A SUPPLEMENT TO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR SHANGHAI URBAN ENVIRONMENT PROJECT -Environmental Assessment for Adjusted Shanghai Sewerage Project Phase III E541 vol.:5 Revised SHANGHAI ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES APRIL 2003 \ Supplernenf to Environnentnil Assessment for Shanghai Urban Environment Project A Supplement to Environmental Assessment for Shanghai Urban Environment Project - Environmental Assessment for Adjusted Shanghai Sewerage Project Phase III Table of Contents List of Tables .......................................3 List of Figures .......................................3 Acronym ......................................4 I Background .......................................5 2 ' Adjusted Scheme for Area B of SSPIII ......................................6 2.1 Main Engineering Work for Area B ........ ..............................6 2.2 Wastewater Treatment Plant ........................................6 2.2.1 Design capacity .....6.................................6 2.2.2 Design Strength of Influent and Effluent ............... .......................6 2.2.3 Sewage Treatment Process ......................................6 2.2.4 Discharge Outfall and Handling of Sludge .................. ....................9 2.3 Rationale of WWTP Siting at Zhuyuan .................................. . . 9 3 Potential Environmental Impacts of Adjusted Scheme for Area B .11 3.1 Impact of Effluent Discharge on Water Body of Chang Jiang Estuary ... 11 3.2 Impact on Ambient Air ..11 3.3 Impact of Noise ..1 3.4 Impact on Social Environent ..11 3.5 Impacts of Sludge Transport ..13 3.6 Potential Impact of Construction Activities ..13 3.6.1 Impact on Surface Waters .13 3.6.2 Impact on Road Traffic .13 (Adj SSPIII EA) \ Supplement to Environmental Assessment for Shanghau Urb,in Environment Project 3.6.3 Impact on Inland Water Traffic ........................... 14 3.6.4 Impact of Fly Dust .......................... 14 3.6.5 Impact of Noise .......................... 14 3.6.6 Impact of Debris and Domestic Refuse ...........................,.,.,. 14 4 Environmental Management ............................... 15 4.1 Mitigation of Environmental Impacts ............................... 15 4.1.1 Construction Stage ............................... 15 4.1.2 Operational Stage ............................... 15 4.2 Prescribed Mitigation Measures ............................... 16 4.3 Monitoring Requirement ............................... 18 5 Conclusion ................................ 19 (Adj SSP1I1 EA) -2- i Supplement to Environmental Assessment for Shanghai Urban Environimient Project List of Tables Table I Comparison of scheme for adjusted SSPIII Table 2 Design strength of influent and effluent in sewage treatment plant of SSPIII Table 3 Main social impacts of Area B scheme with Minxing and Zhuyuan options Table 4 Mitigation measures proposed for SSPIII Table 5 Monitoring programme for pump stations and WWTP in operation stage Table 6 Monitoring programme for Chang Jiang estuary List of Figures Fig. I Service area and main sewer for Area B of SSP-III Fig. 2 Flow chart of A/O phosphorus removal process (Adj SSPIII EA) -3 - A Supplemcnt to Environmental Assessment for Shanghau Urban Lnviionment Project Acronym A/O Anaerobic/Oxydic APL Adaptable Programme Loan BAF Bio-Aerating Filtration BOD5 5 day Biochemical Oxygen Demand COD Chemical Oxygen Demand DO Dissolved Oxygen EA Environmental Assessment EIS Environmental Impact Statement EPBs Environmental Protection Bureaux LAS Linear Alkyl Benzene Sulphonate PV Permnanganate Value PRC People's Republic of China RMB Renminbi (Chinese currency yuan) SAES Shanghai Academy of Environmental Sciences SEPB Shanghai Environmental Protection Bureau SHUEP Shanghai Urban Environment Project SMG Shanghai Municipal Government SMSC Shanghai Municipal Sewerage Co. Ltd. SS Suspended Solids SSPIII Shanghai Sewerage Project Phase III SWA Shanghai Water Authority SWEC Shanghai Water Environment Construction Co. Ltd. TOC Total Organic Nitrogen TSS Total Soluble Solids WWTP Wastewater Treatment Plant (Adj SSPIII EA) -4 - .\ Supplernent to Enx% ron,inental A ssessment for Shangh:ai Lrb.mi Lnvironment Pfro)cLt A Supplement to Environmental Assessment for Shanghai Urban Environment Project - Environmental Assessment for Adjusted Shanghai Sewerage Project Phase III 1 Background Shanghai Sewerage Project Phase III (SSPIII) is one of components included in Shanghai Urban Environment Project (SHUEP) to seek an Adaptable Programme Loans (APLs) facility from the World Bank. The Environmental Assessment (EA) of SSPIII was reviewed by Shanghai Environmental Protection Bureau (SEPB) in February 2002. In October 2002, Shanghai was awarded to host the Expo for 2010. To prepare the 2010's Expo, an ambitious redevelopment programme for riversides along the Huangpu has been launched. As the previous proposal of Minxing wastewater treatment plant for Area B of SSPIII seems contrary against the redevelopment programme, Shanghai Planning and Development Commission and Shanghai Construction Commission organised Shanghai Water Authority (SWA) and other concerned agencies to further study and adjust the scheme. A supplementary feasibility study report was submitted and reviewed following the planning formality. According to the remark given by SEPB to the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for SSPIII, should there be any changes in components, characters, scale or siting of the project, the ELS ought to be resubmitted for review and approval. Therefore, a supplementary report to the EIS for SSPIII has been prepared to reflect the adjustment and for submission'. The changes of adjusted SSPIII are mainly in the scheme for Area B (Table 1). Table I Comparison of scheme for adjusted SSPIII Item Previous scheme Adjusted scheme Comparison Service area (kni2) 163.34 168.87 + 5 53 DWF (Mm3/d) 1.06 1.09 + 0.03 Trunk length (km) 4.60 14.15 + 9.55 WWTP location Minxing (by Huangpu) Zhuyuan (by Chang Jiang) Treatment process High efficiency precipitation + BAF AJO phosphorus removal Investment _ _ (M yuan RMB) 4,740 4,680 - 60 (Adj SSPIII EA) 5 - \ Supplcniiciii to I n% rronrnclnrl -Assessmcnt for Shlnghai Urban Lnv-rronmenrt lrojeut 2 Adjusted Scheme for Area B of SSPIII The previous scheme for Area B of the SSPIII covered 31.56 lkm(2 Now it is expanded to 37.09 km2 by including four self-draining areas in Hongkou and Yangpu districts and Minxing catchment. The design dry weather flow is increased from 405,200 m3/d to 431,000 m13/d whilst the capacity of sewage treatment plant will still be kept at 500,000 m3/d. The site of sewage treatment plant is moved from Minxing Road in the previous scheme to Zhuyuan, and the alignment of main sewer is changed accordingly (Fig. 1). 2.1 Main Engineering Work for Area B The main engineering work for Area B of SSPIII includes sewage collection system and treatment facilities. 1) Sewage collection system: Link sewers in sub-service areas, main storm-water drainage system, main sewer, and a midway pump station. The total length of the sewers is 14.15 km 2) Construction of a sewage treatment plant at southeast side of Zhuyuan No.1 WWTP at Chang Jiang estuary: * Wastewater treatment - sewage treatment plant; * Wastewater discharge - head tower, outlet pumping station and outfall. 2.2 Wastewater Treatment Plant 2.2.1 Design capacity The design capacity of Zhuyuan No.2 Sewage Treatment Plant (for telling from Zhuyuan No.1 WWTP of SSPD) is 0.5 million m3/d with average dry weather flow of 5.79 m3/s, dry weather peak flow of 7.52 m3/s, and minimum flow of 3.47 m3/s. Most of the service area of the treatment plant is combined sewerage service area with an interception ratio of 1.5 or 3.0 (interception ratio n is defined as the total capacity of collection system being (n+1) times dry weather flow). Thus, the storm peak flow is 21.26 m3/s. 2.2.2 Design Strength of Influent and Effluent Based on a survey, the strength of influent sewage is proposed. The effluent strength should be in compliance with Grade 2 of integrated wastewater discharge standard (GB 8978-1996) (Table 2). Table 2 Design strength of influent and effluent in sewage treatment plant of SSPIII Item CODc, BOD5 S NH3-N Total P Influent strength (mg/L) 300 150 200 25 4.0 Grade 2 of discharge standard (mg/L) 120 30 30 25 1.0 2.2.3 Sewage Treatment Process The sewage treatment plant at Zhuyuan will use an A/O process. It comprises two biological steps namely anaerobic and oxydic processes respectively to remove phosphorus and BOD in the sewage (Fig. 2). (Adj SSPIII EA) -6 - P-4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C- 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~c 0 C. L0. 0 __ -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o wJ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- '4-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~' (1- LU 00~~~~0 E CD~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C C> C>~~~~~~~~~~~~C En 4) En co 0 0~~~~~~~~~ cts ---- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '- CU~~~~~~~~' 0 ~~~0 co o E -e~~~~~~~ C c2 0- C 4.) U~~~~~ 4 Vk~~o 0 10) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 L)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4 V)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~U C)~~~~~~~~~~I OD 0 ~ E E E E E ~ 0 0 0~~~~ U co WSo U z I-F2 _ F-C~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~L N sL[lzlA il[L( to 10 11VirM ) 1f10t,ft.i1 Assessmenit for Shangha.i * rlmn Enviti0ninit lroject Ulaving been pretreated by grid screening and sedimentation, the influent is introduced into an anaerobic tanlk. in which phosphorus in the sewage will be released in a form of ortho- phosphates into the mixed liquor Through a retention interval, the sewage flows into an oxydic tank, in which ortho-phosphates in the mixed liquor will be drastically absorbed by the sludge in an aerobic condition. Thus, the content of phosphorus in the liquid phase of sewage will be significantly decreased. After a secondary sedimentation, the effluent with lower phosphorus can be discharged whilst higher content of phosphorus remaining in the separated residual sludge. In the application of A/O biological phosphorus removal process, a ratio of BOD5 to total phosphorus in the sewage is a key factor to affect the phosphorus removal efficiency. If the ratio is too low, phosphorus-absorbing microorganisms in the sludge will be unable to sufficiently take up phosphorus, and the content of phosphorus in the effluent will not be dropped to a possibly lower level. It is reported that to achieve the phosphorus content lower than I mg/L, the ratio of BOD5 to total phosphorus in the influent should be higher than 20, or a ratio of dissolved BODs to dissolved phosphorus greater than 12. Based on the design strength of the influent of SSPIII, the ratio of BOD5 to total phosphorus can meet the requirement for biological phosphorus removal, and the phosphorus content in the effluent is expected to be in compliance with the limit set in the Grade 2 of integrated wastewater discharge standard (GB 8978-1996). The anaerobic step in the process, however, is unfavourable to nitrogen removal. Like the conventional biological treatment process, the nitrogen removal is only about 20%. If the total nitrogen content in the influent is not so high, the effluent can be in compliance. As the operation and management of the A/O biological phosphorus removal process are rather simpler, and there is mature experience for the operational management available in China, this process is therefore suitable. 2.2.4 Discharge Outfall and Handling of Sludge An outfall is to be set at bankside of the Chang Jiang estuary at Zhuyuan for normal discharge of the effluent, but a deep-water outfall will be set for emergency discharge. The sludge generated in the sewage treatment process is handled with mechanical thickening and dewatering. 582 m3/d sludge cake with water content of 65% will be hauled by trucks to a sludge treatment works at Bailong Gang. 2.3 Rationale of WWTP Siting at Zhuyuan An analysis of the wastewater treatment plant alternatives in SSPIII, i.e., Minxing option and Zhuyuan option, has been conducted during the previous EA in terms of social and environmental impacts. It was found that the both water bodies at Zhuyuan of Chang Jiang estuary and in the lower reaches of the Huangpu River would unlikely cause significant impacts if the effluent had been subject to appropriate treatment. The assimilative capacity of Chang Jiang estuary,' however, is comparably much higher than that of the Huangpu River, and moreover, the Zhuyuan option could eventually get rid of almost all the pollution loadings collected by this system away from the Huangpu River, whilst the Minxing option still allow the return of part of the loadings back to the Huangpu River by release of the effluent. From a water quality point of view, especially no effect on the Upper Huangpu water resources, the both options could be acceptable if relevant measures were taken for minimising unanticipated impacts. (Adj SSPIII EA) .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ * Then it was called for further consideration particularly in terms of economic, planning and risk prevention aspects. Some incompatibility did exist between the WWTP siting of Minxing option and regional planning. For the Comprehensive Redevelopment Programme of Riversides along the Huangpu is an ambitious plan launched by the SMG, all the development projects should be in line with this core task, and the SSPIII scheme could be no exceptions. Hence, the Minxing option seemed to be not consistent with this ambitious plan. Since the successful awarding of hosting the 2010's Expo, the redevelopment of riversides along the Huangpu River has become one of focal tasks in Shanghai before the year 2010. More conflicts with the redevelopment plan have emerged in respect to siting the WWTP at Minxing Road. Thus, the adoption of the Zhuyuan option becomes more rational in respect to not only being in favour of the improvement on water quality of the Huangpu River, but also the consistency with the regional planning in particular. (Adz SSPIII EA) -10- I) pI-II K lII( tU L I\ II (J IIIIlI .\L SI C Ill tor(U lungh L UrbYai Ln% iroiltit I lrojC(t 3 Potential Environmental Impacts of Adjusted Scheme for Area B 3.1 Impact of Effluent Discharge on Water Body of Chang Jiang Estuary The potential environrmental impacts of the adjusted scheme for Area B of SSPIII on water body of Chang Jiang estuary have been analysed in the previous EA report. It is summarised as follows. Based on modelling simulations, in general, it was found that the body of water in the Zhuyuan area has a great capability of dilution. The discharge of wastewater after primary enhanced treatment/secondary treatment into the area will not generate any notable effect on the water quality in the surrounding body of water at Zhuyuan. Even under emergency conditions (without treatment for a short period of time, e.g. a couple of days), the effect of the wastewater discharge will be quite limited in a very small area. It was believed that with a better design of the diffuser system, the effect could be limited further. When the effluent enters Chang Jiang estuary at Zhuyuan, it will be mixed with river water, and some particulates in the effluent will be collided with those in river water, and then a series of bio-geo-physicochemical reaction process such as adsorption, exchange and complex will occur. It is a kind of purifying process. Lingqiao emergency water intake is a key object there (about 8 km upstream from Zhuyuan proposed outfall). According to the estimation by modelling, in very dry season when annual Chang Jiang River discharge flow is 7,500 m3/s (occurrence is over 95%), the CODCr increment at Lingqiao will be some 0.24 mg/L, BODs about 0.055 mg/L, NH3-N 0.046 mg/L, and total P 0.00185 mg/L. It will have little impact on Lingqiao water intake even by the effluent of primary enhanced treatment in SSPI combined with the effluent of the SSPIII. 3.2 Impact on Ambient Air Sludge disposal procedure at Zhuyuan WWTP will need 960 m distance for hygiene protection, and therefore three surrounding farmer village will come under impact. If treatment measures are adopted and pollutant removal rate can reach 90% or above, then the hygiene protection distance will reduce to 250 m, and those three surrounding villages will not be impacted by sludge disposal procedure. 3.3 Impact of Noise Zhuyuan No. 1 WWTP is located on the northwest of the proposed Zhuyuan No. 2 WWTP, the west of which is Haixu Road, the east is Yantang Road, and there are some residents on the south. According to the modelling, on daytime, the noise contribution of its inflow pump house to the south and north factory boundary, air blower room, sludge dewatering machines and surrounding factory border all will exceed Class 2 limit value 50 dB(A) in «Noise standard at boundary of industrial enterprises (GB 12348-90)»>, with the highest exceeding 9 dB(A). It reveals that some mechanical noise in the Zhuyuan WWTP will not meet the requirements at the factory boundary. As the site of the Zhuyuan WWTP is a widely open field at the bank of Chang Jiang, the village dwellers are rather farther away so that little impact of noise will be exerted on them. 3.4 Impact on Social Environment In light of the need for construction of a siphon tunnel across the Huangpu River, a midway pump station and more main sewer to convey the collected sewage to the Zhuyuan WWTP, it (Adj SSPIII EA) - 11- IkA I sI1 lull t Io t LIilmI L rUJO t i ruIII1cmi i'[Ujlcci *~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~' wo- wil be carr1leled| outb11e:1 in rurall. rOllLlvrlllUi Ar is required to acqulr-e and borrow more land As more civil work will be carried out i rural area of Pudong, the resettlement of enterprises will be less but the impact on cultivated land and road will be more (Table 3). Table 3 Main social impacts of Area B scheme with Minxing and Zhuyuan options WWTP option No Item Minxing Zhuyuan I Land acquisition (ha) 19 45 29.44 2 In which Cultivated land acquisition (ha) - 21 96 3 Land of dwelling to be acquired (ha) 0.07 3 58 4 Land of enterprises to be acquired (ha) 19.38 3.90 5 Land borrowed (ha) 5.70 16 10 6 Number of households to be resettled 4 388 7 Number of inhabitants to be resettled 26 1382 8 Area of dwelling house to be demolished (m2) 792 71,032 9 Number of enterprises to be moved 24 25 10 Building area of enterprise to be demolished (m-2) 129,458 39,677 11 Affected employees 4,475 699 12 Quantity of spoil (MM3) 0.418 0.358 13 Affected green space (m2) 8,000 5,900 14 Number of affected trees 5,100 1,700 According to (