MICROFICHE COPY X r - (> ct ckc±d F3 Report No.:11660 Type: (MIS) ° CD 11 c Title: FY90 SECTOR REVIEW URBAN DEVEL' *- 0 It Author: ;z .%I ! Ext.: 0 Room: Dept.:INURD o Xc I o .. -s .. |' | i t E t m ~~~~a' CE,o 0 t4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- i-* t g @CD | _I Z z; 9~~~~~[ 0> Titl FY0SCO EIW RA EEwo | Et: 0Ro:Dp.MR tz:l0 ~ ~ I I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I Lf~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C 6~~~~C FILE n COP r Tte eport No. :11660 Type: (MIS)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C FY90 SECTOR REVIEW URBAN DEVEL Repot: 0Noo:116 Dept. :(MIS) Copyright 1991 - The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W. AU Rights Resrved Farst Printing January 1991 This is a document published informally by the World Bank. In orderthat the information contained in it can be prsented with the least posible d-lay, the typesript has not been prepad in accordamce wihh the procedures appropriate to fomal pritd texts, and the Wodd Bank accepts o rponbility for enros. The Word Bank does not accept responsiblty for the views expressd herein, which are those of the author and sbold not be asubuted to the Wodd Bank or to its affifliated organzaton. lhe "iv, interpations, and conclusion am the result of research upote by te Bank; they do not necerly represent official policy of the Bank. The designations employed, the preseain of material, and any aps used in this document are solely for die conenince of th reader and do not imply the expression of any opinion whatover co the pat of the Word Bank or its affliates concerning the legal satus of any country, tewitory, city, area, or of its authorties, or comerning the derimitations of its boundaries or national affiliation. The author is Catherine Favacqu-, fmi the Urban Development Division, nftructure and Urban Development Department of Te World Bak. Ayse Pamuk cotibuted to the data collection. The World Bank FY90 SECTOR REVIEW URBAN DEVELOPMENT GENERAL OPERATIONAL REVIEW EXECITIVE SUMKARY 1. FY90 was a period of relative±y active lending for the urban sector. Although this year's lending performance was the lowest in five years, this situation is expected to improve in the coming two years as shown by a strong FY91-92 pipeline. Delays in the preparation of the China portfolio contributed to the low FY90 level. Sixteen urban projects or a total lending amount of US$1,002.1 million were approved by the Board, representing 4.8 percent of all Bank lending. Nearly half of FY90 borrowing countries were low-income countries and 80 percent had GNP per capita below US$830. 2. Differences in regional approaches had a strong impact on project design and on the profile of FY90 urban operations. The sector has been quite responsive to the call for more urban operations in the Africa region with a sustained increase in its lending portfolio (eight projects or 36 percent of FY90 urban lending). These African projects have components which address some iv-.ediate and pressing problems such as infrastructure, housing, and employment as well as elements to induce long-term reforms in the governance systems and the resource mobilization and allocation structures. LAC has remained the largest recipient in dollar amount but has only focused on follow-up projects, namely a second housing finance project in Mexico and another state level municipal development project in Brazil. The EMENA and Asia regions are expected to increase their portfolio in the next three years with a group of new projects and new borrowers. While the Asia region has a strong upcoming program in China and Indonesia, the EMENA region which has previously been characterized by long- term dialogue and a series of repeater projects in a small group of borrowing countries is now witnessing an opening of its activities in East irn Europe and Algeria. Sectoral issues and project comosition 3. The review of operations reveals the following: - Infrastructure: Analytical work has showed the importance of sound and reliable infrastructure for enhancing the productivity of cities. FY90 urban projects have committed US$341 million or almost 20 percent of total project costs for infrastructure investments. 80 percent of this amount will go to Africa where infrastructure investments are a high priority item on most governments' agenda. - Housing: A limited number of FY90 urban projects have included direct housing construction in their intervention package. US$90 million of total project costs account for housing construction. The mainstream of the Bank's interventions in the housing sector has shifted emphasis from direct provision of housing to improving the financial delivery mechanisms for housing. Housing finance, in FY90, is still a strong subsector in doller amount, accounting for US$941.2 million or 47 percent of total project costs and US$447 million or 45 percent of FY90 lending amount. Its geographic impact, however, remains limited as two of the three FY90 housing finance operations are repeater projects in Mexico and Morocco. - Municipal development: During FY90, nine projects (seven in Africa) focused on municipal development issues, accounting for about US$90 million in total project costs. These proj'cts have focused on (a) strengthening urban institutions at the local level such as infrastructure delivery agencies and - ii - technical departments as well as institutional development at the central level; (b) improving resource mobilization efforts, especially tax systems; (c) improving financial management by inducing greater accountability at the local level and improving municipal accounting practices; and (d) creating capital investment funds to provide lines of credit to municipalities for infrastructure financing. While the targets and policy objectives are well defined, specific recommendations and action programs often fall short of the challenge. - Land- Bank interventions in land management are timidly starting to take shape, but still lack a sound policy framework. The diversity of FY90 approaches is illustrative of the diversity and complexity of land issues themselves ranging from information systems (i.e., Ghana, Burkina Paso), registration and resource mobilization (i.e., Ghana, Philippines), to improvement of land development mechanisms (i.e., Guinea). - Urban environment: One-third of the FY90 portfolio has addressed urban environmaental issues. These projects have aimed at implementing effective solid waste management systems, typically through (a) acquisition of new garbage collection equipment, (b) repair of existing equipment, and (c) development of disposal sites. Flood control efforts have also constituted a large share of environmental interventions (i.e., Nigeria, Yemen). There is a strong pipeline which will focus on resource management, air pollution, water pollution among old (Mexico) and new borrowers (China). - Reconstruction activities: As in the past, the Bank has been involved in reconstruction activities (i.e., Yemen and China). These projects illustrate the experience of the Pa=k, .ccumulated over the past five years, to contend with a different type of project de.ign and project processing. Some lessons from projects under implementation 4. Seventy four projects are currently under implementation amoDnting to US$16,867.6 million in total project costs and to US$5,504.9 million in lending amounts (as committed at the time of appraisals). A review of implementation reports reveals that in terms of (a) development objectives, (b) compliance with legal covenance, (c) project management performance, and (d) availability of funds, urban projects are rated better than dhe rest of the Bank portfolio (l.76 on a scale of 1 to 4). Of the 74 projects in the portfolio, 20 percent have an unfavorable rating (3 or 4) on one or more of the categories of project performance. After a decline in FY86-89, when the supervision coefficient for urban projects averaged 10.8 staffweeks, the overall supervision efforts in the sector have ret-irned in FY90 to an average coefficient of 13.9 staffweeks, comparable to tL.e period FY82-85. Although higher than the Bank average which declined from 11.3 staffweeks during FY82-85 to 10.4 staffweeks during FY86-89, supervision efforts in the sector should be improved. In general, insgULicLj appreciation by the Bank of the difficulty of policy reform and institutional development in urban operations appears to have contributed to an inadeauate supervision in many cases. Also the heavy reliance on external conLultants has raised issues of continuity and quality in implementation which should be addressed in the future as the number of projects, lending amounts, and policy content of urban operations increase. - ili - 5. In terms of sector work, while Bank sector work has increased by about 50 percent from FY82-86 to FY87-89, the urban sector has not kept up with this upward trend in sector work activities, increasing by only about 14 percent over the same period. Moreover, FY90 has actually witnessed a decline in sector work with only 230 staffweeks allocated to sector work as compared with 325 staffweeks in the period FY87-89. While the urban lending program has been steadily increasing over the years, it is a matter of great concern to see the current limited attention devoted to the analytical foundations of the new generation of projects. Pipeline for the Future 6. The pipeline shows a strong projected lending amount exceeding UZ$6 billion over the next three-year period with large programs in Asia and LAC and the emergence of a new portfolio in the EMiNA region. These include socialist countr'es in transition, such as Poland (US$200 million Housing Project); Algeria (Cadastre Project, Construction Industry Project and Local Government Development Project); Yugoslavia (Environment Project) and Hungary (Htusing Project). It will become therefore crucial to improve the quality of the portfolio both upstream and downstream by strengthening the analytical foundations of project preparation and ensuring appropriate supervision. - iv - Table of Contents XE VE EMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i I. SECTOR PERFORMANCE: AN OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 A. FY90 Approved Projects .... . . . . . . . . . . ... 