PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF KERALA INDIA RP74 KERALA STATE TRANSPORT PROJECT The Highways Component RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN OCTOBER 2001 Louis Berger International, Inc. In joint venture with: I.Sheladia Associates Consulting Engineering Services (I) Ltd. Intercontinental Consultants & Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. FIllE COPY Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan The Highways Component TABLE OF CONTENTS 0.1 Table of Contents 0.2 List of Tables v 0.3 - List of Annexes vii 0.4 Acronyms x 1.0 Project Description 1.1 Project Purpose 1-1 1.2 Project Objective and the RAP 1-1 1.3 Project Description 1-1 1.3.1 The Kerala Roadside 1-1 1.4.2 Proiect Location 1-2 1.3.3 The Maintenance Component 1-2 1.3.4 Indigenous People's Development Plan 1-2 1.3.5 Selection of Project Roads 1-2 1.4 Definitions 1-4 1.4.1 Right of Way versus Available Corridor Width (Corridor of Impact) 1-4 1.4.2 Family 1-4 1.4.3 Urban versus Rural Areas 1-5 1.4.4 Cut-off Date An R 1-5 1.5 Methodology 1-5 1.6 Impact Minimising Efforts and Bypasses 1-5 1.7 Vulnerable Groups 1-6 1.8 Resettlement Policy 1-6 1.9 The Participatory Process 1-6 1.10 Land Acquisition And Resettlement 1-6 1.10.1 Land Requirement 1-6 |1.10.2 Project Affected Persons (PAP) 1-7 1.10.3 Project affected Families (PAF) 1-7 1.10.4 Project Displaced Persons (PDP) 1-7 .10.5_ Project Displaced Families (PF) 1-7 1.10.6 ResetementSites 1-7 1.11 Income Restoration 1-7 1.12 Commnon Propertv Resources 1-8 1.13 The KSTP and HIV/AIDS 1-8 1.14 Road Safety and Parking of Vehicles 1-8 1.15 Institutional Arrangements and Project Implementation 1-8 1.16 Consolidated Budget 1-9 1.17 Grievance Redress 1-9 1.18 Monitoring and Evaluation 1-9 1.19 Public Disclosure of the RAP 1-9 2.0 METHODOLOGY 2.1 Introduction 2-1 2.2 The Verification Exercise 2-1 2.3 Surveys 2-1 2.3.1 Reconnaissance Level Screening 2-1 2.3.2 Census 2-2 2.3.3 Socio-Economic Baseline Survey 2-3 2.3.4 Data Computerisation and Analysis 2-3 2.3.5 Data Updating 2-3 2.4 Consultation Methods 2-3 2.5 Strip Maps and Land Schedules 2-3 2.6 Limitations 2-4 Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan The Highways Comnponent 3.0 MINIMISING NEGATIVE SOCIAL IMPACTS 3.1 Introduction 3-1 3.2 Options Considered for Minimising Negative Social Impacts 3-1 3.2.1 Design Considerations 3-1 3.2.2 Public Consultations 3-3 3.2.3 Aggrieved People's Representations 3-3 3.2.4 Analysis of Alternative and Bypass . 3-4 3.3 Results of Minimising Negative Impacts 3-4 3.3.1 The Boundary Wall as an Agent of Minimising Impacts 3-5 3.4 Minimising Resettlement 3-6 4.0 SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF THE PROJECT AREA 4.1 Introduction 4-1 4.2 Geography 4-1 4.3 Demographic Features: Distribution, Density and Growth 4-1 4.4 Occupation Paterns 4-3 4.5 Literacy and Education 4-4 4.6 Urbanisation Trend 4-4 4.7 Social Organisation 4-5 4.8 Socio-Economic Profile 4-5 4.8.1 Economy 4-5 4.8.1.1 Agriculture 4-5 4.8.1.2 Fisheries 4-6 4.8.1.3 Forestry 4-6 4.8.1.4 Industry 4-6 4.8.1.5 Minerals 4-6 4.8.1.6 Tourism 4-6 4.8.2 Migration/Emigration as a Dominant Component of the Economy 4-6 4.8.2.1 The Gulf Emigrants in Kerala's Economy 4-7 4.8.3 Public Services and Socio-Economic Conditions 4-8 4.8.3.1 Health Care 4-8 4.9 Findings of the Census and Socio-Economic Survey Results 4-9 4.9.1 Demographic Profile: Affected Population 4-9 4.9.1.1 Population Distribution by Ae and Sex 4-10 4.9.2 Family Economy / Resource Base 4-10 4.9.2.1 Occupation Pattern 4-11 4.9.2.2 Emigration/Migration of Earning Members 4-11 4.9.3 Literacy and Education Status 4-12 4.9.4 Socio-Economic Profile of the Project Roads 4-12 4.9.4.1 Social Group Indicators 4-13 4.9.4.2 Domestic Water Supply 4-13 4.9.4.3 Structures with Electricity Connection 4-14 4.9.4.4 Construction Material of Structures 4-14 5.0 Poverty Analysis 5.1 State Income (Net State Domestic Product) 5-1 5.2 Economic Development versus Social Development 5-1 5.3 Poverty Level 5-1 5.4 Poverty Line 5-2 5.4 Likely Impact of the Project on Poverty Reduction 5-5 5.4.1 People's Perception on the Impact on Poverty Reduction 5-6 6.0 The Highway Improvement and the Impacts of STDIHIVIAIDS 6.1 Introduction 6-1 6.2 HIV/AIDS in India 6-1 6.3 The Kerala Scene 6-1 6.4 Action Plan: What Needs to be Done 6-3 Louis Berger Tnternational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT - ii - Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan The Highways Component 7.0 The Vulnerable Groups 7.1 Introduction 7-1 7.2 'Below Poverty Line" (BPL) 7-1 7.3 Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes 7-1 7.3.1 The Tribal Peoples 7-1 7.4 Women Headed Families 7-2 7.5 Social Characteristics of the Vulnerable Groups On The Project 7-3 Roads 7.6 Squatters 7-4 7.6.1 The Status of Encroachers and Squatters within the Public ROW 7-5 7,6.2 The Laws on Encroachers and Squatters 7-5 7.6.2.1 Indian Laws 7-5 7.6.2.2 State Law 7-6 7.6.3 Mitigating the Squatters and Vulnerable Encroachers 7-7 7.7 Mitigating Other Vulnerable Groups 7-7 8.0 Road Safety Issues 8.1 Introduction 8-1 8.2 Analysis of Accident Data 8-2 8.3 Design Parameters for the Road Safety Improvements 8-3 8.4 Behaviour Pattern Associated with Driving 8-4 8.5 Action Plan to Address the Problems of Road Safety 8-5 8.5.1 The Government of Kerala 8-5 8.5.2 The PWD 8-5 8.5.3 Driver Education 8-7 8.5.4 The Police 8-7 8.5.5 The Transport Department 8-8 8.5.6 Traffic Courts 8-8 8.5.7 Highway Code Publication and Publicity 8-8 8.6 The Project Action Plan 8-9 9.0 RESETTLEMENT POLICIES AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK 9.1 Introduction 9-1 9.2 Policies and Legal Framework 9-1 9.2.1 The World Bank Policy 9-1 9.2.2 The Indian Legal Framework 9-1 9.3 The Resettlement Policy 9-2 9.3.1 Definitions 9-2 9.3.2 Entitlement Policies for Each Category of Impact 9-3 9.3.3 Method of Valuation of Losses 9-3 9.4 Measures to Avoid Litigation 9-3 9.5 Summary of the Entitlement Matrix 9-4 10.0 CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION 10.1 Introduction 10-1 10.2 Levels of Consultation 10-1 10.2.1 Scoping Workshops 10-1 10.2.2 Methodology for Selection of Locations for Scoping Workshops 10-1 10.2.3 Other Consultations 10-3 10.3 Key Findings of Local Level Consultations 10-3 10.4 Focus Group Discussion 10-3 10.5 Suggested Future Consultations 10-9 11.0 LAND ACQUISITION AND ASSETS AFFECTED 11.1 Introduction 11-1 11.2 Assets Affected 11-1 Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan The Highways Component 11.3 The Extent of Land Take 11_-2 11.3.1 PAFs Due to Land Take 11-2 11.3.2 PDFs Due to Land Take 11-3 11.3.3 Government Land 114 11.3.4 Borrow Areas 11-4 11.4 Loss of 'Other' Affected Private Assets 11-4 11.5 Loss of Common Property Resources 11-5 11.6 The Land Acquisition Process 11-6 11.6.1 Case Studies on Land Acquisition by the Kerala PWD 11-6 12.0 RESETTLEMENT SITES 12.1 Introduction 12-1 12.2 Lost Area of Displaced Families12-1 12.3 Eligible Families for Resettlement 12-2 13.0 INCOME RESTORATION 13.1 Introduction 13-1 13.2 Livelihood of the Affected Families 13-1 13.3 Activities Proposed by the PAPs 13-2 13.4 Families Eligible for Income Restoration 13-2 13.5 Available Government Schemes 13-3 13.6 Income Restoration Plan 13-3 14.0 ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE 14.1 Introduction 14-1 14.2 Staffing Requirement 14-1 14.2.1 Central Level Arrangement 14-1 14.2.2 District Level Arrangement 14-2 14.2.3 Project Level Arrangement 14-2 14.3 Training of PWD Officials and NGOs 14-3 14.4 Roles and Responsibilities of the R&R Cell Down the Line 14-5 15.0 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE 15-1 15.1 Introduction 15-1 15.2 The Implementation Procedure 15-1 15.3 The Basis of Implementation 15-1 15.4 General Activities 15-2 15.5 Land Acquisition 15-2 15.6 Resettlement 15-3 15.7 Rehabilitation 15-3 16.0 COSTS AND BUDGET 16-1 16.1 Introduction - 16-1 16.2 Methodology for the Valuation of Costs 16-1 16.2.1 Valuation of Land Cost 16-1 16.2.2 Valuation of Replacement Cost of Structures 16-2 16.2.3 Valuation of Replacement Cost of Other Assets 16-2 16.2.4 Valuation of Costs of Rehabilitation Assistance 16-2 16.3 Consolidated R & R Budget 16-3 16.4 Disbursement of Compensation and Assistance 16-4 17.0 GRIEVANCE REDRESS 17-1 17.1 Need for Grievance Redress 17-1 17.2 Grievance Redress Committee 17-1 17.3 Grievance Redress Mechanism 17-1 17.4 Response Time 17-2 17.5 Grievance Redress Monitoring 17-2 Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT iv - Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan The Highways Component 18.0 MONITORING EVALUATION AND REPORTING 18-1 18.1 Introduction 18-1 18.2 M&E Mechanisms & Reporting 18-1 18.3 Monitoring Project Input and Output Indicators 18-2 18.4 Monitoring Project Outcome /Impact Indicators 18-3 18.5 Extemal Monitoring and Evaluation 18-4 19.0 MISCELLANEOUS BENEFITS ENHANCEMENT 19.1 Roadside Facilities 19-1 19.2 Conservation and Enhancement of CPR 19-1 19.2.1 Cultural Properties Rehabilitation Policy 19-1 19.2.2 Types of Religious Properties Identified in the Project Location 19-2 19.2.3 Definitions of Cultural Properties 19-2 19.2.4 Impacts of the Project on the Cultural Properties 19-3 19.2.5 The project APPROACH TO mitigating Cultural Properties 19-3 19.2.6 Cultural Properties Rehabilitation Action Plan 19-4 19.3 Benefits Enhancement Activities Proposed by the PAPs 19-7 19.4 Road Safety 19-7 19.5 Construction Camp 19-7 19.5.1 Provisions Incorporated in the KSTP 19-8 19.5.2 Contract Obligations in the KSTP 19-8 19.6 Control of Child Labour 19-8 Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT - v - Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan The Highways Comnponent LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page No. 1.1 Phase I Priority Road Links 1-2 1.2 Phase II Priority Road Links 1-3 1.3 Names and Number of Towns and Districts in Phase I Roads 1-3 3.1 Effects of Minimising Negative Social Impacts Through Design Modifications 3-2 3.2 Project Affected and Displaced Families 3-5 3.3 Minimising Negative Social Impact 3-5 3.4 Affected Compound Walls 3-6 4.1 Kerala: Area, Population, And Density Per Sq Km By District - 1991 4-2 4.2 Gender and Sex Ration in the Project Affected Districts 4-2 4.3 Kerala's Favourable Development Indicators 4-3 4.4 Trend in Literacy - India and Kerala 44 4.5 Birth, Death And Infant Mortality Rates In Kerala 4-9 4.6 Project Road Links and Dates of Census Surveys 4-10 4.7 Affected Project Roads Population 4-10 4.8 Distribution Of Affected Population By Age And Sex 4-11 4.9 Monthly Average household Income and Number of Persons Earning an Income 4-12 4.10 Occupation Pattem on the Project Roads (%) 4-12 4.11 Migration Pattem 4-13 4.12 Literacy/ Education Level of the Affected People on the Project Roads 4-13 4.13 Social Group Particulars of the Project Affected Families 4-15 4.14 Residential Structures with Water Supply 4-15 4.15 Structure with Electricity Connection 4-16 4.16 Baseline Data on Construction Material 4.17 5.1 District-wise Per Capita Income Index (1980-81 prices) 5-2 5.2 Average Expenditure and Income of Project Affected Households 5-3 5.3 Number of Households Below Poverty Line 5-4 5.4 Poverty Indicators 5-4a 5.5 Residential Structures With Water Supply 5-5 5.6 Structures with Electricity Connection 5-5 6.1 Plan for Awareness Campaign and Prevention of HIV/AIDS in the KSTP 6-5 7.0 Affected Vulnerable Families (EPs) 7-2a 7.1 Women-headed Households 7-3 7.2 Disabled Person Headed Households 7-3 7.3 Properties Occupied by Squafters and Encroachers 7-5 7.4 Diseases on Project Roads 7-90 7.5 Women's Participation In household Activities 7-10 7.6 Women's Role In Domestic Decision-Making 7-10 8.1 Accident Rates, Kerala, 1995-2000 8-2 8.2 Motor Vehicle Accidents By Time Of Day During 1997-98 8-2 8.3 Proportion of Accidents By Vehicle Types 8-3 8.4 Safety measures in Road Design 8-4 9.1 Broad Entitlement Framework 9-5 10.1 Stakeholder Involvement In Social Assessment 10-2 10.2 Design Response to Stakeholder/ Community Concerns 10-4 10.3 Future Consultations and Continued Participation Mechanisms 10-9 11.1 Number of Assets Affected 11-1 11.2 Phase I Roads: Number of Displaced Families and Properties Final Estimates 11-2a 11.3 Phase I Roads: Displaced Families, Properties and Area Final Estimates 11-2b 11.4 The extent of Land Take 11-3 11.5 Land Requirement for Parking Areas 11-3 11.6 Number of properties Affected for Parking Areas 11-3 11.7 Link-wise Schedule for Land Acquisition for Parking AREAS 11-3a 11.8 Other Properties Affected 11-4 Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT - vi - Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan The Highways Component 11.9 Loss of Common Property Recourses 11-5 11.10 Action Plan for Land Acquisition in the Kerala State Transport Project (Phase I 11-7 Roads) 12.1 Project displaced Area (Ha) 12-1 12.2 Summary OF available Vacant Land 12-2 12.3 Eligible Families for Resettlement 12-3 13.1 Displaced Families losing livelihood 13-1 13.2 Displaced Squatters and Venerable Encroachers 13-la 13.3 Families Eligible / Individuals for Income Restoration Measures 13-3 13.4 Income Restoration Action plan for the Kerala State Transport Project (Phase 1 13-5 Roads) 14.1 Staffing Requirement 14-1 14.2 KSTP Training Programme on R& R and Environment 14-4 14.3 Roles and Responsibilities 14-4 15.1 RAP Implementation Schedule 15-la 16.1 Resettlement Action Plan Budget by Construction Contract Package 16-4a 18.1 Input and Output Indicators 18-2 18.2 Indicators for project outcome/impact Monitoring 18-5 19.1 Affected Religious Properties 19-2a 19.2 Strategy for Restoration, Relocation or Reconstruction of Cultural Properties 19-4 19.3 Link-wise-Action Plan for impact Mitigation of Cultural Properties 19-5 19.4 Expectation of Assistance of the PAPs 19-7a Louis Berger IntemationaliSheladia Associates/CES/ICT - vii - Kerala State Transport Project Resettlemnent Action Plan The Highways Component ANNEXES Annex 1.1 Names and Number of Villages and towns in Phase I Roads Annex 2 Survey Instruments Annex 2.1 Schedule for Census Survey Annex 2.2 Schedule for Baseline Sample Survey Annex 3 Minimising Impacts Annex 3.1 Engineering Design Guidelines for Minimising Social and Environmental Impacts Annex 3.2 Procedures Adopted for the Engineering Design Annex 3.3 Minimising Negative Social Impacts Annex 3.3.1 Efforts Made to Minimise the Negative Social Impacts with Regard tb Land, Buildings andPeople- Linke3Adur- Chengannur Annex 3.3.2 Efforts Made to Minimise the Negative Social Impacts with Regard to Land, Buildings and People - Link 6 Muvattupuzha - Angamai Annex 3.3.3 Efforts Made to Minimise the Negative Social Impacts with Regard to Land, Buildings and People - Link 40 Thrissur - Kuttipuram Annex 3.3.4 Efforts Made to Minimise the Negative Social Impacts with Regard to Land, Buildings and People - Link 70 Muvattupuzha - Thodupuzha Annex 9.1 Rehabilitation & Resettlement: Principles and Policy Framework Annex 10 Public Consultations Annex 10.1 Minutes of the Scoping Workshops Annex 10.1.1 Scoping Workshop -1 Thiruvananthapuram, 18'h January, 2000 Annex 10.1.2 Scoping Workshop - 2 Ernakulam, 25 January, 2000 Annex 10.1.3 Scoping Workshop - 3 Kozhikode, 2' February, 2000 Annex 10.2 Summary of Consultations with Local Informed People and Issues Raised by Them Annex 10.3 Focus Group Discussions with Local Residents Annex 10.3.1 Link 1, SH-1, Taikkod - Kottarakkara Annex 10.3.2 Link 26 Idukki- Puliyanmala Annex 10.3.3 Link 6 Muvattupuzha - Angamali Annex 10.3.4 Link 84.5-7 Ponkunnam - Thodupuzha Annex 11.1 Contract Package-wise Width of the Corridor of Impact and Land Acquisition Requirement Annex 11.1(1.1) Width of the Corridor of Impact, Contract 1 - Link 1 - Taikkod- Kottarakkara Annex 11 .1(1.2) Width of the Corridor of Impact, Contract 1 - Link 2 - Kottarakkara- Adur Annex 11.1(1.3) Width of the Corridor of Impact, Contract I - Link 3 - Adur - Chengannur Annex 11.1(1.4) Width of the Corridor of Impact, Contract 1 - Link 72 - Taikkod - Kazhakuttam Annex 11 .1(1.5) Width of the Corridor of Impact, Contract 1 - Link 73 - Changanaserry - Alappuzha Annex 11.1 (2.1) Width of the Corridor of Impact, Contract 2 - Link 6 - Muvattupuzha - Angamali Annex 11.1(2.4) Width of the Corridor of Impact, Contract 2 - Link 70 - Muvattupuzha - Thodupuzha Annex 11 .1(3.1) Width of the Corridor of Impact, Contract 3 - Link 40 - Thrissur - Kuttipuram Annex 11.1(3.2) Width of the Corridor of Impact, Contract 3-Link 50.1- Palakkad-Shornur Annex 11.2 Schedules of Project Affected Families Annex 11.2.1 Project Affected Families - Residential Properties Link 1 Taikod - Kottarakkara Link 2 Kottarakkara - Adur Link 3 Adur - Chengannur Link 6 Muvattupuzha - Angamali Link 40 - Thrissur - Kuttipuram Link 50.1 Palakkad - Shomur Link 70: Muvattupuzha - Thodupuzha Link 72: Taikkod - Kazhakuttam Link 73: Changanaserry-Alappuzha Louis Berger InternationaUSheladia Associates/CES/ICT - viii - Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan The Highways Component Annex 11.2.2 Project Affected Families - Commercial Properties Link 1 Taikod - Kottarakkara Link 2 Kottarakkara - Adur Link 3 Adur - Chengannur Link 6 Muva.tupuzha - Angamali Link 40 - Thrissur - Kuttipuram Link 50.1 Palakkad - Shornur Link 70: Muvattupuzha - Thodupuzha Link 72: Taikkod - Kazhakuttam Link 73: Changanaserry-Alappuzha Annex 11.2.3 Project Affected Families - Residential-Commercial Mixed Properties Link 1 Taikod - Kottarakkara Link 2 Kottarakkara - Adur , Link 3 Adur - Chengannur Link 6 Muvattupuzha - Angamali Link 40 - Thrissur - Kuttipuram Link 50.1 Palakkad - Shomur Link 70: Muvattupuzha - Thodupuzha Link 72: Taikkod - Kazhakuttam Link 73: Changanaserry-AJappuzha Annex 11.2.4 Project Affected Families - Agricultural Properties Link 1 Taikod - Kottarakkara Link 2 Kottarakkara - Adur Link 3 Adur - Chengannur Link 6 Muvattupuzha - Angamali Link 40 - Thrissur - Kuttipuram Link 50.1 Palakkad - Shornur Link 70: Muvattupuzha - Thodupuzha Link 72: Taikkod - Kazhakuttam Link 73: Changanaserry-Alappuzha Annex 11.2.5 Project Affected families -"Other" Properties Link 1 Taikod - Kottarakkara Link 2 Kottarakkara - Adur Link 3 Adur - Chengannur Link 6 Muvattupuzha - Angamali Link 40 - Thrissur - Kuftipuram Link 50.1 Palakkad - Shornur Link 70: Muvattupuzha - Thodupuzha Link 72: Taikkod - Kazhakuttam Link 73: Changanassery-Alappuzha Annex 11.2.6 Project Affected Government Used Properties Link 1 Taikod - Kottarakkara --Link 2-Kottarakkara--Adur -- Link 3 Adur - Chengannur Link 6 Muvattupuzha - Angamaii Link 40 - Thrissur - Kuttipuram Linka50.1 Palakkad -sShornur Link 70: Muvattupuzha - Thodupuzha Link 72: Taikkod - Kazhakuttam Link 73:, Changanaserry-Alappuzha Annex 11.3 Schedules of Project Displaced Families Annex 11.3 (1) Project Displaced Families - Residential Properties .. Link 1 Taikod - Kottarakkara Link 2 Koftarakkara - Adur Link 3 Adur - Chengannur Link 6 Muvattupuzha - Angamali Link 40 - Thrissur - Kuttipuram Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT -ix - Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan The Highways Cormponent Link 50.1 Palakkad - Shomur Link 70: Muvattupuzha - Thodupuzha Link 72: Taikkod - Kazhakuttam Annex 11.3 (2) Project Displaced Families - Commercial Properties Link 1 Taikod - Kottarakkara Link 2 Kottarakkara - Adur Link 3 Adur - Chengannur Link 6 Muvattupuzha - Angamalii Link 40 - Thrissur - Kuttipuram Link 50.1 Palakkad - Shornur Link 70: Muvattupuzha - Thodupuzha Link 72: Taikkod - Kazhakuttam A Link 73: Changanaserry-Alappuzhaoe Annex 11.3 (3) Project Displaced Families - Agricultural Propersies Link 1 Taikod - Kottarakkara Link 2 Kottarakkara - Adur Link 3 Adur - Chengannur Link 70: Muvattupuzha - Thodupuzha Link 72: Taikkod - Kazhakuttam Annex 11.4 The Land Acquisition Process Annex 11.5 Requisition to Competent Authority for Land Acquisition Anex 12.1 identified Vacant Private Land Along the Project Roads Annex 12.2 Eligible Families for Residential Plots Link 1 Taikod - Kottarakkara Link 2 Kottarakkara - Adur Link 3 Adur - Chengannur Link 6 Muvattupuzha - Angamali Link 40 - Thrissur - Kuttipuram Link 50.1 Palakkad - Shomur Link 70: Muvattupuzha - Thodupuzha | A Link 72: Taikkod - Kazhakuttam rAnnex 12.3 Eligible Families for Commercial Plots [ 0 t ~~Link 1 Taikod - Kottarakkara [ T ~~~Link 2 Kottarakkara - Adur Link 3 Adur - Chengannur Link 6 Muvamtupuzha - aoS amaci Link 40 - Thrissur- Kuttipuram Link 50.1 Palakkad - Shomur Link 70: Muvattupuzha - Thodupuzha Link 72: Taikkod - Kazhakuttam Link 73: Changanaserry-Alappuzha Annex 14 Implementation Schedule Annex 14.t Suggested List of NGOs Annex 14.2 NGO Profile Annex 14.3 Terms of Reference - NGO Consultancy to Assist with the Implementation of Resettlement Action Plan Annex 14.4 Identity Card for the Project Affected Persons Annex 14.5 (1) Letter on Invitation for NGO Consultancy Annex 14.5 (2) Press Release Inviting NGO Expression of Interest Annex 18 Formats Monitoring and Evaluation Reporting (seven formats) Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan The Highways Component Acronyms AIDS Acquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome BOQ Bill of Quantity BPL Below Poverty Line COI Corridor of Impact CPR Common Property Resources CSW Commercial Sex Worker EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan EP Entitled Person ESC Environmental and Social Cell ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan HIV Human Immuno-deficiency Virus IAS Indian Administration Service IPDP Indigenous People's Development Plan IRC Indian Road Congress IRDP Integrated Rural Development Programme KSACS Kerala State AIDS Constrol Society KSTP Kerala State Transport Project Lin.M. Linear Metre NGO Non-Government Organisation NTH Non-title holder OD Operational Directive OP Operational Policy PIU Project Implementation Unit PSH Partnership in Sexual Health PWD Public Works Department R&R Resettlement and Rehabilitation RAP Resettlement Action Plan ROW Right of Way SC Scheduled Caste Sqm. Square metre ST Scheduled Tribe STD Sexually Transmitted Diseases TH Title holder UNDB United Nations Development Business WB World Bank Louis Berger InternationalVSheladia Associates/CES/ICT - xi - 75 0 7680 N INDI m2010 0 20 40 60 80 100km _-2 PILAI1 BENGAL WA~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- id I TSR 0 11' * 1 vP VADANAP ALiXR 10* N'OCH RNAA/ 10r ALAP LEGEND 9 State boundary - 9. 0 Dlstrtct boundary 0 Project Priorty Road Kw State Capitol District Headquarters * Link Number m (Source:-WATER ATLAS OF KERALA, 1995) TRV HA PROJECT ROADS IN RELATION TO ADMINISTRATIVE OMSIONS OF KERALA 75 761 ° 771 0 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 1 The Highways Conponent Project Description Chapter 1 Project Description 1.1 Project Purpose The purpose of the Kerala State Transport Project is to improve the performance of the State's road transport network by upgrading the road conditions and capacity, together with development of the in-house capabilities of the Kerala State Public Works Department (PWD) to plan, develop and maintain the road networl 1.2 Project Objective and the RAP The objective of the project is to maximise the benefits to the road users arising from the road rehabilitation programme while minimising the negative social impacts by incorporating the social safety measures. More specifically, the social impact objective of the project is to ensure the improvement of the former living standards, income earning capacities and production levels of the project affected persons, or at least to help maintain their previous standards of living, as well as to reduce the high road accident rates in the State. The Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) is a report to address these issues. The RAP complies with the World Bank (Operational Directive 4.30: Involuntary Resettlement and Operational Directive 4.20: Indigenous Peoples) and the Government of Kerala R&R Principles and Policy Framework. 1.3 Project Description The Government of Kerala has requested loan assistance from the World Bank (WB or the Bank) for the Kerala State Transport Project. Along with the highways component, the project has a pilot waterways component. The Kerala State PWD is the executing agency for the project. The social impact issues of the waterways component has been separately dealt with. This infrastructure development is expected to encourage investment in the State's industrial development. A strategic option study (SOS) was conducted by Consultants in 1997; this SOS identified 2810 km of high priority roads for possible upgrading, covering all the districts of the State. While the preliminary social impact screening survey for the current project was in progress, approximately 333 km of State highways were re-classified as national highways and were deleted from the network, leaving approximately 2459 kIa for this-project. Subsequently, an additional 480 km of roads were included for the screening survey, raising the total length to approximately 3000 km. The Bank is considering the loan funding of improvement activities on approximately 575 km roads, which are divided into Phase I and Phase II. Phase I comprises approximately 257 km roads and Phase II 318 km. In addition, there is a road maintenance component for roads that are not part of the road upgrading programme. The total length of the maintenance roads is 1,010 km, to be implemented over a period of three years. The RAP addresses the Phase I roads and will be updated for the Phase II roads. 1.3.1 The Kerala Roadside An important characteristic of Kerala is that most of the roads are surrounded by heavily built up areas. The project affected population in Kerala is educated and generally of middle class base. Rapid urbanization through ribbon development has been a common feature here. The built up Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 1-I KERALA STATE TRAM1PORT OROJECT MDU PROJECT ROADS M. ~~~~~~~~N x~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~A 01 1E G& _A-t 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~3 LEGEND:- PHASE I ROADS PHASE 2 ROADS YEAR ONE MAINTENANCE YEAR TWO MAINTENANCE YEAR THREE MAINTENANCE …------ DELETED ROADS umE E NATIONAL HIGHWAYS OTHER ROADS DISTRICT BOUNDARY ~ ----- STATE BOUNDARY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TOURIST CENTRE t REUGIOUS CENTRE Phase One Phase Two Year One Year Two Year Thre P-1 -1127.1160 km, P-5- 98.780 kam Maintenance Maintenanice Maintenanceu P-3 - 51.500 km P-6 - 87.900 km 339.1 00 kmn 384.800 kmn 306.900k P-4 - 78.280 kM P-7 -131.300 km Totald-256.9401kn Total -317.960 km Total -339.1001km Total-364.8001km Total-306800 km LOUIS BERGER INTERNATIONAL Inc. IN ASSOCIATION WITH SHELADIA ASSOCIATES INTERCONTINENTAL CONSULTANTS & TECHNOCRATS Pvt. Ltd. CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES li) Ltd. Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 1 The Highways Component Project Description areas along the road links consist of expensive pucca, that is, permanent structures. This scenario presents a particular difficulty in upgrading and widening the roads and simultaneously minimizing the negative social impacts. In addition, the State itself being a narrow strip of land does not provide land beyond the existing narrow corridor of roads. In such a scenario, the road upgrading activities will cause people to lose productive land, house plots, buildings, wells, trees or other assets, or lose their income, thus giving rise to negative social impacts. The RAP addresses these issues to resettle and rehabilitate the affected families. 1.3.2 Project Location The project will be upgrading roads in 12 of the 14 districts of the State (Map 1.1). The Phase I roads of approximately 257 km length, are spread over the following 10 districts: I . Trivandrum 6. Idukki The remaining two districts are: 2. Kollam 7. Kottayam 1. Kasaragod 3. Pathanamthitta 8. Thrissur 4. Alappuzha 9. Palakkad 2. Kannur 5. Ernakulam 10. Malappuram which will be taken up in Phase II. The remaining districts of Kozhikode and Wayanad will have the benefit of maintenance works within the existing ROW under the same project, along with all other districts. 1.3.3 The Maintenance Component Road maintenance is the name given to that group of activities which are required to ensure that the roads provide the service to the road users in as near to their "as constructed" condition as possible and to preserve the fabric of the road as a major public asset. The social and environmental issues of the maintenance roads have been dealt with in the Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP). The ESMP is based on the September 2001 revised versions of the maintenance studies. It has been prepared to address all associated impacts and the consequent economic, environmental and social losses. 1.3.4 Indigenous People's Development Plan The KSTP road improvement and maintenance activities are limited to the existing roads. As no incursion is made into any new area, no area with defined indigenous populations has been affected. Therefore, a separate Indigenous People's Development Plan (IPDP), as mandated in the Bank's OD 4.20 has not been attempted. However, the social surveys identified one tribal family on Link 2 as a project affected family, conducting its livelihood in the road's ribbon development area along with other non-tribal families and it has been dealt with according to the project's R&R Policy. 1.3.5 Selection of Project Roads Nine road Links, 257 km in length, passing through 10 districts, make up the three Contract Packages in Phase I. These are presented in Table 1.1 and shown in Map 1.2. The individual road links are marked in square boxes in the map. The Package 2 roads links, as published in the UNDB (United Nations Development Business, a periodical) in November 2000, were subsequently deleted from the priority listing due to costs and less priorities. Therefore, the Phase I roads are comprised of the Packages 1, 3 and 4. Louis Berger InternationalUSheladia Associates/CESllCT Page Chapter 1-2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter I The Highways Component Project Description Table 1.1: Phase I Priority Road Links Sr. ILink Route Lengt Proposed No. No. Road Code _ L ength Carriageway ________I __________ IFrom To _________J W idth (in) Package_1: 1 1 SH-1 Taikkad - Kottarakara 46.000 10.0 2 2 SH-1 Kottarakaara- Adoor 20.850 7.0 3 3 SH-1I Adoor- Chenganoor 23.590 7.0 4 72 SH-1 -NH 47 Taikkod - Kazhakuttom 12.580 10.0 5 73 SH-11 Alappuzha - Chenganassery 24.140 7.0 Package 3: 6 6 SH-I Muvattupuzha-Angamali 33.800 J 10.0 7 70 SH-8 Muvattupuzha - Thodupuzha 17.700 | 7.0 Package 4: 8 40 SH-30 Thrissur - Kuttipuram 32.980 10.0 9 50.1 NP-301 Palakkad - Shomur 45.300 7.0 Total Length: 256.940 Based on the proposed carriageway width as shown in the table, the proposed corridor width varies from 12 to 15 metres and more depending on the topography of the land and the needs of the road design. The proposed corridor widths of the roads are shown at every 250 metres in the tables in Annex 11. 1. Link 26, Idukki-Puliyanmala, 33 km length, presently dropped from Package 3 of Phase I roads, has been retained as a buffer link for Phase II roads. The proposal for the buffer is that if the total project costs permit, only then this link would be included in the project scope. It has been postponed due to the statutory environmental clearance requirements, which take a long time to obtain, as the proposed bypass in this link (Kattapana Bypass) passes through ecologically sensitive areas. The proposed Phase II priority roads links in three contract packages are listed in the following table. Both the Phase I and Phase II roads have been finalised based on the Feasibility Study Report Recommendations and Conclusions of April 2000. The recommendations considered road inventory data, traffic surveys, the EIRR (Economic Internal Rate of Return), relative importance of the roads, environmental considerations and otherwise the social significance of the roads (such as, the Sabarimala Road, Link 84 in Phase II). Table 1.2: Phase II Priority Road Links t { ~~~~~~~~~Route Proposed Sr. Link No. Road Code Length Carriageway No. j_l _ l_ From To (km) Width (m) Package 5: _ 68 NK-3 Pilathara - Pasppinssery 21.000 7.0 2 69 NSH-18 Kasargode - Kanhangad 24.000 7.0 3 74 § SH-31 Thalassery - Valuvapara 53.780 7.0 Package 6: 4 4.1 SH- I Chenagannur - Kottayam 36.000 7.0 5 4.2 SH-1 Kottayam - Ettumanoor 11.000 7.0 6 5 SH-1 Ettumianoor - Muvattupuzha 40.900 7.0 Louis Berger IntemationallSheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 1-3 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter I The Highways Component Project Description Route Proposed Sr. Length Cargey Link No. Road Code Carnaged No. From To (kin) Width (m) Package 7: 7 84.1-84.4 SH-8 Punalur- Ponkunnam 81.000 7.0 8 84.5-84.7 SH-8 Ponkunnam - Thodupuzha 50.300 7.0 ____ :0 ;0:: ; 0: 0 t;: ;54 0f: :;Total Length: 317.980 The Phase I project roads pass through 74 villages and 12 towns of the 10 project districts. The following table shows the names of the towns and districts against the respective road links. The link-wise detAils of all the villages, with information of to and from chainage of the road link passing through a given village, has been presented in Annexe 1.1 Table 1.3: Names and Number of Towns and Districts in Phase I Roads Links Villages Number and Names of Towns Number and Names of Districts 1 12 0 2 Trivandrum, Kollam 2 6 1 Adoor 2 Kollarn, Pathanamthitta 3 6 2 Adoor, Chengannur 2 Pathanamthitta, Alappuzha 6 9 2 Muvattapuzha, Angamali I Ernakulam 40 13 1 Kunnamkulam 2 Thrissur, Kuttipuram 50.1 13 2 Palakkad, Shomur I Palakkad 70 5 2 Muvattupuzha, Thodupuzha 2 Ernakulam, Idukki 72 4 0 1 Trvandrum 73 6 2 Changanassery, Alappuzha 2 Kottayam, Alappuzha Total 74 12 1.4 Definitions 1.4.1 Right of Way versus Corridor of Impact The right of way (ROW) is public land under the control of the PWD and is usually defined as that area over which the public has unhindered access. The corridor of impact is a part of the right of way and sometimes is synonymous with the right of way. The corridor of impact (COI) is the width required for the actual construction of the road, including the new pavements, footpaths, shoulders, support slopes, embankments, drainage, and necessary safety zones. Within this corridor, there should be no structuTe or hindrance. The COI is, thus, the area that will be impacted by the proposed project. 1.4.2 Family The KSTP has adopted "famnily" as the unit for compensation entitlement purpose. In this sense, every "family" is an entitled person (EP). The R&R Principles and Policy document of the project (Annex 9) defines family in three ways for this purpose: a) A "Family" shall mean husband/wife and minor children. b) Every son or unmarried daughter who has attained the age of 18 years on or before the cut- off-date will be treated as separate family. c) Every divorced or widowed daughter living separately or with the family on or prior to cut off date will be treated as separate family. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 1-4 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 1 The Highways Component Project Description 1.4.3 Urban versus Rural Areas Following the Indian Government tradition of identifying an area as urban or rural, the social impact surveys also identified places as rural or urban. By "rural population" is generally meant the population living in villages. A village follows the limits of a revenue village, which is recognized by the district administration. In the context of Kerala a village has little resemblance to the characteristics of a village as generally understood. The villages here are very urbanized and they are not isolated patches of habitation. This situation has developed especially in the past twenty years, as a result of remittances from people from the State who emigrated to West Asia (also known as the Middle East) for livelihoods. As a result, the dividing line between urban and rural areas in Kerala, as it is understood in anthropological literature, is very thin. What is officially noted as an urban area (a town or a city) in the census is based on whether it has a municipality or corporation, and a rural area is always under a Panchayath' administration. 1.4.4 Cut-off Date The date of the social survey on a given road link is the cut off date for that link to determine the R&R assistance entitlement of the non-titleholders of property, who include tenants and squatters. 1.5 Methodology This Report is based on the reconnaissance level social impact surveys, detailed social impact surveys including the census of the project affected persons (PAP) and the sample socio-economic baseline surveys, the Social Impact Assessment Report, the Feasibility Study Report, and public consultations. All of the surveys referred to above relate to primary data. The primary data were collected with the help of structured questionnaires and complemented by consultations, both individual and group, with the PAPs and other stakeholders. These consultations have influenced the engineering design parameters to a large extent and have helped to minimise the negative social impacts. The social impact surveyors interviewed the members of all the properties (residential, commercial and agricultural) that were shown as affected in the preliminary engineering design. While every person in the commercial buildings were enlisted as a "family" as indicated in 1.4.2, the number of families in the residential buildings was derived based on their age and marital status for the purpose of entitlement. 1.6 Impact of Minimising Efforts and Bypasses Although private land acquisition has been unavoidable, a number of measures have been taken in the KSTP to minimise land take and the displacement of people. While preparing the project, emphasis was put on minimising the impacts within the limitations of technical feasibility and cost effectiveness. The options considered for minimising negative social impacts included design considerations, public consultations, aggrieved people's representations, and analysis of alternative and bypasses. Design considerations included footpaths over drains that helped minimise the negative social impact with regard to both land take and road safety. Two bypasses were proposed for the Phase I roads: one to bypass Perumbavoor town on the Link 6 and the other to bypass Kattapana town on the Link 26, and four bypasses in the Phase II roads to bypass the major towns on SH-1: Chengannur, Thiruvalla, Changanassery and Kottayam. Apanchayath is the lowest level of administration in India. It is an elected local self-goveming body, which actually means an association of five persons, usually village elders. Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 1-5 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter I The Highways Cornponent Project Description However, both the bypass proposals for the Phase I roads have been dropped. Perumbavoor Bypass due to pressure from the affected people, and Kattapana Bypass due to the statutory environmental clearance requirements as the proposed bypass passes through ecologically sensitive areas. 1.7 Vulnerable Groups The KSTP defines people as vulnerable if they are identified as eaming up to 25% above the officially recognised "below poverty line" (BPL). The BPL is determined by a survey conducted by the Rural Development Department of the respective State Governments, popularly known as the IRDP (Integrated Rural Development Programme) Survey. The BPL in Kerala currently stands at Rs. 19,000 per annum for a family of five members. Usually, the vulnerable groups may include but are not limited to the following categories of persons: (a) Poor or landless people falling under the "below poverty line" category; (b) Members of the Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST); (c) Women headed households (WH); (d) Orphans or destitute persons (socially handicapped); and (e) Disabled persons (physically or mentally handicapped). 1.8 Resettlement Policy Anticipating adverse impacts of the project on the people living and earning livelihoods along the project roads, the KSTP prepared a project specific R&R Principles and Policy Framework which was approved by the State Cabinet in August 2000. The Policy recognises three broad types of entitlement: entitlement for project affected families, entitlement for project affected persons, and entitlement for project affected groups. This document listed all the entitlement criteria for the potential project affected persons in different categories, such as agricultural, residential, commercial, encroachers and squatters, vulnerable groups such as SC, ST, below poverty line and women headed households. 1.9 The Participatory Process The KSTP has carried out consultations at all levels of the RAP preparation and all key stakeholders have been ensured to participate in the deliberations and fornulation of the R&R plans. The consultations started with the reconnaissance level surveys at an early stage of project preparation, followed by scoping workshops, organised focus group meetings, State level workshops, and follow on consultations. The views expressed by the people were recorded for incorporation into the R&R planning and developing socially responsible road design. 1.10 Land Acquisition And Resettlement The improvement proposed in this project is mainly along the existing roads and most of the works will be confined to the available corridor width. However, there are several areas where additional land will be required for widening and/or realigning a road. If the available corridor width does not accommodate the proposed corridor, land from private owners would be acquired. This information has been mapped in the link-wise detailed Strip Maps/Land Plans and recorded in the land schedules attached to the land maps. 1.10.1 Land Requirement The total land required for widening and upgrading the project roads, including providing parking areas, is 42.23 ha for the Phase I roads, of which private ownership is 41.01 ha. The remaining 1.22 ha is the Revenue Department land. No forestland has been identified. The estimated land take for the Phase II roads is 57.08 ha. The land schedules have been presented in this Report in their land use category-wise (residential, commercial, agricultural, etc.), in Annex 11.2, Schedules of Project Affected Families. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 1-6 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter I The Highways Cornponent Project Description 1.10.2 Project Affected Persons (PAP) The Phase I roads are estimated to affect 13.487 persons and the Phase II roads extrapolated from the Phase I roads, 14,301 persons. 1.10.3 Project Affected Families (PAF) The project affected families along the Phase I roads number 7,454, while that for the Phase II roads is estimated to be 7,865 as extrapolated from the Phase I roads. 1.10.4 Project Displaced Persons (PDP) The Phase I roads displace 1038 persons and the Phase II roads are estimated to displace approximately 1100 persons, as extrapolated from Phase I roads. 1.10.5 Project Displaced Families (PDF) The Phase I roads displace 859 families out of 7454 affected families, and the total area thus affected is 6.88 ha. The Phase II roads also are estimated to displace 859 families, as extrapolated from the Phase I roads. The following table summarises the estimated land take and affected/displaced persons and families according to the two phases: Table 1.4: Estimated Land Take and Affected Persons Length (km) Land Take (ha) PAP PAF PDP PDF Phase I Roads 257 42.23 13,487 7,454 1,038 859 Phase II Roads 318 57.08 14,301 7,865 1,100 859 Total 575 99.31 27,788 15,319 2,138 1,718 1.10.6 Resettlement Sites During the course of the social survey the project identified private plots of land in six of the nine Phase I roads, totalling approximately 6 ha, which appeared to be vacant land and the project will make efforts to procure these presently unused plots to resettle many of the residentially and commercially displaced families. 1.11 Income Restoration Commercial activity and employment in commercial enterprises are the main occupations in the COI of the project roads. People losing their commercial units as well as people losing their jobs who work therein are economically displaced persons and on par with persons or families displaced from their land. It is estimated that the KSTP will affect the livelihoods of 41 agricultural families, 609 commercial families (382 owners and 227 employees), 19 squatters and one vulnerable encroacher, in addition to displacing 189 residential PAF (181 titleholder and 8 tenants) Following the R&R Principles and Policy Framework, the KSTP provides for transitional assistance to commercial units for six months as income restoration measures. The employees will receive assistance equal to three month's lost income, the agricultural families will receive transitional assistance for six months and the squatters will receive transitional allowance for six months. In addition, the wage employees, agricultural families and the squatters are entitled to training for upgrading of skills. Other displaced families, such as the vulnerable groups, will receive additional support in the form of economic rehabilitation grant (currently decided to be Rs. 24,000) to enable them to stabilise their eaming capacity. The residential PDFs will also receive the transitional assistance for up to six months. Louis Berger IntemationallSheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 1-7 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter I The Highways Component Project Description 1.12 Common Property Resources The project has identified commnon property resources, such as schools, hospitals, roadside public wells, taps, trees and cultural properties such as temples, churches, mosques and shrines which have been affected by the project. The schools, hospitals and cultural properties are not strictly common properties as they are owned by their respective registered "Society" or "Trust", but are open to the public. The project will compensate their loss and has planned the benefit enhancement of the cultural properties. 1.12.1 Tree Plantation The project Environmental Management Plan has provision for tree planting and the project will rehabilitate the roadside public wells and taps in cooperation with the local, panchayaths and municipalities and the Kerala Water Authority. No additional land will be required for the tree plantation. 1.12.2 Cultural Properties The Project has identified 36 cultural properties which will be affected. In most cases their compound wall or land is affected. The only cultural properties which have to be relocated are the roadside hyundi or money collection boxes, which are encroachers on the public right of way. The Project has planned mitigating measures for these cultural properties and their costs have been included in the project's environmental costs. 1.13 The KSTP and HIV/AIDS Highways are inadvertently associated with HIV/AIDS due to the behaviour of long distance truckers and related reasons. The KSTP has addressed this issue in terms of awareness campaigns against this problem. 1.14 Road Safety and Parking of Vehicles Kerala occupies the dubious distinction of leading in the road related accidents in India, with 37,072 accidents and 2,711 deaths in 1999-2000. The mixture of buses, trucks, cars, motorized rickshaws, motorcycles and pedestrians travelling at vastly different speeds create extremely unsafe driving conditions. The project has a separate action plan and budget for addressing the road safety issues. Parking of vehicles, especially motorised rickshaws, jeeps, etc. in market places has been a big problem on the Kerala roads. By definition their operators have a right to be on the public right of way, but they only increase confusion in the already congested roads. While the design for road improvement has built in design for bus bays and taxi ands motorised rickshaw stands, the project has specifically earmarked 0.39 ha (part of the total land requirement of 42.23 ha) of land for the additional parking of the taxis and motorised rickshaws. - 1.15 Institutional Arrangements and Project Implementation The R&R and environmental personnel in the PIU of the PWD together constitute the Environmental and Social Cell (ESC). Presently all required personnel in the ESC of the PWD are in place. The process of selection of the NGOs is in progress. The implementation of the RAP consists of five major stages: A. Deployment and training of identified PWD staff and NGOs; B. Issuing of legal notification for land acquisition and the cut-off date; C. Verification of entitled persons (EP) and estimating their type and level of losses; D. Preparing a list of EPs for relocation; E. Relocation and rehabilitation of EPs. In addition, monitoring and evaluation will also form a part of the R&R implementation strategy. The PWD officials (including a senior level Land Acquisition Officer) at the PIU and district Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 1-8 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 1 The Highways Component Project Description levels will function in supervisory roles for the R&R activities. At the project roads level NGOs selected and recruited for the purpose will carry out the actual implementation. The need for training of the PWD officials responsible for R&R activities and the NGOs and the training contents have been addressed in Chapter 14 of the RAP. 1.16 Consolidated Budget The estimated budget for R&R, including land acquisition for both Phases I and II is INR 1,430.0 million. The Bank component in the R&R of the project is estimated to cost INR 660.0 million (approximately INR 330.0 million for each phase). More specifically, the estimated cost of R&R for the Phase I roads is INR 694.60 million, of which the PWD component is INR 381.0 million and the Bank component is INR 313.60. The following tables show the component-wise outline budget for the Phase I and Phase II roads in million Indian Rupees, Phase II extrapolated from Phase I data. Table 1.5: Costs and Budget of the KSTP R&R in Million INR, Phase I Items Package 1 Package 3 Package 4 Total PWD |_WB PWD_| WB PWD WB PWD WB Compensation 248.78 0 89.63 0 36.73 0 375.14 0 Assistance 3.56 189.61 1.37 68.14 0.43 44.24 5.36 301.99 Support 0 4.93 0 2.78 0 1.78 0 9.49 Other Activities 0.25 0.99 L 0.15 0.69 0.10 0.44 0.50 2.12 Total - 252.59 195.53 | 91.15 71.61 37.26 46.46 381.0 313.6 Table 1.6: Estimated Costs and Budget of the KSTP R&R in Million INR, Phase II Items Package 5 Package 6 Package 7 Total l____________ _ _PWDI WB PWD WB PWD WB PWD WB | Compensation 263.70 0 95.0 0 38.93 0 397.63 0 Assistance 3.77 200.98 1.45 72.22 0.45 46.89 5.67 320.09 Support 0 5.22 0 2.94 0 1.88 0 10.04 Other Activities 0.26 1.04 0.16 0.73 0.11 0.46 0.53 2.23 | Total 267.73 207.24 96.61 75.89 39.49 J 49.23 403.83 332.36 1.17 Grievance Redress The KSTP has provisions for redress of grievance of disputes arising out of land acquisition, compensation and assistance to the project affected and displaced persons, families and groups. The Grievance Redress Conmmittees are being formed at the District level in the 10 Phase I road districts, which are expected to resolve the grievances of the entitled persons within a stipulated time. 1.18 Monitoring And Evaluation Monitoring of the R&R activities will be done by the PIU of the PWD on regular basis. The Project has proposed to engage an extemal agency for annual, mid-term and end-term evaluation of the activities. The range of activities that will need to be monitored include * Land acquisition and transfer procedures; * Disbursement of compensation and assistance; * Construction of replacement buildings by the displaced families; * Rehabilitation of displaced families and business enterprises; * Rehabilitation of income levels. The monitoring indicators include both input/output indicators and outcome/impact indicators. The input/output indicators relate to the physical progress and the outcome/impact indicators relate Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 1-9 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter I The Highways Component Project Description to the qualitative progress of the project objectives as stated in the R&R policy. Formats for monitoring have been appended to the RAP as Annex 18. 1.19 Public Disclosure of the RAP The Kerala State has a very advanced public infornation system. With 90% people of the State literate, almost everybody reads a newspaper daily and therefore, information dissemination is relatively easy. A copy of the RAP will be kept at the District Information Office of each project affected district, where people have free access. Advertisements will be published in newspapers indicating its existence and asking interested people to refer to it. The Malayalam version of the Executive Summary of the RAP1 will be kept at affected village offices, in addition to the respective District Information Office. The RAP will also be available at the World Bank Infoshop at Washington, DC and New Delhi. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 1-10 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 2 The Highways Component Methodology Chapter 2 Methodology 2.1 Introduction This chapter describes the methodology adopted for the collection and analysis of data on social impacts and the plotting of strip maps. It also discusses the method involved for screening and identification of areas of concern and the reconmmended methodology for the preparation of the RAP. The basic objective of this exercise is to assess the socio-economic and cultural status of the project affected persons. The action plan is based on primary and secondary data and extensive consultation with the stakeholders. Two sets of questionnaires1 were prepared to collect the primary data: one for collecting informnation on the resource base of the affected population (a census of population and their assets inventory) and the other to develop the socio-economic database for monitoring and evaluation. These are appended to this Report as Annex 2. The consultations were organised to ensure participation of the stakeholders in the project preparation and to address the needs of different social groups. In surmmary, a social impact assessment was undertaken, followed by a census and socio-economic surveys of potentially affected persons. 2.2 The Verification Exercise The Kerala PWD undertook a joint verification with the State Revenue Department of the road links selected for the Project, to establish the legal boundaries of the right of way (ROW), identify current usage of the land in terms of squatters, land encroachments, fixed and moveable structures, trees and wells, etc. The information on the revenue survey numbers of the proposed affected farnilies was obtained from the affected persons, if available, and from the respective revenue local level offices. As the revenue litho maps available in the village offices are very big in size, they were conceptually drawn for the project to facilitate the verification exercise. 2.3 Surveys 2.3.1 Reconnaissance Level Screening The purpose of this survey was to assess the possible impact of the project on the people living and/or working along the study roads in terms of loss of shelter and livelihood. The survey also aimed at finding out the potential project affected persons' perception about the project and the initial reaction to the idea of relocation and resettlement. To facilitate the screening process, data were analysed both manually and through a computer model. The computer model generated an overview of the number of persons that would be affected, the extent of land take, and the cost of relocation and rebuilding of structures. The results of the surveys were incorporated into a series of computer models especially developed for the project. For each link the distance to the edge of the corridor, the distance to buildings and the distance between buildings parallel to the road were entered into a spreadsheet and the following were calculated: 'Annex 2. 1, Schedule for Census Survey of 100% Potential PAPs; and Annex 2.2, Schedule for Baseline Socio-Economic Survey. Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 2-1 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 2 The Highways Comrponent Methodology ! Width of corridor ! Distance between buildings across the corridor ! The proportion of road (percent) in four width categories: over 20 m, 12-20 m, 10-12 m, and under 10 m ! For each of four corridor widths selected by the user (currently set at 9.2, 12, 15 and 30 m representing a 30 foot corridor, a minimum corridor, a 15 m corridor to IRC standards and a dual carriageway respectively) the following were calculated: * Land required to be purchased in order to establish the corridor width * Cost of land required to be purchased * Number of buildings to be demolished * The value of the buildings to be acquired * The number of project affected persons (PAPs) * The number of PAPs per kilometre The reconnaissance level screening survey was supplemented by photographs and informal discussions with the potentially affected persons to provide an overview of the likely impact. A team of 12 surveyors collected this information, supervised by a senior professional. 2.3.2 Census The purpose of the household census survey was to gather quantitative information on the loss of land and other productive resources, loss of structures, loss of access to public services, loss of livelihood, loss of access to common property resources, etc. due to the project, for facilitating compensation, resettlement and rehabilitation. The data for the 100% detailed census survey were collected through the interview method with the help of a structured questionnaire. Based on the preliminary engineering design, property owners and otherwise users likely to be affected by the proposed corridor of impact (COD were included in the interviews to record who they were and to assess their likely loss. Each and every property (structure and land) coming within the COI was measured from the centreline of the road and along the road. A photograph was taken for every affected or a group of contiguous affected structures and all the project roads for improvement were videographed. The land parcels were identified by the name of the owners and the Revenue Department survey numbers, if available from the respective Village Offices, which maintain the local land records. The structures were identified by the names and addresses of the owners andlor users, and the people living therein as household members or working there for livelihoods were included in the census. Their social group information was recorded to facilitate privileged dispensation of compensation to the vulnerable groups, as outlined in the R&R policy document. Other demographic features included literacy level, occupation, income of the household members and skills possessed by them, if any. Tenants, encroachers and squatters within the COI were identified based on their statements. The assets inventory included, in addition to structures, agricultural/plantation land, trees (coconuts are the primary cash crop of the State), and private water source. The construction type, viz., pucca (concrete built) and kutcha (mud wall/thatched roof), wall construction material, roofing material and flooring material were also recorded. The structures were link-wise and left/right side-wise (in progressive chainage direction) serially numbered and within a given structure its multiple units were identified. The structures are further identifiable according to chainage. These numerical orders corresponded with those in the strip mapping exercise that was conducted at the same time. Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 2-2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 2 The Highways Component Methodology This Report deals with the Phase I roads only. The census for the Phase II roads have been completed and the Report will be updated to incorporate the Phase II roads. 2.3.3 Socio-Economic Baseline Survey The purpose of the baseline socio-economic survey was to gather qualitative information on the life style of the PAPs and various categories of losses and other adverse impacts likely to be suffered by them because of the project, such as disruption of social, cultural, religious, or economic activities. A sample of 25% of the households was surveyed for this purpose to facilitate monitoring, evaluation and implementation of the RAP. The households selected were from the socially and economnically poorer sections. The information generated through the socio-economic surveys related to the economic activities of the PAPs, household consumption/expenditure patterns, migration patterns, perception about the project, women's participation in domestic chores, women's role in household decision making, indebtedness, health status, utility connections at home, etc. 2.3.4 Data Computerisation and Analysis The interview schedules, completed every day of the surveys, were verified in the evenings. Once data collection was complete for a given link, they were entered into the computers in the project office using Microsoft Access data programming and processing software. 2.3.5 Data Updating The lists of affected persons and assets will be updated during the consultancy period as well as during the project implementation phase, if necessary, to fully reflect the persons and assets actually affected by road upgrading. 2.4 Consultation Methods The objective of the public consultations was to disseminate information about the project to the potentially affected population and to incorporate their views and suggestions in the preparation of the final engineering design and the RAP. While three State level workshops were held at three centres, each representing a geographical group of districts, to generate the people's and the civil society's ideas and opinions about the project, extensive consultations were also held at the project road level. In general, the social impact survey team members facilitated the public participation, which included members of the local community and the village/panchayath level officials. Public meetings were held with individuals or groups of individuals at a number of places on the project links. Generally, the meetings were held in an area where a high level of impacts was to be expected, such as a narrow section of corridor where a number of structures and/or livelihoods are likely to be affected. In addition, these consultations held at any given location were very important for focusing on public amenities like bus stops, access roads, etc. Different social and interest groups, such as people engaged in commercial activities, members of the Scheduled Castes and Other Backward Communities, selected on the basis of the socio- economic survey, were invited to focus group discussions. This exercise enabled the Consultants to prepare the RAP cogniscant of their needs. 2.5 Strip Maps and Land Schedules The strip maps represent the land plans as well as the details of the project roads. The strip maps were prepared by walking along the project roads at the same time as the census surveys. The Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 2-3 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 2 The Highways Comnponent Methodology basis of these maps is the preliminary engineering designs. The professional responsible for the strip maps marked every metre of land use on both sides of the road in the maps, which included the details of buildings, bus stops, water sources, water bodies, trees, place names and the administrative unit names. The details of buildings included such information as the use of the building - residential, conunercial, govemrnmental, religious, school, health care facility, etc.; number of floors; identification of properties other than buildings, etc. The maps were subsequently computerised in the project office and the data on land take based on the census, were entered into the maps and the affected areas to be acquired were measured and marked on the maps, to facilitate the setting out of land areas in the field. The ownership of the area between two properties parallel to the road is not clear. It is presumed that this patch of land is Government property. The strip maps/land plans are accompanied with the land schedules of the respective road links. The schedules contained the computer identification number of each property arranged according to progressive chainage and serial number according to the left and right sides, the use of the property, name of the owner/user, revenue survey number, name of the village and address of the property, the number of affected farmilies (entitled persons) in that property, the total property area and the affected property area, the total building area and the affected building area (if at all), and the vulnerability categories of the affected families. The total property area is inclusive of the building area. It is necessary to mention that the revenue maps were rarely available with the revenue offices and when they were, they were not of much help because they were all old and in one case (Link 70) last updated in 1920. Moreover, while the PCC design maps are of 1:2000 scale, the maps available with the revenue offices are of disproportionate scales. Therefore, conceptual replica of those maps was prepared. It should also be noted that the revenue offices have not, in many cases, updated the sub-divided revenue numbers (thandapar number) of a plot. The Consultants have recorded whatever little information has been available from the revenue offices and the proposed affected persons with regard to the collection of revenue numbers. 2.6 Limitations The limitation in this project has been defined by the fact that the project roadsides are heavily built up with large and permanent structures. Most buildings on the project roads were identified in congested market areas. With the highest population density in the country, social impact data collection along the project roads in the State proved to be a most time consuming exercise. Moreover, with a twenty-year old history of people migrating or emigrating from the State in search of livelihoods, many affected structures were found locked or otherwise inaccessible and neighbours could not provide any useful information regarding ownership. Locating the owners of the rubber plantations and other agricultural areas along the project roads proved to be a difficult proposition and sometimes an impossible exercise. In such cases, the land schedules marked the property owners as "not known". The NGOs, who would be recruited for the project implementation, will fill those data gaps. Last but not least, the affected people often gave apparently wrong information on their income and expenditure. In many cases people even refused to talk about their incomes. People were, otherwise, cooperative with the survey process, but the local small businesses, especially the eating places, believed the surveyors to be sales tax agents, sent by the State Revenue Department. In almost all cases the owners of the commercial establishments did not allow the recording of the names and other details of their employees, beyond mentioning their numbers. Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/icr Page Chapter 2-4 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 3 The Highways Component Mininiising Negative Social Impact Chapter 3 Minimising Negative Social Impact 3.1 Introduction The R&R component of the Project has been prepared according to the R&R Principles and Policy Framework (approved by the Kerala State Government in August 2000), adopted by the Kerala State Transport Project and the World Bank guidelines.' The Bank policy emphasises the need to avoid or minimise involuntary resettlement on development projects. The KSTP policy, also, acknowledges the importance of avoiding adverse socio-economic impacts in road design and construction. The success of a project depends to a large extent on the improvement that it brings about in the living standards of the people, both in the short and the long termn. While preparing the engineering design, the prime consideration has been to minimise the social negative inpacts within the limitations of technical requirements and cost effectiveness and to enhance the benefits. Despite the best efforts to minimise the negative social impact, however, land take and resettlement has been unavoidable. The project area on each Link was divided into three broad categories for the assessment of land take, which has implications upon costs and budgeting: * Congested market areas with dense placement of structures, including legal title holders of land plots and structures, and legal2 or illegal squatters; * Built up residential areas along the road where there is a requirement for acquisition of land from existing walls and parts of the compound and/or structures; * Roadside agricultural/plantation land. 3.2 Options Considered For Minimising Negative Social Impacts 3.2.1 Design Considerations According to the three broad categories mentioned above, a joint decision among the engineering, environmental and social impact teams was taken to avoid land take from religious structures, such as,-churches, mosques, temples, graves, sacred groves, etc., congested market areas (which would save both displacement and livelihoods as well as excessive costs), and avoid splitting agricultural fields as far as possible. A set of guidelines with social concern was prepared for the reference of the design engineers and is appended to this Report as Annex 3.1. Realignments have been proposed at a number of places on the majority of the road links, each length varying from 100 metres to 400 metres.3 The Environmental Impact Assessment has made a detailed analysis of each one of these realignments. It is mentioned here, however, that these proposed realignment sections pass through virgin agricultural or plantation lands, which the PWD OD 4.30/OP 4.12: Involuntary Resettlement. The World Bank, Washington, DC, 1990/1999. 2 Squatting is by definition illegal, but "legal" squanters are those who are authorized by the civic authorities, such as the municipality or the panchayath, to set up small businesses on small structures, usually measuring 4 squarc metres and raised on a platform, on public lands for a license fee. Locally calied bunk, these are usually wooden structures with tin roof. 3 Annex 1 identifies the realignrment sections in each project link, which are shaded. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 3-1 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 3 The Highways Component Miniuising Negative Social Impact needs to purchase from the owners. Depending on the topography of a given area, even for a road black top width of 7 metres, the average total required width for every 100 metres length could vary from a minimum of 15 metres to a maximum of 30 metres.4 In such cases, the efforts mentioned in Annex 3.1 do not apply. Realignment apart, the widening exercise has been strictly limited to the existing COI and where this has not been possible and compound walls and/or buildings have been affected, considerations were made on the number of affected compound walls andlor buildings on either side of the road in a given area. The side having the less number of affected properties was chosen for the widening side as a measure of minirnising impacts. This information is evident in the strip maps and the road design maps. The engineering design parameters for minimising the social impacts ,re contained in Annex 3.2. Kerala being a land-scarce State and the roads here being typically narrow, to upgrade the project roads to IRC (Indian Road Congress) recommended standards of 30m for four-laning would have affected a very large number of people and properties. Even a compromise corridor width of 23m would have affected a large number of people and properties. Although efforts have been made to confine the road improvements to the existing right of way, this has not always been possible because of the topography and curves. The project has generally considered a 12-15m COI for a 7-metre carriageway. The extent to which negative impacts have been minimised in project design is illustrated in the following table. The figures for the outcomes of a given link according to its finally considered design width are italicised in this table. A sample of the link-wise details indicating the number of affected people, buildings and the magnitude of land take at every km. interval for four different corridor widths that were considered as options is presented in Annex 3.3. Table 3.1: Effects of Minimising Negative Social Impacts Through Design Modifications Road Links 30m COI 15m COI 12m COI 1om COI Link 1: Taikkod - Kottarakara NumberofaffectedPAPs r 6571 3408 j 1405 ] 0 Number of structures affected 896 825 333 0 Magnitudeoflandtake(ha) 78.94 16.21 6.36 1 1.10 Link 2: Kottarakara - Adur Number of affected PAPs 1354 646 587 0 Number of structures affected 767 353 261 0 Magntude of land take (ha) 32.38 6.00 4.44 0 Link 3: Adur - Chengannur Nunber of affected PAPs 1502 709 455 0 Number of structures affected [ 1190 357 291 0 Magnitude of land take (ha) 35.73 4.24 1.49 0 Link 6: Muvattupuzha - Angamali Number of affected PAPs 5865 3703 351 0 Number of structures affected 1608 828 83 0 Magnitude of land take (ha) 52.49 2.06 1.35 0 Link 40: Thrissur - Kuttipuram Number of affected PAPs { 2105 1408 219 0 Number of structures affected 499 345 52 0 Magnitude of land take (ha) 51.62 2.17 0.75 0 4 Annex I describes the required area for the corridor of impact. Louis Berger IntemationallSheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 3-2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 3 The Highways Component Minimising Negative Social Impact Road Links 30m COI 15m COI 12m COI lom COI Link 50.1: Palakkad - Shornur Nunber of affected PAPs 3551 925 857 O Number of structures affected 842 372 315 0 Magnitude of land take (ha) 64.42 2.51 L1.10 0 Link 70: Muvattupuzha - Thodupuzha Number of affected PAPs 1955 1314 350 0 Number of structures affected 1364 324 L 65 0 Magnitude of land take (ha) 30.70 7.52 2.56 0 Link 72: Taikkod - Kazhakuttom (SH-1 - NH47 Link Road) Number of affected PAPs 2300 1129 38 0 Number of structures affected 217 64 9 0 Magnitude of land take (ha) 24.99 7.09 4.28 0 Link 73: Changanassery - Alappuzha Number of affected PAPs 1291 705 626 0 Number of structures affected 155 83 66 0 Magnitude of land take (ha) 36.04 3.36 0.15 0 This table is based on final engineering design. As the table illustrates, adopting a 30m road width parameter would have created a major R&R problem, considering the number of affected persons, number of affected structures and the magnitude of land take involved. A COI varying between 12m and 15m has moderately affected the R&R aspects of the project. In this way, the project has made a maximum effort to minimise negative social impacts. As a result of integrating social issues in project preparation, displacement and the need to resettle andlor rehabilitate affected households and persons has been considerably reduced. Additionally, during the verification of the strip maps against the road design maps, whenever it was found that the new road line was just touching by a compound wall or a building, or a compound wall or a building was affected only by half-a-metre to one metre area, the property was marked for saving in the contractor's maps. Approximately 0.05% properties have been thus additionally saved from being affected. 3.2.2 Public Consultations Public consultations, discussed in Chapter 10, created another avenue for minimising negative social impacts. The purpose of these consultations was to obtain the views and suggestions of the potentially affected persons on the road design and its potential impacts on the affected people. The affected persons were consulted as "focus groups", such as a group of affected residents, a group of affected agricultural families, and, a group of affected shop ownersltraders. These are also interest groups. These interest groups very often came up with alternative suggestions on the alignments. All attempts have been made to accommodate their views and suggestions within the technical feasibility. 3.2.3 Aggrieved People's Representations As the census and social impact surveys progressed and the project evolved, more and more potentially affected people and institutions (e.g., religious places, academic institutions, etc.) presented observations to the project office, both written and in person, requesting to spare their respective properties from the road requirements. Sometimes there has also been political pressure to save certain individual's properties. These requests have been accommodated as much as possible, compatible with the technical feasibility. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 3-3 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 3 The Highways Component Minimising Negative Social Impact 3.2.4 Analysis of Alternative and Bypass The guiding principle with regard to the congested areas has been to limit the road upgrading activities within the available corridor. Design of footpaths over drains also helped minimise the negative social impact with regard to both land take and road safety. Where rninimising the negative impacts have not been feasible, bypasses have been recommended. Originally, two bypasses were proposed for the Phase I roads: one to bypass Perumbavoor town and the other to bypass Kattapana town (both Package 3), and four bypasses in the Phase 11 roads to bypass the major towns on SH-1: Chengannur, Thiruvalla, Changanassery and Kottayam. The purpose of the bypasses is to increase better connectivity while minimising the negative social impacts, especially the displacerpent of the affected persons. To accommodate the bypasses, however, agricultural land has to be acquired. Designs were prepared for both the Perumbavoor Bypass and Kattapana Bypass for the Phase I roads and the local stakeholders had suggested alterations during the consultations. These had been considered while finalising the route. However, both the bypass proposals have been dropped from the Phase I roads: Perumbavoor Bypass due to pressure from the affected people, and Kattapana Bypass postponed to Phase II due to the statutory environmental clearance requirements as the proposed bypass passes through ecologically sensitive areas. It will be included if costs permit. 3.3 Results of Minimising Negative Impacts As a result of mainstreaming participation of beneficiaries and potentially affected persons and a socially responsive design process, the project incorporates measures that significantly avoid, reduce, or otherwise mitigate many adverse social impacts associated with highways improvements. Table 3.2 and 3.3 respectively show the number of project affected and displaced families and the results of rninimising negative social impacts. Table 3.2: Project Affected and Displaced Families Link Link Name Residential Comrnmercial Agricultural Other Total No. PAF PDF PAF PDF PAF PDF PAF PAF PDF 1 Taikkod - Kottarakara 430 41 1490 276 187 24 102 2209 341 2 Kottarakara - Adur 185 22 155 57 44 7 21 405 86 3 Adur - Chengannur 165 1 0 144 18 7 2 24 340 30 6 Muvattupuzha - Anganiali 596 6 968 60 14 0 45 1623 66 40 Thissur - Kuttipuram 375 6 209 16 23 0 14 621 22 50.1 Palakkad - Shomur 195 15 286 33 7 0 37 525 48 70 Muvattupuzha - Thodupuzha 330 53 277 87 151 2 8 766 142 72 SH-1 - NH-47 Link Road 367 36 347 76 128 6 25 867 118 73 Changanassery - Alappuzha 32 0 56 6 4 0 6 98 6 Total 2675 189 3932 629 565 41 282 7454 859 In this table "Commercial" includes both commercial and residential-cum-commercial structures. The category "Other" includes families that did not fall within the three well-defined classifications of residential, conmmercial and agricultural. This category includes families owning fallow or otherwise unused land, cultural or religious properties, schools and other educational institutions (non-govemment), etc. In the case of cultural properties it is only part of land or boundary wall and part of land that are affected although hyundis are fully affected (this is discussed in Chapter 19). In the case of educational or other institutions also, boundary wall or part of land or both have been affected. In the case of fallow or unused land, the degree of being affected has varied from a minimum of 2% of a given plot to fully affected. Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 3-4 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 3 The Highways Component Minimising Negative Social Impact Table 3.3 Minimising Negative Social Impact Road No. of PAP No. of PDP No. of Affec ed Buildings Links Residential Commercial ** Before* After# Before* After# Before* After# Before* After# Link 1 6571 3408 1146 383 601 254 1452 490 Link 2 1354 587 156 76 432 140 277 87 Link 3 1502 455 185 25 667 147 654 94 Link 6 5865 3703 1116 67 817 319 1001 432 Link 40 2105 1408 299 36 436 213 499 91 Link 50.1 3551 857 573 87 253 113 842 145 Link 70 1955 1314 270 149 392 159 467 124 Link 72 2300 1129 436 201 437 246 322 188 Link 73 1291 626 144 14 452 17 317 28 Total 26494 13487 4325 1-38 4487 1608 I831 1679 * Before integrating social aspects # After integrating social aspects ** Residential-cum-commercial structures are included in the conmmercial structure category Table 3.3 indicates that after integrating the social concerns there has been a considerable reduction in the negative social impacts. The impact on the total population has been reduced by approximately 50%. The number of project displaced persons has been reduced by approximately -76%. The impact on the buildings has been considerably reduced by approximately 64% and 71% for residential and comrnmercial, respectively. Agricultural land is not included in this comparison because the agricultural land was required and included as a result of the final engineering design. 3.3.1 The Boundary Wall as an Agent of Minimising Impacts Data obtained through the field surveys indicate that of the 3287 residential and commercial affected structures, 1437 or 44% comprise structures where only the boundary wall or the boundary wall and part of the compound have been affected. The number of affected boundary walls along the project road links is shown in Table 3.4. The existence of the boundary walls has actually saved a large number of affected families, total 2287, from being displaced. Table 3.4: Affected Boundary Walls Total Number of No. of Affected % of Affected # of Families Link No. Affected Res. & Structures with Structures with Saved from Comm. Structures Boundary Walls Boundary Wall Displacement Link I 744 215 29% 539 Link 2 227 129 57% 142 Link 3 241 164 68% 159 Link 6 751 308 41% 572 Link 40 304 170 56% 245 Link 50.1 258 118 46% 136 Link 70 283 118 42% 196 Link 72 434 185 43% 245 Link 73 45 30 67% 53 Total 3287 1437 44% 2287 Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 3-5 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 3 The Highways Component Minimising Negative Social Impact 3.4 Minimising Resettlement The number of affected persons and properties is unusually large in Kerala although, the magnitude of land take is not unusual given the total length of the Phase I roads. As discussed in Chapter 1, it is emphasised that the Kerala roads are different in terms of the settlement pattern along the roads. The relatively higher number of PAPs in Kerala is a result of the relative scarcity of land in the State, roads being typically narrow, extensive ribboTi development along the roads, and high population density (being the highest in the country). While the State average density of population was 749 per square kilometre in 19915, the districts of Thrivananthapuram, Alappuzha, Ernakulam and Kozhikode had population density in excess of 1000 persons per square kilometre. Much of the roadside land beyond the right of way is under private ownership. Exceptions occur when some land is under the Revenue Department, known as the Puramboku land. This necessitates affecting the large number of landowners for the improvement of the roads. Fortunately, the number of project displaced families is much smaller compared to those which are affected, approximately 11%. Therefore, the intensity of the resettlement activity in the project is relatively less. Another area of relief is that encroaching and/or squatting on public land is not common on the project roads, although almost all the links have been identified as having a small number of encroacher and squatter families, total 29 and 46, respectively. Otherwise, the non-titleholders are tenants, both residential and comnmercial. The RAP adequately addresses the issues of rehabilitating the non-titleholders according to the Project's R&R Principles and Policy. To sum up, several measures have been adopted for minimising the negative social impacts in the Kerala State Transport Project. These include applying socially sensitive design parameters, alternative alignments, introducing bypasses, consultations with the residents, shop owners and aggrieved persons, and limiting land take of private properties, wherever possible, to boundary wall and the compound to avoid or minimise displacement of the families. In light of the evaluation of options discussed in this chapter for minimising negative social impacts, it is emphasised that the magnitude of land take and the number of affected persons and properties have been minimised to the extent possible and the resettlement planned is essential and unavoidable for the improvement of the roads in the State. According to the available provisional figures of the National Census conducted in March 2001, the population density of Kerala stands at 818 persons per square kilometre. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 3-6 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 4 The Highways Component Socio-Economic Profile Chapter 4 Socio-Economic Profile of the Project Area 4.1 Introduction The social impacts of the project must be viewed in the context of the geography of Kerala and the location of the road links being studied. In order to determine the project impacts at the micro level, state and district socio-economic 'profiles have been prepared based on secondary literature and compared with the data obtained at the project road level through the census and socio- economic surveys. This includes the geographical area, demography (distribution, density, sex ratio, population growth, rural/urban growth), literacy and education level, social organisation, socio-economic profile (agriculture, fisheries, forests, industrialisation, minerals, etc.), and occupation patterns. These parameters reflect the importance of the location, employment base, demand on infrastructure and other associated problems of development. It was observed that the higher the density of the districts traversed by the project roads, the higher the growth potential and therefore the greater the level of impact on the social environment, positive and negative. 4.2 Geography Kerala is located in the south-western extremity of India as a strip of land, whose maximum length south to north is approximately 600 km and whose width varies from 15 to 75 km east to west. According to geographical features, the State is divided into three areas, namely, the coastal belt, the rmidlands, and highlands (hills and valleys). The State has an area of 38,863 sq. km, divided into 14 districts. The area represents approximately 1.2 percent of the total area of the country. 4.3 Demographic Features: Distribution, Density and Growth The population of Kerala was 29.098 million in the 1991 Census. It represents approxi-mately 3.4% of the countrywide population. Its small area results in the population density being very high, 749 per sq. km. The sex ratio is 1036 women per 1000 men and the decennial population growth rate (1981-91) is 14.32. The comparable sex ratio of India is 927 females per 1000 men and decennial population growth rate is 23.85. According to the provisionalfigures of the national census conducted in March 2001, the total population of Kerala stands at 31.8 million with decennial growth rate (1 991-2001) of 9.42 percent. The sex ratio has increased to 1058 females for every I 000 males.I As a southem State of the country, the people in Kerala are of Dravidian stock and speak Malayalam, a language of the Dravidian family of languages. However, there are traces of the Australoid features in many people of Kerala, indicative of their Australian aborigine origins at some pre-historic times. There is a small tribal population in Kerala, approximately one percent of its total (Table 4.1). Wayanad district in the north-east of the State is known to house the maximum number of the tribal people. The following table shows the State's area, population including Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe populations, and density per square kilometre by district according to the 1991 census. The data from the National Census of 2001 for Kerala are not available, as of October 2001, beyond what is mentioned here. Therefore, the data from the 1991 National Census for Kerala have been used throughout the Report. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 4-1 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 4 The Highways Component Socio-Economic Profile Table 4.1 Kerala: Area, Population, And Density Per Sq Km By District-1991 SI. . . Area Total Scheduled Tribal Density per No Name of Dstrct km) Population Caste Popul Population Sq km 1. Thiruvananthapuram 2,192 2,946,650 343,439 16,181 1,344 2. Kollam 2,491 2,407,566 305,727- 3,884 966 3. Pathanamthitta 2,642 1,188,332 158,033 6,922 450 4. Alappuzha 1,414 2,001,217 190,355 17,996 1,415 5. Kottayam 2,203 1,828,271 135,876 2,801 830 6. Idukki 5,019 1,078,066 156,922 50,269 215 7. Eranakulam 2,407 2,817,236 241,719 4,941 1,170 8. Thrissur 3,032 2,737,311 334,524 4,051 903 9. Palakkad 4,480 2,382,235 378,548 35,465 532 10. Malappuram 3,550 3,096,230 255,731 10,555 872 11. Kozhikode 2,344 2,619,941 184,620 5,407 1,117 12. Wayanad 2,131 672,128 27,835 114,969 315 13. Kanmur 2,966 2,251,727 91,223 18,243 759 14. Kasargod 1,992 1,071,508 81,970 2,928 538 Kerala 38,863 29,098,518 2,886,522 320,967 749 Source: The Census of India, 1991 As the table above shows, the Scheduled Caste population constitutes approximately 9.91% of the total population. While the Statewide density of population is 749, it varies in the districts from as low as 215 in the hill district of Idukki to as high as 1,415 in the agriculturally fertile area of Alappuzha. Density is not, however, reflected in the total population of the districts so that Malappuram district has the highest population and Wayanad district has the lowest. The gender-wise distribution of population of the districts in comparison to the State according to the 1991 census is presented in Table 4.2. Table 4.2 Gender and Sex Ratio in the Project Affected Districts STATE! Population % of Population Females/ District _____1000 males Male Female Total Male Female Kerala 14,288,995 14,809,523 29,098,518 49.11 50.89 1,036 Trivandrun 1,447,594 1,499,056 2,946,650 49.13 50.87 1,036 Kollamn 1,182,810 1,224,756 2,407,566 49.13 50.87 1035 Pathanamthitta 576,176 612,156 1,188,332 48.49 51.51 1,062 -Alappuzha 975,885 1,025,332 2,001,217 48.76 51.24 1,051 Kottayam 912,860 915,411 1,828,271 49.93 50.07 1,003 Idukli 545,872 532,194 1,078066 50.63 49.37 975 Emakulam 1,408,649 1,408,587 2,817,236 50.00 50.00 1,000 Malappuram 1,508,280 1,588,050 3,096,330 48.71 51.29 1,053 Kozhikode 1,292,765 1,327,176 2,619,941 49.34 50.66 1,027 Kannur 1,098,838 1,152,889 2,251,727 48.80 51.20 1,049 Wayanad 341,958 330170 672,128 50.88 49.12 966 Source: The Census of India, 1991 As the table 4.2 shows, except in the two hill districts of Idukki and Wayanad, females dominate the State demographic scene. Kerala is the only State in India where females constitute approximately 51% of the population. In sex ratio, except the two hill districts of Idukki and Wayanad where there are 975 and 966 females respectively per 1000 males, the females vary in other districts between 1000 and 1062 per 1000 males. Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 4-2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 4 The Highways Component Socio-Economic Profile In recent years the State of Kerala has been favoured by the international funding agencies and social scientists because of the positive social development indicators obtained here, most notably in its demographic features, high literacy rates, status of women in society, and high standards of living. The last decennial census conducted in 1991 projected the following statistics as its positive social development indicators as against those in India as a whole, as presented in Table 4.3: Table 4.3: Kerala's Favourable Development Indicators Kerala (1991) India (1991) Male Female Total Male Female Total Sex ratio 1000 1036 INAW 1000 927 a Literacy rate 93.62 86.17 89.81 51.71 64.13 39.29 Birth rate 19.8 per 1000 population 29.5 per 1000 population Infant mortality rate 17 per 1000 live births 80 per 1000 live births Total fertility rate 1.7 per woman 3.6 per woman The numerically dominant female ratio is usually used to indicate gender equality. A high literacy rate and low birth, infant mortality and total fertility rates are all indicative of a developed society. A recent stud,V among the fishing community of the State, however, refutes the State's claim of gender equality. While the sex ratio or the female to male ratio (FMR) of Kerala is equal to that of Japan, this study demonstrates a low rate of FMR amongst the fishing community in Kerala in the field of education, occupation, etc. The literacy rate among these women is 37.20%, in contrast to the State female literacy rate of 86.17%. It is noted that a male child is preferred in the fishing communities due to economic, cultural and dependency factors. The researchers assert that this situation also exists among the tribal population of the State. 4.4 Occupation Patterns The Census of India lists and classifies an individual's economic activity as primary (main) activity, secondary work, tertiary (marginal) work, and seeking/available for work. Typically, primary economic activities include agriculture, forestry and logging, fishing, mining and quarrying; secondary includes manufacturing, electricity, gas and water, and construction; tertiary includes transport, communication, trade, hotels, restaurant, banking and insurance, real estate, housing, and public administration. Primary activity refers to work a person does for more than 183 days in a given year. It has been indicated in earlier sections that the economy of Kerala does not sustain the livelihoods of all the people of the State and that people move out in large numbers to find employment elsewhere. The 1991 Census showed that the work participation rate in the State was 31.40% and the project districts had approximately the same average. Statewide 48% of the work-active people engaged in primary activity in 1991. The share of secondary activity was 18.20% of the population and that of tertiary activity was 33.80%. Apart from migrants and emnigrants who found employment elsewhere, the State had a staggering 3,519,159 persons as of 30 September, 1997 looking for employment. These persons included 134,929 professionals in medicine and engineering. The State Planning Board's Economic Review 1997 mentions that employment in the organised sector only marginally increased in 1996-97 over 1995-96 by 6100, of which 4500 were in the 2Missing Females in a Marginalised Community, a study by K. Pushpangadan and G. Murugan. Centre for Development Studies, Thiruvananthapuram, 1999. Louis Berger IntermationallSheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 4-3 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 4 The Highways Component Socio-Economic Profile public sector and 1600 in the private sector. This only demonstrated the dismal picture of employment availability in the State. 4.5 Literacy and Education In the education sector Kerala's achievement is unique in that it attained the highest literacy rate in India of 89.01 percent in 1991 whereas the all India level was far below at 52.21 percent (Table 4.4). The female literacy rate was as high as 86.17 percent in Kerala compared to 39.20 percent at the national level. The literacy rate among scheduled caste males was 79.66 percent and the female literacy was 74.31 percent in Kerala although recent studies, as mentioned in Section 4.3, indicate otherwise. The trend in literacy levels of India and Kerala in the last 50 years is shown in the following table. Table 4.4: Trend in Literacy - India and Kerala Census JINDIA KERALA Year Perce tage of Li eracy Percentage of Lit racy Total Male Female Total Male Female 1951 16.67 24.95 7.93 40.47 49.79 31.41 1961 24.02 34.44 12.95 56.85 54.97 38.90 1971 29.45 39.45 18.68 60.42 66.62 54.31 1981 36.03 46.62 27.73 70.42 87.74 75.65 1991 52.21 64.13 39.29 89.81 D 93.62 86.17 Source: Census of India and Kerala, various decadal volumes The school education infrastructure in the State in 1996-97 consisted of 6726 lower primary schools, 2968 upper primary schools and 2588 high schools. There are 186 degree colleges with a total of 332,043 students. 3 There are 1.91 mnillion teachers at all stages in the school education system in Kerala and the teacher-pupil ratio is 1:30. 4.6 Urbanisation Trend A trend in recent years is that the whole of Kerala has acquired urban characteristics. This is one of the reasons why the State has been able to achieve the highest literacy rate as well as a good health care system. The State can be called one big urban village where boundaries between an urban area and a rural area are almost invisible or non-existent. In fact, the dividing line between the urban and rural areas in Kerala, as it is understood in the classic anthropological literature, is very thin. The principal reason for this dilution of difference is that most people in the State are forced to move out, even abroad, in search of livelihood opportunities and the remittances of - money' from outside has changed the quality of life in general and rural lifestyle in particular, to an urban lifestyle. The 1991 Census recorded 73.61 percent of the total population of the State living in rural areas. Although the census reports classify different areas as towns (urban) and villages (rural), what is officially noted as a town in the census is based on whether it has a municipality, which is again, determined on the basis of the census operations. Typically, a town with a population in excess of 100,000 is known as a class I town, one with population in excess of 50,000 is known as a class II town, and so on in the descending order. According to the census of 1991, to be qualified as a town, a place (other than a municipality, corporation, cantonment hoard, notified town area conmnittee or townships) should pass the following three tests: 3Economic Review 1997. Thiruvananthapuram, State Planning Board, 1998. Louis, Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 4-4 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 4 The Highways Cormponent Socio-Economnic Profile (a) A minimum population of 5000; (b) At least 75% of male working population engaged in non-agricultural pursuits; and (c) A density of population of at least 400 persons per sq. km. It is noted that in the immediate project area, the main occupation of the population is largely non- agricultural. The baseline data analysed later in this chapter testifies to this. Therefore, presently, most of the "villages" in Kerala, at least those through which the projects roads pass, would qualify in these three tests to be known as towns. However, they are technically still villages because, it is learnt, the local chambers of commerce oppose the move fearing higher taxation if they are officially "converted" to town status. 4.7 Social Organisation The three major religious communities of the State, viz., the Hindus, Christians and Muslims, all inhabit the project road areas. With reference to the State it is said that there are 60% Hindus and 20% each of the Christian and Muslim. The Hindus are organised, as elsewhere in India, on the basis of the caste system with the Brahmins at the top of the caste hierarchy. Other dominant castes in the hierarchy include the Nayars and the Ezhavas. The Scheduled Caste groups are at the bottom. While the Christians and the Muslims have no caste system, they too follow the system informally, especially with regard to those engaged in menial activities, usually known as belonging to the "Other Backward Communities". A common feature of community life in Kerala, especially with reference to the highways project, is the scarcity of land and the State itself being a narrow strip of land, there is hardly any space for community activities in general all over the State. Hence, the road or more precisely, the roadside is the centre of community life all over Kerala. A road, besides being a communication artery, is thus an important "social space". One can see all kinds of human activity taking place along it. Irespective of religion and caste, the community life in the urbanised villages of Kerala revolves around the Panchayath - the local level self-govemment. It is also relatively easy to mobilise people and opinions through the Panchayath. 4.8 Socio-Economic Profile 4.8.1 Economy The State income of Kerala in 1997-98, at current prices, was estimated at 380,024 million as against Rs. 121,735 million in 1990-91, registering an average annual growth rate of 17.7 percent.5 The per capita income in the State at Rs. 2,444, however, continued to lag behind the national average of Rs. 2,785 in 2997-98 by approximately 14%. In Kerala's economy 31.4 percent of the population constitutes the main work force including 47.6 percent of males and 15.8 percent of females. The various sectors of the State economy is outlined below. 4.8.1.1 Agriculture Agriculture forms the main occupation of 50% of the people of the State. Within agriculture, there is a predominance of cash crops, such as, cardamom, cashew nuts, tea, coffee, coconut, and rubber. Rice and tapioca are important food crops, but they do not demonstrate a good performance. The State is not self-sufficient in food crop production. 4 A panchayat is the lowest level of administration in India. It is an elected local self-governing body, which actually means an association of five persons, usually village elders. 5 Kerala State Highways Project with Inland Water Transport Pilot Project, Final Feasibility Study Report on the State Highway Comnponent, Volume 1, April 2000, p. 1 S. Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala PWD. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 4-5 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 4 The Highways Component Socio-Econormic Profile 4.8.1.2 Fisheries Kerala is one of the major fish producing States in the country with more than 25% production of marine fisheries. The fisheries sector contributed to approximately 2% of the Net Domestic Product of the State in 1996.6 The fishing activities are mainly concentrated in the coastal areas and support approximately 3% of the total population in their livelihoods. 4.8.1.3 Forestry The forest area of the State constitutes 28.63% of its total area.7 The major forest products are timber, firewood, cardamomn, honey, bamboo, reeds, etc. Earnings from the sale of forest produce is a major source of revenue to the State Government which in' 1996 amounted to Rs. 16 million. The World Bank aided Kerala Forestry Project, initiated in 1998, aims at the integrated development of the Kerala forest eco-system. 4.8.1.4 Industry Kerala is not an industrialized State, although it has high potential due to the availability of hydro- electric power, rich forests and minerals like ilmenite, monozite, rutile, zircon, sillimanite, clay and quartz sand.' The local major industry includes the coir industry. Emphasis is currently laid on the information technology. The improvement of roads is a step towards the infrastructure development in order to attract investments for industrial development. 4.8.1.5 Minerals Mineral resources of Kerala are not yet fully explored. Keeping this in view, two State level agencies, viz., Department of Mining and Geology and Kerala State Mineral Development Corporation Limited have been formed to stimulate the exploration of the mineral resources of the State. There were 106 mining leases for major minerals and 375 quarrying leases for minor minerals in the State in 1997.9 These had generated employment opportunities for approximately 1500 persons.'0 The minerals concerned included china clay, silica sand, mineral sand, lime shell, limestone, quartz, bauxite, graphite and magnesite. 4.8.1.6 Tourism hi the absence of a viable economic backbone, tourism has been identified as a sunrise area of Kerala's economy. With its golden beaches and tranquil backwaters, moderate temperature, no winter season, and an abundance of greenery everywhere, the State is said to be a tourist's paradise. It rains heavily twice a year during May-August and October-December and the water, after filling the rivers, canals, lagoons, etc. drains into the Arabian Sea. The palm lined beaches and the houseboats, which are converted rice boats, in the backwaters are also major tourist attractions. 4.8.2 Migration/Emigration as a Dominant Component of the Economy Migration/emigration and the remittances therefrom have been an important part of Kerala's economy in the past three decades, which have given the State's economy the name of "money 6 Economic Review 1997. Thiruvananthapuramn, State Planning Board. Economic Review 1997. Thiruvananthapurarn, State Planning Board. sIndia 1999. Governent of India, Publications Division, New Delhi, 1999. 9 Economic Review 1997. Thiruvananthapuram, State Planning Board. '( Economic Review 1997, page 83. Thiruvananthapuram, State Planning Board. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 4-6 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 4 The Highways Cormponent Socio-Economic Profile order economy". This aspect has been triggered by the lack of livelihood opportunities locally. Most emigration has been to the Gulf countries in West Asia (also known as the Middle East). 4.8.2.1 The Gulf Emigrants In Kerala's Economy The global price hike of petroleum in 1973 and the consequent earnings of large revenue had accelerated a process of industrialization and social change in the West Asian region, necessitating the services of a large number of foreign workers. As a result, workers from Kerala began to emigrate to the Gulf countries. The emigration, which started with a few thousand per year during the mid-1970s, assumed a larger proportion during the 1980s and the 1990s. The inflow of large amounts of Gulf rernittances and its spending has resulted in unprecedented economic changes since the mid-1970s in the poor and industrially under-developed economy of Kerala. The impact of the Gulf migration is not uniform throughout Kerala. The impact is substantial in those areas or districts where the rate of migration is high. A group of researchers at the Centre for Development Studies, based in Trivandrurn, has estimated that the migration rate, that is, emigrants per 100 households is 21% for the whole of Kerala. This indicates that from every five households in Kerala, at least one person has migrated to the Gulf. The rate of migration is highest in Malappuram district (49.2%), followed by Pathanamthitta (33.1%) and Thrissur (25.6%). From Malappuram district at least one person had migrated from nearly half of the total households of the district. The other district having a fairly high intensity of migration are Kollam, Emakulamn, Palakkad, Kozhikode, Kannur, and Kasaragod. A^ majoix impact in the labour front is the reduction of unemployment. Another change that occurred in the labour market due to the Gulf opportunities was the introduction of vocational education and training for skills,-most notably computer skills. The impact of migration on consumption, savings and investment has been substantial in Kerala. Studies comparing the income, consumption and savings of migrant and non-migrant households and also the baseline information in the following chapter reveal that migrant households have a higher income, better consumption levels and asset position compared to non-migrant households. As a majority of the migrant households were poor, the migration has helped to reduce poverty levels in Kerala. Available evidence suggests that a large number of low-income households in ten districts climbed to higher income levels due to the receipt of remittances. The flow of remittances has also led to the generation of more savings in an under-developed economy like that of Kerala. On the negative side, the inflow of remittances has pushed up prices of land in urban and rural areas- in nine- districts where the intensity of migration has been high. Thus the inflow of a large amount of remittances and its spending has resulted in unprecedented economic changes in the State. However, the recent development in the Gulf has led to an unprecedented return of emigrants to the State. The fall in oil prices, the recent recessionary tendencies in the Gulf countries, the stringent restrictions imposed on migrant labour in 1996 by Saudi Arabia and Baharain in 1997 and stiff competition from migrants from other countries have resulted in the return of a large number of emigrants. It is estimated that the total number of returnees from the Gulf was 107,000 in 1996, 127,000 in 1997 and 79,000 in 1998. This has been reflected in the economy of the State which also began to experience severe recession. According to various estimates, more than 300,000 emigrant workers returned to Kerala from the West Asian countries between 1996 and 1998. This unprecedented return of emigrants and a dip in the flow of remittances have created a severe economic rccession in the State. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICTI Page Chapter 4-7 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 4 The Highways Component Socio-Economic Profile 4.8.3 Public Services and Socio-Economic Conditions Social development of Kerala has attained a commendable success. As indicated, Kerala is the land of high literacy and health care where enrolment in primary schools is nearly as high as in West Europe and infant mortality rates are as low as in New York. Apart from historical factors, the successive Governuents of the State have followed a development strategy by consciously investing in social development sectors like education, medical services and public health. Literacy, life expectancy and income are the three indicators used to measure the human development index. Kerala's pioneering redistributive policy, measures like land reforms, introduction of housing schemes for economically weaker sections and the comprehensive coverage of a public distribution system deserve special mention. The institutional and non- institutional social security measures introduced by the successive Governments in Kerala were largely directed at reducing income insecurity and deprivations among weaker segments in the State. In 1991 there were 5,459,474 occupied residential units in Kerala, 4,076,775 (74.7 percent) in rural areas and 1,382,699 (25.3 percent) in urban areas. Of these 56.0 percent were pucca (high construction standard), 19.1 percent semi-pucca (moderate construction standard) and 24.9 percent kutcha (mud and thatch). 92.4 percent of residences used wood for cooking, 48.4 percent were connected to electricity, 18.9 percent had a safe drinking water supply and 51.3 percent had toilets". 4.8.3.1 Health Care Kerala has made notable achievements in health standards as reflected in the attainment of a low infant mortality rate, low maternal mortality rate, low birth rate, low death rate, and high life expectancy at birth. This has been made possible through a wide network of health infrastructure and social factors such as women's high education levels, and general health consciousness and awareness. The major development indicators of birth rate, death rate, infant mortality rate and expectation of life at birth are presented in Table 4.5. Table 4.5: Birth, Death And Infant Mortality Rates In Kerala Year Birth Rate per Death Rate per 1,000 Infant Mortality per Expectation of Life 1,000 Population Population 1,000 Population at Birth of Kerala Kerala All India Kerala All India Kerala All India Males Femnales 1970 32.3 36.8 9.2 15.7 61 129 56.7 60.0 1980 26.8 33.7 7.0 12.6 42 117 64.7 69.0 1981 25.6 33.0 6.6 12.5 37 110 66.0 71.8 1985 22.9 32.9 6.9 11.8 - -33 97 - 65.7 72.5 1986 22.4 32.6 6.7 11.1 27 96 66.9 72.8 1987 21.0 32.2 6.0 10.9 26 95 - - 1988 19.9 31.3 6.0 10.0 24 94 - - 1989 20.3 30.5 6.1 10.2 21 91 67.5 72.9 1990 20.3 30.5 6.1 14.2 21 80 69.0 72.0 1991 19.8 29.5 5.8 10.2 17 80 69.0 72.4 1992 17.7 29.5 6.3 10.1 17 79 69.0 72.4 1993 17.4 28.7 6.0 9.3 13 74 69.0 72.4 1994 17.4 28.7 6.1 9.3 16 74 69.0 72.4 1995 17.7 28.8 6.0 9.0 16 74 69.0 72.4 Source: Economic Review 1997, Kerala State Planning Board. "Kerala at a Glance 1998: Districtwise Statistical Overview. Jagran Research Centre, Kanpur, 1998. Louis Berger InternationalJSheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 4-8 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 4 The Highways Component Socio-Economic Profile As the table shows, Kerala has succeeded in reducing infant mortality rate to 16 whereas the all India level was as high as 74 in 1995. Sirmilarly, maternal mortality rate (not in the table) in Kerala varied between 1.5 and 2 in 1996 for every three thousand deliveries. The corresponding all-India rate was 4.6. Life expectancy, which is an important indicator of health status of any region, is considerably higher in Kerala than in the whole country. Life expectancy at birth in Kerala is 69.0 years for men and 72.4 years for women, whereas for all India it is 60.6 for men and 61.7 years for women. 4.9 Findings of the Census and Socio-Economic Survey Results The following sub-sections discuss the findings of the social impacts surveys, including the census and the sample survey. As these exercises continued for over a year during 2000-2001, the cut-off date for the purpose of assistance to the eligible squatters and encroachers is the start date of the census surveys in a given link. The following table lists the links and dates when the census surveys were initiated. Table 4.6: Project Road Links and Dates of Census Surveys Sr. No. Links Link Name Date of Census I I Taikkod - Kottarakara 10 April, 2000 2 2 Kottarakara - Adur 27 April, 2000 3 3 Adur - Chengannur I May, 2000 4 6 Muvattupuzha - Angamali 18 February, 2000 5 40 Thrissur - Kuttipuram 6 October, 2000 6 50.1 Palakkad - Shomur 31 January, 2001 7 70 Muvattupuzha - Thodupuzha 5 February, 2000 8 72 SH-I - NH-47 Link 29 November, 2000 9 73 Changanassery - Alappuzha 16 June, 2000 4.9.1 Demographic Profile: Affected Population The total project affected persons in the nine Links of the Phase I roads are 13,487. Table 4.7 shows the Phase I affected population figures (PAPs) of the project roads gender-wise and estimated PAPs for of the Phase II roads, extrapolated from the Phase data. Table 4.7 Affected Project Roads Population Phase I Roads Phase II** Links Link Name PAPs Male Female Links PAPs I Taikkod - Kottarakara 3408 2572 836 4 4,227 2 Kottarakara - Adur 587 427 160 5 601 3 Adur - Chengannur 455 347 108 68 949 6 Muvattupuzha - Angamali 3703 2606 1097 69 437 40 Thrissur-Kuttipuram 1408 971 437 74 1,160 50.1 Palakkad - Shomur 857 587 270 84.1-4 4,077 70 Muvattupuzha - Thodupuzha 1314 762 552 84.5-7 2,850 72 SH-I - NH-47 Link 1129 687 442 Total 14,301 73 Changanassery - Alappuzha 626 398 228 l Total 13,487 9,357 4,130 l **Extrapolated from the Phase I data. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 4-9 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 4 The Highways Component Socio-Economic Profile This table demonstrates that in this sample the number of males dominates the number of females. This is because in the majority of cases the structures surveyed were used for commercial activities where the males dominate the scene. The residential structures surveyed accounted for 38% of the total number of structures. Therefore, the number of females is necessarily small in this sample and the sex ratio is roughly 441 women per 1000 men. This is not a true representation of the State but a very specific project road situation due to certain ruling parameters. Sirnilarly, due to the same reason the average family size along the project roads statfstically is only 2.26. 4.9.1.1 Population Distribution by Age and Sex The following table demonstrates the distribution of the affected population by age and sex: Table 4.8 Distribution Of Affected Population By Age And Sex Age Gro p0 1-17 18-30 31-50 51-60 60+ Total Link M F M F M F M F M F I 154 116 639 242 1149 306 361 83 269 89 3408 2 20 32 91 36 195 70 67 6 54 16 587 3 8 9 76 30 163 37 56 12 44 20 455 6 230 196 894 376 1052 340 252 92 178 93 3703 40 60 51 261 123 441 169 115 40 94 54 1408 50.1 74 60 181 57 199 89 79 33 54 31 857 70 216 138 181 160 197 140 78 50 90 64 1314 72 67 66 133 114 290 172 123 53 74 37 1129 73 33 71 35 54 94 24 54 57 182 22 626 Total 862 739 2491 1192 3780 1347 1185 426 1039 426 13487 In all the links, males dominate in all the work active age groups of 18-30, 31-50 and 51-60. Even in the 60+ age group males dominate because they are the entitled persons of any proposed affected property. The sex ratio in the 1-17 age group is often even. 4.9.2 Family Economy/Resource Base The survey generated data on the average monthly family income. It also identified the number of persons, 18 years and above, earning an income and also a very small number of persons below 18 years (16 to 18 years of age) earning an income. These findings are shown in the Table 4.9. Table 4.9 Monthly Average Family Income and Number of Persons Earning an Income Link Average Fly. Persons 18+ Earning an Income Persons <18 Earning an Income No. Income (Rs.) Number Percentage of PAPs* Number Percentage of PAPs* I 2657 2009 58.95 4 0 2 3443 337 57.41 0 0 3 4227 318 69.89 0 0 6 6535 1850 49.96 2 0 40 6629 790 56.11 2 0 50.1 4091 307 35.82 6 0 70 1261 320 24.35 2 0 72 5093 598 52.97 0 0 73 1218 289 46.17 0 0 Total 6818 16 Average 3906 50.55% 0 * Percentage to total PAPs, refer to Table 4.7 Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 4- 1 0 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 4 The Highways Component Socio-Economic Profile As the table shows, Link 73. Chenganassery-Alappuzha, records the lowest average monthly family income at Rs. 1218, followed by Link 70, Muvattupuzha-Thodupuzha, which are even below the State BPL income level (discussed in Chapter 5). However, the all-link average monthly income stands at Rs. 3906, which is more than the State as well as the national per capita income level. The table also shows that a very small number of persons, total 16, below 18 years of age, have been recorded working in all the road links. However, the survey data show that they are not child labourers. Their age ranges from 16-18. In any case, the KSTP will ensure that during implementation of the project the contractors do not use child labour. The table shows that overall, 50.55% of the PAPs, who are above 18 years of age, are engaged in income eaming activity. 4.9.2.1 Occupation Pattern The survey gathered information on the main occupation and subsidiary occupation of the project affected persons under the heads as mentioned in the following table. It is noted that no affected person reported having a subsidiary occupation or household industry. The principal occupations reported by the project affected persons are owning shops and businesses and/or working therein as employees. The latter category is included under private service. The "Other activities" include those that do not fall within the defined categories. The percentage calculation has been obtained on the basis of persons (18+ years) earning an income on each of the Links (as in Table 4.9). Table 4.10 Occupation Pattern on the Project Roads (%) Types 1 2 3 6 40 50.1 70 72 73 No. ofpersons earning* 2009 337 318 1850 790 307 1261 5093 1218 Agriculture 1.3 1.9 3.1 11.0 0 0 4.0 4.6 0 Agriculture labourer 2.7 2.5 1.6 0 0 2.8 6.5 1.7 5.4 Plantation 1.7 2.5 4.7 2.2 0.06 2.0 6.0 3.0 0 Plantation labourer 2.2 1.9 0 0 1.8 2.8 11.3 2.3 0 Allied agri activities 0 0 0 3.5 0.4 1.7 3.6 0 0 Professional 1.9 5.1 4.7 8.1 1.9 5.5 1.8 2.6 2.7 Government service 0.9 7.6 6.3 5.3 1.9 4.3 0.5 1.5 6.2 Private service 36.6 31.6 41.6 18.0 37.8 31.o 31.4 41.0 5.4 Shops/business 51.7 38.1 34.1 44.4 54.5 40.2 15.8 39.3 46.1 Household indust. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.3 Other activities 1.0 6.3 1.6 1.0 0.06 6.9 10.0 2.0 2.9 Day labourers 0 2.5 2.3 0.5 1.58 2.8 9.1 2.0 29 Total: 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 * Number of persons earning an income, refer to Table 4.9 The category "Government service" includes mostly school teachers and small-scale local level Government staff. No household industries were recorded as affected, although the surveys recorded self-employment training centres for household industries, assisted by the Central Government's scheme of Development of Women and Children in Rural Areas (DWACRA) on a number of links. 4.9.2.2 Emigration/Migration of Earning Members Kerala being a job-scarce State, many people migrate out of their own district or State to other districts of the State or to other States of India, or even to other countries in search of livelihoods. The sample data on ernigration and migration of people from Links 1, 2+3, 6, 40 and 70 report the following characteristics: Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CESlICT Page Chapter 4-11 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 4 The Highways Component Socio-Economic Profile Table 4.11 Number of Persons Migrated and Returned Migration Type Link I Link 2+3 Link 6 Link 40 Link 70 Migration to the Gulf countries 8 4 19 1 3 Migration to other countries I 0 0 0 0 Migration to other States 3 1 2 1 0 Gulf returned 8 3 3 0 I Other countries returned 0 0 0 0 0 Total 20 8 24 2 4 The occupation of people working in the Gulf countries is not clear, as their relations did not reveal this information. In this small sample, Link 6 in Emakulam district, in keeping with the State's general trend, shows the highest number of people emigrating to the Gulf countries for livelihoods, followed by people from Trivandrum district. 4.9.3 Literacy and Education Status In keeping with the State's reputation as the most literate State in the country, the PAPs along the project roads also showed high literacy/education trend, as evident in the following table. Table 4.12 Literacy/Education Level of the Affected People on the Project Roads Links r7~ 1 2 3 6 40 50.1 70 72 73 Total Total PAPs 3408 587 455. 3703 1408 857 1314 1129 626 13487 Illiterate 39 0 2 52 7 12 39 14 12 177 Just literate 71 9 5 67 34 6 50 6 3 251 Primary 234 60 30 312 88 77 122 125 45 1093 Belowl 08 42 611 181 192 220 159 52 1935 High school pass 1299 233 159 1109 638 320 302 391 290 4741 Intermediate 388 69 63 518 121 43 154 140 60 1556 Graduate 302 49 68 291 116 43 135 119 46 1169 Post-graduate 49 9 12 46 18 2 31 22 4 193 ITI trained 18 7 11 66 3 2 8 4 4 123 Engineer* 15 2 4 8 5 1 5 4 2 46 Doctor** 10 2 3 9 2 1 7 4 3 41 Otber + 4 5 0 1 2 7 1 3 0 23 Total 2786 527 397 3038 1208 694 1035 977 509 11171 Percentages 82 90 87 82 86 81 79 87 81 83 * Engineer includes graduate, post-graduate as well as diploma holder engineers ** Doctor includes allopathic, homoeopathic, ayurvedic as well as unani medical practitioners + Others professional includes lawyers, chartered accountants, computer degree/diploma holders, pharmacist, teachers' training diploma holder, Arabic language trained, nursing trained, etc. This table demonstrates that in all categories of designated literacy/educational levels, the percentages in all the project links vary from 79% to 90%, with an all-link percentage of 83. This is much higher than the trend elsewhere in India, although below the Kerala State average figure of 90%. This literacy/education level also demonstrates the lesser vulnerability of the project affected or displaced persons because they have access to information and are aware of the implications of the project for protecting their well being. 4.9.4 Socio-Economic Profile of the PAPs Urbanisation is the most prominent socio-economic characteristics along the project roads. Shops, shopping areas, educational institutions, health care facilities, religious institutionis, public utilities Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 4-12 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 4 The Highways Component Socio-Economic Profile such as wells, offices, etc. are to be found all along the project roads. Urbanisation is also reflected in access to electricity connection and building types. 90% of the affected buildings are of pucca construction. While piped water supply is not common, historically, both the private and public wells have been serving the drinking water needs of the people of the State. The sample survey showed that more than 70% families had their own wells. Every sample family has a toilet. The sample survey identified the expenditure patterns of the sample families as their quality of life, which is discussed in Chapter 5. Other features such as access to water supply, electricity connection, and the construction material used for the average family are discussed here, in addition to social profile of the population. 4.9.4.1 Social Group Indicators The socio-economic survey collected information on various social parameters, such as religious identity, caste, and tribe affiliation as the project affected family's social group indicators. The following table shows the results. Table 4.13 Social Group Particulars of the Project Affected Families Link PAF Hindu % Christian % Muslim % SC % ST % 1 2209 1206 55 583 26 420 19 18 I 0 0 2 405 148 37 195 48 62 15 10 3 1 0 3 340 152 45 135 40 53 16 8 0 0 0 6 1623 623 38 651 40 349 22 14 1 0 0 40 621 194 31 231 37 196 32 4 0 0 0 50.1 525 263 50 71 14 191 36 6 1 0 0 70 766 304 40 330 43 132 17 3 0 0 0 72 867 607 70 97 11 163 19 14 1 0 0 73 98 57 58 33 34 8 8 2 4 0 0 Total 7454 3554 48 2326 31 1574 21 79 1 1 0 Religion: It is noted that in the project road areas, the Hindu PAF constitute 48% of the affected families while the Christian and Muslim PAF constitute 31% and 21%, respectively. These percentages generally reflect the religion following of the areas through which the project road links pass. Caste and Tribe: The Scheduled Caste project affected families number 79 and constitute 1% of the total PAF. There is only one tribal (ST) family identified as affected in the project road links. 4.9.4.2 Domestic Water Supply The Kerala State has an average of 19% structures connected with piped drinking water supply. The social impact surveys on the project roads collected data on this from the residential structures and the findings are presented in the following table. For the purpose of examining domestic water supply, the residential-cum-commercial mixed structures, otherwise considered with conmnercial structures, have been added with the regular residential structures. Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 4-13 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 4 The Highways Component Socio-Economic Profile Table 4.14: Residential Structures with Piped Water Supply No. of Structure % of "Yes" No. of % of Link Residential Structures Owner's to No. of Tenants tenant's No. Response "Yes" Res. Response "Yes" structures "Yes" Res. Mixed* Total 1 254 15 269 41 15% I 0% 2 140 3 143 4 3% 0 0% 3 147 2 149 2 1% 0 0% 6 319 30 349 72 21% 20 6% 40 213 9 222 51 23% 2 1% 50.1 113 19 132 9 7% 2 2% 70 159 10 169 92 54% 13 8% 72 246 36 282 7 2% 2 1% 73 17 4 21 4 19% 1 5% Total 1608 128 1736 282 16% 41 2% * Residential-cum-commercial rmixed structures. As the table shows, the domestic piped water supply in the project road link areas at 16% of the structures occupied by owners is comparable with the State average of 19% (refer to Table 5.4, Chapter 5), and a very small number of tenants have responded "Yes" (2%) if they have access to piped water supply. 4.9.4.3 Structures with Electricity Connection The social impact surveys collected information on access to electricity for both the residential and conimercial structures. The residential-cum-comnmnercial mixed structures are added to the regular residential structures for this purpose. The results are presented in the Table 4.15, which shows that 67% of the owner respondents and only 5% of the tenant respondents have access to electricity for domestic lighting, whereas 27% of the owner respondent and 45% of the tenant respondents in commercial structures have access to electricity. Table 4.15: Structures with Electricity Connection Residential (including Res-Comn.) Structures Commnercial Structures No. of % of No. of No. of %of N.o No. of Structure ,Yes"o Tenants' % of No of Structure "Yes" to Tenants' f % of Link No. Owiner's tenant's Owner's No. of tenant's Structures Res. Response Structures Response "Y Response structures " Yes" "YGS" I Response commr "Yes" es "Yes" structures "Yes" "Yessrutie 1 269 229 85% 11 4% 475 123 26% 292 61% 2 143 90 63% 6 4% 84 20 24% 26 31% 3 149 72 48% 5 3% 92 19 21% 25 27% 6 349 170 49% 27 8% 402 81 20% 111 28% 40 222 193 87% 8 4% 82 43 52% 63 77% 50.1 132 102 77% 7 5% 126 38 30% 57 45% 70 169 80 47% 13 8% 114 28 25% 49 43% 72 282 215 76% 7 2% 152 57 38% 69 45% 73 21 14 67% 0 0% 24 9 38% 6 25% Total 1736 1165 67% 84 5% 1551 418 27% 698 45% Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 4-14 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Socio-Economic Profile Table 4.16 Baseline Data on Construction Material Wall Roof Link No. Structure o- Laterite % Bricks % Bridks Others %Tiles % Terrace % Tiles and Strctre Bricks (kutcha) ___ Terrace i 74 17 23% 350 47% 165 22% 55 7% 245 33% 296 40% - 9 - 12% 75 33% 103 45% 33 15% 16. 7% 96 42 85 7% 2 4% 3 241 66 27% 114 47% 42 17% 19 8% 95 39% 119 49% 18 7% 6 -- 751 --314 42% 363 48% -~-18 -~2% 56 7% _326 43% 286 38% 100 13% 40 K304 117 38 3 3 2 7 5 12% 140 46% 83 27% 26 9 50.1 258 - 136 53 4 3% 9 3%1% 127 -49% 10139%/ 1 3 _ 5% 70 _283~ Po 39% 129 ~46% 23 8% 21 7% 144 51% ~ 105 37% 10 4 72 ____ ~~~ ~~~~76 18% 322 74% 0 01~ % 36 8% 183 42163%327 73 45 7 1% 20 44 1 2 % 71 6% 2 1 _ 4%920%6 T7a3 38 175 - 33 M- 1625 9%.3 4_ 9___3___ 11 28 -1- -5 3-3X. 1 -5 4% 10/126 817 2 2B 38% - -321 10% Roof (continued) Floor ___ LinkNo. No. of Tace te Red % Md % concrete % Other LikN.Structures Ththd % OhrOxideMu 1 744 95 13% 16 2% 162 22% 153 21% 411 55% 20 3% 2 1--227 14 6% 0 0% 44 19% 35 15% - -148 65% 0 0 3 _ 241 9 ~~~ ~~ ~~~4%/ 0 0%5 2%6 2%/ 179 74% 0 _ 0% 6 751 36 _ 5% 3 0% _ 242 3% _6% 48 57%345 50.1 - 304 49 16% __6 2% 61- 20% - 78 _26% 145 - 48% - 20 7 50.1 258 21% __ 65 76 29% 6 2% 13 0 618% 70 283 15 5% 9 3% 73-p26% _ 3 15% 153 54% 14 5% 72 4f34 42- 10%- -13- 3% 1 - 4-5% 16- 4- 4 . 1 _ 0 4 -L10a 73 - 45 9 9- 20% _ 07% _14 31%9 429% 0 -1 Total 3287 _ _ 271 -8% 622 2% 923! 28% 396 12% 1830 56% 138] A4. LBIlI/SheladiaICES/ICT Page 4-14A Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 4 The Highways Comnponent Socio-Economic Profile 4.9.4.4 Construction Material of Structures The social impact surveys gathered information on construction material used in the structures that were to be affected with regard to wall, floor and roof. Table 4.16 presents the findings. While in the southern part of the State there is a prevalence of brick walls (Link 6 and 72 having 48% and 74%, respectively), other parts have preference for laterite walls because of its wide availability there. Overall, brick wall occupies 49% and laterite has 33% share. Mud bricks walls have 10% and the "other" category, including the kutcha structures, has a 8% share. With regard to roof, tiles rank first with 42%, followed by terraced roof (38%). Other roofing materials include thatched (8%) and a combinafion of tiles and terraced (10%). The "other" category (2%) includes asbestos sheet and any other material. With regard to floor, the concrete variety dominates with 56%, followed by red oxide (28%) and mud floor (12%). The "other" category (4%) includes marble, mosaic and tiled floor, significantly found on Link 50.1. This information is indicative of the quality of shelter and the resultant quality of life of the project affected population of the Kerala State Transport Project. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 4-15 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 5 The Highways Conmponent Poverty Analysis Chapter 5 Poverty Analysis 5.1 State Income (Net State Domestic Product) The State income of Kerala in 1997-98, at current prices, was estimated at Rs. 380,024 million as against Rs. 121,735 mnillion in 1990-91, registering an average growth rate of 17.7%. The per capita income at current prices was placed at Rs. 11,396 in 1997-98 as compared to Rs. 4,200 in 1990-91 showing an average annual growth rate of 16%. In real terms, i.e., at 1980-81 constant prices, tlhe State income in 1997-98 was estimated at Rs. 77,820 million as compared to Rs. 52,623 million in 1990-91 and per capita income at Rs. 2,444 in 1997-98 as against Rs. 1,815 in 1990-91. The average annual growth rate in real terms registered in the State was 5.7% and in per capita income 4.3%. The per capita income in the State at Rs. 2,444 continued to lag behind the national average of Rs. 2,785 in 1997-98 by approximately 14%. 5.2 Economic Development versus Social Development Economically the State of Kerala is going through a difficult phase whereas it is strong in all aspects of social development indicators comparable with those in the developed countries, including low population growth rate, favourable sex ratio, high literacy rate, and good health care. This is a paradox in Kerala for high social development indicators are expected to accelerate the economic development. Economic development in Kerala has been "stunted" mainly by a lack of growth in agriculture, lack of avenues for jobs, lack of infrastructure development, almost no industry and the endemic labour union problem that discourages a prospective entrepreneur. The agriculture sector, despite rich resources and heavy plan investments was under stagnation for a long time. Agriculture in the State favours cash crop production and food crop production is deficient. The size of operational holdings in the State is small, averaging 0.332 ha. Approximately 93% of the holdings are marginal, with an average size of 0.175 ha. The net area irrigated is approximately 15% of the net area sown, of which the irrigated area under paddy is over 50% of the total irrigated area. There are some indicators showing that in recent years the agricultural sector is emerging from stagnation. The agricultural growth in recent years is confined to a few selected commodities, in particular rubber and coconut, which is mainly due to the recent increase in area under these crops. A significant share of the State's economy depends on remittances by the expatriate Keralites, informally known as the "money order economy". In effect, Kerala is a consumer, not a producing, State. 5.3 Poverty Level The KSTP Feasibility Study has evaluated the relative poverty level of the districts of Kerala. The district-wise per capita income at constant prices (1980-81) has been taken as an indicator to evaluate the level of poverty. For this purpose, the per capita income data relating to the project influence area districts since 1970-71 have been collected and analysed. In order to appreciate the relative position of a district in the State, year-wise indices in respect of the State average have bcen developed based on the per capita income at constant prices for each of the districts. To analyse the regional level, the districts are also grouped into southern, central and northern regions. The district-wise per capita indices are presented as follows: Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 5-1 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 5 The Highways Component Poverty Analysis Table 5-1: District-wise Per Capita Income Index (1980-81 prices) SI. No. Districts Region 1970-71* 1980-81 1990-91 1996-97 I Thiruvananthapuram S 99.7 98.4 101.5 103.2 2 Kollam S 110.8 101.9 102.8 94.9 3 Pathananthitta S - 109.1 106.1 4 Alappuzha S 100.7 86.9 100.0 86.5 5 Kottayamn S 109.8 96.3 100.5 106.2 6 Idukli C 110.8 132.3 115.4 121.2 7 Ernakulam C 108.8 133.8 153.1 159.7 8 Thrissur C 91.8 96.9 104.4 100.0 9 _PalakkadC 97.0 86.7 89.4 87.0 10 Malappuram N 76.3 69.3 60.3 59.1 11 Kozhikode N 105.9 105.3 92.0 94.0 12 Wayarlad N 106.5 118.0 13 Kannur N 93.8 104.2 91.7 93.4 14 Kasaragod N _ 85.9 95.4 State 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Source: Economic Review 1997, Kerala State Planning Board. * at 1970-71 prices. S = Southern, C = Central, N = Northern These indices show that Malappuram in the northem region, Palakkad in the central and Alappuzha in the southem region are the poorest districts. Most of these districts have remained poor and the condition is generally worsening, since the per capita indices have been decreasing in comparison to the State figure. If the above indices are analysed on the regional level based on the districts average figure of the specific region, it is found that within the central region, Idukki and Emakulam districts have been performing well throughout the analysis period, whereas the whole northem region remained below the State Level. This analysis has been based on recorded documents available from the Department of Economics & Statistics of the Govemment of Kerala. However, the ground reality is different because people often do not mention their true income in govemment records. It was discussed in Chapter 4 that both Malappuram and Palakkad districts did very well economically since the 1970s due to the prevailing "money order economy". In fact, the project roads in Malappuram district received the highest EIRR ratings for this project. The selection of project priority roads was not particularly influenced by the poverty parameter, as the roads selected are not connected to the backward areas of the State. The selected roads are State truck routes, next only to the national highways in importance. The main parameter was the State's overall development. 5.4 Poverty Line Poverty in India is officially linked to a nutritional baseline measured in calories. For determining the poverty line the Planning Conmnission of India measures the monthly consumption expenditure of individuals, separately for each State and for rural and urban areas within a State. The poverty line corresponds to a total family per capita expenditure sufficient to provide, in addition to basic non-food items such as clothing and transport, a daily intake of 2400 calories in rural and 2100 in urban areas. Poverty is, thus, a concept closely related to subsistence level of living.' Y.C. Nanda, Employment Creation and Poverty Alleviation. Mumbai, National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD), 1998. Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 5-2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 5 The Highways Component Poverty Analysis The actual identification of below poverty line (BPL) families is done by a survey, known as the BPL or IRDP (Integrated Rural Development Programme) survey, carried out by the Rural Development Department of all the State Governments. Generally, the poverty line is multiplied by an assumed family size (usually 5) and used as a cut-off for the family as a whole. In addition, this survey also uses certain exclusion criteria such as the type of the house, ownership of a minimum amount of land, ownership of certain consumer durables, etc. The latest poverty line information available for Kerala is for 1996-97, which is the base year for the 9t Five Year Plan. The poverty line for the rural areas in the State is Rs. 327.48 per person per month, and that for the urban areas is Rs.372.96. For a family of five members the corresponding figures are Rs. 1,637.4 in rural areas and Rs. 1,864.8 in urban areas. This is comparable to the data obtained through the social impact surveys for this project. The social impact surveys gathered information on the expenditure pattern of the potentially project affected families on a sample basis on 11 road links. The sample expenses included the broad categories of food items, cooking fuel, clothing, health care, lighting and utilities, education, communication, social functions, house rent, newspapers, and hiring of labour. Except three links, all other eight links have been removed from the project priority list; these are not included in this analysis. The Table 5.2 presents the monthly average expenditure pattern obtained from three remaining sample survey links as well as link-wise monthly average income obtained through the 100% census survey of all the project priority links. Table 5-2 Average Expenditure and Income of Project Affected Families Link Link Name Average Monthly Family No. Expenditure Income 1 Taikkod-Kottarakara 2657.0 2 Kottarakara-Chengannur 3443.3 3 Chengannur-Adur 4227.9 6 Muvattupuzha-Angamali 3033.3 6535.5 40 Thrissur-Kuttipuram 2538.9 6629.0 50.1 Palakkad-Shomur 4091.0 70 Muvattupuzha-Thodupuzha 3300.0 1261.3 72 Taickod-Kazhakuttom (NH-47) 5093.0 73 Changanassery-Alappuzha 1218.0 All links average (rounded) 2957.0 3906.0 The data on the sample expenditure pattern was gathered to reflect the quality of life of the project affected families. As Table 5.2 shows, link-wise the respective families have reported monthly expenditure oftien more than a family's monthly income. This is most prominent on Link 70, although the all-links average shows a monthly average family expenditure of Rs. 2957 and income of Rs. 3906. In fact, the project specific all links average monthly family income is much more than the State per capita income (assumed for a family of five members) of Rs. 2,444, the national per capita income of Rs. 2,785, and the State BPL of Rs. 1637.4 (rural) and Rs. 1864.8 (urban). The survey data, however, recorded a number of families in all links as belonging to the below poverty line category. The Table 5.3 shows the number of BPL families. Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 5-3 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 5 The Highways Component Poverty Analysis Table 5-3: Number of Families Below Poverty Line No. of Affected BPL Link No. Families 1 308 2 56 3 161 6 73 40 168 50.1 172 70 119 72 276 73 22 Total 1355 Overall, 18% of the PAFs live below the poverty line. The fact that Kerala is a prosperous State is evident in structure type of the affected buildings. The social impact surveys indicated that approximately 9% of the families use kutcha structures but the remainder are all pucca structures. Aspects of poverty, however, are clear in such parameters as domestic water supply, sanitary latrines, electricity connection, work participation rate, and net domestic product. Table 5.4 assembles a few poverty indicators district-wise (12 project affected districts out of total 14) based on the national census data for Kerala, 1991, comparable with the corresponding survey data on residential structures with water supply (Table 5.5) and structures with electricity connection (Table 5.6). For the purpose of examining water supply and electricity connection, the residential-cum-commercial mixed structures, otherwise considered with commercial structures for the purpose of entitlement, have been added with the regular residential structures. Table 5.5 Residential Structures With Piped Water Supply No. of Structure % of "Yes" No. of o Link Residential Structures Owner's to No. of Tenants' tenant's Response Res. Response Yes No. "Yes" structures "Yes" Res. Mixed* Total I 254 15 269 41 15% 1 0% 2 140 3 143 4 3% 0 0% 3 147 2 - 149 2 1% 0 0% 6 319 30 349 72 21% 20 6% 40 213 9 222 51 23% 2 1% 50.1 113 19 132 9 7% 2 2% 70 159 10 169 92 54% 13 8% 72 246 36 282 7 2% 2 1% 73 17 4 21 4 19% 1 5% Total 1608 128 1736 282 16% 41 2% * Residential-cum-conmmercial mixed structures. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 5-4 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 5 The H,ghways Component Poverty Analysis Table 5.4: Poverty Indicators (All figutes are from the 1991 Census unless otherwise mentioned.) RoadI Ne raooCnupinNrgw rs Road length I' Road length % HH with % -Hes % HHs with Prcapita Wortk AreofomaConsurptonsNetmsownoGros PopuIatio Link Link Name Dsrcs 00 per takh Literacy sate with electricity % fmi okr oetcOpebrationatl ors of Fertiiiser Area (ha) Irrigated Sex Distrits 000sq. Rae drining saitary etectrci ty cosmption Participation product Holdings (ha) Area (ha) (Tonnes) (1994- Area (ha) n Growth Ratio No km ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~population Rt drnig siayconnections os Rate - 1997-98) (1994l-95) Rt (19) (1997) wte tatrines (1996-97) Primary SeconcayTetary (Rs. Mn.) (19M091) ((996-97) 95) (1 995-96) KOerala State 22272 97 8.1 888 51.28 48.43 224.10 kwh 21.40 48.09 18.20 33.88 77829.2 1801823 1981599 187518 2238490 342193 1.34 1036 Phase I Roads 1 Taikkod-Kottarakara Trivandrum 1837 62 69.22 23 75 58.92 54.44 32.60 47.50 16.00 36.50 8135.7 106773 49861 8741 144117 6268 1.27 1036 Kollam 1734 72 90.47 11 96 52.55 49.55 32.10 48.90 22.10 31.00 6108.8 79645 81438 8383 144725 1987 1.01 1035 2 Koltarahara-Adur Kollam Pathanamthitta 1372 116 94.86 10.81 49.09 50.36 29.70 59.80 10.20 30.00 3369.2 89791 155214 7843 94078 5426 0.54 1062 3 Adur-Chengannur Palthianamthitta Alippuzha 1125 5B 93.87 2522 50.50 53.26 34.10 40.50 28.00 33.50 4631.7 83974 0 10220 102951 32406 0.70 1051 6 Muvattupuzha-Angarnalt Ernakulam 2088 75 92.35 45.77 67.39 65.22 33.40 33.20 24.90 41.90 12026.5 126072 8123 19789 181423 50506 1.06 1000 26 ldukki-Puliyanmala Idukki 1694 79 86.94 21.07 31.95 31.99 39.70 77.10 5.50 17.50 3498.4 204127 260907 14903 194682 5078 1.06 975 40 Thrissur-Kuftipuram Thnrissur 1567 158 90.18 18.32 63.63 57.63 32.00 39.20 23.60 37.20 7363.6 124216 103619 15266 153741 71085 1 15 1085 Malappuram 1960 63 87.94 708 47.14 38.04 24.30 54.50 12.50 33.00 4593.9 140266 103417 13756 208757 30384 254 1053 50.1 Palakkad-Shrornur Palakkad 1682 70 81.27 22.37 30.44 38.49 35.50 60.40 13.10 26.50 5543.8 186730 136257 22100 209478 73248 1.53 1061 70 Muvattupuzha-Thodupuzha Ernakulam tdutkkl /2 SH. .- NH.47 Link Trivandrnum 73 Alappuzha-Changanassery Alappuzha Kottayam 2111 116 95.72 18.09 55.33 55.48 31.20 50.20 14.00 35.80 5192.7 146533 8141 25163 182062 9174 0.74 1003 Phase II Roads 4 Chengannur-Ettumanoor Alappuzha KolHayam | Ettumanoor-Muvattupuzha Koltayam Ernakulam 68 P lathara-Pappinissery Kannur 1949 88 91.48 6.12 44.65 45.62 28.90 42.50 21.20 36.30 5624,.7 166621 48734 8581 202492 13902 1054.00 1049 69 Kasaragod-Kanhangad Kasaragod 1024 95 52 51 8 70 33 91 37 50 33.30 49 80 24.10 25.10 2731.6 102708 5625 4267 141842 32848 2.05 1026 74 Thalassery-Valuvapara Kannur 84 Puinalur-Thodupuzha Kottam Pallamt__hitta [Kottayam I ldukki LBtI/Shelad a/CEStICT Page 5-5a Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 5 The Highways Comrponent Poverty Analysis Table 5.6 Structures with Electricity Connection Residential (including Res-Comm.) Structures - Commercial Structures No. of No. of %o ofNo. of %of N.o Structures Structure % of No. of of Structure "Ys" to No.of % of Link No. Owner's "Yes" to Tenants' No. of 's No. of Tenants' tenant's Link No. Owner's Res. Response Structures Response Response"Ys Response comm.L "Yes" Ys Yesps structures Yes" "Yes" structures Res" 1 269 229 85% 11 4% 475 123 26% 292 61% 2 143 90 63% 6 4% 84 20 24% 26 31% 3 149 72 48% 5 3% 92 19 21% 25 27% 6 349 170 49% 27 8% 402 81 20% III 28% 40 222 193 87% 8 4% 82 43 52% 63 77% 50.1 132 102 77% 7 5% 126 38 30% 57 45% 70 169 80 47% 13 8% 114 28 25% 49 43% 72 282 215 76% 7 2% 152 57 38% 69 45% 73 21 14 67% 0 0% 24 9 38% 6 25% Total 1736 1165 67% 84 5% 1551 418 27% 698 45% The surveys showed that the access to water supply at home, an indicator of poverty, was limited to an average of 16% of the structures (Table 5.5). This is less than the State average of 18.89% (Table 5.4), although the individual districts have different averages ranging from 6.12% (Kannur) to 45.77% (Emakulam). The surveys showed that approximately 67% of the structures used by residential owners and 50% structures used by commercial tenants had an electricity connection (Table 5.6). The comparable Statewide figure is 48.43% (Table 5.4). The State per capita electricity consumption (1996-96) is 224.18 kwh. As a socially developed State, approximately 52% of families have sanitary latrines and the baseline sample surveys also showed similar trends. In terms of work participation rate, however, Kerala occupies a very low position at 31.40%. Statewide, 48% persons engage in the primary2 activity, 18.20% in secondary3 activity and the remaining 33.80% in tertiary4 activity. All this is reflected in the Net State Domestic Product of Rs. 77,820.2 million (1997-98). 5.4 Likely Impact of the Project on Poverty Reduction The project has been prepared with utmost care, with the collective contributions of the engineers, economist, environmentalist, sociologist and the potentially affected people, with a view to saving as many families and properties and minimising as much land take as possible. At the preliminary design stage itself many likely negative impacts had been identified and neutralised. Subsequently, as the social impact surveys progressed, more and more potentially affected people and institutions came up with representations, requesting to save their respective properties. These requests have been accommodated as much possible, keeping in view the technical feasibility. The people affected by the project would be compensated and otherwise assisted for their losses according to the provisions of the Resettlement and Rehabilitation Principles and Policy 2 Primary activities include agriculture, forestry and logging, fishing, mining and quarrying. 3 Secondary activities include manufacturing, electricity, gas and water supply, construction. 4 Tertiary activities include transport, storage and communication; railways; transport by other means and storage; trade, hotel and restaurants; banking and insurance; real estate and ownership of dwellings, public administration; other services. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 5-5 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 5 The Highways Cornponent Poverty Analysis Framework of the project. The project will provide employment in construction activities for the local labourers, both for demolition and new construction of buildings as well as for the building of roads. 5.4.1 People's Perception on the Impact on Poverty Reduction It is significant that while 74% of the respondents in the socio-economic sample survey welcome the project, more and more people who took the social surveys and the subsequent land staking out exercise seriously and made representations for alteration of the alignments, considered the project as inducing more poverty because of its magnitude of the number of people affected. Their perceptioni was backed by the stories that in the past whenever the Government acquired private land, the compensation offered was not comparable with the replacement value of land. Another reason for this consideration was that land holding, whether homestead or commercial or agricultural, is typically small in the State and finding suitable alternative plots of land was almost impossible. Moreover, as the project does not introduce any new road but only upgrades the existing roads, no PAP thought it would improve the poverty scene in a significant way. Nevertheless, the project considered the PAP's expectations from the project, further discussed in Chapter 19 on benefits enhancement. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 5-6 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 6 The Highways Component Inpacts of STD/HIV/AIDS Chapter 6 The Highways Improvement And The Impacts Of STD/HIV/AIDS 6.1 Introduction Acquired immuno-deficiency syndrome (AIDS) caused by the human immuno-deficiency (HIV) virus is emerging as a major health problem and is profoundly affecting different aspects of human life. It has emerged as a serious challenge to the public health system in India. According to the National AIDS Control Organisation, Government of India, after the first AIDS case was detected in India in 1986, over two million people are already infected with the HIV infection today.' Various studies carried out worldwide by the World Health Organisation and national organisations have established a direct link between the highways users (more specifically the truck drivers) and the commercial sex workers, which is largely responsible for the transmission of the HIV infection. It is this concern that is discussed in this chapter as an attempt in preventing of the spread of the HIV/AIDS on the improved highways. 6.2 HIV/AIDS in India As the highways are improved, the transport system also improves. Throughout the world, the growth of transport systems has been and continues to be a key element in economic development. In both developed and developing countries, increases in GNP are accompanied by greater investment in both vehicles and transport infrastructure. In the developing world, current trends in population, industrialisation and urbanisation put heavy pressures on the transport networks in general. This trend, in fact, has resulted in a growth of many transport companies and, consequently, vehicles and crewmembers in many parts of India. It is reported that HIV is rapidly spreading to rural areas in India through migrant workers and truck drivers. Surveys show that five to ten percent of the truck drivers in the country are infected with HIV. The World Health Organisation estimates that currently there are two to five million crewmembers (drivers, assistants) of inter-city trucks in India. Besides being away from their homes for most of the year (almost eleven months), 75-90% of these drivers have a high rate of sexual promiscuity with female commercial sex workers and other sex friends enroute upon their travels or at places where they stop for rest. The truck drivers are also reported to engage in homosexual relations with their assistants. The crew members, their spouses and the female commercial sex workers serving these men on the route and also in cities and towns constitute a sexually active population of approximately 5-12 million in India. 6.3 The Kerala Scene Discussions held with the Kerala State AIDS Control Society (KSACS) indicate that four varieties of comrnercial sexual liaison are responsible for the growth of STD/HIV/AIDS: NACO Country Scenario, 1998-99. National AIDS Control Organisation, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Govemrnment of India. New Delhi, undated (1999?). Louis Berger InternationallSheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 6-1 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 6 The Highways Component Impacts of STD/HIV/AIDS * Street based * Family based * Lodge based * Theatre based The street based liaison refers to commercial sex workers (CSWs) who are picked up by clients from identified spots on the streets in a given city or town. "Lodge" based liaison refers to some identified hotels or other residential arrangements where the owners permit the commercial sexual liaison to take place. Farnily based liaison has approval of the family members or community members of the CSWs. "Theatre" based refers to cinema theatres where young men, mostly college students, take CSWs for non-coital sexual gratification. The KSTP engaged the KSACS for a quick survey of the situation in the State for incorporating mitigating factors in the project, as it is feared that increased movement of vehicles on improved roads would increase the incidence of HIVIAIDS by their drivers. The KSACS organised field visits to its project sites at Kanjirapally, Palakkad, Kottayam, Kumily, Kozhikode, Pathanamthitta, Munnar, and Ernakulam. At all these sites interviews and focus group discussions were held with the project team and peer educators. The following aspects were explored during the sessions: With the Project Staff * Does the need assessment give an indication of high risk sexual behaviour on the highways? * Do the sex workers report that the highway drivers and crew form their significant client group? * How does the existing health system address the health issues related to highways? * What could be the complementary strategy if the highway specific sexual health issue exist? With the Peer Educators: * Do they have many clients from among highway drivers and crew and others special in the highway area? * Is there a difference in the condom using habits among the above population? * Did they experience any highway specific sexual health issue in their area? The focus group discussions and the interviews revealed that the truck drivers do not figure prominently. It is estimated that, of all commercial sexual liaisons, truck drivers as clients constitute less than 20%. Several factors discourage truckers' involvement: * The major trucking roads, NH 47 and SH 1, are heavily congested on both sides with residential and shopping areas; * Unlike other states, especially in North India, there are no roadside "dhaba" in Kerala which provide truckers with food as well as clandestine sex facilities; * Kerala is an end destination with fewer transitory trucking routes. Other findings include the following: * The sex workers operating in different parts of the State often engage in sexual encounters with a population having linkages with the highways. This includes picnic groups, vehicle crew, travellers in connection with social festivals, etc. * Sexual encounters inside parked vehicles take place mainly in some lorry stands in town areas. * Condom usage during these encounters is reported to be high. However, it is also reported that sufficient condom outlcts, if identified and promoted, would be a good step forward. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 6-2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 6 The Highways Component Impacts of SID/HIV/AIDS * It is also reported that there are great opportunities for target specific communication to be provided in this area. * Homosexual activity in these areas with those from among highway drivers and crew and others is reported to be rare except at Kottayam and Kumily. In these two areas there are reports of commercial MSM (men having sex with men) activity. * Families and other areas, such as forests, near the highways are often used as operation points for the commercial sexual activity. * It is reported that many adolescent boys and young men come in small groups from other places in their own vehicles, pick up the commercial sex workers from the highways and take them elsewhere for the activity. Most of the time they are drunk and do not carry condoms with them. The CSWs operate mostly on the interstate routes, most notably at and around the check points.2 These routes include the Kottayam-Kumily road which ultimately lead to Tamil Nadu State, NH 17 connecting the city of Kochi in Kerala to Mumbai, and the Valayar check post on NH 47 near Palakkad at the border between Kerala and Tamil Nadu. The check posts are important points because here the truckers get some extra time for themselves before their tum for checking comes. Other geographical areas include remote places in Wayanad district, bordering Tamil Nadu and Karnataka States, where there are only sparsely populated hutments. The CSWs there are known to be women from the poor and vulnerable tribal families. The CSWs interviewed by the KSACS work mostly on individual or family enterprise basis. However, they are not known to be the only source of STD/HIV/AIDS. It is reported that the important source of STD/HIV/AIDS in the State are the young men in the age group of 20-30, who migrate to other parts of the country and abroad in search of livelihoods. They return home to get married without realising that they were infected by HIV elsewhere. Their young wives, typically in their mid-20s, and the newborn children are the new risk groups in the State. It is reported that this form of HIV/AIDS contracting has taken an alarming upward trend in recent years. Fighting the HIIV/AIDS problem in the State started four years ago as part of the programme of the National AIDS Control Organisation. In the Phase I of this effort, emphasis was placed on awareness generation regarding the risks involved. The KSACS, a unit of the State Health Department, has now shifted the strategic plan to contain HIV/AID)S from awareness programmes to active intervention in the risk groups. The KSACS targets the CSWs for intervention where they function. The street based CSWs are known to function during the day wherever their clients take them. In the night, they move to the bus stations in large towns and cities for clients where no activities take place between 10 PM and 5 AM. The women are given condoms and it is reported that in most cases they are successful in persuading the men to use them. The neighbouring State of Tamil Nadu has an active HIV/AIIDS prevention programme and the long distance truckers coming into Kerala are already targeted in that State. Therefore, Kerala at present does not have an active programme to particularly target the truckers. 6.4 Action Plan: What Needs to be Done Although the problem of commercial sexual activity along the highways in Kerala is not known to have assumed much significance, there is a need to address it, especially in the inter-state border road areas, as a preventive measure. It would be advisable to design the support services as part of 2 Check points are identified spots along the highways where the regulatory authorities carry out the verification exercise of motor vehicles, especially trucks, including collection of octroi and excise duties. Louis Berger InternationaVSheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 6-3 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 6 The Highways Component Impacts of STD[HIV/AIDS the highway project with strong and sustainable linkages with the current PSH (partnership in sexual health) projects in the State supported by the British DflD and carried out by NGOs. In the social context of Kerala, it would be worthwhile launching a sexual health awareness programme in connection with social festivals. An action plan has been prepared for awareness campaign and prevention of HIV/AIDS, as shown in the Table 6.1 and a comprehensive budget appended to the R&R budget. The NGOs engaged at the project road level for the implementation of the project will do this job if qualified, or sub- contract specialised NGOs for the purpose. The EIA and the link specific EMPs of the KSTP discusses the health and safety matter during the construction period, which also includes transmission of communicable diseases, such as H1W/AIDS. Therefore, during the construction period the prevention of the problem at the construction camp will be part of the contractor's responsibilities, which would include providing routine medical check up, medical facilities, and condoms. The awareness campaign, to be undertaken by the NGOs, will continue throughout the implementation period. Awareness campaign will include the following activities: * Meetings involving the CSWs (in groups) and identified CSW patrons (individually or in a group, according to particular situations); * Putting up signing/hoardings; * Pictorial literature; * Explaining the health risks through the use of flip charts; * Referral services; * Social marketing of condoms (this is particularly important, as the condom usage rate is reported to be reasonably high by the CSWs interviewed by the KSACS); * Information on availability of pharmacies. The meetings with the CSWs will be organised on a weekly basis by the NGO counsellor. Interaction for awareness generation with the CSW users will be held at identified locations, such as traffic check points, at an interval of 15 days. Louis Berger intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICr Page Chapter 6-4 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 6 The Impacts of HIV/AIDS Table 6.1: Plan for Awareness Campaign and Prevention of HIV/AIDS in the KSTP Project Stage Location Action Theme Action Components Implemention Overseeing Source of Funding Responsibility ResponsibilitySorefFudn Awareness Campaign Signing/hoardings NGO HIV/AIDS Budget Construction Condom dispensing PIU Camp Prevention General medical facilities Contractor Contractor's budget Routine medical check-up Signing/hoardings HIV/AIDS Budget Advertisements Project Site Awareness Campaign, Referral services NGO PIU Implementation Prevention Social marketing of condoms Informartion on availability of pharmacies Signing/hoardings Immediate Advertisements Surrounding of Awareness Campaign, Referral services NGO PIU HIV/AIDS Budget the Project Prevention Social marketing of Locations condoms Informartion on availability ,__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __of pharmacies Louis Berger International/Sheladia/CES/ICT Page Chapter 6-5 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 7 The Highways Component The Vulnerable Groups Chapter 7 The Vulnerable Groups 7.1 Introduction The Kerala State Transport Project defines people as vulnerable if they are identified as eaming up to 25% above the officially recognised "below poverty line" (BPL). The BPL in Kerala currently stands at approximately Rs. 19,000 per annum for a family of five members (average for rural and urban areas). The KSTP R&R Principles and Policy Framework mentions that the vulnerable groups may include but are not limited to the: (a) Poor or landless people falling under the "below poverty line" category; (b) Members of the Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST); (c) Women headed households; (d) Orphans or destitute persons (socially handicapped); and (e) Disabled persons (physically or mentally handicapped). The squatters are also a vulnerable group. The census and social impact surveys did not record the existence of orphans or destitute persons, as squatters or otherwise, within the existing road corridor. The issues of the vulnerable groups in respect of this project and their mitigation are discussed in this chapter. 7.2 "Below Poverty Line" (BPL) BPL is a fiscal line. People not having the capacity to spend for maintaining themselves above that line are known as those below the poverty line. In the social surveys for the KSTP, approximately 1.6% of the affected families surveyed have reported to be BPL. Chapter 5, Poverty Analysis, discusses in detail the BPL rnatter. 7.3 Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) The members of the SC and the ST are the socially and economically deprived sections of the Indian population. The Scheduled Caste groups are at the bottom of the Hindu social hierarchy. These communities lag behind other communities in several respects, such as literacy, occupational status and income level. These differences point to their higher vulnerability. The social impact surveys have identified 79 project affected SC families and only one ST-family. 7.3.1 The Tribal Peoples The tribal peoples are variously known as indigenous peoples and indigenous ethnic minorities. These terms refer to social groups with a social and cultural identity distinct from the dominant society that makes them vulnerable to being disadvantaged in the development process.] The term "tribal" is often pejorative and has political connotations. The people so described have been traditionally marginalized and exploited all over the world by peoples who have occupied their lands. The Constitution of India provides for a special treatment for the uplift of the tribal peoples in India, known as the Scheduled Tribes (ST). l Operational Directive 4.20: Indigenous Peoples. Washington, DC, The World Bank, 1991. Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 7-1 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 7 The Highways Conmponent The Vulnerable Groups It was mentioned earlier that the social impact surveys listed only one tribal family as PAF who will be treated according to the R&R Principles and Policy Framework. The surveys established that this family's socio-economic profile, ownership pattern, resource base, participation and institutional arrangement are no different from non-tribals with whom they live along the project road. Moreover, as this project does not make any incursion into the virgin tribal areas but upgrades and improves only the existing roads, no attempt has been made to prepare a separate indigenous people's development plan (IPDP). 7.4 Women Headed Families Women are generally a vulnerable group in the developing world, although in Kerala they enjoy a very high social status as expressed in terns of literacy level, life expectancy and maternal mortality rate discussed in Chapter 4. However, they are vulnerable in Kerala in respect of their access to the economic resources. The Table 7.1 lists a count of all the affected vulnerable families, comprising BPL, women headed, scheduled caste, scheduled tribe, and disabled person families, numbering 2160 out of the total PAFs of 7454. Table 7.2 presents the corresponding displaced vulnerable families, broken up into titleholder and non-titleholder. Table 7.1: Affected Vulnerable Families Link No BPL SC ST WH Disabled Total 1 308 18 0 65 5 396 2 56 10 1 28 0 95 3 161 8 0 28 0 197 6 73 14 0 120 9 216 40 168 4 0 118 6 296 50.1 172 6 0 87 0 265 70 119 3 0 21 1 144 72 276 14 0 224 I l 525 73 22 2 0 2 0 26 Total 1355 79 1 693 32 2160 Table 7.2: Displaced Vulnerable Families Link No. BPL SC ST WH Total TH NTH TH NTH NTH TH NTH 1 17 30 6 1 0 8 3 65 2 6 1 4 0 1 2 0 14 3 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 5 2 0 0 0 0 2 9 50.1 9 6 0 0 0 5 0 20 70 15 7 0 0 0 0 0 22 72 6 12 8 0 0 9 2 37 73 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 4 Total 60 58 18 2 1 28 7 174 (TH Title Holder; NTH Non-Title Holder) As Table 7.1 shows, the scheduled caste and scheduled tribe families less than 1%, disabled person families less than 1% and 9% families have women as their head. The number of women PAF is less than the State level women headed family number, partly because, in all probability, many Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 7-2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 7 The Highways Component The Vulnerable Groups women-headed families are not affected by the project. However, the percentage of female headed families on Link 72 in this sample, in the district of Trivandrum matches with the State average number. In most cases this female headship results from property being registered in the name of the female. This is especially so in Link 72 where the affected properties are mostly agricultural land. The survey demonstrates that the disabled person, SC and ST families as vulnerable categories are of little numerical significance on the project roads. The KSTP will provide economic rehabilitation grant to all the vulnerable families and plots of land measuring 40 sqm to the non- titleholder vulnerable families, total 68, free of cost. All the 2160 vulnerable families have been accounted for receiving economic rehabilitation grant in the R&R budget of the project. 7.5 Social Characteristics of the Vulnerable Groups On The Project Roads Some of the social characteristics discussed in this section include people's perception regarding the project, women's participation in domestic chores, and comnmon diseases suffered by the people. Data on these aspects were collected on a sample basis from 400 residential structures that were perceived as vulnerable. The significance of this information lies in the fact that these are tools for monitoring the efficacy of the project during the implementation phase. The basic purpose is to see that the project affected persons' standard of living during and after the project implementation does not go below their present level. 7.5.1 Resource Base The economic characteristics of the PAFs (vulnerable families included) has been discussed in previous chapters. Chapter 4 discussed the occupation patterns of the PAFs. Based on the information already recorded, this section outlines the resource base of the vulnerable families. Like the general trend along the project roads, the principal occupations reported by the project affected persons are owning shops and businesses andlor working therein as employees. The latter category is included under private service. The "Other activities" include those that do not fall within the defined categories. The following table shows the occupations engaged in by the vulnerable group families in terms of percentage. The percentage calculation has been obtained on the basis of the total number of vulnerable families in a given link, as obtained from Table 7. 1. Table 7.3 Occupation Pattern of the BPL Families (%) Types 1 2 13 6 40 50.1 70 172 73 No. of BPL families* |3961F 1 F i9 I F-26 1F26 65 144 525 263 Agriculture 3.78 21.0 13.19 11.57 0 0 6.94 38.09 0 Agriculture labourer 12.62 10.5 5.07 0 0 9.43 3.47 9.52 15.38 Plantation 0 21.0 7.61 5.09 18.91 7.54 13.88 0 0 Plantation labourer 7.57 10.5 0 0 9.45 13.20 0 0 0 Allied agri activities 0 0 0 2.31 4.72 3.77 6.94 0 0 Professional 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Governmnent service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Private service 25.25 10.5 1.01 18.51 13.51 15.09 13.88 4.76 23.07 Shops/business 48.26 16.0 62.98 55.55 44.93 47.16 52.08 47.63 46.15 Household indust. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other activities 2.52 0 5.07 2.31 1.68 1.88 1.43 0 7.69 Day labourers 0 10.5 5.07 4.66 6.80 1.93 1.38 0 7.71 Total: 100% 100% 100°/. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% * Number of BPL families, refer to Table 7.1 Louis Berger IntemationalVSheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 7-3 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 7 The Highways Comnponent The Vulnerable Groups As the table above shows, the project affected vulnerable group families have not been recorded to be engaged in any traditional skill based occupations except a few cases, such as carpentry. Most commercial vulnerable farnilies run small shops, like pan (betelnut) shops. The sample income and expenditure patterns of the identified vulnerable families showed that they spend more than earn. This finding is also supported by a recent survey conducted by the Kerala Government for ration cards, which showed that the people spend more than they earn. The project's sample survey shows that while 74% of the respondents welcome the project, the group also fears more road related hazards due to increased traffic after the upgrading of the roads. As discussed before, 18% of the families reported to be below the poverty line and the sample survey recorded approximately 25% people indebted to financial institutions2 and private moneylenders. 7.5.2 Health Problems Information on diseases prevalent on the project road areas was collected. While all respondents reported common diseases like allergy, skin disease, eye problem, teeth problem, etc., there were specific cases of the following diseases: Table 7.4 Diseases on Project Roads Diseases Asth- High Rheu- Arthritis Diabe Jaund Heart TB Kidne Paral- Cancer ma Blood rnatic -tes ice -y ysis Press fever ure oNCmses 18 IS 23 10 9 10 7 4 3 4 2 The State has a good public health care set up which are accessible to all the people. It is expected that good road infrastructure will make accessing the health care centres even better. 7.53 Women's Work Participation The sample size of 400 structures belonging to vulnerable households recorded women's participation in framily activities as the following: Table 7.5 Women's Participation In Family Activities Activity Number of Average daily time (hours) women engaged spent Cooking 586 1.77 Washing 530 1.22 Collection of drinking water 365 0.80 Cleaning of house 437 0.78 Child rearing 165 2.45 Cattle rearing 58 1.91 Household industries 6 5.3 Support for cultivation 39 1.89 Relaxation and entertainment 246 2.28 The Table above shows that while most women surveyed reported cooking as their main family activity, followed by washing and cleaning of house, income generating activities were engaged in 2 Private financing institutions found all over Kerala, conimonly known as the "blade companies" because of their murderous behaviour in the event of non-payment of the loans. Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 7-4 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 7 The Highways Component The Vulnerable Groups by the least number of women. In terms of time spent, relaxation and child rearing take the prinary position. 7.5.4 Women's Decision Making Women also reported their role in domestic decision making on the following matters: Table 7.6 Women's Role In Domestic Decision-Making Activities Percentage of Respondents Financial matters 75% Education of children 66% Health care of children 69% Purchase of assets 66% Day-to-day activities 68% On social functions and marriages 74% In keeping with the generally accepted high social status of women in Kerala, Table 7.6 shows that on project roads also they conmmand a high social status, with more than 60% responses of women participating in significant domestic decision making process as listed in the table. Of utmost significance is the fact that 75% responses confirmed women's participation in domestic financial matters, followed by matrimonial matters. 7.6 Squatters The squatters, often clubbed together with encroachers, are also a vulnerable group because they are often found to be residing or conducting their livelihood activities in the ROW or the corridor of impact. In the context of Kerala roads, the squatter community mostly comprises those running small, raised shops on a platform, locally called a bunk, or otherwise kutcha structures which may or may not have been licensed by the civic authorities. Others in this category include construction workers and migrant labourers from neighbouring States. Table 7.6 presents the numbers of squatter, encroacher, and vulnerable encroacher families along the Phase I roads. Table 7.7: Squatter and Encroacher Families Link No. Project Affected Displaced Vulnerable Squatters Encroachers Squatters Encroachers 1 22 6 1 1 1 2 3 2 2 0 3 3 2 0 0 6 9 11 2 0 40 0 0 0 0 50.1 2 1 1 0 70 4 2 2 0 72 1 2 0 0 73 2 3 1 0 Total 46 29 19 1 Of the 46 affected squatter families 19 will be displaced by the project. While they will not get compensation for land, will get assistance for their structure and other measures as per the project's R&R Principles and Policy Framework. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 7-5 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 7 The Highways Cornponent The Vulnerable Groups 7.6.1 The Status Of Encroachers And Squatters Within The Public ROW Most cases of encroachment and squatting in Kerala are limited to puramboke (revenue) land, although it is common to come across obvious squatting on PWD land, such as a roadside vendor on the ROW. The surveys showed that most of the squatters are small shop owners who are licensed to carry out their livelihood activities on the municipality or panchayat or puramboke land. Some are without any such license. The surveys identified only those bunks as squatters whose owners did not have a license from the civic authorities (Municipality or Panchayath, as the case may be). Others were recorded as simply commercial enterprises, even though the individuals did not own the land on which the bunks were raised. Other squatters included labourers residing on the roadside. 7.6.2 The Laws on Encroachers and Squatters 7.6.2.1 Indian Laws The enactment of the Constitution of India is a significant landmark because it sought to introduce the concept of fundamental rights which serve as affirmative claims against State action. The judiciary in India has played an active role in shaping and furthering the evolution of "obligation of the State not to violate the fundamental rights" to an obligation of the State to take positive measures to establish a society where each citizen can realise his or her fundamental rights. In the post-Constitution India a number of legislative Acts have been passed which relate to the encroachers and squatters, such as The Slum Area (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956, The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, and The Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971. As the names indicate, these laws range from eviction of unauthorised dwellers from State-owned property to those which seek to improve the living conditions in slum areas. The interpretation and application of these laws should be viewed as solving problems, thus furthering the progress of the community as a whole, which is also in keeping with the World Bank's position on encroachers and squatters. The most relevant of these laws, The Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, defines public premises as premises belonging to the Govemment, or vested in any Local Authority by law. The Act provides for the issue of notice to the persons in unauthorised occupation to show any cause against the Order of Eviction. It further authorises the officer appointed by the Government to use force, as may be necessary, to evict an unauthorised occupant from the public premises if the latter does not comply with an eviction order. The officer has power to order demolition of unauthorised construction on public premises. He may also, after the prescribed period of notice, remove, cause to be removed or dispose of by auction, property remaining on such premises. It is pointed out, however, that this Act cannot be implemented in isolation. It has to be carried out in the context of the guarantees under the Constitution of India. Power granted to the State and its authority under this Act should be exercised keeping in view the limits prescribed on the exercise of such power under the Constitution of India. For instance, the officer appointed under the Act is required to ensure that any exercise of power under the Act will stand the Test of Constitutionality. All these also relate to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 1966, and the Directive Principles of State Policy of the Constitution of India. Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 7-6 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 7 The Highways Component The Vulnerable Groups The Supreme Court of India has made a distinction between slum and pavement dwellers, both squatters, which has a bearing on this project.3 The Court has stated that slums which have been in existence for 20 years or more, and which have been improved and developed will not be removed unless the land on which they stand is required for public purpose, in which case alternative sites or accommodation will be provided for them. In the case of pavement dwellers, however, the provision of alternate places is not a condition for the removal of the encroachments. Nevertheless, the Court has ruled that alternate sites should be provided to those pavement dwellers that are in receipt of census cards. A significant matter for this project is that in this particular case, the Supreme Court has ruled that the cut off date for this purpose is the date of census conducted by the State Government prior to the order of eviction. It is clear that in India, sqUiatters and encroachers are not eligible for compensation. Compensation is a legal term, used in connection with land acquisition under Eminent Domain. Therefore, the approach taken for squatters and encroachers is not based on compensation and legal recognition, but on assistance and support for shelter and income, based on humanitarian grounds. As mentioned, the Indian Constitution recognises the right of its citizens to shelter and livelihood, and both the Governent and private development agencies such as NGOs, have a number of targeted programmes, aimed at supporting poor and vulnerable groups. It should be recognised that many of the squatters occupy the space illegally either because they are poor or have no other land for shelter, as the Supreme Court ruling discussed above emphasises, or because of the fact that the road corridor constitutes an economic corridor with customers for various types of businesses and services. Many of the squatters therefore also perform a useful economic and public service, and it may not be in the public's best interest to remove them without assisting them in continuing to carry out their business. 7.6.2.2 State Law The Government of Kerala has enacted The Kerala Highway Protection Act 1999. A whole chapter in the Act is devoted to the "Prevention of unauthorised occupation of highway land and removal of encroachments." The main aspects of this Act with regard to the encroachers and squatters are: * Highway land is deemed to be Government property; * If it appears to the Highway Authority that an encroachment has taken place on the highway land under its jurisdiction, the person responsible for the encroachment will be asked to remove it. Force would be used to achieve this, if required. When an encroachment is made (among others things) for a livelihood, the Highway Authority will surnmanrily remove such encroachment. It is pointed out that like The Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 of the Government of India, the State law too should handle the question of squatters and encroachers with regard to an individual's constitutional rights. The position of the Supreme Court of India is that eviction of the squatters and encroachers will lead to deprivation of their livelihood and consequently, to the deprivation of their life. The Court recognises that these people use public properties for an unauthorised purpose, their intention in doing so is not to commit an offence. Therefore, this does not amount to an offence of criminal trespass under the Indian Penal Codc. 7.6.3 Mitigating the Squatters and Vulnerable Encroachers The Kerala Highway Protection Act 1999 empowers the State Government to remove encroachments from highway land. This legislation should make the task of identifying 3 "Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation." The Supreme Court of India, 1985 [1985(3)SCC545] Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 7-7 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 7 The Highways Component The Vulnerable Groups encroachers easy, as it rests upon the Government to determine and maintain the boundaries of the highways. In keeping with the position of the World Bank on the encroachers and squatters, the Rehabilitation and Resettlement: Principles and Policy Framework document of the Kerala State Transport Project recognises the right of the encroachers and squatters. To safeguard their interests and also, to prevent abuse of resettlement assistance, the Policy Framework determines that the cut-off date for the entitlement of compensation for the non-title holders will be the date of census survey. (This is also the position of the Supreme Court of India, discussed earlier.) The squatters and vulnerable encroachers are not entitled to compensation. Other than that, the Policy Framework offers the following benefits to the squatters and vulnerable encroachers: * Consultation, counselling regarding altematives, and assistance in identifying new sites and opportunities. * Advance notice to harvest non-perennial crops, or compensation for lost standing crops. * R&R assistance for structures or other non-land assets (non-vulnerable encroachers are excluded from this benefit). • Shifting assistance. - Option of moving to resettlement sites (in a group of minimum 25 families) incorporating needs for civic amenities. * Rehabilitation and assistance for lost or diminished livelihoods. * Additional support mechanisms for vulnerable groups in re-establishing or enhancing livelihood. * Employment opportunities in connection with the project to the extent possible. 7.7 Mitigating Other Vulnerable Groups The R&R Principles and Policy Framework enjoins the following benefits to the identified vulnerable groups: * Consultation, counselling regarding altematives, and assistance in identifying new sites and opportunities. * Compensation for land at replacement cost and allowances for fees and other charges. * Advance notice to harvest non-perennial crops, or compensation for lost standing crops. • Compensation for perennial crops and trees, calculated as annual produce value for one season. * Compensation or R&R assistance for structures or other non-land assets. * Shifting assistance. * Option of moving to resettlement sites (in a group of minimum 25 families) incorporating needs for civic amenities. * Rehabilitation and assistance for lost or diminished livelihoods. * Additional support mechanisms for vulnerable groups in re-establishing or enhancing livelihood. * Employment opportunities in connection with the project to the extent possible. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 7-8 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 8 The Highways Component Road Safety Issues Chapter 8 Road Safety Issues 8.1 Introduction One million people are killed and 10-15 mnillion people are injured or disabled in road traffic accidents (RTAs) every year worldwide. The developing countries suffer the most and the annual loss is estimated to exceed a staggering amount of US$1000 billion, which is equivalent to nearly twice the value of all development assistance. It is estimated that 75% of road fatalities occur in developing countries and clearly the RTAs constitute a major health problem.' With approximately 50 fatalities per 10,000 vehicles, compared to less than five in North America and Western Europe, India has a high RTA rate2. Within India, Kerala occupies the dubious distinction of leading in the road related accidents with 37,072 accidents and 2,711 deaths in 1999- 2000. The mixture of buses, trucks, cars, motorized rickshaws, motorcycles, bicycles and pedestrians travelling at vastly different speeds create extremely unsafe driving conditions. Moreover, roads in Kerala are typically narrow. It would appear that approximately 81% of road users are pedestrians, but 90% of the road space is black top covered for the remaining 19% people as motorists. As the clippings from the local press show (presented in this chapter on an A-4 size sheet), almost everyday a number of persons die as a result of RTAs in the State, but the road designers have been accused of failing to acknowledge pedestrians and also that they give scant attention to the road safety issues. In the context of Kerala the social problems associated with the unsafe roads are many: * Children go to school mostly unescorted by family elders. In the absence of footpaths they are often RTA victims. * Most drivers are not aware that they are supposed to halt their vehicles if a school bus ahead of them stops. * In the common RTAs, a family loses a dear member, perhaps the family earner, and is doomed to poverty. Society loses trained professionals, such as teachers, doctors and others. * Drivers have inadequate knowledge of driving norms, regulations, and disciplines and no observance of them. * In the absence of proper drainage and poor road shape, there are always pools of water after rains and pedestrians get splashed with muddy water by fast driven motor vehicles. * Use of the vehicle horns, most of the time unnecessary, causes immense social and health problems as well as acute discomfort. * It is humiliating and dangerous for a pedestrian, waiting to cross a road, when a fast approaching driver turns left or right, without any signals. The motorists simply have no regard for pedestrian safety or well being. * There is an almost total absence of safety refuges and footpaths and little regard by engineers for these essential facilities. The Global Road Safety Partnership flier, The World Bank, undated (August?), 2000; Guidelines on Road Safety Action Plans and Programmes, United Nations/ESCAP, New York, 1999. Transport and Road Research Laboratory/Overseas Development Administration, Towards Safer Roads in Developing Countries. Overseas Unit, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthome, Berkshire, EnglandRG 11 6AU, 1991. Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 8-1 S ~Sjtudecnctkilled Mishap prse ai: 15 mURtJULY 17 .sNwsE to which the assis t on+"^ ! - shldent *~~~~vas kff~Tirt vathaPUrara, Nov *f 5/_) t . ~~Four kle v 7 Two killed in in mishap '^ 8 PR road ccidn Byour StaffReporter *> g w sw R.Oner d c, ,eed nt Ms. 2 . Four per S One killed in accident N I -ACCHI JAN. Z7 e av -~ Fx erort5-7-e~9S2ur lz A I*| 1 8 killed ~~in .S ... sl' _Oa.7 I! mishap ^9 e y | SV ()RS SLaff Repor' Nf4 V \ f K0,4K -s AUG,1 . t - Ail n5t . . f e dt000sz / policy 2°=- ~~~~iv ApX-e . blame e Zh fl nr h Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 8 The Highways Component Road Safety Issues 8.2 Analysis of Accident Data As shown in Table 8.1, the accident rate has apparently decreased slightly between 1996 and 1998, although below any level of statistical significance. The accident rate suddenly jumped to more than 11% during 1999-2000. Table 8.2 shows the breakdown of accidents by district during daylight and at night time. This demonstrates that 29 percent of ascidents occur during darkness whereas the project traffic surveys indicate that approximately 25 percent of trips occur at these times. Table 8.1: Accident Rates, Kerala, 1995-2000 Year No. of Accidents No. of Injuries No. of Deaths 1995-96 37,1123 53,475 2,707 1996-97 34,702 51,168 2,707 1997-98 33,820 47,668 2,668 1998-99 33,296 46,397 2,668 1999-2000 37,072 49,399 { 2711 Increase/Decrease 95196-96197 -7.0% 4.5% 0.0% 96/97-97/98 -2.6% -7.3% -1.5% 97/98-98/99 -1.55% -2.67% 0.0% 98/99-99/2000 11.4% 6.47% 1.61% Sources: Director General of Police of Kerala, Trivandrun Table 8.2: Motor Vehicle Accidents By Time Of Day During 1997-98 SI No. District Daylight Darkness Time not Total .________ ___________ Known 1 Thiruvananthapuram 2323 1252 11 3586 2 Kollam 1375 1517 11 2903 3 Pathanamthitta 952 388 13 1353 4 Alappuzha 2112 764 1 2877 5 Kottayam 1967 511 - 2578 6 Idukki 686 192 - 878 7 Ernakulam 3810 1782 86 5678 8 Thrissur 1904 1153 56 3113 9 Palakkad 1559 613 - 2172 10 Malappuram 1916 422 2 2340 1 1 Kozhikode 2410 727 2 3139 12 Wayanad 439 139 - 578 13 Kaanur 1681 106 1787 14 Kasaragode 676 162 - 383 Totals 23,810 9,826 182 33,820 Percent 70.4 29.1 0.5 100.0 Source: Director General of Police Table 8.3 demonstrates that while buses are 3.7% of the vehicular fleet they are involved in 20.1% of the accidents. Two-wheelers form 53.1% of the fleet but are involved in only 21.9% of the Louis Berger Internationial/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 8-2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 8 The Highways Component Road Safety Issues accidents. This could be due to the fact that buses travel more kilometres per year than other types of vehicles. The project traffic surveys show that buses represent I .1% of the trips and therefore they still appear to be responsible for a higher proportion of accidents than their mileage would justify while accidents involving two-wheelers appear to be in proportion to their number of trips. This supports the popular perception that bus drivers drive less carefully than the drivers of other types of vehicles. The above discussion suggests that there is a need for additional training for bus drivers in safe driving techniques and for sanctions for those who cause accidents or are obsessed to drive in a dangerous manner. It may also require the relaxing of bus schedules that were made years ago when the pressure on the roads was considerably less. In addition, there is a need for improvements in yehicle design and in maintenance to include engineering features that would improve bus safety and road safety in general. The absence of effective rear lights has been noticed on the majority of State owned buses. Table 8.3: Proportion Of Accidents By Vehicle Types Type Of Vehicle Total Total Percent Percent Percent Accidents Per Vehicles Accidents Vehicles Accidents Trips 1,000 Vehicles Buses 55,482 6,996 3.7 20.1 11.1 126.1 Goods Vehicles 139,145 3,744 9.3 10.8 20.0 26.9 Cars 263,274 5,067 17.4 14.6 31.43 18.5 Jeeps 67,329 2,650 4.4 7.6 - 39.4 Auto rickshaws 164,835 6,516 10.9 18.8 14.5 39.5 Two-Wheelers 800,142 7,620 53.1 21.9 22.6 9.5 Miscellaneous 17,831 2,135 1.2 6.1 0.4 119.7 Totals 1,508,038 34,728 100.0 100.0 100.0 23.0 Sources: Motor Vehicles Department for vehicle statistics (1998), Director-General of Police for Accident statistics and the Project traffic census for percent trips. 8.3 Design Parameters for the Road Safety Improvements The design of the road improvements planned under the Kerala State Transport Project includes engineering features that should minirnize the accident rate as far as is possible. The types of measures that can be incorporated include: * Introduction of 40 km/hr speed limit through the more heavily built up areas with special attention to policing. * The separation of pedestrians and bicycles from motorized traffic, especially the provision of footpaths. This includes the use of covered drains as footpaths in areas where the corridor is narrow to avoid land take in addition to providing footpaths alongside narrow bridges. * Clearance of footpaths of obstructions such as trees, utility poles, rubbish tips and transformer stations. (Their clearance can also reduce the severity of accidents for vehicles leaving the roadway.) * Improved lines of sight. * Provision of lay-bys, off-road bus stops and service roads. * Improved junction designs with signing and priority lining. Provision of safety barriers. (These are generally provided above slopes in excess of six meters in height or ponding water which could threaten the safety of vehicle occupants.) Includes jeeps Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 8-3 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 8 The Highways Component Road Safety Issues * Provision of road signing. • Channelisation of traffic. * Installation of street lighting in urban areas, specifically designed to improve safety where there is a proven higher incidence of accidents during the hours of darkness. * Provision and enforcement of safe pedestrian crossing facilities. The measures that can be taken will be limited by the physical nature of the corridors through which the roads pass. These are winding with tight curves and inadequate geometry. The possibilities for improved lines of sight are not only limnited by these curves but by the existence of buildings, walls, vegetation and fences. On the social side, it may be difficult to convince bus drivers to use bus lay bys because of the difficulties of re-entering the traffic stream and because in many locations people at bus stops overflow onto the pavement. Without the provision of "speed bumps", effective policing, or some other measure to slow traffic it will be difficult to make drivers stop at pedestrian crossings. Based on a sample strip map page from Link 2, the following table shows the safety measures adopted in the design of the roads. The copy of the strip map reproduced overleaf has been reduced in size. The measurement refers to the original 1:1000 scale. Table 8.4: Safety Measures in Road Design Set Back of Sr. Link Chainage Property No. Col Width Building from No. N Co. nage Left/Right the edge of the road 91.800 L-1 14.0 7.0 2 R-2 14.0 6.0 3 91.870 R-5 14.0 6.0 4 91.890 L4 X 14.0 7.0 5 91.930 R-8 14.0 5.0 6 2 91.970 L-7 14.0 10.0 7 91.990 L-8 14.0 11.0 8 91.990 R-9 14.0 5.0 9 92.040 L-10 14.0 6.0 10 92.095 L-12 14.0 4.2 11 ____ 92.130 L-15 13.0 2.0 8.4 Behaviour Pattern Associated With Driving In all countries the driving of a vehicle appears to stimulate an individual's aggressive instincts. In developing countries this appears to be accentuated not only by an individual's powerlessness in his normal situation as compared to his feeling of power when he is behind the wheel of a vehicle but also by ineffective policing. The sense of aggression is particularly noticeable among bus drivers and as indicated before, they appear to be involved in a higher number of accidents than could be justified by their mileage. There appears to be a need for a focused and sustained program to encourage safe driving rather than the offensive driving that is so much part of the local culture. This must involve training, education through the media, enforcement and sanctions against offenders. Bus drivers, the majority of whom are employed by a single entity, the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, should be the easiest group to reach and the one who could have the greatest impact on reducing accidents. Other Government drivers also form a large proportion of motorists and should be easily targeted for further training. Another action to improve safety is improved road maintenance and the prevention of the use of the right-of-way to store materials, dump wastes and for other uses which block pedestrian pathways forcing pedestrians onto the roadway and sometimes forcing vehicles to move to the Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 8-4 KOTTARAKARA ADUR. ADUR - ~ ~ t '11 ----' ' ' -- i- 5- -6 -!,1 D- - t \ | \; ADUR. o = :~~~~~7 - BUILDING COMMERCIAL USE B (C) TEMPLE TREE Ic- NFEw-\ L CEN'TER L NE NOTE:- BUILDING RESIDENTIAL USE a (R) CHURCH GATE X a ELECTRICITY POLE LX.STUNRG OGHTERI L 1. rREA -N (RCJNDEC) 13ARBED WRE BOUNDAR - MOSQUE 2., 'C J A: - - - - BOUNDARY WAUL POND KM STCNE 0 WXISING ROAD EDGES LOIjS BERGER INTERNATIONAL _nc. --U O - -- K S ___. ,_ 8RI23 05L2)DGI j PUS IC WORKSDEPMENT O(OA I KeralBa State Transport Project A ABo*,tIo. dit4 S,do (USA) lWd _____|_ B2NE O1DCC' SfRI KE P ERALA. ND_A T,-1 PA Id AA, ~- BGUAI .fR I 'Al" STRIP MAP / LA%ND PLAN K01LDTARrAKARAk - ADUR Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 8 The Highways Component Road Safety Issues right. Drains need to be covered and maintained in a smooth and regular pattern and must be kept clean to be effective. Footpaths must be created and maintained in such a way as to encourage pedestrians to use them. Progressively higher insurance costs for offending drivers should encourage road safety norms, as will the imposition of compulsory eye testing as part of any driving license application/renewal and loss of license for serious offenders. 8.5 Action Plan To Address The Problems of Road Safety The respective roles of the State Government, the PWD, Driver Education, the Police, and the Transport Department are outlined here. The independent road safety auditor has separately prepared a detailed action plan for the project. It will be implemented by the PWD in cooperation with the Transport and Police Departments. A budget of US$ 7.5 million has been earmarked in the general BOQ of the project for this purpose, which includes such components as improvements of accident blackspots and road safety furniture and markings. 8.5.1 The Government of Kerala One of the most important assets of the State Government is the State road system. The role of the road corridors is to provide the facility for safe and speedy transport of people and goods, both by vehicles and for pedestrians. New projects will develop following the KSTP but an improvement in the road fabric in terms of alignment and pavements will not solve the main problem of road safety. In fact, with "improved" roads vehicle speeds will increase and the incidence and severity of RTAs will also increase if positive action is not taken now. As indicated earlier, India is one of the leaders in the incidence of RTAs and the Kerala State suffers from a record twice as bad as the national average. This fact alone must be sufficient evidence to convince the public and the policy makers that something needs to be done. The existing Kerala State Road Safety Council (KSRSC) and the District Road Safety Councils (DRSC) are useful vehicles for effecting change. There is some pressure on the Councils and news features and letters in the local press provide ample justification for some drastic action. It is, therefore, recommended that each Road Safety Council support an Action Sub-Committee with authority to act and to receive the backing in terms of political support to effect action. There must be State level reform in attitudes to the whole sphere of road usage. It is recommended that a road safety policy unit meets with representatives from the principal players. representatives with authority to underwrite an agreed action plan. The road system cannot be changed overnight. It will undergo a relatively slow metamorphosis. It is, therefore, most important to accept that the existing standard of roads may be here for some time and all roads should be reviewed by the PWD to ensure compliance with modern traffic management techniques (safety audits). Funding is quoted as one of the major limitations confining the activities of the DRSCs. There must be a more equitable distribution of available funds aimed at the promotion of road safety. 8.5.2 The PWD The role of the PWVD must be to effect the following physical changes in the road system compatible with a realistic funding level and target dates for implementation; hence the planning of the necessary budget provisions: Louis Berger InternationallSheladia Associates/CES. ICT Page Chapter 8-5 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 8 The Highways Component Road Safety Issues * New road signing - mandatory and advisory; * New road lining - especially junction priorities but also centre and edge lines; • Review junction layouts and potential for one-way systems (traffic management); and * Periodic maintenance (resurfacing) to be preceded by a formal road safety audit and provision of footpaths and shoulder improvements made~ in all projects before formal approval. A senior PWD engineer of the rank of Executive Engineer in each District will be one of the most active participants on the road safety action committee (RSAC) and would be responsible for reporting progress on field activities by the PWD to the RSAC. This officer will coordinate with the District and State Emergency Response Councils, the Police Department, the Motor Vehicles Department, etc. One of the first priorities is to gain a baseline reference for monitoring the status of RTAs in each District and this can be done very quickly. It is necessary to obtain the current accident reporting forms from the police, to review them and to make any changes needed, quickly sending out the revised forms for field use. A copy of each of the newly completed police RTA forms should be sent to the PWD District Engineer's office within two days of each accident. There needs to be clear definitions of each RTA relative to its location, most likely cause assessed by the police and the seriousness. RTAs are usually classified as "damage" only (often not reported), "slight injury" where patients are discharged from hospital the same day, "serious injury" where victims are hospitalised for more than three days and "fatal" where death is reported within 30 days of the RTA (this could require a follow up report from the police following submission of the first RTA report). The District Senior Engineer would be responsible for making up schematic road maps in simple strip maps for rural roads or based on town maps indicating upon them the location of all RTAs as they are reported using a colour coding for seriousness and separation year by year. It will also be necessary for the Senior Engineer's office, having collected the reports, to prepare a monthly summary for release to the press (within 10 days of the end of each month?). Only by accurate monitoring and reporting can there be any measure of possible success. The Committee and the public need to be aware of the accident trends and the most common causes. As records develop over months and years, accidents in which road conditions are a contributory factor need to be investigated. Engineers should carry out safety audits with senior police officials and traffic engineering measures identified to reduce the source of danger. With regard to the RTA records, there is a need to adapt the present accident recording system to use the TRL (Transport Research Laboratory, UK) RTA Data System. TRL offers two complementary softwares: SafeNET and MAAP. SafeNET is a software package for assessing the safety of a traffic management scheme and it assists traffic engineers in the design of safer road networks. Its capabilities of modelling road networks include: . Roundabouts; * Mini-roundabouts; * Traffic signal junctions; * Urban and rural priority T-junctions; * Urban crossroad and staggered junctions; * Urban single carriageway roads; * Urban roads including minor junctions; and Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICTr Page Chapter 8-6 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 8 The Highways Cornponent Road Safety Issues * Traffic calming measures. The software package MAAP (Microcomputer Accident Analysis Package) provides the accident investigator with the latest techniques in accident data storage and analysis which facilitates accident, casualty and vehicle cross tabulations with graphical presentation and stick diagram analysis. The safety benefits that can be derived from identifying hazardous locations through careful analysis of accident data, studying sites and then designing appropriate remedial measures have proven to be particularly high in developed and other developing countries.4 The effectiveness of this approach can be maximised by a planned programme of remedial measures based on accident reduction targets for the highways authorities, viz., the PWD in Kerala. The four main strategies are: single site or black spot programme, mass action plans, route action plans, and area wide schemes. 8.5.3 Driver Education There is a very big problem in Kerala with driver attitudes. The national Motor Vehicle Rules 1989 apply to the whole country and there is no reason why they should not be observed and enforced in Kerala. They form the basic legal requirement for all drivers and law enforcers and yet they are blatantly disregarded. T'here are several advisory publications in the market, viz., Guidelines for Safe Driving issued by MOST and a Driver's Handbook published privately. Unfortunately, neither of these is totally true to the Motor Vehicle Rules 1989 and they refer only to drivers. What is required is a Kerala specific Highway Code defining the conduct of all road users. This should be in accordance with the National Standards or where these are not adequate, revised using an international standard. Driving tests will need to be re-appraised. The handbook in the Malayalam language on 100 standard questions framed for driving tests is not totally appropriate for modem road conditions. A thorough knowledge of the new Highway Code should be the basis of any driving test in addition to the proven capability to control a vehicle on the road in trafficas should be the ability to read a number plate from 20 metres. The Highway Code should possibly follow the UK (or other pattem) and include a fixed penalty system for offences. It is important that good police training and court procedure enable rapid treatment of offenders and also that representatives of law enforcement contribute to the drafting of any new code. The adoption of the new code should have a target date of six months from inception and involve a small working party made up of Representatives from the Transport Department; P.W.D; Police; Judiciary; and A Road User Association 8.5.4 The Police The police will require retraining. The role of the police should as far as possible be advisory and educational but it is essential that the road user leams to respect their authority. This will only be achieved if police drivers are better trained and set an example. In most countries police drivers and those of other emergency vehicles are the best trained. Additional training is necessary for 4 Road Safety Guidelines, Global Road Safety Partnership Prograrrmme. Louis Berger IntemationaliSheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 8-7 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 8 The Highways Component Road Safety Issues drivers at large if they need to drive HGV, and a higher standard again is required to drive Public Service Vehicles PSV (carrying in excess of six persons?). The Police should be in the forefront of road user education expanding their current good work in schools and also on the roads. Minor user misdemeanours should result in guidance and warnings, only blatant disregard for the rules or abuse upon the police authority should result in enforcement action. All drivers must appreciate that disregard for the rules will result in fines, loss of the licence, or in some instances imprisonment. The loss of a licence should be a sufficient threat to most drivers, since it could result in the loss of their means of livelihood and as long as the rules are enforced without favour drivers should react quickly. 8.5.5 The Transport Department All vehicles operating on public highways must conform to certain standards in their construction design and operational safety. At present, the designs of the public vehicles are not sensitive to the needs of children, disabled persons or women (especially those clad in a sari). The basic requirement should be laid down in the Highway Code and enforced with the help of effective policing and court action. Some basic requirements include. * Rear view mirrors * Front & rear lights + rear reflectors * Reversing lights * Indicator lights and horn X Effective brakes and steering * Functioning speedometer * Mudguards X Roadworthy tyres with tread depth greater than 2 mm * Windscreen and effective windscreen wipers etc. * Evidence of an approved third party insurance as a minimum requirement. Vehicles over three years old should be tested at licensed centres which must be appropriately qualified. The annual registration of a vehicle must be dependent upon the production of a valid "test certificate" in addition to the insurance and other documents if more than three years old. 8.5.6 Traffic Courts There needs to be participation of the road safety stakeholders in the drafting of any new Highway Code and to ensure adherence to the laws of the country. There also needs to be guidance on police action and the means of presenting prosecutions to the courts. There is also a responsibility for legal observance over the whole process to ensure unbiased policing and prosecution from corruption or favour. 8.5.7 Highway Code Publication and Publicity This should be a Government document available for sale at a modest price at all bookshop outlets. It should have a foreword by the Chief Minister or the State Govemor commending it to the people and seeking universal observance of the rules and laws in the code. Louis Berger InteniationaUSheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter S-8 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plani Chapter 8 The Highways Comnponent Road Safety Issues There is little doubt that improved roads and better standards of driving will have a beneficial effect on tourism in the State. If the Tourism Department has the resource, it may be possible to use their expertise in the production and distribution of the code. The Tourism Department may also be able to use their expertise in media presentation and coverage to the new code and road safety issues generally. 8.6 The Project Action Plan The Action Plan will be widely circulated and the respective District Road Safety Committee will be responsible to oversee its implementation. Louis Berger Internationial/Siheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 8-9 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 9 The Highways Component Resettlement Policies Chapter 9 Resettlement Policies and Legal Framework 9.1 Introduction The Public Works Department of Kerala has prepared the R&R Principles and Policy Framework for the Kerala State Transport Project in accordance with the principles laid down in the World Bank OD 4.30 on Involuntary Resettlement, OD 4.20 on Indigenous Peoples and the legal framework of the Government of India. The Kerala State Government approved this policy document in August 2000. This action plan has been prepared on the basis of the broad outlines formulated in the policy document (Annex 9.1). 9.2 Policies and Legal Framework 9.2.1 The World Bank Policy The World Bank has set out certain mandatory social impact mitigation requirements for its loan projects. The OD 4.30 describes the Bank policy and procedures for projects that involve involuntary resettlement. This policy aims to improve, or at a minimum, restore the welfare of the people who will be displaced because of a development project. This policy also requires that projects minimize the need for involuntary resettlement. Where displacement is unavoidable, resettlement plans should pay particular attention to the vulnerable groups. The other rclevant Bank document, OD 4.20 provides specific safeguards when indigenous peoples are anticipated to be adversely affected by a development project, such as the Kerala State Transport Project. 9.2.2 The Indian Legal Framework The most relevant Indian regulations for facilitating resettlement and rehabilitation are: The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (amended 1984). This Act is the principal document for procedures to be followed for acquisition of land by the Government for public purposes and for determining compensation. While this Act does not per se provide for mitigation measures, its Section 23 discusses compensation at market price. the market value of land being determined "at the date of the publication of the notification." The Environmental Guidelines for Rail/Road/Highway Projects, Ministry of Environment & Forest, Government of India, 1989, on relocation of project affected persons. These are just guidclines and the Government is not bound to implement these provisions. Nevertheless, the Guidelines have a section on relocation, which recommends the following mitigation measures for social impacts: (a) Advance notification of enough (say, two years) time must be given to enable the relocatees to find a suitable place. At the same time, the project authorities could arrange for public relations through television, radio, and advertisement on the need for the project and how land acquisition and compensation will be effected. (b) Advance realistic payment should be available in some form for the relocatees to secure a new unit. (c) The estimation of compensation for land and property should be based on the fair market value. The termfair mlarket valute is defined as being the amount at which the property would exchange between a willing buyer and a willing seller and both parties should have reasonable knowledge of all relevant facts. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CESICT Page Chapter 9-1 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 9 The Highways Component Resettlement Policies (d) The choice of replacement of a living unit organized by the project authority may be made available for the relocatees who are not satisfied with the compensation amount or who cannot find a suitable house. (e) Re-establishment cost must be carefully considered to offset the loss in income, increase in expenditure resulting from disconnection of public utility services and moving cost. Special attention must be paid to the possible loss of job or business that cannot be re-established. (f) In case of any squatters. a special programme for construction of a low cost housing unit (the labour provided by relocatees) may be set up. (g) A social work subsection should be established to follow up and monitor the problems faced by the relocatees. This sub-section should also be entrusted with the responsibility to ensure that individual households relocated receive sufficient compensation with enough lead time to secure a living unit. The Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 1994, on comprehensive rehabilitation plan. This Notification, which applies to highway projects costing more than Rs. 50 crore (Rs. 500 million), has a provision for a comprehensive rehabilitation plan, if more than 1000 persons are likely to be displaced. It requires the impact assessment agency (i.e., the PWD) to prepare a set of recommendations based on technical assessment of documents and data, in interaction with the affected people and environmental groups. 9.3 The Resettlement Policy The Kerala State Transport Project's Resettlement & Rehabilitation Principles and Policy Framework provides guidance for a developmental approach to resettle and rehabilitate the people affected by the project. In particular the policy document highlights that: * Wherever possible, displacement will be reduced or avoided altogether by sensitive design of civil works (viz., alternative designs or modifications to the design). * Where displacement is unavoidable, those displaced will have their living standards improved. * As far as possible, the displaced persons from one location will be located as a single unit. Particular attention will be paid to the needs of the most vulnerable groups to be resettled. * The PAPs will be compensated at replacement cost for assets lost, irrespective of their legal standing in the project area. Special assistance will be extended to the vulnerable to enhance their eaming opportunities. The PAPs and the host communities will be encouraged to participate in the design and the implementation of the RAP. 9.3.1 Definitions The policy document, to be found as Annex 9.1, describes all of the relevant definitions of the terms used. Some of the important definitions are highlighted here: * The cut-off date for titleholders will be the date of issue of the notice under section 4(1) of The Land Acquisition Act (1894/1984). In the case of non-title holders it is the date of the start of the census survey in the respective road links. * A person above the age of 18 years has been defincd as a separate family unit and will be eligible for support, if affected by the project. * A project affected person (PAP) is one who sustains damage as a consequence of the project by (a) reasons of severing such land or (b) affecting his/her immovable properties in any manner or (c) adversely affecting his/her livelihood/earnings calculated by an objective assessment. This category includes project displaced persons. Louis Berger Itternational/Slheladia Associates/CES'ICT Page Chapter 9-2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 9 The Highways Component Resettlement Policies A project displaced person (PDP) is one who is compelled to change his/her place of residence and/or work place or place of business due to the project. * The category of vulnerable group of persons is defined as those persons falling under the "Below Poverty Line" category and earning up to 25% above the poverty level. This group includes the disadvantaged persons belonging to the Scheduled Castes and Tribes, disabled persons, orphans, destitute persons and women headed households. * Below poverty line (BPL) is a sum determined by the respective State Governments for rural and urban areas separately, that indicates the monthly average minimum spending on basic items for survival for a person. For Kerala this sum currently stands at Rs. 327.48 for rural areas and Rs. 372.96 for urban areas. The poverty line in India is defined on the basis of recoitimended nutritional requirements of 2400 calories per person per day for rural areas and 2100 for urban areas. This is the official definition of poverty line in India. In monetary terms, the poverty line is the total per capita monthly expenditure by which this recommended level of calorie intake is satisfied. The calories intake is then calculated based on the monthly per capita expenditure. * An encroacher is a person who has trespassed on Government land, adjacent to his/her own land or asset to which he/she is not entitled and who derives his/her livelihood and housing from the encroached land pnror to the cut-off date. * A squatter is a person who has settled on publicly owned land (and other private land) for housing or livelihood without permission or who has been occupying publicly owned building without authority prior to the cut-off date. 9.3.2 Entitlement Policies for Each Category of Impact The R&R policy of the project provides for a comprehensive package of compensation and assistance to entitled persons, families and groups suffering losses as a result of the project. It provides mitigating measures for: * Loss of assets, including land and house or work place; * Loss of livelihood or income opportunities; and * Collective impacts on groups, such as loss of community assets, common property resources and others. Even in cases where no compensation for land is possible, as in the case of encroachers and squatters who are illegal occupants of land, the project will offer compensation and assistance for physical structures, relocation and rehabilitation. The implementation of the administration of compensation will be based on specific provisions as agreed in the RAP. 9.3.3 Method of Valuation of Losses The method of valuation of compensation used for affected structures, land, trees, other assets and assistance has been detailed in Chapter 16. The compensation values vary according to the use pattem and place, but an average amount has been used for indicative purposes. 9.4 Measures to Avoid Litigation Precedents show that land transfer almost always involves litigation which is costly and time consuming. Under the Land Acquisition Act 189411984, an affected person may accept the award of compensation under protest and appeal to a court of law for further reference. To avoid litigation, the R&R policy of the project has a provision for setting up State and district level committees to assess the replacement value of a property and advise the R&R Cell of the PWD Loutis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 9-3 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 9 The Highways Comnponent Resettlement Policies accordingly. The most important expected outcome of these comrmnittees is the deliberation of the difference of valuation between the amount of award of compensation by the District Collector and the replacement value of the property. The agreeable difference will be offered to the affected persons under the head of replacement value. 9.5 Summary of Entitlement Matrix The broad entitlement framework comprising the compensation and assistance actions is summarized in Table 9. 1. Table 9.1: BROAD ENTITLEMENT FRAMEWORK KERALA STATE TRANSPORT PROJECT Resettlement and Rehabilitation: Broad Entitlement Frame Work . . .~~~ Land Inside Right of Impacts and assistance criteria a n Wah acqui_sition Na o VVulnerable ulnerable Vulnerable Vulnerable A. Corridor of Impact: Loss of land and other assets Support given to families and households 1 Consultation, counseling regarding alternaives. and assistance in identifying new sites and / .1 1 1 opportunities 2 Compensation for land at replacement cost. plus allowances for fees or other charges 1 3 Advance notice to harvest non-perennial crops, or compensation for lost standing crops 4 Compensation for perennial crops and trees, calculated as annual produce value for one 1 1 season 5 Compensation or R&R assistance for structures or other non-land assets 1 V / 1 * 6 Shifting assistance . 1 1 1 7 Option of moving to resettlement sites (in a group of minimum 25 famnilies) incorporating 1 / 1 ____ needs for civic amenities B. Corridor of Impact: Lost or diminished livelihood Support given to adult individuals 8 Rehabilitation and assistance for lost or / V / dimninished livelihood 9 Additional support mechanisms for vulnerable groups in re-establishing or enhancing 1 V livelihood 10 Employment opportunities in connection withb / _ project to the extent possible I I_I 11 Any other impacts not yet identified, whether Unforeseen impacts shall be documented and loss of assets or livelihood mitigated based on the principles agreed upon in this policy framework C. Indirect, group oriented impacts in the vicinity of the road corridor Group oriented support will be given to mitigate negative impacts on the conmmunity, and to enhance development opportunities. Addressing traffic safety needs of pedestrians will target particular support at more vulnerable groups, for examnple. * The entitlements will exclude the affected non-vulnerable encroachers but include non-vulnerable squatter. Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 9-4 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter I 0 The Highways Component Consultation and Participation Chapter 10 Consultation And Participation 10.1 Introduction Development projects are by definition external interventions. Direct involvement of the intended target groups or their representatives in the process of project preparation and negotiation is not a common practice. To change this state of affairs, development institutions are using methods that come under the name of "participatory development" or "people's participation", which is considered by many to be a prerequisite for sustainable development. Experience indicates that involuntary resettlement generally gives rise to problems for the affected population. It also shows that problems reduce when people are properly informed and consulted about the project and allowed to make meaningful choices and participate in the decision making process. This not only rcduces the insecurity among the PAPs but also avoids opposition to the project which otherwise is likely to occur. Therefore, as indicated in Chapter 2. the project preparation involved consultations with stakeholders, proposed project affected persons and groups in the forms of scoping workshops, project level individual and focus group meetings, district and State level meetings. 10.2 Levels of Consultation The public consultation exercise during the project preparation involved information dissemination - informing the people about the details of the project and to invite their comments before finalizing the engineering design. The consultations were carried out with individuals during the screening survey stage and with both individuals and groups during the detailed social impact surveys. In addition, three State level scoping workshops were conducted in three different key locations. 10.2.1 Scoping Workshops Three scoping. workshops were conducted during January-February, 2000 in the three key locations of Thiruvananthapuram, Emakulam and Kozhikode for a comprehensive external scoping exercise in conjunction with the stakeholders (the minutes are appended as Annex 10.1). Detailed project information was prepared and distributed to nearly 200 NGOs, Govemment Agencies, university and research institute experts and other interested parties, and they were invited to take part in or provide information to the scoping workshops organised by the PCC. As summarised in the following table and illustrated in Photo 10.1 and 10.2, several dozen organizations, agencies, and individuals were represented in sessions held in three regions of the State indicated above. These consultations were intended to substantially enrich project planning and design, improve public awareness of development objectives of the Government of Kerala and promote project acceptability and transparency. 10.2.2 Methodology for Selection of Locations for Scoping Workshops The State being linear in shape and the three cities mentioned above being conveniently located along the coastal region, it was decided to organise the workshops in those places. The major criterion was the easy accessibility of these cities to the people in their respective hinterland Louis Berger InternationaP/Sheladia Associates/CESiICT Page Chapter 10-1 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 10 The Highways Component Consultation and Participation districts, grouped as the southern, central and northern districts. Secondly, these are the three cities in the State that have all the necessary infrastructure for such an event. Table 10.1: Stakeholder Involvement In Social Assessment Event Date Location Invitees Attkndees Regional Scoping, Session January 18, PWD Rest House, 80 57 and Stakeholder 2000 Thiruvananthapuram Consultation-I Regional Scoping Session January 25, Hotel Renaissance, 60 47 and Stakeholder 2000 Kochi Consultation-Il Regional Scoping Session February 1, Malabar Palace 60 51 and Stakeholder 2000 Hlotel, Consultation-Ill Kozhikode Total 200 155 Photo 10.1: Regional Scoping Session tUEAJ 9ATh JIiNW S I ihA.@D on f4 AT mm i Project proponents invited NGOs, Mna ELOs DBUNW, G6IW OF government agencies, road users and e'ffw ax% rLmw other stakeholders to identify social ana REGlNA4 S%)m, mu SH lO environmental concerns and issues that m'* VrE gt sntin_ should be addressed in project preparation and provided information regarding the project, enabling informed participation. Photo 10.2: Scoping Session Participants Several dozen participants took part in regional scoping sessions and stakeholder workshops. Inputsfrom these events influtenced design decisions and subsequent assessment activities. Louis Ber2er Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 10-2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 10 The Highways Component Consultation and Participation 10.2.3 Other Consultations The three scoping workshops held across the State were complemented by extensive, smaller scale local consultations with potential project affected persons, stakeholders and other interested parties within the COI of the project road links. On an average ten to twelve persons who were likely to be affected took part in the consultation process at each location initially. The focus group consultations attracted more attendees. Besides PAPs, other stakeholders too participated in the consultation process. The number of participants increased as the consultation progressed. The State, district and local level consultations were designed in line with the World Bank and Government of India requirements and policy directives on involuntary resettlement as well as to assist the PCC and PWD to make informed and sensitive decisions during the development of the project' 10.3 Key Findings Of Local Level Consultations As part of the public consultation activities, a total of 419 persons had been interviewed in detail during the reconnaissance level surveys. These persons raised interesting and relevant issues and concerns. These issues and concerns and the key findings of the consultations are described below and the tabulation is appended as Annex 10.2. * The PAPs were not aware of the project. They were pleased that they were being consulted. * In most locations the PAPs (47.2%) were in favour of the proposed road widening exercise. They all agreed that the road upgrading would benefit the communities in terms of savings of fuel, maintenance and time due to improved road surface, and better access to health care, education, road safety and other civic amenities. However, they were disheartened if their own structures were to be affected by the project. • A small percentage of the PAPs (5.9%) opposed the project. They had interesting reasons: people would lose livelihoods, poor people with small living area would be displaced, a village should remain a village, etc. * The PAPs were concerned about the religious structures getting affected. They were assured that the project would not touch the religious structures. At one particular point (Link 6, Chainage 208.100) the authorities of a mosque were considering shifting on their own because of congestion in the area. * The PAPs were concerned (22.6%) about road congestion and the need for footpaths, cycle path and parking areas. They particularly complained about the parking of trucks and auto rickshaws in the busy market areas. * The PAPs were concerned (29.1%) regarding drainage problems and water logging. They suggested construction of drains in busy areas and 3.1% respondents suggested provision of protection for rice paddies. * A majority of the PAPs (43.4%) were very much concerned about the high road traffic accident rates and suggested the need for road signing, road bumps, curve straightening, and improvement of sight distance. * The PAPs were also concerned about the level of compensation and this aspect was explained to them. 10.4 Focus Group Discussion Based on preliminary social assessments, scoping and initial field appraisals, a participatory strategy was devised to mainstream the affected population's participation in project preparation. During the surveys people were invited to meetings, grouped as residential clusters, by agricultural Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 10-3 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 10 The Highways Component Consultation and Participation and commercial occupations, housewives, etc, The purpose of these consultations and people's participation was to: * Identify social sensitivities and other concerns in affected road areas that should be considered in project design and planning; * Review measures taken to avoid, reduce or mitigate adverse impacts and minimise displacement; * Explain principles and procedures proposed for land acquisition, resettlement and rehabilitation, should these be necessary, and compensation and assistance that will be provided to project affected families who may lose land or assets or suffer other losses. The views aiid suggestions of these stakeholders have been incorporated into the engineenrng design, wherever feasible, so as to reduce the negative impacts likely to be caused by the project. Sample details of these focus group meetings have been appended as Annex 10.3 and the original meeting documents, with photographs and signatures of participants have been recorded in notebooks. The broad issues and results of the consultations are presented in the following table, grouped as individual concems/suggestions and focus group concerns/suggestions. Table 10.2: Design Response to Stakeholder/Community Concerns | # Stakeholder or Community Project Design Outcome/Action Taken Concerns/Suggestions I. Individual Concerns/Suggestions I Road congested; footpath, cycle path and Footpaths and street lighting have been provided in the parling area necessary design for school and congested areas and parking areas provided in market areas. 2 Road should not be widened because poor Not a design concern. Consultations explained to the people with smnall land areas will be people that road improvement will be done in an displaced and lose jobs agreeable manncr and those affected would be compensated and assisted with resettlement and rehabilitation. 3 Drainage and water logging problems The project design has provision for covered drains in should be removed town areas and line drain in other areas. 4 Protection of paddy fields; provision of The design has taken care of this, slopes 5 Road safety problems: road signing, speed Road signing and lining have been proposed. reducing bumps, curve straightening and Realignments and bypasses have taken care of the curve sight distance needed problems to a large extent. 6 Increase the tarring area width by 2m on It was explained that it was not economical except when both sides auxiliary lanes are justified by projected traffic usage. 7 Provide bus bay at the stops and build waiting sheds with adequate size and Bus lay bys have been planned as per land availability. facility 8 Plant trees like teak, mango, etc. by the Has been addressed in the Environmental Management sides of the roads to prevent soil erosion. Plan Report and strategy explained to the people. 9 Build a circle at the Nedumbassery Has been considered in the design. International Airport junction. 10 Insist on rubberised tarring. Rubber Modified Bitumen has been investigated and is _____ being integrated into the project specification. I I Provide signal post at every junction. Not recommended but a system of priorities has been designed for each major junction. 12 Provide provision for crossing of cables and pipelines at periodic distances in order Has been incorporated in designs. to prevent cutting of road in future. 13 Provide pen-nanent arrangements for laying of cables, pipelines, etc. by the side Has been incorporated in designs for urban areas. of the road to prevent periodic cutting of Louis Bcrger International/Sheladia Associates/CES:ICT Page Chapter 10-4 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 10 The Highways Component Consultation and Participation Stakeholder or Community Project Design Outcome/Action Taken Concerns/Suggestions the roadsides. 14 At least 2m each on both sides of the It was explained to the people that this suggestion was tarring area of the road should be kept free not practical due to land scarcity. of anything. 15 Avoid height difference between soil area Agreed good highways practice and has been and tarring area at both sides of the road. incorporated in designs. 1 6 Use reflectors to show the demnarcation Cat's eyes are not general practice but have been line. reconmmended. 17 Perumbavoor Bypass: the proposed bypass crosses the canal. Which Department (PWD or Irrigation) will undertake the execution works? (The existing narrow The bypass proposal has been dropped. road is the canal patrol road, discharge 1.095 cusec, bed width 0.90 m, I trapezoidal canal. 18 Timber industry on Link 6, The design engineers and the PWD engineers Perumbavoor Bypass: Please save the jointly inspected the site and altered the alignment area. The industry gives jobs to 30 to save the industry. persons residing in the premises. The industry was set up with a huge (The bypass proposal has been dropped) investment, including bank loans, yet to be paid back. There is no suitable area nearby to relocate. 19 Delta Plywoods, Link 6, Perumbavoor The design engineers and the PWD engineers Bypass: The proposed bypass divides jointly inspected the site and altered the alignment the industry compound into two and to save the industry. the plywood drying area is affected. The industry engages over 100 (The bypass proposal has been dropped) employees all of whom will be rendered jobless. A huge investment, Rs. 20 million, was made to set up the industry. 20 Principal, Marthoma Women's College, I The design engineers and the PWD engineers Link 6, Perumbavoor Bypass: The jointly inspected the site and altered the proposed design of the bypass touches alignment to save the college building. the main building constructed at a cost 2 It was pointed out that the bypass would be of Rs. 5 million. A bypass close to a constructed on the existing road. Hence, the women's college invites anti-social argument about the anti-socials is not valid. elements. The college authorities plan ' to construct a ladies' hostel also on the (The bypass proposal has been dropped.) top floor of the main building which will be facing the new bypass. 21 Link 6, Perumbavoor Bypass: The The design engineers and the PIU engineers jointly Vattakattupadi-Pattal road can be inspected the site and altered the alignment to save widened and the alignment could be the temple, school and the college. made through the back side of a temple and away from the college and (The bypass proposal has been dropped) school. 1 22 Suggests BTR number and Field Suggestion well taken. Survey Maps should be consulted and compared before field investigation for identifying encroachment. 23 i Link 35: Unauthorised building The matter was referred to the PWD and Louis Berver Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CESICT Page Chapter 10-5 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 10 The Highways Component Consultation and Participation Stakeholder or Community Project Design Outcome/Action Taken Concerns/Suggestions extensions (charthu) on public lands Muvattupuzha Municipality. from Puthenkurisu Junction to Muvattupuzha Junction should be (This Link has been dropped from the project.) demolished. 24 Link 35: A hump with signing is Design engineers have taken note of this. required in front of each school gate at Chowara and Kizhumadu. 25 Link 35: There are 80 blind students in Road signing for speed limits and presence of the school. Traffic control required traffic personnel recommended. for their safe passage. 26 Link 35: Sand loaded trucks are The matter referred to the Perumbavoor _ seriously damaging the road top. Municipality.. 11. Focus Group Concerns/Suggestions Focus group discussion with residents at a proposed realignment site on Link l. Queries included: 1. The extent to which their properties 1. Surveyors informed them of the extent of would be affected and the level of affected properties and the level of compensation. compensation, which would be given at the 2. They suggested a footpath from market price. Kuravankuzhy to Nilamel for the 2. The Consultants have already planned the safety of pedestrians, especially footpath in the area. school children of the area who go to a nearby school. 3. If properties on the right side are 3. Because of the straightening effort, properties on also affected. the right side are not affected. 4. If produce could be harvested and 4. They were informed that they would be allowed trees cut before the acquisition. to harvest their produce. 5. An affected widow with a child will 5. The RAP deals with this situation. be losing her entire property of 5 cents (200 sq. m). She should be given at least an equal size of land and a house to live in nearby. 6. The road should be rubberised and 6. Rubber Modified Bitumen has been investigated and speed limit reduced. is being integrated into the project specification. 7. The gathered affected people 7. Straightening at this particular spot was not examined the strip plan and wanted found technically feasible. Encroachment to know why a sharp curve between recommended to be cleared by the project chainage 52.500 and 52.600 after authorities. Chadayamangalam is not being 8. The Resettlement & Rehabilitation Principles and straightened. They remarked that Policy Framework already is in place and the this particular curve is a frequent RAP is a pro-active tool to mitigate the PAP's accident spot. The situation has problems. been aggravated by a recent encroachment on the left side of the curve by a mosque-like structure. 8. The affected persons suggested that, being from socially and financially backward groups, a rehabilitation plan should be in place before the actual roadwork started. They assured the surveyors of_their fiill Louis Berger InternationaliSheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 10-6 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 10 The Highways Cornponent Consultation and Participation Stakeholder or Community Project Design Outcome/Action Taken Concerns/Suggestions support to the road upgrading process if such a pro-active scenario prevails. 2 Focus group discussion with residents and agricultural landholders at a proposed bypass site on Link 26. A local NGO, Valiyakandam Padasekhara Samiti, attended the meeting. They handed a memorandum to the surveyors. Their suggestions included: 1. By making appropriate changes in I. It was found that the available Government land the design, the road may be width is of 1.5 metres width which is necessary constructed along the left side of to retain for inspection track. In addition, land the paddy field, as this side will be required for building a retaining wall to contains Government land of 3 retain land. The suggestion is not technically metres width on both sides of the feasible. canal. 2. There is already a road of 40 ft 2. There are many acute curves on the existing 40 ft width from Vellayamkudy Junction wide road and many buildings along it will have (chainage 82.200) to to be demolished if this road is to be improved as Jnattuvettappadi. It is better to a bypass. It was explained that the suggestion widen this road rather than make a was not technically, socially and economically bypass, which may cause economic viable. loss to the Government. 3. In the present design, the road deviates from chainage 3.000 to 3. It was explained that this suggestion, if accepted. reach chainage 3.200 which is a would actually cause more properties to be paddy field. Due to this deviation, affected. about 6 families and their agricultural lands will be affected. The road can be aligned straight from chainage 2.800 along the land boundaries of St. George Ferona Church to reach the paddy field mentioned above. 3 Focus group discussion with residents at a proposed bypass site on Link 6. Issues raised included: 1. The local people voiced concern 1. The PWD has addressed this issue. at the lack of available information 2. The design has been changed. about the project. 3. The social impact surveyors explained to the 2. Approximately 10 brand new people the compensation levels and how land buildings will be demolished value is to be calculated from the R&R policy between chainage 2.200 and 3.200; document. 3. Compensation level, land value; 4. The design engineers along with the PWD 4. The proposed bypass affects a engineers jointly inspected the site and altered school, a college and a temple and the design to save these properties and the a canal. Canal irrigation was canal. startcd in the area some 35 years 5. As in 4 above. ago and it is important to retain this. The alignment needs to be Louis Bergcr International/Sheladia Associates/CESlICT Page Chapter 10-7 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 10 The Highways Component Consultation and Participation Stakeholder or Community Project Design Outcome/Action Taken Concerns/Suggestions revised. 5. A suggested option: The bypass should be realigned through the side of a pond and paddy field between Chira and the bridge crossing Poopari Road. 4 Focus group discussion with housewives at a proposed bypass site on Link 6. Issues raised included: 1. The local people voiced concern at 1. The PWD have been requested to address this the lack of available information issue- about the project. 2. While the people are not against 2. This option suggested by the proposed affected the idea of the bypass, they are people involving a longer route was not found concerned about the large-scale technically and economically feasible. It is true loss of properties. They offered a that many persons and properties at the entry and possible option: the bypass could the exit of the bypass, touching the M.C. Road be started two furlongs away from will be adversely affected and the project will Vallam Junction through the paddy compensate them according to the principles laid field at Cheenkukugarapadam, down in the R&R policy document. parallel to Poopani Thodu. It could continue straight through the Poopani bridge. It is not clear why the bypass is proposed to turn right from Malamun. It could make a left turn from Malamuri and bypass the town. 3. The proposed affected people 3. The project is sensitive to these issues and has suggested that this meeting should taken note of the people's legitimate concerns. have been held before the topographic survey. A survey for a new road is like a sudden natural calamity and people get mental problems, leading to suicides. Even prospective marriages in the area have been called off. 5 Focus group discussion with residents at a proposed bypass site on Link 60, mostly agricultural landholders. A local NGO, Padasekhara Samiti, attended the meeting. They handed a memorandum to the surveyors. Issues raised included: l.When a piece of agricultural land is I . The social impact surveyors explained to the acquired for the project, small plots gathered affected people that the R&R Policy will be halved with small pieces on Framework specifically addresses this issue in either side of the acquired land. clause No. 7.2, which states that if PAP/PDP These small pieces will not be viable loses >75% of his land, he has a right to seek to the landholder. The Govemment acquisition of his remaining contiguous should buy the remaining land also. property that may become unviable for him. 2.The paddy ficld at chainage 2.300 2. The engineering design has provided a slab l gets submerged by 3 metres during culvert at this location to prevent the problem Louis Berger International/Sheladia AssociatesiCES/ICT Page Chapter 10-8 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 10 The Highways Component Consultation and Participation Stakeholder or Commnunity Project Design Outcome/Action Taken Concerns/Suggestions I the rainy season. If the field is filled raised by the local people. up this water will enter the nearby plots. 3. Culverts should be provided at 3. The project has provided for culverts wherever proper locations for proper drainage. necessary and the design plan is flexible. The The "proper location" should be "iproper location," as suggested by the people, discussed with the local people. could be accommodated at the time of the 4. Some amount of money should be implementation of the project. given in advance to the persons to be 4. The people were informed that the R&R policy resettled for finding and constructing framework has provisions to address this suitable houses before they are concern. displaced. 5.If the bypass is aligned along 5. The existing road is very narrow and it will not Areacode (Court Junction)- be cost effective to follow this suggestion. Kulakkamdam -Chakkalakuthu- Mukatta, the new road can be constructed by widening the existing road. 10.5 Suggested Future Consultations The project ensures and will continue to ensure that the affected population and other stakeholders are informed, consulted and allowed to participate actively during the implementation of the project. The NGO Project Manager at the road link level will be responsible for carrying out public consultations on a continuing basis during the implementation of the project, and the R&R Officer in the R&R Cell of the PIU will be responsible for monitoring this activity. The suggested consultations to be carried out throughout the project period are outlined below: Table 10.3: Future Consultations and Continued Participation Mechanisms Project Stage PAPs and Representatives NGOs Local Officials Identification * Receive information on . Design and carry out a Assist in census and project impacts. information and socio-economic survey. • Participate in coordination suggestions. a Assist NGO in commnittee. . Assist in census and information . Participate in census socio-economic dissemination. surveys. survey. . Participate in arrange . Pasrticipate in * Participate in consultations. consultations to develop coordination * Arrange PAP transport IG programmes. committee. to consultation sites. • Keep records of . Participate in a Assist in the consultations. consultations. documentation of the . Choose resettlement * Representations on consultations. altematives or housing grievance tribunals. a Examine the feasibility schemes. * Facilitate PAP inter- of the IG programmes . Inputs of design of group meetings . and discuss with PAPs. resettlement locations. . Participate in grievance tribunals. Imiplementation a Monitor the provisions of . Provide up dated a Process IG proposals. entitlement. information on PAPs. . Participate in grievance Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CESJICT Page Chapter 10-9 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 10 The Highways Comnponent Consultation and Participation Project Stage PAPs and Representatives NGOs Local Officials * Labour and other input at * Provide support in redress. site. group mnanagement. * Provide assistance * Credit and other group * Monitor entitlement under local schemes. scheme management. provision and * Membership of * Management of sites and imnplementation of IG implementation project input. progranmnes. committee. * Management of comnnon * Members of * Process documents for property resources. imnplementation welfare and socio- * Member of implementation comrittee. economic services (e.g., committee. BPL card). Monitoring and * Participate in grievance * Provide infonnation * Interaction with PAPs Evaluation tribunals. on project staff on to identify problems in * Report to project in IG vulnerable groups. IG programmes. schemes. * Participate in * Report on service quality on correctional strategies. sites. * Provide inputs to M&E. As part of the proposed future consultations, a follow up public consultation at State level was already organised at Thiruvananthapuram on 24 August 2001. The findings of the social and environmental impact surveys and the Resettlement Action Plan were discussed at great length in this consultation. Apart from the general public, NGOs and other professionals attended the consultation in large numbers. The proceedings of this meetings are being separately compiled. Two other similar consultations in the central and northern parts of the State have been proposed to be organised during October-November 2001. Two local level follow up local level consultations have been held at Muvattupuzha, combining roads links 6 and 70 on 5 October 2001 and at Valakom, combining road links 1 and 2 on 6 October 2001. All the proceedings of the follow up consultations will be separately presented. Louis Berger IntemationatSheladia AssociatesiCES/ICT Page Chapter 10-1() Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 11 The Highways Component Land Acquisition & Assets Affected Chapter 11 Land Acquisition And Assets Affected 11.1 Introduction The extent of land to be acquired by the project is an indicator of impact on the social environment. In the urbanized environment of Kerala, the affected properties are mostly pucca buildings (permanent structures) although, in tenns of the magnitude of land take, the agricultural land dominates. The social impact surveys have established that the total additional area of land required for accommodating the improvement works for the Phase I roads is 42.23 ha, of which private land is 41.01 ha (Table 11.2). The only government properties (land and structures) that were identified during the surveys were buildings that were fully or partially affected, totalling an area of 1.22 ha. No forest land was identified as being affected by the project. The estimated land take for the Phase II roads is 57.08 ha, extrapolated from the Phase I data. 11.2 Assets Affected The KSTP Phase I will affect a total of 4180 properties, which include 1608 residential structures, 1551 commercial structures, 128 commercial-cum-residential mixed structures, 443 agricultural plots, 74 Govemment properties (buildings and land) and 376 properties not belonging to any of these categories, labelled as "Other" (Table 11.1), such as fallow or unused land, bus shelters, religious properties, schools, hospitals, etc. Table 11.1: Number of Assets Affected Link No. of Affected %O of Affected % of Affected % of Affected % of Affected % of Affected % of Affected Res. affected Co mm. affected Mixed affected Govt.office/ affected Other affected Agri. affected No. Properties Structures properties Structures p roperties structures properties land properties properties properties Plots properties 1 984 254 26% 475 48% 15 2% 14 1% 67 7% 159 16% 2 300 140 47% 84 28% 3 1% 6 2% 28 9% 39 13% 3 298 147 49% 92 j 31% 2 1% 6 2% 44 15% 7 2% 6 842 319 38% 402 1 48% 30 4% 10 1% 67 8% 14 2% 40 363 213 59% 82 23% 9 2% 11 3% 30 8% 18 5% 50.1 322 113 35% 126 39% 19 6% 5 2% 52 16% 7 2% 70 395 159 40% 114 29% 10 3% 16 4% 25 6% 71 18% 72 606 246 41% 152 25% 36 6% 4 1% 44 7% 124 20% 73 70 17 24% 24 34% 4 6% 2 3% 19 27% 4 6% Total 4180 1608 38% 1551 37% 128 3% 74 2% 376 9 43 11% Of the total 4180 affected properties, the residential structures comprise 3 8% while the cormmercial units and residential-commercial mixed structures together comprise 40% of the total properties. The agricultural plots constitute 11% of the total. Many of the commercial units are single person establishments of small floor areas (Annex 11.2). Some of these structures, even if affected by 25% of their total area, would be severely damaged and the persons running them would be dispossessed of their livelihoods. For indicative purpose, on average, a commercial structure losing 50% of its floor area will need to be rehabilitated. Similarly, residential structures without a compound area, if affected by 50% of their total area, would be severely damaged and the PAPs would be displaced. On the other hand, it was generally Louis Berger IntemationallSheladia AssociateslCES,ICT Page Chapter 11-1 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 11 The Highways Component Land Acquisition & Assets Affected observed during the social impact surveys that residential structures with compound areas and reasonable set back (approximately 6 to 10 metres from the existing road edge) would be severely affected and the PAPs would be displaced if 75% of the total compound area were required for the road upgrading. 11.3 The Extent of Land Take Private land will be acquired andlor Govemment land will be transferred for specific purposes, such as widening the road, bus stops and lay bys, and improvement of junctions. The major extent of land will be acquired for road widening and realignments. Roadside amenities like footpaths, bus stops and auto-rickshaw stands, suggested by the people during the social impact surveys have been incorporated in the engineering design and the required area for these amenities has been built into the total area required for the road widening. Based on the tables in Annex 11.2, Schedules of Project Affected Families, it is estimated that on average, 12.86% of the total compound areas of private properties have been affected. In the case of commercial structures, 19.47% of the total compound areas have been affected and for agricultural plots, approximately 25% of the total areas have been affected. Individually, the properties have been affected ranging from less than 1% of their total areas to 100%. It is suggested that at the time of the project implementation, many of the properties losing very small percentages of their area could be saved by excluding them from the project with a slight but acceptable compromise of design standards, e.g., footpath width. 11.3.1 PAFs Due to Land Take Based on the social impact surveys and incorporated in the link-wise detailed tables in Annex 11.2. Schedule of Project Affected Families, Table 11.2 shows the extent of land take for the Phase I roads from all categories of properties and the number of families affected. The residential-cum- commercial mixed category has been included in the regular commercial category. Table 11.2: Number of Affected Families and Land Take, Phase I Roads Residential Commercial Agricultural Govt. Other | Total Links Link Name PAF Ha PAF Ha PAF Ha Ha PAF 1 Ha 1 PAF Ha Kottarakkara 430 4.95 1490 1.62 187 8.06 0.51 102 1.08 2209 16.21 2 Kottarakkara- 185 1.26 155 0.45 44 2.26 0.16 21 0.31 405 4.44 __Adur1 ___ __ 3 Adur - Chenannur 165 0.71 144 0.22 7 0.22 0.02 24 0.32 340 1.49 6 Muvattupuzha 596 0.85 968 0.61 14 0.35 0.04 45 0.20 1623 2.06 - AngamaliII 40 Thipssura- 375 1.10 209 0.23 23 0.38 0.25 14 0.20 621 2.17 Kuttipuram 50.1 Palakkad - 195 0.39 286 0.29 7 0.02 0.06 37 0.34 525 1.10 70 Muvattupuzha 330 1.53 277 0.64 151 4.43 0.15 8 0.77 766 7.52 72 SH-I - NH-47 367 2.45 347 0.57 128 3.68 0.01 25 0.39 867 7.09 73 Changanassery 32 0.04 56 0.04 4 0.02 0.01 6 0.04 98 0.15 - Alappuzha _ Totals 2675 13.28 3932 4.67 565 19.42 1.21 282 3.65 7454 42.23 Percentages 36% 31% 53% 11% 8/8% 46% 3% 4% 9% 100% 1000/o The table shows that of the three primary affected categories of residential, commercial and agricultural families, the commercial and residential-commercial mixed PAFs, 3,932 (53%) top the list with 11% land area affected, followed by the residential PAFs, 2,675 (36%) with 31% land area affected and agricultural PAFs, 565 (8%) with 46% land area affected. Job opportunities Louis Berger IntemationallSheladia Associates/CES/ICT Paee Chaptei 11-2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 11 The Highways Component Land Acquisition & Assets Affected being generally severely limited in the State, most people often have chosen trade and petty shops as their source of livelihoods. This is reflected in the project road survey: The affected families will be compensated according to the R&R policy of the project. A land acquisition action plan has been appended to this chapter. Except in the case of hyundi (money collection boxes) under religious properties (further discussed in Chapter 19), the "other" properties are affected in terms of losing land or boundary wall and their owner PAFs (in the case of private properties), numbering 282 (4%) are not displaced. A total of 1437 families have been affected by the loss of their boundary walls. Of the 7454 PAFs, 6556 or 88% are titleholders. Of the non-titleholders, 823 are tenants, 46 squatters and 29 encroachers. The squatters and encroachers have been discussed in detail in Chapter 7. The following table shows the distribution of non-titleholder tenant PAFs in relation to the total PAFs. The commercial-cum-residential category has been included with the regular commercial category. Table 11.3: Distribution of Titleholder and Non-Titleholder PAFs Link Residential Com ercial Agri Other Squatter* Encroac* Total TH NTH TH NTH TH TH NTH NTH 419 1 1 1175 287 t87 102 22 6 2209 2 181 4 128 22 44 1 21 2 405 3 164 1 120 19 7 1 24 3 2 340 6 551 45 776 172 14 j 45 9 11 1623 40 366 9 173 36 23 114 0 0 621 50.1 189 6 1t221 62 7 37 2 1 525 70 320 10 [212 59 151 8 4 2 766 72 354 13 278 66 128 25 1 2 867 73 32 0 50 1 4 6 2 3 98 Total 2576 99 3133 724 565 282 46 29 7454 *Squatter and encroachers engaged in conunercial activities. The following table shows the estimated land take for the Phase II roads extrapolated from Phase I data, totalling approximately 57 ha land. Table 11.4: Estimate of Land Take, Phase 1I Roads Links Link Name Land Take Ha 4 Chengannur - Etumanoor 5.60 5 Ettumanoor - Muvattupuzha 2.09 68 Pilathara - Pappinissery 2.27 60 Kasargode - Kanhangad 1.27 74 Thalassery - Valuvapara 0.68 84.1-4 Punalur - Ponkunnam 23.90 84.1-5 Ponkunnam - Thodupuzha 21.27 Total 57.08 The PAFs along the Phase It roads are estimated to be 14,301. 11.3.2 PDFs Due to Land Take The link-wise tables in Annex 11.3 (Schedules of Project Displaced Families), provide details of the affected families who will be displaced and the affected properties. The Annex 11.3 is derived from the tables in Annex 11.2. Based on the tables in Annex 11.3, Table 11.5 summarises the area affected and the number of displaced properties and families. Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CESITCT Page Chapter 11-3 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 11 The Highways Component Land Acquisition & Assets Affected Table 11.5: Number of Displaced Families and Area of Displaced Families, Phase I Links Residential Commercial Agricultural Total PDF Ha PDF Ha PDF Ha PDF Ha 1 41 0.76 276 0.90 24 1.15 341 2.80 2 22 0.23 57 0.13 7 0.92 86 1.28 3 10 0.03 18 0.10 2 0.15 30 0.28 6 6 0.01 60 0.06 0 0.00 66 0.07 40 6 0.03 16 0.08 0 0.00 22 0.11 50.1 15 0.14 33 0.04 0 0.00 48 0. I 70 53 0.63 87 0.34 2 0.21 142 1.17 72 36 0.40 76 0.15 6 0.43 118 0.97 73 0 0.00 6 0.01 0 0.00 6 0.01 Totals 189 2.23 629 1.81 41 2.86 859 6.88 Percentages 22% 32% 73% 26% 5% 42% 100% 100% Table 11.5 shows that of the total 7454 PAFs, 859 are PDFs, divided into residential PDFs (22%), commercial (including res-comm. mixed) (73%) and agricultural PDFs (5%). The commercial PDFs top the list in terms of number, although in terms of land take the agricultural farnilies lose the most. Of the 629 commercial PDFs, 382 are owners of comnmercial units and 227 are their employees. The remaining numbers constitute squatters. The following table shows the titleholder and non-titleholder distribution of the PDFs. The agricultural families are all titleholders. There is one vulnerable encroacher family that will be losing its livelihood, not included in this table. Table 11.6: Distribution of Titleholder and Non-Titleholder PDFs Link Residential Commercial Agricultural Squatter Total TH NTH TH NTH Titleholder NTH 1 39 2 179 85 f 24 11 340 ! 2 22 0 23 32 7 2 86 1 3 10 0 13 5 2 0 30 6 4 2 39 19 0 2 66 40 6 0 12 4 0 0 22 50.1 15 0 19 13 0 1 48 70 52 1 45 40 2 2 142 72 33 3 47 29 6 0 118 73 0 0 F 5 0 0 1 6 Total 181 8 ! 382 227 41 19 858 11.3.3 Government Land Government land includes roadside revenue land and Government buildings. No forestland has been identified as affected by the project. Total affected area of identified Government structures and land is 1.22 ha, to be transferred to the PWD for the project. 11.3.4 Borrow Areas Land required for borrow areas will not be acquired. Contractors will take the required lease from owners and will return it after suitable restoration. Therefore, land required for this purpose is not included in this estimate. The Environmental Management Plan of the individual links deals with this issue in detail. 11.4 Loss of "Other" Affected Private Assets Along with the frontage of their properties, many PAPs will also be losing other assets on their frontages due to the project. These include trees, wells, water tanks on the rooftop, etc. Trees are mostly coconut trees. The following table lists these assets link-wise. Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 11-4 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 11 The Highways Component Land Acquisition & Assets Affected Table 11.7: Other Properties Affected Link No. Trees Wells Water Tanks "Other" ** 1 1 119 16 4 21 2 25 3 1 6 3 7 1 0 3 6 21 8 3 0 40 23 3 4 28 50.1 18 1 1 31 70 1 1 8 2 1 72 87 18 0 33 73 2 0 0 0 1 Total 313 58 15 123 ** The catcgory "Other" includes car sheds, cowsheds, shops adjacent to the main building, etc. Most families in Kerala have wells as their own source of drinking water. All these assets listed in the above table as affected by the project, have been accounted for compensation and budgeted, except those marked under "Other"++ in the table which have been accounted for as part of the structures for compensation. 11.5 Loss of Common Property Resources Ribbon development along the roads is a part of the habitation pattem in Kerala; hence, the loss of most common, conmnon property resources (CPR) are the roadside public wells, hand pumps, water taps, large trees, and bus stops/shelters owned by the municipalities and the panchayaths and public institutions like schools and hospitals, which will be replaced by the project authorities or civic authorities. Several cultural properties are also affected. The individual road link related Envirorunental Management Plan (EMP) reports deal at length with the roadside tree rehabilitation. The EMP reports also discuss these CPRs and their replacement costs have been included in the general project BOQ. Link-wise losses of these items are shown in Table 11.8. Every attempt has been made to save the roadside hospital, school and other educational institution buildings. If they are affected, it is only their compound wall and part of the compound that will be required for the project. Table 11. 