Page 1 INTEGRATED SAFEGUARDS DATASHEET RESTRUCTURING STAGE I. Basic Information Date prepared/updated: 02/18/2011 Report No.: AC6102 1. Basic Project Data Country: Romania Project ID: P100638 Project Name: Complementing EU Support for Agricultural Restructuring Project (CESAR) Task Team Leader: Holger A. Kray Estimated Appraisal Date: January 26, 2007 Estimated Board Date: November 27, 2007 Managing Unit: ECSSD Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Sector: General agriculture, fishing and forestry sector (68%);Central government administration (20%);Sub-national government administration (12%) Theme: Rural markets (29%);Rural policies and institutions (29%);Other rural development (14%);Rural services and infrastructure (14%);Land administration and management (14%) IBRD Amount (US$m.): 65.00 IDA Amount (US$m.): 0.00 GEF Amount (US$m.): 0.00 PCF Amount (US$m.): 0.00 Other financing amounts by source: Borrower 5.00 5.00 Environmental Category: C - Not Required Repeater [] Is this project processed under OP 8.50 (Emergency Recovery) or OP 8.00 (Rapid Response to Crises and Emergencies) Yes [ ] No [X] 2. Project Objectives The objective of this Project is to facilitate market-based farm restructuring through enhancing the ability of farmers, farm family members, and farm workers to manage their assets and income. 3. Project Description Under this overarching objective, the Project will assist the Government of Romania (GOR) in completing the property title registration of land assets in rural areas to improve the security of land property rights and the functioning of rural land markets. Equally important, the Project will assist the GOR in improving the delivery of guidance services that enable the agricultural population to more sustainably manage its income and assets and thus contribute to the absorption of available national and EU support programs. Page 2 4. Project Location and salient physical characteristics relevant to the safeguard analysis The Project is targeting 19 counties across Romania with agricultural production. 5. Environmental and Social Safeguards Specialists Mr Keith W. McLean (ECSS4) Mr Cesar Niculescu (ECSS3) 6. Safeguard Policies Triggered Yes No Environmental Assessment (OP/BP 4.01) X Natural Habitats (OP/BP 4.04) X Forests (OP/BP 4.36) X Pest Management (OP 4.09) X Physical Cultural Resources (OP/BP 4.11) X Indigenous Peoples (OP/BP 4.10) X Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12) X Safety of Dams (OP/BP 4.37) X Projects on International Waterways (OP/BP 7.50) X Projects in Disputed Areas (OP/BP 7.60) X II. Key Safeguard Policy Issues and Their Management A. Summary of Key Safeguard Issues 1. Describe any safeguard issues and impacts associated with the proposed project. Identify and describe any potential large scale, significant and/or irreversible impacts: The Project was originally classified as category B and OP 4.01 was triggered due to planned civil works under Component 1. An environmental management plan was prepared and disclosed during preparation. The civil works activities are being canceled under this restructuring and OP 4.01 is no longer triggered. OP 4.36 was originally triggered during Project preparation due to intended positive impacts of the Project on forests, however these are mostly indirect and therefore it is agreed not to trigger OP 4.36. OP4.12 is still not triggered as there are no civil works, and no land acquisition. 2. Describe any potential indirect and/or long term impacts due to anticipated future activities in the project area: n/a 3. Describe any project alternatives (if relevant) considered to help avoid or minimize adverse impacts. n/a Page 3 4. Describe measures taken by the borrower to address safeguard policy issues. Provide an assessment of borrower capacity to plan and implement the measures described. n/a 5. Identify the key stakeholders and describe the mechanisms for consultation and disclosure on safeguard policies, with an emphasis on potentially affected people. n/a B. Disclosure Requirements Date Environmental Assessment/Audit/Management Plan/Other: Was the document disclosed prior to appraisal? Date of receipt by the Bank Date of "in-country" disclosure Date of submission to InfoShop For category A projects, date of distributing the Executive Summary of the EA to the Executive Directors Resettlement Action Plan/Framework/Policy Process: Was the document disclosed prior to appraisal? Date of receipt by the Bank Date of "in-country" disclosure Date of submission to InfoShop Indigenous Peoples Plan/Planning Framework: Was the document disclosed prior to appraisal? Date of receipt by the Bank Date of "in-country" disclosure Date of submission to InfoShop Pest Management Plan: Was the document disclosed prior to appraisal? Date of receipt by the Bank Date of "in-country" disclosure Date of submission to InfoShop * If the project triggers the Pest Management and/or Physical Cultural Resources, the respective issues are to be addressed and disclosed as part of the Environmental Assessment/Audit/or EMP. If in-country disclosure of any of the above documents is not expected, please explain why: no disclosure as this is reducing the safeguards category. C. Compliance Monitoring Indicators at the Corporate Level (to be filled in when the ISDS is finalized by the project decision meeting) The World Bank Policy on Disclosure of Information Have relevant safeguard policies documents been sent to the World Bank's N/A Page 4 Infoshop? Have relevant documents been disclosed in-country in a public place in a form and language that are understandable and accessible to project-affected groups and local NGOs? N/A All Safeguard Policies Have satisfactory calendar, budget and clear institutional responsibilities been prepared for the implementation of measures related to safeguard policies? N/A Have costs related to safeguard policy measures been included in the project cost? N/A Does the Monitoring and Evaluation system of the project include the monitoring of safeguard impacts and measures related to safeguard policies? N/A Have satisfactory implementation arrangements been agreed with the borrower and the same been adequately reflected in the project legal documents? N/A D. Approvals Signed and submitted by: Name Date Task Team Leader: Mr Holger A. Kray 02/16/2011 Environmental Specialist: Mr Cesar Niculescu 02/16/2011 Social Development Specialist Mr Keith W. McLean 02/15/2011 Additional Environmental and/or Social Development Specialist(s): Approved by: Sector Manager: Ms Dina Umali-Deininger 02/17/2011 Comments: