Page 1 Document of The World Bank Report No: 58206-RO RESTRUCTURING PAPER ON A PROPOSED PROJECT RESTRUCTURING OF HAZARD RISK MITIGATION & EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROJECT LOAN 4736 RO AND GEF TF 053472 BOARD APPROVAL DATE May 20, 2004 TO ROMANIA December 9, 2010 Page 2 2 Regional Vice President: Philippe Le Houérou Country Director: Peter C. Harrold Sector Manager / Director: Wael Zakout/Peter D. Thomson Task Team Leader: Gabriel Ionita Page 3 3 ROMANIA HAZARD RISK MITIGATION AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROJECT P099895 CONTENTS Page ANNEX 2: REALLOCATION OF PROCEEDS...........................................................4   Page 4 4 Page 5 ANNEX 2: Reallocation of Proceeds ______________________________________________________________________ ROMANIA – HAZARD RISK MITIGATION AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS P075163 AND P081950 LOAN 4736 RO AND GEF TF 053472 Restructuring Paper 1. Proceeds for Romania Hazard Risk Mitigation and Emergency Preparedness Project, Loan 4736, P075163, will be reallocated as follows: Category of Expenditure Allocation (in US$) % of Financing Current Revised Current Revised Current Revised (1)Works for: (a) Part B of the Project 47,888,000 47,888,000 (b) Part C of the Project 61,848,000 66,215,354 (c) Part D of the Project 2,883,000 2,883,000 (d) Part E of the Project (i) Part E.1 0 0 (ii) Part E.2 19,000 19,000 (ii) Part E.3 26,646 26,646 100% of foreign expenditures and 78% of local expenditures (incurred before March 7, 2007) and 78% of all expenditures thereafter (2) Goods for: (a) Part A of the Project 8,904,000 8,904,000 (b) Part C of the Project 239,000 239,000 (c) Part E of the Project (i) Part E.1 69,091 69,091 (ii) Part E.2 235,000 235,000 (iii) Part E.3 269,000 269,000 (iv) Part E.4 23,000 23,000 (d) Part D of the Project 1,700,000 1,700,000 100% of foreign expenditures 100% of local expenditures (ex factory cost) and 75% for local expenditures for other items procured locally (incurred before March 7, 2007) and 75% of all expenditures thereafter (3) Technical Services for Part C.5 of the Project 0 0 100% of foreign expenditures, and 75% of local expenditures (4) Consultants' services, including audit and training, for: (a) Part A of the Project 3,300,000 3,300,000 (b) Part B of the Project 6,086,000 6,086,000 75% of expenditures incurred by local consultants and 85% of foreign consultants Page 6 6 Category of Expenditure Allocation (in US$) % of Financing (c) Part C of the Project 5,953,000 5,953,000 (d) Part E of the Project (i) Part E.1 100,000 100,000 (ii) Part E.2 2,372,000 2,372,000 (iii) Part E.3 172,000 172,000 (e) Part D of the Project 550,000 550,000 (5) Operating costs for: (a) MAI PMU 100,909 100,909 (b) MTCT PMU 328,000 328,000 (c) MEWM PMU 2,085,000 2,085,000 (d) NAMR PMU 482,000 482,000 75% 75% 75% 75% (6) Unallocated for: (a) Part A of the Project 0 0 (b) Part B of the Project 0 0 (c) Part C of the Project 4,367,354 0 (d) Part D of the Project 0 0 TOTAL 150,000,000 150,000,000 2. Proceeds for Romania Hazard Risk Mitigation and Emergency Preparedness Project, GEF Grant 053472, P081950, will be reallocated as follows: Allocation (US$) % of Financing Category of Expenditure Current Revised Current Revise (1) Goods 1,150,000 1,200,000 100% of foreign expenditures 100% of local expenditures (ex factory cost) and 75% of local expenditures for other items procured locally (2) Works 2,700,000 2,700,000 100% of foreign expenditure and 78% of local expenditure (3) Consultants’ services 1,600,000 1,600,000 75% of expenditures incurred by local consultants and 85% expenditures incurred by foreign consultants (4) Training, workshops and study tours 330,000 360,000 100% (5) Operating costs for: (a) Part D of the Project 210,000 0 (b) Part E.4 640,000 770,000 75% 75% (6) Unallocated 370,000 370,000 TOTAL 7,000,000 7,000,000 Page 7 7 3. The Project was approved on May 20, 2004 and became effective on October 20, 2004. The Project has suffered delays and slow implementation, but commitment of Project funds gained momentum during 2008 and now over 84 percent of Project funds have been committed, 68 percent of the Loan disbursed, and about 77 percent of Project activities completed. The project is moderately satisfactorily progressing towards meeting the revised project objectives, and implementation progress is currently rated moderate satisfactory. 4. The proposed reallocation of Loan proceeds is necessary to allow completion of activities under components B and C, while the proposed reallocation of GEF Grant proceeds is necessary to allow for better use of funds for ongoing and future contracts for goods and services under component D. Although sufficient funds are available in the Loan and GEF Grant accounts, the Borrower’s strict regulations for management of scarce fiscal space under the current economic and financial crisis impose limited funds allocation to the implementing agencies.