79798
Water Papers
Water Papers
June 2013
The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Insights from a Review of Fiscal Year 2011
Susanne M. Scheierling and Kimberly N. Lyon
Water Papers are published by the Water Unit, Transport, Water and ICT Department, Sustainable
Development Vice Presidency. Water Papers are available online at www.worldbank.org/water.
Comments should be e-mailed to the authors.
Approving Manager
Julia Bucknall, Sector Manager, TWIWA
Contact Information
The paper is available online at http:www.worldbank.org/water. Authors may also be contacted
through the Water Help Desk at whelpdesk@worldbank.org.
Disclaimer – World Bank
© 2013 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank
1818 H Street NW
Washington DC 20433
Telephone: 202-473-1000
Internet: www.worldbank.org
This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
/ The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not
necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they
represent.
The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries,
colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judg-
ment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or
acceptance of such boundaries.
Rights and Permissions
The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work
without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction
and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant
permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly.
For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete
information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA,
telephone 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, www.copyright.com.
All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office
of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, fax 202-522-2422,
e-mail pubrights@worldbank.org.
iii
Contents
Abbreviations and Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii
Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2. Methodological Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Water-related WBG Managed Commitments for FY02–11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4. Water-related IBRD/IDA Commitments for FY02–11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5. Review of Water-related IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5.1. Main Characteristics of Water-related IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5.2. In-depth Review of Water-related IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
5.2.1. Core Sector and Other Key Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
5.2.2. Crosscutting Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
5.2.3. Additional Key Topics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
6. Review of Water-related ESW/TA Products Delivered in FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
7. Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Annexes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
A. Questionnaire for In-depth Review of Water-related IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11 . . . . . . 41
B. List of Water-related IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11, by Region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
ore Sector and Other Key Indicators for Water-related Subsectors and
C. C
Theme for IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
D. Results for Crosscutting Issues of Designated IBRD and IDA Projects Approved in FY11 . . . . . . 65
E. List of Designated IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11, by Subsector and Theme . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
F. List of Water-related ESW/TA Products Delivered in FY11, by Region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
iv The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
List of Tables
Table 3.1: WBG Managed Commitments to the Water and Related Subsectors, FY02–11 . . . . . 7
Table 5.1: Distribution of Water-related Commitments per Project, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Table 5.2: Water Commitments by Subsector, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Table 5.3: Water-related Projects with Only the Theme Code for
Water Resources Management, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Table 5.4: Water-related Projects Mapped to the Water Sector Board . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Table 5.5: Expected Results for the Core Sector Indicators for Water Supply, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . 19
Table 5.6: Expected Results for the Core Sector Indicators for Sanitation and
Wastewater Treatment, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Table 5.7: Expected Results for the Core Sector Indicators for Irrigation
and Drainage, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Table 5.8: Expected Results for Core Sector Indicators for Hydropower, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Table 5.9: Expected Results for Other Key Indicators for Hydropower, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Table 5.10: Expected Results for the Key Indicators for Flood Protection, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Table 5.11: Expected Results for the Key Indicators for Water Resources
Management, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Table 5.12: Designated Water Projects Mapped to Sector Boards Other Than Water, FY11 . . . . 23
Table 5.13: Water Resources Analysis in Designated Water Projects, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Table 5.14: Analysis of Longer-term Water Availability in Designated Water Projects, FY11 . . . . 25
Table 5.15: Pollution-related Activities in Designated Water Projects, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Table 5.16: Demand Management in Designated Water Projects, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Table 5.17: Water-specific Issues in Designated Water Projects, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Table 5.18: Financing for Designated Water Projects, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Table 5.19: Financial and Economic Analysis in Designated Water Projects, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Table 5.20: Cost Recovery in Designated Water Projects, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Table 5.21: Monitoring and Evaluation in Designated Water Projects, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Table 5.22: Social Issues in Designated Water Projects, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Table 5.23: Other Issues in Designated Water Projects, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Table 5.24: Poverty-focus in Designated Water Projects by Subsector, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Table 5.25: Gender Integration in Designated Water Projects by Subsector, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Table 5.26: Climate Change Adaptation in Designated Water Projects by Subsector, FY11 . . . . 31
Table 5.27: Cost Recovery in Designated Water Projects by Subsector, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
List of Figures
Figure 4.1: Water-related Commitments by Region, FY02–11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Figure 4.2: Cumulative Lending for the Top Ten Borrowing Countries, FY02–11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Figure 4.3: Water-related Commitments by Subsector, FY02–11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Figure 5.1: Distribution of Water-related Commitments per Project, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Contents v
Figure 5.2: Water-related Commitments by Region, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Figure 5.3: Water-related Projects by Region, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Figure 5.4: Commitments for the Top Ten Borrowing Countries, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Figure 5.5: Water Commitments by Sector Code, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Figure 5.6: Subsector Commitments by Region, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Figure 5.7: Theme Code Commitments by Region, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Figure 5.8: Water Commitments by Sector Board, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Figure 5.9: Water-related Projects by Sector Board, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Figure 5.10: Water-related IBRD vs. IDA Commitments, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Figure 5.11: Distribution of Water-related IBRD and IDA Commitments per Project, FY11 . . . . . . 17
Figure 5.12: Water-related IBRD vs. IDA Water Commitments by Region, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Figure 5.13: Water Commitments by Lending Instrument, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Figure 6.1: Water-related Expenditures for ESW and TA Products, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Figure 6.2: Water-related ESW and TA Expenditure by Region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Figure 6.3: Water-related ESW Expenditure by Region, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Figure 6.4: ESW Products by Region, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Figure 6.5: Water-related TA Expenditures by Region, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Figure 6.6: TA Products by Region, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Figure 6.7: Water-related ESW Expenditure by Sector Board, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Figure 6.8: Water-related TA Expenditure by Sector Board, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Figure 6.9: Water-related ESW and TA Expenditures by Top Ten Countries, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Figure 6.10: Water-related Expenditures for ESW and TA Products by Source, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . 36
Figure 6.11: Water-related ESW and TA Expenditure by Source and Region, FY11 . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
vi The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Acknowledgements
This report was prepared by Susanne M. Scheierling (Task Team Leader, TWIWA) and Kimberly N.
Lyon (TWIWA) as part of a study on “Reviewing the World Bank’s Water Portfolio�? (P123334) in the
Water Anchor of the World Bank. The work was carried out in collaboration with Supriya Kulkarni
(Consultant) and Gabriel Goodliffe (Consultant). The review was prepared under the overall guidance
of Julia Bucknall (Sector Manager, TWIWA). The team would like to thank Sanjiva Cooke (AES), Sylvia
Michele Diez (TWI), and Avjeet Singh (SDNRE) for generously providing advice throughout the prepa-
ration of the portfolio review. Rikard Liden (TWIWA) and Marcus Wijnen (TWIWA) advised on selected
indicators. Victoria Zabolotnyi (CNGSF) helped with water-related IFC data. Comments on the study’s
concept note were provided by the peer reviewers Vijay Jagannathan (EASIN), Karin Kemper (LCSEN),
Jock Anderson (AES), and William Kingdom (SASDU). The Water Sector Board under the leadership of
Jose Luis Irigoyen (TWI) also provided valuable guidance.
An earlier version of the report was shared with the members of the Water Sector Board in June 2012,
and posted on the Bank’s internal website to provide information to the members of the Water Practice
and beyond. In July 2012, an expanded version of the report was discussed with the Quality Working
Group set up by the Water Sector Board, comprising Rita Cestti (OPCQC), Martin Gambrill (SASDU),
Wambui Gichuri (LCSUW), Yoshiyuki Imamura (EASWE), IJsbrand de Jonghe (ECSS1), Marie-Laure
Lajaunie (LCSEN), Sanjay Pahuja (SASDI), Eddy Perez (TWIWP), Gustavo Saltiel (AFTWR), Michael
Toman (DECEE), and Caroline van den Berg (MNSWA). In November 2012, an improved version of
the report was presented to the Water Sector Board, and discussed in a review meeting of the Quality
Working Group. This report incorporates the many helpful comments received from the members of
the Water Sector Board and the Quality Working Group. Financial support from the Water Partnership
Program (WPP) for carrying out the portfolio review of the water sector is gratefully acknowledged.
vii
Abbreviations and Acronyms
AAA Analytic and Advisory Activities IBRD International Bank for Recon-
AFR Africa Region struction and Development
AES Agriculture and Environmental ICR Implementation Completion
Services Department Report
AI Irrigation and Drainage (Sector ICT Information and Communication
Code) Technology
ARD Agriculture and Rural Develop- I&D Irrigation and Drainage
ment Department (now AES) IDA International Development
APL Adaptable Program Loan Association
BB Bank Budget IEG Independent Evaluation Group
BOD Biochemical Oxygen Demand IFC International Finance Corporation
BW Public Administration – Water, ISR Implementation Status and
Sanitation and Flood Protection Results Report
(Sector Code) LCR Latin America and Caribbean
CSI Core Sector Indicator Region
DPL Development Policy Loan LH Large Hydropower (Sector Code)
EAP East Asia and Pacific Region M&E Monitoring and Evaluation
ECA Europe and Central Asia Region MNA Middle East and North Africa
Region
EMT Energy and Mining
MIGA Multilateral Investment Guaran-
ENV Environment
tee Agency
ERL Emergency Recovery Loan
MW Megawatt
ESW Economic and Sector Work
OSB Other Sector Board
FIL Financial Intermediary Loan
OPCS Operations Policy and Country
FBS Fee-based Service
Services
FY Fiscal Year
PAD Project Appraisal Document
GEF Global Environment Fund
PPP Public-private Partnership
GW Gigawatt
PREM Poverty Reduction and Economic
HE Health Management Network
viii The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
SAR South Asia Region WAT Water
SDV Social Development WBG World Bank Group
SIL Specific Investment Loan WC Water Supply (Sector Code)
SIM Sector Investment and WD Flood Protection (Sector Code)
Maintenance Loan WRM Water Resources Management
TA Technical Assistance WS Sewerage (Sector Code)
TF Trust Fund WSS Water Supply and Sanitation
TR Transport WT Wastewater Collection and
TTL Task Team Leader Transportation (Sector Code)
TWI Transport, Water and ICT WV Wastewater Treatment and
Department Disposal (Sector Code)
TWIWA Water Anchor WZ General Water, Sanitation and
UD Urban Development Flood Protection (Sector Code)
WA Sanitation (Sector Code)
ix
Executive Summary
A
study initiated by the Water Anchor with advisory activities (AAA), in particular economic
the encouragement of the Water Sector and sector work (ESW) and technical assistance
Board in fiscal year (FY) 12 envisioned (TA), delivered in FY11. The focus of the report
that more in-depth reviews of the World Bank’s is on the new IBRD and IDA commitments in
water portfolio be carried out on an annual basis. FY11, which are analyzed not only based on data
Going beyond the usual analysis of data from the provided in the World Bank’s project database
World Bank’s project database, these reviews but also with data generated by reviewing the
would provide better insights into the work car- Project Appraisal Documents (PADs) using a
ried out in the water sector, inform about portfo- newly developed questionnaire.
lio trends, report on the World Bank’s core sector Some of the key findings of the FY11 review
indicators and other strategic themes, and help are the following:
support the Water Anchor and the Water Sec-
tor Board in sector strategy development. The �?�? Water-related IBRD and IDA commit-
reviews would also provide guidance to other ments comprised about 95% of the
important functions, such as areas on which to overall WBG managed commitments
focus the outreach of the Water Anchor to the for water. From FY02 to FY11 they grew
Bank-wide Water Practice and knowledge and more than five-fold, from US$1.3 billion
learning activities. This report presents insights to US$7.4 billion—largely driven by
from the FY11 review of the World Bank’s water increased commitments for water sup-
portfolio. In the next phase, a detailed review ply and sanitation.
of the FY12 water portfolio and possibly other �?�? In FY11 a total of 105 water-related IBRD
activities will be carried out. and IDA projects were approved. Com-
This report on the FY11 review of the World mitments by region were largest for the
Bank’s water portfolio includes a methodological East Asia and Pacific Region (EAP) and
section followed by reviews of four broad areas: the South Asia Region (SAR) with 30%
the water related commitments managed by and 29%, respectively. With regard to the
the World Bank Group (WBG) for FY02–11; the number of projects, Africa was by far the
water-related commitments of the International leading Region with 33 projects.
Bank for Reconstruction and Development �?�? Of the 105 water-related projects, only
(IBRD) and of the International Development 22% were mapped to the Water Sector
Association (IDA) for FY02–11; water-related Board (WAT)—and most of these were
projects approved in FY11; and analytic and water supply and sanitation projects.
x The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Almost all of the irrigation and drainage The findings from the review of water-related
projects were mapped to the Agriculture projects approved in FY11 suggest that it may be
and Rural Development (ARD) Sector worthwhile for the Water Anchor to make more
Board, and all hydropower projects to the efforts to reach out to the Task Team Leaders
Energy and Mining (EMT) Sector Board. (TTLs) that are responsible for water-related proj-
Flood protection projects tended to be ects and AAA products that are not mapped to
mapped to the Urban Development (UD) the Water Sector Board. To ensure that projects
Sector Board. do better in addressing the key issues of poverty,
�?�? With regard to the World Bank’s core sec- gender, climate change, and cost recovery, the
tor indicators, the 105 water-related proj- Water Anchor could collaborate more closely
ects approved in FY11 were expected to with TTLs of projects in the pipeline, discuss the
provide 5.1 million people with access to issues’ relevance, and provide support as neces-
improved water sources, and 2.7 million sary. It may be further important for the Water
people with access to improved sanita- Sector Board to strengthen its work across sec-
tion. In addition, an area of 2.0 million ha tors on water-related issues and to collaborate
of land was expected to be provided with more closely with other Sector Boards such as
new or improved irrigation and drainage ARD, EMT, UD, and ENV.
services. Based on the experience of the FY11 port-
�?�? Of the 105 water-related projects, 63 folio review, it is recommended that—not in the
projects were considered “designated,�? least to help identify trends in the World Bank’s
i.e., more than 33% of their total com- water portfolio—the next phase should follow
mitments were water-related, and no the same methodological approach and also
non-water-related code had a larger cover the four broad areas. Areas for possible
share in total commitments than the expansion and/or improvement of the review
water-related codes. Of the designated under the next phase include the following:
projects, 53% had an explicit poverty
focus, 52% were gender-informed, 25% �?�? For water–related projects approved in
address adaptation to climate change/ FY12, more in-depth qualitative reviews
climate variability, and 67% included cost of aspects in each of the four subsectors
recovery in their design. could be initiated in collaboration with
�?�? AAA delivered in FY11 included 73 ESW the respective thematic groups. Lessons
and 69 TA products, amounting to a total could be learned from ARD’s approach of
expenditure of US$21.6 million. Trust involving thematic groups in the annual
funds contributed 61% of that amount. portfolio review.
The Water Sector Board was the most �?�? For water-related ESW and TA products
important Sector Board, but accounted delivered in FY12, efforts should be
for less than half of the AAA expenditure. undertaken to qualitatively analyze
Other important Sector Boards were them with regard to their respective
Environment (ENV), UD and ARD. themes and key contributions. A more
in-depth review could be carried out in
collaboration with the respective the-
matic groups.
Chapter 1
1
Introduction
A
s part of the Transport, Water, and Infor- Bank’s internal project database. They comprise
mation and Communication and Technol- an analysis of the portfolio performance by water
ogy Department (TWI) in the Sustainable subsector and the sector overall, the approvals
Development Network of the World Bank, the 1
of the last fiscal year (FY) and the lending pipe-
Water Anchor is a unit that integrates the various line for the ongoing FY, the development of the
water subsectors, including water supply and AAA program, and the outcomes of the ratings
sanitation, agricultural water management of water projects by the Independent Evaluation
(including irrigation and drainage), hydropower, Group (IEG) of the World Bank Group (WBG).3
flood protection, and water resources manage- As the need arises, the Water Anchor and
ment. One of the core tasks of the Water Anchor other units and Departments in the World Bank
is to act as the secretariat of the Water Sector carry out more detailed portfolio reviews on
Board, which is headed by the Director of TWI specific water topics. For example, the Water
and includes the Sector Managers of units in Anchor carried out an in-depth portfolio review
the World Bank dealing with water subsectors. of the water sector in 2009 that covered the
Another core task of the Water Anchor is to key characteristics and the performance of
review the portfolio in the water sector; this is the portfolio that was under implementation
in support of “quality enhancement�? of lending at that time. In 2010, IEG published “Water and
activities as well as the outcomes of analytic and Development�? with the results of an evaluation
advisory activities (AAA) —one of the central
2
of World Bank support to the water sector from
functions of the Water Sector Board. 1997–2007 (IEG 2010). A more limited review
Different portfolio reviews of the water sec- of the water portfolio was carried out in 2010 in
tor are currently being carried out. TWI conducts connection with the update of the water strategy
quarterly and yearly reviews of the overall water “Sustaining Water for All in a Changing Climate:
portfolio. These reviews are based on informa- Water Resources Sector Strategy Implementa-
tion that is readily available from the World tion Progress Report�? (World Bank Group 2010).
1
The World Bank includes the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the International
Development Association (IDA).
2
Analytic and advisory activities (AAA) include economic and sector work (ESW) and non-lending technical assistance
(TA). They may comprise major stand-alone reports or single technical assistance engagements with clients or other
development partners. They may also be “just-in-time�? advice or be part of a larger umbrella program.
3
The World Bank Group (WBG) includes, besides IBRD and IDA, the International Finance Corporation (IFC), the Multilat-
eral Investment Guarantee Agency (MICA), and the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID).
2 The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
In the last couple of years, as part of Economic improve upon and expand the portfolio reviews
and Sector Work (ESW), the Water Anchor currently carried out by TWI. This approach
carried out portfolio reviews that focused on would provide better insight into the work car-
particular aspects of water resources manage- ried out on water, inform the Water Sector Board
ment. These included a review of projects that and the Water Practice of portfolio trends, report
addressed improved water management in on the World Bank’s core sector indicators, and
rainfed agriculture during FY99–08 (Scheier- contribute to tracking implementation of the
ling et al. 2010a), and projects that promoted World Bank Group’s Water Resources Sector
wastewater reuse in agriculture during Strategy as well as other strategies that touch
FY99–09 (Scheierling et al. 2010b). In addition, upon the water sector. If carried out over several
an in-depth review of watershed management years, such a portfolio review would help assess
projects implemented during the period from trends in the nature of the projects, highlight
1990 to 2004 was carried out (Darghouth et changing themes, and identify interesting inno-
al., 2008). Currently a study is underway that vations in the water sector. Finally, it would help
reviews water supply and sanitation projects support the Water Anchor and the Water Sector
approved in the period FY09–11 with regard to Board in sector strategy development as well as
poor-inclusive indicators. As part of the ongo- provide guidance to other important functions,
ing gender work in the Water Anchor, the water such as with regard to areas on which to focus
supply and sanitation projects approved during the outreach of the Water Anchor to the Bank-
FY09–11 are also analyzed with regard to the wide Water Practice and knowledge and learning
extent to which they are gender-informed. activities. This report presents insights from the
Different units and Departments in the World FY11 review of the World Bank’s water portfolio.
Bank carry out portfolio reviews using different The aim of this report is to go beyond the
approaches and levels of detail. The Agriculture reviews currently conducted by TWI so as to
and Rural Development Department (ARD) car- provide deeper insight into the status of the
ries out what is probably the most ambitious and World Bank’s water portfolio. This includes the
in-depth sector portfolio review. For more than
4
presentation of results from reviews of four broad
ten years, a designated team has been reviewing areas, including (i) water-related commitments
the agricultural and rural development portfolio managed by WBG for FY02–11; (ii) water-related
on an annual basis and continually improving commitments of the International Bank for
the process. ARD’s thematic groups 5
carry Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the
out related and more specific reviews of their International Development Association (IDA) for
particular subsectors. The results of the overall FY02–11; (iii) new water-related commitments in
exercise are summarized in an annual report. FY11; and (iv) AAA products, in particular eco-
It is reviewed by a Bank-wide Portfolio Quality nomic sector work (ESW) and technical assis-
Group (of which the Water Anchor is a member), tance (TA) delivered in FY11. The focus of the
discussed in the ARD Sector Board, and then report is on the new IBRD and IDA commitments
widely distributed within the World Bank.
