Report No. PID3851 Project Name Mali-Project to Support Grassroots Initiatives (@) to Fight Hunger and poverty (GRIP) Region Africa Sector Poverty Reduction Project ID MLPE35617 Borrower Republic of Mali Implementing Agency Association d'Appui aux Initiatives de Base (AIB) Ministry of Economy, Plan, and Integration Date PID prepared May 7,1996 Date PID revised December 23, 1997 Appraisal Date May 19, 1996 Projected Board Date March 17, 1998 Background: It has become increasingly apparent in Africa that public sector resources alone cannot reduce poverty or hunger for its growing population. Bordered by seven countries, with a land mass twice the size of France, Mali's leaders recognize that their country's development requires the active cooperation of formal and non-formal structures to reach its widely diverse and dispersed communities. The proposed Project to Support Grassroots Initiatives to Fight Hunger and Poverty has been designed with these considerations in mind. It is based on a set of guiding principles, namely that (a) the key objective is reducing poverty and hunger by getting results at the community level; (b) the Malian NGO/Government partnership and community involvement are potentially valuable contributions; and (c) long-term poverty and hunger reduction objectives are to be measured in terms of both performance and process indicators. The 1993 Global Hunger Conference, sponsored by the Bank and many NGOs, led to the notion of national hunger workshops and Mali was chosen as the first country proto-type. In the initial planning phase, Malian NGOs were skeptical of Government intentions, seeing Government as wanting to impinge on NGO freedom of action and policy independence; the Government mistrusted NGOs as wanting to pursue political goals and operational agendas inconsistent with national programs; and both were skeptical of the Bank's willingness and institutional ability to relate to communities in a flexible manner, to be patient and listen. The June 1995 Mali Hunger Workshop concluded that more might be accomplished by each party through cooperation rather than competition and mistrust. A Steering Committee to Fight Hunger, in which NGOs had substantial voice, was created to pursue the "process" of tripartite collaboration. The proposed Project is seen as a vehicle to experiment innovative partnership approaches in the fight against hunger and poverty. Project Objectives: The project's main objectives are: (i) to improve the living conditions of rural poor communities by responding to their priority needs; (ii) to strengthen community participation in the identification of their priority needs and in the design and implementation of actions that respond to those needs, in partnership with NGOs and local authorities and in coordination with ongoing national programs; and (iii) to strengthen institutional and policy-making capacity at the national level in the fight against hunger and poverty. Project Description: The project concept reflects an iterative dialogue with beneficiaries, service providers, and authorities and addresses three complementary and inter-linked processes: a community consultation process, a sub-project implementation process, and a Government/NGO "partnership" process. The proposed project would support these processes with two components: (a) a community development component comprised of multi-sectoral community- requested infrastructures in targeted rural communities; and accompanying local capacity-building measures to strengthen community, NGOs, and Government capacity; and (b) policy and institutional support to strengthen local and national decision- making on poverty issues (poverty-related data collection, monitoring, and analysis). Participation of communities, NGOs, and Government is encouraged and supported at every stage of project preparation, implementation and follow-up. Project Implementation: The project is community-based and would be implemented in a phased manner, starting with the region of Mopti and expanding to other poor regions as experience in approach and modalities is gained. To initiate the community consultation process, a community-needs and capacity-assessment would be conducted by NGOs in the targeted village. The results would be verified to ensure consistency with national programs and to avoid duplication. Sub- project proposals would be developed by the communities with the help of an NGO in community development (NGO-CD) and sent to the Project Management Office. During sub-project conceptualization, consideration would be given as to how IEC and training activities could be incorporated to address community needs, giving special emphasis to women's concerns. The sub-project implementation process would begin with a technical feasibility study. Once found technically acceptable, the sub- project request would be submitted to the Associations aux Initiatives de Base for possible financing. Once selected, a contract would be entered into with qualified implementors (NGOs, community groups, technical services) through competitive bidding, - 2- with the counter-signature of the community. The community would receive training to ensure maintenance of works. At completion, a post-evaluation would be carried out by an independent consultant, with the participation of the community. The NGO/Government "partnership" process is an integral part of the project and is promoted at every stage of the project cycle -- at the central level through the Associations aux Initiatives de Base, at the local level through the regional/local development committees, and at the community level through NGOs and local technical services. Benefits: The project would help reduce poverty in the most vulnerable rural areas of Mali. This would be achieved in the short term by financing sub-projects identified by the communities themselves as having highest priority. The project would also (i) enhance the understanding of communities in how to achieve sustainable improvement in their living condition; (ii) strengthen and encourage collaboration in the fight against hunger and poverty between public and private entities at the community, regional and national levels; and (iii) develop the capacity at central and local levels to collect and analyze relevant poverty data, to formulate poverty reduction policies, take decisions based on such data and policy formulation, and to monitor and evaluate progress in achieving local and national goals. Risks: The first risk is the difficulty in building community confidence in a new relationship with Government and their capacity to manage local activities, given past unfulfilled promises. Creating this new trust and level of skill will be part of an extended process, supported by the project, which will begin slowly, accelerating with experience and demonstrated results. The second risk is the extent to which the Government and NGOs can manage to maintain an ongoing dialogue, and their willingness to collaborate and compromise in order to implement programs at the community level. The creation of the Association to Support Grassroot Initiatives with beneficiary representatives on its Advisory Board and the successful pilot phase of testing this partnership on the ground both augur well for their commitment to continue this cooperative process. Third, project implementation may be hampered by limitations on technical competence, absorptive capacity, and familiarity with Bank procedures by service providers. This concern has been addressed through pre-selection criteria, inclusion of training to the community, training in community development to the NGO-CD, and training to intermediaries on Bank procedures and a system to monitor and evaluate performance outcomes. Finally, project achievements may be constrained by difficulty in reaching communities, transferring knowledge and improved practices, and sustaining community and NGO involvement throughout the project period. This risk is mitigated by providing appropriate training to respond to these needs, ensuring the presence of an NGO-CD in the -3 - community throughout its sub-project cycle, and assisting communities in defining relevant IEC themes. Contact Point: Public Information Center The World Bank 1818 H Street N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433 Tel. No.: (202) 473-4654 Fax No.: (202) 473-8216 Note: This is information on an evolving project. Certain components may not necessarily be included in the final project. Processed by the InfoShop week ending January 9, 1998. - 4 -