Document of The World Bank FOR OFCIAL USE ONLY Report No. 13418 PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT REPUBLIC OF TUNISIA SEVENTH WATER SUPPLY PROJECT (Loan 2368-TUN) AUGUST 2, 1994 Infrastructure Operations Division Maghreb and Iran Department Middle East and North Africa Regional Office This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents ma2 not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. their~~~~~~~ CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Currency Unit Tunisian Dinar, D = 1,000 Millimes D 1 = US$0.92 US$1 = 1.09 MEASURES AND EOUIVALENTS Metric System U.K. System Kilometer (Km) = 0.62 mile (mi) Meter (m) = 3.28 feet (ft) Cubic meter (m3) = 220 gallons (g) Million cubic meters/year (Mm3/year) = 0.603 million gallons per day (mgd) Liter (1) = 0.220 gallon (g) Liters per second (1/sec) = 19,000 gallons per day (gd) GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS AIC = Associations d'Interet Collectif DGR = Direction du G6nie Rural ICB - International Competitive Bidding LCB = Local Competitive Bidding PCR = Project Completion Report SONEDE = Societ6 Nationale d'Exploitation et de Distribution des Eaux LRMC = Long Run Marginal Cost FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY THE WORLD BANK Washington, D.C. 20433 U.S.A Office of Director-General Operations Evaluation August 2, 1994 MEMORANDUM TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS AND THE PRESIDENT SUBJECT: Project Completion Report on Tunisia Seventh Water Supply Project (Loan 2368-TUN) Attached is the 'Project Completion Report on Tunisia - Seventh Water Supply Project (Loan 2368-TUN)" prepared by the Middle East and North Africa Regional Office with Part II provided by the Borrower. The project was a fast follow-up on a similar (National Rural Water Supply Project (Loan 2134-TUN) project and could have benefitted from waiting for lessons drawn from the earlier project. Nevertheless, it met or exceeded its physical targets increasing access to water for rural communities from 46% to 67%. Due to the ever increasing cost of progressively marginal services the sector's financial viability may well be threatened in the future. Appropriate studies for finding solutions are in progress. The outcome of the project is rated as satisfactory, its sustainability as likely, and its institutional development as substantial. The quality of the PCR is very good. No audit is planned. Attachment This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY TUNISIA SEVENTH WATER SUPPLY PROJECT (LOAN 2368-TUN) PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT TABLE OF CONTENT PREFACE .....................i EVALUATION SUMMARY .1.1.......................... Objectives ...................... ii Implementation ......................ii Results ......................... Sustainability ...................... iii Findings and Lessons Learned ..................... iii Overall Project Assessment .................... iv PART I: PROJECT REVIEW FROM BANK'S PERSPECTIVE .... ......... 1 Project Identity ............................................. 1 Background . ............................................... 1 Project Objectives and Description ................................. 2 Project Design and Organization .................................. 3 Project Implementation ........................................ 3 Project Results . ............................................. 5 Project Sustainability ......................................... 8 Bank Performance . ........................................... 8 Borrower Performance ........................................ 9 Project Relationship . .......................................... 9 Consultant Services ......................................... 10 Project Documentation and Data ................................. 10 Lesson Learned . .......................................... 10 PART H: PROJECT REVIEW FROM BORROWER'S PERSPECTIVE ....... 12 Introduction . ............................................. 12 Background .............................................. 13 Project Identity ............................................ 14 Project Design ............................................ 16 Project Execution .......................................... 19 Project Results ............................................ 19 Accoriiplishments .......... . 22 Annexes ....................................... 25 This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. PART III: STATISTICAL ENFORANOR A T........................O. 37 Related Bank Loans ......................................... 38 Project Timetable .......................................... 38 Loan Disbursements ......................................... 39 Disbursements (Chart) ....................................... 40 Project Implementation ....................................... 41 Project Cost .............................................. 42 Project Financing .......................................... 42 Loan Allocation by Category ................................... 43 Project Results ............................................ 44 SONEDE: Actual and Forecast Income Statements from 1983 to 1992 ... ....... 45 SONEDE: Actual and Forecast Cash Flow Statements from 1983 to 1992 ... ..... 46 Status of Covenants ......................................... 47 Staff Inputs .............................................. 48 Mission Data ............................................. 49 TUNISIA SEVENTH WATER SUPPLY PROJECT (LOAN 2368-TUN) PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT PREFACE 1. This is the Project Completion Report (PCR) for the Seventh Water Supply Project, for which Loan 2368-TUN in the amount of US$50.0 million was approved on December 13, 1983. The Loan Agreement was signed on February 7, 1984 and the loan became effective on November 2, 1984. The Loan was closed on June 30, 1993, after two one-year extensions. The Loan was fuUly disbursed and the last disbursement was made on November 10, 1993. 2. The PCR was jointly prepared by the Infrastructure Operations Division, North Africa Department, of the Middle East and North Africa Regional Office (Preface, Evaluation Summary, Parts I and M) and the Borrower (Part II). 3. Preparation of this PCR was started during the last Bank supervision mission of the project in May 1993, finalized during a final mission in December 1993, and is based, inter alia, on the Staff Appraisal Report; the Loan and Project Agreements; supervision reports; quarterly progress reports; correspondence between the Bank and the Borrower; and internal Bank memoranda. - ii - TUNISIA SEVENTH WATER SUPPLY PROJECT (LOAN 2368-TUN) PROTECT COMPLETION REPORT EVALUATION SUMMARY Objectives 1. The project's major objectives were to: (a) provide a larger share of the rural population with public water supply services; (b) assist "Soci6t6 Nationale d'Exploitation et de Distribution des Eaux" (SONEDE) in its efforts to promote adequate operation and maintenance of the rural systems; and (c) assist SONEDE in expanding its organization to cover the design, construction and operation of water supply systems in villages with populations between 100 and 1,500 (para.3.01). Implementation 2. The loan was declared effective eleven months after Board Presentation, and the first disbursement took place one more year later. Implementation started slowly because the project was launched too quickly after the Sixth Water Supply Project (Loan 2134-TUN), which was SONEDE's first experience in the rural sub-sector (para.2.06). The Health Education Program was designed to sensitize the rural population to proper and safe use of the water supply and improve their health conditions. 3. Project implementation was the responsibility of the Studies and New Works Department of SONEDE which, thanks to the skills of its staff, worked efficiently and obtained very good results. The only problem, faced throughout the project implementation, was the difficulty in finalizing bidding documents for ICB, because SONEDE did not use the Bank sample bidding documents. This led to lengthy and unproductive discussions (para.5.05). The Rural Monitoring Unit, established within SONEDE under the project, also performed very well, and succeeded in reducing its staff. The works were completed with a 2.5 year delay, due to the project's slow start, a slowing down in 1989 and 1990, the large number of villages involved and the difficulty in reaching many small and isolated villages throughout the country (para 5.02). 4. The project included a financial and organizational study, to determine the impact of SONEDE's expanded activities in rural areas on its financial situation, and to propose new institutional and financial arrangements. According to Section 2.04 of the Project Agreement, SONEDE had to complete this study by March 31, 1986 (para.6.03). The study was started out in 1986, but was never completed nor submitted to the Bank for review and discussion. It is now being carried out, by Tunisian consultants, as part of the preparation of the Eighth Water Supply Project (para.6.04). Results 5. The project exceeded expectations in meeting its objective of improving access to potable water in the rural areas, as 775 rural water supply systems were built, instead of 634 forecast at appraisal. During project implementation, the percentage of the rural population served by SONEDE increased from 28.3 % to 33 %. Taking into account the rural systems built by the "Direction du Genie Rural" (DGR), during the same period, the overall percentage covered in rural areas jumped from 46% to 67.5%. In addition, 48,000 house connections were installed, compared to 25,000 estimated at appraisal (para.6.02). The project also helped strengthen SONEDE in the planning and implementation of rural projects through its Studies and New Works Department and the new Rural Monitoring Unit (para.6.03). 6. However, the second objective of putting in place new financial and institutional arrangements for operation and maintenance of the water systems in isolated villages was not realized. SONEDE never completed the necessary study (para.4 above) and made no effort to promote the creation of AICs which were to be responsible for operation and maintenance of the water systems in these villages (difficulties owing particularly to the statutes of SONEDE and to the fact that the creation of AICs is the sole responsibility of the Ministry of Agriculture, paras 6.04 and 6.05). On the financial side, SONEDE was not able to satisfactorily meet some of the financial covenants of the legal agreements (para.6.08). Sustainability 7. The development of rural water supply could only be sustainable if SONEDE exploited all possibilities for active participation of local consumers in the operation and maintenance of rural water supply facilities. For this reason, every effort should be made hereafter to promote the creation of AICs, which should take full responsibility for operation and maintenance of the rural systems. SONEDE should also develop least cost technology for rural areas to improve the rural population's access to safe water at an affordable cost (para.7.01). Otherwise, SONEDE's involvement in rural water supply would probably exceed its financial capacity (para.7.02). Findings and Lessons Learned 8. The technical aspects of the project were performed by SONEDE satisfactorily, though with some delays. However, as happens in many developing countries and with many projects, the financial and institutional arrangements were more difficult to implement owing to SONEDE's reluctance to promote AICs or develop appropriate technology for rural areas (para.9.02). On the Bank side, it should be noted that a long and successful dialogue with SONEDE has made the Bank staff too flexible and lenient towards SONEDE's reluctance to recruit consultants, promote AICs and develop appropriate technology (para.8.02). - iv - Overall Project Assessment 9. The project achieved its physical goals, but the institutional and financial objectives were not fully achieved. Overall, the project may be considered satisfactory. PART I TUNISIA SEVENTH WATER SUPPLY PROJECT (LOAN 2368-TUN) PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT PART I: PROJECT REVIEW FROM BANK'S PERSPECTIVE 1. Project identity Name Seventh Water Supply Project Loan Number 2368-TUN Borrower Republic of Tunisia RVP Unit MENA Country Tunisia Sector Water Supply and Sanitation 2. Background 2.01 The Ministry of Agriculture is responsible for the management and allocation of all water resources. In 1975, the Government enacted a "water code" for the regulation of water supply and demand priorities. The code also provided for the establishment of a National Water Committee to assist the Ministry of Agriculture in the management the water resources. The "Soci6t6 Nationale d'Exploitation et de Distribution des Eaux" (SONEDE), an autonomous public entity, under the supervision of the Ministry of Agriculture, is responsible for the production and distribution of water in urban areas and large villages. The "Direction du G6nie Rural" (DGR) is in charge of providing water supply services to rural areas and villages with less than 500 residents. 