8: Loss of Common Property Resources Link Hospitals Schools Wells Water Hand Bus No taps pumps stops 1 4 11 3 14 5 9 2 4 5 2 2 1 13 3 3 10 0 1 0 8 6 5 6 1 0 4 9 40 7 11 5 24 3 21 50.1 12 20 1 42 1 17 70 1 5 2 17 0 4 72 1 5 21 5 3 9 73 6 l 0 38 0 27 Total 43 74 3 143 17 117 The Kerala roadside is full of cultural (religious) properties, especially those of the Christian and Islamic faiths. The roadside places of worship are strictly not CPR because they are owned by Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates:CES/ICT Page Chapter 11-5 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 11 The Highways Component Land Acquisition & Assets Affected their respective registered Society or Trust, although these are open to the public. Despite attempts made to save the roadside religious properties, 36 of these have been affected in the form of losing their compound walls and/or part of the compound. The acquisition of these properties and their compensation have been treated as that for any other private property, but the mitigating aspects of their loss have been separately dealt with in detail in Chapter 19. The mitigating costs for their benefits enhancement has been included in the environmental budget, contained in the link- specific EMPs. 11.6 The Land Acquisition Process The land acquisition process is the first high profile activity for the implementation of a project like this, and often the most difficult one. For some people the Government's land acquisition process is a painful experience because people develop emotional attachment to their properties. In most cases, people invest their life's savings in building a dream house. Demolishing such a building for a road improvement project shatters people's very existence. Thus, the amount of land to be acquired by the project is another indicator of impact on social environment. Annex 11.4 provides a review of the land acquisition process. The Land Acquisition Act [1894/1984] (LA Act) facilitates the acquisition of the privately owned lands by the Government in India. The objective of the LA Act is to empower the Govemment to acquire lands only for public purpose or for a company. If lands are needed for a public purpose they cannot be acquired by an executive action without following the provisions of the LA Act. The provisions of the Act will apply only to the private lands. There are separate rules for alienation or transfer of Government land in favour of any other Government department for public purposes. 11.6.1 Case Studies on Land Acquisition by the Kerala PWD In recent years the Kerala PWD has acquired private land for the improvement of the national highways. Two major problems for land acquisition have been experienced in this regard. First, litigation by the affected persons and secondly, delays incurred in the completion of formalities at various stages. As the works on the national highways assume a great importance in the national road network and the funds from the Government of India have to be utilised during the allotted financial years, the land acquisition process has to be completed most expeditiously. In order to minimise the delay in getting the land under possession, the urgency clause of the LA Act is routinely invoked. In such a case, a composite notification in the prescribed forn is published, as required by the sub-section 4(1) and 17(4) of the LA Act. The following two examples demonstrate the processes and delays in land acquisition by the PWD: 1. In LAC No. 1/2000, in respect of widening of MC Road at Kesavadasapuram - PMG, area 0.0036 ares: * Date of requisition : 10 November 1997 * Date of 4(1) notification : 12 January 1999 * Date of declaration : 6 January 2000 * Date of taking possession 3 February 2000 * Date of award : 1May 2001 2. In LAC No. 97/98. construction of a bridge over the Karamana River, area 9.09 ares: Louis Berger InternationallSheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 11-6 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 11 Thc Highways Component Land Acquisition & Assets Affected * Date of requisition : 14 January 1998 * Date of 4(1) notification: 29 July 1998 * Date of declaration 15 October 1998 * Date of taking possession : 30 December 1998 * Date of award 28 May 1999 In some earlier cases, such as the ADB assisted Kochi Bypass (from Edapally to Aluva, NH-47, length 46 km), although the District Collector awarded compensation, estimated at Rs. 48 million in 1988-89, the hitigations continued and finally the courts awarded an estimated Rs. 360 million in 1999 as final settlement. Similarly, in the case of Kollam Bypass (NH-47), the original estimated compensation in 1986 was Rs. 13.9 million, but due to litigation the courts awarded Rs. 21.1 million as final settlement in 1992.' In all these cases the urgency clause for land acquisition was invoked. The KSTP will follow the normal procedure of land acquisition under the LA Act. Request for acquisition of land for Link 73, passing through two districts, have already been made to the respective District Collectors and copies appended to this Report as Annex 11.5. An action plan for land acquisition is presented in Table 11.9. An officer of the IAS rank will be appointed in the PIU of the PWD as Special Officer for Land Acquisition, with the powers of a District Collector, to expedite the land acquisition process. It is expected that due to greater interaction of the PWD with the project affected persons, dissemination of information, and the policy of offering replacement value of land and other assets (in the determination of which the PAPs will be partners), the possibility of litigation would be almost nil. Table 11.9: Action Plan for Land Acquisition in the Kerala State Transport Project (Phase I Roads) Land Targe t Dates for Acquisition under LA Act 1894 Link Link Name Length Requi sito Section Issue of Issue of Declaration No. (kin) Requirement t eto Section 6 Section 9 (Ha) Competent 4(1) NotificationNotification ofAward Authority Notification 1 Taikkod-Kottarakara 46.000 16.21 31.10.2001 15.12.2001 28.2.2002 15.3.2002 31.5.2002 2 Kottarakara-Adur 20.850 4.44 31.10.2001 15.12.2001 28.2.2002 15.3.2002 31.5.2002 3 Adur-Chengannur 23.590 1.49 31.10.2001 15.12.2001 28.2.2002 15.3.2002 31.5.2002 6 Muvattupuzha-Angamali 33.800 2.06 31.10.2001 15.12.2001 28.2.2002 15.3.2002 31.5.2002 40 Thrissur-Kuttipuram 32.980 2.17 31.10-2001 15.12.2001 28.2.2002 15.3.2002 31.5.2002 50.1 Palakkad-Shomur 45.300 1.10 31.10.2001 15.12.2001 28.2.2002 15.3.2002 31.5.2002 70 Muvattupuzha-Thodupuzha 17.700 7.52 31.10.2001 15.12.2001 28.2.2002 15.3.2002 31.5.2002 72 Taikkod-Kazhakuttam 12.580 7.09 31.10.2001 15.12.2001 28.2.2002 15.3.2002 31.5.2002 73 Alappuzha-Changanassery 24.140 0.15 25.8.2001 15.12.2001 28.2.2002 15.3.2002 31.5.2002 Total 256.940 42.23 Information obtained from National Highway Wing of the Kerala PWD. Louis Berger IntemationalUSheladia Associates/CES!lC'T Page Chapter 11-7 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 11 The Highways Component Land Acquisition & Assets Affected As far as the institutional capacity is concemed with regard to people. skills. organisations, resources and rules to deliver the funding and entitlements, it is clarified that the PIU has in place the R&R related staff. Chapter 14 discusses the skills and training requirements of and the provision of training to the PIU and the district level identified PW1D staff and the identified NGOs. The R&R Policy document outlines the rules for deliverng the funding and entitlements and Chapter 16 outlines the funding mechanism. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES, ICT Page Clhapter II -S Kerala State Transport Project Resettlemcnt Action Plan Chapter 12 The Highways Component Resettlement Sites Chapter 12 Resettlement Sites 12.1 Introduction The PAPs were specifically consulted regarding their preference for relocation during the surveys, should the need arise. Displacement anticipated under the project is linear throughout the project length rather than concentrated at one location. Therefore, a major displacement of the scale of a dam project is not foreseen. However. with the highest population density in the country and extensive ribbon development along the project roadside, the number of displaced families, especially those depending on the commercial enterprises for livelihoods, is quite substantial. The baseline sample survey indicated that if resettlement were necessary, approximately 75% of the affected persons would prefer cash to land compensation. The reason is clear for, although small in size, 51% of the affected structures are commercial establishments, which have an established client base. They do not wish to venture into a new location, but rather would squeeze their existing operational base. TIhe majority of those PAPs who preferred land and structure compensation indicated their option for relocation in the vicinitv of their existing location. People in this categorv include vulnerable groups, especially widows. Although the project's R&R Policy document has proposed plots for houses/shops at the new resettlement sites, this is a rather difficult proposition in the context of Kerala. Nevertheless, the strip mapping exercise identified apparently vacant plots of land at several places and attempts would be made to acquire these plots to relocate at least some of the displaced families. 12.2 Lost Area of Displaced Families It was discussed in Chapter 11 that the project displaced families numbered 859 and their lost area is 6.88 ha (Table 11.5). Titleholders constitute 604 of these families and non-titleholders 254, which include 8 residential tenants, 227 commercial wage employees and 19 squatter families (refer to Table 11.6). Of the area lost by the displaced families, that by the squatters constitute a total of 171.0 sqm. The titleholders own the remaining area. The following table shows the distribution of land that will be lost by titleholder and non-titleholder (squatter) families, totalling approximately 6.88 ha: Table 12.1: Distribution of Area Lost by PDFs Link No. Residenti I (m2) Commercial (m2) Agricultur al (m2) Total M2 TH NTH TH NTH TH NTH 7529.0 24.0 8918.0 38.0 11454.0 0.0 27963.0 2 2259.0 16.0 1312.5 0.0 9242.0 0.0 12829.5 3 275.5 0.0 1032.5 0.0 1498.0 0.0 2806.0 6 66.0 0.0 583.5 14.0 0.0 0.0 663.5 40 250.0 0.0 838.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1088.5 50.1 1382 9.0 443.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1834.0 70 6239 60.0 3372.25 0.0 2068.0 0.0 11739.25 72 3989.0 0.0 1472.0 0.0 4287.0 0.0 9748 73 0.0 0.0 69.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 79.0 21989.5 109.0 18041.25 62.0 28549.0 0.0 68750.75 Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 12-t Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 12 The Highways Component Resettlement Sites The eligible families for resettlement are listed in Annexe 12.2 (Residential) and Annexe 12.3 (Commercial). The list of eligible families for agricultural plots is not separately prepared. The list of eligible agricultural families and the lost area are derived from the Agricultural Project Displaced Families, appended in Annex 11.3, who are all landowners. The R&R Principles and Policy Framework proposes moving people as a group and establishing a resettlement site or a shopping complex, if 25 or more displaced families or shop owners in a cluster so wish. In this case, provision of additional infrastructure is suggested, such as health care facilities, school, post and telecommunication services, approach roads, street lighting, bus stops, etc. It is noted here that as a socially developed State, Kerala has all these infrastructure facilities in place all over the State. The experience of NTPC with regard to the R&R activities at Kayamkulam Thermnal Power Station testifies to this. The KSTP will develop land for this purpose. The consultation process to be initiated by the project in phases during its implementation should ensure that people are in fact willing to move as a group. An important principle is that people should not be relocated far from their current location, so that they continue to maintain existing economic and social networks. In practice, though, locating such a place is a difficult proposition in land scarce Kerala. In any case, a budget provision has been made to develop resettlement sites. should sites be available and the displaced families are willing to move there. In the context of severe scarcity of land and, as the R&R Policy Framework also provides for an option of self-relocation, an assessment needs to be made whether a resettlement site is in fact necessary even when there are clusters of families to be relocated. This is important because, as the strip maps show, only small vacant plots are available, scattered here and there over a given road link. Only individual families or commercial establishments could be accommodated there. There is hardly any space available, large enough to accomnodate a cluster of 25 famrilies and/or commercial establishments, near their current location. A local saying is reiterated that every habitable place has been inhabited and every cultivable land has been cultivated in Kerala. The social impact survey identified vacant plots of land in some of the road links, totalling an approximate area of 6.24 ha. Approximate, because the length of the plot was measured and recorded during the social surveys, width of a plot was often based on estimates. The link-wise detailed infornation with chainage and left/right location from the road centreline is presented in Annex 12.1. The summary of such land availability is shown in the following table. Table 12.2 Summary of Available Vacant Land Link No. Area Sq. M. Ha 1 7,590 0.76 2 1,750 0.18 3 4,800 0.48 6 10,040 1.00 70 18,250 1.83 73 19,900 1.99 Total 62,330 6.24 On this identified land many of the displaced families should be able to be resettled, including the rehabilitation of agricultural land. However, the relative small size of the available apparently vacant land may not be acceptable to the displaced families. Moreover, the owners of the vacant Louis Berger InternationaU/Sheladia AssociateslCES/ICT Page Chapter 12-2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter I2 The Highways Component Resettlement Sites plots have to be willing to sell off their land for resettling the affected people. The project will make an effort to this end. In addition, land will be given free of cost to all displaced, non-titleholder, vulnerable families, numbering 68 (BPL=58, Woman headed=7, Sc=2, ST=1), as discussed in Chapter 7, Table 7.2. Each such family will be given 40 sqm. of land and the total requirement for this purpose is 2,720 sqm. of land. This has been budgeted. The eligible tenants for shifting and rental assistance have been accounted for in the budget, according to their profile as contained in Annex 11.2, Schedule of Project Affected Families. Louis Berger InternationaliSheladia AssociateslCESiICT Page Chapter 12-3 Kerala State Transport Project Resenlement Action Plan Chapter 13 The Highways Component Income Restoration Chapter 13 Income Restoration 13.1 Introduction The basic objective of the RAP is to restore the livelihood of the project affected families. Restoration of the pre-project levels of income is an important part of rehabilitating individuals. To achieve this objective, preparation of income restoration (IR) programmes under this RAP will be approached as if they were economic development programmes. Income restoration schemes will be designed in consultation with affected persons, which they must explicitly approve. 13.2 Livelihood of the Affected Families The PAPs losing their economic base can be classified into the following categories: * PAPs involved in agricultural activities * PAPs involved in commercial activities - PAPs as employees. Commercial activity and employment in commercial enterpnrses are the main occupations in the COI of the project roads. People losing their commercial units as well as people losing their jobs who work therein are economically displaced persons and on par with persons or families displaced from their land. Based on the information contained in Annex 1 1.3, Schedule of Project Displaced Families, the following table summarises the categories of families who will lose their livelihoods due to the project and are eligible to receive income restoration assistance according to the project's R&R Policy. This table is derived from Table 11.6 in Chapter II, excluding the residential families (total 189) but including one vulnerable encroacher family. Table 13.1: Families Losing Livelihoods Commercial Units Squatters owning Vulnerable Link Agriculture Owner Employee comm Comm. Unit Encroacher Total 1 24 t 179 85 I 1 300 2 7 23 32 2 0 64 3 ____2 1 13 5 0 0 20 6 0 39 19 2 0 60 40 0 12 4 0016 50.1 0 19 13 1 0 33 70 2 45 40 2 0 89 ! 72 6 47 29 0 0 82 73 0 5 0 1 0 6 Total 41 382 227 19 1 670 While the owners of the commercial units will receive transitional assistance for six months as income restoration measures, the employees will receive assistance equal to three month's lost income, the agricultural families, the squatter and vulnerable encroacher families will receive transitional allowance for six months. In addition, the wage employees, agricultural families and the squatters are entitled to training for upgrading of skills. Other displaced families, such as the vulnerable groups, will receive additional support in the form of economic rehabilitation grant (currently decided to be Rs. 24,000) to enable them to stabilise their earning capacity. Displaced titleholder residential families, numbenng 181 (not listed in this table), are entitled to six months' transitional allowance while displaced residential tenant families, numbering 8, will be entitled to up to six months' rental allowance. Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES.ICT Page Chapter lS-I Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 13 The Highways Component Income Restoration 13.3 Activities Proposed by the PAPs The social impact surveys did not reveal any specific request or suggestion from the PAPs for income restoration activities. However, when asked what kind of assistance they would like to receive from the project authorities, people generally asked for assistance in the form of housing loans, bank loans, assistance under available govemment schemes, marketing facility, and cash assistance. People generally did not attach much importance to this inquiry. Table 19.4 in Chapter 19 sumrnarises these findings. The affected people, being educated and not exactly subservient, as may be the case in the northern part of the country, there is a greater sense of self-reliance in their livelihood restructuring. There are, nevertheless, economically and socially vulnerable persons, such as widows or disabled people, who will need to be given economic rehabilitation grants and/or training for upgrading of skills, whichever is applicable. 13.4 Families Eligible for Income Restoration In addition to entitlements for the loss of land, structures and other assets to the project affected families as per the entitlement matrix of the KSTP R&R Policy, the RAP proposes to assist in income restoration and provide alternative economic rehabilitation assistance to displaced residential families, wage employees, squatters, vulnerable encroachers, all other vulnerable families, agricultural families, and commercial families. The following income restoration measures and categories of eligible families are adopted by the KSTP R&R Policy: A. Economic rehabilitation grant * All vulnerable families including BPL, women headed, SC, ST, disabled (42160) B. Transitional allowance (total 624 families) * Titleholder PDF, residential structures (#181) * Titleholder PDF, commercial structures including res-comm. mixed struc. (#382) * Titleholder displaced agricultural families (#41) * Displaced squatters (#19) * Displaced vulnerable encroacher (#1) C. Assistance for loss of wages * Displaced wage employees (#227) D. Training for skill upgrading (total 287 families) Displaced agricultural families (#41) * Displaced wage employees (#227) • Displaced squatters (#19) E. Shifting allowance (total 582 families) * Titleholder PDF, commercial structures including res-comm mixed struc. (#382) * Titleholder PDF, residential structures (#181) * Displaced squatters (#19) F. Rental allowance (total 590 families) * Titleholder PDF, commercial structures including res-corm mixed struc. (4382) * Titleholder PDF, residential structures (#181) * Displaced residential tenants (#8) * Displaced squatters (#19) The following table shows the number of eligible families link-wise for income restoration measures. Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CESilCT Page Chapter 13-2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 13 The Highways Component Income Restoration Table 13.2: Families Eligible for Income Restoration Measures Links |I 2 3 6 40 50.1 70 72 73 Income Restoration Measures _ _ Total Eco. Rehab. Grant to vuln. Famn 396 95 197 216 296 265 144 525 26 2160 Transitional allowance 248 54 26 49 19 34 100 89 5 624 Assistance for loss of wages 85 32 5 19 4 13 40 29 0 227 Trairing for skill upgrading 112 43 7 23 4 15 46 35 2 287 Shifting allowance 229 47 23 45 1 8 35 99 80 6 582 Rental allowance 231 47 23 47 18 35 100 83 6 590 The figures in this table have been grouped package-wise and budgeted accordingly, as presented in Chapter 16, Table 16.1. 13.5 Available Government Schemes A number of Govemment schemes are available in the State for assisting the socially vulnerable groups of people, such as the Intensive Habitat Development Programme, Scheme for the Upliftment of the Vulnerable Communities, Rehabilitation of Landless and Houseless Scheduled Castes, Self-Employment Programme for Women, etc. These schemes will be pooled together to rehabilitate the vulnerable persons. In addition, the Indian Central Government administered income generation schemes, such as Integrated Rural Development Programme (IRDP), Development of Women and Children in Rural Areas (DWACRA), Training of Rural Youth for Self-Employment (TRYSEM), Prime Minister's Rozgar Yojana (PMRY), Jawahar Rozgar Yojana (JRY), Employment Assurance Scheme (EAS), etc. should also be accessed. These schemes have been refined in recent years to enhance their effectiveness and sustainability. Last, hut not the least, National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) supported micro-finance schemes should be accessed to assist the people for income restoration. 13.6 Income Restoration Action Plan It is clear from the profile of the displaced wage employee and squatters that they are financially marginalized. The agricultural families being displaced too are small landholders. While the wage earners, mostly shop employees, and the squatters could be rehabilitated in their original livelihood, the agricultural families would need special attention for training in alternative livelihoods. The NGOs engaged in the implementation of the RAP will, in consultation with these people, finalise appropriate livelihood skills training. Table 13.3 provides an outline income restoration action plan. An income restoration programme is not merely for income restoration. It affects one's style of livelihood. The following are the key factors affecting the choice of livelihoods: * Social status * Economic security * Food security * Freedom of working * Traditional wisdom and skills * Efficacy and efficiency of cultural linkage The project will ensure the actualisation of mechanisms involved for a successful income restoration programme, such as A. Technical And Administrative Support * Support of counsellor/facilitator/motivator Louis Berger IntemationaliSheladia Associates'CES/ICT Page Chapter 13-3 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 13 The Highways Component Income Restoration * Local demand survey * Specialised tailor made training facilities B. Financial Assistance * Money management * Involvement of banks * Linkage with the State Government schemes C. Additional Efforts * Trust and confidence of NGO • Schemes based on socio-cultural requirements * Information dissemination * Visit to successful ventures. Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 13-4 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Income Restoration Table 13.3: Income Restoration Action Plan for the Kerala State Transport Project (Phase I Roads) Dispaced Altenate Families Alternate Displaced Alternate Families Alternate Target DateTagtDeTretae Length Agricultural Agri.Land ! Commernal esidential Rr fral Lsing Rs- Commral f fo C mpletion Link No. Link Name ~~~~~~~Comm. Land Land Comm. Land Om Completion (km) Fmilies Requi'ed Estbs Reqired Fmilies Required Properties Required Ietfcio oLad of Traini'ng (Number) (ha) (Number) (ha) (ha) (Number) (ha) of Land Procurement Skills 1 Taikkod-Kottarakara 46.000 24 1.15 172 0.80 41 0.76 7 0.10 Done 31.5.2002 Mar-03 2 Kottarakara-Adur 20.850 7 0.92 23 0.13 22 0.23 0 0.00 Done 31.5.2002 Mar-03 3 Adur-Chengannur 23.590 2 0.15 12 0.06 10 0.03 1 0.04 Done 31.5.2002 Mar-03 6 Muvattupuzha-Angamali 33.800 0 0.00 39 0.06 6 0.01 0 0.00 Done 31.5.2002 May-03 40 Thrissur-Kuttipuram 32.980 0 0.00 12 0.08 6 0.03 0 0.00 31.12.2001 31.5.2002 Jul-03 50.1 Palakkad-Shornur 45.300 0 0.00 17 0.03 15 0.14 2 0.01 31.12.2001 31.5.2002 Jul-03 70 Muvattupuzha-Thodupuzha 17.700 2 0.21 43 0.28 53 0.63 2 0.06 Done 31.5.2002 May-03 72 Taikkod-Kazhakuttam 12.580 6 0.43 43 0.11 36 0.40 4 0.04 31.12.2001 31.5.2002 Mar-03 73 Alappuzha-Changanassery 24.140 0 0.00 4 0.01 0.00 1 0.00 Done 31.5.2002 Mar-03 Total 256.940 41 2.86 365 1.56 189 2.23 17 0.25 . Louis Berger International/Sheladia/CES/ICT Page 13-5 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 14 The Highways Component Organisational Structure Chapter 14 Organisational Structure 14.1 Introduction The PIU of the PWD will implement the R & R component of the Kerala State Transport Project. The responsibilities include planning, implementation and monitoring of land acquisition and R&R related programmes. Since land on the existing corridor belongs to the State, the Govemment, on behalf of the PWD will acquire land. The State district administration will acquire private land on behalf of the PWD. However, the PWD has minimal experience of undertaking the R&R activities. Therefore, this chapter outlines the organisational framework to be established by the PIU for the implementation of the RAP. It also appends a suggested consultancy term of reference for engaging NGOs, screening criteria for NGOs and an identity card format for the R&R beneficiaries. 14.2 Staffing Requirement Considering that a large number of people, approximately 13,500 to be affected and approximately 800 families to be displaced by the project, it is required to set up a regular unit within the PIU to deal with the R&R activities. The following table outlines the staffing requirement for this purpose. Table 14.1: Staffing Requirement Level Job Title and/or Description Number I PWD Rehabilitation Officer (R&R coordinator) I (Central Level) Land Acquisition Officer I Computer Operator l I Executive Engineer (as Rehabilitation Officer) I PWD Division and Revenue Officer 1 District Land Survey official(s) L As required Adrninistration District Development Officer 1 District Agricultural Officer Road Link Level Project Manager 1 per road link (NGO engagement) Overseer 1 per road link Field Assistant 4 per road link * * Dependent on workload. 14.2.1 Central Level Arrangement The Project Director at the PIU is responsible for overall performance of the R&R Cell and the Rehabilitation Officer as the programme coordinator will be responsible for overall project coordination and management. The R&R Cell will have a small team of support staff dedicated to the social aspects component of the PIU, including a land Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 14-1 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 14 The Highways Component Organisational Structure acquisition officer. Presently all required personnel in the Environmental and Social Cell (ESC) of the PRJ are in place. The ESC of the PIU will be responsible for the establishment and maintenance of a centralised RAP management system. In the development of this system, particular attention will be paid to: * Procedures for undertaking and completing census and asset verification exercises; * Updating of RAP data bases for each road link as well for the project as a whole; * Integration of land acquisition, compensation and construction activities; * Establishment of procedures for internal monitoring and review of road link level progress reports; and * Procedures for the prompt implementation of corrective actions and the resolution of grievances. 14.2.2 District Level Arrangement In the project affected district, the Executive Engineer of the Division will function as the Rehabilitation Officer of the District Level Committee (district level R&R Cell). It is recommended, if necessary, to bring in capable officials from other Govemment Departments as well and obtain their services through deputation to undertake this work. These officers, especially the Executive Engineer as Rehabilitation Officer, will work closely with the NGOs engaged at the road link level. The R&R Policy Framework has recommended the assistance of the District Revenue Officer and any other representative from the district administration and representatives of the PAPs/PDPs in the District Level Committee (DLC). The DLC is responsible for assessing the replacement value of the project affected properties and for monitoring and evaluation at the road link level. 14.2.3 Project Level Arrangement While the PIU level and district level arrangements are necessary for the coordination of the RAP activities, the project level or road link level arrangements are most important for effective RAP implementation. The work of identifying and developing the resettlement sites for individuals or groups and other R&R related development activities will be undertaken by the road link level contractor (NGO) appointed by the PIU. A list of NGOs has been appended as Annex 14.1 for preliminary considerations. The NGO contractor will appoint a Project Manager, supported by one Overseer and four Field Assistants, for each road link. This number, however, will vary according to the length of a given road link. Each of these road link R&R teams will be advised by the DLC discussed above. The overall functions of the project level R&R team are: * To establish and maintain consultation mechanisms with the supervising Rehabilitation Officer; * To integrate land acquisition, compensation and construction activities; * To establish proper PAP data bases for the road link under its control; Louis Berger International/Sheladia AssociatesiCES/ICT Page Chapter 14-2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 14 The Highways Component Organisational Structure * To establish and maintain effective consultation mechanisms with the affected households and communities; * To regularly liaise with the DLC regarding the list of entitled persons, eviction notices, compensation payments and grievance redress; * To regularly liaise with the District Revenue Officer to ensure prompt transfer of affected land titles to the Revenue Department; and * To ensure implementation of resettlement and rehabilitation and support measures as detailed in the entitlement policy. The proposed institutional organization within the PIU is presented in the following Exhibit: Exhibit 14.1: Schematic Organisational Structure L Project Director O PIU |o ORehabilitation Offlcer | R&R Cell, PIUl |Land Acquisition OMfcer| PIUl District Levei District Level Committee Rehabilitationi Officer (Executive Engineer) 4 1. Revenue Officer 2. Development Officer 3. Agricultural Officer 4. Land Survey Officer Road Link Level 5. NGO Representative Project Manager _ 6. PAP/PDP Representative (NGO Contractor) Overseer Field Assistants 14.3 Training of PWD Officials and NGOs PWD officers at the district level who will be associated with the R&R and environmental activities have been identified. A one-day in-house training programme was conducted on 24 August 2001 for the officials from the southern districts of the State to sensitisc them on the social and environmental issues in a transport project involving land acquisition and displacement of people. Two more similar training sessions of two days duration each Louis Berger International,Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 14-3 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 14 The Highways Component Organisational Structure have been planned to be conducted on 28 and 29 September and 3 and 4 October 2001, comprising the PWD officials in the central and northern distnrcts. The training exercise will be periodically organised. It has been planned to commission specialised training institutes to prepare tailor made training modules for the training of the PWD officials. Some of the training institutes identified at this stage are (I) Loyola College of Social Sciences, based in Tnivandrum; (2) KIRTADS, based in Kozhikode, and (3) Administrative Staff College of India, based in Hyderabad. The process of identifying NGOs to be associated with the project started in Apnrl 2001. A sample letter of invitation to an NGO is appended as Annex 14.5. The engagement of NGOs is expected to be completed in September 2001 and they would be given training along with the identified PWD officials on R&R and environmental issues. It is planned to impart training at a time to a group of 15 persons. The training contents will be repeated to include the identified personnel of the Supervision Consultants when they are in place. The following table outlines the training programme on R&R and Environmental issues organised by the Environmental and Social Cell of the PIlU: Table 14.2: KSTP Training Programme on R&R and Environment 4 Who Attends? Training Progranune on Instruction Duration PWD's PIU RO. Regulation and Policies Related to Land Division Executive AcquisitionlR&R and Environment: land Engineer, NGO, acquisition; KSTP R&R policy; basic features of Supervision the RAP; institutional arrangement; monitoring, Consultant evaluation and reporting; planning for relocation; Lecture ½ day documentation requirement of the project; environmental overview; environmental regulations and Acts. PWD's P11U9 PD and Salient Features of the KSTP R&R Policy and RO, Chief Engineer, general EA aspects: implementation Suptdt. Engineers, arrangements, roles and responsibilities, Division Executive grievance redress cell and district level Engineer, NGO, committees, continued consultation and feedback, WrsP ½ day Supervision labour laws, gender issues, health and hygiene Consultant issues, environmental awareness and safeguards in the project. PWD's PIU PD and Effective R&R and EMP Implementation: RO, Chief Engineer, experience sharing related to R&R and EMP Suptdt. Engineers, implementation, disbursement mechanism, Lecture and 3 Division Executive conflict resolution methods, contingency Group ½ day Engineer, NGO, management, rapid appraisals, documentation, Discussion Supervision monitoring and reporting, pollution and Consultant environmental impact assessment. PWD's PIU PD and Long Term Environmental and Social Issues in RO, Chief Engineer, the Highway Sector: social and environmental Suptdt. Engineers, assessment methods, analytical tools, monitoring Lecture and Division Executive and evaluation, social risk assessment and Group and Engineer, NGO, management, concept of R&R resource centres, Group / day Supervision integration of social and environmental issues and Discussion Consultant good practices, long term environmental issues in highway management. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 14-4 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 14 The Highways Conmponent Organisational Structure 14.4 Roles & Responsibilities of the Staff of R&R Cell Down the Line Table 143: Roles and Responsibilities Level Implementation Roles and Responsibilities Level ~~Staff * Oversee the progress of land acquisition and Project Project Director R & R activities Implementati * Participate in the district level committees to on Unit facilitate land acquisition. * Contract NGOs for the implementation of the RAP (The screening criteria for selecting NGOs are in Annex 14.2 and the Terms of reference for NGO in Annex 14.3). * Coordinate with other Government line Departments and NGOs for ensuring effective delivery of mitigation and rehabilitation support. * Make budgetary provisions for land R&R Cell, R & R Officer acquisition and R & R activities. PIU * Coordinate the implementation of R & R activities with in-house and field staff. * Translate or have translated the R&R Policy Framework in Malayalam. * Printing of the Policy and Identity Cards for the PAPs (suggested IC in Annex 14.3). * Consolidate the micro R & R plans prepared by the PIU on physical and financial needs on a monthly basis. * Organise training for the PIU and NGOs for capacity building to implement R & R * Prepare monthly progress reports. * Monitor the progress of R & R. and land acquisition and public consultations at the road link level. * Prepare terms of reference and facilitate the appointment of external agencies for monitoring and evaluation (M&E). * Develop terms of reference for any studies identified to enhance the implementation of R & R and facilitate the appointment of consultants and coordinate the studies. * Coordinate with the NGOs appointed for the implementation of the R & R. * Organize bi-monthly meetings with the NGOs to review the progress on R & R. * Keep formal accounts for all project funding and prepare for and cooperate with Government audits. Louis Berger InternationallSheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 14-5 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 14 The Highways Component Organisational Structure Level Implementation Roles and Responsibilities Level ~Staff Land Acquisition * Effect land acquisition. Officer * Monitor the progress of land acquisition at the road links level. * Ensure that the contractor has paid the mutually agreed amount to the people for the land taken over as borrow areas. And ensure that the land is returned to the owner within the stipulated time as per the agreement and has not been made unproductive. * Prepare land acquisition plans and submit to the district administration for acquisition. Computer * Manage the database of affected persons. Operator * Meet regularly to review the progress of land District District Level acquisition. Committee * Decide on the replacement value on the basis of the methodology mentioned in the RAP. * Facilitate the implementation of Government programmes in the project affected areas. * Liaison with District Administration for dovetailing Govemment's income generating and developmental programs for the PAPs. Rehabilitation * Overall responsible for land acquisition and R Officer & R activities in the field. (Executive . Liaise with district administration for support Engineer) for land acquisition and implementation of R & R. * Participate in the District Level Commnittee. * Coordinate with the NGOs appointed for the implementation of the R&R. * Monitor road link level R&R activities and submit monthly reports. * Ensure the development of resettlement sites and agricultural land, wherever required. * Participate in the allotment of residential, conimercial and agricultural plots. * Organise the disbursement of cheques for assistance and compensation in the affected area in public. * Coordinate with the District Rehabilitation Project Project Manager Officer to implement the R & R activities. (Road Link) (NGO Contractor) * Develop rapport with the PAPs. * Prepare micro-plans for R & R. * Implement information dissemination campaigns and distribute the translated R&R Policy Framework to the PAFs. Louis Berger Internationab-Sheladia AssociatesiCES/ICT Page Chapter 14-6 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 14 The Highways Component Organisational Structure Level Implementation Roles and Responsibilities Staff * Verify project affected families listed in the RAP * Ensure inclusion of those PAPs who may not have been covered during the census survey. . Issue identity cards (Annex 14.4) to the project affected families (PAF). * Facilitate the opening of joint accounts in local banks to transfer assistance for R&R for the PAFs. * Participate in the disbursement of cheques for the assistance at public places. * Carry out public consultations with the PAFs on a continuing basis during the implement- ation of the project. * Generate awareness about the alternate economic livelihood and enable the PAFs to make informed choice. * Identify training needs of the PAPs for income generating activities. * Establish linkages with inter-agency, e.g., financial institutions, Govt. departments, etc. for income restoration and R&R services. * Enable the PAFs to identify the alternate sites for agriculture, residential and commercial plots. * Participate in the consultations on allotment of shops and residential plots. * Ensure that the PAPs have received their entitlements. * Ensure the preparation of rehabilitation sites. * Participate in the meetings organized by the PIU. . Assist the Supervision Consultant in ensuring that the contractors are following the various provisions of the applicable laws conceming the worker's safety, health and hygiene, women's issues and the child labour issues. * Submit monthly progress reports. Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 14-7 Kerala State T'ransport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 15 The Highways Component Implementation Schedule Chapter 15 Implementation Schedule 15.1 Introduction The implementation of the RAP will consist of land acquisition and R & R activities. The PIU will further detail the implementation schedule, with possible support from the Project Coordinating Consultants (PCC) during the implementation of the project. The programme schedule for the remaining major tasks of the RAP is shown in Table 15-1. This schedule will be updated as the project progresses. The road link level R&R Project Managers will prepare a simplified summary on the operational aspect of the implementation plan. It is expected that the R&R activities of the project will be completed in approximately 36 months time, with some activities stretching out longer, provided that no environmental clearance is required for land acquisition. If environmental clearance is required or there are other unforeseen problems, land acquisition will take longer. It was confirmed in June 2001 that no environmental clearance is required for the Phase I road links. Three links of the Phase II roads will require environmental clearance and the process of obtaining the clearance has already been initiated. The land acquisition activity is expected to be completed by 31 May 2002 and construction is expected to conmmence from I June 2002. The implementation schedule as presented in Table 15.1 is linked with the timing of the contractor's mobilisation with effect from I June 2002, timed as the beginning of Year I of the project implementation. 15.2 The Implementation Procedure The implementation of the RAP consists of five major stages: A. Deployment and training of staff; B. Issuing of legal notification for land acquisition and the cut-off date, C. Verification of entitled persons (EP) and estimation of their type and level of losses: D. Preparation of list of EPs for relocation; E. Relocation and rehabilitation of EPs. The need for training of the PWD officials responsible for R&R activitics and the NGOs and the training contents have been addressed in Chapter 14. As indicated in Chapter 14, in addition to in- house capacity building, NGOs and other professional organisations could be hired for the R&R implementation. 15.3 The Basis of Implementation The basis of RAP implementation is the PAP database. A PAP database in Microsoft Access format has been developed containing census and socio-cconomic information on both Phase I and Phase II project roads. The list of affected EPs and assets needs to be verified prior to construction/upgrading works and adjustments made to the PAP database. There is a likelihood of the number of EPs increasing or decreasing. Increasing - by way of persons turLing 18 or a shopkeeper hiring nexv employees on Louis Berger International/Sheladia AssociatesiCES ICT Page Chapter 15-1 Table 15,1: RAP Implementation Schedule No. Tasks Year 0 Year I Yaar2 Year 3 Y-4 GeneraltActlviries 2123 4 567 89 10~1 12 12 _3456789 1 12 2345678911 121 2 3f7 4 _ f79l 10112 1 2 1 Appointment of PID staff fo-r R & R activities - 2 Appointment of NCGOs 7 YT234 1J 890 2 3 Set-up of state and district level cornmittees I- 4 Training of staff and NGOs fWk R &f4activities .- 6 Tansiation and printing of fthe R & R4 policy in tihe- - Malayalam tangu age 7 Dissernination of inforrnafon and awareness _ l i*E= i* campaign about fthe project and the policy I 8 Verfitcation of surveys up PWD & Renenue Dept. ~ . 9 updating the census data base i~ E ic Updating data base on socio-economic suwvey --. U 1 1 Distribution of Identity Cards 12 Opening of joint accounts In banks - l li Land Acquisition 13 A quIition plans II I, 14 ftequlsitbontoCompetentAuthontytoran I jI a5 coulsition I tiIssue of notices under section 4(1) of LA Act 16 Issue of notices under section 6 of LA Act I 1 7 Issue of notices undler sectlon 9 of LA Act ~I -----~-jn--vii I------- 16 Completing thre procedures according to the Act to i i 15g Announcement of award according to thon Act 20Announcement and disbursement of replacement I vaue i 2 1 Issue ofcheqtues II- 1 . . .I Resettlement 22 Verification of Displaced Persons (DPs) 23 ldentiftcation/verification of atratvpls I 24 Development of relocation sites (it necessary) ~ 25 Disbursement of shift ing and rental allowance f 26 Allotments of plots~ to Entitled Persons (EPs) 27 ConstiLucbion of houises arnt s-hops 28C nstutio of shpigcomplexes I 29 Bujilding/relocating of commttunity facilities RehabilitItaltion 30 Verification of EPs for allowance ot livelihood 31 Disbursement of cheques for assistanco 32 Plans for income generating IIG) programmes 33 D)issemination of nformabon onIG programmes I[I1 34Tanino up-gra-ding of s-kills for G-I Grievance Redress 35 1Set up the committee for grievance rud,uss i 36 JGrievance redreSssI~I l i i MonItoriFng and Evaluation 37 Appointment of external agency -I 35 Physical andi financial progress 39 Annual evaluation by external agency__ 40 Mid-term evaluation by external agen cy 41 Final evaluation by extemnal agency l t i t 1 _________ Legend: .. Continuous activity Discontinuous activity Kerala State Trenoport Protect fResettlemntrs Action Plan, lrriplenientaticn Scttedlule Pagie lb-ta Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan C'hapter 15 The Highways Component Implementation Schedule the date of the particular land acquisition. Decreasing - by way of death of an EP, or a shop employee leaving an affected establishment before land acquisition. 15.4 General Activities * Appointment of staff at the PIl; (Completed) * Contracting NGOs; (Initiated) * District level conmmittees set-up by the State Government; * Training of the R & R managers and NGOs for the implementation of the RAP; * Translation and printing of R & R policy in local language. Preparing pamphlets of,R & R policy in local language; Distributing the R & R policy to the EPs; * Verification of the EPs: Updating the census data base to include those who may have been left out during the census survey; * Distribution of Identity Cards: * Opening of joint accounts in the name of EP, representative of NGOs and the contract level R&R officer; * Public consultations and creating awareness about the project amongst the PAPs; e Monitor physical and financial progress: * Prepare monthly progress reports. 15.5 Land Acquisition Land will be pernanently and temporarily affected by the project. (a) Permanent acquisition will be under the Land Acquisition Act 1894 (amended in 1984) and will comprise the following activities: * Preparing land plans and land schedules for acquisition with details about the total holding and the area affected: (Completed) * Appointment of the competent authority; (Completed) * Issue of notices as per the Land Acquisition Act for acquisition; (Initiated) * Announcement of compensation award as per the Act; * Issue of cheques in public places prior to taking possession; (b)Temporarily affected land will facilitate civil works on the project roads by providing diversion routes for traffic and for earth works from borrow areas: * Contractor negotiates with owners the area to be leased; * The contract signed between the owner and the contractor will include the terms of payment and return of the land to the owner; * Complete payments will be made to the Contractor after the PIU is satisfied that the terms and conditions of the contract have been met; * Returning the land after restoring to its original condition. Louis Berger Interiationial Sheladia Associates CESIICT Page Chapter 1 5-2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 15 The Highways Component Implementation Schedule 15.6 Resettlement * Civil works will begin after people have been relocated. Verification of the displaced population - agriculture, residential and commercial; Identification of alternate plots in consultation with the people; Development of the relocation sites with basic infrastructure facilities; Disbursement of shifting allowance and rental allowance; * Setting up of temporary sites if needed; Announcement and disbursement of the replacement value of the property affected of EPs and payment through cheques in public places; Allotment of plots to EPs through public consultations; Construction of residence and shops at the resettlement sites by the PAPs or the PIU as desired by the PAPs; Developing shopping complexes wherever required; * Building/relocating the commnunity facilities in consultation with the community; * Enhancement of the existing facilities identified in the RAP and any other during the course of implementation by the community. 15.7 Rehabilitation * Verification of EPs entitled to transitional allowance, alternative economic rehabilitation support and economic rehabilitation grant; * Providing information to EPs to make informed choice about income generation (IG) programme; Training for upgrading of skills for IG programme; * Payment of assistance to synchronize with the release of compensation paid to EPs; Income generating activity for each EP to be planned by the EPs in consultation with the NGOs. Louis Berger Intemationat/Sheladia Associates,CES ICT Page Chapter 15-3 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 16 The Highways Component Costs and Budget Chapter 16 Costs and Budget 16.1 Introduction The budget is indicative with outlays for the different expenditure categories calculated at the 1999 price index. The information on costs was collected by the socio-economic and census surveys of the PAPs together with field inquiries conducted by the Project Quantity Surveyor. Land compensation cost has been calculated on the basis of the best available Government registered market prices and the building replacement cost has been calculated on the basis of the PWD's Basic Schedule of Rates (BSR). A peculiar problem in Kerala with regard to procuring the Government registered prices of land transactions is that informnation on these is not available centrally at the State level in Trivandrum. The information reported here is based on discussions with the Government officials responsible for land acquisition. No certified copies of Government registered land prices are available. 16.2 Methodology for the Valuation of Costs 16.2.1 Valuation of Lands Cost The private lands to be acquired along the project roads havc been estimated on the basis of the land plans (Annex 11.2). The compensation of land has the addition of 30% solatium, 12% additional and 9% interest on the Government registered market price. In the case of agricultural land, in addition, there is a 10% severance grant. It was noticed during the social surveys and the market survey of the replacement value of land that there is a difference of 40% in average cost of one sq.m. of agricultural land between the Government registered market price and current replacement value, 120% difference between Govemment registered price and current replacement cost of residential land, and 125% difference between Government registered price and current market price of commercial land. The replacement cost of land varies from link to link, and within a link the price of residential land is different from that of commercial or agricultural land. Commercial area land is further divided into town centres and other areas with shops. The land cost is more in the town centres than for lands in commercial use in other areas. An average estimate for different use of lands has been made and illustrated below: * Unit cost of agricultural land per m2 Rs. 285 * Unit cost of homestead land per m2 Rs. 485 * Unit cost of commnercial land per m2 Rs. 895 * Unit cost of "other" use land per m2 Rs. 430 Unit cost of rubber plantation land per ha Rs. 1,490,000 * Unit cost of pineapple plantation land per ha Rs. 740,000 16.2.2 Valuation of Replacement Cost of Structures The valuation of assets replacement has been based on the PWD's Basic Schedule of Rates (withtouZt depreciation), which provides the unit costs of construction materials. An average estimate has been calculated for the following items: Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES,'ICT Page Chapter 16-1 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlernent Action Plan Chapter 16 The Highways Component Costs and Budget * Unit cost of a pucca structure per m2 Rs. 3000 • Unit cost of a kutcha structure per m2 Rs. 1000 * Unit cost of a bunk per m2 Rs. 500 Unit cost of mosaic flooring per m' Rs. 4815 * Unit cost of marble flooring per m2 Rs. 5885 * Unit cost of red/black oxide flooring per m2 Rs. 4280 • Unit cost of concrete flooring per M Rs. 2675 * Compound wall replacement cost per linear metre Rs. 1235 The difference between the BSR rate and market rate of building replacement is approximately 50% and this difference has been marked for assistance. The bunks are moveable and relocatable; hence, not budgeted. 16.2.3 Valuation of Replacement Cost of Other Assets Coconuts are important cash crops in the State. The average production is estimated at approximately 5500 nuts per hectare, or 2200 nuts per acre. One hectare of land can accommodate 65-75 trees. Hired labour is the single largest component of cost, followed by cost of fertilisers. The unit cost of a coconut tree has been worked out at current prices. The average market cost of digging a open well is approximately Rs. 30,000/- and the market price of a water tank is approximately Rs. 5000/-. The difference between the BSR price of an item and its corresponding market price has been budgeted under the head "Assistance." * Average unit cost of a coconut tree Rs. 75 * Average unit cost of other trees Rs. 40 * Unit cost of a water tank (1000 Itr capacitv)[BSR]: Rs. 2,500 * Unit cost of a hand pump (India Mark II) Rs. 2,630 * Unit cost of a well (20 metre deep) [BSR] : Rs. 14,725 - Cost of a water pumping unit (I hp) Rs. 4,735 16.2.4 Valuation of Costs of Rehabilitation Assistance The rehabilitation assistance includes the following items, amount of money for each item and the duration of entitlement as detailed in the R&R Principles and Policy Framework. a) Residential/Commercial Families * Transitional allowance for 6 months at the minimum wage, i.e., Rs. 4500/month * Rental allowance for 6 months @ Rs. 600/month * Lump sum shifting allowance @ Rs. 300 b) Agricultural Families * Transitional allowance for 6 months at the minimum wage, i.e.. Rs. 4500/month * Training for skill upgrading for alternative economic activities, Rs.1000/ individual c) Wage Earners * Income allowance for 3 months at the minimum wage, i.e., Rs. 4500/month * Training for skill upgrading for altcrnative economic activities, Rs.1000/ individual d) Tenants * Rental allowance for 6 months, @ Rs. 600/month Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 16-2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 16 The Highways Component Costs and Buduet e) Squatters Assistance for structure replacement * Rental allowance for 6 months, @ Rs. 600/month * Shifting allowance it Rs. 300 * Training for skill upgading for altemative economic activities, Rs. 1000/ individual f) Vulnerable Encroachers * Transitional allowance Assistance for structure replacement * Rental allowance for 6 months, @ Rs. 600/month * Shifting allowance ( Rs. 300 g) Vulnerable Groups * Economic Rehabilitation Grant for 1 year, Rs. 24,000 One of the objectives of the R&R Policy is to provide support to the vulnerable families so that they are able to restore their livelihoods above the poverty level. Therefore, an economic rehabilitation grant of Rs. 24,000/-, calculated at one years State BPL consumption level as determined by the State Department of Rural Development, which currently stands at approximately Rs. 19000/- per family and 25% addition to this amount as per the R&R Policy, has been provided for the vulnerable group families. In the vulnerable group the included families are all identified BPL, women headed, SC and ST families. 16.3 Consolidated R&R Budget The estimated budget for R&R, including land acquisition for both Phases I and HI is TNR 1,430.0 million. The Bank component in the R&R of the project is estimated to cost INR 660.0 million (approximately INR 330.0 million for each phase). Mlore specifically, the estimated cost of R&R for the Phase I roads is INR 694.60 million, of which the PWD component is INR 381.0 million and the Bank component is INR 313.60. The following tables show the component-wise outline budget for the Phase I and Phase II roads in million Indian Rupees, Phase II extrapolated from Phase I data. Table 16.1: Costs and Budget of the KSTP R&R in Million INR, Phase I Items Packa ge I Package 3 Package 4 Total tems ~~~PWD WB PWD WB PWD IWB PWD IWB Compensation 248.78 0 89.63 0 36.73 0 375.14 0 Assistance 3.56 189.61 1.37 68.14 0.43 44.24 5.36 301.99 Support 0 4.93 0 2.78 0 1.78 0 9.49 Other Activities 0.25 0.99 0.15 0.69 0.10 0.44 0.50 2.12 Total 252.59 195.53 91.15 71.61 37.26 46.46 381.0 313.6 Table 16.2: Estimated Costs and Budget of the KSTP R&R in Million INR, Phase II Items Package 5 Package 6 Package 7 Total PWD WB PWD WB PWD WB PWD WB3 Compensation 263.70 0 95.0 0 38.93 1 0 397.63 0 Assistance 3.77 200.98 1.45 72.22 0.45 46.89 5.67 320.09 Support 0 5.22 0 2.94 0 1.88 0 10.04 Other Activities 0.26 1.04 0.16 0.73 0.11 0.46 0.53 2.23 Total 267.73 207.24 96.61 75.89 39.49 49.23 403.83 332.36 Louis Beiger International/Sheladia AssociatesCES/ICT Page Chapier 16-3 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 16 The Highways Component Costs and Budget The Table 16.3 shows the itemised, detailed indicative budget of the R&R component of the project Phase I roads in three packages. The land registration and stamp duty costs have not been included in the budget, as in the case of Kerala Government transactions these fees are waived. The budgetary provision for the benefits enhancement of the religious structures is not included in the R&R budget, as it is part of the link-specific EMPs. The R&R budget has a provision to add the inflation rate to the budgeted amounts annually. 16.4 Disbursement of Compensation and Assistance A joint account will be opened at a local Bank. The signatories will be the EP, road link level R&R Project Manager (NGO contractor) as Verifying Officer and an NGO representative. Cheq.ues will be given for all assistance. Apart from shifting and rental allowance the others will be deposited in the joint accounts. The amount will be withdrawn against the purchase of productive assets. In case of structures the withdrawal will be in three instalments against the progress of construction, i.e., (a) foundation, (b) walls, and (c) roof completion. According to the current law the owner will receive cheques from the district administration for the entitled compensation. All payments of cheques will be made in the village office in the presence of the district administration representative, the road link level Project manager and the NGO representatives. The following organogram illustrates the disbursement mechanism from the PITU to the affected person. Organogram 16.1: Disbursement Mechanism PWD/PUJi District Adrninistration (District Collector) Village Office Panchayath PresidentiMember(s) Entitled R&R Project Manager NGO Representative Person .o.i..B..g.r.........o................ .....AsoT ......... p. .... Cp . 6 ILouis Berger IntemationaliSheladia Associates, ES/ICT Page Chapter 16-4 Table 16.3 RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN BUDGET BY CONSTRUCTION cONTRACT PACKAGE, Phase I Roads, As Per the Entitlement Matrix (Costs in Indian Rupees) Package 1 Package 3 Package 4 All Packages Total Sr. item Unit Quantity ~~~~Unit Amount Quatounnt RteQuantity Unit RateAmutmortiMlinRs No. Rate PWD WB___ _____TOTAL_ Q_a___ LI1 te PWD WB TOTAL -PWD Ws TOTAL PWO WB Total ICost of agricultural land Sqr 142,390 81 285 40,581,378 40,581,378 47,8605.50 285.00 1.3,641,668 ~ 13,041,668 3,947.00 285.00) 1, 124,895 ~ 1,124,895 55.35 55.35 -2Additional IO% grantlfor severance of agr. land _____4.058,138 4.058,138 1,364,167 1,304,16712491240 5. 53 3 Cost of pnaste residential land Sq~, 66 9,048.50 485 45,613,523 45,613,523 23,753.04 485.00 11,520.224 11,520,224, 14.941.00 485.00 7.246,385 7,246.385 04.38 04 38 -4 Cost of prvale commercial land S .m 28,928.80 885 25,861,366 25,861,366 12,524.66 885.00 11,209.517 11,206,517 5,194.50 895.02 4,649,078 _____ 4,649,078 41.75 41.75 5 Cost of land in'othter' use Sq.rn 21',402.90 4301 9,203,247 9,203,247 8,698.00o 430.00 4.170.140 4,170.140 5,455.50 430.001 2,345.865 _____ 2,345.865 15,72 15,72 Sub Totai - Land cost ~~~125,347,651 0 ,125,347,651 41,9065,716, 8 41,905,716 15,478.712 0 15,478.712 182.73 182.73 630 s(atumon an cot LA ct2,32i 3760,29 3,60,25 1,51,75 2,51,154.043.614 14,643.614 04.82 ___ 54.82 7 12% additi'onal on land ccit (LA Act 23l lA])1,4.11,4,1 5,028.686 5,028,686 1,857.445 _____ 1,857.445 21.03 __ 21.93 8 12% interest on land cost 15,041,718 15,041,718 1 5,028,686 5,028.686 1.857.445 1,857.445 21.03 21.93 9 Ran/Corn structure cornensation: neona Sq m. 17,785 3000 53,359,000 53.355,000 7,985 3,000.00 23,955.000 23,650,000 4,123 00 3,000 00 12,369.000 12,360,000 89.068 89.68 331 Othr anslatiosn copnsation:treeos 1crs A 3,801 30 114,030 114,03 32,6 30 61,950 6,9500 41,6 30 37,800 37,807 0.21 0.021 12 Studesrnd asseti copnaof nwredles Lamur 50,000 50595.50 5595,0001472 50,0000 250.000 4___ 50,000 50,000 00.000 0___ .1 0.810 13 NOte Rseruitmpent atfornRA imte teenanikn Lamam0 1250_ 4.1,0 4,11,200 2,6280012,000.628,5000 1,608,60050 12,66.00 9.00 9.001 Total: Compenatort 24877643 ,9,20 24,925,4230 89693 2,77 9990 29,37902 1,793,49910 16,7830,490 751 9.4 37.149 38 RsConurret monture treplcmn Pos:pca q Lm. urn 85250,000 7750 267750,00 150,000 01197,50 1,7750.000 4_123 100,000 6_184500 6100,5000 0.0 4.00 04.50 AsitnetotaluaOthersfr asstItes 250,00049 99210,9000 10,24.000 190,0 00 696,900 838,900 9____ 1__ 0,000 49,200 53,2000 0.90 2.1 02.6 Goto reposfrANdipaeNT vOuAL I4 Farri ___ 2_040_00 25258443 95589,5709489,11301 1 291,148,20271.135,473 16275,075 3720,80,640,09 372.9158.00 39,0 14001.3.6 69.60 Dee Ipmnt olematof Milionsfo RRupen474 __Plot 325__ 252.50 195.530 448.110 91.150 200 7161 12.760 27.2700 46.460 78272 ___5 _ A5cronyms: Scm Seabuiatogren mtre vlinerable Gieroup te PAF P ,3 4002,3,0 Project00Aff0c24d0Family:0P00P8. Pro0ect56isplaced Family;00NT3,4=4N00-Ti1l84a5dar 26eraantale Trloansp ortu t Project 00 PR 39 36GP B04000iget,0400 Tha Hi0o5920h2920m33ays108 Component2Pa2 Chpe 210- Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 17 The Highways Component Grievance Redress Chapter 17 Grievance Redress 17.1 Need For Grievance Redress In case of projects involving land acquisition and involuntary resettlement, the grievance procedure and appeal mechanism are an important aspect related to R & R of the PAPs. The Land Acquisition Act has provisions at different stages of the land acquisition process for the affected persons to object to the proposed acquisition of land and other properties, etc. It also allows the affected persons to receive compensation under protest and to approach the court for settlement. While an affected person cannot challenge the land acquisition by Government (which involves a "public purpose") in court, an aggrieved person may go to a court of law in order to challenge the amount of compensation. Experience shows that litigation causes unnecessary delays and cost overruns in many projects. Keeping in mind the legal procedures involving such cases, the PIU will constitute a committee for grievance redress which will provide a forum for people to express their dissatisfaction over compensation and R & R provisions. It does not imply that the affected people will be debarred from approaching the court on the compensation issue. 17.2 Grievance Redress Committee The PIU will constitute a Gnrevance Redress Committee (GRC) at each District Headquarters within two months of commencement of the implementation of the project. The GRC will comprise the road link level Project Manager (NGO contractor), District Collector or his representative, representatives from panchayat or municipality, NGOs and the project affected persons. The District Collector or his designated representative for the purpose will head the Committee. In fact, the District R&R Committee, discussed in Chapter 1 0, and the GRC may function as one body. Apart from being involved in grievances on resettlement issues, the R&R committees may also take an informal role in the handling of grievances and issues related to land acquisition in an effort to minimise the numbers of PAPs taking their grievances to the court system. 17.3 Grievance Redress Mechanism The PAP and NGO representatives will bring the PAP grievances before the GRC/R&R Committee. The main objective is to provide a step-by-step process for registering and addressing the grievances. It is expected that this mechanism will ensure redress to the aggrieved party. The PAPs will have access to the committee that will function throughout the project period. Louis Berger IntemationaliSheladia Associates/CESJiCT Page Chapter 17-1 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 17 The Highways Component Grievance Redress 17.4 Response Time The GRC will hear grievances once in 15 days. Since the entire resettlement process has to be completed before road construction work starts, the GRC may meet more than once every 15 days depending upon the number of such cases. The GRC will inform the concerned Entitled Person of their decision within 15 days of the hearing of the grievance. The following organogram illustrates the sequential steps for the grievance redress mechanism: Organogram 17.1: Grievance Redress Mechanism Entitled Persons/PAPs Grievance Related to Award for Land Resettlement & Acquisition Rehabilitation Provisions Competent Road Link Authori'ty Level Project Rersd (District Collector Managed or his designated M representative) Not', Redressed Nlot i- :Redressed- Grievance Redress | Redressed Committee F RediressedS C ivill L -S: :.- Court/ Not Redressed 17.5 Grievance Redress Monitoring A format for grievance redress monthly and cumulative monitoring has been appended to this Report in Annex 18 (Format 18.4: Monthly and Cumulative Report). It contains information on the number of grievances received, resolved, and the number of unresolved grievances. It is to be signed by the Chairman of the Grievance Redress Committee (the District Collector). Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES!ICT Page Chapler 1 7-2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 18 The Highways Component Monitoring and Evaluation Chapter 18 Monitonng, Evaluation And Reporting 18.1 Introduction Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of the RAP implementation are critical activities in involuntary resettlement. Monitoring involves periodic checking to ascertain whether activities are carried out according to the RAP. It provides the necessary feedback for project management to keep the programme on schedule. By contrast, evaluation is essentially a surnming up job, the end of the project's assessment of whether those activities planned to be carried out actually achieved their intended objectives. One of the objectives of the Kerala State Transport Project is to ensure that the affected individuals and households regain, and preferably improve upon, their living standards. The measures detailed in this Report are designed to meet this objective. An M&E progrnamme will, accordingly, be implemented to (a) record and assess project inputs and the number of persons affected and compensated, and (b) confinn that former living standards are being re-established. There are two broad activities to be monitored: first, the progress of land acquisition and second, the R&R activities. The range of activities and issues that will have to be recorded and monitored include: - Land acquisition and transfer procedures; - Disbursement of compensation and assistance - Construction of replacement buildings by the displaced households; Re-establishment of displaced households and business enterprises; - Rehabilitation of income levels. Two broad categories of indicators, (a) input and output indicators and (b) outcome/impact indicators, will be used to monitor the project implementation. Input and output indicators relate to the physical progress of the works and include such items as the extent of land acquisition and compensation paid, the number of families displaced and resettled, the extent of govemment land identified and allotted to the project affected families, other R&R assistance extended and the related financial aspects. The outcome/impact indicators relate to overall project objectives as stated in the R&R policy. Monitoring will be done both internally and externally. An external agency will be contracted to monitor and evaluate the R&R programmes. Periodic changes will be made in the RAP based on that evaluation. 18.2 M&E Mechanisms and Reporting Internally, the R&R Officer at the PtJU will be responsible overall for monitoring the progress of land acquisition and R&R. The Land Acquisition Officer, also at the PIU, will Louis Berger IltematioalaVSheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 18-1 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 18 The Highways Component Monitoring and Evaluation be responsible for monitoring the progress of land acquisition and the Rehabilitation Officer at the District level will be responsible for the progress of the R&R activities. These officials will undertake this intemal monitoring monthly. The Road Link Level Project Manager (RLLPM) will complete the monthly monitoring inputs in reporting formats, as appended in Annex 18. Monitoring the contractor's conformitv and the labour issues willform a part of the Construction Supervising Consultant 's activities and is dealt with in the individual road link Environmental Management Plan. The external monitoring and evaluation agency will be commissioned for annual, mid- tenn, and end-term monitoring and evaluation of the R&R activities. The monitoring and evaluation schedule is presented in Table 15.1 of Chapter 15, Implementation Schedule. 18.3 Monitoring Project Input and Output Indicators Project monitoring at the road link level will be the responsibility of the Distnrct Rehabilitation Officer who will prepare monthly progress reports on the R&R activities. The reports will compare the progress of the project to targets set up at the commencement of the project. The Rehabilitation Officer at the PIU will consolidate the monthly reports as contained in Annex 18. The progress of the project will be monitored with respect to the following broad categories of indicators: financial progress, physical progess, social development, and participation of stakeholders. A suggested input and output monitonrng indicators format is presented in Table 1 8. 1. Table 18.1: Input and Output Indicators No. lMonitoring Input Output 1. Financial Progress 1 Amount disbursed for land compensation Compensation 2 Amount disbursed for structure compensation Compensation 3Amount disbured for acquisition of wells Compensation 4 Amount disbursed for acquisition of trees Compensation 5 1 Amount disbursed for alternative economic rehabilitation Assistance 6 Amount disbursed for transitional assistance Assistance 7 Amount disbursed for house construction grant Assistance 8 Amount disbursed for rent (tenants included) Assistance 9 Amount of shifting allowance (tenants included) Assistance 10 Amount disbursed for restoration of cultural properties Number of cultural properties restored 11 Amount disbursed for restoration of CPR Items of common property restored 12 Amount required for extension of programmes Income restoration 13 Amount paid towards training and capacity building Better im lementation and coordination 14 1 Fee paid to external M&E agency Monitoring cost 15 | Fee paid to NGO contractor for implementation Implementation cost 2. Physical Progress 1 Total land required Compensation 2 Number of EPs whose land was acquired Compensation 3 Number of EPs whose residential structLres were affected Compensation + assistance 4 Number of PAFs whose residential structures were Compensation + assistance acquired and demolished 5 Number of EPs whose commercial structures were Compensation + assistance acquired and demolished. 6 Number of EPs allotted agricultural land Econornic rehabilitation 7 Number of EPs allotted residential plots _ Rehabilitation LuUis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES.ICT Page Chaptet- 18-2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 18 The Highways Component Monitoring and Evaluation No. I M1onitoring Input |Output 2. Physical Progress (continued) 8 Number of EPs allotted comnmnercial plots Economic rehabilitation 9 Total area of agricultural land allotted Rehabilitation 1 0 Total area of residential land allotted Rehabilitation 1 1 Total area of commnercial land allotted Rehabilitation 12 Type and number of community infrastructure relocated Rehabilitation 13 Number of EPs who received alternative economic Economic rehabilitation rehabilitation support 14 Number of EPs who received transitional allowance Economic rehabilitation 15 Number of EPs who received house construction grant Shelter 16 Number of EPs who received shifting allowance Relocation 17 Number of EPs who received rental allowance Relocation 3. Social Development 1 Consurnption pattern Economic well being 2 Occupational pattern Diversified opportunities available 3 Status of health Improved health 4 Number of EPs brought above the BPL Poverty alleviation 5 Literacy Access to education 6 Time disposition of women Increased productivity 7 Decision making by women Improved status 8 Drinking water Basic needs met 9 Schools Increased facilities 10 Health centres Increased facilities 11 Commnunity infrastructures Community development 4. Participation of Stakeholders 1 Number of meetings for dissemination of infonnation on Awareness about the project R&R 2 Nunmber of meetings with each EP to finalise their option Informed choice for selectioni of for R&R livelihood options 3 Number of EPs approaching the Grievance Redress Grievances resolved/unresolved Committee 4 Number of EPs who participated in District Level Decision making by the EPs Committees 5 Selection of resettlement sites Decision making by the EPs 6 Number of EPs self-relocated Decreased dependency on the project 7 Number of women EPs deciding the relocation site Minimising impact on women 8 Number of women EPs gainfully employed Increased opportunity for women 9 Number of EPs moving the court Implementation of project within the time frame 10 Total area, number of structures, and EPs saved from Minimising negative social impact Inegative impact during implementation 18.4 Monitoring Project Outcome/Impact Indicators The progress of the project should be monitored against the objectives of the project, through impact performance indicators. Table 18.2 (pages 5-7) contains a list of suggested outcome/impact performance indicators, which will be used to monitor project objectives. These indicators are important tools in understanding the progress targeted and planned in the RAP and will fonn the basis for monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the RAP. The socio-economic survey undertaken during the project preparation will provide benchmarks for comparison on the socio-economic status of the PAPs in the post project period. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES!ICT Page Chapter 18-3 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 18 The Highways Component Monitoring and Evaluation The outcome/impact indicators are, in effect, parameters for measuring the qualitative impact of the project and how the project has changed the lives of the people qualitatively. These indicators are expected to provide information about whether the project objectives are being achieved or not. A key objective of the project is the restoration and improvement of affected people's income and quality of life. 18.5 External Monitoring and Evaluation As indicated, an external organisation with experience in resettlement and rehabilitation and other social development programmes will be engaged to carry out the evaluation and reporting of the implementation of the RAP. This agency will be independent of the project. This external agency will do monitoring and evaluation of the PILT maintained reporting formats as well as the output/impact of the project as outlined in Table 18.2. This external exercise will be done thrice during the life of the project. The first evaluation will be an annual evaluation and will take place after the PDFs have been displaced from the Col. Any problems encountered will be assessed and necessary changes will be recommended to the PIU for consideration. This is to ensure that these problems do not recur during the remaining part of the project. The other evaluations will be the standard mid-term and the end-of-project evaluation. It is recommended that the external evaluation be based on a recognised sampling method to select the items of the performance indicators to be monitored and the EPs within each road link to be monitored. The parameters and indicators suggested for extemal evaluation are illustrative only. As an independent and external agency, the evaluation agency may modify, add, eliminate or combine these parameters and indicators, as necessary. The external evaluation agency will submit three evaluation reports to the PfIU. The reports should contain all the data collected and critical analysis of the same. It is expected that the agency will present a comparative analysis with reference to the pre- project and post-project status in the socio-economic conditions of the PAPs. The PIU will initiate corrective actions, if necessary, based on the recommendations of this agcncy. Louis Bcrgcr Intemational/Shleladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 18-4 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Monitoring and Evaluation Table 18.2: Indicators for Project Outcome/impact Monitoring N. Project Vbertifiale OVI Baseline OVIaluet OVI Target Means of Critical Outcomes and bepnie No. Objectives Viable Value Value Value Final Verification Inputs Assumptions Impacts bl Indicators (OVI) Mid-term Agencies (a) Improve/ Baseline Maintain/ Maintain/ a) Mid-term and final a) Replacement value 1. Availability of New employment PIU Families affected maintain previous income levels improve improve project evaluation for the lost property; opportunities for non opportunities shall improve or levels of income of the PAPs baseline baseline income survey by an b) Economic farm based IG at least retain income levels levels of PAPs independent agency; rehabilitation package activities; their previous of PAPs considering b) Monthly progress 2. Availability of standard of considering running inflation reports (project market; living, earning running execution) 3. Availability of capacity, inflation Governrnent production level Schemes. b) Improve/ Baseline Maintain/impro Maintain/improv a) Mid-term and final a) Replacement value Availability of land Restoring the PIU maintain previous survey values ve baseline e baseline project evaluation for loss of productive for the allotment of economic status levels of income levels income levels of survey by an assets; plots of the affected productive assets of PAPs PAPs independent agency; b) Purchase of alternate considering considering b) Monthly progress agricultural plot, shops; running running inflation reports (project c) Purchase of inflation execution) productive asset under IG programme c) Baseline Maintain/ Maintain/ a) Mid-term and final a) Allotment of Availability of land Better housing PIU Improve/maintain survey values improve improve project evaluation residential plots; for the allotment of previous levels of baseline baseline values survey by an b) Replacement value plots dwelling values independent agency: for the structure; b) Monthly progress c) Purchase of building reports (project material execution) d) Enhancement Baseline Maintain/ Maintain/ a) Mid-term and final a) Relocation of the Cooperation from Community PIU of community survey values improve improve project evaluation structures affected; the community development resources baseline baseline values survey by an b) Infrastructure values independent agency; facilities at resettlement b) Monthly progress sites; c) reports (project Increasing the capacity execution) of existing facilities Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page 18-6 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Monitoring and Evaluation No. Project Vjertifvale OVI Baseline OVI Target OVI Target Means of Critical Outcomes and bie No. Ind~~~~Viciators (V)Value Value bl Objectives Iniaos(V) Value Mid-term VleFinal Verification Asmtos ipcs Aece 2 Participatory No litigation and Baseline Maintain/ Maintain/ a) Mid-terrn a) Availability of the Skills available for a) Empowerment PIU decision making grievances information on improve the improve the evaluation; R&R policy in ensuring of the community processes participatory mechanism for mechanism for b) Monthly progress Malayalam; participation during to make informed institutionalised process consultation consultation reports b) The time period the implementation choices; between information b) Timely about IG and decision implementation taken by the EPs on the activity; c) Process of allotment of plots; d) Participation in the meeting for replacement value; e) Numbers opttng for self-relocation; f) Development of community resources; g) Number of Cases dealt with by the Grievance Redress Committee; h) Number of EPs moving the court. 3 Bringing the Improve previous Baseline Minimise Minimise social a) Mid-term a) Economic Congenial social Improvement in PIU, vulnerable level of income information social and and economic evaluation; rehabilitation grant; environment to the socio- External people above economic disparities b) Monthly progress b) Dovetailing facilitate the economic status Agency the poverty level disparities reports Government's participation of the of the people. and widening the programmes tor the vulnerable. scope for vulnerable; opportunities c) Allotment of Agricultural land; d) Participation in the decision making. 4 Gender Improve in Baseline Minimise Minimise social a) Mid-term a) Joint allotment of a) Congenial Improvement in PIU, economic and information social and and economic evaluation; plots; environment to the socio- External social status economic disparities b) Monthily progress b) economic facilitate women's economic status Agency disparities reports rehabilitation; participation; b) of the people c) Participation in the Availability of selection of plots, sites. markets. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page 18-6 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Monitoring and Evaluation Projct Ojectvely ovi Baseline OV agt OVI Target Means of utCritical Outcomes and besos No. Project Verifiable Value Value Vaiue Final Verification Inputs Assumptions Impacts ble Indicators (OVI) Mid-term____Agencies 5 Community Improved Baseline Benefits to the Benefits to the a) Mid-term a) Relocation of the Collective decision Development of PIU, development facilities information community community evaluation; structures affected; making to address the comrmunity External b) annual evaluation; b) Increase in the the needs of all. Agency c) End-term infrastructure ar evaluation resettlement sites; c) Additional facilities. 6 Minimising Number of EPs Baseline Minimising Minimising a) Mid-term a) Continuous Scope for flexibility in Number of EPs PIU, negative social affected by the information negative social negative social evaluation: participation with the the design affected by the External impact project reduced impact during impact during b) annual evaluation; people; project reduced Agency imple- implementation c) End-term b) Interaction with the mentation evaluation design team. Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page 18-7 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 19 The Highways Component Benefits Enhancement Chapter 19 Miscellaneous Benefits Enhancement 19.1 Roadside Facilities The project has provided for a number of roadside amenities and facilities for the local people. These include rest areas, service roads, footpaths, lined and/or covered roadside drains in the built up areas, pick up bus stops, motorised rickshaw and taxi stands, bus bay, etc. All these facilities have been incorporated in the design of the roads, bill of quantities and specifications of the main civil works contract. The Environmental Management Plan of the individual road links has detailed information on these issues. 19.2 Conservation and Enhancement of CPR The common property resources along the project roads include trees, wells, water tap, bus stops, schools, hospitals, and religious properties. The project affected roadside wells and water taps will be replaced by the project authorities in cooperation with the local government (panchayath or municipality) and the Kerala Water Authority. The Environment Management Plan has detailed information on these issues, including roadside tree planting. Religious properties are not strictly common property, although they are open to the public. Despite best efforts made in the engineering design to avoid land take from them, as many as 36 of them have been affected, mostly in the form of losing their boundary wall. A discussion is made here regarding the benefits enhancement of the cultural properties. 19.2.1 Cultural Properties Rehabilitation Policy The project needs to develop a policy for the rehabilitation of cultural properties that will be affected by the road improvement programme. This could be made a part of the broad R&R Principle and Policy Framework. The KSTP has been guided by the Bank's Draft Operational Policy 4.11, which exclusively deals with the cultural properties, in its handling of the affected cultural properties due to the project. Further, as desired by the Bank, this section of the RAP has been prepared as a separate safeguard policy exclusively for the Kerala State Transport Project. What Does Cultural Property Mean? The United Nations term "Cultural Property" includes sites having archaeological (prehistoric), palaeontological, historical, religious, and unique natural values. Cultural Property, therefore, encompasses both remnains left by previous inhabitants, for example, niuddens, shrines, and battlegrounds) and unique natural environmental features such as canyons and waterfalls. The rapid loss of cultural property in many countries is irreversible and often unnecessary. Detailed background information on all aspects of this note are contained in the technical paper of the same title, available from the office of Environmental and scientific affairs, Project policy department, which is ready to provide assistance on request. (Draft OP 4.11) Louis Berger lnternationaliSheladia Associates/CES'ICF Pace Chapter 19-] Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 19 The Highways Component Benefits Enhancement 19.2.2 Types Of Religious Properties Identified In The Project Location The environmental and social surveys and the detailed social impact studies have identified all cultural properties (total 36) that will be affected by the Phase I roads improvement. These are presented in Table 19.1. Their magnitude of being affected widely varies. The following types of cultural properties are found on the project roads: 1. Temple 2. Church 3. Mosque 4. Shrines of all the three rnajor religions 5. Tree shrines/sacred groves 6. Roadside hyundi (money collection box) of all the three religions Except the tree shrines, the others are not strictly "common property" because they are owned and managed by their respective registered "Society" or "Trust". The public only has access to them. As the table shows, there are 13 Hindu cultural properties, 15 Christian and 8 Muslim. Four cultural properties have encroached on the Government land. There are three tree shrines. Most of the 100% affected properties are hyundi, which are also encroachers and could be easily relocated. Other properties are affected in terms of losing boundary walls or land. It was noticed during the surveys that many cultural properties, especially those of the Christian faith, are now serving the role of traffic islands. The project recommends landscaping of those sites as a benefit enhancement measure. 19.2.3 Definitions of Cultural Properties Temples are Hindu places of worship. There are private as well as community temples. Most of the temples are different from one another by way of age and idols (Shiva, Vishnu, Krishna etc). In a majority of the cases, the location has specific significance. Because of the same reason temples are usually located away from the Roads. Churches are Christian places of worship. There are no private Churches. The churches usually belong to different groups within Christianity (Catholic, Marthoma, Syrian, Pentecostal, etc). Except few cases the location has no specific significance for a church. Mosques are the places of worship of the Muslims. There are Sunny Mosques and Mujahiddin mosques. With regard to the rehabilitation policy, all mosques can be treated as belonging to the same type. There is no known location specific mosques in the project location. Shrines are usually small structures, located in the vicinity of the main religious structure associated with all the three major religions of the State. The shrines usually serve the purpose of helping the road users obtain a quicker religious service, besides indicating the larger presence of the religious community in the locality. The shrines are a most important part of any place of worship. Normally a small shrine develops to a bigger place of worship with earlier shrine remaining as the most important part of the property. Tree shrines are usually associated with the Hindus. There are a few tree shrines located along the project roads. People worship the idols installed at the base of the trees as well as the trees. These trees have a special significance to the local community, which will usually oppose the removal of such tree shrines. The landscaping would be ideal. This will require extensive community consultation. Sacred groves are also usually associated with the Hindus. Even today, the Nair community in Kerala worship snakes and other demigods. For this purpose they preserve a small forest, known Louis Berger IntemationalSheladia AssociatcslCES/lCT Page Cliapter 19-2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Benefits Enhancement Table 19.1: Affected Religious Properties Seri4al PO0ti User Status t.^tVillage a0T 0 . g *41t21 w; 000i@ it2>X tgdsiitt Ng : : . . . N"mbqr .. .. ......~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. ..... ...... . nags' us vI age- MV.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ftRligiousi.stitutions Linik Chalng U5i,t9l 1 50.740 L.206.A 1. Owner Chidayamrangalam 664 65 9.79% 0 0 Sree Mahadevar Temple 2 1 54.455 L.251.A 4. Encroacher Edamulakkal 28 28 100.00% 2 28 100.00% Tree shrine 3 58.540 R.333.4 1. Owner Valakam 130 16 12.31% 28 0 000% Mosque 4 77.580 R.69.B 1. Owner Kalayapuram 15 8 53 33% 15 8 53.33% Christian shrine 5 2 82.400 R;75.P 4. Encroacher Kalayapuram -- 4 4 100.00°/c 4 - 14 i00.00% Hyundi ofAyappan Temple 6 86.100 L.50.B 1. Owner Enathu 1500 50 3.33%/O 9 9 100.00% Temple 7 93.900 R.106AA 1. Owner Peringanadu 2560 100 3.91% 0 0 St. Mary's Church 8 3 98.640 L.90.A 1. Owner Kurambaia 360 25 6.94% 0 0 Church 9 ______ 105.710 L.141.A 1. Owner Kulanada 31 20 64.52% 3i 20 64.52i%- Christian shrine 10 211.380 R.98.G 1. Owner Mulavoor 22 8 36.36%0/ 0 0 __ Mosque 11 211.965 L.93.A 1. Owner Mulavoor 195 37 18.97% 0 0 Mosque 12 212.710 R. i i 5.A 1. Owner Mulavoor 1320 93 7.05%- 0 0 Mosque 13 2i4.230 R.A38.A 1. Owner Muiavoor 600 -2 3.67% -- 0 0- 0 Arch of Thrikalathur Bhagavathi Temple 14 225.880 R.170.A 1. Owner Perumbavoor 136 21 15.44% 0 0 Roadside shrine of the adjacent Church 15 6 226.830 R.178.E 1. Owner Perumbavoor 1 1 100.00% 1 _1 100.00% Hyundi of Hindu shrine in the middle of the road 16 229.250 R.226.A 1. Owner Chelamattom 325 16 4.92% 0 0 __ Mosque 17 230.705 L.239.B 1. Owner Chelamattom 12 12 100.00% 12 12 100.00% Hyundi of mosque 18 231.640 L.253,G 1. Owner Chelamattom 500 19 3.80% 81 . _ 0 0.00%_ Sree Narayana shrine 19 234.820 R.316.A 1. Owner Mattur 52 23 44.23%/o 52 - 23 44.23% Christian. shrine 20 237.100 L.331.A 1. Owner Angamali 6200 54 0.87% 0 0 __ _ St. Joseph's church 21 22.080 R.33.A 1. Owner Kanippayoor 50 45 90.00% 0 0 Tree shrine 22 26.480 R.81.A 1. Owner Porkulam 4 4 100.00% 4 4 100.00% Hyundi of Christian shrine 23 40 26.505 L.91.A 1. Owner Agithyoor 60 8 13.33% 40 8 20.00% Christian_Prayer Hali - 24 26.520 R.85.A 1. Owner Agathyoor 1 1 100.00% 1 1 100.00% Hyundi of Christian shrine 25 30.640 L.129.D 1. Owner Karikkadu 450 7 1.56% 0 0 Mosque 26 0.040 R.01 1. Owner Yakkara 3640 14 0.38% 0 0 CSI church 27 22.890 L.62.A 1. Owner Mangara 400 29 7.25% 0 0 . Mosque 28 50.1 30.860 L.65.B 1. Owner Ottapalann 1600 153 9.56% 0 0 Temple land 29 38.900 L.95.A 1. Owner Vaniyamkulam 225 45 20.00% _ 64 r 0.00% Temple __ __ 30 41.340 R.121.A 4. Encroacher Vaniyamkulam 40 28 70.00% 40 28 70.00% Tree shrine 31 5.810 R.48.A 1. Owner Muvattupuzha 180 21 11.67% 64 _ 0 0.00% Mosque 32 70 62514.A 4 --_s _____ e_ 32 ___6.550 L.43.A 4. Encroacher Muvattupuzha 68 14 20.59% 7 7 100 00% Arch of church 33 4.720 L.116A 1. Owner Koliyakode 3600 173 4.81% 0 0 _ Sree Oharmasastha Temple 34 72 6.680 R. 138.A 1. Owner _ Andoorkonam 800 160 20.00% _ 0° 0 t _ Church 35 9.140 R.188.A 1. Owner Ayirooppara --- - 640 28 - 4.38%_ 40 0_ t0.00% Church 36 11.980 R.246.A 1. Owner Kazhakuttam m 600 11 1.83% 0 0 Temple Trust Office Total 36 _________ _______________ 27013 1363 5.05% 521 153 29.37% ____________________33__2_5 Christian (15) Hindu (13) Muslim (8) Lntiis Rnmr er Pace Chanter 19-2a Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 19 The Highways Component Benefits Enhancement as sacred groves. This represents the close association of man with nature. Usually, landscaping would be ideal for the sacred groves. Hyundi: these are box shaped structures of masonry work for money collections, maintained by the institutions of all the three major religions throughout the State. These are usually of one square metre area, placed strategically on the public right of way, essentially targeting the truck drivers and other motorists who do not have the time to visit the places of worship. 19.2.4 Impacts of the Project on the Cultural Properties The impacts on the cultural properties are of the following categories: 1. Only Compound wall affected 2. Compound wall and part of the compound affected 3. Part of structure affected 4. Sanctum sanatorium affected - can be categorised as the complete structure affected 5. Only land affected 6. Complete cultural property affected 7. Loss of access/entrance, if the existing access is from the project roadside. Other impacts to cultural properties include Induced impacts: The construction of road or realignments or bypasses sometime will result in induced impacts obstructing the cultural properties in various ways. In the instances of such events the highway authority will assist through consultation and other means (highway Protection Act 2000) restoring the importance of the shrine. This will be mostly applicable along the new alignments. 19.2.5 The Project Approach to Mitigating Cultural Properties In all cases, the mitigation actions are framed unique to that particular situation with respect to the available space, the unique characteristics of the religious structure affected and the local public and religious judgement. In other words, the project policy is unique to consider the widely varying situations for each cultural property. The loss of land and assets of the cultural properties will be treated on par with the loss of other land and assets for the purpose of compensation and assistance. However, the project will, in addition, strive to enhance benefits to the affected cultural properties in consultation with their respective managements. The Project has a clear strategy to take people and affected parties into confidence before taking any decision on shifting of structures especially religious structures. There would not be any involuntary shifting or relocation especially in the case of cultural properties. An outline benefits enhancement for the cultural properties is shown in the following table. Table 19.2: Strategy For Restoration, Relocation Or Reconstruction of Cultural Properties Extent of Impact If Consultation conducted Benefit If no Consensus Si on Cultural and Enhancement Obtained No Properties Conesus Obtained I Only Comnpound Reconstruction of wall parallel Access/entrance Land acquisition at wall and land to the present compound wall. provided through alternate sites through beneath affected Loss of land compensated. one of the sides negotiation 2 Compound wall Reconstruction of wall parallel and part of to the existing wall. Loss of Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 19-3 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 19 The Highways Component Benefits Enhancement Extent of Impact If Consultation conducted Benefit If no Consensus Si on Cultural and Enhancement Obtained No Properties Conesus Obtained compound affected land cornpensated. If land is available adjacent to the property, will be purchased. 3 Structure affected Alternate structure constructed - Do -Do- and all pre-status restored. 4 Sanctum Complete structure Alternate arrangement, sanatorium reconstructed and all pre-status - Do - road safety, landscaping affected restored. measures etc 5 Only land affected Alternate land provided, Land acquisition at preferably, if available, [Landscaping alternate sites through adjacent to the existing consultation and location. negotiation 6 Comnplete cultural Relocation of site identified by property affected the cultural property Landscaping authorities and rebuilding of | the property. 19.2.6 Cultural Properties Rehabilitation Action Plan The Rehabilitation Action Plan includes environmental enhancement and design changes to save the property from being affected. The project team revisited the cultural properties sites in August 2001 for three days to ascertain the type of the exact impacts on the individual properties and also to devise typical designs for cultural property enhancement (Drawing No. Cultural 1/1). It was also decided to effect changes in engineering design of the roads to save the cultural properties from being affected. The team found the following three distinct cases for impact mitigation, besides the environmental enhancement including landscaping. The costs involved in the benefits enhancement of the religious properties have been included in the link-specific EMPs. 1. Design changes made to save cultural properties. Accordingly, most of the cultural properties have been saved. 2. Relocation necessary. In three cases along Link 40, Thrissur-Kuttippuram some land acquisition will also be necessary. 3. Hyundi. The team found that many cultural properties marked earlier by surveyors as shrines are actually not shrines, but all roadside hyundi (money collecting boxes of the shrines). The removal and relocation of these sites will be relatively easier, but there is still the need for consultation with the affected property management. All these cases are marked in the following table (based on the base table 19. 1). Table 19.3: Link-wise Action Plan For Impact Mitigation Of Cultural Properties Link 1 CHAINAGE LOCATION TYPE OF AFFECTED PROTECTION / MITIGATION I STRUCTURE OR NOT ENHANCEMENT MEASURE 50.74 - left Chidayamanga Hyundai of Sree Yes Design adjusted to save the cultural side lam ~~Mahadevar side lam Temple property 54.455 - Left Hindu Tree Yes Design adjusted to save the cultural side Edamulakkal Shrine property 58.54 - Right Vak Mosque Compound New wall will be built with proper Side area affected access Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 19-4 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 19 The Highways Component Benefits Enhancement Link 2 TYPE OF AFFECTED PROTECTION I MITIGATION I CHAINAGE LOCATION STRUCTURE OR NOT ENHANCEMENT MEASURE 77.58 - Right No Design adjusted to save the cultural side Kalayapuram Christian Shrine (Alignment proper ____________ _ changed) 82.4 - Right Hyandai of No Design adjusted to save the cultural side Kalayapuram Ayyapple (Aligntnent property side ~~~~~~TermTle changed)poei 86.1 - Left No Design adjusted to save the cultural Side Enathu Temple (Alignment property _______________ ._______________. ________ __ changed) Link 3 TYPE OF AFFECTED PROTECTION / MITIGATION I CHAINAGE LOCATION STRUCTURE OR NOT ENHANCEMENT MEASU RE 105.71- left Kulanada Christian Shrine No side Design Shifted and adjusted to save the (Alignmnent cultural property changed) 98.64 - Left Kurambala Church Compound New wall will be built with proper access side area affected _ 93.9- dRight Peringanadu StMary' s Compound New wall will be built with proper access Side Church Iarea affected Link 6 TY-PE OF AFFECTED PROTECTION I MITIGATIONI CHAINAGE LOCATION STRUCTtRE OR NOT ENHANCEMENT MEASURE 211.965 - Mulavoor osque Compound New wall will be built with proper Left Side area affected access 212.71 - Compound New wall will be built with proper Ri ht Side Mulavoor Mosque area affected access 211.38 - Mulavoor Mosque Compound New wall will be built with proper Right Side area affected access 214.23 - Mulavoor Gate of Thrikalathur Compound New wall will be built with proper Right Side Bhagavathy Temple area affected access 225.880 - e C S Compound Environmental enhancement as per right Side Perumbavoor Chnshan Shrme area affected design drawing No. Cultural 1/1 226.830 Right Hyundi of Hindu Total area To be relocated Side shrine affected 229.25 - Compound New wall will be built with proper Right Side area affected access 230.705 - C Yes To be shifted away from the structure Left Side Chelamattom Hyundai of Mosque 231.64 - Left Sree Narayana Compound New wall will be built with proper SiC a oShrine Iarea affected access Side Shnne Page Chaptee 19es Louis Berger lntemnational/Sheladia Associatcs/CES:lCT Page Chapter 19-5 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 19 The Highways Component Benefits Enhancement TYPE OF AFFECTED PROTECTION / MITIGATION / CHAINAGE LOCATION STRUCTURE OR NOT ENHANCEMENT MEASURE 234.82 - No Design Shifted and adjusted to save the Right Side Mattur Christian Shrine (Alignment cultural property changed) 237.1 - Left Church Compound New wall will be built with proper Side . _ area affected access Link 40 TYPE OF AFFECTED OR PROTECTION / MITIGATION / CHAINAGE LOCATION STRUCTURE NOT ENHANCEMENT MEASURE 26.48 - Right Porkulam Christian Shrine Christian Shrine To be shifted away from the structure Side 26.630 Christian Shrine To be shifted away from the structure Porkulam Christian Shrine Right side 26.52 - Right Agathyoor Christian Shrine Yes To be shifted away from the structure Side 26.505 - Left AgChristian Prayer Yes To be demolished and construct a Side gathyoor Hall new one away from new aligntnent 30.64 - Left Ka.kadu Mosque Compound area New wall will be built with proper Side affected access 22.08 - Right K . Compound area New wall will be built with proper Side amppayoor Tree Shrie affected access Link 50.1 TYPE OF AFFECTED PROTECTION / MITIGATION / CHAINGAE LOCATION STRUCTURE OR NOT ENHANCEMIENT MEASURE 0.04 - Right Side Yakkara C.S.I.Church Compound New wall will be built with proper area affected access Compound New wall will be built with proper 22.89 - Left Side Mangara Mosque area affected access 389-Left Side Vaniiyarnikulam Temple Compound New wall will be built with proper area affected access 30.86 - Left Side Ottapalam Temple Land Compound New wall will be built with proper area affected access 41.34 - Right No Design Shifted and adjusted to save Side Vaniyamkulam Tree Shrine (Alignment the cultural property ____ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ____ ___ __ ____ ___ ___ ___ changed) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Link 70 TYPE OF AFFECTED MITIGATION / ENHANCEMENT CHAINGAE LOCATION STRUCTURE OR NOT MEASURE 5.SI - Right Hvundai of Yes Hundai will be relocated Loui Berg Muvattupuzha Sidc .mosque Louis Beruer IntemDationaliSheladia Associates/CES/lCT Page Chapter 19-6 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 19 The Highways Component Benefits Enhancement Yes To be demolished and construct a new 6.55 - Left Muvattupuzha Arch of Church one away from new aligmnent Side Link 72 TYPE OF AFFECTED MITIGATION I ENHANCEMENT CHAINGAE LOCATION STRUCTURE OR NOT MEASURE 6.68 - Right Andoorkonam Church Comrpound New wall will be built with proper access Side area affected 9.14 - Right A Compound New wall will be built with proper access Side Ayirooppara Church area affected 11.98 - Right Kazhakuttam Temnple Trust Cormpound New wall will be built with proper access Side Office area affected 4.72 - Left Koliyakode Sree Dharma Compound New wall will be built with proper access Side iYa Sastha Temnple area affected As a result of this mitigating effort, most of the initially affected cultural properties have been fully saved. 19.3 Benefits Enhancement Activities Proposed by the PAPs During the social impact surveys when asked what kind of assistance or benefits they would like to receive from the project authorities, people generally asked for assistance in the form of housing loans, bank loans, assistance under available government schemes, marketing facility, and cash assistance. People generally did not attach much importance to this inquiry. Table 19.4 summarises these findings. The responses to the different quenes are not mutually exclusive in relation to the total number of properties on a given road link. The affected people, being educated and not exactly subservient, as may be the case in the northern part of the country, there is a greater sense of self-reliance in their livelihood restructuring. There are, nevertheless, economically and socially vulnerable persons, such as widows or disabled people, who will need to be given economic rehabilitation grants and/or productive assets grant, whichever is applicable. The Project will strive to address the needs of the people for benefits enhancement within the framework of the R&R Policy. 19.4 Road Safety Kerala roads are high accident prone and the project has taken measures to minimise road traffic accident through better road geometry, traffic islands, footpaths, organising awareness campaign and driver education. An independent road safety auditor prepared a Road Safety Action Plan and the road design has adapted to the recommendations of the Action Plan. 19.5 Construction Camp For large scale construction like that of highways, construction camps should be planned to house the construction labourers. In most cases the labour force will be supplied from outside by the contractors and will stay in the camps throughout the period of construction. To meet the basic necessities of these mobile people, certain provisions should be made in the construction camps. Louis Berger International/Shieladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Chapter 19-7 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Chapter 19 The Highways Component Benefits Enhancement 19.5.1 Provisions Incorporated in the KSTP Social and environmental issues during the road construction stage generally involve equity, safety and public health issues. The road construction agencies are required to comply with the laws of the land., which include the following: 1. Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (provides compensation in case of injury by accident arising out of and during the course of employment). 2. Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 3. Employees PF and Miscellaneous Provision Act, 1952. 4. Maternity Benefit Act, 1951 5. Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1948 6. Minimum Wages Act, 1948 7. Payment of Wages Act, 1936 8. Equal Remuneration Act, 1979 9. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 10. Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 11. Inter-State Migrant Workmen's (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979 12. The Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 13. Environment Protection Act, 1986 14. Chemical Accidents (Emergency Planning, Preparedness and Response) Rules, 1996. 19.5.2 Contract Obligations in the KSTP In addition to and in supplementation of all the provisions in the EMAP and RAP, the following equity and welfare measures will apply to the construction activities in the KSTP. 1. First aid 2. Accommodation 3. Potable water 4. Washing and bathing places 5. Toilet 6. Shelters for rest 7. Creches 8. Canteen 9. Public safety and health/hygiene provisions. All these measures are equally important, but the health/hygiene problem assumes more importance in the context of the predominantly lone male workforce in the construction industry. These labourers play a significant role in spreading sexually transmitted diseases and HIV/AIDS. While the project has a modest budget provision to generate awarencss campaign against HIV/AIDS in the immediate area of the project, the contractor will be responsible to take steps to prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS in the construction camp. 19.6 Control of Child Labour Minors, that is, persons below the age of 14 years should be restricted from getting involved in the construction activities. Measures should be taken to ensure that no child labourer is engaged in the activities. The Environment Management Plan of the individual road links discusses in detail the safeguard measures of this aspect as well as its monitonng by the Construction Supervision Consultant. Louis Berger InteniationallSheladia Associates/CES/ICT Page Clapter l 9-S ANNEX 1: Project Description Annex 1 .1: Names and Number of Villages and Towns in Phase I Roads Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 1.1 Names and Number of Villages and Towns in Phase I Roads Links # Villages Number and Names of Towns Number and Names of Districts 1 12 0 2 Trivandrum, Kollam 2 6 1 Adoor 2 Kollam, Pathanamthitta 3 6 2 lAdoor, Chengannur 2 Pathanamthitta, Alappuzha 6 9 2 Muvattupuzha, Angamali 1 Ernakulam 26x 1 0 1 Idukki 40 13 1 Kunnamkulam 2 Thrssur, Kuttipuram 50.1 13 2 Palakkad, Shornur 1 Palakkad 70 5 2 Muvattupuzha,Thodupuzha 2 Emakulam, ldukki 72 4 0 1 Trvandrum 73 6 2 Kottayam, Alappuzha 2 Kottayam, Alappuzha Total 75 12 10 Link-wise Details of Villages: Link 1: Chainage From - To 1. Taikkad village starting chainage 25.300 25.300 - 25.500 2. Nellanadu village 25.500 - 31.200 3. Vamanapuram Village 31.200 - 32.600 4. Pulimath Village 32.600 - 36.300 5. Pazhayakunnel Village 36.300 - 43.200 6. Nilamel Village 43.200 - 48.500 7. Chadayamangalam Village 48.500 - 53.400 8. Edanulakhal Village 53.400 - 56.300 9. Ummannoor Village 56.300 - 63.500 10. Valakam Village 63.500 - 68.400 11. Vettikavala Village 68.400 - 69.400 12. Melila Village 69.400 - 71.200 Link 2: 1. Kottarakkara Village 72.400 - 73.400 2. Mylam Village 73.400 - 76.900 3. Kalayapuram Village 76.900 - 83.200 4. Enathu Village 83.200 - 88.000 5. Erattu Village 88.000 - 89.600 6. Adoor Village 89.600 - 91.100 Link 3: 1. Peringanadu Village 91.100 - 96.400 2. Kurambala Village 96.400 - 101.300 3. Pandalam Village 101.300 - 103.600 4 Kulanada Village 103.600 - 107.300 5. Mullakuzha Village 107.300 - 113.700 6. Chengannur Village 113.700 - 115.900 Link 6: 1. Marady Village 206.400 - 207.400 2. Velloorkunnam Village 207.500 - 210.300 3. Mulavoor Village 210.400 - 216.900 4. Rayamangalam Village 216.900 - 224.100 5. Perumbavoor Village 224.200 - 228.700 6. Chelamattom Village 228.800 - 233.000 7. Kalady Village 233.100 - 234.400 8. Mattoor Village 234.500 - 236.700 9. Angamali Village 236.800 - 240.100 LBII/SheladialCES/ICT Page 1 of 2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 1.1 Link 40 1. Choondal Village 19.600 - 19.800 2. Kanippayyoor Village 19.800 -21.700 3. Kunnamkulam Village 21.700 - 28.800 4. Porkulam Village 5. Agathiyoor Village J 25.400 - 28.600 6. Karikkad Village 1 7. Perimpilavu Village J 28.600 - 30.800 8. Kadavallur Village 30.800 - 34.100 9. Alamcode Village 34.100 - 42.100 10. Vattamkulam Village 42.100 - 46.500 11. Edappal Village 46.500 - 46.600 12. Kalady Village 46.600 - 49.200 13. Thavannur Village 49.200 - 52.600 Link 50.1: 1. Yakkara Village 1 2. Palakkad I Village 0.000 - 3.500 3. Palakkad II Village J 4. Pirayari Village 3.500 - 7.500 5. Parali II Village 7.500 - 12.200 6. Parali I Village 12.200 - 15.900 7. Mankara Village 15.900 - 22.000 8. Perur I & II Village 22.000 - 27.680 9. Ottappalam II Village 27.680 - 34.300 10. Ottappalam I Village 34.300 - 36.000 1 1. Vaniyamkulam II Village 36.000 - 38.400 12. Vaniyamkulam I Village 38.400 - 42.500 13. Shomnur Village 42.500 - 45.200 Link 70: 1. Marady Village 2.000 - 2.400 2. Muvattupuzha Village 2.400 - 9.400 3. Manjalloor Village 9.400 - 14.900 4. Kumaramangalam Village 14.900- 18.00 5. Thodupuzha Village 18.000 - 19.700 Link 72: 1. Koliyakode Village 1.100 - 5.100 2. Keezhthonnakkal Village 5.100 - 5.800 3. Ayiroorpara Village 5.800 - 11.400 4. Kazhakoottam Village 11.400 - 12.500 Link 73: 1. Changanassery Village 1.300 - 1.800 2-Payippal Village 1.800 - 4.540 3. Veliyanad Village 4.540 - 6.180 4. Ramankari Village 6.180 - 11.260 5. Champakkulam Village 11.260 - 16.320 6. Nedumudi Village 16.320 - 21.500 LBII/Sheladia/CESlICT Page 2 of 2 ANNEX 2: Survey Instruments Annex 2.1: Schedule for Census Survey Annex 2.2: Schedule for Baseline Sample Survey Aw4't> Z1 }Senal No. of Property: L / R: KERALA STATE TRANSPORT PROJECT One/Two/Three/More Stonred SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Schedule for Census Survey of 100% Potential PAPs (Including Asset Inventory) Schedule Serial No. in Computer: Chainage: ............. Name and Signature of Interviewer: Date of interview: Name and signature of Supervisor/Coordinator:............................................................ I Photo Roll No. / Negative No. A. General Identification Link No.: .... Road Code: ...... Road Section: ...................................................... District: ... . Town: ... ... Panchayat: .... .... Village: ...................... B. Property Identification I Revenue Survev No. 1. Address of the property identified: ....... ............ 2. Use of property: 1. Residential 2. Commercial 3. Res-Comm 4. Govt. Office 5. Other: . 6. Agn 3. Status of the user of the property: 1. Owner 2. Tenant 3. Encroacher 4. Squatter 4. Name of owner of the property: ............ ............. Occupation: . 5. Name of the user of the property: ................................................... 6. Name of the respondent: .................. ....... Relationship with the User. B-1. The property is: 1. Woman headed 2. Disabled person headed 3. None of these B-2. Household Information 7. If physical/social disability in the household, define (e.g., physical disability - dumb and deaf, blind, lame, etc., social disability - old, infirm, orphan, destitute, etc.): 8. Living in this structure for how many years? .......... 9. Does the household have a ration card? 1. Yes 2. No If yes, since when? (year) ........ B-3. Enlistment: 10. Is the head of the property user listed in the voters' list? l. Yes 2. No. If not, why? ... C. Household Member Information/Commercial Employees Information 1. Number of affected families (entitled persons): ............... Male: Female: 2. Household member details/Commercial employeese Sr _ arita Rel. to Educ Occupation Total # Name Age M~I/F~' status Head ation Main Subs (monthly) S 2 5 6 6 _____ 7 9 10 _______ ____________________ LBII/SAJCESIICT Page 1 of 5 C-1: Social Group Particulars: 3. HH Religion: 1. Hindu 2. Muslim 3. Christian 4. Other (please specify): ............... 4. Scheduled Caste/ Scheduled Tribe/ Other Backward Caste: 1. SC 2. ST 3. OBC 4. None D. Land Use: (please convert local unit for area into m2) Description Area Number Total area of immovable property owned by the HH Area used for family dwelling Area used for business, rental, etc. if any Area used for agricultural production, if any Area used for rubber plantation, if any , Area unised for being fallow land, if any Area of land encroached, if any Area and number of trees used for fuel wood, if any If tenant, name and address of owner: E. Structure and Homestead Land: Existence of compound wall 1. Yes 2. No Distance of boundary from the center of road Length of boundary along the road Width of the boundary Boundary other than wall: material used 1. Barbed wire 2. Shrubs 3. Coconut leaves 4. Mud 5. Any Other Area of compound (sq. m.) Area of compound within the COI Distance of structure from the center of road Length of structure along the road Width of the structure Area of structure (sq. m.) Area of structure within the COI Type of structure 1. Pucca 2. Kutcha Wall construction material 1. Laterite 2. Bricks 3. Mud bricks 4. Others Roofing material I Tiles 2. Terraced 3. Both 4. Thatched 5. Other Flooring material 1. Concrete 2. Red/black oxide 3. Mud 4. Other F. Land Tenure: (refers only to agricultural/plantation land) 1. Area of land holding (please convert into m2): 2. Type of land ownership: 1. Owner 2. Tenant 3. Encroacher 4. Squatter 3. Do you have legal documents for your type of ownership? ...... ]. Yes 2. No 4. If not owned by head of HH, name and location of owner: 5. Area of land rented out (m2): 6. Area of land rented in (m2): 7. Total operational holding (m2): 8. How many labourers do you engage annually, if any? ................ LBIUSA/CES/ICT Page 2 of 5 G. Agriculture/Plantation: Type of crop Area cultivated Annual yield Cost of labour Total income l________________ _____(kg/paraJcount) and fertilizer (horizontal) Rice | Tapioca Coconut Banana, areca nut, pepper Areca nut only ._. Pepper only Ginger Nut meg Pineapple | Rubber Tea Coffee Other (specify) _ Total Income H. Agricultural/Plantation Land Getting Affected: (Mi) | Agriculture .Private Land Encroached Land Area within the COI | IrrigatedlI Unirrigated Plantation! Irrigated Unirrigated 1. Other Assets Getting Affected: Assets Affected Units within the COI Water pumping out units Wells Hand pumps Water tap Any other: J. Owner's and Tenant's Response with regard to Structure: (a) Residential structure (Owner's response): 1. How old is the structure (in years)? .......... 2. What is the market value of this structure today? ... 3. Do you have a tenant within this structure? ....... 1. Yes 2. No 4. If yes, name of the tenant: ........ 5. How long has the tenant been living within this structure? .......... 6. Do you have electricity connection in the structure? ...... 1. Yes 2. No 7. Do you have tap water connection in the structure? ....... 1. Yes 2. No LBII/SA/CES/ICT Page 3 of 5 (b) Residential structure (Tenant's response): I. .How much rent do you pay per month?. 2. Did you pay any adjustable/returnable advance money? .... 1. Yes 2. No 3. Do you have electricity connection in the structure'? ...... 1. Yes 2. No 4. Do you have tap water connection in the structure? ...... 1. Yes 2. No 5. Who pays for electricity and water bills? 1. Owner 2. Tenant (c) Commercial structure (Owner's response): 1. How old is the structure (in years)?. 2. How long have you been operating from this structure? .... 3. What type of business do you do? .......... 4. What is the total household income from business9 ............ 5. How many business partner(s) do you have, if any? .. 6. Usage of structure: 1. Shop 2. Godown 3. Workshop 4. Office 7. How many helping hand do you have, if anv'? ............ 8. What is the market value of this structure today? ......... 9. Does the structure have electricity connection? .... 1. Yes 2. No (d) Commercial structure (Tenant's response): 1. How long have you been operating from this structure? .... 2. What type of business do you do? .......... 3. What is the total household income from business9 ........... 4. How much rent do you pay per month9 ....... 5. Did you pay any adjustable/returnable advance money? I. Yes 2. No 6. Usage of structure: 1. Shop 2. Godown 3. Workshop 4. Office 7. How many business partner(s) do you have, if any'? .... 8. How many helping hand do you have, if any? ... ...... 9. Does the structure have electricity connection? .... 1. Yes 2. No K. Expected Benefits: 1. What benefits do you expect if resettlement is necessary? 1. Bank loan 2. Housing loan 3. Assistance under govt. schemes (e.g. DWACRA) 4. Any other 2. What facilities do you think should be enhanced: I. Health care 2. Frequency of bus services 3. More stops for buses 4. Drainage 5. Marketing facility along the corridor of impact 6. Other: LBII/SA/CES/ICT Page 4 of 5 L. Total Household Income: Income item Income amount 1. Income from regular job 2. Income from business 3. Income from remittances 4. Income from wage eamings 5. Income from seasonal jobs 6. Income from cultivation and/or plantation on own land 7. Income from cultivation and/or plantation on shared land 8. Income from cultivation and/or plantation on encroached land 9. Income from structure rents 10. Income from taxi/autorickshaw rent 11. Income from household industry 12. Income from selling fuel wood _ _ _ 13. Income from fishing 14. Income from any other source TOTAL Verified and signed, PWD representative: Verified and signed, Revenue Dept. representative: Verified and signed, Panchayat representative: (Please sign with your name, designation, date, and place) LBII/SA/CES/ICT Page 5 of 5 Awsi# 2.2- Serial No. of Structure: L / R: Unit Ser. No.: KERALA STATE TRANSPORT PROJECT One/Two/Three/More Storied SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Schedule for Baseline Socio-Economic Sample Survey (Supplementary to the Census Survey; the cover page is same for both.) Q. Serial No. in Computer: Chainage: ...................... Name of Interviewer: Date of interview:........................ Name and signature of Supervisor/Coordinator: :............................................................ A. General Identification Link No.: .... Road Code: ...... Road Section: . District: .. . Town: .. Panchayat: . ... ... Village: . B. Structure Identification 1. Address of the structure identified: ............................................................ 2. Use of structure: 1. Residential 2. Commercial 3. Res-Comm 4. Govt. Office 5. Other:. 3. Status of the user of the structure unit: 1. Owner 2. Tenant 3. Encroacher 4. Squatter 4. Name of owner of the structure: ............................. Occupation: . 5. Name of the respondent: ............................ Relationship with the Ownerr. B-1. Structure Ownership: 1. Woman headed 2. Disabled person headed 3. None of these R-2. Household Information 6. If phvsical/social disability in the household, define (e.g., physical disability - dumb and deaf, blind, lame, etc., social disability - old, infirm, orphan, destitute, etc.): 7. Living in this structure for how many years? . 8. Does the household have a ration card? 1. Yes 2. No If yes, since when? (year) B-3. Enlistment: 9. Is the head of the structure user listed in the voters' list? I. Yes 2. No. If not, why? ... C. Household Information: 1. Number of affected families: ............... 2. Household member details: Name Age M/F Marita Rel. to Educ Occupation Total Skills I status head ation Main Subs (monthly) 2l 3 _ _ 5 _ _ 9 SCSC_ _ P ae = LBIIISA/CES/ICT Page I of 4 Serial No. of Structure: L / R: Unit Ser. No.: 3. Has migration taken place from this HH? If yes, where? Has anyone returned? Category of Migration Response 1 Number 1. Migration to the Gulf countries 1. Yes 2. No l 2. Returned from the Gulf countries 1. Yes 2. No i 3. Migration/emigration to other countries 1. Yes 2. No i 4. Returned from other countries 1. Yes 2. No I 5. Migration to other states in India 1. Yes 2. No _ 6. Migration within the state 1. Yes 2. No _ C-1: Social Group Particulars: 4. HH Religion: 1. Hindu 2. Muslim 3. Christian 4. Other (please specifv): ................ 5. Scheduled Caste/ Scheduled Tribe/ Other Backward Caste: 1. SC 2. ST 3. OBC 4. None D. Quality of Life: Expenses of the HH annually in terms of percentage of total income: please indicate the consumption/expenditure for different items in the last one year: Categories Items Expenditure | A Food Rice (kg.) Pulses (kg.) Milk (Itr.) Cooking oil (kg.) __________. Vegetables (kg.)__________ Fruits (kg.) Meat/fish (kg.) Eggs (estimated no.) Sugar (kg.) __ B Cooking fuel C Clothing D Health care E Lighting and utilities F Education G Communication H Social functions I Agriculture (e.g., hiring of implements, seeds, labor, etc.) J Newspapers K Other (specify) Total E. Women Specific Household Activities: Sr. # Activities # of women engaged Time spent (hrs.) daily 1 Cooking 2 Washing 3 Collection of drinking water 4 Cleaning of house 5 Cattle rearing.. 6 Child rearing 7 Engaged in HH industries 8 Extending support for cultivation 9 Relaxation and entertainment 10 Any other activity LBtIISA/CES/1C1 Page 2 of 4 Serial No. of Structure: L/ R: Unit Ser. No.: F. Women's Role In Household Decision Making: 1. Do you have any say in decision making at household level? 1. Yes 2. No 2. If yes, do you have any say in the following matters? Issues 1. Yes 2. No I Financial matters 2 Education of children 3 Health care of children 4 Purchase of assets 5 Day to day activities 6 On social functions and marriages 7 Any other (specify) G. Private Infrastructure Water supply system by type (circle) Open well Bore well Public water 1 tube well supply Number of each type of water supply system -Which wvater supply system is affected by project l Number of toilet _ H. Household Equipment: Type of lighting (kerosene, electric, etc.) Type of cooking energy (gas, kerosene, electric, improved chulha, fuel wood, etc.) Type of transport (bike, motor cycle, car, auto rickshaw, etc.) Type of furnishing (bed, chairs, tables, etc.) Type of entertainment (TV, radio, stereo, etc.) If cooking energy is fuel wood, its source l_l 1. Indebtedness Indicate borrowings, if at all, during the last one year: Source Amount borrowed Amount returned Balance Bank (name) Private money lender Others (specify) J_ Health Status 1. Was any member of your family affected by any illncss/diseases in the last one year'? Yes/No 2. If yes, indicate the details: Type of disease/illness No. of cases _Treatment ta_k_en* * 1. Allopathic; 2. Homoeopathic; 3. Ayurvedic; 4. Unani; 5. Nature cure; 6. No treatment LBI1/SA/CES/ICT Page 3 of 4 Serial No. of Structure: L / R: Unit Ser. No.: K. Perception about the Project * Do you think it is necessary to widen and strengthen the road? (Yes/No . why?) * Do you perceive any impact on your day-to-day life due to this project? (describe) * Do you think more vehicular traffic on the road will affect the safety of children'? * What measures do you think should be taken to minimize the risk? L. Resettlement & Rehabilitation OWNER (a) In case of PAPs getting displaced: 1. What, in your view, constitutes fair compensation? 2. What is your preference for compensation - cash or land? 3. How far do you prefer to be located? Within/outside town/village 4. How far is it from the present location? 5. What do you prefer as resettlement measure? (options may be combined) a) House site b) Constructed house c) Shifting expenses d) Replacement value and compensation e) Any other suggested by the PAP (b) In case of PAPs whose property can be sct back: What, in your view, constitutes fair compensation for replacement value? (c) PAP whose commercial structure is getting affected: What do you prefer as rehabilitation measure? a) New constructed shop b) Compensation for restarting the operation c) Compensation for loss of income during the transition period d) Any other suggested by the PAP TENANT a. In case of PAPs getting displaced: What do you prefer for resettlement? 1. Shifting allowance 2. Self-relocation 3. Any other (please specify) b. PAP whose commercial structure is getting/may be affected: What do you prefer as rehabilitation measure? 1. New constructed shop 2. Compensation for restarting the operation 3. Compensation for loss of income during the transition period 4. Any other measures suggested by the PAP AGRICULTURAL LAND HOLDER What would prefer for rehabilitation? a. Land for land b. Cash compensation c. Any other (please specify) LBII/SA/CES/ICT Page 4 of 4 ANNEX 3: Minimising Impacts Annex 3.1: Engineering Design Guidelines for Minimising Social and Environmental Impacts Annex 3.2: Procedures Adopted for Engineering Design Annex 3.3 Minimising Negative Social Impacts Annex 3.1 KERALA STATE HIGHWAYS PROJECT Engineering Design Guidelines for Minimising Social and Environmental Impacts To minimise the negative social impacts, some of the basic principles guiding the engineering design of the project roads are: * Limit the upgrading activities within the existing road corridor, making maximum use of traffic engineering methods when the road passes through heavily congested areas, such as an organized market place or dense housing clusters. This action minimizes both the social and economic impacts. * Leave cultural property sites, such as temples, churches, mosques, shrines, sacred groves, graves or cremation grounds, and archaeological sites untouched in the design of the road alignments. Where it is essential to acquire part of cultural property sites such taking must be limited to outer courtyards and frontage without taking any part of the sanctuary building. Gates, arches, stairways, etc. may need to be replaced. Implementing this parameter will be easier following the preliminary design, when the social-environmental strip mapping exercise is complete and which would identify every structure and the land use of the project roads. * Upgrading/widening on one side is preferable - it limits land take and building demolition to one side only and reduces costs. People thus affected may demand land take on the other side as well. Public hearings should take care of this aspect. • While doing the above, care be taken to avoid taking agricultural land as much as possible. The screening surveys and site visits facilitated this to some degree. The social-environmental strip mapping identified the land use of the project roads. The- taking of rubber plantation land will have the least impact. The price of rubber having fallen in recent years, the cost of acquiring such land would also be less than other productive land. * Avoid rice paddies as far as possible. It may be necessary to develop an equal area of paddy. It will probably be necessary to build retaining walls to reduce the erosion of paddy fields. * Try to avoid splitting fields. If fields become unviable, compensation will need to be paid for the whole field. One of the major problems of new routes is the securing of land ownership. Design Guidelines for Minirnising Negative Social Impacts Page 1 of 2 Annex 3.1 * While attempting to ease curves, minimize the amount of property and number of homes to be affected. * Try to avoid removing old tropical hard wood trees. * Avoid taking of wetlands wherever possible. * While all the parameters mentioned above are ideal, it is also noted that it is not necessary that the engineering design should protect everything. If something cannot be protected, the Environmental Impact Assessment is required to document why it was not possible to save/protect the facility in question. * Introduce appropriate speed limits on all densely developed sections, possibly in association with speed reducing humps with signing. Speed humps should be designed to allow the comfortable passage of vehicle travelling under the speed limit. Design Guidelines for Minimising Negative Social Impacts Page 2 of 2 Kerala State Transport Project The H ighways Component Annex 3.2 Procedures Adopted for the Engineering Design The engineering survey was camed out through topographical survey in the field to collect the existing features 15m on either side of centreline of existing road. They are submitting the raw data and AutoCad drawing. The raw data is in the following format. Point No: Easting Northing Elevation Code or Comment * This data is inputted in to the Design Software CARD/1 to get the base map. * At this stage the alignment is designed for 65 kmph speed in niral areas and 40 kmph speed in urban areas. The minimum radius is 155m and 66m respectively. * Basically there are four types of cross sections, namely, Type 10, Type 30, Type 40, and Type 43. * Type 10 (Fig: 1) is used for urban and semi-urban areas as well as for educational and religious areas. * Type 30 (Fig: 2), Type 40 (Fig: 3), and Type 43 (Fig: 4) are used for rural areas. * Type 10 has a provision for footpath as well as drain and cable duct. * Type 30 provides for covered drain beyond the shoulder. This covered drain can be used as footpath. * Type 40 is provides for open drain beyond the shoulder. This is used mostly in open areas without any habitation or where habitation is minimal. * Type 43 is without drains. This is used at embankments and bridge approaches. * Horizontal and vertical alignments are designed (Preliminary Alignments) keeping in view the above design parameters. Wherever possible the existing alignment is improved with the greater geometric standards and some realignments are also proposed. During this preliminary design exercise an approximate type of cross section is applied by examining the base map. The ROW is obtained with the application of software. * With all this information, the social survey team is given a printout of the preliminary design and they proceed to the field to do the social survey and strip mapping on the preliminary engineering design. * Meanwhile, the engineering design team goes to the field with the preliminary design to check the feasibility of the horizontal and vertical aligmnents and comes with some more proposals or go back to the existing position due to non-feasibility in field condition. The exact types of cross sections are decided at this stage in the field and the same are noted in the drawings and subsequently incorporated in the final design. * The preliminary alignment is modified with the field corrections to get the final design. * If there are realignments then the survey team will carry out topographical survey in the field to collect the existing features and for this also social survey is carried out. * At the stage of final design exercise some more engineering options are used to limit the land acquisition, thereby saving the affected properties as much as technically feasible. * The options are 00 = normal 05 = side road 10 = vertical cut-line, after cable-duct or drain 11 = Vertical cut-line, after 2.5m footpath 20 = retaining wall, after cable-duct or drain 21 = retaining wall, after 2.5m footpath Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Resettlement Action Plan Kerala State Transport Project 1-he Highways Component Annex 3..2.. 23 = retaining wall, 1/2 under cable-duct 24 = retaining wall, in cut-section, after 2.5m footpath or drain 30 = gabion, after cable-duct or drain 31 = gabion, after 2.5m footpath 40 = slap on earth drain * With all these options the final ROW is finalized and with the same, setting out of ROW is done in the field. Fig: 1 Fig: 2 Fig: 3 Fig: 4 Annex 3.3 (1) Annex 3.3 Efforts Made to Minimise the Negative Social Impacts with Regard to Land, Buildings and People Link 3: Adur - Chengannur (Phase I Road), 22.0 km Land Take in Ha Number of Structures Affected Number of Persons Affected KM New Corridor Minimum Width in m New Corridor Minimum Width in m New Corridor Minimum Width in m 10 12 15 30 10 12 15 30 10 12 15 30 0 1 0.00 0.00 0.26 1.76 0 0 a 74 0 0 0 105 2 0.00 0.00 0.28 1.78 0 0 0 89 0 0 0 110 3 0.00 0.25 0.30 1.80 0 25 83 0 37 126 4 0.00 0.00 0.18 1.68 0 32 83 91 0 45 166 131 5 0.00 0.00 0.10 1.60 0 40 91 87 0 59 180 95 6 0.00 0.00 0.21 1.71 0 0 87 0 0 0 174 0 7 0.00 0.45 0.45 1.95 0 27 0 93 0 37 0 105 8 0.00 0.00 0.22 1.72 0 0 80 0 0 0 93 9 0.00 0.00 0.28 1.78 0 14 80 74 0 21 159 91 10 0.00 0.00 0.18 1.68 0 28 0 65 0 42 0 90 11 0.00 0.00 0.19 1.69 0 35 0 63 O 52 0 88 12 0.00 0.00 0.12 1.62 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 13 0.00 0.34 0.34 1.84 0 0 0 71 0 0 0 85 14 0.00 0.00 0.26 1.76 0 16 O 0 0 27 0 0 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.49 0 27 0 56 0 45 0 74 16 0.00 0.00 0.07 1.57 0 28 0 48 0 52 0 58 17 0.00 0.00 0.15 1.65 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 83 18 0.00 0.00 0.17 1.67 0 12 0 63 C 17 0 71 19 0.00 0.00 0.16 1.66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0 7 161 0 0 21 30 0 21 0.00 0.30 0;32 1.82 0 0 16 0 0 19 22 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0 0 O 67 0 0 0 78 Land Take Number of Affected Structures Total Number of Persons Affected Minimum Corridor Width 1 Om 0.00 Minimum Corridor Width 1 Om 0 Minimum Corridor Width 1 Om 0 Minimum Corridor Width 12m 1.49 Minimum Corridor Width 12m 291 Minimum Cormdor Width 12m 455 Minimum Corridor Width 15m 4.241 Minimum Corridor Width 15m 357 Minimum Corridor Width 15m 709 Minimum Corridor Width 30m 35.73 Minimum Corridor Width 30m 1190 Minimum Comidor Width 30m 1502 Kerala State Transport Project Mlnimising Negative Social Impacts Page 1 of 4 Annex 3.3 (2) Annex 3.3 Efforts Made to Minimise the Negative Social Impacts with Regard to Land, Buildings and People Link 6: Muvattupuzha - Angamali (Phase I Road), 33.0 km Land Take in Ha Number of Structures Affected Number of Persons Affected KM New Corridor Minimum Width in m New Corridor Minimum Width in m New Corridor Minimum Width in m 10 12 15 30 10 12 15 30 10 12 15 30 O 1 0.00 0.00 0.12 1.63 0 0 9 9 0 0 38 38 2 0.00 0.00 0.08 1.70 0 0 23 70 0 a 130 213 3 0.00 0.00 0.12 1.72 0 0 85 85 0 0 359 359 4 0.00 0.00 0.14 1.67 0 0 65 82 0 0 305 314 5 0.00 0.00 0.12 1.74 0 0 36 69 0 0 225 192 6 0.00 O.0O 0.00 1.39 0 0 33 53 0 0 150 206 7 0.00 0.47 0.13 1.97 0 0 25 48 0 0 125 183 8 0.00 0.00 0.07 1.67 0 0 19 53 0 0 115 199 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.57 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 152 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.14 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 157 11 0.00 0.40 0.05 1.90 0 0 0 32 a 0 0 127 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.27 0 0 23 0 0 0 126 0 14 0.00 0.00 0.05 1.65 0 0 25 0 O 0 113 0 15 0.00 0.00 0.10 1.70 0 0 24 40 0 0 94 149 16 0.00 0.00 0.12 1.70 0 0 23 45 0 0 99 172 17 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.58 0 0 23 35 0 0 94 128 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.43 0 0 14 14 0 0 56 48 19 0.00 0.00 0.11 1.61 0 0 9 9 0 0 38 32 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.62 0 0 18 67 0 0 86 241 21 0.00 0.00 0.14 1.64 0 0 13 69 0 0 65 240 22 0.00 0.00 0.04 1.67 0 0 24 83 0 0 99 320 23 0.00 0.00 0.06 1.63 0 0 35 68 0 0 145 258 24 0.00 0.00 0.07 1.71 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 230 25 0.00 0.00 0.08 1.58 0 0 41 83 0 0 158 312 26 0.00 0.48 0.21 1.98 0 83 83 83 0 351 351 320 27 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 0 0 12 15 0 0 62 60 28 0.00 0.00 0.07 1.57 0 0 35 70 0 0 165 252 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.39 0 0 27 67 0 0 128 240 30 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.45 0 0 38 62 0 0 150 213 31 0.00 0.00 0.05 1.55 0 0 26 55 0 0 106 205 32 0.00 0.00 0.05 1.55 0 0 22 87 0 0 83 267 33 0.00 0.00 0.08 1.56 0 O 18 18 0 0i 38 38 Land Take Number of Affected Structures Total Number of Persons Affected Minimum Corridor Width 1 Om 0.00 Minimum Corridor Width 1 Om 0 Minimum Corndor Width 1 Om 0 Minimum Corridor Width 12m 1.35 Minimum Corridor Width 12m 83 Minimum Comdor Width 12m 351 Minimum Corridor Width 15m 2.06 Minimum Corridor Width 15m 828 Minimum Corridor Width 15m 3703 Minimum Corridor Width 30m 52.49 Minimum Corridor Width 30m 1608 Minimum Corridor Width 30m 5865 Kerala State Transport Project Mlnimising Negative Social Impacts Page 2 of 4 Annex 3.3 (3) Annex 3.3 Efforts Made to Minimise the Negative Social Impacts with Regard to Land, Buildings and People Link 40: Thrissur - Kuttipuram (Phase I Road), 33.0 km Land Take in Ha Number of Structures Affected Number of Persons Affected KM New Corridor Minimum Width in m New Corridor Minimum Width in m New Corridor Minimum Width in m 10 12 15 30 10 12 15 30 10 12 15 30 0 _ I 1 0.00 0.05 0.14 2.00 0 40 40 40 0 169 169 169 2 0.00 0.06 0.09 1.25 0 0 40 20 0 0 152 85 3 0.00 0.03 0.09 2.01 0 0 31 20 0 119 83 4 0.00 0.02 0.00 1.49 0 0 21 25 0 0 78 105 5 0.00 0.08 0.00 1.12 0 0 35 9 0 0 142 38 6 0.00 0.07 0.00 1.20 0 0 19 15 0 0 75 62 7 0.00 0.07 0.08 1.58 0 0 21 27 0 0 89 112 8 0.00 0.04 0.21 1.93 0 12 12 12 0 50 50 50 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.41 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 91 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0.00 0.00 0.11 1.61 0 0 25 17 0 0 121 72 12 0.00 0.00 0.11 1.61 0 0 12 17 0 0 58 70 13 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 66 14 0.00 0.00 0.11 1.67 0 0 19 13 0 0 91 53 15 0.00 0.10 0.19 2.00 0 0 18 c 0 0 78 0 16 0.00 0.04 0.18 1.97 0 0 15 13 0 0 62 55 17 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.30 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 40 18 0.00 0.00 0.09 1.72 0 0 5 4 0 0 22 18 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.41 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 28 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 50 21 0.00 0.00 0.09 1.73 0 0 4 24 0 0 13 99 22 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.45 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 28 23 0.00 0.08 0.32 2.20 O 0 8 14 0 0 26 60 24 0.00 0.05 0.15 2.03 0 0 3 20 0 0 9 84 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 62 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 o0 0 0 9 0 0 0 38 27 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0.00 0.00 0.03 1.53 0 0 8 21 0 0 26 87 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 0 °l 0 0 20 0 0 0 86 30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.82 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 99 31 0.00 0.02 0.06 1.56 0 ol 0 4 20 0 0 13 84 32 0.00 0.04 0.12 1.78 0 _ 0 51 17 0 0 15 75 33 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0 0 0° 13 0 0 0 56 Land Take Number of Affected Structures Total Number of Persons Affected Minimum Corridor Width 10m 0.00 Minimum CorridorWidth 10m 0 Minimum Comdor Width 1Om 0 Minimum Comidor Width 12m 0.75 Minimum Corridor Width 12m 52 Minimum Corridor Width 12m 219 Minimum Corrdor Width 15m 2.17 Minimum Corridor Width 15m 345 Minimum Comdor Width 15m 1408 Minimum Corridor Width 30m 51.62 Minimum Corridor Width 30m 499 Minimum Corridor Width 30m 2105 Kerala State Transport Project Mlnimising Negative Social Impacts Page 3 of 4 Annex 3.3 (4) Annex 3.3 Efforts Made to Minimise the Negative Social Impacts with Regard to Land, Buildings and People Link 70: Muvattupuzha - Thodupuzha (Phase I Road), 19.0 km Land Take in Ha Number of Structures Affected Number of Persons Affected KM New Corridor Minimum Width in m New Corridor Minimum Width in m New Corridor Minimum Width in m 10 12 15 30 10 12 15 30 10 12 15 30 0 . _ _ _ 1 0.00 0.22 0.66 1.72 0 5 12 75 0 26 59 106l 2 0.00 0.30 0.90 1.80 0 6 16 63 0 32 40 90 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.48 0 0 0 73 0 0 0 102 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.41 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 92 5 0.00 0.13 0.39 1.63 0 4 15 69 0 27 60 99 6 0.00 0.01 0.03 1.51 0 2 3 65 0 12 15 92 7 0.00 0.01 0.03 1.51 0 2 5 44 0 10 0 63 8 0.00 0.07 0.21 1.57 0 4 19 100 0 23 90 152 9 0.00 0.06 0.18 1.56 0 3 17 57 0 16 58 80 10 0.00 0.23 0.69 1.73 0 8 32 61 0 42 152 85 11 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.31 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 48 12 0.00 0.28 0.84 1.78 0 4 60 100 0 23 240 148 13 0.00 0.19 0.57 1.69 0 8 23 33 0 42 95 49 14 0.00 0.45 1.34 1.95 . 0 7 21 93 0 35 103 132 15 0.00 0.14 0.42 1.64 0 2 0 74 0 12 0 104 16 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.44 0 0 0 79 0 0 0 112 1 7 0.00 0.22 0.62 1.72 0 4 32 82 0 23 127 116 18 0.00 0.15 0.32 1.65 0 2 38 98 0 10 153 142 19 0.00 0.10 0.32 1.60 0T 3 31 100 0 17 112 143 Land Take Number of Affected Structures Total Number of Persons Affected Minimum Comidor Width 10m 0.00 Minimum Corrdor Width 1Oim 0 Minimum Corridor Width 10m 0 Minimum Comdor Width 12m 2.56 Minimrum Corrdor Width 12m 64 Minimum Corridor Width 12m 350 Minimum Corrdor Width 15m 7.52 Miniimum Corridor Width 15m 324 Minimum Corridor Width 15m 1314 Minimum Comdor Width 30m 30.70 Minimum Corridor Width 30m 1364 Minimum Comdor Width 30m 1955 Kerala State Transport Project Mlnimising Negative Social Impacts Page 4 of 4 ANNEX .9. 9. Rehabilitation & Resettlement: Principles and Policy Framework- (The complete document as approved by the Kerala State Cabinet in August 2000) Annex' -1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF KERALA INDIA KERALA STATE HIGHWAYS PROJECT REHABILITATION & RESETTLEMENT: PRINCIPLES AND POLICY FRAMEWORK August 2000 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ...........................1 2. BROAD PRINCIPLES .............................1 3. ABBREVIATIONS AND TERMS ...........................2 4. DEFNITIONS ...........................4 5. BROAD PROCEDURES ...........................5 6. SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND RESETTLEMENT PLANNING ..................7 7. IMPLEMENTATION: ACQUISITION OF LAND AND PROPERTIES ......................8 8. RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION .............................................................9 9. MONITORING AND POST - PROJECT EVALUATION ............................................ 10 10. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ............................................................ 10 11. COST AND BUDGETING ............................................................11 12. GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL CELL ............................................................ 11 13. SCOPE FOR MAKING AMENDMENTS IN THE R&R POLICY .............................. 11 Annexure L ............................................................ 12 Annexure II ............................................................ 13 KERALA STATE HIGHWAYS PROJECT REHABILITATION & RESETTLEMENT: PRINCIPLES AND POLICY FRAMEWORK 1 INTRODUCTION The Government of Kerala is preparing the state highways project. The aim of the project is to improve and strengthen the state's transport network. Apart from the positive aspects of the road upgradation, the project may cause people to lose productive land or house plots, structures, wells, trees or other assets or to lose income otherwise. The policy recognizes those people who are likely to be affected by the upgradation and widening of the road network and support mechanisms are proposed to be provided accordingly. This document describes the principles and approaches to be followed in minimizing and mitigating negative social and economic impacts caused by the project. It provides the basis for a detailed and time-bound Resettlement Action Plan (RAP), which will be prepared for the project. The RAP will contain the details of census, baseline socio-economic surveys of the potentially affected population undertaken during the preparation of the project, mitigation measures, implementation arrangement and plans, budget, monitoring and evaluation parameters. 2 BROAD PRINCIPLES 2.1 These guidelines are prepared to address the issues related to the Kerala State Highways Project for resettlement & rehabilitation (R&R) of the project affected persons (PAP). The guidelines outline the range of assistance in re-establishing their homes and livelihoods in the course of the implementation of the project. The avoidance of involuntary resettlement is an integral part of the project design but will be dealt with from the earliest stages of the project preparation. The broad principles of the R&R policy are as below: a) The negative impact on persons affected by the project should be avoided or minimized, exploring all viable alternative project designs. b) Where the negative impacts are unavoidable, the project-affected persons should be assisted in improving or regaining their standard of living. c) People's participation should be undertaken in the planning and implementation of the project. d) Positive impacts will be enhanced as far as possible. 2.2 The project will broadly have three impacts that require mitigation measures. They are: a) Loss of assets, including land and house; b) Loss of livelihood or income opportunities, c) Collective impacts on groups, such as loss of common property resources. The first two categories represent direct project impacts on an identified population. The people likely to be affected by the project will be surveyed and registered, and project monitoring and evaluation will compare longer-term impacts against baseline socio-economic data. 2 The third category represents a group impact, where group members need not be individually surveyed. Gains and losses of a group-oriented nature are not quantifiable in terms of impact on the individual. Mitigation and support mechanisms will be collectively oriented, and the monitoring will focus on impact on such groups. 2.3 All acquisition of private land would be under the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984, which provides for compensation for the properties to be acquired. further support will be extended under the broad pnrnciples of the policy to meet the replacement value of the assets and improve their standard of living. 2.4 The common property resources will be replaced as far as feasible and assistance will be provided at replacement value to the group. 2.5 Major widening and strengthening work planned will take place within the ROW based on land availability, gradient, traffic and congestion of population along the road length. However, major land acquisition and many impacts are perhaps not foreseen except at locations where existing alignment may involve shifting to accommodate bypasses, geo-metrics and other cost effective improvements. Efforts will be made during implementation to minimize any disturbance in the daily activities of the local populace. 2. 6 Before taking possession of the acquired lands and properties, all compensation, resettlement and rehabilitation and related activities would be made in accordance with this policy. 2.7 All land acquisition will be after harvest of crop. 2.8 If resettlement sites are developed as part of the project, the local "host population" should also be consulted about their views and needs. There should be no or minimum adverse social, economic and environmental impacts of displacement on the host population and specific measures should be provided in the RAP to mitigate any such impacts. 2.9 The broad entitlement framework of different categories of project-affected people shall be as per Annex I. The suggested format for detailed entitlement matrix shall be as per Annex II. The assistance specified in the entitlement matrix will be adjusted to reflect the annual inflation rate. 2.10 During project implementation, the resettlement program will be coordinated with the completion of designs and the likely timing of civil works. The project will provide adequate notification, counselling and assistance to affected people so that they are able to move or give up their assets without undue hardship before commencement of civil works. 2.11 The project will ensure that civil works are not started on any road segment before compensation and assistance to the affected population has been provided in accordance with this policy framework. 3 ABBREVIATIONS AND TERMS Following abbreviations and terms will be found used both in the policy and the RAP: a) Abbreviations: B.P.L Below Poverty Line B.S.R. Basic Schedule of Rates C.G.I. Corrugated Galvanised Iron C.O.I Corridor of Impact 3 C.P.R. Common Property Resources EP Entitled Person Ha Hectare M.E.H. Minimum Economic Holding N.G.O. Non-Governmental Organization P.A.P. Project Affected Persons P.D.P. Project Displaced Persons R.A.P. Rehabilitation Action Plan R.O. Rehabilitation Officer. R.O.W. Right of Way R&R Resettlement and Rehabilitation S.E.S Socio-Economic Survey SC Scheduled Caste S.T Scheduled Tribe Uls Under Section b) Terms Adharam Basic record of land rights. (North Indian, Perso-Arabic derived tern is Jamabandi.) Cent A local land area measurement term, one-hundredth of an acre, equivalent to 40 sq. mt. Corridor of Impact Width of corridor required for the construction of road and for its safety zone. Danam Land Include lands attached with Temples (pandaramvaka), Mosques (wakj), Churches (edavaka) etc. where priests are allowed to cultivate the same without having to pay revenue to the State for the same. (North Indian, Perso-Arabic derived term is Muafi Land.) Development Block A number of villages grouped together form a Development Block. District Collector Administrative head of a District. Hectare (Ha) A unit measuring land area. One Hectare equals 10,000 Sq. meters or 2.475 Acre. Kole Land Low land for agriculture, especially found in the Kuttanad area. Lessee A person who, not being a tenant, is allowed to cultivate land on certain terms and conditions. Panchayat Elected local self-governing body at village level. 4 Panchayat Samiti Local Self-governing body at Block level is Panchayat Samiti. Pattayam Land deed. Puramboke Land Revenue land adjoining streams, rivulets, tanks, canals and roads. President Elected head of a Grama Panchayat. 4 DEFINITIONS 4.1 Cut-off date Cut-off date shall be the following: a) In the case of land acquisition affecting legal title holders, the cut-off date would be the date of issuing the notice u/s 4(1) of LA. Act. b) For the non title holders the cut off date will be the date of census survey 4.2 Project Displaced Person A project displaced person (PDP) is one who is compelled to change his/her place of residence and/or workplace or place of business due to the project. 4.3 Project Affected Person Unless otherwise specified in this Policy document, a project affected person is one who, in consequence of the project, sustains damages (a) by reasons of severing such land or (b) by affecting his/her immovable properties in any manner or (c) by adversely affecting his/her livelihood/eamings calculated by an objective assessment. The category of project affected person (PAP) includes project displaced person (PDP). 4.4 Definition of Family a) A "Family" shall mean Husband/Wife and minor children. b) Every son or unmarried daughter who has attained the age of 18 years on or before the cut-off- date will be treated as separate family. c) Every divorced or widowed daughter living separately or with the family on or prior to cut off date will be treated as separate family. 4.5 Landless/Agricultural Labourer A person who does not hold any agricultural land and who has been deriving his main income by working on the lands of others as an agricultural labourer prior to cut off date. 4.6 Encroacher A person is an encroacher if he/she has trespassed Government land, adjacent to his/her own land or asset to which he/she is not entitled, and who derives his/her livelihood and housing therefrom prior to the cut-off date. 4.7 Squatter A squatter is a person who has settled on publicly owned land for housing or livelihood without permission or who has been occupying publicly owned building without authority prior to the cut-off date. 5 4.8 Income Income of a PAP shall mean the amount of income as shown in his Income Tax Return prior to the cut-off date. In the absence of such a return, his income shall be calculated by an objective assessment applying the same method as adopted by the Government agencies for identifying B.P.L. families. 4.9 Below Poverty line A household whose monthly consumption expenditure is less than a designated sum as determined by the Department of Rural Development, Government of Kerala, will be considered below poverty line. 4.10 Vulnerable Person Unless otherwise specifically mentioned in this document, a person who has been designated as falling under the 'Below Poverty Line' categcry and earning up to 25% above the poverty level will be considered a vulnerable person. Generally, the vulnerable groups may include but not be limited to the: a) Poor or landless people falling under the "Below Poverty Line" category; b) Members of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes; c) Women-headed households: d) Orphans and destitute persons (socially handicapped); and e) Disabled persons (phvsically handicapped). 4.11 Targeted Support to Vulnerable Groups The project will deterninc, through census surveys and other studies, who among the affected population may be considered as vulnerable or at risk. The vulnerable groups will receive targeted support and special attention from the project, and provided support mechanisms. 5 BROAD PROCEDURES 5.1 Basic Approach a) The project recognizes that along with the positive aspects of infrastructure development, there are also negative impacts, which include the possible loss of assets, the loss of house and shelter, and the loss of livelihood or income opportunities. Moreover, a project like this inflicts some impacts on the communitv as a whole, such as. loss of access to community facilities like schools and hospitals, access to water and sanitation, and access to common property resources. b) People losing their home represent a particular challenge in the resettlement program. Every effort will be made by the project to ensure that new housing is available before people are required to relocate. c) Every effort should be made during project design and preparation to minimize acquisition of land and other assets and to reduce negative socio-economic impacts. The structures/assets falling outside the Corridor of Impact would as far as possible be left undisturbed. d) If the project impact leads to people being unable to continue with their previous occupation, the project will provide support and assistance through alternative employment strategies. Longer- term earning opportnities will be provided through strategies such as vocational training, employment counselling. iticlusion in income generating schemes, and access to credit. 6 e) The policy principle is to provide R&R assistance to both PDPs and PAPs. Compensation for land, however, will not be extended to the encroachers and squatters, considering the illegal nature of their possession. f) The identification of encroachers and squatters, in case they do not possess ration cards, would be sought from voters' list, or from any other legal documents or information from the community. In the absence of any supporting legal documents, findings of the Census survey shall be relied upon. g) Efforts should be made to ensure involvement of the people and stakeholders in planning, implementation and monitoring of the project through focus group discussions, workshops at district and at state levels. h) Copies of this document, information on its salient features or its official Executive Summary, will be displayed at the notice board of the offices of the project authority for general information to the public. Policy translated in local language should be distributed to the affected people. Interested public may contact Rehabilitation Officer for further details. The Resettlement Action Plan will provide detailed information regarding the consultation process. It will take account of the fact that informnation must be given at different stages, repeated, and provided through different media. The consultation process planned for the project will use different types of consultation such as in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, seminars and meetings, and key informant interviews at different levels of stakeholder involvement, including: * Household representatives - men and women; - Clusters of PAPs; - Village Panchayats; - District development committee: • Other govemment agencies and departments. i) The project will therefore ensure that the affected population and other stakeholders are informed and consulted about the project, its impact, their entitlements and options, and allowed to participate actively in the development process. This will be done particularly in the case of vulnerable individuals and groups, who will be encouraged to choose the options which entail the lowest risk. This exercise will be done throughout the project life - during preparation, implementation, and monitoring of project results and impacts. 5.2 Compensation and R & R a) All P.A.Ps. as defined in para 4.3 shall be entitled to resettlement and rehabilitation besides compensation as stipulated hereinafter. Those PAPs who are not entitled for compensation may get R&R benefits as per their respective entitlement framework. b) The compensation for land and building shall be provided within the ambit of the L A Act and to meet the replacement value, R&R assistance will be provided. c) All losses, including loss of income, should be compensated within the overall R&R package as per the broad entitlement framework. The unit of entitlement framework shall be the family as defined in para 4.4. d) In case of acquisition of land/buildings/other assets, the replacement cost should be considered. The replacement value will be assessed as per procedure laid down in para 7.3. In case the replacement cost is more than the compensation at market price determined by competent authority, the difference is to be paid by the project in the form of assistance. 7 e) The entitlement of compensation & assistance will be extended to only those PAPs who are so identified on or prior to the cut off date. Claims regarding R&R assistance should be dealt by the Grievance Redressal Committee. 5.3 General Assistance to P.A.Ps. & P.D.Ps. a) The shifted population shall be assisted in getting their names included in voters' lists of the area of their resettlement. b) PAPs falling under vulnerable groups shall be provided suitable assistance to minimise the adverse impacts through various means will be described in depth in the RAP. 6 SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND RESETTLEMENT PLANNING 6.1 Corridor of Impact Displacement under the project will be limited to the corridor required for the road and its safety zonc. This corridor is referred to as the Corridor of Impact (COI), and comprises typically the total construction width, inclusive of drains/embankments, shoulders. The COI can have a different extent to the right and left from the road centre line and varies as required. Within this corridor, there cannot be any structures or other hindrances. In this project, the Corridor of Impact is defined as the full construction width and a safety zone on either side which will cover the shoulders, footpaths, drains, etc 6.2 Surveys For proper rehabilitation of the project affected and displaced persons, social impact assessment shall be undertaken. This would help in assessing the magnitude of displacement, losses to be sustained by PDPs and PAPS, better targeting of vulnerable groups, ascertaining the cost of R&R, drawing out the rehabilitation package and administering the same. The social impact assessment shall consist of two surveys namely: a) Census survey of 100 percent of PAPs; b) A baseline socioeconomic sample survey of 25 percent of the PAPs to establish the monitoring and evaluating parameters. The purpose of the census is to register and document the status of the potentially affected population within the project impact area. This will provide a demographic overview of the population, and will cover people's assets and main sources of livelihood. The baseline survey shall be completed prior to the date of notification under Section 4(1) of LA Act. If declaration under sub-section is not issued within the stipulated period as specified the survey will be undertaken again and the notification under section 4(1) shall be reissued. The census survey will inter-alia include collection of information about the following: a) The resource base including land, water, and forest etc., with an assessment of its development and ecological potential in the pre-project conditions. b) The economy base of the affected people including the modes and magnitude of production, consumption pattern, related economic institutions and allocation of various productive resources. c) Household census covering immovable property owned by the PAPs and other resources in their possession/use. These surveys would be carried out in association with local and host communities as well as with the local representatives. 8 d) The social structure, norms, customs, cultural centres, traditions, patterns of leadership and institutions of social network. e) The census surveys will prima-facie identify tenants, sharecroppers, encroachers and agricultural day labourers. During such census survey, those PAPs are dependant on the road for their livelihood, shall also be identified and listed along with their identified income. Besides this, the survey will also identify PDPs and PAPS, the ST and S.C. populations in accordance with the S.T. and S.C. lists of the Govt., the vulnerable PAPs such as the old, handicapped, infirm, orphans and destitute. Baseline data of the Survey should also include: a) Accurate up to date maps of the area of project; b) Analysis of social structure and income resources of the population; c) Inventories of the resources which the tribal use as well as data on their systems of economic production; d) The relationship of the tribal to other local and national groups. Baseline studies should capture the full range of production and marketing activities in which the tribal are engaged. 6.3 Resettlement and Rehabilitation Action Plan (RAP) a) The census survey, which serves to provide baseline socioeconomic information about the affected persons, willIbe completed before initiation of the preparation for the RAP. b) A comprehensive plan for resettlement will be drawn up in advance by the project authorities based on the socio-economic surveys. The entire plan for resettlement should be prepared by the project authorities with the participation of local representatives, NGOs, and including representatives of the PAPS. c) The RAP shall be brought to the notice of the displaced and affected persons with the help of the local NGOs, the representatives of PAPs and the host communities so that they are able to make their suggestions. d) The completed RAP will include the census of affected people, and their entitlements to restore losses, budget, institutional mechanisms and schedule of tasks, assessment of the feasibility of income restoration mechanisms and avenues for grievance redress and participatory monitoring of results. 7 IMPLEMENTATION: ACQUISITION OF LAND AND PROPERTIES 7.1 Land surveys for payment of compensation shall bc done on the basis of updated official records and ground facts. The land records shall be updated relating to title/classification/current use of land expeditiously for ensuring adequate cost compensation and allotment of land to the entitled displaced persons. For determining classification/current use of land, official records as they are on the cut-off date shall be taken into consideration. 7.2 If 75 percent or more land holding of a PAP/PDP is acquired or when the part of a land remaining after acquisition becomes economically unviable after acquisition, the owner of such land/property shall have the right to seek acquisition of his entire contiguous holding/property provided the residual land is less than MEH. 9 7.3 The compensation amount for the land and properties to be acquired shall be paid according to the provisions of the L A Act. For this purpose, land market surveys will be done by project authorities in association with representatives of PAPs and professional assesses. While determining the replacement cost of the land project authority will take recourse to three systems of assessment described below a) Taking into account such prescribed rates or the average of the actual transaction rates of similar lands for contemporary years for which sale deeds are registered. b) Taking into consideration 20 times of the annual value of gross production of the concerned land, averaged over preceding five years. c) Fixing up market value of land equal to the minimum land value if so prescribed by the State Govt. under Indian Stamp Act for the purpose of registration of sale deeds under Indian Registration Act of 1908. 7.4 The replacement cost to be fixed up by the project authority shall be the amount which shall be the highest among the three amounts arrived at by the aforesaid three alternative methods. In case replacement cost is higher than the market value determined by competent authority the difference shall be paid in the form of assistance. 7.5 The value of the houses, buildings and other immovable properties of the PAPs including the PDPs shall be determined for the purpose of payment of compensation at the relevant B.S.R without deducting the depreciation value. 7.6 Compensation for properties belonging to the community or for common places of worship which are acquired for the project shall be provided to enable construction of the same at the new place through the local self-governing bodies. 7.7 Compensation for trees will also be based on their market value in case of timber bearing trees and replacement cost in case of fruit bearing trees as per the rates decided by the competent authority in consultation with Deptt. of Agriculture, Forest, Horticulture, Sericulture etc. as the case may be. 7.8 Compensation shall be paid and efforts will be made to complete the R&R of PAPs/PDPs before taking possession of the landlproperties. The PDPs and PAPs shall hand over the land and properties acquired to the Government free from all encumbrances such as mortgage, debt etc., pertaining to the lands and properties acquired. Hlowever, in case of any loans, on such acquired lands and properties given to the PAP by any Govt. agency, remains unadjusted as per the information furnished by the PAPs or by the loaner agency then such amounts shall be deducted out of total compensation. 7.9 Disposal of acquired properties: The acquired land and properties shall vest in the department/organisation paying compensation for such lands/properties. 8 RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION 8.1 Agricultural land for land compensation will be provided to vulnerable persons as defined in para 4.10. Efforts will be made to allot the new agricuiltuiral land in thejoint name of the husband and wife. 8.2 New resettlement sites or site for shopping complexes should be developed, if so opted by 25 or more number of families of PDPs or displaced shop owners, as the case may be , at one place preferably in nearby areas. However, where PDPs do not opt for such site and prefer cash, then adequiate assistance towards the cost of infrastructure development will be given to the PDPs. 10 8.3 At the new settlement centres, civic amenities like drinking water, internal and link roads, medical facilities, schools, electricity, etc. will be provided along with any other amenities which the PDPs had at their abandoned place. Any facilities provided by the Govt. & all common resource properties being availed by the displaced and affected persons prior to the project will as far as possible be provided/continued at Government cost at the new place of their resettlement or at the old place, as the case may be. 8.4 Plots for houses/shops at the new resettlement sites will be provided to the PDPs on payment basis except for the vulnerable person who will receive it free of cost. The allotment of plot for house/shop will be in the joint name of husband and wife. Cost of registration to that effect would be bome by the project authority. 8.5 Rehabilitation assistance a) Economic rehabilitation assistance shall be provided to the affected vulnerable families; b) Transitional allowance, shifting allowance, and rental allowance shall be provided to the affected people; c) Training for upgradation of skills or those related to income generation will be provided as a part of rehabilitation assistance. 8.6 The R&R activities in respect of the tribals should be adapted to their needs and environment. 8.7 Customary right and land tenure system of the tribal PDPs and PAPs should be protected.. 9 MONITORING AND POST - PROJECT EVALUATION On completion of implementation of the R&R work, project authorities shall monitor resettlement & rehabilitation of the PAPs & the host population. Such evaluation will be done annually, mid-term and end-term from the date of commencement of R&R work by external agency with the participation of the representatives of the PAPs. Suggestions made in the evaluation report will be incorporated in the RAP/revised RAP to make the R&R programmes more effective. The monitoring would be done involving project affected people in assessing results and impacts. 10 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE The project will have an R & R Cell with one Rehabilitation Officer at the hcad officc (Project Implementation Unit) will coordinate the R & R activities and one land acquisition officer will assist in the land acquisition. In addition, in the Division, the Executive Engineer will work as the Rehabilitation Officer and will work closely with the NGOs appointed. The cell will be further supported by District Level Committees comprising the Revenue Officer, any other representative from district administration, representatives of PDPs/PAPs, NGOs and the Executive Engineer. The District Level Committees will assess the replacement value of the property and advise the RR cell accordingly as well as on any other matter conceming the social aspects of the resettlement. The responsibilities of the Cell will include implementation of the RAP and monitoring and evaluation. 11 11 COST AND BUDGETING The cost of all compensation and R & R works will be integral part of the overall project cost, which will be borne by the Project. 12 GRIEVANCE REDRESS Grievance Redress Cell will be formed at the District levels with representation from PAPs, Village Council, PWD, Block Administration, District Administration, NGOs, reperesentative of Panchayat and or Municipality and any other opinion leader who will look into the grievances of the local people. 13 SCOPE FOR MAKING AMEND-MENTS IN THE R & R POLICY The State Government may from time to time make amendments in this R&R Policy as and when considered necessary. 12 Annexure I BROAD ENTITLEMENT FRAME WORK A summary entitlement matrix for the project is provided below: KERALA STATE EHIGHWAYS PRQJECT Rehabilitation and Resettlement: Broad Entitlement Frame Work Impacts and assistance criteria Land Inside Right of acquisition Way Non Non VulnerableVulnerabe Vulerable Vulnerable A. Corridor of Impact: Loss of land and other assets Support given to families and households Consultation, counseling regarding alternatives, 1 and assistance in identifying new sites and v .1 / / opportunities. 2 Compensation for land at replacement cost, j / plus allowances for fees or other charges 3 Advance notice to harvest non-perennial crops, , 1 ./ or compensation for lost standing crops. Compensation for perennial crops and trees, 4 calculated as annual produce value for one V / season 5 Compensation or R&R assistance for structures or other non-land assets 6 Shifting assistance / 1 V Option of moving to resettlement sites (in a 7 group of rninmum 25 families) incorporating / / / needs for civic amenities B. Corridor of lmpact: Lost or diminished livelihood Support given to adult individuals 8 Rehabilitation and assistance for lost or /* diminished livelihood Additional support mechanisms for vulnerable 9 groups in re-establishing or enhancing | | livelihood 1 0 Employment opportunities in connection with | / | project to the extent possible I.IUnforeseen impacts shall be documented and 11 Any other impacts not yet identified, whether mitigated based on the principles agreed upon in loss of assets or livelihood t o fm o C. Indirect, group oriented impacts in the vicinity of the road corridor Group oriented support will be given to mitigate negative Impacts on the community, and to enhance development opportunities. Addressing traffic safety needs of pedestrians will target particular support at more vulnerable groups, for example. * The entitlements will exclude the affected non-vulnerable encroachers but include non-vulnerable squatter. These categories and support mechanisms are described in more detail in the entitlement matrix (vide Annex II). In case of any ambiguity in provisions of Annex I and 11 the provisions of Annex II shall govern. 13 Annexure 11 SUGGESTED FORMAT OF DETAILED ENTITLEMENT MATRIX: INDIA - KERALA STATE HIGHWAYS PROJECT CATEGORY LOSS ENTITLEMENT ENTITLEMNIENT DETAILS IA Private Agricultural Family Compensation at "replacement 1 If the replacement cost (determined as per para 7.3 of the Property land and assets (as deflned in cost" or "actual market value" policy framework) is more than the compensation (at para 4.4) "market price" as determined by the Competent Authority as per para 7.3 of the policy framework), then the differcnce is to be paid by the project in the form of ."assistance". 2 PAPs will be explained the process and their views will be taken into consideration, while determining the market value. 3 If the residual plot(s) is (are) not viable i.e. less than MEH, there are three options to be given to the entitled person (EP). . The EP retains the plot, and the compensation and assistance paid to the tune of required amount of land to be acquired; . Compensation and "assistance" are given for the entire plot including residual plot , if the owner of suclh land wishes that his residual plot should also be acquired by the project authority provided residual land is quantified less than MEH. The project authority will acquire the resi'dual plot so paid. . IF EP is from vulnerable group, compensation for the entire land is by means of land for land if so wished by EP. 4 Transitional allowance calculated at minimum wages for 6 months, if the residual land is not viable or for 3 months when the residual land is viable 5 In case of severance of agricultural land, an additional grant of 1 0% of the amount paid for land acquisition. 6 All fees, taxes and other charges, as applicable under the relevant laws, incurred in the relocation and resource establishment, are to be borne by the project. 7 . Alteniative econonlic rehabilitation support arid training for upgradation of the skills. 14 lB Private Non- Family Compensation at "replacement I Compensation for loss of residential/commercial land at Property agricultural cost" or "actual markct value" replacement value. land and 2 If the asset (part or full) in question is a assets residential/commercial structure, then the replacement cost will be calculated as equivalent to the cost of provision of residential structure of area equivalent to that lost, subject to relevant "quality standards" of BSR as maintained by Government/Local Bodies Authorities. 3 If the replacement cost is more than the compensation (at "market price" as determined by the Competent Authority), then the difference is to be paid by the project in the form of "assistance". 4 Transitional assistance calculated at minimum wages in the form of a grant to cover maximum six months. 5 Rental allowance for 6 months. 6 A lumpsum shifting allowance. 7 The tenants will receive the following: l The amount of deposit or advance payment paid by the tenant to the landlord or the remaining amount at the time of expropriation, (this will be deducted from the payment to the landlord). . A sum equal to six months rental in consideration of disruption caused, and * Compensation for any structure the tenant has erected on the property. (This will be deducted from the payment to the landlord). . Absentee landlords will receive only the Compensation at "replacement cost" IC Relocation Family Alternate plot I. Option for residential/commercial plot at resettlement site if so opted by 25 or more number of PDPs on payment basis except for vulnerable group who will receive it free of cost. The size of the plots will be equal to the area lost or maximum up to 50 sq mt. for house and 25 sq. mt. for shop. 2. For those who chose self-relocation, the PDPs will be entitled to plots (mentioned above) even if they do not opt for resettlement sites. 15 2A Livelihood Wage earning Individual Assistance equal to three I This is valid for persons indirectly affected due to the months lost income employer being displaced. 2 The loss of income will be calculated on the basis of the minimum wage. 3 Alternative Economic Rehabilitation support and training ___ _____ for up-gradation of skill. 2B Non-perennial Family Notice to harvest standing I They are entitled to be given a notice substantially 4 crops crops. months in advance. 2 If crop is lost grant towards crop lost before harvest due to forced relocation, equal to market value of crop lost plus cost of replacement of seeds for the next season's harvest. 2C Perennial Family Compensation at "market Compensation for perennial crops and trees, calculated as crops Such as value" annual produce value for last three years. ____ ~~~~fruit trees 3A Illegal use of Encroachers Family Will receive no compensation I Encroachers will be notified a time in which to remove the ROW for land but assistance for their assets, (except trees) and harvest their crops. assets to the vulnerable 2 To meet the loss of income they will be entitled to transitional allowance, calculated at minimum wages for 6 months. Also shifting and rental allowance for six montlhs. 3 Compensation for structures at replacement cost to the vulnerable person. - 31B Squatters Family Will receive no comlpensationi 1 Facilitation/access to training, whichl includes equivalent for lanid but assistanice for income generating assistance. assets. 2 Shifting assistance and rental allowance for six months. 3 Transitional allowance for six months calculated at minimum wages. 4 Economic relhabilitation support and training for _upgradadtion of skills. 4 Additional Primary Family Additional assistance I Economic rehabilitation grant calculated at one year's support to source of poverty line as determined by the State B3PL survey. vulnerable income group 5A Shifting Mobile and Family TIlhey are not eligible for Ambulatory vendors licensed for fixed locations will be Business ambulatory compensation or "assistance". considered as kiosks. vendors 16 5B Kiosks Family "Assistance" for business I The Assistance will be paid, calculated at minimum wages disruption. for three months. 2 Where numerous vendors are Displaced, provision of a "vendors market", rent free for first six months, thereafter they would be collectively encouraged to purchase their market site. 3 For purpose of the above detail 2, only when 50 vendors are displaced, the provision will be in force. However, the PIU will decide whether such a "vendor's market" needs to be provided, on a case-to-case basis, when the number of displaced vendors is less than 50. 6A Community Common Community Conservation, protection, I Easily replaced resources such as cultural properties will infrastructure property compensatory replacement be conserved (by means of special protection, relocation, cohesion and resources replacement etc.) in consultation with the community. amenities 2 Loss of access to firewood etc. will be compensated by involving the communities in a social forestry scheme, in co-ordination with the Department of Forests, wherever possible. 3 Adequate safety measures, particularly of pedestrians and children; Landscaping of community common areas; improved drainage; roadside rest areas etc., may be provided in the design of the highways. 4 Employment opportunities in the project, if possible. 5 Loss of trees will be replaced by compensatory afforestation. 6B Host Community Enhancement of community I The facilities will be enhanced to meet the increasing communities resources. Replacement of demands of the host population. likely to be depleted resources 2 Compensation/assistance will be provided in the form of provision of Community, recreational, infrastructure facilities and help in organizing income-generating schemes, in consultation with the host community. 6C ny other impact not yet UJnforeseen impacts shall be documented and mitigated identified, based on the principles agreed upon in this policy whether loss of framework. asset or livelihood ANNEX 10: Public Consultations Annex 10.1: Minutes of Scoping Workshops Annex 10.2: Summary of Consultations with Local Informed People and the Issues Raised by Them Annex 10.3: Focus Group Discussions Annex 10.1 (1) KERALA STATE HIGHWAYS PROJECT WITH INLAND WATER TRANSPORT PILOT PROJECT Scoping Workshop - I Thiruvananthapuram, 18th January, 2000 MINUTES An environmental and social scoping workshop was held on the 18'h January in the PWD Rest House at Thycaud, Thiruvananthapuram. This was the first of the three that were proposed to help identify priority environmental and social issues, covering the districts of Thiruvananthapuram, Kollam, and Parthanamthitta. Mr. Karrappuni, Chief Engineer, Roads and Bridges Department of the PWD opened the workshop with a keynote address. Mr. David Wood, Team Leader of the PCC, made a welcome speech. Mr. Dushyantha Kumar, Director of the Project Implementation Unit, was Chairnan. Apart from the organizers, the various NGOs and officials who attended the workshop included: 1. K. Viswanath, Director, Mitraniketan. 2. M.P. Muraleedharan, Geological Survey of India, Kerala Unit, Trivandrum. 3. K.M. Ravindran, Special Officer, Roads and Bridges Development Corporation. 4. Shiju Chenran, Kodumon Grama Vikasana Samithy, Pathanamthitta. 5. C. Christu Das, Director, The Dale View, Punalal P.O., Poovachal (via), Trivandrmm. 6. Dr. S.P. Thampi, Director, Marine Archeology, Govt. of Kerala, Tnrvandnrm. 7. K. Thomas Paulose, Vice President, Friends of the Trees, Trivandrum. 8. S. Chandra Mohan, Asst. Director, Kerala State Land Use Board, Trivandrum. 9. Sudheer Babu, S., Environmental Engineer, Kerala State Pollution Control Board. 10. Abdul Samad, Specialist (Soil Conservation), Kerala State Land Use Board. 11. C.K. Karunakaran, Secretary, Friends of Trees, Trivandnim. 12. Anil Kumar, P.V., Rajiv Gandhi Cultural Study Centre, Venganoor, Trivandrunm. 13. Edwin George, The Salvation Army, Kawdiar, Trivandrum. 14. Mr. Sunder, Project Coordinator, Rajiv Gandhi Centre, Tyrivandrum. 15. Tommy Cyriac, Consultant, Finance Department, Govt. of Kerala. 16. Jacob Mohan George, Asst. Executive Engineer, Trivandrum. 17. Ms Sonia Kapoor, Environmental Specialist, The World Bank, New Delhi. Mr. Karrappuni mentioned that the aim of the project is to rehabilitate and improve the existing roads with minimal acquisition of land and minimum dislocation of people and maximum benefit to the population at large. The objective of the workshop is to gather inputs and concems from the public, NGOs, and experts for the scoping of the enviromnental and social aspects of the project. After the welcome address, the various experts addressed the audience with their assigned topics for discussion. Mr. Andrew Blelloch, Environmental Specialist, talked on the environmental and social assessment process for the highways. Bill Cummings, Social Impact Specialist, talked on the environmental and social assessment process for the waterways. Mr. Sundara Rajan, Environment Impact Coordinator, talked on the environmental concerns in highways and waterways, and Dr. Biswanath Debnath, Social Impact Coordinator, discussed social concerns relating to highways. The participants joined the discussion with their presentation. Mr. M.P. Muralidharan of the Geological Survey of India talked about the physical environment. He mentioned that the Page 1 of 2 Annex 10.1 (1) road alignments and widths in Kerala are unscientific, which may be made better with the use of satellite survey information. Moreover, water logging on roads recurs during monsoons due to inappropriate design for the soil conditions. He suggested that the design of north- south roads and the east-west roads should be different. Mr. Abdul Samad of the Kerala Land Use Board mentioned that there is a land degradation problem in Kerala due to the varying terrain and the fact that approximately 40% of the landmass of the State is prone to landslides and slope instability. He also mentioned that consideration should be given to a proper water management system, minimizing disturbance to the paddy fields, and the biotic issues during the execution of the project. Mr. Sudheer Babu of the Kerala State Pollution Control Board mentioned that the PWD has to submit an application for conducting public hearing with the'prescribed fees and 20 copies of the executive summary of the project for clearance by the KSPCB. The KSPCB will convene a panel for conducting the public hearing and subsequently make recommendations to the MoEF. Mr. Christu Das, Director of Dale View, mentioned the apparent absence of coordination between the PWD and other line departments. He criticized the inadequate traffic signals, signboards and milestones and the frequent digging within the highways. Mr. Ravindran, Special Officer, Roads and Bridges, described the difficulties involved in land acquisition for the roads. He mentioned that the effective width of the roads is reduced due to inadequate provisions for the pedestrians using the roads and also due to the existence of the utility poles. Mr. Thomas Paulos, Vice President of Friends of the Tress and a retired town planner, also mentioned the difficulties involved in land acquisition for the roads. He mentioned that strict laws and regulations should facilitate land acquisition. Mr. Karunakaran, Secretary of Friends of Trees mentioned that a committee should examine the environmienital aspects and ensure that the guidelines are being followed. He maintained that the biological aspects of environment should be given more importance in this project. Various mitigation measures and safeguards should be ensurcd to protect thc bio-divcrsity of the State. Dr. Thampi of the Dept. of Archeology dealt at length with the importance of heritage tourism and the need for creating a cultural awareness in Kerala. Ms Sonia Kapoor of the World Bank discussed the importance of the NGO involvement in this project and explained that the mitigation measures for various impacts can be fonnulated by conducting talks with stakeholders like NGOs, local people, etc. She also mentioned that the enviromnental and social impacts cannot be solved by the PWD alone. Hence, we should be realistic and pragmatic in dealing with these problems. Mr. Anil Kumar of the Rajiv Gandhi Cultural Study Centre urged that coordination of various agencies should facilitate the rehabilitation programre, undertaking awareness classes for the pedestrians, and creating road management committees at the panchayat level. The workshop closed with thanks to the various attcndees by the Chairman. Page 2 of 2 Annex 10.1 (2) KERALA STATE HIGHWAYS PROJECT WITH INLAND WATER TRANSPORT PILOT PROJECT Scoping Workshop - 2 Emakulamn, 25th January, 2000 MINUTES An environmental and social scoping workshop was held on the 25'h January in Hotel Renaissance, Ernakulam. This was the second of the three that were proposed to help identify priority environmental and social issues, covering the districts of Alappuzha, Ernakulam, Kottayam, Thrissur, Idukki, and Palakkad. Er. E.K. Govindan, Superintending Engineer, Roads and Bridges Department of the PWD Central Circle, Aluva, opened the workshop with a keynote address. Mr. Andrew Blelloch, Environmental Specialist in the PCC, made a welcome speech. Mr. Dushyantha Kumar, Director of the Project Implementation Unit, was Chairnan. Apart from the organizers, the various NGOs and officials who attended the workshop included: 1. Mr. K. K. Abdul Gaffoor from the Kerala State Inland Navigation Corporation, Kochi. 2. Dr. Sankar from the Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Thrissur. 3. Mr. Ravindran from the Kerala Sahitya Parishad, Thrissur. 4. Dr. Komala Valli Amma, Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Department, Govt. of Kerala, Trivandrum. 5. Dr. V.N.S. Pillai from the Cochin University for Science and Technology, Kochi. 6. Mr. Raji G. Nair, Assistant Executive Engineer, Irrigation Department, Kollam. 7. Mr. Joseph J. Karoor from the Friends of Periyar, Thekkady. Er. Govindan mentioned that the traffic volume in Kerala is annually increasing at the rate of 10-11% and discussed the vital role of the road network in the state's development activities. He also mentioned that the aim of the project is to rehabilitate and improve the existing roads with minimal acquisition of land and minimum dislocation of people and maximum benefit to the population at large and the resettlement and rehabilitation objectives would be followed up with the panchayat level discussions. After the keynote and welcome address, the various experts addressed the audience with their assigned topics for discussion. Mr. Andrew Blelloch, Environmental Specialist, talked on the environmental and social assessment process for the highways. Bill Cummings, Social Impact Specialist, talked on the environmental and social assessment process for the waterways. Mr. Sundara Rajan, Environment Impact Coordinator, talked on the environmental concerns in highways and waterways, and Dr. Biswanath Debnath, Social Impact Coordinator, discussed social concerns relating to highways. The participants joined the discussion with their presentation. Dr. Komala Vally Amma briefly described the Kerala waterways and made a comparison of the relative maintenance costs of the railways, the highways and the waterways and mentioned the cost per km in the waterways is Rs. 1000/- while it is Rs. 5000/- in the two other modes. Mr. Abdul Samad of the Kerala Land Use Board mentioned that there is a land degradation problem in Kerala due to the varying terrain and the fact that approximately 40% of the landmass of the State is prone to landslides and slope instability. He also mentioned that Debnath/Workshop Minutes 25012000 Page I of 2 Annex 10.1 (2) consideration should be given to a proper water management system, minimizing disturbance to the paddy fields, and the biotic issues during the execution of the project. Mr. Sudheer Babu of the Kerala State Pollution Control Board mentioned that the PWD has to submit an application for conducting public hearing with the prescribed fees and 20 copies of the executive sunumary of the project for clearance by the KSPCB. The KSPCB will convene a panel for conducting the public hearing and subsequently make recommendations to the MoEF. Mr. Christu Das, Director of Dale View, mentioned the apparent absence of coordination between the PWD and other line departments. He criticized the inadequate traffic signals, signboards and milestones and the frequent digging within the highways. Mr. Ravindran, Special Officer, Roads and Bridges, described the difficulties involved in land acquisition for the roads. He mentioned that the effective width of the roads is reduced due to inadequate provisions for the pedestrians using the roads and also due to the existence of the utility poles. Mr. Thomas Paulos, Vice President of Friends of the Tress and a retired town planner, also mentioned the difficulties involved in land acquisition for the roads. He mentioned that strict laws and regulations should facilitate land acquisition. Mr. Karunakaran, Secretary of Friends of Trees mentioned that a committee should examine the environmental aspects and ensure that the guidelines are being followed. He maintained that the biological aspects of environment should be given more importance in this project. Various mitigation measures and safeguards should be ensured to protect the bio-diversity of the State. Dr. Thampi of the Dept. of Archeology dealt at length with the importance of heritage tourism and the need for creating a cultural awareness in Kerala. Ms Sonia Kapoor of the World Bank discussed the importance of the NGO involvement in this project and explained that the mitigation measures for various impacts can be formulated by conducting talks with stakeholders like NGOs, local people, etc. She also mentioned that the environmental and social impacts cannot be solved by the PWD alone. Hence, we should be realistic and pragmatic in dealing with these problems. Mr. Anil Kumar of the Rajiv Gandhi Cultural Study Centre urged that coordination of various agencies should facilitate the rehabilitation programme, undertaking awareness classes for the pedestrians, and creating road management committees at the panchayat level. The workshop closed with thanks to the various attendees by the Chairman. DebnathlWorkshop Nlinutes 25012000 Page 2 of 2 Annex 10.1 (3) KERALA STATE HIGHWAYS PROJECT WITH INLAND WATER TRANSPORT PILOT PROJECT Scoping Workshop - 3 Kozhikode, 2nd February, 2000 MINUTES An environmental and social scoping workshop was held on the 2 February in Hotel Malbar Palace, Kozhikode. This was the last of the three workshops that were proposed to help identify priority environmental and social issues, covering the districts of Kasarkode, Kannur, Kozhikode, Malappuram and Wayanad. Kozhi kode workshop also discussed the waterways, aspects in a low profile. Er.K Narayanan, Superintending Engineer, Roads and Bridges Department of the PWD North Circle, Kozhikode, opened the workshop with a keynote address. Mr. Andrew Blelloch, Environmental Specialist in the PCC, made a welcome speech. Mr. Dushantha Kumar, Director of the Project Implementation Unit, was Chairman. Apart from the organizers, the various NGOs and officials who attended the workshop included: 1. Mr U Chandran Assistant General Manager Telecom Department, Kozhikode 2. Mr KD Joseph, Assistant EE, Kerala State Pollution Control Board, Kozhikode 3. Mr AM Jayan, Town Planner, Calicut Development Authority, Kozhikode. 4. Mr. Shanmugan, Assistant Executive Engineer, Kerala Water Authority, Kozhikode 5. Mr. KG Harshan . Assistant Executive Engineer, Kerala Watcr Authority, Kozhikode 6. Mr KM Unnikrishnan, Society for Protection of Environment, Kerala. 7. Mr Mohan Kumar, Deputy Director, Anthropology, KIRTADS, Kozhikode 8. Mr Dinesh Kumar, RASTA, Kozhikode 9. Mr Jayendran, Executive Engineer, PWD,Vadakara 10. Mr. Narayanan Namboothiri, EE roads division Manjeri 11. Mr.Abdul Khader, Executive Engineer, PWD Roads Division, Kozhikode Er. Narayanan during his keynote address mentioned that the state government has undertaken major policy reforms as a part of this project with the World Bank Assistance. An institutional Development Study is planned to review the institutional needs, options and resource requirements for sustainable road sector management reforns in planning financing and development of network assets. Er. Narayanan mentioned that the traffic volume in Kerala is annually increasing at the rate of 10-1 1% and discussed the vital role of the road network in the state's development activities. He also mentioned that the aim of the project is to rehabilitate and improve the existing roads with minimal acquisition of land and minimum dislocation of people and maximum benefit to the population at large and the resettlement and rehabilitation objectives would be followed up with the Panchayat level discussions. After the keynote and welcome address, the various experts addressed the audience with their assigned topics for discussion. Mr. Andrew Blelloch, Environmental Specialist, talked on the environmental and social assessment process for the highways. Mr Willium Cummings, Social Impact Specialist, talked on the environmental and social assessment process for the waterways. Mr. Sundara Rajan, Environment Impact Coordinator, talked on the environmental concerns in highways and waterways, and Dr. Biswanath Debnath, Social Impact Coordinator, discussed social concerns relating to highways. Page 1 of 3 Annex 10.1 (3) Mr Narayanan Namboothiri mentioned that Telecom and Kerala Water Authority works are affecting the road traffic. He argued for an out side the road space formation for separate space for the utilities and drainage facility. He mentioned about a proposal for Nilambur bypass. This bypass alignment identified is about two km mainly passing through paddy fields. Mr U Chandran of Telecom department opined that suggestions for putting ducts are well and good. He also suggested having removable slabs along footpaths so that the telephone cables can be taken through the ducts provided below the slabs. He sought better facilities for crossing of roads. Mr Kumar later replied that there should be economic assistance from the concerned departments and the present cables, which are already laid, cannot be removed. Mr Abdul Khader told that in this project the past history of the road development should be evaluated. Ribbon development is everywhere. He is in favour of parallel roads and bypass roads to get away from the present narrow roads. He mentioned that all roads become drains during monsoon season and there are sewerage outlets to the road. Surface water is entering the roads. Capillary effect on the roads should be considered and also the topography and climate. In Kerala there is very little budget for road improvements. He told that facility of roads is limited and there are no traffic regulations. Providing standard width is impractical. Access roads are the main problem for PWD Roads. These should be included in the project. Mr Kumar later replied that environmental and social concerns are given high weight age in this project. He mentioned that that minimum width of the road is provided according to the traffic. State has to justify all investments to the bank. Capillary rise is considered in this project design. Geometric correction of roads will be carried out wherever feasible. Mr Sundara Rajan later explained that total solution of our problems cannot be achieved by any single project however all viable alternatives will be taken in to consideration. He mentioned that state government has taken a major initiative towards most of the problem through the recently introduced Highway protection bill. Mr KD Joseph mentioned that during public hearings public concerns arc carefully considcred. Mr Jayan of Calicut Development Authority. He is in favour of controlling visual pollution effectively. The road markings should be considered. In the case of bypasses it is possible to collect betterment revenue. He stated that it will be very useful to every one if the already approved alignments are considered. Mr Shanmugam of Kerala Water Authority mentioned that in the case of provision of water supply pipes provided along the roadsides, the department could pay the expenses. Widening in fact shift the existing pipeline towards the center so provision of relaying of pipes should be made. Mr KG Harshan of KWA told that the cost of relaying of pipes should be included in the project budget. He also told that there are environmental and social concerns of this pipe laying should be taken in to account. Mr Unnikrishnan representing an NGO mentioned the need for avoiding ecologically sensitive areas. Rehabilitation of the people should be given more importance. The impact on low-income groups is high although the cost of land acquisition is very low. There should be some way out for the storm water drains. It is time to prevent the garbage being thrown in to the drains. In all project related matters there should be 100 % transparency. If this is done there will not be any difficulty in convincing the people. Social and environmental impact should be considered seriously. Page 2 of 3 Annex 10.1 (3) Mr Mohan Kumar of Kerala Institute for Research training and development studies for SCs and STs mentioned that there are about 103 SCs and STs in Kerala. Most of these weaker sections live along the roadsides. In the case of low income group's rehabilitation will be very difficult as the culture is linked with the land they hold. The encroachers should be classified and given compensation. Mr Mohan Kumar mentioned that in the case of SC and ST rehabilitation, it is always better to be spread and mixed with all other communities but they usually don't like the idea than a colony. Mr Dinesh kumar of RASTA an NGO mentioned that the roads are very important for social advancement. People should be made aNvare about the various positive aspects of the project. Mr Jayendran mentioned that overloading of vehicles is a serious concern as this cause accidents and damage to the road as well. Hence he explained the need for controlling these aspects. In the case of drainage accidents and divider accidents it should not be charged against the people who construct this. Mr Sundara Raja later mentioned that in foreign countries this is charged to the corporate body not to individuals. Page 3 of 3 Annex 10.2. Summary Of Consultation With Local Informed People And Issues Raised By Them Concerns Raised Link Road People Road Road Road Drainage Protection Road Code Inter- congested- should should not problems, of paddy safety and viewed footpath be be water fields/ signing necessary widened widened logging slope needed I SH-1 8 2 5 _ 4 2 SH- I 3 1 1 1 3 SH-1 4 3 4 SH-i 5 1 _ ___ 5 SH-1 6 __ _ 41 6 SH-I-i 4 4 1 1 2 2 7 ST-10 4 = 1 1 8 ST-12 4 2 9 ST-7 3 1 10 SK-I 11 1 8 _ 1 1 7 11 SK-10 6 1 5 _ 12 SP40 2 2 13 SP-42 4 1 3 3 2 14 SH-1o 9 1 6 3 1 4 15 NSH-1 4 2 4 2 4 16 SA-4 5 4 1 4 4 17 SH-20 4 1 2 2 18 SY-12 12 1 8 19 SY-76 4 3 1 20 NSH-5 8 6 2 21 NSH-5 11 5 9 1 4 22 NSH-2 3 1 1 2 23 CE-I 6 4 24 NSH-4 5 1 2 2 25 NSH-4 2 1 2 1 26 NSH-4 I I 1 27 CI-33 2 1 1 28 SH-19 8 1 1 4 29 NSH-5 2 2 30 NSH-5 2 1 31 NSH-5 8 6 1 32 CI-97 4 4 33 SH-17 5 4 1 34 CE-So 7 1 2 1 2 4 35 CE-28 5 1 3 1 4 2 36 SH-16 8 7 1 37 CE-56 3 3 3 1 3 38 CE-40 2 1 1 2 39 SH-22 3 1 2 2 40 SH-30 13 1 6 1 3 4 41 SH-39 4 1 3 42 CT-194 4 3 2 2 43 SH-21 7 1 3 4 3 44 Cr-109 3 1 1 1 32 45 CT- 171 1 __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ 46 SH-23 5 2 3 2_ 2 3 47 SHa 23 1 1 Project Reseflemen Action Plan Page I of Kerala State Highways Project Resettlement Action Plan Page I of 2 Annex 0.2 # Concerns Raised Link Road People Road Road Road Drainage Protection Road Code Inter- congested- should should not problems, of paddy safetv and viewed footpath be be water fields/ signin l necessary widened widened logging slope needed 48 CT-25 1 1 49 NP-314 3 1 1 2 50 NP-301 7 2 3- 4 51 NSH-12 5 1 1 1 4 5 52 NM-i 5 3 1 53 NM-2 12 4 3 1 54 NM-3 5 1 2 3 2 55 SH-39 1 1 1 56 NM-4 11 2 1 _ X = 57 NM-5 6 2 4 4 5 58 NO-5 4 1 2 4 59 SH-34 4 1 2 3 3 60 SH-28 8 4 2 7 1 7 61 NO-1 3 1 1 2 2 62 NW-7 2 1 2 63 NO-10 5 2 1 5 2 2 64 NW-4 8 1 1 65 SH-29 3 3 66 NK-7 4 4 67 NK-2 5 1 3 5 1 4 68 NK-3 6 1 6 2 3 69 NSH-18 4 3 1 4 70 SH-8 6 5 3 1 1 4 72 2 2 1 1 73 SH-11 8 2 3 1 2 2 74 SH-31 10 7 7 4 7 80 9 2 1 4 3 8 1 3 3 _ _ _ _ 2 3 82 5 3 4 2 83 SH-13 8 1 1 2 7 84 SH-8 14 12 14 12 6 14 87 NW-2 7 2 3 4 Totals 419 95 198 25 122 13 182 Percentages 22.6 47.2 5.9 29.1 3.1 43.4 Notes: 1. Road congested, footpath necessary includes the need for cycle path and parking area. 2. Accidents, road signing needed includes other parameters like speed reducing bumps, curve straightening, and sight distance. 3. Road should not be widened includes considerations such as people losing jobs, poor people with small living area will be dislocated, etc. Kerala State Highways Project Resettlement Action Plan Page 2 of 2 Annex 10.3 (1) KERALA STATE TRANSPORT PROJECT Report of Focus Group Discussion with Local Residents Link 1, SH-1, Taikkod-Kottarakara, Ch. 25.000-71.300 Date: 03/08/2000 Photo No. 166/12 District Thiruvananthapuram Site Chainage 41.000 Facilitator Sam Vidyanath Recorder : Byju V Number of Participants : 14 (List of Names Attached) Time Session Begin : 5 pm Time Session Ended : 5.45 pm Time team arrived at Site : 4.45 pm Time team left the Site : 5.50 pm The baseline Socio-economic survey team arrived at the site by 4.45 pm. There were 14 people assembled there. Mr. Sam Vidyanath acted as the facilitator and Mr. Byju was the recorder. Mr. Sam Vidyanath introduced the Kerala State Highways Project and the Consultants to the assembled people. He told them that KSHP was a new project taken up by the Kerala Government with Financial aid of the World Bank. Straightening sharp curves in MC Road and general widening of the road were part of the Project. Then he explained the new alignment at this particular place. Mr. Nazarudeen wanted to know how his house would be affected. Sam told him that he would lose part of his compound. In answer to further questions from Mr. Nazarudeen and Mr. Chakrapani, Sam explained that affected parties would get market value for their property. Mr. Rasheed suggested that a footpath should be constructed from Kuravankuzhy to Nilamel for the safety of Pedestrians, especially school children studying in a school nearby. Mr. Sivadasan asked whether those living on the right side of the present road would be affected. Sam answered in the negative. In answer to a question from Mr. Nazarudeen, Sam assured him he could cut trees from his compound until he was issued notice for land acquisition. Mr. Manoharan raised another issue. Mrs. Radha, an unemployed widow with a child, would lose entire land and house. So she should be given at least 5 cents of land and a house nearby. Samn replied that we would specifically mention her case in our report. Mr. Soman wanted the road to be rubberized and speed of vehicles to be reduced. On request, we examined the strip map and found that a sharp curve (between Chainage 52.500 and 52.600) after Chadayamangalam has not been straightened. Mr. Shaji told us that this particular curve is a frequent accident spot. Even as recently as 30/07/2000, an accident Annex 10.3 (1) involving a car and bus occurred here. He also told us that the left side of the curve was encroached land and a Mosque like structure constructed recently was obstructing the widening process. They told us that the affected people belong to financially and socially backward groups and scheduled castes. They wanted a rehabilitation plan to be ir place before the actual work started. They assured us that the widening process would have their full support in this scenano. At the end of the meeting everybody had tea and snacks and we left the place at 5.50 pm. Annex 10.3 (2) Report Of The Meeting Held On 22.08.2000, 4 PM At The PWD Rest House, Kattappana Focus Group Discussion with the Local Residents, Commercial Establishments and NGOs on the Proposed Kattappana Bypass Link 26: Idukki-Puliyanmala Presided by: Sunil Kumar } all social impact Facilitator and demonstrator: Anish G.S } surveyors Minutes recorded by: Sundarlal and Rajaram. The PWID and Village Office personnel did not join the meeting,, as it was held on a public holiday. The demonstrator gave a brief description of the project. Twenty six proposed project affected persons attended the meeting and expressed their views on the project. 'Valiyakandam Padasekhara Samithi', a local NGO, was represented by its President, Mr. Kumaran Kottathara and the Secretary, Mr. George Poomattam along with several other members of the organisation. The President of the NGO handed to the surveyors a memorandum signed by 27 persons. The main issue mentioned in this memorandum is that if the present design of the road is implemented, a major part of the paddy field may get destroyed and the surrounding land may become unfit for cultivation. The project may also affect many other agricultural lands. To avoid this, the NGO put forth two proposals. Proposal l By making appropriate changes in the design, the road may be constructed along the left side of the paddy field, as this side contains Govenmment land (Purarnbokku) of 3 metres width on both sides of the canal. Proposal 2 There is already a road of 40 ft. width from Vellayamkudy Junction (chainage 82.220) to Jnattuvettappadi. It is better to widen this road rather than make a bypass, which may cause economic loss to the Govermment. The main junctions on this road are: 1. Vellayamkudy 2. Gov. College Junction 3. I.T.I. Junction 4. School Junction 5. Pallikavala 6. St. Martha's Convent Junction 7. Rationkada Junction 8. Jacob Church Junction 9. Jnattuvettappady Complaint Made By The PAPs Of Chainage 3.000 Kerala State Highways Project Public Consultations Page I of 4 Annex 10.3 (2) In the present design, the road deviates from chainage 3.000 to reach chainage 3.200 which is a paddy field. Due to this unnecessary deviation, about 6 families and their agrncultural lands may be affected. Proposal To Avoid This Deviation Instead of this deviation, the road can be aligned straight from chainage 2.800 (St. Martha's Nursery School) along the land boundaries of St. George Ferona Church and the Kochukadayil family to reach the paddy field mentioned earlier. This will reduce the length of the proposed road and the loss of six properties. The expenses for the road may also be less. Moreover, the irregularity in the alignment may be solved and the loss of more properties between chainages 3.000 and 3.200 may be avoided. The social impact surveyors were given another memorandum by Mr. Balan and Mr. Sukumaran who together have ten cents (approximately 400 m2) of land on the nrght side of the Idukki-Puliyanmala road. Approximately three-fourths of their land may be affected by this project. They suggested that the bypass may be connected to an existing road which joins the Idukki-Puliyanmala road on the opposite side of Friends Workshop at the left side of chainage 85.400 of the Idukki-Puliyanmala road. The participants had tea and snacks at the conclusion of discussions. The demonstrator gave vote of thanks and the meeting was over at approximately 5 pm. The following project affected persons participated in the meeting: Serial Name and Address Signature No. ** I P.J. Joy, Puthettu IIouse, Kattappana S.P.O. 2 Chacko Joseph, Panthammanckal House, Kattappana South P.O. 3 Sunny James, Kunnathettu (H), Vellayamnkudy P.O. 4 Pappachan Joseph, Kanottukunnil, Vellyapady P.O., Kattappana 5 Thomas, Velayil, Kattappana 6 Joy Thomas, Kalapurackal, Vellyemkudy P.O., Kattappana 7 K Kumaran, Kottatharayil, Valiyakandam Padasekharasamithi President 8 Abraham Thomas, Kulapurackal 9 Thomman, Kulapurackal 10 Thomas Matthew 11 George Devassia, Poomarathil 12 T.E. Abraham 13 P.N. Jacob, Kulapurackal, Kattappana 14 Jose 15 A.D. Thomas, Ambattu 16 Basil Mathew, Advocate Kerala State Highways Project Public Consultations Page 2 of4 3 Annex 10.3 (2) 17 S.R. Pushparaj'an, Sreemnandiram 18 V.A. Mathew, Vattamattathu 19 K.N. Balan, Vadakedathu 20 P.N. Sukumaran, Vedickal 21 Raveendran T.K., Idiyamplackal 22 Sakrias George, Idiyamplackal 23 P.V. Varghese, Puthenparambil 24 Joy Joseph, Medethu 25 Shaji Sebastin, Tharakannal 26 Augustine Thomas, Kalapurackal ** The signatures of the participants will be found in the original hand written minutes of the meeting Kerala State Highways Project Public Consultations Page 3 of 4 3 Annex 10.3 (3) Public Consultation, Link 6: Muvattupuzha-Angamali At Proposed Perumbavoor Bypass Report Of The Meeting Held On 09.08.2000, 4:45 PM At The House of Mr. K.P. Eldo, Koonapallil, Poopari P.O. To Discuss The Problems And Opinions Of The PAPs Focus Group Discussion with the Affected Residents Presided by: Jayachandran M.G. } all social impact Facilitator and demonstrator: Geendas K.S. } surveyors Minutes recorded by: Rajaram, Sajith Kumar, Shaji Kumar } Photo Roll No. Phase-lI/106, Photo No. 33,34 44 persons, representing the local traders' association, attended this focus group meeting. Karthikapuram is a small town by the side of the Karthikapuram River at chainage 30.500 on the Thaliparamba-Manakadavu road. The principal towns on this road are Karuvanchal, Alakkod and Karthikapuram. This is a hill section road, terminating at the Kerala-Kamataka border at Coorg. The existing road at Karthikapuram is narrow and has many curves. The area is also congested and thc proposed road improvement would adversely affect many properties. Therefore, the focus group meeting was aimed at the Vyapari Vyavasavi Ekopana Sarnithi and the public for discussing the issues and getting public opinion on them. The public had the general opinion that the curved road between chainage 30.400 and 30.500 should be straightcned (it has already been so designed by the design engineers during the joint site visit by the Consultants and the PIU) even though several commercial establishments will have to be pulled down. A big rock by the side of the road has actually created the curve. One person was recently killed in an accident at this curve involving this rock. The general suggestion was that the road might be straightened at the above-mentioned chainage by constructing a new culvert across the drain down stream.This exercise will save the temple nearby, but the common stage of the temple land will be affected. Issues raised in the meeting included the following: * When the road is widened the Government would acquire approximately 2-3 metres of land width. After the road widening if a new construction is to be made by the roadside, property owners will again have to keep a set back of 3-5 metres according to the existing rules. Therefore, a person holding a land of width 6-8 metres will not be able to carry out a new construction after the execution of the project and his entire land will be unviable. * New constructions cannot be carried out on the existing roadside due to the anxieties regarding the and execution of the project. Construction of boundary walls and D:\Debnath_B\Public Consultations\Consultation Link 6.doc 1 Annex 10.3 (3) maintenance activities are to be stopped. The transaction of land is currently at a standstill because of the surveys. People want to know the results of the final engineering design and the project execution time/penrod as early as possible. * The landlord of this area was the Alakkod Raja. The entire land area has only two or three revenue survey numbers for kilometres together. All the current property owners have the same survey numbers who got the property from the Raja. There is no other general identification of their respective properties, like the Thandapar Number or Sub- Divisions. * If any type of toll will have to be paid by the users of the improved road as the project is being assisted by the World Bank. * If rehabilitation and/or compensation will be made to occupants of properties not having legal documents. The assembled people suggested that a possible inter-state road connecting Vyakamba with Nalady (in Kamataka State - to where there is already a bus service from the Kamataka side) would immensely benefit the people of the region. This suggested road can lessen the distance to Verajpet and Mysore for trucks from Kannur by 30 km. At present these vehicles use the Iritty-Koothupuzha-Valuvapara (Link 74, project road) inter-state road. Currently Vayakamba is connected with Nalady through a forest footpath. To build a formnal inter-state road forestland will have to be acquired on the Karnataka side. The assembled people were of the opinion that if implemented, the road improvement would benefit the people of Karthikapuram for the reduced travel time to Thaliparamba. At prcsent it takes 1.5 hours to cover a distance of 30 km to Thaliparamba. If the suggested inter-state road is ever built it will facilitate easy marketing of the local agricultural products and hill products in the Kamataka State. D:\Debnath_B\Public Consultations\Consultation Link 6.doc 2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 10.3 (4) Report Of The Meeting Held On 02.02.2001, 4:30 PM At The Vyapari Vyvasai Office, Ponkunnam Link 84.5-7: Ponkunnam-Thodupuzha Focus Group Discussion with the Potentially Affected Local Shop Owners Meeting started: 4:30 PM Meeting ended: 5:30 PM Photo Numbers: Phase 1169/9-11 Survey Team Members: 1. Biju Franklin 2. Rajaram 3. Pramod 4. Rejenish Monji The social impact survey team members organised the meeting with the help of the local Merchants' Association (Vyapari Vivvasai Samithi) at Ponkunnam and the General Secretary and the President of the Association attended the meeting along with 20 others. Many shops were proposed to be affected by the road improvement project and the merchants made suggestions regarding a new bypass to save their properties. The issues/suggestions raised for the discussion included: l. Consider the case of a shop owner who is not fully losing his shop. He is only losing a part of his shop. Will there be any compensation for the loss of the business area? If there is, what is the basis of the compensation? Are the criteria of compensation different for different shops? 2. What would be the compensation for the employees of the affected shops? 3. If the Government provides resettlement, it should be in town areas which are easily accessible. 4. For reconstruction of buildings after the road widening, is it necessary to provide the set back as prescribed by the panchayath/municipality authorities? 5. For building owners the compensation for the buildings should include the existing market value of lands in town areas. If compensation is paid on the basis of prices in the Government records the affected people will not accept that because people record very low prices of lands for effecting a low stamp duty. 6. Bypass proposal: Three options discussed as follow: First Option: The bypass starts at the 4th mile junction, i.e., right side of Ponkunnam- Thodupuzha road, chainage 90.850. It passes through Panainattom, Manthara. Kapally Colony and falls on the Kottayam-Kumily road at KVMS junction. From KVMS junction there is a road linking the Ponkunnam-Punalur road. The existing road along the proposed bypass has only 8 m total width. It has no sharp curves. It passes mainly through rubber plantations. If this road is widened, the number of affected structures is estimated to be much less. Presently no bus service is available on this road. The KVMS junction is on a steep gradient, which needs to be modified. LBII/Sheladia/CES/ICT Public Consultations Page I of 2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 10.3 (4) Second Option: The bypass starts from the Elikkulamn Grama Panchavath office junction (chainage 89.030). The road passes through Manthara and falls on the Kottayam-Kumily road at KVMS junction. This proposed bypass has sharp curves. The width is narrower than the proposed bypass first option, only 6 m. Third Option: The bypass starts from the CMS L.P. School junction (left of Ponkunnam-Thodupuzha road, chainage 84.725) and ends as it falls into the Kottayam- Kumily road [at which place?]. The existing road needs to be widened. The major drawback of this proposed bypass is that people going to Kumily or Punalur have to travel through the town. This proposed road bypasses only the length between chainage 84.160 and 87.720 of the Ponkunnam-Thodupuzha road. This road can also be used as a bypass for vehicles plying between Kottayam and Pala. 7. The local shopkeepers were generally of the view that the road should be widened, but some considerations should be made in the case of road widths within town areas. Most of them do good business during the Sabarimala season as the pilgnrms keep coming and say that the road should pass through the town. 8. The social impact surveyors answered the questions of the focus group in the context of the State Government adopted R&R Principles and Policy Framework and left the bypass options to be decided by the PIU. LBII/Sheladia/CES/ICT Public Constiltations Page 2 of 2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 10.3 (5) Report Of The Meeting Held On 10.02.2001, 4:30 PM At The House of Mr. Joseph Varkey, at Sarala, village Meanachil Link 84.5-7: PonKunnam-Thodupuzha Focus Group Discussion with the Potentially Affected Agricultural Land Owners Meeting started: 4:30 PM Meeting ended: 5:45 PM Photo Numbers: Phase 11/72/36-37, 75/1-2 Survey Team Members: 1. Biju Franklin 2. Shaji Kumar 3. Rejenish Monji The following issues/qucstions/suggestions were discussed: 1. The main issue in this meeting was how the land value was to be calculated for the payment of compensation. If compensation is paid on the basis of prices in the Government records the affected people will not accept that because people record very low prices of lands for effecting a low stamp duty. 2. If land price is based on the recently completed registration, what would be the minimum area that would be considered for compensation? [question not clear.] 3. When the road design is finalised, could they use the affected land for cuIltivation before the road construction is started? 4. If compensation for agricultural land is based on the yield from crops, then what method would be followed for land in which crops have not started yielding? 5. Maximum price of crops should be considered for calculating calculation. For example, rubber now sells only for Rs. 30/kg, but three years ago this used to be Rs. 65/kg. So, for compensating for acquisition rubber plantation lands, the rate of Rs. 65/kg should be considered. 6. After receiving the compensation, could the affected persons still use the wood from the trees that would be on the Government land? 7. Would the compensation include loss of yield from the agricultural land? 8. How would compensation be calculated for paddy fields which have not been cultivated for, say, the last 10 years? Will these fields be treated as fallow lands or agricultural lands? If agricultural land, how would the yield be calculated? 9. The Govermment should give the affected people some support in the form of subsidies for manure and electricity at concessional rate. For boosting the rubber price the Government should start some industries in this area using rubber as a raw material. 10. The road must be widened, but along with it water bodies, such as, ponds and wells, must also be protected. The people informed the meeting that the lands between Ponkunnam and Pala are very fertile, and the area is calm and quiet. They were relieved to learn that the proposed road width has been reduced from 30m to 1 5m. LBII/Sheladia/CES,/ICT Public Consultations Page I of I ANNEX 11.1: Contract Package-wise Width of the Corridor of Impact and Land Acquisition Requirement Annex 11.1 (1.1) Width of the Corridor of Impact, Contract 1 Link 1: Taikkod (km 25.260) to Kottarakara (km 71.260) = 4 6000 km Sr. Chainage Length Available Available Width Additional Area to be Nr. Cham nTo Lnt Corridor Corridor Area Required Width Acquired No. From To (in) Width (m) (sq.m.) (m) Required (m) (sq.m.) 1 25.260 25.500 240 11.00 2,640 15.23 4.23 1015.20 2 25.500 25.750 250 13.00 3,250 14.58 1.58 395.00 3 25.750 26.000 250 14.60 3,650 16.37 1.77 442.50 4 26.000 26.250 250 15.60 3,900 14.55 -1.05 0.00 5 26.250 26.500 250 14.80 3,700 18.57 3.77 942.50 6 26.500 26.750 250 14.20 3,550 18.24 4.04 1010.00 7 26.750 27.000 250 16.20 4,050 19.06 2.86 715.00 8 27.000 27.250 250 15.50 3,875 20.58 5.08 1270.00 9 27.250 27.500 250 16.80 4,200 18.16 1.36 340.00 10 27.500 27.750 250 16.00 4,000 16.09 0.09 22.50 11 27.750 28.000 250 15.80 3,950 20.44 4.64 1160.00 12 28.000 28.250 250 12.20 3,050 18.17 5.97 1492.50 13 28.250 28.500 250 14.00 3,500 18.26 4.26 1065.00 14 28.500 28.750 250 12.80 3,200 16.07 3.27 817.50 15 28.750 28.760 10 13.00 130 14.18 1.18 11.80 1 26 20 - X28I ....00 . -.: = 2316 -:.236 ;a .650796 17 29.041 29.250 209 12.70 2,654 15.18 2.48 518.32 18 29.250 29.500 250 13.60 3,400 17.96 4.36 1090.00 19 29.500 29.750 250 10.60 2,650 14.80 4.20 1050.00 20 29.750 30.000 250 14.00 3,500 17.92 3.92 980.00 21 30.000 30.250 250 15.20 3,800 15.63 0.43 107.50 22 30.250 30.500 250 14.60 3,650 15.64 1.04 260.00 23 30.500 30.750 250 13.30 3,325 19.32 6.02 1505.00 24 30.750 31.000 250 13.60 3,400 21.73 8.13 2032.50 25 31.000 31.250 250 12.50 3,125 16.36 3.86 965.00 26 31.250 31.379 129 12.80 1,651 17.42 4.62 595.98 27 1 33? 31`57 () 0 O. Wi6.40 280M0 28 31.579 31.750 171 12.00 2,052 15.59 3.59 613.89 29 31.750 32.000 250 9.60 2,400 16.61 7.01 1752.50 30 32.000 32.138 138 9.60 1,325 16.06 6.46 891.48 31 3 32 1 i N 0 4 9. 0 ..u 18J 82 2 899.20 32 32.298 32.500 202 10.00 2,020 23.92 13.92 2811.84 33 32.500 32.750 250 9.60 2,400 20.41 10.81 2702.50 34 32.750 33.000 250 9.60 2,400 24.05 14.45 3612.50 35 33.000 33.158 158 9.90 1,564 20.65 10.75 1698.50 36 j 54 Thi 7.a28 141&96 37 MM:E --1f: 268f75 38 33.361 33.500 139 11.00 1,529 20.57 9.57 1330.23 39 33.500 33.621 121 12.00 1,452 16.26 4.26 515.46 40 -.33.621 ON {3.~7-$ - A.AW5.0( .- .0 Z5.70 iZq3909.30 41 33.870 34.000 130 12.80 1,664 15.70 2.90 377.00 42 34.000 34.250 250 13.60 3,400 20.06 6.46 1615.00 43 34.250 34.487 237 14.00 3,318 19.46 5.46 1294.02 4 41 P .'. 00 88 288 <:1000t52 45 34.966 35.000 34 14.00 476 23.46 9.46 321.64 46 35.000 35.250 250 12.50 3,125 19.04 6.54 1635.00 47 35.250 35.500 250 12.80 3,200 17.96 5.16 1290.00 48 35.500 35.750 250 13.20 3,300 18.80 5.60 1400.00 49 35.750 36.000 250 13.00 3,250 19.43 6.43 1607.50 50 36.000 36.250 250 12.80 3,200 19.09 6.29 1572.50 51 36.250 36.500 250 12.50 3,125 20.86 8.36 2090.00 52 36.500 36.750 250 13.50 3,375 17.52 4.02 1005.00 53 36.750 37.000 250 13.80 3,450 18.96 5.16 1290.00 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan 1 of 4 Annex 11.1 (1.1) Sr. Chainage Length Available Available Width Additional Area to be Nr. Length Corridor Corridor Area Required Width Acquired No. From To (in) Width (m) (sq.m.) (m) Required (m) (sq.m.) 54 37.000 37.250 250 14.10 3,525 16.20 2.10 525.00 55 37.250 37.500 250 13.80 3,450 16.67 2.87 717.50 56 37.500 37.548 48 14.00 672 18.22 4.22 202.56 57 <~; ;R37w8 ¢ 38&0i8 ~5307 ____0 A0 - -20.93 420'93 114092.90 58 38.078 38.250 172 14.50 2,494 24.80 10.30 1771.60 59 38.250 38.343 93 11.80 1,097 17.90 6.10 567.30 60 7$38V343 t"8,5 .O472 -Z00 Q& 0 5.3 k 25.63 12097-36 61 38.815 39.000 185 11.80 2,183 24.06 12.26 2268.10 62 39.000 39.250 250 11.75 2,938 16.18 4.43 1107.50 63 39.250 39.500 250 11.25 2,813 17.93 6.68 1670.00 64 39.500 39.750 250 11.50 2,875 17.78 6.28 1570.00 65 39.750 40.000 250 12.30 3,075 14.97 2.67 667.50 66 40.000 40.250 250 12.00 3,000 18.47 6.47 1617.50 67 40.250 40.500 250 18.10 4,525 15.78 -2.32 0.00 68 40.500 40750 250 25.00 6,250 13.97 -11.03 0.00 69 40.750 40.875 125 10.50 1,313 14.72 4.22 527.50 70 K 4OA876 I5 f200 C .0 *01. W0 0. 00.0 . 24.42 2.4884.00 71 41.075 41.250 175 10.67 1,867 28.36 17.69 3095.75 72 41.250 41.500 250 11.50 2,875 15.45 3.95 987.50 73 41.500 41.750 250 11.90 2,975 20.73 8.83 2207.50 74 41.750 42.000 250 12.70 3,175 18.40 5.70 1425.00 75 42.000 42.250 250 13.00 3,250 28.72 15.72 3930.00 76 42.250 42.500 250 12.80 3,200 17.08 4.28 1070.00 77 42.500 42.750 250 13.50 3,375 18.33 4.83 1207.50 78 42.750 43.000 250 14.10 3,525 18.77 4.67 1167.50 79 43.000 43.250 250 13.50 3,375 18.36 4.86 1215.00 80 43.250 43.500 250 14.80 3,700 18.45 3.65 912.50 81 43.500 43.750 250 14.50 3,625 20.87 6.37 1592.50 82 43.750 44.000 250 14.20 3,550 19.02 4.82 1205.00 83 44.000 44.135 135 14.00 1,890 20.30 6.30 850.50 84 _ 3 I> ?= t22 i< W22 M6924 85 44.972 45.000 28 12.90 361 15.53 2.63 73.64 86 45.000 45.250 2501 12.30 3,075 21.07 8.77 2192-50 87 45.250 45.500 250 14.20 3,550 17.36 3.16 790.00 88 45.500 45.750 250 11.80 2,950 19.38 7.58 1895.00 89 45.750 46.000 250 12.50 3,125 30.61 18.1f 4527.50 90 46.000 46.250 250 12.70 3,175 16.08 3.38 845.00 91 46.250 46.500 250 12.70 3,175 22.65 9.95 2487.50 92 46.500 46.750 250 11.10 2,775 18.25 7.15 1787.50 93 46.750 47.000 250 11.90 2,975 16.25 4.35 1087.50 94 47.000 47.250 250 11.00 2,750 17.67 6.67 1667.50 95 47.250 47.500 250 12.80 3,200 23.23 10.43 2607.50 96 47.500 47.750 250 11.40 2,850 20.77 9.37 2342.50 97 47.750 48.000 250 11.50 2,875 20.97 9.47 2367.50 98 48.000 48.250 250 11.35 2,838 16.63 5.28 1320.00 99 48.250 48.500 250 12.80 3,200 16.85 4.05 1012.50 100 48.500 48.750 250 13.80 3,450 19.02 5.22 1305.00 101 48.750 49.000 250 14.40 3,600 19.22 4.82 1205.00 102 49.000 49.250 250 15.30 3,825 19.74 4.44 1110.00 103 49.250 49.500 250 14.80 3,700 19.58 4.78 1195.00 104 49.500 49.750 250 13.50 3,375 26.67 13.17 3292.50 105 49.750 50.000 250 12.50 3,125 15.83 3.33 832.50 106 50.000 50.250 250 11.90 2,975 14.59 2.69 672.50 107 50.250 50.350 100 11.75 1,175 19.11 7.36 736.00 108 .4:50.5a 6 .< '2426 'f. 000 j` 0 16.55 6.-55 2085.30 109 50.476 50.750 274 11.95 3,274 16.37 4.42 1211.08 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan 2 of 4 Annex 11.1 (1.1) Chainage Length Available Available Width Additional Area to be Sr. eng Corridor Corridor Area Required Width Acquired No. From To (m) Width (m) (sq.m.) (m) Required (m) (sq.m.) 110 50.750 51.000 250 11.20 2,800 16.60 5.40 1350.00 111 51.000 51.250 250 11.40 2,850 19.66 8.26 2065.00 112 51.250 51.365 115 12.50 1,438 19.08 6.58 756.70 113 a$~365 iM"$11598 W 233 tg O00 0. l i3 l.37 19.31 ?;64513.21 114 51.598 51.750 152 11.40 1,733 19.54 8.14 1237.28 115 51.750 52-000 250 12.80 3,200 18.57 5.77 1442.50 116 52.000 52.090 90 13.50 1,215 21.86 8.36 752.40 117 50 353A 2081 , >:. Co D93 3 625.33 118 53.171 53.250 79 15.00 1,185 21.10 6.10 481.90 119 53.250 53.500 250 15.90 3,975 14.72 -1.18 0.00 120 53.500 53.750 250 15.30 3,825 20.71 5.41 1352.50 121 53.750 54.000 250 14.80 3,700 16.11 1.31 327.50 122 54.000 54.250 250 14.75 3,688 15.70 0.95 - 237.50 123 54.250 54.500 250 14.70 3,675 16.15 1.45 362.50 124 54.500 54.750 25.0 14.50 3,625 16.62 2.12 530.00 125 54.750 54.984 234 15.30 3,580 15.80 0.50 117.00 126 / 5 o. 127 55.266 55.516 250 15.45 3,863 19.79 4.34 1085.00 128J55516 6% 5 X 00 1m ; 94 .08O 129 56.058 56.250 192 16.40 3,149 19.94 3.54 679.68 130 56.250 56.500 250 15.80 3,950 20.36 4.56 1140.00 131 56.500 56.750 250 14.50 3,625 18.43 3.93 982.50 132 56.750 57.000 250 13.75 3,438 15.25 1.50 375.00 133 57.000 57.250 250 13.20 3,300 19.16 5.96 1490.00 134 57.250 57.500 250 13.50 3,375 14.58 1.08 270.00 135 57.500 57.750 250 13.90 3,475 16.28 2.38 595.00 136 57.750 58.000 250 14.50 3,625 16.49 1.99 497.50 137 58.000 58.250 250 14.00 3,500 17.51 3.51 877.50 138 58.250 58.542 292 14.25 4,161 16.84 2.59 756.28 139 MX%$2 005884 0. O. _ _ 49.53 $5Q 116 140 58.844 59.000 156 12.55 1,958 18.28 5.73 893.88 141 59.000 59.250 250 12.10 3,025 17.44 5.34 1335.00 142 59.250 59.500 250 11.50 2,875 17.41 5.91 1477.50 143 59.500 59.750 250 11.30 2,825 18.10 6.80 1700.00 144 59.750 60.000 250 12.10 3,025 15.67 3.57 892.50 145 60.000 60.250 250 11.00 2,750 14.74 3.74 935.00 146 60.250 60.400 150 11.50 1,725 17.66 6.16 924.00 147 -60.400 MWM fVt3 93 ,g000 >J¢-SM. -. 0 2 t1.00 0 8253.00 148 60.793 61.000 207 12.30 2,546 19.99 7.69 1591.83 149 61.000 61.250 250 11.90 2,975 19.12 7.22 1805.00 150C 61.250 61.500 250 10.90 = 2,725 16.44 5.54 1385.00 151 61.500 61.750 250 11.20 2,800 17.94 6.74 1685.00 152 61.750 62.000 250 10.90 2,725 17.04 6.14 1535.00 153 62.000 62.250 250 11.20 2,800 18.91 7.71 1927.50 154 62.250 62.500 250 12.50 3,125 18.45 5.95 1487.50 155 62.500 62.684 184 13.80 2,539 20.02 6.22 1144.48 15E 0: 2629fl" »' . flOD 157 62.945 63.250 305 13.00 3,965 20.09 7.09 2162.45 158 63.250 63.500 250 14.20 3,550 21.54 7.34 1835.00 159 63.500 63.750 250 14.50 3,625 18.55 4.05 1012.50 160 63.750 64.000 250 15.40 3,850 16.97 1.57 392.50 161 64.000 64.061 61 14.80 903 15.41 0.61 37.21 162 6411 .6*081 64.314 1225 $000 19.27 -19.27 4875.31 163 64.314 64.500 186 14.20 2,641 18.51 4.31 801.66 164 64.500 64.750 250 14.50 3,625 16.62 2.12 530.00 165 64.750 65.000 250 12.20 3,050 20.69 8.49 2122.50 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan 3 of 4 Annex 11.1 (1.1) Chainage Length Available Available Width Additional Area to be No. From To (n) Corridor Corridor Area Required Width Acquired Width (m) (sqm.m) (m) Required (m) (sq.m.) 166 65.000 65.250 250 11.10 2,775 17.47 6.37 1592.50 167 65.250 65.500 250 11.90 2,975 19.49 7.59 1897.50 168 65.500 65.750 250 13.50 3,375 21.32 7.82 1955.00 169 65.750 66.000 250 12.50 3,125 20.27 7.77 1942.50 170 66.000 66.132 132 11.30 1,492 19.55 8.25 1089.00 171 tse+<66;132 :n66A474 sK.4 342 0,0O ';_'_ O_' . 20.30 -20.30 6942.60 172 66.474 66.500 26 14.20 369 26.91 12.71 330.46 173 66.500 66.750 250 14.80 3,700 14.37 -0.43 0.00 174 66.750 67.000 250 15.70 3,925 18.93 3.23 807.50 175 67.000 67.250 250 16.50 4,125 17.52 1.02 255.00 176 67.250 67.500 250 14.10 3,525 15.00 0.90 225.00 177 67.500 67.750 250 11.50 2,875 15.44 3.94 985.00 178 67.750 68.000 250 12.60 3,150 14.81 2.21 552.50 179 68.000 68.250 250 14.20 3,550 25.91 11.71 2927.50 180 68.250 68.500 250 15.20 3,800 14.77 -0.43 0.00 181 68.500 68.750 250 11.20 2,800 15.04 3.84 960.00 182 68.750 69.000 250 12.50 3,125 19.66 7.16 1790.00 183 69.000 69.250 250 11.50 2,875 18.59 7.09 1772.50 184 69.250 69.500 250 14.20 3,550 18.40 4.20 1050.00 185 69.500 69.750 250 11.50 2,875 29.11 17.61 4402.50 186 69.750 70.000 250 10.80 2,700 17.93 7.13 1782.50 187 70.000 70.250 250 9.20 2,300 17.25 8.05 2012.50 188 70.250 70.500 250 10.50 2,625 18.33 7.83 1957.50 189 70.500 70.750 250 10.00 2,500 18.40 8.40 2100.00 190 70.750 71.000 250 11.20 2,800 15.35 4.15 1037.50 191 71.000 71.260 260 11.50 2,990 15.69 4.19 1089.40 Total & Average 46,000 11.63 505,265 18.51 361288.42 36.13 ha Land Requirement For Realignment Sections Sr. No. Aream2 Ha 1 16 6507.96 2 27 3280.00 Land Requirement Other Than Realignment: 3 31 2899.20 20.78 ha 4 36 1416.96 5 37 2268.75 6 40 3909.30' 7 44 10001.521 8 57 11092.90 9 60 12097.36 10, 70 i 4884.00 11 84 1 16924.14' 12 108 1 2085.30; 13 113 4513.21 14 117 j 22625.33. 15 126 6280.14 16 128 10807.48 17 139 5913.16 18 147 8253.00 19 156 5950.80 20 162 4875.31. 21 171 6942.60 Total 153528.42 15.35 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan 4 of 4 Annex 11.1 (1.2) Width of the Corridor of Impact, Contract 1 Link 2: Kottarakara (km 72.380) to Adoor (km 93.250) = 20.870 km Sr. Chamnage Length Available Available Width Additional Area to be No. From To (m) Corridor Corridor Area Required Width Acquired NO. FrOm TO (in) Width (m) (sq.m.) (m) Required (m) (sq.m.) 1 72.380 72.500 120 12.00 1,440 13.21 1.21 145.20 2 72.500 72.750 250 11.75 2,938 13.07 1.32 330.00 3 72.750 72.835 85 11.70 994 14.49 2.79 237.15 4 2 0O 204 20.34 ,38;8 5 73.022 73.250 228 13.00 2,964 20.02 7.02 1600.56 6 73.250 73.500 250 14.50 3,625 14.97 0.47 117.50 7 73.500 73.750 250 16.00 4,000 24.40 8.40 2100.00 8 73.750 74.000 250 15.50 3,875 14.08 -1.42 0.00 9 74.000 74.250 250 15.50 3,875 15.76 0.26 65.00 10 74.250 74.402 152 14.00 2,128 14.24 0.24 36.48 11 ' 9 72 o9oo RU? 0 Mm" 3MiI3g9 12 74.611 74.750 139 10.20 1,418 18.12 7.92 1100.88 13 74.750 75.000 250 9.25 2,313 15.15 5.90 1475.00 14 75.000 75.250 250 10.70 2,675 15.60 4.90 1225.00 15 75.250 75.500 250 11.50 2,875 18.63 7.13 1782.50 16 75.500 75.750 250 11.50 2,875 15.33 3.83 957.50 17 75.750 76.017 267 14.50 3,871 15.75 1.25 333.75 18 q92.083 01.00 - . S9 1 &4 *4794w 19 76.300 76.480 180 10.50 1,890 15.03 4.53 815.40 20 0 .I20 ~Wo:oo 7 . '3 f 7 212T60 21 76.600 76.750 150 14.00 2,100 18.62 4.62 693.00 22 76.750 77.000 250 15.50 3,875 17.11 1.61 402.50 23 77.000 77.250 250 13.00 3,250 17.89 4.89 1222.50 24 77.250 77.500 250 13.00 3,250 14.98 1.98 495.00 25 77.500 77.750 250 13.20 3,300 24.03 10.83 2707.50 26 77.750 78.000 250 12.50 3,125 14.33 1.83 457.50 27 78.000 78.250 250 12.00 3,000 15.94 3.94 985.00 28 78.250 78.500 250 12.50 3,125 16.36 3.86 965.00 29 78.500 78.675 175 12.00 2,100 14.14 2.14 374.50 30 8.M >.532 ° - ° °2 27 *C tnwb918764 31 79.207 79.250 43 15.00 645 18.52 3.52 151.36 32 79.250 79.500 250 15.50 3,875 19.03 3.53 882.50 33 79.500 79.750 250 14.50 3,625 15.87 1.37 342.50 34 79.750 79.868 118 14.00 1,652 16.37 2.37 279.66 35 rW79~~ 18 8 164( ~ .00 K. 18.99 \ 18.99 7 31143 60 36 81.508 81.750 242 14.00 3,388 13.39 -0.61 0.00 37 81.750 82.000 250 15.50 3,875 14.64 -0.86 0.00 38 82.000 82.250 250 15.00 3,750 14.65 -0.35 0.00 39 82.250 82.500 250 15.00 3,750 14.00 -1.00 0.00 40 82.500 82.750 250 14.00 3,500 15.53 1.53 382.50 41 82.750 83.000 250 14.00 3,500 15.43 1.43 357.50 42 83.000 83.250 250 15.50 3,875 18.25 2.75 687.50 43 83.250 83.500 250 16.00 4,000 14.91 -1,09 0.00 44 83.500 83.750 250 12.75 3,188 23.11 10.36 2590.00 45 83.750 84.000 250 16.00 4,000 14.41 -1.59 0.00 46 84.000 84.250 250 11.00 2,750 16.07 5.07 1267.50 47 84.250 84.500 250 11.00 2,750 15.09 4.09 1022.50 48 84.500 84.750 250 12.25 3,063 17.36 5.11 1277.50 49 84.750 84.980 230 19.30 4,439 14.88 -4.42 0.00 50 84.980 '85.140^ 160 < :-,0.00 . : . - 15.961 15.96 12553.60 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Page 1 of 2 Annex 11.1 (1.2) Chainage Available Available Width Additional Area to be Sr. Length Corridor Corridor Area Required Width Acquired No. From To (m) Width (m) (sq.m.) (m) Required (m) (sq.m.) 51 85.140 85.250 110 12.80 1,408 14.75 1.95 214.50 52 85.250 85.500 250 12.50 3,125 14.37 1.87 467.50 53 85.500 85.750 250 12.50 3,125 18.01 5.51 1377.50 54 85.750 86.000 250 12.70 3,175 14.75 2.05 512.50 55 86.000 86.250 250 12.50 3,125 15.35 2.85 712.50 56 86.250 86.560 310 12.80 3,968 16.46 3.66 1134.60 57 ~<48656 86.W 4 320- 0;00 0 16.78 16.78 8 5369.60 58 86.880 87.000 120 13.00 1,560 17.42 4.42 530.40 59 87.000 87.250 250 12.20 3,050 14.82 2.62 655.00 60 87.250 87.500 250 13.20 3,300 15.07 1.87 467.50 61 87.500 87.750 250 15.20 3,800 16.31 1.11 277.50 62 87.750 88.000 250 12.20 3,050 15.00 2.80 700.00 63 88.000 88.039 39 10.70 417 15.00 4.30 167.70 64 88.039 >*88.403 364 - 0.00 0 ' 17.69 s . A17.69 . 6439.16 65 88.403 88.500 97 10.00 970 15.00 5.00 485.00 66 88.500 88.750 250 10.50 2,625 15.00 4.50 1125.00 67 88.750 89.000 250 10.20 2,550 15.00 4.80 1200.00 68 89.000 89.250 250 10.70 2,675 15.00 4.30 1075.00 69 89.250 89.500 250 11.00 2,750 15.00 4.00 1000.00 70 89.500 89.750 250 9.80 2,450 15.00 5.20 1300.00 71 89.750 90.000 250 9.50 2,375 15.00 5.50 1375.00 72 90.000 90.250 250 9.90 2,475 15.00 5.10 1275.00 73 90.250 90.500 250 10.20 2,550 15.00 4.80 1200.00 74 90.500 90.750 250 10.50 2,625 15.00 4.50 1125.00 75 90.750 91.000 250 10.50 2,625 15.00 4.50 1125.00 76 91.000 91.250 250 11.50 2,875 15.00 3.50 875.00 77 91.250 91.500 250 11.50 2,875 15,00 3.50 875.00 78 91.500 91.750 250 12.25 3,063 15.00 2.75 687.50 79 91.750 92.000 250 10.80 2,700 15.00 4.20 1050.00 80 92.000 92.250 250 11.50 2,875 15.00 3.50 875.00 81 92.250 92.500 250 16.00 4,000 15.00 -1.00 0.00 82 92.500 92.750 250 16.00 4,000 14.49 -1.51 0.00 83 92.750 93.000 250 16.10 4,025 14.30 -1.80 0.00 84 93.000 93.250 250 15.00 3,750 13.48 -1.52 0.00 Total and Average 20,870 11.50 220,441 16.02 122547.28 12.25 ha Land Requirement for the Realignment Sections Sr. No. Area M2 Hectare 1 4 3803.58 2. 11 3398.341 Land requirement other than realignment: 3 18 4794.021 5.37 ha 4 20 2127.60i 5 30 9187.641 6 35 1 1 31143.601 7 50 2553.601 8; 57 5369.60 9 64 6439.16 Total 68817.14 6.88 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Page 2 of 2 Annex 11.1 (1.3) Width of the Corridor of Impact, Contract 1 Link 3: Ado or (km 93.250) to Che ganoor (km 116.820) = 3.570 km Sr. Chainage Length Available Available Width Additional Area to be Sr. Length Corridor Corridor Required Width Acquired No. From To (m) Width (m) Area (sq.m.) (m) Required (m) (sq.m.) 1 93.250 93.500 250 15.70 3,925 14.15 -1.55 0.00 2 93.500 93.750 250 15.00 3,750 14.53 -0.47 0.00 3 93.750 94.000 250 15.00 3,750 19.15 4.15 1037.50 4 94.000 94.250 250 12.75 3,188 15.77 3.02 755.00 5 94.250 94.500 250 12.50 3,125 17.73 5.23 1307.50 6 94.500 94.750 250 14.00 3,500 20.37 6.37 1592.50 7 94.750 95.000 250 15.50 3,875 18.79 3.29 822.50 8 95.000 95.250 250 18.00 4,500 19.60 1.60 400.00 9 95.250 95.500 250 15.10 3,775 15.79 0.69 172.50 10 95.500 95.750 250 15.00 3,750 17.04 2.04 510.00 11 95.750 96.000 250 14.50 3,625 16.15 1.65 412.50 12 96.000 96.250 250 15.50 3,875 21.43 5.93 1482.50 13 96.250 96.500 250 15.25 3,813 15.79 0.54 135.00 14 96.500 96.750 250 14.20 3,550 15.20 1.00 250.00 15 96.750 97.000 250 15.00 3,750 15.62 0.62 155.00 16 97.000 97.250 250 15.50 3,875 15.44 -0.06 0.00 17 97.250 97.500 250 16.50 4,125 14.04 -2.46 0.00 18 97.500 97.750 250 15.50 3,875 15.29 -0.21 0.00 19 97.750 98.000 250 15.50 3,875 15.49 -0.01 0.00 20 98.000 98.250 250 16.00 4,000 14.99 -1.01 0.00 21 98.250 98.500 250 12.50 3,125 13.13 0.63 157.50 22 98.500 98.750 250 11.25 2,813 12.22 0.97 242.50 23 98.750 99.000 250 11.00 2,750 12.86 1.86 465.00 24 99.000 99.250 250 11.70 2,925 12.93 1.23 307.50 25 99.250 99.500 250 1.50 375 13.88 12.38 3095.00 26 99.500 99.750 250 1.50 375 13.83 12.33 3082.50 27 99.750 100.000 250 11.75 2,938 15.06 3.31 827.50 28 100.000 100.250 250 12.50 3,125 12.58 0.08 20.00 29 100.250 100.500 250 12.50 3,125 15.27 2.77 692.50 30 100.500 100.750 250 13.00 3,250 15.57 2.57 642.50 31 100.750 101.000 250 13.20 3,300 17.13 3.93 982.50 32 101.000 101.250 250 13.60 3,400 13.57 -0.03 0.00 33 101.250 101.500 250 11.50 2,875 14.93 3.43 857.50 34 101.500 101.750 250 11.50 2,875 13.64 2.14 535.00 35 101.750 102.000 250 12.00 3,000 14.08 2.08 520.00 36 102.000 102.250 250 12.50 3,125 12.85 0.35 - 87.50 37 102.250 102.500 250 12.70 3,175 15.62 2.92 730.00 38 102.500 102.750 250 12.75 3,188 18.68 5.93 1482.50 39 102.750 103.000 250 13.10 3,275 15.46 2.36 590.00 40 103.000 103.250 250 13.50 3,375 14.68 1.18 295.00 41 103.250 103.500 250 13.00 3,250 14.81 1.81 452.50 42 103.500 103.550 50 12.50 625 24.00 11.50 575.00 43 103.550 103.750 200 12.50 2,500 23.40 10.90 2180.00 44 103.750 104.000 250 13.25 3,313 15.45 2.20 550.00 45 104.000 104.250 250 14.50 3,625 16.42 1.92 480.00 46 104.250 104.500 250 14.20 3,550 14.68 0.48 120.00 47 104.500 104.750 250 13.801 3,450 20.30 6.50 1625.00 48 104.750 105.000 25 13.50 3,375 13.93 0.43 107.50 49 105.000 105.250 250 13.25 3,313 15.13 1.88 470.00 50 105.250 105.398 148 14.50 2,146 18.98 4.48 663.04 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Page 1 of 2 Annex 11.1 (1.3) 51 -10,5.398.. 105.622 -i,224 v.. 0.00 O 18.73 18.73 4195.52 52 105.622 105.750 128 13.50 1,728 26.92 13.42 1717.76 53 105.750 106.000 250 12.75 3,188 14.39 1.64 410.00 54 106.000 106.250 250 14.00 3,500 14.09 0.09 22.50 55 106.250 106.500 250 12.75 3,188 13.34 0.59 147.50 56 106.500 106.750 250 13.25 3,313 13.94 0.69 172.50 57 106.750 107.000 250 13.30 3,325 23.27 9.97 2492.50 58 107.000 107.250 250 14.00 3,500 17.92 3.92 980.00 59 107.250 107.500 250 11.50 2,875 14.73 3.23 807.50 60 107.500 107.750 250 11.50 2,875 15.96 4.46 1115.00 61 107.750 108.000 250 12.00 3,000 17.04 5.04 1260.00 62 108.000 108.250 250 12.00 3,000 14.67 2.67 667.50 63 108.250 108 500 250 12.70 3,175 14.51 1.81 452.50 64 108.500 108.750 250 13.80 3,450 15.65 1.85 462.50 65 108.750 109.000 250 14.00 3,500 15.17 1.17 292.50 66 109.000 109.250 250 16.00 4,000 15.23 -0.77 0.00 67 109.250 109.500 250 14.80 3,700 14.59 -0.21 0.00 68 109.500 109.750 250 15.20 3,800 14.98 -0.22 0.00 69 109.750 110.000 250 14.50 3,625 15.59 1.09 272.50 70 110.000 110.250 250 15.60 3,900 14.63 -0.97 0.00 71 110.250 110.500 250 12.00 3,000 15.48 3.48 870.00 72 110.500 110.750 250 12.25 3,063 12.94 0.69 172.50 73 110.750 111.000 250 12.50 3,125 20.12 7.62 1905.00 74 111.000 111.250 250 13.25 3,313 16.31 3.06 765.00 75 111.250 111.500 250 13.50 3,375 15.40 1.90 475.00 76 111.500 111.750 250 13.50 3,375 14.79 1.29 322.50 77 111.750 112.000 250 15.00 3,750 14.89 -0.11 0.00 78 112.000 112.250 250 13.50 3,375 14.39 0.89 222.50 79 112.250 112.500 250 13.50 3,375 14.22 0.72 180.00 80 112.500 112.750 250 13.75 3,438 14.43 0.68 170.00 81 112.750 113.000 250 13.70 3,425 13.82 0.12 30.00 82 113.000 113.250 250 14.00 3,500 14.41 0.41 102.50 83 113.250 113.500 250 13.20 3,300 13.28 0.08 20.00 84 113.500 113.750 250 13.50 3,375 13.74 0.24 60.00 85 113.750 114.000 250 13.50 3,375 11.98 -1.52 0.00 86 114.000 114.250 250 13.80 3,450 16.09 2.29 572.50 87 114.250 114.500 250 13.30 3,325 24.09 10.79 2697.50 88 114.500 114.750 250 13.25 3,313 17.06 3.81 952.50 89 114.750 115.000 250 13.00 3,250 14.36 1.36 340.00 90 115.000 115.250 250 14.00 3,500 12.80 -1.20 0.00 91 115.250 115.500 250 13.50 3,375 15.59 2.09 522.50 92 115.500 115.750 250 13.00 3,250 14.38 1.38 345.00 93 115.750 116.000 250 13.50 3,375 13.76 0.26 65.00 94 116.000 116.250 250 13.00 3,250 13.72 0.72 180.00 95 116.250 116.500 250 14.00 3,500 12.80 -1.20 0.00 96 116.500 116.750 250 13.50 3,375 14.20 0.70 175.00 97 116.750 116.820 70 13.00 910 14.19 1.19 83.30 Total and Average 23,570 13.21 311,709 15.73 58564.62 5.86 ha Land requirement for realignment: 0.42 ha (Sr. No. 51) Land requirement other than realignment: 5.44 ha Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Page 2 of 2 Annex 11.1 (1-4) Width of the Corridor of Impact, Contract 1 Link 72: Taikkod (0.000) to Kazhakuttom (km 12.580) = 12.580 km Sr. Chainage Available Available Width Additional Area to be No. From To Length (mi) Corridor Corridor Area Required Width Acquired No. From To Width (m) (sq.m.) (m) Required (m) (sq mn) 1 0.000 0.050 50 11.50 575 12.85 1.35 67.50 4 0.4280 5 16.00 80 16.00 0.00 0.00 6 NOMM2 _gO 7 8 0.820 1.000 _ 180 8.50 1,530 14.19 5.69 1024.20 9 1.000 1.200 200 8.40 1,680 17.87 9.47 <1894.00 1 0 imY:aom V09M 1 1 1.280 1.340 60 9.001 540 15.25 6.25 375.00 12 1.340 1.420 80 8.50 680 15.28 6.78 542.40 13 1.420 1.500 80 9.50 760 14.00 4.50 360.00 14 1.500 1.750 250 9.50 2,375 14.73 5.23 1307.50 15 1.750 2.000 250 12.00 3,000 16.65 4.65 1162.50 16 2.000 2.250 250 12.50 3,125 15.70 3.20 800.00 17 2.250 2.500 250 10.00 2,500 16.11 6.11 1527.50 18 2.500 2.750 250 10.50 2,625 15.54 5.04 1260.00 19 2.750 3.000 250 11.50 2,875 15.71 4.21 1052.50 20 3.000 3.250 250 11.20 2,800 15.72 4.52 1130.00 21 3.250 3.500 250 11.00 2,750 16.59 5.59 1397.50 23 3.660 3.750 250 12050 12125 17.80 5.30 477.00 |241 3.7501 3.940 190 12.50r 2,375 15.66 3.16 600.40 25 am~e INNOW21t$l 26 4.000 4.260 260| 11.5 2,990 14.65 3.15 819.00 28 4.300 4.500 200 10.00 2,000 16.27 6.27 1254.00 29 4.500 4.750 250 10.50 2,625 14.96 4.46 1115.00 30 4.750 5.000 250 10.00 2,500 14.55 4.55 1137.50 31 5.000 5.320 320 10.00 3,200 14.53 4.53 1449.60 32 MOM. g 't0(.'.3 33 5.420 5.460 40 10.50 420 16.20 5.70 228.00 34 WROMWW$B5gg95jgS9° :g,#@O9 i§dhr' 90 l5290 35 5.815 5.825 10 15.00 150 15.00 0.00 0.00 36 5 -. *$17.155 22 37 6.320 6.500 180 14.40 2,592 15.29 0.89 160.20 38 6.500 6.750 250 13.50 3,375 15.38 1.88 470.00 39 6.750 7.000 250 14.00 3,500 15.80 1.80 450.00 40 $W73gpO !Z4o .2794 M8382.00 41 7.300 7.500 200 10.50 2,100 15.06 4.56 912.00 42 7.500 7.750 250 11.00 2,750 16.21 5.21 1302.50 43 7.750 8.000 250 10.50 2,625 16.24 5.74 1435.00 44 8.000 8.250 250 12.00 3,000 16.06 4.06 1015.00 45 8.250 8.500 250 14.00 3,500 16.00 2.00 500.00 46 8.500 8.750 250 12.00 3,000 15.35 3.35 837.50 47 8.750 9.000 250 11.80 2,950 16.20 4.40 1100.00 48 9.000 9.250 250 12.80 3,200 16.05 3.25 812.50 49 9.250 9.500 250 14.80 3,700 16.87 2.07 517.50 50 9.500 9.750 250 13.50 3,375 16.94 3.44 860.00 51 9.750 10.000 250 13.00 3,250 17.24 4.24 1060.00 52 10.000 10.250 250 10.00 2,500 15.71 5.71 1427.50 53 10.250 10.500 250 10.50 2,625 16.46 5.96 1490.00 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Page 1 of 2 Annex 11.1 (1.4) 54 10.500 10.750 250 10.00 2,500 18.95 8.95 2237.50 55 10.750 11.000 250 10.50 2,625 16.25 5.75 1437.50 56 11.000 11.250 250 10.00 2,500 15.65 5.65 1412.50 57 11.250 11.500 250 14.00 3,500 15.71 1.71 427.50 58 11.500 11.750 250 14.00 3,500 17.37 3.37 842.50 59 11.750 12.000 250 14.00 3,500 17.44 3.44 860.00 60 12.000 12.250 250 14.00 3,500 15.77 1.77 442.50 61 12.250 12.500 250 14.00 3,500 16.32 2.32 580.00 62 12.500 12.580 80 14.00 1,120 15.82 1.82 145.60 Total and Average 12,580 9.27 119,567 16.31 87,125.85 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Page 2 of 2 Annex 11.1 (1.5) Width of the Corridor of Impact, Contract I Link 73: Che ganassery (0.000) to .lappuzha (k 24.140) 24.140 km Sr. Chainage Length Available Available Width Additional Area to be Sr. eng Corridor Corridor Area Required Width Acquired No. From To (in) Width (m) (sq.m.) (m) Required (m) (sq.m.) 1 0.000 0.250 250 15.00 3,750 12.25 -2.75 0.00 2 0.250 0.500 250 10.00 2,500 13.76 3.76 940.00 31 0.500 0.750 250 10.00 2,500 13.45 3.45 862.50 4 0.750 1.000 250 10.00 2,500 13.39 3.39 847.50 5 1.000 1.250 250 13.00 3,250 13.92 0.92 230.00 6 1.250 1.500 250 12.00 3,000 13.41 1.41 352.50 7 1.500 1.750 250 13.00 3,250 13.29 0.29 72.50 8 1.750 2.000 250 15.00 3,750 18.28 3.28 820.00 9 2.000 2.250 250 18.00 4,500 14.71 -3.29 0.00 10 2.250 2.500 250 18.00 4,500 15.04 -2.96 0.00 11 2.500 2.750 250 18.00 4,500 14.75 -3.25 0.00 12 2.750 3.000 250 18.00 4,500 14.77 -3.23 0.00 13 3.000 3.250 250 18.00 4,500 15.44 -2.56 0.00 14 3.250 3.500 250 18.00 4,500 14.52 -3.48 0.00 15 3.500 3.750 250 18.00 4,500 16.87 -1.13 0.00 16 3.750 4.000 250 18.00 4,500 16.46 -1.54 0.00 17 4.000 4.250 250 14.00 3,500 15.25 1.25 312.50 18 4.250 4.500 250 14.00 3,500 16.08 2.08 520.00 19 4.500 4.750 250 14.00 3,500 20.82 6.82 1705.00 20 4.750 5.000 250 13.50 3,375 14.42 0.92 230.00 21 5.000 5.250 250 16.70 4,175 14.67 -2.03 0,00 22 5.250 5.500 250 15.00 3,750 15.08 0.08 20.00 23 5.500 5.750 250 14.00 3,500 14.34 0.34 85.00 24 5.750 5.850 100 13.50 1,350 21.64 8.14 814.00 25 5.850 6.250 400 9.00 3,600 18.47 9.47 3788.00 26 6.250 6.500 250 14.00 3,500 15.84 1.84 460.00 27 6.500 6.750 250 14.00 3,500 15.23 1.23 307.50 28 6.750 7.000 250 14.00 3,500 14.12 0.12 30.00 29 7.000 7.250 250 17.50 4,375 14.83 -2.67 0.00 30 7.250 7.500 250 16.00 4,000 14.88 -1.12 0.00 31 7.500 7.750 250 15.00 3,750 18.02 3.02 755.00 32 7.750 8.000 250 14.00 3,500 22.25 8.25 2062.50 33 8.000 8.250 250 18.00 4,500 15.24 -2.76 0.00 34 8.250 8.500 250 16.00 4,000 15.71 -0.29 0.00 35 8.500 8.750 250 16.60 4,150 14.79 -1.81 0.00 36 8.750 9.000 250 16.00 4,000 15.50 -0.50 0.00 37 9.000 9.250 250 16.50 4,125 15.27 -1.23 0.00 38 9.250 9.500 250 16.00 4,000 14.02 -1.98 0.00 39 9.500 9.750 250 16.00 4,000 14.79 -1.21 0.00 40 9.750 10.000 250 16.00 4,000 15.20 -0.80 0.00 41 10.000 10.250 250 16.50 4,125 14.63 -1.87 0.00 42 10.250 10.500 250 16.00 4,000 15.12 -0.88 0.00 43 10.500 10.750 250 16,00 4,000 14.64 -1.36 0.00 44 10.750 11.000 250 16.00 4,000 17.09 1.09 272.50 45 11.000 11.250 250 16.00 4,000 15.57 -0.43 0.00 46 11.250 11.500 250 16.00 4,000 15.94 -0.06 0.00 47 11.500 11.750 250 16.00 4,000 15.73 -0.27 0.00 48 11.750 12.000 250 16.00 4,000 15.15 -0.85 0.00 49 12.000 12.250 250 16.00 4,000 15.28 -0.72 0.00 50 12.250 12.500 250 16.00 4,000 16.11 0.11 27.50 51 12.500 12.750 250 16.00 4,000 15.05 -0.95 0.00 52 12.750 13.000 250 16.00 4,000 19.85 3.85 962.50 53 13.000 13.250 250 16.00 4,000 13 22 -2.78 0.00 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Page 1 of 2 Annex 11.1 (1.5) 54 13.250 13.500 250 16.00 4,000 16.13 0.13 32.50 55 13.500 13.750 250 16.00 4,000 16.65 0.65 162.50 56 13.750 14.000 250 16.00 4,000 15.73 -0.27 0.00 57 14.000 14.250 250 15.00 3,750 18.33 3.33 832.50 58 14.250 14.500 250 13.00 3,250 14.53 1.53 382.50 59 14,500 14.750 250 14.00 3,500 14.78 0.78 195.00 60 14.750 15.000 250 14.00 3,500 14.58 0.58 145.00 61 15.000 15.250 250 16.00 4,000 13.38 -2.62 0.00 62 15.250 15.500 250 16.00 4,000 13.52 -2.48 0.00 63 15.500 15.750 250 16.00 4,000 15.75 -0.25 0.00 64 15.750 16.000 250 16.00 4,000 17.31 1.31 327.50 65 16.000 16.350 350 16.00 5,600 14.99 -1.01 0.00 66 16.350 16.500 150 16.00 2,400 16.79 0.79 118.50 67 16.500 16.750 250 16.00 4,000 16.61 0.61 152.50 68 18.750 17.000 250 16.00 4,000 14.95 -1.05 0.00 69 17.000 17.250 250 15.70 3,925 16.60 0.90 225.00 70 17.250 17.500 250 16.00 4,000 14.29 -1.71 0.00 71 17.500 17.750 250 16.00 4,000 17.64 1.64 410.00 72 17.750 18.000 250 16.00 4,000 15.29 -0.71 0.00 73 18.000 18.250 250 16.00 4,000 20.27 4.27 1067.50 74 18.250 18.500 250 16.00 4,000 15.69 -0.31 0.00 75 18.500 18.750 250 16.00 4,000 16.18 0.18 45.00 76 18.750 19.000 250 16.00 4,000 16.60 0.60 150.00 77 19.000 19.250 250 15.00 3,750 14.05 -0.95 0.00 78 19.250 19.500 250 15.00 3,750 16.87 1.87 467.50 79 19.500 19750 2501 14.00 3,500 18.34 4.34 1085.00 80 19.750 20.000 2501 16.00 4,000 19.36 3.36 840.00 811 20.000 20.250 250 14.00 3,500 22.49 8.49 2122.50 82 20.250 20.500 250 12.00 3,000 23.85 11.85 2962.50 83 20.500 20.750 250 12.00 3,000 13.43 1.43 357.50 84 20.750 21.000 250 12.00 3,000 14.97 2.97 742.50 85 21.000 21.150 150 7.00 1,050 16.45 9.45 1417.50 86 21.150 21.500 350 10.00 3,500 17.50 7.50 2625.00 87 21.500 21.750 250 10.00 2,500 19.20 9.20 2300.00 88 21.750 22.000 250 10.00 2,500 20.41 10.41 2602.50 89 22.000 22.250 250 10.00 2,500 20.44 10.44 2610.00 90 22.250 22.500 250 10.00 2,500 22.12 12.12 3030.00 91 22.500 22.750 250 10.00 2,500 27.18 17.18 4295.00 92 22.750 23.000 250 10.00 2,500 15.87 5.87 1467.50 93 23.000 23.250 250 10.00 2,500 20.82 10.82 2705.00 94 23.250 23.500 250 10.00 2,500 15.04 5.04 1260.00 95 23.500 23.750 250 10.00 2,500 13.70 3.70 925.00 96 23.750 24.000 250 10.00 2,500 14.37 4.37 1092.50 97 24.000 24.140 140 10.00 1,400 15.58 5.58 781.20 Total and Average 24140 14.50 350,150 16.21 56411.70 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Page 2 of 2 Annex 11.1 (2.1) Width of the Corridor of Impact, Contract 2 Link 6: Muvattupuzha (km 206.400) o Angamali (km 240.200) = 33.800 km Chainage Available Available Width Additional Area to be No. Length To M Corridor Corridor Area Required Width Acquired No. From To (mI) Width (m) (sq.m.) (m) Required (m) (sq.m.) 1 206.400 206.500 100 14.40 1,440 16.43 2.03 203.00 2 206.500 206.750 250 14.10 3,525 16.10 2.00 500.00 3 206.750 207.000 250 14.20 3,550 19.09 4.89 1222.50 4 207.000 207.250 250 14.20 3,550 16.27 2.07 517.50 5 207.250 207.500 250 14.10 3,525 17.01 2.91 727.50 6 207.500 207.750 250 13.70 3,425 16.78 3.08 770.00 7 207.750 208.000 250 13.70 3,425 23.36 9.66 2415.00 8 208.000 208.250 250 13.50 3,375 16.84 3.34 835.00 9 208.250 208.500 250 14.10 3,525 -15.90 1.80 450.00 10 208.500 208.750 250 15.20 3,800 16.33 1.13 282.50 11 208.750 209.000 250 15.20 3,800 15.62 0.42 105.00 12 209.000 209.250 250 15.50 3,875 16.50 1.00 250.00 13 209.250 209.500 250 14.10 3,525 16.52 2.42 605.00 14 209.500 209.750 250 14.20 3,550 16.57 2.37 592.50 15 209.750 210.000 250 15.10 3,775 17.53 2.43 607.50 16 210.000 210.250 250 13.10 3,275 16.37 3.27 817.50 17 210.250 210.500 250 13.50 3,375 18.27 4.77 1192.50 181 210.500 210.750 250 13.70 3,425 16.96 3.26 815.00 19 210.750 211.000 250 13.80 3,450 16.41 2.61 652.50 20 211.000 211.250 250 13.80 3,450 17.19 3.39 847.50 21 211.250 211.500 250 13.70 3,425 16.91 3.21 802.50 22 211.500 211.750 250 13.70 3,425 15.82 2.12 530.00 23 211.750 212.000 250 13.80 3,450 14.62 0.82 205.00 24 212.000 212.250 250 13.80 3,450 15.80 2.00 500.00 25 212.250 212.500 250 14.40 3,600 15.95 1.55 387.50 26 212.500 212.750 250 14.10 3,525 14.52 0.42 105.00 27 212.750 213.000 250 14.70 3,675 14.49 -0.21 0.00 28 213.000 213.250 250 15.50 3,875 15.12 -0.38 0.00 29 213.250 213.500 250 13.80 3,450 14.48 0.68 170.00 30 213.500 213.750 250 14.10 3,525 16.99 2.89 722.50 31 213.750 214.000 250 13.70 3,425 14.54 0.84 210.00 32 214.000 214.250 250 13.70 3,425 16.38 2.68 670.00 33 214.250 214.500 250 14.10 3,525 14.53 0.43 107.50 34 214.500 214.750 250 14.70 3,675 14.34 -0.36 0.00 35 214.750 215.000 250 15.10 3,775 15.65 0.55 137.50 36 215.000 215.250 250 15.20 3,800 14.34 -0.86 0.00 37 215.250 215.500 250 14.70 3,675 15.07 0.37 92.50 38 - 215.500 215.750 250 14.70 3,675 14.98 0.28 70.00 39 215.750 216.000 250 15.00 3,750 14.44 -0.56 0.00 40 216.000 216.250 250 14.70 3.675 17.65 2.95 737.50 41 216.250 216.500 250 14.70 3,675 15.06 0.36 90.00 42 216.500 216.750 250 14.70 3,675 14.33 -0.37 0.00 43 216.750 217.000 250 15.00 3,750 14.61 -0.39 0.00 44 217.000 217.250 250 15.10 3,775 14.04 -1.06 0.00 45 217.250 217.500 250 14.70 3,675 15.61 0.91 227.50 46 217.500 217.750 250 14.10 3,525 15.07 0.97 242.50 47 217.750 218.000 250 14.70 3,675 17.01 2.31 577.50 48 218.000 218.250 250 14.60 3,650 14.90 0.30 75.00 49 218.250 218.500 250 14.70 3,675 23.20 8.50 2125.00 50 218.500 218.750 250 15.10 3,775 16.65 1.55 387.50 51 218.750 219.000 250 14.50 3,625 14.62 0.12 30.00 52 219.000 219.250 250 14.50 3,625 15.00 0.50 125.00 53 219.250 219.500 250 14.70 3,675 27.44 12.74 3185.00 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Page 1 of 3 Annex 11.1 (2.1) 54 219.500 219.750 250 14.70 3,675 14.63 -0.07 0.00 55 219.750 220.000 250 15.10 3,775 14.13 -0.97 0.00 56 220.000 220.250 250 16.70 4,175 22.15 5.45 1362.50 57 220.250 220.500 250 15.70 3,925 14.31 -1.39 0.00 58 220.500 220.750 250 15.50 3,875 16.80 1.30 325.00 59 220.750 221.000 250 15.70 3,925 14.20 -1.50 0.00 60 221.000 221.250 250 15.70 3,925 14.14 -1.56 0.00 61 221.250 221.500 250 15.20 3,800 15.12 -0.08 0.00 62 221.500 221.750 250 15.50 3,875 15.67 0.17 42.50 63 221.750 222.000 250 14.10 3,525 14.43 0.33 82.50 64 222.000 222.250 250 15.10 3,775 14.80 -0.30 0.00 65 222.250 222.500 250 15.10 3,775 15.44 0.34 85.00 66 222.500 222.750 250 14.50 3,625 15.81 1.31 327.50 67 222.750 223.000 250 13.30 3,325 15.36 2.06 515.00 68 223.000 223.250 250 14.10 3,525 15.28 1.18 295.00 69 223.250 223.500 250 13.70 3,425 15.34 1.64 410.00 70 223.500 223.750 250 14.10 3,525 14.17 0.07 17.50 71 223.750 224.000 250 14.10 3,525 13.88 -0.22 0.00 72 224.000 224.250 250 14.10 3,525 14.20 0.10 25.00 73 224.250 224.500 250 14.10 3,525 15.39 1.29 322.50 74 224.500 224.750 250 14.60 3,650 14.19 -0.41 0.00 75 224.750 225.000 250 14.70 3,675 17.75 3.05 762.50 76 225.000 225,250 250 14.70 3,675 14.90 0.20 50.00 77 225.250 225.500 250 15.10 3,775 18.29 3.19 797.50 78 225.500 225.750 250 15.10 3,775 13.96 -1.14 0.00 79 225.750 226.000 250 14.70 3,675 16.03 1.33 332.50 80 226.000 226.250 250 14.10 3,525 17.38 3.28 820.00 81 226.250 226.500 250 13.70 3,425 17.48 3.78 945.00 82 226.500 226.750 250 13.10 3,275 17.50 4.40 1100.00 83 226.750 227.000 250 13.40 3,350 17.41 4.01 1002.50 841 227.000 227.250 250 13.40 3,350 14.77 1.37 342.50 85 227.250 227.500 250 14.10 3,525 14.72 0.62 155.00 86 227.500 227.750 250 13.70 3,425 14.35 0.65 162.50 87 227.750 228.000 250 13.70 3,425 16.66 2.96 740.00 88 228.000 228.250 250 13.60 3,400 17.09 3.49 872.50 89 228.250 228.500 250 13.50 3,375 18.10 4.60 1150.00 901 228.500 228.700 200 13.30 2,660 16.11 2.81 562.00 91 228.700 228.900 200 13.30 2,660 37.79 24.49 4898.00 92 228.900 229.000 100 13.10 1,310 32.35 19.25 1925.00 93 229.000 229.250 250 12.70 3,175 16.96 4.26 1065.00 94 229.250 229.500 250 12.50 3,125 15.86 3.36 840.00 95 229.500 229.750 250 12.40 3,100 17.19 4.79 1197.50 96 229.750 230.000 250 12.40 3,100 14.18 1.78 445.00 97 230.000 230.250 250 12.40 3,100 14.52 _2.12 530.00 98 230.250 230.500 250 12.40 3,100 17.30 4.90 1225.00 99 230.500 230.750 250 12.50 3,125 15.95 3.45 862.50 100 230.750 231.000 250 12.40 3,100 18.97 6.57 1642.50 101 231.000 231.250 250 12.30 3,075 16.39 4.09 1022.50 102 231.250 231.500 250 12.40 3,100 16.59 4.19 1047.50 103 231.500 231.750 250 12.40 3,100 17.19 4.79 1197.50 104 231.750 232.000 250 12.30 3,075 19.95 7.65 1912.50 105 232.000 232.250 250 11.70 2,925 16.62 4.92 1230.00 106 232.250 232.500 250 12.10 3,025 17.52 5.42 1355.00 107 232.500 232.750 250 12.10 3,025 15.95 3.85 962.50 108 232.750 232.980 230 12.70 2,921 14.34 1.64 377.20 109 232.980 233.420 440 10.15 4,466 10.15 0.00 0.00 110 233.420 233.450 30 12.80 384 30.06 17.26 517.80 111 233.450 233.500 50 12.40 620 28.74 16.34 817.00 112 233.500 233.750 250 13.00 3,250 19.32 6.32 1580.00 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Page 2 of 3 Annex 11.1 (2.1) 113 233.750 234.000 250 13.00 3,250 16.60 3.60 900.00 114 234.000 234.250 250 12.10 3,025 13.92 1.82 455.00 115 234.250 234.500 250 13.00 3,250 20.28 7.28 1820.00 116 234.500 234.750 250 12.70 3,175 16.68 3.98 995.00 117 234.750 235.000 250 12.70 3,175 15.33 2.63 657.50 118 235.000 235.250 250 13.10 3,275 15.70 2.60 650.00 119 235.250 235.500 250 12.70 3,175 14.83 2.13 532.50 120 235.500 235.750 250 12.70 3,175 15.09 2.39 597 50 121 235.750 236.000 250 12.70 3,175 -14.50 1.80 450.00 122 236.000 236.250 250 12.10 3,025 14.53 2.43 607.50 123 236.250 236.500 250 12.70 3,175 15.11 2.41 602.50 124 236.500 236.750 250 12.50 3,125 14.78 2.28 570.00 125 236.750 237.000 250 12.70 3,175 16.00 3.30 825.00 126 237.000 237.250 250 13.00 3,250 14.40 1.40 350.00 127 237.250 237.500 250 13.10C 3,275 14.40 1.30 325.00 128 237.500 237.750 250 12.70 3,175 15.70 3.00 750.00 129 237.750 238.000 250 12.70 3,175 14.55 1.85 462.50 130 238.000 238.250 250 12.70 3,175 15.46 2.76 690.00 131 238.250 238.500 250 13.70 3,425 16.35 2.65 662.50 132 238.500 238.750 250 13.70 3,425 15.82 2.12 530.00 133 238.750 239.000 250 13.70 3,425 15.09 1.39 347.50 134 239.000 239.250 250 14.10 3,525 16.10 2.00 500.00 135 239.250 239.500 250 13.70 3,425 15.38 1.68 420.00 136 239.500 239.750 250 13.70 3,425 16.80 3.10 775.00 137 239.750 240.000 250 13.70 3,425 17.53 3.83 957.50 138 240.000 240.200 200 14.101 2,820 16.95 2.85 570.00 Total and Average 33800 13.83 467,181 16.52 84177.50 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Page 3 of 3 Annex 11.1 (2.2) Width of the Corridor of Impact, Contract 2 Link 70: Muvattupuzha (km 2.000) to Thodupuzha (km 19.700) = 17.700 km Sr. Chainage Length Available Available Width Additional Area to be Sr. Length 9 Corridor Corridor Required Offset Width Acquired No. iFrom To (m) Width (m) Area (sq.m.) (m) Required (m) (sq.m.) i 2.000 2.250 250 12.00 3,000 13.53 1.53 382.50 21 2.250! 2.5001 250 10.50 2,625 20.11 9.61 2402.50 3 2.500: 2.7501 250 10.50 2,625 14.44, 3.94 985.00 41 2.750 3.0001 250 11.00 2,750 14.571 3.57 892.50 5j 3.000 3.100 100 12.001 1,200 14.44; 2.44 244.00 6 3.1001 3.430 330! 12.00; 3,960 14.44 2.44 805.20 7 3.4301 3.5001 70 12.50 875 21.92 9.42 659.40 81 3.500 3.7501 250 12.00 3,000 12.91 0.91 227.50 91 3.750, 4.000 250 11.001 2,750 13.22 2.22 555.00 101 4.0001 4.250 2501 16.801 4,200 12.93' -3.87' 0.00 11 4.250i 4.5001 250 11.00 2,750 14.59 3.59' 897.50 121 4.500 4.750 250i 11.00 2,750 14.50 3.50 875.00 131 4.7501 5.000 250 12.001 3,000 14.50 2.50 625.00 14i 5.000! 5.250 250. 14.00 3,500 12.45, -1.55 0.00 15 5.2501 5.500 250 11.001 2,750 13.14 2.14 535.00 16. 5.500 5.750 250 11.50 2,875 13.96 2.46 615.00 17 5.750i 6.000 250 11.00 2,750 12.34 1.34 335.00 18 6.000 6.250 250 11.500 2,875 13.80 2.30 575.00 1 9 6.250 6.500 250 12.001 3,000 15.57 3.57 892.50 201 6.500; 6.750 250 12.001 3,000 15.54 3.54 885.00 21 6.750 7.000 250 12.00 3,000 18.34 6.34 1585.00 22 7,00 7.100 100 11.50 1,150 14.98 3.48 348.00 23: 7.100 7.400 300 12.001 3,600 13.00, 1.00 300.00, 24| 7-. _ 7-950 L 550.. - 40 0.,. . , :21.30 Right 21.30 1,%1715.00 25 7.950 8.000 501 11.00 550 20.02 9.02 451.00 26, 8.000 ' . , -- 200' '. 0.00 - ' 0 19.671 Left | 19.67 3934.00 27 8.2001 8.250 50 13.001 650 19.18 6.18 309.00 28i 8.250' 8.500 250: 11.00 2,750 17.21 6.21 1552.50 291 8.500, 8.750 250 11.501 2,875 13.97 2.47 617.50 301 8.7501 8.950 200, 11.60 2,320 14.49 2.89 578.00 31 8;W950'' 91,1i0 0.00 I0 - - 0 17.181 Left | 17.18 7:.. 2577.00 32 9.100! 9.250 150 15.00 2,250 16.42: 1.42 213.00 331 9.250 9.500 250; 11.60 2,900 16.52' 4.92 1230.00 341 9.500' 9.750 250 12.00 3,0001 14.37, 2.37 592.50 351 9.750, 10.000, 250 11.60 2,900' 14.43 2.83 707.50 36 10.0001 10.250 250 15.00 3,7501 14.21 -0.79 0.00 37 10.2501 10.450 200 12.00 2,4001 12.79 0.79 158.00 38[ 1'07450'T7-1-0.700- "'25 ('70hi00---' -- 15. 57| ''rt L.-. ' -15.571'' 3892.50 39j 10.700 10.7501 50 11.00 550 16.46; 5.46 273.00 ' 401 10.750 11.0001 250 11.001 2,750, 14.76; 3.76 940.00 41 11.0001 11.250 250 12.50 3,1251 16.10i 3.60 900.00 42 11.250j 11.500 250 11.00 2,7501 14.70 3.70 925.00 43 i 11-5001 11.7501 250 11.50 2,8751 15.03 3.53 882.50 441 11.7501 12.0001 250 11.50 2,875 14.66 3.16; 790.00 45: 12.000 12.2501 250 10.40 2,600 15.28, 4.88' 1220.00 461 12.250 12.5001 250 17.501 4,375 15.51 -1.99 0.00 47 12.500 12.6001 100 8.50 850 19.16 10.66' 1066.00 481 12.,600t:128001 20 .001 0 18.791 Right | 18.79 3758.00| 49; 12.8001 13.000 i 200 9.50 1,900 19.42 9.92' 1984.00 50; 13.0001 13.2501 250 13.00 3,250 17.93 4.93 1232.50 511, 13.250 13.500| 250, 11.00 2,750 19.92 8.92 2230.00 52 13.500 13.6001 100 11.00 1,100 18.66 7.66 766.00 53 13.6001 13.860 260 0.00 0° 18.641 Right | 18.641 4846.40 Kerala State Highways Project Resettlement Action Plan Page 1 of 2 Annex 11.1 (2.2) 54 13.860 14.000 140: 11.00 1,540 19.02 8.02 1122.80 55 14.000 14.250 250 12.00 3,000. 19.88 7.88 1970.00 561 14.250 14.500 250 10.50 2,625 18.92i 8.42 2105.00 57 14.500 14.750 250 11.00 2,750 14.63 3.63 907.50 58 14.750 15.000 250 11.00 2,750 16.70 5.70 1425.00 59 15.000 15.100 100 13.50 1,350 15.48 1.98 198.00 60! 15.100 '15.2501 1501 0.00 0 19.20 Right 19.201 2880.001 61 I15.250 - 15.4501 20011- t-'0.00[,s 0 15.18 ^iLeft 1 15.181: 3036.00| 621 15.450 15.500 50 11.00 550j 12.73 1.73 86.50 63 15.500i 15.750 250 11.00 2,750 14.27 3.27 817.50' 641 15.750' 15.800 50 11.00, 550 20.13 9.13 456.50 65 15.800 1 15.9501i :=150 :0.00 i =0. t 0 19.09 Left I 19.09| 2863.501 66 15.950, 15.980 30. 12.50 375i 18.78: 6.28 188.401 671 15.980162001 220r 0.00 0 4O1OOW2 Right I ^4 24.120 5306.40 68 16.200 16.250 50 12.50 625 21.33 8.83 441.50 69 16.250 16.500 250 11.00' 2,750 15.28 4.28 1070.00 70 16.5001 16.750 250 12.00 3,000i 15.35 3.35 837.507 71 16.750 16.950 200 12.00 2,400 15.10 3.10 620.00 72: 16.95017'17.0501 :100 0.00 : 0 `14.63Right 14.63 1463.00j 73 17.050 17.250 200 12.00 2,400 14.03 2.03 406.00 741 17.250, 17.520 270 11.00 2,970 14.68 3.68 993.606 75 17.5201 17.6501 1301 0.00 I 0 15.121 Left 15.12| 1965.60 76 17:6501 17.9201 2701 0.0 0 19.70 19.70[ 5319.00 771 17.920 17.940 20! 11.00 2201 24.48' 13.48 269.60 78jl 17.9401 18.050 1101- 0.001 0 21.181 Left 1 21.181 2329.801 -79. 18.050Q 1 8.3001 250: 0.001 01~ 19.161 Right 19.161 47900 80 18.300 18.450 1501 11.00 1,650 19.57 8.57 1285.50 81 18.4501 -18.7501 300 0.00 0 16.91 Left | 16.911 5073.001 82i 18.750' 18.900 150 11.00 1,650 15.40 4.40 660.00 83: 18.900 19.1001 200 0.00 0 14.33 Right 14.331 2866.00| 84 19.100 19.250 150 10.50 1,575 12.63 2.13 319.50 85. 19.250 19.500 250 10.50 2,625 12.95 2.45 612.50 86' 19.500 19.700 200 10.00 2,000 13.95 3.95 790.00 iTotal and Average 17,700 9.38 164,185 16.34 121437.70 Ha 12.14 Land Requrement for Realignment Sections: Sr. No. Area m2 Area Ha 1 24 12,780.00 2 26 3,934.00 Land requirement other than realignment: 3 31 2,577.00 5.18 ha 4 38 3,892.50 5 48 3,758.00 6 53 4,846.40 7; 60 2,880.00 8 61 3,036.00 9 65 2,863.50 10 67 5,306.40 11 72 1,463.00 12 75 1,965.60 13: 76 5,319.00 14 78 2,329.80 15 79 4,790.00 16 81 5,073.00 17 83 2,866.00 Total: 69,680.20 6.97 Kerala State Highways Project Resettlement Action Plan Page 2 of 2 Annex 11.1 (3.1) Width of the Corridor of Impact, Contract 3 Link 40: Thrissur (km 19.600) to Kuttipuram (km 52.580) = 32.980 km Chainage Available Available Width Additional Area to be Sr. Length Corridor Corridor Area Required Width Acquired No. From To (m) Width (m) (sq.m.) (in) Required (m) (sq.m.) 1 19.600 19.750 150 18.30 2,745 14.52 -3.78 0.00 2 19.750 20.000 250 18.30 4,575 18.02 -0.28 0.00 3 20.000 20.250 250 17.20 4,300 15.23 -1.97 0.00 4 20.250 20.500 250 17.10 4,275 14.82 -2.28 0.00 5 20.500 20.750 250 17.10 4,275 14.65 -2.45 0.00 6 20.750 21.000 250 17.10 4,275 16.58 -0.52 0.00 7 21.000 21.250 250 12.10 3,025 14.91 2.81 702.50 8 21.250 21.500 250 12.30 3,075 15.36 3.06 765.00 9 21.500 21.750 250 12.40 3,100 14.43 2.03 507.50 10 21.750 22.000 250 12.50 3,125 19.76 7.26 1815.00 11 22.000 22.250 250 13.10 3,275 14.99 1.89 472.50 12 22.250 22.500 250 13.10 3,275 17.59 4.49 1122.50 13 22.500 22.750 250 13.70 3,425 15.11 1.41 352.50 14 22.750 23.000 250 13.10 3,275 15.13 2.03 507.50 15 23.000 23.250 250 13.10 3,275 14.60 1.50 375.00 16 23.250 23.500 250 13.40 3,350 17.16 3.76 940.00 17 23.500 23.750 250 13.10 3,275 16.58 3.48 870.00 18 23.750 24.000 250 17.10 4,275 16.71 -0.39 0.00 19 24.000 24.250 250 14.10 3,525 16.13 2.03 507.50 20 24.250 24.500 250 14.10 3,525 17.97 3.87 967.50 21 24.500 24.750 250 14.20 3,550 16.64 2.44 610.00 22 24.750 25.000 250 14.00 3,500 16.13 2.13 532.50 23 25.000 25.250 250 14.10 3,525 15.03 0.93 232.50 24 25.250 25.500 250 12.30 3,075 15.14 2.84 710.00 25 25.500 25.750 250 12.30 3,075 16.03 3.73 932.50 26 25.750 26.000 250 12.20 3,050 14.74 2.54 635.00 27 26.000 26.250 250 12.10 3,025 15.36 3.26 815.00 28 26.250 26.500 250 12.20 3,050 15.77 3.57 892.50 29 26.500 26.750 250 12.10 3,025 18.13 6.03 1507.50 30 26.750 27.000 250 12.00 3,000 16.78 4.78 1195.00 31 27.000 27.250 250 12.10 3,025 16.77 4.67 1167.50 32 27.250 27.500 250 12.10 3,025 15.94 3.84 960.00 33 27.500 27.750 250 12.20 3,050 15.59 3.39 847.50 34 27.750 28.000 250 12.10 3,025 16.82 4.72 1180.00 35 28.000 28.250 250 12.10 3,025 16.05 3.95 987.50 36 28.250 28.500 250 12.20 3,050 15.59 3.39 847.50 37 28.500 28.750 250 12.10 3,025 17.66 5.56 1390.00 38 28.750 29.000 250 12.10 3,025 16.74 4.64 1160.00 39 29.000 29.250 250 12.10 3,025 18.80 6.70 1675.00 40 29.250 29.500 250 12.20 3,050 15.75 3.55 887.50 41 29.500 29.750 250 12.20 3,050 16.17 3.97 992.50 42 29.750 30.000 250 12.20 3,050 15.64 3.44 860.00 43 30.000 30.250 250 12.20 3,050 20.74 8.54 2135.00 44 30.250 30.500 250 12.10 3,025 14.32 2.22 555.00 45 30.500 30.750 250 12.20 3.050 15.23 3.03 757.50 46 30.750 31.000 250 12.30 3,075 15.29 2.99 747.50 47 31.000 31.250 250 13.10 3,275 15.45 2.35 587.50 48 31.250 31.500 250 13.50 3,375 14.56 1.06 265.00 49 31.500 31.750 250 13.50 3,375 14.58 1.08 270.00 50 31.750 32.000 250 13.50 3,375 17.46 3.96 990.00 51 32.000 32.250 250 15.10 3,775 17.87 2.77 692.50 52 32.250 32.400 150 15.10 2,265 15.62 0.52 78.00 53 32.400 32.750 350 15.00 5,250 16.38 1.38 483.00 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan 1 of 3 Annex 11.1 (3.1) Chainage Length Available Available Width Additional Area to be Corridor Corridor Area Required Width Acquired No. From To (m) Width (m) (sq.m.) (m) Required (m) (sq.m.) 54 32.750 33.000 250 15.00 3,750 17.20 2.20 550.00 55 33.000 33.250 250 14.10 3,525 17.22 3.12 780.00 56 33.250 33.500 250 14.10 3,525 18.11 4.01 1002.50 57 33.500 33.750 250 13.80 3,450 14.59 0.79 197.50 58 33.750 34.000 250 13.80 3,450 20.18 6.38 1595.00 59 34.000 34.250 250 13.90 3,475 14.17 0.27 67.50 60 34.250 34.500 250 15.10 3,775 20.92 5.82 1455.00 61 34.500 34.750 250 15.20 3,800 14.56 -0.64 0.00 62 34.750 35.000 250 15.10 3,775 15.62 0.52 130.00 63 35.000 35.250 250 13.10 3,275 15.52 2.42 605.00 64 35.250 35.500 250 13.20 3,300 14.94 1.74 435.00 65 35.500 35.750 250 12.80 3,200 15.36 2.56 '640.00 66 35.750 36.000 250 12.70 3,175 14.76 2.06 515.00 67 36.000 36.250 250 14.10 3,525 14.29 0.19 47.50 68 36.250 36.500 250 20.10 5,025 14.45 -5.65 0.00 69 36.500 36.750 250 20.00 5,000 14.70 -5.30 0.00 70 36.750 37.000 250 20.10 5,025 14.41 -5.69 0.00 71 37.000 37.250 250 20.10 5,025 15.16 -4.94 0.00 72 37.250 37.500 250 21.10 5,275 16.32 -4.78 0.00 73 37.500 37.750 250 20.10 5,025 15.57 -4.53 0.00 74 37.750 38.000 2501 20.10 5,025 15.92 -4.18 0.00 75 38.000 38.250 250 19.10 4,775 16.83 -2.27 0.00 76 38.250 38.500 250 19.20 4,800 15.42 -3.78 0.00 77 38.500 38.750 250 18.10 4,525 14.55 -3.55 0.00 78 38.750 39.000 250 18.00 4,500 16.49 -1.51 0.00 79 39.000 39.250 250 18.10 4,525 15.47 -2.63 0.00 80 39.250 39.500 250 17.30 4,325 16.49 -0.81 0.00 81 39.500 39.750 250 17.30 4,325 18.67 1.37 342.50 82 39.750 40.000 250 17.30 4,325 17.99 0.69 172.50 83 40.000 40.250 250 18.10 4,525 15.59 -2.51 0.00 84 40.250 40.500 250 18.00 4,500 20.67 2.67 667.50 85 40.500 40.750 250 18.10 4,525 18.30 0.20 50.00 86 40.750 41.000 250 18.10 4,525 16.79 -1.31 0.00 87 41.000 41.250 250 18.10 4,525 16.97 -1.13 0.00 88 41.250 41 500 250 18.30 4,575 17.96 -0.34 0.00 89 41.500 41.750 250 18.30 4,575 16.26 -2.04 0.00 90 41.750 42.000 250 18.30 4,575 17.70 -0.60 0.00 91 42.000 42.250 250 13.10 3,275 15.62 2.52 630.00 92 42.250 42.500 250 14.50 3,625 18.52 4.02 1005.00 93 42.500 42.750 250 15.10 3,775 14.83 -0.27 0.00 94 42.750 43.000 250 15.10 3,775 14.33 -0.77 0.00 95 43.000 43.250 250 15.10 3,775 17.14 2.04 510.00 96 43.250 43.500 250 16.10 4,025 16.81 0.71 177.50 97 43.500 43.750 250 16.20 4,050 18.62 2.42 605.00 98 43.750 44.000 250 16.20 4,050 16.79 0.59 147.50 99 44.000 44.250 250 17.10 4,275 23.30 6.20 1550.00 100 44.250 44.500 250 17.10 4,275 14.23 -2.87 0.00 101 44.500 44.750 250 17.10 4,275 16.58 -0.52 0.00 102 44.750 45.000 250 17.00 4,250 17.16 0.16 40.00 103 45.000 45.250 250 15.10 3,775 15.56 0.46 115.00 104 45.250 45.500 250 15.10 3,775 17.76 2.66 665.00 105 45.500 45.750 250 15.10 3,775 16.54 1.44 360.00 106 45.750 46.000 250 15.10 3,775 16.48 1.38 345.00 107 46.000 46.250 250 17.20 4,300 15.78 -1.42 0.00 108 46.250 46,500 250 17.10 4,275 16.59 -0.51 0.00 109 46.500 46.750 250 17.10 4,275 15.63 -1.47 0.00 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan 2 of 3 Annex 11.1 V.1) Sr. Chainage Length Available Available Width Additional Area to be r. _ 9 Corridor Corridor Area Required Width Acquired No. From To (m) Width (in) (sq.m.) (m) Required (m) (sq.m.) 110 46.750 47.000 250 17.10 4,275 15.56 -1.54 0.00 11 47.000 47.250 250 17.10 4,275 15.13 -1.97 0.00 112 47.250 47.500 250 17.10 4,275 14.54 -2.56 0.00 113 47.500 47.750 250 16.90 4,225 15.70 -1.20 0.00 114 47.750 48.000 250 16.90 4,225 15.22 -1.68 0.00 115 48.000 48.250 250 17.10 4,275 - 15.15 -1.95 0.00 116 48.250 48.500 250 17.00 4,250 19.85 2.85 712.50 117 48.500 48.750 250 16.90 4,225 15.62 -1.28 0.00 118 48.750 49.000 250 16.90 4,225 13.93 -2.97 0.00 119 49.000 49.250 250 18.10 4,525 14.33 -3.77 0.00 120 49.250 49.500 250 17.50 4,375 15.72 -1.78 0.00 121 49.500 49.750 250 17.70 4,425 14.63 -3.07 0.00 122 49.750 50.000 250 17.70 4,425 18.18 0.48 120.00 123 50.000 50.250 250 18.10 4,525 13.96 -4.14 0.00 124 50.250 50.500 250 18.00 4,500 15.29 -2.71 0.00 125 50.500 50.750 250 18.10 4,525 14.27 -3.83 0.00 126 50.750 51.000 250 18.10 4,525 15.69 -2.41 0.00 127 51.000 51.250 250 20.10 5,025 15.64 -4.46 0.00 128 51.250 51.500 250 21.10 5,275 24.50 3.40 850.00 129 51.500 51.750 250 21.10 5,275 14.66 -6.44 0.00 130 51.750 52.000 250 21.30 5,325 16.42 -4.88 0.00 131 52.000 52.250 250 17.3 4,325 18.66 1.36 340.00 132 52.250 52.580 330 17.50 5,775 16.85 -0.65 0.00 Total & Average 32,980 15.58 513,710 16.28 55908.50 5.59 ha Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan 3 of 3 Annex 11.1 (,.i.) Width of the Corridor of Impact, Contract 3 Link 50.1: Palakkad (0.000) to Shornur (km 45.300) = 45.300 km - Chainage Available Available Width Additional Area to be Sr. Length Corridor Corridor Area Required Width Acquired No. From To (in) Width (m) (sq.m.) (m) Required (m) (sq.m.) 1 0.000 0.250 250 12.50 3,125 14.20 1.70 425.00 2 0.250 0.500 250 13.10 3,275 15.22 2.12 530.00 3 0.500 0.750 250 11.30 2,825 14.59 3.29 822.50 4 0.750 1.000 250 10.20 2,550 14.30 4.10 1025.00 5 1.000 1.250 250 12.10 3,025 14.64 2.54 635.00 6 1.250 1.500 250 11.30 2,825 14.37 3.07 767.50 7 1.500 1.750 250 12.10 3,025 14.06 1.96 490.00 8 1.750 2.000 250 11.30 2,825 14.71 3.41 852.50 9 2.000 2.250 250 11.40 2,850 14.14 2.74 685.00 10 2.250 2.500 250 11.50 2,875 14.53 3.03 757.50 11 2.500 2.750 250 12.10 3,025 16.17 4.07 1017.50 12 2.750 3.000 250 12.30 3,075 13.47 1.17 292.50 13 3.000 3.250 250 12.40 3,100 13.39 0.99 247.50 14 3.250 3.500 250 12.30 3,075 13.10 0.80 200.00 15 3.500 3.750 250 15.30 3,825 14.21 -1,09 0.00 16 3.750 4.000 250 16.70 4,175 14.16 -2.54 0.00 17 4.000 4.250 250 13.20 3,300 13.41 0.21 52.50 18 4.250 4.500 250 14.30 3,575 15.85 1.55 387.50 19 4.500 4.750 250 20.40 5,100 14.06 -6.34 0.00 20 4.750 5.000 250 23.75 5,938 13.76 -9.99 0.00 21 5.000 5.250 250 23.50 5,875 15.38 -8.12 0.00 22 5.250 5.500 250 20.30 5,075 19.80 -0.50 0.00 23 5.500 5.750 250 23.50 5,875 14.64 -8.86 0.00 24 5.750 5.850 100 20.50 2,050 13.31 -7.19 0.00 25 5.850 6.250 400 23.10 9,240 14.66 -8.44 0.00 26 6.250 6.500 250 21.10 5,275 17.06 -4.04 0.00 271 6.500 6.750 250 20.30 5,075 14.66 -5.64 0.00 28 6.750 7.000 250 20.30 5,075 14.98 -5.32 0.00 29 7.000 7.250 250 19.70 4,925 15.31 -4.39 0.00 30 7.250 7.500 250 19.80 4,950 16.49 -3.31 0.00 31 7.500 7.750 250 19.30 4,825 14.71 -4.59 0.00 32 7.750 8.000 250 18.20 4,550 19.36 1.16 290.00 33 8.000 8.250 250 19.10 4,775 18.18 -0.92 0.00 34 8.250 8.500 250 19.80 4,950 18.58 -1.22 0.00 35 8.500 8.750 250 20.10 5,025 19.05 -1.05 0.00 36 8.750 9.000 250 20.10 5,025 14.65 -5.45 0.00 37 9.000 9.250 250 21.20 5,300 15.31 -5.89 0.00 38 9.250 9.500 250 20.30 5,075 15.72 -4.58 0.00 39 9.500 9.750 250 20.50 5,125 17.48 -3.02 0.00 40 9.750 10.000 250 21.30 5,325 15.71 -5.59 0.00 41 10.000 10.250 250 19.70 4,925 14.58 -5.12 0.00 42 10.250 10.500 250 18.20 4,550 14.68 -3.52 0.00 43 10.500 10.750 250 16.20 4,050 15.36 -0.84 0.00 44 10.750 11.000 250 16.80 4,200 14.93 -1.87 0.00 45 11.000 11.250 250 17.30 4,325 15.05 -2.25 0.00 46 11.250 11.500 250 17.20 4,300 14.88 -2.32 0.00 47 11.500 11.750 250 18.10 4,525 13.97 -4.13 0.00 48 11.750 12.000 250 18.30 4,575 14.68 -3.62 0.00 49 12.000 12.300 300 11.20 3,360 16.23 5.03 1509.00 50 12.300 12.500 200 11.10 2,220 13.22 2.12 424.00 51 12.500 12.750 250 11.30 2,825 17.34 6.04 1510.00 52 12.750 13.000 250 13.20 3,300 12.49 -0.71 0.00 53 13.000 13.250 250 13.20 3,300 14.70 1.50 375.00 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Page 1 of 4 Annex 11.1 (3.a) Sr. Chainage Length Available Available Width Additional Area to be No. From To ngth Corridor Corridor Area Required Width Acquired No. From To (in) Width (m) (sq.m.) (m) Required (m) (sq.m.) 54 13.250 13.500 250 13.40 3,350 13.55 0.15 37.50 55 13.500 13.750 250 12.50 3,125 15.02 2.52 630.00 56 13.750 14.000 250 12.20 3,050 15.35 3.15 787.50 57 14.000 14.250 250 12.20 3,050 19.08 6.88 1720.00 58 14.250 14.500 250 12.50 3,125 15.39 2.89 722.50 59 14.500 14.750 250 13.20 3,300 18.53 5.33 1332.50 60 14.750 15.000 250 14.30 3,575 14.08 -0.22 0.00 61 15.000 15.250 250 14.20 3,550 15.04 0.84 210.00 62 15.250 15.500 250 15.20 3,800 14.48 -0.72 0.00 63 15.500 15.750 250 13.70 3,425 14.85 1.15 287.50 64 15.750 16.000 250 13.10 3,275 15.45 2.35 587.50 65 16.000 16.250 250 13.20 3,300 19.32 6.12 1530.00 66 16.250 16.500 250 13.80 3,450 14.98 1.18 295.00 67 16.500 16.750 250 13.50 3,375 18.43 4.93 1232.50 68 16.750 17.000 250 13.80 3,450 15.06 1.26 315.00 69 17.000 17.250 250 14.20 3,550 14.70 0.50 125.00 70 17.250 17.500 250 14.30 3,575 17.81 3.51 877.50 71 17.500 17.750 250 18.20 4,550 14.99 -3.21 0.00 72 17.750 18.000 250 18.40 4,600 14.21 -4.19 0.00 73 18.000 18.250 250 17.30 4,325 15.15 -2.15 0.00 74 18.250 18,500 250 16.50 4,125 18.24 1.74 435.00 75 18.500 18.750 250 17.50 4,375 15.77 -1.73 0.00 76 18.750 19.000 250 16.50 4,125 15.67 -0.83 0.00 77 19.000 19.250 250 18.70 4,675 16.16 -2.54 0.00 78 19.250 19.500 250 19.20 4,800 14.75 -4.45 0.00 79 19.500 19.750 250 18.30 4,575 15.95 -2.35 0.00 80 19.750 20.000 250 18.20 4,550 15.03 -3.17 0.00 81 20.000 20.250 250 18.50 4,625 14.84 -3.66 0.00 82 20.250 20.500 250 19.20 4,800 16.14 -3.06 0.00 83 20.500 20.750 250 18.20 4,550 15.13 -3.07 0.00 84 20.750 21.000 250 18.10 4,525 15.45 -2.65 0.00 85 21.000 21.150 150 18.20 2,730 13.94 -4.26 0.00 86 21.150 21.500 350 18.70 6,545 18.77 0.07 24.50 87 21.500 21.750 250 18.50 4,625 18.14 -0.36 0.00 88 21.750 22.000 250 18.30 4,575 14.85 -3.45 0.00 89 22.000 22.250 250 18.10 4,525 15.00 -3.10 0.00 90 22.250 22.500 250 19.10 4,775 15.81 -3.29 0.00 91 22.500 22.750 250 17.90 4,475 13.98 -3.92 0.00 92 22.750 23.000 250 18.30 4,575 13.98 -4.32 0.00 93 23.000 23.250 250 27.00 6,750 14.41 -12.59 0.00 94 23.250 23.500 250 25.00 6,250 18.98 -6.02 0.00 95 23.500 23.750 250 22.25 5,563 18.88 -3.37 0.00 96 23.750 24.000 250 18.50 4,625 19.04 0.54 135.00 97 24.000 24.250 250 18.50 4,625 18.70 0.20 50.00 98 24.250 24.500 250 16.50 4,125 18.09 1.59 397.50 99 24.500 24.750 250 16.20 4,050 15.11 -1.09 0.00 100 24.750 25.000 250 15.30 3,825 15.16 -0.14 0.00 101 25.000 25.250 250 15.70 3,925 14.54 -1.16 0.00 102 25.250 25.500 250 16.20 4,050 14.50 -1.70 0.00 103 25.500 25.750 250 18.30 4,575 16.27 -2.03 0.00 104 25.750 26.000 250 26.50 6,625 17.15 -9.35 0.00 105 26.000 26.250 250 26.50 6,625 17.48 -9.02 0.00 106 26.250 26.500 250 20.70 5,175 17.04 -3.66 0.00 107 26.500 26.750 250 21.30 5,325 14.89 -6.41 0.00 108 26.750 27.000 250 17.60 4,400 19.85 2.25 562.50 109 27,000 27.250 250 18.50 4,625 19.06 0.56 140.00 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Page 2 of 4 Annex 11.1 (&.c!) Chainage Available Available Width Additional Area to be Sr. Length Corridor Corridor Area Required Width Acquired No. From To (in) Width (m) (sq.m.) (m) Required (m) (sqr.m.) 110 27.250 27.500 250 20.10 5,025 14.08 -6.02 0.00 111 27.500 27750 250 21.20 5,300 14.81 -6.39 0.00 112 27.750 28.000 250 25.30 6,325 15.36 -9.94 0.00 113 28.000 28.250 250 25.60 6,400 15.20 -10.40 0.00 114 28.250 28.500 250 23.40 5,850 15.09 -8.31 0.00 115 28.500 28.750 250 23.50 5,875 14.54 -8.96 0.00 116 28.750 29.000 250 21.10 5,275 15.31 -5.79 0.00 117 29.000 29.250 250 22.10 5,525 14.00 -8.10 0.00 118 29.250 29.500 250 20.10 5,025 13.98 -6.12 0.00 119 29.500 29.750 250 20.30 5,075 14.45 -5.85 0.00 120 29.750 30.000 250 25.60 6,400 14.14 -11.46 0.00 121 30.000 30.250 250 21.20 5,300 13.79 -7.41 0.00 122 30.250 30.500 250 21.30 5,325 13.17 -8.13 0.00 123 30.500 30.750 250 24.50 6,125 14.94 -9.56 0.00 124 30.750 31.000 250 25.50 6,375 14.63 -10.87 0.00 125 31.000 31.250 250 20.50 5,125 14.96 -5.54 0.00 126 31.250 31.500 250 23.50 5,875 13.87 -9.63 0.00 127 31.500 31.750 250 18.50 4,625 14.69 -3.81 0.00 128 31.750 32.000 250 20.50 5,125 14.54 -5.96 0.00 129 32.000 32.250 250 20.50 5,125 15.71 -4.79 0.00 130 32.250 32.500 250 19.30 4,825 13.03 -6.27 0.00 131 32.500 32.750 250 19.80 4,950 13.92 -5.88 0.00 132 32.750 33.000 250 18.50 4,625 13.52 -4.98 0.00 133 33.000 33.250 250 21.50 5,375 15.72 -5.78 0.00 134 33.250 33.500 250 10.00 2,500 14.18 4.18 1045.00 135 33.500 33.750 250 12.50 3,125 13.05 0.55 137.50 136 33.750 34.000 250 11.60 2,900 14.34 2.74 685.00 137 34.000 34.250 250 18.10 4,525 14.16 -3.94 0.00 138 34.250 34.500 250 15.30 3,825 16.03 0.73 182.50 139 34.500 34.750 250 12.20 3,050 14.02 1.82 455.00 140 34.750 35.000 250 16.20 4,050 13.63 -2.57 0.00 141 35.000 35.250 250 20.20 5,050 13.87 -6.33 0.00 142 35.250 35.500 250 21.30 5,325 14.13 -7.17 0.00 143 35.500 35.750 250 21.30 5,325 14.21 -7.09 0.00 144 35.750 36.000 250 20.80 5,200 14.26 -6.54 0.00 145 36.000 36.250 250 21.20 5,300 14.04 -7.16 0.00 146 36.250 36.500 250 21.30 5,325 14.52 -6.78 0.00 147 36.500 36.750 250 20.50 5,125 14.69 -5.81 0.00 148 36.750 37.000 250 21.60 5,400 14.94 -6.66 0.00 149 37.000 37.250 250 20.20 5,050 18.15 -2.05 0.00 150 37.250 37.500 250 19.50 4,875 19.69 0.19 47.50 151 37.500 37.750 250 20.10 5,025 13.98 -6.12 0.00 152 37.750 38.000 250 20.50 5,125 14.91 -5.59 0.00 153 38.000 38.250 250 18.30 4,575 14.74 -3.56 0.00 154 38.250 38.500 250 18.40 4,600 14.81 -3.59 0.00 155 38.500 38.750 250 15.50 3,875 15.34 -0.16 0.00 156 38.750 39.000 250 11.20 2,800 13.72 2.52 630.00 157 39.000 39.250 250 11.10 2,775 14.15 3.05 762.50 158 39.250 39.500 250 19.20 4,800 13.79 -5.41 0.00 159 39.500 39.750 250 14.30 3,575 14.15 -0.15 0.00 160 39.750 40.000 250 18.50 4,625 13.66 -4.84 0.00 161 40.000 40.250 250 18.50 4,625 16.62 -1.88 0.00 162 40.250 40.500 250 17.20 4,300 16.22 -0.98 0.00 163 40.500 40.750 250 19.10 4,775 17.06 -2.04 0.00 164 40.750 41.000 250 18.50 4,625 19.17 0.67 167.50 165 41.000 41.250 250 21.80 5,450 14.15 -7.65 0.00 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Page 3 of 4 Annex 11 .1 (3.. 8 Sr. Chai nage Length Available Available Width Additional Area to be Corridor Corridor Area Required Width Acquired No. From To (m) Width (m) (sq.m.) (m) Required (m) (sq. m.) 166 41.250 41.500 250 15.00 3,750 15.33 0.33 82.50 167 41.500 41.750 250 15.20 3,800 13.67 -1.53 0.00 168 41.750 42.000 250 15.60 3,900 17.17 1.57 392.50 169 42.000 42.250 250 1560 3,900 18.78 3.18 795.00 170 42.250 42.500 250 15.60 3,900 15.68 0.08 20.00 171 42.500 42.750 250 18.20 4,550 16.86 -1.34 0.00 172 42.750 43.000 250 20.10 5,025 15.33 -4.77 0.00 173 43.000 43.250 250 18.50 4,625 15.27 -3.23 0.00 174 43.250 43.500 250 18.20 4,550 14.35 -3.85 0.00 175 43.500 43.750 250 18.30 4,575 15.67 -2.63 0.00 176 43.750 44.000 250 15.10 3,775 13.35 -1.75 0.00 177 44.000 44.250 250 15.20 3,800 13.50 -1.70 0.00 178 44.250 44.500 250 15.30 3,825 15.47 0.17 42.50 179 44.500 44.750 250 16.20 4,050 15.49 -0.71 0.00 180 44.750 45.000 250 18.50 4,625 17.30 -1.20 0.00 181 45.000 45.300 300 18.50 5,550 18.30 -0.20 0.00 Total and Average 45300 17.74 804,270 15.38 31175.00 3.12 ha Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Page 4 of 4 ANNEX 11.2: Schedules of Project Affected Families Annex 11.2.1: Project Affected Families - Residential Properties Annex 11.2.2: Project Affected Families - Commercial Properties Annex 11.2.3: Project Affected Families - Residential- Commercial Properties Annex 11.2.4 Project Affected Families - Agricultural Properties Annex 11.2.5: Project Affected Families - "Other" Properties Annex 11.2.6: Project Affected Government Used Properties Annex 11.2.1: Project Affected Families - Residential Properties LINK 1: TAIKKOD - KOTTARAKKARA 08-00-01, 12:14 PM PROJECT AFFECTED FAMILIES - RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES to Propsrt UrStus Revenue Survey a.E 4 uneal ID ctS. Nowner User E N. Village Address w ).d 0.. -050. 2831 25.655 L.5 D Sasn/dimran 1517/7 TP 7281 Nellinadu 1I61lSinrOhu Bhavan 1 1800.00 26.00 1.44% ~120.00 0.00 0.00% 24964 26.105 R.10.A.1 Ghandrika Deviamma 1 0/4T 86 Neilanadu Chiandrika Bhavan 1 850.00 21.00 -2.47% 110.00 0.00 0.00% 8788 26.140 R.10.B Dhamodsaran Pilla/ 001,2T 4 Nellanad 61264. Anandt Bhavan, Venjaramoodu, Tvm. 1 8000.00 2.00 0.03% 12000 0.00 -0.00% 8972 26.280 L.13.A Nandrini ./455111. TP 6611 INellanad Mandopakunnu VIeeduVen aramoodu (Build/ng under consti 1 800.00 37.00. 4.63% 60.00 0.00 0.00% 30647 26.4301L.15 Nandini S 467116, TP 6635 lNellanad 1/457 1 300.00 6.00 2.00% 130.00 0.00 0.00% - - 10522 27.280 1L.34 K Somadevan _______ 1 _ 2815T436 Nellanadu K SomadevanBunglav HouseVeniarammoodu P 0 1 1250.00 25.00 2.00% 0.00 0.00 3511 27.290 L35 Vamadevan .1289/I5, TP 85 Nellanadu IIl836ArunodayamVeniaramood P 0 1 320.00 7.00 2.19% 64.00 0.00 0.00%.) 2978 27.445 R.38 Suseela 12/4P372 Nallanadu Vlltf28, Sheilas Mand/ram, Near L.P.S., Ven aramoodu 5 100.00 8.00 8.00% 100.0 8.00 8.00% 1 1 2986 27.470 R.40 Abdul Rasheed 1256/11 TP 6285 Nallanadu Malakkal Veedu, Veniaramoodu P.O. 1, 1200.00 23.00 1.92% 63.00 0.00 0.00% 353.4 27.840 L.40 K Sukunmaran 1 _ 270/8, TP Nellanad 11/909 1 840.00 24.00 2.86% 80.00 7.00 8.75% 1 3850 27.970 L.41 N Sukumaran 1 _ 270/7, TP 4030 Nellanad 11 19lOVilayll VeeduThar,drn PikaVenjarammoodu 4 4160.00 68,00 1.63% 120.00 51.00 42.50% 1 3717 27.990 L.42 Sadas/van V ' _ 270116, TP 4027 Nellanad 11/91 3Vle o1 VeeduThandan pokaVenjarammoodu 5 800.00 23.00. 2.88% 400.00. 23.00 5.75% 1 2991 28.040 R.42 IChandr-asek,laran Na/, 1 _ 254/14 Nallanadu ]Swathi. Ven aramoodu 1 500.00 75.00 15.00% 56.00 0.00 0.00% 8781 28.060 R.42.A Vasantha 1 1254110, TP 3760 Nellanud 14192. Vasanlthalayam, Venvaramoodu PO 0_1rvannth 3 1250.00 238.00 19.04% 64.00 0.00 0.00% 1 _ 8784 28.080 R.42.9 K.G. Raau 1 254/12. TP 3762 Nellanad 4197, Arunimna 1 1200.00 332.00 27.67% 200.00 0.00 0.00% 8798 28.1001R.42.C Asma Beevi 1 __ 254/12.1. TM 3168 Nellanad IV/99, Ma/dinh Mans/Il Thandran Pc,ka, Venaramood P.O. 3 1080.00 1132.00 12.22% 50.00 0.00 0.00% I1 2996 28.120 1R.44 AnIfa Beevi /( 254/7 Nallanadu Puthtvalvlaeveedu, Ven aramooda 2 240.00 125.00 52.05% 30.00 30.00 100.00% - - 3000 28.1801 R.46 Radha 1270/12, TM 4034 Nallanadu VItl302, Vadakkavlla tHi Ven aramoodu P.O. 2 400.00 140 360%0.00 0.00 1 _ 3002 28.1901R.47 J/anardlranan ChaItiva I 270/111. TM 4033 Nallanadu_ Vill/300, Karuvlsa Veedu, Thandranpyuzhka 5 480.00 165.00 34.38% 0.00 0.00 8807 28.2001 RA47A Ramla Beevi I254/16 Nellanad IV/1l 1 New 2000) Banglave Vilaveed, Alanthara. Ven ara 1 2240.00 -399.00 17.81%1 60.00 0.001 0.00% 3728 28.2701L.4.4 Vijay1 260/3,T 3941 Nelloana Kavuvila VeeduAlanthara Venjarammoodu 1 200.00 9.00 2.50% 56.00 9.00 8.93% 1__ 3731 26.3101L.45 M Salir ________ 260/4, TP 3942- Nellanad 111938M Sal/mAmeer Mans/il Venjarammood P 0 1 280.00 53.00 18.93% 50.00 0.00 0.00% 1I 3733 28.360 1LA46 Rayu C 126015, TP 3943 Nellanad Sreyas,AlanlharaVeniarammoodu 1 270.00 4.00 1.48% 0.00 0.001 3007 28.3801 R.48 Lath/ka Kumari 1252/5, TP 3997 Nallanadu Koikkal, VIU,S35 1 400.00 32.00 8.00% 1I20.00 0.00 0.00% 1 3011 28.3901R.49 Thrankamani 1 262/4, TP 3996 Nallanadu VIII/349, Mannsi Bnavan, Venjaramoodu P.O., Mamoodu 1 200.00 48.00 24.00% 120.00 5.00 4.17% _1 _ 3013 28.40018.50 Thanksppan Nair 1 __ 202/3 Nallanadlu VII/347, Jaya Bhavan, Alunthara, Veniaramoodu 3 240.00 68.00 28.33% 96.00 0.00 0.00% 1__ 3016 28.410 R.51 Bhavani 1 _ 262/2, TM 3994 Nallanadu Vlt/346, Varuvila Veedu 1 360.00 35.00 9.72% 91.00 35.00 43.21% _1_ 3035 28.4251R.52 Ashka 1_______ __ 125 TP 1661 Nallanadu Asha Br,ght Land, Ven aramoodu 1 640.00 49.001 7.66% 108.001 0.00 0.00% 3743 28.5801 L.48 Balakrishnan Prilial V 1__ 250/5. TP 3982 NeIlanad IV/4ChekkalaviakrnmMarnmodu 1 3840.00 103.001 2.68% 0.001 0.00 3747 28.6151 L.49 Kumiara P/ila/ 1 128/11 TP 9782 Nellanad Vl71.shjaIMammoodVenfarammood I1 580.00 14.0 2.50% 80.00 0.00 0.00% 3042 28.72518.54 M. Sa/i V1 109/11 1,TP 1805 Nallanadu VI I/752. Vvsakh House. Alunthara, Veniaramoodu 1 2360.00 32.00 1.35% 225.001 0.00 0.00%1 8978 28.7601LW5 Sa/nudeen ________ 1128/2. TP 9782 Nellanad 11l1 SSnamna Mans~IUdumoodu. Venjaramoodu P0 2 200.00 16.00 8.00% 80.501 0.00 0.00% /__ 8981 28.7901L.50.A Sa/nudeen 1 128/2, TP 9782 Nellavad IV/17 (93.98)VI/14 (2000)ShamnamanziiUdimoodu 1 600.00 290.00 48.33% 56.001 56.00 100.00%1 3752 28.9401L.51 Abdul Salam ./ 96/14, TM 1242 Nellanad Abdul SalamVanmurlakthS.723 1 -1000.00 102.00 10.20% 140.00 34.00 24.29% 1__ 8996 29.1701L.51.D Raveendran .1 96/14, TP 1242 Nel/moad II/125R R.Bhavarn Kbzham y/ Koonam, Venjaramoodu 1 790.00 32.00 4.27% 30 00 0.00 0.00% 1 8967 29.185 L.51 E Thanksasoan 96/14, TP 1242 NelOanad 6/296 CheckaravIlaveedu 1 600.00 18.00 3.00% 30.00 0.00 0.00% .1 8998 29.200 L.51 F Neelakantan Ndadr I96f13, TP 1244 Nellanad Kamalabhavan, Keezhaikonam, Vengjaramoodu 3 365.00 13.50 3.70% 48.00 0.00 0.00% 3044 20.230 R.55 Ravindran Na/r 1 1 102/1, TP 1503 Naslanadu Retha V/Par 1 20.0 400 2.10% 80 00 --0.00 0.00% 3046 29.280 R.56 Sudarsan 1I '101/10,1 1 TP 1497. Nallanadu IVII/230, Sreavalsa Nivas Venjaramoodu P.O., Keeshikular 1 1 4000.00 18.001 0.45% 300.00 0.00 0.00% 3049 29.380 R.58 Moansan Na/r 1_______ /101/4, TM149I Nallaonadu VI,i 222 Aswathy 11 4180.00 9.00 0.22% 0.00 0.001 9013 30 750 L.68.M Sas/dhearn Nair . _ 199/5 TM 1257 Nellanad 1/486 Kizt,akkurmkara Puth,anveedu. Vamanapvram P.O 6 1120.00 7.00 0.63%1 75.00 0.001 0.00% II 9018 30.810 L.5650 Psdmanabha Pillai .. I_ 99/5, TM 1257 NelIanad 146SOivnMoanmou3 2000.00 34.00 1.70% 150.00 3.00 22.67% 4013 31 040 L.59 lRainamma 1 ___ 41/2, TP Nellanad V/4700haru.ila Pulhan veeduNellaoadu P 0 Hospitar Jn. _2_ 4___00.00 ---18.00 4-.50%/ 90.00 18.00 22.50% 1 4017 31.060 L.60 Amuut1_ 5371,1 TP Vamianapuram V./477Charuv/ila veeduVamanapuram 2 1280.00 15.00 1.17% 60.00 15.00 25.00%/ 1 1 3080 31.420 8.71 Krishnan Nair V 575/2 Vamanapvram 111/828, B/ndu Ninas, Vamanap uram P.O., Vamanapuramn 4 5200.00 16.00 0.31% 200.00 0.00 0.00% 3081 31.560 8.72 Santha 7 575/4, TM 11 41 Vamnana urn/n 9/823 C/h/tralnyam, Vamanapuram 2 1080.00 92.00 8.76% ~7000' 000 0.00% 1 -- 30823 31 .580 8.73 Sahadnoonath 1576/5 TP1 5545 Vamanapuram 'Al-Sah', Vamanapuram 3 520.00 175.00 33.65% 80.00 0.00 0.00% 42 31600 L.62 Kumnara P/Ii1 a 537/7 Vamanaouram Kumara PillaiA/uvilakomVamanapuramPO0 1 51.0 67.001 13.14%0.0 .0 24859 31.6850 L.62.A Sadheed Ali V 537/5 Varnanapuram Ali Manz/i. Vamana ram 1 2200.00 44.00 2.00% 150 001 0.00 0.00% 3086 31.680 R4.74 Salavudheen 1 ___577/3 Vamyanapuram 111/814, Ancy House, Vamanapuram 1 1800.00 114.00 7.13% 330.00 0.00 0.00% 25433 31.740 R,74.A Not Known V I Vamanapuram 191.00 --7.00 7.69% 91.00 7.00 7.69 28434i 317801L.64.0 iNot Known I Vamfanapvram 1 70.00 91.00 7.29% 0.00 00 4055 2.150L.79 Hemach/andran 1 1__533/7 (TP 2217) Vamnanapuram 111/37l1Chandrav/lasam (H)Vamana)urn,, MO 2 400 30 00 7.50% 300.00 30.00 10.00%1 40701 32.1951L.93 IMural/dharan I__ 1 533:5 Vamanapuram Remy a BhavanVamanapuram PMOVamanapu/am 1 2.0 141.~00 44.06% 150 00 15(0.0 0.0 40/61 327210 I-.85 .Jara0robabn .1 I 533,4 Vamanapurami 111/387SB Sadanam MO 4 560.00 30.0 54 /.2% 100 /00 2.0 .7- - tPL-o.9EuP.yumr imWH- .... aH-aldW K{erala State Transport Project Puns I v/S LINK 1: TAIKKOD - KOTTARAKKARA 08-10-01, 12:14 PM PROJECT AFFECTED FAMILIES - RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES User tus ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Vulnaraba ID Ch. Proper t Owns, User UrS t_r@No. S us Village Addreuuss8 4078 32.260 L.86 Sathe_oan _ = = 535/11 Vamanawram PSatheesanPadmasaraiVamanapuram 2 322.00 219.00 6801% 1 120.00 100.00% / _ 3162 32.445 R.92 Ponnan Nadar / 608/2 Vamanapuram Mulluvathalakalit Veedu, 3/440 4 840.00 788.00 93.81% 49.00 49.00 100.00% 314 32.500 R.93 Kamalamama V 60811 (TP 11 170) Vamanapuram 111/425, Kamalayam, Vamanapuram 2 1200.00 821.00 88 42% 105,00 18.00 17,14% 4083 32.810 L.88 P A Nalr _ 398/5-1 Vamana uram KavIkal Vilskom VeaduKarettu, VamaraPuram 1 250.00 28.00 11,20% 120.00 0.00 0,00% 3195 32.960 R.101 Na a pan PilIal / 393/3 TP 2999) Pulimath V11139, Anandamandiram, Pulimathu P.O., Karalte 2 48.00 10.00 20.83% 48.00 10.00 20.83% 3277 33.140 R.117 Ibrahim Kunju 1 330/14 (TP 4729) Pulimath Kalumkll veedu, Vamanapuram P.O. 4 375.00 80.00 21.33% 120.00 0.00 0.00% 10418 33.580 R.118 Latheefa 3 365/1 TP 10 Pulimath DolPhin, Karate 1 300.00 130.00 43.33% 108.00 0.00 0.00% 2857 33.680 L.10b Knishnan Achdan Krlshnan Acharn 339/15 (TP 7655) Pulimath Knishnan Achari Vedan Vilakam Pulimath P.O. Karaite 4 600.00 308.00 51.00% 96.00 20.00 20.83% 8854 33.720 R.118A Salfudeen 1 357/14 (TP 8008i Pullmath Nlzamanzil, V1I/357, Karatte, Muthankonam 1 400.00 13.00 3.25% 100.00 0.00 0,00% 8855 33.760 R.1 11.B C. Velappan 1 357/12 (TP 4869) Pullmath 1Xf792, V.V. Bhavan, Karatte, Pu imath P.O. 1 600.00 37.00 6.17% 120.00 0.00 0.00% 9056 33.800 1-.107,A Sa-thlkumari 1339/11 Pulimath AMCOS Bus Garage 2 2320.00 491.00 2118% 600.00 0.00 0,00% 0-057 33.840[L.107.8 I11339/12 Pulimath AMCOS Co Operative Socety Pulimath P.O 1 1 1050.00 180 00 17 14% 160.001 10 00 8.25% 2859 34.200 L.109 V.K.Radhamma 1______/133/13 (TP 1529) Pulimath Radha Sadam Pulimattu 1 2720.00 79 00 2 90% 0.00 000 1 2860 34.270 L.109 Thaiu 7 1 = 347/4 (TP 6400) Pulimath 111/774 Pulimattu Pullmatthu Post Via Kilimanoor 1 150.00 12.00 8 00% 150.00 12.00 8.00% 3301 34.310 R.123 Hard / 1347/1,3 P 6880) Pullmath VIl/404, Santh havan, Pulimathi P.O., Pulimalhl 2 64.00 2300 35.94% 64.00 23.00 35.94% 3330 34.460 R.131 Basheer / 109/12 Pulimath Leema Manzil, Pulimathi 4 370.00 1400 3.78% 100.00 0.00 0.00% 8856 34,570 R.131.A Sivaprasad V 118/5-1 (TP 10159) Pulimath Omana Nivas, Pulimath 1 1200.00 13.00 1.08% 120.00 13.00 10.83% 8858 34.580 R.131.8 Suseela 1 109/11-2 Pulimath IV-3, Charvila Puthan Veedu, Pulimath P.O., Pulimath 1 400.00 77.00 19.25% 54.00 50.00 92.59% 1 _ 8861 34.600 R.131,C Sabu / 109/12 (TP 1250) Pullmath Prasada Mandiram, Pulimath P 0. 2 1600.00 612.00 38.25% 80.00 80.00 100.00% I 9058 34.740 L.1 15.A Vikraman / 345/1 Pulimath V,kraman Vanamnaki Pulimath 1 4000.00 914 00 22.85% 96.00 0.00 0.00% 9060 34.860 L.115.D Appukkuttan _ 345/6 Putimath 111/227, Lall Bhavan, Pulimath P.O., Pulimath 2 1200.00 593.00 49.42% 72.00 0.00 0.00% _ 2938 34.960 R.132 Muralidharan / 342/6 Pulimath VIII 151 Puthenveedu, Kudiyela, Pulimath P.O 1 1600.00 48.00 3.00% 120.00 48.00 40.00% _ 2946 34.980 R.133 Ponnamma / 342/7 Putimath VII /750 Vadekkevtla VeeduKudiyela 1 1300.00 28.00 2.15% 42.00 20,00 66.67% _ ' - - 9067 36.160 L 1248 Viswambaran 3 5_ _ 411 Putimath ViswambaranVaidyan, Vadakkeathu 1 4000.00 723.00 18.08% 70.00 61.00 87.14% 8947 37.800 R.150.C Bhaskaran Pilal / : 37/24,TP656 Pazhayakunnu Bhaskarapilla, Lalitha, Kizhakkedathu Veedu, Oomampallik 6 12000 00 370700 30 89% 100000 567.00 56.70% 9163 38.720 L.137.D N. Vanitha _ . _z 228/14 TP2382 Pahayakukku X/1211 Vinu Cottage, Klimanoor P.O., ThundIlkada 1 2100.00 95.00 4.52% 72 00 0 00 0.00% 3928 38.830 R.172 K.V.George J _ _ 17/10(TP281 Pazhayakunnu 797 S.N. Mandirnam Kilimanoor P.O 1 80.00 2300 28.75% 80.00 23.00 2875% 3940 39.075 R.177 .Padmakstli .5/9P52 Paztiayakunnu tIX/I 123 Tulasninandiram 2 1840.00 70.00 4.27% 160.00 0.00 0.00% ~ 3961 39.620 R.184 Sreedharan J 189/11 (TP 3261) Pazhayakunnu IX/1051 Vipin Nivas papala 1 1320.00 334.00 25.30% 120 00 120.00 100.00% /I 8816 39.640 R.164.A Sundarmbal 1 188/20 TP 3009 PazhaYakukku Sundarambalkundkal Pappala Kilimanoor 1 600.00 114 00 19.00% 0.00 0.00 1 8818 39.670CR.184.8 Rajan Babu = 189/11 (TP 3261) Pazhavakukkun X I/602 & X 1/ 601 Kundankavil Veedu Pappala K,limanno 3 600.00 74.00 12.33% 50.00 0.00 0.00% 3963 39 680 R.165 Reuhu 194/2 tTP 3021) Pazhayakunnun IX/1047 Slipa Pa pala Kilimanoor 1 2880.00 30 00 1.04% 300.00 0.00 0.00% 3965 39.850 R.186 Abdhul Mari _ 155/3 (TP 4147) Pazhayakunnu Abdul ManatShini land Pappala Kllimanoor 1 600.00 28.00 4.67% 88.00 0.00 0.00% 8819 39.880 R.186A G.Vilasan J 195/3 (TP4017) Pazhayakukku2 X 1/557 Raoam, Pappala K/limanoor 1 750.00 164.00 21.87% 180.00 0.00 0.00% 8820 39 900 R.186 B Lathankt K.B 195/3 (TP 4017) Pazha akukku Aswathy PappalaX t/ 556 2 880.00 464 00 52 73% 130.00 0.00 0.00% 8821 39.940 R.186.C K.B.Thankamanri J 195/3 (TP 4017) Pazhayakukkur K.B.Thankamani, Thitakangaer 1 880.00 262 00 29 77% 0.00 0.00 8826 39.980 R.186.E Asokan / 155/3 (TP 4147) Pazhavakukkun X I - 551, Pa pala Kilimanoor 1 600.00 97 00 16.17% 180.00 0 00 0 00% 8827 40.070 R.186.F Ramaswami _ _ _ _ 155/3 (TP4147) Pazhoyakukku Ratheesh Bhavan, Survey No.4/6 2 1200.00 600 0.50% 64.00 6.00 9.38% J 92033 40 460 L.15OA INIrmala ______ 1 126/4 (TP 6073 Pazhayakunnu XIII/589, Nirmala Bhavan, Thattathumala P.O. 2 1 480.00 8.001 1.25% 70.001 0.00 0 00% I 3069 40.790 L.152 Devayani / 353/5 TP 6876 Pazhayakukku N.Devayanl Charuvilla Veedu Manalettu Pacha 1 1440.00 260,00 18.06% 0.00 0.00 _ _ _ 25400 40820 R.189.A Not Known _ Pazhayakunnu 1 17.00 17,00 100.00% 17.00 17.00 100.00% 9205 40.910 L.153A Nataraian J 52/8. TP 4751 Pazhayakunnu 1i139, Charuvila Puthen Veedu, Mandathanpachu 1 1200.00 429 0C 35.75% 72.00 0.00 0.00% 9212 40,950 L.153 8 Vasudevan / 52/8, TP 4752 Pazhayakunnu 1141, Charuvilla Puthen Veedu, Thattalhumala, Kilimanoor 1 2400.00 955 00 39.79% 120.00 0.00 0.00% 9215 40.980 L,153 C Indira I52/8. TP 4753 Pazhayakunnu 1/142, Charuvila Puthan Veedu, Th,attathu Mata 2 1200.00 415.00 34.58% 42.00 30 00 85.71% / - 9227 41 020 L.153 E Ra8amma I 1 16/ 7P 6841I Pazhavakukkun 1/144, Charuvila Puthna Veodu, Thattathumala P 0. 4 960.00 428.00 44.58% 75.00 75 00 100.00% 7 I ( _ 9229 41 040 L.153 F Somaralan 1 16/7 (TP 68411 Pazhayakukku 111/994, 11149, Patil disintegrated house 1 527.00 523 00 99.24% 30.00 15.00 50.00% J 9230 41 080 L.153G Nazurlheen _ = 116/9 Pazhayakukku 1/150, Thoppll Veedu, Manalathupacha 1 1200.00 221 00 18.42% 128.00 0.00 0.00% 6234 41 1201L.153 H Radha I 1 52/7 (TP 4750 Pazhayakunnu Ili15i Radha Mandiram, Thattathumala P.O 1 - 6400.00 490 001 7.66% 120.00i 0.00 0.00% 9241 41 200 L.1 53 J Naruddin- 15 2/9 (TP 5152) Pgzhayakukku N.N.OQuarters, Thattuthumalla PO. 2 920 00 208 00 22.39% 15000o 0 00 0.00% If 9244 41 210 L.153 K Mohanan 6 9 60/2 TP6878 Pazhayakukku 1/1156, Mohanan 2 600.00 183.00 27.17% 54 00 000 0.00% 9248 41.~230 L.1531L Radhra - _ 604 TP883 Pazhayakukrku III188 Kodayilveedu, Manaltahu 1 200.00 11i3.00 56.50% 63 00 36.00 57.14% I 9253 41.280 L.153 N Bhuvanendran Nair 1 _ 60/13 (TP 6169) Pazhayakukku Palathuveedu 1 400.00 22.00 5.50% 225.00 0.00 0.00% 3995 41.300 R.195 Appu / 195/6 (TP 2105 Pazhaakunnu 5/378 1 375.00 48.00 12.80% 140.00 0.00 0.00% 10262 41.340 L.1533 Q D.Sucheendran J 110/8 TP 1015) Pazha akukku 1/14, KunnI Veedu nanalathupacha. Klinmanoor 1 3200.00 44.00 1.38% 375.00 0.00 0.00% | 9264 41.360 L.153R V.P. Prabhakaran 1_10/8TP 1015) Pazhayakukkunr 1/1 65 Sreenikethan. Thattathumala 1 2000.00 1100 0.55 72.00 0.00 0.00% 0-. Oowr I - TnTnz E - E-E-troer:s- Sq.un, EP- E,td PnrOn- BPL - Beo- P-oeny Li.e. WH - Woman Headed Kerala State Transport Project P;g. 2 r 5 LINK 1 :TAIKKOD - KOTTARAKKARA 08-10-01, 12:14 PM PROJECT AFFECTED FAMILIES - RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES User sttus Vleal Propert ReeuSre dresOfa ~ ~ ~ ID Ch. Nt. Owner User Reves no.Suve Village ddress em 3079 4130L154 Sivasanknaran 1 - 41 /8 TP 359) Pazhayakukku Sivasankaran Kadavil Veedu Thaltathumaly 3 1800.00 35.00 i.94% 86.00 0.00 0.00% / 10421 41.420 R.197 Su-keshan 1 203/7, TP 2183 Pazhayakunnu V/412 Sitnating a I-illy Formnatiion 1 1000.00 587.00 58.70% 96.00 0.00 0.00% 3999 41,480 RI19S Mohanan 1198/4 Pazhayakunnu V/41 1 Mohanalayam Thattathumala 1 2520.00 450.00 17.86% 49 00 0.00 0.00% 4003 41.520 R.199 Jagatharmma 1 _ 202/1 (TP 2175) Pazhavakunnun V/409 Man alosera House Thai/a/huma/a 3 I 760.001 521.00 68.55%1 80.00 0.00 0.00% 9205 41.880 L.154.A Savithri V 1_4118 TP 361) Pazhayakukku 11668A, TheriyIl Puthanveedu, Thattathumala 1 1000.00 180.00 -18.00% 72.00 0.00 0.00% 11 8266 41.890 L1154.B R. Vasudevan P/Ill 1 _ 41/12 (TP 372 P'azhayakukku Hill View, Th,aththlmala P.O. 1 120000.00 865.00 0.55% 90.00 8.00 8.89% 884I 42.020 R.201.C Abdul Karim _______ 1203/1 1 TI' 21 86 Pazheayakukku 2/560 Karim Manzll Thaettathumals Kilimanoor 1 2000.00 311.00 15.55% 15D000 0.00 0.00% 8830 42.100 R.201.E Rasheed _______ /203/12 (TP 2187 I'azhayakukku 21550 Rasheed Hives. Thattathnumala I 3200.00 77.00 2.41% 150 00 0.00 0.00% 3241 42.100 R.202.1 Pushpala/ha ________ 203/14 (TP 8184) PazhaVakunnu W/404 Varshia am Manae/shupache Thattathumad Post 1 3000 30.00 100.00% 30 00 30.00 100.00% 11- 3100 42.580 L.157 Abdulla /37/6 (TP 334) Paz/hayakunnu Beean Manzil IV /65 1 400.00 103.00 25.75% 0.00 0.00 3089 42.700 L.158 Abdul Rahin/ V 91/2 (TP 6167) Nallanadu Abdhul Rahim ShajahEan Mansit/Thatiathutmaa, Kil[manuor 3 4000.00 43.00 1.08% 120.00 12.00 10.00% 1 8871 43.000 R.207 A Raesheed 1 438/4, TP 3928 Pazhnayakukkur 2/405 --1 6000.00 119.001 1.96% 70.00i 0.00 0.00% 8872 43.020 R.207.B Abdul Majeed 1438/5 (TP 3827) Pazhayakuknku 2/404 RazIya Manzil Vazharode, Tha/tathumala 2 1 4800.00 124.00 2.58% 150 00 0.00 0.00% 8873 43.080 R-207.C Muihammed llyat / 438/6, rP 3828 P'azhyakukk/tu 2/403 M.M.Manzil Vazhode Thattathuimala 1 1 4000.00 202.00 5.05% 190 00 0.00 000o% 3268 43.1180 R.208 Abdul Balam ./443/2 Nilamel Abdul Ba/am, Analmonsl Nilamnel P 0. VakkhOdu 4 2000.00 90.00 4.50% 120,00 0.00 0 00%1 8891 44.600 R.212,A Babu 1 _ 1449/2 (TP 8080) Nilamel NP VIlI/47N/Iamel P.O 2 4000.00 1520.00 40.50% 100 00 100.00 100.00% 8892 45.100 R.212.G Ramesan 1 1_390/2 (TP 2531) Ni/smel V / 245 Ab//ash Bhaven Nlilamel P.O 1 1540.00 75.00 4.57% 95.00 0,00 0 00% 24868 45.280 L.178.D M.M.Nizar 1 251/1 1 TP' 2152 Ni/smel Rzaheed Manzil 1 1050.00 52.00 5.90% 192.00 0.00 0.00% 24869 45.400 R.213,A Fareludin 1______ _ 34 1/6. TP 2948 Nilamel Mar Mannil Karode Nilamnel 1 15.00 15.00 100.00% 15.00 15.00 100.00% 24871 47.830 R.222.A Salnudheen 1______ _ 3354, TI' 2877 Nilamel 1S.N.House, Kurlakode Chadayamangalam 1 20~00 10.00 50,00% 20.00 10.00 50.00% 3211 48.490[L.196 Abubakktar 11208/1, TPI' 1126 Chadayamagala 33-A SaIlya Mars/il Kunoda 1 900.00 130,00i 14.44% 150.001 .000 0,00% / 9112 48.560 1,196. Geetha Kumarl 1 208/2 TI' 1 127) Chada amaaal iT.P'.MohandassSreelekshm,KuriyoduChadayamaga/am 1 1200.00 155~00 12892% 0.00 D001 8001 48.610 R.229.A Janardhanan Pillai 1 339/4 Chadsyamagal Melunnipurathu Veedu Kuriode Kumarapuram P.OI 1 1600.00 -62.50 3.91% 20.00 0.00 00(0% 2377 48.625 R.23D Suihansa 313/2 TP 2985) Nilamel Chendravilasam Purlyode 1 360.00 17.00 4.72% 60.00 17.00 28.33% 11 3370 48.650 R.229 Raa/kohmi 1339/1 Nellanad 1S.Ra erndran Unnithan Saras Kurmade 1 1200.00 30.00 2.50% 0.00 0.00 2381 48.800 R.231 Basheer 1 313/4 TI' 2989) ChadayamnagalalBasheer Ruksans Mansil n/lame 1 400.00 9.00 2.25% 84.00 0.00 0.00% 3373 48.850 R.229 Prabha 1 339/12 (TP 1617) Chadayamenga V/V430 Va/l avedu Kurnyodu Chadamanoa/am 1 300.00 30.00 10.00% 0.00 0.0011 8903 49.180 R.231 ~A Haneefa 1 313/13 TI' 2995) C/hadeyama ala VII / 178 1 1400.00 33 00 2.36% 0.00 0.00 9126 49.300 L. 198.C Devaki V 1312/11 TP 2970 Chladasemasaall VII / 355 Chadayama alam 1 2500.00 300.00. 12.00% I 80.00 0.00 0.00% I 9128 49.370 L.198.0 Hydrot 1 312/2, TI' 2971 Chadayama iala VilII/355 1 2400.00 300.00 12.50% 49.00 0.00 0.00%/ 3382 49-640 R.232 K.Sormasekharan Nair 1 1311/9 (TP 2966) chadayaman a LskshmI Nivas 1 3040.00 532.00 17.50% 120.00 -33.00 27.50% 8910C 49.880 R.232.A Gopalakrishna PI/la/ 1 311/4 TI' 2965) Chladsyamagal 7/1 47 Saraswathy V/segam Chadayamagalanm 1 I 2400.00 619.00 25.79% 144.00 0,00 0.00 9128 49.740 L-198.E Beena 1_______ 1222/2, TI' 2935 Chladsyamagal 8/374 Beean ManzIl Chladeamar agaam P.O _1 1040.00 239.00 22 98% 100,0 0.00 0.00%1 3222 49.750 L.199 Solekthe _ 222/3 TPI' 1900) Chasdayamanga Soyas/Coltsage Chadasmamnga/am P 0. Medayi 1 8000.0 24.00 3.00% 225.00 24.00 10.67% 3233 49.770 1.200 I'.S.Babarudeen 1_ 222/4 TI' 1 90 1 Chadaysmanga Parsvilaveddu, chadasmanglaim 3 1 200.00 11 00 0,92% 280.00 9.00 3.21% 9`133 49.860 L.201.A B/ndu _ 222/2 TPI' 1899) Chadaymarnaal 8/411 Mangalath Puthlen Veedu Chadayamaga/am 1 1240.00 9200 742% 96.00 0~00 0.00% 9134 49.900 1.201.9 Rudrayan/ Amma 122214 TP 1901) Chadayamagal VIlf1413 Medayi VeeduChadayamagalamFP.O 1 4000.00 225.00 5.63% 60.00 0.00 a000% 1 3389i 49.990 R.235 Gopakumar 1271/2 T P 251 0 Chadsyamanga Madhava Cotstag IX 1 800.00 26.001 3.25% 120.00 0.00 0.00% 3390 49.995 R.236 Gopakumar 1270/1 TI' 2508) Chadayamanga Madaeva Cottage Chadsyamanga/am 3 2280.00 11.00 0.48% 225.00 0.00 0.00% 9135 50.050 1,201.C Haenrmman 1 222/4 TI' 1901) Chadavems alE /4l6 Charuvll/a Puthen Veedu Chadayamaga/am 2 1680,00 154.00 9.17% 64.00 0.00 0.00% I1 3392 50.250 R.237 Saba/isa 253/7 TI' 2280) C/ladsyamenga X/538 Cheru/terekondthu Puthlenveedu House Chnadavamar 2 1 240.00 9.00 3.75% 60.00 7.00 li.67% I 3394 50.300 R.238 Mohammad Shafl I 1 253/8 TI' 2261) Chadsyamenga IX/620 A Sale Manzcl C/ladsyamenga/am 1 240.00 62.00 25.83% 64.00 18.00 28.13%1 3397 -50.330 R.239 Abd/lul Lath/f 1 _ 1253/8.2, TI' 2263 C/ladsyamanga Thamarason's house Chaday amengslam 1 280.00 60.00 21.43% 80.00 4.00 5.00% 9139 50.400 L.201.G Ses/dheren Pi'lal/ 1 _ 1227/19 TI' 1993) C/ladeyems 5/ 8/439 Ka/hikae C/ladasemsa/aam 1 2340,00 1008.00 43.08% 150.00 150.00 100.00% 3400 50.485 R.240.1 Narayens P/i/lal 1 1 253/9 TI' 2282) Chaday amngaIs lIs/tlakds House 2 160.00 - 6.00 -3.75% 80.001 6.00 7.50% 3405 50.490 R.240.2 Narayann Pi//al 1 _ 1253/9 TI' 2263) C/ladsyamanga laI/s Ia/tds HouseChadayamanga/am 3 80.001 5.00 8.25% 60.001 5.00 8.33% 3639 51.245 R,273.6 Sam Kumar 1 1243/12 TI' 2763) C/ladsyamanga Behind Pooja Hire Serv/ce Chadayamanga/am 1 8.00 5.00 62.50% 8.001 5.00 62.50% 3642 51.245 R.273.7 Mohammed 1 243/3 TP 2756 Chada omanga Upsta/r of Keerthl Pr/n/ers Chladsyamanga/am 1 60.00 1600 2667% 60~00 16.00 26.67% 3645 51.300 R.274 Muhammad Rashid 1243/16, TI' 2767 Chnadaysman a Not Available 1 480.00 149.00 31.04% 160.00 0.00 0.00% 3660 51.400 R,277 Sasidhrarn /242/8 TI' 2741) C/ladsyamanga / 236 Va/os/a Hives Chadayamanga/am 1 3000.00 112.00 3.73% 80.00 28.00 35.00% 8915 51.450 R.277.A Sainulabdeen - 22/ T236 C/lade ama aI VI / 237 S.R.Cottaga Chadayamagslamr 2 3080.00 231.00 7.50% 144.00 0.001 0.00%- 1 8919 51.470 R,277.B Georg a 242/1 TI' 2736) Chadayamagal 6/235 SaroA v/Ia,Chadsyamagsa/m 1 1840.00 492.00 26.74% 500.00 0.00 0.00% 8920 51.500 .277.C R.a/trean P1i/aal 1 152/14 (TP 1797) C/ladeyamagal Sreeran am Chadsyama a/am P.O 1 7000.00 1021.00 14.50% 120.00 0.0 00% 3657 51.750 R.280 Cladaenrn/242111 (TP 2655) Chadaysmanos Ia/oa 800.00 30.001 5.00% 120.00 0.00 0 89641 52.400 1R.280 F ]Georga Mathai 242/15 Chaday2mangi- 6/11 Vijaya Bhavan 1 08.0 200 .2 2.0 0.001 0.00% 0.- C.ne. 7-T-nat: E - Enc.... t- - vsnean: EP . Ent/itle P.-sn. BPL - Bel-w P-tey Lim WHl - W-.tn 14de/i Kerala State Transport Project Pase 3 nI LINK 1i TAIKKOD - KOTTARAKKARA 08-10-01, 12:14 PM PR0JECT AFFECTED FAMILIES - RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES 397854.44 .249 Basoer1 13/9 P 132 Eamualkl /82 M/ta Kovl Aoar4U3500 S.0a1000s% 35.0 3500 00b0%e 3390 4.80 R.2B.G1 Dr.bs A e.JAogam 1137/3 TP 9263 Chdaymakala 6/422 Soaru Mazlhadayaagaa 1 1520.00 18500 12.1% 320.000 .0 00% 9162 54,670 L.223.A GohinaKtha It 129i(T 1 933,4 hdaymlaltal Eopinath2 an Chrvla Veh dEavankarPod 1 1600.00 281.00 1.750% 300.00 0.00 0.00% 9306 54.955 R.23_1. ChT daMoanniPlal 11312/15P 5 Edamulakkal EP13I5 K3zhakkumkaraVpterdu Vedo Ayo 1 1000.00 100.00 10.00% 120.00 0.00 10.00% 8903 54.9801R.2311E Siveasakaa1P li1312/2 (TP 20858 Edamulakal LPXI3 S2anttkara Vaom,Ar oryorPs 1 12040.00 150.00 13.33% 120.00 0.00 0.00% 3993 55.1201R.257 C..Varghese 11334/1 TP 9852 Edarmulakkal CI/ 1104 anjantt eu HueAyoar P.O 0 2 12000.0 338.00 33.80% 850.00 0.00 0.00% 4018 55.800 L.2479 unai Base l 1 440/3 TP 40328 Edamlakkal 1hoo2 MadantKoil, Puyenoer 4 100.00 356.00 60.60% 180,00 180.00 100.00% 1 39172 64.000 L.253.AyPshela anev S 440/ 3i E04 damlakkal 7M7ol[ayl Puhen Veedm Anyodor ka 1 880. 00 270.00 17.07% ¶0.00 10.00 02.00% V 10532 54.0401R.309 Rajeevn Kua 413/1 6iP 3944 Edamlakkal Mundhapphallel House,nyoor.O 1 1800.00 1387.00 24,19% 63.00 02.00 0200%1 3917 56.120 L .319.C Rlajenra MC 416/92 TP 3944 Edamlakal 10/04zhvaruvlAyo P.O. Vejlabak 1 1805,00 30.00 12.73% 100.00 0.00 02.00%1 3918 56,0150R.2119 Dr A.J.Asokha I( 1 416/ iTP 3944 Edamlakkal X22 305oMat havanna noe1 4020.00 180.00 120.00% 100.00 0.00 0.00% 9182 6.1970 11.254A JohnS Kutt 41339P34 VEdamuakalE Xi / 308 Jaykay uramvuan ayoo P.Od Vaa 16D0000 280.001 3.75% 150000, 0.00 0.00% 8918 56.229 1R.316I.C GKiathan Kullt 1 1416/16TP 3950 Edamlakam E 1un9uvi MeeduKBaaamben yodor PO,Akaman Pot28E 1 3200.00 240.00 7.50% 56.00 __ 0.00 0.00% 1 9186 56.9270.3 1.1)9 I ChadrchoIodant, illa11/1_ TP 3951 Vdamlakkalm E Xi 309Maharuveetdadaaahn eeeduaAyooroV 3 1600.00 80.00 3750% 120.00 0.00 0.00% 4027 56.350 1R.271 AGE.S Mealhw 4161/21 TP 3595 Vdamlakal EP26 A.P 57 rHouekkambamkd 200.00 56.00 10.00% 520.00 5.00 10.00% 4096 57,12101L.287 C Munachava PI 1 1330/ TP91 377 amlakkal MChiavkaro Vieedum Avoork P.O. 4 1000.00 73.00 03.580% 60.00 0.00 0.00% 24064 55.9G0 IR.32867 Thnandykacha 1440328 TP 37755 Valakam Mahaooda VelathlPtenm ed 1 750.00 306.00 40.00% 10.00 10.00 - -00 4947 57.300 L1.268.A uhllpa 75144012 TP64054 Vatakam 79 adalk urahowa,apac1Vaaa 480.00 67.00 12.507% 48.,00 6.00 12.50% 35432 582251L.3269 M.dhavan /0 3721 Bi TP 35944 Valakam G111ths PhoanS t Va acklPOd Umaoa 1 2600.00 138.00 54.00% 150.00 0.00 0~00% 24888 56.370 L.269.C Chacko Ma hes 1372/10 TP 35944 Valakam 0t0 ThahilruvlhePumened Vduabmoe1 1950.00 125.00 4.10%. 10.00 0.00 00% 9233 58,490 L.2691.AD Cendroh rasa416,97 (TP 3521) Valakam VIX/305SaMuthyamarinaampacode1 6400.00 25.00 30.91% 120.00 00 .0 9123 58.190 L.269,E JohanS 1 3419/9 (TP 3522) Valakam Mullam6aThndilpuram48 8edKma oeVya 740.0 25 .00 3.36% 200.00 0.00 0.00% 92847 58.210 L.2691. KJActaaan Kut 319/1 6TP 39522 Valakam Kunnuvia VeeduKBambenoicodeVaaa Pot1 2280.00 1240.00 75.2% 0.0 0.00 21847 56.480 L.305G CKoch Koshn 41316J1 TP 34951 Valakam Xttaw30 P 1uth aapuhe V eedulca trKampanco 2V 8 1000.00 70.00 0.09% 100.00 7.00 7.00% 42489 60.310 L.2371 ChAnGrastheas 4 316/218.1 355 Valakam VMall9 Alt, IHouse,Kmakd 1 360.00 3400 90.44% 360.00 34.00 9.440% 248956 60.2120 L.28 I Mraidhavan Pilar 1 370118.2P377 Valakam Mualdhavan VNairs aaam Varymknoor.P,O4 3900.00 65.00 6.67% 390.00 65.00 16.67% 246892 50.910 R.3281.2 BabThankachan 347/12 TP 3757 Valakam Maiamo Todm aseeakalem aoPI 390.00 130.00 30.33% 30.00 13.00 33% 24896 60.180, L.287 CAckou 375i31/18. 119 Valakam VadakkurathutVed 1 345.00 67.00, 49.28% 34500 17.00 49285% 8954 50.251 R.329E Sn G e iara a 475/3, TP 43595 AVahaktr XVIII/695 Sunayott eHVaylckol 1, mm.o 2600.00 243.00 4.050% 100.00 10.00 100.00% 89236 60.525 R.329AF Pcko Vrohese 465/40 TP43596 AVcaka Thotathl Puthouenveedum1 880.00 4254.00 54105% 10.00 80.00 6.7 92305086.250 L.32291A R.aJJondrGearad e / I3196 (TP30521 Valakam Pittsho4SabatisamVlaka 2 84.00 15.00 12.50% 82.00 1.0 25% 92537 6258.51 L,291 No Bhvnow 1398 T 52 Valakam Sunk 1dran48 220.00 22.00 10.00% 220.00 22.00 10.00% 9226 628080 L.331 .C SP Mathardaar 273/6 TP 237522 Valakam Shi452Rdiatheehrhav,I anPlckamdPe 1 4480.00 1267.00 59.20% 10.00 ___0.00 0.% 1 2a488 52.460 L.33105 C.Ket aohtn G1r3______ _ 226.21 (TP 23789 Valakam Chennela Puhen VaeuPlakoeamtraa1 4600.00 48.00 0.09% 32000 7__ .00 0.00% 32489 63.150 R.334. Thankrasekar 2912711. TI64 Valakam Mallhappallrl THouseluheved 1 560.00 53. 00 98.45% 560.00 50.00 10.00% 324825 63.070 R.3375 MunalidarnNi 1 3299/138P265 Valakam Muaithakrthn TNanvir,althal nameerumaor2. 8030.00 685.00 165.63% 890.00 05.00 06.00% 92312 63.120 L.311.2 KBabu Thma 354/1.1T 35 Vetikavam 14/20 Cheras,oeendatls VeuPalnakom P.OKotrIkr 8030.00 687.001 85.38% 60.001 0.00 0.00% / 92326 63,190 1,335.3 GChark h1eArhm______ _ 364/18.2 V.etalakla KatrakklaPthen VeeduPaaeiPOI/taIkr 12005.00 370.001 30.63% 72.001 0.00~ 0002% 89235 63.920 R.337.A SunOnyierel 14_____ 62/1 VTPtt395) Avcala JVieIIlA12Sunvath aneavliko 1 2000.00 100.00 5.050% 120.00 I 00.00 10.00% 89237 63.960 1.337,0 KCToa _______ _ 6 Ve4396la K..ToPs V ni3Valakr HoaPanveIolakar 680000 0.0 .7 120.001 0.00 0.007% 9395 64.000 L.332.C K.uJJohan Geor__e_ I_1331116_TP 362/1 Vealikamat PintashopSan .P Io/nary anae 2 40.00 80.00 120.00% 20.00 0.00 0200% 92423 64.080 R.359.1 VotK.3nown ________ I __ 6 Vetalako1m 0 Ia l VliaVedPnvl Sunkarkaa 12200.0 105.00 87.50% 620.00 92.00 15.00% 3287 62.120 1.338. hb Milson i127_31621 (TP 1181) Valaikama Shiue mandiamChrayi. VlaamP. 2 4800.00 2638.00 59.80% 195.00 19.00 00.00% 92562.170 L.331.D ___0,____ TP___23781 Valakavm ChenalalVet u Vaavlakam3 2000.00 487.00 204.35% 80.00 0.00 0.00% 1 9231 64.1201[.338.A JK____Babu_ 1 _ I 352/14 . 11 Vettikavala PA4P204 ChdakoatheVed duaPav aveli PO otaaka 3 6200.00 -168.00 85.97% 120.00 0.00 0.00% 923 6.920a oov L,v337WA K.CWtaniel 36MSetkaaa Vlyl mrvtyPaaei 20.0 1000 5D% 1000 00 t0 923; 643.9,60 L.3373 K.C.Thomas 362,1 Vettikavala KeralThStatsAyansvaorl Projsectael erakra2 6000 100416 at.0 .0 . LINK 1: TAIKKOD - KOTTARAKKARA 08-10-01, 12:]" F'M PROJECT AFFECTED FAMILIES - RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES ID CS. Owner User ~~~~~~~~~~~~User Status Reene ad Vulnerable ProCh erty 0 T EseeS RvnoeSue Village Address '0 C. - '4. a 9249 64.240 L.339.A K.V.Rajendron Pillai I_ 1 1362)14 (TP 1 181) Vettiksavala 19/316 Kishnamviiasam Panveli P.0 2 800.00 357005 59.50% 300.00 120.00 40.o 00% 9251 64.260 L1339.63 Kuttam Pilial I359/1 Vettlikavala V.PXIV/1 320 Kutlan Pillai KarthrikaPanaveli P.0 2 3200.00 129.00 4.03% 75,00 _ 00 0.% 24962 64.560 R.3609A Saraswathi Ammo Saraswathi Ammo / 317/1, TP 3491 Vettikavala Soraswathi Amma Neduveli Veedu Panavelil 1 2800.00 24.00 0.66% 105.00 0.00 0.00% _ 3383 64.980 L.345 saii / 336/7 Vettikavola Thondathil Puthen Veedu.Ponaveli 3 1320.00 5.00 0,38%. 180.00 ___0.00, 0.00% 3398 65.0566 L.348 6yaomola ammo _________ /_ 338/6 Vettlkavala Sreevilasem,Panoveli_ 1 35.00 11.00 31.43%1 35.00 11.00 31.43% 24963 65.4001R.282.A K.G.Thomas K.GThomas / _ 268/13 Vettikavala K.GThomas,Kerakro Veedu Sadanafrhapuram P.0 Kollarakl 1 4000.00 29.00 0.73% 48.00 0.00 0.00% 3441 6580L.357 Eswan ri mms V_______ /_ 320/4 VetfikavEala Melokonathu Puthen veeduSadonandapuram 2 680.00 196.00 28.68% 66.00 30.00 45.45% _ 2?4948 8835R.382.1 P.K.tdicula P.K.idicula /1 175/4 Vetlikavala P.K.Idiculo Rinu Bhavan Sadananapurom 3 1 200.00 55.00 4.58% 1150.00 6.00 4.00% 24950 80.330 R.382.1( Ales Alex / 175/6, TP 2084 Vettikavolo #Deleted 1 600.00 168.00 26.33% 48.00 48.00 100.00% 1 24951 88.340 R.382.L CBabyCo / I175/7, TP 2065 Vettikavala V.P.XVII /204 Esscol Building Sodananthapuram Kotiaraikk 1 100.00 93.00 93.00% 63.00 8.00 12.70% 24952 568,350 R.382.M Matrrukutly Mathuksutt If 1175/8 Vettikavala Choruoiioveedu Sadanapuram 1 1212.00 176.00 14.44% 72.00 72.00 100.00% 3873 88.400 R.383 K. Bobv / 1268/12 (TP 3119) Vettlkaxala_ 11/238, Chiaruvilakochu Putihenveedu, Sadaxanth urrr 1 1880.00 159.00 8.48% . 150.00 5.00 3.33%1 3459 58.475 L.380 Kunoamma /1297/1 Veltikavala Thadalhuvla, uthenveduSadoanadapuram 3 I 360.00 17.00 4.72% 36.00 17.00 47.22% 1 3882 57.160 R.388 O.K Thomas 1 267/23 (TP 31 06) Vettikavala /8660-A, Melootu, TOG. Villa, Karikksom P.O., Sodonando r 1 800.00 24.00 3.00%1 0.00 0.00 3638 67.5451.-371 Khrader /330/11.3 Vettikavalo Niza Manzsl Vettikaovala a 160,00 9,0 .3 00 .0 1.6 9277 67.570 1.371.8 K.Nanu Achrya 5 330/12 (TP 21 58 Velttkavala 1/402 Charuvlla Pulhen, VeeduKarickom 2 3600.00 14,00 8.39% 150.00 0.00 0.0)0% I - - 8278657.590 1.371.C G.Lukose If 330/12 Vettikavala I/ 395 Mini BhavanKarikkakam P.OKottarakkora 4 800.00 21.00 3.50% 35.0 0.00 0.00% 3643 57.800 1.372 K. M. Alexander If 330/1S Veitlkaovola KaloiCkal, Karlkakoam.P.O.Kottarakaora 2 400.00 57.00 14.25% 56.00 0.00 0.00/s 9282 68.260 L1372.8 P.O David /174/6 (TP 3657j 91U MeIrla 01 / 367 PoornihottathilI Houxekarllkkam P.O 1 2000.00 360.00 18.00% 0.00 0.0 3660 98.340 L373 Mathai Abraham /174/3 (TP 3856) Melila ThaoyI veedu,Karikksam .P.O.Kcttarakora 2 2280.00 460.00 19.74% 65.00. 65.00 1800.00% 9284 88.400 L.373.A P.KOmxmen /176/2 Mellila Ii / 365 Chombokasxeipuithen VeeduKarukom POK1ollarork 3 2400.00 400.00 16.67% 0.00 0.00 9285 68.820 L.375.A .Leelarnma Varghense/ 174/7 (TP 3659) Melila Anondhta PadmanabhanArikkam P.OKottarakkara 3 1200.00 200.00 16.67% 60.00 9.00 15.00% 1 9287 69.260 L.375.8 Rojan Gearge ./ . . 172/3 Melila Rojan GeorqeChoruvila Pulhen VeeduKarikkam P.OKottar I 1600.00 120.00 7.50% 36.00 0.00 0.00% 92900I 69.3001L-375.C Geargae I_ 1 172/1 (TP 1608) Melilo Xi /287 Charuvila Puthen veeduKarikkakam P.O 1 800.00 120.00 15.00% 60 00 0.00 0.00% 1 0282 69.320 1L375.0) Alexander 7 _ 1172/2 Melila M.P.XI / 285 Near To Charuvilo Pudren Veedul:T4> ~ ~ &~I~Vulnerable ID Ch.,Poet onr 1~~er ~9 -0~ol~jp~y 14255 3 050 L 87 Krishnan Nair Krishnan Nair .1168819, 1101 Ko01,yacode XV1363, Kapplch,ra Veedu. K<011yacode P.O. Thirtuvananth; 2 940.00 14.00 1.49% 144.00 000 00o0% 5' I_ 14258 3 090 L 88 Manoharan Nair Manoharan, Nair .1188/21. 1102 1<01,yacode XV,1358, Devaki Amma, Rahul Bhavan, Kol,yacode, yenjar, 200000O 19 00 0.95% 324 00 0 00 0 00% (I _ 1 3887.3.100 R4.70.A Suknumaran Nair Sukumaran Nair 337/2, Koliaknode Wn875, Vrmndasanam, KoliakodeP 0. 3 100000 18.I&001 I0B% 5600. 0 00 0 00% 13869 3 135 JR 70.C Sreeknumar Sreekumar 1 41 97 Kollakode xv/870,Pallhveedu, Ko01lykode P.O. 1 1840 00 60.001 3 28%/ 48 00 0 00 0 00% /1 14263 3.140 z[L.92 Vi ayakumar V/iayakumnar a108148 Kol, acode Viayakurnar, Ch4thira, K<01yakode, XVJ/350 1 2150 00 15 001 0.70% 0 00 0.00 -- 14274 3.260 [.94.1 Usha Devi Usha Desi 1 V _ 170/8,1149 Kohy acode XV/45, Prasanna Bliavan, Koliy aode P.O. 1 2000 00 15.00 0 75% 270 00 5 00 1 85% 14243 3.260 [.94.2 Prathapan Prathapan 5 71915 Koliyakode XV/46 Prasanna Bhavan Kol,yakode Post 2 360.00 15.00 4.17% 56 00 16 00 28 57% 14245 3.280 L[95 T.G.Prabhakoran Aso T.G.Prabhakaran A 1 _ 101152 Koliyacode Pranlavam Koliyakode P.O 1 720000C 700.00 9.72% 14 00 0.00 0 00% 13874 3.340 R 70.G Vasantha Kumaari Vasantha Kumari / __ 491 38 Koliakode XV111 007, BVBhavan, Ko/iyakode P 0. 1 80000o 25.00 4.17% 36.00 0.00 0 00% / 13875 3.340 z R.70.G.2 K<,shan POWa Vasanthakumari __ 439/111 8329 Koliakode 439/1011 B MN Bhavan 1 -310.00 25.00 8.06% 0.00 0 00 13877 3.360 R.70. Krishna P/llal Krishana Pil1al 1 _ 439113, 6331 ___Koliakode 443/27 S S Nivas, Koliakode P.O. I1 440 00 13 00 2.95% 80 00 0.00 0 00% / 13878 3.370 6.70.J Baby ammoa a ma 1 3/493 Koliakode IPuspa B3havanKoliakode, Koliakode Pa0 a2 320_00 26.00 8.13%1 48~00 22 00 45 83% 5f / 13878 3.380 IR.71 Ushrakunar Ushlakumar, - 321 91 Kland elvlsm oiloePO -_____ 1 320.00 01.00 28.44% 150.00 0 00 0 00%1 13880 13.400 IR.72 Bhamadevi Vimala Mohan / _ 352/14, 4970 KoliaKode XIV/999, [81 Bhavan, Koilakode P 0. 2 320 00 18E2.00 47.50% 80.00 80.00 100 00% 1 13881 3.420 R.73 Sreedevi SFeedeAl5 352/13, 4989 otade Sihhsn looeP..oiode2 1120.00 172.00 15.36% 100.00 100.00 100 100% / / 12882 3.480 6.74 Rodha ~~~~Shobana 1 352/12 Kotiakode Shobana V4lasom. Ko/iakode P.O 2 0.0 22.08.0 6 0 20 3.23% / / 13895 3.680 6886 Saraswatro Amma Saraswathi Amma 351/12, 4952 KotIyak 14/1 0&11 KovarlhalakalKollyakc,de P.OKoliyakode 2 50000o 279.00 46.50% 100.00 49.00 49800% a 14268 3.710 [.101 Gopinathan Go inathan / 175/2.12383 Ko01yacode XIII / 820 Leela Bhavan Ko/iyakode Post 1 1720.00 102.00 5 93% 54.00 28 00 51.85% .1 14270 3.720 L 102 Kesavan Asari Kesavan Asaf, . 175/4, 1240 K<01, acode Padmnalayam Koliyakooe P.O 1 480.00 45.00 9.38% 120 00 0.00 0.00% 14277 3.790 L 104 V,swambharan Nair V./swambharan Na8i5 180/4,1325 Koliy8c0de V s.ambaran Ntair Makam Ko, yakode 1 800 00 40.00 5.00% 80.00, 00 0 0 0%1 5 14278 3.810 L 105 Pankajakshnan Nair Pankalakshanr Nor 1810/5. 1328 Ko0,Vacode Krishnavilasam Ko/iyakode P0 1 1570 00 80 00 5.10%/ 0 00 0.00 5' 13033905 R 81 Vi ayakumari V.jayakumar, 1 1351/8, 4948 Kotiakode XIV ! 21 Viiayala amPootantharKo1:/487 1 30.00 6.20 20.67% 30.00 12.00 40.00% _ 4967 76.140 R.51.1 Chandrasekharan ' _ ___ 213/4, TP1974 My/am Chandrasekharan Tea shop 2 25.00 25.00 100.00% 25.00 25.00 100.00% ___ 4966 75,140 R.51.2 Mo/amma 1__a'_ 213/4, TP 1974 My/am Pan Shops 1 12.00 12.00 100.00% 12,00 12.00 100.00% a' a' 4969 76.140 R.51.3 Molamma _ 1 _ 213/4, TP 1979 Mylam Engg.Works 1 20.00 20.00 100.0%D 20 00 2000 100.00% _ ._ 4972 75.140 R.51.4 John Kutt __ _ 2i3/4, TP 1974 Mylam Johnkutty Tea Shop 1 12.00 12.00 100.00% 22.50 12 00 53.33% ___ 4162 75.165 L.18.1.2 Vasundara Devi __ a' 361/6, TP 2633 Mylam IX/732 Ration Shop 1 40.00 16.50 41.25% 40.00 16.00 40.00% _ 5_ 4164 75.165 L.18.3 Vasundhara Devit a 361/6, TP 2633 Mylam Tamarakuudy Society Manure Dept. 1 35.00 13.50 38.57% 35.00 13.00 37.14% /_ 4167 75.1701[.19 Sudhakaran 1 361/11 1,TP 2634 My/am Bunk I1 2~00 ____200 100.00% 2.00 1.50 75.00% _ 4975 76.420 R.53 Purushothaman a _ _ _ 209/6, TP 1912 Mylam X11/425 Tea Shop Mylam Junction 1 16.00 4.00 25.00% 16.00 4.00 25.00% __ 4981 75.540 R.54 Mohanan K a _ _ _ 204/7, TP 1913 Mylam X111426 Ambika BrIcks 1 20.00 2.50 12.50% 20.00 2.50 12.50% __ 24653 75.705 R.56.A Mathai _I_I _ 204/6 Mylam Karitil Thekkedil Veedu 1 20.00 10.00 50.00% 20.00 10.00 50.00% __ 10575 75.820 R.56.A K.M. Babu I _ 1_ _ 204/7 Mylam Kuttyil Brick Industries, Iniakkad, Muylam P.O. 31 3000.00 10.00 0.33% 300,00 300.00 100.00% __ 25381 75.900 L.21.1 NotKnown I _ 1___ 320 Mylam 1 20.00 2.00 10.00% 20.00C 2.00 10.00% __ 4183 76.270 [.25 G.Pappachan __ a' 1 314/3. TP 2062 My/am XII/202A. Esteen Enterprises 5 240.00 51.00 21.25% 60,00 9.00 15.DO% _ 4202 76.335 L.29 Joy .. / _310/8, TP 2007 My/am Xll/207 K.J.Sadhanam Mylam P.O 1 80.00 4 00 5.00% 16.00 4.00 25.00% __ 4198 76.340 L.28.2 Gopinath / 1 _ 310/5, TP 2014 Mylam Xll/206 Statonery Shop Inchakkad I 12.00 5.00 41.67% 12.00 5.00 41.67% __ 4194 76.350 L.28.1 K.JoY _ _1 310/9. TP 2013 Mylam Xll/204 1 24.00 12.00 50.00°/ 24.00 12.00 50.00% ___ 4204 76-400 L.30 Babu _ __ _ 310/9. TP 2017 Mylam X(1/256 Kizhakkem/ackal Fumiture Workshop 4 1050 00 41.00 3.90% 60.00 0.00 0.00% ___ 24659 76.910 L.30.D Yohannan a 307/6 Mylam Thuruvilayil Veedu 1 510.00 11.00 2.16%1 53.00 2.00 3.77% 24660 77.150 R.66.A Silpa Auditorium a __ _. 309/8, TP 2701 Kalayapuram Silpa Auditorium 1 2700.00 167.00 6.19%1 0.00 0.00°'°(- 5129 77.490 R.69.1 Baby kutty / _ _ _ 292/5, rP 3669 Mylam V11/26 A 1 16 00 14.00 87.50% 16.00 14.00 87.50% __ _ 5131 77.490 R.69.3 Babakutty . __ _ 382/14, TP 3669 Mylam VIl /27 Stabionery Shop Mylam 1 20.00 14.00 70.00% 20.00 14.00 70.00% __ 25390 77.970 L.37.0 Not Known a _ _ _ 307 Kalayapuram 1 66.00 1.00 1.52% 66500 1.00 1.52% __ 24667 77.980 L.37.A Geevarghese Ommen a _ 1__ _ 307/9-1 Kalayapuram Kariottimalathil 1 108.00 3.00 2.78% 108.00 3.00 2.78% ___ 4223 78.005 L.38.1 S.AiiVarhese _ a _ _ 305/4,_ P 1987 VII/167 A.C.Rubber Stores 1 36.00 6.00 16.67% 36.00 6.00 16867% __ _ 4225 78.005 L.38.2 Annamma Varghese a _ _ _ 3p0/6, IP 1986 Mylam Ration Shop V/l/167A 1 32.00 6.00 13.75% 32.00 6.00 18.75% a' 4227 78.005 L.38.3 Sajeev Varghese _ a _ _ 305/6, TP 1986 Mylam Kezhakkedathu Vllt16 1 32.00 3 00 9.38% 32.00 3.00 9.38% __ 4230 78.020 L.39 Alexander --- 1305/7, TP 1988 Mylam VII/164 Flour Mili 1 60.00 2000 33.33% 60.00 20.00 33.33% __ 10602 78.060 R.72.A Joseph Baby _ _ _ 303/7, IP 2603 My/am 16/29, Joseph Baby Ku,aaa1akTVui, Palanthalakkal, Vallakadavu, Jo 1 300.00 26.0 8.67 50.00 26.00 52.00% a 0 - Owner: T - Tenant: E - En--aher: S - Squatllr EP - Entwied Person. PL - 130w P-rvety Li-e. WH - W...n Headed Kerala State Transport Project LINK 2: KOTTARAKKARA - ADOOR 06-10-01, 10:50tAM PROJECT AFFECTED FAMILIES - COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES User Status m d iid ulnral lo Ch. Property Oner 0 1 E S NRevenueSurvey Village Address E E - E 10 a m' Zn rt. e _ __ __ ___ __ _ _ _ ____ ____ ___ 10603 78.320 R.72.B Alexander E.U. / _ _ _ 303/7, TP 2603 ~~~~~~~~~3C. - A 17-c-Tej PPOPE'LRT1ES User Status . Vunerabta Property Owner User Reeu uvy Village AddressvI-s ID C. No. T ES No. ,- es - 3 24810 93700 1_ 690 JoKy Vrhs ________ 1052/12 TP 1471 Per,ro00ad,, K zhaketh,I Veeld. 221,00 5 00 2.22% 0.00 0.00 2001 2! 93.800 L.69AA) Govt lEducatior departmE / 101O/7 Pevmcnaduo Govt Por,ary School 1H0600o 2600 0 11 86% 0 00 0.00 ___ 24814 93.880 IL.69.H VJ Kosh / _ 13/11: TP 1407 Penngaradu Rakshasynngam_ 1 700.00 3 00 0 43% 0 00 0 00 20014 93.900 . .69A83 Govt ot1 _ _d94/1 FOe,i~naaidu Coot land (Pond) I240 00 50 00 20.83% 0 00 0.00 24816 94.0201R.106.D Parameshwraran /157/4, 10 1510 eocoo/ Pa,arnleooharh Vern,, - -560 00 33 00 0 89% 0 00 0.00 20917 84 100 R 106AB Govt Gov[ V ___ oo/Il%/vor/ Can,!, 00000 100IGO(1 1 14% 0.00 0 00 2091 984.100 R.106AC; Govt EdLocasino Depa/tm / t49/2 Heringanadu Boo /0Sotv ot 000 - 300 00 50.00 16 67% 0 00 0.001 20920 94 200 R.106A0 Govt Govt 1 147/11 jn O aoad,. Govt 1l0nd- 1320 00 10040O 7.50%, 0 00 0.00 2481 8 94 300 L 69 J Mareamma 1 _ __ 132/4, 3 P I1 90 Pennoooan,. GeorgelBhovoo,o.m ______________ 1 1000 00 50 00 5.00% 0.00 0 00 ___ 24819 94.37O R 106 F Yohannan 146/14: TP 10325 _Pevoqnad,. CIrar.o .a VeeJ., IS10000 4 _50 30% 0 00 0 00 ___ 24821 95.1t 1.0 L69 K Mar/arntea 1101/3: TP 823 -.Fooaa, -I o ,/Id, I 360 00 540 16 25% 0 00 0 00 __ 24825 60 290 1L.70 B La 9e~1 __669; TP 813 PonnganadU. Ka,mevvaoV.ed1 _________ 1 040 00 0000 11 0 00 0 00 24829 95.995 R.1 1 O.A Govt. of Kerala 167,1 Peoood. / 0he0er 65 010 0 0 65 0 0 24896 040 RitOA 1 AIV 67 Ao.r 16050 1650 9.09% 16050 1050 9 09% 27297.260 L.769B.1 K.S.Mathachan ________ 1V _ 242/4, TOI 3301 Kx,/o,bala Paraknno, Chakethl _209.00 0050 2 16% 16 00 0.00 0.00% 24742 09 640 L.90 A T,ust 1 _246/1. TP 3300 K(.//rnbal C,cnB.0o 360000 300 9Oa33% 0.00 0 00 27999.900 L.98.A Pawaethiammat 1 __ 34/3 c.//0n/bo/a Bu,/dmO 20000 3`0 130% 00 0 00 ___ 24763 100 850 Ld 108.A Phvn Amma 1 ___ 223 502 K,ot/l 6y~V/0nt/I 130 001 /,. 0%00 0 ___ 24765 101 070 L 1_139 B arasamma 1 211/16 TP 2869 _K,,/0n,)ala4 V //th0evt64/ VadakkethIl t 0000 _1700, 21.% 000 0/3 24766 101 240 1t26 A rCoot olKerala 1 411/2 K,0rnb0l0 6.0 0,and -21 /// 9// 38.10% 21.00 8 00 39 10%I 254721 1021.7201R.129.A1 I 223 P,odoat ___ ________________ 3500000 1 00 0 04% 221 00 0 00 0 00% 24772 ~101.900 R.129.A N.S S Colle e _______ 223/1 TO 3014 Pandat/o, N/S S C01/030 Ground 12)729.00 75 1 00 7 00% 0 00 0 00 24773 102.020 R.129 B N S S Collee _______ 1223/1 TP 3C14 00040 0/, N_S S Colle0o Grou,,d 291 500 200500 10 121% 224.00 0.00 0 00% 24775 102 090 R.129.C NSSH,hSho 1 __ 223/1 TO 30 14 Pandla am 1S S tfgh Sch,oDl 3790 00 3U0200 9400 00 24793 102.960 R.tI39.A Reoliunallhan 238/1 3, TO 3105 Panda am PlantrOottathil 90.00 0 00 9.09% 0.00 000 24790 103 940 R 142 A Not Known a' _ _371/2 t 53h2 K,440,,to M..,daOckl Pal00n Place 420 00 72 00 '17 14% 60 00 0 00 0 00% 24831 104 200 P 46 amuel 1 __372/12: TP4129 K.lOo-z Aojod Bha,a, I 1 8600 080 //%0 0 00I 24841 104.420 L.133.F Ratnamoma P _ 561T 3262 EVoolda 3l,ee,,,a Sadan, 1 640 00 115003 17.97% 0 00 0 00 24727 104.730 R 146.H C500..,.,. __372/21, TO 1481 K,10an1da Ka10,oII Vcd2 1 20000o 6 00 0 21% 0.00 000 24726 105 710 L .141.A . aoee1 __ 259/1 TO -3023 K,J1n0310 _ R-eo,dn Ct~,r,m/a Sth..,ne 31//// 2046 o 64 52% 31 00 2000O 64 52% 24734 107 590 R.1 52.0 aaaa Rmks/_ 363/1 TP 32//3 H.looto I kOO ~,l V/o,//, I 600 00 24 04 400%/ 0 00 0 00 24737 I07.090 R 154.A Govt Land _______ ___ 363/19 I&lako,azha L_0_School 100000 3050 0 19% 476 00 0.03 0 00% 24149 110.140 . 15A 08ilL..,,, 1 __ 338/19. TP 347 M.,l,jok-ha 00/0 1,1 Pvk _ t 405 00 1 00 171,0 00 0 00 ___ 24751 Ill 030 R 166 A. 1 iG alarisnan224/5 TO 3700 . Kl,/l;0n,/1/h0 f'2-]/1,noeaeetl// ___ 5600 0 12 00 240% 0 00 0 00 ___ 24753 111.100 L.153.B d ____a____an1 _ 242,15, TO 1000 t,t k1,1/h0 41/4/fh1thl,, t200 20 21)00 0 00 ___ 0O..On, T T-n-t E Eno/eaot/r S Sq..fner 0P - Et,nrd Pt/-- F3PL B. Onk*evn-t1 L./n WHCW.WenanH-nade K4erala State Transport Project LINK 3 ADOOR - CHENGANUR 06-10-01, 11:10 AM ______ _____ ~ ~~~~~~~~PPo c7 T A PgC)C,T&T~ AL(; ~~~User Status -E' Vulnerable to Ch. No. Owner User WH T 8 S RevenuL e7 Vilago Address r - u 24758 111.320 R.166.C Ramaklrshnan , _I_ 225/24 TP 2862 Mullakuzha Chu,akiv/i _ 1 360.00 27.00 7.50% 0.00 000 _ _ _ 24778 112.170 R.169.A Govt. Land . _ I - - 233/6 - -Mu akk.zha Pu ramhoke 1 7500.0 500 0.64% 0. 00 0.00 _ _ _ 25498 112.200 L.155.A NotKnown _ _ _ 458 Mu akkusha_ -___ ___ I 600.0D 4 00 0067% 0 .0 0.00 24798 114.340 R.18 3A AnadaoallyAma 452TP228. _ _ 4 Chefnanrur PermleVenu 1 400.00 32.00 8.00% 000 0.00 ____ 24799 114.380 R.184.A Ge.r 452/4, P36s5 g PeosedalVeedo 320.00 _107GC 811% 0.00 0.00 _ _ 24805 115.750 L 170.A John _ 2675, TP3087 Ghengarnur !o h V _ 500.00 . 5(1 1 00% 0.00 000 _ _ _ _ 24806 116.340 1L.173.A Govt Land . 131/6 LP School I 128000 4900 383% 9600 200 208% _ _ Total 44 44 0 0 0 1 23 58421.00 291S.00 4.90% 118.00 38.00 3.25% a 0 0 0 0 Owner T - Tenan . E - Ettoachet. s - SQuare: EP - Entitted Persons B.PL - Relon Po-coy Li.t WH - Woman Heade, Kerala State Transport Project Pip 9n, 0 LINK 6: MUVATTUPUZHA - ANGAMALI 09-10-01, 12:14 PM PROJECT AFFECTED FAMILIES - OTHER PROPERTIES User Status ~o~Vleal I P rty Owner Revenue Village Address | Cu4 GO oEE No. ~ ~0 T E S Survey No. Vilage 00 24502 208.B15 R.62.A Govt of Kerala _ _ __ _ Velloorkunnam Bus shelter 8.50 8.50 100.00% 8.50 8.50 100 00% = 24503 208.880 L.49.A Govt. of Kerala / Velloorkunnam Bus shelter 19.00 19.00 100.00% 19.00 19.00 100 00% 24512 209.390 R 67.8 Govt of Kerala 1_ = _ 710/5 Velloorkunnam Bus Shelter 3.60 3.60 100.00% 3.60 3.60 100.00% = 24513 209.880 R.82.A not known 1 716/2 Velloorkunnam Vacant land with compound wall 1 2000.00 93 00 4 65%I 0.00 0.00 24514 209.990 L.64.A not known _ 829/ Velloorkunnam Vacant walled plot 1 160.00 31.00 19.38% 0 00 0 00 24515 210.200 L.64.A not known 1 __ 829/ Velloorkunnam Vacant walled plot 1 1000 00 120.00 12.00% 0.00 0.00 24516 210.760 L.76.A not known 1 _8_ _ 612/10 Mulavoor Vacant walled plot 1 200.00 32.00 16.00% 0.00 0.00 _ _ _ _ 24538 211.380 R 98 G Loca mosque t 1 974/7 Mulavoor Mosque 22 00 8.00 36.36% 0.00 0 00 ___ 24521 211.770 L.90.A not known 1 = 801/ Mulavoor 1 800.00 20.00 2.50% 0.00 0.00 24522 211.850 L.90.B not known 1 801/8 Mulavoor 1 600.00 7.00 1.17% 0.00 0.00 __ __ 24523 211.850 R.103.A not known I/ 981/6 Mulavoor 1 700.00 16.00 2.29% 0.00 000 24524 211.965 L.93.A Local mosque t = _ 801/10 Mulavoor MosqLle 195.00 37.00 18.97% 0.00 0 00 24525 212,040 L.94.A not known 1 __ _ 801/11.2 Mulavoor 1 180.00 30.00 16.67% 0 00 0 00 24527 212 485 R 114.A not known 1 985/13 Mulavoor 1 40500 23.00 5.68% 000 000 24529 212.710 R.115.A Local mosque t = = = 985/14 Mulavoor Mosque 1320.00 96.00 7.27%° 000 000 24530 212.900 L.102.A not known 1 800/1 Mulavoor 1 1060.00 18.00 1.70% 0 00 0 00 _ . 10725 213.920 R.131 E.M.S. Memori _ = 790/1.3 Mulavoor E.M.S. Memorial Build ng 170.00 28.00 16.47% 48 00 0 00 0 00% __ 24540 214.230 R 138.A Temple trust 1 617/6.2 Mulavoor Gate ofrhrikalathoor Bhagavathi Temple 600.00 22.00 3.67%1 0.00 0.00 _ _ 24542 214.470 R.138.8 not known 1 = = 617/7 1 Mulavoor 1 22500 8.00 3.56%1 0 00 0 00 _ _ _ 21485 217.420 R.149.D Govt 1 167/8 Rayaman alarT Govt U P School, Kazhillam 1200.00 50 00 4.17°A 0 00 0 00 _ 25157 219.400 L.1 17.2 KSRTC ___ ___ Rayamangala Bus stop 1300 1300 1000% 13 00 13 00 100.00% 24555 219 880 L 117A St. Thomas 1 _ _ _ 225/2 TP 650 Rayamangala Church Land 1 825.00 8.00 0.97° _ 0 00 0 00 _ . _ 24557 22U.015 IL.1 17.B Govt of Kerala 1 1___225/2 3 Raymarngan Bus shelter 22 00 12 00 54 550/ 22 00 12 00 54.55% _ 24558 220.030 R. 149.J George Varhe 195/1 TP 79 Rayanangalar Purathivayalil 1 600.00 46.00 7.67°/ 0 00 0.00 24565 223.800 L. 120.D not known V/ 68/ Rayamangalan 1 1500 00 13 00 0.87% o 0 00 0.00 _ _ __ 1599 224.600 L130 AITUC Union 1 Perumbavoor C Achutha Menon Memmorial Hall 56.00 8.00 14.29°A 42 00 000 0.00%_ 25162 224.700 L.130.A not known 1/ Pulluvazhi Walled plot 1 2100.00 52.00 2.48% 0.00 0.00 I 25512 224.740 L.130.B Not Known 1 1 870 00 22.00 2 53% 00 ( 00 25514 224.800 L.133 Not Known 1 = = = 1 57.00 1.00 1.75% 0 00 0 00 = == 25164 225.100 L.136.B not known 1 Pulluvazhi __Walled plot 1 1100.00 60 00 5.45°A 0.00 0 000 25523 225.520 L. 136.C Not Known 1 1 5400.00 4 00 0.07% 0 00 0 00 ____ 25167 225.880 R.170.A Perumbavoor C _______ Christian Shrine 136.00 2900 21.32% 0 00 0 00 25169 226.120 L.143 C not known 1 Private vacant land 1 620 00 43 00 6 94% 0°00 0 00 25172 226.670 R.177.A not known 1 Walled plot 1 800.00 40 00 5 00% 0 00 ( 00 25533 226.680 IL.148.D Not Known 1 1 870.00 11 00 1.26% 0.00 0 00 25175 226.830 R.178.E Loca[ Temple T _ =___= Hndu Shrine 1 .O 100 100 00% 1 00 1.00 100.00% 25634 227.600 L.155.A. 1 Not Known I I 420.00 -500 1.19% 0.00 0.00 1430 227.770 L.159.1 Koyakutty 1 47/13 Perumbavoor 7/288 1 50 00 400 8.00% 48 00 4.00 8.33% 25535 227.840 R.195.t _ 1 400.00 200 0.50% 0.00 0 00 25181 228.350 R 207.A KSRTC 1 Kanjirangadu Bus Shelter 18 00 18 00 100.00°/ 18.00 18.00 100 00% 25183 228.560 L.173.B not known V_ Kaniiranqadu Vacant walled plot 1 80000 24.00 3.00/o 000 0.00_ 24575 229 250 R.226 A Mosque trust ' _ __ 462/ Cheamattom Mosqule 325.00 16.00 4.92%1 0.00 0 00 1 _ __ C Ow--er T - Teniant E - Errcacner S - Sqe,aeler EP -Sneiled Persons Bs - Belo, Poiery Line vH - AniriVe Headed Kerala State Transport Project Pauc 1 or 2 LINK 6: MUVATTUPUZHA - ANGAMALI 09-10-01, 12:14 PM PROJECT AFFECTED FAMILIES - OTHER PROPERTIES Property Owner ~User Status 'a : d uneal ProCh. rty 1 ES Revenue Adres .6 s E& tf2. E ID Ch. OwnerSrveNo. Village Addes 0 ci f E s- 7252s t) 0. tc~~~~~~ ~~ 0 .( 10772 229.700 R.234 anatha Library I Chelamattom IV/520, Public Library, Chelamattom 20.00 1.00 5.00% 20.00 1.00 5.00% _ 25541 230.580 R.243.A Not Known 1 = = = 1 280.00 6.00 2.14% 0.0( 0.00 24581 230.690 R.243.B not known / __ _ 4671 Chelamattom Vacant plot 1 825.00 2300 2.79% 0.00 0 00 _ _ _ 24582 230.705 L.239.B Mosque / 78/ Chelamattom Hyundi belonging to the mosque 12.00 2.00 16.67% 12.00 2.00 16.67% 24584 230.780 R.243.E not known _ 467/ Chelamattom Vacant land 1 900.00 46.00 5 11% 0.00 0.00 24589 231.640 L.253.G SN Trust 1 __ _ 488/ Chelamattom Sree Narayana Shrine 500.00 18.00 3.60% 81.00 0.00 0.00% __ 24590 231.800 R,264.A not known 1 283/ Chelamattom 1 1250.00 31.00 2.48% 0.00 000 _ 458 232.270 R.290 Catholic Syrian 1 _ 322/4 Chelamattom Catholic Syrian Bank 6 250.00 7.00 2.80% 250.00 7.00 2.80% = 25542 232.340 R.290.A Not Known 1 _ 1 380.00 11.00 2.89% 6.00 0.00 0.00% 24593 232.600 R.292.B School 1 = 324/ Chelamattom School 3450.00 177.00 5.13% 0.00 0.00 = = = 21524 232.700 L.279.A Govt 3 38/8 Chelamattom L.P.School 1000.00 100.00 10.00% 0.00 0.00 24594 232.810 R.295.A Govt. of Kerala 1 = = = 143/ Chelamattom Bus Shelter 32.00 9.00 28.13% 32.00 9 00 28.13% === 24595 232.830 L 280.A not known 3 __ 39/ Chelamattom Head Load Workers Union Office 55.00 22.00 40 00% 55.00 22.00 40.00%°/ 10774 234.430 R.307 Sreeramakrish r Kalady IV/145, Childrens Library, Community Centre 3000.00 53 00 1 77% 1200.00 0.00 0.00% 2001 234.440 L.310 Govt. of Kerala _ 396/7 Kalady IV/136, Govt. L.P. School 2 160.00 54.00 33.75% 80.00 0.00 0.00% 24600 234.820 R.316.A Metropolitan C 1f 179, Mattur Roadside Christian shrine 52.00 33 00 63 46% 52.00 33 00 63.46% 24604 235.770 R.321.B Stanley _ = = = 153/ Mattur Stanley, Kalady 1 1050.00 22.00 2.10% 0.00 0.00 = = = 25549 235.810 R.321.C Not Known 1 1 400.00 6 00 1.50% 0.00 0.00 24605 235.855 L.313.E Govt. of Kerala 1 _ = == 195/ Mattur Bus shelter 12.00 8 00 66.67% 12.00 8.00 66.67% = 25550 235.980 R. 321.C 1 Not Known 1_ 1 1200.00 5.00 0.42% 0.00 0.00 _ _ _ 25551 236.700 R.322,D 200.00 3 00 1.50% 200.00 3.00 1.50% 24610 237.100 L.331 .A Church 1 183/3 Angama(i St. Joseph's Church 6200.00 54.00 0.87% 0.00 0.00 = = = 25553 237.380 L.331 .8.2 7.00 7.00 100.00% 7.00 7.00 100.00% 25555 237.783 R.327.B.1 Not Known _ _ _ ___ 1 800.00 7.00 0.88% 0.00 0.00C 24614 238.060 R.327.D Varghese 1 _ _ _ 127/ Vacant land, Saradalayam, Vengoor I 1000.00 33.00 3.30% 0.00 0.00 _ _ _ _ Total 67 61 3 0 0 44 50886.10 1840.10 3.62% 2230.10 171.10 7.67% 0 8 0 0 0 - Owner T Tenant E - Encroaceer S - Squater EP- Entitled Persons BPL - Bel-w Povery Line: WH - Womait Headed Kerala State Transport Project Page 2 oa 2 LINK 40 THRISSUR - KUTTIPURAM 06-10-01, 11:35 AM PROJECT AFFECTED FAMILIES- OTHER PROPERTIES User Status In .J- Vulneraiblea ~~ CS. Property Owner user ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Revenue Survey VlaeAddress o wo~ s ~& 5 No. 0 T ES5 No. 2 ~ oS 2I3D 20Ch. Owner______ User/3.TP65 Kicvklm narcn/rOtO 00101. 470 0.0 0.0%00 0 21164 22.730 L.20.B Prema Kvmarp . 1 19/53, TP 6372 K~unnamkvlarr_MILJtEkuv ___1 720 00 9.00 1.25%/ 0 00 0.00 22551_ 23 300 R.35 A Government of Kerala 1_ 119/13__ _Kuniamkulam Government UP/H,gh Schirr, Kunnamkuilvn- 1 500 00 60 03 400% a000 0.00 _ 21167 24.120 L.54.A Lissy v1 120/.16 Knooemrulrvm Mlekkattuvk, am 1 450 00 8.00 1 780 000 0 00 11290 24.140 tl.56A Not Knorna Kvoevnt,mkvtav/Wie,avts 1 426 00 3 03 0.71% 0.00 0.00 25570 24.650 1.65.1 Not Knoywnr' Kuonvmkulaw Vacant land I 2550 00 15103 5 902% 0 00 0.00 25571 24.840 L.66.A Not Kou-, V Kun,e-Wlamvl Vvcavt v,d I -700 00 -21 03 3 0001 0 00 I 0 00 2_2572 25.300 R.69 B Vij9avan 373/2 1 Chowanoor Vaovart Lvrtd ___ 1 2900 00 04 00 _3 00% 0.00 000 _______ 24990 20.480 R.8t A Local ctOurcO . Po,k.,,vvim - Roadoenvid 4 00 403 100.00% 4 0 4 00 100.00% 22573 26 505 1.81 A Church 1 1206/6, TP 925 A~mtjhyor __ Prayer Hvll 60 00 6800 13.33% 40 00 0.00 20 00% 24991_ 26.520 ROS5A Local church 1 --200/0 ALathyor 'Ovovieyio 100O 1 03 100 00% 1 00 1 00 100.00% 25572 26.630 R.99.A L ocal church 1 ___Pork.jarn Roaosode hyvndi . _____ 2 00 -203D 100.00% 2 00 2 00 100.00% 24994 26.675 R.99 03 Govt. of Kerala Transeort De2t. 1 - 29// Aqatl 00r Bus Shelter _________ 1900 19 00 100.0000 10.00 10 00 100 00% _ 22574 27.100 LA 16.A lAmmini V 193/3-4, TP' 753 POrkkulam Vacvnt vaid / 2000 00 270.00 13 80% 0.00 0 00 _____ 22575 27.200 L..t1O. ROamesh Drnesh I C13/6, TP 755 Po)rkuam Vacant lvaod 2336 00 309.00 13 23% 0 00 00 _____ 21197 27.360 LA1160C Akshara Sports C1ub Akshara SporOts t al - 1491 P0iku am Aksh-ro Sport,i _11,-__ _ /400 00 26.00 1.85% 50 00 5 00 10.00% 22576 27 530 R.109.A Samsudeen . 10E0/3 Akatnyo Vvcant feld 1 379 00 122 00 32 19% 0 00 00 25008 20 410 1.121.A Govt of Kera a Transport Dept. .1 72/5 ZShM ot r Bus ti Shelte ____ ________ _12//0 6 00 50 00% 12 00 6 00 50 00% 25573 30 460 R.12t F KSRTC I Ka,,kkad Bus sthterl,1 0 1 7 20 .01 7 22577- 300640 L.128 0 L oeal Mvosque I __3__ 163/ Ka,,, /avo Mosqun 450 00 1000 2.22% 0.20 0 00 _____ 21213 30.820 L.1296 E RevenueDOeparttuent eeeOna/e1 194,2 !KaukSddl . ttl0 ____ a 1Ie760000 5 00 006% '. 0.00 000 ______ 25574 33 OtO R.123.A IKSRTC /Kadvavllr Bus shelter a800 a800 100 00% 6 00 Bo0 100.00% 25575 42 410 [.148 A KSRTC a' Vttoerkulam Buso shelter 1000 1800 100 00 -10.00 1 000 100 00% 22900 43 540 L.169.A Mvohar,mntd 91 8-/l Vattamkuilvm Vacant pOct i 400 00 1500 3 70% 00 00 0 ________)___ 2291346 680 FR. 157.C Am,naUmma a'3010 Ky_vady Moe.pparorn,b__ 1 64100 23 03 35.94 0 00 000 20484.150 R.161.A Kunjukuta5n _______ 376/2A 363 KaladL Z Charvtht.alapptt ___ 64300 13 00 2 119/ 0 00 0.010 ____ 2505 4290 R.181 C Govt of Kera a Education ODe _ 62/22 Ky ia~ [.0 Szhool Mantco, _____003O 30 0 0 000 0.00 0.00% 5058- 51.310 L.213 A 1A1 P. Sconool ________ 4/1 Thav-,t- At P ttcThI Ttrkert10500C0 14 200 13 52% 800 000 00000 T Ia 3 30 00 0o 13 19802.00 1 002 00 9 50% 311 00 75.00 24.12% 0 0 0. 0 C-O n T - Teno E~ nrave S- Sov-tie uP.- E00,1d P-esv- BPL. Brk- P-vey Lee WH. Woman Heavdd Kerata State Transport Project Pabe 11012 LINK 50.1 :PALAKKAD - SHORNUR 9125/2001. 12:30 PM PROJECT AFFECTED FAMILIES - OTHER PROPERTIES ~ h Property Revenue VilgAdrs No. E B S Suirvey No. LL qcC 22550 0 040 R,01 OSI Churcht I - 14512458 Y'akkara CSI Church 3600 14.00 0.38% 0.00 0.00 ___ 17164 02306 L.1 Ramachandran Rarnachandran I IYakara Vacant Land, Now Kerala Saw Mill. Olavakode P.O. 1 600.00 9.50 1.55% 0.00 __0.00 224 L.0 .1 1 I.A no1nw /- --171865 Yakkara Vacant land 1 2000.00 118.50 5.93% 0.00 _0~00 25320 0.500 R.5.1 BREM. School Trust / Palakkad.lll B.EM. High SchoolI 1100.00 30.00 2.73% 0.00 _ 0.00, 22952 10.640 JR.5.A not known 1 1 5012061 Yakkar Vacant land 1 600.00 5.00 0.83% 0.00 0~00 ___ 17017 1.380 JR.20.6 P.A S Kusappan QMS Arts Club __ /--88/ B.6/ TP 01 Yakkara M.S.S Club Pathan Street Palakkad 1.0 70 66% 1.0 70 66%_ 22960 1.530 R.23.A not known ________ - --150, BL 21 Yakkara Vacant land 1 300 1.00 5.00% 00 0 25327 2.160 L.28.9 Venkatesa Hospital T /Yakkara Vonkatesa Hospital 1 600.00 20.00 3~33% 0.00 0.00 - 22075_ 2.230 R.3t.~A notknown 7 V 236/4,BEL-h __ ipura Vacant land 1 500.00 58.00 6.22% 0 00 000O 22078 2240 L.28.H Mercy College /- -5B/2, BL-6 Palakkad Merc College Hostel 500.00 212,50 42.50% 45000 0,00 0 00% 22004_ 2.740 R.31.8 Karuna Hospital _______ - - - 9B/4, BL-5 PaleIkead Keruna Hospital 1900.00 8.00 0.32% 650.00 000O 0.00% 25346- 2.970 R.31 .C Not Known ______ Palakkad-lll Shied/worktho____ __p__ 1 40.00 2.50 6.25%1 40.00 2.50 8.25% 25348_ 3.200 R.36.A Not Known _______ __ ___Palakkad-ll Vacant plot 1 400.00 38.00 9.00% 0.00 0.00 _____ 25349 3.485 R.42.A KSRTC V Pirayid Bus ShelteratBypaussRoad 15.00 1 5.00 100.00% 18.00 15.00 ____ 22003 4.900 RA.40. not knowni I 1174/1, EL-i Pirayiri Vacant land I 800.00 41.00 5.13% 0.00 __0.00 _____ 20351 4.975 R.41.0.1 KSRTC /Pirayid Bus shelter 0.00 60 0.0 .0 80 0.0 25353 6.800 RAO0.C.3 KSRTC /- --PirayId Bus shelter I10.00 10.00 100.00% 10.00 10.00 22595 7,300 [47.0 not known _______1_7370/2, B[-1 Pira Id Vacant plot 1 100.00 8.00 8.00% 0.00 0.00 22996 9.080 L.47.D Government of Kerala Transport Departme V --- F- F217 L1 Pri tssetr22.00 22.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00 23734_ 13.550 RAI1A notknown _______ S- --98/3-2 Parall Vacaritland 1 640.001 88.00 10.83%. 0.00 0.00 25354 13.820 R.43.A KSRTC /Parali-t Bus shelter 1200 8.00 50.00% 12.00 6.00 50.00% 23007 17.040 P.45.C not known V 41613, BL-12 Mangera Walled plot of trees 1 80000 176.00 22.00% 0.00 0.00 23008 17.090 R.45.0 not known V 41615, B[-12 Mangara Vacant land 1 1080.00 21.00 1.94% 0.00 0.001 25357 i/7.220 IL.58.Z Not Known /Mankara Walled vacant land 1 640.001 17.00 2.88% 0_ 000 0,00 23740_ 18.500 L.58.9 P.K NairJ.BR School -. 360/2, TP 1248 Mankrara P.K. Nair JRB. School 2780.00 16.00 0.88% 0.00 0,001 23011 18.520 R.45.F not known 7 81/3, BL-1 2 mangara yaan tt__________ 1 400.00 14.00 3.50% 0.00 0.00 23012 19.670 [.61.A GovernmentoftKerala Health Department ,/ 135/1, EL-12 Mangara Matemnal & Child Health Centre 1 400.00. 3.50 0.88% 0.00 0.00 23745 21.760 [.61.5 not known V 135/4, E L-1 2 Pathnirpala IVacant lend surrounded by residential buildings 1 40.0 40.001 1.00% 0.00 0.00 23014 22.140 R.46.5 inut knoOw / 48/1, Desarn 207 Mangars Walled huee cornp0und 1 10.0 47.00 3.92% 0.00 0.00 23016 226890 [.62.A Local mosqus commitl V 10f7, Desam 207 Mangara Mosquie 40.0 29.00 7.25% 0.00 0.00 23756 25.010 L.62.8 Government of Kerala Transpcrt Dept. / 10/8, Desam 207 Pazhaya Lakrk Bus Sto with shelter 24.00 10.00 41.67% 24.00 10.00 25354 25.335 L.62.51 Not Known /Lakkidl Percoo Walled vacant plot I1 L 560.00 3.00 0.54% 0.00 -0.00 25365 25,530 [562B 2 KSEB /___ _ Lakkidi Peronr Transtorner 4.D0 __ 4.00 100.00%1 4.00 4.00 25366 26.450 R.46.E KSRTC _____ Mangala Bus Shelter 32.00 12.00 37.50% 32.00 12.00 25400 27.335 [.65.1 KSRTC Kot, zaBus shelter at Lekkadi Junction 1 24 00 12,00 50 00% 24.00 12.00 5000% 25401 27.420 L.65.2 NotKnown /Koothup azha Enclosed area with trees 1 127500D 17.00 1.33% 000O 0.00 23018 28.240 L.65.A not known 7 - --28/3 Lakkidi Vacant plot 1 1200.00 3.00 0.25% 0.00 0 00 25403 200300 [.65.A.1 Not Known / __Oaalm- I I Shed 1 25.00 ___3.00 12.00% 25.00 3.00 25404 28.005 L.65.A.2 KSRTC / tsalamn-l_ Bus shelter ___8.00 8.00 100.00% 8.00 8.00 23109 29 910 R.47A not known 8 9/2, Patta-5 Ottapslam-Il -Shed 1 390.00 10.50 2.69% 156.00 8.00 23035 44.340 L.283. not known 40129- Shnnu Vacaint Cloty 1 1000.00 23.500 2.30% 0.00 0.00 253075 34.900 [.126A NTeml Known 631 VanyamkulVacantplan 10000 35.0 3504% 0400 0.00 00 TOTAL3.18 9213. 31kow 39917 Vaiakua Vcn po250 183.50 4.80% 1975 13.5 .5% 0 0 23826 .h nOarond teeonvertmmet1lad 4W00 -0W7ar0t 4a 2H00ade00 23031 43,500 L,121.A not known 3612 Shomur V~~Keacan StatledTanplort Pro000ject lo3ll.0 .0 LINK 70: MUVATTUPUZHA - THODUPUZHA 10-10-01, 9:39 AM PROJECT AFFECTED FAMILIES - OTHER PROPERTIES User Status ulnorable Property lvnueSrv.q.EE ID Ch. N Owner User O T RevenueSurvey Village Address IL & U e F. 21325 2.01 L.02 Holy Mary Church = = 373/11-2 Maradi Holy Mary ChurchPost Office JuicLronMuva 4000 00 55.00 1 38% 0 00 _ 0.00 22107 2.10 L 03 Holy Mary Church Nirmala High Schoo __ 373/11-2 Marady Nirmala High School. Muvantupuzha 2000 00 35.50 1 78% 1000 00 0 00 0.00% 25326 2 24 R 8.01 Roadside hyundi of local mosque 16 00 3.50 21 88% 16 00 3 50 21 88% 25332 2.60 L.4C.1 Not Known 1 78.00 10.00 12.82% 0.00 10 00_ 22165 3.64 L.15.A NaduthottemVarkey / __ 170/6,TP 441 Voovattuuzha VacantLand 138000 116.00 841% 0 00 - 000 25376 5 73 L 35 B KSRTC / Bus shelter 15.00 3.50 23 33% 15 00 3.50 23.33%A 22202 581 R 48.A Mosque 198/13 Muvattpuzha Mosque 180 00 3 50 1 94% 64 00 0 00 0 00% _ _ 22226 6.55 L,43.A Church _ 44/7 Muvattupuzha Arch of Church 68.00 2.50 3268% 17 00 3 00 100.00% __ 25380 6.59 L 43 A 1I 17.50 3.50 20.00% 17 60 3 50 20.00% 22269 8 92 R 598B Not Known / 243/4 2 MuvatttPuzha VacantUAbandoned Building 1 800.00 122.00 1525% 122.00 122 00 100.00% = 22319 10.88 R.80.C Cammol School _ 146/3 Maneloor Nursery School 800.00 70 00 875% 400 00 0 no 0 0 00% 223t7 10.90 L.82.A Thomas _ 188/I6, TP 1312 Manjrlloor Carmel School 2400.00 173.00 721% 12D000 000 0 00% 1164 12.38 L.65 St. Thonas L P. Scho / _ M a St. Themas L P. School Mambiparampil 3000 00 380.00 1267% 380 00 0 00 0 00% 22420 13.90 L.68.A Lappe _ 653/1, TP 1383 ianjloor Vacant tand 980.00 10.00 16 33% 0 00 0 00 22455 14.70 L 74.1 Kochu KunIu 559/1-2, TP 2584 Manjalloor Vacant Land 1400 00 330 00 23 57% 000 0 00 22456 14 80 L.74.2 Kalyani 560/2-1, TP 11547 Manjalloor Vacant Land 1 800.00 165 00 20 63% 0 00 0.00 _ _ _ _ 8638 14.92 L 75A Kurian 552/3, Manua loor Kurinan Myladi il Kadalikadoi P O 4000 00 907.00 22 68% 0 00 0 00 ____ 1253 1540 L.82.1 Jose Varghese CPM Secretariat _ / _ _ 543/4, TP 4A.3 ana2L_or V/144, CPIM-Madakkathanab Br 1 25.00 2.00 8 00% 25 00 20 a 0020 _% 8572 15 92 L 89 L) Marlhavan Madhavan 41 549/1 5 anlor MV. VI/383, Pallikkadath,l, Madakkathenaur 3 2760 00 794 00 28 77% 000 ___ 0.00 ____ 21393 17.90 R.155 G Padmanabhan Memor I1/1-5 Kumaramangala Padmanabhan Memorial Cultural Centre 1000 00 676.00 67 80% 80 00 8000 100 00°% 8680 18.08_ R.182A_ FrancisJ _ 159/1,2 Kumaram n gala N.J.Mathew, Nilavoor House Alakkode Kale _ 2880.00 1800.00 6250% 000 0 000 _ _ _ _ 21879 18.54 L.118.J2 Merchants'Associatioi Merciants'Associat ___ __ 184/5 TIodupue ha _ 2400 00 951.00 39863% 0.00 0 00_.._ _ _ __ 8774 18.65 LilS1 L Jagathamma Jagathamma .1 __ _ 167/10. TP' 1696 Tholdi 009 2,61.27 P ayanka Ta/sonng Centre 1 525.00 384.00 714% 60.00 0.00 0 00% /_ 8658 18.71 L.118 N Bhaskaran Nair 1/ __ _ 164/5, TP 4846 Kumaramangala Chanthrathil Penumpilichira Thodupuzha 800 00 35000 4375% 30000 000 0 00% 22014 18.82 R.171 1 Not known I19/2 Thodupuzha Vacant Land 200.00 18800 94.00% 000 0 00 Ttl 25 20 1 Z 01 . 8 32524.50 7685.00 2315% 38.3 21.50 6.28% A 1 0 A - Owner T - Tennt E - En-acler S - Sqiunttor EP - Enfifld Persons uPL Beew Po-ero LIn WH - Woan Hrad Kerala State Transport Project Pa,g 1 of LINK 72: TAIKKOD - KAZHAKOOTUM 08-10-01, 5.17 PM PROJECT AFFECTED FAMILIES - OTHER PROPERTIES ~Use Sbt(11s6 ~' ' ~~& ~ unrable, No:D C., vAUsr R *'? I3TT6 goo R,5 S Mumthas Begam 1 125/4, 306 Kozhikode ~~~~~~1 280.00 49.00 17.50% 50.00 0.00 0 00% __ 1L3778 0.970 R.8 1 322/2. 4631 Pirappincode uldnafcSeeuaruesMndra Vlavoor P 80.00 19.00 23.75% 30 100 28 14122 1 000 L.5 lKamalamma Karnalarnma 1 101/2 Marickal C/o Kadayil Pulthen Veedu, Velavoor 0pposite Suresh Sre 1 2420.00 110.00 4955% 0.00 0,00 1 41 25 1.060 L.7 AbdutAzeez Abdul Azeez . 218/3, 1052 Pita icod N. Abdul Azeez, Pallivila Veedua Velavoor, Pirappancode I 1 1400.00 204.00 14.57% 00 DO 000 (I T4-128 1.140 L.9 Nazeer Na_zeer/ 102/4 Koliakode N.S. Manzil, Velavoo,. Koliyakod P.O0 1 1560.00 708.00 45.26% 0.00 0.00 13812 1.345 R,18 M Suresh Kumar /1 324/3, 4675 Kotiakode Fallow Land, M Suresh Kumar, Vazhathu Veedu, Velavoor1 2380.00 54.40 2 31% 00 000O 1 4160 1O 49 .20 Nazeer Niazeer a 3/3Koliyacode 13 433800.00 79.00 2.15% 0.00 0.00 1T3822 1.~61 0 R.27 YShan Y Shajahan 324/1 5. 4683 Koliakode Y ShaaShan, Kada ii Vilakathu Veedu, Velavoor. Koliakiode 1 162.00 147.00 80.74% __ 0,00 0.00 -- - 25604 1.620 R.27.A K.S.R.T.G Kohiyakode 5.00_ -5.00 170-0.00% ___ .00 5 00 1 00 00% 14173 1.770 L.38 Ayisha Beev iA isha Beevi / _ 1138/14. 546 Koliakkode Cheruvilakathu Veedu, VelavDor, Koliakode P.O. 1 800.00 128.00 15 .75% __ 0.00 0.00 23005 1.920 L.41 .A K.S.R.T.C Koliyakode 3.00 3.00 10.0X.00 0 3.00 100 00% 13833 1.940 R.38 Anilha Anitha/ 328/12. 4895 Koliakode Krishna Sree, Kollakode 1 840.00 48.00i 7.19% 0,00 0.0 ____ 13834 1 960 R39 Sulochana Suloctrans 328/13, 46096 Koliakode jAgricujlture Land 1 580.00 45.00 8.04% 0.00 0.00 13835 1 980 R40 I4 Raeela Beevi Atrdul Basheer V 328/14, 4687 Koliakode Raleela Beevi Jannalhil HoLise Velauvoor, Koliakode Post, 1 780.00 "27.50 3652% 000 0.00 13838 2.000 RAI lAnitha S D Anitha S D3 /1 328/15, 4688 Koliakode Priya Nivas ,Kaniyapuram 1 1600.00 60.00 3.75% 0.00 0,00 13901 2.500 P'58 Kumnari Valsala Kumnari Valsala 1331/1, 4731 Koliakode RAJAMANGALATHL Veed,, Koliakode Ko[iakode P.O V( 1 1840,00 67.90 4.12% 0.00 0.001 __ 14241 2.510 L.55 Damodharan Nair Damnodharan Nair 1 160/38 K7 oliyacode 1 900 680 708% 0 00 0.00 14190 2.695 L.60 Nassera Bneet Afsal Khian _ 175/3, 1238 oi cd K.Mu.M.Nursery School Koliakkode Pont Thiruvananthapur 2 1000.00 40.00 4.00% 80,00 0 00 0 00% 14201 2.795 [864 Abdul Kharim Abdul Kharim a' 170/4, 1148 K'0 i- No . > o. , I 25606 0000 R.01 NotKnown __ _ 225 Boundary wall on M.C. Road, left side, Perunna Junction 1 2100.00 30.00 1 .43% 0 00 8340 0 370 R8 not known ' _ _ _ 222/86-2A, TP 504 Ct,encianasserv Vdcant Land & Compound Wall 1 1100.00 142 00 12,91% 0 00 0.00 8275 0.780 L.10 not known / __ 220 Chenganassery Vacant Land 1 1600.00 1300 0 81% 000 00C _ _ _ _ 8357 10 140 R.81 Joseph Chacko / _ _ _ 2418614,5, TP 1127 Ramankery Joseph Chacko Macolam Kunm, Ramankery P 0 1 375.0t 50.00 13.33% 0 00 0.00 1 __ 22937 12 430 R.95 A Government Df Kerala Transport Departmr _ _ _ _ 25 Champakkulam Waiting shed 30.00 30 00 100 00% 30 00 30 00 100 00% 2293h 13.375 L 37 A Government of Kerala Transport Departm J Champa,kulam Waiting shed 21 00 4 00 19 05% 21 00 4 00 19 05% 22939 14 835 R_110A Government of KeralT Transport Departmr _ _V _ 25 Champakkulam Waiting shed _ 25.00 7001 2800% 2500 7.00 28.00% 24846 15.920 L.37 B not known / Champakkulam Vacant plot 1 360.00 25 00 6.94% 0 00 0 00 22479 15.930 L.37 C Govt. of Kerala Transport Departm / Champakkulam Waiting shed s 000 8.00 53.33% 15 00 000 53.33% 23524 16.420 R 115.A not known _ I _ 91303 Nedumudi Vacant plot 300 00 18.00 6 00% 0 00 0(00 22940 17.480 L.38A Government of Kerala Transport Departm / 9 Neduudi Wa0ting shed 12.00 500 41.57% 1200 500 41.67% 22941 18.000 R 121.A Governmnent of Ke,ala Transport Departm / _ __9 Nedumudl VVaitino shed 17.00 1700 100 00% 17.00 t1700 100 00% 22943 19.440 R122 A Governmw-ent of Kera Transport Departmf I _ 9 Nedumudi Waiting shed _ 1200 700 58 33% 1200 7.00 58 33% 22944 20.465 L.41 A Government 0f Kerla T ransport Departm I _ I Nedumudi Waiing shed 12 00 7 00 58 33% 12 00 I O 58 33% 22945 21.550 R 124 B Govt of Kerala Iransport Departm 1 _ 8 Nedumudi Wailing shed 31.00 3100 100.00% 12 00 12 00 100.00% 22947 22 970 L 47 A not known _ 672 Alappuzha Homoeo Clinic 330.00 4 00 1 21% 0 00 0.00 23538 23570 R142 A Government of Kerala Transport Departm 1 _ 41/ Alappuzha Waitngshed 1500 500 33 33% 1500 5.00 33 33% 25609 23900 L.56A Not Knorn 1 _07 _Vacant land. tntl o SB Colege 1 2000 00 31 00 1.55% 0 0C 0.00 25601 24.140 L.00 KSRTC 1 030 Bus shellS n TCH-47 facing Ctianganassery Junction _ 7 00 7 00 100 00% 7 0C 7.00 100 00% Total 19 19 0 0 0 6 8362.00 441.00 .527% 178.00 109.00 61.24% 1 0 0 0 0 0-n, r . Tnanl E0- Ennuantin 5 OmaIn EP En1nilind P-i-, BPL -9.0b. Poveny L-i, WH - Woman leaded Kerala State Transport Project Pq1t Annex 11.2.6: Project Affected Government Used Properties LINK 1: TAIKKOD - KOTTARAKKARA 08-10 01, 12:18 PM GOVERNMENT OFFICE / LAND , z-.wc = __B _ _. ___ _ . . _~~~~~Usr S _ _, a Property RvnUs er Survey Vr fab e ID Ch. ~~Owner User 0 ilaeAdrs t f l ia No, T E No. , n 20599 26.900 L.30.A Govt of Kerala Education Departr n _e_ _ 295/14 le.lanadu Govt. High chool, Venjaramoodu_ 4050.00 132.00 326% 200.00 0.00 0.00% 24855 30.460 R 54.A Govt. of Kerala Revenue Dept. J ___ _ 100/17 Nellanadu Bus Shelter, Govt. Land _ 4400 00 115.00 2 61% _ _ __ 24856 31.450 R.71 .A Govi. of Kerala Revenue De _ 574/1 Vamanapjr Purampokku Land 1000.00 59900 59 90% 0.00 000 _0_0__ 2485' 31.500 R.71.B Govl. of Kerala P&T 1 _ 574/2 Vamanapur Purampokku Land 750.00 587 00 78 27% 84.00 84.00 100.00%_ 24850 _31.540 R 71 C Govt. of Kerala Revenue Dept. J _ _ _ 574/3 Vamanapur Purampokku Land 600 00 304.00 50 67% 0 00 0.00 24862 32.060 L,77 A Govt, of Kerata Rural Developmert 1 ___ 535/10 OVamalapu Ru/ra DlvfeafoPme,f B oatd 34oftvr 200 00 11 00 5 50% 1C8.00 it 00 tO 15% 20701 33.080 1.99.A Govt. of Kerala Revenue Dp __ _ 330/15 Pulimath Panchavatt Office, Pu/math 120.00 8 00 8 67% 30 00 8 00 266 7% 34864 40 300 R.188. Gout. of Kerala Revenue Dept. ____ 1183/11.2 Pazhayakun Vacant Govervvnent land 50 00 80.00 100 00% 0.00 0 00 ____ |2406 42.150 R.207.A Govt, of Kerala Revenue Dept I _ _ _ 204/3, TP 4143 Pazhayaku- Puranpokku Land 1450.00 145000 100 00% 0.00 0 00 _ ___ 24875 50.870 R 270 A Govt. of Kerata _ ' ____ 254/7 Cadaram Government oftce 48.00 24 00 50 00% 48.00 24.00 50.00% 24894 55.160 IL 257 A Govt Ot Kerala Revenue Dept. | 36934 Edamulakka Purampokku Land | 2400 00 1252.00 5217% 0 00 0.00 20752 57.800 L.266.2 Revenue DePt. | ' | - -439/11 Valakam GoVt land 1130.00 130 00 11 50% _ 0.00 C 00 3791 71.160 -390.2.4.4 P.G. GeorRe kutty | |J_ _ 137/2 lTP 75641 Kottarakara 10/83Telegraph officeDept. of Telecommunicnlons 1 20 00 2.00 10.00% 20 00 2.00 10.00% 10553 71.160 L 390 3,4 Georgekuntty 1 36/10 Kottarakate Tetecom office 48 00 2.00 4 17% 48 00 2.00 4.17% TOTAL 14 12 2 0 0 1 _16306.00 4706.00 28.88% 538.00 131.00 24.35% 0 0 0 0 0 .ner T. - e-nlf- E. EnuEvauher . S. S-quare, Lu - nJImlla Pard s BPL - Belo Puv-y L-e WH - W-,nav H-need Kerala State Transport Project Page fu/l LINK 2: KOTTARAKKARA - ADOOR C6-10-01, 10:50 AM GOVERNMENT OFFICE / LAND oUsr StatL_ Visu abie Property Owe srRevenue Survey Viia Ade6 a - I 'n I S -X( ID Ch. No we sr ~ T~~No. Vils drs U gE~~ 25.67 73 800 R.28.B Govt. of Kerala / MYLAM 776.50 775.50 100.00% 0.00 0.00 _ _ _ _ 24044 73 060 L.4.H Govt. of Kerala Revenu DePt. / _ _ 379/6 Mvlam, Village Office, Mylam 375.00 49.00 13.07% 55.00 0.00 0.00% 25374 74 460 R,35.G Govt. of Kerala / _ _ 199 Mylam 538.00 538.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00 2 _ _ r I 05275,100 R.48 Br________ '__ 1531Mvtarr ESI Office 60.00 8.00 13.33% 60.00 17.00] 28__33 24 8 2.370 R 75.0 Goot of India DePt, of Telecomm, / 4t O[yprm T phone Exchange, Kotakada 440.00 36 00 6.16% 169.00 0.00 0.00% 24676 82.440 R75.0 Govt. of Kerala GHe ot. HDsp tal and Educafion Offic e Complex J 1750.00 17&O0 10 06% - = = 0oI 6 1 ______ 510033.0 1583.50 4020% 284.00 17900 J . a 9Jo% 0 Owne: T T-rant- E - Enroacer: s - Squater: EP - Ented P-rsons 8PL-Be ow P-%y LneW - Woman Headed Kerala State Transport Project Pgan7 f9 LINK 3: ADOOR - CHENGANUR 06-10-Cl 11:10AM GOVERNMENT OFFICE / LAND user tts~~ Vuneal ReventieSurvey -eR ~ v6 ~ ~~ ID Ch. Property Owner User T S o.vlnleg e Address r x No. VIIIO0e Address w ~~~~~~~~~ ~~ N. E 24788 101 140 L.114.A Indian overseas Bank a' _ _ 2/2 Kuramtala Bank Bi. dive Are_ 198.00 21 00 10 61% 198.00 17.00 8.59% 20944 101.200 R.126.C Govt Excise Deparmeni / _ _ 411 1 Kurumbala Excse Office 080.00 80 00 9.05% 0.00 0.00 24777 102.580 L.124.D Govt. / _ _ _ 39/8 Pandalrn Pust Ofihce 600.00 6 00 1 00% 135.00 0.00 0.00% 24784 103.180 R.139.8 Govt. / _ _ 257(12 Pandalam i ITCram 13m ___ 122500 57.00 4.30% 0.00 0.00 _ _ _ _ 24757 111.160 R166 Gov of Kerala Revenue Dept a _ _ 225/19 M,illakuziaha a a __ _ 640.00 61 00 953% 100.00 0.00 0.00% 25516 116.460 L.178.C 1 131 r evvLir ..__ 550.00 3 00 0 64% 0O oe Total I 6 0 0 0 0 4193.00 228.50 5.45% 433.00 17.00 3.93% 0 0 0 0 0-Owner T Ten-n E Encboadee s Squater.EP-EitedtPetsons BPL - bwe6 P-eney Lire WH - Woman Headee Kerala State Transport Project deau] at la LINK 6: MUVATTUPUZHA - ANGAMALI 09-10-01, 12:14 PM PROJECT AFFECTED FAMILIES - GOVERNMENT OFFICE / LAND User Satus 0 .Vulneral Prprty Reeu 4 ID Ch. N.~ Owner User Revenue Villae Address w 2 e et * IL 0 E.5 0 'at 25461 208.800 R.62.A _____ ______ ____________________8.50 8.50 100.00% 8.50 8.50 100.00% _ 24518 -21-1.200 83A Govt. of Kerala KSE6 1 ___ 82/0 Ml~avoor KSSSbSain2400.00 115,00 4.78% 0.00 0.00 24535 213.500 L.104,F Govt. of Kerala Education Dept . __ _ 763/8 Vulavoor Government L.P. School 1100.00 105.00 9.55% 000 0 25483 2114.380 IL.106.E _____________________10.00 4.00 40.00% 10.00 4.00 40.00% _ 24554 218.180 R.140E.H Govt. of Kerala Education Dept _ =_ __ 167/8 Rayamanigala Govt. L.P. School, Kazh illom 1280.00 14.00 1.09% 0.00 0.00 21405 22S.400 L. 148 A. Govt of Kerala Govt 1 __ 67/53 Perumbavoor G.ovt land_8 90. 6.00 6.67% _00 600 _25527 Z225.41 0 L.148,A I_____ ______80 .0 7.0 8.00 6.00750 24585 231.100 R.250.A Govt. of Kerala Revenue Dept. _ _ _ _ 289/7 Chelamattom VIlage Office, Chelamattom ___= 375.00 10.50 2.80% 110.00 0.00 0.00% 1771 231.120 L.247 Govt. of Kerala . _ _ 485/ Chelamattom KeralaStateSeedFarm 10000.00 110.00 1.10% 144.00 000 0.00% 10947 234.500 L.311 I___________ ./_____Kalady HARILAL WELLFARE -LIBRARY ~1250.00 37.50 3.00% 120.00 0.00 00% Total 10 7 8 0 2 8 16521.50 416.50 2.52% 400.50 18.50 4.62% 0 0 0 O 0 . Ovvvir T - Tenanl E - OnernacCer . S - Squaller: EP - Onlliled Persons EPL- Eelow Pover-, LW tvWH. Woman Headed Kerala State Transport Project Page Il vI LINK 50.1: PALAKKAD - SHORNUR 9/25t2001. 12.20 PM _________ _ser__ S taasPROJECT AFFECTED FAMILIES - GOVERNMENT PROPERTIES __-,____ ID Ch. OnrUeSReven..e VIle Address Propet OweUe 1 T IE Surey No. " < & I i able I 22954 0.760 L.12A Government of Kerala KSRTC I I _ 14512403 Yakkara KSRTC Bus Terminous, Yakkara 1092.00 13.00 1.19% 300.00 13.00 4.33% __ __ 23725 5.860 R 40 C 2 Government of Kerala Revenue Departnme / _- 341/3 Pirayti Govemment land 647.00 101.00 15.61% 0.00 0.00 23023 35 020 R81.A Govemment of India Dept of TelecommL / 20/2 Ottapalam TelecmCoaxialStathon 4000O0 12.00 300% 0.00 0.00 25386 40 560 R 121.1 Revenue Dept. I___/ aniyamkulam Purampokku land 500.00 500.00 100 00% 0 00 0.00_ TOTAL] 5 5 O 0 O O1: -- 2t55 63D0_ 23.73% 13116 117 5 .38% O 0 0 O0 0o. 0-ner T Tenant E En-rr-ah-Sr. S - Squatter -P. EntEtled PersonP BPL Below Poven1 LPne . WIt. -W man Header Kerala State Transport Project PNon 1 rnf LINK 70: MUVATrUPUZHA - THODUPUZHA 10-I0-01, 9:39 AM GOVERNMENT OFFICE I LAND P-oper O-Ter ---.User Status _ _ . Vulnerable ~E ID Ch. No. Owo T l ES5 RJVE2nue SUrVeY VillaDe Address uu es, e~ < Z E E e E u ^ v r BLI t CL ~ ~~~ 0 U 22106 200 L01 Government of india / _ _ _ 373111 Marady Post Office Buildiny Muvattupuzha 252.00 85.50 33.93% 220.00 10 00 4,55o/% __ 22127 2 18 R.8.1 Revenue Department / _ __ 38119 Marady Government Land 16.50 9.00 54.55% 0.00 0.00 _ _ _ _ 21335 252 L4A Revenue Department 1 __ _ 160/6 M Govt. land 2600.00 50.00 1.92% 0.00 _ 0.00 21339 2.73 L4.D Revenue Department / _L _ _ 161/1-B Moovattupuzha Govt. land 500.00 450.00 90.00% 0.00 0 00 - - - | 25411 517 G.28 I _ _ _ 144.00 1.00 0.69% 0.00 0.00 22200 5.70 L 35.A GoK / _ _ _ 55/3-3A Muvattupuzha Purlp House and Bus Stop _ 215.00 5.00 2.33% 5.00 5 00 100°00% -- 22236 7.30 L46 DepartmentofHealth _/ _34/10-10A Muvattupuzha PublicFlalthDepartment __ 900.00 1.00 0.11% 80.00 0.00 0.00%-- - 25405 8.50 L 54.1 Nct Known 1108.00 3.00 2.78% 90.00 0.00 0.00% _ 21353 15.80 R. 116.6 Government /8J4B uraaapt ot land 600 56.001 93.33% 0.00 0.00 ___ 21382 16.50 R.133.A Revenue Department / _5B,5A TP 5361 Kumaramangala Govt Land 120.00 18 00 15.00% o DO 0.00 _ . _ _ 21383 16.64 R.133.B Revenue Department 1 __ 7/4B,4A TP 3251 Kumaramangala Govt. Land 118.00 118.00 100.00% 0.00o 0.00 I 21364 16 70 R.135 A Revenue Department . _ 7/2B,3E, TP 3251 Kumaramangala Govt. Land 127.00 32.00 25.20° A 0.00 0 00 21365 16.80 R 136.0 Revenue Department 1 SY No. 7/1 B Gumaramangala Govt. Land 62 00 27.00 43.55% 0.00 0.00 - _°-- - 219 18.30 R.168.E Revenue Department /152 /3 -5167 ThodUPulzha Govt.Land 115.00 115.00 100.00% 0.00 0.00 21399 19.30 R.174.E Thodupuzha Fire Stati_ 1 63 /12 .13 Thodupuzha Govt.LandThodupuzha Fire Station g0o0o 61.50 6.83% 100.00 6.00 6. 00% 21400 19 44 R 174+F Revenue Department 194/1 -1 Thodupuzha Govt.Land 160800 140.00 0 00 Total 1 16 . . 14 0 L 0 0 0 7917.50 1046.00 13.21% 495.U0 21.00 4.24%_ 0 0 0 0 0 -0D-e, T - Tenanl E . Encro-c-eh S - Squatter EP Entitled Persns 6PL - e,. - P.-vmry Line WH - Woman Headed Kerala State Transport Project Page I al 1 LINK 72: TAIKKOD - KAZHAKOOTUM 081001, 4:18 PM GOVERNMENT OFFICE / LAND ID Property ~~~~~~~~~user Status co ,,.. unerable ID Ch. No, Owner | Usr .1: '' g | na.Aidr* - -> 14261 3140 L91.2__ Vlayyalumar Animal Husbandar / __ _ 1701i81149 Kolyacode Anmal HusbandaryOffice, Kolivacode _ 2000 500 2500% 20.00 S.00 25.00% 120315 6 230 R 1018 GoutLand Govnt. Land __ _ BL-13 - vioorar Telephone Exchoange ,Poithencode P.O.__ 150 00 6,00 4.00% 8000 0.00 0.00% 24231 70930 z L 174 A Gout of Ke,ala ennmDecailirn / __ 174Arora VlaeOfce Ayirooppara ___ 525~00 48 00 8.76% 48 00 1200 25 00%1 140 10.300 L 226 Panchayathun Libaryr Kzhakutam GrC e /_ 8,0 yroaa Pnlaa Library, Chandawtla, Kauhakwalarn P 0. ___ 20000D 5400O 27.00% 80.00 6 00 10.00% Total 4 3 0 0 0 0 895.00 111.00 12.40% 238.00 25.00 10.50% 0 0 0 0 o - Owner T Tenant E - EnDnoacnel S - Squater P EPnitd Pers-ns BPL - BSo- Po-yty Lno WH - woman Hieaj.Od Kerala State Transport Project Paae tor LINK 73: ALAPUZHA - CHANGANASERRY 0O-10-01, 4:04 PM GOVERNMENT OFFICE / LAND ID C.Property -w~ '77 ~~ S[sf~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ tt9W 22934 8.280 R,54.A Govemment of Kera a / _ 24 Ramankan Family Welfare Centre, Ramankart 700.00 48.00 6.86% 16000 000 0.00% 844B 122800 R4127 iSanthtakuman 1 675/13, TP 6163 Alappuzha jxX VIII/ 396 Kerala Agocultural Departments Alappuzha 1 2800 001 10.00 0.36%1 100.00 0 00 0.00%1 Total 2 1 1 0 0 0 3500.00 58.00 1.66% 26000 0.00 o00- 0 0 0 0 - C yn T -Ten-ot E-E FCooacher SSqualer: EP - EntiWlld Pe--vvo Dl - Bylow Pov.ny LineV WH - Woman Headed Kerala State Transport Project P l'Je Iot I ANNEX 11.3: Schedules of Project Displaced Families Annex 11.3.1: Project Displaced Families - Residential Properties Annex 11.3.2: Project Displaced Families - Commercial Properties Annex 11.3.3: Project Displaced Families - Agricultural Properties Annex 11.3.1: Project Displaced Families - Residential Properties LINK 1: TAIKKOD - KOTTARAKKARA 08-10-01, 3:00 PM PROJECT DISPLACED FAMILIES - RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES WITHOUT COMPOUND WALL User Status ~ ~EE ~ Vulnerable ID Ch Property Owner U :etuS RevenueSurvey VillageAddressuu2Revenue Survey Village Address E a- -e E 3 * - D e No. OTn ETS No. 2996 28.120 R 44 _ __ 254/7 Nallanadu Puthivalvilaveedu, Venjaramoodu 2 240.00 125 00 52.08% 30.00 30.00 100 00% _ _ __ 4070 32.185 L.83 Muralidharan / __ _ 533/5 Vaamanapuram Remya EhavanVamanapuram P OVamanapuram 1 320 00 141 00 44 06%° 150 00 150.00 100 O0% 3162 32.445 R 92 Ponnan Nadar 1 _ 608/2 Vamanapiram Mul uvathalakalll Veedu, 3/440 4 840.00 788.00 63.81° 49.00 49 00 10000% __ 2946 34 980 R.133 Ponnamma _ __ 342/7 Pulimath_ VII /750 Vadekkovila VeeduKudiyela 1 1300.00 28 00 2.15% 42 00 28 00 66 67%1 _1 __ 9067 36 160 L.124 B Viswambaran 1 _ 345/11 Pulimath V,swambaran Vaidyan. VadakWeathu 1 4000.00 723 00 1608°% 70.00 61.00 B7.14% 3961 39.520 R.1t4 Sreedharan 1 __ 108/11 (TP 3261) Pazhayakunnum IX/1051 Vipin Nivas pappala 1 1320 00 334 00 25.30% 120.00 120 0 100.00% _1 25460 40.B20 R.189.A Not Known I Pazhayakunnum 1 17.00 1700 100.00% 17.00 17 0 o 10000A __ 9227 41 020 L.153.E Rajaiiiarur / _ 1 1617 (TP 684 1) Pazhayakukkurm 1/144. Charuvila Puthan Veedu, Thlartathumala P 0. 4 960.00 42800 44.58% 7500 75600 100 00% 1 V 9220 41.040 L.153 F Somarajan / ___ 116/7 (TP 6841) Pazhayakukkum 111/994, 1/149, Partly disintegrated house 1 52700 523.00 9924% 3000 1500 50 00% /__ 9248 41.230 L.153 L Radha 6 0/4. TP 8783 PazhayakukkUrm Ii158, Kodayilveedu. Manalathu 1 200 00 113 00 56.500 63.00 36 00 57.14% 1 . 3241 42.100 R.202.1 Pushpalatna 1 __ _ 203/14 1TP 6164) Pazhayakunnum V/404 Varshlayam Manalethupacha Thattathuniad Post 1 30 00 30.00 100.00A% 30 00 30 00 100 00/0 1 _ 24860 45 400 R 213 A Faraludin f/ 341/6, TP 2948 Nilamel Mary Mannil Karode Nilamel 1 15.00 15 00 100.00°A 15.00 15 0D 100 00% ____ 24871 47 830 R 222.A Sainudheen 1 335/4, TP 2877 Nilamel S.N.House, Kurakode Chadavamangalam 1 20.00 10.00 50.D0% 20 00 10 00 50.00% __ 9139 50 400 L 201 G Sasidharan Pillai / ___ 227/19 (TP 1993) Chadayamagala 8/439 Kathika Chadayamagalam 1 2340 00 1006 00 43.08% 150.00 150.00 100.00% 3639 51 245 R.273.6 Sam Kumar 1 1_ _243/12 (TP 2763) CThada amangal' Behind Pooja Hire Sorwice Chadayamangalain 1 8 00 9 00 62.50% 8 00 5.00 62.50% 3978 54.444 L.249 Basheer _1__ 1_137/9 (TP 1032) Edamulakkal U862, Madan Kovil, Ayoor 4 35 00 35.00 100 00% 35 00 35 00 100 00% _ 4016 50.800 L267 Kunjandy Baby 1440/3 (TP 4055) Valakam Choola, Melathil Puthen Veedu 4 100000 566.00 56 60%/ 180.00 18000 100.00% ._ 8925 60 510 R 337.E Sunny George 1 ___ _ 465/3 (TP 4395) Anchal XVIII/612,Sun cot/upeValakom 1 600 0c 243.00 40 50% 100 00 100 00 100 00% 6926 60 525 R.337.F P M George 1 _ _ 465/4 (TP 4396) Anchal 18/613,P V HouseValakom P 0 1 8800 c 454 00 51.59% 120.00 80 00 66 67%A 25537 62.585 R.359.1 Not Known / _ _ _ Valakom Bunk 1 22 00 22.00 100.00% 22.00 22 00 100.00% 3279 63 050 1 334 Thankchan _ _ 299/12 (TP 2654) Valakam Kailhakkattil, Thannivilaputhenvsedu 1 560.00 553.00 98 75% 50.00 50 00 100 00% 3287 64.120 L.339 Wilson . ___ _ 362/14 (TP 181)_ Vattikavala Shujen,Panavali P.O 2 800 00 638 00 79.75% 195 00 195 00 100.00% __ 24950 66.330 R 382 K Ales I _ 175/6, TP 2064 Vettikavala #Deleled 1 600 00 158.00 26 33% 48 00 48.00 100.00% _ 3665 68 340 L373 Matha Abraham a __ _ 174/3 (TP 3856) Melila Thayyll veedu,Karik/am .P 0 KoHarakara 2 2280 00 450 00 19.74% 65.00 65.00 100 00% __ 3684 69 420 L 376 Wilson K V 290/1 )TP 3700) Mehla rea shop,Kaippalloor.Karikkakam 1 18 00 9 00 50.000/ 18 00 9 00 50 00% Total 25 22 1 1 1 ( 40 18932.00 7416.00 39.17% 1702.00 1575.00 92.54% 10 s 0 - wner T - Tenant E - En-roahner S - Squa0er EP - Enhitled Persons OPL - Beclw Poneri/ LUe WH - Woman Headed Kerala State Transport Project PWge Int LINK 1: TAIKKOD - KOTTARAKKARA 08-10-01, 2:58 PM PROJECT DISPLACED FAMILIES - RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES WITH COMPOUND WALL user Status Iulerable I Ch Propertyi Owe Revenue Survey ftE-E o 0 S . Owner Village Address I 3.- a',& 3379 54 740 R.309 Rajeev Kumar _ / _ _ 130/16(TP 952) Edamulakkal Murrdappalil House. AyoorP.O 1 180.00 137 00 76.11% 100.00 12.00 12.00% TOTAL| 1I _ 0 1 0 0 . 1 180.00 137.00 71.11% 100.00 12.00 12.00-/. 0 0 0 0 00. -me' T - Te,anm E Encroacher 5 Squater: EP. Entitled Persons BPL Below Povertv LLne: WH - Wornan Headed Kerala State Transport Project Page I o, I LINK 2: KOTTARAKKARA - ADOOR 06-10-01, 10:49 AM PROJECT DISPLACED FAMILIES - RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES WITHOUT COMPOUND WALL User Status ' aVuIneal Property ReventueSurveyAdrs E ;g - (1- ID Ch. No. Owner oNo, Village Adrs - |t5 IL 7oT ETs 8 U~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. 4 4 4913 74 490 R.36 Puskaran 1 __ _ 199/4 Mylam Muttambalath Pulhenveedu Pallickal P.O 2 500.00 500.00 100.00% 19.00 19.00 100.00% _ _ 4914 74 520 R.37 Ravindran Pillai __ 1 _ 199/5 Mvlam Perirnpally Melalijil 1 288.00 288.00 100.00% 37.00 37.00 100.00% __ 5017 76705 R.63 E M.Majeed I _ 104/12,TP 900 Mylam X11/379 Nisha Manzil Mylam P.O 5 160.00 48.00 30.00% 60.00 48.00 B0.00% _ 10609 78 895 R.72 D John _ 303/7, TP Kalayapuram V'il/191, John Baby Sadanam, Kalayapuram 1 80 00 16 00 20.00% 32.00 32.00 100.00% / 10633 81.100 R.75.1 RaveendranPillal . 382/28, TP6118 Vulnyapuram V/31, Gokulam, Kulakara P , Kulakara 1 41000 41000 100 00% 5000 36.00 72 00% _ 1 0834 81.120 R.75 J Kumearan 1 82/13 Kalayapuram Thenqumthondil (H), Puthumukku, Kulakkada P.O. 2 317.00 3 17.00 100.00% 40.00 40.001 `100.00% 1( 10635 81.140 R.75 K Gopalan 1 382/14 Kalayapuram Pulipurackal, KP V/33. Kullakara P 0 4 502.00 502 00 100.00% 120.00 80.00 66.67% _ 4269 85 490 L.50 George / _ _ _ 19/1 1 (TP 4449) adoor VW31 1 Pallithzbeyil Vayala P O 3 75 00 56 00 74.67% 75.00 56.00 74.67% __ 435) 95 150 L.70 Su atha _ 720/ 0 aahvl do P.O Aoor 2 00 40 48.00%, 48.00 24.00 500%_ / Total | - - _ _ | 7_|___|_1_|_1_|_ __ .21[ 2382.08 2161.30 0 90.72% ] 481.00 372.00 7734% | O - 0-wer T - Tenant E E-incacher S - Squatter EP Eritled Persons BPL - 6elowF Poerty Lme WH - Woan. He-ded Kerala State Transport Project *.aoe-a 4. LINK 2: KOTTARAKKARA - ADOOR 06-10-01, 10:49AM PROJECT DISPLACED FAMILIES - RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES WITH COMPOUND WALL User Status ' '8Vleal C Property ~~~~~~~Revenue Survey Vala. ddes - E ID Oh. Prpry Owner VilTag ASdrNo.La CE' E No. No. e _ 5012 76.480 1v62 K.M.Babu 1_11 04/1 1TP 899 Mvram Xl 247 Kutlr il Mylam P.0 Kottarakkara 1 150.00 11400 76.00% 150.00 114.00 76.00% Total 1 ]f~~~~II~~t 150.00 114.00 76.00% 150.00 114.00 76.00% 0 1010101~~~~~11400 7 0- Owner T - Tenant E Encroacher S - Sqonor: EP - Entitled Persons BPL - Below P-certy Lte- WH - Wo-an Headedi Kerala State Trarlsport Project t T LINK 3: ADOOR - CHENGANUR 06-10-0l, ll 10 AM PROJECT DISPLACED FAMILIES - RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES WITHOUT COMPOUND WALL User Status Vleae Proper IUserStNtusI H~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;.tuVlnrb ID Ch. No k Ni P II 1"PI ~ 22171 0.500 R iSA SubramanjyanChefti Subramanlyan Che 1914 Tp 10391 Koliakkode Geelhanjali0I,akkoc P rappancode Post 91 500 69200O 75.63% 50.00 50.00 100.00 Total 1 1 0 0 1 915.00 692.00 75.63% 50.00 5D.00 10000 0 0 0 0 0 O.el T - Te-aI: E - E-cboa-tr 5 - SIEP e, EP SOilled P--,n LX-. Below Po-e.Li-L WH Womon Headed Kerala State Transport Project P"Ud I d I Annex 11.3.2: Project Displaced Families - Commercial Properties LINK 1: TAIKKOD - KOTTARAKKARA 08-10-01, 2:58 PM PROJECT DISPLACED FAMILIES - COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES User Status ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~, 'Vulnerable No. No. w M~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~5 ~ U - I - 33326.756 L.24.1 Abdul Vahid - 1 1 461/16, TP 12017 Nellanad 1/636,1l1637Video ElectronicsVenjarammoodlU 3 36.00 18.00 50.00% 56.00 10 00%_ 372 26.780 L.28 Velayudhan Pillai 1 6/3JP66 Nellanad 1/G46Sudharsan TextileaVenjarammoodu 4 64.00 46.00 51 06% 94.00 48.00 51.06% _ ?~~93 28.110 143 254/8 ~ Nallanadu M.S. Shock Absorbers, Radiator Works 1 480.00 134.00 27.62% 50.00 50.00 100 00% 3738 28.560 1L.47 Balakrishna Pillai .1 260/0. TP 3983 Nellanad IVNVNSS K4arayo amChekskalavilakamMammodAlanthiaraVn 1 3840.00 196.001 5.18% 42.001 42.00 100.00%. 3066 30.730111.67.1 Abdul Majead 1 119/1. TP 6230 Nallanadu Provision Stores, Ambalamukku 1 200.00 12.00 6 00% 16.00 12.00 75.00%1 9014 30.780 IL.56.N Goar rI 99)5, TP 1257 Nvllanad I/ 486 Ambalamujkku Poonathlmoodu 1 200.00, 9.00 4.50% 9 00 9.00 100.00% 36174 32.8020 jl-56.7 Padmknaaran Pi.a 1 _ /6361 TP.85 elnd Bn, 12 maauk Vamanapuram P.0 1M I26,0 2shus Hair Dresser00 - 4321 36.7801L.166 Pr/handran Pila Va_38/8Plmanapr, VIII/16PAt "SmopeProuiseotoe I 225.00 21000 so333% 72.00 54 00 7500% 0027 36.800 R1 1-1 sch ah1 Goaln 5360/12.1, TP_100325 Pulmanapuram V1128cartLn,Plmt rm an choatshomp) .. 360.00 49.00 13.61% 16.00 16.00 100 00% -3227 36.960 L.740 Mohanachandran _ 1357/24 TP P728 amnapura JaI, CasommunteaPulonmSTDoVmaaua 2 450.00 309.00 7267% 80.00 80.00 68100.00 3235 36.870 RIL.5i GoSaidaharn ./ 5_356/194 TPuliVmanath a V/li/e VicencyTwomsnapsrem I ls 150.00 109.0 72.-B 67% 15 0.00 100.00 66267% 3507 37.5010 PL.176 Vundyaranean __ . 536/6. TP 602 PVamaunapula Hotel aDuTarg mm l.ka 2 40.00 37.00 892.0%j 40.00 37.00 92500% 3812 32.550flL.7648 Sivdsonh _ 545120P 4 P. Vamha aun 6 Bn a h 14.00 14.00 100.00% 14.00 14.0 100.00% _ 3620 37.640 R1-0. S64- omaoumai T35/2 TPG 74 Vamanapuramu Room3 S/o. Roomidharan eRao nrT. 1 160.00 138.00 586.25% 70.00 70.00 100.00% 3802 37.640[L.7650. JanrdeananPla 1 37/2TP74 P azB ku Tn V/7 Aedn Str2Uo alhr 28.00 28.00 100.00% 28.00 28.00 100 00% _. _ 38724 37.640 L.170.3 Gspakumar ./ 5351/2 TP.B4 Vaman apunnm 111/31t anpua 2 26.00 26.00 100.00% 20.00 28.00 10000% 3625 32.010 L.711 SuI ua __ 1__ 53811 TP59 PLh kmanapuram 2OArhn Rc imno 2 2450 45.00 100.00% 245.00 45.00 100.00% 3626 38.020 LP7752 J0/hllaeae P 1i 5 36/10 GP 56 amhanalujam Provi2i0 BSthreeVamanapura WokSh2 4700 47.00 100.00% 47.00 47.00 100.00% 3833.4 -73 lhs I _ 537112 GTL V4) Pzamanapura STocuBooth Kinanoffrc 2 10.00 54.00 50.00% 10.00 54.00 50.00% 3193.1 .73 ITakpa ca I__ 37/23 (TP 16235) Paaapounam KIIIrSall F hoot We nCiar 312.0 8.00660.67% 12.00 3__.00 66.67-0% .1i 40.431231T0 1178P2hamanapura Pan36 Sho ClassmanhopVmaaurm1 26000 2.0 100.00% 21.00 ____ .00 100.00% I_ 4L3559J O2A6 5L80iQRatndtarai V _......LL.L_~_537/7 P234 _ VamanEpuamun Cig4ar &Pn Bakery 2pu 1200 212.00 100.00% 12.00 212.00 100.00% 40 3.7 .1. Ch.a 53357 (TP 2341 Vamhanapuram P 11/379 AStti ionraSho shopVamanapurmr 1 18.00 212.00 70.00% 18.00 212.00 6670% 40650~n 3217 - Tnat .2 nRnacnikr .Sumatr.P En,te Person173 aaaurmNrayaRsarnVaaaua 6.sW 000% 6.0 600 o 8P067 3et1e 0 ILntt 82, Wt3t - Wo, amnpua 1138KdaivedVauaprrn1 36.0 0e0 7.2de.0 0001t 4073 P Madhavan J 1 533/4 Vamanapuram 111/384Nonerala Stalec BaransortdPojemaapt a 12.0 9005r3 r0 4.0 9 8 LINK 1: TAIKKOD - KOTTARAKKARA 08-10-01, 2:58 PM PROJECT DISPLACED FAMILIES - COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES 8815 38.500 R.183.C.2 Rati 1~Use 1S/tat2usata kkkm1,87SeeMhaemVAecus2 158 1.0n0.0% 150r80ab 0% 38084842.00 R.2158.3 Rohad-1 237/72 TP 2187 Paz/tayakunnku 111587 Tailorn Shop 1 30.00 32000 100.00% 30.00 10.00 100 00% _ /_ 88593842.60 L.21.3 . Keasheod Ba'4 203/128T 2182 (P7 Pazhtayakukkum Tow55 Prol onl to7 28.000 128.00 50.70% 28.00 28.00 100.00% 8888 42.0840 L.141.8 Rae/teed _ 1 2035/12, TP21182 PazhavakukkurmPet IISh2Ntop a leTatahml 0 Go 30.00 30.00 100.00% 30.00 30.00 100.00%~ 8887 3842.631L.12.1 Sahu Haameded 1 235/12 0TP2I1882 Pazhtayakunnu 11/1593G Aswaloon 0yr W Govtks . ttlumnoor 1 30.s00 7000 10.00% 30.00 30.00 100 00% 3244 3 842.100 142.2022 Staln___ 203/14 (TP 18164 Pa7hayakunnu Sh104 iar and pan sta hopmandBelaok 1 2800 26.00 100.00% 26.00 26.00 100.00% 3408 30.800 R 217.2. NAduddea 3 56/1 TP 2295) Cahayakaman atJ 1 Pan Sthop_____ 1 5.~00 5. 00 100,00% 5000 50.00 100 00% 1 3412 50.510 R143.242 Saltre a1t8n 18 _ 5/1 (TP 22695 Cahadakukkn 11t 6075 SreetMona& ooli bArnciads 2aa 25.00 25.00 100.00% 215.00 2500 100 00% 9305 50,690 R. 258.1 Gounammriha Pji 1 260/ (TP 37004 Ctazhayakukk CaruEvet puchen VedMnlytu1 12.00 70 4.00 58.33% 1200 70.001 5,03% 3508 40.950 RL6.15 Vazuevan Pil26 0/20 TP 306) Cahaoaaany a nunnu ett8 Camsz t Chphadtathamal at 2 12000 24700 58330% 12 00 1_ 700 58330% I 3658 40.060 R 280. 1 Rshadrao/ 2603/120 TP 30147 Ptadhayamenur It Mat/STDuh Boothc 1 6800 3.400 90001% 1000 1___ 00 50003% 1 3325 40.9060 R.21.D2 Goiathened la - 145/82 TP 218752 CPazhayakuan at P56 S/to F_ _v __Contra __1 70.00 70.00 100.00% 700 .00 to o oo0o% I 3328 420.90 1[.2011)3 KRash 2 .d .. 145/12, TP 21875 Cahdeamakkn at Bun TiornSo 1 80.00 8. 00 100.00% 8.~00 8.00o 100 00% _ 3336 40.406R L201135 Madhaean P1 20a1452 rTP 218752 Pahayakukkn at y 5 PrtablonS to0 1 18.00 11.00 I51110% 18.00 11.00 101 11% 1 33381 500501L 2015 Ab6 Rasheed 1( 145/12 TP 218762 Pahayakakan 81 PittSI5 Naonal BakheryTattuad pGv 1 1500 30.00 10075% 153000 11.00 10875% 4 3867 51.0451R.2713.1 Rtashead 1 243/12 TP 21756 Ptazhayanuku1 t Sack Store Chaloosn aplam,. Tatthml I 24.00 12 00 5 000% 2450 0.0 120 00 0% 3630 521.245R 273.2 VShanathan 1_ 243/10 (TP 26164 CahaoaamennauVn Sa En inerern tVatumaa Chd mnaa 24 00 126.00 800.0% 2400 12600 50000% __ 36348 42151.2 R203.1 Raia Bevmitra __.243/11 (TP26164 CahdaymaknnurHteloo HarSrV cCtaa ma 2o 20.00 16.00 800.00% _ 24000 2 016100 800% 32536 410251R.273.5 Banesuadin 243/11 (TP 262 4 PtazhayakunnuiaaIS dK n r eWtrkshoV771 24__ 800 5400 625.0% 8400 54.001 625.0% I 14025336201R[224. Suresvoo1 230/15T 14 Edamavakunnul Smaik BothWF I/4 1 6800 1600 75000% 8600 1600 I 5000% 1 34268 53.8501 [.2428 Batuden 01/36 PPa96 haymuakunnu Leetbl en Wr,A norhop_ 45000 45.00 100.0% 4500 45 00 100.00% _ 3267 2 .940 Rr287. Puhnkarpan I 314/12 (TP 2117) Pazhayakunnu ut756 Votl Sandshn a Thtttur 2 15000 7500 700.0% 10.00 7500 700.0% _ 37806 $4100 L1.271 M Newajauci 432 130/ 1TP 3443 Nidamael TAjOne.uCdin,Kdi A eeuoo ilme 1 400 0 25.00 37250% 24000 25 00 106250% 9093wne T483 L.6.0Tnat 2 Enracher 234SoLmarterVII. 23 menaBoks& anyNiamtitled1.0 6 5% er0 0son2 0% 5P0 . 44O Po5os r161n 2H - WoNlmeo.PVl i27 rnceailmr ot M0e.0 adn a O100 5. 9097 44850 L.61,P,3 ajeem asha 23/21 (T 2074) ilamel N.P.V11 2e6Acha Ctatte Trandpr Pramlojet IPsRo 2 old5% ia0 1.0 5.6 LINK 1: TAIKKOD - KOTTARAKKARA 08-10-01, 2:58 P'M PROJECT DISPLACED FAMILIES - COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES 355/, 54.160 140.5 Parameuwaan PiIa UserSt t_ VulnPe74rablea L4hJwel okAor .03.06.0%80300 5.0 3576 54.430 L.247 Go inatrian 1 137/6 TP 1031 Odamulalrkal Pe Sho b Go naThan I 600 6.00 100.00% 6.00 6.00 100 00% 1~~~~~ C) L) l' 3676 54.440 L248 Name / 137/9 TP 1032 Edamrrlakkat Barber 580 1 6,00 6.00 100.00% 6.00 6.00 100 00%~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Is 33 L 4. 20 37.20 Suobnriaea _ 13015 ITP 951) Edamulakkal Choentalc Ai Traders, Ayoor 2 10.0 32 .00 320.00% 42.00 32.00 76.19o% _ 4007 5.76 1.26 Phii ose/ 43/18 T' 401 Valkam /85 35ed edcie 1 20.0 180.00 70.00% 26.00 25.00 100.00% / 409 5.8 L.2374 B adakfsh 43/03 (TP 94052 Vdamlakkal Hoteld 2D0.0 100i00% 60 60 0.0 4010 56790 1.265 Thomas /~~~~4 _ 43/21( TP 40533 VaaEdamu Bukaahkoe1 310 294.00 109.25% 169.00 169.00 100.00% / 25528 59.080 R.24.1 NotrKndown alakkal Bunkchla 1 8.,00 --__ 9.0 10.0 0 __ .0100%_ 23705 59.190 R.234.C SueelJani 3271/2 TP 2334 Edamlakram FIn SDSShop Vaa 1 20.001 11.00 660.00%1 20.00 11.00 55. 00% _ 3821 60.080 L2337 a Bolabu 284 3121 (TP 3588) Valanad Babu' Cattler Ageltcy Fed aeg oa 00 10 37% 8.0 5.00 63.75 __. 352 0.09 20 1137 284rnnn/_ _ 31/1 (TP 3589 Vdaluakka Manures Shol 1 32.00 20,00 62 500% 32.00 30.00 62.500% 88651 60.35D L.240. KPKramesarn P / _ai_ 2371/2 (TP 3552 Edamlakkam BLnkh Jeweanr Wors Aor2 7.00 3___00 100.00% 7.00 3__ .00 100.00% 3966 60.415 L.247. Gera 7/22 TP 13852 Vdamlakan l PettyShopbuny Marinattun K6rm,a.a P01 2.0 200 100.00% 16.00 16.00 100.00% 3010 61095 R.342.2 Jacob 1 ~~~~~~~103/20 (TP 1192 Vdamlakkam are ST ShOP BoI ___ 4.00 3.07.0%400 30 7.0, 3904 64.115 L.247 Nala 6 91 I 8 alkmV13 .0 200 10000% 2.00 ' .00 100.00% 1 3805448 6126L.3230 Bmmachnan P.7 a__ 331/9 (TP 3039 Edamlakkam Bunk, /llo 1 2.00 1.00 50o.00% 2.00 1.-00 50.o 00% 39082 14A50 L.3291 Thankachan1___ 1323/3 TP 2875 EVamlakkal Bunkal Sop,nVeaVlkmP 1 500 50 .00 100.00% 90.00 50.00 100.00% _ 23499 64.525 R.326..1 Suandharesan 123/1, TP 2909 Vdamlakkal ChembSarkas TriaVods,Ayo 1 25.00 325.00 100.00% 425.00 325.00 761000% ~~11 I - - ~ ~ ~ 439115 T~~~P 4038 ) p, Vafakkal P 0. I~~~~~~~ 187.00 17.00 100.00% 17.00 17.00 100.00% 332 4.1 [.340 K. E tlak/_ _ 39/,T'16 Valaikaval V1198e Pand Piarandt TanaveShotraraPs16.0 50100%500 .0100% 3400 556.350 L1363. Khulimons' 137911 (TP' 4059) Velaikama Tea9ho, Ayu avida Menicines 1 25.-00 240.00 06.00% 25.00 24.00 960.00% 3659 54.260 RL6.26 MB amue 14_ _ 379/1 (TP 40521 Valakaval Hrtontel . aav 2 100.00 10. 00 100.00% 16.00 16.001 100.00% 3013 564.420 RL364 Thoman lst 14360/21 TP 3946 Valaikam Bua at Kambaabde 1 710.00 16. 00 100.00% 16.,00 169.00 100.00% 1 34042 565.090 [.349 I Habumar 054 Ve/akavml Prvson kmr StworCe eca tucue e 1 250.00 213.00 94.060% 25.00 21.00 164.00%1_ Vatatram Bunk at KaIrirad 1 9.00 _____ 5.00 55.66% _____ 9. 7500 75.00 550.56% 4346 560.9560 [.3071 AnilaKmar117 T399 Vattakamal Kunvada.shairCatngsd crm ____ 12.00 99.010 6.50% 31.50 31.50 100.00% _ 205495 6.9250[31 27 r2eAihamma Bash _r _ __ 1400/8 TP 31057 Velakaal Karhiama s/orshrKkannPi1 230.00 22500 689.4%1 26.00 25.00 68.440% 34938 566610 30.27 I .kmr iO ./n - I__ 4300/9 T' 105 Velaikaam JSasMHailrs Vanikk.alaa p4a 5.00 5.00 100.00% 9___500 0.00 100.00% 404156.90 L.78_2L_ksmana__112_2_TP_8_5) Veliaalaka C V2arttm asi0ti alas ad ca 1 1000 1.9200 100.00% 10.00 10.00 100.00% _ 30531 69.0970 L4399. KaTPmon38 _5_Meialak 133 anSo.Krito ____ 1 28.0 1.0 46o.93% 1000 6.00 60000% C . wnr1412ote,£ E2racerSS SuOte E Etile Prsn 40P.6iO 57.530r Lie282H2 Aobrul Headed1[916(P 78 aaa are hpI 1,0 .0 .0 60 4039 5.990 .289 Seedhaan Pilai I 37511(TP 381) Nelanad 44KerasanSthateasm Tranalikrt Projectl Pe00on 03625 00 6.0 6.5 LINK 1: TAIKKOD - KOTrARAKKARA 08-10-01, 2:58 PM PROJECT DISPLACED FAMILIES - COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES User Status - ~ ~ U ~ - ue Vulnerable ID Ch. Property Owner U er S latu S Revonue Surveey Village Address I L E No. 01F ES, No. Wi & 3602 69.455 L.378 Mathew 20 __ _ 250/10 TP 3709) Kottarakara Tea stall,EyarnkunnuKottarakara Post 1 17.00 17.00 100.00% 17.00 17.00 100.00% __ 24983 69.365 L.3a1 A not known _ _ _ _ Kottarakara . 1 11.00 11.00 100.00% 11.00 11.00 100 00% __ 24984 70.045 1.351.6 not known I _ _ _ Kottarakara I 6.00 6.00 100.00% 6.00 6.00 100.00% 3706 70.070 L383 Chacko Thomas 1 300/2 ITP 3688) Kottarakara Alen Hollow Bricks,Pulamon post,Kottararkara 2 - 25.00 17.00 68.00% 25.00 17.00 68.00% __ 3748 70.740 L389.4 K. sasi - 1 _ _ 137/42 (TP 924) Kottarakara Sudhi hair Cutting Saloon 1 6 00 3.00 5000 o8 .00c 3.00 500 0% __ 3754 70.740 L.389 5 Madhavan Pillai _ / - _ 137/42 (TP 924) Kottarakara VI/Cigartte and Pan shopKottarakara 1 2.50 2.00 80.00% 2.50 2.00 80.00% 3757 70.740 L.3B9 6 Radhakrishnan Pillai / 137/42, TP 924 Kottarakara Sree Ganesh Tyreworker 1 9.00 6.00 66.67% 9.00 6.00 66.67% 3797 71.175 L 391.1 Kuttan _ 137121(TP 1903) Kottarakara HalrStyllngSaloonPulamonKottarakara 2 32.00 32.00 100.00% 32.00 32.00 100,00% __ _ 3810 71 185 L.391 3 Saju _ 137/21 (TP 1903) Kottarakara Sruthl Casseete Centre 1 32.00 32 00 100 00% 32.00 32 00 too 00% _ 3813 71.190 L.391 4 Koshy Kuniu _ 137/21 (TP 1903) Kottarakara Durga Fruit Stall,Kottarakara 4 32.00 32.00 100 00% 32 oc 32 00 100.00% _ _ 3817 7 1. 1 9 L.391 5 K~. ~Dasapan pllal a 137/21 (TP 1903) K~otltarakara Cool Bar 1 32.00 32.00 100.00% 32.00. 32.00 100 00% __ 3_79B7 7.1 161 Sankara Pillai / ____ 122/2-I lTP 1906) Ko~ttarakara Aosata Sialonary Koltarakkar 2 80.00 32.00 40 00%] 48 00 32.00 60 67% __ 3789 71.210 R.416.2 Mohanan Nair = _ 122/2-1 (TP 1906) Kottarakara Absara Provisional Store Kottarakkara 4 40.00 32.00 60.00% 40.00 32.00 80.00% _ _ Total . 172 5 S8 105 2 7 265 23272.25 1969.00 34.23% 4819.75 4086.50 84.79% 42 4 1 0 O- Owner T - T-Iarit E - Encroacrhe: S - Sqwuannr EP- Entnle Persons PFL- Be-onn Poverly b.e -WH. W_man 1aHader/ Kerala State Transport Project PaU 4 0f LINK 1: TAIKKOD - KOTTARAKKARA 08-10-01, 2:58 PM PROJECT DISPLACED FAMILIES - RES + COMM PROPERTIES User Status _a ..u. V eb ID Ch. Properly Owner Revenue Survey a- t3 e Address iu rTr4 No. Onr 0 T E S N. Village Addes 2836 26.050 L.6 Seln8n 5 __ 36/11 TP 11419,11 Nellanadu I/322ParmiIakoflam House 1 200.00 39.00 19.50%1 20.00 10 00 00.00% _ 90821 34.9301L.1 15.C Sasidharan Pillai I___ 34516 Pullmath No. 193118-2-25, Land of Sasidharan Pillal. G3eothamandiran 1 4000.001 482.00 12.05%1 80.00 80.00 100.00% _ 3104 36.700 R.138 Baby J _ __ 35811, TP 8770 Pulimath Vill, 21Jyothi NivasPulimathu P.O 3 240.00 211 00 97.92% 60.00 60.00 100.00% _ / _ _ 8844 37.620 R.149 P.Sadanandan I _____ 8/11 (TP 502) fazhlayauek P. Sadanandan, Krishna Blivan, Near Police Station 2 194.001 194.00 100.00% . 0.00 50.00 100.00%1 3076 40.820 L.153 Bhasi _ _ 353/7 (TP 4805) NallanaduPazha 3/984 Bhasi Pandalathu Veedu Mallayathupachd Killimanoo 1 2000.00 20.00 1.00% 40.00 20 00 50.00% 10527 54.235 L.241 Sulabadeen _ _ 137/4. TP 1027 Edamulakkal Poovamathuka an,I Veedu Wirng Centre, Aycor 1 27.00 27.00 100.00% 27.00 27 00 100.00% 4 57.945 L 288 PrSukumaran 375/13-2 (TP 3580) /Valakam VIV01446 Hotel Cigarand panl Shop and Resideanced 2 24.00 17.00 70.83% 24 002 17.00 70.83% 1 Toal7 8 1I I 0 11 6985.00 990.00 .14.81% 301.00 264.00 87.71% 1 0 - Oner: T T-ennt E - Fnrroacnee: S - Squaner: EP . Ertitlee Persons BPL .- Oeio PovenV Line: WH - Woman HeMAeW Kerala State Transport Project PugO 1 f I LINK 2: KOTTARAKKARA - ADOOR 06-10-0, 10O49 AM PROJECT DISPLACED FAMILIES - COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES User Status F Vulnerable Property RvneuvyAd I ID Ch. N. Owner RTeES no. Suvy Vlage Adress ( L .*3 fl 246-37 73.260 L 4.C Thomnas 1 ____9112 Kottarakara Weigh Brige amp 1 36 0O 27 00 75 00% 360 2700 75.00% 4905 73.8301 R 29 Sahaexn _ _ SMdiaola Bunk Parn Shop 1 3.50 3.0 100.00% 3501 3.50 100.00% _ 4148 75.0201L 14 1 J~ 1 ,,,, _ 1 364/25, TP 2661 my/am Flouir Mill 1 260O0 12 00 46.15% 26 00 13 00 50.00% _ 4932 75. 110o R 49.1 Chackto Alex I __ 2/5,3, TP 1 950 MamX46CaoA/xPvionho1 12 00 3.00 25.00% 12 00 6300 50.00% 4967 75.140 R.51 .1 TChandrasekharan ./ 213A4, TP1974 yamChiandrasekharan Toa shiop 2 25 00 25.00 100.00% 25 00 25.00 100.00% 4968 75.140 R.51.2 Molamma ./ 13i4, TP 1 974 My/am _ Pan Shop 1 12 00 12 00 100.00% 12 00 12.00 100.00% 11 4669 75.1401R.51 .3 Mo/amma 1 213i4, TP 1979 My/am Engg Works 1 20 00 20.00 100.00% 20.001 20.00 -100 00% __1V 4672 75.1401R.51 .4 JonKty1___ 213A4, TP 1974 My/am Johnku/ly Tea Shop 1 12 00 12 00 100 00% 22 50 12.00 53.33% _ 4107 75.170 L,19 Sudhakaran 1_361 ill. TP 2034 Mylam Bunk 1 200 2_ 200 100.00% 2 00 1 50 75.00% 24653 75.705 R,56 A Mathai 1 204/6 Mly/am Kari/il Thekktedil Veedu 20 00 10 00 50.000/ 20.00 10 00 50.00% _ 10575 75.620 R.56.A K.M. Babu 1 264,7 Myamrr _ Kutrtiyil Brick Ir/dustninot, lonok/ad, May/m P.O. 31 3000.00 10.00 0.33%1 300.00 300.00 100.00% _ -41/94 76.350_t 28 1 K.o __31'0/9, TP 2013 My/am X1//204 I 2400o 12 00 50.00% 24 00 12.00 50.00% 5129 77 400 R 60.1 Bayhty _ 1262/5, TP 3660 My/am ~1/1/26 A I 1600o 14.00 87.50% 16.00 14 00 87.50% _ 5131 77 490 R 693 1 1382/14, TP 3669 My/am V11/ /27 Stationery Shop My/amn 1 20 00 14 00 70.000/ 20.00 14 00 70.00%. 10602 76.060 RP72 A coo--i BAby __ 303/7, TP 2603 My/am 12,Joehab t/,Pa/antha/akkaol, V'allakad 1 300 00 26 00 8 67% 50.00 26 00 52.00% 1 _ 10650 78.740 L 41.1 Gopa/a Pi//al 1 ___301/1. TP 2399 K/a/ayap ratn Gopa/api//a, Vazhottu Vood,,, Pottorktizhakke, Ka0/a 1 2000 00 76 00 3 80%1 110.00 76 00 69 09% _ 4237 79 670 L.42 Vinod 1 __251 O232~4 !/~ uneal ID Ch. yU v 341 0440_ R.9 Joseph P C 222i12, TP 10226 Chenmanassery Stationery Bunk, XX1377, Avani, Perunna 15.00 12.00 80.00% 15.00 12.00 80.00% ./ __ 8363 3 080 R 16 V Rajappan 6/115/6 Chenganassery 1/422, Puthenparampu Veedu, Paraikkal, Panaichakkavu P. 6.00 6.00 100 00% 6.00 600 100.00% __ 8509 5730 R 44 Sarojini Amna 9/9-1 Veliyanad Vll /257 Swarnis Medical Store and Toddy 1080.00 43.00 3.98% 60.00 43 00 71.67%/ / _ __ Total 3 1101.00 61.00 5.54% 81.00 61.00 75.31% 2 1 0 0 o - oNner T - renari E - Encroacher s , Squa.ttr EP - Eni/ned Persons BPL - Bele Pove" LiOne WH - Vvoinian Hea/en Kerala State Transport Project Page 1 ofi Annex 12.2: List of Eligible Families for Residential Plots LINK 1: TAIKKOD - KO1TARAKKARA 08-10-01, 2:58 PM ELIGIBLE FAMILIES FOR RESIDENTIAL PLOTS -0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~Vulnerabl ID Ch. Owner Revenue Survey Vilage Address t- , -o. * efEE 0 N=. Owner No. _- E U_ E 40032.185 L.83 -Muralidharan 533/5 Vamnonapuramn Remya ShavanVamanapuram P OVamanapuram 320.00 141.00 44.06%1 150.00 150.00 100.00% __ 3162 32.445 R.92 Ponnan Nadar 608/2 Vamanapuram Mulluvathalakalil Veedu, 31440 840.00 788.00 93.81% 49.00 49.00 100.00% _____ 2946 34.980 R.133 Ponnamma 342/7 Pulimath VII /750 Vadekkevila VeeduKudiyela 1300.00 28 00 2.15% 42 00 28 00 65.67% 2_ ._ 0007 34.160 L.1524 B Viswambran 345/11 Pulimath V/iswambaran Vaidyan, Vadakkeathu 4000.00 723.00 18.08% 70.00 61.00 87.14% _____ 3961 39.020 R.184 Sreedharan 189/11 (TP 3261) Pazhayakunnurr X/41051 Vipin Nivas pappala 1320.00 334.00 25.30% 120.00 120.00 100.00% / 26460 40.620 R.189.A NotFKnown PazhaN akunnur 17.00 17.00 100.00% 17.00 17.00 100.00% __ 9227 41.020 L.1532E A Raamma 11i6/7nu e 3 TP6 )l 1/144, CharuVos PuthankVeedu Thattathumalam P.O. 960.00 426.00 4458% 76.00 75.00 100.00%°/ / _ _ 9229 41.040C L.153.FG SaMaran 116/7 (TP 6841) Pazhayakukksu 11/994,1/149, Partly disintegraled house 527.00 523.00 99.24% 30.00 15.00 50.00% 1 __ 924537 425 L.15359.L Nadot Known TP8783 Pazhayakukku n 11158 Kodayilveedu, Manalathu 200.00 113.00 56.50% 63.00 36.00 57.14% V/ _ 3241 42.100 R.202.1 Pushpalatna 203/14 (TP 6164) Pazhayakunnury 404 Varshlayam Manaletha pacha Thattathevmad Post 30.00 30.00 100.00% 30.00 30.00 100.00% _ _ 24869 45.400 R.2133A Faraludin 341/6, TP 2948 Nilamel Mary Mannil Karode Nilamel 15.00 15.00 100.00% 115.00 15.00 100.00% __ __ 24871 47.830 R.222.A Sainudheen 335/4, TP 2877 Nilamel S.N.House, Kuriakode Chadayamangalar 20.00 10.00 50.00% 20.00 10.00 50.00% _ __ 9139 50.400 L.201.G Sasidharani Pillai 22/1 T 19 Chadayomagala 8(439 Kathika Chadayamagalarn 2340.00 1008.00 43.08% 150.00 160.00 100.00% ____ 40161 55.8001L,267 Kunianoyv Baby 440/3 (TP 4055) Valaksam Choola, Metathil Puthen Veedu 1000.00 566.00 56.60% 180.00 180.00 100 00% /_ 8925 60 510 R3373 SunnyGeorge 465/3 (TP 4395) Anchal XVIII/612,Sun cottageValakom 500.00 243.00 40.50% 100.00 100.00 10000% ____ _ 5926 60.525 R.337.F P MGeorge 454TP36) Anchal 18/813,P V HotiseValakom P 0 880.00 454.00 51.59%1 120.00 80 001 56 67% 1_ 25537 62.585 R.359.1 Not Known Vatakom Bunk 22.00 22.00 1100.00% ~ 22.00 22.00 100.00% 3279 63.050 -.334 Thankchan 299/12 (TP 2654) Valakam Kaithakkattil, Thannivilaputhenveedu 550.00 553.00 98.75% 50.00 50 00 100.00% _ _ 3287 64.12 L38 Wilson 362/14 (TP 1181)_Vattikovala Shujen,Panavali.P.0. 800.00 636.00 79.75% 195.00O 195.00 100&00% 24959 66.3301 R.382 K Ales 175/6, TP 2064 Vettikavala #Deleted 500.00 158.00 26.33% 48.00 48.00 100.00% 1 3685 68.340 L373 Mathai Abrahamn 174/3 (TP 3856) Melula Thayyil_veedu,Karikkam .P.0.Kattarakara 2260.00 450.00 19.74% 65.00J 65.001 100.00% _ 3684 69.420 ..37G Wilson. K. V I290/ (TP 37) Mettll Tea shop.Kaippalloor,Karikkakam 18.00 9.00 50 0038.8% 18.00 9.005 50.00% Total 22 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~118649.00 ,7251.00 38.88%. 169001050 9.9%84 0 - Owner. T - Tenant e - Encroacher S , Sq-atlenr EP - Entoled Persons BPL - Below Povenry Line WH - woman Heaned Kerala State Transport Project Page 1 of I LINK 2: KO1TARAKKARA - ADOOR 08-10-01, 10:59 AM ELIGIBLE FAMILIES FOR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES ~~ecO 4(2 1~~~~~~4 ee~~~ Vu~lnerabl Property ORevenue Su y V Addr E _ _e~ .~ 0 _ _ __ 5012 76480 R.62 KM Babu 104111, TP 899 Mylam Xii 247 Kuttiyil Mylam P.O Kottai-akkara 150.00 114.00 76.00%/ 150.00 114.00 76.00% _ -_ 4913 74,490 R.36 Puskaran 19914 Man Muttambalath Puthentveedu Pallicial P.O_ _ _ 500.00 500.00 I00.0D% 19.00 19.00 100.00% If 5017 76.705 R.63 EMMajeed 104/12, TP 900 Mylam Xll/379 Nisha Manzil Mylam P.O 160.00 48.00 30.00% ° 60.00 48.00 80.00% 10633 81 100 R.75 I Raveendran Pillai 382128, TP 6118 Kalayapuram V/31, Gokulaam, Kulakara P.O., Kulakara 410.00 410.00 100.00% 50.00 36.00 72 00% _1 10634 81.120 R.75.J Kumaran 382113 Kalayapuram Thengumthondil (H), Puthumukku, Kulakkada P.O. 317.00 317.00 100.00% 40.00 40.00 100.00%° 1 I 10635 81.140 R.75.K Gopalan 382114 Kalayapuram Pulipurackal, KP V/33, Kullakara P.O. 502 00 502.00 100.00% 120.00 80.00 66.67% 1 _ _ 4269 85.490 L.50 George 619/11 (TP 4449) Adoor V1311 Pallithzbeyil Vayala P.O 75 00 56.00 74.67% 75.00 56 00 74.67%_ _ 4351 95.150 L.70 Suiatha _ 72011 __ .._ 401 Panachivila H Adoor P.O Adoor _ 50.00 _ 24.00 48.00%0 48.0 24.00 50.00% _ 1 = Total | 8 l l l l | 2164.00 1971.00 | 91.08% | 562.00 417.00 74.20% 3 | j|1 0-Owner . T - Tenanlt: E- Encroacher 5- Squatter EP - Enffled Persons BPL - 1leIon Poverty LIne WHl - Woman Headed Kerala State Transport Project Page I of 1 LINK 3: ADOOR - CHENGANUR 08-10-01, 10:55 AM ELIGIBLE FAMILIES FOR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES -~~~~~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ Vulnerable D. C. _roert Revenue Survey Village Address afY'- O E Lr _ op OeN b -X/9-s-1 9 f J-t@ 7 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 14.1 SUGGESTED LIST OF NGOs 1. Trivandrum District a) Jana Kshema Sangham, Archbishop's House, P.O. -Pattom, Trivandrum 695004 (Contact Person: Rt. Rev. Dr. Lawrence Mar Ephraem) Promotes social development activities. b) Habitat Technology Group, Pushpavanam, P.O. Poojapura, District: Trivandrum - 695012. Contact person; G. Shankar, Chairman. Telephone: 0471-344904, 342723. Activities in the areas of housing, disaster management, income generation. c) Mitraniketan, Vellanad P.O. Trivandrum 695543. (Contact person: K. Viswanathan, Director.) Promotes integrated social development. (Tel: 0472-882045, Fax 882015) Activities in the areas of housing, micro-credit, disaster management, rural technology, economic policy issues. d) National Women's Welfare Centre, Vanitha Bhavan, Ottasekharamangalam, Ariyancode 695125. (Contact person: S. Lilly Genet) Implements programmes for women and child development and conducts vocational study classes for women. e) Peace and Disarmamnent Society of Kerala, Ariyancode P.O., Ottasekharamangalam 695125. (Contact person: M. Rajayyan) Promotes integrated rural development. 2. Kollam District a) International Centre for Study and Development, Shangrila Hills, P.O. Valakom, Kollam 691532. (Contact person: K.C. Matthew) Promotes grassroots level organisations and undertakes development programmes sponsored by the Central and State Governments. b) Arya Service Charitable Society, P.O. Kavanad, District: Kollam - 691003. Contact person: G. Sreekumar, President. Activities in the areas of self employment programmes, rural technology, income generation, enterprise development. c) Edamon Social Service Society, P.O. Edamon, District: Kollam - 691307. Contact person: Fr. P. Samson, President. Telephone: 0475-335628. Activities include income generation, housing. d) Eravipurarn Community Development Centre, P.O. Eravipuram, District: Kollam - 691011. Contact person: Fr. Ranadhir, Director. Telephone: 0474-719973. Activities in the areas of environment, consultancy project, rural technology, income generation, housing. e) Punalur Social Service Society, P.B. No. 50, Punalur, District: Kollam - 691305. Contact person: Fr. Ronald M. Varghese, Director. [ronald@kelnet.xlweb.com] Telephone: 0475-222108. Activities in the areas of housing, micro-credit, income generation, enterprise development. LBII/Sheladia/CES/CT NGO List Page I of 5 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 14.1 3. Alappuzha District a) Kerala Rural Reconstruction Association, Kerra, Mundancavu P.O., Chengannur 689121 (Contact person: K.C. Kuruvilla.) Promotes social development and rural reconstruction. b) Allepey Diocesan Charitable and Social Welfare Society, Post Box 114, District: Alappuzha - 688001. (Telephone: 0477-245083, 245053). Contact person: Fr. Antony Jacob, Director. Activities include environment, income generation, disaster management, housing development, micro-credit. c) Community Development Society, Alappuzha Town, near Civil Station, District: Alappuzha - 688001. Contact person: Renuka Sivadas, Prwesident. Telephone: 0477-253168. Activities include income generation, waste management, micro-credit. d) Forum for Rural Environment and Economic Development, New Bazar, Alappuzha, District: Alappuzha - 688001. Contact person: Adv. P.J. Mathew, Chairman. Telephone: 0477-241281, 260032. Activities in the areas of consultancy projects, funds disbursement, micro-credit, housing. e) Kuttanadu Vikasana Samithy, P.O. Ramankary, District: Alappuzha - 689659. Contact person: Fr. Thomas Pellianickal, Director. Telephone: 0477-703624. Activities in the areas of field management, housing, micro-credit, income generation. 4. Pathanamthitta District a) Kodumon Gram Vikasana Sarnithy, Aycadu, Kodumon P.O., Pathanamthitta 691555. (Contact person: KunjannarDma Kunju) Promotes social development of the poor and the needy. b) Society for Action With the Poor, House No. 126, Ward No. V, Mangalath, Pannivizha, P.O. Adoor 691523. (Contact person: John Mangalath) Promotes rural development. c) Kodumon Gramavikasana Samithy, Aycadu, P.O. Kodumon, District: Pathanamthitta - 691555. Contact person: Prof. Mony Thomas, President. Telephone: 0473-485214. Activities in the areas of fund disbursement, field implementation, micro-credit. d) Pazhakulam Social Service Society, P.O. Pazhakulam, Adoor, District: Pathanamthitta - 691527. Contact person: George Kutty T.A., President. Telephone: 0473-422262, 424371. Activities in the areas of housing, micro-credit, disaster management. 5. Kottayam District a) Centre for Development Action, Vikas Institute, P.O. Kanakkari, District: Kottayam - 686632. Contact person: M.S. Ommen, President. Telephone: 0481-537917. Activities include pollution, rural technology, income gencration, enterprise development. LBIIlSheladia/CES/ICT NGO List Page 2 of 5 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 14.1 b) Gramin Udyog Yojana, Vikas Works Compound, Near Petrol Pump, Erumely, Kottayam 686510. (Contact person: Kurian Thomas) Provides vocational training facilities for unemployed and poor people, designs and implements programnmes for employment generation in rural areas, and promotes the welfare of the weak and disabled persons. c) Malanadu Development Society, Kanjirapally, Kottayam 686507. (Contact person: Matthew Vadakemuriyil) Charity based social development organisation, promotes the general welfare of the poor. d) Society for Integral Development Action, Koovapally, Kottayam. (Contact person: George Thomas) Promotes social development. e) Friends for Social Justice, P.O. Parathode, Kanjirapally, District: Kottayam - 686543. Contact person: V. Prbhakaran Nair, President. Telephone: 0482-802959. Activities in the areas of income generation. 6. Idukki District a) Anakkara Vikasana Sangam, P.O. Anakkara, Idukki - 685512 (Contact person: K.M. Joseph, Telephone: 04869-62213) Promotes rural development, housing, health, sanitation, education, etc. b) Gramin Vikas Yojana, Mulakandamedu P.O., via Kattappana, Idukki 685515. (Contact person: S.T. Thomas) Promotes social work, appropriate technology, rural development activities, etc. c) Social Action Movement of Idukki, P.O. Puliyanmala, Kattappara South. Idukki 685515. (Contact person: Babu Thomas K.) Implements rural development projects. d) Bapooji Sevak Samajam, P.O. Chakku Pallam, District: Idukki - 685509. Contact person: Kuttachan Kakkad, Chairman. Telephone: 048969-62239. Activities in the areas of organising crafts people, income generation, fund disbursement, marketing, wasteland development, enterprise development. e) Vandamedu Development Society, Vandamedu P.O., Idukki 685551 (Contact person: Fr. Roy J. Chittoor). Promotes and implements integrated rural development programmes. 7. Ernakulam District a) Association for Welfare Action in Kerala Environment (AWAKE). P.O. Thrikkariyoor, Emakulam 686692 (Contact person: Paroor Sridharan.) Promotes social development in the areas of food, clothing, housing, education, employment and health care. b) Association for Social Development, Suhruth Sadan, Chunanghveli, P.O. Ernathala, District: Emakulam - 683105. Contact persion: Sr. Sreejiva, President. Telephone: 0484-623299. Activities in the areas of fund disbursement, watcr/sanitation, income generation, housing, micro-credit. LBII/Sheladia/CES/ICT NGO List Page 3 of 5 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 14.1 c) Sevashram, Peechanikad, P.O. Puliyanam, Ankamaly, District: Emakulam - 683572. Contact person: Lissy Jose, Secretary. Telephone: 0484-454782. Activities in the areas of income generation, micro-credit, consultancy projects. 8. Thrissur District a) Jan Shikshan Sansthan, Kodungallur 680664. Provides literacy linked vocational training programmes in both rural and urban areas. b) Kerala Sastra Sahithya Parishat, Parishat Bhavan, Guruvayoor Road, Thrissur 680004. (Contact person: K.R. Janardhanan) Promotes social development and provides alternative models for development. c) Apex Voluntary Agency for Rural Development (AVARD), AVARD Bhavan, P.O. Chalakkudy, District: Thrissur - 680307. (Contact person: Rev Fr. Joy Chalissery, Executive Director, Telephone: 0488-842964, 847964.) Activities in the areas of environment, pollution, income generation, enterprise development, transportation, housing, micro-credit. d) Centre of Science & Technology for Rural Development, P.O. Ayyanthol, Dist Thrissur - 680003. Contact person: Dr. K.N. Raj, Chairperson. Telephone: 0487- 641678. Activities include income generation, enterprise development, housing, waste management. 9. Palakkad District a) National Association for Tribal Uplift, Research and Education, Mully, Athikadavu P.O., Attappady 641102. (Contact person: Rajagopal) Promotes social development through social justice. b) Attappady Social Service Organisation, ASSO Bhavan, Pakulam, P.O. Thavalam, District: Palakkad - 678589. Contact person: Fr. Sebastian Chiramel, Executive Secretary. Telephone: 0492-453237. Activities in the areas of field implementation, income generation, economic policy issues, waste management, housing, micro-credit. c) Gandhi Smarak Seva Kendram, P.O. Anjumoorthy, Mangalam, District: Palakkad - 678682. Contact person: P. Ramachandran Nair, Secretary. Telephone: 0492- 255197. Activities in the areas of field implementation, water/sanitation, enterpnse development. d) Integrated Rural Technology Centre, P.O. Mundoor, District: Palakkad - 678592. Contact person: Dr. R.V.G. Menon, Director. [menon@md2.vsnl.net.in] Telephone: 0491-820224, 832663. Activities in the areas of housing, waste management, rural technology. 10. Malappuram District a) Kolathur Educational Social and Cultural Organisation, P.O. Kolathur, Dist. Malappurarn - 679338. Contact person: T. Mohammed, President. Telephone: 1.BII/Shieladia/CES/ICT NGO List Page 4 of 5 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 14.1 04935-303365. Activities in the areas of consultancy projects, field management, fund disbursement, income generation, housing. b) Rehab Foundation, P.B. No. 48, P.O. Manjenr, District: Malappuram - 676123. Contact person: Moosakutty T.R., Secretary. Telephone: 0493-768401. Activities in the areas of development, disaster management. c) SESHY-Community Based Rehabilitation Project, P.B. No. 5, P.O. Parapanangadi, District: Malappuram - 676303. Contact person: Dr. V. Kunhahammed Kutty, Project Officer. Telephone: 0443-410663. Activities in the areas of income generation. 1 1. Kannur District a) Arangam Kolu Vikasana Samithy, P.O. Alankkodu, District: Kannur - 670571. Contact person: Shaji Thomas, President. Activities in the areas of environment, income generation, transportation, micro-credit. b) Gandhi Smaraka Grama Seva Kendram, P.O. Kariad South, Thalassery, District: Kannur - 673316. Contact person: N.C.T. Madhusudhanan Nambiar, President. Telephone: none. Activities in the areas of income generation, micro-credit. c) Malabar Social Service Society, Sreepuram, P.O. Pallikunnu, District: Kannur - 670004. Contact person: Fr. Jacob Kolaparambil, President. Activities in the areas of micro-credit, income generation, rural technology. d) Nalanda Cultural Centre, Thokilangadi, P.O. Kuthuparamba, District: Kannur - 670643. Contact person: Adv. K.P. Jyothirindranath, President. Telephone: 0479- 361175. Activities in the areas of income generation, enterprise development. 12. Kasaragod District a) Foundation for Educational Innovations in Asia, P.B. No. 13, P.O. Batheni, District: Kasaragod - 673592. Contact person: Dwarthe Peroto, Executive Trustee. Telephone: 0493-621080. Activities include funds disbursement, micro-credit. b) Grama Vikasana Samithy, P.O. Bedur, District: Kasaragod - 670511. Contact person: K.P. Narayanan, General Secretary. Telephone: 0499-753224, 753118. Activities in the areas of field implementation, income generation. LBII/Sheladia'CES/ICT NGO List Pagc 5 of 5 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plani Annex 14.2 NGO PROFILE 1. Name of the NGO Society/Trust Registration Details (Enclose registration certificate) Registration Number Year of Registration Place of Registration 2. Address of Head Office 3. Number of branch / field offices (Enclose a separate list giving addresses and staff strength at branch / field offices) 4. Total strength of the organisation: Managerial / Professional Field Support staff 5. Memorandum and Articles of Association: enclose a list showing (i) key officers of the organisation and (ii) Executive Committee/Goveming Body members, including their profession. 6. Infrastructure facilities (own) No. of buildings No. of vehicles (Types) Computers Typing machines Others (Specify) 7. Area of operation Districts Taluk Villages / Towns 8 Sources of fundingc (Enclose latest audited financial statement) 9 Type of activities (Enclose brochure and latest annual report) 10 Method of service delivery (Discuss about the methods / approaches involving local communuities; relevant brochures could be attached) LBII/Sheladia/CES/ICT NGO Profile Page I of 2 Kerala Statc Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 14.2 11. Name some successful experiences / Projects (Use separate sheet) 12. Experience in income generation / community development / land acquisition activities 13. List the Govt. Departments / Agencies associated with (Use separate sheet, if necessary) 14. Any experience in Resettlement and Rehabilitation activities: 15. Any experience in environmental management activities: 16. Indicate your major achievements 17. Road Links you would like to work in (in the order of preference) LBII/Sheladia/CES/ICT NGO Profile Page 2 of 2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 14.3 IMPLEMENTATION OF RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE NGOs 1. Background of the project 1.1 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (The World Bank) is assisting the Government with loan funding for the Kerala State Transport Project (KSTP). 1.2 The KSTP project consists of upgrading approximately 575 kins of high priority State Highways. It also includes a pilot project of Inland Water Transport (IWT) which essentially consists of dredging and bank protection of selected canals. The road works include widening of the existing carnrageway from 7.0 to 10.0 m, strengthening of the pavement, widening of cross drainage structures, rehabilitation /reconstruction of existing distressed culverts and bridges and providing traffic safety features etc. The execution of these roads will re carried out in 2 Phases, viz. Phase I and Phase II. Most of the road improvements will be confined to public land, i.e. the existing Right of Way (RoW) or available corridor, which is controlled by PWD. However, road improvement includes realignment of the road at same localities, which will include expropriation of land from the current owners/ users. The project works will also necessitate the eviction of squatters and removal of encroachments within the RoW. 1.3 Detailed project reports, feasibility reports and detailed engineering design have been prepared for the project including comprehensive environmental and social assessments. The construction work on Phase I is expected to start sometime during December 2001. 1.4 The Phase I works consists of upgrading approximately 257kms of roads. The table containing the list of roads, districts, number of affected persons and the area of land to be acquired are given below. Length No. of Area of land Links Description Length District Affected to be persons acquired (Ha) Package l 1. Taikkod-Kottarakkara 46.00 Trivandrum/Kollam 3408 16.54 2 Kottarakkara-Adoor 20.85 Kollam/Pathanamthitta 587 3.22 3 Adoor-Chengannur 23.59 Kollam/Pathanamthittal 455 1.50 Alappuzha 72 Taikkode-Kazhakkoottam 12.58 Trivandrum 1129 7.61 73 Alappuzha-Chenganassen 24.14 AlapuzhalKottayam 626 0.14 Package 3 6 Muvattupuzha-Angamali 33.8 Ernakulam I 3703 1.85 70 Muvattupuzha-Thodupuzha 17.70 Emakulam-Idukki 1314 7.35 LBIIlSheladialCES/ICT Page 1 of 10 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 14.3 tLength NNo. of Area of land Links Description (km) District Affected to be I persons acquired (Ha) ______ Package 4 40 Thrissur-Kuttippuram 32.98 Thrissur-Malappuram 1408 0 2.36 50.1 Palakkad-Shornur 45.30 Palakkad 857 1.05 IWT 105.0 Nil Nil 1.5 A detailed Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) has been prepared for compensating and assisting the Project Affected Persons (PAPs) including the project displaced persons to restore their livelihood and shelter. The RAP fully complies with the requirements of the State Government and the World Bank. Implementation of the RAP is an important part of the overall project. 1.6 To assist the Project Implementation Unit (PIU) of the Public Works Department in the implementation of the RAP, the PIU now invites the services of eligible NGOs to be procured under quality and cost based lump sum contracts. NGOs will be contracted to implement the RAP in individual packages as shown in the table above. 2. Objectives of the Assignments 2.1 The objectives of the NGO consultancy are to facilitate the resettlement and rehabilitation processes of the KSTP by * Educating the PAPs regarding their rights, entitlements and obligations under the RAP. * Ensuring that PAPs obtain their full entitlements under the RAP. Where options are available, the NGO shall provide advice to PAPs on the relative benefits of each option. * To provide support and information to PAPs for income restoration. * Assist the PAPs in relocation and rehabilitation, including counselling and coordination with the local authorities. * Assisting PAPs in the redress of grievances through the system implemented as part of the RAP. * Impart informnation to all the PAPs about the functional aspects of the various district level committees set up by the project and assist them in benefiting from such institutional mechanisms. * To assist the PITJ in ensuring social responsibilities of the project, such as compliance with the labour laws, prohibition of child labour and gender issues. * To collect data and submit progress reports on a monthly basis as well as quarterly basis for the project authorities to monitor the progress of the RAP implementation LBII/Sheladia/'CES/ICT Page 2 of 10 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 14.3 3. Scope of Work 3.1 The NGO shall play a role of secondary stakeholder in the implementation of the RAP and in mitigating the adverse impacts of the project. The NGO will function as a link between the project authorities represented by the Project Director's representative, the District Administration and the affected community. The NGOs shall remain responsible for the development of a comprehensive livelihood system to facilitate the PAPs to take advantage of the option available (as per the RAP). 3.2 Administrative Responsibilities of the NGOs will include * Developing rapport between the PAPs and the Project authority, particularly the District Rehabilitation Officer (DRO) who is the district level PWD Executive Engineer. This will be achieved through regular meetings with both the DRO and the PAPs. * Undertaking a public informnation campaign at the commencement of the project to inform the affected communities of i. The need for land acquisition ii. The need for eviction of squatters and encroachers and iii. The likely consequences of the project on the community's economic livelihood. * Assisting the Engineer (Supervision Consultant) to ensure that the contractors comply with the applicable labour laws (including of prohibition of child labour) and gender issues. • Assisting the PIU and /or the Engineer in ensuring compliance with the safety, health and hygiene norms and the RAP action proposed for HIV/AIDS awareness/prevention campaign. * Reporting to DRO on a monthly basis and quarterly basis. The report should include physical and financial progress both in terms of quantitative and qualitative reporting. The report should prominently feature the problems and issues addressed and tackled with the PAPs and the solutions found. The report should have a separate chapter covering the women's issues, their problems and what has been done (within the framework of the RAP) to ensure their participation in decision making as well as the options made available for them to access economic opportunities, marketing and credit. The report should clearly include the number of field units made by the NGO's staff and the outcome of consultation with the people. 4. Responsibility of implementation of the RAP will include: 4.1 Identification and verification 4.1.1 The NGO shall undertake a survey of the project affected area and shall update the information on the eligible PAPs and Project Affected Families (PAFs). The NGO shall verify the informnation already contained in the RAP and the individual losses LBII/Sheladia/CES/ICT Page 3 of 10 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 14.3 of the PAPs. The NGOs shall establish rapport with the PAPs, consult them, provide them information about the respective entitlements as proposed under the RAP and distribute identity cards to the eligible PAPs. An identity card should include a photograph of the PAP, the extent of loss suffered due to the project and the choice of the RAP with regard to the mode of compensation and assistance (if applies, as per the RAP). 4.1.2 The NGO shall prepare a list of a project displaced persons / families (PDPs / PDFs) for relocation, enlisting the losses and entitlement as per the RAP after verification. It shall also prepare a list of the Project Affected Persons / Farnilies (PAPs I PAFs) enlisting the losses and the entitlements as per the RAP, after verification. Verification exercise shall include actual measurement of the extent of loss/damage and valuation of the loss I damage /affect along with the DRO. The NGO shall display the list of eligible PAPs in prominent public places like Panchayath office, Village office, Taluk office and the District Head Quarters. 4.1.3 During the identification and verification of the eligible PAPs /PAFs, the NGO shall ensure that each of the PAPs are contacted and consulted either in groups or individually. The NGO shall specially ensure consultation with the women from the PAP families especially women headed households. 4.1.4 Participatory methods should be applied in assessing the needs of the PAPs, especially, with regard to the vulnerable group of PAPs. The methods of contact may include (i) village level meetings (ii) gender participation through group interactions (iii) individual meetings and interactions. While finalising the Entitled Persons (EPs) for compensation / assistance, the NGOs shall make a list of entitled PAPs, and distribute identity cards to each and every verified eligible PAP. A format for the identity card is appended to the ToR. 4.2 Counselling the Entitled Persons. 4.2. 1. The counselling shall include the following activities by the NGO * The NGO shall explain to the PAPs, the need for land acquisition, the provisions of the policy and the entitlements under the RAP * Distribute the Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement & Rehabilitation Policy and the translated version of the policy (into Malayalam) to each and every project affected family (PAF) for making them understand the entitlement packages in correct perspectives. • The NGO shall disseminate information to the PAPs on the possible consequences of the project on the community's' livelihood systems and the option available, so that they do not remain ignorant. * The NGO shall initiate micro level plans for income restoration, in consultation with the PAPs. Women's perceptions are important to be incorporated in the development of these plans. * The NGO will monitor the involvement of child labour, if any, in the civil construction works in each package. LBII/Sheladia/CES/ICT Page 4 of 10 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 14.3 4.2.2 In all of these, the NGO shall consider women as a special focus group and deal with them with care and sympathy. 4.3. Disbursing the assistance * The NGO shall determine and document the entitlement of each of the PAPslPAFs on the basis of the RAP and compare it with the DRO's data. In case of discrepancies, the NGO shall try to resolve it in consultation with the DRO on the basis of policy guidelines and if necessary, pursue the matter through the grievance redress mechanism. * The NGO shall assist the project authorities in ensuring a smooth transition during the part or full relocation of the PAPs/PAFs. In close consultation with the PAPs, the NGO shall inform the DRO about the shifting dates agreed with the PAPs in writing and the arrangements desired by the PAPs with respect to their entitlements. * The NGO shall assist the PAPs in opening bank accounts explaining the implications, the rules and the obligations of a joint account, and how she / he can access the resources she / he is entitled to. * The NGO shall ensure proper utilization of the R&R budget available for each of the packages. The NGO shall ensure that the PAPs have found economic investment options and are able to restore against the loss of land and other productive assets. The NGO shall identify means and advise the DRO to disburse the entitlements to the eligible persons / families in a manner that is transparent and shall report to the PI7U on the level of transparency achieved in the project. 4.4 Accompanying and representing the EPS at the Grievance Committee meetings * The NGO shall nominate a suitable person (from the staff of the NGO) to be a member of the Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) for the respective contract package. * The NGO shall make the PAP aware of the GRC * The NGO shall train the PAPs on the procedure to file a grievance application and to confirm that a statement of claim from the concemed PAP accompanies each grievance application. The NGO shall help the PAPs in filling up the grievance application and also in clearing their doubts about the procedure as well as the context of the GRC award. * The NGO shall record the grievance and bring the same to the notice of the GRC within 7 (seven) days of receipt of the grievance from the PAPs. It shall submit a draft resolution with respect to the particular grievance of the PAP, suggesting multiple solutions, if possible, and deliberate on the same in the GRC meeting through the NGO representation in the GRC. * Shall accompany the PAPs to the GRC meeting on the decided date, help the PAP to express his / her grievance in a formal manner if requested by the GRC and again inform the PAPs of the decision taken by the GRC within 3 days of receiving LBII/SheladialCES/ICT Page 5 of 10 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 14.3 a decision from the GRC (The time frame for the GRC to take a decision is 15 days). 4.5 Assisting the EPs and the DRO identify and negotiate for the New land for Resettlement. 4.5.1 Regarding this the NGO shall * Obtain the PAPs choice in tenns of (i) land identification (ii) site for relocation (iii) shifting plan and arrangements (iv) grant utilization plan (v) community asset building plan and institutional arrangements in maintaining the assets. * Assist the PAP/DRO in identifying suitable land for relocation and for agriculture. The identification of suitable Government land will be done is association with the Revenue Department. Assist in negotiating its transfer to the PAP. Where suitable government land is not available, the NGO will assist the PAP to locate a land owner willing to sell his land and will assist in the negotiation of the purchase price. 4.6 Assisting the eligible PAPs to take advantage of the existing government housing and employment scheme. 4.6.1 With regard to the above, the NGO shall - Coordinate (and impart wherever required) the training and capacity building of the PAPs for upgrading their skills for income restoration. This will include the training to be given by the NGO to women self-help - group members in accounting, record maintenance, skill acquisition in the chosen enterprise and marketing etc. * Help the PAPs in realizing and optimizing the indigenous technology knowledge through the use of local resources. * Define, evolve and implore alternative methods of livelihood using the local skill and resources. * Establish linkages with the district administration for ensuring that the PAPs are benefited from the schemes available and those they are entitled to. The focus for this component of the NGO's work shall be the vulnerable PAPs for their income restoration. The NGO shall maintain a detailed record of such facilitation. * Assist PAPs in receiving benefits from various government development programmes particularly for house construction. 4.7 Representing the EPs in Market Value Assessment Committee * Market value assessment committees will be established at the district level to evaluate the actual market price of the properties in the areas where acquisition of land and / or structures are necessary. The project will assist the eligible PAPs / PAFs towards the difference between the assessed market price and the LBII/Sheladia/CES[ICT Page 6 of 10 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 14.3 compensation award. The NGO shall represent the Entitled Persons (EPs) in the cormmittee to ensure that a fair assessment takes place. 4.8 Inter - agency linkages for Income Restoration and other R&R services The NGO shall be responsible for establishing linkages with * Financial institutions for facilitating the PAPs to access credit. * Government departments, district administration etc to ensure that the PAPs are included in the development schemes, as applicable. * Training institutes for imparting skill and management training for enterprise creation and development. 4.9 Assisting the Engineer in ensuring the social responsibilities. 4.9.1 The NGO shall assist the Engineer (Supervision Consultants) to ensure that the contractors are abiding by the various provisions of the applicable laws, concerning the workers' safety, health and hygiene, women's issues and the child labour issues. The applicable laws include (a) The Maternity Benefit Act, 1951 (b) The Contract Labour (Registration and abolition) Act 1948 (c) The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (d) The Equal Remuneration Act 1979 (f) The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act 1986 (g) The Building And Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Condition of Service) Act 1996 (h) The Cess Act of 1996 and (i) The Factories Act 1948. Any divergence from (workers' welfare and remuneration, safety, health, hygiene, women's issues and child labour issues) the provisions of these laws should be brought to the notice of the Engineer and the DRO. 4.9.2 As per these laws, there are specifications regarding the facilities/requirements at the construction camp/site including basic health care facilities, mother and child welfare units and facilities for vaccination, day creche, etc. The NGO shall work in coordination with the lady inspector of works or the resident engineers of the contractor, or any other representative of the contractors, to ensure these facilities are provided in a satisfactory manner, and all social responsibilities of the contract is implemented satisfactorily. 4.10 Assisting the PIU/Engineer in actions to HIV/Aids awareness/prevention campaign 4.10.1 Information campaign/advertisement in collaboration with line agencies (such as NACO and Kerala State AIDS Control Society) and international donor agencies active in the State (such as the British DfID), including provision of signing / hoardings at suitable locations, distribution of vehicle stickers and provision of condom vending machines at suitable locations (rest areas, truck parking lay-byes etc.) The NGO shall assist the PIU to implement these measures, including collaborating with the line agencies. 4.10.2 The contractors are required to provide condom vending machines at the construction camps, provide for medical facilities and regular medical checkups especially meant for detecting/curing STD/AIDS. The NGO shall ensure, in LBII/Sheladia/CES/ICT Page 7 of 10 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 14.3 collaboration with Engineers that such facilities and medical check ups are provided to workers at the construction camps. 5. Monitoring and Evaluation 5.1 The RAP includes provision for mid termn and post project monitoring and evaluation by external consultants. The NGO involved in the implementation of the RAP will be required to supply all information and documents to the external monitoring and evaluation consultants. To this end, the NGOs shall keep proper documentation of their work and the R&R process involved in the project and shall be responsible for the upkeep and updating of such documents periodically and regularly. The documnents shall include photographs and videotapes of the pre- intervention and post intervention scenario of all the properties, structures and assets affected by the project. 6. Recommending for the improvement of R&R services. * Extend all services recommended by the additional studies to be undertaken by the project in respect of the R&R services to be provided as part of the project. * Recommend and suggest techniques and methods for improvement of services extended by the concemed government departments and other agencies and committees in disbursement / extension of R&R services in the project. * Document implementation of the R&R process and services, including difficulties faced and corresponding solutions. o Discuss with PIU on contingency management and other improvement of R&R services, within the project period. 7. Documenting of tasks carried out by the NGO and Evaluation of the achievements of the RAP. 7.1 The NGO selected for the assignments shall be responsible to * Submit an inception report within three weeks on signing up of the contract, detailing the plan of action, manpower deployment, time schedule, detailed methodology and a withdrawal plan at the end of the period of contract. The withdrawal plan shall be detailed and shall reflect how the PAPs / PAFs will maintain the assets created and transferred to the PAPs / PAFs * Prepare monthly progress reports to be submitted to the DRO, with weekly progress and work charges as against the scheduled time frame of RAP implementation. * Data on PAPs for monitoring of impact indicators will be submitted to the DRO on a monthly basis. * Micro level plans for each PAP on the project will be submitted to the DRO for information within three months of the commencement of the services. Where LBlllSheladia/CES/ICT Page S of 10 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 14.3 changes occur during the project requiring changes to the micro level plans, the NGO will update the relevant plans and submit them to the DRO. * Submit a completion report at the end of the contract period summarizing the actions taken during the project, the methods and personnel used to carry out the assignment and a summary of supports / assistance given to the PAPs. * All other reports / documentation as described in the terms of reference. 7.2 All progress reports shall include data on input and output indicators as required by the DRO. Reporting in writing as well as photographs, videotapes etc. taken during the assignment shall be submitted in support of the reports. Account reports both on expenditure and administration as well as training and other heads shall be submitted in the form of Quarterly reports and along with the completion report. In addition to the above, the NGO shall * Prepare and submnit separate descriptive reports on participatory micro-plans with full details of the Participatory Rapid Appraisal exercises conducted. 7.3 The NGO shall document in full details the consultation / counselling processes, the process of identification of the resettlement sites and a full description of the training imparted (or facilitated) as part of the assignment. These documents shall be submitted to the PIU as annual reports. 8. Conditions of Services 8.1 The NGO shall ensure that the RAP is implemented on an effective and proper manner. The prime responsibility of the NGO shall be to ensure that each and every eligible PAP receive appropriate and due entitlement (within the Entitlement Framework of KSTP) and that at the project R&R service, eligible PAPs have improved (or at least restored) their previous standard of living. Additionally, the NGO shall help the PIU in all other matters deemed to be required to implement the RAP in its spirit and entirety. All documents created, generated or collected during the period of contract in carrying out the services under this assignment will be the property of the PIU. No information gathered or generated during and in carrying out this assignment shall be disclosed by the NGO without the explicit permission of the PIfl. 8.2 In order to carry out the above tasks, employees of the NGO are to be stationed in the project area. Besides contacting PAPs on an individual basis to regularly update the baseline information, group meetings and Gram Panchayath (village level) meetings will be conducted by the NGOs on a regular basis. The frequency of such meetings will depend on the requirements of the PAPs but should occur at least once a month to allow the PAPs to remain up to date on project developments. NGOs will encourage participation of individual PAPs in such meetings by discussing their problems. LBIIISheladia/CES/ICT Page 9 of 10 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 14.3 9 Time frame for Services 9.1 The NGOs will be contracted for a period of three years from the date of commencement, with a withdrawal methodology built into the proposal from the NGO. 10 Data, Services and Facilities to be provided by the Client 10.1 The PTU will provide the NGO the copies of the PAP's census, the RAP, the land acquisition plan and any other relevant reports/data prepared by the Project Preparation Consultants. The PIU will assist the NGO in collaborating with the Supervision Consultants. 10.2 All facilities required in the performance of the assignment including office space, office stationery, transportation and accommodation for staff of the NGO etc. shall be arranged by the NGO. LBII/Sheladia/CES/ICT Page 10 of 10 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex 14.4 Identity Card Kerala State Highways Project ENTITLEMENT PHOTO IDENTITY CARD Contract Chainage Form No. Family size Earning member Name: Present Address: Permanent Address: Vulnerable category: Caste: Type of loss: Tenure Status Occupation: Income per month Total area: Total area lost: Compensation Rs. Entitlement: Total amount Rs Options for resettlement: Options for IG program: Signature of Entitled Person Signature of Verifying Officer/ Signature of NGO representative Road Link Level Project Manager LBIl/Sheladia/CES/ICT Identity Card Page I of I A4MYV,( Kerala Public Works Department (PWD) Fax: 00-91 471-330787 Project Implementation Unit (PIU) Phone: 00-91 471-330787 TC 41/304, Muthoot Chamnbers 337094 Near Awappan Temple, Thycaud e-mail: pdpiupwd(&satyam.net.in Thiruvananthapuram-695 014 No. PWD/PIU/80/01 Date: 17-04-2001 From N. Dushantha Kumar Project Director To Mitraniketan. Vellanad P 0. Trivandrum Phone: PIN: 695543 0472-882045 Sir. Sub:- Kerala State Transport Project - Ltpgradation and Improvement of roads - Resettlement and Rehabilitation - Request for Expression of Interest (EOI) for NGO Consultancy - reg. The State Govermment is undertaking the rehabilitation and maintenance of State Roads with World Bank assistance. Acquisition of land will be necessitated to widen the existing road in a few locations. Since the project is under consideration of the World Bank for financing, it should therefore be in compliance with the World Bank policy on resettlement and rehabilitation described in the relevant operational directives. The department has formed a Project Implementation Unit for this project. The R&R is proposed to be done with the assistance of the selected NGOs. The Terms of Reference of the Consultancy Services are attached. You are requested to fill in the enclosed Proforna (NGO profile) along with the required details. Your Expression of Interest is expected to reach this office not later than 15 th May 2001. Thanking you, Yours sincerely, Projec ctor Encl:- 1) list of roads 2) TOR - 1 No. 3) Proforma of NGO profile - 1 No. Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex-145 (2) The Highways Component NGO Expression of Interest KERALA STATE TRANSPORT PROJECT - Press Release Consultancy Services for NGO Participation in the implementation of Resettlement and Rehabilitation processes in the Project - Expression of Interest called for The Govemment of India has applied for a loan assistance from the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (the World Bank) towards the cost of Kerala State Transport Project for taking up the upgradation and rehabilitation of about 610 kms of high priority state highways and heavy maintenance of about 1000 kms of roads. It also includes a pilot project of Inland Water Transport (IWT) which essentially consists of dredging and bank protection of selected canals. The road upgradation works include widening of the existing carriageway from 7 to 10 m, strengthening of the pavement, widening of cross drainage structures, rehabilitation / reconstruction of existing distressed culverts and bridges and providing traffic safety features. The execution of these roads will be carried out in 2 phases. Most of the road improvements will be confined to public land i.e., existing right of way (ROW) or available corridor, which is controlled by PWD. However road improvements include easing the curve at some localities which will include expropriation of land from the current owners I users. The project works will also necessitate the eviction of squatters and removal of encroachers within the ROW. The following table contains a list of the Phase I roads and their length: Link Description Length Link Description Length (kms) (Kms) Packagel Package 4 1 Taikkod - Kottarakkara 46.0 40 Thrissur - Kuttipuram 32.98 2 Kottarakkara - Adoor 20.85 50.1 Palakkad - Shornur 45.30 3 Adoor - Chengannur 23.59 IWT 105.0 72 Taikkod - Kazhakoottam 12.58 73 Alappuzha - Changanassery 24.14 Package 3 6 Muvattupuzha - Angamali 33.8 70 Muvattupuzha - Thodupuzha 17,7 A detailed Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) has been prepared for compensating and assisting the Project Affected Persons (PAPs) including the project displaced persons to restore their livelihood and shelter. To assist the Project Implementation Unit (PIU) of the Public Works Department in the implementation of the RAP, it has been proposed to make use of the services of Non Governmental organisations (NGOs) to be procured under quality and cost based lump sum contracts for individual road link level project R&R management. Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CESlICT I Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Annex-14.5 (2) The Highways Component NGO Expression of Interest The objective of the NGO consultancy are to facilitate the resettlement and rehabilitation processes of the KSTP, These may include among other things * Educating the PAPs regarding their rights, entitlements and obligations under the RAP * Ensuring that the PAPs obtain their full entitlements under the RAP * To provide support and information to PAPs for income restoration. * Assist the PAPs in the redress of grievances through the system implemented as part of RAP. The employees of the NGO are to be stationed in the project area. The NGOs will be contracted for a period of three years from the date of commencement. They will be given training suitable for performing the tasks. Further details can be had from the office of the Project Director, Project Implementation Unit (PWD), T.C. 41/304, Muthoot Chambers, Near Ayyappan Temple, Thycaud, Thiruvananthapuram - 695 014 between 10 AM and 5 PM on any working day. The NGOs who are interested to take up this assignment are requested to apply to the Project Director in the above address enclosing full details of their organisation, Key personnel, Previous experience etc. on or before 29th September 2001. Project Director Project Implementation Unit, Muthoot Chambers, TC 41/304, Near Ayyappan Temple, Thycaud, Thiruvananthapuram - 695 014, India, email: pdpiupwd@satyam.net.in, Phone: + 91 471 337094, Fax: + 91 471 330787 Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT 2 ANNEX 18: Monitoring Formats Annex 18.1 Record for Individual/Family Entitlements Annex 18.2 Monitoring Form for Community Entitlements Annex 18.3 Monthly and Cumulative Corridor Entitlement Report - Individuals, Families and Communities Annex 18.4 GRC Monthly and Cumulative Report Annex 18.5 Road Link Level Project Manager's Report for Individual PAF Annex 18.6 Monthly Synthesis of RAP Implementation (Physical) Annex 18.7 Monthly Synthesis of RAP Implementation (Financial) Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Fornats for Reporting The Highways Component ANNEX- 18 FORMATS FOR REPORTING Format - 18.1: Record for Individual /Family Entitlements Link No. & Name Location Chainage EP Name: Address ID NO.: Entitlement Category: 1A Entitlement Due Entitlement Received Land/ Cash: Cash | Land Cash Land Fees, Taxes, Other Charges: Amount Due | Amount Paid Additional Grants: Amount Due Amount Paid 1B Entitlement Due Entitlement Received Land/Cash: Cash i Land Cash I Land Temporary Accommodation: I Not Needed Provided i Grant Rs. Shifting Allowance: I Paid I Not Paid Reimbursement of Deposit/ Advance: I Amount Due Amount Paid Rental Allowance/ Lost Income: Amount Due Amount Paid Compensation for Structures: | Amount Due | Amount Paid Premium for Owner / Occupier: | Amount Due Amount Paid Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Fonnats for Reporting The Highways Component 2A Allowance for Lost Income: Amount Due Amount Paid 2B _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __-- - -- - Notice to Harvest Crop: Issued I Not Issued Grant for Lost Crop | Amount Due | Amount Paid _2C_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ______________ _ _ _ __ ___ _ 2C Capitalized Value of Crop: Amount Due | Amount Paid 3A Notification to Remove Assets/ Date Issued | Not Issued Harvest Crop: I Case-by-case Assistance: Entitlement Due Entitlement Received 3B _ _ ____________ ___ _ _ ____ _________ 3B Plot or House Entitlement Due Entitlement Received Plot House Plot House Assistance to Construct Residential/ | Entitlement Due _ Entitlement Received Business Unit: Shifting Assistance: I Entitlement Due Entitlement Received Facilitation/ Access to Training! | Entitlement Due Entitlement Received Income Generating Assistance: 4A Entitlement Due Entitlement Received Land for Land + Grant for materials to Land |Grant Land Grant Construct Dwelling Unit Plot and House Loan (Residential): Entitlement Due Entitlement Received Plot Loan Plot Loan Plot and Building Loan (Commercial): Entitlement Due Entitlement Received Plot Loan Plot Loan Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates!CES/ICT 2 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Formats for Reporting The Highways Component 4B Lump-sum Grant I Entitlement Due | Entitlement Received Training/ Counselling: Entitlement Due Entitlement Received Surplus Training Money for Entitlement Due Entitlement Received Enterprise start-up: 5A/5B Disruption Assistance: Entitlement Due Entitlement Paid Vendors' Market i Provided I Not Provided Date Signature of Entitled Person Date Signature of Road Link Level Project Manager (NGO) Remarks: Reason for Non - Payment Non - Acceptance by PAP Date Signature of Road Link Level Project Manager (NGO) Louis Berger InternationallSheladia Associates/CES/ICT 3 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Formats for Reporting The Highways Component Format - 18.2: Monitoring Form for Community Entitlements Community Name: Link No. & Name: Location: Chainage: Entitlement Category: 5A Social Forestry Scheme: Entitlement Due Entitlement Received Compensatory Afforestation: Entitlement Due Entitlement Received Recreational/ Infrastructure Entitlement Due Entitlement Received Facilities: Assistance for Income-Generating Entitlement Due Entitlement Received Scheme: l _ Enhancement of Roadside Areas: Entitlement Due i Entitlement Received Safety Measures: EntitlementDue Entitlement Received Safe Space and Access to Business Entitlement Due | Entitlement Received Purpose: Date Signature of Road Link Level Project Manager (NGO) Louis Berger Intermational/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT 4 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Formats for Reporting The Highways Component Format- 18.3: Monthly and Cumulative Corridor Entitlement Report - Individuals, Families and Communities Link No. and Name: Month: Year: Total Previous Total Current l P Activity Target Months Month Completed General Consultation with PAPs: - Individual - Group Verification of PAPs ID Cards Issued Entitlement Category IA: Payment in Land / Payment in Cash Payment of Fees, Taxes, Other Charges _ Payment of Additional Grant I Entitlement Category 1 B: Provision of Temporary Accommodation _ Payment of Shifting Allowance Reimbursement of Deposit/ Advance Payment of Rental/ Lost Income Payment of Compensation for Structure Payment of Owner/Occupier Premium Entitlement Category 2A: Payment of Lost Income Entitlement Category 2B Notice to Harvest Crops Issued Grant for Lost Crops Paid L _ Entitlement Category 2C: ____I_I Payment of Capitalized Crop Value Entitlement Category 3A: Notification to Remove Assets/ Harvest Crops Case-by-case Assistance Entitlement Category 3B: Plots Awarded House Allocated Assistance to Construct Residences Assistance to Construct Business Units Payment of Shifting Assistance Access to Training Facilitated Access to Income-Generating Assistance Facilitated Entitlement Category 4A: Land Allocated Grants for Building Materials Plots/ Housing Loans (EWS) Plotsl House Loans (LIG) Louis Berger International/Sheladia Associates/CES/ICT 5 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Formats for Reporting Tlhe Highways Component Activity Target Total Previous Total Current % Target Months Month Completed Entitlement Category 41B:_ Payrnent of Lump-sum Grants. Training Programmes Organized Counselling Sessions Organized Awards of Surplus Money for Enterprise Start-up Entitlement Category 5A/5B: Payments of Disruption Assistance _ Allocation of Space in Vendors' Markets Entitlement Category 6A: Social Forestry Schemes Started Communities Provided with Project Employment Compensatory Afforestation Schemes Started Entitlement Category 6B: Recreation/ Infrastructure facilities built Provision of Assistance for Income- Generating Scheme Date Signature of Road Link Level Project Manager (NGO) Louis Berger IntemationalUSheladia Associates/CES/ICT 6 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Fornats for Reporting The Highways Component Format - 18.4: GRC Monthly and Cumulative Report Name of District: Date of Establishment: Link No. & Name Location: Chainage: Month: Year Task Current Month Previous Month Total Number of Grievances Received r 1 Number of Recommendations by GRC Number of Decisions by RLLPM l Number of Grievances Referred by the RLLPM to the PIU Number of Decisions by PIU l Number of Decisions Communicated to Claimants Number of Unresolved Grievances Date Signature of Chairman District Grievance Redress Committee Louis Berger InternationalVSheladia Associates,CES/ICT 7 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Formats for Reporting The Highways Component Format - 18.5: Road Link Level Project Manager's Report for Individual PAF District Link No. & Name Location Month Year EP Name ID No._ Address: Forwarded for consideration of the District Level Committee on date Details of Land! Properties to be acquired Land! Area m2 Building m2 Crop Type Well Trees No. Compensation Received under each Head as Land/ Area Building Crop Type Well Trees No. Total PerLA MVAC Recommendation on Value of Property Land! Area Building Crop Type Well Trees No. Total Difference in Compensation and MVAC Land] Area Building Crop Type Well j Trees No. Total Valuation Total Assistance I AmountDue Amount Paid Date Signature of Road Link Level Project Manager (NGO) Louis Berger InternationalUSheladia Associates/CESllCT 8 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Formats for Reporting The Highways Component Format - 18.6: Monthly Synthesis of RAP Implementation (Physical) Month of: Link No. and Name: Target Target for Task % of Task Cumulative already Total Current completed Remain Target for Rerks Resettlement Category completed Task Month (% of (% of Total Unachieved Next Month. ema 4 ~Total) ___k Land _ _ 1 | _ _ Cash Fees, Taxes, Other Charges Additional Grant of 100% . _ _ lB Temporary Accommodation . Shifting Allowance _ Reimbursement of Deposit /Advance Rental! Lost Income Compensation for Structure . Owner/ Occupier Premium Six months Lost Inconme 2B NoUice to Hasrvest Crops | '|.j Grants for Lost Crops Paid Payment of Capitalized Crop Values 3A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____ Notificabon to Remove Assets/ Harvest Crops ____|_._|_ ___|__ Case-by-Case Assistance _ ____i______ 3B Plot House Assistance to Construct Residential Business Unit ___________ Shifting Assistance ___|_||_ Facilitation/ Access to Training! Income-Generab'ng Assistance I 4A Land for Land + Materials Grant for Dwelling Unit | _ _ _ _ _____ Plot + Housing Loans (EWS) - | __ _. _ Plot+ Housin Loans LIG) _________ Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CESflCT 9 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Formats for Reporting The Highways Component Target Target for Task % of Task Cumulative already Total Current completed 1 Remain Target for completed Task Month (% of (% of Total Unachieved Next Month* _______ Total) Task) 4B Lump-sum Grant Training/ Counselfling Surplus Training Money for 1 Enterprise Start-up ______ 5A15B1 Disruption Assistance Vendors Market 6A Social Forestry Schemes = _ Project Employment Compensatory Afforestation 6B Recreationl Infrastructure Facilities Assistance for Income- Generating Schemes *Target of current month + task carryfori'ardfrom previous month/s Date Signature of Road Link Level Project Manager (NGO) Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/CESICT 10 Kerala State Transport Project Resettlement Action Plan Formats for Reporting The Highways Component Format - 18.7: Monthly Synthesis of RAP Implementation (Financial) Month of: Link No. and Name: Budget Allocation And Spending Total Budget Monthly Expected Actual % of Total Allotted Disbursement Disbursement Allotment Acquisition of private land Acquisition of private non-agricultural land and assets Assistance for restoration of livelihood I Compensation / Assistance for loss of standing crop Compensation / Assistance for loss of perennial crop l Assistance to vulnerable encroachers Assistance to squatters l Support to vulnerable group for housing -Support to Vulnerable group for livelihood __l_ l Assistance for the businesses kiosks l _ Assistance or developing vendor market Restoration/ Enhancement of cultural properties Restoration of community resources l l Date Signature of Road Link Level Project Manager (NGO) Louis Berger Intemational/Sheladia Associates/'CESfICT T]