WATER AND SANITATION PROGRAM: LEARNING NOTE




Scaling Up Rural Sanitation                                                                                                                     Key findings
Understanding Determinants                                                                                                                      During 2014 and 2015, three research studies
                                                                                                                                                were carried out to examine the drivers and

of Access to Hygienic Latrines
                                                                                                                                                barriers to latrine adoption and the availability
                                                                                                                                                of desirable, affordable latrines in rural areas
                                                                                                                                                of Vietnam. The findings were used to develop
for Rural Households in Vietnam                                                                                                                 integrated behavior change communication
                                                                                                                                                (BCC) and sanitation supply chain
                                                                                                                                                strengthening programs in Hoa Binh Province
From Research Findings to Campaign Development                                                                                                  and the Mekong Delta region. Insights and
June 2016                                                                                                                                       lessons learned from these activities include:
                                                                                                                                                •	 Socio-graphic conditions such as proximity
                                                                                                                                                   to other households, population density,
INTRODUCTION                                                                                                                                       access to transport and geography (flatlands
                                                                                                                                                   vs. highlands) – not ethnicity – are key
Vietnam has achieved impressive re-                                       been completed. For 2016-2020, the                                       factors that affect a community’s access to
sults in increasing sanitation coverage.                                  New Countryside Development Pro-                                         information, products and services, as well
In 1990, only 31% of rural households                                     gram will be the umbrella program un-                                    their motivations for latrine adoption.
had access to improved sanitation.1 By                                    der which sanitation is to be addressed.                              •	 Common drivers for latrine adoption
2015, this rate had increased to 70%.2                                                                                                             across all three regions include a desire for
The Joint Monitoring Program (JMP) of                                     PROBLEM STATEMENT                                                        convenience and safety for family members.
                                                                                                                                                   Moreover, social drivers of belonging,
the World Health Organization (WHO)                                       Despite overall progress in sanita-
                                                                                                                                                   harmony and a desire to keep up with
and the United Nations Children’s Fund                                    tion coverage, the national average in                                   ones’ neighbors (i.e status) also influenced
(UNICEF) established criteria for ‘unim-                                  Vietnam masks significant disparities                                    purchasing decisions for latrines and other
proved’3 and ‘improved’ latrines, while                                   among regions. Of the total number of                                    household items.
the Vietnam Ministry of Health (MoH)                                      households that do not have improved                                  •	 An integrated program that combines
has developed a more stringent set of                                     sanitation facilities in the country, 50%                                evidence-based BCC with a sanitation
                                                                                                                                                   supply chain strengthening component can
criteria for ‘hygienic’ latrines used for                                 are in the Mekong River Delta and an-
                                                                                                                                                   increase latrine uptake. This approach was
setting national targets and for monitor-                                 other 25% are in the Northern Moun-                                      used in Hoa Binh Province and resulted
ing. The Vietnam Health and Environ-                                      tains and Central Highlands regions.                                     in a significant jump in the proportion of
ment Management Agency (VIHEMA)                                           While the national rate of open defe-                                    households with latrines that meet the
under the MoH is responsible for rural                                    cation is only 3%, over 20% of house-                                    Ministry of Health standards for hygienic
                                                                                                                                                   construction, operation and maintenance.
sanitation and hygiene. Within com-                                       holds practice open defecation in the
                                                                                                                                                •	 Sanitation programs that aim to apply an
munities that have sustained open def-                                    Northern Mountains and Central High-
                                                                                                                                                   integrated approach can leverage existing
ecation free status4, VIHEMA aims to                                      lands areas.6                                                            resources – including research insights
increase the rate of households with                                                                                                               and communication materials – but new
hygienic latrines to 75% by 2020, and                                     Findings from a global review of forma-                                  programs may need to adapt their model
to 90% by 2030.5 Since 2010, the gov-                                     tive research studies on latrine adoption                                to fit the local context: small-scale, targeted
                                                                                                                                                   research is still needed to determine
ernment’s delivery mechanism for rural                                    reveal that non-health drivers such as
                                                                                                                                                   differences in physical, social and emotional
water supply and sanitation has been a                                    social status, privacy and convenience                                   drivers for latrine uptake in other regions,
series of five-year National Target Pro-                                  are among the key factors that moti-                                     followed by pretesting and refinement of
grams (NTPs).The third NTP (NTP3) for                                     vate households to invest in latrines,                                   communication materials.
rural water supply and sanitation has                                     while past approaches in Vietnam have


1
  Improved latrines are those that hygienically separate human excreta from human contact. Improved latrine types include: water flush to
sewer/septic tank/pit, composting, VIP, and simple pit with slab and cover latrines.
2
  World Health Organization and UNICEF. Joint Monitoring Program for Water Supply and Sanitation, 2015.
3
  Unimproved latrines include flush/pour flush to elsewhere, pit latrines without slabs, bucket latrines, hanging latrines, shared sanitation
facilities, no facilities, and bush/field.
4
  No one in the village will revert to open defecation.
5
  The Statement of Commitments for Sanitation and Water of the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam at the Spring Forum,
2015.
6
  Ibid.
2   Understanding Determinants of Access to Hygienic Latrines for Rural Households in Vietnam                                                                                 Scaling Up Rural Sanitation