With the encouragement of the Water Sector
Board, the Water Anchor decided to move into the
4
In FY13, ARD became the Agriculture and Environmen-
tal Services Department (AES).
direction of ARD’s practice and initiated a study 5
Thematic groups in the World Bank are groups of people
for carrying out more in-depth portfolio reviews interested in and/or working on a common subject. They
may have external partners, and use email distribution
of the water sector on an annual basis. This would lists, websites and other means for knowledge sharing.
Introduction 3
in FY11 which are analyzed not only based on period. Chapter 5 focuses on the water-related
data provided in the World Bank’s internal proj- IBRD and IDA projects approved in FY11: first, by
ect database but also based on data generated highlighting their main characteristics in Section
by reviewing the Project Appraisal Documents 5.1 and, second, by presenting the results of more
(PADs) with a newly developed questionnaire. in-depth reviews of selected aspects in Section
The report is organized as follows: An out- 5.2—including the World Bank’s core sector
line of the methodological approach of the FY11 indicators and other key indicators, crosscutting
water portfolio review is provided in Chapter 2. issues, and additional key topics. The water-
Chapter 3 analyzes the trends in water-related related ESW and TA products delivered in FY11
WBG managed commitments for FY02 to FY11, are reviewed in Chapter 6. Chapter 7 follows this
and Chapter 4 the trends in water-related IBRD with conclusions and some recommendations
and IDA commitments over the same ten-year for the next phase of the water portfolio review.
Chapter 2
4
Methodological Approach
T
he methodological approach for the FY11 The sector codes for the water and related
portfolio review was developed in close subsectors include:
collaboration with three teams: staff in
TWI who have been involved in preparing the �?�? AI Irrigation and Drainage
quarterly and annual reviews of the water port- �?�? BW Public Administration – Water,
folio, the portfolio review group in ARD, and IEG Sanitation and Flood Protection
staff who had reviewed the Bank’s water projects �?�? LH Hydropower6
for the period FY1997–2007 (IEG, 2010). Lessons �?�? WA Sanitation
of the water-related portfolio reviews that were �?�? WC Water Supply
recently carried out by the Water Anchor (see �?�? WD Flood Protection
the Introduction) were also taken into account in �?�? WS Sewerage7
the development of the approach. �?�? WT Wastewater Collection and
The methodological approach that was then Transportation
designed for carrying out the FY11 portfolio review �?�? WV Wastewater Treatment and
consisted of six steps. The first step was the defini- Disposal
tion of the universe of projects and products for the �?�? WZ General Water, Sanitation and
review. The definition needed to consider the dif- Flood Protection
ferent water subsectors, and the associated sec-
tor and thematic codes that the World Bank uses The theme code for water and related sub-
to classify projects. Based on guidance by TWI sectors comprises:
and the ARD portfolio review group, the universe
of projects was defined as including all projects �?�? 85 Water resources management
with the sector and/or theme codes mentioned
below. The universe thus included projects and As a second step, a choice regarding the
products mapped to the Water Sector Board as subset of the universe of projects and products
well as projects and products mapped to Sector was required for some of the six areas of the
Boards that cover other sectors. portfolio review. Whenever possible, for example
6
The LH code was adopted in FY11. Earlier, hydropower projects were coded with: LD Power or LE Renewable Energy.
7
Starting FY12, the WS code was replaced by: WT Wastewater Collection and Transportation, and: WV Wastewater
Treatment and Disposal. Most projects approved in FY11 were already retrofitted with the new codes at the time of the
analysis, but the WS code was still used for some projects.
Methodological Approach 5
for the review of the trends in water-related WBG the core sector indicators (CSIs). At the time of the
managed commitments and in water-related review CSIs were issued for the following water
IBRD/IDA commitments over the last decade subsectors: water supply, sanitation/wastewa-
(Chapters 3 and 4), all projects that had the ter, irrigation and drainage, and hydropower. For
water-related sector and/or theme codes were the remaining subsectors (such as flood protec-
included. This was also the case for the review tion) and the water-related theme code of water
of the main characteristics, and the core sector resources management, key indicators were
and other key indicators, of the water-related developed based on the advice of the respec-
IBRD/IDA projects approved in FY11 (Section tive sector specialists in the Water Anchor.8 The
5.1 and Subsection 5.2.1). However, for the second type of questions addresses crosscut-
exploration of the more in-depth crosscutting ting issues that are of importance across all
issues and additional topics (Subsections 5.2.2 water subsectors. A number of the crosscutting
and 5.2.3), only a subset of “designated�? IBRD issues are based on indicators mentioned in the
and IDA projects that fulfilled certain minimum results framework of the Water Resources Sec-
criteria with regard to their share of water-related tor Strategy Implementation Progress Report
commitments were selected because the par- (World Bank 2010—see the Introduction), as well
ticular issues and topics may not be applicable as indicators of other sector strategies, including
for projects that have only a relatively small share the Infrastructure Strategy Update (World Bank
of their total commitment amounts allocated to Group 2012a) and the Strategy for Information
a water codes. The selected subsets of projects and Communication Technology (World Bank
and products are discussed at the beginning of Group 2012b). Furthermore, some of the IEG
each chapter and section. recommendations from the recent evaluation of
A third step involved the decision on the type World Bank’s support to the water sector were
of data to be included in the review. Data available also included (IEG 2010). Finally, the third type
from the World Bank’s project database were of questions covered several key topics (such as
the main source of the analysis in all four broad poverty, gender, climate change adaptation, and
areas of the portfolio review. For the review of the financial sustainability) and applied them to each
water-related IBRD and IDA projects approved in water subsector.
FY11 (see the Introduction), data from the World The fifth step was the establishment of the
Bank’s project database were supplemented portfolio review system. This included design-
with data that were generated from the PADs ing a database and analysis system in Excel,
through a newly designed questionnaire. Thus, based on guidance from TWI and the portfolio
data from the project database were used for review group in ARD. The database contains
the analysis of the main characteristics of FY11 data downloaded from the World Bank’s project
projects (Section 5.1); the more detailed aspects database and, for the IBRD and IDA projects
of the in-depth review are based on the results of approved in FY11, data gathered in the review of
the questionnaire (Section 5.2). the PADs using the questionnaire. This informa-
The fourth step was the design of the ques- tion was supplemented by data gathered in other
tionnaire for the review of the PADs of the IBRD exercises, such as those carried out by TWI on
and IDA projects approved in FY11. Annex A public-private partnerships, and by PREM on
shows the questionnaire that was used for the
FY11 review. It comprises three broad types of 8
For hydropower, key indicators beyond the CSIs were
Chapter 2
questions. The first type includes questions on also developed.
6 The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
gender. The CSIs for water supply, launched in to the quality of the work in the water sector
2009, were available for the FY11 approved the (including AAA and lending, both portfolio and
projects in project database. pipeline); (ii) help in gathering information not
The final step was the creation of a Quality captured in the World Bank’s project database
Working Group. The Quality Working Group was on AAA and lending from the respective Regions
set up by a decision of the Water Sector Board and units; (iii) contribute to identifying and
in June 2012, and consists of focal points for monitoring corporate priorities (AAA and lend-
each Region. The mandate of the Quality Work- ing) with multi-regional or global significance;
ing Group included: (i) act as a link between the and (iv) review the work carried out by the Water
Water Sector Board and the practice with regard Anchor on the World Bank’s portfolio.
Chapter 3
7
Water-related WBG Managed
Commitments for FY02–11
T
he water-related commitments man- other sources (such as Special Financing and
aged by WBG comprise two main com- the Institutional Development Fund). Table 3.1
ponents: The first component is WBG shows the trends in WBG managed commit-
financing consisting of financing of the World ments to the water and related subsectors
Bank (IBRD and IDA) and the International for the ten-year period from FY02–11.9 Both
Finance Corporation (IFC), and guarantees WBG and non-WBG financing increased. WBG
from the Multilateral Investment Guarantee managed financing, driven largely by IBRD/
Agency (MICA). The second component IDA lending, grew more than five-fold from
involves non-WBG financing, such as financing FY02 to FY11. Water-related IBRD/IDA lending
from Carbon Offsets, the Global Environmental amounted to US$7.4 billion in FY11, an increase
Fund (GEF), Recipient Executed Activities, and of about US$1.4 billion from FY10.
WBG Managed Commitments to the Water and Related Subsectors, FY02–11
Table 3.1:
(US$Million)
FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11
IBRD/IDA 1,278 1,779 2,666 3,604 2,322 4,064 3,612 5,790 5,962 7,377
IFC 31 58 123 49 338 200 442 177 591 206
MIGA 0 0 129 147 44 125 21 75 8 0
Carbon 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 1 1
Offset
GEF 0 12 35 14 28 16 21 24 43 22
Recipient 12 29 32 196 72 85 76 97 97 125
Executed
Others 26 0 13 47 0 28 18 16 97 13
Total 1,347 1,878 2,998 3,928 2,631 4,269 3,808 6,055 6,662 7,634
9
In addition to information from the World Bank’s project database, data on water-related commitments were also
collected from IFC and MIGA. These commitments include hydropower commitments.
Chapter 4
8
Water-related IBRD/IDA
Commitments for FY02–11
T
his chapter focuses on the largest contrib- over the ten-year period from FY02 to FY11 are
utor to water-related WBG managed com- analyzed by Region, by top ten borrowing coun-
mitments—the commitments supported tries, and by the four water-related subsectors.
by IBRD and IDA financing. In each year during Commitments by Region. Figure 4.1 shows
FY02–11, they accounted for more than 90% of the large increase in water-related commit-
the WBG managed commitments (Table 3.1). ments supported by IBRD and IDA funds during
To review water-related commitments for FY02–11. Total commitments across the six
IBRD and IDA projects, the commitment amounts Regions increased from US$1.3 billion in FY02
that were associated with the respective sector to a record of US$7.4 billion in FY11. Among the
codes for water-related sectors (see Chapter six Regions, the largest increases are observed
2) were used. (Project commitments associated in EAP, SAR, and LCR.
with other sector codes were not included.) 10
Commitments for Top Ten Borrowers.
Below, the trends in IBRD and IDA commitments The cumulative IBRD/IDA lending for the top
Water-related Commitments by Region, FY02–11
Figure 4.1:
(US$Million)
US$Million
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Fiscal Year
SAR MNA LCR ECA EAP AFR
10
Each project is coded with up to five sector codes (and, in addition, also with up to five theme codes).
Water-related IBRD/IDA Commitments for FY02–11 9
regional projects for AFR, i.e., projects includ-
Cumulative Lending for the
Figure 4.2:
Top Ten Borrowing Countries, ing more than one country (with asterisks in
FY02–11 Figure 4.2), would rank 11th in the list.
(US$Million) Commitments by Subsectors. The water-
related IBRD/IDA commitments by subsectors
US$Million
over the same ten-year period are presented
7,000
in Figure 4.3. The water-related subsectors
6,000
with the corresponding sector code(s) are the
5,000
following:
4,000
3,000
�?�? Irrigation and drainage (sector code AI)
2,000
�?�? Hydropower (sector code LH)11
1,000
�?�? Flood protection (sector code WD)
0
�?�? Water supply and sanitation (sector
India
China
Mexico
Indonesia
Vietnam
Argentina
Brazil
Turkey
Bangladesh
Colombia
Africa*
codes WC, WZ, BW, WA, WT, WV and WS)
11
As indicated in footnote 3, the code LH was introduced
for hydropower in FY11. Before, hydropower projects
were coded with: LD Power or LE Renewable Energy. In
order to generate the hydropower portfolio for FY02–11,
ten borrowing countries from FY02 to FY11 is The World Bank’s project database was searched for all
in Figure 4.2. India, with US$5.8 billion, was by projects with LH, LD and LE codes approved during this
period. All projects with the LH code were included in the
far the leading borrower, followed by China with list. The projects with LD and LE codes were individually
US$4.2 billion. Four LCR countries are also reviewed to include only those power and renewable
energy projects that were related to hydropower. The
among the top ten borrowers. No individual
resulting list was further refined with the help of the
country from AFR appears in the top ten list but Water Anchor’s hydropower specialist.
Water-related Commitments by Subsector, FY02–11
Figure 4.3:
(US$Million)
US$Million
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Fiscal Year
I&D Hydropower Flood Protection WSS
Chapter 2
10 The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
The water-related commitments by subsec- increased from US$493 million to US$4,002
tor are those commitments that, based on a million, which amounts to the largest increase
particular project’s components and activities, among the four subsectors. Hydropower and
are associated with the respective codes. flood protection had relatively large increases
Between FY02 and FY11, commitments for from FY10 to FY11. Commitments for irrigation
the subsector water supply and sanitation dom- and drainage varied over the ten-year period
inated the water-related commitments. They between US$220 million and US$1,147 million.
Chapter 5
11
Review of Water-related
IBRD/IDA Projects
Approved in FY11
T
his chapter concentrates on IBRD and IDA
5.1. Main Characteristics of
projects approved in FY11 that were water-
Water-related IBRD/IDA
related. These are the projects with one or
Projects Approved in FY11
more of the water-related sector and/or theme
codes listed in Chapter 2. The water-related
commitments refer to the part of a project’s total The water-related IBRD and IDA projects approved
commitment amount that is associated with in FY11 are shown by Region in Annex B. This sec-
the water-related codes as reported in Business tion presents their main characteristics based on
Warehouse.12 information provided in the World Bank’s project
The chapter comprises two main sections. database. These characteristics include the follow-
Section 5.1 is based on data from the World ing: (i) water-related commitments; (ii) commit-
Bank’s projects database, and presents the main ments by Region; (iii) projects by Region; (iv) com-
characteristics of the water-related IBRD and IDA mitments for top ten borrowers; (v) commitments
projects approved in FY11. Section 5.2 is based on by sector code and subsector; (vi) commitments
a new questionnaire (Annex A) that was designed by sector code and Region; (vii) commitments by
for the FY11 review, and applied to each project’s projects with only the theme code; (viii) commit-
PAD to provide a more in-depth review of selected ments by theme code and Region; (ix) commit-
aspects. Subsection 5.2.1 presents the CSIs for ments by Sector Board; (x) number of projects by
the water subsectors for which they have been Sector Board; (xi) commitments by product line
issued, and key indicators for the other subsec- and distribution of commitments; (xii) commit-
tors and the theme. Subsection 5.2.2 discusses ments by product line and Region; and (xiii) com-
some insights on crosscutting issues that are con- mitments by lending instrument.
sidered to be relevant across the four subsectors Water-related Commitments. A total
and the theme. Finally, Subsection 5.2.3 reviews of 105 projects with water-related sector and
the extent to which the projects in each subsector theme codes were approved in FY11. Of these,
address additional key topics, including poverty, 25 projects were Additional Financing projects.13
gender, climate risks, and financial sustainability. The total lending amount of the 105 projects
12
Commitments associated with the various water-related sector codes should not be added up with commitments
associated with the water-related theme code for water resources management to avoid double counting. However, the
latter commitments are shown separately to indicate the magnitude of theme code commitments.
13
Additional Financing projects provide previously approved projects with additional support, often without changing
components and activity types. Only if the project objectives are changed by the additional support, is an Additional
Financing project presented to the World Bank Board of Executive Directors for approval.
12 The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
was about US$12.0 billion, and the water-related
Distribution of Water-related
Figure 5.1:
commitments US$7.4 billion (62%). The aver- Commitments per Project,
age water-related commitment per project was FY11
US$70.5 million. The range of water-related com-
Number of Projects
mitments per project is presented in Table 5.1,
60
and the distribution shown in Figure 5.1.
50
Commitments up to US$50 million are
40
observed for 66% of the projects (or 69 projects),
30
and commitments up to US$100 million for 82%
20
of the projects (or 86%). The largest commit-
10
ment amount was for the National Ganga River
0
Basin Project in India with US$790 million. 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 >200
The distribution of commitments shows Upper Limit (US$Million)
that more than half of all projects (53 projects) in
FY11 had a commitment amount of up to US$25
million.
Commitments by Region. The regional Figure 5.2 with the commitment amounts, AFR
breakdown as a percentage of the total water- is now by far the leading Region with 33 projects.
related commitments for FY11 is in Figure 5.2. This indicates that, on average, the commitments
EAP and SAR are the leading Regions with 30% per project in AFR are lower than in other Regions.
and 29%, respectively. Commitments for MNA EAP was the leading Region in terms of commit-
and ECA represent the smallest shares at 8% ments, and follows AFR in the number of projects.
and 3%, respectively. SAR seems to be the Region with, on average, the
Projects by Region. Figure 5.3 shows the largest projects in terms of commitments.
number of projects by Region. In contrast to Commitments for Top Ten Borrow-
ers. The top ten borrowers in FY11 shown
in Figure 5.4 comprise many of the same
Table 5.1:
Distribution of Water-related countries that appeared in Figure 4.2 as lead-
Commitments per Project, ing with regard to cumulative lending over
FY11
Number Share of
of Total
Range of Commitments Projects (%) Water-related Commitments
Figure 5.2:
Below US$1 million 4 4 by Region, FY11
Between US$1–5 million 15 14
Between US$5–10 million 11 10 AFR
SAR 14%
Between US$10–50 39 37
million 29%
Between US$50–100 17 16 EAP
million 30%
Between US$100–500 16 15 MNA
million ECA
8%
3%
Above US$500 million 3 3 LCR
16%
Total 105 100
Review of Water-related IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11 13
Water-related Projects by
Figure 5.3: Commitments for the Top Ten
Figure 5.4:
Region, FY11 Borrowing Countries, FY11
(Number of Projects) (US$Million)
SAR 13 US$Million
29% 1,600
AFR 33 1,400
MNA 6 14% 1,200
8% 1,000
800
600
LCR 22
EAP 22 400
16%
30% 200
ECA 9 0
3%
India
Indonesia
Vietnam
China
Argentina
Bangladesh
Egypt
Colombia
Lebanon
Africa*
Pakistan
the period FY02–11. Three new countries are
among the top ten borrowers in FY11, namely
Egypt, Lebanon and Pakistan. In FY11, India
Water Commitments by
Figure 5.5:
was by far the largest borrower with US$1.5 Sector Code, FY11
billion, almost twice as large as the next largest
WV WS
borrower, Indonesia, with US$795 million. As 5% 1%
WT
in Figure 4.2, no individual country from AFR 8%
appears in the top ten list, but regional projects
AI
for AFR (with asterisks in Figure 5.4) rank 10th WA 12%
8%
in the list.
Commitments by Sector Code and BW LH
Subsector. Figure 5.5 and Table 5.2 show total 8% 24%
commitments by water-related sector codes.
