55972 v2 Restructuring Status: Archived Restructuring Type: Level two Last modified on date : 07/15/2010 1. Basic Information Project ID & Name P069901: NG-Com Based Urb Dev (FY02) Country Nigeria Task Team Leader Hassan Madu Kida Sector Manager/Director Junaid Kamal Ahmad Country Director Onno Ruhl Original Board Approval Date 06/06/2002 Original Closing Date: 06/30/2009 Current Closing Date 08/31/2011 Proposed Closing Date [if applicable] 08/31/2011 EA Category B-Partial Assessment Revised EA Category B-Partial Assessment-Partial Assessment EA Completion Date 11/01/2000 Revised EA Completion Date 2. Revised Financing Plan (US$) Source Original Revised BORR 27.52 27.52 IDA 110.00 110.00 Total 137.52 137.52 3. Borrower Organization Department Location i 4. Implementing Agency Organization Department Location Akwa Ibom State Government Ministry of Finance Nigeria Bauchi State Government Ministry for Special Duties Nigeria Ebonyi State Government Ministry of Works Nigeria Edo State Government Office of the Governor Nigeria Jigawa State Government Office of the Governor Nigeria Nasarawa State Government Ministy of Urban Nigeria Development Ogun State Government Ministry of Works Nigeria Ondo State Government Capital & Urban Development Nigeria Authority Federal Ministy of Housing and Urban Development Nigeria Urban Development 5. Disbursement Estimates (US$m) Actual amount disbursed as of 07/28/2010 99.79 Fiscal Year Annual Cumulative 2010 0.00 99.79 Total 99.79 6. Policy Exceptions and Safeguard Policies Does the restructured project require any exceptions to Bank policies? N Does the restructured projects trigger any new safeguard policies? If yes, please select N from the checklist below and update ISDS accordingly before submitting the package. 7a. Project Development Objectives/Outcomes Original/Current Project Development Objectives/Outcomes (i) Establish partnerships between communities and their Local Governments (LGs) so that sub-project proposals are developed jointly by them; (ii) deliver basic urban services in poor urban settlements; and (iii) demonstrate viable approaches to infrastructure development and service delivery that enable LGs to move away from a culture of total financial dependency for infrastructure investment and even recurrent infrastructure O&M expenditures. 7b. Revised Project Development Objectives/Outcomes [if applicable] ii iii