2.02 Bank involvement in the water supply sector in Tunisia started with the Tunisia Water Supply Project (Ln. 581-TUN), approved on December 3, 1968. A major component of this project was the establishment of SONEDE which, in essence, laid the groundwork for both the rapid improvement of water supply services in Tunisia and the Bank's long, and generally successful, involvement in the sector. This was followed by six successive operations, including the project reviewed in this report (one IDA credit and six IBRD loans). Total lending amounted to US$225 million and by large, all projects were successfully implemented, albeit with some delays. 2.03 Faced with scarce water resources, the Government has given priority to the development of water resources, and has launched a water conservation program to reduce losses and waste which, in the long run, is expected to reduce overall per capita consumption by 15 %. 2.04 The Sixth Water Supply Project (Loan 2134-TUN), approved on April 27, 1982, was the Bank's first involvement in rural water supply in Tunisia. The project, also called National Rural Water Supply Project, consisted of: (a) expansion of existing or construction of - 2 - new water supply systems in 150 villages (population over 500); (b) provision of credit facilities for the financing of house connections; and (c) purchase of 80,000 water meters. The loan was closed on June 30, 1988, after two extensions. The Project Completion Report was issued in September 1989, and a Performance Audit Report was prepared in July 1993. On completion, only 77 out of the planned 150 village schemes had been executed, at considerably higher cost than estimated at appraisal. 2.05 The Seventh Water Supply Project (Loan 2368-TUN), also called Rural Water Supply Development Project, was first discussed with Tunisian officials in Washington, in July 1982, three months before Loan 2134-TUN became effective. The Bank sent a mission to Tunisia in September 1982 to identify a project in the rural water supply sub-sector. A preparation mission took place in February 1983, and the project was appraised in April 1983. Although the Seventh Project was clearly a continuation of the Sixth Project, the loan for which had been declared effective only six months earlier, in October 1982, the SAR only briefly mentions it. 2.06 The Sixth Water Supply Project was the first experience of SONEDE in the rural sub-sector, and it is difficult to understand why the Seventh Project was launched so quickly after the previous one. The slow start of the project is a result of this haste, as the Rural Department of SONEDE, to be established under the project, was not yet operational. In addition, the impact of this rural area water supply development on SONEDE's financial situation was not known. A study on this subject was included in the Seventh Project, but the study was never completed. A new study has now been carried out under the proposed Eighth Water Supply Project and results have been incorporated within the new project. 3. Project Objectives and Description 3.01 Prject Objectives: The project's major objective was to provide a larger share of the rural population with public water supply services (at the time of appraisal, 46% of this population had access to such services, compared to 91 % in urban areas). A second objective was to assist SONEDE in its efforts to promote adequate operation and maintenance of the rural systems. For isolated villages, SONEDE was expected to promote the establishment of water user's associations (AIC), or contract with individuals or existing organizations for the operation and maintenance of the water supply systems in those villages. A third objective was to assist SONEDE in expanding its organization to cover the design, construction and operation of water supply systems in villages with populations between 100 and 1,500. 3.02 Project Description: The project consisted of: (a) installation of piped water supply facilities in about 600 villages with a population between 100 and 1,500, and the recalibration of transmission mains from which the villages would be supplied with water; (b) installation of house connections and related pipe extensions in rural areas; (c) provision of drilling and operational equipment; (d) research, design and testing of new materials and equipment for rural water supply projects; (e) financial and organizational studies, with the objective of formulating an appropriate financial strategy for developing the sector; and (f) a public health education program in the villages to be provided with piped water. 4. Project Design and Organization 4.01 The project concept was developed by SONEDE, with inputs from Bank staff, over a short period of time, from July 1982 to April 1983. This short preparation time can be attributed to the continuing dialogue and close relationship between the Bank and SONEDE, and SONEDE's increasing project preparation and implementation capacity developed during the six preceding loans. In addition, the concept of the project was the same as that of the Sixth Project, with the difference that the population threshold for supplying villages with piped water facilities was lowered to 100 inhabitants from 500. 4.02 The master plans, feasibility and final design studies for new investments in villages were carried out by SONEDE. Taking into account SONEDE's experience and implementation capacity, appraisal responsibility for the sub-projects was delegated to SONEDE. Bank appraisal was limited to the evaluation of SONEDE's management and overall investment program, including the selection of eligibility criteria for sub-projects. The creation of a rural department within SONEDE was requested by the Bank at the time of appraisal. During negotiations, SONEDE submitted a letter confirming the creation of a planning and monitoring unit for rural water supply projects. 5. Project Implementation 5.01 Loan Effectiveness and Project Start-up: The Loan was approved on December 13, 1983 and signed on February 7, 1984. The only condition of effectiveness was the execution of a Project Financing Agreement between the Government and SONEDE. Effectiveness, originally scheduled for June 7, 1984, was postponed to September 10, 1984, then to November 7, 1984, and was finally declared on November 2, 1984. The delay was mainly caused by slowness in approving and ratifying legal documents. The Republic of Tunisia was the Borrower and SONEDE and the Ministry of Public Health (health education program component) were the executing agencies. The Borrower made available the proceeds of the loan to the executing agencies on a grant basis except for amounts allocated for credits to consumers which were relent to SONEDE at the following terms and conditions: repayment in Dinars over a period of 17 years, including four years of grace, at an interest rate of 10.5%. 5.02 Implementation Schedule: Table 4, Part mII, gives the number of sub-projects completed, year by year, compared with those estimated at appraisal. Project implementation was originally scheduled to be completed by December 31, 1989, but started one year behind schedule, partly because of late effectiveness. In addition, from 1989 to 1991, there was a slowing down, clearly shown on the graph, page 3, Part ImI. By closing, the Project had built 775 rural systems, instead of 634 forecast at appraisal, but it took 2.5 more years than forecast at appraisal to complete the project. This is mainly due to the great number of villages involved - 4 - and to the difficulty in reaching many of the small and isolated villages throughout the country. The appraisal schedule seems to have been too optimistic. 5.03 Water tariffs are the same all over Tunisia, which allows cross-subsidization within the sector, but the level of subsidies is not known. With the proposed extension of SONEDE's services to small villages, the subsidies are increasing. To determine the extent to which such cross-subsidization is feasible and its upper limits, a financial and organizational study was to be carried out by SONEDE under the project. It was agreed during negotiations that this study would be completed by March 31, 1986, and submitted to the Government and the Bank one month later. The study was carried out but never completed nor submitted to the Bank. At the time of the Loan Committee meeting, on October 27, 1983, the Senior Vice- President for Operations, requested advancement of this study in order to have its conclusions as soon as possible, and commented that he was skeptical of SONEDE's capacity to conduct the study with its own resources. It would have been a wise decision to take into account these comments. 5.04 A Health Education Program in the villages covered by the Project was also included. It focused on the importance of using potable water and the promotion of user associations to operate and maintain the facilities built under the project. At the beginning, the Ministry of Health was not very interested and this component was not started until 1989. Nevertheless, the Directorate of the "Hygiene du Milieu et Protection de l'Environnement" performed well, and the program was completed in 1993. 5.05 Procurement: After effectiveness, the procurement process started out quickly and proceeded satisfactorily. Pipes, fittings, pumps and related materials were provided through ICB, while contracts for civil works were awarded on the basis of LCB. Through the end of the project, there were long discussions about bidding documents for ICB, because SONEDE never used the Bank Sample Bidding Documents, although the Bank often requested SONEDE to do so. In addition, all the contract awards were reviewed and approved by the Bank which, for hundreds of civil works contracts, imposed a heavy burden on Bank staff. It would have been better to give SONEDE full responsibility for awarding the civil works contracts, and to only control some bidding processes during supervision missions. 5.06 Project Costs: A comparison between the appraisal estimates and the actual costs of the project is given in Part Im, section 5, Table 5.A. The appraisal cost estimate was TD 67.4 million (about US$ 104.4 million), and the actual cost has been TD 72.9 million (about US$ 82.8 million). The main differences were due to the number of water systems built (775 instead of 634 forecast at appraisal), the number of house connections (48,000 instead of 25,000 forecast at appraisal), and to operation equipment which was purchased at the end of the project to use the remaining funds of the Loan. 5.07 Disbursements: In Part Im, Table 3, actual quarterly disbursements of the Loan are compared with the appraisal estimates and the disbursement profile of water and sanitation projects in Tunisia. Disbursements were spread over 10 years. This compares to the profile of - 5 - water supply projects in Tunisia (8.5 years) and to the 7.5 year disbursement period which had been estimated at appraisal. This is due to the fact that the first disbursement took place two years after Board approval, or one year after effectiveness. The original closing date of June 30, 1991 was postponed to June 30, 1992, then to June 30, 1993. By this time the Loan had been fully disbursed with the final disbursements on commitments taking place up to November 10, 1993. 5.08 Credit Allocation: The original allocations by category and the actual disbursements under Loan 2368-TUN are shown in Table 5.C, Part III. There were two formal reallocations, on June 2, 1987 and April 23, 1991, mainly to increase the percentage of reimbursement by the Bank, from 40% to 60%, then 90%, for civil works, and from 60% to 70% and 90% for equipment and materials in local currency. These increases were possible as the result of the Tunisian Dinar/US Dollar depreciation. The TD/US$ exchange rate went from US$0.65 to US$1.02 to TD 1, increasing the amount of the Loan expressed in TD. Cost overruns for Categories 1 (civil works) and 3 (credit to customers) were US$1.5 million and US$2.2 million respectively, the latter because 23,000 more house connections were installed than forecast at appraisal (para. 5.06). 5.09 Project Financing: Because of the depreciation of the Tunisian Dinar against the US Dollar, the Bank Loan financed a higher percentage of the cost and the Government contribution was decreased. The original and actual contributions of the Bank, the Government, SONEDE and the customers are shown in Part m, Table 5.B. In TD, the Bank contribution jumped from 32.3 to 44 million, while that of the Government was reduced from TD 28.6 to 18.7 million. 6. Project Results 6.01 Project Objectives: The Project successfully met its first objective of providing a larger share of the rural population with public water supply services; the percentage of the rural population being served jumped from 46% to 67% between 1983 and 1993, thanks to the water systems built by both the "Direction du G6nie Rural" (DGR) and SONEDE. However, the Project was less successful in assisting SONEDE in its efforts to promote adequate operation and maintenance of the rural systems. The services provided by SONEDE are of excellent quality, but costly. It was proposed that for isolated villages, far from the existing water supply network, SONEDE would promote the establishment of water AICs (para. 3.01) which would retain the responsibility for operation and maintenance. Although this would have reduced its financial burden, SONEDE made no effort in this direction and its current policy is to take over those systems built by the DGR and operated by users' associations. This problem is discussed below (paras. 6.05, 6.06). 6.02 Physical Results: The physical targets of the project were fully achieved or exceeded (para. 5.06), as is shown in Part m, Tables 4 and 6.A. This is due to the efficiency of the Studies and New Works Department and the Rural Planning and Monitoring Unit, established within SONEDE, and to the success of the house connection program that included - 6 - a line of credit to customers. The facilities built under the project are working well, and are well operated and maintained. 6.03 Institutional Performance: On the institutional side, the project objectives were twofold: (a) strengthen SONEDE, the implementing agency, in its operation, maintenance and implementation of the project in rural areas, and (b) promote the creation of AICs responsible for operation and maintenance of the water systems in isolated villages. The first objective was satisfactorily achieved, but as previously mentioned (para. 6.01) the second objective was not and still needs further efforts from the Government and SONEDE. As a matter of fact, SONEDE does not seem to realize how costly it is to develop the rural water sub-sector with the same standards as in urban areas. Water tariffs are the same all over Tunisia. This national tariff allows cross-subsidization within the sector, between large cities, small towns and rural areas. However, the level of subsidies is not known and, with the expansion of SONEDE's services to small villages, the subsidies need to be further increased. According to Section 2.04.b of the Project Agreement, SONEDE was to have carried out and completed by March 31, 1986, a study to determine the cost of providing potable water to rural areas, the extent to which cross-subsidization is feasible, and the impact of rural development on SONEDE's financial situation. 6.04 This study was started in 1986 and the first conclusions were that the cost per m3 of providing water was four times as much in rural areas as in urban. Unfortunately, SONEDE never submitted the study to the Bank for review and discussion, as requested by the Project Agreement, nor used the conclusions of the study to adjust its own policy. This study has been started again in the framework of the Eighth Water Supply Project, now under preparation. The preliminary results already indicate that the long-run marginal cost (LRMC) for providing rural water supply would be two to three times the current average costs and would be a problem for SONEDE's long-term financial viability. 6.05 For the time being, SONEDE's policy is to operate the rural water systems itself, provide every household with a house connection, and to charge for the water consumed at the national rate. As all rural customers use less than 20 m3 per quarter, the rate is TD 0.095 per m3, far below the actual cost. Including rent of the water meter (TD 3), the average bill amounts to TD 5 per quarter. If the rural population was served by standpipes, the water rate would be much higher, TD 0.286 per m3, which is paradoxical. Obviously, the service through house connections is much better, but it is clear that SONEDE cannot bear the incremental cost for the whole country. Up to now, SONEDE has built the cheapest rural systems, in capital cost as well as in operating cost. The systems to be built in the future will be increasingly costly, and their impact on SONEDE's financial situation will be increasingly negative. 6.06 The Law of July 6, 1987 and three Decrees, of October 27, 1987, January 12, 1988, and December 14, 1992 regulate the creation of AICs. There are now about 1,200 existing AICs and 380 applications have been submitted for the creation of new ones, most of them with the help of DGR. Generally, every household served by an AIC pays TD 2 per month for water supply. It is clear that, in its own interest, SONEDE should not try to replace -7- existing AICs but, when possible, make every effort to promote new AICs, as recommended by the Bank at the beginning of the Seventh Water Supply Project. It would be much more efficient for SONEDE to provide bulk water at the entrance of a village, at the rate of TD 0.286 per m3, than to provide every household with potable water at the rate of TD 0.095 per m3 (water supply provided through stand-pipes in rural areas is generally designed and executed by the DGR but maintained by an AIC). A firm decision on the policy to be followed should be made and agreed with the Bank within the framework of the proposed Eighth Water Supply Project. 6.07 Financial Performance: Project accounts were regularly audited by an external auditor, and all reports were received (with some delays) by the Bank. Tables 6B and 6C, Part m, give a summary of SONEDE's income and cash flow statements from 1983 to 1992. The average operating expenses for the period 1983-91 were 16.9% lower than appraisal estimates, and revenue was by 22.2% lower than appraisal estimates. This is the result of average tariff and water consumption being consistently below appraisal estimates. 6.08 Some financial covenants of the Loan and Project Agreements were not satisfactorily fulfilled on a regular basis during Project implementation: (a) at the end of 1993, the Government's arrears amounted to 1 year's worth of billing, and those of the municipalities to 2 years, which was not in compliance with payment being received at "reasonable period after billing", according to the Loan Agreement; (b) the internal cash generation of SONEDE should have been at least 1.5 times the debt service requirement. This was met, but only after taking into account customer contributions; (c) Section 4.04.a of the Project Agreement requires that SONEDE maintain a self- financing ratio of not less than 20%. This covenant was also fulfilled, but again, only by taking into account the customer contributions; (d) the Side Letter No. 3 requires that the self-financing ratio, including the customers' contributions, be not less than 40%. This was fulfilled until 1989. Then, it was 38.3% in 1990, 27.9% in 1991 and 36.5% in 1992. 6.09 Indeed, starting in 1986, debt service requirements became increasingly higher than appraisal estimates due to the devaluation of the dinar, in terms of US$. The increasing cost of debt, which rose from 12.8 % in 1986 to 19.4% in 1992, was due to exchange losses on Bank loans (TD 10.9 million on the average from 1987 to 1992). To close the financing gap, the Government raised its equity contributions, which reached 32% of SONEDE's investments over the period. These developments obviously prevented SONEDE from fulfilling the financial covenants under the Loan, as shown para 6.08 above, and required the reassessment of its tariffs, which is being done under the proposed Eighth Water Supply Project's preparation. -8- 6.10 SONEDE carries out a systematic analysis of the effect of its tariffs on the changes in the consumption patterns of its various consumer groups which provides an excellent planning tool for forecasting future demand. However, due to the uniform national tariff policy, monitoring of the cost of the water in the different regions is carried out rarely, if at all, consequently the economic aspects of the service are paid little or no attention. 7. Project Sustainability 7.01 Maintaining an acceptable level of benefits throughout the economic life of the water supply facilities constructed under the project would require continuous satisfactory maintenance and operation by SONEDE, but the financial constraints caused by the Government's tariff and other policies make it difficult to keep up pressure its maintenance and operation activities. Adequate maintenance and operation of the project facilities are, therefore, at risk. The sustainability of the institutional improvements designed to enable SONEDE to manage its growing involvement in rural water supply is also questionable, due to: (a) absence of technical staff interested in developing least cost technology to improve the rural population's access to safe water at an affordable cost; (b) increasing number of difficulties in supplying water at low cost to small and remote villages; (c) increasing specific investment costs, and operation and management expenses of the facilities in these villages; and (d) inability and lack of interest shown by SONEDE for the creation of AICs. 7.02 It is clear that the development of rural water supply is only be sustainable if SONEDE actively promotes participation of local consumers in the operation and maintenance of rural water supply facilities. For this reason, every effort should be made to facilitate the creation of AICs. Otherwise, SONEDE's involvement in rural water supply will exceed its financial capacity. 8. Bank Performance 8.01 Bank supervision by the Bank was hindered by a high turnover of task managers (four) responsible for the project during its implementation. During the life of the project, a total of 15 successive supervision missions visited Tunisia, at the rate of 2 per year, except in 1986, 1988 and 1990, when there was only one mission per year. The elapsed time between supervision missions reached 16 months from September 1990 to January 1992. It should also be noted that most of the missions were combined with the supervision of other projects: the Sixth Water Supply Project (Loan 2134-TUN), the Sfax Flood Protection Control Project (Loan 2289-TUN) or the Third Urban Sewerage Project (Loan 2255-TUN). About 109.8 staff-weeks were spent on this project over the entire project cycle, which is very low, the average being - 9 - 200 s/w. The details of staff input and missions are given in Part m, section 8, tables 8.A and 8.B. 8.02 During the supervision phase, the Bank appears to have been too lenient with respect to delays in the submission of the organization and financial study, which was finally dropped, and to SONEDE's reluctance to promote AICs and develop and apply appropriate technology for rural water supply. This failure to be more rigorous was probably due to the otherwise productive dialogue and close relationship that has existed between the Bank and SONEDE since 1968. 