WZ
Hydropower (sector code LH) is the single larg- 9% WD
WC 10%
est subsector in terms of commitments, but 15%
grouped together, the sector codes related to
water supply and sanitation (sector codes WC,
WZ, BW, WA, WT, WV, WS) form the largest
subsector overall with 55% of water-related tion dominates in LCR, MNA and ECA. Flood
commitments (or US$4.0 billion). Irrigation and protection is not part of the portfolio in MNA, and
drainage (sector code AI) amounts to 12%, and is most pronounced in SAR.
flood protection (sector code WD) to 10%. Commitments by Projects with Only the
Commitments by Sector Code and Theme Code. The total water commitment for
Region. Figure 5.6 illustrates that hydropower all subsectors shown in Table 5.2 (US$7,326
commitments are concentrated in EAP, SAR million) is slightly lower than the amount shown
and AFR. Irrigation and drainage commitments as IBRD/IDA commitment for FY11 in Table 3.1
appear in each Region. Water supply and sanita- (US$7,377 million). This is because the water
14 The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Water Commitments by Subsector, FY11
Table 5.2:
Corresponding Sector Commitments Share of Total
Subsector Code(s) (US$Million) (%)
Irrigation and Drainage AI 862.6 12
Hydropower LH 1,723.3 24
Flood Protection WD 738.0 10
Water Supply and WC, WZ, BW, WA, WT, WV 4,001.7 55
Sanitation and WS
Total 7,325.6 100
commitments by subsector in Table 5.2 exclude total commitment amount for the theme code of
projects that have no sector code for water but US$51 million (Table 5.3).
do have the theme code for water resources Commitments by Theme Code and
management (code 85). Four IBRD/IDA projects Region. Besides the four projects with only the
approved in FY11 fall into this category, with a theme code for water resources management,
Subsector Commitments by Region, FY11
Figure 5.6:
(US$Million)
US$Million
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
AFR EAP ECA LCR MNA SAR
Region
AI LH WD WC WZ BW WA WT WV WS
Water-related Projects with Only the Theme Code for Water Resources
Table 5.3:
Management, FY11
Water Commitment
Country Project ID Title (US$Million) Sector Board
Ethiopia P109737 Agricultural Growth Program 24.00 ARD
Kenya P094692 Kenya Coastal Development Project 4.55 ENV
Peru P118713 Peru 3rd Prog. Environmental DPL: 21.75 ENV
India P124354 India: Uttarakhand Decentral. 1.03 ARD
Watershed
Total 51.33
Review of Water-related IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11 15
there are 30 projects that have one (or more)
Water Commitments by
Figure 5.8:
water-related sector code(s) and the theme code Sector Board, FY11
for water resources management. All 36 projects
Other
are listed in Annex C, Table F. The total commit- TR
3%
5%
ment in FY11 for the water-related theme code
amounts to US$1.15 billion. Figure 5.7 shows the
UD
commitments for water resources management 9%
by Region. Similar to the case of the subsector
commitments (Figure 5.6), EAP and SAR are EMT WAT
24% 42%
leading in terms of commitments for water
resources management. ARD
17%
Commitments by Sector Board. As shown
in Figure 5.8, only 42% of the water-related
commitments made in FY11 were mapped to
the Water Sector Board. The remaining com- Water-related Projects by
Figure 5.9:
mitments are under the Sector Boards for Sector Board, FY11
Energy and Mining (EMT), Agriculture and Rural (Number of Projects)
Development (ARD), Urban Development (UD), Other
Transport (TR), and others. 9
ENV
Number of Projects by Sector Board. 4
The number of water-related projects by Sector
TR
Boards is in Figure 5.9. Of the 105 water-related 4
projects approved in FY11, only 23 projects (or
22% of the total) are mapped to the Water Sec- EMT UD
9 30
tor Board. The largest share of projects is with
the Sector Board for Urban Development (UD),
WAT
followed by the Sector Board for Agriculture and 23 ARD
26
Rural Development (ARD).
Theme Code Commitments
Figure 5.7: Projects Mapped to the Water Sector
by Region, FY11 Board. The 23 projects mapped to the Water
(US$Million) Sector Board, indicated in Figure 5.9, are shown
US$Million in more detail in Table 5.4. Their respective water
400 commitments as a share of total commitments
350 are very high—in most cases amounting to 100%.
300
Commitments by Product Line and Dis-
250
200 tribution of Commitments. The share of the
150 two products lines, IBRD and IDA, in total water
100
commitments in FY11 is shown in Figure 5.10.
50
0 Of the total commitments of US$7.4 billion,
AFR EAP ECA LCR MNA SAR IBRD accounts for 66%, and IDA for the remain-
Region
ing 34%.
16 The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Water-related Projects Mapped to the Water Sector Board
Table 5.4:
Project Water % of
Country ID Title Commitment Subsector
Lebanon P103063 Greater Beirut Water Supply Project 100% WSS
Colombia P111479 Rio Bogota Environmental Recuperation and 100% WSS
Flood Control Project
Uzbekistan P111760 Syrdarya Water Supply Project 100% WSS
China P112626 Liuzhou Environment Management Project 97% WSS
Phase II
Argentina P114081 Buenos Aires Province Infrastructure 74% WSS
Sustainable Investment Development
Additional Financing
China P115695 Bayannaoer Water Reclamation and 100% WSS
Environment Improvement Project
Peru P117293 Optimization of Lima Water and Sewerage 100% WSS
Systems
Peru P117314 AF National Rural Water Supply and Sanitation 100% WSS
Niger P117365 Urban Water and Sanitation Project 100% WSS
China P117819 Yunnan Urban Environment-Phase II 100% WSS
Additional Financing
Tajikistan P118196 Second Dushanbe Water Supply Project 100% WSS
Vietnam P119077 Urban Water Supply and Wastewater 100% WSS
India P119085 National Ganga River Basin Project 79% WSS
Egypt P120161 Integrated Sanitation & Sewerage 100% WSS
Infrastructure 2
Argentina P120211 Norte Grande Water Infrastructure 100% WSS
Mozambique P120546 Additional Financing – Water Services and 100% WSS
Institutional Support (WASIS) Project
Mexico P121195 MX Water Utilities Efficiency Improvement 100% WSS
Project (PROME)
Vietnam P122940 Additional Financing for Coastal Cities 79% Multi-
Environmental Sanitation Project subsector
Chad P123501 Additional Financing Urban Development 98% WSS
Project
Malawi P124486 Second National Water Development Project – 100% WSS
Additional Financing (IDA)
Angola P124511 Water Sector Institutional Development 100% WSS
Additional Financing
Argentina P125151 Second Norte Grande Water Infrastructure 100% WSS
Kyrgyz P126390 Additional Financing for Second On-Farm 96% I&D
Republic Irrigation Project
The distribution of commitments in related commitments; 34 of the 63 IDA-financed
Figure 5.11 indicates that, compared to IBRD, projects had water-related commitments of
IDA financed more projects with smaller water- US$20 million or less. Of the 44 IBRD-financed
Review of Water-related IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11 17
Water-related IBRD vs. IDA
Figure 5.10: Water-related IBRD vs. IDA
Figure 5.12:
Commitments, FY11 Water Commitments by
(US$Million) Region, FY11
(US$Million)
IDA US$Million
$2,483 million 2,500
(34%)
2,000
1,500
1,000
IBRD
$4,895 million 500
(66%) 0
AFR EAP ECA LCR MENA SAR
Region
IBRD IDA
projects, 12 had water-related commitments
above US$100 million.
Commitments by Product Line and Region.
As illustrated in Figure 5.12, water-related IBRD small in MNA (for Djibouti). The largest amount of
and IDA projects approved in FY11 are present IBRD financing is in EAP, followed by SAR.
in all Regions. IBRD commitments are small in Commitments by Lending Instrument.
AFR (for Swaziland), while IDA commitments are Figure 5.13 shows that the vast majority of
financing of water-related commitments in FY11
was delivered through Specific Investment Loans
Distribution of Water-related
Figure 5.11: (SILs), amounting to 88%. Development Policy
IBRD and IDA Commitments Loans (DPLs) accounted for 4%. The remainder
per Project, FY11 consisted of Adaptable Program Loans (APLs),
IBRD Emergency Recovery Loans (ERLs), Financial
No. of Projects Intermediary Loans (FILs), and Sector Invest-
30 ment and Maintenance Loans (SIMs). The latter
20 category financed one project in China.
10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
More
Water Commitments by
Figure 5.13:
Lending Instrument, FY11
Upper Limit (US$Million)
ERL
2.7% Other
IDA DPL 0.1%
4.4%
No. of Projects
30
APL
20 4.8%
10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
More
SIL
Upper Limit (US$Million) 88.0%
18 The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
5.2. In-depth Review of 5.2.1. Core Sector and Other Key
Water-related IBRD/IDA Indicators
The questions on the CSIs and other key indica-
Projects Approved in FY11
tors were applied to all 105 water-related IBRD
and IDA projects approved in FY11 as applicable;
This section presents the main insights of the
for example, any project with the sector code for
in-depth review of the water-related IBRD and
irrigation and drainage (AI) was analyzed with
IDA projects approved in FY11, using a ques-
regard to the list of CSIs for irrigation and drain-
tionnaire that was developed for this exercise.
age. If that project was also coded for hydro-
The questionnaire is shown in Annex A. As
power (LH), it was also analyzed with regard to
mentioned in Chapter 2, three broad types
the list of CSIs for hydropower. All projects had
of questions were asked: first, questions that
broader aims and a more comprehensive results
elicited data on the CSIs or key indicators for
framework than the CSIs and the other key indi-
each of the water-related subsectors; second,
cators are able to reflect.
questions on crosscutting issues that have
The detailed results for the review by core
been emphasized in recent sector strategies
sector and other key indicators are shown by
and other significant documents on water-
subsector and project in Annex C. The tables
related issues in addition to some further ques-
presented include results for the CSIs for water
tions that were considered to be relevant; and,
supply (Table A), sanitation and wastewater
third, questions on several key topics that the
treatment (Table B), irrigation and drainage
Water Sector Board recently identified as being
(Table C), and hydropower (Table D.i), and for
particularly important for each of the water
further key indicators for hydropower (Table D.ii),
subsectors.
flood protection (Table E), and water resources
The following subsection discusses the
management (Table F).14 The main results for
results of the review for the CSIs and other key
each water-related subsector and the theme are
indicators. The review covers all water-related
summarized below.
projects, i.e., each project with one or several of
Water Supply. In FY11, there were 27
the water-related sector and theme codes was
projects with the sector code for water supply
included—independent of the share of water-
(WC) in 21 countries. Through these projects,
related commitments in the project’s total
approximately 5.1 million people in eight coun-
commitment. Subsection 5.2.2 reports on the
tries are expected to be provided with access to
results for the crosscutting issues; the results
“improved water sources,�? with approximately
for the additional key topics, including poverty
3.5 million and 1.6 million beneficiaries situated
focus, gender integration, climate change
in urban and rural areas, respectively (Table 5.5).
adaptation, and financial sustainability, are in
Furthermore, plans call for construction
Section 5.2.3. The reviews of the crosscutting
or rehabilitation of 1,307 improved community
issues and the key topics are based on only a
water points under the projects. For piped
subset of the water-related projects—so called
household water, about 364,000 new and
“designated�? projects that fulfill a minimum
requirement regarding the project’s share
of water-related commitments in its total No specific indicators exist, or were developed, for
14
projects with the following sector codes: BW: Public
commitments. Administration—Water, Sanitation and Flood Protection;
WD: Flood Protection; and WZ: General Water, Sanitation
and Flood Protection.
Review of Water-related IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11 19
Expected Results for the Core Sector Indicators for Water Supply, FY11
Table 5.5:
1. People provided with access to “improved water sources�? under the project (number) 5,124,383
i. People provided with access to “improved water resources�? under the project – 3,502,863
urban (number)
ii. People provided with access to “improved water resources�? under the project – rural 1,621,520
(number)
2. Improved community water points planned to be constructed or rehabilitated under 1,307
the project (number)
3. New piped household water connections planned to be resulting from the project 363,932
intervention (number)
4. Piped household water connections planned to be affected by rehabilitation works 498,751
undertaken under the project (number)
5. Water utilities planned to be supported under the project (number) 20
6. Other water service providers planned to be supported under the project (number) 0
499,000 rehabilitated connections are expected “improved sanitation�?—with 1.3 million and 1.4
as a result of the projects. million beneficiaries in urban and rural areas,
There will also be 20 water utilities sup- respectively (Table 5.6).
ported under the projects. Five of these utilities Construction of some 71,000 improved
are located in LCR and the remaining 15 in AFR. latrines and 2,000 new sewer connections is
Sanitation and Wastewater Treatment. In planned under these projects in three countries
FY 2011, there were 22 projects in 13 countries (Cameroon, Malawi, and Niger) in AFR.
coded with one or more of the following sector Treatment plant outlets financed under
codes: WA, WS, WT, and WV. Through these the projects in Cameroon and Vietnam plan to
projects, it is expected that approximately 2.7 remove approximately 1,300 tons per year of
million people in six countries (located in MNA, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) pollution
AFR and EAP) will be provided with access to loads. About 750,000 people will be trained in
Expected Results for the Core Sector Indicators for Sanitation and Wastewater
Table 5.6:
Treatment, FY11
1. People planned to be provided with access to “improved sanitation�? under the project 2,680,431
(number)
i. People planned to be provided with access to “improved sanitation�? under the project 1,289,301
(i) urban (number)
ii. People planned to be provided with access to “improved sanitation�? under the project 1,391,130
(ii) rural (number)
2. New sewer connections planned to be constructed under the project (number) 2,000
3. Improved latrines planned to be constructed under the project (number) 71,475
4. Volume of BOD pollution loads planned to be removed by at treatment plant outlets 1,288
financed under the project (tons/year)
5. People planned to be trained to improve hygiene behavior or sanitation practices under 750,400
the project (number)
20 The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Expected Results for the Core Sector Indicators for Irrigation and Drainage, FY11
Table 5.7:
1. i. Total area planned to be provided with new and/or improved irrigation and drainage 1,972,800
services (ha)
ii. Area planned to be provided with new (only new, but not improved) irrigation and 300,000
drainage services (ha)
2. i Total number of female and/or male water users planned to be provided with new/ 874,500
improved irrigation and drainage services
ii. Number of female water users (only female, but not male) planned to be provided with 359,228
new/improved irrigation and drainage services
3. Number of operational water user associations planned to be created and/or 2,975
strengthened
improved hygiene behavior or sanitation prac-
Expected Results for Other
Table 5.9:
tices in Cameroon and Peru.
Key Indicators for Hydropower,
Irrigation and Drainage. In FY 2011, there
FY11
were 19 AI-coded projects in 19 countries.
3. Planned energy production 2,684
Under these projects, approximately 2.0 million (GW/yr)
hectares of land are planned to be provided with 4. Is the project addressing 2 Projects
new and/or improved irrigation and drainage watershed/ river basin planning?
Yes or No
services. Of this area, 300,000 hectares will
5. Is the project addressing water 0 Projects
be provided with new irrigation and drainage
use management? Yes or No
services (Table 5.7).
6. Is the project designed as a multi- 2 Projects
About 874,500 water users in AFR and purpose intervention? Yes or No
ECA are planned to be provided with new or 7. Beyond safeguard requirements, 2 Projects
improved irrigation and drainage services and, does the project integrate
enhancing development benefits
of this total, 359,228 water users (or 41%) are
to local communities (benefit
estimated to be female. A total of 2,975 opera- sharing)? Yes or No
tional water user associations are expected to Note: In Tables 5.9, 5.10, and 5.11, for questions asking
“Yes or No,�? results indicate the number of projects for
be created and/or strengthened in AFR, EAP
which the response “yes�? was given.
and ECA.
Hydropower. In FY 2011, 7 LH-coded proj-
ects were approved in AFR, EAP and SAR. As additional or rehabilitated generation capacity
shown in Table 5.8 and Table 5.9, these projects to be installed. The expected annual energy
planned to finance 1,762 megawatt (MW) of generation amounts to approximately 2,684
gigawatts (GW).15
Two projects had components address-
Table 5.8:
Expected Results for ing watershed or river basin planning, and
Core Sector Indicators for two projects were designed as multipurpose
Hydropower, FY11 interventions. Benefits sharing (beyond the
1. Generation Capacity of Hydropower 1,744
constructed under the project (MW)
2. Generation Capacity of Hydropower 18
15
Generation capacity from Additional Financing proj-
ects has not been included unless it represented genera-
rehabilitated under the project (MW)
tion that is additional from the original project.
Review of Water-related IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11 21
requirements of the World Bank’s environmental
Expected Results for the
Table 5.10:
and social safeguard policies) was a feature of Key Indicators for Flood
two projects in Nepal and India. No hydropower Protection, FY11
projects addressed water use management, and 1. Does the project have an 10 Projects
none included carbon financing. activity evaluating flood hazard
(including climate change
Flood Protection. There were 21 WD-coded
impacts)? Yes or No
projects, located in all Regions except MNA.
2. Does the project have an 15 Projects
Of these, 10 projects had activities evaluating activity on flood risk mitigation?
flood hazard, including climate change impacts. Yes or No
Fifteen projects had activities on flood risk miti-
gation (Table 5.10).
Water Resources Management. In FY Expected Results for the
Table 5.11:
2011, a total of 36 projects were assigned the Key Indicators for Water
theme code for water resources manage-
Resources Management, FY11
ment (85). Of these, 14 projects assessed the 1. Does the project assess the 14 Projects
implications of its proposed
implications of its proposed activities on water activities on water quality?
quality, and 15 projects supported institutional Yes or No
Does the project support
arrangements for integrated water resources 2. 15 Projects
institutional arrangements
management at the national or local level for broader/more integrated
(Table 5.11). water resources management
at national level and/or local
level (such as at the level of
Ministry, basin organization,
user association)? Yes or No
5.2.2. Crosscutting Issues
The questions on crosscutting issues are shown
in detail in Annex A under item G, including a
reference on the origin of the question—such total commitments as water-related commit-
as targets in recent sector strategies (World ments. On the other hand, it was considered
Bank Group 2010, 2012a, and 2012b) and issues likely to discard too many relevant projects if
raised in other significant documents dealing only projects were included that had 51% or
with water-related issues (such as IEG 2010). more of their total commitments allocated
The crosscutting questions are grouped under to one particular water-related sector code.
(i) water-related issues; (ii) financing; (iii) finan- Thus the following approach was chosen:
cial and economic analysis, cost recovery, and The crosscutting questions were applied to a
monitoring and evaluation (M&E); (iv) social subset comprising “designated�? water projects
issues; and (v) other issues. that fulfill certain minimum criteria with regard
A special subset of the water-related proj- to their share of water-related commitments. A
ects was selected for the review of crosscutting project was defined as designated when it met
issues (and for the review of the additional key two criteria:
topics in Subsection 5.2.3). On the one hand,
it was considered difficult to apply these more �?�? more than 33% of its total commitment
focused questions to all 105 IBRD and IDA amount is water-related (i.e., allocated to
projects approved in FY11, especially those one or more of the water-related sector
projects that have a relatively low share of their and theme codes); and
22 The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
�?�? no non-water-related code has a larger code for irrigation and drainage, only one—the
share in total commitments than the Irrigation Restoration and Development Project
water-related sector and theme codes. in Afghanistan—explicitly considered groundwa-
ter management.
A total of 63 projects fulfilled these two crite- Longer-term Availability of Water. Sixteen
ria. They included all of the 23 projects mapped projects verified the longer-term availability
to the Water Sector Board listed in Table 5.4. In of water to support the project activities
addition, the 40 projects listed in Table 5.12 that (Table 5.14). Of the four designated projects in
are mapped to other Sector Boards qualified. MNA, one project—the Greater Beirut Water
The share of total commitments allocated to Supply Project—verified longer-term water
water-related sector codes tends to be more availability. Of the 18 designated projects in
than 51% in most projects. Only 10 projects AFR, two projects verified long-term availability
have a water-related share between 34% and of water. A total of 16 projects addressed climate
51%. The irrigation and drainage projects are change adaptation or climate variability in its
mapped to the Agriculture and Rural Develop- activities.18
ment (ARD) Sector Board. Hydropower projects Water Pollution. Twenty-six of the 63 desig-
are mapped to the Energy and Mining (EMT) nated water projects supported activities that
Sector Board, and flood protection projects dealt with water pollution issues (Table 5.15).
tend to be mapped to the Urban Development Demand Management. Table 5.16 shows
(UD) Sector Board. that five projects included demand management
Annex D presents the detailed results on the approaches.
crosscutting issues for the 63 designated water Other Water-specific Issues. Table 5.17 indi-
projects. Table G.I shows the water-related cates 27 projects as “integrated�? water projects
issues; Table G.II. financing; Table G.III. financial according to the definition of integrated water
and economic analysis, cost recovery, and projects provided in World Bank (2010), i.e.,
M&E; Table G.IV. social issues; and Table G.V. they had at least one theme code from two of
other issues. Below the results are summarized the three relevant thematic groups—includ-
under the same five headings. ing Urban Development, Rural Development,
Water-related Issues. The main purpose of and/or Environment and Natural Resource
the water-related questions is to assess whether Management.
the projects are based on a sound analysis of the Twenty-three of the 63 designated water
water resources, and the extent to which use, projects triggered the safeguard on international
availability, and quality of water are considered waterways.
during project preparation.
Water Resources. Of the 63 designated
projects reviewed, 17 projects were based on
a water resource analysis—either done by the 16
It is possible that some projects were based on pre-
liminary assessments and studies that were not explicitly
government, an agency, or the World Bank prior
mentioned in the PAD.
to or during project preparation (Table 5.13).16 17
Only if the PAD of a project explicitly mentioned
Fourteen projects explicitly considered groundwater management and/or conservation was it
counted as “yes.�?
groundwater management and conservation.17 18
The review did not try to identify particular technolo-
Most of these were water supply and sanitation gies or project features that would contribute to climate
change adaptation if they were not clearly identified in
projects. Of a total of 15 projects with the sector the PAD.
