School feeding program

Definition

School feeding is defined as the provision of breakfast, lunch, or both to children while they are in school.
Some programs provide complete meals, while others provide nutritious snacks or high-energy biscuits.
There are two main groups of school feeding programs based on their modalities: in-school feeding where
the children are fed in school; and take-home rations, where families are given food if their children attend
school. In Vietnam, what we are discussing is the first modality, providing food/milk tor children at school.

Objectives

The primary objective of school feeding program is to provide meals (breakfast, lunch, snack, milk…) to
alleviate short term hunger, increase attention span, facilitate learning and obviate the need for children
to leave school to find food. In-school meals also act as an incentive to increase school attendance.

In addition to that, micronutrient fortification and deworming could be included in the school meal
program as they are cost-effective interventions.

Benefits of School Feeding Programs

Social benefits

School meals help families support their children’s education while protecting their food security. They
help break the inter-generational cycle of hunger and poverty that affects vulnerable families and
communities. However, while safety net programs must reach the poor to be effective, school feeding
programs face challenges in reaching the poorest. The main reson is that enrollment is always lowest
among the poorest and vulnerable communities. It should be noted that in-school meals are usually
served to all children in the school including non-needy children, to avoid issues of logistics, jealousies, or
stigma that might arise if only some children are fed.

Educational benefits

Implementation of school feeding programs is associated with increased enrollment, particularly for girls
from vulnerable populations in many low-income countries including some LMICs such as Vietnam. School
feeding programs can help to get children into school and help to keep them there, through enhancing
enrollment and reducing absenteeism; and once the children are in school, the programs can contribute
to their learning, through avoiding hunger and enhancing cognitive abilities. A daily meal also allows
children to focus on their studies rather than their stomachs. These effects may be potentiated by
complementary (nutrition-enhancing) actions, especially deworming and providing micronutrients.

Providing school meals has also been shown to improve cognitive abilities and educational achievements
in both low and high-income settings as they help to alleviate short-term hunger, and if the quality of
meals is improved, significant improvement of study results is observed.

In Vietnam, the Vietnamese Government, through a WB supported project – School Education Quality
Assurance Program (SEQAP), decided to pilot full day schooling program in 2010, and which also included
a school lunch, in disadvantaged areas. An independent evaluation of the project implementation showed
that full day schooling has improved the quality of education quality and performance. The evaluation
noted that for the program to succeed a school needs at least minimum physical conditions (e.g. adequacy

                                                      1
of classrooms and spaces for school activities, availability of kitchen for lunch, toilets...) and more
importantly, strong leadership, qualified teachers as well as strong parent and community participation
and support.

Nutritional benefits

Because the window of opportunity for adequate nutrition for optimal health and physical and cognitive
development is short and spans the first 1,000 days of life beginning at the first day of pregnancy, any
undernutrition occurring during this period can lead to extensive and largely irreversible damage to
physical growth, brain development and consequently, human capital formation. Therefore, interventions
to improve nutritional outcomes must focus on this age group and on women of child-bearing age. From
this perspective, providing food to school-age children cannot reverse the damage of early nutritional
deficits. A school child who is short for her age was had her growth likely stunted by inadequate nutrition
at an earlier age, and hence school feeding would not be able to address their nutritional as well as
cognitive deficits.

Although the most recent systematic review shows that providing meals at schools can have a significant
impact on the growth of school-age children, the effect is small and probably cannot reverse the
consequences of earlier malnutrition. However, there could be intergenerational benefits for younger
children. The links between school feeding and increased enrollment point to a positive effect on the well-
being of the next generation because both maternal and paternal education levels are strong
determinants of child growth and development as measured by stunting. The odds of having a stunted
child decrease by about 4–5 percent for every additional year of formal education achieved by mothers.

In summary, it has been shown that the primary drivers for increased support for school feeding are the
benefits for social protection and for education. Well-designed school feeding programs, which include
micronutrient fortification and deworming, can provide nutritional benefits and should be considered to
complement and not substitute nutrition programs targeted at the first 1,000 days of life, which should
remain a clear priority in countries’ efforts to address childhood undernutrition and ensure human capital
formation for future generations.

Implications for Vietnam

In July 8, 2016, the Prime Minister ratified the School Milk program (Decision 1340/QD-TTg) with the
objective of improving the nutritional status and especially the height of pre-school and primary school
children by 2020. Its main intervention is to promote daily milk consumption through policy development,
education and communication, and technical assistance. The MOH manages the milk program in
cooperation with the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism and the Ministry of Education and Training.
The program mobilizes private contributions (20%), family and community contributions (50%) and local
governments (30%). The program was first piloted in big cities, Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh city and is expanded
to other provinces depending on their priority and resources. Recently, some poor and mountainous
provinces expressed their interest to implement the program.

It is also important to note that even with School Milk/Meal programs, for the objective of improving
nutrition status and tackling child stunting, nutrition interventions during 1,000-day should be
prioritized.




                                                    2