2 Al. Source of Financing .... . .. 2 A2. Regional Distribution and Composition of the FY90 Lending Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 LAC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 AFRICA ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 EMENA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S ASIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S B. Projects Under Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 B1. Overall Performance .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 B2. Disbursement .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 B3. Supervision .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 C. Sector Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 D. Urbani Pipeline FY91-93 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 ASIA ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 AFRICA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 EENA ...................... .... 10 IAC .1.1......................... . ll II. PLICYISSUESANDSECTORALRESPONSES .12 A. Regional Disparities and the Bank's Response ... . . . . 12 B. Subsectoral Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Bl. Infrastructure ................... . 12 B2. Housing ...................... . 12 B3. Municipal Development ............... . 13 B4. Land ........................ . 14 B5. Urban Environment ................. . 14 B6. Reconstruction ..... . . ...... . . . . . . . 15 C. Addressing Generic Issues .15 Cl. Women in Development: How have women's issues been addressed in FY90? . . 15 C2. Poverty Alleviation: Has it become a sectoral priority? . . . . . . . . . 15 iNEXES ......................... 17 - 37 I. SECTOR PERFORMANCE: AN OVERVIEV 1.1 After almost two decades of interventions in the urban sector, the Bank has invested a total lending amount of over US$11 billion more than 60 percent of which was committed in the last five years. Consequently, the share of urban lending to total Bank lending has also considerably increased, reaching a peak of 10 percent in FY88. TRENDS IN URBAN LENDING 1983-1990 USS million Percent 2500 12% _Loans & Credilts : 2000 I Pct of Total Ban 10% 1500 6% 1000 4% 500 - 2% 0 0% 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 Loans & Credits 554 525 384 1540.11324.1 2016.31188.51002.1 Pct of Total Bank 3.8% 3.4% 2.7% 9.4% 7.5% 10.5% 5.6% 4.8% Fiscal Year 1.2 Differences in regional approaches have had a strong impact on project design and the overall profile of FY90 urban operations. The sector has been quite responsive to the call for more interventions in the Africa region with a sustained increase in its lending portfolio and an approach that has proven to be often innovative and quite sophisticated. LAC has remained the largest recipient in dollar amount but has only focused on follow-up projects. The EMENA and Asia regions are expected to increase their portfo.io in the next three years with a group of new projects and new borrowers. 1.3 Municipal development and housing finance have continued to dominate the profile of both urban operations and sector work activities. - 2 - 1.4 FY90 has also witnessed a decline in the amount of sector work activities. The current limited emphasls on the analytical foundations of the new generation of projects has become a matter of concerns. 1.5 In terms of project management performance, supervision efforts, although slightly higher than the Bank average, aave fallen short of monitoring and assistance needs during project implementation. A. FY90 iproved Projects 1.6 Sixteen urban projects or a total lending amount of US$1,002.1 million were approved by the Board during FY90, representing 4.8 percent of all Bank lending. This represents a stable continuation of last year's performance and is likely to increase in the future, as will be discussed in the analysis of the pipeline. Al. Source of Financini 1.7 The percentage of aggregate cost sharing by the Bank/IDA group increased to 50 percent of a tot&l project costs amounting to US$1,965.4 million, with an IBRD contribution of US$702.70 (7 projects) and an IDA contribution of US$299.4 million (9 projects). Thirty percent of total urban lending was finianced through IDA credits, of which 82 percent went to African countries. SOURCE OF URBAN LENDING BY REGION FY3D an Leadlg (US$ milion) sa0 400 300 200_. . 100 0 AFRICA ASIA EMENA LAC Regqlol IBRD CM IDA 1iTotal A2. Regional Distribution and Composition of the FY90 Lending Program 1.8 Nearly half of FY90 borrowing countries were low-income countries and 80 percent had GNP per capita below US$830. The largest share of Bank financing per urban dweller went to Fiji (US$55 per urban dweller), Guinea (US$44 per urban dweller) and Burkina Faso (US$29 per urban dweller). In countries such as China, Philippines, and Brazil, where urbanization rates remaIn high, the Bank's financial contribution to urban development has been minimal (less than US$1 per urban dweller). Total Bonk & Urban Lending by Region FY98 $7 USS million (Thousands) 10% $6 8% $5 $4 . $3 4%- $2 - - - ------- ------ 2 % $1 ^_2 $0 0% AFRICA ASIA EMENA LAC Total Bank Lending $3.933 $6.397 $4.407 $5.965 Urban Lending $0.36 $0.086 $0.105 $0.45 Pct. of Urban 9.16% 1.35% 2.39% 7.54X Region Total Bank Lending 90 Urban Lending - .- Pct. of Urban . 4 - REGIONAL DISTRIBUT;ON OF URBAN LENDING FY 86-90 (USS million) Avg FY 86-89 Fr so LAC 42% EM EN EMENA 7K AISIA 37 % ^ $362.3 P~~AFICA 14K LAC $212.9 ~~~45% LAC 1.9 The LAC region continued to contribute substantially to the urban portfolio of the Bank with two large projects in Mexico and Brazil totalling US$450 million or 45 percent of FY90 urban lending. This continues a trend set in the past years (i.e. the average share of LAC region to urban lending has been 42 percent over the period FY86-89). The share of urban lending to the total Bank lending for the region reached a significant 7.5 percent. 1.10 This year's operations, however, have not introduced striking innovations. They have mostly capitalized on previous similar operations in two countries which have been Bank borrowers for a long time. In Mexico, FONHAP0, the low-income housing fund, is about to receive an additional US$350 million loan to strengthen the impact of the first project and enlarge access to housing credit for the low-income groups. In Brazil, the Municipal Development Project in Rio do Sul is reintroducing features of similar projects in other states of the country. AFRICA 1.11 The Africa region has continued its surge in urban activities (which started in FY88) with eight projects totalling US$360.4 million or 36 percent - 5 - of FY90 urban lending. This represents a drastic increase in the share of urban lending which averaged nine percent in the period FY86-89. Urban lending for Africa also increased as a share of total Bank lending, averaging 9.16 percent. 1.12 These eight projects have two common aspects: (a) components which address some immediate and pressing problems such as infrastructure, housing, and employment and (b) elements to induce long-term reforms in the governance systems and the resource mobilization/allocation structures. All eight projects have consequently large infrastructure investments (80 percent of all infrastructure investments., and most of them have a housing component which involves the direct production of housing through traditional Sites & Services and slum upgrading schemes as well as some deeper reforms of the housing sector. The issue of stre4gthening local governments has become of foremost importance and consequently consistent support is being given to: (a) improvement of urban administrations and institutional structure of municipal £overnments, (b) human resources development, (c) sources of revenues, (d) budgeting and allocation of investments resources, and (e) financial management. A new generation of urban projects is emerging in Africa, as will be discussed in the section on the urban pipeline. ENA 1.13 Urban projects have traditionally constituted a marginal share of landing activities in the EMENA region. In FY90, it accounted for only 2.4 percent of total Bank lending for the region and 10 percent of total urban lending. 1.14 The EMENA lending program has been characterized by long-term interventions and a series of follow-up projects in a small group of borrowing countries. The FY90 Second Housing Finance Project in Morocco is illustrative of this long-standing policy dialogue on housing issues. Its basic objectives are to improve the functioning of housing finance as well as to rationalize land and housing supply. The housing sector, because of its direct linkages with macro-economies, remains the predominant window of opportunity for future interventions in Eastern Europe. ASIA 1.15 The Asia region seems to be slowly increasing its urban lending portfolio. With three operations this year totall.ng US$86.2 million (Fiji, China, Philippines), its share of total urban lending remains the lowest of all regions (8.6 percent) and its contribution to the total Bank lending for the region almost insignificant (1.35 percent). The large China and Indonesia portfolio will probably change the balance in the coming two to three years. The profile of FY90 urban operations is quite diverse as it includes first projects in Fiji (housing) and China (reconstruction) and a typical municipal development project in the Philippines. 1.16 Further discussion on the composition and content of these operations will be included in Chapter II of this report. - 6 - B. Pro1ects Under ImD1gmentation 1.17 Seventy four projects are currently under implementation amounting to US$16,867.6 million in total project costs and to US$5,504.9 million in lending amounts (as committed at the time of appraisals). Respectively, Africa (23 projects and US$938.6 million in lending), Asia (21 projects and US$2,449.7 million) and IAC (18 projects and US$1,619.1 million) have the largest portfolio under implementation while the EMENA region has (12 projects and US$497.5 million) the smallest portfolio. The average age of projects in the current portfolio is 3.8 years with a maximum stay of 10 years. Bl. Overall Performance 1.18 A review of implementation summaries (forms 590) reveals that in terms of (a) development objectives, (b) compliance with legal covenance, (c) project management performance and (d) availability of funds, urban projects are rated better than the rest of the Bank. In fact, the overall average status rating for the urban portfolio is 1.76 on a scale of 1 to 4, slightly better than the total Bank average of 1.85. In the EMENA region, the average rating of the urban portfolio (2) exceeds the Bank average where half of the urban projects are rated poorly. 1.19 Only 2 projects (Secondary Towns Project in Kenya and Cukurova Urban Development Project in Turkey) got a 4 rating, indicating that the major problems in the implementation process are not being adequately addressed. Of the 74 projects ln the portfolio, 20 percent have an unfavorable rating (3 or 4) on one or more of these categories of project performance. B2. Disbursement 1.20 60 percent of all loans and credits in the current urban portfolio have not been disbursed. Considering that the average age of the portfolio is 3.8 years, the disbursement performance is comparable to Bank averages. However, it is interesting once again to analyze regional variations. Asia, with an average portfolio of 3.8 years, is the most fast-disbursing region (only 44 percent remain undisbursed). On the other hand, LAC, with an average portfolio of 3.7 years, has a high 73 percent undisbursed balance. Africa has a comparable undisbursed balance but a younger portfolio averaging 3.4 years. B3. Sugervision 1.21 After a decline in FY86-89, when the supervision coefficier.t for urban projects averaged 10.8 staffweeks, the overall supervision efforts in the sector have returned in FY90 to an average coefficient of 13.9 staffweeks, comparable to the period FY82-85. 1.22 These figures hide important regional variations: - EEMENA has the highest supervision coefficient (16.9 staffweeks), probably related to two problem-ridden projects (Egypt Urban Development II -29 staffweeks- and Turkey Cukurova Project -35 staffweeks) and two complex projects in Pakistan (Punjab and Karachi). - Africa and Asia have comparable supervision coe:ficients of respectively 14.1 and 14.9 staffweeks with old problem-projects such as Kenya Secondary Towns Project and new complex projects in Nigeria, India, and Indonesia. - LAC is experiencing a below average supervision coefficient which may be related to its fairly problem-free portfolio (except for Brazil Salvador Metropolitan Development Project) and to the high level of the counterpart institutions. 1.23 Generally, there is a strong correlation between high supervision rates and (a) old problem-ridden projects such as Kenya Secondary Towns Project, Calcutta Urban Development III Project, Egypt Urban Development II Project, or more recent ones such as Turkey Cukurova Project and (b) new multi-city, integrated projects requiring high level of assistance in the early years of implementation to address institutional issues such as Nigeria Urban Infrastructure Project, India Uttar Pradesh Urban Development Project, Indonesia Urban Sector Loan, Pakistan Punjab Urban Development Project. 1.24 It can be concluded that, although higher than Bank average (which declined from 11.3 staffweeks during FY82-85 to 10.4 staffweeks during FY86-89), supervision efforts in the sector could be improved. In general, insufficient appreciation by the Bank of the inherent complexity of urban operations appears to have contributed to an inadequate supervision in many cases. Supervision often fell short of providing the borrower with needed orientation regarding non- technical aspects of execution, particularly in the areas of inter-institutional coordination, financial management, coo,t recovery, and relations with the local communities affected by project activities. Also, the heavy reliance on external consultants has become an issue which should be addressed in the future as both the number of projects, the amount of lending, and the sophistication of urban operations increase. 1.25 It is worth noting that in the Africa region, there is a growing open recognition of corruption problems related to procurement and of the need to address them directly in project design. It has become apparent that regular supervision by the Bank, or by government-selected accounting and auditing firms are not sufficient, and that there is therefore a need to technically audit physical and financial progress of projects by an independent firm. Such a scheme has been developed, for example, in two upcoming projects in Benin and Niger. C. Sector Work 1.26 Sector work activities have declined during FY90 both in terms of staffweeks allocated for such activity but also in terms of the scope of the work undertaken. 1.27 While Bank wide sector work has increased by about 50 percent from an annual average of 5,100 staffweeks in FY82-86 to nearly 7,700 staffweeks in FY87- 89, the urban sector has timidly followed that upward trend in sector work activities with an increase of about 14 percent over the same period. The average number of staffweeks for the period FY82-86 was about 280 staffweeks or about 4.4 percent of Bank wide sector work, reaching 325 staffweeks in FY87-89 or only 4 percent of Bank wide sector work. FY90 has actually witnessed a decline in sector work while only 13 reports have reached various stages of completion totalling close to 230 staffweeks. While the urban lending program has been steadily increasing over the years, it is a matter of concern that, a limited emphasis is given to the analytical foundations of the new generation of projects. 1.28 Sector work in Africa is the most dynamic with six studies involving two urban sector reviews in Madagascar and Malawi as well as four issue-oriented reports on housing in Ghana, local government in Nigeria and Kenya. and urban poverty in Zaire. Municipal development and local government finance dominate the topics of these sectoral reviews. One innovative feature of sector work is that, in addition to looking at resourcc mobilization issues and focusing on improvement of the tax systems, there is a new emphasis on the institutional framework of local governments. A lot of attention is placed on the incentives that arise from the structure of inter-governmental relations. Such is the case of the studies in Mexico, Kenya, Nigeria which have typically encompassed an analysis of institutional development, human resources development, sources of revenue, and budgeting/ allocation of investment resources. Political issues have not been addressed in most sector studies, except in the case of the more adventurous Mexico sector study which has included some recommendations on the electoral cycle and the extension of mayors. This gap should b addressed because it is essential to reach any kind of impact. Also worth noting is the emphasis, in the Africa region, on urban-rural linkages and on the macro-economic dimension of urbanization. D. Urban Pipeline FY91-93 1.29 The pipeline s1hows a projected lending amount exceeding US$6 billion over the next three-year period with large programs in Asia and LAC. ASIA 1.30 In the Asia region, 23 projects totalling US$2,260.9 million or 37 percent of planned Bank urban lending are scheduled for the FY91-93 period. 1.31 Because its economic situation does not justify the Bank's continuing involvement, Korea, which was traditionally one of the largest recipients of urban loans in the region, will receive what will probably be the last loan, a US$100 million housing loan in FY91. 1.32 On the other hand, China has become the potential prominent recipient in the region with three projects scheduled for FY91 (Medium Size Cities Integrated Development Project, Lianing Urban Project, Beijing Environment Project), two projects scheduled in FY92 (Zhejiang Urban Project and Tianjin Urban Project) and one project in FY93 (Lianing Environment Project). The total lending amount planned for China amounts to US$680.2 million, or 30 percent of total lending scheduled for FY91-93. URBAN PIPELINE PROJECTS (FYsi-FY 93) US$ million 3000 2 500 2 000 1500 _0_2R 1000 500 0 AFRICA ASIA EMENA LAC TOTAL FY91 128.1 843.9 0 169 1141 FY92 333.1 829 625 1008 2795.1 FY93 385.6 588 200 951 2144.6 Region _UFY91 M FY92 FY93 A Including Standby & Reserve 1.33 Indonesia remains a large borrower in the region with eight projects totalling US$941 million including a Second Housing Project, a third follow up project in Jabotabek, and four multi-city projects in the regions of East Java/Bali, Sulawesi/Irian Jaya and Kalimantan. 1.34 India, which has been the second largest recipient of Bank loans in the sector (total of 14 urban projects: US$1365.3 million), has only two projects in the pipeline: a follow-up project regarding the institutional strengthening of HDFC and ICDS II. However, sector work attempting to define an urban and water supply operational strategy for the country was carried out during FY90. 1.35 Similarly, Philippines, which was traditionally a large borrower (eight urban projects including the FY90 Municipal Development Project, totalling US$451 million), does not seem to have high lending prospects in the future except for the FY93 US$50 million third Municipal Development Project. - 10 - 1.36 Projects are also planned for new borrowing countries such as Papua New Guinea, Vanuatu, Solomon Islands, and Bhutan for small interventions, mostly dealing with housing and infrastructure. 1.37 As noted earlier, sector work activities in the region are not sufficient to provide sound analytical framework for such a large lending program. AFRICA 1.38 In the Africa region, 26 projects totalling US$831.8 million or 13.7 percent of planned urban lending are scheduled for rhe FY91.93 period. The average size of projects is projected to be around US$30 million, continuing a generation of numerous small projects. 1.39 New recipient countries are emerging such as Angola, Benin, Chad, Congo, Gabon, Somalia, Swaziland, Togo, and Uganda. Sector work in these countries should be carried out. 1.40 A new generation of projects is emerging in Africa, which has two major objectives: employment generation and improvement of financing mechanisms for infrastructure. Following the trend set by the Senegal Public Works and Employment Project, many projects under preparation such as Benin, Mali, Madagascar, Cote d'Ivoire and Togo aim at reducing the social impact of adjustment by creating employment through public works schemes. Institutional arrangements for such projects are quite innovative with the creation of semi- private entities in charge of simplified procurement procedures. The long term justification of such projects lies in the consolidation of a network of local private enterprises. SUNk 1.41 In the EMENA region, 12 projects totalling US$825 million or 13.7 percent of planned urban lending (the loan amounts for two projects in Algeria are not known yet) are scheduled for the period FY91-93. The pipeline includes follow-up projects in traditional borrowing countries such as: - Tunisia with a US$100 million Municipal Development and Environment Project. - Morocco with a Municipal Finance Loan to FEC scheduled for FY92. - Pakistan with a US$100 Sind Urban Development Project and a US$70 million shelter project. 1.42 Egypt, to whom the Bank has not lent for urban projects in the past 10 years, is coming back in the pipeline with two Regional Development/Tourism projects for an amount of US$450 million (quite surprising after the many problems encountered by the previous two projects which have required some of the highest supervision coefficients in the region). - 11 - 1.43 New borrowers are emerging among socialist countries in transition such as Poland (US$200 million Housing Project); Algeria (US$25 million Cadastre Project, Construction Industry Project, Local Government Dev'lopment Project); Yugoslavia (US$100 million environment project ii Split) and Hungary with a housing loan. More projects are likely to emerge as a .esult of sustained policy dialogue and sector work in Eastern Europe. IAC 1.44 In the IAC region, 15 projects totalling to US$2,128 million or 35 percent of planned urban lending are scheduled for the period FY91-93. 1.45 Mexico, the largest recipient of Bank loans in the urban sector, is scheduled to remain a large borrower. In addition to a total of 9 urban projecte (including the FY90 Second Low-Income Housing Project, Mexico's portfolio is expected to increase by another four projects totalling (US$700 million)l/ focusing mostly on Mexico City. 1.46 In Chile, while Bank interventions traditionally focused on housing issutes, two infrastructure projects are planned for FY92 and Fr. 3 totalling US$451 million. Urban environment is also given some attention with a FY93 project of US$150 million. 1.47 New borrowers such as Venezuela, Paraguiy and Uruguay are planned to enter the lending program. 1.48 In global terms, the pipeline will continue to place emphasis on housing, municipal development and decentralization issues. It should be noted that only 2 pieces of sector work have been carried out in support of the future pipeline (Decentralization and Urban Management in Mexico, and Provincial Government Finance in Argentina). / Does not include the loan amount for Mexico City Urban Sector, which is still unknown. - 12 - II. POLICY ISSUS AND SECTORAL RESPONSES: An Evaluation of How FY90 rCban Operations Have Addressed Major Sectoral Issues A. Regional Differences and the Banksg esponse 2.1 It is worth noting that FY90 urban operations have been shaped by regional diversity. Project design has tended to reflect three major factors: (a) the income level and level of development of countries; (b) the institutional framework and its degree of sophistication; (c) the level of political acceptance of policy reforms. 2.2 It is therefore justifiable to see some disparities in the Bank lending operations as they attempt to combine immediate needs and long-term policy dialogue. B. Subsectoral Response Bl. Infrastructure 2.3 Analytical work has showed the importance of sound and reliable infrastructure for enhancing the productivity of cities. Furthermore, poorly maintained infrastructure or lack of it are constant reminders of the deficiencies of urban administrations. FY90 urban projects have committed US$341 million or almost 20 percent of total project costs for infrastructure investments. 80 percent of this amount will go to Africa where infrastructure investments remain the priority of many borrowers. All of the eight FY90 African projects have a large infrastructure component which aims at upgrading key urban infrastructure in the target cities. Noteworthy is the Cote dlvoire Municipal Development Project and its development program which involves the participation of NGO's. Emphasis on rehabilitation, planning/programming and maintenance remain at the forefront of Bank activities in infrastructure. Infrastructure financing is a crucial issue in Africa; cost recovery mechanisms for infrastructure investments have been integrated into the new generation of African projects such as in Guinea and Cameroon Urban II projects. B2. Housing 2.4 A limited number of FY90 urban projects have included direct housing construction in their intervention package. Roughly US$90 million total project costs account for housing construction. Traditional sites and services and self- help housing are financed in the two Ethiopian projects (Second Addis Ababa Urban Development Project and Market Towns Development Project). Some housing construction activities are also financed in the context of the two reconstruction projects in Yemen and China. Finally, the Fiji Housing Project is addressing housing and urbanization issues by improving provision of affordable housing to lower income groups and strengthening the National Housing Authority. This project is somewhat outside the main stream of Bank's interventions in the housing sector which have shifted emphasis from direct provision of housing to improving the financial delivery mechanisms of housing and access to credit. - 13 - 2.5 Housing finance, in FY90, is still a strong sector in dollar amount, accounting for US$941.2 million or 47 percent of total project costs and US$447 million or 45 percent of FY90 lending amount. Its geographic impact, however, remains limited as two of the three FY90 housing finance operations are actually repeater projects in Mexico and Morocco. The US$350 million Second Low Income Housing Project in Mexico is a replenishment of FY86 first housing loan to FONHAPO (at the time, FONHAPO supplied about 5 to 10 percent of the formal mortgage credit in Mexico) and was justified as a response to the stronger than anticipated demand for FONHAPO financing and to FONHAPO's good past performance. A rather sophisticated financial intermediation scheme was designed by which BANOBRAS (Banco Nacional de Obras y Servicios Publicos) would on-lend the Bank loan to FONHAPO, a low-income housing fund, which would then relend to subborrowers (states, municipaiities, social and cooperative organizations). The project in Morocco will provide a second line of credit to CIH (Credit Immobilier et Hotelier). B3. Municipal Development 2.6 Municipal development remains high on the agenda. During FY90, nine projects (seven of which are in Africa) focused on the issue, accounting for about US$90 million total project costs. All municipal development projects include some of these four elements: (a) Strengthening of urban institutions at the local level, such as infrastructure delivery agencies (Ethiopia) and technical departments in charge of operation and maintenance of urban services (Burkina Faso) as well as institutional development at the central level, typically the Ministry of Local Government (Ghana), Ministry of Finance or NSnistry of Planning and Public works (Guinea, Ethiopia, Nigeria). (b) Resource mobilization efforts through improvements in the tax system: The Burkina Faso project is promoting the modernization of the fiscal legislation and the improvement of tax collection systems. In Ghana, the project is supporting a property revaluation exercise for Accra. The Second Municipal Development Project in the Philippines includes a real property tax administration component. (c) Improvement of financial management: The inducement of greater accountability at the local level and improvement of municipal accounting systems have remained high priorities. The Burkina Faso Municipal Development Project, for example, has been focusing on improving municipal accounting practices. (d) Creation of capital investment funds: The Cote d'Ivoire and the Brazil Municipal Development Projects are financing lines of credit to municipal credit funds. 