REPUBLIC OF RWANDA RWANDA TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (RTDA) FEEDER ROADS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (FRDP) REHABILITATION, UPGRADING AND MULTI-YEAR MAINTENANCE WORKS OF SELECTED FEEDER ROADS IN GAKENKE DISTRICT LOT I, II&III (69KM) UPDATED RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN PREPARED BY: MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND ANIMAL RESOURCES UPDATED BY: RWANDA TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND GAKENKE DISTRICT THROUGH CHINA HENAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION (CHICO) and JVCSEC& FAIR CONSTRUCTION FEBRUARY 2022 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Government of Rwanda (GoR), through its Implementing Agency, Rwanda Transport Development Agency (RTDA) has received Additional Financing from the Multi-Donor Trust Fund (MDTF) managed by the World Bank, for selected feeder roads in the six districts, namely Gatsibo, Nyagatare, Nyaruguru, Gakenke, Rutsiro and Nyabihu under the Feeder Roads Development Project. Due to the anticipated displacement, the development of the Feeder Roads requires the preparation of a Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) to ensure that planned project activities are implemented in full compliance with the requirements of Rwandan laws and the World Bank’s Operational Policy (OP) 4.12 on involuntary resettlement. RAP preparation In March 2017, the Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources (MINAGRI) prepared the Resettlement Action Plan for Feeder Roads Rehabilitation, Upgrading and Multi-Year Maintenance in Gakenke District based on the Project Feasibility Studies. The World Bank requested the Single Project Implementation Unit (SPIU) at RTDA to have the RAP updated once the project designs are finalized and approved. In June 2019, the works contract was awarded to China Henan International Cooperation (CHICO) and JVCSEC& FAIR Construction by RTDA through Gakenke District. The Contractor will carry out works under Design, Build and Maintain (DBM) approach, following Output and Performance-Based Road Contract (OPRC). The Contractors prepared detailed project designs for the six (6) Feeder Roads of totaling 69km length in Gakenke District (Buranga-Kamubuga-Rutabo-Base, Buranga-Kamubuga- Rutabo-Base, Buranga-Kamubuga-Rutabo-Base Spur 21 Spur1, Gashenyi-Karambo-Kinoni, Ruhanga- Biziba. The Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) was updated by the Contractor through RTDA and Gakenke District in the year 2020. The RAP was disclosed in-country on 5th May 2020 and in the World Bank info shop on 7th May 2020. Justification for revision of the Updated RAP During road rehabilitation, additional assets to be affected by the project were identified resulting into an increase in the compensation amount. - The requirement to achieve 7 meters’ road width consistent with Rwanda road classification and amendment of contract, resulted in assets of an additional 463 households being affected in all project roads. 1 Spur 2 has two sections: Base-Masoro-Mukaje (4.7km) and Kabyaza-Nturo-Kanyiramenyo (5.1km) Page 2 of 189 - Houses belonging to 6 households were left in high risk locations in Lot I Feeder Road Buranga-Kamubuga-Rutabo-Base (FR1), between Km 0+000 and Km22 and had to be expropriated for safety purposes. - In Lot II, in the spur roads of FR1 Buranga-Kamubuga-Rutabo-Base Spur1 between Km0+000 and Km9.8, additional land take has been necessitated following assessment of assets belonging to 121 households that have been affected by storm water drainage outlets in areas beyond 50metres from the culverts. In Buranga-Kamubuga-Rutabo-Base Spur2, between Km0+000 and Km8+400, additional land take has been necessitated following identification of affected properties belonging 159 households that have been damaged by storm water from drainages. - On Lot III FR3 Gashenyi-Karambo-Kinoni between Km0+000 and Km11 and in FR10 Ruhanga biziba between Km0+000 to Km7+800, there are 50 cross culverts that have resulted in identification of 167 additional PAHs affected by pipe culverts. RTDA and World Bank agreed that the RAP for Gakenke District should be updated to accurately reflect all the affected assets and persons, actual compensation costs and associated displacement impacts. The Table below presents the previous and current number of affected persons on each road and the valuation costs. The affected asset classes are provided in the main RAP document. The Table below presents the previous and current number of affected persons on each road and the valuation costs. Lot FR Length Previous Current Previous Revised valuation (km) No. of No. of Valuation PAHs PAHs Lot I FR1 32 454 767 172,000,559 451053285 Lot II FR1-1 9.8 156 321 70,527,959 145,015,559 FR1-2 8.4 130 245 90,049,254 105,404,954 Lot III FR3 11 131 354 90,423,694 100,812,995 FR10 8 100 300 80,025,984 94,155,588 Total 69 1,071 1,987 503,027,450 896,442,381 length Page 3 of 189 The Revised updated RAP includes the total number of PAHs and PAPs, their affected assets, total value of affected assets and provides a strategy for resettlement compensation to ensure that the PAPs’ livelihoods are improved or at least restored to pre -project levels. The RAP also puts in place appropriate measures, including grievance redress channels, for the PAPs and other community members to receive and resolve complaints on time and appropriately. This revised Updated RAP Report presents the findings of project displacement impact in Gakenke District. Objectives of the Updated RAP The overall objective of the RAP is to sustainably manage the involuntary resettlement process, where displacement cannot be avoided. The specific objectives are to provide a baseline with regard to the affected assets, PAPs and their socio-economic conditions following conduct of a census and socio-economic survey ; to identify the requirements of the national and international legal and policy framework to be complied with; to determine the RAP implementation arrangements; to assess the potential risks and impacts and devise their mitigation mechanisms; to estimate the costs necessary for compensation following valuation of affected assets; to disseminate information relating to the project design, implementation, resettlement alternatives, and to obtain views and recommendations of PAPs and other stakeholders; to establish a grievance redress mechanism and support restoration of affected livelihoods and living standards. Methodology for Updating of RAP The RAP updating focused on all elements of the resettlement plan, including the review of secondary data on feeder roads in Rwanda and the socio-economic data of Gakenke District. Field visits were conducted and consultation meetings were held with project affected persons and other stakeholders with an objective of obtaining their views, concerns and recommendations, reviewing existing national laws and policies governing expropriation, and conducting a comparative analysis with the Word Bank policies. A census and socio-economic survey of affected persons was conducted culminating in the asset valuation, inventory of affected assets, and RAP compilation. For purposes of disseminating project information including, potential risks and impacts, resettlement options and obtaining views, concerns and recommendations for updating the RAP, consultations were held with relevant institutions and with the additional project affected persons. The previous consultations held as well as the most recent consultations are summarized in the tables below. The previous consultations held as well as the most recent consultations during updating of RAP are summarized in the table below. Page 4 of 189 Co-operative society leaders consulted in 2019 S/N Name of the Leader Cooperative name Contact 1 Hakizimana Andre KOAIGA 0788654321 2 Ndamage Alphonse CTMGA 0780987678 3 Mwumvaneza Valens TUBUBUNGABUNGE 0784345865 Church leaders consulted in 12th October 2021 S/N Name of the Leader Church Contact 1 Niringiyimana Samuel Seventh Day Adventist 0788886867 2 Niyibizi Alexis ADEPR 0785244191 3 Uwingabiye Alexandre Catholic 0782051359 Authorities Consulted in Gakenke District in 2019 and in September 2021 S/N Names Function Contact 1 Nkuranga Joseph District executive secretary 0788302738 2 Nsanzabandi Charles Division Manager of the District 0788591168 3 Makuza Jean Pierre District Road engineer 0785652885 4 Aline Mpambara District Gender family promotion officer 0788652746 5 Nkurunziza Jean Bosco Executive Secretary of Kamubuga Sector 0781528498 6 Eugene Uwimana Executive Secretary of Gashenyi Sector 0781038044 7 RUHASHYA Charles Executive Secretary of Nemba Sector 0788847178 8 DIEUDONNE Executive Secretary of Busengo Sector 0788539830 Uwimana 9 Jean de Dieu Twahirwa Executive Secretary of Kivuruga 0785036738 10 Gatabazi Celestin Executive Secretary of Janja Sector 0788894131 Page 5 of 189 Consultation with PAPs and Grievance Redress Committees in 2019 and 2021 Date of public Number S/No. Zone Cells covered consultation participants 1 Buranga Buranga 24/10/2019 100 2 Mbatabata mbatabata 24/08/2019 120 3 Kamubuga Kamubuga 23/12/2021 92 4 Gashenyi Gashenyi 18/10/2019 250 5 Gakingo Gakingo 02/10/2019 325 6 Gashamba Gashyamba 11/10/2019 246 7 Rutabo Rutabo 11/09/2019 106 8 Sereri Sereri 23/10/2021 78 9 Kanyanza Kanyanza 15/07/2021 55 10 Nyakina Nyakina 12/08/2021 161 TOTAL 1533 Updated Census and Survey results The survey results indicated that the road widening with a total 10.5m width right of way (RoW) is likely to affect 1,987 households (PAHs) composed of 11,072 people (PAPs), including 223 female-headed households and 1764male-headed households. It is worth noting that, the total number of houses to be physically displaced for both Lots is seventy-five (75) composed of 297 people. The project identified a total of two hundred and twenty-eight (228) vulnerable people who will be offered extra support during the resettlement process so as to–improve or at least to restore their initial way of living. About 53.85 % of the affected communities have low literacy levels, with mostly primary education level attainment. Majority of the affected families (68%) have 4 to 6 people/ household and the total number of vulnerable groups are 228 which represents 1.14% of the total project affected persons. 97% of the total affected families own at least one type of livestock and mostly survive on agriculture. All PAPs and other stakeholders consulted are in favor of the proposed project. The rehabilitation/upgrading and maintenance of the five (5) roads are likely to acquire and affect a total of 39.231ha of land for 10.5 m RoW, of which 87% is agricultural land. This is likely to lead to loss of 75 houses and, 19.75ha of crops and 24,654 trees with at least 30cm girth size, one (1) water tap and 3 electrical poles are also likely to be affected. Most of the affected land is small portions relative to the overall size of the land parcel and range between 6 meters to 7 meters. The largest numbers of PAPs live on the affected land but will be left with a viable size of land on which they can continue to live on or derive their livelihood during and after road construction. Page 6 of 189 During consultation meetings, all the PAPs indicated a preference for cash compensation for the portion of affected land. With the PAPs, it was discussed and agreed that three the types of land-affected PAPs will include; i) PAPs who will completely/fully lose their land, ii) PAPs that will partially lose their land, and iii) PAPs that will temporally lose land due to campsite installation and borrow pits. On loss of houses, majority of PAPs whose affected land is small in size relative to the total parcel preferred and requested for self-relocation within the same parcel since they will be losing the house (s) but want to reconstruct their houses within the same plot since the remaining land is viable. Other PAPs mentioned having second house/alternative plots elsewhere and need cash compensation since there will be no need for construction of a new house. The relocation support to be provided to PAPs include, land title updating charges, disturbance allowance of 5%, freedom to salvage material for reconstruction, among others. For those who will not be able to relocate within the same plots, the SPIU will work/collaborate with the District to ensure that PAPs get suitable alternative land of similar potential and locational advantages. All the affected properties will be compensated prior to any project work. The resettlement and compensation of crops, trees, structures and land will be made as per Rwandan law and the World Bank’s policies (OP 4.12). Where there is conflict, the latter will prevail. Grievance redress committees have been established at Cell level to address community concerns and grievances from PAPs throughout the project period. A monitoring system is in place to monitor the PAPs livelihoods during and after the project activities. Other project cross- cutting issues relating to Gender-Based Violence, Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (SEA) and Sexual Harassment (SH) will be addressed through a GBV/SEA/SH Action Plan to be implemented with the support of a local service provider. These activities have been budgeted for under provisional sum in the works contracts. The estimated budget/cost of RAP implementation for the interventions to improve the five (5) feeder roads in Gakenke District is One Billion Forty-six Thousand Six Hundred Nineteen Rwanda francs (1,000,046,619 Rwf) Cut-off date The cut-off date provided in the previous RAP following finalization of design was 31 st December 2019. Gakenke District has been enforcing the cut-off date of 31st October 2021 which has ensured that the Right of Way has remained free from opportunistic invasion. Factoring the increase in the number of project affected households from 1,071 to 1,987; project affected persons from 5,552 to 11,072 and the number of vulnerable households has increased from 150 to 228 during road rehabilitation, it was considered necessary to declare a new-cut-off date for the additional PAPs for whom a census had Page 7 of 189 not been conducted and the RAP had not been disclosed for the purpose of expropriation for project development. The revised Updated RAP report therefore has two cut-off dates of 31st December 2019 applicable to 1071 PAHs and a second cut-off date of 10th September 2021 applicable to the 916 PAHs. The census of additional PAPs commenced on 10th September 2021. No land improvement in the Project-Affected Area after this date shall be eligible for compensation. All the PAPs were informed of the cut- off date and its implications. Information about the cut-off date was disseminated mainly through public meetings and during the socio-economic survey. In view of the RAP findings, it can be concluded that the anticipated resettlement impacts will be within the manageable levels. The anticipated positive impacts of the project to the Gakenke community and the country at large, will far outweigh the adverse resettlement impacts that can be adequately mitigated through timely implementation of the RAP and related resettlement management plan that will provide a road map towards restoration of affected livelihoods. Once the RAP is cleared by the World Bank it will be disclosed locally by RTDA and by the World Bank electronically through its external website. Page 8 of 189 BASIC DATA ON THE RAP S/No. Description Impacts in Quantity 1. District Gakenke 2. Province Eastern Province 3. Planned activity Rehabilitation, Upgrading and Multi- year Maintenance Works of Selected Feeder Roads in Gakenke District, 69Km, in three (3) Lots Initial Additional Current 4. Feeder roads in Numbers 5 0 5 5. Length of Roads in Km 69 0 69 6. Average additional width for 10.5 m RoW 6.0 7 13.0 in meters 7. Average additional width for 6.0 m road 1 6 7 width in meters 8. Total Number of households likely to 1071 916 1987 be affected (PAHs) 9. Number of houses to be fully affected 69 6 75 10.Number of PAPs 5,552 5,520 11,072 11.Live fences affected in meters 0 32 32 12.Number of institutional 0 0 0 buildings affected fully 13.Acquired land for 6.0 m in Hectares 31.05 8.24 39.29 14.Loss of Crops in ha 12.74 7.1 19.75 15.Loss of trees in numbers 16076 8578 24654 16.Water valve chambers 0 0 0 17.Water Taps 1 0 1 18.Number of Vulnerable 150 78 228 19.Number of electrical pole 3 0 3 20.Estimated budget for the RAP (Frw) 568,686,195 431,360,424 1,000,046,619 Page 9 of 189 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................2 TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................10 List of Tables..................................................................................................................13 Definition of Terms .......................................................................................................16 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................21 1.1. BACKGROUND ...............................................................................................21 1.2. RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN OBJECTIVES ..............................................23 1.3. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ..............................................................24 1.4. FORMAT OF THE REPORT .............................................................................25 2. LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ......................................................26 2.1. NATIONAL RELEVANT POLICIES AND STRATEGIES ......................................26 2.1.1. National Land Policy, 2019 ............................................................................. 26 2.1.2 National Strategy for Transformation (NST1/2017-2024)................................ 27 2.1.3 Land Tenure System and Provisions in Rwanda ............................................ 28 2.1.4. Transport Policy ............................................................................................. 28 2.1.5 The Revised National Gender Policy, 2021 ..................................................... 28 2.1.6 The National Human Settlement Policy, 2009 ................................................ 30 2.1.7 National Social Protection Strategy, 2011 ....................................................... 30 2.1.8 National Policy on Child Labour .................................................................... 31 2.2. LEGAL INSTRUMENTS .......................................................................................32 2.2.1 Important Resettlement Legislations ........................................................... 32 2.2.2 World Bank Policy (OP 4.12) ......................................................................... 35 2.3. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR RESETTLEMENT .....................................................1 2.4. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT AND FRAMEWORK ..................................10 2.4.1. Project stakeholder identified in Gakenke district........................................ 12 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION..........................................................................................13 3.1. PROJECT LOCATION ..........................................................................................13 3.2. OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT ...........................................................................13 3.3. PROJECT DETAILS...............................................................................................13 3.3.1. Roads Status in the project area ..................................................................... 15 3.3.2. Brief Description on selected feeder roads .................................................... 15 Page 10 of 189 3.3.3. Sectors crossed by the selected feeder roads in Gakenke District ................. 16 3.3.4. Feeder Road Design Standards ...................................................................... 17 4. PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE ................18 4.1 Socio economic baseline of the District ...................................................................18 4.1.1. Demographics ................................................................................................ 18 4.1.2. Location of the indicated Feeder Roads in Gakenke District. ....................... 19 4.1.3. Socio-economic Conditions of the District .................................................... 20 4.2. Population within the Right of Way ......................................................................20 4.3. Socio-economic profile of PAPs within right of way ..............................................21 4.3.1 Sex of Respondents ......................................................................................... 21 4.3.2 Age structure of the surveyed household ....................................................... 21 4.3.3. Education of Respondents ............................................................................. 22 4.3.4. Family Size of the Household of respondents ............................................... 23 4.3.5. Marital status of respondents ........................................................................ 23 4.3.6 Employment status of PAP ............................................................................. 23 4.3.7. Vulnerability of PAPs .................................................................................... 24 4.3.8 Livestock in the surveyed household ....................................................... 25 4.3.9. Economic Activity and Source of Income ...................................................... 25 4.3.10. Housing conditions of the PAPS .................................................................. 26 4.3.11. House Conveniences and their Conditions .................................................. 26 4.3.12. Access to social infrastructures .................................................................... 27 4.4 RESETTLEMENT IMPLICATIONS ................................................................28 4.4.1 Loss of Houses .......................................................................................... 28 Source: updated Contractor Field Surveys and computation, October 2021 ............. 29 4.4.2 Loss of Land .............................................................................................. 29 4.4.3 Loss of other structures ............................................................................. 29 4.4.4 Loss of plantation ........................................................................................... 30 4.5. IMPACT ANALYSIS .............................................................................................30 4.5.1 Potential positive impacts ............................................................................... 32 4.5.2 Potential Adverse Negative impacts ............................................................... 33 4.6. PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS AND PARTICIPATION ...........................................34 Source: Updated Contractor Field Surveys and computation, October 2021 ................35 4.6.1 Stakeholders and their engagement in the project implementation ........ 35 4.6.2 Public Participation – Methods and Process ............................................... 38 Page 11 of 189 4.6.3. Findings from Public Consultation Meetings ............................................... 38 5. RESETTLEMENT AND COMPENSATION STRATEGY .........................................42 5.1 Institutional implementation arrangements ...........................................................42 5.2 Criteria for expropriation and compensation .........................................................47 5.3 Valuation and Compensation ...........................................................................48 5.4 Complaints Procedure ...........................................................................................53 5.4.1 Grievance Redress Mechanisms ............................................................... 54 6.5. Monitoring and Evaluation ...............................................................................59 6.6. Community Involvement..................................................................................61 6.7. Approval and Disclosure of Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) ...........................62 6.8. Budgets for RAP ...............................................................................................62 APPENDICES ................................................................................................................65 Page 12 of 189 List of Tables Table 1: Comparative Analysis between World Bank OP 4.12 and Rwanda Legislations .............. 1 Table 2: Roles and responsibilities of stakeholders in RAP implementation .................................... 1 Table 3: Entitlement Matrix ...................................................................................................................... 2 Table 4: Key Stakeholders identified in Gakenke District .................................................................. 12 Table 5: The key activities with responsible impact and measure to be taken................................ 14 Table 6: Sectors crossed by the selected priority feeder roads .......................................................... 16 Table 7: Population in of Gakenke District........................................................................................... 18 Table 8: Sectors and Cells crossed by the Selected Feeder Roads in Gakenke District. ................. 19 Table 9: Households per selected roads in Gakenke District............................................................. 20 Table 10: Sex of PAPs in the household surveyed............................................................................... 21 Table 11: Age of the PAPs of household surveyed ............................................................................. 22 Table 12: Level of Education of respondents ....................................................................................... 22 Table 13: Family Size of the Household ................................................................................................ 23 Table 14: Marital Status of Respondents in Household Surveyed .................................................... 23 Table 15: Employment Status of PAPs .................................................................................................. 24 Table 16: Vulnerability in the PAPS ...................................................................................................... 24 Table 17: Housing Conditions ................................................................................................................ 26 Table 18: Conveniences in the Surveyed Household and their Conditions .................................... 27 Table 19: Number of social infrastructure along all feeder roads in Gakenke District .................. 27 Table 20: Details of House on Road Side .............................................................................................. 28 Table 21: Land acquisition for road widening ..................................................................................... 29 Table 22: Zones of Public Consultation................................................................................................. 35 Table 23: Stakeholders and level of engagement in the RAP implementation ............................... 35 Table 24: RAP Implementation Schedule ............................................................................................. 37 Table 25: Authorities Consulted in Gakenke District ......................................................................... 38 Table 26: Details about consulted church leaders ............................................................................... 40 Table 27: Details about consulted cooperative leaders ....................................................................... 40 Table 28: Summary of Feeder Roads’ Public Consultation in Gakenke District ............................. 42 Table 29: Implementing Institutions and their responsibility ........................................................... 44 Table 30: Actions to be provided for livelihood restoration of the vulnerable PAPs ..................... 50 Table 31: Estimate transport and communication of grievance redress committee ....................... 59 Table 32: Resettlement and Compensation Monitoring Programme ............................................... 60 Table 33: Compensation Rates for Building/House ........................................................................... 63 Table 34: Tree Compensation Budget ................................................................................................... 63 Table 35: Estimated Cost/Budget for the implementation of RAP................................................... 64 Page 13 of 189 List of Figures Figure 1: Location of Feeder Roads Lot 1 in Gakenke District ................................................................... 23 Figure 2: Location of indicated Feeder Roads in Gakenke District ............................................................. 17 Figure 3: The Grievance redresses Mechanism Structure .......................................................................... 55 Page 14 of 189 ABBREVIATIONS CHICO China Henan International Cooperation Group EDPRS Economic Development and Poverty Reduction Strategy EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan FS Feasibility Studies FGD Focused Group Discussion GMO Gender Monitoring Office GOR Government of Rwanda GRC Grievance Redress Committee IL Impact Level MINAGRI Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources MoE Ministry of Environment NGOs Non-Governmental Organizations NR National Road OP Operation Policy PAPs Project Affected Persons RAP Resettlement Action Plan RDB Rwanda Development Board RTDA Road Transport Development Agency REMA Rwanda Environment Management Authority RFRDP Rwanda Feeder Roads Development Project RLMUA Rwanda Land Management and Use Authority RoW Right of Way Sq. mi Square Mile ToR Terms of Reference WB World Bank WHO World Health Organization Page 15 of 189 Definition of Terms Census: A field survey carried out to identify and determine the number of Project- Affected Persons (PAPs), their assets, and potential impacts; in accordance with the procedures satisfactory to the relevant Government authorities, and the World Bank Safeguard Policies. Community: A group of individuals broader than the household, who identify themselves as a common unit due to recognized social, religious, economic or traditional government ties, or through a shared locality. Compensation: cash or other assets given in exchange for the taking of land, or loss of other assets, including fixed assets thereon, in part or whole. Complete Structures: Buildings, including houses and institutional structures, which have enclosed walls, roofs and leveled earth or concrete floors. Cut-off date: Cut-off date is the date of commencement of the census and assets inventory of project affected persons (PAPs), persons occupying the project area after the cut-off date are not eligible for compensation and /or resettlement assistance. Resettlement assistance: Support provided to people who are physically displaced by a project. Assistance may include transportation, shelter, and services that are provided to affected people during their move. Economic displacement: Loss of income streams or means of livelihood resulting from land acquisition or restricted access to resources (land, water, or forest) which results from the construction or operation of a project or its associated facilities. Economically-displaced households: Households whose livelihoods are impacted by the Project, which can include both resident households and people living outside the Project Area but having land, crops, businesses or various usage rights there. Eligible Crops: Crops planted within the project area by Project-Affected People before the Entitlement Cut-Off Date and that are eligible for compensation in accordance with this RAP. Eligible Land: The land (cropped and fallow, agricultural and communal) within the Project Area that is affected by the Project. Page 16 of 189 Eligible Structures: The buildings and structures constructed within the project area before the Entitlement Cut-Off Date and that are eligible for compensation in accordance with this RAP. Entitlements: The benefits set out in the RAP, including: financial compensation; the right to participate in livelihood restoration programs; and, transport and other short- term assistance required to resettle or relocate. Farmer: A person who has acquired the right to use a piece of land for farming activities, either for cash generation or home consumption, and is engaged in such activities at the time of the entitlement cut-off date. Household: A person, or group of persons living together, in an individual house or Compound, who share cooking and eating facilities, and form a basic socio-economic and decision-making unit. Incomplete Structures: Buildings and structures missing any major construction elements such as walls, roofs, rammed earth or concrete floors, doors, and/or window openings. Institutional Structures and Infrastructure: Buildings, structures and facilities for public, government and religious use, such as schools and churches, within the Project Area, and being used for the purpose for which they were established at the Entitlement Cut-Off Date. Involuntary resettlement: The involuntary taking of land resulting in direct or indirect economic and social impacts caused by: - Loss of benefits from use of such land; - Relocation or loss of shelter; - Loss of assets or access to assets; or - Loss of income sources or means of livelihood, whether or not the project- affected person has moved to another location. Involuntary land acquisition: The taking of land by the government or other government agencies for compensation, for the purposes of a public project/interest against the will of the landowner. Land: Refers to agricultural and/or non-agricultural land whether temporary or permanent, and which may be required for the Project. Page 17 of 189 Landowner: Is a person who has lawful possession over a piece of land. The Landowner may or may not own structures and crops on the land. Land acquisition: The taking of or alienation of land, buildings or other assets thereon for purposes of a Project under eminent domain. Livelihood Programs: Programs intended to replace or restore quality of life indicators (education, health, nutrition, water and sanitation, income) and maintain or improve economic security for Project-Affected People through provision of economic and income-generating opportunities, which may include activities such as training, agricultural production and processing and small and medium enterprises. Non-resident Household: A household (or individual) that has an asset in the Project Area, which existed on or before the Entitlement Cut-off Date, but who resides outside the Project Area. Occupied Structures: These are structures that have signs of regular and sustained human occupancy, for a period prior to the Entitlement Cut-Off Date. Physical Displacement: Loss of shelter and assets resulting from the acquisition of land associated with a project that requires the affected person(s) to move to another location. Physically-displaced Household: Households who normally live in the Project Area and who will lose access to shelter and assets resulting from the acquisition of land associated with the Project that requires them to move to another location. Project-affected Household (PAHs): All members of a household, whether related or not, operating as a single socio-economic and decision-making unit, who are affected by a project. Project affected Persons (PAPs): means persons who, for reasons of the involuntary taking of their land and other assets under the project, result in direct economic and or social adverse impacts, regardless of whether or not said PAPs physically relocate. These people may have their: - Standard of living adversely affected, whether or not the PAP must move to another location; Page 18 of 189 - Right, title, investment in any house, land (including premises, agricultural and grazing land) or any other fixed or movable asset temporarily or permanently possessed or adversely affected; - Access to productive assets temporarily or permanently adversely affected; or business, occupation, work or place of residence or habitat adversely affected. Public consultation, or simply consultation, is a regulatory process by which the public's input on matters affecting them is sought. Its main goals are in improving the efficiency, transparency and public involvement in large-scale projects or laws and policies Relocation: A process through which physically displaced households are provided with a one-time lump sum compensation payment for their existing residential structures and move from the Project Area. Resettlement Action Plan (RAP): Also known as a Resettlement and Compensation Plan, a resettlement instrument (document) prepared when sub-project locations are identified and involves land acquisition which leads to or involves the physical displacement of persons, and/or loss of shelter, and/or loss of livelihoods and/or loss, denial or restriction of access to economic resources. RAPs are prepared by the project owners (managers or their appointed representative) impacting on the PAPs and their livelihoods and contain specific and legally binding requirements for compensation of the PAPs before the implementation of such project activities. Replacement Cost: The rate of compensation for lost assets must be calculated at full replacement cost, that is, the market value of the assets plus transaction costs. With regard to land and structures, “replacement costs” may be defined as follows: ▪ Replacement cost for agricultural land: The pre-project or pre-displacement, whichever is higher, value of land of equal productive potential or use located in the vicinity of the affected land, plus the costs of: a) Preparing the land to levels similar to those of the affected land; b) Any registration, transfer taxes and other associated fees. Right-of-Way: is an easement granted or reserved over the land for transportation purposes; this can be transport related, as well as electrical transmission lines, or oil and gas pipelines. The right-of-way is reserved for the purposes of maintenance, expansion or protection of services, and may also impose restrictions on certain other use rights. Socio-economic Survey: A detailed socio-economic survey of all households within the Project Area, recording detailed demographic and socio-economic data at the household and individual level. Page 19 of 189 Stakeholders: Any and all individuals, groups, organizations, and institutions interested in and potentially affected by a project or having the ability to influence a project. Tenant: A person who lives in a structure belonging to another, regardless of whether they pay rent or not. Vulnerable Persons: Socially and economically disadvantaged groups of persons such as widows, the disabled, and households headed by orphans, elderly persons or household heads who are likely to be more affected by project implementation or are likely to be generally constrained to access or seek out their entitlements promptly. Page 20 of 189 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. BACKGROUND The Government of Rwanda (GoR) in partnership with its development partners initiated Rwanda Feeder Roads Development Project (FRDP) implemented under the coordination of MINAGRI. The Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning (MINECOFIN), by a letter to the World Bank dated October 10, 2017, requested restructuring of the parent Feeder Road Development Project in line with changes to the institutional framework for road management. RTDA as an implementing agency has the responsibility of implementing, manage and monitor of all feeder roads programs. The project received financing from IDA to rehabilitate, upgrade and maintain 500 km of selected feeder roads in Rwamagana, Gisagara, Karongi and Nyamasheke Districts. The GoR also applied for additional funding for the rehabilitation of 1200 km of feeder roads in other six districts, namely Gatsibo, Nyagatare, Gakenke, Nyaruguru, Rutsiro and Nyabihu Districts. The Project Development Objective (PDO) of the FRDP is to; “ enhance all season road connectivity to agricultural market centers in selected districts”. The proposed PDO will be mainly achieved by improving access roads to agricultural market centers in selected areas. The proposed project contributes to the overarching goal of increasing agricultural production, ensuring food security, and enhancing agricultural marketing. The project is designed as an integral part of the agricultural support initiatives in Rwanda. This project, coupled with the ongoing agriculture projects, is expected to have impact on improving the livelihood of the rural population, which will be monitored during implementation. The project has benefited from Additional Financing (AF) from the MDTF that has allowed the FRDP to extend into a further six (6) districts. The component of concerning Project Development Objective (PDO) of the FRDP is three Components. 1 Rehabilitation, Upgrading and Maintenance of Selected Feeder Roads Component, 2 Strategy Development for Rural Access, Transport Mobility Improvement and Support to Institutional Development for the Preparation of Follow on Operations, including: Component and 3 Support to project management, including: MINAGRI through FRDP prepared the feasibility report for first priority feeder road 69km for 5 selected feeder roads in the district of Gakenke. The major activities associated with the selected feeder roads in Gakenke District include rehabilitation/upgrading of carriageway pavement with a standardized width, bridges and drainage work as well as maintenance of rehabilitated infrastructures. The requirements of construction materials have been identified along with the quarry and borrow area sites. Page 21 of 189 In March 2017 a RAP for Gakenke feeder roads project was prepared and the project activities were to affect more than 618 people. Updating the RAP was deemed necessary due to the following reasons: (a) The initial RAP was prepared based on the feasibility study that was conducted in February 2017, with the new works contracting approach of Design, Build and Maintain (DBM), contractors were required to make a detailed design indicating the final road alignment with the exact ROW and therefore updating the Resettlement Action Plan was required to have exact figures of affected PAPs and their respective assets to be affected in regards to the approved detailed design. (b) It was agreed between the World Bank and RTDA to update the RAP considering the final road design. The implementation instrument for the remainder of Vision 2020 and for the first four years of the journey under Vision 2050 will be the National Strategy for Transformation (NST1). NST1 integrates far-sighted, long-range global and regional commitments by embracing: • The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) consisting of 17 Goals with associated targets and indicators, across a range of economic, social and environmental aspects; • The African Union Agenda 2063 and its First 10-Year Implementation Plan 2014-2023 which is dedicated to the building of an integrated, prosperous and peaceful Africa, driven by its own citizens and representing a dynamic force in the international arena; • The East African Community (EAC) Vision 2050 which focuses on initiatives for job creation and employment by prioritizing development enablers which are integral to long-term transformation, value addition and acceleration of sustained growth; • The COP 21 Paris Agreement on Climate Change and other agreements. The Government of Rwanda (GoR) through a Multi Donor Trust Fund (MDTF) managed by the World Bank Group has received additional resources for the Rwanda Feeder Roads Development Project (FRDP). To implement this project, the GoR through Rwanda Transport Development Agency (RTDA), contracted with JV CSC & EC (proprietary) and FAIR CONSTRUCTION Ltd for lot 1 and CHICO for lot 2 &3 to prepare the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) in Gakenke district of Rwanda. Gakenke district is one of 5 Districts that make up the Northern Province, and it is located in the south western part of this Province with a surface area of 704.06 Km2. It is divided into 19 sectors namely: Busengo, Coko, Cyabingo, Gakenke, Gashenyi, Mugunga, Janja, Kamubuga, Karambo, Kivuruga, Mataba, Minazi, Muhondo, Muyongwe, Muzo, Nemba, Ruli, Rusasa and Rushashi. The population of Gakenke Page 22 of 189 district is 338.586 of which 53%are female and 47%are male. More than a half (53%) of the population is composed of female individuals and the majority of the population is young, with about 83% still under 40 years of age. The proportion between females and males in Gakenke District is 112 females/100 males’ females which are slightly above that of the national average of 111 female s per 100 males. Gakenke District has the average size of the household of 5 persons, which is above the national average household size (4.8). This average is made up of HH headed by male (with 5.4 persons) and HH headed by female (with 3.9 persons) Figure 1: Location of Feeder Roads Lot 1 in Gakenke District In Gakenke District, the entire feeder roads network linking agriculture farms to markets is in poor condition. Thus, the implementation of FRDP will certainly improve the consumer access to safe and affordable food and enhance producers’ access to markets, especially in areas with high agricultural potential through improvement of feeder roads. 1.2. RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN OBJECTIVES Referring to the scope of this study, the objectives of this updated RAP are articulated Page 23 of 189 as follows: ▪ To provide a baseline with regard to the socio-economic conditions of PAPs after field investigation; ▪ To identify the national and international legal framework to abide with as well as the institutional arrangements; ▪ To raise awareness on the project and its impacts among the public in general and those who will be directly affected by the project activities. ▪ To assess the potential impacts and determine their mitigation mechanisms; ▪ To conduct public consultations with PAPs and other project Stakeholders to obtain their views, concerns and recommendations. ▪ To estimate the cost necessary for land acquisition and associated resettlement costs. ▪ To specify all resettlement arrangements and the measures for avoiding, minimizing or compensating losses or other negative social impacts resulting from resettlement ▪ To ensure participation of vulnerable groups including, female household heads, the elderly, persons with disability, the poor, as well as youth in resettlement arrangements for their views and ideas for development 1.3. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY The approach and methodology of the RAP was in line with the requirements of World Bank OP 4.12 and to fulfil the Government of Rwanda expropriation requirements. i) Analyzing secondary data information contained in official reports. The desk review entailed going through relevant data sources. ii) A cut-off date was declared to the PAPs. A survey on the socio-economic status of the project affected persons alongside the road was then carried out through administration of structured questionnaires to collect the data required on social economic aspects of the PAPs in Gakenke. iii) R e v i e w o f national l a w s a n d policies governing resettlement and carrying out a comparative analysis with the requirements of the Word Bank Operational Page 24 of 189 Policy 4.12 on involuntary resettlement. iv) The collected data was compiled and analyzed following the socio-economic survey. During t h e survey, identification of the assets likely to be affected by the development of the feeder roads together with the project affected person was done. v) Consultations were conducted with project stakeholders including PAPs with an aim of informing them about the project, the anticipated resettlement impact, the resettlement options available to PAPs and to obtain their views and concerns for incorporation in the RAP preparation. vi) Valuation of affected assets was done by government registered valuers. The compensation cost for the valuated assets was determined on the basis of full market replacement costs while factoring the cost of acquiring or development of the affected assets in an area with equal productive potential and with similar locational advantages. 