9. Borrower Performance 9.01 Thanks to the competency of its staff; the performance of the Studies and New Works Department of SONEDE was excellent: the bidding process progressed on schedule, with no problems in concluding contracts and at costs below appraisal estimates, as well as successfully completed the physical works as described earlier (para. 5.06). The Rural Monitoring Unit performed very well, reduced its staff, appraised all the sub-projects and kept a record of their technical data and costs. Quarterly progress reports were submitted to the Bank in a timely manner, but included only financial data on contract expenses throughout project implementation. No written information was prepared on experience acquired in executing the project components, and therefore no lessons could be learned that may be relevant to improve preparation and implementation of other projects. Although the Bank insisted repeatedly on receiving acceptable progress reports, nothing was actually done. 9.02 On the institutional side, the performance of SONEDE has been very poor: it did not respect its commitments as regards (a) the institutional and financial study required by Section 2.04.b of the Project Agreement; (b) the promotion of AICs for operation and maintenance of rural water systems; and (c) the development of appropriate technology for rural water supply. It is clear that, up to now, SONEDE is not interested in using a specific approach for the rural sub-sector: the service provided to small villages is the same as in big cities. An alternative plan of action to SONEDE's assumption of rural water supply systems (para. 6.01, 6.05) should be proposed and developed under the proposed Eighth Water Supply Project to avoid further financial problems for SONEDE. 10. Project Relationship 10.01 SONEDE, the Bank and relevant Government authorities maintained their close relationship developed during the implementation of the six preceding projects. This relationship was beneficial to the achievement of the physical objectives of the project where the Bank responded in a flexible way to SONEDE's requests. However, the Bank should have been more firm in its efforts with SONEDE to build the new institutional arrangements needed to adequately address its increased involvement in rural water supply. Borrower-contractor relationships were good. - 10 - 11L Consultant Services 11.01 SONEDE did not use consultants for appraisal or detailed design of rural sub- projects, but used its own design office which generally performed well for routine works. Nonetheless, the reluctance to employ local or foreign consultants led to failures in: (a) the institutional and financial study, and (b) the development of appropriate technology in rural areas. 12. Project Documentation and Data 12.01 The original documentation for the project was adequate and appropriate. The appraisal report and both legal agreements provided a useful framework for both the Bank and SONEDE throughout project implementation. As mentioned earlier, the quality of information on project implementation provided by SONEDE's progress reports hampered obtaining a detailed overview needed for the PCR. 13. Lessons learned 13.01 The project accomplished its physical goals, but the institutional and financial objectives were not fully achieved. However, as happens in many developing countries and with many projects, the financial and institutional arrangements were more difficult to implement owing to SONEDE's reluctance to promote AICs or develop appropriate technology for rural areas (para.9.02). On the Bank side, it should be noted that a long and successful dialogue with SONEDE has made the Bank staff too flexible and lenient towards SONEDE's reluctance to recruit consultants, promote AICs and develop appropriate technology (para.8.02). - 11 - PART II - 12 - TUNISIA SEVENTH WATER SUPPLY PROJECT (LOAN 2368-TUN) PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT PART II: PROJECT REVIEW FROM BORROWER'S PERSPECTIVE I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Project Completion Report (PCR) is to examine in detail the different stages of appraisal, implementation, execution and completion of the Seventh Water Supply Project, and to draw useful lessons from the experience gained. The PCR is made up of three quite distinct parts, as detailed below. Part I This part will comprise: - A summary of the main events occurring during the execution of the project and an analysis of essential questions of particular interest for the Bank. - A comparison of the actual results of the project with the initial objectives. - An assessment of the performance of the Bank and of the Borrower over the entire project cycle, underscoring decisive initiatives taken (or not taken) by one or the other party and emphasizing the lessons that can be learned. - An initial evaluation of the extent to which the immediate objectives, established in mutual agreement, have been achieved, and of the impact of the project on the Government's policies and on the institutions. Part H (prepared by Borrower) This second part will present: The analysis of the main problems concerning the project and an ex-post evaluation of its execution. An evaluation of the performance of the Bank and of the Borrower during the preparation and execution of the project and a statement of the lessons learned for the future. - 13 - An assessment of the relations between the Bank and the Borrower during the preparation and execution of the project. Part m This consists in a compendium of statistical data covering the main aspects of the operation and of its execution, in particular the estimated costs and disbursements and the indicators regarding the estimated and actual benefits of the project and its economic and financial impact. II. BACKGROUND Since 1968, the year in which SONEDE was established, the Bank has provided the company with financial assistance to accomplish its objectives and has participated in the financing of nine projects which have helped to bring about significant improvements in the sector. In point of fact, at the end of 1991 the percentage of the urban population served was 100%, while that for the rural population was 31.3%. Table I in the Annex of Part HI summarizes the progression, in rural Tunisia, of the main potable water indicators from 1973 to the end of 1991, the period covered by the four development plans executed by SONEDE. We summarize below the key characteristics of these loans: 1968 Loan 581-TUN US$15.0 million - Water supply for Tunis and Sousse 1970 IDA Credit 809-TUN US$10.5 million - Improvement and expansion of the systems in eight regions 1972 Loan 858-TUN US$18.5 million - Water-supply facilities for Credit 329-TUN tourism areas 1974 Loan 989-TUN US$23.0 million - Water supply for Sfax and 62 major rural centers 1977 Loan 1445-TLUN US$21.8 million - Water supply for five northern provinces with cofinancing by the KFD 1979 Sector Loan 1702-TUN US$25.0 million - Village water supply 1982 Sector Loan 2134-TUN US$30.5 million - Water supply in 150 villages with house connections for low- income customers Loan 1431-TUN - Sidi Salem integrated project (raw water for the treatment plants supplying Tunis - 14 - 1984 Loan 2368-TUN US$50.0 million - Potable water supply for 634 rural villages US$193.5 million All these loans and their outcomes are the result of a strong relationship between the Bank and SONEDE, and their mutual agreement on the means and appropriate methods to improve the conditions and quality of service in the water sector and ensure that this sector progresses according to a clear and balanced strategy. mL. IDENTIT OF THE SEVENTH PROJECT 1. Reference IBRD Loan No. 2368 Loan Agreement . February 7, 1984 Effectiveness . November 4, 1984 Closing date: Initial June 30, 1991 Revised June 30, 1992 Actual June 30, 1993 Amount . US$50 million R.V.P. . MENA Borrower : Tunisian Government Sector : Water Supply and Sewerage Subsector . Rural Water Supply 2. Project Description 2.1 Category 1: Works Construction of water-supply systems in about 634 rural villages and if necessary rehabilitation of existing supply systems with a view to supplying neighboring rural localities. The population of these rural localities ranges between 100 and 1,500 persons. 2.2 Category 2: Supplies Supply of pipe and equipment for water supply to rural centers, together with drilling equipment and equipment and materials needed for operation and maintenance of the supply systems. (Parts A,B,C) - 15 - 2.3 Category 3: Grant of loans to residential customers in the rural areas for installation of house connections and related extensions. (Part E) 2.4 Category 4: Execution of a Health Education program, managed by the Ministry of Public Health, in the villages where running water is to be supplied. (Part F) 3. Project Cost and IBRD Financing Execution of the project required investments estimated at TD 67.4 million (inclusive of taxes), the financing of which was partially covered by IBRD by means of a US$50 million loan, the breakdown by project component being as follows: CATEGORY INITIAL ALLOCATION UPDATED ALLOCATION amount allocated expenditures financed amount allocated expenditures financed (in US$) (in US$) June 2, 1987 May 2, 1991 WORKS 19,850,000 40% 19,850,000 60% 90% EQUIPMENT & 20,000,000 100% of the 22,225,312 100% of the 100% of the MATERIALS foreign exchange foreign exchange foreign exchange FOR PARTS A, B expenditures and expenditures and expenditures and & C OF THE 60% of the local 70% of the local 90% of the local PROJECT currency currency currency expenditures expenditures expenditures LOANS TO 5,500,000 50% 7,500,000 50% 50% CUSTOMERS (PART E OF THE PROJECT) _ HEALTH 300,000 100% of the 300,000 100% of the 100% of the EDUCATION foreign exchange foreign exchange foreign exchange (PART F OF THE expenditures and expenditures and expenditures and PROJECT) 60% of the local 70% of the local 70% of the local currency currency currency expenditures expenditures expenditures FEE 124,688 amount due 124,688 amount due amount due under Section under Section under Section 2.05 (a) of the 2.05 (a) of the 2.05 (a) of the Loan Agreement Loan Agreement Loan Agreement UNALLOCATED 4,225,312 _ TOTAL 50,000,000 50,000,000 - 16 - IV. PROJECT DESIGN In 1986 SONEDE carried out a rural strategy study that enabled it to assess its objectives for the period 1986-2000 and the means required to achieve them. The outcome of this study was a realistic proposal to cover 70% of rural households by the year 2000 and an increase in water supply system construction rate rising from 110 to 135 villages per year. The Tunisian Government, wanting to ensure provision of basic necessary infrastructure in rural areas, with water supply constituting a priority component of this infrastructure, requested Bank assistance with financing the remainder of SONEDE's investment program in rural areas, formulated in the Sixth Development Plan for the period 1982-86, and also the program of the Seventh Development Plan for 1987-91. The Bank responded favorably to the Tunisian request, and after an identification mission, followed by an appraisal mission in April 1983, the Bank Board approved, on December 13, 1983, a loan in the foreign exchange amount of US$50 million (Loan 2368-TUN). Total project cost was estimated at about US$104.4 million (TD 67.164 million) for water supply for about 225,000 persons distributed among 634 rural villages without water service; execution of the project was scheduled for 1984-89. This project, which forms the greater part of the rural centers program included in the Seventh Development Plan for 1987-91, consists mainly of: Expansion and development of distribution systems in the rural localities currently served, and creation of new water-supply systems in 634 clearly identified new localities at a total cost of TD 67.364 millon. Of this, TD 57.125 million would be for supplies and works, so that by 1991 coverage of 33.2% would be achieved in rural areas, with a connection rate of 39.3% for a rural population numbering 3,387,000. Provision of