    focused mostly on health-based messaging.7 More recently,                                                      Research findings from the studies were then used to devel-
    Community Led Total Sanitation, BCC, and sanitation mar-                                                       op BCC campaigns and supply chain strengthening programs
    keting also have been applied in some areas of Vietnam. So                                                     for the Mekong River Delta region and for Hoa Binh Province,
    far, there has been no effort to deliver an integrated program                                                 which was selected as representative of the Northern Mountains
    to address both demand creation and supply chain strength-                                                     region. Hoa Binh Province has a population of approximately
    ening at scale in the lagging regions.                                                                         850,000 people from seven main ethnic groups – the Muong,
                                                                                                                   Kinh, Thai, Tay, Dao, Mong and Hoa – and a poverty rate of
    ACTION                                                                                                         15%.8 The province also served as a “laboratory for lessons”
    In 2013, the Water and Sanitation Program (WSP)—a multi-do-                                                    to inform development and implementation of the strategy and
    nor partnership that is part of the World Bank Group’s Water                                                   BCC and supply chain strengthening tools for other regions.9
    Global Practice—began implementing a three-year technical
    assistance program entitled “Scaling up Rural Sanitation in                                                    This Learning Note summarizes key findings and insights
    Vietnam”. The assistance aims to strengthen government ca-                                                     from the research and design process used for the BCC
    pacity for scaling up sanitation promotion with a particular fo-                                               campaigns and supply chain strengthening programs for Hoa
    cus on households in low access areas. Through the program,                                                    Binh Province and the Mekong River Delta.
    WSP, SNV (the Netherland’s Development Organization),
    CODESPA (a Spanish non-governmental organization) and                                                          RESULTS
    other partners have supported VIHEMA to develop a strategy                                                     This section describes in detail the steps taken to develop
    and set of tools on BCC and supply chain strengthening for                                                     both the demand generation and supply chain strengthening
    several regions of Vietnam, including the Northern Mountains,                                                  activities for the Hoa Binh and Mekong River Delta programs,
    Central Highlands and Mekong River Delta. A consistent de-                                                     including the research, development of activities, and evalua-
    sign process was used for each of the regions, based on for-                                                   tion results from the Hoa Binh program.10
    mative research to understand the factors that influence con-
    sumer demand for, and the supply of, hygienic latrines.                                                        1.	 FORMATIVE RESEARCH

    Figure 1.	 Regional Map of Vietnam                                                                             During 2014-2015, WSP and UNICEF supported three san-
                                                                                                                   itation market research studies: an initial study in Hoa Binh
                                                                                                                   Province; a second study in the Mekong River Delta provinc-
                                                                                                                   es of Soc Trang, An Giang, Kien Giang and Ca Mau; and a
                                                                                                                   final study led by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical
                                                                                                                   Medicine in the Northern Mountains and Central Highlands
                                                                                                                   provinces of Ha Giang and Kon Tum.11

                                                                                                                   The studies sought to provide insights into household defeca-
                                                                                                                   tion practices in these areas, uncover the barriers and drivers
                                                                                                                   of hygienic latrine adoption, and determine the strengths of,
                                                                                                                   and challenges to, the sanitation supply chain to deliver aspi-
                                                                                                                   rational yet affordable hygienic latrines. Data collection meth-
                                                                                                                   ods included key informant interviews, in-depth interviews,
                                                                                                                   focus group discussions, and structured surveys with house-
                                                                                                                   hold members. Behavior change frameworks were used to
                                                                                                                   guide the development of the detailed research questions and
                                                                                                                   to inform the design of the demand generation components
                                                                                                                   of all three studies. The first two studies applied the Sani-
                                                                                                                   FOAM12 framework while the study in the Northern Mountains
                                                                                                                   and Central Highlands regions applied the Evo-Eco13 model.

    7
      Other key determinants include: access, availability, social norms, product attributes, affordability, skills and self-efficacy, and competing priorities. See O’Connell, Kathryn. What Influences Open Defecation and
    Latrine Ownership in Rural Households? Findings from a Global Review. WSP. 2014.
    8
      Hoa Binh Statistics Book, 2014.
    9
      Development of a BCC campaign for the Northern Mountains and Central Highlands is currently underway.
    10
       At the time of writing at-scale results from the Mekong Delta program were not available.
    11
       The first studies were supported by WSP and the last study was supported by UNICEF and WSP. Water and Sanitation Progam, World Bank, SNV & CODESPA, Rural Sanitation Consumer Demand and
    Supply Chain Assessment for Hoa Binh; Jensen, Lene and Usswald, Craig Sanitation Consumer Demand and Supply Chain Assessment for the Rural Mekong River Delta, 2014; London School of Hygiene and
    Tropical Medicine. Sanitation and Hygiene in the Northern Moutains and Central Highlands of Vietnam: Report of a Formative Research Study and Recommendations for SupRWS, 2015
    12
       Devine, Jacqueline. Introducing SaniFOAM: A Framework to Analyze Sanitation Behaviors to Design Effective Sanitation Programs. Water and Sanitation Global Scaling Up Project, Working Paper, 2009.
    http://www.wsp.org/sites/wsp.org/files/publications/SaniFOAM_Report409_3.pdf/
    13
       See http://www.hygienecentral.org.uk/research-behaviour.htm

                                                                                                                                                                                                      www.wsp.org
Scaling Up Rural Sanitation                                     Understanding Determinants of Access to Hygienic Latrines for Rural Households in Vietnam                                                                        3




A.	 Current Defecation Practices                                                                                   •	 Product attributes: Pour flush latrines are the most de-
Based on NTP3 monitoring data, by June 2015 roughly 50%                                                               sired. Cleanliness and the absence of smell are considered
of households in the three regions had a hygienic latrine,                                                            among the most important benefits by members of rural
compared to the national rural sanitation coverage rate of                                                            households. Pour flush latrines with ceramic pans are pre-
64%. Only 25% of poor households, on average, have a hy-                                                              ferred for their durability and ease of cleaning. Flushing with
gienic latrine. Table 1 provides an overview of the situation in                                                      water also prevents odors and allows for the latrine to be
the three regions.                                                                                                    located closer to, or in, the home. Households prefer “all-
                                                                                                                      in-one” latrines that include a bathroom, water tank and
B.	 Demand For Latrines                                                                                               septic tank, which increases cost.
Behavioral Determinants Common to All Three Regions                                                                •	 Social norms: Open defecation is not acceptable, but
Analysis of the studies revealed that the three geographic re-                                                        unhygienic latrines are perceived to be ‘normal’. Although
gions have some common barriers and opportunities related                                                             open defecation is not socially acceptable and there is
to demand creation for latrines. These are presented below                                                            shame and stigma attached to the practice, the use of
by behavioral determinant.                                                                                            unhygienic latrines is a normal, accepted behavior. In the
                                                                                                                      Northern Mountains and Central Highlands regions, smelly,
•	 Access/availability: Materials are available in most com-                                                          dirty latrines are the norm, while in the Mekong River Delta,
   munities but may be harder to access for households in                                                             fishpond and ‘field combat’ latrines (i.e. pour-flush latrines
   remote communes. While latrine construction materials are                                                          without any sub-structure) are common. Because the use
   available in the majority of communes in flat, lowland or                                                          of unsanitary latrines is so pervasive, there is little pressure
   midland regions, more remote communities face challeng-                                                            to change.14 Open defecation is more common in the Cen-
   es in accessing materials.                                                                                         tral Highlands because adults spend the majority of their
                                                                                                                      day in the fields far away from their homes and latrines.

     Table 1: Overview of Sanitation in Three Regions

                     Region                                       Sanitation Coveragea                                         Common Latrine Type

           Northern Mountains                            •	 46% of households use                                •	 Great variation in latrine designs but the
                                                            unhygienic latrines and 20% do                          most common include dry sanitation
                                                            not own latrines.                                       options such as unimproved dry pits and
                                                         •	 Only 30% of poor households                             double vault latrines.
                                                            own a hygienic latrine.


             Central Highlands                           •	 Nearly 50% of households use                         •	 Various types of latrine models exist; the
                                                            unhygienic latrines and 15% do                          most common types include dry pit and
                                                            not own latrines.                                       wet latrines.
                                                         •	 Only 20% of poor households                          •	 Latrine designs vary greatly from area
                                                            are likely to own a hygienic                            to area, with households copying
                                                            latrine.                                                their neighbors’ – often faulty – latrine
                                                                                                                    designs.
                                                                                                                 •	 Many latrines are not in use due to faulty
                                                                                                                    design and poor maintenance.

            Mekong River Delta                           •	 Roughly 55% of households       •	 Almost all latrines are wet latrine types.
                                                            use unhygienic latrines and 22% •	 Most common improved latrine type is
                                                            do not own a latrine.              pour flush to septic tank.
                                                         •	 Only 28% of poor households     •	 Most common unimproved latrine types
                                                            are likely to own a hygienic       are ‘hanging latrines’ (simple latrine
                                                            latrine.                           structures suspended over a body
                                                                                               of water) and ‘field combat’ latrines
                                                                                               (unhygienic latrines with a solid super
                                                                                               structure that flush directly into the river
                                                                                               or a fishpond.
                                                                                            •	 Sharing latrines is common among
                                                                                               poorer households.
a
    Sanitation coverage rates are based on national data as reported by the Center for Rural Water Supply and Sanitation (CERWASS) as of June 2015.



14
  The only exception to this norm is the simple river latrine – similar to the fishpond latrine but built on the edge of a river. Rural residents in the Mekong Delta see defecation into the river from this type of facility
as an unacceptable practice, and many reported scolding those who engage in the practice and destroying their facilities. The social norm against the use of simple river latrines appears to be the result of more
than a decade of campaigning against river defecation by local authorities.


www.wsp.org
4   Understanding Determinants of Access to Hygienic Latrines for Rural Households in Vietnam                                                                                    Scaling Up Rural Sanitation




    •	 Knowledge: Information is limited about hygienic latrines                                                        -	 Harmony and affiliation: In all three regions, households
       and their affordability. A key barrier is a lack of knowledge                                                        desire harmony with neighbors and within their com-
       about government requirements for a hygienic latrine. In Hoa                                                         munity. For households in Hoa Binh Province, this is
       Binh Province, only septic tank latrines are thought to be                                                           achieved through the solidarity and camaraderie of work-
       hygienic. In the Mekong River Delta, some residents believe                                                          ing together to build latrines. In the Mekong River Delta
       that flushing into a fishpond is hygienic because the fish in                                                        region, households share canals and waterways and want
       the pond consume the fecal waste. In addition, many house-                                                           to build a latrine to avoid contamination and getting into
       holds think that the only hygienic latrine models are those                                                          conflicts with neighbors. In the Northern Mountains and
       with septic tanks made with bricks, and they are unaware                                                             Central Highlands in particular, good relations with neigh-
       that other–and less costly–types of substructures, such as                                                           bors and a sense of belonging to the community are also
       tanks or pits made from concrete rings, are also suitable.                                                           important. At the same time, there was also a bit of rivalry
    •	 Affordability: Financing options are limited. There are                                                              and desire to keep up with neighbors (i.e status), which re-
       limited opportunities to access financing for household                                                              sults in purchases of similar household items and latrines.
       sanitation improvements. While consumer goods and ag-                                                          •	 Willingness to pay: Previous subsidy programs in the
       ricultural inputs can often be bought in installments, credit                                                     Northern Mountains and Central Highlands have diminished
       arrangements for latrines are much more limited.15 Loans                                                          households’ willingness to pay for latrines. In the Mekong
       from the Vietnam Bank for Social Policy are the exception.                                                        River Delta, fishponds serve as both latrines and a source of
       Many non-latrine owners wish to take out a loan but de-                                                           income and/or food. Many households are unwilling to build
       mand far exceeds supply and installment payments are not                                                          new or to upgrade to hygienic latrines if it means destroying
       commonly offered by suppliers.                                                                                    fishpond latrines and giving up their economic benefits.
    •	 Attitude: A hygienic latrine is a ‘nice to have’, not a ‘need
       to have’, item. Most rural households in the Northern                                                          Differences among Regions
       Mountains and Central Highlands regions feel that a hy-                                                        Despite the similarities presented above, there are also nota-
       gienic latrine is a luxury item, but an unhygienic latrine is                                                  ble differences among the three regions as detailed in Table 2:
       acceptable. In the Mekong River Delta region, dirty, smelly
       latrines are not acceptable, but latrines with a flush to a                                                    •	 In the more remote communes of the Northern Mountains,
       pond are. A hygieninc latrine is something they would build                                                       households live farther apart and the sense of belonging
       if they have a lot of extra money. Households prefer to in-                                                       to a community is less of a factor; households cite disgust
       vest in income generating assets.16                                                                               and desire for cleanliness as key motivations for obtaining
    •	 Drivers: Despite these barriers, there are opportunities                                                          a hygienic toilet.
       to promote latrines by emphasizing the benefits of latrine                                                     •	In the Central Highlands and lowland communes of the
       ownership. While not all social, physical and emotional driv-                                                     Northern Mountains, communities are linked by relative-
       ers are universal, three drivers were consistently found in all                                                   ly good roads and households live closer to one another,
       three regions:                                                                                                    making a sense of community and belonging more influen-
      -	 Convenience: All households desire a hygienic latrine that                                                      tial. In these areas, pride, belonging, respect and a desire
          can be located near or within the home for easy access,                                                        to be seen as complying with government rules and regu-
          particularly at night or during bad weather.                                                                   lations are important.
      -	 Safety: In the Northern Mountains and Central Highlands                                                      •	 In the Mekong River Delta region, safety and privacy are key
          regions, fears of being bitten by animals were a concern,                                                      drivers because of the risks associated with using hanging
          and meeting ghosts was a fear mentioned in all areas. In                                                       latrines. The very high population density also means that
          every region, the fear that children or the elderly may fall                                                   it can be difficult for women to find a place with sufficient
          into pit latrines or into waterways when using fishpond                                                        privacy.
          latrines were key concerns.




    15
         Retailers and masons do provide partial credit for a limited period to some households. Whether or not to provide credit and to whom it is offered is at the discretion of the individual retailer/mason.
    16
         71.4% of survey respondents in Hoa Binh pointed to income generating activities as their top investment priority.




                                                                                                                                                                                                        www.wsp.org
Scaling Up Rural Sanitation                               Understanding Determinants of Access to Hygienic Latrines for Rural Households in Vietnam                 5




     Table 2: Regional Differences Related to Demand Generation for a Hygienic Latrine

                                                                                            Regions
     Determinants
                                                Northern Mountains                            Central Highlands                     Mekong River Delta

         Skills/             Households prefer and feel confident to build their                  The reliance on masons is very high in these areas.
      self-efficacy          own latrines. In Hoa Binh, over 70% of households
                                reported building their latrines themselves.

     Social support          Relatives, neighbors and friends are the key source       Masons are highly influential in these regions as they are the main source
                             of information for latrine construction. Communities                             of advice on latrine models.
                                collaborate and share knowledge about latrine
                              construction, and help one another to build their
                                                     latrines.

        Disgust/              Disgust from smelly, dirty latrines is a key driver in   Smell is less of a factor due to the   Most latrines are wet types and so
       cleanliness             mountainous communities as simple pit latrines             climate with low humidity.          households are not affected by the
                               can easily break down. Having a latrine offers a                                                   bad smells from latrines.
                              way for people to be clean and to have a cleaner
                                                environment.

          Privacy              Most households have a latrine, and they tend to          Latrines are more temporary (for         Women, particularly river
                               invest more resources on the superstructure so          both the underground part and the        defecators, worry about being
                                       that it provides sufficient privacy.             superstructure) and privacy is not       seen defecating and feeling
                                                                                                      critical.                 embarrassment at being seen.


C.	 The Supply Chain for Latrine Products and Services                                      Bank for Social Policy, and they are reluctant to borrow at
Once interest is generated through BCC activities (see next                                 high interest from commercial banks.
section), there should also be a supply of sanitation products                           •	 Lack of latrine options for challenging environments:
and services to meet the demand. Supply chain research in                                   In the water-scarce communes of the Northern Mountains
the three regions revealed similar opportunities and challeng-                              and Central Highlands, there are currently few options for
es to achieving this goal.                                                                  latrines. There is a need to develop robust but lightweight
                                                                                            latrine substructures that are easy to transport from district
Challenges Common to All Regions                                                            towns to remote communes. For the Mekong River Delta,
•	 Complexity of shopping for latrine products and ser-                                     land-based latrine models are not always suitable due to
   vices: To build a latrine, consumers first have to purchase                              the large number of rivers and streams. Fiberglass septic
   construction materials from multiple retailers, and then find                            tanks and plastic septic tanks are available but have limit-
   a service provider to build or install the latrine. No supply                            ed market penetration and are the most expensive option.
   chain actor in any of the three regions offered both prod-                               Plastic septic tanks17 hold promise but need further devel-
   ucts and installation services.                                                          opment to make them better suited to sun exposure.
•	 No marketing to consumers by supply chain actors:
   Since most of the products that go into building a latrine                            Distinct Challenges for Each Region
   are also used for other construction purposes, there is little                        As with the drivers for latrine adoption, challenges to the san-
   incentive for retailers/suppliers to market their products and                        itation supply chain are also context-specific and vary by re-
   services specifically for latrines (i.e. there are no complete                        gion. The sanitation supply chain is weakest in the Northern
   latrine packages that could be branded). Masons and re-                               Mountains region due to rugged terrain, low population den-
   tailers also do not formally promote their services and prod-                         sity and relatively poor transport. The sanitation supply chain
   ucts but instead rely on word-of-mouth for new customers.                             is better developed in the Central Highlands thanks to better
•	 Insufficient access to financing for consumers and                                    roads, higher population density, and more communes locat-
   supply chain actors: Although financing is available                                  ed in the midlands and lowlands. The sanitation supply chain
   through formal and informal channels, it is insufficient (in                          is most developed in the Mekong River Delta due to large
   both number of financing options and amount of financing                              number of lowland communes, high population density and a
   available). Retailers lack capital to expand their business as                        good network of roads or waterways. Table 3 below presents
   they do not qualify for low interest loans from the Vietnam                           the challenges specific to each region.


17
     Produced by the company ROTO Plastics Corporation.




www.wsp.org
6   Understanding Determinants of Access to Hygienic Latrines for Rural Households in Vietnam                                      Scaling Up Rural Sanitation




    Table 3: Differences in Supply Chains among Regions

                                                                                                 Regions
            Factors
                                         Northern Mountains                            Central Highlands                         Mekong River Delta

       The role of masons              Masons are less influential                The need for septic tank models and the preference to hire labor for latrine
                                  because information about latrines            building means that masons determine the size and price of latrines, and thus
                                   is obtained from family members              are very influential. However, many masons do not have formal skills or training
                                              and friends.                                                      in building latrines.

         Transportation                 Transport of materials is relatively easy in lowland and midland                 Most communes are easy to reach;
                                            communities but more challenging for remote villages.                      however, in remote villages, boats may be
                                                                                                                           required to transport materials.

      Market development            Lower population density, lower               Households have higher, more          High population density, higher income
                                   income levels and the preference               diversified sources of income,           levels, fewer suitable latrine types
                                     for self-building results in lower         including farming and harvesting        (primarily only septic tank varieties) and
                                      market potential for sanitation           trees. Households readily accept         preference to have latrines installed by
                                                businesses.                               mason services.               masons results in high market potential
                                                                                                                                 for sanitation business.

      Technological options          Concrete ring septic tanks are                Concrete ring septic tanks              Concrete ring septic tanks can be
                                     completely new to this region.               have been adopted by some              promoted for land-based households,
                                                                                consumers, though their use is still     though in general they were perceived
                                                                                            limited.                   to be of inferior quality and less durable.
                                                                                                                       Such product perceptions would need to
                                                                                                                       be addressed. In non-land-based areas,
                                                                                                                        plastic septic tanks have been adopted
                                                                                                                        by some consumers though their use is
                                                                                                                                        still limited.




    Figure 2.	 Process to Develop BCC Campaigns                                          2.	 BEHAVIOR CHANGE COMMUNICATION
                                                                                             CAMPAIGNS

                                   7                                                     The process to develop the Hoa Binh and Mekong River Delta
                          Finalize materials                                             campaigns followed the same key steps (see Figure 2). The
                                                                                         first step included formative research as described above.
                                  6                                                      The second step involved distilling the key research results
                          Pretest IPC tools
                                                                                         into findings that were used to support development of the
                                                                                         creative brief (a document that defines the parameters for
                                 5
                       Develop tools, materials                                          the BCC campaign). The creative brief helped to ensure that
                                                         Stakeholder Feedback




                                                                                         stakeholders and the advertising agency hired to develop the
                                  4                                                      campaign shared the same vision and desired outcomes from
                      Pretest concept, messages                                          the campaign. Based on the creative brief, several campaign
                                                                                         ideas were developed and underwent multiples rounds of
                                3                                                        pretesting (steps 3 and 4). Based on the pretesting results,
                          Concept ideation                                               multimedia, print materials and interpersonal communication
                                                                                         (IPC) tools were drafted (step 5). Before finalization, the IPC
                                  2                                                      tools were tested once more with frontline workers to ensure
                            Creative brief
                                                                                         that the tools were easy to understand and to apply in the
                                                                                         field (step 6). Feedback from stakeholders, including VIHE-
                                 1                                                       MA and the provincial Departments of Health, was obtained
                         Formative research
                                                                                         throughout.




                                                                                                                                                    www.wsp.org
Scaling Up Rural Sanitation               Understanding Determinants of Access to Hygienic Latrines for Rural Households in Vietnam                 7




                                                                         Figure 3.	 Logo for Sanitation Campaigns
The Hoa Binh campaign was developed in 2014 over the
span of eight months, and included the campaign concept,
visuals, messages and tools for frontline workers to conduct
face-to-face or IPC activities. Research revealed that IPC was
the most effective channel for rural communities, and there-
fore almost all of the tools were designed for village- or house-
hold-level activities. Two packages were designed comprising
a “basic” and an “extended” package of IPC tools, as de-
scribed below:

•	 The basic package included guidelines for a village map-
   ping activity and for village and household meetings, as well
   as banners, and scripts for loudspeaker announcements.
   This package was designed based on government cost
   norms for communication activities and is recommended
   for provinces with limited budgets for BCC activities.                VIHEMA recommends that all organizations working on sanita-
•	 The extended package included the basic package                       tion in Vietnam use this logo and tagline, though regional cam-
   along with guidelines for additional activities such as the           paigns will be able to add specific calls to action. For example,
   Sanitation Festivals (education-entertainment activities),            in Hoa Binh, the call to action is “Join hands for a beautiful
   newspaper article writing, mural paintings and content for            village” (Chung tay vi lang que sach dep). In the Mekong River
   longer radio messages. The extended package was devel-                Delta, the call to action is “A hygienic latrine for your family’s
   oped for provinces with resources to implement additional             peace of mind” (Nha tieu hop ve sinh, an tam cho gia dinh).
   BCC activities beyond the basic package.
                                                                         The development of the campaign for the Northern Moun-
A logo was developed for VIHEMA to use in all future sani-               tains and Central Highlands regions is currently underway and
tation campaigns. It depicts a stylized, modern latrine with a           is likely to be based upon a similar concept to the one used
substructure, middle structure and superstructure. The tag-              in Hoa Binh. Additional tools developed from the Northern
line “Sanitation for All” emphasizes the government objective            Mountains and Central Highlands campaign may include TV
of a hygienic latrine for every family in Vietnam. It was de-            spots, videos and mobile audio-visual tools.
veloped following an extensive process of pretesting, which
resulted in a visual that audiences felt represented progress,           Table 4 presents more details of the two campaigns that have
modernity, cleanliness, comfort and family.                              been developed to date.


Table 4: Details of the Hoa Binh and Mekong River Delta Campaigns

                         Hoa Binh campaign                                                 Mekong River Delta campaign

Drivers:                                                                Drivers:
•	 pride and recognition                                                •	 false belief that feces do not contaminate fish and water quality
•	 belonging and social cohesion                                        •	 safety for children and the elderly
•	 cleanliness, comfort                                                 •	privacy
•	 better health for children                                           •	 status and affordability
                                                                        •	 being a good neighbor

Campaign concept: “Join hands for a clean village”                      Campaign concept: “It’s not what you think it is”
Given the strong sense of community in Hoa Binh communes, the           The campaign was developed based on misperceptions about the
campaign highlights the personal, family, and community benefits of     risks (or lack of) of using unhygienic latrines. The four key risks are
having a hygienic latrine. It does this by emphasizing the collective   food safety (fish that are contaminated by eating feces), swimming
effort by all households to create a cleaner environment.               in contaminated water, falling into a fishpond, and being seen while
                                                                        defecating. There were also two key positive messages about
                                                                        collective action to build latrines and how even poor families can afford
                                                                        a latrine.




www.wsp.org
8   Understanding Determinants of Access to Hygienic Latrines for Rural Households in Vietnam                             Scaling Up Rural Sanitation




    Table 4: Details of the Hoa Binh and Mekong River Delta Campaigns (continued)

                             Hoa Binh campaign                                                    Mekong River Delta campaign

    Messages: Nine key messages were developed that included, among          Messages: Six messages were developed that included, among
    others:                                                                  others:
    •	 Be a better neighbor.                                                 •	 Don’t feed your children fish feces - stop defecating in the water!
    •	 Be a pioneer, be a bright example.                                    •	 Don’t put the elderly and children at risk - stop using hanging latrines!
    •	 Provide comfort for your family                                       •	 Don’t let women be embarrassed - stop using a hanging latrine!
    •	 Act for solidarity.                                                   •	 Be a good example and good neighbor - help each other build a
    •	 Make your community a better place to live.                              hygienic latrine now!
    •	 Choose a civilized lifestyle                                          •	 Even poor families can build a hygienic latrine!
    • 	Do you want your children to be healthier and taller?

    Tone: The tone is positive and aspirational with crisp, clean visuals    Tone: The tone is sharp, direct and shocking, combining disgust and
    that capture the beauty of Hoa Binh Province. The encouraging and        fear. The tone reflects the preference amongst southern Vietnamese for
    suggestive tone reflects a preference for a more roundabout, indirect    more straightforward communication style.
    style of communication among northern Vietnamese.
                                                                             The visuals depict realistic situations in front of fishpond latrines, unlike
    The color green was chosen for its association with being clean, fresh   in Hoa Binh where latrines are not featured in any of the key visuals.
    and healthy; the flower depicts households that are connected together
    in a community.


    Hoa Binh materials                                                       Mekong River Delta materials




    3.	 SUPPLY CHAIN STRENGTHENING APPROACH                                   To address the lack of suitable latrine choices, the following
        AND TOOLS                                                             product options were developed:

    Based on the findings from the research, a market strengthen-             •	 Hoa Binh – Lower cost substructure options were needed
    ing strategy was developed that included: 1) the introduction                that would reduce the total cost of a latrine yet ensure that it
    of innovative and more affordable sanitation technologies to                 is still hygienic. The recommendation of using concrete rings
    reduce cost and increase profitability for the private sector; 2)            for septic tanks rather than clay bricks or cement bricks re-
    support for development of sales agent and distribution net-                 sulted in a 50% cost reduction in cost (from approximately
    works of sanitation products and services that reach house-                  USD 168 to USD 87) for the same size of substructure and
    holds at the village level; 3) strengthening of financing mech-              mid-structure – two critical components of a hygienic latrine.
    anisms that facilitate rural households to invest in sanitation              In addition, the concrete rings reduced the possibility of in-
    products; and 4) support for capacity building of the private                correctly connecting tanks, a very common mistake made
    sector to operate profitably in the rural sanitation market.                 by both masons and households when building brick tanks.



                                                                                                                                            www.wsp.org
Scaling Up Rural Sanitation               Understanding Determinants of Access to Hygienic Latrines for Rural Households in Vietnam       9




•	 Mekong River Delta – For households in flood prone ar-             Existing concrete ring producers or retail shops that sold
   eas or locations with limited land space, plastic tanks were       construction materials such as cement, sand, gravel, and
   introduced. This is the most appropriate option currently          latrine pans were eligible to become a SANCON. However,
   for households in this area as the tanks are durable, light        only those with capacity to extend their product line to cover
   weight, easy to install and affordable, especially for house-      sanitation products and services were invited to participate
   holds that already have invested in a toilet (see Figure 4).       in the training program. The SANCON owners received train-
                                                                      ing on how to operate their sanitation business. This included
Figure 4.	 Plastic Septic Tanks for Flood-prone Areas
                                                                      learning about key latrine types, training on how to develop
                                                                      a business plan, recruitment of sales agents, financial man-
                                                                      agement, and on-site practice for concrete ring production,
                                                                      among other things. In addition, to help the SANCONs recruit
                                                                      their sales agents, the Commune Health Station helped con-
                                                                      nect the owners of the SANCON with the network of Village
                                                                      Health Workers, Vietnam Women’s Union members or Village
                                                                      Chiefs. Training of SANCON staff was carried out by external
                                                                      resource agencies because provincial health staff were inex-
                                                                      perienced in this new approach.

                                                                      Sales agents are responsible for actively promoting and mar-
                                                                      keting sanitation products and services provided by the SAN-
                                                                      CON. This is often done in two ways. In the first approach two
                                                                      people pair up, with one person (a frontline worker) leading
In addition, the One-Stop-Shop model was adapted to all               the IPC session and the other (a sales agent) providing infor-
three regions and renamed as Sanitation Convenience Shops             mation on latrine options at the conclusion of the IPC session.
(SANCONs). SANCONs are places where customers can, in                 The sales agent is then responsible for placing the order with
one visit, obtain advice on latrine types, prices and opera-          the SANCON and follow-up with the customer. The second
tion and maintenance requirements, and also purchase ma-              scenario is for only one person to do all of these tasks. The
terials and arrange for delivery and installation of latrines by      sales agent(s) receives a flat fee for each latrine sale complet-
trained masons (see Figure 5). Importantly, SANCONs allow             ed with the SANCON.
households to spread out payments for latrines for up to 4-6
months, depending on the SANCON.                                      To equip sales agents with tools (other than for BCC), product
                                                                      catalogues were developed with pictures of latrine products
Figure 5.	 SANCON Model                                               and information on prices of components, including combi-
                                                                      nations of materials for latrines within a range of consumer
    A ordable
                          Materials and
                                                    Masonry and       budgets (see Figure 6). Guidelines were developed to explain
     hygienic                                        transport        how sales agents and village motivators could work together
                           equipment
     latrines                                         services
                                                                      in village meetings so that households could easily access
                                                                      product information at the end of the IPC session.

                                                                      Figure 6.	 Latrine Options Catalogue
                          Convenience
                             shop




                              Sales
                              agent




                           Household




www.wsp.org
10 Understanding Determinants of Access to Hygienic Latrines for Rural Households in Vietnam                                                                        Scaling Up Rural Sanitation




   The SANCON model that utilizes a network of agents working                                                4.	 EVALUATION OF THE INTEGRATED
   directly at the village has worked well in Hoa Binh Province.                                                 APPROACH IN HOA BINH
   However, the model has needed adaptation for the other re-
   gions. In the Mekong River Delta, the high population density                                             Prior to the use of BCC in Hoa Binh, the Hoa Binh De-
   and greater number of villages per commune required that                                                  partment of Preventive Medicine used traditional informa-
   a commune coordinator role be created to directly manage                                                  tional methods to generate demand for latrines. Beginning
   the day-to-day operations of the sales agents and consol-                                                 in 2015, the department started implementation of the
   idate orders before sending them to the SANCON. On the                                                    basic BCC package alongside the supply chain strength-
   other hand, in areas that are sparsely populated like parts of                                            ening strategies. An assessment was then carried out in
   the Northern Mountains, the SANCON model may need to                                                      nine pilot communes to evaluate the effectiveness of the
   be modified again. For example, individual sanitation retailers                                           evidence-based approach compared to the previous ac-
   may need to develop latrine molds and provide installation                                                tivities under the NTP. The assessment included pre- and
   services on-sight at the household level in order to help ex-                                             post-intervention evaluations conducted at the begin-
   tend the supply chain to hard-to-reach consumers.                                                         ning and the end of 2015.18 The evaluation aimed to:
                                                                                                             1) assess the impact of BCC and SANCON interventions in
                                                                                                             increasing coverage of hygienic sanitation in nine interven-
         Achievements as of December 2015                                                                    tion communes; and 2) evaluate the potential for sustain-
                                                                                                             ability and replicability of the sanitation promotion approach
         Hoa Binh: Over 1,000 health staff and sale agents                                                   in other communities characterized by limited budget and
         trained and 10 SANCONs established                                                                  capacity. The key endline findings are presented in Figure 7.

         Mekong Delta: 60 key senior staff trained from                                                      The BCC approach and tools developed for Hoa Binh Prov-
         13 Mekong provinces representing the Center for                                                     ince have been adopted by VIHEMA for roll-out within the
         Preventive Medicine, Women’s Union and National                                                     World Bank-funded Results-Based Rural Water Supply and
         Center for Rural Water Supply and Sanitation                                                        Sanitation Project implemented in eight provinces of the Red
                                                                                                             River Delta in northern Vietnam.


   Figure 7.	 Key Findings from Hoa Binh Post-Intervention Evaluation

         1.	 Following an intensive intervention of combined BCC and supply chain strengthening activities, there was a rapid increase in hygienic
             sanitation coverage in Hoa Binh – from 27.7% to 48.4% over a 20-month period. This compares with a national increase of 1.9% per
             year (estimated by the JMP) to 2% per year (the NTP estimate), as shown in the chart below.
         2.	 The increase in hygienic sanitation in Hoa Binh benefited all nine
             intervention communes and was found among all income and eth-       50%
             nic groups: the poor, near poor, and non-poor. Access among the
             poor rose 6% (from 18% to 24%) while for the non-poor it almost
             doubled (from 34% to 60%). The increase in hygienic toilets was     40%
             associated with a decrease in unhygienic facilities, as most of the
             households in these communes already had some form of toilet
             already.
                                                                                 30%
         3.	 Eighty-five percent of all respondents said they had participated
             in sanitation activities in 2015. Of these, 87% had attended sani-
             tation village meetings, 29% had attended sanitation festivals and
                                                                                 20%
             13% had received a household visit by outreach workers.
                                                                                             2013                  2014                 2015
         4.	 Approximately 83% of respondents without a toilet said they were
             now planning to construct one, 44% of them within the next year
                                                                                                       Post-intervention survey results
             (compared to a baseline of 7%).
                                                                                                       (for nine communes in Hoa Binh)
         5.	 Ten SANCONs were set up as part of the intervention, with one
                                                                                                       NTP3 (Hoa Binh)
             dropping out and another one established independently. Approx-
                                                                                                       JMP (Hoa Binh)
             imately 43% of respondents said they were aware of the existence
             of SANCONs.


   18
        Quattri, Maria, Demand Creation and Supply Chain Development for Scaling up Rural Sanitation in Hoa Binh province: Post Intervention Rapid Assessment Report, 2016



                                                                                                                                                                                  www.wsp.org
Scaling Up Rural Sanitation                                 Understanding Determinants of Access to Hygienic Latrines for Rural Households in Vietnam 11




LESSONS
The following lessons learned are based on research and re-                                                    marketing and information provided to households about
sults of implementation of the BCC programs in the Hoa Binh                                                    sanitation services and, importantly, financing for poorer
and the Mekong River Delta provinces.                                                                          households, all require multi-faceted interventions that go
                                                                                                               beyond communication.
•	 Geography influences drivers for both latrine adop-                                                      •	 The SANCON model has demonstrated potential,
   tion and strengthening the sanitation supply chain.                                                         but requires modification, particularly in areas with
   A common assumption in Vietnam is that cultural differ-                                                     dispersed villages and weak supply chains. The es-
   ences between various ethnic groups (particularly between                                                   tablishment of SANCONs has provided households with
   Kinh and non-Kinh groups) are key factors in influencing                                                    reasonably priced, good quality latrines that meet hygienic
   latrine adoption. However, the formative research shows                                                     standards. However, in Hoa Binh Province, market pene-
   that drivers are not primarily determined by ethnicity but                                                  tration by the SANCONs, particularly in remote communes,
   rather by the socio-geographic situation of communities,                                                    has been somewhat limited. This is due to limited location
   such as the proximity to other households, density of com-                                                  of the SANCONs in accessible district or commune cen-
   munity and the physical environment (which varies signifi-                                                  ters; consumer preference for self-built latrines or the use
   cantly between river delta and mountain communities). In                                                    of local, often untrained, masons; lack of consumer famil-
   addition, the presence of roads is a key factor that shapes                                                 iarity with new products (latrines made using concrete rings
   the supply chain and influences preference for products                                                     rather than bricks); and low profit margins for SANCONs in
   and services (e.g., use of hired labor), and thus drives la-                                                remote, dispersed locations with high transportation costs.
   trine adoption. These factors also shape socio-emotional                                                    Experience in other countries has also shown that it takes
   drivers. Households living in more densely populated areas                                                  time for sanitation enterprises to gain market penetration.19
   were more likely to mention the influence of neighbors and                                                  For such areas, a modified approach is proposed in which
   community on their decision to invest in a latrine, whereas                                                 linkages between SANCONs and local shop owners is fa-
   in less densely populated areas disgust was more of a mo-                                                   cilitated and further innovations in mason-led latrine con-
   tivator.                                                                                                    struction are promoted.
•	 Substituting evidence-based sanitation BCC for the                                                       •	 The government can finance BCC activities but exter-
   traditional approach of using health motivators re-                                                         nal support is still required to spur sanitation supply
   quires acceptance by senior provincial implement-                                                           chains. Given sufficient political support from the national
   ers. Senior government health leaders, especially at the                                                    level, provincial governments can self-finance the opera-
   provincial level, may be comfortable with their established                                                 tional cost of BCC activities, resulting in significant change.
   approaches to hygiene promotion that emphasize educa-                                                       However, supply strengthening activities may still require ex-
   tion, information and health-based messaging rather than                                                    ternal support. Market research shows that without external
   the use of emotional or social drivers, such as social norms,                                               support, current supply chain actors may not have sufficient
   which have been shown to be more powerful in changing                                                       incentives to extend their business lines to include sanitation
   latrine adoption behavior. Therefore, it is critical to involve                                             products and services. There is a role for government sup-
   these stakeholders right from the beginning of developing                                                   port to actively facilitate supply chains, including training for
   an innovative BCC campaign. They should be given orien-                                                     actors on new business models, particularly in remote areas
   tation and training, and afforded time to adapt and appre-                                                  where access to products and services is a challenge.
   ciate new tools and methodologies. While grass-root level
   implementers at the commune level are usually more open                                                  RECOMMENDATIONS
   to trying out “new ways”, getting the full support from pro-                                             The following section provides recommendations that may be
   vincial health systems for adopting a new BCC campaign                                                   useful for future rural sanitation programs in Vietnam.
   is difficult, but essential; resistance to change from estab-
   lished practices may be highest at this level.                                                           •	 Additional rapid research is needed to understand
•	 Latrine adoption requires more than BCC. Formative                                                          the drivers to latrine adoption and supply chain
   research in the three regions indicates that while BCC must                                                 strengthening for other areas of Vietnam. Significant
   be a central part of any effort to promote hygienic latrine                                                 evidence now exists related to both the demand and sup-
   ownership and usage, other barriers must be addressed                                                       ply sides of latrine adoption in rural Vietnam. Future rural
   equally. Aspirational and affordable product design, more                                                   sanitation programs can utilize these insights and avoid the



