irrigation problems for the 40 percent of affected holdings
would raise average yields by 68 kg per acre, or about 6 percent for irrigated paddy (Figure 77). Similarly, alleviating
the constraint for maize would raise average yields by 6.1 percent. Droughts result in lower yields for maize (removing


110	   This section focuses on Bhutan’s two traditional crops, rice and maize, and two export-oriented crops, cardamom and areca. A broader set of results is available in the background
       paper.




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               73
     Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                  their impact would raise yields by 1.5 percent) but have an insignificant impact on rice yields. This is expected because
                  maize – in contrast to irrigated paddy – relies to a larger extent on rainfall. Irrigation problems also severely affect yields
                  for cardamom and areca nuts. The alleviation of this constraint could raise cardamom yields by 11 percent and areca nut
                  yields by a more modest 4 percent. Cardamom yields also suffer because of droughts, so a reliable water supply could
                  raise yields by 2.2 percent.

                  Crop damage has, by far, the largest impact on yields for paddy and maize. The estimation results suggest that remov-
                  ing this constraint for affected farmers could raise yields by 9 and 15 percent for paddy and maize, respectively. Besides
                  crop damage by wild animals and water constraints, crop damage by insects and disease are a tertiary constraint for
                  paddy and maize, which, if addressed, would increase average yields by 4.7 and 4.4 percent, respectively.

                  Removing the impact of labor shortages – for instance through the adoption of labor-saving technologies – could
                  also raise yields. Overcoming labor shortages could increase paddy, cardamom and areca nut yields by 5, 6, and 4
                  percent, respectively. The alleviation of this constraint does not necessarily require the allocation of additional labor to
                  the sector. This could be achieved through the adoption of labor-saving technologies (see simulations in section 2.3.4).



                  Figure 77: Ensuring access to water, overcoming labor shortage through productivity, and protecting
                  crops from damage can trigger substantial yield increases.
                   18%

                   16%                                                                                 15.38%

                   14%

                   12%                                                                                                          11.35%

                   10%
                                                     8.92%
                    8%
                           5.97%                                              6.09%                                                                      6.11%
                    6%
                                        4.77%                    4.74%                                              4.42%
                                                                                                                                                                      4.04%
                    4%                                                                                                                                                             3.62%

                                                                                          1.83%                                                2.20%
                    2%

                    0%
                          Irrigation    Labour        Crop         Crop      Irrigation   Drought       Crop         Crop      Irrigation     Drought    Labour     Irrigation    Labour
                           problem     shortage      damage    damage by      problem                 damage     damage by      problem                 shortage     problem     shortage
                                                     by wild   insects and                             by wild   insects and
                                                     animals     diseases                              animals     diseases
                                          Irrigated Paddy                                         Maize                                     Cardamom                      Areca Nut
                  Source: World Bank staff calculations based on data from the Renewable Natural Resources (RNR) Census.
                  Note: The figure shows the impact on yields (as a percentage of 2019 average yields for the overall country) of removing a given constraint. It only reports statistically
                  significant constraints.




                  The impact of different constraints varies by geographic area. For instance, in the eastern and south-western part of
                  Bhutan, maize production is most constrained by water scarcity, whereas the effect on paddy is driven by the western
                  region. Crop damage by wild animals is also most likely to impact paddy in the western region, whereas this constraint
                  is most prevalent in the south-east for maize.

                  The results are consistent with a broader literature linking production constraints to yields in Bhutan and beyond.
                  Using the 2009 RNR census, the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) (2010) notes that the self-reported
                  top constraints to farming are wildlife, insects/plant diseases, irrigation, and labor shortage. Using propensity score
                  matching techniques, they find that improved quality of land (i.e., irrigation) is strongly related to productivity. Cursory
                  policy simulations indicate that irrigation investment programs provide larger returns, compared to, for instance, rural
                  roads and wetland protection. More broadly, yield growth in the South Asia Region (SAR) has been attributed to an extent
                  to the expansion of irrigation (Morita, 2021). In other contexts, Jones et al. (2023) study hillside irrigation schemes in
                  Rwanda and find that such schemes enable dry season horticultural production (essentially adding a season focused
                  on water-intensive crops), thereby boosting on-farm cash profits by 70 percent.



74
                                                                                                                                                                                     Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




The impact of other constraints, which cannot be captured quantitatively using RNR census data, include difficult
transport and export logistics. Due to its mountainous topography and low population density, improving transport
logistics is a major challenge in Bhutan. The country’s infrastructure has started falling behind its peer countries. For
instance, Bhutan’s ranking in the Logistics Performance Index has decreased, from 69 in 2012 to 93 in 2018 (Figure 78).
This decline is driven by slow progress (and marginal regressions) in key areas, such as infrastructure, customs, and
international shipments, whereas Bhutan’s comparator countries have consistently improved (Figure 79).



Figure 78: Bhutan’s ranking in trade logistics has                                                          Figure 79: …owing to a decrease in infrastructure,
decreased in recent years…                                                                                  international shipments and timeliness ratings,
                                                                                                            and only a modest improvement in other areas.
                                                                                                                                3.0
                            2007         2010        2012         2014         2016        2018
                       0
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           2.6
                       10                                                                                                       2.5
                                                                                                           Better Performancs                                                                                     2.3                2.4                  2.5
                                                                                                                                                  2.1                                 2.1                                 2.3
                      20                                                                                                                                                                                 2.2
                                                                                                                                2.0                                            1.9
 Better Performancs




                                                                                                                                      2.0
                                                                                                                                                        1.9
                      30
                                                                                                                                1.5                                                                1.8
                      40

                      50                                                                                                        1.0

                      60
                                                                                                                                0.5
                      70                               69
                                                                                                                                0.0
                      80                                                                                                              2007 2018 2007 2018 2007 2018 2007 2018 2007 2018 2007 2018
                                          83                                    84
                                                                                                                                        Customs



                                                                                                                                                              Infrastructure



                                                                                                                                                                                        International
                                                                                                                                                                                           shipments


                                                                                                                                                                                                           Logistics
                                                                                                                                                                                                           Services


                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Tracking
                                                                                                                                                                                                                           and Tracing



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Timeliness
                              85
                      90
                                                                   89
                                                                                             93
                      100
Source: World Bank’s International Logistics Performance Index.




Bhutan’s difficult topography also impacts land productivity. Only 13.5 percent of Bhutan’s land surface is arable,
under permanent crops, or under permanent pastures, putting it at the bottom of the global distribution of agricultural
land area (Figure 82). While having a low agricultural area is often cited as a constraint to growth in the sector, Bhutan’s
low population density means that substantial growth opportunities remain. Indeed, the country ranks 68th in the world
when calculating the share of arable land per capita (Figure 83). More than 31 percent of agricultural land is on slopes
greater than 50 percent111, which is not only challenging to cultivate but is also associated with soil and nutrient losses
when traditional farming practices are applied. As a result of the difficult topography, around 64,000 acres of farmland
remain fallow.

                                   an accelerate structural transformation
2.3.4.	 Closing productivity gaps c

This section estimates the macroeconomic impacts of closing parts of the yield gap shown in Figure 74.112 The estima-
tion relies on a CGE model designed specifically to capture the key characteristics of Bhutan’s economy (see description
in Box 8). In order to evaluate the ability of agricultural productivity growth to accelerate structural transformation, the
model is used to simulate a 20 percent reduction in Bhutan’s existing yield gaps through a joint improvement in the quality
of agricultural capital (better machines), fertilizers and pesticides (more effective chemicals), and fuel (better quality fuels).
The simulated yield improvements that form the basis of the productivity improvement scenario are shown in Figure 83.




111	                  MoAF. 2017: “Agriculture Land Development Guideline (ALDG) – 2017”. Thimphu, Bhutan, citing the National Soil Services Center, MoAF. 2011. Land Cover Mapping Project 2010.
112	                  In the stylized CGE scenarios, estimates for specific crops are taken as representative of the broader crop group weighted by land area under cultivation where necessary.




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                75
     Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                  Figure 80: Bhutan is ranked 170th among 208                                                                                         Figure 81: …but 68th when the low population
                  countries in terms of its agricultural land area…                                                                                   density is considered.
                                                             90                                                                                                                                         400

                                                             80                                                                                                                                         350




                                                                                                                                                       Square kilometre of agri. land oer 1000 people
                                                             70
                  Agricultural land (% of total land area)




                                                                                                                                                                                                        300

                                                             60
                                                                                                                                                                                                        250
                                                             50
                                                                                                                                                                                                        200
                                                             40
                                                                                                                                                                                                        150
                                                             30

                                                                                                                                                                                                        100
                                                             20
                                                                                                                            Bhutan
                                                                                                                                                                                                         50
                                                             10
                                                                                                                                                                                                              Bhutan
                                                             0                                                                                                                                           0

                  Source: World Development Indicators
                  Note: Agricultural land refers to the share of land area that is arable, under permanent crops, and under permanent pastures. Arable land includes land defined by
                  the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) as land under temporary crops (double-cropped areas are counted once), temporary meadows for
                  mowing or for pasture, land under market or kitchen gardens, and land temporarily fallow.




                  The model shows that increasing non-labor productivity affects marginal returns to different production factors,
                  and thus impacts wages and returns to land. Increasing productivity and yields have modest and ambiguous impacts
                  on agricultural wages. On the one hand, agricultural wages in the central, eastern, and western regions decline slightly,
                  as marginal products decline, and labor gets crowded out by technology (’the crowding-out effect’; Figure 84). On the
                  other hand, more efficient agricultural production also has an ‘income effect’, because it increases output and incomes
                  of landowners, among others, and therefore boosts demand. The income effect dominates the crowding-out effect in the
                  southern parts, where agricultural wages increase slightly in response to the increase in non-labor productivity. Outside
                  of agriculture the income effect prevails throughout the country, with higher yields increasing un- and low-skilled wages.

                  As low-skilled and unskilled wages rise by more than agricultural wages, households are incentivized to supply labor
                  outside of agriculture. As a result of changing relative wages, the supply of agricultural labor is lower, and the supply
                  of unskilled and low-skilled labor is higher in the agricultural productivity scenario compared to the reference scenario
                  (Figure 85). This structural change in the labor market occurs when higher relative wages outside agriculture incentivize
                  households to supply their labor to the pool of unskilled and low-skilled workers, rather than as agricultural labor.113 Thus,
                  the agricultural productivity ‘shock’ triggers a movement of labor out of agriculture into the secondary and tertiary sectors.

                  The movement of labor out of agriculture can accelerate structural transformation. The agricultural labor share in
                  the productivity improvement scenario is 0.8 percentage points lower by the year 2030 than in the reference scenario
                  (Figure 86). This reduction is driven by all regions, apart from the western region, as it retains more agricultural workers
                  than in the reference scenario, in the face of the largest yield increases and thus the largest income effect (Figure 93).




                  113	                                        Part of the workforce is also absorbed by non-crop-producing agricultural sectors, such as in livestock and forestry production.




76
                                                                                                                                Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
                                                                                                                                                                 Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Box 8: A description of the CGE modeling approach

The results shown in this Chapter are derived from a recursive dynamic variant of the STAGE single-country CGE
model114. The model is a member of the class of single country CGE models that are descendants of the approach to
CGE modeling described by Dervis et al., (1982)115. The model is centered around a SAM that identifies the agents in the
economy and provides the transactions database with which the model is calibrated. It differentiates between different
sectors and five regions (central, eastern, western, south-eastern, and south-western (see definition above).

In this Chapter, the model is first used to explore agricultural productivity improvements and then also used to assess
the impact of climate change (see section 2.4). It does so through a total of three policy scenarios and a reference baseline
scenario. Each scenario spans an 11-year period from 2019 (the base year of the SAM) to 2030. Outcomes under each scenario
are compared to a reference scenario, which corresponds to the hydro-led growth scenario discussed in module 1 of this CEM.

The considered scenarios are the following:

Reference Scenario (A1_HydroLed): This scenario includes the continuation of past trends and current policies in place,
plus the construction and commissioning of four planned hydropower projects: Punatsangchhu I, Punatsangchhu II,
Nikachhu, and Kholongchhu. The additional planned investment results in an expansion in hydro capacity and production
after 2023/2025. No additional projects are planned after 2025.

Productivity Improvement Scenario (A2_HydroLed_Prod_LabSav): In this scenario, the reference scenario is augmented
by adding labor-saving productivity improvements in agriculture. A comparison of this scenario with the reference
scenario shows the impact of crop- and region-specific productivity improvements in crop-based agriculture that release
labor to other sectors of the economy.

Climate Change Scenario (A3_HydroLed_CC): This scenario augments the yields in the reference scenario by including
climate-induced yield changes. A comparison of this scenario with the reference scenario shows the impact of crop
specific climate change impacts on land productivity.

Combined Scenario (A4_HydroLed_Prod_CC): As scenario 1, but with productivity improvements in agriculture and
climate change impacts. A comparison of this scenario with the reference scenario shows the impact of the productivity
improvements and climate change together. A comparison of this scenario with the productivity improvement scenario
shows the augmenting/dampening effects of climate change on yield changes from agricultural productivity improvements.

The production structure of the model is designed to capture labor-saving productivity improvements in agriculture.
The production structure places labor as a substitute to aggregate non-labor factors (Figure 84). Under an elastic degree
of substitution (5) between the labor and non-labor input aggregates in crop production improvements in the productivity
of non-labor factors leads producers to move away from less productive labor inputs, towards more productive non-la-
bor inputs, leading to labor shedding from these sectors. Conversely, reductions in land productivity, such as those that
may arise under climate change, will increase the use of other non-labor and labor factors in the production process.

Figure 82: Production structure for labor saving productivity improvements
                                                Value added

                   Labour                                                                    Non-labour

             Labour by skill type                 Capital                       Land                             Chemicals                              Energy

                                             Capital by type           Cropland Pastureland         Fertilizer           Pesticides       Electricity       Non-electricity

                                                                                                                                      Electricity by type    Fuels by type




114	   McDonald, S. 2022. “STAGE: A Standard Applied General Equilibrium Model: Technical Documentation”,
115	   Dervis, K., De Melo, J. and Robinson, S. 1982. “General Equilibrium Models for Development Policy”. Cambridge University Press.




                                                                                                                                                                                                      77
     Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                  Figure 83: Closing 20 percent of the existing                                     Figure 84: …raises relative wages of
                  yield gaps by augmenting non-labor production                                     non-agricultural workers…
                  inputs…
                   45%                                                                                0.8%

                                                                                                      0.6%
                   40%
                                                                                                      0.4%
                   35%
                                                                                                      0.2%
                   30%
                                                                                                     0.0%

                   25%                                                                               -0.2%

                   20%                                                                               -0.4%

                                                                                                     -0.6%
                   15%
                                                                                                     -0.8%
                   10%
                                                                                                              HighSkilledLab
                                                                                                              SemiSkilledLab
                                                                                                               LowSkilledLab
                                                                                                                UnskilledLab
                                                                                                                    C_AgriLab
                                                                                                                  C_Cropland
                                                                                                               C_Pastureland
                                                                                                                    E_AgriLab
                                                                                                                  E_Cropland
                                                                                                               E_Pastureland
                                                                                                                   SE_AgriLab
                                                                                                                 SE_Cropland
                                                                                                              SE_Pastureland
                                                                                                                  SW_AgriLab
                                                                                                                SW_Cropland
                                                                                                             SW_Pastureland
                                                                                                                   W_AgriLab
                                                                                                                 W_Cropland
                                                                                                              W_Pastureland
                    5%

                    0%
                            Rice              Maize   Other Cereals   Vegetables   Fruit & Spices             National     Central     East       SouthEast SouthWest    West
                                                        & Pulses                                                          Labour      Cropland         Pastureland
                  Source: Shutes, Feuerbacher, and McDonald. 2022. CEM Background Paper.
                  Note: Both figures show outcomes in the year 2030 and compare outcomes between the agricultural productivity and the reference scenarios.

                  Figure 85:…and induces a shift of labor out of                                    Figure 86: …which accelerates structural
                  agriculture…                                                                      transformation, especially in the southern part.
                    1.0%                                                                              1.0%

                   0.8%
                                                                                                     0.5%
                   0.6%

                    0.4%                                                                             0.0%

                   0.2%
                                                                                                     -0.5%
                   0.0%

                   -0.2%
                                                                                                     -1.0%

                   -0.4%

                                                                                                     -1.5%
                   -0.6%

                   -0.8%
                                   Agricultural         Unskilled             Low skilled            -2.0%
                                                                                                              National    Central     East       South East South West   West
                  Source: Shutes, Feuerbacher, and McDonald. 2022. CEM Background Paper.
                  Note: Both figures show outcomes in the year 2030 and compare outcomes between the agricultural productivity and the reference scenarios.




                  The impact of agricultural productivity improvement on GDP is modest. The introduction of labor-saving productivity
                  improvement in crop-based agriculture leads to a small headline impact on GDP of 0.4 percent by 2030 (Figure 88),
                  which is in line with the small initial share of crop production in total output (6 percent in 2019). The impact on domestic
                  demand (consumption and investment, or absorption) is larger at 1.6 percent, consistent with the boost to a part of the
                  economy that is largely consumed domestically (only 11 percent of crop production was exported in 2019).

                  In contrast to the modest headline figures, increasing agricultural productivity can cross-fertilize growth in the
                  service sector. Service GDP is almost 1 percent higher under the agricultural productivity scenario in comparison to the
                  reference scenario (Figure 90). The impacts outside agriculture arise from the increased availability of low-skilled labor
                  and an increase in household spending arising from lower food costs (Figure 87), as well as higher non-agricultural



78
                                                                                                                             Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
                                                                                                                                                               Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




wages. Within services, almost all sectors expand, with the strongest growth estimated in the air and transport, and
telecommunications sectors. The hotels and restaurants sector also benefited from the direct effect of lower crop prices
as it accounted for 20 percent of total intermediate demand for crops in 2019, and used 34 percent of all vegetables
and 71 percent of all fruits and spices.

Figure 87: Higher agricultural productivity                                     Figure 88:…which generates an income effect that
reduces crop prices…                                                            augments the direct impact of productivity increases
                                                                                and leads to spillovers to the service sector.
                                                                                  4%
 0.0%


 -0.5%                                                                           3%


 -1.0%                                                                           2%

 -1.5%
                                                                                  1%

 -2.0%
                                                                                 0%
 -2.5%

                                                                                 -1%
 -3.0%


 -3.5%                                                                           -2%
                                                                                       Absorption


                                                                                                    Real GDP


                                                                                                               Agriculture

                                                                                                                               Natural
                                                                                                                             resources

                                                                                                                                         Food


                                                                                                                                                    Industry

                                                                                                                                                                Construction


                                                                                                                                                                               Utilities


                                                                                                                                                                                           Services
 -4.0%
            Rice        Maize        Other        Vegetables     Fruit
                                  Cereal Pulses                & Spices                                                                         Sector output
Source: Shutes, Feuerbacher, and McDonald. 2022. CEM Background Paper.
Note: Absorption comprises domestic private and public consumption and investment. Both figures show outcomes in the year 2030 and compare outcomes between
the agricultural productivity and the reference scenarios.




