Document of The World Bank Report No: 63526-UG RESTRUCTURING PAPER ON A PROPOSED PROJECT RESTRUCTURING OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT MANAGEMENT AND SERVICES DELIVERY PROJECT CREDIT NO. 4372-UG TO THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA June 21, 2011 Urban and Water Unit (AFTUW) Country Department AFCE1 Africa Region Reallocation of Unallocated Proceeds and Extension of Closing Date _______________________________________________________________________ UGANDA — LOCAL GOVERNMENT MANAGEMENT AND SERVICES DELIVERY PROJECT P090867 CREDIT NO. 4372-UG Restructuring Paper 1. This paper presents the background and rationale to (i) reallocate the unallocated credit proceeds and (ii) extend the closing date of the project by 12 months. 2. The unallocated proceeds for UGANDA LOCAL GOVERNMENT MANAGEMENT AND SERVICES DELIVERY PROJECT, Credit No. 4372, P090867 will be reallocated as follows: Category of Expenditures Allocation Expressed in SDR % of Financing Current Revised Current Revised Current Revised (1) Works for: (1) Works for: 100% 100% (a) Part A of the (a) Part A of the 770,000 770,000 Project Project (b) Part B.1 (a) and (b) Part B.1 (a) and 8,290,000 9,265,570 B.1(c) of the Project B.1(c) of the Project (2) Goods, (2) Goods, 100% 100% Consultants’ Consultants’ services services (including (including audits), audits), Training and Training and Operating Costs for: Operating Costs for: (a) Part A of the (a) Part A of the 10,580,000 10,580,000 Project Project (b) Parts B.1(a), (b) Parts B.1(a), 9,690,000 10,807,830 B.1(c), B.2 and C of B.1(c), B.2 and C of the Project the Project (3) CDDGs for (3) CDDGs for 3,190,000 3,190,000 100% of 100% of Subprojects under Subprojects under the the Part B.1(b) of the Part B.1(b) of the amounts amounts Project Project disbursed disbursed (4) Unallocated (4) Unallocated 2,580,000 486,600 2 TOTAL AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT 35,100,000 35,100,000 3. Project Implementation Progress: Project disbursement as of June 21, 2011, stood at US$30.5 million – 55.5 percent of the total IDA credit of US$55 million. The midterm review (MTR) which was conducted in November 2010 concluded that project implementation was on course and that the project will achieve its development objective. However, since project effectiveness was delayed by twelve (12) months because of the Constitutional requirement to have the credit approved by Parliament, the MTR recommended that the project closing date be extended by twelve (12) months to December 31, 2012 to allow the client to complete implementation of project activities. 4. The proposed reallocation of the unallocated creed proceeds is necessary to accommodate (i) increase in cost for Goods, Consultants’ services, Training and Operating Costs from SDR 9,690,000 to SDR 10,807,830 for the additional one year period, and (ii) the need to finance the increase in civil works cost from SDR 8,290,000 to SDR 9,265,570 due to cost increases as a result of delays in the start up of civil works in Northern Uganda. The re-allocation of the SDR 2,093,400 is from the original unallocated category of SDR 2,580,000 of the credit (see table above) and it will not affect the achievement of the project development objective. 5. The most recent Implementation Status and Results (ISR) report for the project rates the overall implementation progress as moderately satisfactory. This is because of the slow progress in the implementation of Component 1 – Support to Public Financial Management Systems Reform Program and the delays in the implementation of civil works for the Support to the North. There are no changes to the original project development objective and basic project design, and the project objective continues to be relevant and achievable. The progress toward achieving the project development objective is rated satisfactory. The overall risk rating is medium high. Because of the twelve months delays in project effectiveness, the end-of the project targets have not been changed, but rolled forward by one year. 6. The proposed extension is necessary to allow Government to complete the implementation of the planned project activities and in particular, to make up for the delays caused by parliamentary approval of the credit, which delayed the effectiveness of the credit by one year. The Borrower has submitted an action plan acceptable to the Bank to complete the project. 7. This will be the first extension of the closing date of the project. 3