2.7 Most municipal development projects appear overly ambitious. If the targets and policy objectives are well defined, specific recommendations and action programs often fall short of the challenge ahead. - 14 - 2.8 The UNDP-funded World Bank/UNCHS Urban Management Program is addressing these issues under its municipal urban finance component through the development of guidelines for urban property taxation, municipal credit institutions and an evaluation of organizational options for the delivery of urban ser.ices. B4. Land 2.9 Bank interventions in land management are timidly starting to take shape but, regrettably, lack a sound policy framework. The diversity of FY90 approaches is illustrative of the diversity and the complexity of land issues themselves. These approaches can be categorized as follows: (a) Information systems with a mapping component in the Ghana project and an urban information system, involving street naming in Burkina Faso. (b) Registration and resource mobilization with improvements to the land registration and the land conveyancing systems as well as property revaluation program in Ghana and improvements to the land real property tax administration in the Philippines. (c) Land development with a pilot component in the Guinea project aimed at introducing new enabling mechanisms for the formal development of land. Again, the Urban Management Program provides under its land management component considerable support to these issues though products on land information systems, land registration and land markets operations. B5. Urban Environment 2.10 Five FY90 projects have addressed urban environment issues. These projects have aimed at implementing effective solid waste management systems, typically through (a) acquisition of new garbage collection equipment, (b) repair of existing equipment and (c) development of disposal sites (Burkina Faso, Ethiopia). In Brazil, one stated objective of the Bank's operation is to improve the coordination of urban development and environment policy and investment decisions at the state and municipal levels. The project includes a US$89 million environmental health infrastructure component which will focus on drainage, solid waste management as well as other sub-projects such as water pollution control of the Rio dos Sinos Basin. In Nigeria, the emphasis has been placed on environmental rehabilitation involving control works on eroding slopes and flood control efforts. Flood control works have also been the focus of the Yemen project. 2.11 The pipeline shows several projects with entire focus on such environmental issues as resource management, air pollution, water pollution among old (Mexico) and new borrowers (China). - 15 - 2.12 The Urban Management Program under its environment component is aiming at identifying approaches that can yield lasting remedies to environmental problems in urban areas. B6. Reconstruction 2.13 As in past years, the Bank has been involved in reconstruction activities with two projects: the Emergency Flood Reconstruction Project in Yemen and the North China Earthquake Reconstruction Project. They illustrate the experience of the Bank, accumulated over the past five years, in dealing with quite a different type of project design and project processing. The emphasis is placed on reconstructing housing, essential infrastructure and economic assets in a much shorter time than could otherwise be the case. Strengthening the institutional capacity to manage disaster recovery programs is also part of this type of lending activity. C. Addressin; Generic Issues Cl. Women in development: How have women's issues been addressed in FY90? 2.14 The topic of women in development has not had a large impact in the urban sector. However, the few projects which have addressed the issue, have been innovative and part of an integrated intervention package. The two Ethiopian projects include some small innovative components to assist poor women in urban areas with a particular emphasis on cost recovery. These projects aim at utilizing the entrepreneurial capacities of women for generating income in poor urban areas. One of them, the Second Addis Ababa Project, includes a component to assist poor women living in the Kebele (slum) areas to undertake revenue-generating projects. Up to 15 percent (US$165,000) of the Kebele Development Fund is planned for such income generating projects. Loan funds are expected to be used in activities such as preparing food for restaurants, pottery work, sewing training and purchase of equipment. The Market Towns Development Project in Ethiopia is also promoting an experimental income enhancement/ entrepreneurship development program. A total credit of US$1.4 million is planned to be extended through the Agricultural and Industrial Development Bank (AIDB) to micro-scale cottage industry and service enterprises. In addition, the Ghana Urban II project includes the training of 100 women in construction techniques with the assistance of local NGO's. C2. Poverty Alleviation: Has it become a sectoral priority? 2.15 Besides the three projects mentioned above, a large number of projects are concerned with the social impact of their interventions. In Senegal, a Public Works and Employment Project will attempt to mitigate the social costs of adjustment through labor intensive public works programs. The two reconstruction projects are expected to reach the poor (175,000 people in the case of the China project). Most housing projects have emphasized access to housing by the poor. The Fiji project, for instance, is expected to provide affordable housing to about 6,000 low and moderate income households. The Mexico Housing Finance Project would also provide new or improved housing for about 250,000 families, making credit available for the poorest segment of the housing market. Typically, urban projects are caught between generating policy reforms - 16 - whose impact may in the short term adversely affect the poor (or at best whose social benefits are not immediately visible) and confronting urban poverty througk. investment programs. 2.16 In conclusion, the urban program has a strong portfolio. The pipeline shows an increase or a steady continuation of urban activities in the future. Although, in some cases (i.e., women's issues), it is sometimes difficult to combine the overall sectoral objectives with the broader concerns of the Bank, in others (i.e., environment), the sector can make a solid and durable impact. The importance of the sector has also been recognized in the upcoming programs in socialist Economies. However, important policy and technical gaps remain to be addressed. FY90 URBAR PROJECTS IDA IBRD Total PROJECT COSTS BANK COUNITRY PROJECT NAME (US$ mi..) Loan/Credit (US$ mi.) 2 AFUCA Burkina Paso Second Urban Project 22.20 0.00 22.20 38.50 58X Cote D'Ivoire Municipal Development Project 0.00 66.00 66.00 80.32 822 EthiopLa Second Addis Ababa Urban Development Project 35.00 0.00 35.00 46.70 752 EthiopLa Market Towns Development Project 40.20 0.00 40.20 52.90 762 Ghana Urban II Project 70.00 0.00 70.00 100.40 702 Guinea Second Urban Project 57.00 0.00 57.00 81.70 702 NigerLa Oyo State Urban Project 0.00 50.00 50.00 68.80 731 Senegal Public Works and Employment Project 20.00 0.00 20.00 33.30 60X Totalt 244.40 116.00 360.40 502.62 72S EEA Morocco Second Housing Finance Project 0.00 80.50 80.50 354.50 23X Yemen AR Tais Flood DLsaster Prevention and MunLcipal Development Project 15.00 0.00 15.00 22.25 67X Yemen PDR Emergency Flood Reconstruction Project 10.00 0.00 10.00 5.36 65X Totals 25.00 80.50 105.50 392.11 27X ASIA China North China Earthquake Reconatruetion Project 30.00 0.00 30.00 45.30 66Z Fiji Dousing Project 0.00 16.20 16.20 41.20 392 PhilippLnes Municipal Development Project II 0.00 40.00 40.00 57.20 702 Total: 30.00 56.20 86.20 143.70 60S LAC Brasil Municipal Development Project in the State of R1o Grande Do Sul .00 100.00 100.00 227.00 442 Mexlco Second Lov Income Housing Project 0.00 350.00 350.00 700.00 SO0 Totals 0.00 450.00 450.00 927.00 492 TOTAL: 299.40 702.70 1,002.10 1,965.43 51X . . . . | .. . I I , ........................ . , .......... | , I . . ANNBX 2a ECON0IIC AND DENOGRAPIBC INDICATORS POM PY90 BORROING COUNlRIES POPULATION POPULATION LoanlCredit URBAN POP. GNP LOANICREDIT PROJECT COSTS BANK (mid-1988) GROW?B RATE URBAN per urban GROWTH RATE PER CAPITA COUNTRY REGION IDAIIBRD (us$ mi.) (US$ mi.) X millions (1980-88) POPULATION dveller (USS) (1980-88) (1988) __________________________________________________________________________.________________________________________________________________________ Ethiopia (tot.) AFRICA IDA 75.20 99.60 762 47.40 2.9X 132 12.20 5.2X $120 Burkina Paso AFRICA IDA 22.20 38.50 58X 8.50 2.6X 91 29.02 5.4X S210 Nigetria AFRICA IRD 50.00 68.80 732 110.10 3.3Z 341 1.34 6.31 S290 Chlna ASSA IDA 30.00 45.30 662 1,088.40 1.3X SO0 0.06 11.01 4330 Gha AFRCA IDA 70.00 100.40 702 14.00 3.41 33S 15.15 4.22 S 400 Guinea AFIUCA IDA 57.00 81.70 701 5.40 2.4X 241 43.98 5.72 *430 Yeme PDR EtENA IDA 10.00 15.36 652 2.40 3.01 42Z 9.92 4.7X S430 Philippines ASIA IBRD 40.00 57.20 70X 59.90 2.5X 411 1.63 3.72 S 630 Yeme AR EHENA IDA 15.00 22.25 67S 8.50 3.41 232 7.67 8.8X $640 8enegal AFRICA IDA 20.00 33.30 60X 7.00 3.01 38X 7.52 4.02 $650 Cote D Svoire AFRICA SBRD 66.00 80.32 822 11.20 4.01 451 13.10 6.62 $770 Moroeeo MEUNA IBD 80.50 354.50 231 24.00 2.71 471 7.14 4.42 $830 Piji ASIA IiD 16.20 41.20 39X 0.73 1.9X 402 5S.33 2.61 S1,510 texiOo LAC IBRD 350.00 700.00 50X 83.70 2.21 71X 5.89 3.12 *1.760 Brazil LAC IBRD 100.00 227-00 441 144.40 2.2X 75X 0.92 3.62 $2,160 1,002.10 1,965.43 51x Soures QDR 1990, lHIS. ANNX 2b LOICEIT PM NEW un DELED BY REGION UBn" LOARICEDIT LONCEIIT POPULATION URBA RIGICE (11S mL.) 000. (1989) DWELLR (8$)2 AFRICA 360.4 133,245 0.0027 I ASIA 86.2 591,906 0.0001 EmSA 105.5 175,140 0.0006 LAC 450 291,656 0.0015 1002.1 1,191,949 8auxesst Utban Deelopment Diviot, 0eneal Operationl Rewlre, 1989, MIS. ANNEX 3a TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR UXAI LENDING PROECTS 1Y90/^ (rn Us$ millions) ETHIOPIA GUUI. COTE O' MARKET DDIS VEE YEENN TOTAL FASO IVOIRE TOMS M GANA GUINEA NIEIA SEEGAL CNINA FIJI PNILIP OOC A.R. P.O. 3421. MEXtOO A. ER 1,149.2 0.0 0.0 8.0 17.9 27.5 2.1 0.0 0.0 35.6 35.1 0.0 351.0 0.0 8.2 8.6 655.2 Al. Eand tufsitfcn 112.0 0.1 1.4 ttO.S A2. Direct Q fjnaneln 31.3 0.0 0.0 1.0 6.0 4.5 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.2 0.0 0.0 Area Develtqent for SIS 14.6 1.0 2.0 2.1 9.5 Area Upgrading Wborks 7.1 2.6 4.5 Core & Finished Hauss 8.2 8.2 Sociat Fac.Pubslic Sldp. 1.4 1.4 Equipment and Vehicles 0.0 A3. Fin. tntermed. Pinancin. 1,005.9 0.0 0.0 7.0 11.8 23.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.6 24.2 0.0 351.0 0.0 0.0 8.6 544.7 Land DevSopmSnt Funds 372.7 1.1 6.81k 36.0 328.8 Neu Housing Nortgages 195.1 23.0 172.S Noms Iq,rovamant Loens 71.0 1.1 26.1 0.4 43.4 Const. Ind. & Material Lns. 366.7 7.0/8 9.6/ig 9.5 17.0 315.0/1 8.6 8. GEWE5 INfRASTM ME S88.9 29.1 59.9 33.3 20.3 52.2 57.9 SS.5 28.S 9.2 0.0 42.9 0.0 19.3 S.3 175.6 0.0 31. Lnd Ajiajkitlon S.7 0.1 3.7 0.3 0.7 0.9 B2. D1rct finacirm 358.1 29.1 40.9 25.3 20.3 52.2 S4.2 p3.7 28.S 7.3 0.0 42.9 0.0 18.4 S.3 0.0 0.0 I DrainigeSIope Stab. 92.0 19.7 18.3 1.1 6.0 19.7 9.3 17.1 0.5 i Roeds/Bridgaes/ther Trnspt. 100.2 3.4 11.6 1.0 4.3 26.6 41.5 1.8 9.8 %D Bues, Cwrs & Tratns 0.0 Water & Sewerage 31.9 0.6 17.9 5.0 4.5 1.4 2.5 Sotld Waste Nngsemmnt 10.6 3.9 0.4 3.7 2.6 Indnstr1& Estate 0.0 Other tnfrastructure 55.0 S.8 0.1 6.0 6.7 1.0 28.S/i 3.9 3.0 fPt4ic suIldings 25.3 0.6 5.0 4.0 2.2 0.1 13,4 Equipmenm & Vehicles 43.2 0.9 1.4 10.5 9.2 7.1 3.4 7.9 1.3 1.S 33. Fin, Intr 225.1 0.0 19.0 7.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.5 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17SA6 0.0 acipketl intre. Funds 216.1 19.0 21.5 175.6/! SE' snd tndustry Loans 9.0 7.8 1.2 C. OTN COSTS 181.0 4.8 20.4 6.8 3.0 15.7 21.7 12.2 4.8 0.5 6.0 14.3 3.5 3.0 1.9 20.6 44.8 Project Oesin * PPF 26.9 2.7 9.7 1.9 1.6 1.2 9.8 TA, Trng., Cons. S Studies 122.9 2.1 10.7 6.8 3.0 13.7 20.4 10.3 1.9 0.5 4.8 14.3 3.S 1.4 1.9 20.6 7.0 Project AdbOt Costs 34.2 2.0 1.3 1.3 1.6 28.0 0 TOTAL PROJECT COST 1t922.1 33.9 60.3 48.0 41.2 95.4 81.7 67.7 33.3 4S.3 41.1/g 57.2 354.S 22.3 15.4 204.8 700.0 E- RA. JIDA LE1, * 002.1 22.2 66.0 40.2 35.0 70.0 57.0 so.0 20.0 30.0 16.2 40.0 6.5 15.0 10.0 100.0 350.0 t. QEOFlM^NI3f 7S.1 5.S 0.8 9.8 16.5 3.7 8.3 11.S 1.0 / Project casts re net of tames nd dutles nd refl et estimated prece and physical contingencies. /k Inctudes a shtter construction copponant new plots illt be devtoped and hbmes wilt be constructed by purchasers with loans. i Same construction toans are expected to be consolidated into ortge loans dilch may be pptlied to purchase nerly constructed houses. Nause would be constructed by self-help cooperatives with loans chanmled through the Housing and Savings Sank. C copmponet breakdewn is not avaltmble; include some pAfic buildings ond urban rehabilitatfon. / Also includes tons for envwroruntal health infrastructure. Possible sur-caqaonts have alray ben fidntiffed. DI Does not include interest dring construction, estimted at US$10.1 million. ANNEX 3b TOTAL PROJECT COSTS POR UMAN LBNDNG PROJCT8 FY90/O (In Percentage) ETHtOPIA SURK. COTE 0 MARKET ADDIS YEMEN YBEMN TOTAL FASO IVOIRE TOWNS ABABA GHACA GUINEA NIGERIA SENEGAL CHINA FIJI PHILIP MOROCCO A.R. P.D. BRAZIL MEXICO A. SHELtER 59.8 0.0 0.0 16.7 43.4 28.8 2.6 0.0 0.0 78.6 85.4 0.0 99.0 0.0 53.2 *.2 93.6 Al. Land AccslfitUon 5.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.8 A2. Direct Financino 1.6 0.0 0.0 2.1 14.6 4.7 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 53.2 0.0 0.0 Area Development for S&S 0.8 0.0 0.0 2.1 4.9 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 23. t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Area Upgrading Works 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Core & Finished Houses 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 53.2 0.0 0.0 Social Fec./Public Sidge. 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Equipment and Vehicles 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 A3. Fin. Intermediary Financifa 52.3 0.0 0.0 14.6 28.6 24.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 78.6 58.9 0.0 99.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 77.8 Land Devetopment Funds 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.5/k 0.0 10.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.0 New Housing Mortgages 10.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.6 Ho6e Improvement Loans 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.6 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 Const. Ind. & Material Lns. 19.1 0.0 0.0 14.6/1 23.3/_ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.0 41.4 0.0 88.9/1 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 8. GENERAL INFRASTRUCTURE 30.6 83.a 74.6 69.2 49.3 54.7 70.9 82.0 85.6 20.3 0.0 75.0 0.0 86.5 34.4 8s.7 0.0 S1. Land Acaulsftion 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.4 0.0 1.S 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 82. Direct Financino 18.6 83.8 50.9 52.7 49.3 54.7 66.3 49.8 85.6 16.1 0.0 75.0 0.0 82.S 34.4 0.0 0.0 Drainasge/Slope Stab. 4.8 58.1 22.8 2.3 0.0 0.0 7.3 29.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.3 0.0 76.7 5.2 0.0 0.0 Roads/Bridges/Other Trnmpt. 5.2 10.0 14.7 2.1 10.4 27.9 50.8 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 r Buses, Cars & TraIns 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O water & Sewerage 1.7 1.8 0.0 37.3 12.1 4.7 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Solid aste Management 0.6 11.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.9 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Industrfal Estates 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other tnfrastructure 2.9 0.0 7.2 0.0 0.2 6.3 8.2 0.1 OS.6/, 8.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.S 0.0 0.0 P"lfc Buildings 1.3 1.8 6.2 8.1 0.0 2.3 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Equipment & Vehicles 2.2 2.7 0.0 2.9 25.5 9.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 7.5 0.0 13.8 0.0 5.8 9.7 0.0 0.0 83 Fln. Intederv Fa i11in l.7 0.0 23.7 16.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.8 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6S.7 0.0 Mwi. tnfra. (Unspecified) 11.2 0.0 23.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 85.7/± 0.0 SEs and Industry Loons 0.5 0.0 0.0 16.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 C. O 9.6 14.2 25.4 14.2 7.3 16.5 26.6 18.0 14.4 1.1 14.6 25.0 1.0 13.5 12.3 10.1 6.4 Project Oesign & PPF 1.4 8.0 12.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 4.8 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 TA, Trn., Cos. & Studies 6.4 6.2 13.3 14.2 7.3 14.4 25.0 15.2 5.7 1.1 11.7 25.0 1.0 6.3 12.3 10.1 1.0 Project AdmM Costs 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 1.6 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.2 0.0 0.0 4.0 0. TOTAL PRECT two 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.094 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 E. 1111hok LE11s $52.1 6.5 82.2 83.7 85.0 73.4 69.8 73.9 60.1 66.2 39.4 69.9 22.7 67.3 64.9 48.8 50.0 f. CAfUBM1 3.0 16.2 1.0 0.0 0.0 10.3 20.2 5.S 24.9 0.0 28.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 /a Project costs ore net of taxes nd duties and reflect estimated prfce rnd hsfcal contingencies. /k tncludes a ehelttr construction clponent: nw plots will be deloped aid houes wil be constructed by purdcae i th loans. / SCme construction loans are epected to be consolidated into mortgage loans which ey be aplied to purchase newly costructed houses. Houses would be constructed by self-help oooperatives with loans chanesl d throug the Housing rd Sawings Bank. I /j C~onWent breakdown Is not avealable; includes some pAblic bultdings rd urban rehabilitation. /A lso includes leans for envirormental health infrastructure. Possible s.b-cowpcnents have already been identiffed. /D Ooes not include interest during construction, ectimated at US$10.1 million. ANNEX 3c TOTAL PROJECT COSTS FOR U1RBAN LENDING PROJECTS FY90 (By regions) AFRICA ^ ASIA ENEMA LAC TOTAL X Of %XOF X OF X OF X OF USS TOTAL US$ TOTAL USS TOTAL USS TOTAL USS TOTAL A. SHELTER 55.5 11.5 70.7 49.2 359.2 91.6 663.8 73.4 1,149.2 59.8 Al. Land Acaulsitfon 0.1 0.0 1.4 1.0 0.0 0.0 110.5 12.2 112.0 5.8 A2. Direct Financina 13.6 2.8 9.5 6.6 8.2 2.1 0.0 0.0 31.3 1.6 Area Development for S&S 5.1 1.1 9.5 6.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.6 0.8 Area Upgrading Works 7.1 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.1 0.4 Core & finished Houses 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.2 2.1 0.0 0.0 8.2 0.4 Social Fac./Public Stdgs. 1.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.1 Equipment and Vehictes 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 A3. Fin. Intermediarv Financina 41.8 8.7 59.8 41.6 351.0 89.5 553.3 61.2 1,005.9 52.3 Land DeveLopment Funds 1.1 0.2 6.8 4.7 36.0 9.2 328.8 36.3 372.7 19.4 New Housing Mortgages 23.0 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 172.5 19.1 195.5 10.2 Home Improvement Loans 1.1 0.2 26.5 18.5 0.0 0.0 43.4 4.8 71.0 3.7 Comnt. Ind. & Material Lns. 16.6 3.4 26.5 18.5 315.0 80.3 8.6 1.0 366.7 19.1 B. GENERAL INFRASTRUCTURE 336.6 69.9 52.1 36.3 24.6 6.3 175.6 19.4 589.0 30.6 B1. Land Acaulsition 4.1 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.9 0.2 0.0 0.0 5.7 0.3 82. Direct Financnla 284.3 59.0 50.2 35.0 23.7 6.0 0.0 0.0 358.1 18.6 Drainage/Slope Stub. 64.8 13.5 9.3 6.5 17.9 4.6 0.0 0.0 92.0 4.8 Roads/Bridges/Other Trnspt. 90.4 18.8 9.8 6.