The World Bank Report No: ISR4533 Implementation Status & Results Mozambique National Decentralized Planning and Finance Program (P107311) Public Disclosure Copy Operation Name: National Decentralized Planning and Finance Program Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 3 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: (P107311) Country: Mozambique Approval FY: 2010 Product Line: IBRD/IDA Region: AFRICA Lending Instrument: Technical Assistance Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Ministry of Planning and Development Key Dates Board Approval Date 30-Mar-2010 Original Closing Date 30-Jun-2015 Planned Mid Term Review Date 30-Jun-2012 Last Archived ISR Date 18-Dec-2010 Effectiveness Date 30-Aug-2010 Revised Closing Date 30-Jun-2015 Actual Mid Term Review Date Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) The Project Development Objective is to improve the capacity of local government to manage public financial resources for district development in a participatory and transparent manner. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Yes No Component(s) Component Name Component Cost Improving National Systems 3.20 Strengthening Participatory Planning and Budgeting 10.40 Enhancing Management and Implementation Capacity 9.20 Strengthening Oversight and Accountability 0.30 Knowledge Management 0.40 Public Disclosure Copy Effective Project Management and Coordination 3.90 Non-Common-Fund Activities 0.00 Overall Ratings Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory Satisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory Overall Risk Rating Page 1 of 6 The World Bank Report No: ISR4533 Implementation Status Overview The project faced considerable delays in its first year of implementation, mostly caused by the increased use of national systems for procurement and financial management, and disbursements began only in May 2011. However, the project seems on track to achieve its PDO and results. A key contribution to this will be the further development and full roll-out of the District Development Monitoring System (Sistema de Monitoria do Desempenho Distrital, SMoDD), which will allow a better monitoring of project-specific indicators as well as a Public Disclosure Copy number of country-relevant indicators. Locations No Location data has been entered Results Project Development Objective Indicators Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline Current End Target Direct project beneficiaries Number Value 0.00 0.00 10368.00 Date 30-Mar-2010 16-Sep-2011 30-Jun-2015 Comments Direct beneficiaries are the No change at this time Of which 30 percent are following: -Local government female official per district, of which x % are female. -Members of Conselhos Locais, of which y % are female. Districts with more than 90% budget execution Number Value 85.00 20.00 110.00 of their district operational plan (PESOD) Date 07-Jul-2010 16-Sep-2011 30-Jun-2015 Comments 20 out of a sample of 33 districts for which data are available at this time; not to be compared with baseline of 85 (out of 128). Districts with annual PESOD execution reports Number Value 0.00 0.00 115.00 Public Disclosure Copy publicly displayed and discussed in District Councils in accordance with guidelines Date 30-Mar-2010 16-Sep-2011 30-Jun-2015 Comments No data available at this time. Districts that report on District Performance in Number Value 0.00 0.00 128.00 decentralized planning and finance through SMPD Date 07-Jul-2010 16-Sep-2011 30-Jun-2015 Comments No data available at this time. Intermediate Results Indicators Page 2 of 6 The World Bank Report No: ISR4533 Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline Current End Target Districts that have received all final and all Number Value 0.00 0.00 128.00 available updated of district process dossiers Date 07-Jul-2010 16-Sep-2011 30-Jun-2015 Public Disclosure Copy and implementation manuals Comments No data available at this time. Degree of progress in developing and rolling Number Value 0.00 53.00 100.00 out the Performance Monitoring System for decentralized planning and finance (SMPD) Date 07-Jul-2010 16-Sep-2011 30-Jun-2015 Comments no system Unit of measure is actually Tool formally adopted by percentage. Government Provincial trainers accredited by IFAPA Number Value 0.00 0.00 50.00 available for training district staff in decentralized planning and finance processes Date 07-Jul-2010 16-Sep-2011 30-Jun-2015 Comments No change at this time Districts with an operational plan (PESOD) Number Value 28.00 24.00 33.00 approved and disseminated in accordance with (selected criteria in) established Date 07-Jul-2010 16-Sep-2011 30-Jun-2015 planningguidelines Comments 24 out of 33 districts for which data is available. Not to be compared with the baseline of 28. District Councils that