UMENIT9 Supplemental Letter No. 2 INDIA STATE OF BIHAR 2015 International Development Association 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433 United States of America INDIA: Credit No. 5578-IN (Enhancing Teacher Effectiveness in Bihar Operation) Performance Monitoring Indicators Dear Sirs and Mesdames: We refer to: (a) Section IlI.A of Schedule 2 to the Financing Agreement of even date herewith between India (the Recipient) and International Development Association (the Association); and (b) Section II.A of the Schedule to the Implementing Entity Agreement of even date herewith between the Association and the State of Bihar (the Project Implementing Entity). Unless otherwise agreed with the Association, we shall monitor and evaluate implementation of the Project in accordance with the Performance Monitoring Indicators attached to this letter. Very truly yours, INDIA By G41 Authorized Representative Very truly yours, STATE OF BIHAR By ___ Authorized Representative Attachment - Performance Monitoring Indicators Key Performance Indicators Program Development Objective: To improve effectiveness of elementary school teachers in Bihar PDO Level Unit of Baseline Cumulative Target Values Frequency Data Responsibility Results Measure 2013-14 Yr 0 Yr. I Yr. 2 Yr. 3 Yr. 4 Yr. 5 Source/Meth for Data Indicators - 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 odology Collection PDO Number 400,000 400,000 435,000 445,00 455,000 465,000 475,000 Annual TEMIS SCERT + Indicator 1: 0 annual BSEIDC Beneficiaries (Female (Female (Female (Female (Female (Female report; (elementary teachers: teachers: teachers: (Femal teachers: teachers: teachers: UDISE school 41%) 41%) 42%) e 44%) 44%) 45%) annual teachers teacher report covered s: 43%) through the program including % of female teachers) PDO T % Baseline: Teacher Teacher 3 times Third party Third party Indicator 2: El Average performa perform during survey Improved language nce ance operation report teacher score scored scored period- performance 45%, increased increase baseline, effectively average by d by midline monitored math 2%age 5%age and end through index score points pointsov line based on 58% over er scores measured measure baselines d baseline S PDO 7 % (i)Teache (i) (i) Three Third party SCERT and EE PDO Level Unit of Baseline Cumulative Target Values Frequency Data Responsibility Results Measure 2013-14 Yr 0 Yr. I Yr. 2 Yr. 3 Yr. 4 Yr. 5 Source/Meth for Data Indicators 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 odology Collection Indicator 3: r Teacher Teacher times sample Directorate of Percentage of attendanc attendanc attendan during survey Research and teacher e at e at ce at operation report Training attendance primary primary primary time 81% 84% 86% period (ii)Teach Teacher (ii) er attendanc Teacher attendanc e: 84% attendan e at (ii) ce at upper Teacher upper primary attendanc primary 78%' e at 83% (does not upper include primary excused 81% absence) PDO % 35% TEIDI 60% 65% 70% 75% Annual Annual SCERT Indicator 4: 0 0 filled baseline reports from Percentage of posts survey SCERT and teacher completed TEIDI positions in and score survey TE institutions index reports filled generated SCERT PDO Number 3500 3500 7000 13,000 19,000 49,000 90,000 Annual SCERT SCERT Indicator 5: ODL Additional teacher qualified database elementary _ 'Source: Independent Study by Ed CIL, MHRD GOI: 2013 PDO Level Unit of Baseline Cumulative Target Values Frequency Data Responsibility Results Measure 2013-14 Yr 0 Yr. 1 Yr. 2 Yr. 3 Yr. 4 Yr. 5 Source/Meth for Data Indicators - 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 odology Collection teachers resulting from program interventions (cumulative)' Intermediate Results Area 1: Physical infrastructure and use of ICT facilities in teacher education institutions Intermediate T Number 0 0 0 250 300 350 400 Annual BSEIDC BSEIDC Results annual Indicator 1.1: reports Number of institutions with improved physical and ICT infrastructure Intermediate T % 0 Online 30% of 50% of Annual SCERT SCERT Results E teacher trainees trainees ODL Indicator 1.2: assignme using using teacher ICTsystem for nt and online online database D.ElEd assessme system system elementary nt system for for teacher develope uploadin uploadin certification d and g g program piloted assignm assignm developed and ents and ents and used receivin receivin gg feedback feedback 2 Cumulative numbers include (i) 25,000 teachers certified through face- to- face regular D.EL Ed. course delivered at DIETs and PTECs and (ii) 65,000 teachers trained through D.El.Ed. Open Distance Learning program PDO Level Unit of Baseline Cumulative Target Values Frequency Data Responsibility Results Measure 2013-14 Yr 0 Yr. I Yr. 2 Yr. 3 Yr. 4 Yr. 5 Source/Meth for Data Indicators 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 odology Collection from from instructo instructo rs rs inte rmediate Results Area 2: Monitoring and evaluation system for teachers Intermediate Yes/No 0 (i)Discl School Teacher Policy Annual BSEIDC BSEIDC and Results El osure of support perform framewo Annual Dept. of Indicator revised visits by ance rk for reports+ Education 2.1.: and BEOs benchma providin Dept. Of Teacher complet and rks g Education management ed BRCCs translate incentiv annual and TEMIS (quarterl d into e to reports attendance teacher' y) and by updated better effectively s and teacher performi monitored and databas CRCCs training ng evaluated e on (monthly curricula teachers DRT ) in at develope website least 20 d and districts approve (ii)SM d by Cs GOB for trained impleme on ntation monitor ing teacher attenda nce in 10 districts Indicator 2.2: % TEIDI (ii)TEID Improvement _ . . baseline I end PDO Level Unit of Baseline Cumulative Target Values Frequency Data Responsibility Results Measure 2013-14 Yr 0 Yr. 1 Yr. 2 Yr. 3 Yr. 4 Yr. 5 Source/Meth for Data Indicators 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 odology Collection in Teacher survey line Education complet survey Institutional ed and shows Development score an Index scores index improve generate ment of d 10% in TE index score over baseline Intermediate 0 0 State of 0 State of 0 Twice SCERT SCERT Results Educati Educatio during Indicator 2.3: on n Bihar operation Student Bihar Report period learning Report on outcomes on grades 3, monitored grades 5 and 8 3,5 and NAS 8 NAS survey survey/ includin State g trend level data/ assessm State ents level assessm ents Intermediate Results Area 3: Fiduciary and Governance systems PDO Level Unit of Baseline Cumulative Target Values Frequency Data Responsibility Results Measure 2013-14 Yr 0 Yr. 1 Yr. 2 Yr. 3 Yr. 4 Yr. 5 Source/Meth for Data Indicators 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 odology Collection Intermediate Results Indicator 3.1: % of 6 % No 60% 70% 75% 80% 90% Annually BSEIDC BSEIDC procurement formal complaint complaints System handling handled exists data satisfactorily in a timely manner. Two six Strengthened Annual Framew monthl Quarterly Audit Annually BSEIDC BSEIDC internal audit internal ork and y audit Committ Audit framework audit ToR internal carried ee meets committee established focused approve audit out and at-least minutes on d by carried reported 4 times support to audit out and submitte in a financial committ reporte d to audit financial audit. ee d committe year submitt e ed to audit commit tee