loans to low-income urban populations and rural-dwellers for connections to the SONEDE systems. Improvement of consumption metering through procurement of new meters. Development of SONEDE's capabilities for carrying out studies of appropriate technology in rural areas. It should be noted that SONEDE is responsible for selection and appraisal of water-supply subprojects in rural areas, given its experience and execution capacity. The Bank is responsible for, among other things, assessing SONEDE's performance and evaluating its overall investment program, including the preparation and selection of eligibility criteria for subprojects, as defined below, which it does in mutual agreement with SONEDE with a view to standardizing and rationalizing investment decisions. - 17 - Existence of a grouped agglomeration Existence of a connection potential Availability of water resources that are assured in both quality and quantity terms (lg/l S RS S 2g/1) Average capital cost per person, expressed in 1983 prices, as represented by the ratio of the proposed investments in the subproject at 1983 prices and the 1983 population of the village concerned. This average cost must be equal to or less than the 1983 per capita investment cost, termed the eligibility threshold, obtained by means of a mathematical calculation model which relates the per capita investment (explained variable) and the population concerned (explanatory variable). It is generally proportional to the number of inhabitants, as follows: y = axb or y = investment population x = 1983 population a and b are the parameters to be estimated. It has been found that the per capita cost in Tunisia varies from TD 480 for 100 persons to TD 96 for a population of 1,000. The values to be assigned to these parameters were determined following surveys and studies of a sample (a very representative one from the socioeconomic standpoint) of 4,000 unserved localities with populations of between 50 and 2,000 persons. The values arrived at by the calculations for supplying the 634 localities considered were: a = 13,125 and b = -0.6 correlation coefficient between x and y, leading to the following equation: y = 13,125 x -0.6 (see curve in graph) Adoption of these criteria is designed to bring the benefits of this sort of operation to a larger number of rural villages and semi-urban centers of a rural nature. The setting of a ceiling to the capital cost involved is also aimed at limiting the field of choice for subprojects and thereby ensuring a minimum financial return. The project was well designed and despite some delays in its execution, the reasons for which are discussed below, it fully achieved its objectives, as detailed in Section VII. - 18 - SEVENTH IBRD PROJECT ELIGIBILITY CURVE y = Eligibility ratio (I/1) y = 13,125 X x = Population 1983 TUNISIA RURAL WATER SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Per Capita Investment Cost in Villages -= 60 21__2 .. I ____ X -Populaon 1983; 3q83 . . SoaI . e Dst ; - 19 - V. PROJECT EXECUTION According to the execution schedule drawn up at appraisal, the project was to be completed by December 31, 1989. The house connections component was executed promptly by SONEDE, exceeding the appraisal estimated in both quantitative terms (by 95.20% - 48,000 connections completed as against 25,000 estimated) and financially (by 54.87% compared with the initial estimates - TD 12.865 million against an estimated TD 7.984 million). Execution of the water-supply component of Loan No. 2368-TUN, for which the relevant loan agreement was signed on February 7, 1984 and became effective in November 1984, started more hesitantly than programmed but then gathered momentum rapidly as shown by the execution data for the project works component for the period from 1985 to June 1993 detailed below. In point of fact, SONEDE began with the villages that were easiest to supply, because they were the closest to existing facilities or else had their own local resources that were considered adequate in both quantitative and qualitative terms, whereas the others were further from sources of supply and sub projects for them were more difficult to study and execute. Execution of the project was delayed and SONEDE requested and obtained two extensions of the project execution period, the first being of one year, i.e. to June 30, 1992, and the second also of one year, to June 30, 1993, to enable it to continue execution of the water-supply components. However, all goods supplied and services rendered were paid for from loan funds up to November 10, 1993. Execution of the project took nine years from loan effectiveness (November 4, 1984) to final loan closing date, upon full disbursement, in November 1993. The Bank showed significant flexibility in twice allowing increases in the proportion of works, supplies and health education components financed, and in agreeing to finance other operating supplies (leak detectors, limnimeters, etc.) to use up residual loan funds. The delay was caused by the following factors: Late loan effectiveness (nine months after signature) Remoteness of and difficulties of access to many villages Difficulties in locating water resources suitable for supplying the villages, existing resources being either too far away, inadequate or too saline. VI. PROJECT RESULTS SONEDE set up a viable structure, the Rural Centers Division, which ran its rural water supply program adequately and handled the monitoring of the Seventh Project. The tasks assigned to it included: - 20 - Correspondence with EBRD for approval of financing for subprojects, and contracts for supplies and works, all in accordance with Annex I to the Loan Agreement. Monitoring of the progress of the works and of the entry into service of facilities included in rural centers subprojects financed by IBRD. Coordination with IBRD in collaboration with the Loan Department for the management of the loan and administration of the project. Execution of the project's technical components, appraisal of the subprojects and their detailed design, contract awards (in accordance with the loan agreement) and the supervision of installation were carried out efficiently by the SONEDE technical directorates (Studies and Works). No difficulties were experienced with performance of contracts by contractors and suppliers. The connection programs were in fact executed quicker than programmed and SONEDE always provided the Bank with progress reports on schedule, together with the required information concerning the execution of the project. Similarly, financial data on contractual expenditures were forwarded to the Bank throughout the entire project execution period, enabling it to obtain the detailed overall view needed for preparation of the completion report. Finally, it can be affirmed that the experience gained in the execution of the various technical and economic components of the project was positive, in that all reports sent to the Bank were approved. The lesson to be learned from the experience gained during execution of the components of the Seventh Project can be divided into five points: 1. The first point relates to the time taken for procurement, which was six months or longer, starting with the call for bids and concluding with the date of announcement of award of the contract. These times were in fact reduced by two months for works contracts and by one month for supplier contracts, according to a statistical analysis made of 145 calls for bids issued in 1993. One hundred-nineteen were for execution of line-laying and construction of water-supply works, and took only four months to award the contract, while the other 26 were for supplies and took five months. However, to meet its urgent pipe needs for works in progress, SONEDE on occasion resorted to local shopping, in which case the procedure was completed in just three months. 2. The second point relates to water supply for rural localities by simple tapping and extension of lines. In this case, the works are executed by means of a framework contract, the contract being awarded directly to the contractor in the govemorate where the project is to be carried out. This procedure enables an appreciable time saving in that there is no need to go through calls for bids while it also allows execution of several projects of the same type. - 21 - 3. The third point is the methodology used for monitoring the progress of project components; this methodology was established jointly with the Bank and proved most useful, allowing preparation of the quarterly progress reports. 4. The fourth is the creation, encouragement and development of a new generation of contractors to operate in rural areas. The fact is that the old contractors, while having extensive experience in water-supply works, most often have too heavy a workload to be interested in bidding on "a few small projects" to bring water to rural centers. This policy of encouraging new contractors prepared to do this work has been beneficial for SONEDE, since it has enabled the company to carry out several projects in rural areas. 5. The fifth is the emphasis on research, manufacture and testing of appropriate low-cost technology for rural locations. In this context SONEDE has sought to reduce capital costs in rural areas by means of: use of low-cost connections eliminating all unnecessary parts and equipment after the stop valve, such as pipe elbows, reduction after joints, the water cock and reduction of one meter of polyethylene pipe. This means a substantial saving for the customer of TD 15.010 for a connection with a 15-mm diameter meter and TD 34.147 in the case of a 20-mm diameter meter (see Table IX), in relation to a total connection cost, not including the frontage charge, for a minimum of 10 meters estimated at TD 4 per meter for a 15-mm meter and TD 5 per meter for a 20-mm meter. The customer's connection to the stop valve is made by means of a simple copper elbow with two set bolts, one of which is used for the connection to the stop valve and the other for connection to the water cock by means of a reducer (see diagram on pages 26 and 27). The connection of this elbow to the customer's inside fittings, whether copper, galvanized metal or polyethylene, is done by means of well-designed and appropriate joints (see page 27). It has also been decided to eliminate all use of lead pipe in the connections (use of lead has been prohibited in developed countries on account of its toxicity). Application of new materials (PVC) for areas where the soil is corrosive to parts made of cast iron or steel. PVC is presently being tried out in the Hammamet Sud tourism zone (26,000 beds) where 11,710 km of lines with outside diameters of 315, 250, 200 and 160 mm was laid in 1993. Pipe made of this material is very easy to lay; however, the cost of special items is prohibitive. Trials with the Fordilla automatic shut-off faucet were fully satisfactory since use of this type of faucet made it possible to reduce the consumption of the nonconnected population in the low-income neighborhoods by about half. This consumption was measured for four years (1985-88) plus the first quarter of 1989, after which the faucet was broken and no longer usable. Unfortunately, the - 22 - slow and automatic closing of the faucet after release of the volume for which it was set did not meet the needs of the people who wanted a continuous flow for filling their 10- and 20-liter jerrycans. This being the case, SONEDE has not pursued these trials with this type of faucet. It should be noted that their shut-off action continues to work perfectly compared with conventional water cocks, which have to be replaced two to three times a year. To make the Fordilla faucet suitable for the needs to be met, the pushbutton must be strengthened by making it one-piece with the faucet body so that it cannot be twisted or broken off, and the set volume must be increased to enable users to fill their containers quickly. Supply and installation of four windmills to generate electricity for the motor pumps installed in four surface wells in out-of-the-way locations at quite a distance from STEG medium and low-voltage lines, where connection to power would have been costly. The operation of these windmills has given complete satisfaction as regards output and energy saving. Breakdowns are very rare, but should one occur there has never been any problem with maintenance or parts. As to use of polyethylene pipe, studies have shown that installation of this pipe in Tunisia results in prohibitive costs for special items. It has not proven feasible to develop and use other appropriate technologies for rural areas, such as utilization of renewable energy by means of photovoltaic batteries for powering small pumps,a technology applied by STEG for 34-kW rural electrification and irrigation pumps of about 2 kW and also by UNICEF for rural water supply near Kairouan. This new technology works well for low-flow water points. It will certainly be the subject of in-depth studies during execution of the Eighth Project which is currently under preparation. VII. ACCOMPLISHMENTS With the closing of the loan, a provisional balance sheet can be drawn up of the commitments made and actual accomplishments between 1985 and the end of 1993. Thus, out of 777 localities scheduled for service as of the end of June 1993, 775 had been served by October 31, 1993, including 543 rural localities with a combined population of 380,233 (1990) which had been provided with water service by the end of 1992 at a total capital cost of TD 38.47 million. This represents an achievement rate of 85.65 % of the target number of 634 rural localities initially set, and a cost that was only 67.35% of the initial estimate of TD 57.13 million for supplies and works. These 543 localities break down as follows: 488 rural localities taken over and provided with a new potable water infrastructure; and 55 rural localities already possessing water systems which were rehabilitated to permit supply to neighboring rural centers. - 23 - The annual breakdown by governorate of these 543 localities, with their total population and the investments affected are shown in the annex in Table IX, the Annual Summary Table of Rural Centers Provided with Service in the Annex. Over the period 1985-92, volumes consumed and sold rose from 8.6 million m3 to 19.3 million m3, hence an increase of 9.67%, while the number of connected customers went up from 28,600 in 1985 to 122,068 in 1992. Apart from a few exceptions, the differences between the appraisal estimates and the actual figures are acceptable. The impact of all these accomplishments in the rural water-supply field is significant, as is borne out by the chief indicators for rural Tunisia set forth below: - Tunisian rural population (millions) 3.337 - Rural population served (millions) 1.064 - Coverage 31.9% - Connected population (millions) 0.616 - Absolute connection rate 18.5 % - Relative connection rate 57.9 % - Total number of customers 122,068 - Total volume consumed (probable) (m3 millions) 19.300 Finally, the following Annual Summary Tables are presented in the Annex: A General Summary Table (Table II) showing Commitments for Supplies and Works between 1985 and June 30, 1993, Investments Effected up to September 30, 1993, and Disbursements up to November 10, 1993. Two Summary Tables (Tables m and IV) of costs of Supplies Committed between 1985 and June 30, 1993, and those of Investments Effected up to September 30, 1993. Four Summary Tables (Tables V, VI, VII and VII) presenting the cost figures for Works in the Program Studied, Committed and Executed. However, it should be noted that Table V includes, in addition to the annual figures for Works for each program, the annual number of localities involved in each program and the percentage progress compared with the initial estimates (number of localities and costs of works). Furthermore, and to set forth the key features of the execution of the Seventh IBRD Project, four graphs have been attached to these tables showing, respectively: - 24 - the costs of Supplies and Works the costs of Supplies only the cost figures for Works in the Program Studied and Committed and in the Program actually Executed the number of localities for which water supply was studied, committed, executed and brought into service. .:cT-2.W t7 - 25 - ANNEXE Etats Recapitulatifs Annuels (10 tableaux) et 4 graphiques ALIMENTATION EN EAU POTABLE DES CENTRES RURAUX DE. TUNISIE SONEDE ~~~~~~EVOLUTION DES PRINCIPAUJX TNDICATEUJRS DE 1973 A FIN 1991 1 ABL.KA Il IV L PLAd 5V6 PLAN IVI PLAN IVOI PLANI IDESJ.NATION II- I--- I - n-1-1 I jf ~~~~~ ~~~1973 11974 1975 119'76 11977 11978 1979 I1980 11981 5 198 2 f 1983 I 19 84 11985 11986 1 1987 1988 1989 1990 I 99 I 51'OPu1atiLon 2R60 2 .900 I 2932 1 2969 1 3007 1 304 5 3 20803 3122 1 3 182 5 3202 f 324 3 3 3285 I 314S5 3086 1 3131 j 3 177 1 3224 J3262 j 3299 I IHurale ToLaicf f I H I 1 I 1 I I I I I I jPopu..aLion 216 480 1 489 1 560 If 63 0 1 700 1 760 838 1 885 II 941 9 64 11006 8 90 B03 I 854 I 908 953 1 981 I1.033 I R.~r.3lslwm1.,cH I I I I H 1 I I I I I 5TaU.X l.conf 6.76 1 I 8.86 5 2.25 % I 3 I I ------U- H H l-r--------------i- I~~~~~~~I u ITo.u. de 16 116.55 %I 17 % 118,9 H 24 5 1 23 5 24,7 %f 26,8 1 2 8 9 129.4 5 129,7 5 130.6 5 120,3 1 126 1 127,3 1 128.6 1 129.6 5 J30.1 1 131.3 5 5 5dennert.rc ft I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I ll---- ------ i 4-If I I I --I-----11-------i --I 4- ---------HA - --1--- I-I 5rP.pul.Ltion I 77 8 3 f 90 f 110 H 130 1 160 18 0 2 204 1 2 3 0 1 05 J 3 20 1 358 2710 1 255 1 295 1 35' 1 46 1 951 53 1 5foranch6c ~~ H I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ 1- 0 3 Hi H Ii i H i - I-f------ ----]I - 5Taux de DrimnchtH 2 6 9 51 3,21%1 3,07%1 3,71%p 4,32t) S.26%1 5,5411l 6,53%1 7,231ff 9.53%1 9.87%1 10,90%1 8.86%1 8.2611 9,42%1 11.1711 13.8311 IS.18%1 16.7655 5Absolu H I 1 I I 1 H *Taux de IJr-.cht0l6,74 ' 117.3 I18 5 119.6 1 20.6 1 22.9 5 123.7 5 124.3 %1 25.9 5532,2 1 33,2 5 135.6 1 130.3 ' 131.8 1534.6 5 j 39.1 1 (46.8 15GS.S % 152.53 55 5Nombhre ToLal H 8. 70 1 10. 00 I13 ,4 0 1 17. 20 H 20.50 1 23.00 f 23,00 j 24,20 126.70 5 1.,30 136.30 f 39.20 1 28.60 j 31.10 1 40.50 1 48.24 141,73 J j 93.14 5 id IAtlonn(n uI I I H I I I I H I I I III5 5Tau. ACr~rDi0.dufI 3 0.7 1 8.6 1H-0.2% I 23.145 I JNbrecld' .bonn6.s I 5Volusc ToIl,1 H 82 j 87, 8 f93.,5 f 9'7,6 5109.8 I115.7 f 123 f 132,7 1 141 U 150, 2 f158.1 I 164.5 1 170.6 I 179 H184,9 I 197,3 1192,4 1194,5 197.,6 I 1--oo 6,3 ) £ --4 jvoluu.c ConnomptfI 3.9 1 4,2 S.2 f 5,3 5 6,3 f 7.0 f 6,6 1 6,8 I 7,7 H 7,7 f 8sCo 8,5 G ,G 7,1 5 *.4 I 10.6 114,10 12.3 11,60 1 5Taux Accroiss. H 10.8% I ,1 55 -21 513.91 5 jVo1uvw. Conu.g,.rI a - 27 - SONEDE DET 7eme PROJET BIRD D'APPROVISIONNEMENT EN EAU POTABLE MONTANTS DES FOURNITURES ET TRAVAUX (MDT) Annee Engages Executes En service 1985 12,727 1,091 0,359 1986 18,432 8,541 2,700 1987 23,059 16,851 8,044 1988 25,044 22,374 13,540 1989 31,442 25,084 18,922 1990 39,563 31,767 21,057 1991 49,115 41,435 28,836 1992 59,399 48,493 38,474 1993 62,695_ 58,438 1 ENGAGES DE 1985 AU 30 JUIN 1993 MONTANTS DES FOURNITURES ETTRAVAUX: EXECUTES DE 1985 AU 30 SEPTEMBRE 1993 70,000 60,000 I ' 'X DI 50,000 -X J 40.000 / UJ 30,000 , - ,_ z 20.000 -r - U,~ ~ -, ,- z* , - 1 0,000 ,. o * 1 - ; - *- ,- 10,000-7 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 ANNEE - * Engages Executes * En service SEPTIEME PROJET BIRD E'['Ar RECAPI?IULATIF ANNUEL DES INVESTISSEMENTS IRELISES DES FOURNI'MRES FINANCEES PAR hA 131 RD DE 1985 AU 30 SEPTEMBRE 1993 TABLEAU IV r - 111-I I -I I I I I I |EQUIPEMENTS I COMPTTERS A | Toms CAISING PROTrCrTIONS 9 TRACTO-PELLES| TOTAL GNERAI. I I PIECES I I I I I I I ANW-.E I CONDUITES I I lffDRO-ELECr- VITESSE AVEC CREPINES ET I DE I ET MONTAN I I I I SPECIALES I I I I I I I KECANIQUES |ACCESSOIRES ACCESSOiRES CONDUITES 4 EOLIENNES DT I 1 t-t I ~ I _I _I I I II I I I . Il I I I I 1985 88.677 I i I I I I 80.677 0,41 I I l I I I I I I I 1996 4.575.795 30 .398 | 50.446 4 4.656.639 21,15 1981| 8.524.163 152.849 54.661 | j 69.790 | 265.500 9.066.963 42,00 | 1980 10.338.028 152.849 304.641 169.626 532.898 589.608 265-500 1 ]2.353.150 | 57,21 | 1989 J 10.338.028 152.849 I 594.695 I 206.682 I 532.898 678.980 I 268.980 I 12.773.112 59,16 I I 1990 11.238.330 152.849 I 885.093 329.003 532.898 704.654 f 271.489 j 14.114.316 I 65,37 7 1991 | 13.207.492 227.727 | 1.360.334 329.003 | 532.89S | 863.427 401.482 | 16.922.363 j 78,37 I 1992 j 15.342.691 532.338 J 1.595.538 J 329.003 532.8998 1 .358.805 401.482 20.092-755 I 93,06 I | 1993 19.422.953 628.033 1.730.215 329.003 | 532.898 | 3.896.690 401.482 26.949.282 | 124,81 NB: Provisions initiales du montant des fournitures; 21,591 MIT - 29 - SONECE DET 7eme PROJET BIRD D'APPROVISIONNEMENT EN EAU POTABLE MONTANTS DES TRAVAUX (MDT) Ann6e Etudies; Engages Executes 1985 10,480 2,749 1,002 1986 17,878 6,881 3,885 1987 23,388 9,870 7,784 1988 25,903 11,676 10,021 1989 30,434 17,868 12,311 1990 34,679 22,854 17,653 1991 36,249 27,614 24,513 1992 39,950 32,343 28,400 1993 40,658 33,887 31,488 45,000 40,000 ;"_ 35,000 I- o~ ~ ~~ I o 30,000 . . - z 0 - 25,000 , z X 20,000 : U) 15007 / Z- .' .i / z I-15,000 . / ~~ - 10,000 *- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 5.000 ./ 0,000 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 ANNEE * Etudies Eng2a6s Ex\cuzes - En service SEPTIEML PIROJET BIRD PROGRAMME ENGAGE ET FINANCE PARZ LA B'IRD ET.AT RECAPITULATIF ANNUEL ET PAR GOTUVERNOIRAT DES MONTANTS DES MARCHIES TIRAVAUX 1985 AU 30 LTUIN 1993 TAlIIL.AU VI I I ( i~~~ ~ ~~~~~955 1986 1997 1988 1959 1990 1 1~991 1992 I 9 G(NOIVIIRNORAT j montant m Iontant 1 ontant j IMontant I IMonLant K4nL.inL I I40LanL I MonIi.tn Konan I INbreldcs marchonjNbrejdes Mlnrclesjllbreldes l4archealUbreldes marchesINbreldes marcheoNlbrcldcll marclicalNbreldes HarchcoINbrcIlct. M.-~hrvniN1reldcoMacl. I I I Travaux I Travaux I Travaux I Travauix j Travaux I TrOvatix I Travaux I IT0, I Travaux Irovu [TftlRdS I0 I I 5 1 01 0 01 0 11a 0 1 010a 01 1I 0 10 1 01 )ARIANA I0 j J 5 4 1 215.040 IS I 255.1I5S 6 401.232 6 1 401.232 1 I 737.604 18 1 737.604 jlliF34 814(35 I 3 1 I 29.G53 13 1 I956 1 I 79.569 I3 1 79.569 7 422.146 16 1 29.020 116 1 829.020 116 3 529.020 1 1 I iI1 j E 1 2 205.326 131 242.100 141 296.700o 4 1 301-950 1 4 I 301.950 3 30~1-95o 4 I 32H.515 1 25 I1.195-.759 I 25 1 1.391.759 3 INAIWFUI. 1 2 1 92.S52 1161 563.641 1 161 5661 1 16 1 56.4 1 18 776.550 1 30 31.170.900 340 I .G42.394 1 41 I1.0104.679 3 41 1 1.018.679 1 31 1*0A 4 1 262.874 1 4 I 282.7512 11 3 617.969 111 j 642.686 3 15 3 1.438.804 115 1.43.8.84 327 1.897.369 3 27 32.027.976 3 27 3 2.027.976 3JUIM~)1i1A 0 1 131 218.015 1 371 600.822 1371 625.557 3 42 3 935.396 5 48 J .100.806 357 3 1.445.876 3 61 I1.502.!.29 3 7.2 3 2.612.620 1 C 321.. KEI 3 a 3 31 S 9.791 I 3I ISG.028 2 7 5 500.435 5 20 1 9SS.474 3 25 1.20G.3611 321 78 1.286.368 1 28 31.286.368 3 28 3 1.286.368 1 3SII.JhNA 30 3 3 9 3 409.478 1 9 I 409.478 5 13 1 702.521 5 26 1 1.176.521 126 11.176.S21 1 26 1 1.294.316 3 30 3 1.716.421 1 30 3 3.716.421 I/.6rIICXIAN 0) 3 54.288 3 5 5 230.575 15 3 230.S75 36 5 299.591 17 I 398-544 Itl I 606.950 5 12 1 783.500 1 13 3 926-780 3 23 3 926.780 53x!;s.J ~~ 1 13 1 396.660 5 221 971.4S51 22 3 971.451 23 2 1.034.034 ZS5 1.1SG6.63 25 3 1.160.871 3 31 3 1.440.090 3 31 3 1.44515.090 3 31 11.448.090 Im"AS~TIR I 3 1 3 1 3 20 3 213.384 1 20 3 213.304 320 302.581 328 3 302.-581 1 28 1 302.581 5 25 3 102.~1.8 211 302.5813 IMAM12A I6 3 264.239 5 263 780.2719 326 3 788.279 131 1 849.329 Si 513 1.131.453 3 53 3 1.452.002 1 712 3 1.831.045 3 72 31.~831.045 a1 2.016.594 K8AI (RiAN 32 3 134.857 4 157.542 517 3 348.533 1 21 3 S30.377 j21 3 5302.377 3 28 1 1.024.244 164 31.861.1719 3 65 3~ 2.561.179 I65 3 .915.390 XASS KU I N0F. 3 10 366.015 3101 699.466 3 10 1 699.466 I 0 720.956 I 10 3 759.50003 10 3 759.500 J 14 3 976S.7 31 2 4 3 9715.785e JSFAX3 0 39 3 358.960 327 3 484.785 1 30 5 570.283 5 ~3 1.177.550 3 53 1.3 i 7 n.sso I~ 31 1.941.642 1124 I7 2.554.716 112.4 3 2.65-.H4 61 161521 1JOWZill 5 1 379.063 3 161 455.413 5161 458.413 3 17 3 5371.558 5 27 3 949.868 3 293 3 1.010.681 3 30 1 1.365.777 40 I n11.424-197 1 45 1 .614.0493 lGADES I4 I 70a.706 5 9 3 955.741 5 9 3 1.014.578 3 9 1 1.024.575 3 19 3 1.773.025 325 32.206.509 125 1 2.294.503 126 2. 142.1145 3 26 32.341.84h 3xtUhI1.I 0 j 63.162 121 259.680 3 21 496.250 3 2 3 496.150 1 8 3 1.237.7136 323 52.082.98( 15 23 1 2.130.553 3 24 I 2.199.579 324 3. 219)9.!119 3(AF!SA 0 I I I I 3 3 3 85.670 3 3 as55670 i 1 636.737 1 19 5 705.117 3 213 1 163.999 21 763.999 ITOZI-.Uk 3 I I I 1 9 3 418.853 3 10 I 591.342 I 0 5 609.541 I11 I 751.050 1 22 1 751.-050) I 12 I '151 -050 11 761l.050 31*:nENJN1HE o 0 3 1.20 3 4 3 343.317 j 41 343.317 j 4 1 343.317 13 5 1.1715.410 3 1 1.248.466 I17 I 1.245.466 I 15 1.282.520 in 1.282.8z0 ITATAOUIJIK 0 3 3 185.740 16 3 677.738 5 6 3 699.343 16 1 699.343 3 133I 1.065.486 13 1.065.486 129 2. 161.503 29 52.365.S03 5T(I1AI. 3 ~~1 3 72.745.a47 1156 3 6.882.142 1261 3 9.869.729 1297 111.675.821 1414 117.865.426 1504 122.g554.094 1643 12'I.613.882 1752 132. 142.791 1771 113.Ru7l.1718 SEPTIEME PROJTET BIRD PROGRAMME EXECUTE ET FINANCE PAR LA~ BIRD ETAT RECAPITUIATIF ANNUEL ET PAR GOUJVERNORAT DES MONTANTS DES TRAVAUX EXECU'TES DE 1985 AU 30 SEPTEMBRE 1993 TrAIIJ.VAU Vill I I 3~~~~~~~~~~~I985 I 1986 19837 I 1as 19539 j 199(3 1 991 j 3992 j lOTS 1 (2)31V3i(53()ISAr I I ~Montant Montant j lontant MonLant I IMawtanL j OOMa.nt, " Oii.nta I ont .m32 mosia5nL3 I Nbrzc des Tra-auxiNbrelIdes Travauxl bxc Idea TrravauxINbreldon Travaux INbrelIdes TravauxINbre IdeB Travaux I brc ides TravauxjiNbrit crc Tr.ivau.x Nbcc ders Trokvausxi I I I ~~~~~~~~t6m I I F.~~~~~~~~~xecutes ftEee,uiEs I Bxecutda I I Excue I I xecut6s I ExccuL88 I E.xecuL6S I Izccutta I I rUN Is II II II II II II II II II IARIANA4 I 1 207.771 16 I 281.570 I G 360.131 j 6 372.2.74 1 6 1 429.611 I I3SPN AROMIP; j1j 4.228 13 1 61.0331 3 1 62.4710 13 1 G2.470 17 I 118.335 1 13 I 4 41. 675 1(3. *1 9.283 I I 1 J3-.410 ItI33ZKNTriC. 2 1415.199 3 247.526 3 I 2 6 1.2712*J 3 1 266.89S I 4 I 306.672 41 311.486 1 4 I 326.890 1 24 673.803 125 1.269.232 INA1IKUI. 12 1 57.155 116 I 359.369 26 S43.446 116 1 546.903 117 1 75.465 130 1 70.3 38 I 1.066.771 141 j1.479.382 141 I1.656.003 I33EJA 14 I 30.976 1 4 I 231.616 11. 325.146 ii 561 j5.602 111 1 620.796 15Is 1-437.S&12- 1.6.4 1 2 2.012.458 127 I2.128.620I IJENIXMIUA I I I 13 1 141.300 137 1 316-61S j 37 1 593.941 1 39 I 703.421 1 8 979.009 157 j 1.207.235 161 j 1.419.!.4 I 72j 1.587.619I I I. K I I I I 8I 11S.910 j 17 310.867 20 682.470 24 955.6-i9 28 1.1240.569 j 28 11.295.985s I 28I 1. 316. 473 J.'; II. I ANA I I 5 64.104 19 352.475 1 13 494.494 13 I 635.714 26 1.021.453 26 j1.134.2U331 2-7 11. 168..61 130 t1-4 01.1I85! I/.Ac.33(N3AN I I ~~~~I 5 I 146.127 15 I 193.979 1 5 193.979 6 j 258.008 j7 430.690 1I. 677.510 13 1 '154.361 1 3 I 825. 7371 I~~~ 355H 1~~~~~ I fi.194 I17 4141.211 121 94a8-306 j 2 4 9714.362 25 1.094.450 25 1 . 02.B1] I 27- 1.220.82.2 I31 1.406.413 I.11 1.444.948 IHowvr I RI 20 '/7.280 20 j 107.325i 28 j 229.381 J28 2339.0103 27 290.368 213 293.1633 j 2.8 2(11. 3611 IMAIIIIA j3 I 83.711 16 20t.585 26 GS62.1-21 I 31 670.493 42 j 840.422 51 j 1.192 . 2. 6 72 L .614.628 81 1 3.743.7/6! I 83 I 3. oY.083 I KA I (HIAN j2 j 11-1.708 j 2. 140.640 171 278.1308 21 400.543 I21 I 475.382 2n 660.423 6. I, 1.4 01t-227 6!. 11. 29. 4 79 65 1 3.96f. 313Ii 1 I Nl-. I ~~~111.708 I10 j 290.410 1 10 1 694.832 110 1 696.143 110 I 7U6.620 I 0 1 746.506 14 853. 12!, 1 H 893.111 15FAX j 1 9 2 09.812 I27 j 405.800 30 I 584.416 154 I 772..289 154 1 .05.9.440 I1 1.614.609 II1(. I 2.59.93l,11 j34 1 2.586.314 I IIUIII 0OlJ-/.L53 8l 245.887 1 16 1 407.921 j16 1 432.632 117 1 4G0.389 22 I 618.77a 1 29 1 965.961 38 1.426.382 140 1I.S87.552 I 45 I. I./8.537 I IGAIII-S 4 I 265.044 I 9 1 757.836 9 1 1.054.117 19 11.057.087 13 1.075.894 19 1.428.237 1 25 J1 .172 426 I 26; 12 -2.26.86 FIG 26 2.286.023I IKEFnS3 I II FJ 59.058 I2 1 506.799 12 1 509.427 IS 631.361 71 1.0971.124 j22 1 .953.5712 j 23 I 2.071.626 124 I2.142.297 Ic:AYSA I I I 9 144.699 16 508.G20 12 1 708.956 j 21 I 7-08.956 ITO2LURI II II 9 I 194.8111 10 434.309 10 617.858 10I 61G.043 I111 737.086 1 111 747.641 j 1 It 747.641 1 IMM3)F255NH 3 1 220.986 4 I 350.866 1 4 I 350.866 I 3 13 43-7.904 17 1.13S.3G9 17 I 1.321.011 1 18 I 1.331.730 j 18 1 1.380.058 ITATAO3.J3 IIIMP F I 166.580 16 1 416.777 1 6 1 653.776 16 680.584 113 8 52.133 1 3 11.088.7112 I 29 I 1.350.700 129 1 2.034.853 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I I I II ITOTAI, 1 20 11.001.874 1109 I 3.884.68,1 1259 1 '7.784.385 1289 110.020.976 1367 112.311.343 146/1 117.6!52.773 1627 124.513.350 j74fi P8t.399.fl99 I'l-p 131-468.484 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~II KA3IT01I3A 33N..l IfAII (Code inarch6 70.019).dtabli nur d6coupLe proviaolro en 1987 pour 242.441 r91 et C163.ur6 en 1988 our d6cempic uidfiniLif plour 2411.327 Trr iWIr SEPTIEME PROJer BIRD MONTANTS DU BRANCtrEMENT ECONOMIQUE A USAGE DOMESTIQUE PAR DIAMETRE DU COMPTEUR TABLEAU IX MONTANT DU BRANCHEMENT ECONOMIQUE ( DE 4ml) PAR DIAMETRE DU COMPTEUR ET PAR DIAMETRE DE LA CONDUITE DE DISTRIBUTION DIAMETRE DE AVEC OU SANS LES FRAIS DE FACADE D'UNE LONGUEUR MINIMUM POSSIBLE DE 10ml LA CONDUlTE Dl. DISTIBU- COMPTEUR 0 15 mm COMPTEUR 0 20 mm TION SANS FRAIS DE GAIN EN AVAC FRAIS DE GAIN EN SANS FRAIS DE GAIN EN AVAC FRAIS DE GAIN EN (mm) FACADE FACADE (4DT/ml) FACADE % FACADE (5DT/ml) % DT - DT . DT . DT ¢ 80 165,473 9,07 212,273 7,07 238,431 14,32 296,931 11,50 4 100 165,652 9,06 212,452 7,06 238,610 14,31 297,110 11,50 q, 150 168,218 8,92 215,018 7,00 241,176 14,15 299,676 11,40 Prix moyen 166,448 9,02 213,248 7,04 239,406 14,26 297,906 11,46 NB:Montants en DT des accessoirs, non necesaires, situes apres le Robinet d'arret Compteur 0 15mm Compteur b 20mm 2 raccords coud6s 8,638 20,792 Reduction 0,216 0,484 Robinet a bec 1,737 3,163 1 ml de polyethylene 0,565 0,940 TOTAL 11,156 25,379 Divers 15% + TVA 17% = 3,854 9,768 TOTAL GENERAL 15,010 34,147 j:|~r,.i r: ri:zoIi l ir I HRANCII.| HRANCII.| d=15mm' d=20m Tube on cuivre 1-/10/; 20/22 Ecrou prisonnier 20/27 28/34 .. \ . D . Behelle ~~~~~~~~Etuide et Dessixn LI \ \\ I ItclCUpar: JEBII ______ - S1)1 IN.. p!ispnm er ---I ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~-~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~Ecr licolIc 1 et_ d;]'. . 1) - 1. 0 1 < | ~~~~~~~~~~('1, 0 lJ D )E[ D . UlA |CI. BRItANCHti. (I=irGUL1mi d=Z0mmi _ t __._ ___ Tnbe an culvrc lo/ln en/;±z I \ | \\ | . ,Ecro priouonior 20/27 | 6/34 Tube 16 1X8 P50 RACCORD [:RACCORD BEX. RACCORD GALVANISE RACCORD POLYETHYLENE] POLYETHYLENE ; (Cuivre 016/18) DROIT OU GOUDE| DROIT OU COUDE COD - 35 - SONEDE DET 7eme PROJET BIRD D'APPROVISIONNEMENT EN EAU POTABLE NOMBRE DE LOCALITES Annbe Etudie Engag Ex6cut| En service 1985 183 41 28 2 1986 323 156 109 31 1987 390 261 259 113 1988 452 297 289 189 1989 547 414 367 262 1990 661 504 467 300 1991 696 643 627 400 1992 801 752 746 543 1993 818 777 775 900 700j 6U 00- 0 400.TF TF 300 , 200 100 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 ANNEE * Etudi- Engage * Execuie i - En service - 3 7 - P A RT III I - 38 - TUNISIA SEVENTH WATER SUPPLY PROJECT PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT PART III STATISTICAL INFORMATION 1. Related Bank Loans Loan Purpose Approval Status Lo.51-TUN Creatioo of SONEDE 1968 Completed Ln.809-TUN 2ad 'iater Supply Project 1970 Completed Ln.989-TUN 3rd Water Supply Project 1974 Completed Ln.1445-TUN 4th Water Supply Project 1977 Completed Ln.1702-TON 5th Water SUpply Project 1979 Completed Lc.2134-TUN 6th Water Supply Project 1982 Completed To strengthen SONEDE's financial position, espand its rural operations and provide credit for house connections Sfax Flood Protection Proj. To zininize flood damage potential 1983 Completed Ln.2289-TUN in Sfaz and suburbs Third Urban Seweraae Project To rehabilitate and espand existing 1983 Completed Ln.2255-TUN sewerage and stornvater systems in 30 urban centers 2. Project Timetable Planned Revised Actual Date Date Date Identification 09/82 Preparation 09/82-04/83 Appraisal 04/83 Post-appraisal 09/83 Negotiations 11/01/83 Board Approval 12/13/83 Loan Signature 02/07/84 Effectiveness 06/07/84 09/10/84 11/02/84- Credit Closing 06/30/91 06/30/92 06/30/93 Project Completion 12/31/89 12/31/91 06/30/93 --------------------- --------------------- -------------- ----- -- -------------------- -3 , '0 *1 *-.-I *.-, *0 -I C., Q 2'' -Ct 2' -Ct -< -. - .-< Ct -z o to - -n .0 '0 Co cc 0 cc Co I - 0 -a Co - Co Cl Cc Cc o . a o Co "2Cr, Co 2000 C((fl . (cC 020 COO C,<0 20 2.0 tO 10 0.. 2Cc Co 12' 0 CC CC 2' tO t. C C 0 l).I CC CC p. 1 CC 02' Ccl. OCaCCO OOtflltlt OClttttC It. C' CC Cc -I C' CS C 00 2(00Cc Cc' 00 00 fl*Cc Cc-tflCc Cc-I CICc 000Cc Cc-I 00 Cc't 210 00 (5C I - 0 CC It (C 21 - 21 IC -I .* C ft -- Cc Ct ,-1 (p 2' 21' tO CS .-- C ft. tC fl)Ct II CC 2' (C 0. CJ W 2C2. 2rt..J. oc.. 020 tzr2-l. COW OW 020. , 0-2' C Co C020 Co 020. 0 OW 002C2'0 (.0 0 OW o a---- a Co- 0 02.0- 0 Cl, .020 n.- -0.n -a.-- .a-n -n.---.n-a .n.-cc.n to.- Co.IC cc-cc -a.- cc-n c.--Co2.c. .000-Cc , 0 -fl-a .a20,.-.fl OtCc 020 ccn cc Co 0.0 -.0CC' CCIO'0 0-00cc Otfl .00. Cc Cc a 0.0 (.0 (.00.-..-. 0 0.0 -a -acc Co Corn -J 200 a, a.Co 20 .0. I (C CC l-..l C-.. - CS -S a, -.1 a, Co a a (C I , Cc Itt I .0'2' .0.0 .0.0.0.0 OOOC.0*.OC.0.-.-..- a S Coo' flL0. CS Co ..O a,Co .11. C-.Com a-t..aOo.t, Co I--.t-ca, .C '-a*--O a (SI 0Co0CoCoCoCoC S Ia, -0t B -a I I Cc WI I Cc o a a ICC 0 .0.0 0.5.0a,, WOO 020C.020 20202020 20201.0t.0 00.-.. C--C a 0 a a,  a,COCCC 0r..a.- O-Ja,Co Co,0O2aa.aO20r..la- -acca,Co ICcOCoCo .0.0.1.Co 000 a 0 Cc (C a cc 20 20 20 Co .0. Co cc ,..a a .- to .0 Co Co cc ..o a, 20 .0. ,-. 0 cc Cot.. .-.OL..S.a. Co200C-.-.-l- I Cc I 6 -0.0 00C001 00 .00.0120 - .C-C-- Co CCaCcS-.0Co -.tCO.M. Occa,.-., cc.a a,.-ooooto a Co a C'. U.) Cc I 0.1 Cc 0.I I 0 a 0 (C I .0 0 0 flfl COCOO -J ....a,a,a, a'CoCoCoCo.0.0 .0..P- .0.00020.-IC-. S Co a aa I fl cc 20.0C-ICo Co -a o co 0 200 .--a-.0-.0 a, .0. .0 20 0 a, r..a 0 .0 0 CC, 0 CC -a- 20 0 0 0 0 I -. a IcC CD I at -J 0 a, cc 0 a. a,, a, CO C cco.-.20CCt-I.-lt-.2020C-.lr... S 0 Cc cc cc a, a, cc 0 r..a cc t-. a- cc 0 a, .0. 20 a,, in-.., 20 a' r.-S .0. a, a, .0. a. Co Co a, I-., .tO. a, cc (53 .0. .0. .0. .0. S CC a tO a I 0 a B o I Cc CD I a (C Cc Cc a a -c -3 a . Cc o a 20.0.0.0. .0. .0.0 .0.0.2.40 l-.tt02020 20202020 0.0o Cc I 0.00 cc cc.0-..J .-00a' 1.0020-53 0.00.-.. 'fl-JCo0..-a.Co...-2.JO.. I -- a 0 Co Co Co 0 Co 00 0 0 0 0 000 0 000 Ccl 0 000 00 0 0 0 P.O. CD 0 Co Co Co 000 Co 000 Co Co 000 0000 0000 0000 0 Co Co US Dollar zilillhoos C L' 0-- -- 's0LS ' ffiAeSM- =_== _== - __ __ __ wi _0tS2t$;D 0 U. __1- -t -a a.=. =_ht W- = 0-___ +> A - 41 - 4. Project IpDlementation PROJECT EXECUTION 1985 1986 1937 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 Appr. Actu. Appr. Actu. Appr. Actu. Appr. Actu. Appr. Actu. Appr. Actu. Appr. Actu. Appr. Actu. Appr. Actu. Cumulative Investment 5.9 2.7 11.8 17.2 23.7 29.4 41.4 34.7 59.2 37.5 59.2 44.1 59.2 52.6 59.2 58.7 59.2 71.0 iu Dinars million Percent of Estimate 46% 146% 124$ 84% 63% 74% 89% 99% 120% Subprojects coapleted 63 2 127 31 254 113 444 189 540 262 634 300 634 400 634 543 634 775 Percent of Estimate 3S 24% 441 43% 49% 47% 631 861 122% - 42 - 5. Project Cost and Financing A. PROJECT COSTS (TD thousands) Component SAR --------- Estimate Actual Difference Percentage 'Works, Pipe laying 34,402 31,488 (2,914) -8.47% Pipes & Equipment 20,347 21,789 1,442 7.09% Operation Equipment 1,113 5,160 4,047 363.61% Health Education Progran 509 293 (216) -42.46% Sub-Total 56,371 58,730 2,359 4.18% House Connections, Estensions 8,964 12,365 3,401 37.93% Supervision and Studies 1,947 1,735 (212) -10.87% Total Cost: 67,282 72,830 5,548 8.25% Front End Fee 81 81 0 0.00% TOTAL PROJECT COST: 67,363 72,911 5,548 8.24% B. PROJECT FINANCING (US$ thousands) (TD thousands) Initial Actual Balance Initial Actual Balance Budget -------- ------- Budget -------- ------- Baak Loan 2368-TUN 50,000 50,000 0 32,300 44,000 11,700 Government Equity Contribut. 