Review of Water-related IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11 23
Designated Water Projects Mapped to Sector Boards Other Than Water, FY11
Table 5.12:
Project Water % of Sector
Country ID Title Commitment Subsector Board
Afghanistan P122235 Irrigation Restoration and Development 74% I&D ARD
Project
Africa P114782 Additional Financing for the Regional 52% Hydropower EMT
and Domestic Power Markets Project
Africa P118316 Lake Victoria Environmental 51% WSS ENV
Management Project (Burundi and
Rwanda)
Azerbaijan P107617 Water Users Association Development 84% I&D ARD
Support Project
Bangladesh P122014 Emergency 2007 Cyclone Recovery and 50% Multi- ARD
Restoration Project Additional Financing subsector
Belize P111928 Municipal Development 50% Multi- UD
subsector
Benin P113145 Benin Emergency Urban Environment 72% WSS ENV
Project
Brazil P095171 Integrated Health and Water 55% WSS HE
Management Project (SWAP)
Cameroon P117102 Sanitation Project 100% WSS UD
Cameroon P121027 Urban and Water Development Support 80% WSS UD
Project Additional Financing
Central P117616 Emergency Urban Infrastructure 64% Multi- UD
African Rehabilitation and Maintenance subsector
Republic
Central Asia P120788 Central Asia Hydrometeorology 100% Flood UD
Modernization Project
China P098078 Huai River Basin Flood Management and 100% Flood ARD
Drainage Improvement
China P110632 Sichuan Small Towns Development 40% Multi- UD
subsector
China P116656 Zhejiang Qiantang River Basin Small 91% WSS UD
Town Environment Project
Djibouti P117355 Rural Community Development & Water 38% Multi- ARD
Mobilization / PRODER subsector
Egypt, Arab P117745 EGYPT-Farm-level Irrigation 95% I&D ARD
Republic of Modernization
El Salvador P122640 Disaster Risk Management Development 63% WSS UD
Policy Loan with a CAT DDO
Ethiopia P125307 Irrigation and Drainage 97% I&D ARD
Georgia P120887 Additional Financing to the Regional & 50% Multi- UD
Municipal Infrastructure Development subsector
Project
India P096124 Vishnugad Pipalkoti Hydro Electric 96% Hydropower EMT
Project
(continued on next page)
24 The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Designated Water Projects Mapped to Sector Boards Other Than …
Table 5.12: (continued)
Project Water % of Sector
Country ID Title Commitment Subsector Board
India P122096 Bihar Kosi Flood Recovery Project 34% Multi- UD
subsector
Indonesia P112158 Upper Cisokan Pumped Storage Hydro- 100% Hydropower EMT
Electrical Power (1040 MW
Indonesia P114348 Water Resources and Irrigation Sector 61% Multi- ARD
Management Program 2 subsector
Kenya P113542 Kenya Informal Settlements 40% Multi- UD
Improvement Project (KISIP) subsector
Malawi P121120 Irrigation, Rural Livelihoods and 54% I&D ARD
Agricultural Development Project
Moldova P115634 Disaster and Climate Risk Management 100% WSS UD
Project
Mozambique P107598 PROIRRI Sustainable Irrigation 61% I&D ARD
Development
OECS P117871 Regional Disaster Vulnerability 76% Flood UD
Countries Reduction APL1 — Grenada and
Pakistan P096745 Punjab Barrages Improvement Phase II 100% I&D ARD
Project (PBIP-II)
Peru P104760 Sierra Irrigation Subsector 89% I&D ARD
Philippines P114048 KALAHI-CIDSS (Additional Financing) 40% Multi- SDV
Project subsector
Philippines P117470 Laguna de Bay Institutional 100% WSS ENV
Strengthening and Community
Participation Project
Sri Lanka P125855 Second Additional Financing for the 62% I&D ARD
Community Livelihoods in Conflict
Affected Areas Project
St. Vincent P124939 Hurricane Tomas Emergency Recovery 37% Multi- UD
and the Loan subsector
Grenadines
Tanzania P111155 Zanzibar Urban Services Project 46% Multi- UD
subsector
Togo P125049 Emergency Infrastructure Rehabilitation 86% Flood UD
and Energy Project
Vietnam P084773 Trung Son Hydropower Project 95% Hydropower EMT
Vietnam P113949 Mekong Delta Water Management for 95% I&D ARD
Rural Development
Zambia P102459 Irrigation Development and Support 54% I&D ARD
Project
Financing. For FY11, close to US$3 billion compares to US$7.4 billion in IBRD/IDA water-
of financing was secured from borrowing coun- related commitments for the period.
tries as counterpart financing (Table 5.18). This
Review of Water-related IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11 25
Water Resources Analysis in Designated Water Projects, FY11
Table 5.13:
Projects for Which “Yes�? Share of Total
Question Was Given (Number) Projects (%)
Is the project based on a water resource analysis 17 27
done by the government, an agency, or the
World Bank?
Does the project adequately consider 14 22
groundwater management and conservation?
Analysis of Longer-term Water Availability in Designated Water Projects, FY11
Table 5.14:
Projects for Which “Yes�? Share of Total
Question Was Given (Number) Projects (%)
Does the project support hydrological monitoring? 19 30
Does the project support meteorological 12 19
monitoring?
Does the project ensure that the data on 3 5
hydrological/ meteorological monitoring are
broadly made available?
Does the project ensure stakeholder participation 9 14
in hydrological/meteorological monitoring?
Does the project address adaptation to climate 16 25
change/climate variability?
Is the project based on an assessment of the water 16 25
resource availability for the activities promoted
under the project in the longer-term?
Pollution-related Activities in
Table 5.15: Demand Management in
Table 5.16:
Designated Water Projects, Designated Water Projects,
FY11 FY11
Projects for Share Projects
Which “Yes�? of Total for Which Share
Was Given Projects “Yes�? Was of Total
Question (Number) (%) Given Projects
Question (Number) (%)
Does the project 26 41
include support for Does the project 5 8
addressing water include demand
pollution issues? management
approaches (i.e.,
instruments to
reduce users’
demand for water),
An additional US$32 million was mobi- including fees, tar-
iffs, and/or quotas?
lized from the African Development Bank—the
only Regional Development Bank to finance
investments in designated water projects for 19
This financing was mobilized for the Additional Financ-
ing for the Domestic and Regional Power Market project
FY11.19 Financing from other sources, including
for the rehabilitation of the Inga 1 and 2 hydropower
local sources, the private sector and bi-lateral plants in the AFR Region.
26 The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Water-specific Issues in Designated Water Projects, FY11
Table 5.17:
Projects for Which “Yes�? Share of Total
Question Was Given (Number) Projects (%)
Is the project an “integrated�? water project (i.e., with 27 42
at least one thematic code from two of the three
relevant thematic groups (Urban Development,
Rural Development, and/or Environment and Natural
Resource Management)?
Does the project trigger Safeguard Policy OP7.50 on 23 36
International Waterways?
Table 5.18:
Financing for Designated a financial analysis and 55 an economic analysis
Water Projects, FY11 (Table 5.19).21 Six projects had neither a financial
Financing nor an economic analysis. Four of these were
Source (US$Million) emergency support projects which do not require
Government’s Counterpart 2,970 an economic and financial analysis; the fifth project
Funding was a DPL, and the sixth a framework-type project
Multilateral Development Banks 32 for which cost estimates and cost-effectiveness
Other Sources 427
20
The bilateral agencies providing financing were
the Swedish International Development Cooperation
Agency (SIDA), the German Kreditanstalt für Wiede-
agencies,20 amounted to US$427 million for the raufbau (KfW), the French Agency for Development
(AFD), and the Australian Agency for International
fiscal year. Development (AusAID). Other sources included local
Six projects, or 9% of all designated water communities, local governments, the Climate Invest-
ment Funds, and other trust funds.
projects, involved public-private partnerships 21
For some projects it was difficult to determine from
(PPP). the PADs whether an economic and/or financial analysis
was carried out because they lacked a presentation of
Financial and Economic Analysis. For
economic and/or financial rates of return, comparisons
FY11, 48 of the 63 designated projects included of alternative project designs, and treatments of risk.
Financial and Economic Analysis in Designated Water Projects, FY11
Table 5.19:
Projects for Which “Yes�? Share of Total
Question Was Given (Number) Projects (%)
Does the project include a financial analysis? 48 75
Does the project include an economic analysis? 55 86
Related to the economic analysis, does the scope of the 36 56
analysis include all components of the project (i.e., not
just selected components)?
Does the economic analysis compare different project 9 14
designs, and so choosing the one finally appraised?
Does the economic analysis explicitly address risk? 29 45
Are the benefits of activities addressing wastewater 11 Not applicable
treatment, health improvements, and environmental to all projects
restoration quantified? (If applicable)
Review of Water-related IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11 27
Cost Recovery in Designated Water Projects, FY11
Table 5.20:
Projects for Which “Yes�? Share of Total
Question Was Given (Number) Projects (%)
Is cost recovery part of the design of the project? 44 66
If Yes, is it mentioned whether cost recovery covers 26 Not all projects
some operation and maintenance costs (O&M)? are revenue
generating
If Yes, is it mentioned whether cost recovery covers 16 Not all projects
some capital costs, in order to fund replacement? are revenue
generating
In the absence of full recovery of O&M and capital cost, 8 Not all projects
does the project discuss how the remaining costs will be are revenue
covered? generating
analyses were expected be provided with the through guaranteed subsidies from the govern-
individual investment proposals. ment. (See also Subsection 5.2.3.)
Of the 55 projects that had an economic Monitoring and Evaluation. For FY11, 59
analysis, 36 provided an economic analysis projects of the 63 designated water projects (or
that covered the entire scope of the project 92%) provided details on monitoring and evalu-
rather than selected components. Nine projects ation (M&E) of project activities (Table 5.21).
compared different project designs and chose Of these, 45 projects (or 70%) included at least
one to be further appraised. Risk was explicitly one indicator in the results framework that had a
addressed—with the use of sensitivity analysis, baseline value other than zero (excluding indica-
scenario analysis, and/or risk analysis using tors related to project management).
Monte Carlo simulation or a more comprehen- Social Issues. Among the social issues ana-
sive risk analysis—for 29 projects. lyzed were whether the projects had an explicit
Eleven projects22 were found to quantify poverty focus, whether they were gender-informed,
the benefits of activities addressing wastewater and whether services were to be delivered through
treatment, health improvements, and environ- community driven development (CDD).
mental restoration. As indicated in Table 5.22, of the 63 desig-
Cost Recovery. Of the 63 designated water nated water projects, 34 projects (or 53%) had
projects, 44 had cost recovery as part of their an explicit poverty focus. A World Bank project
design (Table 5.20). 23
However, while many of
these projects discussed cost recovery either
as a feature of the project or as an aspiration
22
Wastewater treatment and environmental restoration
benefits were quantified for Yunnan Urban Environment-
for the relevant utility, for example, they did not Phase II Additional Financing (P117819); Bayannaoer
mention specific rates that were planned for cost Water Reclamation and Environmental Improvement
Project (P115695); and Zhejiang Qiantang River Basin
recovery. Of the 44 projects with cost recovery Small Town Environment Project (P116656). Wastewater
considerations, 26 projects indicated that they treatment benefits were quantified for Liuzhou Environ-
ment Management Project Phase II (P112626). Health
intended to recover a proportion of the operation benefits were quantified for National Ganga River Basin
and maintenance (O&M). In the absence of full Project (P119085).
23
The question on cost recovery was not applicable to
cost recovery, 19 projects discussed how the
all projects, such as projects for improving hydrometeo-
remaining costs would be covered, for example, rological monitoring systems or DPLs.
28 The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Monitoring and Evaluation in Designated Water Projects, FY11
Table 5.21:
Projects for Which “Yes�? Share of Total
Question Was Given (Number) Projects (%)
Does the project provide details on monitoring and 59 92
evaluation (M&E) of project activities?
Does at least one indicator in the Results Framework 45 70
have a baseline value that is another value than zero
(beyond indicators related to project management
issues)?
Social Issues in Designated Water Projects, FY11
Table 5.22:
Projects for Which “Yes�? Share of Total
Question Was Given (Number) Projects (%)
Does the project have a poverty focus? 34 53
Is the project gender-informed? 33 52
Does the project deliver water interventions through 20 31
CDD?
is considered poverty-focused if the appraisal A total of 23 designated water projects
includes a poverty assessment for the project (or 36%) included an ICT component (beyond
area, if any project component includes activities the use of ICT in project management). A few
especially addressing the poor, or if any poverty- projects had ICT components for the purpose
focused results indicators were included. At of knowledge management.25 In other cases,
least one of these three dimensions needs to be ICT was used for creating customer information
addressed. (See also Subsection 5.2.3.) systems or to support specialized systems such
A total of 33 (or 52%) of the designated water as hydro-meteorological facilities.
projects were gender-informed. 24
A World Bank None of the PADs of designated water proj-
project is considered to be gender-informed if ects mentioned the term “green growth.�?
it covers at least one of the three dimensions: Four designated water projects (or 6%) were
(i) analysis and/or consultation on gender related regional projects, i.e., implemented beyond one
issues; (ii) actions to address the distinct needs of country. Two projects were in Africa, one each in
women and girls, or men and boys, and/or positive ECA in LCR. The regional projects cut across all
impacts on gender gaps; and (iii) mechanisms to of the water Subsectors.
monitor gender impact to facilitate gender-disag-
gregated analysis. (See also Subsection 5.2.3.)
Of the designated water projects, 20 5.2.3. Additional Key Topics
projects (or 31%) delivered water interventions The review covered a number of additional key
through CDD. topics that the Water Sector Board recently
Other Issues. Other issues in the question-
24
For comparison, of the total of 105 water-related
naire concerned the use of information and com-
projects, 49 were gender-informed (or 47%).
munication technology (ICT), considerations 25
This included the Efficiency Improvement Program
(P121195) in Mexico, and the National Ganga River Basin
of green growth, and whether the project was
project (P119085), which plans to establish a Ganga
designed as a regional project (Table 5.23). knowledge center.
Review of Water-related IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11 29
Other Issues in Designated Water Projects, FY11
Table 5.23:
Projects for Which “Yes�? Share of Total
Question Was Given (Number) Projects (%)
Does the project have an ICT component (beyond the 23 36
Project Management or PIU/PMU component)?
Does the project address “Green Growth�? issues? 0 0
Is the project a regional project (i.e., a project 4 6
implemented beyond one country)?
identified as being particularly important for (or 48%). The remaining 13 projects (or 21%)
water-related projects. They include (i) explicit were categorized as multi-subsector.
poverty focus, (ii) gender integration, (iii) climate Poverty. Just over half of all designated
change adaptation, and (iv) financial sustainabil- water projects were found to have an explicit
ity. As for the crosscutting issues in Subsection poverty focus.26 By subsector, irrigation and
5.2.2, only the 63 designated water projects drainage, water supply and sanitation, as well
were analyzed. The results are presented by as multi-subsector projects had similar shares
water subsectors (including irrigation and drain- (Table 5.24). Only one of the four flood protec-
age, hydropower, flood protection, water supply tion projects, and none of the four hydropower
and sanitation, and multi-subsector). projects, were poverty-focused.
The designated projects were assigned to Gender. According to the Draft Update on
the subsectors as follows: If a project had 51% or Implementation of the Gender Equality Agenda
more of its total commitment amount allocated at the World Bank Group (2012c), 60% of all proj-
to one water-related sector code, it was assigned ects approved by the Bank in FY11 were “gender-
to the corresponding subsector. In the case of informed�? in at least one of the three dimensions
AI, the project was assigned to irrigation and that are used to rate operations.27 As indicated
drainage, in the case of LH to hydropower, and in in Table 5.25, the designated water projects are
the case of WD to flood protection. A project was less gender-informed than the projects Bank-
assigned to water supply and sanitation if 51% or wide, at 52%. While 75% of both the flood pro-
more of its total commitment was allocated to tection and the irrigation and drainage projects
one or several of the following the sector codes: were gender-informed, only 40% of water supply
WC, WA, WS, WT, WV, WZ, and BW. Finally, a and sanitation projects were gender-informed.
project for which the sector code WZ accounted Hydropower projects were also lower than the
for more than 51% of the total commitment—or, Bank-wide average.
alternatively, a combination of water-related sec-
tor codes corresponding to different water sub- 26
A project is regarded as poverty-focused if it covers at
sectors—was categorized as multi-subsector least one of three items: the appraisal includes a poverty
assessment for the project area, a project component
Annex E lists the designated water projects
includes activities especially addressing the poor, or a
by subsector. Of the 63 designated projects, 12 poverty-focused results indicator is included.
projects were assigned as irrigation and drain-
27
These include analysis and/or consultation on gender
related issues; actions to address the distinct needs
age projects (or 19%), 4 as hydropower projects of women and girls, or men and boys, and/or positive
(or 6%), 4 as flood protection projects (or 6%), impacts on gender gaps; and mechanisms to moni-
tor gender impact to facilitate gender-disaggregated
and 30 as water supply and sanitation projects analysis.
30 The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Poverty-focus in Designated Water Projects by Subsector, FY11
Table 5.24:
Does the project have a poverty focus?
Number of Projects for Which “Yes�? Share of Total
Subsector Projects Was Given (Number) Projects (%)
Irrigation and Drainage 12 7 58
Hydropower 4 0 0
Flood Protection 4 3 75
Water Supply and Sanitation 30 17 57
Multi-subsector 13 7 54
Total 63 34 53
Gender Integration in Designated Water Projects by Subsector, FY11
Table 5.25:
Is the project gender-informed?
Number of Projects for Which “Yes�? Share of Total
Subsector Projects Was Given (Number) Projects (%)
Irrigation and Drainage 12 9 75
Hydropower 4 2 50
Flood Protection 4 3 75
Water Supply and Sanitation 30 12 40
Multi-subsector 13 7 54
Total 63 33 52
Climate Change Adaptation. Overall, 25% subsector also had a high proportion of projects
of the designated water projects addressed designed with cost recovery in mind. However,
climate change/climate variability (Table 5.26). the projects did not necessarily intend to fully
For both the flood protection and irrigation recover operation and maintenance costs.
and drainage subsectors, half of the projects In many cases, the aim was only partial cost
addressed these issues. Of the four hydropower recovery; in some instances, the project outlined
projects, none directly addressed the issues.28 steps to be taken for achieving cost recovery.
Financial Sustainability. Financial sustain-
ability was reviewed with the cost recovery
criterion. Sixty-seven percent of all designated
28
An explanation for this could be that two of the four
projects addressed cost recovery issues hydropower projects were run-of-river or diversion
(Table 5.27). All four projects in the hydropower projects that provide little or no additional water storage,
while the remaining two storage projects did not envi-
subsector considered cost recovery as part of
sion seasonal carryover of water between wet and dry
their design. At 92%, the irrigation and drainage seasons.
Review of Water-related IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11 31
Climate Change Adaptation in Designated Water Projects by Subsector, FY11
Table 5.26:
Does the project address adaptation
to climate change/climate variability?
(e.g., with improved storage, water resource management,
preparedness, coastal zone management)
Number of Projects for Which “Yes�? Share of
Subsector Projects Was Given (Number) Total Projects (%)
Irrigation and Drainage 12 6 50
Hydropower 4 0 0
Flood Protection 4 2 50
Water Supply and Sanitation 30 7 23
Multi-subsector 13 1 8
Total 63 16 25
Cost Recovery in Designated Water Projects by Subsector, FY11
Table 5.27:
Is cost recovery part of the design of the project?
Number of Projects for Which “Yes�? Share of
Subsector Projects Was Given (Number) Total Projects (%)
Irrigation and Drainage 12 11 92
Hydropower 4 4 100
Flood Protection 4 1 25
Water Supply and Sanitation 30 21 70
Multi-subsector 13 5 38
Total 63 42 67
Chapter 6
32
Review of Water-related ESW/
TA Products Delivered in FY11
T
his chapter focuses on two product lines of The review below covers a number of key
the water-related analytical and advisory features of the ESW and TA products delivered
activities (AAA) work delivered in FY11: in FY11, including the following: (i) expenditure
economic and sector work (ESW) and technical by ESW and TA, (ii) expenditure by ESW and TA
assistance (TA) products.29 Water-related ESW and Region, (iii) ESW expenditure by Region,
and TA are those products that are associated (iv) number of ESW products by Region, (v) TA
with one or more of the water-related sector and expenditure by Region, (vi) number of TA prod-
theme codes listed in Chapter 2. The water-related ucts by Region, (vii) ESW expenditure by Sector
commitments refer to the part of a project’s total Board, (viii) TA expenditure by Sector Board, and
commitment amount that is associated with the (ix) ESW and TA expenditure by top ten countries.
water-related codes as reported in the World Expenditure by ESW and TA. The total
Bank’s project database. 30
expenditures for water-related ESW and TA
The review of ESW and TA products in this delivered in FY11 amounted to US$21.6 million,
chapter is solely based on information provided in including US$9.6 million for ESW and US$12.0
the World Bank’s project database. There was evi- million for TA. As shown in Figure 6.1, the share of
dence that some water-related knowledge pieces total ESW and TA expenditure was 45% for ESW
delivered in FY11 that were funded by trust fund and 55% for TA products.
sources, such as the Water Partnership Program Expenditure by ESW and TA and by
(WPP) and the South Asia Water Initiative (SAWI), Region. Water-related ESW and TA expenditures
were not reported in the project database; they by Region are in Figure 6.2. Expenditures are
were then also not included in this review. by far the highest in AFR and SAR, account-
According to the data in the project database, ing for US$6.6 million and US$5.3 million,
a total of 142 water-related ESW and TA products respectively—more than double the amount of
(73 ESW and 69 TA products) were delivered in the expenditures in the other Regions. In third
FY11. Among these are two Fee-based Service place are ESW and TA expenditures for “World�?
(FBS) products—one for Chile and one for products at US$3.1 billion. The share of ESW to
Romania. Annex F lists the ESW and TA products TA expenditure varies across Regions. In SAR
that were delivered in FY11 by Region. and MNA, TA is dominating, whereas in EAP and
29
See footnote 2 for further details on ESW and TA.
30
Contrary to the coding of IBRD and IDA projects which is carried out by the respective TTL and reviewed by OPCS,
the coding of AAA, including ESW and TA, is not reviewed by OPCS. The choice of sector and theme codes as well as
the reporting on the associated commitment amounts may therefore be less reliable for AAA than for projects.
Review of Water-related ESW/TA Products Delivered in FY11 33
ESW Expenditure by Region. As shown in
Water-related Expenditures for
Figure 6.1:
ESW and TA Products, FY11 Figure 6.3, the largest share of ESW expenditure
in FY11 occurred in AFR with 29%, followed by
ESW “world�? products with 25% of the total amount
TA 45% of US$9.6 billion. SAR and LCR account for 14%
55% and 15%, respectively.
Number of ESW Products by Region.
A total of 73 ESW products were delivered in
FY11. As shown in Figure 6.4, “world�? products
account for the largest share with 29%, followed
by AFR with 26%. This is similar to their respec-
LCR ESW accounts for a higher share. The share tive expenditure shares in Figure 6.3. In contrast,
of ESW is highest for “world�? products that either EAP shows a relatively large number of ESW
address topics in more than one Region or gen- products, while expenditures were relatively low,
eral issues independent of particular Regions. whereas SAR had only two ESW products (or 3%
It is interesting to compare the ESW and TA of the total) but expenditures accounted for 14%
activity by Region in Figure 6.2 to total lending of the total.
by Region in Figure 5.6. SAR is larger than the TA Expenditure by Region. As shown in
average across Regions both in terms of ESW/TA Figure 6.5, the largest share of TA expenditure
and lending activities. In contrast, AFR is larger occurred in SAR with 33%, followed by AFR
than average in ESW/TA activity but smaller than with 32% of the total. Compared with ESW
average in lending, whereas EAP is smaller than expenditures shown in Figure 6.3, AFR has a
average in ESW/TA activity but larger than aver- similar share of the total, yet the share of SAR
age in lending. expenditure in TA is more than twice the one in
ESW. “World�? products account for only 6% of
TA expenditure.
Number of TA Products by Region. A
Water-related ESW and TA
Figure 6.2:
Expenditure by Region total of 69 TA products were delivered in FY11.
(US$Thousand) Figure 6.6 shows that AFR had the largest share
US$Thousand
7,000 Water-related ESW
Figure 6.3:
6,000 Expenditure by Region, FY11
5,000
WORLD AFR
4,000 25% 29%
3,000
2,000
1,000 SAR
14%
0 EAP
ECA
MENA
EAP
AFR
LCR
SAR
WORLD
9%
Region ECA
MENA
LCR 4%
4%
TA ESW 15%
Chapter 6
34 The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
ESW Products by Region, FY11
Figure 6.4: Figure 6.6: TA Products by Region, FY11
(Number of Products) WORLD 7
AFR 19 10%
WORLD 21
29% 26%
AFR 22
32%
SAR 14
SAR 2 20%
3%
EAP 16
22%
MENA 3
4% MENA 4
EAP 9
LCR 5 6%
13%
7% ECA 7 ECA 4
LCR 9
9% 6%
13%
of TA products with 30%, followed by SAR with share of all Sector Boards, accounting for 43% of
20% and LCR and EAP each with 13%. The shares total ESW expenditure. None of the ESW expen-
for AFR and ECA are similar to their share in TA diture is mapped to the Agriculture and Rural
expenditure shown in Figure 6.5. In contrast, Development Sector Board (ARD) whereas 17%
MNA’s share of TA products is approximately of the lending is mapped to ARD (see Figure 5.8).
half of its share in expenditure, while EAP’s share TA Expenditure by Sector Board. Figure 6.8
of TA products is more than double its share of shows the share of TA expenditure by Sector
expenditure. Boards. WAT accounts for 39% of TA expenditure,
ESW Expenditure by Sector Board. The and is closely followed by the Urban Development
share of water-related ESW expenditure by Sec- Sector Board (UD) with 30% of TA expenditure.
tor Boards is shown in Figure 6.7. ESW mapped ARD represents 9%, and Social Development
to the Water Sector Board (WAT) is the largest Sector Board (SDV) represents 7%.
Figure 6.5:
Water-related TA Expenditures Water-related ESW Expenditure
Figure 6.7:
by Region, FY11 by Sector Board, FY11
WORLD Transport
4% Other
6%
AFR Public Sector 3%
32% Governance
7%
SAR
33%
Urban
EAP Development
5% Water
21% 43%
ECA
MENA LCR 6% Environment
11% 7% 22%
Review of Water-related ESW/TA Products Delivered in FY11 35
leading countries and regional undertakings. The
Water-related TA Expenditure
Figure 6.8:
by Sector Board, FY11 three countries with the highest ESW and TA expen-
diture are all in SAR: Pakistan, India and Nepal. The
Transport
3% Energy and remaining seven countries are in AFR, MNA, EAP
Environment Mining
4% 3% and ECA. Regional ESW and TA for AFR rank above
any individual country, as do ESW and TA products
Social Other
Development categorized as “world�? (all with asterisks).
5%
7% Expenditure by Bank Budget (BB) and
Trust Fund (TF). As shown in Figure 6.10, the
Agriculture and Water
Rural Development share of expenditure for ESW and TA products
39%
9% delivered in FY11 was 39% BB and 61% TF.
Expenditure by BB and TF and by Region.
Urban Development Water-related BB and TF expenditures by Region
30% are indicated in Figure 6.11. The share of BB to TF
expenditure varies significantly across Regions.
In ECA and MNA, more expenditure for ESW and
ESW and TA Expenditure by Top Ten Coun- TA come from BB, whereas in AFR, SAR and
tries. Figure 6.9 shows the expenditures for the LCR, TF accounts for a higher share.
Water-related ESW and TA Expenditures by Top Ten Countries, FY11
Figure 6.9:
(US$Thousand)
US$Thousand
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
Egypt,
Arab Rep.
Africa*
World*
Pakistan
India
Nepal
Central
America*
South Asia*
Georgia
Eastern
Africa*
Kenya
Middle East and
North Africa*
Indonesia
Nigeria
Uganda
Malawi
TA ESW
Chapter 6
36 The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Water-related Expenditures
Figure 6.10: Water-related ESW and TA
Figure 6.11:
for ESW and TA Products by Expenditure by Source and
Source, FY11 Region, FY11
(US$Thousand)
BB US$Thousand
TF 39% 7,000
61%
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
ECA
MENA
EAP
AFR
LCR
SAR
WORLD
Region
BB TF
Chapter 7
37
Conclusions
T
he FY11 review of the World Bank’s water Water–related IBRD and IDA projects
portfolio yielded many interesting find- approved in FY11 were analyzed based on both
ings. The key findings are summarized data from the World Bank’s project database
below with regard to the four broad areas of the and data generated by a PAD review with a newly
review: (i) water-related WBG managed com- developed questionnaire. An important insight is
mitments for FY02–11; (ii) water-related IBRD that only 22% of the water-related projects are
and IDA commitments for FY02–11; (iii) water- mapped to WAT, and most of these are water
related IBRD/IDA projects approved in FY11; and supply and sanitation projects. Almost all of the
(iv) AAA, in particular ESW and TA, delivered in irrigation and drainage projects are mapped to
FY11. This is followed by a discussion of some ARD, and all hydropower projects to EMT. Flood
of the implications of the review’s key findings. protection projects tend to be mapped to UD.
Last but not least, recommendations are made The review of the PADs included questions
for carrying out the next phase of the portfolio on key indicators. Among the main results for
review that will focus on water-related projects the core sector indicators are that the 105 water-
approved in FY12. related projects approved in FY11 are expected
Key Findings. WBG managed water-related to provide 5.1 million people with access to
commitments for FY02–11 grew from US$1.4 bil- improved water sources, and 2.7 million people
lion to US$7.6 billion during the ten-year period. with access to improved sanitation. In addition, it
Both WBG and non-WBG financing increased. is expected that an area of 2.0 million ha of land
WBG financing, driven largely by IBRD and IDA will be provided with new or improved irrigation
lending, grew more than five-fold. and drainage services.
Water-related IBRD and IDA commitments for The PAD review also included an analysis
FY02–11 grew from US$1.3 billion to US$7.4 billion of four key topics that WAT had identified as
over the decade. Commitments for the subsec- particularly important. Of the 63 “designated�?
tor water supply and sanitation dominated the water-related projects (i.e., those projects of the
water-related commitments; they increased from 105 projects that have more than 33% of their
US$0.5 billion to US$3.1 billion. Hydropower and total commitments allocated to water-related
flood protection had relatively large increases codes, and no non-water-related code with a
from FY10–11. Commitments for irrigation and larger share in total commitments than the water-
drainage varied over the ten-year period between related codes), 53% have an explicit poverty
US$0.2 billion and US$1.2 billion. focus, 52% are gender-informed, 25% address
38 The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
adaptation to climate change/climate variability, Recommendations for the FY12 Portfolio
and 67% include cost recovery in their design. Review. The next phase of the portfolio review will
Water-related AAA delivered in FY11 included focus on projects approved in FY12. In order to
73 ESW with an expenditure of US$9.6 million, help identify trends in the water portfolio, includ-
and 69 TA products with an expenditure of ing with regard to the nature of newly approved
US$12.0 million. WAT was the most important projects, the approach of the next phase should
Sector Board, but accounted for less than half follow the same methodology (and use the same
of the AAA expenditure (about 43% of ESW terminology and definitions), and cover the four
expenditure and 39% of TA expenditure). Other broad areas of review at least to the extent that
important Sector Boards included ENV and UD they were covered in the FY11 review. The next
for ESW expenditure, and UD and ARD for TA portfolio review should also continue to cover all
expenditure. Trust funds contributed 61% of the water-related projects, not only those mapped to
total AAA expenditure of US$21.6 million, with the WAT. In addition, the questions listed in Annex A
remaining amount contributed by Bank budget. should be used again for the in-depth review of the
Implications of Key Findings. The insights PADs of the projects approved in FY12. Based on
gained from the review of water-related IBRD and the experience of the FY11 portfolio review, areas
IDA projects approved in FY11 are revealing with for possible expansion and/or improvement of the
regard to the extent of the World Bank’s involve- review under the next phase are mentioned below.
ment in the water sector. This is also reflected in For water–related IBRD and IDA projects
the large portion of water-related projects and approved in FY12 it may be of interest to go beyond
AAA that are not mapped to WAT but to Sector the issues covered in the questionnaire of Annex
Boards with a main focus on other sectors. It may A, and initiate a more detailed qualitative review
thus be worthwhile for the Water Anchor to make of key aspects specific to each of the four subsec-
more efforts to reach out to the TTLs responsible tor (irrigation and drainage, hydropower, flood
for water-related projects that are not mapped to protection, and water supply and sanitation).
WAT. To ensure that—over time—projects do bet- This could be initiated in collaboration with the
ter in addressing the four key issues of poverty, respective Bank-wide thematic groups. Lessons
gender, climate change, and cost recovery, the could be learned from ARD’s approach of involv-
Water Anchor could collaborate more closely ing thematic groups in the annual portfolio review.
with TTLs of projects in the pipeline, discuss the For water-related ESW and TA products deliv-
issues’ relevance, and provide support as neces- ered in FY12 efforts should to be undertaken to get
sary. The implications of the findings for WAT a better idea of the delivered products. ESW and
include that, in order to keep an overview and TA products should be qualitatively analyzed with
strategic focus of the water-related work, efforts regard to their respective themes and key contri-
should be strengthened to work across sectors butions. It may be even worthwhile to develop a
on water-related issues and to collaborate more questionnaire for a qualitative review. A more in-
closely with other Sector Boards such as ARD, depth review could be carried out in collaboration
EMT, UD and ENV. with the respective thematic groups.
39
References
Darghouth, S., C. Ward, G. Gambarelli, E. Styger, Scheierling, S.M., C. Bartone, D.D. Mara, and Pay
and J. Roux. 2008. Watershed Management Drechsel. 2010b. Improving Wastewater Use
Approaches, Policies, and Operations: Les- in Agriculture: An Emerging Priority. Policy
sons for Scaling Up. Water Sector Board Dis- Research Working Paper 5412. Washington,
cussion Paper Series, Paper No. 11. Wash- DC: World Bank.
ington, DC: World Bank. World Bank Group. 2010. Sustaining Water for All
Independent Evaluation Group (IEG). 2010. Wa- in a Changing Climate: Water Resources Sec-
ter and Development: An Evaluation of World tor Strategy Implementation Progress Report.
Bank Support, 1997–2007. Washington, DC: Washington, DC: World Bank. http://sitere
World Bank. sources.worldbank.org/NEWS/Resources/
Operations Policy and Country Services (OPCS). sustainingwater.pdf (Accessed June 27,
2012. Delivering Results by Enhancing Our 2012.)
Focus on Quality. Washington, DC: World World Bank Group. 2012a. Transformation
Bank. through Infrastructure: Infrastructure Strat-
Scheierling, S.M., W. Critchley, S. Wunder, and egy Update FY2012–2015. Washington, DC:
J.W. Hansen. 2010a. Improving Water Man- World Bank.
agement in Rainfed Agriculture: Issues and World Bank Group. 2012b. ICT for Greater Devel-
Options in Water-Constrained Production opment Impact: World Bank Group Strategy
Systems. Final Report. Water Anchor. Wash- for Information and Communication Technol-
ington, DC: World Bank. ogy. Washington, DC: World Bank.
40
Annexes
41
Annex A
Questionnaire for
In-depth Review of Water-
related IBRD/IDA Projects
Approved in FY11
A. Water Supply (Sector Code: WC) A6. Number of other water service providers
A1. (i) People in urban areas planned to be planned to be supported under the project
provided with access to “improved water (number)�����������������������������
sources�? under the project [Core Sector Indicator]
(number)�����������������������������
(ii) People in rural areas planned to be
provided with access to “improved water B. Sanitation (Sector Code WA);
sources�? under the project and Sewerage (Sector Code WS)
(number)����������������������������� Since FY12: Sewerage was replaced by: Waste-
[Core Sector Indicators] water Collection and Transportation (Sector
A2. Improved community water points Code WT) and Wastewater Treatment and
planned to be constructed or rehabilitated Disposal (WV)
under the project B1. Number of people planned to be provided
(number)����������������������������� with access to “improved sanitation�? under
[Core Sector Indicator] the project
A3. New piped household water connections (i) urban
planned to be resulting from the project (number)��������������������������� __
intervention (ii) rural
(number)����������������������������� (number)��������������������������� __
[Core Sector Indicator] [Core Sector Indicator]
A4. Piped household water connections B2. New sewer connections planned to be
planned to be affected by rehabilitation constructed under the project
works undertaken under the project (number)�������������������������� ___
(number)����������������������������� [Core Sector Indicator]
[Core Sector Indicator] B3. Improved latrines planned to be con-
A5. Number of water utilities planned to be structed under the project
supported under the project (number)�������������������������� ___
(number)����������������������������� [Core Sector Indicator]
[Core Sector Indicator]
42 The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
B4. Volume of biochemical oxygen demand Hydropower (part of Renewable
D.
(BOD) pollution loads planned to be Energy with Sector Code LE)
removed at treatment plant outlets Since FY12, replaced by: Large Hydropower
financed under the project (Sector Code LH)
(tons/year)��������������������������� D1. (i) New generation capacity to be installed
[Core Sector Indicator] (MW)��������������������������������
B5. People planned to be trained to improve (ii) Generation capacity to be restored or
hygiene behavior or sanitation practices increased from rehabilitation
under the project (MW)��������������������������������
(number)����������������������������� [Core Sector Indicators]
[Core Sector Indicator] D2. Planned energy production
(GWh/year) ��������������������������
[World Bank Group 2010.]
Irrigation and Drainage (Sector
C. D3. (i) Is the project addressing watershed/
Code: AI) river basin planning (beyond safeguard
C1. (i) Total area planned to be provided with requirements, such as Environmental
new and/or improved irrigation and drain- Impact Assessment, EIA)?
age services Yes ______ No ______
(ha)��������������������������������� (ii) Is the project addressing water use
(ii) Area planned to be provided with new management (beyond safeguard require-
(only new, but not improved) irrigation and ments, such as Environmental Impact
drainage services Assessment, EIA)?
(ha)��������������������������������� Yes ______ No ______
[Core Sector Indicator] [World Bank Group 2010.]
C2. (i) Total number of female and/or male D4. Is the project designed as a multipurpose
water users planned to be provided with intervention (i.e., in addition to hydropower,
new/improved irrigation and drainage does it include other purposes such as
services irrigation, flood protection, tourism etc.)?
(number)����������������������������� Yes ______ No ______
(ii) Number of female water users (only D5. Beyond safeguard requirements (i.e.,
female, but not male) planned to be pro- beyond mitigation), does the project inte-
vided with new/improved irrigation and grate enhancing development benefits to
drainage services local communities (benefit sharing)?
(number)����������������������������� Yes ______ No ______
[Core Sector Indicator] [World Bank Group 2010.]
C3. Number of operational water user asso-
ciations planned to be created and/or
strengthened
(number)�����������������������������
[Core Sector Indicator]
Questionnaire for In-depth Review of Water-related IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11 43
lood Protection (Sector Code
E. F G2. Is the project based on an assessment
WD) of the water resource availability for the
E1. Is the project based on a site-specific eval- activities promoted under the project in
uation of flood hazard (either as a result a the longer-term?
study carried out before the project or as Yes ______ No ______
part of the project’s activities)? G3. Does the project address adaptation to
Yes ______ No ______ climate change/climate variability (e.g.,
E2. Does the project have an activity on flood with improved storage, water resource
risk mitigation? management, preparedness, coastal zone
Yes ______ No ______ management)?
Yes ______ No ______
[World Bank Group 2010.]
ater Resources Management
F. W G4. (i) Does the project support hydrological
(Thematic Code: 85) monitoring?
F1. Does the project assess the implications of Yes ______ No ______
its proposed activities on water quality? (ii) Does the project support meteorologi-
Yes ______ No ______ cal monitoring?
F2. Does the project support institutional Yes ______ No ______
arrangements for broader/more inte- (iii) Does the project ensure that the data
grated water resources management at on hydrological/meteorological monitor-
national level and/or local level (such as ing are broadly made available?
at the level of Ministry, basin organization, Yes ______ No ______
user association)? (iv) Does the project ensure stakeholder
Yes ______ No ______ participation in hydrological/meteorologi-
[World Bank Group 2010.] cal monitoring?