1.4. FORMAT OF THE REPORT This report has been prepared taking into consideration the legal requirements in the country and the World Bank OP 4.12. This report on Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) has following sections: ▪ Non-Technical Executive Summary concisely summarizes the contents of the main RAP report. ▪ Chapter 1 presents the project background, RAP development history, RAP objectives and an outline of the approach and methodology adopted for the RAP preparation. ▪ Chapter 2 provides a review of the relevant national laws and policies, institutional arrangement and financier policies under which the RAP has been prepared. ▪ Chapter 3 briefly describes different aspects of the project including location of the project, objectives of the project and description of the selected feeder roads ▪ Chapter 4 describes the socio-economic conditions of the project affected persons to enable establishment of a socio-economic baseline upon which the impact of the resettlement process on the PAPs will be monitored. ▪ Chapter 5 presents the implementation framework, resettlement management plans along with compilation of public consultation, grievance redress mechanism, cost of RAP and monitoring program. Page 25 of 189 2. LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK 2.1. NATIONAL RELEVANT POLICIES AND STRATEGIES This chapter describes the relevant policies and strategies, legal instruments, institutional arrangement and international framework applicable to rehabilitation and /or construction of feeder road in different districts of Rwanda. The awareness of social issues started as early as in 1920. The social initiatives were also supported by vast campaigns for soil conservation from 1947. In 1977 action program of human settlement (1977), stockbreeding (1978), soil protection and conservation (1980), water supply in rural areas (1981), erosion control (1982) and reforestation (1983) were launched. The national environment strategy was prepared in 1988-1989, and the strategy was adopted by Cabinet in May 1991 with a view to keep a balance between population and natural resources. The aims of this strategy are as follows: ▪ To enable the country to strike a dynamic balance between population and resources while complying with the balance of ecosystems; ▪ To contribute to sustainable and harmonious socio-economic development such that, both in rural and urban areas, men and women may realize their development and well-being in a sound and enjoyable environment; and to protect, conserve and develop natural environment. 2.1.1. National Land Policy, 2019 The policy provides for land tenure systems, guiding principles of land management, an effective & efficient land registry, and land transactions. In order to achieve the objective of the Land Policy, a number of organic laws, decrees and orders have been and are still being prepared and promulgated to facilitate the implementation of the Rwandan Land Policy. The land in Rwanda is titled to individuals that clearly indicates the full ownership of land and in any case of Government program or projects, the government is obliged to full expropriation and compensation of the affected land in accordance with the national expropriation law (Article 26 of the Expropriation Law N° 32/2015 of 11/06/2015) and the World Bank requirements under OP 4:12. In Rwanda there is no customary ownership of land, every land owner has a land title provided by the Rwanda land management and use authority. For this project all affected land owners have land tittles and will be fully compensated for their affected land. Land tenure is governed by formal written law (basic and supplementary provisions), but many provisions still obey the rules and practices of customary law. Therefore, if Page 26 of 189 the law takes precedence over formal customs, there is always a certain legal duality that characterizes the property rights of individuals. Rwandan Constitution of 2003, the National Land Policy of 2004 and the Organic Land Law of 2021 on the presumption of ownership of Buildings, crops and other property found property on land are presumed to belong to the land owner. However, that does not prohibit any other person to own buildings, crops and any other property on other person’s land in accordance with provisions of this Law, other laws or agreement with the land owner. The Land Tenure Regularization (LTR) programme was established to register and administer land ownership in Rwanda. The titling began officially in 2009. The land registration process successfully completed the recording of 10.4 million parcels of land into the national land registry by 2012. The land titles provide for full equal rights to both wife and husband, through the systematic land registration process. Article 20 of the law governing land in Rwanda which was enacted in June 2013 states that registering land is mandatory for anyone (who owns it). In any case of Government program or projects, the government is obliged to full expropriation and compensation of the affected land in accordance with the national expropriation law (Article 26 of the Expropriation Law N° 32/2015 of 11/06/2015) and the World Bank requirements under OP 4:12. In Rwanda there is no customary ownership of land, every land owner has a land tittle provided by the Rwanda land management and use authority (RLMA). For this particular project all affected land owners have land tittles and will be fully compensated for their affected land. More details have been captured in the RAP report under National Land Policy, 2019. 2.1.2 National Strategy for Transformation (NST1/2017-2024) The National strategy for transformation (NST1/2017-2024) which is Government Programme, takes environment and climate change as one of the cross-cutting areas which will be embedded within Sector Strategic Plans and District Development Strategies. In this regard, focus will be on improving cross sectoral coordination to ensure smooth implementation of environmental policies and regulations. In this regard, critical sectors identified for strengthening include: agriculture, urbanization, infrastructure and land use management. Additional emphasis will be put on strengthening monitoring and evaluation. High impact areas selected include implementation of: Environmental and social Impact Assessments, biodiversity and ecosystem management, pollution and waste management. Page 27 of 189 2.1.3 Land Tenure System and Provisions in Rwanda The Land Use Master Plan (Land law No 08/2005 of 14/07/2005, article 6) states that all types of land tenure must be in compliance with the designated land use. The Land Law provides two types of formal land tenure: full ownership/ freehold and long-term leasehold. As a result of the recent privatization of State owned lands, many land users don’t hold either type of land tenure. As a result of this, the Organic Land Law recognizes existing rights, whether written or unwritten, under both civil law and customary practices through new national land tenure arrangements. Article 7 of the law formalizes land ownership, especially those acquired through customary means. In such cases, populations with customary/indigenous land rights are being encouraged to register their land through decentralized the District Land Bureau, Sector Land Committees and Cell Land Committees. The land in Rwanda is titled to individuals that clearly indicates the full ownership of land and in any case of Government program or projects, the government is obliged to full expropriation and compensation of the affected land in accordance with the national expropriation law (Article 26 of the Expropriation Law N° 32/2015 of 11/06/2015) and the World Bank requirements under OP 4:12. In Rwanda there is no customary ownership of land, every land owner has a land tittle provided by the Rwanda land management and use authority. For this project all affected land owners have land tittles and will be fully compensated for their affected land. Land tenure is governed by formal written law (basic and supplementary provisions), but many provisions still obey the rules and practices of customary law. Therefore, if the law takes precedence over formal customs, there is always a certain legal duality that characterizes the property rights of individuals. 2.1.4. Transport Policy The transport policy (TP) was approved in December 2008. This policy considers the action plan of the Sub-Saharan Africa Transport Policy and cross-cutting issues such as HIV/AIDS, gender mainstreaming, socio-economic and environment. The main objective is to reduce down constraints of transport in order to promote sustainable economic growth and contribute to poverty reduction. The policy also advocates the reduction in transport costs, develop transport infrastructure, increase mobility and supplying of services and allow the entire population to improve their standard of living. 2.1.5 The Revised National Gender Policy, 2021 The Vision of the National Gender Policy is to set the Rwandan society free from all forms of gender-based discrimination and see both men and women participate fully and enjoy equitably from the development processes. Page 28 of 189 The main mission of this policy is to contribute to the elimination of gender inequalities in all sectors of national life, in order to achieve the nation’s goal for sustainable development. The Resettlement activities will involve and affect both men and women in terms of loss of property and both genders are expected to be treated equally thus this policy will be relevant. 2.1.5.1 Gender equality in the Regional and International Context Actions of Rwanda with respect to gender promotion are not isolated from the regional and global context. The review of the later helps to position this policy in the regional and global context and to ensure that it responds to various gender related commitments that Rwanda has committed to or ratified as below described: • Ratification of the international bill of rights in April 1975. • Convention on the Elimination of All forms of Discrimination against Women in 1980 and ratified it in 1981. • Adoption of the 1995 Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action marked a turning point for Rwanda’s commitments to promote GEWE. • The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa, commonly known as Maputo Protocol in 2004. Further, in order to strengthen the mechanisms to combat violence against women and children in times of war and peace, the Government of Rwanda is a member state of the International Conference of the Great Lakes and is also a signatory to the Protocol on the Prevention and Suppression of Sexual Violence against Women and Children. 2.1.5.2. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) By nature, gender cuts across a range of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) under the 2030 Development Agenda. But the Agenda 2030 dedicates a standalone SDG- the fifth SDG on “Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls”. The SGDs gender related indicators are domesticated in the national development framework such as NST-1, sector strategies and DDS. Priority areas under SDG 5 include: eliminating all forms of discrimination against all women and girls, elimination of all forms of violence against all women and girls in the public and private spheres, including trafficking and sexual and other types of exploitation, eliminating all harmful practices such as child labour, early and forced marriage and female genital mutilation and ensuring women’s full and effective participation and equal opportunities for leadership at all levels of decision-making in political, economic and public life among others. 2.1.5.3. Gender in the African Union Agenda 2063 Adopted in 2013, the African Union Agenda 2063 is a shared framework for inclusive growth and sustainable development for Africa to be realized in the next fifty years. The agenda, builds on and seeks to accelerate the implementation of past and existing continental initiatives for growth and sustainable development 12. With regard to Page 29 of 189 gender, the agenda emphasizes on the women’s empowerment in all spheres of social, economic and political lives leading to inclusive economic growth with expanded job opportunities, especially for the youth and women. In the same area, the agenda, envisions an African continent where no child, woman or man will be left behind. 2.1.5.4. Gender in the EAC Vision 2050 According to the East African Community (EAC), mainstreaming GEWE is crucial ensuring the participation of women in the transformation of the region. The vision recognizes that no society can reach its full potential, unless it empowers women and remove all obstacles to women’s full participation in all areas of human endeav ours13. Through the vision, the EAC region stresses the harmonization of gender policies in order to facilitate gender equality and women’s empowerment. The EAC vision 2050 also intends to remove the severe regional gender related disparities such as girls ’ education, equality and equity in terms of political and economic participation as well as rural settings affecting gender equality. 2.1.6 The National Human Settlement Policy, 2009 The resettlement policy involves finding adequate housing for a category of households which are homeless, often poor and vulnerable (widows, orphans, persons with disability etc.) and bringing all the houses in the villages (Imidugudu) to an acceptable level in terms of housing and access to social and economic services. The National Human Settlement Policy was adopted in July 2004 and revised in 2009 and is in line with the major national policies included in the vision 2020 and in the national strategic paper for poverty reduction and takes into consideration the decentralization policy openly implemented since 2001. Gakenke district feeder roads project is expected to physically displace 1987 households, and these will be required to relocate to approved settlement sites in the district therefore this policy will be triggered. In Gakenke district a total number of 307 people were identified as vulnerable in the categories of disabled, very old and orphans. Detailed information on identification of vulnerable people is captured in the social economic report annexed to the report. 