19
  Similar low levels of market penetration (20%) were found in early sanitation marketing programs in remote rural areas of Lao PDR, while in Cambodia newly established sanitation enterprises typically were
able to capture 30-50% of sales.

www.wsp.org
12 Understanding Determinants of Access to Hygienic Latrines for Rural Households in Vietnam                                                             Scaling Up Rural Sanitation




     need for full scale studies. However,                                     materials are persuasive, engaging to
                                                                                                                                                  Acknowledgment
     small-scale, targeted studies are still                                   audiences, and easy to use.                                        The authors would like to thank
     needed to uncover any differenc-                                       •	 The role of frontline workers                                      Susanna Smets for her overall guidance
     es in social, physical and emotional                                      should be expanded beyond IPC.                                     and contributions to the content of the
                                                                                                                                                  document. We would also like to thank
     drivers among community members                                           Experience has shown that frontline
                                                                                                                                                  Xuan Thi Thanh Le, Duc Thi Nghiem,
     residing in geographic regions out-                                       workers have the capacity to deliv-
                                                                                                                                                  Almud Weitz, and Thuy Bich Nguyen for
     side of those in the Mekong River                                         er both IPC and sales information,                                 their review of the document.
     Delta, Northern Mountains and Cen-                                        and thus toolkits should be designed
     tral Highlands. Understanding the                                         with both roles in mind. In particular,
     nuances of these drivers will help                                        where commission-based incentives                                  About the program
     program managers determine the di-                                        from sales are insufficient, it may be
                                                                                                                                                  Today, 2.5 billion people live without
     rection of their BCC campaigns (e.g.,                                     pragmatic for various outreach work-
                                                                                                                                                  access to improved sanitation. Of
     the degree to which the program                                           ers20 to carry out these dual roles                                these, 71% live in rural communities.
     should emphasize family versus                                            (both BCC and sales).                                              To address this challenge, WSP is
     community benefits). Supply chains                                     •	 Proof of concept for the business                                  working with governments and local
     are also influenced by geography, so                                      model needs further institution-                                   private sector to build capacity and
     targeted research is also needed to                                       alization. Documented evidence of                                  strengthen performance monitoring,
     understand the challenges and op-                                         the model’s feasibility is needed so                               policy, financing, and other components
     portunities within local supply chains.                                   that governments, with support from                                needed to develop and institutionalize
   •	New BCC and supply chain                                                  development partners, will scale up                                large scale, sustainable rural
     strengthening tools can be de-                                            business and sales training. Train-                                sanitation programs. With a focus on
     veloped more rapidly if based on                                          ing for sanitation businesses and                                  building a rigorous evidence base to
                                                                                                                                                  support replication, WSP combines
     existing campaign materials, but                                          their sales agents is often outside
                                                                                                                                                  Community-Led Total Sanitation,
     pretesting is still required. The de-                                     the comfort zone and core capabil-
                                                                                                                                                  behavior change communication,
     velopment of evidence-based BCC                                           ities of the Vietnamese government                                 and sanitation marketing to generate
     campaigns and tools have typically                                        health staff. External resources could                             sanitation demand and strengthen
     required at least 1.5 years, espe-                                        be used for this purpose, particularly                             the supply of sanitation products and
     cially if broad quantitative research                                     in large-scale projects where public                               services, leading to improved health
     is needed. The experience of devel-                                       funds are available for technical sup-                             for people in rural areas. For more
     oping materials for the Mekong Riv-                                       port. In addition, linkages to other                               information, please visit www.wsp.org/
     er Delta, which were based on the                                         programs – such as livelihood, voca-                               scallingupsanitation.
     materials used in Hoa Binh Province,                                      tional training, and small-medium en-
     shows that the time needed for rapid
     research, field testing of draft materi-
                                                                               terprise training initiatives – may need
                                                                               to be developed in the long-term to                                Contact Us
     als, and completion of the final mate-                                    institutionalize business training for                             Email: 	 wspeap@worldbank.org
     rials can be reduced. It is important,                                    sanitation enterprises.                                            Website: 	www.worldbank.org/water
     however, that shorter development                                                                                                                      www.wsp.org.
     periods still allow sufficient time for                                By Nga Kim Nguyen, Hang Diem
     rapid research and pretesting of mes-                                  Nguyen, Lene Gerwel-Jensen, Minh
     sages and tools to ensure that BCC                                     Thi Hien Nguyen, Duong Chi Nam


   20
     In Vietnam, outreach workers are individuals in villages who collaborate with different organizations such as the Women’s Union, the
   Department of Family Planning and Population within the MoH, Youth Union, and Farmer’s Union, among others. They can work for more
   than one organization and they receive allowance.


   WSP is a multi-donor partnership created in 1978 and administered by the World Bank to support poor people in obtaining affordable,
   safe, and sustainable access to water and sanitation services. WSP’s donors include Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France,
   the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States,
   and the World Bank.

   The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are entirely those of the author and should not be attributed to the World
   Bank or its affiliated organizations, or to members of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent.

   © 2016 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank