E3042 v55 Chiperere Teachers’ House. SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING FORM Areas of Impact Impact Evaluation Potential Mitigation Measures Is this sub-project site/activity within and/or Extent or coverage Significance (Low, will it affect the following environmentally (on site, within 3- Medium, High) sensitive areas? 5km or beyond 5km) 1.0 No Y On Wit Beyond Low Med High es Site hin 5 km ium 3-5 km 1.1 National parks and game √   Reserve 1.2 Wet-lands √ 1.3 Productive traditional √ agricultural /grazing lands 1.4 Areas with rare or √ endangered flora or fauna 1.5 Areas with outstanding √ Scenery/tourist site 1.6 Within steep √ slopes/mountains 1.7 Dry tropical forest s such √ as Brachsystegia species 1,8 Along lakes, along √ beaches, riverine 1.9 Near industrial activities √ 1.10 Near human settlements √ √ √ Areas of Impact Impact Evaluation Potential Mitigation Measures 1.11 Near cultural heritage √ sites 1.12 Within prime ground √ water recharge area - - 1.13 Within prime surface run √ off 1.14 Will the sub-project use inter national water sources? √ 2.0 Screening Criteria for Impacts during implementation and Operation Will the implementation and operation of the sub- project within the selected site generate the following externalities/ costs/impacts? Areas of Impact No Yes O With Beyon Low Mediu High n in 3- d 5 km m Si 5 km te 2.1 Deforestation √ √ √ Replant with trees. 2.2 Soil erosion and siltation √ √ Fill pit 2.3 Siltation of watercourses, √ Dams 2.4 Environmental degradation √ arising from mining of Areas of Impact Impact Evaluation Potential Mitigation Measures construction materials 2.5 Damage of wildlife species √ and habitat 2.6 Increased exposure to √ agro-chemical pollutants 2.7 Hazardous wastes, √ Asbestos, PCB's, pollution from unspent PV batteries 2.8 Nuisance - smell or noise √ 2.9 Reduced water quality √ 2.10 Increase in costs of water √ Treatment 2.11 Soil contamination √ 2.12 Loss of soil fertility √ 2.13 Salinization or √ alkalinisation of soils 2.14 Reduced flow and √ availability of water 2.15 Long term depletion of √ water resource 2.16 Incidence of flooding √ 2.17 Changes in migration √ patterns of animals 2.18 Introduce alien plants and √ Areas of Impact Impact Evaluation Potential Mitigation Measures Animals 2.19 Increase the use of √ pesticides and fertilizers 2.20 Increased incidence of √ plant and animal diseases 3.0 Screening Criteria for Social and Economic Impacts Will the implementation and operation of the sub- project activities within the selected site generate the following socio-economic costs/impacts? No Yes O Within Beyon Low Mediu High n 3-5 d 5km m km S i t e 3.1 Loss of land/land √ acquisition for human settlement, farming, grazing 3.2 Loss of assets, property, √ houses, Agricultural produce etc 3.3 Loss of livelihood √ 3.4 Require a RAP or ARAP √ Areas of Impact Impact Evaluation Potential Mitigation Measures 3.5 Loss of cultural sites, √ graveyards, monuments 1/ 3.6 Disruption of social fabric √ 3.7 Interference in marriages √ for local people by workers 3.8 Spread of STIs and HIV √ and AIDS, due to migrant workers 3.9 Increased incidence of √ communicable diseases 3.10 Health hazards to workers √ and communities 3.11 Changes in human √ settlement patterns 3.12 Conflicts over use of √ natural resources e.g. water, land, etc 3.13 Conflicts on land √ ownership 3.14 Disruption of important √ pathways, roads 3.15 Increased population influx √ 3.16 Loss of cultural identity √ 3.17 Loss of income generating √ Areas of Impact Impact Evaluation Potential Mitigation Measures capacity 4.0 Consultation ( comments The LDF program is good and there is need for its Issue taken up from Beneficiaries) extension REPORTING FORMAT ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS REPORT LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FUND (LDF) DISTRICT……………CHIRADZULU…………………………………………………… PROJECT NAME……CHIPERERE TEACHERS’ HOUSE………………………………… REPORTING OFFICER…Y.MAKWINJA…………………………………………………… DATE………………………18/06/2012.…………………………………………………… SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PLAN AND REPORTING ID PROJECT EXPECTED PROPOSED MITIGATIONS/ OUTPUT TARGET ACHIEVEM REMARKS NO ACTIVITY IMPACTS MITIGATION ACTIVITIES INDICATORS ENT 1.0 Intensive use of Loss of soil Promotion of manure making and No of pits, Area N/A agro-chemicals e.g. fertility utilisation applied to fertilizer, herbicides, manure pesticides Water pollution/ Sensitisation of farmers on No of N/A Reduced water disposal of empty containers sensitisation quality meetings 2.0 Implementation of Soil erosion, Conduct ridge alignment, Establish Area realigned, N/A the Irrigation siltation vetiver hedge row , de-silting of Length of hedge scheme water channels row established Conflicts over use Trainings in Irrigation agronomy ( No of training N/A of water water mgt, irrigation scheduling, sessions, No of Crop mgt) Trainings in conflict farmers trained management Spread of HIV Conduct awareness meetings on No of N/A and AIDS, STDs dangers of contracting HIV and awareness AIDS, STDs meetings conducted Loss of land for Establishment of pastures No. of pastures N/A grazing established Conflicts over Public awareness campaigns on No. of N/A land use and land ownership awareness ownership meetings 3.0 Brick moulding Soil erosion Fill up borrow pits. Area affected. 200 sq Pits filled &burning. metres 200sq metres 4.0 Deforestation Planting of trees 1500 trees 1500 trees 5.0 6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Project Potential/Expec Cause of Impact Proposed Mitigation Activities Output Target Responsible Timeframe Budget Activity ted Impact Control/ Indicator Persons/ estimate Mitigation Institutions Measures Building a Soil erosion. -molding of bricks. Rehabilitate - fill up borrow pits and No. of pits 1 pit Communities/ Teachers’ borrow pits. revegetate area. covered PMC House. . Deforestation Burning of bricks Afforestration . -Number of 2000 Communities/ Nov-Jan -Establish nurseries tree grown PMC .. -Revegetate affected -Number of 1500 areas trees planted.