2.1.7 National Social Protection Strategy, 2011 In 2006, almost 57 per cent of the population in Rwanda still lived in poverty, while levels of inequality were on the rise. A number of categories of the population are particularly vulnerable to poverty including older people, those living with disabilities, young children, female-headed households, genocide survivors, youth and the historically marginalised. Page 30 of 189 The Strategy defines social protection across two main dimensions: • As a Social Protection Sector, which essentially comprises the system of regular and predicable cash transfers that will provide income support to those living in poverty and vulnerable to falling into poverty; • As a means of ensuring access to other public services – such as health and education – by enabling poor households to overcome the financial barriers that they may face. 2.1.8 National Policy on Child Labour The National Policy on the Elimination of Child Labor is supported by a larger policy framework for child protection and National economic/social development. Key components of this framework include the Vision 2020, the Economic Development and Poverty Reduction Strategy (EDPRS), and other sector policies related to education, employment, and protection of Orphans and Vulnerable Children (OVC). NST1 represents the national long-term development aspiration of Rwanda. NST1 outlines plans to promote macroeconomic stability and wealth creation of Rwanda, to transform its economy from an agrarian to a knowledge-based one in the medium term and to create a productive middle class and foster entrepreneurship in the long term. Therefore, attacking poverty head-on, through education and skills training, employment expansion, and developing a knowledge-based economy, will assist the country to eliminate child labor. Other Sectorial Policies The elimination of child labor is a cross-cutting challenge for national economic and social development. The National Policy on Elimination of Child Labor is not a standalone initiative. It builds on existing policy frameworks, including the National Integrated Child Rights Policy (2011), the National and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) Policy (2008), the National Policy on Orphans and other Vulnerable Children (2003), the Education Sector Policy (2003), the National Policy for Family Promotion (2005), the Community Development Policy (revised in 2008), the National Social Protection Policy (2004), the Decentralization Policy (2000), the Employment Policy (2006), the National Gender Policy (2010), and others. In addition to the aforementioned policy context, the Government of Rwanda has put in place national legislation promoting children’s rights and prohibiting child labor. These include: a) Rwandan Constitution of 2003 as amended to date which puts particular emphasis on children’s protection; b) Law n° 10/2011 of 13/05/2011 determining missions, organization and power of Rwanda Defense Forces; Page 31 of 189 c) Presidential Order nº 72/01 of 08/07/2002 establishing army general statutes d) Law n° 13/2009 of 27/05/2009 regulating labor in Rwanda which prohibits employment for children under the age of 16; e) Ministerial order No. 06 of 13/07/2010 determining the list of worst forms of child labor, their nature, categories of institutions that are not allowed to employ children and preventive mechanisms; f) Law no 27/2001 of 28 April 2001 determining the rights of the child and the protection of children against violence; g) Law No 54 of 14/12/2011 relating to the Rights and the protection of the children; h) Organic Law N° 01/2012/OL of 02/05/2012 instituting the penal code. 2.2. LEGAL INSTRUMENTS A significant number of legal instruments have been enacted to ensure and effective resettlement, land acquisition, and compensation in the context of rehabilitation and/or construction of feeder road in different districts of Rwanda. As far as land is concerned, the policies are prepared by the Ministry of Environment ( MoE). The Rwanda Land Management and Use Authority (RLMUA), the Rwanda Water and Forestry Authority (RWFA), the Rwanda Mines, Petroleum and Gas Board (RMB) are the a u t h o r i t i e s that lead the management of promotion of natural resources which is composed of land, water, forests, mines and geology. It shall be entrusted with supervision, monitoring and to ensure the implementation of issues relating to the promotion and protection of natural resources. 2.2.1 Important Resettlement Legislations The land which is not protected in protected areas (Wetland and National Parks) is recognized as private land both customary and legally. The Expropriation law N° 32/2015 of 11/06/2015 on expropriation outlines rights and compensation procedures for land expropriated for public interest. The valuation Law (2007) stipulates valuation methods to be applied to the expropriated assets. The following laws are important for rehabilitation and resettlement, land acquisition and compensation: i. The Rwandan Constitution promulgated in 2015; ii. Land Law no N° 43/2013 of 16/06/2013 governing land in Rwanda gazetted in the Official Gazette no Special of 16/06/2013 was promulgated to determine the procedure for use and management of land in Rwanda Property. iii. Valuation Law n o 17/2010; establishing and organizing the Real Property Valuation in Rwanda; iv. Law N° 32/2015 of 11/06/2015 relating to expropriation in the public interest, promulgated in the Official Gazette nᵒ 35 of 31/08/2015; v. Ministerial Order No. 002/2008 of 2008 Determining Modalities of Page 32 of 189 Land Registration: The above legal orders are briefly described as follows: i) The Rwanda Constitution: The constitution is the supreme law of the land. Under Article 34 of the Rwanda constitution every citizen has a right to private property, whether personal or owned in association with others. Further it states private property, whether individually or collectively owned, is inviolable. However, this right can be interfered with in case of public interest, in circumstances and procedures determined by law and subject to fair and prior compensation. Article 35stipulate that private ownership of land and other rights related to land are granted by the State. The constitution provides that a law should be in place to specify modalities of acquisition, transfer and use of land (expropriation law). The constitution also provides for a healthy and satisfying environment. In the same breath every person has the duty to protect, safeguard and promote the environment. The State shall protect the environment; ii) Law N° 43/2013 of 16/06/2013 governing land in Rwanda gazette in the Official Gazette no Special of 16/06/2013 determining the use and management of land in Rwanda: This is the law that determines the use and management of land in Rwanda. It also institutes the principles that are to be respected on land legal rights accepted on any land in the country as well as all other appendages whether natural or artificial. According to the Law, Land in Rwanda is categorized into two: Individual land and Public land. The latter is subdivided into two categories: the state land in public domain and the state land in private domain. State land in public domain includes national land reserves for environment conservation; land over which administration building are erected, state roads, land containing lakes, rivers, stream and springs. State land in private domain include swamps that may be productive in terms of agriculture, vacant land with no owner, land purchased by the State, donation, land acquired through expropriation and land occupied by state owned forests. Land in Rwanda is predominantly individual land. The law gives the owner of land full rights to exploit his or her land in accordance with the existing laws and regulations. The law also provides for expropriation which stipulates that land expropriation can be undertaken if it’s for public interest. The law states that swamp land belongs to the state and no person can use the reason that he or she has spent a long time with it to justify the definitive takeover of the land. iii) Law N° 32/2015 of 11/06/2015 relating to expropriation in the public interest, gazetted in the Official Gazette nᵒ 35 of 31/08/2015; This law determines the procedures relating to expropriation of land in the interest of the public. Page 33 of 189 Article 3 of the law stipulates that’s it’s only the government that has authority to carry out expropriation. However, the project, at any level, which intends to carry out acts of expropriation in public interest, shall provide funds for inventory of assets of the person to be expropriated and for just compensation on its budget. According to the organic law, no person shall hinder the implementation of the program of expropriation on pretext of self- centered justifications and no land owner shall oppose any underground or surface activity carried out on his or her land with an aim of public interest. In case it causes any loss to him or her, he or she shall receive just compensation for it. Chapter IV deals with valuation of land earmarked for expropriation. The law identifies properties to be valued for just compensation to be land and activities that were carried out on the land including different crops, forests, any buildings or any other activity aimed at efficient use of land or its productivity. Here the law is silent on access to economic activities on the land. iv) Law No.17/2010 of 12/05/2010 Establishing and Organizing the Real Property Valuation Profession in Rwanda: This law provides for the registration of land in Rwanda and conditions for registration. The law also allows the Government to conduct valuation when mandated by their government institutions. Articles 27, 29, 30 and 31 of the law deals with valuation methods. These articles stipulate that price for the real property shall be close or equal to the market value. The valuation could also compare land values country wide. Where sufficient comparable prices are not available to determine the value of improved land, the replacement cost approach shall be used to determine the value of improvements to land by taking real property as a reference. The law also allows the use of international methods not covered in the law after approval from the Institute of Valuers council. v) Ministerial Order No. 002/2008 of 1/04/2008 Determining Modalities of Land Registration: Annex 3 of the ministerial order provides for dispute resolutions procedures and some provisions related to the cell adjudication committee (“CAC”). Articles 17, 20, 22, and 23 provide the process for resolving disputes. Article 17 grants parties to a dispute, the right to take that dispute to the mediation committee. That article also provides that where a dispute arose during demarcation and adjudication but, with the assistance of the CAC, the parties were able to resolve the dispute, the parties are bound by that agreement, and may not later attempt to raise the issue. Article 20 provides procedures for the cell adjudication committee when hearing disputes, including that the hearing is open to the public and announced eight days in advance, among other requirements. Page 34 of 189 Articles 22 and 23 govern the lodging and processing of objections and corrections during a 60-day period. The CAC is comprised of all five members of the cell land committee and five members of the particular village (umudugudu) where demarcation and adjudication is taking place. The cell executive secretary acts as the CAC secretary, although he or she has no voting rights. This order can be used to resolve resettlement conflict at the sub project area. vi) Law N°55/2011 of 14/12/2011 governing Roads in Rwanda: This law provides classification of roads and defines responsibilities, management, financing and road development. In the context of this project, feeder roads fall under the district responsibility. The article 17 of this law stipulates that the widening of a road shall be done after expropriation of the people near the road in accordance with the law to secure the land needed. 2.2.2 World Bank Policy (OP 4.12) The objectives of this resettlement plan reflect the principals contained in the World Bank policy document: OP 4.12 Involuntary Resettlement. OP 4.12 is triggered in situations involving involuntary taking of land and/or other assets where displacement cannot be avoided. The policy aims to avoid involuntary resettlement to the extent feasible, or to minimize and mitigate its adverse social and economic impacts. Specifically, OP 4.12 states that project planning must avoid and minimize involuntary resettlement, and that if people lose their homes or livelihoods as a result of projects, they should have their standard of living improved, or at least restored. It promotes participation of displaced people in resettlement planning and implementation. The OP 4.12’s key objective is to assist displaced persons in their efforts to improve or at least restore their incomes and standards of living after displacement. The policy prescribes compensation and other resettlement measures to achieve its objectives and requires that implementers prepare adequate resettlement planning instruments prior to appraisal of proposed projects. A comparison of the World Bank Policy OP 4.12 and the laws, regulations and guidelines for land acquisition and resettlement of the Government of Rwanda (GoR) is available in Table 1. The comparison also includes which law will prevail during conflict. The OP4.12 states that Cash compensation levels should be sufficient to replace the lost land and other assets at full replacement cost in local markets - involuntary resettlement should be avoided. Where involuntary resettlement is unavoidable, it will be minimized and appropriate measures to mitigate adverse impacts on displaced persons will be carefully planned and implemented. In Rwanda land compensation id mostly in cash as the feeder roads project crosses Page 35 of 189 private land for individuals. People occupying land in the marshland will only be compensated for assets incorporated thereon because restricted and (wetland, parks) are identified as state land. Page 36 of 189 Table 1: Comparative Analysis between World Bank OP 4.12 and Rwanda Legislations Principles Rwanda Legislations World Bank’s involuntary Gap Filling Measures resettlement Valuation Valuation is covered by the OP 4.12 prefers (Replacement cost Adopt replacement cost method O Expropriation Law and The Land method of valuation of assets that of valuation. P Valuation Law and stipulates that helps determine the amount 4. the affected person receive fair and sufficient to replace lost assets and 1 just Compensation. However, a cover transaction costs. In applying 2 ministerial order gives the value of this method of valuation, ) land and crops depreciation of structures and assets should not be taken into account. If the residual of the asset being taken is not economically viable, compensation and other resettlement assistance is provided as if the entire Compensation Article 22 of the expropriation law OP 4.12 gives preference to land Adopt OP 4.12 mode of asset had been taken. No 18/2007 entitles the land holder based resettlement strategies for valuation by giving preference to compensation for the value of the displaced persons whose livelihoods to land based resettlement as land and activities on the basis of are land-based as compared to opposed to monetary size, nature location considering the monetary compensation. resettlement. prevailing market value. Participation The Rwandan organic law on WB OP 4.12 requires that persons to Adopt OP 4.12 methods of and consultation Expropriation simply stipulates that be displaced should actively be participation affected people be fully informed of consulted and expropriation issues. The law also should have opportunity to conflicts the very purpose of participate in planning and design of consultation and involvement by resettlement programs, consultation prohibit any opposition to the need to be meaningful and inclusive expropriation program if considered of all groups and gender to be under the pretext of self- centered justification which might not be the case Principles Rwanda Legislations World Bank’s involuntary Gap Filling Measures resettlement ( Overall strategy Section 2 of the expropriation law on Under the OP 4.12, it’s not Adopt the national O procedures, provides for the process necessary to prove that the project expropriation law in terms of the P to show how the sub projects fits into fits within the overall land master project’s fit in the master plan of 4. the land master plan of the area in plan the area only. 1 question 2 Required Expropriation law does not OP 4.12 requires displaced persons Use World Bank OP 4.12 ) measures provide for alternatives when to be The preferred means of undertaking compensation consulted on, offered choices among, compensation for land is cash and payment However this was provided with technically and agreed with PAPS during economically feasible resettlement consultation meetings. alternatives Compensation of land will be done to PAPS respective bank accounts before works commences Grievance The new Expropriation Law of OP 4.12 requires PAPs be informed Adopt Rwanda Expropriation redress 2015 creates the Resettlement and of the compensation exercise and Law which establishes the GRM mechanism Grievance redress committee and establishes Grievance Redress formed by the District provides complaints procedures for Mechanisms (sector/cell) authority, PAP