Yes ______ No ______
[IEG 2010.]
Crosscutting Issues (All water
G. G5. Does the project adequately con-
related codes: AI, BW, LE/LH, sider groundwater management and
WA, WC, WD, WS/WT and WV, conservation?
WZ, 85) Yes ______ No ______
I. Water Related [IEG 2010.]
G1. (i) Is the project based on a water resource G6. Does the project include support for
analysis done by the government, an addressing water pollution issues?
agency, or the World Bank (e.g., Country Yes ______ No ______
Environmental Assessments, river basin G15. Does the project include demand manage-
planning, hydrological analysis)? ment approaches (i.e., instruments to
Yes ______ No ______ reduce users’ demand for water), including
[World Bank Group 2010, IEG 2010.] fees, tariffs, and/or quotas?
Yes ______ No ______
[IEG 2010.]
44 The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
G26. Is the project an “integrated�? water project G13. (i) Related to the economic analysis,
(i.e., with a thematic code from at least does the scope of the analysis include all
one of the two relevant thematic groups components of the project (i.e., not just
(Urban Development, Rural Development) selected components)?
and a thematic code from Environment Yes ______ No ______
and Natural Resource Management)? (ii) Does the economic analysis compare
Yes ______ No ______ different project designs, and so choosing
[World Bank Group 2010.] the one finally appraised?
G9. Does the project trigger Safeguard Policy Yes ______ No ______
OP7.50 on International Waterways? (iii) Does the economic analysis explicitly
Yes ______ No ______ address risk (i.e., through sensitivity
[World Bank Group 2010.] analysis for key uncertain parameters,
scenario analysis of several alternatives,
II. Financing Monte Carlo analysis for a few quantified
G16. (i) How much additional financing is uncertainties, comprehensive risk analysis
mobilized from government’s counterpart quantifying all perceived uncertainties)?
funding? Yes ______ No ______
(million US$) (iv) Are the benefits of activities address-
(ii) How much additional financing is mobi- ing wastewater treatment, health improve-
lized from MDBs? ments, and environmental restoration
(million US$) quantified? (Note “n/a�?, if not applicable.)
(iii) If yes, which MDBs? Yes ______ No ______
������������������������������������� (v) If yes, which activities are quantified
(iv) How much additional financing is with regard to its benefits.
mobilized from others (e.g., local commu- �������������������������������������
nities, private sector)? [ARD Review, IEG 2010.]
(million US$) G14. (i) Is cost recovery part of the design of the
(v) If yes, from whom? project?
������������������������������������� Yes ______ No ______
[World Bank Group 2012a.] (ii) If Yes, does cost recovery cover some
G17. Does the project involve public private operation and maintenance costs (O&M)?
partnerships (PPP)? Yes ______ No ______
Yes ______ No ______ (iii) If Yes, does cost recovery cover some
[World Bank Group 2012a.] capital costs, in order to fund replacement?
Yes ______ No ______
III. Financial and Economic Analysis/Cost (iv) In the absence of full recovery of O&M
Recovery/M&E and capital cost, does the project discuss
G12. (i) Does the project include a financial how the remaining costs will be covered?
analysis? (i.e., through guaranteed subsidies by the
Yes ______ No ______ government)
(ii) Does the project include an economic Yes ______ No ______
analysis? [ARD Review, IEG 2010.]
Yes ______ No ______
[ARD Review.]
Questionnaire for In-depth Review of Water-related IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11 45
G22. (i) Does the project provide details on distinct needs of women and girls, or
monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of proj- men and boys, and/or positive impacts
ect activities? on gender gaps; and (iii) mechanisms to
Yes ______ No ______ monitor gender impact to facilitate gender-
(ii) Does at least one indicator in the disaggregated analysis.)
Results Framework have a baseline value Yes ______ No ______
that is another value than zero (beyond [World Bank Group 2010 and 2012a.]
indicators related to project management G21. Does the project deliver water interven-
issues)? tions through community driven develop-
Yes ______ No ______ ment (CDD)?
[ARD Review, IEG 2010.] Yes ______ No ______
IV. Social V. Other Issues
G19. Does the project have a poverty focus? G25. Does the project have an ICT component
(i.e., Yes is selected for any of the three (beyond the Project Management or PIU/
dimensions: Is a poverty assessment for PMU component)?
the project area included? Do any project Yes ______ No ______
components include activities especially [World Bank Group 2012b]
addressing the poor? Are any poverty- G18. Does the project address “Green Growth�?
focused results indicators included?) issues?
Yes ______ No ______ Yes ______ No ______
[World Bank Group 2012a.] [World Bank Group 2012a.]
G20. Is the project gender-informed? (i.e., Yes is G10. Is the project a regional project (i.e., a proj-
selected for any of the three dimensions: ect implemented beyond one country)?
(i) analysis and/or consultation on gender Yes ______ No ______
related issues; (ii) actions to address the [World Bank Group 2012a.]
46
Annex B
List of Water-related
IBRD/IDA Projects Approved
in FY11, by Region
Table 1. AFR
Water Commitment Sector
Country Project ID Title Amount (US$Million) Board Subsector
Africa P114782 3A-Reg&Dom.Power Mkt .Add. Fin. (FY11) 147.0 EMT Hydropower
Africa P118316 3A-Lake Victoria Phase II, APL 2 15.3 ENV WRM, WSS
Angola P124511 AO-Water Sector Inst Dvlp AF (PDISA-AF) 120.0 WAT WRM, WSS
Benin P113145 Benin Emergency Urban Env. Pr. 36.0 ENV WSS
Benin P115886 BJ: Agricultural Diversification 3.4 ARD I&D
Benin P125114 BJ-PRSC 6 Supplemental Credit 5.5 PO WSS
Burundi P122217 BI-Emergency Elect. Infrast. Project 3.2 EMT Hydropower
Cameroon P117102 CM-Sanitation APL 30.0 UD WSS
Cameroon P121027 CM-Urban and Water Additional Financing 23.0 UD WSS
Central African Republic P117616 CF-Emergency Urban Infrast. – Add Fin 15.2 UD Flood Protection, WRM, WSS
Chad P113030 TD-Local Dev Prog Sup APL II 3.7 ARD WSS
Chad P123501 TD-Urban Development-Add. Financing 27.0 WAT Flood Protection, WSS
Ethiopia P121727 ET PBS 2 Additional Financing 25.2 SP WSS
Ethiopia P125307 ET: Irrigation and Drainage Add Fin 58.2 ARD I&D, WRM
Ethiopia P113032 ET: Agricultural Growth Program 24.0 ARD WRM
Ghana P122796 GH Third Agriculture DPO 7.9 ARD I &D
Guinea-Bissau P120910 GW – Emergency Electricity & Water Rehab. 1.6 EMT WSS
Guinea-Bissau P123685 Third Economic Governance Reform EGRG 3 0.7 EP WSS
Kenya P113542 KE-Informal Settlements Improvement Proj 40.0 UD WSS
Kenya P094692 Kenya Coastal Development Project 4.5 ARD WRM
Malawi P099626 MW-Energy Sector Project 16.0 EMT Hydropower
Malawi P121120 MW:Irrig, Rural Lvlihds & Agric Add Fin 6.8 ARD I&D, WRM
Malawi P124486 MW:Second Natl Water Dev Project-Add Fin 120.0 WAT WRM, WSS
(continued on next page)
List of Water-related IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11, by Region
47
48
Table 1. AFR (continued)
Water Commitment Sector
Country Project ID Title Amount (US$Million) Board Subsector
Mali P116602 ML-Urban Local Government Support 10.5 UD Flood Protection
Project
Mozambique P107598 MZ-PROIRRI Sustainable Irrigation Devt 42.7 ARD I &D
Mozambique P115217 MZ-Maputo Municipal Development Prog II 2.0 UD Flood Protection
Mozambique P120546 MZ-Water Serv&Inst Spprt (WASIS)-Add’l Fi 37.0 WAT WSS
Niger P117365 NE-Urban Water and Sanitation Project 90.0 WAT WSS
Swaziland P095232 SZ-Loc Govt SIL (FY11) 3.7 UD Flood Protection
Tanzania P111155 TZ-Zanzibar Urban Services Project 17.4 UD Flood Protection, WSS
The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Togo P125049 TG-Emergency Infrastruc Rehab Add Financ 13.0 UD Flood Protection
Uganda P101232 UG-PRSC 8 11.0 PO WRM, WSS
Zambia P102459 ZM – Irrigation Development Project (FY10) 62.1 ARD I&D
Table 2. EAP
Water Commitment Sector
Country Project ID Title Amount (US$Million) Board Subsector
Cambodia P121075 KH-Typhoon Ketsana Emergency Operation 12.4 UD WSS
China P098078 CN-Huai River Basin Flood Management 200.0 ARD Flood Protection, I&D, WRM
China P110632 CN – Sichuan Small Towns Development 40.0 UD Flood Protection, WSS
China P112626 CN – Liuzhou Environment Management II 145.5 WAT WSS
China P115695 CN-Bayannaoer Water Recla. & Env. Impro 80.0 WAT WRM, WSS
China P116656 CN-Zhejiang Qiantang River Basin Small T 91.0 UD WSS
China P117819 CN-Yunnan Urban Environment-Phase II 60.0 WAT WRM, WSS
China P118647 CN-Anhui Shaying River Channel Improv 1.0 TR WRM, WSS
China P120234 CN-Shandong Confucius & Mencius Culture 9.5 UD WSS
(continued on next page)
Table 2. EAP (continued)
Water Commitment Sector
Country Project ID Title Amount (US$Million) Board Subsector
Indonesia P112158 Upper Cisokan Pumped Storage Hydro-Elect 640 EMT Hydropower
Indonesia P114348 Water Resources and Irr Mgmt Program 2 91.5 ARD I&D,WRM,WSS
Indonesia P118531 ID – Fourth Infrastructure DPL (IDPL4) 64 UD WSS
Mongolia P118109 MN-Mining Infrastructure Investment Supp 2.5 EMT WSS
Philippines P114048 PH KALAHI-CIDSS (Additional Financing) 23.6 SDV WSS
Philippines P117470 PH Laguna de Bay Institutional Strengthegning 10 ENV WRM, WSS
Samoa P120594 Samoa Post Tsunami Reconstruction 2.7 TR Flood Protection, WRM
Tonga P120595 Tonga Post Tsunami Reconstruction 0.85 UD WSS
Vietnam P084773 VN-Trung Son Hydropower Project 313.5 EMT Hydropower, WRM
Vietnam P113949 VN-Mekong Delta Water Mgmt for Rural Dev 152 ARD I&D, WRM, WSS
Vietnam P119077 VN-Urban Water Supply and Wastewater 200 WAT WSS
Vietnam P119090 Hospital Waste Management Support 45 HE WSS
Vietnam P122940 VN-CCESP-Additional Financing 51.5 WAT WRM, WSS
Table 3. ECA
Water Commitment Sector
Country Project ID Title Amount (US$Million) Board Subsector
Azerbaijan P107617 WUAP 67.2 ARD I&D, WRM
Central Asia P120788 Central Asia Hydromet modernization 20.7 UD Flood Protection, WSS
Georgia P120887 AF Regional & Mun Infra dev project 22.5 UD WSS
Kyrgyz Republic P126390 AF-Second On Farm irrigation project 14.4 WAT I&D, WRM
Moldova P115634 Disaster &Climate Risk management 10.0 UD WSS
Montenegro P120659 AF-ME Envt Sensitive tourist areas proj 0.2 UD WSS
(continued on next page)
List of Water-related IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11, by Region
49
50
Table 3. ECA (continued)
Water Commitment Sector
Country Project ID Title Amount (US$Million) Board Subsector
South Eastern Europe P110910 SEEC CRIF (Serbia and Macedonia) 3.0 UD WSS
and Balkans
Tajikistan P118196 Dushanbe Water Supply II 16.0 WAT WSS
Uzbekistan P111760 Syrada water supply 88.0 WAT WSS
Table 4. LCR
Water Commitment Sector
Country Project ID Title Amount (US$Million) Board Subsector
The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Argentina P114081 AR (AF-C) BA Province Infrastr. Sust. Inv 37.0 WAT WSS
Argentina P120211 AR Norte Grande Water Infrastructure 200.0 WAT Flood Protection, WSS
Argentina P121836 AR La Rioja Public Sect Streng Prog-APL1 9.6 PS WSS, WRM
Argentina P125151 AR 2nd Norte Grande Water Infrastr. 200.0 WAT WSS
Belize P111928 BZ Municipal Development 7.5 UD WSS
Brazil P095171 BR (MST) Bahia Health and Wtr Mgt (SWAP) 33.0 HE WRM, WSS
Brazil P106702 BR Integr. Solid Waste & Carbon finance 5.0 UD WSS
Brazil P118540 BR Santa Catarina Rural Competitiveness 9.0 ARD WRM, WSS
Brazil P122391 BR-Rio de Janeiro Urban and Housing DPL 92.1 UD WSS
Colombia P110671 National Macroproyectos Social Interest 6.8 UD WSS
Colombia P111479 CO Rio Bogota Environ Infrastructure 250.0 WAT WRM, WSS
El Salvador P122640 SV CAT DDO 31.5 UD WSS
Haiti P121833 HT-(AF) Housing Reconstruction Urban CDD 6.6 ARD WSS
Mexico P121195 MX Efficiency Improvement Program 100.0 WAT WSS
OECS Countries P117871 Regional Disaster Vuln. Reduct. Projects 15.8 UD Flood Protection, WSS,
WRM
(continued on next page)
Table 4. LCR (continued)
Water Commitment Sector
Country Project ID Title Amount (US$Million) Board Subsector
Peru P104760 PE-Sierra Irrigation 17.8 ARD I&D, WRM, WSS
Peru P117293 PE Optimization of Lima Water & Sewerage 54.5 WAT WSS
Peru P117314 PE (AF-C) PRONASAR 2 30.0 WAT WRM, WSS
Peru P120860 PERU CAT DDO 30.0 UD WSS
Peru P118713 Peru Third Programmatic Environmental 21.7 ENV WRM
Development Policy Loan
St. Lucia P125205 SLU Hurricane Tomas ERL 2.2 UD WSS
St. Vincent and the P124939 SVG Hurricane Tomas Emergency Recov Loan 1.8 UD Flood Protection, WSS
Grenadines
Table 5. MNA
Water Commitment Sector
Country Project ID Title Amount (US$Million) Board Subsector
Djibouti P117355 DJ-Rural CDD & Water Mobilization 2.2 ARD I&D, WRM
Egypt P117745 EG-Farm-level Irrigation Modernization 95.0 ARD I&D
Egypt P120161 EG-Integrated Sanitation & Sew. Infra. 2 200.0 WAT WRM, WSS
Lebanon P103063 LB – Greater Beirut Water Supply 200.0 WAT WRM, WSS
Morocco P116557 MA-First DPL in support of the PMV 61.5 ARD I&D
Tunisia P119140 TN-4th NW Mount & Forest Area Dev PNO4 5.8 ARD I&D
List of Water-related IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11, by Region
51
52
Table 6. SAR
Water Commitment Sector
Country Project ID Title Amount (US$Million) Board Subsector
Afghanistan P122235 AF: Irrigation Restoration &Development 72.3 ARD Irrigation &Drainage, WRM
Bangladesh P111017 BD: Padma Bridge 324.0 TR Flood Protection
Bangladesh P120843 BD: Private Sector Development Support 22.8 FPD WSS
Bangladesh P122014 BD: ECRRP Additional Financing-AF 37.5 ARD Flood Protection, WRM,
WSS
India P124354 Uttarakhand Decentralized Watershed Project 1.0 ARD WRM
Additional Financing
India P096124 IN: Vishnugad Pipalkoti HEP 622.0 EMT Hydropower, WSS
India P119085 IN: National Ganga River Basin Project 790.0 WAT WRM, WSS
The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
India P122096 IN: Bihar Kosi Flood Recovery Project 74.8 UD Flood Protection, WSS
Nepal P112893 NP: Kabeli Transmission Project 0.7 EMT Hydropower
Nepal P124088 NP: PAF Nepal-AF 11.0 ARD WSS
Pakistan P096745 PK: Punjab Barrages Improvement II Proj 145.6 ARD I&D, Flood Protection, WRM
Pakistan P123311 PK: Highways Rehabilitation Project-AF 15.6 TR Flood Protection
Sri Lanka P125855 LK: Community Livelihoods in Conflict-AF 29.7 ARD I&D,WSS
53
Annex C
Core Sector and Other Key
Indicators for Water-related
Subsectors and Theme
for IBRD/IDA Projects
Approved in FY11
54
Table A. Water Supply – Core Sector Indicators
Piped
household
Improved water
People in rural community New piped connections Number Number of
areas planned water points household planned to be of water other water
to be provided planned to be water affected by utilities service
People in urban areas with access to constructed or connections rehabilitation planned providers
planned to be provided “improved water rehabilitated planned to be works to be planned to
with access to “improved sources�? under under the resulting from undertaken supported be supported
water sources�? under the the project project the project under the under the under the
Project ID Country Project Name project (number) (number) (number) intervention project project project
P124486 Malawi Second Natl Water 1,632,505 664,320 65,476 96,951 4
Dev Project-Add Fin
P117365 Nepal Urban Water and 484,000 453 37,100 5,000
The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Sanitation Project
P115695 China Bayannaoer Water
Recla. & Env. Impro
P117293 Peru Optimization of 175,000 1
Lima Water &
Sewerage
P121195 Mexico Efficiency
Improvement
Program
P103063 Lebanon Greater Beirut 20,000 200,000
Water Supply
P118196 Tajikistan DUSHANBE WATER
SUPPLY II
P120211 Argentina Norte Grande Water 10,200 6,800
Infrastructure
P120546 Mozambique Water Serv&Inst 292,118 127 42,928 5,000 2
Spprt(WASIS)-Add’l
Fi
(continued on next page)
Table A. Water Supply – Core Sector Indicators (continued)
Piped
household
Improved water
People in rural community New piped connections Number Number of
areas planned water points household planned to be of water other water
to be provided planned to be water affected by utilities service
People in urban areas with access to constructed or connections rehabilitation planned providers
planned to be provided “improved water rehabilitated planned to be works to be planned to
with access to “improved sources�? under under the resulting from undertaken supported be supported
water sources�? under the the project project the project under the under the under the
Project ID Country Project Name project (number) (number) (number) intervention project project project
P124511 Angola Water Sector Inst 840,000 132,000 9
Dvlp AF (PDISA-AF)
P123501 Chad Urban 216,240 127 13,600
Development-Add.
Financing
P114048 Philippines KALAHI-CIDSS
(Additional
Financing)
P121075 Cambodia Typhoon Ketsana
Emergency
Operation
P119077 Vietnam Urban Water Supply 42,628
and Wastewater
P117314 Peru (AF-C) PRONASAR 256,400
2
P125151 Argentina 2nd Norte Grande 4
Water Infrastr.
P116656 China Zhejiang Qiantang
River Basin Small T
P125114 Benin PRSC 6
Supplemental
Credit
P117616 Central African Emergency Urban 38,000
Core Sector and Other Key Indicators for IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11
Republic Infrast. – Add Fin
(continued on next page)
55
Annex A
56
Table A. Water Supply – Core Sector Indicators (continued)
Piped
household
Improved water
People in rural community New piped connections Number Number of
areas planned water points household planned to be of water other water
to be provided planned to be water affected by utilities service
People in urban areas with access to constructed or connections rehabilitation planned providers
planned to be provided “improved water rehabilitated planned to be works to be planned to
with access to “improved sources�? under under the resulting from undertaken supported be supported
water sources�? under the the project project the project under the under the under the
Project ID Country Project Name project (number) (number) (number) intervention project project project
P120910 Guinea-Bissau Emergency
Electricity & Water
Rehab.