44,300 21,300 (23,000) 28,600 18,700 (9,900) SONEDE Cash Generation 7,200 5,227 (1,973) 4,600 4,644 44 Customers Contributions 2,900 6,326 3,426 1,900 5,567 3,667 Total: 104,400 82,853 (21,547) 67,400 72,911 5,511 - 43 - 5 C: Loan Allocation by Category (in US$) Category Estimate Revised Revised Actual Balance -------- -------- (06/02/87) (04/23/91) 1. Civil Works 19,850,000 19,850,000 19,850,000 21,347,035 1,497,035 Bank Financing 401 60% 90% 2. Equipment & Materials, 20,000,000 22,225,312 22,225,312 20,510,127 510,127 Parts A, B & C. Bank Financ.l00S & 60% 100% & 70% 100% & 90t 3. Credits to castomers 5,500,000 7,500,000 7,500,000 7,724,913 2,224,913 Part E. Bank Financing 50% 50% 50% 4. Equipment Part F 300,000 300,000 300,000 293,237 (6,763) Bank Financing 100% & 601 100% & 70% 100% & 70% 5. Front End Fee 124,688 124,688 124,688 124,688 0 6. Unallocated 4,225,312 (4,225,312) General Total: 50,000,000 50,000,000 50,000,000 50,000,000 0 4 44 6. Project Results A. MONITORING INDICATORS 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 Appr. Actu. Aupr. Actu. Appr. Actu. Appr. Actu. Appr. Actu. Appr. Actu. Appr. Actu. Appr. Actu. Appr. Acta. STA,FIFG Total Staff 4,925 4,300 5,152 4,549 5,331 4,472 5,485 4,341 5,706 4,738 5,917 4,732 6,120 4,884 5053 5274 Staff per 1000 Conn. 7.4 6 7.2 6 7.0 6 6.8 5 6.7 5 6.6 5 6.5 5 5 5 Connections per Staff 157 160 173 188 187 198 204 209 OP ERATIONS 'Water Produced 245 235.9 255 244.9 264 256.4 271 271.1 280 265.8 288 272.3 295 282.5 288.2 2.88.2 (3illions m3/year) Water Sold 177.9 170.6 186.0 176.4 194.4 184.9 202.2 197.3 210.0 192.4 217.3 194.5 223.8 197.6 208.9 208.2 (millions ;3/yvear) Uaaccounted for water27.38 27.68 27.05 27.97 26.36 27.88 25.38 27.22 25 27.61 24.54 28.57 24.13 30.05 27.515 27.75 Connectionstl000 640.6 674 690.6 727 738.6 776 784.1 824 829.1 884 874.1 938 919.1 994.1 1056.4 1098 RURAL SECTOR Rurai Poe.t!000 3,145 3,086 3,131 3,177 3,224 3,262 3,299 3,337 3,375 SONEDE Rural Population 890 803 854 908 953 981 1,033 1,064 1,114 Se-7ed *1000 Service level 28.3% 263 27.3% 28.6 V 29.6% 30.1% 31.3% 31.881 33.00I Coooections2100O 39 42 50.5 48.2 47.7 93.1 'iater Sold iIl1ions o3 7.8 9 7.6 16.27 8.39 14.11 18.55 Villaces served 960 994 1,079 G R. Rural Population 1,041 1,101 1,165 Served * 1000 Service level 31.56% 32.99% 34.51% Service level SONEDE + GR 62.871 64.88% 67.5 1 …-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 45- 6. 3. S0N00: AcIt ualI ;ad Fo:ecs t [ ccoae S2o:- a ft r~ 1983 to 1992 (io zil!!ions of T01 198a3 1 98a4 19 95 196 1 9 I2923 1909 3 29019112 !Sst. Act. !Est. Act. 2st. Ac: .!2st. Act. !Est. A !:. st. Act. E st. Act. IS. Act. !Est. AC',. 2 A:toal AtrSold (~.Ill 161 .] 155.3!170.2 111.i !177.9 1741.] 186.0 176.0 114 .4 125.0 !202.2 197.0 200 9. 273 9. 2. 9. 0. :te 'o 0001 1565.4 562.9 1615.6 616 :665.5 6741.0 715. 7272 76. 753 805.6 224.0 851 .6 884 .0 8 96 . 5939.0 941.6 997.0 21,243.2 A7efige Tarii!iliIIlimes/1312 222 223.3 268 229 270 1,55 2 11I 05a 311 253 2 235 2 7 9 2 35 310 2 325 309 I25 2 30 327 "a:er sales 225. 97 33.1 245 .61 38.4 142.01 441.3 257 .35 45.4 260. 46 49.5 '67.74 54.9270. 35 5 S.6 72.2 61.21i79.33 60.6 2 67.52 M!,tr reto Aot. 2aat 5.4 3.4 2 . 8.62 33. 7:10. 12 4. 9 I1. 6 7 5. 6 23.36 6 . 3 25 . 0 721 6.-35 8.2 18.23 2.9 220.9 9 .3 2 9 . 9 S:-w cottectiot clargas 6. 52 7 .3:7 .81 7 .727. 668 8. 528.14 9 S 803 a 8.4 S 2.23 8.9 2 .82 11 .9 2 9. 3 5 t1 9.9 1 112 1 2 . I iersales tortes 2 2.25 2 .422.51 2 . 21. 09 3.2 23 .5 1 3.7 I 2.02 A 4. 5 4. 6 5.2 518 5.2 5.76 4 . 3 6.3 I I Orscellssaoos 2 ~~~~~3. 1 2.7 I 2. 65 3 .I1 39 5 1.1 24 .29 1.5 I 2 .6 5 .a 5 2 504 2 2.6 2 5.45 1.9 6.9 2 . . . less bad debt ?rovisicass -0.2 -0.3 0. 3 .0.4 2-0.3 35 1.) 3 - 0.4 - -0.3!2-0.4I5 -0 .5 - 2 -. 5 - -.1 0 -.55 -1 .32 -0.63 - I.1 0. 6 -0 .4 I -. 42 '37AL 810197ES: 252. 99 4 8 .6 67.11 5 5 .322. 5 i 1.2 2!85.06 6 4. 4290 .7 70 200 .3 77.6 20 6.1 26.3I 212.04 26.8 I121.45 9 2 .9 9 90 .92 F!rsootel 214 .96 15.7 217.50 25 .9 . :10.3 29.3 123.22 22 226 .33 2 2.8 :2. 2 23.4 13 23. 2 25 .6 237.0 28.2 B 240.62a 30 . 92 4 .2 2 Fi:e1 S 2 3.306 3.7 4 2.31 4 . 4 .04 4.825.287 5.2 26. 72 S.7 I 2 .55 62 . 6.2 2 9.4I 6 .5 210.2I7 6.3 2 6 .6 Ce2ei CaI I 1.49 0 .9 I 2.77 1 .I 2.08 1522. 41 1.3 2 2.7 4 2.423. 0 2. 2 3I. 4 4 2.22 3.76 2.2 . 4.1 3.1 3 .3 !i s!rri a Is 29.09 7.6 9 2. 70 7 .0 I :1.30 S .9210.f3 6.7 I 21.3 0 7 I 21.82 3 7.2 1 212.4 6 8.2 213. 2 4 10.2 1 24.00 7 .3 2 10 .1I Oases 2 2.52 2 .a2 2. 82 2 .2 1.44 3. 8 2.26 4. I 2 I 4.0 515 .36 52 5. 5.3 26.'0 4 .42 6. 79 2.72 2 . 'aece: Purcases 2 0.08 0 .1 I 0.5 0 .52 .I6 i 0.6 20 . 17 0.8 2 .1 7 1.210 .18 I1 2 0.28 1 .32 0.2 0 1.2 2 0.29 1.3 I I.22 .Aftiistr. eztnses a the:! 3.1 . 2.1 6 7 .5:4.8 4. 5 4.86 5 4.2 2 5.2 5 4. 3.67 4.I 6 6. 12 5.2 B S. 51 6.2 3 6.910 4 .2 2 4.92 loss cori tol !:Da3sas -.1 272927. 0 :l.l .:O 2-09-11.3 -51.5 -2 -2.2 - I2-1.0 -7 .9 11.3.1 -8. 24.2 6 -. 8 2 7.92 5~~-tota2: 22~~~~6.4 2 7.3 221.04 3 0. 7 23.70 0.6 240 .49 3 3 I. 25 .23 26..' 250.5 1926.911 46 .7 2 6.55 5.0 5 25.4 7 49.8 5.72 3e~~~rec1acios 2~~~8. 11 9.9 10 . 35 1 1.2 213.32 13.6 15.02 22.35 227.44 15. :19.75 0 6.4 222.11 121. 5 2 I 2.3 15226.00 12.6 2 3.52 0003L 0?OPEA?3G !2?!YS1S: 324.52 3 7.2 41.39 4 1.9 42.21 43.3 255.5! 47 .2 2 6.3 .1 270.7 58.3 279.0 6 65.3 2 86.76 69.5 9 94.5 67.5 2 7 4.32 01A20IICOME 218.46 1 1.4225.72 13.4 3.29 18.0 2 29 .5 27.4 2 27.I 7.3 29.3 19.3 27.1 20.8 2 5. 4 17. 2 2 27.0 15.2 2 66 2S Iccerest earced I 2 .42I.8 2. 2.5: 2.32 3.: 3.2 3.2 For!igs ercnatu losses 222 -. 2 -632 -0.4 2 9.9 2 -0.5 I-0.1 2 -117 2 -2.52 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~2 -0.3:I2 17 I I7.0 1.2222 3.924 4.I 5.I ivc inCo2e belOre co 220.56 2 . 8 17. 0.62 .19 7.629. 26 7.I I 16.4 2.2 212.4 -0.825.66 3 1 3. 4 7 22 14.29 -0.2 2.2 :..Co:t I'll I 0. 4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I II NE0 ICM210 . 56 2 .8 I 27. 1 0.8 1 22.9 7 7. 6 29.26 7.3 22.44 -. 1.1 -. 1.6 19:34 . 1.9 -. . I..H.....H..I.............. ia:kiq ratio2 6 5 76 662 762 67 70.6 S! 65 732 70 74.4 7 71 751 2 I 74 7 5. 3 2 7 2 .2 2 78 21.5 917 Goe:Wtoo rer2t; 2 502 51.9 2 5.6 2 54 54.2 2 58. 6 259.1 I2 60.2 2 - 4 6 - 6. C. SOIEDE: Actual and Forecast Cans' low Statooeuts fina 1983 to 1992 (in illIjocn of TO) 1983 1984 1 M 115 76 ' 1987 1938 1989 1998 1991 1992 !'St. Act, jo-t. Act. tost. Act. !-ESt. Act. EaSt. Act. lEst. Act. lESt. Act. lint. Act. lEnt. Act. Actual SOOFCES 0r FUNDS ........ .............-.........-... ------ ...... ------ - ----I------ ---- ................~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ II Set Incone before lntarest 13.46 11.5 125.72 13.5 124.29 21.1 29.5 27.0 27.3 22.0 129.5 24.0 27.1 26.4 125.4 23.2 27.0 22.1 1 24.3 0a2'eciation 11.11 9.9 110.3$ 11.2 I 13 12.6 15.0 13.86 17.4 15.3 19.1 16.4 22.1 15.6 24.0 15.6 126.0 13.6 18.9 Cbaiuaja 'dockioq capital 12.66 7.6 !8.28 -2.81 2.2 (4.0) 4.4' (2.411 2.0 5.71 5.9 (8.6)1 4.5 1.0I 3.5 (5.0)! 4.2 (5.2)! 1.61 Sub-ontal: 123.91 13.9 121.79 27.5 34.6 29.7 40.16 25.2 142.72 431!43.414 31.8 144.74 46! 45.9 36.8 148.75 35.5 1 44.8 LEES' DEBT SERVICEI IpIIIII .................~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~II 9II ?t:nc:oal ! ~~~7.25 4.5 !112.8 12.8 110.94 10.0 113.91 13.7 15.05 28 .3 14.96 27.1 14.25 26.2 15.4 25.4 15.18 27.1 28.31 13taroa. 17.1 8.3 18.62 9.8 19.4 10.7 110.29 13.4 110.87 14.6 111.15S 14.4 111.4 14 111.89 12.1 112.89 11.3 9.51 NET, CAS1 GENERATIO0. 1 5.3 1 .1 1 3.6 4 .9 114 .3 9 .0 1 1.0 . I1 16 .3 0.1 I 17.3 - 9 .7 19.1 I 5.8 18 .6 -0.7! 2 1.0 - 3.51 7.01 Ico row inq 136 .2 2 4.2 129 .2 1 4 .5 10 .7 20.1 1259 19.2 12 1.2 20.1 I2 20.7 12.7 1 20.0 8 .0 I25.0 7. 01 2 6.0 3.4 5 5.01 C:stosers Contributions I . . . 25176 14 .2 I 5.3 21 .3 1 9.3 2 2. 9 1 9. 15 .5 10 .7 1 11.8 11 . 012. 7 11.9 1 3.7 1 891 Go7erneut Contribaticn 112 .4 13.3 4.3 20. 0 1 8.3 7 .6 1 5.6 3.2 I 10.0 8.0 1 2. 1 17 .5 12. 8 11. 5 11 1.9 14.3 1 12 .7 13.9 1 12.21 TOTAL SOUREES 0F FUNDS 165 . 0 48.4 150.3 51.9 151.0 51.7 1 56.2 05.1 157 .3 51.1 160.3, 36.0 616.6 36.3 I 66. 5 33.3 7 71 .6 27.5 1 33.11 A??LCACIONs laveutneot ~~~~15.2 47.41 50.8 43.6 150.7 49.7 I 5.0 52.! H 158 05.9 1 60. 3 ,4i9 163.0 32.2 165.0 31. 7.0 28.4 I 33.5 Otter lovesto1eat 1 1.0 1.01 -0.5 8.3 0 .3 2.0! 1.2 2.21 -2.7 0.2 O .; 1.1 1-0.4 4.1 LS 1. 14i 1.6 -0.9 I -0.41 'TOTAL APLCTIU ONS 65.0 48.4 150.3 51.9 1 51.0 51.7 1 55.2 51157.3 51 .1 1 60.5 36.0 1 62.6 36.3 166.5 33.3 71.6 27.3 3i.1 Self Financico Ratio witbou 15tllS 2.17 116.37 9.26 126.21 17.10 127.52 12.90 12.94 0 .2 127.41 -21.6 128.49 17.90 126 . 95 - 2 .2 0 19. 34 9 -.5 so 1 6.1 I 1 C:ntc:ers Cotnor:utions I I11I1II Self Financi3g Ratio -iith 129.45 20.92 130.88 32.89 139.37 44.10 142.70 53.90 143.41 51.0 4 2.1-0 0 . 53 444 51.90 142.87 38.3 145.96 27.9 I 26.501 Cuncooer Contributions 0 I De:t S!E7ie Rat!o without I 1.53 1 .10 I1 14 5 1. 20 I11.70 1.33 1 .5 6 2.6 11. 65 0. 37 I 1.66 0.97 11.7 4 1. 12 I 1.6 1. 11 I 1.76& 1.01 I 1.1 2I ECol;.oners Cootribotions IIIII Dent Service Rat'o witla 1 2. 0 1.33 I1 1.5 1. 77 12 .27 2.31 1 2.0 2 1.74 1 2. 01 1. 40 2.3 0. 5 1 3 2.1 6 1. 39 1 i9 1. 4 5 2 .1 1 I. 39 1.9 01 Contoners Concribatioas IIII 1III .-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7. Status of Covenants ! Loan ! Project DESCRIPTION ! DDE DATE ! COMPLIANCE !Aareenent!Agreenent !EACH YEAR ! 3.02 !Payment of Water Bills by Government 12/31 !Not Complied with. Arrears 2 years ! !Departments and Agencies ! !for Municipalities, 1 year for Governi! I I I I I ! ! 3.05.i !Quarterly Progress Reports !Quarterly !Complied with ! ! 3.05.ii !Annual Report on ODeration. Indicators! 06/30 !Not complied with I I I II ! ! 4.02.b IDnaudited Financial Statements ! 06/30 !Complied with ! ! 4.02.b !Annual Audit Report . 09/30 !Complied with ! ! 4.03.a !SONEDE's internal cash generation ! 12/31 !Fulfilled with Customers Contributions! !shall be at least 1.5 times projected ldebt service 3.05 ! 4.04.a !Self-Financiag Ratio of 20% ! 12/31 F.ulJfijled with custcaners ! ! ! ! ! Contrxibutions !Side Letter No.3 ISelt-Financing Ratio of 40% including ! 12/31 !Fulfilled until 1989, then 38.31 in ! !Customer contributions ! !1990, 27.9% in 1991 & 36.5% in 1992 ! ! ! 3.05 ! 4.05.b !Review Water RatEs and Propose ! 11/30 !Fulfilled from 1984 onwards ! Adjustments 3.06 ! lReview with Bank conclusions of the ! 06/30/86 !Not done. Study prepared for the 8th ! ! !Financial and Organizational Study ! !'ater Supply Project 4.02.c ! lAnnual Audit of MOPS Accounts -! 09/30 ! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - 48 - 8. A: Staff ilputs (staff-weeks) FT LE? LENA LEll SPI PCR TOTALS 1953 5.3 8.9 0.6 14.8 1984 20.5 5.6 1.8 27.9 1985 6.4 6.4 1986 3.3 3.3 1987 - .0 8.0 1988 5.1 5.1 1989 9.6 9.6 1990 4.9 4.9 1991 4.6 4.6 1992 5.2 5.2 1993 10.3 10.3 1994 1.7 8.0 9.7 TOTlLS: 5.3 29.4 6.2 60.9 8.0 0.0 109.8 This gives a total oi 109.8 staff-weeks for the entire project cycle. - 49 - 8. B: Missions Data -- ---------------- Rating Stage of Month/ Days in Number of Specialization Number of Overall Project Cycle Year Field persons represented Staff-days Status Identification 09/82 9 2 E.F. 18 n/a Preparation 02/83 7 2 E.F. 14 n/a Appraisal 04/83 16 2 E.F. 32 n/a Post-appraisal 09/83 5 2 E.L. 10 n/a Supervision 1 02/84 11 2 E.E. 22 1 Supervision 2 12/84 15 2 E.F. 30 1 Supervision 3 05/85 12 2 E.F. 24 1 Supervision 4 12/85 18 2 E.F. 36 1 Supervision 5 06/86 10 2 E.F. 20 1 Supervision 6 05/87 13 2 E.F. 26 1 Supervision 7 12/87 10 3 E.F.E. 30 1 Supervision 8 09/88 11 3 E.F.E. 31 2 Supervision 9 08/89 18 I F. 18 2 Supervision 10 10/89 16 1 E. 16 2 Supervision 11 09/90 8 3 E.F.F. 22 2 Supervision 12 01/92 8 I E. 8 2 Supervision 13 09/92 22 1 E. 22 2 Supervision 14 02/93 18 1 F. 18 2 Supervision 15 05/93 23 3 E.F.Ec. 66 2 PCR 12/93 10 1 . E. 10 n/a Total of Mission/Staff Days: 473 Key to specialization: Ec.Economist F. Financial Analyst E. Engineer L. Lawyer N.B.: M.ost of the supervision missions were combined with the supervision of previous projects and, since 1990, with the preparation of the Eighth Water Supply Project. -36 - SEP1IPME PRO31T B.I.R.D ETAT RECAPITUIJAT ,F ANNUEL ET PAR GOUVERJIORAT DES LEITRS R111U1 KIS EN SERVICE DE 1985 A PIN 1992 F- - F ~~~~~~~~~~~~-o----------,--------------------------------- Ir00I3 I I I I I II I I I II I I I II I I I III I I I II I I II I I I ii I I I II I TI I TI 1.T~ 1. T 0070 I I I I I I I 3 21 30161 0167371 I I I I I Il II 11010140] I o II 3001 I I I I- I.......II IIIII"It*1 412..I 6J1I71 I-~~~4~~F4----4 ~-F -F-- ----I-- A -I-----I--l----+-----F- -F F- --F---F--F---+ 4 ---------------- I -A F4------- srs I I I I I I I 10 31 15 2o Iooo * I I I. ' 11 04 16 33 3 I I II I I 1 131I110I12 30 00 410...21 071...70 I I I I I I I I I I Il 5 1 0 1 010 I I3 I31 7 o r 1 0 7 7 1 7 5 0 1 I I II 1 1 1 7 0 . 7 0 1' 4 313 1 0 1 1 3 3 1 7 1 33 6 6 I I I I I I I I I 1 6 1 1400 127g 37 l 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 1 , 0 1 0 365*1 4 0 3 0 'III I 41 0001 21.47 1 I I 'lo sO 1 05610 1 3 1 1 16 1 ' ~ 3 3l0l5-1-1 0 0 1 3 1 10-1 3 1