individuals dissatisfied with the representatives and Project proposed project or the value of their Social Safeguard Experts are compensation and process for part of the GRM that will be expressing dissatisfaction and for established. The requirement of seeking redress. OP 4.12 will also be incorporated. Page 2 of 189 Principles Rwanda Legislations World Bank’s involuntary Gap Filling Measures resettlement ( Timeframe Rwanda expropriation law stipulates OP 4.12 requires that displacement A cut- off date should be O a timeframe upon when the property must not occur before necessary applied. Furthermore, where the P to be expropriated must be handed measures for resettlement are in borrower has offered to pay 4. over which is 120 days after place, i.e., measures over and above compensation to an affected 1 compensation has been paid. simple compensation. Measures person in accordance with this 2 pertaining to provision of economic resettlement plan, but the offer ) rehabilitation however can and often has been rejected, the taking of do occur post displacement. land and related assets may only WB OP 4.12 provides for a timeframe proceed if the borrower has (cut-off date) upon which deposited funds equal to the interested parties are entitled to offered amount plus 10 percent respond. in a secure form of escrow or other interest-bearing deposit acceptable to the Bank, and has provided a means satisfactory to the Bank for resolving the dispute concerning said offer of compensation in a timely and equitable manner. Page 3 of 189 Principles Rwanda Legislations World Bank’s involuntary Gap Filling Measures resettlement ( Eligibility Article 18 of the law requires the OP 4.12 criteria for include even OP 4.12 will apply for O person who owns land intended for those who do not have formal legal determining eligibility due to P expropriation to provide evidence of rights to land at the time the census the fact that many of those who 4. ownership or rights on that land and begins but have a claim to such land farm the lands don’t own it, 1 presents a certificate to that effect or assets—provided that such claims although they may have 2 are recognized under the laws of the depended on farming on such ) country or become recognized lands for through a process identified in the their livelihood, and as such, resettlement plan and also those who Should be assisted to at least have no recognizable legal right or maintain their pre-project level claim to the land they are occupying of welfare. (especially for assets) It also includes title holder land owners In-kind Expropriation law is silent on OP 4.12 requires and prefers Apply requirements of World compensation provision of alternative land and resettlement of displaced persons. It Bank OP 4.12 during the resettlement of those to the pre- also includes the title holder land upgrading of the feeder road displaced status owners. where feasible Disclosure of The decision provided for under The WB OP4.12 states that the in- All project information and information Article 15 of Rwandan Expropriation country disclosure allows the safeguards instruments will be Law shall be announced on at least publication of the RAPs to let all disclosed to all PAPs and one of the radio stations with a wide possible affected people be aware stakeholders in an appropriate audience in Rwanda and in at least manner. one of Rwanda-based newspapers with a wide readership in order for the relevant parties to be informed thereof. If necessary, any other means of communication shall be used Page 4 of 189 Principles Rwanda Legislations World Bank’s involuntary Gap Filling Measures resettlement ( Definition of cut Rwanda National law has no such WB OP 4.12 provides for a timeframe RTDA to adopt World Bank O off dates mechanism. The Rwanda national (cutoff date); people who encroach policies on Cut-off date. P law is silent on cut-off date. on the area after the cut-off date are 4. not entitled to compensation or 1 resettlement assistance) 2 ) Treatment of Every disabled person shall be The World Bank Policy requires Both National and World Bank vulnerable entitled to equal rights with other particular attention to be paid to the policies to be adopted when it groups persons before the law. He or she needs of vulnerable groups among comes to treatment of vulnerable shall be respected and be entitled to those displaced. groups in the project human dignity. (LAW N° 01/2007 of intervention area. 20/01/2007 relating to protection of disabled persons). Page 5 of 189 Page 6 of 189 Table 2: Roles and responsibilities of stakeholders in RAP implementation Institution Role and ownership of Project MININFRA/ Coordination of RAP activities responsible for holding all RTDA/GAKENKE information and documentation relevant to the RAP. MINECOFIN Responsible for timely disbursing of the compensation funds; MOE Crucial role in ensuring that appropriate and consistent compensation is provided to all affected persons resulting from the various sub-projects. ensure cost effectiveness of the land acquisition activities RLMUA RLMUA key responsibility is registering land, issuing and keeping land authentic deeds and any other information relating to land. RLMUA will ensure that PAPs have timely access to their land documents to enable them to receive their compensation packages Gakenke One Stop The role of OSC in RAP process is to check and to approve Centre surveys, various maps and to approve land surveys carried out during the RAP exercise. The OSC will also contribute significantly to land conflict management. the main responsibilities of the OSC are monitoring the implementation of land administration and land use management procedures and guidelines one of its specific roles is to monitor and approve expropriation of land repossessed in public interest to accommodate activities with a national character. There are also land Commissions and land Committees at Province, District, Sector and Cell levels. The National Land Commission will also play a key role in grievance resolution. The overall objective of OSC is to put in place and operationalize an efficient system of land administration and land management that secure land ownership, promote investment in land for socio- economic development and poverty Institution Role and ownership of Project The main role that the OSC will play on the project is to contribute to the resolution of any land related grievances. The Land Valuation law was promulgated in 2007 and outlines the role of the Land Valuation Bureaus to provide independent ‘fair and just’ valuation of land and affected assets in the event of expropriation. Land valuation bureaus are free to be established all over the country. The Land Valuation Bureau will be responsible for assessing all affected property and attaching compensation costs to each property. The OSC will be responsible for ensuring activities undertaken comply with the National and District Level Land Use Master Plans. They will assess the validity of land tenure rights of affected persons and eventually provide the land use permit for the new activity proposed by the project. In addition, they will be responsible for ensuring that effective grievance mechanisms are in place. They will also be used during the preparation of the RAP so as to ensure that grievances are reduced at an early stage Ministry of Local Will be a key institution in the implementation of the RAP. It will Government play a supervisory role over the various decentralized (MINALOC administrative structures at the district, sector and cell levels. MINALOC will ensure that the displaced persons resettle in approved planned sites. The RSTF will further be responsible for the monitoring of the displaced persons especially the vulnerable groups INDEPENDENT Will be procured to implement some of the activities of RAP such NGOs as overseeing of livelihood restoration programs, monitoring and evaluation and the RAP process among others. Page 2 of 189 2.3. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR RESETTLEMENT The article 3 of the Law N° 32/2015 of 11/06/2015 relating to Expropriation in the Public interest, stipulates that he or she should receive just compensation for it. This entitlement is based on the figure arrived at by the independent valuer. Through mutual arrangement, both parties can determine the mode of payment. Land acquisition and compensation will be undertaken according to national legislation with particular reference to the Law on Expropriation for reasons of Public Use. The eligibility criteria are based on the three criteria given in Clause 15 of the World Bank’s Operational Policy 4.12: • Those who have formal legal rights to land (including customary and traditional rights recognized under the laws of the country); • Those who do not have formal legal rights to land at the time the census begins but have a claim to such land or assets – provided that such claims are recognized under the laws of the country or become recognized through a process identified in the resettlement plan; • Those who have no recognizable legal rights or claim to the land they are occupying; The eligible criteria for resettlement and compensation are presented in Table 3. The cut-off date provided in the previous RAP following finalization of design was 31st December 2019. Gakenke District has been enforcing the cut-off date of 31st October 2021 which has ensured that the Right of Way has remained free from opportunistic invasion. Factoring the increase in the number of project affected households from 1,071 to 1,987; project affected persons from 5,552 to 11,072 and the number of vulnerable households has increased from 150 to 228 during road rehabilitation, it was considered necessary to declare a new-cut-off date for the additional PAPs for whom a census had not been conducted and the RAP had not been disclosed for the purpose of expropriation for project development. The revised Updated RAP report therefore has two cut-off dates of 31st December 2019 applicable to 1071 PAHs and a second cut-off date of 10th September 2021 applicable to the 916 PAHs. The census of additional PAPs commenced on 10th September 2021. No land improvement in the Project-Affected Area after this date shall be eligible for compensation. PAPs were consulted and they were informed of the cut-off date and its implications. Information about the cut-off date was disseminated mainly through public meetings and during the socio-economic survey. Table 3: Entitlement Matrix Category of Type of Loss Compensation for Compensation for Loss of land Compensation Moving Other Assistance PAP Loss of Structures for Loss of Allowance Income Property Loss of land ------ The land acquired for road widening ------ Disturbance allowances 5%, Owners will be compensated in cash at registration/ transfer fees replacement cost and Payment will be done directly to PAPs Job opportunities and respective bank accounts. facilitation for health PAPs requested for cash payment. The insurance and advocacy to affected land is mainly partial/small other government support, size ranging between 5.7m and people etc. to vulnerable PAPs. living on the same plot of land Capacity building of preferred cash compensation and these severely affected PAPs and are the majority. vulnerable groups to therefore, all the PAPs land will maintain and/or improve remain economically viable during their income generation and after road construction. potential. Job opportunities to the PAPs Relocation support will be provided to the PAPs (land tittle transfer charges, disturbance allowance 5%, district and the project will monitor construction linked progress linked disbursement, facilitation to PAHs to receive the construction permits etc for self-construction If anyone loses all the land parcel/plot or substantial portion and the remaining becomes unviable, and as a result becomes landless due Page 2 of 189 Category of Type of Loss Compensation for Compensation for Loss of land Compensation Moving Other Assistance PAP Loss of Structures for Loss of Allowance Income to the project, the project together with the District will facilitate that PAH to get alternative parcel of land in the neighborhood or a plot in the District formal group settlement to construct his/her new house, house construction & Support for redevelopment in settlement areas (model village) Temporary Land will be paid based on lease Rental Land will be rehabilitated loss of land contract between the land owner, allowances after laterite extraction and due to site contractor and local authorities. These based on given back to their installation annual land respective owners. contract (s) will also be shared with the and borrow output and pits Bank and after road construction this costs land will be restored as per CESMP associated and handed back to owner for use. with land preparation and crop management. Loss of Compensation at For lost rental Coverage Disturbance structure full replacement income, Lump of full cost allowance value not sum cash for total & right to salvage materials depreciated, payment of 6 transport without deduction from considering market months’ rent expenses compensation values for per tenant structures and Capacity building of materials plus 5% severely affected PAPs and as a disturbance vulnerable groups to allowance maintain and/or improve their income generation Page 3 of 189 Category of Type of Loss Compensation for Compensation for Loss of land Compensation Moving Other Assistance PAP Loss of Structures for Loss of Allowance Income potential. If need to relocate, relocation assistance (coverage of costs of transport & assistance to find alternative secured accommodation, preferably in the community of residence through involvement of the project) For People who will construct houses on their own (self-relocation). Relocation support will be provided through assistance with land tittle transfer charges, disturbance allowance 5%, district and the project will monitor construction linked progress linked disbursement, facilitation to PAHs to receive the construction permits among others for self- construction. Those people who will not be able to construct their houses in the same plots, the PIU together with the District will provide support in helping the affected PAPs find a plot of land in the nearby District model village. - If anyone lose all the Page 4 of 189 Category of Type of Loss Compensation for Compensation for Loss of land Compensation Moving Other Assistance PAP Loss of Structures for Loss of Allowance Income land parcel or substantial portion and the remaining becomes unviable, and as a result becomes landless due to the project, project will facilitate that PAH to get alternative parcel of land in the neighborhood or a plot in the District formal group settlement to construct his/her new house, house construction & Support for redevelopment in settlement areas (model village) Loss of forest Cash Disturbance allowances Trees compensation Planting of trees in the privately based on type, buffer zone of the owned age and developed roads to replace productive for the removed ones and value of protect rehabilitated roads. affected trees Loss of crops Cash Disturbance allowance (including tree compensation crops) based on the type, age and market value of the mature crop in the scarce season, whichever is greater. Page 5 of 189 Category of Type of Loss Compensation for Compensation for Loss of land Compensation Moving Other Assistance PAP Loss of Structures for Loss of Allowance Income Property lease Loss of rental Payment of six Coverage Disturbance allowance holders/Tenant accommodatio months’ rent. of full cost n for total Cash for un expired portion transport of the lease if paid in expenses advance to the owner. Loss of crops Cash Disturbance allowances (including tree compensation crops) based on the Relocation assistance as a type, age and cash allowance to cover market value income foregone during the of the mature period that the PAP is crop in the without land; assistance scarce season, will be equivalent to the for the value of production lost remaining until replacement crops are period of the yielding the same level. For tenancy/lease fruit trees the costs of the yielded per period that the tree will take to mature will be calculated including the future price of the fruits Squatters/ Loss of Cash compensation Relocation Disturbance allowance, informal structure at full replacement assistance dwellers* cost not (coverage Right to salvage materials depreciated, of costs of without deduction from considering market transport & compensation values for assistance structures and to find Job opportunities and materials. alternative facilitation for health secured insurance and other accommod government support, etc. to ation, vulnerable PAPs Capacity preferably building of severely in the affected PAPs and community vulnerable groups to of maintain and/or improve residence their income generation Page 6 of 189 Category of Type of Loss Compensation for Compensation for Loss of land Compensation Moving Other Assistance PAP Loss of Structures for Loss of Allowance Income through potential. involvemen t of the project) All PAPs Loss of assets Cash compensation For lost rental Coverage Right to salvage materials (whether due to for any assets income, Lump of full cost without deduction from owner, tenant temporary affected (e.g. sum cash for total compensation, or informal land houses, fences payment of 6 transport dweller) acquisition demolished, trees months’ rent expenses Relocation assistance removed), per tenant and (coverage of costs of public relocation and provision of water taps construction, construction of new plot in the market centers etc.) public water taps, small markets water tanks, to be Assistance of vulnerable construction of constructed by poor people for livelihood small markets, etc the Project reestablishment (i.e. Provision of tree seedlings, job opportunities and facilitation for health insurance and other government support, etc). Page 7 of 189 Category of Type of Loss Compensation for Compensation for Loss of land Compensation Moving Other Assistance PAP Loss of Structures for Loss of Allowance Income Business Loss of Shops along the Compensation Provide Provide additional people ( small Income due to roads, vendors will be paid assistance targeted assistance (for or big vendors) economic for the lost with example job displacement income and relocation opportunities) and production and cover opportunities to during the all the cost improve or at least transition of moving restore their income- period (the the PAP earning capacity, time between production levels, and losing the standards of living to business and economically displaced re- persons whose establishment) livelihoods or income This will be levels are adversely estimated affected. based on the monthly Promptly compensate income of the economically displaced affected persons for loss of parties assets or access to assets at full replacement cost Capacity Building in business. The business people will be sensitized to come for construction opportunities such as provision of construction materials. Vulnerable Full compensation During construction groups of land plus 5% of works, they will be disruption fee in given special attention case he/she has and giving them job land opportunities. Page 8 of 189 Category of Type of Loss Compensation for Compensation for Loss of land Compensation Moving Other Assistance PAP Loss of Structures for Loss of Allowance Income Works impact losses due to the Compensation will the contractor the The works insurance on assets contractor’s be given by the will calculate contractor policies will apply constructions contractor and will the monthly will cover present to the client income and the moving the proof of pay the lost allowances compensation income through the bank account Loss of public Loss of assets Individual fences vii) Disturbance utilities such as water will be allowance valve, compensated, the viii) Right to salvage protection contractor will assets and fence, water estimate the cost of pipelines relocation and such Materials there will be crossing the public utilities such temporally supply of street electric poles and utilities to the affected valves will be community. relocated. Community Religious Compensation of i. Cash assets infrastructure, their structures at compensation graves replacement cost; ii. Cultural Disturbance acceptable allowance relocation; local leaders will be consulted to facilitate getting get other plot not far from the initial church, follow legal procedures for exhumation iii. Right to salvage assets and materials Page 9 of 189 2.4. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT AND FRAMEWORK A number of institutions will be involved in the overall implementation of this project, either by way of their mandate or because of the direct impact of the project on their areas of jurisdiction. These include: • Ministry of Environment (MoE) • Ministry of Infrastructure (MININFRA) • Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry (MINAGRI); • Ministry of Local Government (MINALOC) • Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning (MINECOFIN) • Rwanda Transport Development Agency (RTDA). • Rwanda Development Board (RDB); • The Rwanda Land Management and Use Authority (RLMUA) • Province and District Administration. • Local NGOs • Grievance Redress Committees The Ministry of Environment (MoE) is responsible for developing the policies and norms for efficient land, water resources and environmental management. In this project, this Ministry will ensure that policies, norms and guidelines for land use are respected in the project implementation. The Ministry of Infrastructure (MININFRA) is responsible for overall transport policy and strategic planning, the creation of a transport enabling environment, and setting of transport rules, regulations, standards and strategic planning. MININFRA is also responsible for roads maintenance including rehabilitation. The Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry (MINAGRI) is responsible for developing agricultural and animal husbandry policies and strategies. MINAGRI will also be involved in planning and prioritization of feeder roads development. The Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning (MINECOFIN) is responsible for providing accounting guidance to RTDA as an implementing agency and allocating PAPs compensation budget to RTDA. The Rwanda Transport Development Agency (RTDA) as an implementing agency under MININFRA that is responsible for assisting MININFRA with the management and administration of the transport sector, and the planning, prioritizing, approval, delivery, management and Page 10 of 189 maintenance of infrastructure, including support to districts as the managing and implementing agencies. In this project, it is the responsibility of RTDA as the executing agency for the project to prepare the compensation budget, supervise the compensation exercise and pay for affected people to their respective bank accounts. The Rwanda Land Management and Use Authority (RLMUA) is in charge of implementing national policies, laws, strategies, regulations and Government resolutions related to the management and use of land. In this project it will monitor and provide guidance with regard to the project compliance with existing land legal and policy provisions. Province and District administration In line with the law N°87/2013 of 11/09/2013, a District is a decentralized administrative entity with legal personality, and shall constitute the basis for community development. In the same vein, the Law N°32/2015 of 11/06/2015 governing expropriation for public interest stipulates that the executive committee of the District is responsible to initiate the expropriation and approved by the District Council. In the context of this project, the District will play a critical role in the expropriation process and by the virtue of the article 8 of the law N°32/2015 of 11/06/2015; the District shall establish a committee in charge of supervision of projects of expropriation. In addition, the article 21 of the law N°32/2015 of 11/06/2015, gives to the District the responsibility of approving the list of the persons to be expropriated which serves as a basis for drawing up an inventory of the property to be expropriated, and the District is responsible to inform the persons to be expropriated in the public interest of the expected start date of measurement of land and inventory of property incorporated thereon. With regard to the Province, it will have a supervisory role, not only in the feeder roads project, but also in all activities curried out in the District. In fact, the articles 172 and 173 of the law 87/2013, stipulate that the province shall supervise the functioning of the District. It is the role of the District to call and participate in public consultation meetings, support in the formation and trainings of grievance committees, and participate in resolving grievances raised. Local NGOs: these are service providers to monitors the if the rights of the community and reports independently cases of harm and supports the GoR realize its target GRCs: Handling the grievances during rehabilitation and solve on time. World Bank: will provide loans/ grants for financing the road construction as well as technical assistance for the proper implementation of the project activities. Page 11 of 189 2.4.1. Project stakeholder identified in Gakenke district Stakeholders are people, groups, institutions which are likely to be positively or negatively affected by project interventions and whose roles are instrumental to the success of the project. The following are the key stakeholders have been identified for the planned feeder road intervention in Gakenke district. Table 4: Key Stakeholders identified in Gakenke District No Stakeholders Domain of intervention 1. Local community/ Project Affected Participation in the projects and expression of their Persons complains for smooth implementation that meets the community needs, provisional of necessary construction materials 2. District staffs Labour, Cooperatives, Agriculture, Gender, Infrastructures, Environment, Social and local authorities. 3. Rwanda National Police Road security and Safety 4. Public Sector Federation (PSF) Business and Economic activities in the District 5. Water and Sanitation Corporation Providing water and sanitation services 6. District hospitals and health centers Health 7. Rwanda Investigation Bureau / Investigation and awareness raising about Gender Isange One stop Center Based Violence as well as service provider to GBV victim. 8. RSSB – Gakenke Branch Insurance services 9. EUCL (Energy Utility Corporation Providing energy services (Electricity and other Limited ) related services ) 10. Umurenge Saving and Credit Financial Services Cooperatives (SACCO) 11. Grievance redress committees Handling complaints from the PAPs 12. Church leaders( catholic, Adventist, opinions leaders for, most of citizen belong to at ADEPR and Islam least a religious cluster and these gave important influence to the community Page 12 of 189 13. PROFEMME TWESE HAMWE Education on gender mainstreaming, equity and (NGO) equality between men and women 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1. PROJECT LOCATION Gakenke District is located the Northern Province and has a surface area of 704km2. The District consists of 19 sectors which are Busengo, Coko, Cyabingo, Gakenke, Gashenyi, Janja, Kamubuga, Karambo, Kivuruga, Mataba, Minazi, Mugunga, Muhondo, Muyongwe, Muzo, Nemba, Ruli, Rusasa and Rushashi. The later are made up of 97 Cells and 617 Villages. Gakenke District borders with Rulindo District at its Eastern side, Burera and Musanze Districts at its North, Nyabihu District at its West, at the South by Kamonyi and Muhanga Districts. This District is divided into 19 administrative Sectors, made of 97 Cells, 617 Villages (imidugudu). 3.2. OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT ▪ The prime objective of the project was to improve transport infrastructure with a view to supporting project area’s social economic development. The project development will facilitate the economic growth, the improved transportation of goods and services. Specifically, the major purpose of the proposed upgrading project was to rehabilitate / construct feeder road network in Gakenke District in order to meet the following objectives: ▪ To improve the existing infrastructure in rural areas, which will boost the connectivity and transfer of goods and people from one place to another in less time; ▪ To improve feeder roads which will contribute towards the GDP of the regions and the country; ▪ To pave the way for systematic improvement and continued investment in these areas; ▪ To promote socio economic development of the project area by linking it within the district and other districts and cities in the country; and ▪ To increase agricultural productivity and marketing capacities, by lowering the transport costs and losses of farm input and output. In particular, improved feeder networks will enhance the commercial activities of rural households, access to services and will reduce poverty. 3.3. PROJECT DETAILS The project details were reproduced from the feasibility study. The project components include rehabilitation of right of way, culvert and bridges and cross drainage works. The affected areas of Page 13 of 189 the feeder rehabilitation were limited to the Right of way, plus the widening areas as well as the borrow sites and quarry areas. The existing RoW will be widened by about 4.5m. Cultivation extends into close to the feeder road, with mostly sweet potatoes, beans, pineapple, sugar cane banana plantation in the project area the slope angle can be more than 45 degrees in that project area. The rehabilitation of feeder roads is expected to have environmental and social impacts During the construction of bridges and culverts, temporally deviation may be needed; the contractor was compensating the affected assets and will provide the completion of compensation report. The table below summarizes the key activities with possible impact and measure to be taken. Table 5: The key activities with responsible impact and measure to be taken No Activity Possible Measures Responsibility impact 1. Vegetation Loss of land, -Compensation of -RTDA will be in charge of clearance for crops assets to be affected compensating and will send a road , houses and - Implementation of compensation report with the widening any other restoration plan world bank where the properties. including tree - RTDA will be in charge of road to have planting compensation all the the 10.5 RoW affected PAPs during the road widening for project works 2. Soil Loss of land - Compensation of - RTDA will be in charge of excavation for Loss of crops affected assets compensating all the road Loss of - rehabilitation of affected PAPs and assets widening. houses. borrow pits ,we during the road widening will used the top prior to any project works. soil 3. Construction Loss of land, - Compensation of - The contractor will of culverts crops properties to be compensate assets affected and bridges. affected. due to his Erosion - Construction of mismanagement Construction caused by water channel up - The contractor will submit a of proper water to downstream to compensation completion cross drainage discharge minimize water report approved by the works on the from the impacts on the local authorities and the road constructed surrounding client. alignments structures areas and erosion. - contract provision on any Culverts and damage at the bridge downstream caused by culverts construction 4. Acquisition of Temporally - Contractor will - The contractor will submit a Page 14 of 189 camp site, loss of land compensate the compensation completion storage site, land owner, report approved by the dumping site - Proper local authorities and the and borrow implementation client. pit areas., of the restoration - The contractor will share plan prepared by proof of payment and the contractor rehabilitation pan to the and approved by client. the consultant. - As per the contract, the contractor can only acquire this for land temporary for the purpose of the project and within the project period only. 5. Operation of Air pollution, - Proper - The contractor will prepare construction safety issues implementation the required plans to equipment’s. and accident of OSHS plan indicate the impacts prepared by the caused by the operation of contractor and construction equipment’s approved by and how they will be consultant minimized. The MISPs - Sensitization will be approved by the workshop. consultant. - Preparation of management implantation strategy plans (MISPs). 