The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
P113949 Vietnam Mekong Delta Water
Mgmt for Rural Dev
P125855 Sri Lanka Community 10,000
Livelihoods in
Conflict-AF
P110632 China Sichuan Small
Towns Development
P117355 Djibouti Rural CDD & Water 10,800
Mobilization
P118109 Mongolia Mining
Infrastructure
Investment Supp
P096745 Pakistan Punjab Barrages
Improvement II Proj
P113030 Chad Local Dev Prog Sup 690,000 600
APL II
Total 27 Projects 3,502,863 1,621,520 1,307 363,932 498,751 20 0
Table B. Sanitation and Wastewater Treatment – Core Sector Indicators
Number of Number of Volume of BOD People planned
people planned people planned pollution loads to be trained
to be provided to be provided New sewer planned to be to improve
with access with access connections Improved latrines removed by at hygiene behavior
to improved to “improved planned to be planned to be treatment plant or sanitation
sanitation�? under sanitation�? constructed constructed outlets financed practices under
the project under the project under the project under the project under the project the project
Project ID Country Project Name (i) urban (ii) rural (number) (number) (tons/year) (number)
P113145 Benin Emergency Urban 729,000
Env. Pr.
P125114 Benin PRSC 6 Supplemental
Credit
P117102 Cameroon Sanitation APL 175,000 143,000 2,000 42,500 250 750,000
P124486 Malawi Second Natl Water 24,250 38,130 5,475
Dev Project-Add Fin
P117365 Niger Urban Water and 235,000 23,500
Sanitation Project
P121075 Cambodia Typhoon Ketsana
Emergency Operation
P110632 China Sichuan Small Towns
Development
P115695 China Bayannaoer Water
Recla. & Env. Impro
P117819 China Yunnan Urban
Environment-Phase II
P112626 China Liuzhou Environment
Management II
P116656 China Zhejiang Qiantang
River Basin Small
P113949 Vietnam Mekong Delta Water 10,000
Mgmt for Rural Dev
(continued on next page)
Core Sector and Other Key Indicators for IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11
57
Annex A
58
Table B. Sanitation and Wastewater Treatment – Core Sector Indicators (continued)
Number of Number of Volume of BOD People planned
people planned people planned pollution loads to be trained
to be provided to be provided New sewer planned to be to improve
with access with access connections Improved latrines removed by at hygiene behavior
to improved to “improved planned to be planned to be treatment plant or sanitation
sanitation�? under sanitation�? constructed constructed outlets financed practices under
the project under the project under the project under the project under the project the project
Project ID Country Project Name (i) urban (ii) rural (number) (number) (tons/year) (number)
P119090 Vietnam Hospital Waste
Management Support
P119077 Vietnam Urban Water Supply 263,051
and Wastewater
P122940 Vietnam CCESP-Additional 98,000 1,068
The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Financing
P125151 Argentina 2nd Norte Grande
Water Infrastr.
P111479 Colombia Rio Bogota Environ
Infrastructure
P121195 Mexico Efficiency
Improvement
Program
P117314 Peru (AF-C) PRONASAR 2 400
P117293 Peru Optimization of Lima
Water & Sewerage
P120161 Egypt Integrated Sanitation 1,200,000
& Sew. Infra. 2
P119085 India National Ganga River
Basin Project
Total 22 Projects 1,289,301 1,391,130 2,000 71,475 1,288 750,400
Table C. Irrigation and Drainage – Core Sector Indicators
Total number of Number of female
Total area planned Area planned to be female and/or male water users (only Number of
to be provided provided with new water users planned female, but not operational water
with new and/or (only new, but not to be provided with male) planned to be user associations
improved irrigation improved) irrigation new/improved provided with new/ planned to be
and drainage and drainage irrigation and improved irrigation created and/or
services services drainage services and drainage strengthened
Project ID Country Project Name (ha) (ha) (number) services (number)
P107598 Mozambique PROIRRI Sustainable 5,500 80,000 26,400 220
Irrigation Devt
P115886 Benin Agricultural Diversification 9,000 4,500
P125855 Sri Lanka Community Livelihoods in 114,000
Conflict-AF
P114348 Indonesia Water Resources and Irr 390,000 2,030
Mgmt Program 2
P126390 Kyrgyz AF-SECOND ON-FARM 580,000 285,500 79,500 22,828 475
Republic IRRIGATION PROJECT
P107617 Azerbaijan WUAP 847,000 715,000 310,000 171
P122796 Ghana Third Agriculture DPO
P121120 Malawi Irrig, Rural Lvlihds & Agric
Add Fin
P096745 Pakistan Punjab Barrages
Improvement II Proj
P125307 Ethiopia Irrigation and Drainage Add 17,300
Fin
P117745 Egypt, Arab Farm-level Irrigation
Republic of Modernization
P117355 Djibouti Rural CDD & Water
Mobilization
P116557 Morocco First DPL in support of the
PMV
P119140 Tunisia 4th NW Mount & Forest Area
Core Sector and Other Key Indicators for IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11
Dev PNO4
(continued on next page)
59
Annex A
60
Table C. Irrigation and Drainage – Core Sector Indicators (continued)
Total number of Number of female
Total area planned Area planned to be female and/or male water users (only Number of
to be provided provided with new water users planned female, but not operational water
with new and/or (only new, but not to be provided with male) planned to be user associations
improved irrigation improved) irrigation new/improved provided with new/ planned to be
and drainage and drainage irrigation and improved irrigation created and/or
services services drainage services and drainage strengthened
Project ID Country Project Name (ha) (ha) (number) services (number)
P102459 Zambia Irrigation Development 10,000 10,000 14,000
Project(FY10)
P113949 Vietnam Mekong Delta Water Mgmt 75
for Rural Dev
P098078 China Huai River Basin Flood 4
The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Management an.
P104760 Peru Sierra Irrigation
P122235 Afghanistan Irrigation Restoration
&Development
Total 19 Projects 1,972,800 300,000 874,500 359,228 2,975
Table D(i). Hydropower – Core Sector Indicators
Generation capacity planned to
New generation capacity for hydropower be restored or increased from
Project ID Country Project Name planned to be installed (MW) rehabilitation (MW)
P112158 Indonesia Upper Cisokan Pumped Storage Hydro-Elect 1,040
P096124 India Vishnugad Pipalkoti HEP 444
P084773 Vietnam Trung Son Hydropower Project 260
P114782 Africa 3A-Reg & Dom. Power Mkt .Add. Fin.
P099626 Malawi Energy Sector Project
P122217 Burundi Emergency Elect. Infrast. Project 18
P112893 Nepal Kabeli Transmission Project 0.25
Total 7 Projects 1,744 18
Table D(ii). Hydropower – Other Key Indicators
Beyond
safeguard
requirements,
does the project
integrate
enhancing
Is the project development
addressing Is the project Is the project benefits to local
Planned energy watershed/ addressing designed as a communities
production river basin water use multi-purpose (benefit
Project ID Country Project Name (GW/yr) planning? management? intervention? sharing)?
P112158 Indonesia Upper Cisokan Pumped
Storage Hydro-Elect
P096124 India Vishnugad Pipalkoti HEP 1,665 1 1
P084773 Vietnam Trung Son Hydropower 1,019 1 1
Project
P114782 Africa 3A-Reg & Dom. Power
Mkt .Add. Fin.
P099626 Malawi Energy Sector Project
P122217 Burundi Emergency Elect. Infrast.
Project
P112893 Nepal Kabeli Transmission 1 1
Project
Total 7 Projects 2,684 2 Projects 0 Projects 2 Projects 2 Projects
Core Sector and Other Key Indicators for IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11
61
Annex A
62
Table E. Flood Protection – Key Indicators
Does the project have
an activity evaluating
flood hazard (including Does the project have
climate change an activity on flood risk
Project ID Country Project Name impacts)? mitigation?
P120788 Central Asia CENTRAL ASIA HYDROMET MODERNIZATION 1 1
P117871 OECS Countries Regional Disaster Vuln. Reduct. Projects 1 1
P117616 Central African Republic Emergency Urban Infrast. – Add Fin 1 1
P111155 Tanzania Zanzibar Urban Services Project 1 1
P125049 Togo Emergency Infrastruc Rehab Add Financ 1 1
P098078 China Huai River Basin Flood Management an.
The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
P110632 China Sichuan Small Towns Development
P122940 Vietnam CCESP-Additional Financing 1
P111479 Colombia Rio Bogota Environ Infrastructure
P120211 Argentina Norte Grande Water Infrastructure 1
P123501 Chad Urban Development-Add. Financing 1 1
P124939 St. Vincent and the Grenadines Hurricane Tomas Emergency Recov Loan 1 1
P111017 Bangladesh Padma Bridge 1
P120594 Samoa Samoa Post Tsunami Reconstruction 1 1
P116602 Mali Urban Local Government Support Project
P123311 Pakistan Highways Rehabilitation Project-AF 1
P096745 Pakistan Punjab Barrages Improvement II Proj
P122014 Bangladesh ECRRP Additional Financing-AF 1 1
P095232 Swaziland Loc Govt SIL (FY11)
P115217 Mozambique Maputo Municipal Development Prog II 1
P122096 India Bihar Kosi Flood Recovery Project 1 1
Total 21 Projects 10 Projects 15 Projects
Table F. Water Resources Management – Key Indicators
Does the project
support institutional
arrangements for broader/
more integrated water
resources management
at national level and/
or local level (such as
Does the project assess the at the level of Ministry,
implications of its proposed activities basin organization, user
Project ID Country Project Name on water quality? association)?
P114348 Indonesia Water Resources and Irr Mgmt Program 2 1
P126390 Kyrgyz Republic AF-SECOND ON-FARM IRRIGATION PROJECT 1
P107617 Azerbaijan WUAP 1
P115695 China Bayannaoer Water Recla. & Env. Impro
P095171 Brazil (MST) Bahia Health and Wtr Mgt (SWAP) 1 1
P103063 Lebanon Greater Beirut Water Supply 1 1
P098078 China Huai River Basin Flood Management an.
P122235 Afghanistan Irrigation Restoration &Development 1 1
P118316 Africa 3A-Lake Victoria Phase II, APL 2 1
P124486 Malawi Second Natl Water Dev Project-Add Fin
P111479 Colombia Rio Bogota Environ Infrastructure 1 1
P119085 India National Ganga River Basin Project
P124511 Angola Water Sector Inst Dvlp AF (PDISA-AF)
P125307 Ethiopia Irrigation and Drainage Add Fin 1
P117871 OECS Countries Regional Disaster Vuln. Reduct. Projects
P122014 Bangladesh ECRRP Additional Financing-AF
P104760 Peru Sierra Irrigation 1
P121120 Malawi Irrig, Rural Lvlihds & Agric Add Fin
(continued on next page)
Core Sector and Other Key Indicators for IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11
63
Annex A
64
Table F. Water Resources Management – Key Indicators (continued)
Does the project
support institutional
arrangements for broader/
more integrated water
resources management
at national level and/
or local level (such as
Does the project assess the at the level of Ministry,
implications of its proposed activities basin organization, user
Project ID Country Project Name on water quality? association)?
P122940 Vietnam CCESP-Additional Financing
P117314 Peru (AF-C) PRONASAR 2 1
P120161 Egypt, Arab Integrated Sanitation & Sew. Infra. 2 1 1
The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Republic of.
P117819 China Yunnan Urban Environment-Phase II
P117616 Central African Emergency Urban Infrast. – Add Fin 1
Republic
P117355 Djibouti Rural CDD & Water Mobilization 1 1
P121836 Argentina La Rioja Public Sect Streng Prog-APL1 1
P118713 Peru Peru Third Programmatic Environmental 1 1
Development Policy Loan
P124354 India Uttarakhand Decentralized Watershed Project 1
Additional Financing
P118540 Brazil Santa Catarina Rural Competitiveness 1 1
P118647 China Anhui Shaying River Channel Improv
P113949 Vietnam Mekong Delta Water Mgmt for Rural Dev 1
P117470 Philippines Laguna de Bay Institutional Strengthegning 1 1
P094692 Kenya Kenya Coastal Development Project
P101232 Uganda PRSC 8
P113032 Ethiopia Agricultural Growth Program
Total 34 Projects 14 Projects 15 Projects
65
Annex D
Results for Crosscutting
Issues of Designated
IBRD and IDA Projects
Approved in FY11
66
Table G.I. Water-related Issues
Projects for Which
“Yes�? Was Given Share of Total
Question (Number) Projects (%)
Is the project based on a water resource analysis done by the government, an agency, or the World Bank? 17 27
Does the project adequately consider groundwater management and conservation? 14 22
Does the project support hydrological monitoring? 19 30
• Does the project support meteorological monitoring? 12 19
• Does the project ensure that the data on hydrological/ meteorological monitoring are broadly made 3 5
available?
• Does the project ensure stakeholder participation in hydrological/meteorological monitoring? 9 14
Is the project based on an assessment of the water resource availability for the activities promoted under 16 25
The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
the project in the longer-term?
Does the project address adaptation to climate change/climate variability? 16 25
Does the project include support for addressing water pollution issues? 26 41
Does the project include demand management approaches (i.e., instruments to reduce users’ demand 5 8
for water), including fees, tariffs, and/or quotas?
Is the project an “integrated�? water project (i.e., with at least one thematic code from two of the three 27 42
relevant thematic groups (Urban Development, Rural Development, and/or Environment and Natural
Resource Management)?
Does the project trigger Safeguard Policy OP7.50 on International Waterways? 23 36
Table G.II. Financing
Question Response Comments
How much additional financing is mobilized from US$2.97 Billion
government’s counterpart funding?
• How much additional financing is mobilized US$32 Million 3A-Reg&Dom.Power Mkt .Add. Fin. (P114782).
from MDBs?
• From which MDBs? AfDB
• How much additional financing is mobilized US$427 Million
from others (e.g., local communities, private
sector)?
• From whom? SIDA and French Agency for KE-Informal Settlements Improvement Project (P113542)
Development
3A-Reg&Dom.Power Mkt .Add. Fin. (P114782)
KFW
ZM – Irrigation Development Project (P102459)
Local Beneficiaries
AF: Irrigation Restoration &Development (P122235)
Afghanistan Reconstruction Trust
Fund Regional Disaster Vuln. Reduct. Projects (P117871)
GFDRR,CIF EG-Farm-level Irrigation Modernization (P117745)
French Agency for Development TD-Urban Development-Add. Financing (P123501)
Local Communities Central Asia Hydromet Modernization (P120788)
CIFs MZ-Water Serv&Inst Spprt(WASIS)-Add’l Fi (P120546)
AUSAID PH Laguna de Bay Institutional Strengthening (P117470)
Local Governments LB – Greater Beirut Water Supply (P103063)
Local Sources of Borrowing Country
Does the project involve public private 6 Projects (or 9% of total) involved
partnerships (PPP)? PPP
Results for Crosscutting Issues of Designated IBRD and IDA Projects Approved in FY11
67
68
Table G.III. Financial and Economic Analysis, Cost Recovery, and Monitoring and Evaluation
Projects for Which
“Yes�? Was Given Share of Total
Question (Number) Projects (%) Comments
Does the project include a financial analysis? 48 75
Does the project include an economic analysis? 55 86
• Related to the economic analysis, does the 36 56
scope of the analysis include all components
of the project (i.e., not just selected
components)?
• Does the economic analysis compare 9 14
different project designs, and so choosing
the one finally appraised?
The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
• Does the economic analysis explicitly 29 45
address risk?
Are the benefits of activities addressing 11 Not applicable to
wastewater treatment, health improvements, all projects
and environmental restoration quantified? (If
applicable)
• If yes, which activities are quantified with Wastewater treatment and environmental restoration
regard to its benefits? benefits were quantified for CN-Yunnan Urban
Environment-Phase II (P117819); CN-Bayannaoer Water
Recla. & Env. Improvement (P115695); and CN-Zhejiang
Qiantang River Basin Small (P116656).
Wastewater treatment benefits were quantified for CN –
Liuzhou Environment Management II (P112626)
Health benefits were quantified for
IN: National Ganga River Basin Project (P119085)
(continued on next page)
Table G.III. Financial and Economic Analysis, Cost Recovery, and Monitoring and Evaluation (continued)
Projects for Which
“Yes�? Was Given Share of Total
Question (Number) Projects (%) Comments
Is cost recovery part of the design of the project? 44 66
• If Yes, is it mentioned whether cost recovery 26 Not all projects
covers some operation and maintenance are revenue
costs (O&M)? generating
• If Yes, is it mentioned whether cost recovery 16 Not all projects
covers some capital costs, in order to fund are revenue
replacement? generating
• In the absence of full recovery of O&M and 8 Not all projects
capital cost, does the project discuss how are revenue
the remaining costs will be covered? generating
Does the project provide details on monitoring 59 92
and evaluation (M&E) of project activities?
• Does at least one indicator in the Results 45 70
Framework have a baseline value that is
another value than zero (beyond indicators
related to project management issues)?
Results for Crosscutting Issues of Designated IBRD and IDA Projects Approved in FY11
69
70
Table G.IV. Social Issues
Projects for Which “Yes�?
Question Was Given (Number) Share of Total Projects (%)
Does the project have a poverty focus? 34 53
Is the project gender-informed? 33 52
Does the project deliver water interventions through community driven development 20 31
(CDD)?
Table G.V. Other Issues
Projects for Which “Yes�?
Question Was Given (Number) Share of Total Projects (%)
The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Does the project have an ICT component (beyond the Project Management or PIU/PMU 23 36
component)?
Does the project address “Green Growth�? issues? 0 0
Is the project a regional project (i.e., a project implemented beyond one country)? 4 6
71
Annex E
List of Designated IBRD/IDA
Projects Approved in FY11, by
Subsector and Theme
72
Table 1. Irrigation and Drainage
Water
Sector Commitment Lending
Country Project ID Project Name Board (US$Million) Instrument Type Subsector
Afghanistan P122235 AF: Irrigation Restoration &Development ARD 72.4 Investment I&D
Azerbaijan P107617 WUAP ARD 67.2 Investment I&D
Egypt, Arab P117745 EG-Farm-level Irrigation Modernization ARD 95.0 Investment I&D
Republic of
Ethiopia P125307 ET: Irrigation and Drainage Add Fin ARD 58.2 Investment I&D
Kyrgyz Republic P126390 AF-Second On-Farm Irrigation Project WAT 14.4 Investment I&D
Malawi P121120 MW: Irrig, Rural Lvlihds & Agric Add Fin ARD 6.9 Investment I&D
The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Mozambique P107598 MZ-PROIRRI Sustainable Irrigation Devt ARD 42.7 Investment I&D
Pakistan P096745 PK: Punjab Barrages Improvement II Proj ARD 145.6 Investment I&D
Peru P104760 PE-Sierra Irrigation ARD 17.8 Investment I&D
Sri Lanka P125855 LK: Community Livelihoods in Conflict-AF ARD 29.8 Investment I&D
Vietnam P113949 VN-Mekong Delta Water Mgmt for Rural Dev ARD 152.0 Investment I&D
Zambia P102459 ZM – Irrigation Development Project (FY10) ARD 62.1 Investment I&D
Table 2. Hydropower
Water
Sector Commitment Lending
Country Project ID Project Name Board (US$Million) Instrument Type Subsector
Africa P114782 3A-Reg&Dom.Power Mkt .Add. Fin. (FY11) EMT 147.2 Investment Hydropower
India P096124 IN: Vishnugad Pipalkoti HEP EMT 622.1 Investment Hydropower
Indonesia P112158 Upper Cisokan Pumped Storage Hydro-Elect EMT 640.0 Investment Hydropower
Vietnam P084773 VN-Trung Son Hydropower Project EMT 313.5 Investment Hydropower
Table 3. Flood Protection
Water Lending
Sector Commitment Instrument
Country Project ID Project Name Board (US$Million) Type Subsector
Central Asia P120788 CENTRAL ASIA HYDROMET MODERNIZATION UD 20.7 Investment Flood Protection
China P098078 CN-Huai River Basin Flood Management an. ARD 200.0 Investment Flood Protection
OECS Countries P117871 Regional Disaster Vuln. Reduct. Projects UD 15.9 Investment Flood Protection
Togo P125049 TG-Emergency Infrastruc Rehab Add Financ UD 12.9 Investment Flood Protection
Table 4. Water Supply and Sanitation
Water Lending
Sector Commitment Instrument
Country Project ID Project Name Board (US$Million) Type Subsector
Africa P118316 3A-Lake Victoria Phase II, APL 2 ENV 15.3 Investment WSS
Angola P124511 AO-Water Sector Inst Dvlp AF (PDISA-AF) WAT 120.0 Investment WSS
Argentina P125151 AR 2nd Norte Grande Water Infrastr. WAT 200.0 Investment WSS
Argentina P120211 AR Norte Grande Water Infrastructure WAT 200.0 Investment WSS
Argentina P114081 AR (AF-C) BA Province Infrastr. Sust. Inv WAT 37.0 Investment WSS
Benin P113145 Benin Emergency Urban Env. Pr. ENV 36.0 Investment WSS
Brazil P095171 BR (MST) Bahia Health and Wtr Mgt (SWAP) HE 33.0 Investment WSS
Cameroon P117102 CM-Sanitation APL UD 30.0 Investment WSS
Cameroon P121027 CM-Urban and Water Additional Financing UD 23.0 Investment WSS
Chad P123501 TD-Urban Development-Add. Financing WAT 26.9 Investment WSS
China P115695 CN-Bayannaoer Water Recla. & Env. Impro WAT 80.0 Investment WSS
China P116656 CN-Zhejiang Qiantang River Basin Small T UD 91.0 Investment WSS
China P112626 CN – Liuzhou Environment Management II WAT 145.5 Investment WSS
China P117819 CN-Yunnan Urban Environment-Phase II WAT 60.0 Investment WSS
Colombia P111479 CO Rio Bogota Environ Infrastructure WAT 250.0 Investment WSS
List of Designated IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11, by Subsector and Theme
(continued on next page)
73
74
Table 4. Water Supply and Sanitation (continued)
Water Lending
Sector Commitment Instrument
Country Project ID Project Name Board (US$Million) Type Subsector
Egypt, Arab P120161 EG-Integrated Sanitation & Sew. Infra. 2 WAT 200.0 Investment WSS
Republic of
El Salvador P122640 SV CAT DDO UD 31.5 DPL WSS
India P119085 IN: National Ganga River Basin Project WAT 790.0 Investment WSS
Lebanon P103063 LB – Greater Beirut Water Supply WAT 200.0 Investment WSS
Malawi P124486 MW:Second Natl Water Dev Project-Add Fin WAT 120.0 Investment WSS
Mexico P121195 MX Efficiency Improvement Program WAT 100.0 Investment WSS
Moldova P115634 DISASTER & CLIMATE RISK MGT UD 10.0 Investment WSS
The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Mozambique P120546 MZ-Water Serv&Inst Spprt (WASIS)-Add’l Fi WAT 37.0 Investment WSS
Niger P117365 NE-Urban Water and Sanitation Project WAT 90.0 Investment WSS
Peru P117314 PE (AF-C) PRONASAR 2 WAT 30.0 Investment WSS
Peru P117293 PE Optimization of Lima Water & Sewerage WAT 54.5 Investment WSS
Philippines P117470 PH Laguna de Bay Institutional Strengthening ENV 10.0 Investment WSS
Tajikistan P118196 DUSHANBE WATER SUPPLY II WAT 16.0 Investment WSS
Uzbekistan P111760 SYRDARYA WATER SUPPLY WAT 88.0 Investment WSS
Vietnam P119077 VN-Urban Water Supply and Wastewater WAT 200.0 Investment WSS
Table 5. Multi-subsector (continued)
Water Lending
Sector Commitment Instrument
Country Project ID Project Name Board (US$Million) Type Subsector
Bangladesh P122014 BD: ECRRP Additional Financing-AF ARD 37.5 Investment WSS, Flood
Protection
Belize P111928 BZ Municipal Development UD 7.5 Investment WSS
Central African P117616 CF-Emergency Urban Infrast. – Add Fin UD 15.3 Investment WD, WSS
Republic
China P110632 CN – Sichuan Small Towns Development UD 40.0 Investment Flood Protection,
WSS
Djibouti P117355 DJ-Rural CDD & Water Mobilization ARD 2.2 Investment WSS, I&D
Georgia P120887 AF REGIONAL & MUN. INFRA. DEV. PROJ. UD 22.5 Investment WSS
India P122096 IN: Bihar Kosi Flood Recovery Project UD 74.8 Investment WSS, Flood
Protection
Indonesia P114348 Water Resources and Irr Mgmt Program 2 ARD 91.5 Investment I&D, WSS
Kenya P113542 KE-Informal Settlements Improvement Proj UD 40.0 Investment WSS
Philippines P114048 PH KALAHI-CIDSS (Additional Financing) SDV 23.7 Investment WSS
St. Vincent and P124939 SVG Hurricane Tomas Emergency Recov Loan UD 1.9 Investment Flood Protection,
the Grenadines WSS
Tanzania P111155 TZ-Zanzibar Urban Services Project UD 17.5 Investment Flood Protection,
WSS
Vietnam P122940 VN-CCESP-Additional Financing WAT 51.6 Investment WRM, WSS
List of Designated IBRD/IDA Projects Approved in FY11, by Subsector and Theme
75
76
Table 6. Water Resources Management
Water Lending
Sector Commitment Instrument
Country Project ID Project Name Board (US$Million) Type Subsector
Malawi P121120 MW: Irrig, Rural Lvlihds & Agric Add Fin ARD 6.9 Investment Irrigation &Drainage
China P115695 CN-Bayannaoer Water Recla. & Env. Impro WAT 80.0 Investment WSS
Lebanon P103063 LB – Greater Beirut Water Supply WAT 200.0 Investment WSS
China P098078 CN-Huai River Basin Flood Management an. ARD 200.0 Investment Flood Protection
Indonesia P114348 Water Resources and Irr Mgmt Program 2 ARD 91.5 Investment Multi-subsector
Brazil P095171 BR (MST) Bahia Health and Water Mgt (SWAP) HE 33.0 Investment WSS
The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
77
Annex F
List of Water-related
ESW/TA Products Delivered
in FY11, by Region
78
Table 1. AFR
Sector Water Expenditure Product
Country Project ID Product Name Board (US$Thousand) Subsector Line
Africa P105650 3A-Global Facility Disaster Reduct (FY09) ENV 377.5 Flood Protection, WSS TA
Africa P110499 3A-Africa Irrigation Initiative TR 775.2 I&D, TA
Africa P113192 3A:Disaster risk management – AFR Region UD 285.9 Flood Protection, WRM TA
Africa P113656 SADC support for rainwater harvesting ENV 39.5 I&D,WRM TA
Africa P117854 AF/FIN/00/CSO Country Status Overviews ENV 1303.7 WSS EW
Africa P120791 3A-West Africa Floods Reg. Impact Assess EMT 44.4 Flood Protection TA
Africa P123100 MZ-Zambezi Management Policy Dialogue WAT 134.4 I&D, WSS TA
Africa P124200 3A:AICD – Final Outputs & Sustainability WAT 156.2 WSS EW
The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Benin P118480 BJ-PER ENV 18.6 WSS EW
Benin P124825 BJ: Benin PDNA – GFDRR ENV 154.5 Flood Protection TA
Botswana P118526 BW-Climate Change Policy Note TR 19.5 WSS TA
Botswana P119338 BW-Water Sector Reform Phase 2 TR 3.8 WSS TA
Burundi P117507 BI-Public Expenditure Review (FY11) ENV 6.9 WSS EW
Cameroon P117404 CM: Dev. of Sanitation Strategy – FY11 ENV 0.0 WSS TA
CAR P113124 CF-Country environment Analysis ENV 76.5 WSS EW
Chad P114235 TD – Budget Management TA ENV 44.5 WSS TA
Eastern Africa P104865 Improving Governance Water Sector A UD 604.2 WSS TA
Ethiopia P101588 ET PER 2010 ENV 18.9 WSS EW
Ethiopia P113142 ET-Adaptation to Climate Change ENV 103.6 WRM, WSS EW
Ghana P117744 JRPEFM: Joint Rev. of Pub. Exp. & Fin. M UD 15.3 WSS EW
Ghana P118911 GH-Water Resources Development Paper ENV 194.7 WSS EW
Kenya P079174 Kenya Economic Notes ENV 22.8 WSS EW
Kenya P118665 KE-Water Resources Assessment WAT 489.9 Flood Protection, I&D, EW
WRM, WSS
(continued on next page)
Table 1. AFR (continued)
Sector Water Expenditure Product
Country Project ID Product Name Board (US$Thousand) Subsector Line
Lesotho P126117 LS-Post Flood Disaster Needs Assessment ENV 166.5 Flood Protection TA
Malawi P122086 MW-PPIAF Sida Non-Core Application ARD 108.6 I&D, WSS TA
Malawi P104446 MW-GFDRR Mainstreaming Disaster (FY10) PS 172.0 WSS TA
Mali P107483 ML – Urban Env. Analysis UD 106.2 WSS EW
Mali P112882 ML-Policy Note on Growth SDV 17.1 WSS EW
Mauritania P118057 MR-PER Update WAT 25.2 WRM, WSS EW
Mozambique P117425 MZ Poverty & Growth Diagnostics SDV 72.6 WSS TA
Nigeria P107337 NG-Governance of Service Delivery (FY10) ARD 132.7 WSS EW
Nigeria P125190 NG-Disaster Risk Management in Nigeria WAT 267.8 Flood Protection, WRM TA
South Africa P125776 ZA-Flood Rapid Response (GFDRR) SDV 58.7 Flood Protection TA
Sudan P117306 SD PUBLIC EXPENDITURE TRACKING STUDY WAT 49.5 WRM, WSS EW
Sudan P118978 SD-Preliminery Water Res Assessment-SS WAT 69.5 I&D, WSS TA
Sudan P120941 SD:South Kordofan Water Assessment TR 19.2 I&D, WSS TA
Tanzania P076867 TZ PEFAR 2010 EP 14.1 WSS EW
Tanzania P120241 TZ Cabinet Seminar Policy Notes EP 12.1 WSS EW
Uganda P118867 UG-CWRAS ENV 347.0 WSS
Uganda P119727 CA-Uganda Secondary Cities Proj. StartUp ENV 19.1 WSS TA
Zimbabwe P117241 ZW-Small Town Water & Sanitation Systems WAT 47.2 WRM, WSS EW
List of Water-related ESW/TA Products Delivered in FY11, by Region
79
80
Table 2. EAP
Sector Water Expenditure Product
Country Project ID Product Name Board (US$Thousand) Subsector Line
Cambodia P113311 KH-IFAPER ENV 95.4 WSS EW
China P118322 Water Pricing for Farmer Asso.Sustainab. UD 59.7 I&D, WRM EW
China P123462 Integrated Flood Risk Management PS 10.0 Flood Protection EW
China P123996 China Low Carbon Cities – SDN edited bk ENV 55.4 WSS EW
China P118319 China Rural Waste Water Management Study PS 72.4 WSS TA
East Asia and P101070 Governance, Corruption Links to Forestry PS 113.9 WSS EW
Pacific
East Asia and P113866 Gender Equality thro Infra – AusAid WAT 17.9 WRM, WSS TA
Pacific
The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
East Asia and P110883 EAP-Carbon Finance Regional Work Program WAT 2.9 WSS TA
Pacific
Indonesia P121717 PPIAF Surabaya NRW Management Strategy ENV 0.0 WSS EW
Indonesia P116052 Value of a Well Run Water Utility Study EP 69.5 WSS TA
Indonesia P119217 ID-TF PNPM Supv. and Monitoring (Urban) PS 155.4 WSS TA
Indonesia P117977 ID Social Protection PER PS 50.7 WSS EW
Lao People’s P107755 Lao PDR Country Economic Memorandum 2008 89.5 WSS EW
Democratic
Republic ARD
Lao People’s P098783 LA-Provision of Sustainable WSS Services PO 183.1 WSS TA
Democratic
Republic
Malaysia P124558 MY National Workshop for Eco2 PS 22.0 WSS TA
Mekong P121392 Mekong Open Source Risk Platform WAT 40.0 WSS TA
Mongolia P119796 MN-Diagnostic of Econ Crisis to Infrastructure PS 13.1 WSS EW
Philippines P111775 Philippines Infra Expenditure Review WAT 26.7 WRM,WSS EW
Philippines P115320 PH Approach Paper Inter Govtl. Fiscal Fm SDV 6.3 WRM,WSS EW
(continued on next page)
Table 2. EAP (continued)
Sector Water Expenditure Product
Country Project ID Product Name Board (US$Thousand) Subsector Line
Solomon P118635 Solomon Islands – PER EP 54.0 WSS EW
Islands
Thailand P113398 TH City Development Report PS 11.8 WSS EW
Thailand P108342 TH Environmental Monitor GE 45.5 WRM, WSS EW
Vietnam P118764 VN-Vietnam Development Report 2011 WAT 24.4 WRM, WSS EW
Vietnam P120993 TA-TR Sector Portfolio Assessment UD 0.7 WSS EW
Vietnam P108146 Vietnam: Urban Environmental MOC & ACVN UD 38.1 WSS TA
Table 3. ECA
Sector Water Expenditure Product
Country Project ID Product Name Board (US$Thousand) Subsector Line
Armenia P121249 Armenia Water Sector Note WAT 138.2 WSS EW
Azerbaijan P113867 Prioritizing environmental investments PS 68.3 WRM, WSS EW
Belarus P117680 Belarus PER 1 ENV 20.2 WSS EW
Bulgaria P120703 Water sector strategy TA GE 58.5 I&D, WSS TA
Croatia P114818 Croatia Safeguards UCS pilot UD 7.2 WRM, WSS EW
Georgia P101028 FFS millennium challenging UD 613.0 WSS TA
Kosovo P116043 Comprehensive Water Sector Assessment WAT 73.9 WSS EW
Macedonia P116042 Comprehensive Water Sector Assessment WAT 60.2 WSS EW
Romania P124894 FBS – ENV and Forestry Review WAT 36.8 WSS TA
Russia P112597 PER UD 44.3 WSS EW
Turkey P122859 Environmental Sustainability WAT 53.2 I&D, WRM, WSS TA
List of Water-related ESW/TA Products Delivered in FY11, by Region
81
82
Table 4. LAC
Water
Sector Expenditure Product
Country Project ID Product Name Board (US$Thousand) Subsector Line
Andean P115444 6A Disaster Risk Mgmt Strategy PS 245.1 Flood Protection TA
Countries
Bolivia P115558 BO Water-Related Adaptation to CC UD 90.2 WRM, WSS TA
Bolivia P106695 BO Municipal Service & Finance WAT 47.0 WRM, WSS EW
Bolivia P122004 Bolivia South-South Experience PS 33.7 WSS TA
Brazil P109281 Conservation/Tourism for Sao Luis WAT 100.7 WSS TA
Central P114019 6C Community Tourism Strategies EP 112.3 WSS TA
America
The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
Central P101639 6C Disaster Strategy EMT 1084.7 Flood Protection EW
America
Chile P123699 CL (FBS) Water Resources Assessment Study UD 206.7 I&D, WSS EW
Colombia P119120 CO Deepening Env. Management Capacity WAT 32.8 WSS TA
Guatemala P122376 GT Damage and Loss Assessment UD 21.9 WSS TA
Peru P110305 PE Assess. of CC in hydrology PS 68.9 WRM TA
Peru P106687 PE REDI ENV 80.8 WSS EW
Peru P113889 PE Public Expenditure Review UD 18.6 WSS EW
Uruguay P117123 UY Integration of Public Policies Risk UD 98.6 Flood Protection TA
Table 5. MENA
Sector Water Expenditure Product
Country Project ID Product Name Board (US$Thousand) Subsector Line
Djibouti P117534 DJ Public Expenditure Review ENV 26.6 WSS EW
Egypt P079934 EG Nile Basin Initiative Support TR 727.6 I&D, WSS TA
Lebanon P113910 LB – Country Environmental Analysis WAT 75.9 WSS EW
MENA P107664 5M-ACC Coastal Cities of North Africa EMT 315.7 WRM, WSS EW
MENA P119812 5M-Regional Infrastructure Facility SDV 187.8 WSS TA
Syria P114169 SY-Rural Dev in a Changing Climate UD 188.9 I&D TA
Yemen P110551 GFDRR: RY-Strengthening National System UD 223.9 Flood Protection TA
Table 6. SAR
Sector Water Expenditure Product
Country Project ID Product Name Board (US$Thousand) Subsector Line
India P112333 IN: Strengthening PPP Framework UD 424.9 WSS TA
India P120384 IN: Maharashtra PPP Instl Frameworks ARD 7.1 WSS TA
India P101501 IN: Enhancing Local Accountability UD 85.7 WSS TA
India P107693 IN: Mumbai Urban Business Plan – Phase II UD 137.8 WSS TA
India P110372 IN: Urban Water Reform Strategy UD 719.3 WSS TA
Maldives P118051 MV: PPP Capacity Building UD 7.1 WSS TA
Nepal P114570 NP: Water Resource & Climate Change ENV 705.4 WSS TA
Nepal P112887 NP: Program Support to Emerging Towns PO 248.9 WSS TA
Nepal P104077 NP: Social Inclusion Action Program UD 404.8 WSS TA
Pakistan P114805 PK: PPP Assistance WAT 109.5 WRM, WSS TA
Pakistan P117572 PK: Post Crisis Needs Assessment ENV 246.6 WSS EW
Pakistan P109781 Punjab WASA restructuring UD 130.7 WSS TA
(continued on next page)
List of Water-related ESW/TA Products Delivered in FY11, by Region
83
84
Table 6. SAR (continued)
Sector Water Expenditure Product
Country Project ID Product Name Board (US$Thousand) Subsector Line
Pakistan P123535 PK: GFDRR: Pakistan Floods PDNA PS 906.3 WSS TA
South Asia P120452 REG: Removing Barriers to Hydropower EMT 63.2 Hydropower TA
South Asia P115411 REG: Strategic Basin Asses for Ganges PS 1097.0 WRM, WSS EW
Sri Lanka P122347 LK: Sri Lanka PDNA WAT 46.9 Flood Protection TA
Table 6. World
Sector Water Expenditure Product
Country Project ID Product Name Board (US$Thousand) Subsector Line
The Water Portfolio of the World Bank
World P113012 Coastal Cities and Climate Change ESW TR 118.8 WRM, WSS EW
World P113530 SLM for CC Adaptation and Mitigation EMT 15.0 WRM, WSS EW
World P114750 Economics of Adaptation to Climate Chang UD 1331.1 WRM, WSS EW
World P118437 The changing wealth of nations FPD 4.6 WRM, WSS EW
World P118438 Valuation in wealth accounting SDV 11.0 WRM, WSS EW
World P119676 Monitoring Environmental Val Sustainability UD 10.1 WRM, WSS EW
World P119711 ESW-Valuing Ecosystem Services WAT 36.3 WRM, WSS EW
World P119793 Biodiversity & Climate Ch: Econ Approach WAT 11.5 WRM, WSS EW
World P120369 Role of Env DPLs in Supporting Env Susta EMT 6.8 WRM, WSS EW
World P120786 Environmental Institutions & Governance UD 26.9 WSS EW
World P120938 Environmental Mainstreaming UD 70.7 I&D, WSS EW
World P121780 Coastal Wetlands Carbon Profiling WAT 13.0 WRM, WSS TA
World P121895 Climate Fin Knowledge Platform Phase 2 ENV 18.6 WSS TA
World P124478 Adaptation to Climate Change LSMS Module WAT 122.5 WRM, WSS TA
World P125440 Cracking the Nut of Agricultural Finance EP 8.1 I&D TA
(continued on next page)
Table 6. World (continued)
Sector Water Expenditure Product
Country Project ID Product Name Board (US$Thousand) Subsector Line
World P113671 Transport & Climate Change WAT 127.3 WSS EW
World P118615 Freight Transport for Development OS 0.9 WSS EW
World P118616 Air Transport and Energy WAT 61.9 WSS EW
World P113191 Groundwater Governance PS 235.5 WRM, WSS EW
World P123103 Reallocating Irrigation Water EP 16.5 I&D, WSS EW
World P125633 Gender Review of Inf Portfolio ENV 0.0 WSS EW
World P115793 Analytical Framework for EE Cities. WAT 110.7 WSS TA
World P116831 EAPIRF II UD 329.2 WSS TA
World P113702 Climate Change Adaptation Handbook FPD 95.8 WSS EW
World P120577 Urban Vulnerability Assessment PS 77.2 Flood Protection EW
World P125391 Cities and Climate Change: An Urgent Age ARD 0.0 WRM, WSS EW
World P121303 Climate Change, Disaster Risk Urban Poor ENV 131.0 WSS EW
World P120710 Good Practices in Urban Env Mgmt UD 92.1 WSS, Flood Protection TA
List of Water-related ESW/TA Products Delivered in FY11, by Region
85
WORLD BANK
1818 H Street, NW
Washington, DC 20433