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.2 5.2 1 Buses, Cars and Trains 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Water & Sewerage 29.4 6.1 2.5 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.9 1.7 Solid Waste Mangment 10.6 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.6 0.6 Industrial Estates 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other Infrastricture 48.1 10.0 3.9 2.7 3.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 55.0 2.9 "tl1c BuildIngs 11.8 2.5 13.4 9.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.3 1.3 Equipment & Vehicles 29.1 6.0 11.3 7.9 2.8 0.7 0.0 0.0 43.2 2.2 B3. Fin. Intermediarv FInancina 48.3 10.0 1.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 175.6 19.4 225.1 11.7 Mw. Infra. Clkspecified) 40.5 8.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 175.6 19.4 216.1 11.2 SSE's and Industry Loans 7.8 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.5 C. gONER COSTS 89.4 18.6 20.8 14.S 8.4 2.1 65.4 7.2 184.0 9.6 Project Design & PPt 15.9 3.3 1.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 9.8 1.1 26.9 1.4 TA, Trng., Cons. & Studies 68.9 14.3 t9.6 13.6 6.8 1.7 27.6 3.1 122.9 6.4 Project Ada/SKM Costs 4.6 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.4 28.0 3.1 34.2 1.8 D. TOTAL 48OJECT COSTS U1.6 100.0 143.6 100.0 392.2 100.0 904.8 100.0 1,922.1 100.0 E. AfL"I ENDhING 360.4 74.8 86.2 60.0 105.5 26.9 450.0 49.7 1,002.1 52.1 I. F. OOFINAMCING 44.6 9.3 11.5 8.0 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 57.1 3.0 _ ' ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~w -22 - XDE 4 ANNEX 4 TOTAL COSTS AND TOTAL LENDING FOR URBAN PROJECTS (US$ million) FY 72-90 AFRICA ASIA ENENA LAC TOTAL YEAR COST LENDING COST LENDING COST LENDING COST LENDING COST L E N D I N G ._. _....... .................._. ..._. _......... ,.... ......... _.. ... _____._______. __________................ _..... 72-74 14.5 11.0 128.5 51.0 97.8 62.3 65.2 35.0 306.0 159.3 75 87.5 44.5 76.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 15.5 8.5 179.0 93.0 76 0.0 0.0 137.0 58.0 0.0 0.0 43.2 21.6 180.2 79.6 77 116.8 44.0 197.7 101.5 0.0 0.0 24.5 12.7 339.0 158.2 78 118.4 78.2 191.8 95.6 53.3 32.0 401.0 162.8 764.5 368.6 79 14.1 12.0 196.9 102.0 40.1 19.0 501.0 176.5 752.1 309.5 80 59.4 38.8 431.8 222.0 0.0 0.0 523.7 247.0 1,014.9 507.8 81 24.5 15.0 402.2 175.0 148.4 67.0 725.0 254.0 1,300.1 511.0 82 87.2 61.0 60.9 33.0 142.2 74.0 538.0 206.8 828.3 374.8 83 108.2 69.0 764.3 338.1 285.7 101.0 81.6 46.2 1,239.8 554.3 84 157.6 84.0 264.9 139.3 151.2 75.0 450.5 191.2 1,024.2 489.5a\ 85 58.4 42.0 483.5 218.5 97.2 37.2 585.0 86.9 1,224.1 384.6 86 280.9 160.6 3,126.7 500.0 140.5 70.0 1,420.6 794.5 4,968.7 1,525.1 87 281.2 130.5 2,945.5 692.0 590.5 176.6 713.3 325.0 4,530.5 1,324.1 88 221.8 146.5 2,078.6 1,015.8 139.0 90.0 2,418.7 764.0 4,858.1 2,016.3 89 1,026.7 414.0 53.9 41.5 200.0 58.0 2,043.9 675.0 3,324.5 1,188.5 90 502.6 360.4 143.7 86.2 392.1 105.5 927.0 450.0 1,965.4 1,002.1 TOTAL 3,159.8 1,711.1 1,683.9 3,909.5 2,478.0 967.1 1,477.7 4,457.7 28,799.4 11,046.3 AVERAGE (86-89) 452.7 212.9 2,051.2 562.3 267.5 98.7 1,649.1 639.6 4,420.5 1,513.5 14.07% 37.15% 6.52% 42.26% 100.00% a\ Total Lending Figure is recorded as US$456.5 in the previous Annual Report. OOmmlY 8WIIY 0F TOTAL tlRBAN INVB81!MBI (llBWllD BY PRWJSQ1 CIO8TB) cKunrntY ITOTAL nr90 fY9 nss FY87 ns8 FYs nYx nss nsz nSiL nso Ff79 ms7 FT77 MG FYs, n74-72 xrRentin^- 809.4 569.4 240.0 8^her^ ~~23.4 2s.4 saswiadeab 57.7' " *7 8D1ttL 43. 21.3 22.5 Baote"*n 2.7:7 12.0 11.3 4.4 8r s11 2 992.5 204.8 204.7 353.6 420.0 150.2 25.1 349.7 257.0 312.8 U53.7 248.9 Burkkna t O 42 9 3J.9 9.0 Burundi 40.8 24.1 16.7 Camxeoon 267.9 222.4 45.5 ChiLe 1 846.6 1,269.8 SM6. Chlnft 45.3 *3.3 Colembis 246.8 149.5 ss.s 62.0 Ce tR, Rita 31.5 J1.5 DjLbouti 15.2 1S.2 D=.RPA. 59.2 17.5 41.7 Ecluador 237.7 85.7 100.4 51.6 Egypt 137.2 116.2 21.0 E1 Salvador 137 .3 97.3 24.5 1S. 5 Ethlpla 116.0 89.2 26.8 Fiji 41.1 41.1 Gambia 11.6 11.6 Ghaa 136.4 95.4 16.0 25.0 Guatemala **.8 44.8 OULU"g 9a.1 81.7 16.4 H iti 23.8 2t. 8 Ponduras 8.2 8.2 XQdLa 2,801.6 1,259.6 225.8 124.0 230.2 342.7 49.4 84.0 112.0 175.1 92.0 96.9 Sn $nL& 2,811.2 21S.9 1,047.6 1,148.7 63.S 85.9 06.0 104.6 $1.0 Itory Co*st 547.0 80.3 225.7 74.2 1168 5- J-malc 3a.s 23.9 34.9 1 Jcordan 319.9 92.5 96.5 45.6 75.S KWo# 134.8 35.9 9.4 29.5 b Korea * 60?.5 132.1 1,594.1 1,834.0 19S.5 154.8 107.0 232.3 144.7 25.0 ' Lesetho 49.3 42.2 7.11 Lib tLa 13.0 13.0 "XuS4plczr 15.1 15.1 M*1^wt ~~18.2 18.2 WA1YSL, 103.6 72.0 S1.6 NOLL 44.1 30.0 14.1 K"Crlttus 24.5 2 .5 Kexteo 4,046.6 700. 1,576.0 250.7 1,000.6 15.2 468.0 36.1 SbnxPcco W6. 4 354.$s 209.5 73.1 32.3 Mbnuuzblqu 3.8 .83.8 Nepal 53.9 5s.9 vicar*g"w 79.1 22.6 # 6.0 .. 30.3 Ni0*rL& *35.6 67.7 93.4 23S.9 35.1 Pakisteft 302.6 139.0 140.5 23.1 P_VA 133.3 Iss.3 Pera 170.1 12 .9 43.2 PhllFpptn 817.5 66.232. 66.8 114.6 11.5 120.0 69.9 65.0 sanamal 120.3 Ss.S *0.2 6.7 10.1 : Sr-L t^#k 11.8 n7.8 20.0Z Sudanl 8 .3 63}.3s TaSan rJ43.4 28.t 16.7 Sb dllod 226.6 78.0 45.8 55.1 31.0 16.? SUALSIS, 456.9 200.0 67.4 67.7 53.1 40.1 28.6 U Suoduwt ***.6 *00.6 10.7 S.3 TYm_m A.R. 66.2 22.3 17.9 26.0 Yz"ns D.R. 15.A 15.4 mbt 41.3 41.3 stsb b" GS4.7 546.9 107.8 BTot" 28,208.0 1,92.1 .S,24.5 4 ,S8.l 4,062.4 *496$.? 1,224.1 1,024.2 1,23#.8 028.3 1,S00.1 1,014.9 752.1 164.4 $99.0 lt0.2 179.0 $06.0 ________________ -__ _______ ____________________ -___ -_ _ -________________________ _ -________________________ _________________________ -_______-__________________ AMI 6 COWlIRY 8WIMfiY OF 8AM IMIDIXN CXXouRY TOTAL MO9 Y89 FM8 FY8 FY6 n85s FY4 MS n82 FY81 FY80 mg7 FY78 FYn7 mY6 FT75 PY74-72 Ar8enttna 420.0 300. k 120 0 o-lleeh 47.6 47.6 holivL ~~32.0 1S-0 1. Botewatna 18.6 7.6 8.0 3.0 9urkilnF 1,230.04 1200 0 100.0 175.0 179.5 52.7 8.9 123.9 90.0 159.0 103.0 88 0 Surundl 36.0 21.0 8.2 Cezercon 166.0 146.0 20.0 1. Chillt 355.0 275.0 80.0 China 30.0 30.0o Colombia 783 3001.5 2. Costs. Rica 16.5 400135 2.8 D31boutl 5.0 5.0 1. Dom.Rep. 32.5 7.1 25.4 Ecuador 126.7 60.0 35.7 31.0 Eladvor 86.2 05.0 12. 0 14 Ethiopia 1962 75.2 20.0 1. . Gambia 11.5 11.5 Ghana 102.6 70.0 10.6 22.0 Cu6temals 29.0 29.0 Guinea 67.7 5?.0 10.7 Baits 21.0 21.0 Honduras 6.9 6.9 India 1,365.3 S50.2 150.0 62.0 138.0 171.1 25.0 42.0 S6.0 87.0 49.0 35.0 Ind4nes1$ 959.8o lS0.0 321.0 275.0 39.3 43.0 54.0 52.5 25.0 Ivort Coast 287.0 66.0 126.0 Sl.0 44.0 4. Jordan 115.4 26.4 28.0 30.0 31.0 P.0 Losoth 72°3.0° 30.0 200.0 lS0.0 53.0 00-0 100.° 90-0 65.0 16 8 Liberia 10.0 10.0 Mbi"4pc r 12.8 12.8 MbX*wL ~~15. 0 15.0 Malaysia 420 0601. HW11 40.0 28.0 12.02601. Hmiurtious 15.0 15. Mbxlco 1 579.7 350.0 300.0 12S.0 625.0 9 2 1645.0 16.5 morocco 194.5 80.5 60.0 36.0 18.0 Lbzbque 60.0 oo.0 Rep&l *1.5 41.5 2 rL 5~~~8.0 . 9515016.0 22.0 20.0 P La 26235. 16.09. 15 17.8 8¢neg 1 80.0.0 .00*60 706 0 1f0 Sra n=SL 350 g 5 01.08. SVLLPD 43- 40. 160.0. 580400.9. 30 675 8 . 29.0 $g 0 8 618.0C YcenD" B 2 0 0 O 2.00 50 . 7-iit 0. 20.0 4. . . SriLAo"" 912.0 80.0 1' °20. TSOSAL 10818NW2t1 8. 01602 .1. 21.0 5t346 49. 5. . 271.5 2507. 1609. 9.6 182 7. . 5. AJlMX 7 TOAL IIMBER OF URBAfN PROJTCTS. COUNTtRY TOTAL n 90 FY89 FM88 MY7 FY86 M85 FY84 mY83 F8 m1 1y80 nY79 FY78 T?77 M76 175 n74-72 Argentina 2 1 t Bahaas 1 1 Bangladedh 1 t Bolivia 2 t 1 Botswana 3 1 1 Brasil 14 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 Burkina Faa* 2 1 1 Burundi 2 1 1 Ceamroon 2 1 1 Chile 3 2 1 China I 1 Colombia 3 1 1 1 Costa Rica 1 1 DiLbouti 1 1 Daa.Rep. 2 1 1 Ecuador 3 1 1 1 Egypt 2 1 1 El Salvadr 3 1 Ethiopli 3 2 1 Gambia 1 1 Ghana 3 1 1 1 Guatemala 1 1 outnea 2 1 1 Fiji 1 1 Haitt t 1 Honduras 1 1 India 14 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 Indonesia 9 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 Iran 1 Ivory Coast 4 1 1 11 J amaca 2 1 1 " Jordan 5 1 1 1 2 K1y 1 11 Korea 10 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lesotho 2 1 Liberia I 1 Waaacar 1 1 Malavi 1 1 Malaysia 21 Mali 2 11 Nauritious 1 1 Mexico 10 4 1 1 Mor>cco 4 1 1 1 1 Meusuobique t t Nepal 2 1 learagu Nigeria S 1121 Pakistan t 1 1 1 Pnam 1 1 PFru 2 1 hilippines a a 1 1 1 1 1 Benegal 4 1 1 1 Sudan 1 2 Tns anta 2 Thailatd 5 1 1 1 1 1 TiSa st 1 1 1 1 1 1| Turkey 1 Tomm A.R. 3 111 1mma D.R. 1I J 2azbla I 2X6bobve 211t TOTAL 188 16 12 19 11 16 10 15 14 11 9 11 a 1i 5 1 6 9 4 . . AWBX 7a NUMBER OF URBAN PROJBCTS BY REGION YEAR AFRICA ASIA EMENA IAC TOTAL 74 2 2 3 2 9 75 3 2 - 1 6 76 - 2 - 1 3 77 1 3 - 1 5 78 4 2 2 5 13 79 1 3 1 3 8 80 3 4 - 4 11 81 1 3 3 2 9 82 2 2 2 5 11 8 83 3 4 3 4 14 84 5 3 3 4 15 85 3 3 2 2 10 86 4 4 1 7 16 87 1 6 3 1 11 88 4 7 1 7 19 89 6 1 1 4 12 90 8 3 3 2 16 TOTAL 51 54 28 55 188 I,13 ANNEX 8 -- AFRICA URBAN PROJECTS UNDER IMPLEHEUTATION DURING FY901, (U84 mIllion) Cumulative Current Project Board Effective Years of Loant Project Actual Undisbursed SW for SPE Performance Country: Project INSe$ Dates Date: Yearlmplem. Creditl Costs a/ Disburse. Balance SPIt Coeff.bJ Ratings AFRICA 1 Bostwana Selebi PhUmve 05115186 07/10187 87 3 7.6 12.0 2.5 5.1 12.7 4.2 2 Burundi Urban 2 12/06186 1101189 89 1 21.0 24.1 1.8 19.2 2.9 2.9 3 Csmeroon urban 2 10/27188 05/16189 89 1 146.0 186.0 18.3 127.7 13.6 13.6 4 Cote d'Ivoire Third Urban 03/24187 08104187 87 3 126.0 304.0 44.1 81.9 18.9 6.3 5 Djibouti Urban 1 09111184 07111185 85 5 5.0 15.2 4.1 0.9 49.3 9.9 6 Ethlopia Urban Development Project 05/17/83 02114/84 84 6 20.0 28.9 9.9 10.1 86.9 14.5 7 Gambia Urban Project 03/06/84 12/06/84 84 6 11.5 12.4 9.5 2 67.2 11.2 8 Ghana Priority Works 01/26/88 06/20188 88 2 10.6 16.8 1.9 8.7 27.9 14.0 9 Ghana Urban Development 3121185 09104185 8S 5 22.0 26.3 21.5 0.5 78.9 15.8 10 Guinea Urban 1 & Supplement 05101/84 02119185 85 5 15.2 19.8 14.4 0.8 86.1 17.2 11 Renya Secondary Towns 06116183 03119184 84 6 22.0 37.4 11.1 10.9 144.0 24.0 AM4 B-4 C-3 Dm4 12 Lesotho Urban 2 04/19/88 04103/89 89 1 20.4 23.0 2.9 17.5 4.2 4.2 13 Madagascar Urban 1 06112184 02/22/85 85 5 12.8 10.4 9.4 3.4 86.5 17.3 14 Malawi Urban 1 11127184 11119185 85 5 15.0 17.0 5.0 10 78.2 15.6 15 Mall Urban II Project 04/01186 10129186 86 4 28.0 34.5 21.3 6.7 62.2 15.6 Am3 B-3 C-3 J.3 16 Mozambique Urban Rehab. 08/02/88 02114/89 89 1 60.0 84.0 9.0 51 21.6 21.6 17 Nigeria IMD Urban Development 07/23/85 04/16/86 86 4 53.0 85.0 16.0 37 41.9 10.5 Am2 Im3 18 Nigeria Lagos Solid Waste Nng. 09/19/85 03131186 86 4 72.0 164.3 12.4 59.6 95.1 23.8 1 19 Nigeria Urban Infrastructure 03129188 11/02/89 89 1 69.5 96.8 n/a n/a 33.1 33.1 20 Rwanda Urban Inst. 06113/89 nla 89 1 32.0 45.5 0.0 32 5.6 5.6 4 21 Senegal Municipal Housing ProJect 03115/88 11103/83 a 2 46.0 78.3 2.3 43.7 17.5 8.8 3 22 Zimbabwe Urban 2 06101189 nla 89 1 80.0 S80.0 n/a n/a 0.0 0.0 23 ZLmbabwe Urban 1 06119184 06/07/85 85 5 43.0 112.6 12.2 30.8 65.8 13.2 Total: 938.6 2,014.3 229.6 732.6 1,100.1 76.12 ,1 Does not include: projects approved during FY90 Completed projects for which PCRs have bee prepared during FY90. [Ih ANNBX 8 -- A8IA URBN PROJECTS UNDER IhPLEMENTATION DURING PY90 (US$ Million) Cumulative Project Board Effective Years ofLoanl Project Actual UndLsbursedSW for SPN Performanee Country: Project Name: Date: Date: Year mplem.Credit: Costs: Disbursm.Balance SPN: Coeff. Ratings ASIA 24 India Bombay Urban 01/29/85 08/22/85 85 5 138.0 256.7 59.5 78.5 69.1 13.8 25 India M.P. Urban 06128183 01116184 84 6 18.1 36.0 20.8 7.3 82.4 13.7 26 India Housing Development 03131188 05118188 88 2 250.0 841.0 169.6 80.4 18.2 9.1 27 india Gujarat Urban 12117185 11106186 86 4 62.0 130.5 7.1 54.9 59.6 14.9 28 India Tamil Nadu Urban 06/1318S 11/07188 88 2 300.2 443.7 29.8 270.4 19.9 10.0 29 India U.P. Urban Development 04/21/87 02/26/88 88 2 130.0 237.8 18.9 131.1 62.3 31.2 30 India Calcutta Urban III 05119183 10107/83 83 7 147.0 200.0 70.9 76.1 153.6 21.9 A-3 C-3 D 3 K-3 31 Indonesia Urban V 05/081.4 01124185 8S 5 39.3 64.3 34.8 4.5 117.4 23.5 32 Indonesia Housing Sector 06/23186 12/16/86 86 4 200.0 805.7 192.5 7.5 74.3 18.6 A=2 D03 33 Indonesla Regional Cltles 0/19/87 08125/87 87 3 51.0 88.0 30.1 20.9 30.8 10.3 34 Indoneali Jabotabek Urban/Transport 04/12/88 09/26/88 88 2 150.0 224.0 11.2 138.8 47.7 23.9 35 Indonesia Urban Sector 05/19187 06111187 87 3 270.0 1,006.0 248.0 22 93.8 31.3 36 Rorea Housing Finance Sector 06/23/87 10/22187 87 3 150.0 1,900.0 150.0 0 13.8 4.6 37 Korea Pusan Urban Management 04/28187 08107187 87 3 50.0 140.0 50.0 0 19.5 6.5 38 Korea Urban Lend Development 05/29186 09109186 86 4 150.0 2,100.0 113.0 33 28.0 7.0 39 Korea Regional Development, Jeonju 03/13184 07/20184 84 6 40.7 113.0 38.3 2.4 42.5 7.1 40 Phllippines Housing Sector 06/24/88 12120188 88 2 160.0 325.0 104.3 55.7 24.7 12.4 41 Philippines Municipal Development Project I 06105184 02121185 85 5 40.0 73.0 10.3 29.7 63.8 12.8 42 PhilippLnes Urban rV - Regional CitLes 03131183 02101/84 84 6 42.1 70.0 19.8 22.3 121.3 20.2 1 43 Thailand Shelter III 04114/87 12108/87 87 3 21.0 82.6 1.7 19.3 16.7 5.6 AP2 B=3 N) 44 Thailand Reglonal Cities 04123185 01117/86 86 4 20.3 37.5 9.9 10.4 44.1 1l.0 Co Totals 2,449.7 9,174.8 1,382.5 1067.2 1,203.5 43.6r *1 AuuuX 8 -- zxzua mA M oJETs USDER v LoNENsATION DURSRC 1T90 (US$ million) Cu1ative Project Board Effective Years OfLoaLn Project Actual UndisbursedSW for SP Perfor _nce Coantrys Project sems Date a Dat: Year l-plem.Credits Costs$ Disbursn.3alane SP"N Coeff. Ratins* ----------_-_-_--------_--------_------_---------_--_---------------__---_---__--------------------_-------_--_-_-------------_-------------------__-------__-- 45 Egpt Urban Development a 06110162 02116183 *3 7 54.0 116.2 40.1 13.9 203.2 29.0 A-3 B-3 V33 E -3 S3O 1-3 J 3 K-3 46 Eaypt Luor Tourim Develo met 05117179 03126180 80 10 32.5 52.6 22.3 10.2 123.8 12.4 A-3 8 3 DO K-3 47 Jordan Aman TSraaprtatim & Mmun. Dew. 07107183 0313018U 84 6 25.0 39.1 14.4 10.6 92.2 15.4 48 Jordan CVDB 2 08127185 0512218 86 4 15.0 26.0 8.1 6.9 37.5 9.4 49 Jordan Urban 2 06118185 06113186 U 4 21.6 58.0 10.9 10.7 46.3 11.6 Aw2 3-3 50 Jordan Natlonal Urban Development 06/16/87 07114188 88 2 26.4 57.0 3.7 22.7 38.5 19.3 51 Pakistan Labore Urban 04/19183 01/23/84 84 6 16.0 20.8 7.7 e.3 119.1 19.6 A-3 D3 52 Pakistan Punjab Urban Development 04112188 08101169 89 1 90.0 145.2 6.8 83.2 39.0 39.0 53 Pakistan Karachi Special Development 01114186 06123186 86 4 70.0 140.6 19.6 50.2 116.4 29.1 A-2 C-3 54 Turkey Camurov, Urban Development 05/21/87 01/28188 88 2 120.0 467.4 11.8 108.2 71.6 35.8 A-4 _-4 C-4 D-4 E-3 F-4 C-4 H-4 55 Yesen A.R. Sana. Urban Development 01128182 05107182 82 8 15.0 24.0 10.9 4.1 82.2 10.3 56 Yemen A.R. Urban 2 02/21184 08t30t84 84 6 12.0 10.0 5.3 6.7 43.1 7.2 Total: 497.5 1,156.9 161.8 335.7 1,012.9 67.5S toE AN14X a -- JAC URBAW PROJECTS UNDER FLUM4ETATION DURING FY90 (US$ MlliLn}) CuMUtive Project Board Effective Years ofLcanl Project Actual Undisbur.adSV for SPY Perfor0aice Country: Project lam.s Datet Date: Year Implem.Credit: Costst Disburn.BDalance SPS: Coeff. Ratings ---------_-_----------_---_-------_-_---_--------___-----------__---.------_-__--_----_--_--_-----------------_-------_----------------------__------------__-- LAC 57 Argentin 5-using Sector 1 10127188 03103189 89 1 300.0 608.0 15.0 285 21.9 21.9 A.2 E-3 58 Argentina Municpal Developmrnt 03122188 03103189 89 1 120.0 240.0 5.0 115 22.9 22.9 59 soliI. MNun1cp al Development 08104187 011281 68 2 15.0 21.3 10.3 *.7 42.3 21.2 60 8sril Rio Deergency Flood Reconstruction 06/24/88 121291J8 88 2 175.0 39".6 27.1 147.9 33.3 16.7 A-2 E-3 61 Brasil Salvador Metro Development 04122184 05118187 87 3 55.0 151.0 8.7 46.3 20.2 6.7 Am3 f 3 G-3 H-3 J.3 3.-3 62 Basil Recife Integrated Urban 06103182 11124182 82 8 123.9 247.9 106.5 17.4 101.5 12.7 63 SBasr municipal Developmt (Parana) 06122189 01/19190 90 0 100.0 226.9 nat n/. 1.3 nla 64 Ba"sil Sta Catarina Towns 09119185 09124186 86 4 24.5 70.0 nla n/a 0.0 0.0 65 Chile ousIag 2 03128/89 06116/89 89 1 200.0 1,032.0 55.4 144.6 3.0 5.0 66 Colombia Popayen ReconStruction 02102184 06/26184 84 6 40.0 87.4 40.0 0 48.8 8.1 67 Dominican Rep.Tourism 2 05/17/79 09/09/80 80 10 21.5 71.0 21.5 0 36.0 3.6 68 scuador Flrst National Low Income SBoing o5t14/82 0526183 83 7 35.7 100.4 32.6 3.1 83.9 12.0 69 Ecuador NL tousing 1I 01/12188 11128/88 88 2 60.0 60.0 0.0 60 7.2 3.6 70 E1 Salvador Earthquake Reconstruction 09/15/87 06/17/88 88 2 65.0 102.4 8.1 56.9 44.9 22.S A.? F-3 51w3 71 Ealtl Urban Devlopment 1 03/22183 06J30/83 83 7 21.0 23.8 11.2 9.8 75.9 10.8 72 Jamaica Emergency Reconstruction Import 12122/88 01/10189 89 1 30.0 650.0 30.0 0 6.6 6.6 73 mexico Low Income sousing 08/12785 03/03186 86 4 150.0 300.0 144.3 5.7 48.7 12.2 74 Peru Lin Metropolitan Development 06/21184 07115/85 83 5 82.5 135.9 24.7 57.8 62.2 12.4 Aw3 0-3 C-3 total: 1,619.1 4,521.6 540.4 1,178.7 660.6 TOTL: 5304.9 16,867.6 2,314.3 3,314.2 3,970.8 0 AIMX S -- LBGZND URB1 * PROJECTS UNDER DKPLEMENATION DURING FY90 at Rewised Project Costs as of l"at FoPs 590. bi 8PN Coefficient - tmalative SW for S81 I YTer of Implementation Categorles of ProJect P.rforx nes Project Performance Ratings: A-Overall Status 1-No or mInor problem 5-Project Development Objectives 2Wiodaerte probles COComplanoe with Legal Covenants 3 fajor problems bela. addresed adequately D Project Management Performance 444ajor problem not addressed adequately 5-AvaLlability of Funds F Procurczent Progress GCTSr aln Prooresm 5-Technical Assistance Progress I-Studies Progress ' iJrwEvorenhet*l Aspects 0 -Financial Performnee L-Mbonitoring and Evaluationa Source : Fors 590: I=o and IDA Implementation Sumary. Aug. 8, 1990. ANRX 9 PROJECCT COWPLSED DUORI FY90 -- PCa PREPARED Total Project Costs Cost Lotn INRD IDA Total Planned Actul Oserrunu Country Project Nama Iffaotivmeoss (US4 mi.) (U84 mi.) Uaderrun AMCA lostwaa Second Urban Development Project 06120179 8 0 8 12.5 12.7 0.2 Kenya Second Urban Project 1115/78 25 25 50 69.38 54.528 -14.9 Mauritius Urban Rehablitatlon sad Development Project 05181 15 0 15 24.4 18.1 -6.3 Senegal Petlte Cote TourLsm Project 1981 12.9 0 12.8 17.4 15.5 -1.9 60.9 2S 65.9 123.68 100.828 -22.9 ASIA India Madras Urban Development Project II 03102181 0 42 42 87.9 104.6 16.7 India Kanpur Urban Developmet Project 04122182 0 33.6 33.6 51.7 69.0 17.3 Indonesia Third Urban Development ProJect 09126179 54 0 54 96.0 90.5 -5.5 Indonesia Fourth Urban Development Project 09109/81 43 0 43 83.9 76.8 -9.1 Korea FLrst National Urban Land Development & ouJsing Project 08/11/81 90 0 90 240 309.4 69.4 Korea Second National Urban Land Oevelopment and Housing Project 051311B3 100 0 100 316 363 47.0 287 73.6 362.6 877.5 1013.27 135.8 VHMA Turkey Cukurova Region Urban Engineering Project 07124185 9.2 0 9.2 10.71 13.2 2.5 Morocco Second Urban Development Project 08104181 36 0 36 81.0 26.0 -55.0 45.2 0 45.2 91.71 39.2 -52.5 8rasil Prep. of MatropolLtan Der. Program for Fortalesa & Salvadorl=182 8.9 0 8.9 25.1 11.5 -13.6 Brexil Per=n Market Towns Improvemnet Project 03J15/84 51.3 0 51.3 150.2 108.18 -42.02 Dominican RepubliciStes and Services Project 10122/82 25.4 0 25.4 41.7 6.4 -35.3 Ecuador GuayaquAl Urban Development Project 10/31/80 31 0 31 51.6 37 -14.6 Mexico DeceneentratiLn Program for the Mexico City Region 10113182 9.2 0 9.2 15.2 6.7 -8.5 Panama Colon Urban Development Project 11106180 35 0 35 133.3 83.5 -49.8 115.4 0 135.4 S75.4 246.68 -128.52 Total /b 528.5 10. o6 629 1 1468.29 1400.178 -68 112 /at implm_ntation period is defined as the percod between loan effectiveness and closing. ib: eacludiL the Dominican Republic project Sources PCRS AIJ= 10 PRIECTS CONPLETED DUR6ING Y90- PCRs Prepared PROJECTS CO"PKETED DURING FY90 -- PCRa PREPARED (Contfnued) Totat ProJect Costs Cost letlement. period a/ T1oe Disbursemmnt Loan 18RD IDA Total Planned Actual Overruai Planned Actual Overrun Actuat Total Supervision ERR Coatmry Effectiveness (USN of.)