E522
Nasarawa State Government                              Volume 6
Federal Republic of Nigeria
..s 1...l- -                      U. 
-~ ~ ~  ~~~M
_~ - -t._
World Bank Community Based Urban Development Project
Environmental mpcct Assessment Report
Consultancy Service for Detailed Engineering Studies and Preparation
of Bid Documents
LOLTT                     A
Alloft (Nigeria) Ltd 149/153 Broad Street, P0 Box 515, Lagos, Nigeria
Tel +234 1 2662073 Fax +234 1 2691212
Babtie Group Simpson House, 6 Cherry Orchard Road, Surrey Cr9 6BE, UK
Tel �44 20 8686 8212 Fax �44 208681 2499



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
CONTENTS
Acronyms/Abbreviations                            3
Executive Summary                                 4
1.0 INTRODUCTION.
1.1  Background                                 12
1.2   Brief on the Project                      13
1.3  Institutional Settings and Regulatory Background  14
1.4  Objectives of the E.l.A.                   16
1.5  Benefits of the E.I.A.                     17
1.6  Assessment Methodology                     17
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
2.1   Declaration                               18
2.2   Project Location                          18
2.3   Project Justification                     19
2.4   Objectives of the Project                20
3.0 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES
3.1   Water Supply                             22
3.2   Roads Rehabilitation                     25
3.3    Public Toilets                          27
3.4    Solid Waste Management                  30
3.5    Construction of Abattoir                31
4.0 CONSULTATION.
4.1 Identification of Stakeholders.            34
4.2    Consultation with Stakeholders          34
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS
5.1 Environmental Data Acquisition             42
5.2   Climate Characteristics.                 42
5.3    Wildlife and Vegetation Characteristics  43
5.4    Hydrology.                              44
6.0 POTENTIAL AND ASSOCIATED IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Environmental Impact Assessment Report  1



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
6.1 General                                     45
6.2   Identification and Classification of Impacts  45
7.0 MITIGATION MEASURES
7.1 Dust Generation and Soil erosion during Road
Construction                                 59
7.2 Creation of Artificial lagoon around boreholes  60
7.3 Contact of Sewage Underground water         62
7.4 Littering of Abattoir Surroundings with Animal
Wastes and Unwanted parts                    63
7.5 Leachate Contact with Underground Water at Solid
Waste Dump Site                              64
8.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
8.1 Environmental Management Plan (EMP)         66
8.2 Contingency Plan for the Proposed Activities.  67
8.3   Environmental Monitoring/Inspection       68
9.0 CONCLUSION.                                     72
Environmental Impact Assessment Report  2



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
ACCRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS
ACO       =   Abattoir Construction and Operation
CBO       =   Community Based Organisation
CO        =   Carbon monoxide
C02           Carbon Dioxide
DB (A)    =   Decibel
EIA       =   Environmental Impact Assessment
EMP       =   Environmental management Plan
FCT       =   Federal Capital Territory
FMENV     =   Federal Ministry of Environment
H2S       =   Hydrogen Sulphide
IDA       =   International Development Agency
Mg/m3     =   Milligram per meter cube
NH3       =   Ammonia
NOX       =   Nitrogen Oxides
OD        =   Operational Directive
PC        =   Public Conveniences
Pb        =   Lead
ROW       =   Right Of Way
RC        =   Road Construction
SPM       =   Suspended Particulate Matter
Si        =   Statutory Instrument
WDCO      =   Waste Dump Construction and Operation
WSP       =   Water Supply Project
Environmental Impact Assessment Report  3



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Project:
The Federal Government of Nigeria through the Nasarawa State
Government supported by the World Bank is undertaking a
Community Based Urban Development Project in Karu and
Mararaba Communities. The project will involve:
1.   Rehabilitation of a total of (25) twenty-five kilometres of
tertiary and secondary roads.
2.   Construction of twelve (12) boreholes
3.   Three (3) modern public toilets
4.   One modern Abattoir
5.   Constructions of twenty-three (23) refuse receptacles
6.   Construction of a landfill site
7.   Procurement of waste management equipment
The project is aimed at reducing poverty by providing basic
services and infrastructure in Karu and Mararaba Communities,
which are poor infrastructure deficient communities.
Institutional Settings and Regulatory Background:
The regulatory basis for this EIA are the;
Environmental Impact Assessment Report  4



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
* National EIA Decree No. 86 of 1 992
* Procedural Guideline on infrastructure Development
* Sectoral Guideline on infrastructure Development
* National Policy on the Environment
* World Bank Guideline on Environmental Assessment
* Nasarawa State Environmental Edict No. 1 5 of 1 997
Objectives of the Environmental Impact Assessment:
The objectives of the EIA are to:
* Provide necessary baseline data for purpose of the project
* Identify impacts of various components of the project to
socio-economic setting and the environment
* Identify appropriate mitigation measures to ameliorate
identified impacts.
* Incorporate relevant aspects of the EIA into the decision
making process and provide basis for liaison and cooperation
with all stakeholders.
Project Justification
Deplorable state of roads and acute shortage of drinking water
and waste management facilities as well as poor drainage
conditions in the area as high lighted earlier necessitated and
justify the execution of the project.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report  5



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
Objective of the Project
The objectives of the project include:
* Making significant impact on the living conditions of the
inhabitants of the area.
* Provide basic infrastructure and municipal services within a
reasonable time period.
* Invest in infrastructure services to encourage future efforts
by the communities to bring about physical and social
improvements with their own resources and implement cost-
efficient and affordable solution for infrastructure and
services provision by adopting appropriate and affordable
functional standards within pre-defined per-capital cost
allocation amongst others.
Environment Description
The two communities are located to the north and south of the
Abuja - Keffi highway. Karu and Mararaba townships are located
on the eastern part of the FCT along Abuja - Keffi highway and
has a combine population of about 450,000 people. Most of the
inhabitants are peasant farmers but there is a significant presence
of government workers, labourers, and petty traders. Karu is well
Environmental Impact Assessment Report  6



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
served by very good laterite roads while Mararaba is not planned
and lacks good road network distribution.    New   residential
developments are progressing fast within these communities due
to its closeness to the Federal Capital.
Infrastructure
Mararaba and New Karu though both urban centres lack basic
social amenities such as good drinking water, roads, housing and
electricity supply.
Climatic Characteristics
The study area is influenced by two seasonal periods of dry and
wet seasons. The dry season, which is, the dominant one lasts
from November to April while the wet (raining) season lasts from
May to October. Two air masses, the tropical maritime and the
tropical continental air masses are responsible for the variations in
the seasons.
Wildlife and Vegetation Characteristics
The study areas are very close to the Federal Capital City Abuja,
which is well developed; therefore there are no wild animals. This
is due largely to intense pressure put on land, which is increasing
Environmental Impact Assessment Report  7



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
by the day as a result of rush to the FCT from other parts of the
country.
Vegetation of the area is also affected by these developments.
The original thick vegetation cover is fast giving way to open area
courtesy of rapid developments in housing infrastructure.
Potential Impact of Project
The projects potential impacts are as out lined below:
1.   Construction of roads will lead to:
-    Lowering of air quality
-    Increase  in  background   noise  level resulting  from
equipment movement
-    Soil erosion
-    Damage to aesthetics
-    Increase in accident risks
-    Facilitation of easy movement
-    Possible increase in population
-    Possibility of employment opportunity
Environmental Impact Assessment Report  8



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
2.   Boreholes construction and operation:
-    Provision of clean water
-    Influencing personal hygiene
-    Stimulating local entrepreneurships
-    Provision of employment opportunity
3.   Construction and operation of public conveniences:
-    Improving sanitary conditions of the communities
-    Provision of cheap and hygienic toilets
-    Possible contamination of underground water
-    Possibility of employment opportunity
4.   Construction and Operation of Abattoir:
-    Possible increase in foul smell
-    Provision of hygienically prepared beef
-    Employment generation
5.   Waste dump operation:
-    Improving the aesthetic of the communities
-    Employment generation
-    Possible contamination of underground water
Environmental Impact Assessment Report  9



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
-    Improving quality
Mitigation Measures
Chapter eight of this report gives details of measures to be
adopted to reduce or eliminate impacts arising from the projects
implementation activities or their operations.  Generally, the
projects are of positive side but could generate negative concerns,
which need to be mitigated.
Environmental Management Plan
The consideration of environmental management which is an
integral part of the detailed project design activities and
operations should ensure protection of the environment and
human health and should have as its objectives:
Minimization of environmental risk
Reduction/elimination of adverse impacts
Achieving the above objectives could be possible by adopting the
following policies and principles, which are already elaborated in
the main report.
* Potential impacts identification
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 10



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
* Contingency planning
* Environmental monitory/inspection
�
Conclusion
This EIA has been carried out in accordance with National,
International  and  State  regulatory  requirements  on  the
environment and it is intended to provide environmental and social
aspects of the planning and execution of the project.
Also, the potential environmental and social impacts of the project
on the existing setting have been identified and evaluated and
mitigations proffered where applicable. Furthermore, EMP has
been developed and provided for the project and it is hoped that if
executed in accordance with the EIA provisions and the EMP, it
will cause no serious damage to both the environment and social
setting of the areas involved.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 11



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
Nasarawa State Government in conjunction with the World
Bank proposes to upgrade and provide where not available,
the facilities in the township areas of Mararaba and New
Karu in Karu Local Government Area of the State. The
project will involve construction activities ranging from
roads and drainage, boreholes, public conveniences, solid
waste management and an abattoir. The water supply
scheme, waste dumpsite and public toilets are to be
located on land whose ownership has been transferred to
the community. Relevant documents are in the custody of
the project implementation unit.
Sequel to the above, the Government and World Bank
commissioned an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
of the proposed project in compliance with the regulatory
requirements and their commitment to conducting the
activities in an environmentally friendly manner.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 12



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
1 .2 Brief on the Project
The projects activities, which are to be carried out at
Mararaba township area, near the south-eastern border of
the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja and the Headquarters
of Karu Local Government Area of Nasarawa State, was
conceived to take care of the most pressing needs of the
communities brought about by the most recent population
explosion in these areas as a result of movement of the
Federal Capital to Abuja.
The activities involved in the project are road rehabilitation
following the existing right of way (Row) of cumulative
length of about twenty-five (25) kilometres for both
primary and secondary roads, construction of ten  (15)
number boreholes; five (5) at Karu and seven (7) at
Mararaba, construction of three (3) modern public toilets
and a modern abattoir to be located at the Northern
section of Mararaba very close to the Market. Also to be
involved in the project is the construction of a waste
dumpsite and waste collection centres.
The activities involved in the construction of the various
sub-projects that make up this project do not involved
significant direct pollutant discharges that are large enough
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 13



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
to cause degradation of air, water or soil; large scale
physical disturbances of the site.   There is also no
substantial disturbance  of forest and   other  natural
resources, measurable modification of hydrological cycle.
The project does not involve involuntary displacement of
people and other significant social disturbances.
1.3 Institutional Settings and Regulatory Background
Relevant guidelines and regulations applicable (directly
and/or indirectly) to the execution of the proposed project
are covered by the mandates of the Federal Ministry of
Environment      (FMENV),     the      World      Bank
regulations/guidelines for execution of projects and other
national and international regulations.
1.3.1 Federal Ministry of Environment (FMENV)
The principal FMENV guidelines and regulation related
to the execution of the project activities are specified
in the:
* National Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
Decree No. 86 of 1992.
* National EIA procedural guideline (1 995)
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 14



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
* FMENV, Sectoral Guideline on Infrastructure
Development (1 995).
* FMENV, Sectoral Guideline on Waste Treatment
and disposal (Draft; 1 998).
s Statutory  Instrument  (S.l.  15)  -  National
Environmental Protection (Management of Solid
and Hazardous Wastes) regulations 1991. This
instrument spells out the requirements for
ground water protection, surface impoundment,
land   treatment,   waste   piles,  landfills,
incineration, etc.
* National Policy on the Environment (Revised -
1999) section 4.3.
1.3.2 The World Bank Guideline
X Environmental Assessment Source Book Vol. 1
(Policies, Procedures and Cross-Sectoral Issues).
* The   World   Bank:   Sectoral  Environmental
Assessment - 1993.
* The World Bank:    Environmental Assessment
Source    Book    update;   assessing    the
Environmental Impact of Urban Development.
* World Bank Operational Policy O.P. 4.0
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 15



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
Other guidelines and regulations relevant to the
project are:
* United    Nations'   Environmental   Impact
Assessment: Basic procedures for developing
countries.
* Nasarawa State Environmental Edict No. 15 of
1 997.
1.4 Objectives of the EIA.
The main objectives of the EIA are:
* To provide necessary baseline data (ecological and
socio-economic) for the purpose of the project.
* Identify the impacts of various components of the
project to the socio-economic setting and the
physical environment.
* Identify appropriate mitigations measures to reduce
or eliminate the identified impacts.
* Recommend an appropriate and effective monitoring
programme to measure possible changes to the
environment.
* Incorporation of relevant aspects of the EIA into the
decision making process and provide a basis for
liaison and cooperation with all stakeholders.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 16



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
1.5 Benefits of the EIA
The benefits of the EIA to the socio-economic and the
ecological environmental setting include but not limited to:
* Identification at an early stage the project's inherent
potential and associated negative impacts and their
corresponding mitigation measures.
* Enhancing environmental quality through careful
project implementation.
* Ensuring project sustainability by considering future
possible socio-economic changes.
1.6 Assessment Methodology
For the purpose of the community based urban upgrading
project, two (2) forms of investigations were involved;
literature search into existing write ups about the ecology
and socio-economics of the area and field data gathering
involving reconnaissance/field work and laboratory analysis
of the acquired samples.  Such samples include, water
samples, soil samples as well as informal interview of
stakeholders.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 17



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
2.1 Declaration
The proponent of the project declared that all the
components of the project i.e. road construction/drainage,
construction of public conveniences and abattoir as well as
drilling of boreholes will be carried out within the
framework of the existing State, National and International
legislations  and  Regulations  governing  environmental
management.
2.2 Project Location
Mararaba and New Karu townships are the two areas
where the urban upgrading project activities are proposed
to be carried out. The two urban areas bordered each other
at a distance of about 40 km along Abuja - Keffi Road at
the southeastern border of the Federal Capital Territory
(FCT) Appendix 1. is a map showing the proposed project
location. Prior to the movement of the FCT to Abuja, these
areas were-basically rural to semi urban with very sparse
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 18



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
population and basic infrastructure typical of a rural
township.
Presently, these areas have grown significantly both in size
and population well above 400,000 people. This led to
extensive pressure on the existing infrastructure and
general services, waste management crises and other
socio-economic problems like in adequate housing and
security.
2.3 Project Justification
Karu and Mararaba Communities were chosen to benefit
from  this  project due  to the   deplorable  state  of
infrastructures and basic services within them.  At both
New Karu and Mararaba, potable drinking water and good
roads are virtually not available.  The roads inside the
townships are all unsurfaced and generally not motorable
especially at rainy season. Pools of water at the centre of
the roads are a common feature resulting from lack of
drainage and blockage of available ones. Water for drinking
and other domestic purposes is being purchased daily from
water vendors popularly called "Mai Ruwa" and is generally
not safe for public consumption. This is made inevitable
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 19



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
due to complete absence of pipe borne water or public
boreholes.
Sanitary conditions of the streets and houses in these areas
are also a source of potential health hazards. This is in
consideration that toilet facilities are grossly inadequate and
unkempt where they exist and the streets are dotted with
heaps of waste dumps. In a nutshell, developments in the
area are carried out with no regard to future or anticipated
expansion and modernization.
The realities of acute shortage of these basic infrastructure
facilities and the continuous influx of people especially
those of lower income class into the area necessitated the
project. This (the project) will go along way in making the
areas more habitable to people and stimulate small holder
entrepreneurship thereby promote economic growth.
2.4 Objectives of the Project
The project will upgrade basic infrastructure and municipal
services in the Mararaba and New Karu townships with the
following as its objectives.
* Make significant impact on the living conditions of the
communities including the environmental conditions in
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 20



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
the settlements and hence the health conditions of the
people.
* Achieve   such  impacts   by   provision  of  basic
infrastructure  and  municipal  services  within  a
reasonable time frame.
* Invest in infrastructure and services in the settlement
to encourage future efforts by the communities to
bring about physical and social improvements with
their own resources.
* Implement cost-efficient and affordable solutions for
infrastructure and services provision by adopting
appropriate and affordable functional standards within
pre-defined per-capita cost allocations.
* Make    infrastructure  improvements,  planned  and
implemented in an integrated manner to help avoid
disruption in the settlements in future because of
piecemeal provision of the various services required.
* Establish  adequate   operation  and   maintenance
arrangements through partnerships between local
governments and beneficiary communities to better
ensure overall sustainability of infrastructure.
* Demonstrate a replicable and sustainable approach to
upgrading  that  can   be  scaled-up  to  citywide
programmes.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 21



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES
3.1 Water Supply
This component of the project involves the drilling of
fifteen (10) number boreholes, comprising of seven (7) to
be in Mararaba and five (5) at New Karu. Target land
locations, which are expected to be made available by the
communities, are; the markets areas, the corner shops and
other populated areas and already, the geophysical
investigations for the various proposed sites had been
concluded. The results of this for the identified sites are
included in the accompanying Engineering report.
The boreholes to be constructed are designed to have
drilling casing and screening and equipped with overhead
storage tanks, pumps, riser, rump house and a standby
generator. Chain wire enclosure will be used round the
generator and trained personnel will man the borehole.
Also, considering the success of private entrepreneurs in
operating boreholes in these communities, it is intended
that these private initiatives will be used as a model for the
operation and maintenance of the proposed boreholes.
Further, the high operation and maintenance cost of the
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 22



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
boreholes resulting from purchase of spare parts and fuel
for the generator made the consideration of collection of
charges fee necessary. This is basically to ensure project
sustainability.
The private operators are to operate and maintain the
facility according to the maintenance schedule in the
accompanying operation and maintenance manual.
3.1.1 Water supply Alternatives
Various options/alternatives for the provision of
portable water to the communities were considered
and they are:
i)   Pipe-borne water supply to run along public
access roads.
ii)  Construction of boreholes as centralized water
supply.
iii)  No project option.
Options (i and iii) were rejected for the fact that
option i, is capital intensive and not feasible with the
available funds while option iii) was rejected
considering the dire need for potable water for
domestic and other uses.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 23



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
Option ii, which is adopted as a viable option was
chosen due to the fact that the available finances
could comfortably cover its execution and hence
provide the needed clean and reliable source of water
for domestic and other uses.
Engineering design for the borehole and the auxiliary
facilities has been done to specification and to fit with
the socio-economics of the areas. Also environmental
considerations were taken into account to ensure
project sustainability. The design of the water supply
facilities has been based on other recently constructed
water supply facilities in the same area. These have
been found to operate successfully. Twin boreholes
are proposed thus enabling supply to continue even if
the pump in one borehole is being serviced. Electric
driven submersible pumps have been specified with a
standby generator because the electricity supply in
the area is unreliable. The pumps will deliver to a 50
cubic metre overhead tank.   This tank gravitates
through pipe-work to a minimum of five standpipes.
The tank provides a buffer for peak periods when the
demand at the standpipes exceeds the capacity of the
borehole pumps.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 24



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
3.2 Roads Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation of roads and drainage is a significant
component of the project with a total of twenty-five
(25) kilometres to be rehabilitated, surfaced and paved
in the two (2) identified communities i.e. New Karu and
Mararaba. This will involve site clearing, earthworks,
construction of pavement and block work drains as well
as surface dressing.  To avoid tempering with the
natural setting of the communities and for economic
reasons, no demolishing of any structure will be done
and that all roads will follow the existing Right Of Way
(ROW) at both communities. Also, it is expected that
the design will achieve a balanced cut and fill meaning
that borrow pits will not be required. Drainage along
side of the surfaced and unsurfaced roads will be
ensured and the roads (surfaced ones) will be paved to
avoid been eroded by rain and flowing waters. The
construction activity will involve the use of equipments
such as graders, rollers, plate compactors, trucks, etc.
and an approximate volume of 76,000 m3 of gravel are
required. Sample drawings for the topographical survey
of the road alignments and cross sections have been
provided in the accompanying Engineering report.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 25



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
Soil samples along the route alignments were collected
and tested in the laboratory and the results provided in
the accompanying Engineering report. This confirmed
the visual examination results of the trial pits believed
to be of high California bearing ratio i.e. good
foundation material.
Gravel pits will be sited 25 km from the start of the
duplication, which was as a result of difficulty faced in
securing an alternative closer site.  The consultant
supervising the work for Abuja - Keffi highway that will
pass  through  Mararaba   and  Karu, provided   this
information. The consultant also provided details for
the proposed alignment for the duplication of the said
highway. a typical road and drainage drawing for the
proposed project is provided in the in the accompanying
Engineering report.
3.2.1 Road Rehabilitation Alternatives
Alternatives considered for the road construction
activities include the followings:
i)   Following the existing (ROW) "Right Of Way".
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 26



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
ii)  Straightening  with  grading  or  surfacing
widening the roads. Where necessary by
carrying out some forms of demolition.
iii)  Do nothing.
In  consideration  of  the  above   alternatives,
alternatives ii) and iii) were rejected on the ground
that alternative ii) is a very costly one and cannot
be covered by with the available finances.
Alternative iii) on the other hand, is not a good
option going by the difficulty faced by the people
of the communities in aspect of transportation
infrastructure.
To better the lots of the people, alternative i) was
adopted which will involve surfacing of major
access roads and grading the minor ones to
facilitate easy movement.
3.3 Public Toilets
Another significant component of the project is the
construction of modern public toilets in three (3)
strategic locations (mostly in high public concentration
areas). . A cleaner and a watchman will be employed
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 27



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
for each of the fourteen boreholes to maintain
cleanliness and ensure security of the facilities.
The facilities are proposed to be operated by a
community-based organization because of the direct
interest the community has on the maintenance of the
facilities.  This organization is expected to conduct
publicity campaigns to encourage the use of the public
conveniences and educate the users on the proper use
of the   facilities.  This is expected  to influence
acceptability of the project and hence sanitary condition
of the communities. It is further expected that as time
goes on, private enterprise will take over the operation
of the facility through collection of fees.
3.3.1 Public Toilets Alternatives
Alternatives to design and location of this facility
were given due considerations and were identified
as:
i)   Construction of pit toilets.
ii)  Construction of well built squat slab toilet
and showers with male/female areas.
iii)  Construction of stand alone toilets.
iv)  Do nothing with the present situation.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 28



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
The alternatives above were carefully considered
and evaluated, but all were rejected except ii) on
the ground that;
- it offers the most cost effective and
integrated option
- it is the environmentally best option of all.
Other alternatives were rejected on the premise
that;
Option (i) is not environmentally friendly as it could
allow contact of the human excreta with the under
ground water which is the main source of
domestic and drinking water thereby polluting it.
Hence, exposing the communities to the dangers
of contacting water borne diseases. It could also
result to emission of contaminated air and could
thus lead to spread of air borne diseases.
Option (iii) was rejected not because it is not
environmentally friendly but just as it could not
provide the needed total public convenience i.e.
giving both females and males access to use at
the same time and as well provide a bathing place.
On the other hand, the last option (option iv) was
rejected in consideration of the dear need of these
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 29



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
facilities in view of the terrible sanitary conditions
of the communities.  Also, the opportunity the
State Government has at her disposal is a rare one
and carrying out the project will encourage more
people to settle in these areas to engage in small-
scale business (ventures) and thus boost the
internally  generated  revenue  profile  of the
Government   through   taxation.     Detailed
engineering design of the proposed facility is in the
accompanying Engineering report.
3.4 Solid Waste Management/Disposal
To further emphasize the Government's desire to
ensure improved sanitary condition of the communities
all forms of wastes and especially solid wastes are to
be collected and disposed off in a safe and
environmentally friendly manner. A site has already
been chosen for this purpose and will be operated as a
waste dump. Twenty-three (23) refuse receptacles will
be constructed to gather the waste from nearest
households for onward delivery to the dumpsite (see
layout on page in the accompanying Engineering
report.).
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 30



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
3.5 Construction of Abattoir
The existence of a market place at Mararaba and by
extension the presence of butchers slaughtering and
marketing beef necessitated the need for having a
centralized butchery/slaughter house. This prompted
the idea of inclusion in the upgrade project a modern
abattoir to be located along Keffi - Abuja road east of
Mararaba town to cater for the need of the butchers
while ensuring that a clean and safe beef is sold to the
populace.
The proposed abattoir is designed to consist of a
modern building with a properly designed disposal
system   for  liquid  waste  (see  layout  in  the
accompanying Engineering report.). It is expected that
most of the solid waste will be recycled and hence no
special disposal facility is required in that regard.
Slaughter activity being a job dealing with a lot of blood
and other waste matter, large volume of water is
required and with that in mind, a borehole is proposed
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 31



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project  *
to cater for the water needs of the operators of the
facility.
The most suitable of the following modes of operation
of the facility will be adopted when finally comes on
stream:
i)   The facility to be operated and maintained by the
butchers association since they have direct
interest in operating and maintaining it.
ii)  The facility be operated and maintained by a
private enterprise that will then charge the
butchers for each animal slaughtered.
In either of the aforementioned situations, proper house
keeping must be ensured considering the direct health
implications the operation of the facility has to its
products consumers. The abattoir will be operated and
maintain  by  private  operator  according  to  the
maintenance schedule specified in the accompanying
operation and maintenance manual.
3.5.1 Potential Accidental Events
As stated earlier, the abattoir is proposed or
designed as a modern facility and hence its
operation is expected to be mostly mechanical.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 32



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
For this reason therefore, the operators must be
well trained to avoid incidence.
The main potential accident in the facility is the
floor i.e. concrete or tiles and the animals to be
slaughtered. To avoid or minimize incidences in
these areas, slaughtering must be done with
utmost care while at the same time the animals
should be handle with great care so as not to
frighten them.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report  33



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 CONSULTATION
4.1 Identification of Stakeholders
Development activities have the potential to impact the
economic, social and cultural aspects or categories of a
community or communities, where such activities are
taking place. Therefore, there is the need to take into
consideration public concern during project development,
especially at the initial stages of the process of
environmental Assessment.  A consultation programme
could facilitate this. For the purpose of this project, the
stakeholders identified are;
* The host communities of New Karu and Mararaba
* Nasarawa State Government
* Nasarawa State Government
* Butchers Association of Karu and Mararaba
* Community Technical Committees
* Greater Karu Urban Development Authority
4.2 Consultation with Stakeholders
The   above  mentioned  stakeholders  were  severally
consulted and informed about the proposed project, its
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 34



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
positive and negative consequences were discussed and
deliberated upon and acceptable implementation procedure
was unanimously accepted.
The Local Council, the State Government and the were the
first to be consulted being the bodies responsible for the
project funding. While the inhabitants of the New Karu and
Mararaba were consulted using an informal structured
interviews administered strategically.
4.2.1 Objectives of Consultation Programme
The main objectives of consultation programme are:
i)   Provision  of information  to  satisfy  public
concern, particularly to the principal stakeholders
(and obtain input in respect of their concerns)
ii)  To avoid conflict by addressing issues promptly.
iii)  Identify  social  conditions  of  the  host
communities and;
iv)  To identify best ways of implementing project.
4.2.2 Organisation
New Karu and Mararaba townships are located in
Karu Local Government Area of Nasarawa State
of Nigeria as earlier mentioned in this report.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 35



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
They   are  two    independent   communities
traditionally each with its traditional ruler.
The two communities are rapidly expanding due
to their proximity to the Federal Capital, Abuja
making it increasingly difficult to identify their
individual boundaries and that of the FCT.  The
settlements are basically modal, taking advantage
of the major transportation route to the North
Eastern  States  and  the  South  and   most
importantly, the influx of people into the FCT
where there is acute accommodation problem.
Presently however, these two towns are highly
nucleated with several roads (thought unplanned
and sometimes unmotorable) traversing their
various sections.
4.2.3 Demography
The present populations of New Karu and
Mararaba has been estimated to be 450,000
inhabitants.
4.2.4 Education
Education wise also, despite the population of
Mararaba, ..there is single public primary  or
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 36



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
secondary school.   All the schools including
Mararaba Primary and Secondary school, Abuja
International Primary and Secondary school,
Ademola Adeoye Nursery and Primary school etc.
are privately owned.
4.2.5 Social Amenities
Also amenities such as telephone are completely
non-existent while those that exist e.g. electricity
are highly epileptic. Social amenities e.g. Cinema
halls, parks and other recreational centres are non-
existent.
4.2.6 Infrastructure
There is an obvious lack of good and motorable
roads after leaving the major highway.   The
streets are very narrow criss-crossed by open
gutters in some places with clear lack of drainage
facility. Water supply is equally a serious problem
in these areas/communities as virtually every
household depends on water vendors for its
domestic water needs.
Housing condition at these communities are below
any urban standard, at best could be considered
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 37



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
as potential disasters except in few cases where
concrete houses are build.    In addition, the
available houses are being over stretched of their
carrying capacity with an average of four (4) to
six (6) people occupying a room.
4.2.7 Health Conditions
Health services at both communities are mainly
provided by privately own clinics such as Adonai,
Island and Savannah clinics amongst others.
There is clear absence of public or Government
owned health centres in Mararaba except the one
at Karu.
Also, the sanitary condition for the two (2)
communities - Mararaba and New Karu appear
quite unsatisfactory or unsafe to be considered a
healthy environment.   Wastes of all kind are
dumped uncontrollably in these communities.
Sewage disposal is not quite different from that of
solid waste except in some cases where in-built
toilet facilities are provided in flush system and pit
type.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 38



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
The informal interview revealed that the prevalent
causes of morbidity in the population were as a
result of communicable diseases those related to
environmental cleanliness and these include:
Cholera, Malaria, Diarrhoea, Cough, etc.
Major health hazards encountered in the study
area were invariably those from the unsanitary
nature  of the  neighbourhoods, streets  and
residential and commercial premises.  Another
source of potential available drinking water from
water vendors whose priority is to make good
sales and money with no regards to the quality of
the water they sell.
4.2.8 The Economy
The inhabitants of the communities under review
obtained their lively hood from largely from
provision of services and exchange of goods. As
explained earlier in this Chapter, most of the
inhabitants are either government workers, those
working with construction firms and specialized
services providers or traders.  Most of these
people shuttle daily to and from the city centre
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 39



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
where their offices are located with few others
running their businesses in the locality.
4.2.9 Cultural Heritage and Quality of Life
The astronomic growth in population within a
short time span resulting from influx of people
into the FCT greatly affected the old setting of
these communities.  Prior to the movement of
seat of Government to Abuja in 1992, the
communities were basically agrarian with life
centred on neighbourhood and family ties and the
economy simply rural. The way of life was as
typical and as simple as found in any Nigerian
rural settlement with celebration of naming and
wedding ceremonies and the yearly Sallah and
Christmas celebrations.
However,   since  the  1 990s  when   Federal
Government establishments moved from Lagos to
Abuja, the situation changed drastically.  The
once simple rural life changed to a typical Nigeria
city life especially with the quality of the
population coming in on daily basis. Also demand
for essential basic services increased especially on
aspect of housing, roads and drinking water. The
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 40



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
major ethnic groups found in the two communities
presently are Gbaggi, Koro, Gwandara, Yeskwa,
Gade, Mada, Eggon, Igbo, Hausa, Yoruba and a
host of others.
The condition of decay and insufficiency of
available infrastructure including good roads,
housing, sanitation and health facilities no doubt
give clear picture of poor quality of life. Although
there exist a number of private clinics and
hospital, access to good medical care to most of
the inhabitants remained a mirage considering the
high cost of securing or payment of the available
services.  Acute shortage of potable water and
terrible  sanitation  problems  re-enforced  the
obvious fact of low quality of life in the
communities.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 41



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS
5.1 Environmental Data Acquisition
The Chapter presents environmental data characteristics of
the proposed projects area, which will be used as a
benchmark for future changes that may arise due to the
project implementation. A multidisciplinary approach was
adopted for the collection of the environmental data and
the process include:
* Field data collection/survey/ground truthing.
* Desk top/Literature search.
The data obtained (physical, chemical and socio-economic)
through the above-identified methods were integrated and
incorporated in the report. The activity was carried out in
May 2001, which followed the initial field reconnaissance
through the two communities and their environs.
5.2 Climatic Characteristics
The study area is influenced by two seasonal periods, the
dry and wet seasons.  The dry season is the dominant
season and lasts from November to April. The period is
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 42



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
characterized by hot and dry Northeast trade winds. Heavy
down pour and thunderstorms characterizes the rainy
season, which begins in May and last through October,
especially at the beginning of the season. The season is
influenced by the southwesterly, which is a moisture-laden
air mass. On the other hand, the temperature regime in the
area also follow the pattern explained above i.e. higher
temperatures are experienced during the dry season
especially at the tail-end of it while lower temperatures are
experienced at the middle of the wet season to the
beginning of dry season.
5.3 Wildlife and vegetation characteristics
The study areas fall within the larger vegetation zone of
Northern Guinea Savannah characterized by tall woody
trees and grasses. However, due to its proximity to the
well-developed FCT and the continuous pressure/demand of
land for building purposes, the vegetation has been
seriously or massively depleted. Presently, large expanse
of land could be seen in the area with bare surface almost
devoid of vegetation.
Consequently, it could be deduced that the area is sparsely
vegetated and as such vegetation resources are of less
significance.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 43



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
Wildlife distribution in the study area followed the same
pattern with vegetation.  Prior to movement of FCT to
Abuja, wildlife was a common scene in the area. However,
as their habitats got threatened, a lot of them migrated
further into the bush while many others were hunted down.
At the moment and especially during the field study no
single wildlife was observed most probably due to the fact
that their habitats have been over taken by human
developments.
5.4 Hydrology
Locating a stream or river in an around Mararaba or New
*Karu proved a Herculean task during the field visit.
However, a dry valley was observed which probably comes
alive during the rainy season. Thus, the area could be said
to be devoid of rivers and streams.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 44



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
CHAPTER SIX
6.0 PONTENTIAL AND ASSOCIATED IMPACTS ASSESSMENT
6.1 General
All physical development activities that border on the
environment no matter their usefulness to the people have
some kind of negative impacts that come with them. In
this light, the proposed activities i.e. road construction,
boreholes drilling, construction of public conveniences and
the abattoir could be said to have potential impacts to both
the environment and the communities. Thus, this Chapter
will dwell mainly on the impacts associated with the
implementation and operation of the projects.
6.2 Identification and classification of potential impacts.
The key environmental and socio-economic components
used as indicators of potential changes in the communities
are as shown in the table below.
Environment/socio-economic components and potential
impact indicators
Environmental/Socio-  Potential Impact Indicators
economic component
Socio-economics      Population, Health  and  safety,
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 45



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
Infrastructure   change     and
Aesthetics.
Water Quality         Physic-chemical    Characteristics
(Improved drainage)
Air Quality and noise H2S, NH3, NOX, SPM    and Noise
level                 level
The potential impacts of the proposed project are
variegated and were identified through the interfacing of
the project activities and the social and environmental
components.    Based on this, the following types of
potential impacts were identified.
* Direct  Impact   -   Impact  resulting  from  the
consequences of the activities of the activities.
* Indirect Impact - an impact that is at least one step
away from the project activities.
* Localized Impact - an impact that is felt within the
immediate vicinity of the projects.
* Short term Impact - an impact causing temporary
effect and lasting for the period of the activities.
* Long term Impact - an impact lasting beyond the
project activities.
* Positive Impact - Beneficial and positively affecting
the communities and the environment.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 46



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
* Negative Impact - adverse and negatively affecting
the people and the envirqnment.
The table below is the checklist for potential impacts of the
project activities.
Activity       Potential Impact    Adverse  Beneficial  Direct  Indirect Localized
Construction   Lowing of air and
of roads       other particular
matter (smoke)         v                  v                    v
Increase in
background noise
level resulting                           v
from equipment
movement
Soil erosion
resulting from
constitution in
the rainy season       vv
or improper
method thereby
exposing the soil
Environmental Impact Assessment Report  47



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
Damage to
aesthetic through
deep and cuts,
major fills and
spoil deposit
Facilitating easy
movement on
completion of the                           v
road.
Possible
influence to
influx of people
into the area
thereby                           v
stimulating other
economic
ventures.
Possibility of
employment
opportunity.                                      _
Environmental Impact Assessment Report  48



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
Increase in
accident risks
resulting from
increased road
traff ic.
Boreholes          Provision of clean
construction       water on
and operation.     completion of
work.                             v     
Influencing
personal hygiene
of the inhabitants
of the
communities due
to increased
water quality
availability.
Stimulating local
entrepreneurships
bordering on                      v
water supply
/availability.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report  49



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
Provision of
employment
opportunity                  vO
during operation
Construction    Improvement of
and   operation sanitary
of       public conditions of the
conveniences    area through                 v        O
centralized
sewage
collection.
Provision of
cheap and
hygienic toilets
and bashes for
the communities.
Possible
contamination of
under ground
water through                                 O
see-page of
soakaways.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 50



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
Possibility of
employment
opportunity for
operation and
maintenance.
Construction      Possible increase
and    operation  in foul smell if
of abattoir.      waste from
animal parts are
not properly
collected and
disposed.
Provision of
hygienically
prepared beef for
the consumption
of the people.
Generation of
employment
opportunity for                 v
the operation of
the facility.
Waste Dump        Improving the
aesthetic of the
communities.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report  51



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
Provision of
employment
opportunities
during the                                          -         '
construction and
operation
periods.
Possible
contamination of
underground
through sea page
of leachete.
Improving air
quality by
removing rotten
materials from                    v
the streets and
hence improve
health condition
of the people.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report  52



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
IMPACT PREDICTION AND SIGNIFICANCE
A method (Rau and Wooten, 1990) incorporating a list of project
activities/actions with a checklist of environmental indicators (that
may be affected) in a matrix format, was adopted for the
prediction of impact levels.  This follows the identification of
cause-effect   relationships   between     specific   project
activities/actions and potential environmental impacts.  The
entries in a cell of the matrix represent effect relationship.
The measures of impact level, in each case, was based on:
* Likely extent of impact
* Probable severity
* Sensitivity rating of the environment
* Nature and quality of activity impacting
* Legislative requirements
In addition, a scale of A to C was used in ranking the potential
impacts thus:
* A = Low impact
* B = moderate impact
* C = Significant impact
Also, positive (+) and negative (-) signs were used to denote
potential beneficial and adverse impacts respectively.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 53



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
PROJECT ACTIVITY IMPACT MATRIX
Environmental                Project Activities
Components          RC     WSP     PC    ACO    WDCO
Hydrology/Ground water                 B-             C-
quality.
Surface water quality.  A-             C+     A-      B+
Air Quality             C-             B+     B+      C+
Aesthetics              B+      B+     C+     B+      C+
Noise level (on site)   B-     A-
Socio economics
Health Hazards          A-                            B-
Visual Intrusion        B-
Employment/Income       B+     A+      A+     A+      A+
generation.
Key:
Matrix Cell Entries
Project Activities:                          A = Low impact
RC = Road Construction                       B = Moderate impact
WSP = Water Supply Project                   C = Significant impact
PC = Public Conveniences                     (+) = Beneficial
(-) = Adverse
ACO = Abattoir Construction and Operation
WDCO = Waste Dump Construction and Operation
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 54



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
POTENTIAL IMPACT INDICATORS FOR PROJECT ACTIVITIES
Different components of the project i.e. road construction,
boreholes construction, public convenience, abattoir and the
waste dump have different potential negative consequences to
environment and social setting of the area.  These potential
impacts could be seen to start manifesting before they eventually
dominate or show conspicuously.  The table below shows a
matrix of potential impact indicators to the various forms of
project activities. It is worth nothing that due to the positive
impacts the project activities have on the communities, executing
of any of its component could lead to increased number of people
been attracted to the communities.
Potential Impact Indicators Matrix
S/No.       Activity          Potential Impact Indicators
1.    Road construction   Percentage   particulates  matter
increase in the atmosphere.
Hearing impairment to increase
noise   level   resulting  from
equipment movements.
Population increase in the two
communities.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 55



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
Increase in vehicular movements on
the  roads  that could  lead   to
possibility of more accidents.
2.    Boreholes            Accumulation of water in a localize
construction         ponds   leading  to  creation  of
breading grounds for mosquitoes
and other insect vectors - i.e.
increased mosquito population.
Population   increase   in   the
communities.
3.     Public Conveniences  Reduction in level of excreta smell
and sighting in the area.
Change of drinking water taste
from   boreholes  around   toilets
areas.
Change in population (increase) of
the two communities.
4.     Abattoir construction Elimination of  foul smell around
and operation.       the area.
Improved quality of meat products
obtained in the area.
5.    Waste          Dump Improvement in aesthetics of the
construction    and streets in the area.
operation.           Foul smell reduction on the streets
of the communities
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 56



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
Change in chemical constituents of
underground      water    around     the
waste dump site.
Change      in   water    taste    from
borehole around the dump site.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report  57



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
CHAPTER SEVEN
7.0 MITIGATION MEASURES
The timing of the implementation of the mitigation measures
will be mainly the construction phase. However, for waste
management aspect and the abattoir operation, mitigation
measures will be implemented throughout the project life span.
The implementing institutions for these identified mitigation
measures are the host communities who will look after the
abattoir and the water supply system and the Nasarawa State
Government through other agencies such as the State
Environmental Protection Agency, the Greater Karu Urban
Development Authority and other relevant agencies will take
care of the waste management and road maintenance aspects.
These institutions (the communities and the State Government
Agencies) will monitor and maintain the operation of these
facilities as well as the implementation of the mitigation
measures.
Also, for the   training  of personnel to  handle the
implementation of the mitigation measures, the Nasarawa
State Government has a training programme in place through
the human resources development department that will
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 58



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
identify the timing and kind of training to be given to the
implementing  officers.  The  Government will also    be
responsible for the cost of the training of these officers.
However, for the purpose of these projects, training and waste
management and     community   health  education  are  of
paramount importance   which   should  be  given  priority
attention.
The impact prediction exercise indicates that the project
activities despite having more positive impacts have some
negative impacts associated with its execution and operation.
In the light of this, the potential negative impacts and their
mitigation measures are described in the following sub
sections.
7.1 Dust Generation and soil erosion during road construction
Potential impacts
The existing air quality appears to be of impurities such as
suspended   particulate  matter  (SPM)  for  the  two
communities   except  for  gaseous/vehicular  emission
resulting from high traffic along Abuja - Keffi highway.
The potential hazard involve in road construction include
generation of dust and carbon monoxide. The dust is of
particular interest because of its potential to severely
impair air quality with second-order effect of adverse
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 59



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
impact on human health especially to the people living
down wind. Also, the activity could lead to soil erosion
and degradation as well as severe damage to the
ecosystem.
Mitigation measures
The mitigation  measure for dust and other gaseous
emission during project execution shall include the
following:-
* Use of efficient filters in the equipments to be used
for the construction work as well as regular checks
and maintenance.
* To ensure that dust generation is reduced to the
barest minimum, water will be sprinkled on the
surface just before embarking on any earthwork.
* The use of fillers by the workers is to be made
compulsory to reduce the inhalation of dust, which
could cause trachea infection.
* Adequate drainage will be provided to protect land
and prevent erosion.
7.2 Creation of Artificial Lagoon around boreholes resulting
from spilled water.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 60



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
Potential impact
Water will be sold to individuals and water vendors, which
will be collected directly from, tap heads connected from
the overhead tanks. This will lead to spillage, and so also
when any of the taps is bad and not repaired or blocked
immediately thereby creating a lagoon of stagnant water.
An environment is thus created for mosquitoes breeding
(and other disease vectors) which will consequently
transmit diseases to the people.
Mitigation measures
Mitigation measures for artificial lagoon created through
spilled water have been conceived to include the following:
* Adequate drainage facility shall be created around the
borehole to ensure that any water spilled is drained as
quickly  as  possible  to  avoid  stagnation  and
subsequent mosquitoes breeding.
* An attendant (operator) shall be employed to operate
and monitor the facility. This will assist in observing
and reporting any faulty tap for prompt repair. Also,
to avoid constant break down (spoilage) of the tap,
the operator shall be the only person to service
customers.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 61



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
7.3 Contact of sewage at the public conveniences with under
ground water
Potential impacts
Since the public conveniences facilities are going to be
located very close to the boreholes for reasons of
availability of water, it is not impossible as the sewage
from the soak away could find its way into the ground
through see-page and get into contact with the ground
water thereby polluting it.  This will have negative
consequences  on  human   health through  contacting
diseases such as cholera and other diseases.
In addition to the above, the soak away if not properly
covered or constructed, could be releasing to the
surrounding environment contaminated air, which could
also have detrimental effect on human health.
Mitigation measures
To ensure that above potential impacts are mitigated, the
following measures were conceived and shall be adopted
right at the commencement.
The floors and sides of the septic tank will be
concretised to ensure that no sewage got leaked into
the surrounding so as not get in contact with under
ground water. It should also be noted that the toilets
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 62



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
and the septic tanks shall be located against the
direction of underground water and away from the
borehole.  Also living of the well will be ensured
extending the casing above ground level and capping
it properly.
* The cover slab will be made of reinforced concrete
and venting will be high up to the level of roof top to
avoid  release  of  contaminated  gases  to  the
surrounding and ensuring high up dispersion.
� Water quality will be continuously monitored to
ensure that it is both safe and desirable for the
community for its various uses.
7.4 Littering of abattoir surroundings with animal wastes and
unwanted parts.
Potential impact
Animal parts and their associated wastes are organic in
nature and on decay they release some forms of gases and
have foul smell. This makes both passers-by and those
living around the area very uncomfortable. In other words,
fresh and clean air needed for normal metabolic process will
not be available to the affected person as such their health
will be affected.  Problem  of dermatitis caused by skin
infections in animals as well as the nature of the floor
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 63



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
(slippery) and cuts and abrasions from machinery are also
potential impacts of the project.
Mitigation measures
Measures to mitigate the above impact have been identified
and include;
* All animal parts (unwanted) shall be collected daily
and taken to the primary waste collection centre (the
nearest to the abattoir) for onward delivery to the
waste dumpsite.
* Good house keeping and enforcement of health and
safety standards shall be ensured.
* The inside of the facility shall be thoroughly washed
daily and regular disinfect ion shall as well be carried
out to ensure that all wastes are removed and that
disease vectors are eliminated.
7.5 Leachete contact with under ground water at the Waste
Dump site
Potential impact
Continuous dumping of wastes especially those of organic
origin in the dumpsite have the potential of increasing
bottom or floor level temperature. This situation coupled
with lack of air circulation facilitates the process of decay
and decomposition of materials, which in the process
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 64



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
release their inherent water content. This then got mixed
with other harmful or toxic materials around forming
aqueous  solution  and  filter into  the  soil thereby
contaminating and subsequently underground water. Also,
spread of diseases and chemical contaminants by animals
feeding on the dump is another potential impact of the
project which when the affected ones are consumed could
negatively impact on human health.
Mitigation measures
Although the waste dumpsite is proposed to be far away
from the communities, the impacts it will have were not
overlooked. In this regard, the following were considered:
* Wastes taken to the dump site shall immediately be
burnt to avoid piling of wastes and subsequent
decomposition of materials.
* Concrete flooring shall be considered before putting
into operation to ensure that leachete are channelled
to avoid sea page into the ground.
* Potential Hazardous wastes shall not be disposed off
in the dump site.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 65



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
COST ESTIMATE FOR MITIGATION MEASURES
Project Component     Mitigation Measures      Quantity          Unite Rate           Amount             Responsible
Authority
1. Water supply     -Adequate drainage of                             Part of construction cost       Host Community
borehole sites
- Flushing & clearing of  Lump sum       150,000.00
screens annually.                                                   697,500.00
- Daily supervision     Lump sum         547,500.00
2. Construction of   - Daily collection &    1 2 Months      40,000.00            480,000.00           Local Enterprises
Abattoir         disposal of primary
wastes by labourers
(Monthly)
- Dislodging Monthly                     20,000.00           240,000.00
3. Roads &           Use of filters and water                                                          Contractor
Drainages        against dust during                     Part of construction costs
construction
4. Public Toilets &  Prevention of leakages                                                            Client
Baths            in making adequate                       Part of construction costs
provision of preventive
measures at
construction stage
- Monthly cleaning      Monthly             20,000.00           240,000.00        Local Enterprises
- Monthly dislodgement  "                   15,000.00           180,000.00
5. Solid Waste       - Concrete flooring                     Part of construction costs                Client
management       - Refuse collection,    6 units             -                 N1 10,775,000.00
plants & equipment
Environmental Impact Assessment Report



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
CHAPTER EIGHT
8.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Environmental management as an instrument of control and
quality improvement is aimed at all probable or potential
impacts of a proposed project with the goal of avoiding or
minimizing  such  impacts.  This instrument helps an
organisation to set environmental policy and objectives, to
establish and assess the effectiveness of procedure and
regulatory requirements.
This EIA report is intended to provide the environmental
aspects of the planning and execution of the project, which is
in compliance with regulatory requirements.
8.1 Environmental Management Plan (EMP)
The considerations for environmental management are an
integral part of the detailed project activities, designs and
operations.  The EMP should ensure protection of the
environment and human health from project activities and
its objectives are:
* Minimization of environmental risk
* Reduction /elimination of adverse impacts
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 66



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
The achievement of EMP objectives shall be facilitated by
setting out programme (consisting of the policy and
principles) to which the projects shall conform and defining
the means by which this programme shall be implemented.
These policy and principles shall form the key reference
document for ensuring that environmental issues, are
addressed throughout the projects' life cycle and shall
include the major aspects described below;
8.1.1 Potential Projects Impacts Identification
The potential environmental Impacts of the proposed
projects have been identified and possible mitigation
measures proffered (Chapters 6 and 7 respectively).
8.2 Contingency plan for the proposed activities
Road Construction
Despite all the mitigation measures to reduce or eliminate
dust during this activity, it is not unlikely that highly
sensitive asthmatic workers could not get an attack with
slight rise in dust level. For this reason, First Aid and other
related drugs will be made available on site to handle
emergencies. The essence of providing overhead storage
tanks attached to the borehole is not only to store water
while the pumping machine is working but also to ensure
that water is made available even when repairs are been
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 67



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
carried out. Thus, the tank is serving as a contingency and
ensures continuous supply of water.
Also the overhead storage tanks proposed to be attached
to the boreholes will act as a contingency measure/plan in
event of system failure. Thus the stored water will be used
to bridge the gap of shortage supply from the borehole for
the period it will be under repairs.  In other words,
consumers may not notice that the borehole was faulty as
supply will be maintained.
8.3 Environmental Monitoring/Inspection
Environmental monitoring/inspection is an aspect of the
Environmental Management Plant (EMP) and its objects
include:
* To assess the effectiveness of the mitigation
measures
* To verify the operational performance and impact of
the project components and
* To determine whether observable environmental and
social changes are the results of the project activities
or natural variation.
The below table provides a comprehensive monitoring plan
for the project.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 68



Nasarawa World Bank,Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
Environmental     Parameter to Monitori 1 Regulatory  Activit
Components        be monitored  ng       Limit        y
Frequenc (FMENV)      Phase
y
Ambient     Noise Noise Level   Daily    90 dB(A) for
Level                                    8-hr.
working
period
Gaseous Emission  Suspended     Bi-      250mg/m3'
Particulate  weekly
Matter (SPM)
Carbon       Bi-       10% by
dioxides     weekly    volume        0
(C02)
Carbon       Bi-       11 .4mg/m3
monoxide     weekly   (Daily
(CO)                   average of
hourly
Ambient
Air).
Nitrogen     Bi-       350-1 ,000
oxides (N02)  weekly   mg/m3
Ground      Water Arsenic       Quarterly 0.05rMg/m3
Quality                         at waste
dump
site
Environmental impact Assessment Report 69



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
Lead (Pb)         If    0.05mg/m3       0
Other Heavy   Quarterly  1 0mg/m3   
Metals (Total)
PH               If         6 - 9
Gaseous Emission   Same as           ,      As indicated
those during            in       the
0
construction.           construction
phase
Physical           Aesthetics        II
Environmental                                               0
Improvement
Socio economic      Population
and
attitudinal
changes
It could be observed from the table above that frequency of
monitoring of parameters is more during construction phase than
the operation phase.   This is for the fact that most of the
projects' activities will take/require short time duration to be
executed and to really capture their impacts, regular monitoring
shall be employed. The operational phase on the other hand, is a
long term  phase and that the quarterly measurement of the
parameters is expected to give unbiased result.
Further, it is expected that strict adherence to the implementation
of the EMP will ensure:
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 70



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
* Early detection of subtle alternatives in environmental
quality.
*  Compliance to all regulatory limits and standards.
*  Detection     of   inadequacies      of   mitigation    measures
recommended.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report  71



Nasarawa World Bank Community Based Urban Upgrading Project
CHAPTER NINE
9.0 CONCLUSION
The Environmental Impact Assessment has been carried out in
accordance  with the  National, International and  State
Regulatory Requirements on the environment. It is intended to
provide the Environmental and Social aspects of the planning
and execution of the proposed projects.
The potential environmental and social impacts of the
proposed project on the existing settings of the project areas
have been identified and evaluated. Also, mitigation measures
have been proffered for the potential impacts. Furthermore,
an Environmental Management Plan has been developed and
provided for the projects. It can therefore be concluded that
the projects will cause no serious damage to both the
environment and social settings of the areas if executed in
accordance with the EIA provisions, including the EMP.
Environmental Impact Assessment Report 72