SFG2188 V1
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA
COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT (CSDP)
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
(ESMP)
For
CONSTRUCTION OF 1 BLOCK OF 6 MARKET STALLS
AT
KUKUWA TASHA COMMUNITY IN GUJBA LGA OF YOBE STATE
DRAFT FINAL REPORT
May, 2016
CSDP-ESMP 2016
Table of Contents
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS 3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
CHAPTER 1:INTRODUCTION 5
1.1 Background 5
1.2 CSDP Project Development Objectives and Components 5
1.3 Environmental Classification and Rationale for Preparing an Environmental and Social
Management Plan (ESMP) 6
1.4 Objectives of the ESMP 6
CHAPTER 2: MICRO PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL
IMPACTS 7
2.1 Micro Project Description 7
2.2 Beneficial Impacts 7
2.3 Negative Impacts 7
2.4 Mitigation Measures 7
CHAPTER 3:POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 8
3.1 ESMP and Monitoring Matrix 8
3.2 Capacity Building Need and Targets 9
3.4 Summary of ESMP cost 10
REFERENCES 11
APPENDIX 1:ESMP CHECKLIST 12
APPENDIX 2: CSDP PROJECT CYCLE AND EA PROCESS 13
Page 2
CSDP-ESMP 2016
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
AF Additional Financing GO Gender Officer
BH Boko Haram GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism
CBO Community Based Organization IDA International Development
Association
CDA Community Development IDPs Internally Displaced Persons
Association
CDD Community Driven Development LGA Local Government Area
CPMC Community Project Management LGRC Local Government Review Committee
Committee
CSDA Community and Social M&E Monitoring & Evaluation
Development Agency
CSDP Community and Social OO Operation Officer
Development Project
EA Environmental Assessment OP Operational Policy
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment PO Project officer
ESMF Environmental and Social PRA Participatory Rural Appraisal
Management Framework
ESMP Environmental and Social RPBA Recovery and Peace Building
Management Plan Assessment
ESSF Environmental and Social Screening SA State Agency
Form
Page 3
CSDP-ESMP 2016
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Kukuwa Tasha Community has identified the construction of 6 market stalls as a priority project in
their community which they believe will help in the improvement of sanitation and hygiene and
reduce the incidences of water borne diseases. The community seeks the assistance of CSDP to fund
the project.
Based on the environmental and social checklist screening carried out in the area, this micro project
is classified as a category B project. The screening result shows that this micro project is envisaged
to have minimal environmental and social impacts resulting from the construction activities and
wastes. But these are site specific and limited in scope, and can be readily addressed through
mitigation measures contained in this ESMP.
Beneficial Impacts
The beneficial impacts of this micro project are as follow:
Stimulation of economic activities and development
Employment for traders and shop attendants
Increase income and welfare
2.3 Negative Impacts
The negative or adverse impacts of this micro project at the implementation stage are as follow:
Market stalls will result in increase in solid and liquid waste generation and air pollution of
the surrounding environment
Poor waste management may result to public health crisis
There may be incessant traffic obstruction along the adjoining road due to the market
Activities of theft and burglary may increase especially, if they are open or unfenced
shops/stalls
Fire incidence from the market may result to loss of life and property
To mitigate the minimal adverse potential impacts, an ESMP is prepared which include impact,
mitigations and monitoring measures, cost implications which are all in this document. Also,
capacity need and training requirements and cost implications were prepared.
The overall cost of implementing the ESMP is as follows:
Cost
Item Responsibility Cost Estimate in (USD)
Estimate(N)
Mitigation &
CDA, CPMC, SA 520,000 750
Monitoring
Training & Capacity
Consultant 450,000 2250
Building
Sub-Total 300,000 1500
Management (20%) SA 60,000 300
Contingency (10%) 30,000 150
Total 1,360,000 4,950
Page 4
CSDP-ESMP 2016
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
The Federal Government of Nigeria has received financing from the World Bank (WB) for
implementing a 2-year World Bank Assisted Additional Financing (AF) of Community and Social
Development Project (CSDP). The thrust of the Community and Social Development Project
(CSDP) is to contribute to the realization of the Nigerian government’s strategy for poverty
reduction by improving the welfare and living conditions of many poor and vulnerable communities
in most states of Nigeria. The project has the objective to increase access by the poor to improved
social and natural resources infrastructure services in a sustainable manner throughout Nigeria. This
will be achieved through the provision of grant support to benefiting Communities for the
implementation of community-driven micro projects under approved Community Development
Plan (CDP). To commence State-level implementation of the additional financing, the Project
intends to use part of the proceeds for consultancy services for the review/upgrade of
Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) and prepare Abbreviated Resettlement Action
Plan (ARAP) for the participating States in the North East Geopolitical Zone.
1.2 CSDP Project Development Objectives and Components
The initial consultation suggest that the Project Development Objective (PDO) for the CSDP AF
will remain unchanged as the original PDO- “to sustainably increase access of poor people to social
and natural resource infrastructure services�?, but the key performance indicators (KPIs) will be
revised. The CSDP AF KPIs will put some emphasis on support to vulnerable and disenfranchised
household and individuals expand scope of assistance to such households beyond public goods
(schools, health center, water etc.). It will also include demand side support i.e. a safety net. The use
of a community managed approach and emphasis on local government active partnership with
community groups will be retained and strengthened during CSDP AF period. The new emphasis
on safety net will result in an additional component, for ‘vulnerable groups’ transfers, to the original
design. In essence, the additional financing will now have 4 components:
Component 1: Coordination and Program Support Component (Federal and State Level)
Component 2: LGA/Sectoral Ministries Capacity and Partnership building Component
Component 3: Community-Driven Investment Component
Component 4: Vulnerable Groups livelihood investment grants/transfers component.
Page 5
CSDP-ESMP 2016
1.3 Environmental Classification and Rationale for Preparing an Environmental and
Social Management Plan (ESMP)
As part of the credit agreement with the World Bank, projects supported by Bank’s funding are
usually subjected to safeguard screening to determine the environmental and social risk before
approval.
The environmental and social checklist screening carried out in the field is consistent with the ESMF
classification of the CSDP micro-projects as a category B project. The screening result shows that
this micro project is envisaged to have minimal environmental and social impacts resulting from the
construction activities and wastes. But these are site specific and limited in scope, and can be readily
addressed through mitigation measures
This ESMP is therefore prepared to set out site specific mitigation, monitoring and institutional
measures to be taken during implementation to eliminate adverse environmental and social impacts,
offset them or reduce them to acceptable levels.
1.4 Objectives of the ESMP
The main objective of this ESMP is to review and update the environmental and social checklist
prepared for the micro-project and document the actions necessary to prevent or minimize
predicted negative impacts of the sub-project during project implementation.
Specifically, this ESMP is designed to ensure the following:
Identify potential impacts that may occur during implementation stage of the various project
activities;
Develop detailed specific mitigation measures with relevant costs implication that will need
to be achieved during and after sub-project implementation;
Specify responsibilities and institutional arrangement that will be put in place to ensure that
the mitigation measures are implemented
Integrating environment fully into the various activities of the proposed project and ensuring
inclusion of environmental requirements into tender documents, continuing management
and evaluation of the environmental performance of the micro-project.
Providing detailed design criteria for specific mitigation measures to be implemented.
Tracking to ensure the effectiveness of the mitigation measures at meeting the discharge
standards.
Provide implementation and monitoring schedule
Page 6
CSDP-ESMP 2016
CHAPTER 2: MICRO PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL
AND SOCIAL IMPACTS
2.1 Micro Project Description
The Kukuwa Tasha community has selected the construction of 1 block of 6 Market Stalls as
priority micro-projects which they are asking for the assistance of CSDP for funding. The market
stall when constructed will boost economic activities and attract income to households.
2.2 Beneficial Impacts
The beneficial impacts of this micro project are as follow:
Stimulation of economic activities and development
Employment for traders and shop attendants
Increase income and welfare
2.3 Negative Impacts
The negative or adverse impacts of this micro project at the implementation stage are as follow:
Market stalls will result in increase in solid and liquid waste generation and air pollution of
the surrounding environment
Poor waste management may result to public health crisis
There may be incessant traffic obstruction along the adjoining road due to the market
Activities of theft and burglary may increase especially, if they are open or unfenced
shops/stalls
Fire incidence from the market may result to loss of life and property
2.4 Mitigation Measures
Necessary and specific mitigation measures to the identified adverse impacts are described in the
ESMP matrix that follows in the next section.
Page 7
CHAPTER 3: POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
In line with the TOR, this ESMP is to mitigate the adverse impacts at the implementation/operation phase since construction activities
have been completed. It details the identified impacts, mitigation measures, responsibility for implementation and cost amongst others. The
sub-section after the ESMP matrix is the monitoring arrangement to ensure effective implementation and delivery of project development
objectives.
3.1 ESMP and Monitoring Matrix
OPERATIONAL PHASE
Impact Mitigation measures Method of Performance indicator Responsibility Time Cost
identification Monitoring frame estimate (N)
Mitigation monitorin
g
Solid and liquid -Introduce and implement Site inspection -Evidence of waste bins CPMC, CPMC, SA Daily 150,000
waste generation effective waste management -Evidence of order in waste Market
plan handling and disposal authorities,
OO, PO
Disease outbreak -Construct VIP toilets Community -Availability of sanitary CPMC, CPMC, Daily 100,000
may occur due to -Construct a borehole to survey materials Market SA, GO
poor hygiene ensure water supply (soap, tissue paper, authorities,
-Constitute a market disinfectant) OO, PO
committee for sanitation and -Evidence of functional
hygiene water supply
-Sensitize on hygiene and
sanitation
Fire outbreak and -Training on fire fighting and Community -Number of persons CPMC, CPMC, SA Annually 50 000
risk of loss of life safety measure survey trained/evidence of training Market
and property -Provide firefighting -Number of firefighting authorities,
equipment equipment installed OO, PO
-Provide fire assembling
points and sensitize the
market association
Loss of asset/income -Fence the market (Life Survey -Evidence of fenced area CPMC, -During 150,000
due to theft Fencing) -Number of complaints Market constructio
- Form a committee for -Minutes of meetings authorities, n
Rotational Communal indicating agreements OO, PO -During
CSDP-ESMP 2016
Policing operation
Traffic obstruction -Provide locally improvised Site inspection -Number of speed breakers CPMC, -After 70, 000
speed breakers and road and evidence of road Market constructio
signage signage authorities, n
-Provide First Aid Kits -Availability of First Aid OO, PO -Annually
Kits
Total (Mitigation) 520,000
3.2 Capacity Building Need and Targets
The ESMP would also include a detailed capacity building/training for staff of CSDP at the Federal level and for the 26 states. Here below
is a breakdown of the proposed training and cost implications.
Capacity Need Participants Subject Resource Person Duration Cost (N)
Environmental and Social Management OO, PO, GO, M&E CSDP project cycle and WB Safeguards 1 day 150,000
in Micro Projects Environmental checklist Consultant
process
WB safeguard policies and guidelines GO, M&E Principles and Application of WB Safeguards 1 day 150,000
OP 4.01 and OP 4.12 Consultant
Medical Waste Management, Sanitation OO, PO, Preparation and WB Safeguards 1 day 150,000
and Hygiene Implementation of Waste Consultant
management
Total (Capacity Building) 450,000
This cost is exclusive of cost of hall, and other logistics which shall be undertaken by the CSDP under management cost.
Page 9
CSDP-ESMP 2016
3.4 Summary of ESMP cost
Cost
Item Responsibility Cost Estimate in (USD)
Estimate(N)
Mitigation &
CDA, CPMC, SA 520,000 750
Monitoring
Training & Capacity
Consultant 450,000 2250
Building
Sub-Total 300,000 1500
Management (20%) SA 60,000 300
Contingency (10%) 30,000 150
Total 1,360,000 4,950
Note: The budget for capacity building has been integrated into another ESMP report by the
CSDA.
Page 10
CSDP-ESMP 2016
REFERENCES
Environmental and Social Management Plan Framework for CSDP-AF (2014)
ESMP for the Construction of Alternative Bridge No 2 at Emene, Enugu (2012); RSDT
Federal Ministry of Works, Nigeria
Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources (2003): Third National Fadama
Development Project (Fadama III), Rural Infrastructure, Manual No. 4, August
IFC General Environmental Health and Safety Guidelines: Occupational Health and Safety
Lochner, P. (2005): Guideline for Environmental Management Plans. CSIR Report No ENV-S-C
2005-053 H. Republic of South Africa, Provincial Government of the Western Cape,
Department of Environmental Affairs & Development Planning, Cape Town.
Ministry Of Agriculture And Animal Resources (Minagri) (2010): Environmental
Management Plan (EMP) For Nyanza 23 Sub Project , Land Husbandry, Water Harvesting
And Hillside Irrigation Project (LWH) Prepared by Green and Clean Solution Ltd
Project Appraisal Document (PAD) for CSDP-AF
Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook (World Bank Group) 1998
Resettlement Policy Framework for CSDP-AF, (2014)
UNEP (1988): Environmental Impact Assessment, Basic procedures for developing
Countries.
Page 11
CSDP-ESMP 2016
APPENDIX 1: ESMP CHECKLIST
S/n Description Response/Yes No
1 Name of District
2 Is the site close to
a. Market
b. School
c. Hospital
d. Residence
e. Government institution
f. Surface water
3 What is the distance of the site to settlement/economic
activity area
4 Type of settlement in the area
5 Are there economic activities within the corridor?
6 Will construction work affect the movement of road
users?
7 Will it cause a slowdown of traffic flow?
8 Will bridge construction result to public accident?
9 Will bridge construction result to occupational hazard?
10 Will there be waste management concerns during
construction stage
11 Will there be involuntary displacement of persons
12 Soil: Is the project leading to changes in soil
characteristics within the project area
13 During operation, are pedestrians likely to voluntarily use
the pedestrian bridge?
14 Are there social menaces to worry about during operation
(eg robbery during night hours)?
15 Are there going to be vulnerability concerns (women,
disables) that need to be addressed?
16 Will the sitting of the bridge bring about trading activities
and clustering in the vicinity?
17 If yes to question #16:
a. Will this affect/increase social menace in the area?
b. Will it lead to poor/bad traffic condition within
the arena?
c. Will it lead to waste littering on the bridge and
around the area?
Page 12
CSDP-ESMP 2016
APPENDIX 2: CSDP PROJECT CYCLE AND EA PROCESS
STANDARD EA PROJECT LIFE CYCLE
PROJECT CYCLE PLAN FOR CSDP
IMPACT ASSESSMENT STAGES STAGES
Information Campaign by
Screening Project concept the Agency/LGA
Cons ESSF & Environmental Checklist
ESSF
ult &
Stak Envtal Community defines needs OO assists in
ehold CDP for review & re-submission Develops and submits CDP
Checklist CDP design
ers to LGRC
Pre-feasibility study
Scoping
Environmental Scoping Checklist Desk Appraisal by LGDO
Community revises request in line
using checklist
with reviews from LGRC
Envtal Scoping Checklist &
Pre-Appraisal Envtal Checklist
Envtal Checklist
Environmental and Social Impact
Feasibility study
Assessment LGRMC Reviews and
CDP rejected and returned recommends to Agency
to CPMC
Agency/LGA Ministry joint
CDP field appraisal
Environmental & Social Management
Plan/Resettlement Action Plan Contract
signing/Documentation Agency Approves CDP CPMC
Training
EMP
Checklist
Inspections and compliance Monitoring Construction
Supervision Project Launch
trenches
releases
Agency
(Community/Agency sign
M&E funding agreement
CPMC
CSDA
Environmental Management System Commissioning LGRC
State Line ministries
FPSU
World Bank Community implements
CDP
Auditing and Monitoring Operations
Subsequent
Trenches
released
Envtal Project Completion
Audit
Checklist
Closure Plans and Rehabilitation Checklist Decommissioning &
Post Completion Joint
Closure
Evaluation
EAR
THG
UAR
DS
Source: CSDP Environmental Checklist Training by Earthguards Consult (2009)
Page 13
CSDP-ESMP 2016
Page 14