operate in accordance Number Value 7.00 5.00 102.00 with (selected criteria in) current legislation Date 07-Jul-2010 16-Sep-2011 30-Jun-2015 Comments 5 out of 33 districts for which data is available. Not to be compared with the baseline of 7. Districts with financial processes closed in e- Number Value 50.00 18.00 110.00 SISTAFE at the end of the financial year Date 07-Jul-2010 16-Sep-2011 30-Jun-2015 Public Disclosure Copy Comments 18 out of the 33 districts for which data are available. Not to be compared to the baseline of 50. Proportion of procurement contracts in public Percentage Value 13.00 9.00 60.00 works executed by the districts with prior approval ("visto") by the Administrative Tribunal Date 07-Jul-2010 16-Sep-2011 30-Jun-2015 Comments 9 percent of contracts in 33 districts for which data are available. Page 3 of 6 The World Bank Report No: ISR4533 Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline Current End Target Local government technical staff integrated in Number Value 98.00 52.00 628.00 civil service payroll (based on selected key- Date 07-Jul-2010 16-Sep-2011 30-Jun-2015 Public Disclosure Copy post pre-financed by the national project) Comments 52 staff in the 33 districts for which data are available. Not to be compared with baseline of 98. Districts with an annual increase of at least Number Value 65.00 16.00 85.00 10% in local revenue collection and registration in e-SISTAFE Date 07-Jul-2010 16-Sep-2011 30-Jun-2015 Comments 16 out of 33 districts for which data are available. Not to be compare to the baseline of 65. Districts that submitted their annual financial Number Value 7.00 7.00 128.00 statements to the Administrative Tribunal in accordance with current legislation Date 07-Jul-2010 16-Sep-2011 30-Jun-2015 Comments 7 out of 33 districts for which data are available. Not to be compared to the baseline of 7. Districts with their accounts audited by the Number Value 51.00 51.00 44.00 Administrative Court Date 07-Jul-2010 16-Sep-2011 30-Jun-2015 Comments No change at this time. Districts that inform their local consultative Number Value 20.00 3.00 128.00 councils about the results of internal and external control exercises Date 07-Jul-2010 16-Sep-2011 30-Jun-2015 Comments 3 out of 33 districts for which data are available. Not to be compared to the baseline of 20. N-DPFP web page in the government (MPD) Number Value 0.00 0.00 12.00 Public Disclosure Copy portal updated at least 3 times per year with Best Practices and District Performance reports Date 07-Jul-2010 16-Sep-2011 30-Jun-2015 Comments Webpage exists with 98 No change at this time Information updated with 12 PEDDs accessible Best Practices and SMPD summary report Districts that use at least 3 established Best Number Value 0.00 0.00 128.00 Practices in decentralized planning and finance Date 07-Jul-2010 16-Sep-2011 30-Jun-2015 Comments No change at this time Page 4 of 6 The World Bank Report No: ISR4533 Best practices identified and disseminated Number Value 0.00 0.00 12.00 Date 07-Jul-2010 16-Sep-2011 30-Jun-2015 Comments No change at this time Public Disclosure Copy Timely submission of consolidated Project Percentage Value 0.00 100.00 100.00 AWPB and monitoring reports Date 07-Jul-2010 16-Sep-2011 30-Jun-2015 Comments Implementation manual AWPB and monitoring reports available delivered on time. Data on Financial Performance (as of 26-Aug-2011) Financial Agreement(s) Key Dates Project Loan No. Status Approval Date Signing Date Effectiveness Date Closing Date P107311 IDA-47050 Effective 30-Mar-2010 11-May-2010 30-Aug-2010 30-Jun-2015 Disbursements (in Millions) Project Loan No. Status Currency Original Revised Cancelled Disbursed Undisbursed % Disbursed P107311 IDA-47050 Effective XDR 19.60 19.60 0.00 5.74 13.86 29.00 Disbursement Graph Public Disclosure Copy Page 5 of 6 The World Bank Report No: ISR4533 Key Decisions Regarding Implementation It was decided that due to the serious and urgent nature of issues related to prior review and approval of contracts by Tribunal Administrativo, the independent control body ("vistos"), and the delay in submitting the 2010 audit, the project will need to be downgraded to Moderately Satisfactory in two categories (Project Management and Financial Management). This will result in a downgrading of the Overall Implementation Progress (IP) rating to Moderately Satisfactory. It is hoped, however, that the MPD's efforts to resolve the situation with Public Disclosure Copy the Tribunal Administrativo may lead soon to resolution of the outstanding issues and that implementation may gather momentum in the coming months. This would be a precondition for restoring the IP rating to Satisfactory. Restructuring History There has been no restructuring to date. Related Projects There are no related projects. Public Disclosure Copy Page 6 of 6