The CGE analysis shows that a closure of agricultural productivity gaps can contribute to structural transformation
and generate spillovers to non-primary sectors. Labor-saving crop productivity improvements lead to growth in the
agricultural and service sectors, via the direct effect of lower food prices and indirect effect on wages, both of which
increase household consumption, which, in turn, stimulates services demand. The structural transformation effect of
labor mobility augments the boom in the service sector.




2.4.	 Climate change may increase agricultural
output but also lead to yield variability

This section considers the effect of climate change on yields in Bhutan and the associated macroeconomic impact.
The section begins by briefly summarizing the past and future impacts of climate change on temperatures and precipita-
tion in Bhutan. It then uses estimates from global climate models developed by the FAO to estimate the impact of future
climatic changes on yields by crops and geographic regions. These estimates are then fed into the CGE model, described
in section 2.3.4, to understand how climate-induced agricultural output changes will affect Bhutan’s broader economy.

                                    o raise both temperatures and precipitation levels
2.4.1.	 Climate change is expected t

Over the last 70 years, average temperatures in Bhutan have increased at an accelerated pace. Mean temperatures in
Bhutan increased by 1.4 degrees Celsius between 1951 and 2020, an average pace of 0.2 degrees per decade. The speed
of heating has accelerated in recent years, with mean temperatures rising by 0.3 degrees per decade between 1991 and
2020. The increase has occurred across the temperature distribution, with minimum temperatures also rising (Figure 89).



                                                                                                                                                                                                      79
     Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                  The rise in temperatures was accompanied by changing precipitation patterns. While annual average precipitation
                  has not changed significantly over the last three decades, the average effect masks a changing composition of precip-
                  itation patterns across regions and an increased divergence between the northern and southern parts of the country.
                  The northern parts of Bhutan, traditionally the driest, have experienced annual declines of between 5 and 10 millimeters
                  of rainfall per year, making them even drier. In contrast, rainfall in the wetter southern parts has increased by up to 10
                  millimeters per year (Figure 90). Seasonality has also increased over the same period, with pre-monsoon and monsoon
                  periods (April to September) experiencing more rainfall, with little changes in the other months.


                  Figure 89: Minimum temperatures have                                                                 Figure 90: …and rainfall has become more
                  increased significantly across Bhutan over the                                                       variable and extreme in the southern parts of the
                  last three decades…                                                                                  country.

                            30°N                                                                                                  30°N

                                                                                                        °C/year                                                                                       N° daysyear
                            29°N                                                                          0.040                   29°N
                                                                                                          0.038                                                                                             1.2
                                                                                                          0.036
                            28°N                                                                          0.034                   28°N                                                                      1.0
                 Latitude




                                                                                                                       Latitude




                                                                                                          0.032                                                                                            0.8
                                                                                                          0.030
                            27°N                                                                          0.028                   27°N                                                                     0.6
                                                                                                          0.026                                                                                            0.4
                                                                                                          0.024
                            26°N                                                                          0.022                   26°N                                                                     0.2
                                                                                                          0.020                                                                                            0.0
                            25°N                                                                                                  25°N

                                   87°E      88°E      89°E      90°E       91°E    92°E       93°E                                      87°E   88°E    89°E      90°E       91°E    92°E      93°E
                                                                Longitude                                                                                        Longitude
                  Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2022.
                  Note: The left figure shows the yearly change in minimum temperatures between 1981 and 2010. Changes that are statistically significantly different from zero are marked
                  by a black dot. The right figure shows yearly changes in heavy rainfall conditions (precipitation ≥20mm/day) over the 1981 to 2010 period, with statistically significant
                  changes marked by a red dot.




                  Going forward, climate models predict rising temperatures and more irregular precipitation patterns. Between 2021
                  and 2099, mean temperatures are expected to increase by a further 1.2 degrees under a low climate change scenario
                  (RCP2.6)116, 2.4 degrees under an intermediate scenario (RCP4.5), and 4.5 degrees under the most extreme scenario
                  (RCP8.5).117 These values exceed the global average temperature increases. Similar increases are expected for minimum
                  temperatures (Figure 91). Rainfall is expected to increase by between 10 and 30 percent per year overall, particularly
                  during the pre-monsoon and monsoon months (Figure 92). Most of the precipitation increase is projected to affect the
                  lowlands and the south-eastern parts of Bhutan. Concurrently, the number of dry days is also expected to increase,
                  which implies that heavy precipitation events are likely to become more frequent. These are especially likely to affect
                  the south-western parts of the country.118

                  Extreme temperature and weather events are also expected to become more frequent. The temperature and precipi-
                  tation projections highlight that the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events is likely to increase going forward.
                  Higher rainfall will increase the potential for flash floods, landslides, and soil erosion. Extreme heat events are likely to
                  affect Bhutan’s lowlands. For instance, the number of tropical nights, defined as nights where the minimum temperature
                  does not dip below 20 degrees, are expected to increase by 20 to 30 days per year by the end of the century for the
                  country, and by 70 to 90 days in the lowlands when compared with a 1981 to 2005 baseline.




                  116	        RCP8.5 is the highest emissions pathway in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) baseline, associated with the most severe climate impacts. In comparison,
                              RCP2.6 is consistent with a global mean temperature increase of up to 2°C.
                  117	        Source: Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) models, which are utilized within the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the IPCC, providing estimates of future
                              temperature and precipitation, are provided by the World Bank Group and the Asian Development Bank (2021), Climate Risk Country Profile: Bhutan (2021).
                  118	        These and other estimates presented in this section are based on a background paper prepared for this report. See Alvar Beltrán, J., Soldan, R., and Franceschini, L. 2022. “Climate
                              Risk Assessment. Climate Impacts in Bhutan’s Agroecological Zones and Opportunities for Climate Smart Agriculture Practices”. Food and Agriculture Organization.




80
                                                                                                                          Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
                                                                                                                                                        Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Figure 91: Going forward, minimum temperatures are expected to continue to increase…

                                  2010-2039                                         2040-2069                                2070-2099                                    °C

                                                                                                                                                                               7
           29°N

           28°N
Latitude




                                                                                                                                                                               6
                                                                                                                                                                RCP 2.6
           27°N

           26°N                                                                                                                                                                5

           25°N

                                                                                                                                                                               4
           29°N

           28°N
Latitude




                                                                                                                                                                RCP 8.5        3
           27°N

           26°N                                                                                                                                                                2

           25°N

                  87°E 88°E 89°E 90°E 91°E 92°E 93°E 94°E            87°E 88°E 89°E 90°E 91°E 92°E 93°E 94°E    87°E 88°E 89°E 90°E 91°E 92°E 93°E 94°E                        1
                                                                                     Longitude



Figure 92: …and rainfall variability will increase with climate change severity.


    3000

                                                                                                                                  Slope       p.value
    2500
                                                                                                                          obs         0.63     0.89
mm




    2000                                                                                                                          Slope       p.value
                                                                                                                        RCP 2.6   -0.96        0.16

     1500                                                                                                                             Slope   p.value
                                                                                                                        RCP 8.5       1.23     0.18
     1000
        1980        1989   1998     2007      2016     2025   2034    2043   2052   2061   2070   2079   2088   2097            obs              RCP 2.6            RCP 8.5
                                                     Date

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2022.
Note: The left figure shows projected changes in mean minimum temperatures in comparison to the historical reference period (1981-2010). The analysis differentiates
by (i) projection horizon, and (ii) climate change severity. The black dot indicates whether at least 60 percent of the calculated models agree in the sign of the climate
change signal (positive or negative). The right figure shows the path of inter-annual rainfall variability over the 21st century.




                                       re expected to alter Bhutan’s yield structure
2.4.2.	 The impacts of climate change a

The developments induced by climate change are expected to impact the agricultural sector both on the intensive
and the extensive margins. On the intensive margin, yields, especially in rainfed production systems, are expected to
be adversely affected by the impacts of increased heat and more erratic rainfalls on, among others, agricultural water
availability, crop losses due to flash floods, and the emergence of new diseases. This impact will be exacerbated by the
absence of widespread irrigation facilities to modulate rainfall and temperature variability.

On the extensive margin, land in higher altitudes may become suitable for crop production. While production in the
southern lowlands of Bhutan is likely to suffer from climate change, land in higher altitudes may become suitable for crop
production due to more adequate temperatures and increased rainfall. In the case of rice, for instance, land suitability is
expected to increase by 10 percent by 2050, subject to land being cleared and available for cultivation.



                                                                                                                                                                                             81
     Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                  Model estimates highlight that climate change will affect the yields of maize and rice in a non-linear fashion.119 The
                  yield projections for both crops depend on the severity of climate change. Under a moderate RCP2.6 climate change
                  scenario, rainfed maize yields are expected to increase over the next century and exceed the 2021 level by 4.4 percent
                  (Figure 93). In contrast, more severe climate change (RCP8.5) would induce a short-term yield boom, increasing rainfed
                  yields by 7 percent over the next decade, but a longer-term yield decline below the 2021 level at the end of the century.
                  Rainfed rice yields are expected to decrease systematically, falling below their 2021 level by 2.1 and 21.3 percent by
                  2099, under RCP2.6 and RCP8.5, respectively. In contrast, irrigated rice is significantly less sensitive to climate change
                  severity and yields are expected to remain close to 2021 levels over the forecast horizon.

                  More generally, a failure to contain climate change will benefit rainfed yields initially, but will lead to a longer-term
                  yield decline compared with a more moderate climate change scenario. By 2099, rainfed rice and maize yields are
                  projected to be 15 and 7 percent lower under RCP8.5 than under RCP2.6, respectively (Figure 97). This trend, however,
                  masks some non-linearity, with these yields benefiting from higher rainfall and increased temperatures associated with
                  more climate change until 2040 or, in the case of rainfed rice, mid-century, and then consistently falling short of yields
                  under RCP2.6.

                  Figure 93: Yields for rainfed maize are projected                                                                                 Figure 94: Irrigation of vegetables, such as
                  to increase going forward, but that increase will                                                                                 carrots, is key to turning climate change into an
                  be temporary if more severe climate change                                                                                        opportunity.
                  materializes.
                                                            108                                                                                                                                107

                                                            107
                                                                                                                                                                                               105
                                                                                                                                                     Yield Index (RCP2.6 yields in 2021=100)
                  Yield Index (RCP2.6 yields in 2021=100)




                                                            106

                                                            105                                                                                                                                103

                                                            104
                                                                                                                                                                                               101
                                                            103

                                                            102                                                                                                                                99

                                                            101
                                                                                                                                                                                               97
                                                            100
                                                                                                                                                                                               95
                                                            99

                                                            98                                                                                                                                 93
                                                                                               0




                                                                                                                             0
                                                                  30




                                                                                                                                     9
                                                                                       0
                                                                           0




                                                                                                        0


                                                                                                                80
                                                                                             06




                                                                                                                                   09
                                                                                                                          09
                                                                                    05
                                                                         04




                                                                                                      07




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    0




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               90
                                                                                                                                                                                                      30




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         99
                                                                                                                                                                                                                         0
                                                                                                                                                                                                                 0




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          70


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       0
                                                                0




                                                                                                                0




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    06
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        05
                                                                                                                                                                                                               04




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     08
                                                                                                    -2




                                                                                                                                 -2
                                                             -2




                                                                                           -2




                                                                                                                       -2
                                                                        -2


                                                                                 -2




                                                                                                             -2




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            0




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           0
                                                                                                                                                                                                        0




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               0
                                                                                                                                                                                                     -2




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  -2


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         -2




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        -2
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            -2
                                                                                                                                                                                                             -2


                                                                                                                                                                                                                        -2




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   -2
                                                                                                  61




                                                                                                                               91
                                                        21




                                                                                        51




                                                                                                                      81
                                                                      31


                                                                               41




                                                                                                            71




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         61




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    91
                                                                                                                                                                                                 21




                                                                                                                                                                                                                              51




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           81
                                                                                                                                                                                                            31


                                                                                                                                                                                                                     41




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  71
                                                      20


                                                                    20


                                                                             20


                                                                                      20


                                                                                                20


                                                                                                          20


                                                                                                                    20


                                                                                                                             20




                                                                                                                                                                                               20


                                                                                                                                                                                                            20


                                                                                                                                                                                                                   20


                                                                                                                                                                                                                             20


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     20


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                20


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          20


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   20




                                                                       Rainfed Maize RCP2.6                     Rainfed Maize RCP8.5                                                                    Irrigated Carrot RCP8.5                 Rainfed Carrot RCP8.5
                  Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2022.
                  Note: All projections are drawn from the MPI-M-MPI-ESM-LR model.




                  The irrigation status of crops is a key determinant of yield trajectories until the end of the century. The example of
                  carrots – one of the exportable vegetables identified in section 2.2.4 – illustrates this (Figure 94). Under the RCP8.5
                  scenario, rainfed yields are expected to plummet by mid-century and remain 4 percent below their 2021 level by 2099.
                  In contrast, irrigated carrot yields avoid this decline and are projected to exceed 2021 levels by 5 percent by the end
                  of the century.




                  119	                                      As part of a background paper for this report, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations applied an agro-ecological zoning tool on an eco-physiological model
                                                            to estimate climate change impacts on crop yields for rainfed and irrigated conditions. The approach follows Kassam, A.H. 1977. “Net Biomass Production and Yield of Crops”. FAO,
                                                            Rome, and Kassam, A.H., et al. 1991. “Agroecological Land Resources Assessment for Agriculutral Development Planning”. World Soil Resources Reports (71/ vol. 1-8) FAO/IIASA,
                                                            Rome; summarized in Alvar Beltrán, J., Soldan, R., and Franceschini, L. 2022. “Climate Risk Assessment: Climate Impacts in Bhutan’s Agroecological Zones and Opportunities for
                                                            Climate Smart Agriculture Practices”. FAO, Rome, Italy. 2].




82
                                                                                                                                Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
                                                                                                                                                       Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Transitioning from rainfed to irrigated production methods provides a unique opportunity for Bhutan to safeguard
against the adverse impacts of climate change on agriculture. For instance, under irrigated conditions, maize yields are
expected to increase over the projection period in comparison with historic values and between RCP8.5 and RCP2.6. Specif-
ically, by 2099, irrigated maize yields under RCP8.5 are projected to exceed yields under RCP2.6 by 2.8 percent. This will
be driven by (i) closer to optimal temperatures at pollination, and (ii) a decrease in frost stress conditions at the early stages
of crop development. Also, considering that irrigated yields exceed rainfed yields by 20 percent on average, the difference
in climate impacts between rainfed and irrigated production systems highlights the importance of irrigation in adapting
agricultural production to climate impacts. Since irrigation for crops, other than for rice, is virtually absent in Bhutan today, this
analysis highlights that addressing this key constraint will make agriculture more resilient to the effects of climate change.

The yields of select vegetables are expected to increase as climate change makes climatic conditions more favorable
to their production, even under rainfed conditions, thereby opening an export opportunity for Bhutan. Cabbage and
white potato yields are projected to benefit substantially from climate-induced temperature and precipitation changes.
Rainfed cabbage yields, for instance, are expected to exceed 2021 levels by 5 and 13 percent at the end of the century
under RCP2.6 and RCP8.5, respectively. These increases outweigh the expected yield growth even under irrigated
conditions. In addition, more severe climate change is expected to benefit cabbage yields, with 2099 RCP8.5 yields
exceeding RCP2.6 yields by 8 and 10 percent, respectively (Figure 95, Figure 96).

Figure 95: More severe climate change is                                                    Figure 96: …whereas yields under irrigated
expected to temporarily benefit maize and rice                                              conditions are expected to systematically
yields under rainfed conditions, but cause a                                                benefit from more severe climate change.
deterioration in the longerrun…
 15%                                                                                         12%


                                                                                             10%
 10%

                                                                                              8%
  5%
                                                                                              6%
  0%
                                                                                              4%
 -5%
                                                                                              2%

-10%
                                                                                              0%

-15%                                                                                         -2%
                                         0




                                                                      90
          30




                                                                                99
                               0
                     0




                                                   70


                                                             0




                                                                                                                                       0




                                                                                                                                                                  90
                                                                                                      30




                                                                                                                                                                          99
                                                                                                                         50
                                                                                                                 0




                                                                                                                                            70


                                                                                                                                                         0
                                       06
                             05
                   04




                                                           08




                                                                                                                                     06
                                                                                                               04




                                                                                                                                                       08
                                                  0




                                                                                0
          0




                                                                      0




-20%
                                                                                                                                              0




                                                                                                                                                                           0
                                                                                                      0




                                                                                                                                                                 0
                                                                                                                         0




                                                                                             -4%
                                     -2


                                               -2




                                                                             -2
       -2




                                                                   -2
                 -2


                             -2




                                                         -2




                                                                                                   -2




                                                                                                                                  -2


                                                                                                                                           -2




                                                                                                                                                                        -2
                                                                                                                                                              -2
                                                                                                             -2


                                                                                                                      -2




                                                                                                                                                     -2
                                              61




                                                                            91
       21




                                    51




                                                                   81
                31


                          41




                                                        71




                                                                                                                                 51


                                                                                                                                           61




                                                                                                                                                                       91
                                                                                                   21




                                                                                                                                                             81
                                                                                                           31


                                                                                                                     41




                                                                                                                                                   71
    20


              20


                        20


                                  20


                                              20


                                                      20


                                                                20


                                                                          20




                                                                                                20


                                                                                                          20


                                                                                                                    20


                                                                                                                                20


                                                                                                                                       20


                                                                                                                                                  20


                                                                                                                                                           20


                                                                                                                                                                     20




     Rainfed Cabbage         Rainfed Carrot        Rainfed Maize        Rainfed Rice            Irrigated Cabbage      Irrigated Carrot         Irrigated Maize      Irrigated Rice
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2022.
Note: The left figure shows impacts under rainfed conditions, whereas the right figure shows impacts under irrigated conditions. All projections are drawn from the
MPI-M-MPI-ESM-LR model.




The increase in select crop yields is consistent with predictions made by other models in the literature. The Interna-
tional Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT, 2017), by applying the International Model for Policy Analysis of Agricultural
Commodities and Trade model to assess climate impacts on agricultural commodities for a climate and non-climate
scenario,120 finds that almost all crop yields are expected to increase between 2020 and 2050, and that yield increases
under climate change are likely to be higher than under no climate change conditions. Under this model, higher tempera-
tures could increase the yields of fruits (apples), tropical fruits (oranges), rice, vegetables (cardamom and chili), and potato
by 0.8, 6.2, 0.9, 4.9 and 5.0 percent, respectively, compared to a non-climate change scenario. The only exception in
this paper is maize yields, which are projected to decrease by about 10 percent by 2050.



120	 CIAT and World Bank. 2017. “Climate-Smart Agriculture in Bhutan”. CSA Country Profiles for Asia Series. Washington, D.C.




                                                                                                                                                                                              83
     Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                  Heat stress, dry spells and extreme rainfall are also expected to impact agricultural production. The estimates provided
                  by the model incorporate the impact of extreme events on projected crop yields. Extreme events have a higher predictive
                  power under RCP8.5 than under RCP2.6, consistent with a higher expected frequency and severity of extreme events.
                  The most common projected climate hazard is heat stress, followed by dry spells. Although wet days affect a small
                  proportion of crops, their impact is particularly high under RCP 8.5. These results suggest that irregular rainfall patterns,
                  which combine heavy rain with subsequent dry spells, are most likely to affect crop yields under RCP 8.5.

                  There are additional adverse impacts of climate change, which the model projections are unable to capture. Water
                  shortages are expected to arise not because of an absence of water – Bhutan has the highest per capita availability
                  of water in the world – but because of its unequal distribution between seasons and locations, as well as a lack of
                  comprehensive and efficient irrigation infrastructure. This will be exacerbated by a reduction of snowmelt water in the
                  spring, which currently provides an important water source for irrigation. Risks of soil erosion arise because of steep
                  terrain and anticipated extreme rainfall, and could damage soil fertility, irrigation schemes, and market-access roads.
                  A warmer climate could also lead to more and different type of pests and diseases. For instance, leeches, which previ-
                  ously predominated in warmer areas, are now found in cooler regions. Potato tuber moths, a common pest in the lower
                  subtropical region, are increasingly found at higher elevations, and the caterpillar fungus is disappearing at elevations
                  below 3000 meters.

                  The projected climate impact emphasize three aspects for adaptation policy to consider. First, an expansion of irriga-
                  tion is crucial, as irrigated crop yields are less volatile over the century and less susceptible to more severe temperature
                  and precipitation changes. Second, climate change has the potential to open production and export possibilities in select
                  vegetables, such as cabbage, from about mid-century. Acknowledgement of this fact ahead of time will allow Bhutan to
                  establish the necessary infrastructure and support facilities for farmers to benefit from this opportunity. Third, the yield
                  changes associated with climate change can be deceptive. For instance, rainfed maize yields may increase temporarily,
                  which may distract from necessary investments to benefit from longer-term yield gains from vegetables. The next section
                  illustrates the latter point by using a modeling approach.

                  2.4.3.	 Short-term climate-induced yield changes can temporarily increase output,but risk
                          distracting from longer-term diversification opportunities

                  This section uses the CGE model, described in section 2.3.4, to evaluate the medium-term macroeconomic implica-
                  tions of the yield changes associated with more extreme climate change. The impact of more extreme climate change
                  on agricultural yields is calculated as the average difference in yields under RCP8.5 and RCP2.6 from 2019 to 2030,
                  using the same data source as the previous section. As such, RCP2.6 is taken as a reference scenario against which
                  the additional change in yields from more extreme climate change is identified. The estimates include both systemic
                  climate change and stochastic occurrences of localized natural disasters. The CGE model is only calibrated until 2030,
                  as it relies on underlying macroeconomic projections. As such, it can only evaluate the impact of climate change in the
                  medium term, which, as discussed in the previous section, differs from its longer-term impacts.

                  The scenario models climate change as a shock to land productivity, which is calibrated to match the yield differ-
                  ences between RCP8.5 and RCP2.6. The impact of more extreme climate change on yields is shown in Figure 97, which,
                  consistent with the practice in Bhutan, assumes that paddy is irrigated, and all other crops are rainfed. The estimates
                  show that more severe climate change is expected to increase rainfed maize and other cereal and pulse yields by 2030,
                  whereas yields are expected to decline for (irrigated) rice, vegetables, fruits, and spices, compared to a less serious
                  climate scenario.

                  This simulation only considers a partial impact of climate change, operating through agricultural production. Other
                  possible climate change impacts, such as reduced labor productivity of outdoor workers under higher average tempera-
                  tures and the loss of infrastructure assets, are not considered. The simulation also does not model the aggregate macro-
                  economic impact of large-scale disasters, such as glacial outburst floods, to which Bhutan is vulnerable.




84
                                                                                                                   Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
                                                                                                                                        Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Figure 97: A short-term climate-induced                                           Figure 98: …induces a modest production shift
increase in maize and cereal yields…                                              towards these crops.
 10%                                                                               16.0%

                                                                                   14.0%
  8%
                                                                                   12.0%


  6%                                                                               10.0%

                                                                                    8.0%
  4%
                                                                                    6.0%

                                                                                    4.0%
  2%
                                                                                    2.0%

  0%                                                                                0.0%


          Rice          Maize          Other        Vegetables       Fruit         -2.0%
 -2%                                                                                          Rice         Maize      OtherCerPulses Vegetables    FruitNSpices
                                    Cereal Pulses                  & Spices
                                                                                              S2_HydroLed_Prod_LabSav                S3_HydroLed_CC
                 Average yield change           Land productivity change                      S4_HydroLed_Prod_LabSav_CC
Source: Shutes, Feuerbacher, and McDonald. 2022. CEM Background Paper.
Note: Both figures show outcomes for the year 2030 and compare outcomes between the agricultural productivity and the reference scenarios.




Climate-induced yield changes affect relative prices and production in equilibrium, counteracting Bhutan’s recent trend
towards export-oriented crops. The model shows that crops for which yields improve under climate change see a fall in
prices (maize, other cereals, and pulses), while prices increase for those crops for which yields fall (rice, vegetables, fruits,
and spices). These price changes increase the output of maize, cereals and pulses and reduce the production of other crops
(Figure 98). Climate change thus induces a shift back towards Bhutan’s traditional rainfed mainstay – maize – at the expense
of crops that are expected to experience stronger yield increases later in the century (vegetables, including cabbage).

The yield improvements brought about by climate change do not induce a labor movement effect, as observed for
the productivity improvement scenario. With price increases for some goods offsetting price decreases for other goods,
climate-induced yield changes do not affect relative wages (Figure 99). As a result, more severe climate change – even
though it seems to increase some yields and land productivity on the surface – results in much smaller labor mobility
effects than the broader agricultural productivity improvements discussed in section 2.3.4, that is, more severe climate
changes reduce the agricultural labor supply by 0.1 percent, compared to the 0.7 percent reduction in response to input
productivity improvements.

Consequently, even though climate change increases some yields in the short term, these do not increase demand
and thus do not generate spillovers to non-agricultural sectors. Despite the increase in agricultural productivity for
some crops, the expansion in the services sector, as observed in the scenario on agricultural productivity improvements,
is absent in the climate change scenario. This is because household expenditure increases by only 0.1 percent compared
to the reference scenario in response to the climate-induced yield changes, compared to a 5 percent increase observed
in response to agricultural productivity increases. The exception to this is the food sector, which uses maize, cereals,
and pulses as inputs and benefits from lower prices, but does not receive a growth stimulus through higher demand.

Considering these countervailing forces, the headline impact of climate-induced yield changes on output is modest.
The model highlights that the effect of more extreme climate change on agricultural production will primarily impact the
economy via lower prices of maize, which will reduce food prices and stimulate agricultural and food sector output. This,
in turn, will filter through to a small increase in domestic consumption, investment, and GDP (Figure 100).

Therefore, the model, illustrates the deceptive nature of climate-induced yield changes. While climate change may
increase some yields and enable production in more mountainous and drier areas, its benefits need to be appreciated
cautiously. First, as highlighted by the model, the superficial yield changes generate little macroeconomic spillovers.



                                                                                                                                                                                 85
     Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                  Second, unless longer-term expectations on yield changes are considered when making investment decisions, there is
                  a risk that short-term yield and output increases of rainfed maize may attract investments to this crop and distract from
                  longer-term adaptation needs.

                  Figure 99: Lower maize and cereal prices are                                                                                             Figure 100:…and generating practically no
                  partially offset by higher prices of crops whose                                                                                         spillovers to the non-agricultural sector.
                  yields decrease, thus leaving wages almost
                  unaffected…
                   0.8%                                                                                                                                     4%

                   0.6%
                                                                                                                                                            3%
                   0.4%
                                                                                                                                                            2%
                   0.2%

                   0.0%                                                                                                                                     1%

                  -0.2%
                                                                                                                                                            0%
                  -0.4%
                                                                                                                                                           -1%
                  -0.6%

                  -0.8%                                                                                                                                    -2%
                          HighSkilledLab


                                            SemiSkilledLab


                                                             LowSkilledLab


                                                                             UnskilledLab


                                                                                             C_AgriLab


                                                                                                         E_AgriLab


                                                                                                                     SE_AgriLab




                                                                                                                                               W_AgriLab
                                                                                                                                  SW_AgriLab




                                                                                                                                                                 Absorption


                                                                                                                                                                              Real GDP


                                                                                                                                                                                         Agriculture


                                                                                                                                                                                                       Natural resources

                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Food


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Industry

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Construction


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Utilities


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Services
                                                      National                              Central      East       South South                West                                                                               Sector output
                                                                                                                     East West
                                           S2_HydroLed_Prod_LabSav                                              S3_HydroLed_CC                                                S2_HydroLed_Prod_LabSav                                    S3_HydroLed_CC
                                           S4_HydroLed_Prod_LabSav_CC                                                                                                         S4_HydroLed_Prod_LabSav_CC

                  Source: Shutes, Feuerbacher, and McDonald.2022. CEM Background Paper. Note: Both figures show outcomes in the year 2030 and compare outcomes between the
                  agricultural productivity and the reference scenario.




                  2.5.	 Policy priorities

                  This Chapter has argued that slow agricultural productivity growth is a constraint to structural transformation. Even
                  though progress has been slow, this Chapter has documented that productivity pockets are emerging and Bhutan has
                  started exploiting its comparative advantages. However, climate change poses a risk to this transition, as it will temporarily
                  alter economic incentives towards the production of traditional crops.

                  The findings lead to three principles that agricultural policy can follow to stimulate growth:

                    a.	 As structural transformation progresses, agricultural labor shortages will increase because people will gravitate
                        towards industrial and service centers. The goal of the growth policy is to facilitate this movement, while enabling
                        investments in technology to compensate for the labor loss.

                    b.	 To support the transition towards Bhutan’s comparative advantages and enable the country to benefit from crops
                        whose yields will increase with climate change in the longer run, it is crucial to avoid investments in traditional
                        rainfed crops with limited growth prospects.

                    c.	 Investing and enabling private investment in irrigation is central to increasing yields, adapting to climate change,
                        and enhancing structural transformation.



86
                                                                                                                               Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
                                                                                                                                                        Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




This section discusses ideas for public policy options that can support agricultural productivity growth. These are
grouped into three complementary approaches: (i) strategic infrastructure investments, (ii) policy reforms that will facil-
itate private investments, as well as access to technology and production inputs, and (iii) targeted support to farmers.

2.5.1.	 Strategic infrastructureinvestments

The most important investment in agricultural productivity that Bhutan can make is in developing irrigation infrastruc-
ture. As documented in this chapter, irrigated yields exceed those of rainfed crops; irrigation can help overcome water
shortages and directly increase yields. In contrast to rainfed yields, irrigated yields are likely to be positively affected by
climate change, providing a unique opportunity for Bhutan to adapt to changing temperature and precipitation patterns.

Despite its significance, irrigation infrastructure in Bhutan is underdeveloped and public investment in it is lacking.
Irrigation investments are often highlighted as a policy priority by authorities. For instance, the 12th and the 13th Five Year
Plans (FYPs) identified water scarcity as a priority area to be addressed to improve agriculture productivity. Despite these
commitments, public investments in agriculture have been modest. As of May 2018, the Government had planned at
least 14 schemes for irrigation development that are on hold due to a shortfall in the availability of funds. In the absence
of public investments, farmers have been relying on small-scale and traditional practices, such as, about 1,000 functional
community-managed irrigation systems.

Public investment is constrained by an institutional fractionalization between the central and subnational govern-
ments. Bhutan devolved certain irrigation-related activities to the dzongkhag level as part of the 9th FYP in 2002. This
resulted in a loss of irrigation development capacity, as expert staff was not devolved together with the expenditure
responsibilities. As a result, local capacity to plan any major irrigation works is limited.121 Instead of delegating specialized
staff, centrally employed irrigation engineers and professionals were reassigned to other infrastructure development
departments, such as roads and building construction, as the central department of agriculture no longer maintains a
focused irrigation division.122

Bhutan does not only lack in irrigation infrastructure, it struggles to maintain the existing facilities. It is estimated that
20 percent of irrigation facilities are inoperable due to technical problems, 18 percent due to social issues, and 8 percent
due to problems with the water source. The inadequate knowledge and lack of experience of district-level engineers in
irrigation planning, design, building, and maintenance are major contributors to their inability to maintain facilities and,
in some cases, identify the root cause of dysfunction.123

The design of current irrigation schemes can potentially be improved for efficiency and climate resilience. Currently,
most irrigation systems are open-earth systems with low efficiency and little resilience to extreme events. This leads to
blockages, water loss through seepage, and water conveyance loss, which can cause high percolation of water through
the soil and lead to erosion and landslides downstream. Outdated irrigation infrastructure is a bigger cause of land
degradation than sustainable and resilient productivity increases.

Water availability is not a crucial constraint compared to investment, maintenance, and design. An assessment of
water availability through surface runoff showed that it was not a constraint for irrigation development. According to this
analysis, 71 percent of the present systems can be upgraded for increasing irrigated areas and/or cropping intensities,
and the remaining systems (29 percent) can only be updated through the diversification of water sources. Using observed
meteorological data from Class A weather stations, the assessments also suggest that the availability of 80 percent
dependable water at the level of a district will not be a constraint for developing new irrigation systems.124




121	 AED. 2018. Irrigation Section Report, Department of Agriculture, Bhutan. Also, Dizon, F., et al. 2019. “Bhutan Policy Note: Harnessing Spatial Opportunities in Agriculture for
     Economic Transformation”. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
122	 AED2018. Irrigation Section Report, Department of Agriculture, Bhutan.
123	 Dizon, F., et al. 2019. “Bhutan Policy Note: Harnessing Spatial Opportunities in Agriculture for Economic Transformation”. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
124	 Agriculture Engineering Division. 2018. Irrigation Section Report, Department of Agriculture, Bhutan.




                                                                                                                                                                                             87
     Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                  In addition to infrastructure investments, rural roads are also critical to enable a reorientation of the agricultural
                  sector towards its comparative advantages. This chapter has argued that transport logistics are a challenge to an
                  export-oriented agricultural sector. As an increasing share of Bhutan’s agricultural output is exported, these constraints
                  will likely become more binding. Despite the importance of rural connectivity, rural roads are mostly unpaved, not resilient
                  to extreme rainfall during intense monsoon seasons or extreme events, and increasingly impassable after landslides.
                  These challenges will be exacerbated by climate change.

                  Priority actions to overcome these constraints include the following:

                    ⊲	 Instituting a multi-year, centrally funded, irrigation investment program: This program can either be centrally
                       administered or instituted through the combination of a conditional grant to dzongkhags and capacity building for
                       subnational implementation. The program should support components involving (i) the construction of new irrigation
                       facilities to increase the irrigated area; (ii) climate-proofing of new and existing irrigation infrastructure through, for
                       instance, lining and concreting of earthen irrigation canal sections, mitigation of slope instability and slope failure,
                       and the use of pipes to enhance functionality; and (iii) the rehabilitation of existing schemes.

                    ⊲	 Transferring irrigation planning and management capacity to dzongkhags: Departments responsible for irrigation
                       maintenance and investments need to be equipped with the necessary skills and manpower to undertake detailed
                       assessments, plan and implement climate-proof irrigation systems, and engage in water resource management and
                       planning. Building this capacity could require a two-pronged approach. On the one hand, the Central Government
                       can institute a staff rotation program that delegates specialized engineers to dzongkhags. On the other hand,
                       dzongkhags could benefit from targeted staff training programs that build missing capacity.

                    ⊲	 Investing in the climate-proofing of roads: This could involve investments in slope stabilization, drainage, and
                       culverts. Investments should be combined with a strategic assessment, which identifies roads that are in poor
                       condition and roads that lead to high potential agricultural areas.

                                  eforms
                  2.5.2.	 Policy r

                  Attracting additional FDI to agriculture can help boost productivity growth. FDI does not only provide farms with capital
                  needed for investment, it is also frequently associated with technology transfers, which can help agricultural producers
                  make better use of their resources and land. Despite these benefits, Bhutan only attracts a limited level of FDI to the
                  sector.125 While Bhutan has made significant progress in the liberalization of its FDI regime, more can be done to reduce
                  regulatory hurdles. Although Bhutan has included agro-processing – including horticulture – as a priority activity in its FDI
                  policy, investment in this sector is still subject to a BTN 20 million minimum project cost (approximately US$240,000) and
                  a 74 percent cap on foreign ownership. This precludes investment into smaller-scale and niche farming operations with
                  potential for high growth. The cap on foreign ownership can also pose investment challenges if finding a local partner
                  proves difficult. These regulatory burdens are compounded by challenges in obtaining (cost-efficient) business visas to
                  explore investment opportunities.

                  Marketing Bhutan’s unique global brand can also help attract investments and promote agricultural exports. Bhutan
                  is known globally for its focus on happiness, sustainable natural resource use, and carbon neutrality. This global brand
                  is a central asset at the country’s disposal. Despite its value, Bhutan has done little up until now to tap into global export
                  markets using these strengths.

                  There are opportunities to enhance efficiency through competition in the agricultural input industries. Bhutan does
                  not levy import duties on most agricultural inputs, such as seeds and fertilizers. This ensures that farmers can access
                  these inputs at competitive prices from abroad. Domestically, however, input industries are predominantly owned by the
                  public sector, which limits competition and incentives for innovative firms to enter the market and for foreign investors
                  to help foster the growth of the sector.


                  125	   World Bank Group. 2017. “Increasing Agribusiness Growth in Bhutan”. World Bank, Washington, DC. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/28538 License: CC BY
                         3.0 IGO.”




88
                                                                                                                             Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
                                                                                                                                                     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Land designation changes and the expansion of irrigation also face regulatory policy constraints. Land use is regu-
lated by the Land Act of Bhutan (2007), which imposes some restrictions that can hamper the transformation of the
agricultural sector. Specifically, the Act imposes regulatory restrictions on the conversion of chhuzhing (paddy land)
to other uses. It also limits the use of irrigation to chhuzhing, excluding kamzhing (the type of land on which maize and
other rainfed crops are grown).

A careful balance is required between Bhutan’s ambition to promote organic agriculture and its focus on growth.
Bhutan is ambitious to become the first country to exclusively produce organic agricultural products. However, evidence
suggests that organic crop yields are 24 percent lower than conventional yields and a full transition to organic agriculture
could considerably reduce GDP.126

Priority actions to reform the policy environment include the following:

  ⊲	 Easing regulatory hurdles for FDI: To attract more FDI, Bhutan could consider eliminating the foreign ownership cap
     and further reducing the minimum investment threshold. It could also consider providing free visas to prospective
     investors.

  ⊲	 Initiating a more aggressive investment and export promotion activity: Branding Bhutanese agricultural products
     with the country’s focus on environmental conservation and sustainable development can stimulate global demand
     and help attract investment for their production. Realizing this opportunity depends on the establishment of a dedi-
     cated investment promotion agency, which can initiate marketing campaigns and identify and approach prospective
     investors directly. This kind of export promotion will also be crucial for successfully implementing a transition towards
     more organic agriculture, as it would yield losses to be compensated by price premiums in international markets.

  ⊲	 Stimulating domestic input competition: Bhutan passed a new National Competition Policy in 2020, which now
     needs to be operationalized. As part of this operationalization, the competition administration could critically
     evaluate the role of SOEs in the agricultural input value chain and determine options to enhance competition and
     opportunities for entry into the sector.

  ⊲	 Easing regulatory hurdles to allow for the expansion of irrigation to kamzhing and the production of export-ori-
     ented crops on chhuzhing: This report has shown that irrigation is key for productivity growth and climate adapta-
     tion, and that its benefits extend beyond paddy. However, extension of irrigation to chhuzhing remains restricted.
     Expanding irrigation privileges to kamzhing will be a central step in enhancing growth and the sector’s resilience.
     Farmers would also benefit from the ability to redesignate their plots towards internationally competitive crops,
     such as, cardamom, cabbage, and areca nuts, if their production is feasible. Facilitating the regulations that currently
     hamper such a transition would be critical.

                          o farmers
2.5.3.	 Targeted support t

Sustainable land management practices are critical to raising productivity and ensuring climate-resilient agriculture,
but these have not yet been streamlined into official policies. Sustainable land management practices aim to prevent
land degradation and are needed to minimize the risks of climate-induced disasters, including landslides, flooding, and
water scarcity. They include activities related to soil and water conservation, natural resource management, terracing,
integration of leguminous crops into the rotation, and other practices.127 Such practices are especially relevant in Bhutan,
which is at high risk of land degradation and associated natural disasters due to its steep-slope topography.

Temporary yield changes induced by climate change may encourage farmers to undertake investments with limited
long-term profitability. This chapter has shown that climate change may temporarily increase yields of rainfed maize,
one of Bhutan’s traditional crops, and these temporary yield changes could distract farmers from taking advantage of



126	   Feuerbacher A, et al. “Is Bhutan Destined for 100% Organic? Assessing the Economy-Wide Effects of a Large-Scale Conversion Policy”. PLoS One. 2018 June 13;13(6) e0199025.
       doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199025. PMID: 29897989; PMCID: PMC5999226.
127	   See, for instance, https://www.fao.org/land-water/land/sustainable-land-management/en/ and http://bhutantrustfund.bt/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/CIF-Report1.pdf




                                                                                                                                                                                           89
     Structural Transformation Through Agricultural Productivity
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                  opportunities to invest in exportable vegetables. Government policies should encourage avoiding such lock-ins by
                  providing advice and financial incentives to farmers.

                  The following considerations can help provide targeted support:

                    ⊲	 Incorporating indicators and activities related to sustainable land management in planning documents: An inclu-
                       sion of such indicators in the upcoming FYPs would ensure their mainstreaming into agricultural policy-making. This
                       could be complemented by district- or local-level sustainable land management plans, developed in consultation
                       with experts and local communities, who lay out applicable practices.

                    ⊲	 Exploring opportunities for providing targeted advice and extension services through text messages: Fabre-
                       gas, Kremer and Schilbach (2019) document the potential of providing digital extension services through mobile
                       phones.128 They also highlight the importance of feedback mechanisms to ensure that information is applicable
                       and usable for farmers, and the need for public financing to establish a well-functioning system. Once a system
                       is established, the marginal costs of extension provision through mobile phones are close to zero, making this a
                       potentially scalable undertaking. Such a system could also be used to provide weather information to farmers.

                    ⊲	 Complementing advice with financial incentives for sustainable land management and critical production inputs:
                       Sustainable and climate-resilient practices impose an up-front cost (through required investments and changing
                       production) in return for a longer-term gain. Targeted support, for instance, through guarantees to financial sector
                       loans, matching grants, or well-targeted subsidies, can help farmers overcome this timing inconsistency. This would
                       also enable them to invest in production inputs that prevent human-wildlife conflicts, such as fences to ramp up
                       local-level irrigation, and to enable farmers to overcome labor shortages by investing in mechanized production
                       devices and other labor-saving technologies. These incentives need to not only reach intended beneficiaries,
                       but also encourage continued climate adaptation, including by discouraging lock-in investments in crops that are
                       expected to experience reduced yields as climate change progresses (e.g., maize).




                  128	   Fabregas, R., Kremer, M., and Schilbach, F. 2019. Realizing the Potential of Digital Development: The Case of Agricultural Advice”. Science, 366(6471), eaay3038.




90
                                               Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                                3.	   Bhutan’s
                                      Financial Sector:
                                      Issues and the
                                      Way Forward
© Shekhar Pillay/Shutterstock




                                                                                    91
     Bhutan’s Financial Sector: Issues and the Way Forward
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                  3.1.	 Introduction

                  The financial sector in Bhutan has experienced significant growth from the infusion of investments in hydropower
                  projects. This growth has been primarily driven by the public sector and banks, while the capital market has not seen
                  much development (Box 9). In the pre-pandemic years, the expansion of the financial sector resulted in a rapid increase in
                  credit to the non-hydro sectors in the economy.129 Despite this, the distribution of credit has been heavily concentrated in
                  only a few sectors. Strengthening the financial sector is critical to efficiently intermediate hydropower rents for financing
                  productive investments in the private sector.



                  Box 9: Overview of the financial sector

                  Bhutan’s financial sector is dominated by banks, which are pre-dominantly state-owned. The financial sector
                  comprises five commercial banks (including two state-owned banks), the non-banking sector includes three insurance
                  companies, one pension fund, one Credit Information Bureau (CIB), one securities exchange, one loss adjuster, and nine
                  brokers (seven securities and two insurance brokers) (Figure 103). The financial sector is dominated by SOEs, which, at
                  end-2020, accounted for 60 percent of the assets of the banking system and 51 percent of the assets of the non-banks,
                  including the pension fund.

                  The capital market remains shallow. As of 2021, there were 19 listed companies with a market capitalization of Nu 47
                  billion (27.4 percent of GDP). The sector is regulated by the Royal Monetary Authority (RMA). Capital markets are regu-
                  lated by the Royal Stock Exchange of Bhutan (RSEB), which is under the purview of the RMA, with transactions facilitated
                  through a central registration depository130.

                  Figure 101: Overview of the financial sector in Bhutan
                                                                                      Structure of Financial Sector in Bhutan

                                                                                               Royal Monetary Authority




                                      Banks                                    Non-Banks                                  Capital Market                                 Pension


                                 Bankof Bhutan                         Royal Insurance Corporation             Royal Securities Exchange of Bhutan         National Pension and Provident Fund



                              Bhutan National Bank                          Bhutan Insurance



                           Bhutan Development Bank                  GIC-Bhutan Reinsurance Company



                                 Druk PNB Bank                       National CSI Development Bank



                                     Tbank                                         MFIs


                  Source: Royal Monetary Authority, Annual Supervision Report 2021.131




                  129	 Hydropower resource rents are deposited into Bhutan’s financial sector by the Central Government and SOEs and have resulted in high liquidity levels. 
                  130	 Market intermediaries include seven registered brokerage firms, four brokers, and three private brokerage firms.
                  131	 RMA. 2021a. “Annual Supervision Report 2021”. Royal Monetary Authority, Thimphu, Bhutan.
                  https://www.rma.org.bt/RMA%20Publication/Annual%20Supervision%20Report%202021.pdf




92
                                                                                                                                   Bhutan’s Financial Sector: Issues and the Way Forward
                                                                                                                                                     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




The allocation of credit in Bhutan is skewed, and this has hampered the development of the private sector. Despite
rapid expansion of credit to the private sector in the past two decades, the lack of access to finance remains one of
the top growth constraints for small- and medium-sized companies. The share of credit extended to cottage and small
firms, which account for more than 96 percent of firms in the country, remains very low, while the credit extended to
large firms is stagnating. Sectors like tourism and housing account for most of the credit in the economy (see Section
3.2). Further, banks rely heavily on collateral and owner’s equity when providing loans. This makes it difficult for micro,
small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) to access finance, as they may not have sufficient collateral or equity.
This approach is not in line with international best practices, which emphasize the importance of financial assessments
and credit history in lending decisions. There are several other constraints that hamper the flow as well as the allocation
of credit, including: (i) weakening financial sector performance and rising non-performing loans (NPLs); (ii) an underde-
veloped non-bank sector, limiting alternative sources of finance for businesses; and (iii) inadequate financial inclusion.

The financial system has been significantly weakened by the COVID-19 pandemic. Loan recovery and asset quality
are likely to remain weak due to the slow recovery of the tourism industry and because of outward migration. Subdued
tourist arrivals and emigration can have negative repercussions on financial sector soundness since 61.3 percent of loans
were concentrated in the services, tourism, and housing sectors as of December 2022. Emigration can have a damp-
ening effect on prices of rental property and newly developed real estate as migrating people may sell their properties
before migrating. The loan repayment capacity of migrants is not expected to strengthen in the short term, as people
are migrating mostly on student visas. Given that over 60 percent of the assets in the financial sector are owned by the
State, this poses fiscal risks through increased contingent liabilities.

Bhutan is highly susceptible to the adverse effects of climate change, and it is crucial to take further action to mitigate
the financial risks associated with climate events. Key risks and natural hazards include flash floods, riverine floods,
landslides, dam outburst floods, cloudbursts, glacial lake outbursts, forest fires, and windstorms. These climate events
not only pose a threat to natural resources, economic sectors, and communities, but also have the potential to result
in financial risks. While Bhutan has taken important steps at the national level to adapt to the impact of climate change
and pursue a low-emission development path, more can be done to enhance resilience and ensure a sustainable,
low-carbon future.

This Chapter is organized as follows: Section 3.2 highlights the concentrated nature of Bhutan’s financial sector and
discusses credit constraints in the non-hydro sectors. Section 3.3 discusses the challenges, including those emanating
from the COVID-19 pandemic, financial inclusion, and potential impacts from climate change. Section 3.4 provides policy
recommendations.




3.2.	 Concentration and credit allocation
in the financial sector

The banking sector is highly concentrated, with the BoB receiving the majority of deposits and benefiting from a lower cost
of funds. The banking sector accounts for 75 percent of the financial sector’s assets and nearly 80 percent of its credit. The
BoB, which is mostly government-owned (with a 20 percent stake held by the State Bank of India), dominates the sector (Figure
102, Figure 103).132 It holds 44 and 48 percent of the banking sector’s assets and deposits, respectively, making it the largest
commercial bank in the country. 133 The BoB has a widespread presence, with branch offices, extension offices, and agents in
every Dzongkhag and major township. While competition has increased with the establishment of three additional banks during
the 2008-2010 period – Bhutan Development Bank (BDB), Druk PNB Bank, and T Bank – the BoB maintains a lower cost of
funds compared to the other banks. This is due to large SOEs and projects maintaining their main accounts with this bank.134


132	   The BoB was the only commercial bank until 1997 when the BNB was launched as the country’s second commercial bank. The BoB served as the country’s central bank until the
       RMA was established in 1983.
133	   In 2021, BoB’s deposit market share was 47.6 percent followed by BNB at 23.8 percent and BDB at 14.4 percent.
134	   The BoB’s demand deposit comprises 31.4 percent of its total deposit portfolio and continues to include deposits from the Government as well as major SOEs and projects.




                                                                                                                                                                                           93
     Bhutan’s Financial Sector: Issues and the Way Forward
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                  The market share of non-banks has been growing over the last decade, although it still represents less than a quar-
                  ter of the total financial sector assets (Figure 104). The non-banking sector comprises three insurance companies,
                  namely the Royal Insurance Corporation of Bhutan (RICB), Bhutan Insurance Limited (BIL), and the Bhutan GIC Reinsur-
                  ance Company, as well as the National Pension and Provident Fund (NPPF)135 and five microfinance institutions (MFIs).136
                  The share of non-banks in total financial sector assets has increased from below 10 percent in 2012 to 23 percent in
                  2022, while their share in credit doubled from 11 to 22 percent during the same period (Figure 105). Non-banks, such
                  as insurance firms, were permitted to compete with banks in lending to individuals and firms due to limited investment
                  opportunities, particularly in corporate bonds. However, non-banks are more susceptible to maturity mismatches and
                  weak supervision compared to banks. They also possess a lower capacity to absorb losses.



                  Figure 102: Banking sector asset size (Nu. Billion),                                        Figure 103: Banking sector deposits (Nu. Billion),
                  2015 and 2021                                                                               2015 and 2021
                    120                                                                                           100
                                   100.7                                                                            90          88.5
                    100
                                                                                                                    80

                    80                                                                                              70
                                                                                                                    60
                    60                                                                                              50
                                                 52.8                                                                                           44.2
                            39.1                                                                                    40
                    40                                                                                                   32.1
                                            31                                                                      30
                                                                                                                                         22.0
                                                                                                                    20
                    20
                                                                                                                    10
                    0                                                                                               0
                              BOB             BNB            BDB       Druk PNB Bank       T Bank                           BOB            BNB              BDB       Druk PNB Bank       T Bank
                                                    2015            2021                                                                          2015             2021


                  Figure 104: Share of banks and non-banks in financial sector assets, 2022
                   35%                                                                                        35%

                   30%        29.5%                                                                           30%

                   25%                                                                                        25%
                                            21.2%
                   20%                                                                                        20%

                   15%                                                                                        15%
                                                            12.4%                                                                                         11.5%
                                                                                                                                9.8%
                   10%                                                                                        10%
                                                                           7.8%
                                                                                        6.3%
                    5%                                                                                         5%
                                                                                                                                                                                   1.5%
                    0%                                                                                         0%
                              BOB            BNB             BDN     Druk PNB Bank      Tbank                             Pension Fund                    RICB                     BIL
                                                           Banks                                                                                       Non–banks

                  Source: Royal Monetary Authority Financial Sector Performance Review Reports.




                  State-Owned Financial Institutions (SOFIs) dominate the financial sector. Three out of five banks are state-owned. In
                  2020, SOFIs accounted for 60 percent of the assets of the banking system and 51 percent of the assets of the Non-Bank-
                  ing Financial Institutions (NBFIs), including the NPPF. Bhutan has the second highest level of state-ownership in the
                  banking sector in the South Asia Region (SAR), exceeding by a large margin the average levels seen in other countries
                  (Figure 106).


                  135	 In 2000, the NPPF was established as an autonomous agency to manage pension and provident fund schemes of civil servants, employees of state-owned corporations and
                       the armed forces. The plan is managed on a partially funded pay-go system and therefore maintaining sustainability is a major issue. Private pensions are managed by insurance
                       companies through a fully funded private provident fund scheme. However, to expand coverage, the NPPF has also started to manage private provident fund schemes.
                  136	 These include RENEW, Bhutan Care Credit (BCC), BAOWE, Microfinance Bhutan, and Tarayana Foundation. The MFIs currently operate in all 20 Dzongkhags.




94
                                                                                                                                              Bhutan’s Financial Sector: Issues and the Way Forward
                                                                                                                                                                 Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Figure 105: Share of banks and non-banks in                                                  Figure 106: Share of state-owned commercial
assets and credit, 2012 and 2022                                                             banks assets to total banking system assets,
                                                                                             2017-2019

                                                                                                                  a. Share of SOCB assets to total bankiun system assets, 2017-19
                                                                                                       80

 Assets, 2012
                                                                                                       70

                                                                                                       60
                                                                                                                              Bhutan
 Assets, 2022                                                                                          50
                                                                                                                                               Sri Lanka




                                                                                             Percent
                                                                                                       40

  Credit, 2012                                                                                         30
                                                                                                                                                  Bangladesh
                                                                                                       20                                                                       Pakistan
                                                                                                                y = 4.7324x – 38.368
 Credit, 2022                                                                                          10       R2=0.065


                                                                                                       0
                                                                                                            8             9            10          11            12             13         14
              0%           20%           40%          60%           80%          100%
                                                                                                                                 Size of the economy, log of GDP in 2016
                                   Banks          Non-banks                                                                    (constant 2017 international dollars, million)

Source: Royal Monetary Authority Financial Sector Performance Review Reports.                Source: World Bank (2021). Hidden Debt: Solutions to Avert the Next Financial
                                                                                             Crisis in South Asia.




Credit flow is concentrated in a few sectors, reflecting the lack of diversification in the private sector, and is declining
for production and manufacturing activities. A comparison between the Economic Census of 2018 and the Enterprise
Survey of 2022 indicates that wholesale and retail trade, as well as accommodation and food services, continue to
dominate the share of firms albeit a modest decline in their share of total credit from nearly 83 percent in 2018 to around
80 percent in 2022 (Figure 107). On the other hand, the share of firms in construction, administrative support service
activity, and manufacturing sectors has increased slightly. In terms of credit outstanding, the housing sector, along
with services and tourism, accounted for around 50 percent of total credit in 2022. However, the share of trade and
commerce, as well as production and manufacturing in total credit declined by more than 5 percentage points of GDP
between 2014 and 2022. Banks have the highest exposure to the housing sector, while non-banks have the highest
exposure to services and tourism.

The share of cottage firms increased between 2018 and 2022, although their share in credit remained below 10
percent. The share of cottage firms increased from 89 to 96 percent, while the share of medium, large and small firms
declined (Figure 108). This shift could indicate the entry of new firms or the exit of older and larger firms in response to
the pandemic. Despite the overwhelming share of cottage firms, only 8 percent of the total credit is directed towards
them (Figure 109). Around 60 percent of credit is directed to non-enterprises, which reflects the increasing prevalence of
housing and educational loans in recent years and further highlights the lack of diversification in the economy. Notably,
the allocation of credit to small- and medium-enterprises has declined significantly in recent years. The share of large
firms, however, has remained mostly unchanged at around 14 percent.137

The capital markets are shallow. Although there has been an increase in the market capitalization-to-GDP ratio from
15.6 percent in 2016 to 27.4 percent in 2021, it remains relatively low compared to peers. Market capitalization expe-
rienced a decline from 2019 due to the fluctuation in share prices and the delisting of two companies in 2020. Market
liquidity, measured by the turnover-to-GDP ratio, increased to 1.8 percent in 2020 but declined to 1.5 percent in 2021,
and it remains the lowest in the SAR. One of the contributing factors to this low liquidity and trading activity is the lack of
diversification in the economy, which limits the number of listed companies. Listings on the main exchange have stag-
nated in recent years. Further, the pace of growth has been constrained by minimal Initial Public Offering (IPO) activity


137	   As per the Annual Report 2021 of the Department of Cottage and Small Industries, CSIs constitute the overwhelming majority of industry in Bhutan, accounting for about 95 of
       the total industries. Despite the pandemic, the number of active licensed CSIs increased to 26,945 in 2021, from 21,813 in 2020.




                                                                                                                                                                                                      95
     Bhutan’s Financial Sector: Issues and the Way Forward
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                  Figure 107: Distribution of firms and credit as per economic sectors
                  a. Distribution of firms, 2018 and 2022                                                       b. Distribution of credit, 2017, 2019, and 2022
                                                                                                                 35
                                     Agriculture, forestry, and fishing    2.62
                                                                                  0.57
                                                 Mining and quarrying 0.24        0.40
                                                                           5.44                                 30
                                                       Manufacturing              6.39
                        Electricity, gas, steam, and air-conditioning 0.02        0.18
                   Water supply, sewerage, and waste management 0.04                                            25
                                                                                  0.14
                                                         Construction 1.21        2.60                  61.59
                                            Wholesale and retail trade                                          20
                                                                                                     55.87
                                            Transportation and storage 0.33       0.67
                                                                                     21.29                       15
                                 Accommodation and food services                             23.85
                                     Information and communication 0.41           0.50
                                                Finance and insurance 0.12        0.16                           10
                                                          Real estate 0.02        0.05
                      Professional, scientific, and technical services 0.51        1.04                            5
                                Administrative and support services 1.25          2.44
                                                        Education 0.62                                            0
                                                                                  1.04
                                      Human health and social work 0.14
                                                                                                                       re


                                                                                                                                 rce




                                                                                                                                                        m

                                                                                                                                                              ing



                                                                                                                                                                          rt


                                                                                                                                                                                     ns


                                                                                                                                                                                               rs
                                                                                                                                            uf




                                                                                                                                                                         po




                                                                                                                                                                                              he
                                                                                                                                                      ris
                                                                                                                                          an
                                                                                                                      ltu




                                                                                                                                                                                   oa
                                                                                  0.13




                                                                                                                                                            us
                                                                                                                             me




                                                                                                                                                                       ns
                                                                                                                                                    ou




                                                                                                                                                                                          Ot
                                                                                                                                          /M
                                                                                                                  icu




                                                                                                                                                                                 lL
                                                                                                                                                            Ho
                                                                                                                             om




                                                                                                                                                                    Tra
                                                                                                                                                 s/T
                                Arts, entertainment, and recreation 1.24
                                                                                                                                       od




                                                                                                                                                                                na
                                                                                                                   r
                                                                                                                Ag




                                                                                  1.23
                                                                                                                            /C




                                                                                                                                                ce




                                                                                                                                                                              so
                                                                                                                                    Pr
                                                                                                                        de




                                                                                                                                                                             r
                                                                                                                                               rvi




                                                                                                                                                                          Pe
                                                                          2.90
                                                                                                                       Tra




                                                                                                                                            Se


                                                       Other services             2.74
                                                                                                                                                 2017       2019       2022
                                                      2018                2022

                  Source: World Bank staff calculations based on the 2022 Enterprise Survey and the 2018 Economic Census.
                  Note: “Others” include education loans.




                  Figure 108: Distribution of firms by size (percent),                                          Figure 109: Credit composition by firm size
                  2018 and 2022                                                                                 (percent of total), 2017, 2019, and 2022
                                                                                                                70

                                                                                                88.81
                   Cottage                                                                                      60
                                                                                                     95.88
                                                                                                                50

                                     8.79
                     Small                                                                                      40
                               2.93
                                                                                                                30

                              1.85
                   Medium                                                                                       20
                              0.86
                                                                                                                 10

                             0.54
                     Large                                                                                       0
                                                                                                                       cro




                                                                                                                                    ge




                                                                                                                                                      all




                                                                                                                                                                   m



                                                                                                                                                                                ge




                                                                                                                                                                                              ise




                             0.33
                                                                                                                                                              diu
                                                                                                                                                 Sm
                                                                                                                                    tta




                                                                                                                                                                                 r




                                                                                                                                                                                             r
                                                                                                                      Mi




                                                                                                                                                                              La




                                                                                                                                                                                          rp
                                                                                                                                                             Me
                                                                                                                                  Co




                                                                                                                                                                                          te
                                                                                                                                                                                         en
                                                                                                                                                                                       n-




                                                           2018          2022                                                                  2017         2019         2022
                                                                                                                                                                                     No




                  Source: Royal Monetary Authority.
                  Note: Non-enterprises include housing, transport, personal, staff, and education loans. Cottage firms have less than five employees, small firms have between five and
                  19 employees, medium firms have between 20 and 99 employees, and large firms have 100 employees or more.




                  and the consequent stagnation in listings on the stock exchange. There are several possible reasons for this low growth,
                  including factors related to issuers and investors (see section 3.3), as well as the absence of underwriting regulation and
                  capability in the market. The lack of deep capital markets has also led to insurance and pension funds lacking feasible
                  investment options, resulting in some of them engaging in credit business and competing with banks.




96
                                                                                                                                               Bhutan’s Financial Sector: Issues and the Way Forward
                                                                                                                                                                Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




In terms of the bond market, its financial significance remains marginal. Domestic public sector debt has increased
from 1 percent of GDP in 2012 to 13 percent of GDP in 2022, mostly reflecting the authorities’ development of the domes-
tic debt market in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which led to a decline in tax revenues and increased spending
pressures. Domestic debt is mostly in the form of treasury bills and 3- to 12-year treasury bonds. The Government issued
eight longer term bonds between September 2020 and June 2023, with banks and the public pension fund being the
main subscribers (Figure 110,Table 6).138 There have been no bond issuances in recent years by corporates or banks.139



Figure 110: Government Bond issuance, Sep                                                                  Table 6: Share of ownership (equities and bonds),
2020-Jun 2023                                                                                              2021
       14                                                                                              9
                                                                                                                     Ownership (%)                     Stocks            Bond market
                                                         12.0                                          8                                                2021                2021
       12
                                                                                                       7
                      10.0         10.0                               10.0                                  Banks                                         7                    45
       10
                                                                                   9.0                 6
       8                                                                                               5
                                             7.0                                                            Insurance firms                               5                     3
       6                                                                                               4
                                                                                         5.0 5.0 5.0
                                                                4.0                                    3    Pension fund                                 11                    28
       4
            3.0 3.0                   3.0                                                              2
                                                                             2.5
       2                                           1.5                                                      Retail investors and HNIs                    48                    0.5
                                                                                                       1
                             0.7
       0                                                                                               0
               Sep      Jan         Jan       Apr       Jun            Dec          Apr       Jun           Others                                       27                   23.5
              2020     2021                         2022                                  2023
              Period (years)              Amount (billion)                   Coupon rate (%, RHS)
Source: Royal Monetary Authority, Royal Stock Exchange of Bhutan (RSEB)                                    Source: Royal Stock Exchange of Bhutan. ‘Others’ include corporate portfolios,
                                                                                                           trust funds, religious institutions and associations.




3.3.	 Financial sector challenges and recent measures

Banks in Bhutan primarily offer traditional lending products and have not adopted risk-based pricing. Despite some
expansion in the range of financial instruments offered by banks, financial instruments are still dominated by traditional
banking products. Banks mostly offer basic credit products with fixed interest and terms.140 This is partly because banks
still assess loan requests against collateral, and not based on the borrower’s financial viability. Financial Institutions
(Fis) in Bhutan do not use risk-based pricing that links the credit score of the borrower to the interest rate of the loan.
The reliance on collateral by banks has led borrowers to seek alternative sources of financing from non-bank lenders.

The surge in credit witnessed during the middle of the past decade was not sustained. The private credit to GDP
ratio increased from 46 percent in 2015 to 74 percent in 2021,141 primarily driven by hydropower-related flows. However,
the adverse impact of the pandemic on tourism and hospitality, as well as the construction and manufacturing sectors,
impacted credit growth. Due to weaker demand from the private sector, credit growth moderated to an average of 7
percent in 2021 and 2022, in nominal terms, compared to an average of 18 percent between 2014 and 2019.




138	       It started with the issuance of a three-year bond at the prefixed rate of 6.5 percent and then two 10-year bonds through open auction.
139	       However, since 2017, there have been a total of 21 issuances of Commercial Papers with a maturity of 180 days by various SOFIs. The issuance size has mostly been small.
140	       Since 2016, they have also started to offer some credit products with floating interest rate.
141	       Bhutan’s private credit to GDP ratio is much higher than that for other South Asian countries such as India, Sri Lanka and Maldives (Figure 5). Only Nepal has a higher private
           credit to GDP ratio of around 97.7 percent in the region.




                                                                                                                                                                                                       97
     Bhutan’s Financial Sector: Issues and the Way Forward
     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                  Loan asset quality has steadily deteriorated. Between 2014 and 2019, the deterioration in loan asset quality can be
                  attributed to overexuberant lending practices, without sufficient credit appraisal, monitoring and recovery management.
                  Non-banks, in particular RICB and BIL, reported higher NPLs compared to banks (Figure 113, Figure 114).142 High NPLs
                  in the non-banking sector resulted from the fact that the insurance companies were engaged in intermediation due to
                  lack of investment opportunities in the capital markets. Within the banking sector, the BDB reported the highest NPLs—
                  largely due to the nature of its activities—followed by the Bhutan National Bank (BNB). By June 2020, with the onset of
                  the pandemic and a sharp slowdown in economic growth, the NPL ratio increased to nearly 15 percent as most firms
                  faced significant challenges in meeting their debt repayments. The majority of NPLs are concentrated in the services
                  and tourism sector (33 percent), followed by trade, production and manufacturing, and the housing sectors (Figure 115).
                  The RMA has suspended fresh lending to the housing sector until December 2023 due to high credit concentration and
                  non-performing loans in the sector.



                  Figure 111: Gross NPL and credit growth (percent),                                                   Figure 112: Sectoral composition of NPLs, 2017,
                  2012-2023                                                                                            2019, and 2022
                    16                                                                                   30%            35
                                                                               14.6
                    14                                                                                                  30
                                                                                                         25%

                    12                                                                                                  25
                                                                        10.9
                                                                10.4                                     20%
                   10                                                                                                   20
                                                                                       8.9         8.7
                    8                                     8.0                                7.9         15%            15

                                6.6   6.3         6.5
                                            6.0                                                                         10
                    6
                         5.2                                                                             10%
                                                                                                                         5
                    4

                                                                                                         5%              0
                    2
                                                                                                                              re


                                                                                                                                     rce



                                                                                                                                                  re


                                                                                                                                                              m


                                                                                                                                                                         ing



                                                                                                                                                                                     rt


                                                                                                                                                                                               ns


                                                                                                                                                                                                          rs
                                                                                                                                                                                 po




                                                                                                                                                                                                          he
                                                                                                                                                            ris
                                                                                                                             ltu




                                                                                                                                                  tu




                                                                                                                                                                                               oa
                                                                                                                                                                      us
                                                                                                                                   me



                                                                                                                                                ac




                                                                                                                                                                                ns
                                                                                                                                                          ou




                                                                                                                                                                                                     Ot
                                                                                                                        icu




                                                                                                                                                                                             lL
                                                                                                                                                                   Ho
                                                                                                                                   om



                                                                                                                                             uf




                                                                                                                                                                               Tra
                                                                                                                                                       s/T




                                                                                                                                                                                          na
                                                                                                                          r




                    0                                                                                    0%
                                                                                                                       Ag




                                                                                                                                             an
                                                                                                                               /C




                                                                                                                                                       ce




                                                                                                                                                                                       so
                                                                                                                                           /M




                         2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023*
                                                                                                                              de




                                                                                                                                                                                         r
                                                                                                                                                     rvi




                                                                                                                                                                                      Pe
                                                                                                                                        od
                                                                                                                             Tra




                                                                                                                                                  Se
                                                                                                                                        Pr




                                            NPL ratio                   Credit growth (RHS)                                                        2017         2018           2022


                  Figure 113: Gross NPL, banks and non-banks (percent), 2015-2022
                   50%
                   45%
                   40%
                   35%
                   30%
                   25%
                   20%
                   15%
                   10%
                    5%
                    0%
                               2015               2016             2017                  2018            2019                       2020                          2021                          2022
                               Bank         BOB          BNB           BDB            Druk PNB Bank            TBank                Non-Bank                Pension             RICB                BIL
                  Source: Royal Monetary Authority, World Bank annual reports. Note: *data for 2023 is for the month of March, while data for other years is for the month of December. In
                  Figure 115, the 2022 data for Bhutan National Bank and Bhutan Development Bank is for September while the rest pertains to December.




                  142	   The NPL for the non-bank sector was rising even before the COVID-19 impact, mainly due to low government expenditure in the construction and contract sector and greening
                         of loans.




98
                                                                                                                                       Bhutan’s Financial Sector: Issues and the Way Forward
                                                                                                                                                         Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




The NPL ratio is expected to rise once forbearance measures are withdrawn. The decline in the NPL ratio in 2021
and 2022 largely reflects the lack of recognition of potentially stressed assets. Financial sector risks are underreported
in official statistics due to regulatory forbearances. Borrower relief measures included measures such as full or partial
interest waiver and loan repayments deferments, funded through the National Resilience Fund (NRF). As a result, the
decline in the NPL ratio in 2021 and 2022 reflects adjustments in NPL accounting, changes in risk-weights for NPLs, and
the writeback of provisions from NPLs as part of the NPL management strategy and resolution framework.143 The NPL
ratio may increase further with better recognition of asset quality over the coming years. Persistent NPLs may hinder the
extension of fresh credit, particularly to riskier segments such as MSMEs. In 2022, the RMA adopted a Prompt Corrective
Action (PCA) Framework to enable early supervisory intervention and mitigate any risk that could threaten the viability
of financial service providers and the overall system. Two out of five commercial banks and one insurance company
were under PCA as of May 2022.

The rise in NPLs, prior to forbearance, mirrors a decline in profitability within the banking system. The net interest
margin — the difference between the interest earned and the interest paid – has declined for most banks in recent years
(Figure 114).144 The decline is a result of slower credit growth and an increase in deposits, which has compressed interest
margins. The overall return to assets (RoA) of the financial sector declined from 2.6 percent in 2015 to 0.9 percent in 2020,
before improving in 2022 due to the monetary measures implemented by the RMA. The moderate growth in outstanding
loans was mostly due to an increase in interest outstanding, owing to loan deferment measures by the RMA. Currently,
the declining RoA of banks reflects the lack of profitable opportunities available in the market (Figure 115).

The financial sector remains capitalized above the regulatory threshold of 12.5 percent; however, the Capital
Adequacy Ratio (CAR) shows a declining trend.145 The CAR has been declining for most banks over the past few years
(Figure 116). For the non-bank sector, capital adequacy improved from 9.4 percent in 2019 to 19 percent by December
2021, supported by the infusion of fresh capital by some of the financial institutions (Fis) and monetary measures intro-
duced by the RMA. Overall capital adequacy declined from 18.3 percent in 2012 to 15 percent in December 2021 because
of increasing NPLs and lower profits. In particular, BDB and one of the insurance companies faced difficulties in meeting
the capital requirements due to high NPL levels. The risk weighted CAR of banks increased marginally from 15.1 percent
in March 2022 to 15.7 percent in March 2023.

Bhutan is highly vulnerable to the physical and financial risks emanating from climate events. The country is suscep-
tible to physical risks resulting from the gradual and sudden impacts of climate change on its real assets, which in turn
have financial implications. To some extent, it is also exposed to climate transition risks that arise from the ongoing efforts
to decarbonize the economy. These transition risks can impose economic adjustment costs on firms and investors who
did not anticipate the transition.

Investment at scale will be required for Bhutan to meet its climate-related and environmental goals because funding
from public sources alone will not meet the financing gap. The financial sector could play an important role in bringing
private finance to meet climate goals – by deepening green finance markets and improving the management and pricing
of climate-related financial risks. Despite taking important steps, financial sector authorities, such as the RMA and MoF,
are still at the initial stages of developing the infrastructure and policy environment to help financial institutions manage
climate risks and better leverage opportunities (Box 10).

Access to finance is a concern for both individuals and businesses. As of December 2021, 79.5 percent of the adult
population held savings accounts; the percentage was higher for men (52.6 percent) than for women (47.4 percent).
However, only 22.9 percent of the adult population had access to credit, of which 56.7 percent were men and 43.3
percent were women. Only 19.4 percent of adults had life insurance coverage, with most being men (55 percent). Despite
a high mobile phone penetration rate of 95 percent, only 21.6 percent of adults had access to eMoney. Many rural
communities still lack access to formal remittance services, preventing them from benefiting from modern electronic


143	   The framework focuses on (i) preventing a loan from becoming an NPL (flow) by implementing effective and efficient processes and systems, and (ii) resolving the current NPLs
       (stock).
144	   The RMA’s loan moratorium led to borrowers not making payments and interest accruing on outstanding balances. Since the accrued interest is added to the outstanding loan
       amount, the outstanding credit increased.
145	   Capital adequacy is aligned with Basel III regulations, while the liquidity coverage ratio is only monitored and not enforced. The minimum CAR threshold was lowered from 12.5
       percent to 10 percent during COVID-19, by removing the 2.5 percent capital buffer as a regulatory forbearance measure to address the impact.




                                                                                                                                                                                               99
      Bhutan’s Financial Sector: Issues and the Way Forward
      Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                   Figure 114: Net interest margin (percent),                                                  Figure 115: Return on assets of banks (percent),
                   2015-2021                                                                                   2015-2022
                    7                                                                                           3%
                                                                                                                       2.5%

                    6                                                                                           2% 1.6%                                                                         1.1%
                        5.7

                    5                                                                                           1%

                        4.4
                    4                                                                                           0%
                        3.7                                                                                                                                                                     0.9%
                                                                                                 3.3            -1%
                    3   3.7                                                                      3.0

                                                                                                               -2%
                    2                                                                            2.1
                                                                                                 1.7
                                                                                                                -3%
                    1
                                                                                                                -4%
                    0
                              2015   2016     2017         2018         2019      2020     2021
                                                                                                               -5%      2015     2016          2017            2018   2019   2020      2021     2022
                              BOB       BNB          BDB           Druk PNB Bank               TBank                    BOB         BNB                       BDB      Druk PNB Bank          TBank



                   Figure 116: Capital adequacy ratio of banks (percent), 2015-2022
                                                                  25%
                                                                          23.4%



                                                                  20%
                                                                                                                                                  17.5%


                                                                  15% 15.7%



                                                                                                                                                       12.7%
                                                                  10%



                                                                  5%



                                                                  0%
                                                                           2015     2016        2017    2018    2019      2020          2021           2022

                                                                          BOB            BNB           BDB       Druk PNB Bank                 TBank
                   Source: Royal Monetary Authority. Note: In Figure 116, data for the year 2022 is not available for Bhutan National Bank (BNB) and Bhutan Development Bank (BDB). In
                   Figure 117, 2022 data for BNB and BDB is as of 30 September, all other data is as of 31 December.



                   and online payment systems. The penetration of bank branches and ATMs remains very low, with Bhutan having the
                   lowest numbers compared to other countries in SAR (Figure 119). Access to finance remains a major concern for private
                   businesses and rural entrepreneurs. Uneven access to bank credit, complex loan procedures, and a limited range of
                   financial instruments offered by banks, continue to impede access to finance. In rural areas, there is a significant unmet
                   demand for simpler banking services.

                   Access to finance is further constrained by the absence of appropriate risk sharing and credit enhancement instru-
                   ments, as well as banks’ risk aversion to lend to MSMEs. A sustainably designed risk sharing facility, such as a partial
                   credit guarantee scheme, can incentivize banks to lend to these sectors without generating contingent liabilities. Such
                   schemes should be introduced on a long-term basis, with the goal of promoting MSMEs in order to diversify the non-hydro
                   sectors, rather than only as short-term measures like the existing NCGS. The design of the scheme can follow international
                   best practices and could be complemented by capacity-building support for the borrowers.




100
                                                                                                                                  Bhutan’s Financial Sector: Issues and the Way Forward
                                                                                                                                                  Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Box 10: Recent steps to encourage green finance

The Green Finance Roadmap for Bhutan is an important step taken by the RMA to align financial sector policies,
regulations, and incentives with the countr’’s environmental and climate goals. This roadmap outlines the strategic
direction to promote sustainability within the financial system and identifies necessary developments to advance Bhuta’’s
green finance agenda. The roadmap will help prioritize actions and coordinate efforts among various stakeholders,
including financial and environmental policymakers, supervisors, regulators, and sector participants. Bhutan’s Green
Finance Roadmap covers key elements for effectively greening the financial system. It includes high-level policy actions
with implementation timeframes. It also addresses governance and coordination, risk management, and a discussion
of green finance flows. Further, it recognizes the potential for more reforms, beyond the banking sector, encompassing
non-banks, insurance companies, capital markets, and institutional investors.

Bhutan has developed a national green taxonomy to support informed decision-making by financial actors regarding
environment-friendly investments. This taxonomy aims to scale up finance for climate mitigation, adaptation, and other
environmental goals; facilitate reliable and comparable disclosures related to sustainability risks and opportunities; and
provide a starting point for standard setters and product developers. It complements actions taken by authorities to
align environmental regulations with fiscal policies that support the greening of the economy. A taxonomy can further
promote market integrity by reducing ‘greenwashing’. The Bhutanese green taxonomy demonstrates good practices by
clearly formulating its purpose, environmental objectives, conceptual framework, and target users, and by incorporating
key principles such as the do-no-harm clause. Additionally, it considers taxonomies from other countries and initiatives
to lay the foundation for future harmonization efforts.




Figure 117: Access to finance (per 10,000 adults), 2017 and 2021
 10
 9
 8
  7
 6
 5
  4
 3
 2
  1
 0
      an



                  ia


                         a


                                    a


                                             y


                                                     an


                                                              an


                                                                          ia


                                                                                  a


                                                                                             a


                                                                                                       y


                                                                                                                an


                                                                                                                         an


                                                                                                                                     ia


                                                                                                                                            a


                                                                                                                                                   a


                                                                                                                                                               y


                                                                                                                                                                       an
                                          ua




                                                                                                    ua




                                                                                                                                                            ua
                        an


                                 oli




                                                                                an


                                                                                          oli




                                                                                                                                           an


                                                                                                                                                  oli
              liv




                                                                      liv




                                                                                                                                 liv
  ut




                                                       t


                                                             ut




                                                                                                                 ist


                                                                                                                       ut




                                                                                                                                                                         t
                                                   kis




                                                                                                                                                                     kis
                                         ag




                                                                                                  ag




                                                                                                                                                              g
                               ng




                                                                                        ng




                                                                                                                                                  ng
                       tsw




                                                                               tsw




                                                                                                                                          tsw
            Bo




                                                                     Bo




                                                                                                                              Bo
Bh




                                                           Bh




                                                                                                                       Bh
                                                                                                              jik




                                                                                                                                                           ra
                                                    ji




                                                                                                                                                                      ji
                                           r




                                                                                                    r
                             Mo




                                                                                      Mo




                                                                                                                                                Mo
                                        Pa




                                                                                                 Pa




                                                                                                                                                        Pa
                                                 Ta




                                                                                                           Ta




                                                                                                                                                                   Ta
                   Bo




                                                                            Bo




                                                                                                                                      Bo




                 Commercial bank branches                              Microfinance institution branches                                         ATMs
                                                                               2017               2021
Source: Financial Access Survey.




Access to foreign private capital for domestic firms is limited in Bhutan, reflecting significant restrictions on capital
account movements.146 Bhutan has one of the most restricted capital accounts in the world, with long-standing capital
controls to all categories of transactions (see AREAER 2020).147 While the FDI framework has been gradually liberal-
ized, the number of approved FDI projects and their aggregate size has been declining.148 Further, there are only five
instances where Bhutanese companies have been permitted to borrow from external sources in the recent decade. The



146	 World Bank. 2022. “Assessment of the External Commercial Borrowing (ECB) Regime in Bhutan”. World Bank, Washington DC.
147	See AREAER Country Reports for Bhutan on https://www.elibrary-areaer.imf.org/Pages/Reports.aspx
148	 The FDI framework still includes relatively high minimum thresholds, local participation rules, and sectoral restrictions.




                                                                                                                                                                                          101
      Bhutan’s Financial Sector: Issues and the Way Forward
      Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                   Government has recently eased access to External Commercial Borrowing (ECB) for the real sector (i.e., non-equity capital
                   flows) to improve access to international finance for domestic firms but continues to limit ECB for the financial sector.149
                   ECB is relatively closely regulated in South and Southeast Asia but is less prevalent elsewhere.150 Other countries usually
                   restrict the outflow of capital but not the inflow.

                   The payment system is still predominantly cash-based, with limited use of digital technologies. However, the COVID-
                   19 pandemic emphasized the importance of digital services during lockdown periods. During this time, the Government,
                   FIs, schools, and institutions increasingly relied on digital finance and payment systems (Government to Citizens [G2C])
                   to meet their needs. In line with the RMA 10-year Roadmap (2021-2030), Bhutan aims to leverage the National Digital
                   Identity as a key foundation for transforming the financial sector through FinTech services, and peer to peer (P2P) and
                   business to business (B2B) lending models. To support and encourage the growth of the FinTech ecosystem, the RMA
                   adopted the FinTech Regulatory Sandbox. Additionally, the RMA developed the Data Warehouse and Analytics System
                   to modernize the financial sector and enhance policy decision-making using emerging digital technologies. The Govern-
                   ment, RMA and fIs should ensure that FinTech is utilized to bridge the gaps in financial inclusion in Bhutan. This can be
                   achieved through faster and more affordable payments, collateral-free digital lending, and the introduction of innovative
                   capital market and insurance products for retail customers.

                   Various steps have been undertaken recently to bolster access to finance. The regulatory approach of the RMA has
                   often prioritized credit affordability, but the banks may not always have the incentives or opportunities to appropriately
                   price risks. To improve access to finance, the RMA launched the Priority Sector Lending Guidelines in 2017, along with
                   amendments to the Credit Information Bureau Rules and Regulations, to enable better assessment of borrowers’ cred-
                   itworthiness beyond collateral considerations. In 2020, the Government launched the National CSI Development Bank
                   and the NCGS to improve access to credit (Box 11).151 However, despite the establishment of the CIB, bank lending still
                   relies primarily on collateral. Recognizing challenges such as the lack of formal credit history, collateral, and low financial
                   literacy, the RMA launched the Financial Inclusion National Action Plan (FINAP, 2019-2023) to improve access and finan-
                   cial inclusion.152 The FINAP focuses on leveraging innovative technologies to expand the benefits of modern electronic
                   and online payment systems in rural areas.153 In 2021, two mobile operators started eTeeru and B-Ngul wallets, enabling
                   individuals to make payments through mobile phones without needing bank accounts.

                   The RMA has implemented various reforms to make the financial sector more responsive to emerging priorities and
                   maintaining financial stability. These reforms include regulatory interventions aimed at improving credit intermediation,
                   facilitating fund flow to CSIs, strengthening corporate governance and risk management systems, and promoting the
                   digital economy. Regulations have been updated to comply with International Financial Reporting Standard-9 (IFRS 9)
                   and Basel III, ensuring prudential regulations are in line with international standards. The payments and clearing systems
                   have been modernized, with the introduction of Real-Time Gross Settlements (RTGS) and the use of the SWIFT system.
                   The RMA is proposing amendments to the Financial Services Act 2011, to allow insurance companies to offer composite
                   insurance (both life as well as non-life). A feasibility study for Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) has been completed
                   to align with the RMA’s efforts to embrace a digital economy. The RMA has prepared a Ten-Year (2021-2030) Strategic
                   Plan (Druk Nguldrel-Lamtoen 2030) to respond to the changing demands of an economy that is increasingly driven by
                   technology and innovation.154




                   149	 The 2023 ECB Guidelines shortened the minimum required loan maturity, broadened the allowable end-use (utilization) of ECB proceeds, including working capital to liberalize
                        refinancing options and increase the maximum allowed interest rates. The guidelines also introduced an automatic approval process for loans that meet eligibility criteria (amount,
                        end-use of the funds, minimum maturity period).
                   150	 The current ECB framework in Bhutan is largely built on criteria used in other countries in the region, including India, Nepal, Bangladesh.
                   151	 The National CSI Development Bank was merged with the BDB in 2023 as a result of financial losses and overlapping mandates.
                   152	 See RMA. 2019. “Financial Inclusion National Action Plan (FINAP), 2019-2023”. RMA, Thimphu, Bhutan. https://www.rma.org.bt/RMA%20Publication/papers/FINAP%20Four%20
                        Pillers%20Brochure.pdf
                   153	 The FINAP targets 85 percent financial inclusion by 2023 from the baseline of 64 percent in 2017.
                   154	 RMA. 2021b. “Druk Nguldrel-Lamtoen 2030” RMA, Thimphu, Bhutan.
                   https://www.rma.org.bt/assets/images/news_image/druk%20nguldrel%20lamtoen.pdf




102
                                                                                                                                          Bhutan’s Financial Sector: Issues and the Way Forward
                                                                                                                                                             Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Box 11: Recent steps to improve access to finance

Priority Sector Lending. Bhutan launched a Priority Sector Lending (PSL) program and guidelines to improve access to
finance. Under this program, agricultural Cottage and Small Industry (CSI) loans for primary production are insured to
address collateral requirements, while loans for other activities are based on cash-flow or project financing practices
instead of collateral. Priority Sector Lending (PSL) clients can receive loans up to Nu. 500,000 for primary production
in agricultural CSI. The preferential interest rates are 8 percent per annum for non-agricultural CSI and 8.5 percent per
annum for value addition in agricultural CSI. The majority of outstanding PSL loans (61 percent) are in the non-agricultural
CSI sector, followed by agricultural CSI sectors (39 percent). However, more loans were sanctioned to the agricultural
CSI sector in terms of the number of accounts. Approximately 80 percent of the loans were disbursed through the BNB
and the BoB.

National CSI Development Bank. The National CSI Development Bank was established by the Government in February
2020 as a government-owned non-deposit bank SOE. Since its inception, the NCSI has been providing microloans to
the agriculture sector at 2 percent, and to the non-agriculture sector at 4 percent, in order to mitigate the impact of the
pandemic. Because of high NPLs and failure to recover loans, the authorities have decided to merge the national CSI
bank with BDB.

National Credit Guarantee Scheme. The NCGS was launched in October 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
to improve access to credit. Participating banks, including BOB, BNB, and the National CSI Development Bank, receive
government guarantees to enable lending without the need for collateral. The scheme has been successful in improving
access to credit and promoting financial inclusion. Currently, there are 213 projects under the scheme, with a total loan
amount of Nu. 852.08 million.155 




3.4.	 Policy priorities

Despite the rapid development in Bhutan’s financial sector, it faces numerous systemic risks and challenges. Moving
forward, reforms are necessary to mitigate systemic risks, promote financial deepening, improve governance, strengthen
regulations and oversight mechanisms, and bolster inclusion. These measures are crucial to complementing the diversi-
fication of the economy and fostering private sector growth. The following policy recommendations could be considered
for addressing the existing gaps and vulnerabilities.

3.4.1.	 Financial stabilityand governance of FIs

Despite efforts made by the RMA in recent years, significant improvements in supervision and regulation ae
still required. The regulatory regime can be further enhanced by moving from the existing compliance and perfor-
mance-based supervisory models towards a risk-based supervisory approach. The insurance sector, in particular, faces
challenges due to limited regulatory and supervisory capacity. Therefore, it is crucial for the RMA to strengthen its capacity
to effectively supervise the insurance sector and promote the development of a resilient and credible insurance industry.
Further, implementing risk-based solvency requirements for the insurance sector and amending the Financial Services
Act 2011, to allow composite insurance by insurance companies for example, should be prioritized. Given the high attrition
rate in the RMA and public services, it is also important to develop a new pool of supervisors with the necessary skills.




155	   The guarantee is limited to the debt financing of the project. It covers loans not exceeding Nu. 30 million by way of term loans. Debt to Equity Ratio under scheme is 90:10, which
       is significantly lower than the existing levels of the financial institutions.




                                                                                                                                                                                                  103
      Bhutan’s Financial Sector: Issues and the Way Forward
      Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                   Detailed guidelines for credit underwriting are essential to reduce risks during loan origination. According to the
                   NPL Management Strategy, the top 20 NPLs were primarily caused by two factors: common clients with high loan
                   exposures and inadequate securities being pledged.156 This highlights the need for comprehensive guidelines, which
                   fIs must adhere to during the credit underwriting process. While the Risk Management Guidelines 2019 provide an
                   overview of procedures for credit appraisal, the increase in NPLs suggests uneven compliance. Although lenders have
                   comprehensive credit manuals in place, it is crucial to assess the level of their application. Therefore, addressing credit
                   underwriting needs to be prioritized.

                   Strengthening credit monitoring is crucial for fIs to address the risk of borrowers failing to meet their contractual
                   commitments. This can be achieved by developing appropriate internal procedures and reporting mechanisms to identify
                   and manage potential non-performing customers at an early stage and prevent deterioration in credit quality. Effective
                   credit risk monitoring involves using Early Warning Indicators (EWIs) and Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) during loan origination
                   and throughout the life cycle of the loan. Sensitivity analysis and stress testing should also be conducted. The RMA could
                   issue a guideline that outlines the fundamental principles for establishing an early warning system. Financial institutions
                   could assess any gaps in their systems using this guideline, and the RMA could request a timeline for implementing
                   necessary improvements. Regular reviews and assessments can be conducted during onsite inspections. Further, insti-
                   tutions need to align their credit risk strategy, including credit-granting decisions, with capital and liquidity planning, the
                   Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP), the Internal Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process (ILAAP),
                   and the broader risk appetite framework.

                   The current loan pricing mechanism could be modified to reflect borrower risks. It is important to have a system of
                   risk-based pricing that considers factors such as risk appetite, business strategies, profitability, and risk perspective.
                   Financial institutions should develop approaches to pricing that are tailored to the type and credit quality of borrowers,
                   offering different loan prices based on the specific type and credit quality of borrowers. For MSMEs, the pricing could
                   be more focused on the overall portfolio and specific product offered, whereas for medium and large enterprises, the
                   pricing could be more customized to the individual borrower’s circumstances.

                   The bankruptcy and insolvency framework could be further developed to facilitate the prompt resolution of NPLs.
                   The Bankruptcy Act of 1999 currently offers protection for insolvent companies seeking bankruptcy. Further, the enforce-
                   ment of this law falls under the jurisdiction of the judiciary. Currently, most cases of loan defaults are litigated in court
                   by borrowers and financial services providers, which can be both expensive and time-consuming. The Bankruptcy Act
                   should be reviewed and amended to establish a framework that enables businesses to effectively resolve insolvency
                   and strengthen creditor rights. Up until now, no one has sought protection under the Bankruptcy Act. Instead, the FIs
                   are opting for out-of-court settlements to expedite insolvency cases, using provisions outlined in the NPL resolution
                   framework. Given that this practice is relatively new in Bhutan, it will be essential to further enhance institutions such
                   as arbitration and build capacity for the settlement of insolvency and bankruptcy cases. The court processes to seize
                   collateral in a timely manner have improved in recent years, particularly with the establishment of commercial benches
                   in Thimphu. However, additional benches are needed in major Dzongkhags.

                   Ensuring a level playing field for SOFIs and other banks can address risks to financial stability. Public-owned banks
                   hold the majority of deposits in the economy. For example, the BoB’s advantage in cost of funds, compared to other
                   banks, can be attributed to its large deposit base in the public sector. Consequently, BoB’s market share has increased
                   significantly over the years. To promote a more diverse banking system and reduce reliance on a single dominant player,
                   it is important to enhance competition among banks for government deposits. This will ultimately contribute to a more
                   stable financial system. Given the relatively weak balance sheets and performance of state-owned banks in recent
                   years, and the ongoing efforts to clean up balance sheets of state-owned financial institutions, full or partial divestiture of
                   state-owned banks could be a medium-term objective for the Government. However, this should only be pursued when
                   the financial sector is more stable, and the efficiency and performance indicators of state-owned banks have improved.
                   Thus, sequencing plans for divesture, after addressing immediate financial sector performance issues, could improve
                   the attractiveness of these banks to private investors.


                   156	 KPMG and ADB. 2021. “Credit Risk and NPL Management for Bhutan. NPL Management Strategy Report.” https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/project-docu-
                        ments/51252/51252-004-tacr-en_2.pdf




104
                                                                                                                                   Bhutan’s Financial Sector: Issues and the Way Forward
                                                                                                                                                     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Bolstering corporate governance and risk management frameworks is essential to improving good corporate gover-
nance practices. In 2020, the RMA introduced the Corporate Governance Rules and Regulations (CGRR) to promote
sound governance by encouraging high standards of governance principles. According to Clause 15 of the CGRR, there
should be a transparent accountability framework to ensure effective accountability of the board and senior management
positions in FIs. The regulations limit the number of directors to seven, including the chairperson and CEO, with at least
two being independent directors. However, this limitation poses challenges for FIs in forming board-level committees,
such as, governance, risk, and audit with sufficient directors. To address this issue, revising regulations may be necessary
to ensure an optimal number of board members in these committees, thereby improving good governance practices.

                   inancial intermediation
3.4.2.	 Deepening f

Strengthening the CIB, by expanding the coverage of service providers and data systems, is essential to reducing
collateral-based lending. The utilization of credit information by lenders appears to be limited.157 Expanding the coverage
of information is critical to developing a comprehensive credit history and implementing a new credit scoring system in
the country. Presently, only FIs, several MFIs, and the utility company report to the CBI. There is significant potential to
expand the coverage of CIB by creating an enabling environment for other financial service providers to share informa-
tion. This expansion would help reduce information asymmetry and enhance the credit history database. Looking ahead,
the CIB could consider incorporating the land record system and the Road Safety Transport Authority in its coverage of
service providers. Making CIB reports mandatory during loan origination would also help mitigate the risks of NPLs. The
CIB is working on a credit scoring model specifically for retail borrowers, which will be integrated with the credit reports.
However, these reports are primarily used as compliance tools rather than comprehensive credit assessment tools.

A review of the design of the PSL scheme can improve its effectiveness by tackling disincentives to lend to the CSI
sector. Amajor challenge is that many projects are rejected due to poor credit history and lack of bankable projects.
Banks have raised concerns about restrictions on their ability to determine the lending conditions under the PSL, such
as interest rate caps, loan tenures, payment structures, and mandatory insurance coverage for agricultural lending
instead of collateral requirements. These concerns are compounded by the lack of credit risk-sharing arrangements
and institutional capacity to serve the CSI sector. While the PSL approach allows banks to make the final decision in the
credit approval process, there is a need to review the role of all commercial banks involved in the PSL initiative. This
includes addressing issues related to generalized lending obligations, the absence of a risk-sharing framework, oper-
ational constraints, pricing limitations, technical capacity, and prudential norms and regulations. The aim is to eliminate
disincentives for lending to the CSI sector.

A sustainable credit guarantee scheme can effectively alleviate credit constraints in risky sectors, such as MSMEs.
However, there are potential risks associated with the limited guarantee coverage period of three years under the NCGS,
as loans are not collateralized after the sunset clause. To ensure the success of such schemes, it is crucial to improve
monitoring and support mechanisms. This can be achieved by reviewing the design, guarantee coverage period, guar-
antee ratio system, and fees of the schemes. Additionally, enhancing coordination between the scheme, CIB, and FIs,
in assessing and managing loans, is essential. To address concerns raised by banks regarding the temporary nature of
the NCGS, it could be made permanent and capitalized separately. This would provide guarantees for the entire loan
duration, ensuring sustained lending support. Further, simplifying the current claims process and expanding the scope
of the NCGS would contribute to its effectiveness.

Implementing a robust collateral valuation system is crucial to mitigating loan losses and safeguarding banks. The
quality and accurate valuation of collateral plays a significant role in securing banks against potential loan losses. In order
to achieve this, the RMA can develop a comprehensive framework for collateral valuations, which is in accordance with
international accepted standards, and conduct capacity building on collateral valuation for lenders and supervisors. In
addition, having an independent valuer will be vital during legal settlements, as borrowers generally seek a higher value
for the surrender of their collateral.



157	   The CIB is governed by the Credit Information Bureau Rules and Regulations, 2017, issued by the RMA. It currently provides consumer and commercial information through an
       automation platform.




                                                                                                                                                                                           105
      Bhutan’s Financial Sector: Issues and the Way Forward
      Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                   Facilitating access to international finance for domestic firms can support private sector development and firm
                   growth. Expanded ECB for the larger companies could free up access to domestic financing for the smaller companies
                   and thereby enhance financial inclusion. It could also reduce the maturity mismatches of domestic banks (banks are
                   financing long-term assets with very short-term funding, i.e., deposits) and concentration risks (banks are relatively small,
                   therefore taking larger export-oriented projects could create industry concentration risks in their balance sheets) by
                   taking some loans off the banking sector balance sheet. Although the government has already made strides in easing
                   ECB for the real sector, further medium-term reforms could be beneficial. These reforms include opening the banking
                   sector to ECB under strict regulatory oversight, easing foreign exchange conditions to allow borrowers more flexibility in
                   meeting repayment obligations, for instance by considering alternative measures for hedging, such as by focusing on the
                   production of tradable goods. Moreover, raising the debt-equity ratio for ECB beyond the current 3:1 limit could support
                   projects with higher leverage, potentially with sector-specific variations. Regulations might also permit shorter-term ECBs
                   below a certain level or for borrowers with a natural hedge in foreign exchange earnings.

                   The adoption of digital technologies can enhance efficiency and boost financial inclusion. Digitized assets and emerg-
                   ing technology are shaping the financial services landscape. Banks can leverage digital technology to improve their
                   services by reducing overhead costs, eliminating the need for branch expansion. This is also vital for building capacity
                   to address the skills gap and promoting digital financial literacy. The drive towards digitalization will facilitate validation
                   of digital signatures and digital documents, which can modernize the financial industry.

                                       limate finance
                   3.4.3.	 Bolstering c

                   Strategy and coordination

                   The Green Finance Roadmap lacks some specific details, and a comprehensive coordination mechanism is necessary
                   to support its implementation. To promote a more coordinated approach and build a strong and efficient domestic
                   green finance market, it is important to establish an overarching coordination mechanism that involves all financial sector
                   authorities, relevant government bodies, and the financial sector as a whole. The establishment of the National Sustain-
                   able Finance Committee is a positive step in this direction. This committee will include all authorities, such as the RMA,
                   relevant departments at the Ministry of Finance, National Environment Commission, Royal Stock Exchange of Bhutan
                   (RSEB), and the Bhutan Chamber for Commerce and Industries. It will also try to work closely with international partners
                   and networks in the sustainable finance field. As a next step, the committee could focus on developing a detailed work
                   plan that includes specific deliverables. Where relevant, technical subgroups (comprising both public and private sector)
                   could be established to support implementation.

                   Developing a national climate finance strategy can provide additional clarity on investment objectives and offer
                   assurance to investors about the Government’s long-term policy direction, including priority investment sectors. For
                   Bhutan, it would be important to consider the potential sources of financing required to meet its adaptation and resil-
                   ience objectives. This is especially important as adaptation investments require different mechanisms, incentives, and
                   actors, compared to mitigation financing. Building institutional capacity across the government is necessary to develop
                   innovative approaches that can unlock finance for adaptation and resilience projects.

                   Building skills and capacity

                   Enhancing awareness of climate-related and environmental risks and opportunities will be critical for supporting
                   the implementation of the Green Finance Roadmap and the development of the green finance market. This can be
                   achieved by developing a detailed plan to identify the specific training needs of authorities and the sector. It is important
                   to identify relevant partners to engage in addressing specific topics. There are training and capacity-building opportuni-
                   ties, which can be accessed by the public and private sectors, including the Central Banks and Supervisors Network for
                   Greening the Financial System (NGFS). The NGFS supports central banks, prudential supervisors, and policymakers to
                   take steps to green the financial sector. Its workplan includes micro prudential supervision, scenario analysis, monetary
                   policy, and other topics related to the greening of central bank activities, including portfolio management. Given that the
                   NGFS is currently the primary mechanism for international coordination on the topic, the RMA may seek membership of
                   the NGFS to benefit from its deep expertise and share best practices with other members.



106
                                                                                                                                   Bhutan’s Financial Sector: Issues and the Way Forward
                                                                                                                                                     Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Climate-related risks and supervisory practice

Conducting a climate-related or environmental risk assessment can help identify the main climate-related and envi-
ronmental financial risks and assess their potential impact on the Bhutanese financial sector. The insights gained from
this assessment can guide the development of a suitable approach to incorporate these risks into the RMA’s supervisory
practices, including internal organization and governance structure. Further, the RMA could provide supervisory guid-
ance to FIs on climate and environmental financial risks in important areas such as corporate governance, strategy, risk
management, scenario analysis and stress testing, and disclosure.158 Such assessments primarily focus on the financial
risks faced by institutions; they could begin with a high-level exposure analysis, progressing to more advanced scenario
analysis as capacity and data improve. Given Bhutan’s reliance on hydropower and low per capita Greenhouse Gas (GHG)
emissions, the assessment of transition risk may be relatively less important at present. However, the scope of assess-
ments can be expanded to include other environmental and social risks, including nature-related and biodiversity risks.

Greening central bank activities

Internationally, there is growing interest in greening the central bank’s activities and operations. Examples of greening
central bank operations include adopting sustainable and responsible investment practices in portfolio management,
disclosing climate-related information, and greening of monetary policies (e.g., through credit operations, collateral
policies and asset purchase). However, many of these options are still under review by the international central bank
community, including the NGFS. While some of these options may be of less immediate relevance to Bhutan and the
RMA, they could integrate climate-related considerations in the macroeconomic analysis and forecasting, which can
inform future monetary policy interventions. In addition, the RMA is considering direct green credit policy instruments
(for example, subsidized loan rates for priority sectors, interest rate discounts, differentiated reserve requirements).
Although this intervention is less tested, it could be effective in redirecting financing flows, provided it aligns with the
Central Bank’s mandate and does not compromise other financial stability objectives.

Transparency, disclosure, and reporting

Enhancing market transparency is crucial to ensuring the efficient allocation of capital for Bhutan’s climate and envi-
ronmental financing objectives. Investors and lenders need adequate information on climate-related and environmental
risks and opportunities to understand, price and manage the risk in their portfolios and operations. The RMA, Ministry
of Finance, and RSEB have launched several initiatives, including reporting and disclosure requirements for financial
institutions, and Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) reporting standards under the support of Global Reporting
Initiative (GRI), to align with international best practice. As a next step, the RMA and other stakeholders could develop a
plan to embed the national green taxonomy in relevant regulatory and policy frameworks, to mainstream green consid-
erations in the financial sector. This could include green bond guidelines or green finance-related reporting frameworks.

Greening financial institutions

The National Development Bank (NDB), or other domestic public financial institutions, can help address the financing
gap to achieve climate and environmental objectives. It is important to ensure that these institutions, including the BDB,
have the appropriate mandate and policy objectives to promote green lending and investment.159 NDBs generally have
a good understanding of local sectors, enabling them to target technical support and private investments effectively.
It is therefore worth considering if public banks such as the BDB can enhance private finance by offering de-risking
instruments like credit enhancements and guarantees. By explicitly incorporating environmental and climate objectives
into their mandates, these institutions can ensure that financing flows align with green objectives. In the case of BDB,
this would involve a specific reference to sustainable low-emissions agriculture in its mandate.




158	 The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has just published its “Principles for the Effective Management and Supervision of Climate-Related Financial Risks,” providing a
     global baseline standard.
159	 BDB is a DFI with a focus on rural financial inclusion. The Bhutan Development Finance Corporation was established in 2010 with the social mandate to cater to the financial
     needs of the micro, small and medium enterprises, with a special focus on agricultural development. Some of the challenges faced by the BDB includes high NPLs and funding
     costs.




                                                                                                                                                                                           107
      Bhutan’s Financial Sector: Issues and the Way Forward
      Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                   Green financial tools and instruments

                   New blended finance instruments could leverage public and concessional finance to mobilize private capital for green
                   investments. Mechanisms such as risk sharing instruments, guarantees, and funds that leverage philanthropic capital,
                   can help bridge the financing gap in Bhutan’s green development objectives. In cases where private investments are
                   not commercially viable, suitable financial structuring through blended finance can unlock private investment. This can
                   be made possible by addressing perceived or actual risks with new technologies or pioneering projects. By providing
                   flexible capital and favorable terms, blended finance, tailored to the local context, can mitigate risks and re-balance the
                   risk-reward profiles of impact investments, making them commercially viable over time.

                   Green bonds can mobilize long-term capital flows. Regulators and policymakers have several tools at their disposal to
                   promote the development of green bond markets and stimulate domestic bond issuance, some of which have already
                   been covered in the Green Finance Roadmap. The adoption or development of green bond guidelines and standards,
                   aligned with internationally recognized frameworks like the International Capital Market Association’s (ICMA) Green Bond
                   Principles, would ensure comparability on an international level. While green bonds may initially have higher transaction
                   costs due to compliance independent review and reporting requirements, fiscal incentives can help offset these costs
                   for first-time or small issuers, facilitating market entry. To lead by example and signal Bhutan’s commitment to meeting its
                   climate goals and green growth objectives, the Government could also consider issuing a green sovereign bond. This
                   can support the development of the local green finance market and diversify the investor base.

                   To scale-up private finance and develop green financial instruments, the authorities could develop a detailed plan for
                   the operationalization of its green finance objectives, which is outlined in the Green Finance Roadmap. To facilitate
                   this process, gaining more insights into the barriers that prevent the flow of financing to where it is needed, would be
                   beneficial in tailoring the instruments to the local context. Specific consideration should be given to mobilizing adaptation
                   financing, which can be particularly challenging.




108
                                                                                                                                    Reference List
                                                                                                               Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Reference List

AED (Agriculture Engineering Division). 2018. Irrigation Section Report. Department of Agriculture, Thimphu, Bhutan.

Alaref, J., Laurine, M., Viollaz, M, Alvin N., and Phillippe, L. forthcoming. “Bhutan Labor Market Assessment Report: Social Protec-
tion & Jobs Global Practice”. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Alvar Beltrán, J., Soldan, R., and Franceschini, L. 2022. “Climate Risk Assessment: Climate Impacts in Bhutan’s Agroecological
Zones and Opportunities for Climate Smart Agriculture Practices”. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.

Asher, S., Campion, A., Gollin, D., and Novosad, P. 2022. “The Long-Run Development Impacts of Agricultural Productivity Gains:
Evidence from Irrigation Canals in India”. Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, United Kingdom.

Benjamin, N.C., Devarajan, S., and Weiner, R. 1989. “The ‘Dutch’ Disease in a Developing Country: Oil Reserves in Cameroon”.
Journal of Development Economics, 30: 71-92.

Blakeslee, D., Dar, A., Fishman, R., Malik, S., Pellegrina, H.S., and Bagavathinathan, K.S. 2023. “Irrigation and the Spatial Pattern
of Structural Transformation in India”. Journal of Development Economics, 161 (102997).

Bravo-Ortega, C., and Eterovic, N. 2015. “A Historical Perspective of a Hundred Years of Industrialization: From Vertical to Hori-
zontal Policies in Chile”. Working Paper No. 399. Department of Economics, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Bustos, P., Caprettini, B., and Ponticelli, J. 2016. “Agricultural Productivity and Structural Transformation: Evidence from Brazil”.
American Economic Review, 106(6): 1320-65.

CPPS (Centre for Public Policy Studies). 2017. “CPPS Policy Factsheet: Oil and Gas”. London, United Kingdom.

Chang, H. J., and Lebdioui, A. 2020. “From Fiscal Stabilization to Economic Diversification: A Developmental Approach to
Managing Resource Revenues”. WIDER Working Paper 2020/108. United Nations University – World Institute for Development
Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), Helsinki, Finland.

Cherif, R., and Hasanov, F. 2019. “The Return of the Policy That Shall Not Be Named: Principles of Industrial Policy”. International
Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.

Cherif, R., Hasanov, F., Spatafora, N., Giri, R., Milkov, D., Quayyum, S., Salinas, G., and Warner, A.M. 2022. “Industrial Policy for
Growth and Diversification: A Conceptual Framework”. International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.

CIAT (International Center for Tropical Agriculture) and WB (World Bank). 2017. “Climate-Smart Agriculture in Bhutan”. CSA
Country Profiles for Asia Series. Washington, D.C.

Collier, P., Van Der Ploeg, R., Spence, M., and Venables, A.J. 2010. “Managing Resource Revenues in Developing Economies”.
IMF Staff Papers, 51(7): 84-118, International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.

Corden, W.M., and Neary, P.J. 1982. “Booming Sector and Deindustrialization in a Small Open Economy”. Economic Journal,
92: 825-48.

Dervis, K., De Melo, J., and Robinson, S. 1982. “General Equilibrium Models for Development Policy”. Cambridge University
Press. Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Di John, J. 2009. “From Windfall to Curse? Oil and Industrialization in Venezuela, 1920 to the Present”. Penn State University
Press, University Park, Pennsylvania.

Dizon, F., Imtiaz, S., and Yu, J. 2022. “Water Constraints to Agricultural Productivity in Bhutan”. Background Paper to the Bhutan
CEM. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Dizon, F., Jackson, C., Adubi, A., and Taffesse, S. 2019. “Bhutan Policy Note: Harnessing Spatial Opportunities in Agriculture for
Economic Transformation”. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Eckert, F., and Peters, M. 2022. “Spatial Structural Change”. Working Paper W30489. National Bureau of Economic Research,
Cambridge, Massachusetts.




                                                                                                                                                     109
      Reference List
      Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                   Fabregas, R., Kremer, M., and Schilbach, F. 2019. “Realizing the Potential of Digital Development: The Case of Agricultural
                   Advice”. Science. 366(6471), eaay3038.

                   Ferreira, G.F.C, Fuentes, P.A.G., and Ferreira, J.P.C. 2018. “The Successes and Shortcoming of Costa Rica Exports Diversification
                   Policies”. Background Paper to the UNCTAD-FAO Commodities and Development Report 2017. Food and Agriculture Organi-
                   zation, Rome, Italy.

                   Feuerbacher, A., Luckmann, J., Boysen, O., Zikeli, S., and Grethe, H. 2018. “Is Bhutan Destined for 100% Organic? Assessing the
                   Economy-Wide Effects of a Large-Scale Conversion Policy”. PLoS One. 2018 June 13;13(6).

                   Gelb, A., and Grasmann, S. 2009. “Déjouer la malédiction pétrolière”. Afrique Contemporaine, 229(1): 87-135.

                   Gelb, A., Tordo, S., and Halland, H. 2014. “Sovereign Wealth Funds and Domestic Investment in Resource-Rich Countries: Love
                   Me, or Love Me Not?” Economic Premise, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Network, World Bank, 133: 1-5.

                   Hannah, D., and Solomon, H. 2018. “Accounting for Unobservable Heterogeneity in Cross Section Using Spatial First Differences”.
                   NBER Working Papers 25177, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

                   Hartwick, J.M. 1977. “Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from Exhaustible Resources”. American Economic
                   Review, 66: 972-74.

                   IMF (International Monetary Fund). 2015. “Malaysia: Selected Issues”. Selected Issues Paper on Malaysia, January 30, Interna-
                   tional Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.

                   IMF (International Monetary Fund). 2022. “Industrial Policy for Growth and Diversification: A Conceptual Framework”. African
                   Department and Institute for Capacity Development, International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.

                   IMF (International Monetary Fund). 2023. “Dutch Disease: Wealth Managed Unwisely”. Back to Basics Compilation, International
                   Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.

                   IFPRI (International Food Policy Research Institute). 2010. “Technology Adoption, Agricultural Productivity, and Road Infrastructure
                   in Bhutan”. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.

                   Jones, M., Kondylis, F., Loeser, J., and Magruder, J. 2023. “Factor Market Failures and the Adoption of Irrigation in Rwanda”.
                   American Economic Review, 112(7): 2316:52.

                   Kassam, A.H. 1977. “Net Biomass Production and Yield of Crops”. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.

                   Kassam, A.H., van Velhuitzen, H., Fischer, G., and Shah, M.M. 1991. “Agroecological Land Resources Assessment for Agricultural
                   Development Planning”. World Soil Resources Reports, 71 (1-8), Food and Agriculture Organization and International Institute
                   for Applied Systems Analysis, Rome, Italy.

                   Kojo, N. 2005. “Bhutan: Power Exports and Dutch Disease”. The Centre for Bhutan Studies, Thimphu, Bhutan.

                   KPMG (Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler) and ADB (Asian Development Bank). 2021. “Credit Risk and NPL Management for Bhutan.
                   NPL Management Strategy Report”. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/project-documents/51252/51252-004-tacr-en_2.pdf

                   KPMG (Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler) and ADB (Asian Development Bank).. 2021. “Credit Risk and NPL Manage-
                   ment for Bhutan. NPL Management Strategy Report”. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/project-docu-
                   ments/51252/51252-004-tacr-en_2.pdf

                   Kuensel. 2023. “Migration of Bhutanese”. Kuensel, Thimphu, Bhutan.

                   Lebdioui, A. 2019. “Economic Diversification and Development in Resource-Dependent Economies: Lessons from Chile and
                   Malaysia”. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

                   Lebdioui, A. 2022. “Inequality and Trade Diversification: How Can Income Inequality in Latin America be Reduced Beyond
                   Commodity Booms?” Canning House, London School of Economics, London, United Kingdom.

                   Lebdioui, A., Addison, T., Bilek, P., and Azman, M. 2023. CEM Background Paper. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

                   Lian, W, Liu, F., Svirydzenka, K., Zhang, B. 2021. “A Diversification Strategy for South Asia”. International Monetary Fund, Wash-
                   ington, D.C.

                   Malavasi, E.O., and Kellenberg, J., 2002. “Program of Payments for Ecological Services in Costa Rica”. In Building Assets for
                   People and Nature: International Expert Meeting on Forest Landscape Restoration, 27: 1-7. Heredia, Costa Rica.

                   McDonald, S. 2022. “STAGE: A Standard Applied General Equilibrium Model: Technical Documentation”.

                   McIntyre, A., Li, M.X., Wang, K., and Yun, H. 2018. “Economic Benefits of Export Diversification in Small States”. IMF Working
                   Paper WP/18/86, International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.




110
                                                                                                                                Reference List
                                                                                                           Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




(MoAF) Ministry of Agriculture and Forests. 2017. “Agriculture Land Development Guideline (ALDG) – 2017”. Thimphu, Bhutan.

Morita. 2021. “Past Growth in Agricultural Productivity in South Asia.” Water Productivity and Food Security - Global Trends and
Regional Patterns, pp. 137–156.

Moscona, J. 2018. “Agricultural Development and Structural Change Within and Across Countries.” Mimeo, Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, Massachusetts.

Mukherjee, H., Singh, J.S., Chung, R.M.F., and Marimuthu, T. 2011. “Affirmative Action Policies in Malaysian Higher Education”.
Draft report submitted to the World Bank, Washington, D.C.

NSSC (National Soil Services Center) and MoAF (Ministry of Agriculture and Forests). 2011. “Land Cover Mapping Project 2010”.
Thimphu, Bhutan.

Norbu. 2017. “Diagnosing the Dutch Disease: Are the Symptoms Present in Bhutan?” Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MRPA)
Paper No. 93249. Munich, Germany.

RMA (Royal Monetary Authority). 2019. “Financial Inclusion National Action Plan (FINAP), 2019-2023”. Royal Monetary Authority,
Thimphu, Bhutan.

RMA (Royal Monetary Authority). 2021a. Annual Supervision Report 2021. Royal Monetary Authority, Thimphu, Bhutan.

RMA (Royal Monetary Authority). 2021b. “Druk Nguldrel-Lamtoen 2030”. Royal Monetary Authority, Thimphu, Bhutan.

Rodríguez-Clare, A. 2001. “Costa Rica’s Development Strategy Based on Human Capital and Technology: How it Got There, the
Impact of Intel, and Lessons for Other Countries”. Journal of Human Development, 2(2): 311-24.

Ruiz-Dana, A. 2007. “Commodity Revenue Management: The Case of Chile’s Copper Boom”. International Institute for Sustain-
able Development, Winnipeg, Canada.

Shutes, L., Feuerbacher, A., and McDonald, S. 2022. CEM Background Paper. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Solimano, A., and Calderon Guajardo, D. 2017. “The Copper Sector, Fiscal Rules, and Stabilization Funds in Chile: Scope and
Limits”. WIDER Working Paper 2017/53. United Nations University – World Institute for Development Economics Research
(UNU-WIDER), Helsinki, Finland.

UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). 2022. “Towards a Smooth Transition Strategy for Bhutan”.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva, Switzerland.

WB (World Bank) and ADB (Asian Development Bank). 2021. “Climate Risk Country Profile: Bhutan (2021)”. World Bank, Wash-
ington, D.C.

WB (World Bank). 2006. “The Impact of Intel in Costa Rica: Nine Years After the Investment”. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

WB (World Bank). 2013. “Malaysia Economic Monitor: Harnessing Natural Resources”. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

WB (World Bank). 2017. “Increasing Agribusiness Growth in Bhutan”. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

WB (World Bank). 2019. “World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains”. World
Bank, Washington, D.C.

World Bank. 2020. “Human Capital Index Report.” Human Capital Project, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

WB (World Bank). 2020. “World Development Report: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains”. World Bank,
Washington, D.C.

WB (World Bank). 2021. “Program Document: Sustainable Hydropower Development Project”. Project ID: P174327, World Bank,
Washington, D.C.

WB (World Bank). 2021. “The Dos and Don’ts of Special Economic Zones”. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

WB (World Bank). 2022. “Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, and Nepal: How Can Economic Zones Contribute to the 200 Million Job
Challenge”. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

WB (World Bank). 2023a. “Global Economic Prospects, January 2023”. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

WB (World Bank). 2023b. “Bhutan Public Expenditure Review”. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Yeoh, T. 2008. “Promoting Revenue Transparency in Malaysia”. Centre for Public Policy Studies, London, United Kingdom.




                                                                                                                                                 111
                              Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                                                                   Annexes
  © Ipek Morel/Shutterstock




112
                                                                                                                                                                 Reference List
                                                                                                                                            Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Annex 1: Growth accounting of
the hydro and non-hydro sectors



Growth accounting using two sectors
                                                                            ​
                                                                            Yt​
The economy consists of two sectors, hydro and non-hydro. Aggregate output (​  ) during period ������ is the sum of the two
                                                                               ​
sectoral outputs (as in national accounts):

                                                                        Yt​
                                                                        ​   = ​
                                                                           ​  YH  ,  t ​
                                                                                ​      + ​
                                                                                         YN  ,t​
                                                                                           ​

                            ​
                             ​
                             YH​
                                 ,  t ​                             (function of capital and productivity)​
                                       : Output of the hydro sector ​

                     ​
                     YN  ,t​
                       ​                                       (​
                            : Output of the non − hydro sector ​                                             )​
                                                                 function of labor, capital, and productivity​  ​


Decomposing hydro sector growth
                     gY
                     ​
Hydro output growth (​   ,H,t​
                       ​     ) is decomposed into two components:

                                                          ​
                                                          gY​
                                                              ,H,t​  (1 + ​
                                                                   = ​    gA  ,H,t​
                                                                            ​     )​(1 + ​
                                                                                         gK​     )​
                                                                                             ,H,t​  − 1​

                                                        ​
                                                        gA  ,H,t​
                                                          ​      : growth of hydro sector TFP​

                                       gK
                                       ​   ,H,t​
                                         ​      : growth of capital stock used in hydro production​


Decomposing non-hydro sector growth
                         ​
                         gY
Non-hydro output growth (​   ,N,t​
                           ​     ) is decomposed into four components:

                                         ​
                                         gY  ,N,t​
                                           ​        (1 + ​
                                                  = ​    gA​     )​
                                                             ,N,t​  ​[​
                                                                     ​ (1 + ​
                                                                            gs​  )​
                                                                               ,t​ (1 + ​
                                                                                        gL​   )​
                                                                                            ,t​ ]​
                                                                                                   ​
                                                                                                    ​(1 + ​
                                                                                                     ​    gK​     )​
                                                                                                              ,N,t​     − 1 ​
                                                                                                                       ​
                                                                                                 β                  1−β



gA
​   ,N,t​
  ​      : growth of non − hydro sector TFP​
gs
​  ,t​
  ​   : growth of human capital​
gL
​   ,t​
  ​    : growth of labor stock​
gK
​ ​      : growth of capital stock used in non − hydro production ​
    ,N,t​
​                                            (​
β : labor intensity of production technology ​              )​
                                              time invariant​


Decomposing Labor Growth
              gL
              ​
Labor growth (​   ,t​
                ​   ) can be further decomposed into three components:

                                                           gL
                                                           ​   ,t​
                                                             ​      (1 + ​
                                                                  = ​    gω​   )​
                                                                             ,t​ (1 + ​
                                                                                      gρ​   )​
                                                                                          ,t​ (1 + ​
                                                                                                   gP​   )​
                                                                                                       ,t​  ​

gω
​   ,t​
  ​    : growth in working age population ratio​
​
gρ  ,t​
  ​    : growth in labor force participation rate​
gP
​ ​    : growth in population ​
    ,t​
                                                                                                               ​
                                                                                                               gY
Substituting the labor growth equation into the non-hydro sector growth equation, the non-hydro sector growth (​ ​     ​)
                                                                                                                   ,N,t​
becomes:
                                                                                                                β
                            gY
                            ​   ,N,t​
                              ​        (1 + ​
                                     = ​    gA​     )​
                                                ,N,t​   ​
                                                       ​[​(​
                                                           1 + ​
                                                               gs   )​
                                                                 ​
                                                                  ,t​ (1 + ​
                                                                           gω  ,t​
                                                                             ​   )​(1 + ​
                                                                                        gρ​   )​
                                                                                            ,t​ (1 + ​
                                                                                                     gP  ,t​
                                                                                                       ​   )​]​
                                                                                                               ​ ​(1 + ​
                                                                                                                  ​    gK​     )​
                                                                                                                           ,N,t​    ​
                                                                                                                                     − 1​
                                                                                                                                 1−β



gA
​ ​      : growth of non − hydro sector TFP​
    ,N,t​
gs
​  ,t​
  ​   : growth of human capital​




                                                                                                                                                                                  113
      Reference List
      Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                   gω
                   ​   ,t​
                     ​    : growth of working age population​
                   gρ
                   ​   ,t​
                     ​    : growth of labor force participation rate​
                   ​
                   gP  ,t​
                     ​    : growth of population ​
                   gK
                   ​ ​      : growth of capital stock used in non − hydro production​
                       ,N,t​


                   Hydro Spillovers
                   Capital expenditure in the hydro sector (investment) generates income in non-hydro sector, for example, through supply
                   of goods (e.g., construction materials) and services (e.g., labor used in construction).
                                                                                                        ~
                   In the absence of hydro investment (​ IH
                                                         ​  ,t​
                                                          ​   ), non-hydro output in period t equals to ​
                                                                                                         
                                                                                                        Y ​
                                                                                                           
                                                                                                          N,t
                                                                                                             ​:
                                                                                                             ​
                                                                             ~
                                                                             ​
                                                                             Y ​
                                                                                
                                                                               N,t
                                                                                   = ​
                                                                                  ​  YN  ,  t ​
                                                                                       ​      − ​​
                                                                                                   ,t​
                                                                                                IH

                   Recover the hydro spillover to non-hydro growth using the above expression:
                                                                                  ~         ~
                                                                                   
                                                                                  ​  
                                                                                  Y ​    ​
                                                                                          − ​
                                                                                            ​
                                                                                            Y 
                                                                                              ​
                                                                                                  ​      ​
                                                                                                         IH
                                                                                                            ,t+1​
                                                                                                          ​        IH
                                                                                                                 − ​​
                                                                                                                      ,t​
                                                                        ​
                                                                        gY​
                                                                            ,N,t​  _
                                                                                 = ​
                                                                                    N,t+1
                                                                                     ​        _
                                                                                              N,t
                                                                                     Y​  ​  
                                                                                            
                                                                                           ​
                                                                                            
                                                                                         N,t
                                                                                                ​
                                                                                            + ​ Y​   
                                                                                                    ​  
                                                                                                      ​
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                N,t


                   Where the first part represents the core non-hydro growth, and the second part represents the spillover effect.




114
                                                                                                                                                                                            Reference List
                                                                                                                                                                  Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




Annex 2: Detailed CGE scenario results


Basic Income Grant (BIG)                                                                         Figure 118: Value and composition of
                                                                                                 government transfers to households including
In Scenario 4 (hydro-led with fiscal transfers), revenues are                                    BIG, 2019-2030
channelled into (untargeted) fiscal transfers in the form of a                                             25000

BIG to households. In this model, growth is driven through
private spending. The BIG is assumed to be untargeted                                                      20000
and unweighted, such that all people receive the same per
capita transfer. The BIG changes both the size (transfers                                                      15000
increase from 4,735 million Nu in 2019 to 24,542 million Nu                                    Nu (millions)
in 2030) and distribution of government transfers to house-                                                    10000
holds (Figure 118). While agricultural households accounted
for 27 percent of total government transfers in 2019, their
                                                                                                               5000
share increases to 51 percent in 2030 under the BIG,
reflecting the large transfers to agricultural households
                                                                                                                   0
under the BIG scenario due to their share in the population                                                            2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030

(Figure 119).                                                                                                                    Urban           Rural          Agricultural
                                                                                                 Source: CGE model.




Figure 119: Impact of the BIG on household income by source, 2030
               8000
               7000

               6000
               5000
               4000
Nu, millions




               3000
               2000
               1000

                  0
               -1000

           -2000
                       Urban       Urban        Urban        Urban       Urban        Rural                 Rural       Rural             Rural       Rural      Non-Poor       Poor
                       Skilled   Semi-Skilled Low-Skilled   Unskilled Other Income   Skilled             Semi-Skilled Low-Skilled        Unskilled Other Income Agricultural Agricultural

                                                        Labour       Government transfers                      Capital        Land        Total di erence
Source: CGE model. Note: The graph shows the difference in average household income by source between 2020 and 2030 (S4_HydroLed_BIG minus the reference
scenario).




                                                                                                                                                                                                             115
      Reference List
      Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




      Overview of the economic development under the different scenarios

      Tabla 7: Economic development in different scenarios, 2030

                                                                            s2_HydroLed Reference Scenario    S1_NoAddHydro   S3_HydroLed_Div   S4_HydroLed_BIG

                                                                       annual compound              Values     Annual compound growth 2019-2030. Shading shows
                                                                       growth 2019-2030           2019-2030       percentage change compared to S2_Hydroled

       cGDP                                  GDP                             4.1%                                 3.4%              4.5%              4.0%
                            Macro




       cABSORP                               Domestic absorption            2.6%                                  3.3%              3.3%              2.3%

       cVAAgr                                Agriculture                     1.1%                                 1.9%              1.7%              1.9%

       cVANat                                Natural resources               1.4%                                 2.5%              2.4%              2.3%

       cVAFd                                 Food and beverages             0.8%                                  1.4%              1.3%              1.4%

       cVAInd                                Industry                        2.7%                                 4.1%              3.6%              3.6%

       cVAUti                                Utilities                      11.0%                                 5.0%              11.3%             11.1%
                            Value added




       cVACon                                Construction                   3.8%                                  3.8%              4.6%              3.7%

       cVASer                                Services                       3.0%                                  3.6%              3.2%              2.1%

       cEMPAgr                               Agriculture                    2.5%                                  2.6%              3.2%              2.6%

       cEMPNat                               Natural resources              -0.8%                                 1.3%              1.1%              1.6%

       cEMPFd                                Food and beverages             2.3%                                  1.9%              2.8%              2.0%

       cEMPInd                               Industry                       0.8%                                  2.5%              2.5%              2.5%

       cEMPUti                               Utilities                       7.6%                                 2.6%              8.3%              8.4%
                            Labour demand




       cEMPCon                               Construction                   2.4%                                  2.9%              4.0%              3.6%

       cEMPSer                               Services                       2.0%                                  2.3%              2.1%              1.0%

       cCAPAgr                               Agriculture                    -1.8%                                 -1.6%             -1.6%             -1.7%

       cCAPNat                               Natural resources               1.5%                                 1.7%              2.2%              1.6%

       cCAPFd                                Food and beverages              1.2%                                 1.4%              1.9%              1.3%

       cCAPInd                               Industry                        1.8%                                 2.1%              2.5%              1.9%

       cCAPUti                               Utilities                       7.8%                                 1.7%              8.0%              7.9%

       cCAPCon                               Construction                    1.3%                                 1.5%              2.0%              1.4%

       cCAPSer                               Services                        1.8%                                 2.1%              2.4%              1.9%
                            Capital demand




       cCAPHydro                             Hydro                           7.8%                                 1.7%              8.0%              7.9%

       cCAPNonHydro                          Non-hydro                       1.4%                                 1.7%              2.1%              1.5%

       cLABAgri                              Agriculture                    2.6%                                  2.6%              3.3%              2.6%

       cLABUnLow                             Unskilled & low-skilled        2.3%                                  2.3%              2.9%              2.3%

       cLABSemi                              Semi-skilled                   2.5%                                  2.5%              3.2%              2.5%

       cLABHigh                              Highly-skilled                 2.6%                                  2.6%              3.2%              2.6%
                            Factor supply




       cCAP                                  Capital                         3.1%                                 1.7%              3.6%              3.2%

       cLAND                                 Land                           0.9%                                  0.9%              0.9%              0.9%



116
                                                                                                                                                                      Reference List
                                                                                                                                               Bhutan Country Economic Memorandum




                                                                                         s2_HydroLed Reference Scenario     S1_NoAddHydro   S3_HydroLed_Div     S4_HydroLed_BIG

                                                                                  annual compound                 Values     Annual compound growth 2019-2030. Shading shows
                                                                                  growth 2019-2030              2019-2030       percentage change compared to S2_Hydroled

 cWFAgri                                         Agriculture                             -1.0%                                  -0.3%             -1.1%               -0.4%

 cWFUnLow                                        Unskilled & low-skilled                  1.1%                                  1.0%              0.6%                0.3%

 cWFSemi                                         Semi-skilled                            0.9%                                   1.0%              0.2%                -0.2%

 cWFHigh                                         Highly-skilled                          1.3%                                   1.1%              0.4%                 0.1%
                         Factor returns




 cWFCAP                                          Capital                                 1.8%                                   1.9%              1.9%                2.0%

 cWFLAND                                         Land                                   -0.03%                                  0.6%              0.3%                0.4%

 cHEXPUrban                                      Urban                                    0.1%                                  4.0%              2.5%                 0.1%

 cHEXPRural                                      Rural                                   2.5%                                   3.5%              3.2%                2.9%

 cHEXPUnLow                                      Unskilled & low-skilled                 2.6%                                   3.2%              3.1%                3.2%
                         Household consumption




 cHEXPSemi                                       Semi-skilled                            2.5%                                   3.9%              3.3%                2.5%

 cHEXPSkilled                                    Highly-skilled                          2.2%                                   4.5%              3.5%                1.8%

 cHEXPPoorAgri                                   Poor agricultural                       1.5%                                   2.0%              1.9%                6.7%

 CHEXPNonPoorAgri                                Non-poor agricultural                   1.6%                                   2.4%              2.2%                3.4%

 cElecGen                                        Electricity output                      7.5%                                   1.4%              7.7%                7.6%

 cElecPrice                                      Electricity price                       4.7%                                   3.9%              4.7%                4.6%
                         Electricity




 cElecExp                                        Electricity exports                     8.2%                                   1.7%              8.3%                8.3%

 cElecDom                                        Electricity domestic sales              4.0%                                   -0.2%             4.2%                4.0%

 cHydroRev                                       Hydro revenue                           6.6%                                   3.9%              7.1%                6.8%
                         Govt




 cGovCons                                        Government consumption                   5.1%                                  3.5%              4.0%                0.6%



                        Key:                     < -50%                              -10% to -50%         Up to -10%          Up to 10%        10% to 50%             >50%

                                                 Percentage change relative to S2_HydroLed reference scenario


Example: Annual compound growth in GDP is 0.4 percentage points higher in S3 than the reference scenario (4.5 percent vs. 4.1 percent). The annual compound growth rate is between
10 percent and 50 percent higher in S3 than the reference scenario as indicated by the shading.




                                                                                                                                                                                       117
© KeongDaGreat/Shutterstock