3.3.1. Roads Status in the project area With the district development plan, Gakenke district road like asphalt road and feeder roads are in Gakenke, especially feeder roads had been constructed and they facilitated trade, the transportation of goods to the different markets and they link the people of all corners Gakenke district and others districts, also the access to health centers and hospitals After the rehabilitation and up grading and maintenance of feeder roads the local people was increasing the wealth care and healthcare 3.3.2. Brief Description on selected feeder roads During selection of feeder roads in Gakenke district, District have been selected based on the environmental factors social factor financial status economic factors due to the life people of Page 15 of 189 Gakenke. Gakenke started in selection of the three (3) feeder roads as the first priority with the length of 69km. The feeder roads to be rehabilitated in Gakenke District have been selected based on their importance in the economic and social life of the District’s population. In Gakenke three (3) feeder roads of 69km were given first priority. Existing structures on the road are made up of wooden logs in poor condition located at sub catchment outlet on the alignment. The alignment is predominantly on a hilly terrain following hillside alignment with steep slopes and is susceptible to landslides during rainy seasons. It is therefore better to widen this road on the hill side as widening on the valley side would require protective structures and also encounter construction difficulties. 3.3.3. Sectors crossed by the selected feeder roads in Gakenke District Gakenke District is subdivided into 19 Sectors, 97cells and 617 villages. The following table shows the sectors that are crossed by the selected feeder roads. To rehabilitate and upgrading Table 6: Sectors crossed by the selected priority feeder roads Feeder Length Road Name Sectors crossed by the roads Road N° / km KIVURUGA NEMBA FR1 Buranga-Kamubuga Base 32 KAMUBUGA GASHENYI Kivuruga-Mbatabata 18 GASHENYI Kabyaza-Nuro-Kanyiramenyo BASE NEMBA FR1 KIVURUGA Base-Masoru-Mukaje KARAMBO GAKENKE GASHENYI FR3 Gashenyi-Karambo-Kinoni KARAMBO 19 JANJA FR10 Ruhanga-Biziba BUSENGO TOTAL 69 8 The selected feeder road covered 8 Sectors in the all sector of Gakenke district the selection feeder road under rehabilitation and upgrading is passing through at least 2 two sectors Page 16 of 189 3.3.4. Feeder Road Design Standards Generally, the study of rehabilitation intends to improve the condition of the District transport network that can: ▪ Ensure an average commercial speed of 40 km/h; ▪ Reduce routine and periodic maintenance cost; and ▪ Reduce vehicle-operating costs and contribute to economic growth. The length and the required width are 4.5 meters as the road will be widened to 10.5 m of carriageway as stated in the road act. Figure 2: Location of indicated Feeder Roads in Gakenke District Page 17 of 189 4. PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE 4.1 Socio economic baseline of the District 4.1.1. Demographics Demographics Gakenke District is part of the Northern Province. The district has a population of 338, 234 inhabitants (Census 2012 final data) and extends over an area of 704.1sq.km. It covers 19 Sectors, 97 Cells, 617 villages with 81,367 households. The population density accounts for 480 inhab/sq.km, ranking the district sixteenth country- wide; this density is 16% higher than the national average (415 inhab/sq.km) and 9% lower than the Northern Province average (527 inhab/sq.km), whereas the population growth 2002-2012 has been 0.5%, significantly lower than the national average (2.6%). The district is rural with a negligible share of urban population accounting for less than 3% of total district. The population is unevenly distributed over the district area -the most populated area is the sector of Cyabingo (726 inhab/sq.km) while the least populated sector is Minazi (286 inhabitants/sq.km) in the southernmost part of the district. Also the population density and demographic growth in decade 2002-2012 are contrasted among sectors. The growth rate ranges from -0.1% in Busengo sector to 1.5% in Ruli Sector. The average household size in Gakenke District (4.2 persons/HH) is slightly below the national average household size (4.3 persons/HH). For GBV, though there are limited data, it is not a big problem in Rwanda and particularly Gakenke District. The Country has achieved impressive results in the fight against GBV, including a GBV hostile legal and policy framework that supports prevention and response to GBV, and provides an opportunity for further advancements. Currently there is study being conducted by GMO and findings on GBV prevalence in districts will be made available upon publication. The main demographic data of Gakenke District are highlighted in Table 7 below. Table 7: Population in of Gakenke District District Both Urban Rural Pop.share Area Densit House Populat Estimated Sectors Sexes Pop. Pop. (% of(Sq.ky hold ion population District m) (inhabi size growth 2015 Pop.) tants rate Gakenke 338,234 9,347 328,887 100 704.1 480 per 4.2 (2002- 354,689 0.5% Busengo 20,164 20,164 6.0 Sq.km) 4.2 38.2 528 2012) 21,145 -0.1% Coko District 16,340 16,340 4.8 55.6 294 4.3 0.7% 17,135 Page 18 of 189 Cyabingo 17,544 17,544 52. 24.2 726 4.3 -0.1% 18,398 Gakenke 22,670 3,719 18,951 6.7 41.2 551 4.2 0.8 23,773 Gashenyi 20,067 20,067 5.9 41.8 480 4.2 0.2 21,043 Janja 15,804 15,804 4.7 30.5 518 4.4 0.3 16,573 Kamubuga 20,758 20,758 6.1 34.7 598 4.3 0.8% 21,768 Karambo 12,159 12,159 3.6 21.9 556 4.1 0.4% 12,751 Kivuruga 18,226 18,226 5.4 31.3 583 4.5 0.7% 19,113 Mataba 14,346 14,346 4.2 33.2 433 4.1 0.7% 15,044 Minazi 13,527 13,527 4.0 47.2 286 4.3 -0.1% 14,185 Mugunga 19,361 19,361 5.7 29.1 665 4.1 1.3% 20,303 Muhondo 20,125 20,125 6.0 54.9 366 4.2 0.1% 21,104 Muyongwe 15,550 15,550 4.6 34.1 456 4.4 -0.1% 16,307 Muzo 21,378 21,378 6.3 46.6 459 4.2 1.1% 22,418 Nemba 15,643 2,182 13,461 4.6 22.6 691 4.2 0.8% 16,404 Ruli 18,516 3,446 15,070 5.5 46.7 397 4.0 1.5% 19,417 Rusasa 18,250 18,250 5.4 30.3 603 4.3 0.4% 19,138 Rushashi 17,806 17,806 5.3 40.1 444 4.3 0.1% 18,672 Source: National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda, 2018 4.1.2. Location of the indicated Feeder Roads in Gakenke District. The Table below depicts the Sectors and Cells crossed by the indicated feeder roads in Gakenke District. Table 8: Sectors and Cells crossed by the Selected Feeder Roads in Gakenke District. Feeder roads ID Sectors Cells Sereri Kivuruga Cyintare Karambo Gashenyi Nyancina Nemba Rutabo FR1,FR3&FR10 Buranga Mbatabata Kamubuga Kamubuga Kidommo Rukore Gakindo Janja Gashyamba Page 19 of 189 Busengo Ruhanga Kanyanza Karambo Karambo 4.1.3. Socio-economic Conditions of the District Gakenke District is part of the Northern Province. The district has a population of 338,234 inhabitants (Census 2012 final data) and extends over an area of 704.1sq.km. It covers 19 Sectors, 97 Cells, 617 villages with 81,367 households. The population density accounts for 480 inhab/sq.km, ranking the district sixteenth country-wide; this density is 16% higher than the national average (415 inhab/sq.km) and 9% lower than the Northern Province average (527 inhab/sq.km), whereas the population growth 2002-2012 has been 0.5%, significantly lower than the national average (2.6%). The district is rural with a negligible share of urban population accounting for less than 3% of total district. The population is unevenly distributed over the district area -the most populated area is the sector of Cyabingo (726 inhab/sq.km) while the least populated sector is Minazi (286 inhab./sq.km) in the southernmost part of the district. Also the population density and demographic growth in decade 2002-2012 are contrasted among sectors. The growth rate ranges from -0.1% in Busengo sector to 1.5% in Ruli Sector. The average household size in Gakenke district (4.2persons/hh) is slightly below the national average household size (4.3 persons/hh). 4.2. Population within the Right of Way The feeder roads in Gakenke district pass through scattered settlements, villages and /trading centers. The boundaries of feeder roads expansion have not been transferred on the land. In general, about 4.5m average additional width will be required for widening of road to have a right of way of 10.5 m. The widening will have impact on houses, agriculture land and other infrastructure facilities. The road widening is likely to affect a total of 1987 households. The table below shows the number of affected households and PAPs per cell and per road. Table 9: Households per selected roads in Gakenke District Feeder roads ID Lots Names Number of Households FR1 Lot 1 700 FR1 Lot 2 690 FR3 and FR10 Lot 3 597 Total 1987 Source: Field survey and Analysis, October 2021 Page 20 of 189 The population affected by the rehabilitation of the 1st priority feeder roads was 9935 PAPs had grouped into 1987 families. 4.3. Socio-economic profile of PAPs within right of way Socio-economic profile has been developed for the PAPs. Information from field visits revealed that 1987 households were likely to be affected by the project. In order to develop the socio- economic profile of the PAPs, a survey by questionnaire was used to collect the baseline data (The questionnaire is available in Annex 3). The socio-economic conditions of PAPs within right of way were discussed in subsequent sections. 4.3.1 Sex of Respondents The researcher wanted to get the views from both male and female respondents so as to avoid biasness in the responses. Both sexes (female and male) can be affected by the project differently; so, it would be unrealistic to get views from one sex. The table below shows that 79% of the PAPs are males whereas 21% are females. This shows that the majority of the respondents are of the male sex. Despite the women sensitization and involvement, there were some women who were still reluctant to respond to the questionnaire, especially those in the rural areas. Table 10: Sex of PAPs in the household surveyed Sex Number of Percentage (%) Respondents Male 1570 79% Female 417 21% Total 1987 100 Source: Field survey and Analysis, October 2021 4.3.2 Age structure of the surveyed household The age structure of the respondents was a necessary part of the research to determine whether the results of the findings are from mature persons who understand the situation. The table below gives a clear age structure of the PAPs. From the table below, it comes out that 45%of the respondents (majority) are in the range of 30-40 years. During this age, it assumed that people are more active and likely to be involved in various activities. This range is followed by the group age of 20-29, which represents 17%. The group 41-51 which has 23% is followed by the range of PAPs who have 52year and above representing 15%. These results show that the majority of respondents are mature and active; therefore, they can be reliable. Page 21 of 189 Table 11: Age of the PAPs of household surveyed Age group Number of Percentage (%) Respondents Less than 20 - - 20-29 337 16.96 30-40 889 44.74 41-51 471 23.70 Above 52 290 14.59 Total 1987 100 Source: Field survey and Analysis, October 2021 4.3.3. Education of Respondents The level of education among the PAPs is very low as revealed by the data analysis reported in Table 11. Among the respondents (PAPs), 5.1% are illiterate, primary education represents53.8 and 5.25 have incomplete secondary level. The proportion of 22.35 representing those who completed the secondary and vocational represents 10.75 The most respondents in the field survey and analysis had primary level in education. The main reason is the poverty of families that could not afford school fees and materials required for the education of their children. But nowadays, due to the government policy, elementary education is free of charge; therefore, every parent has an obligation to send his/her children to school. Table 12: Level of Education of respondents S/No. Level of education Frequency (No) Percentage (%) 1 Illiterate 101 5.08 2 Primary 1070 53.85 3 Incomplete secondary 100 5.03 4 Secondary 446 22.45 5 Secondary vocational 215 10.82 7 Higher (bachelor’s degree) 55 2.77 Total 1987 100 Source: Field survey and Analysis, October 2021 Page 22 of 189 4.3.4. Family Size of the Household of respondents Table 12: Summarizes the family size of the households’ respondents. The Analysis had indicated that 15% of the respondents’ families’ size is large, means that the size of the family is above 6 persons per household. While 68% are medium, which means that they are within the range of 4-6 in the family and 17% has small size, means between 2-4 persons per family. The average size of the household of respondents on the feeder road is between4-6. Table 13: Family Size of the Household S/No. Family size Number of respondents Percentage (%) 1 Small (2-4) 336 17 2 Medium (4-6) 1324 68 3 Large (Above 6) 327 15 Total 1987 100 Source: Field survey and Analysis, October 2021 4.3.5. Marital status of respondents The marital status of the PAP was an important parameter to know the views of different categories of people about the project. Table 14: Marital Status of Respondents in Household Surveyed S/No. Marital status Number of respondents Percentage (%) 1 Married 1570 79 2 Single 260 13 3 Widow 140 7.15 4 Divorced 17 0.85 Total 1987 100 Source: Field survey and analysis, October 2021 Table 13 above showed that the marital status of the respondents was about 79% of PAPs were married; single representing 13%, widows and 0.85% divorced. Means that the higher number of respondents in field survey were married and divorced was low in that field survey. 4.3.6 Employment status of PAP With regard to the surveyed household, about 79.01% are employed in either their own or at someone else agricultural farm. Moreover, a proportion of 9.3%, among the PAPs are traders Page 23 of 189 owning small business, which they combine with agricultural activities. This can be explained by the fact that in the District, the agricultural activities (Maize, Banana, pineapple, Sugar cane, Beans) were dominant and combined with small businesses selling the produce in the local commercial centres. The percentage of PAPs that represents “mason” was 3.88%, the students/ pupils were 5.99%; while only 1.76% of the respondents were civil servants, especially teachers in the local primary schools. Table15 described the employment status of members in the PAPs surveyed. Table 15: Employment Status of PAPs S/N Employment Frequency (No) Percentage (%) 1 Employed (in own agricultural farm) 1570 79.01 2 Pensioner 0 0 3 Student, pupil 119 5.99 4 Mason 77 3.88 5 Traders 186 9.36 6 Civil servant (Teachers) 35 1.76 7 Military Servant 0 0 Total 1987 100 Source: Field survey and analysis, October 2021 4.3.7. Vulnerability of PAPs The vulnerability and social group for individuals in the community was for a paramount importance because it gave the idea of level of vulnerability. The Table 15 had given the detail on vulnerability. The majority of the project affected population (84.6%) was in normal conditions and persons representing 3.3% are orphans, persons living with disability are represented by 0.55% and 6.7% represent aged persons. Table 16: Vulnerability in the PAPS S/No. Social group Frequency (No) Percentage (%) 1 Living with disability 11 0.55 2 Orphans 66 3.32 3 Households headed women 79 3.98 4 Aged people 72 3.62 5 People without vulnerabilities 1759 88.53 Total 1987 100 Page 24 of 189 Source: Field survey and Analysis, October 2021 4.3.8 Livestock in the surveyed household The population of Gakenke District was involved in livestock activities. There were some families who did farming activity but they did not involve in the livestock activities. The table below showed the distribution of livestock in the project area: Number of Livestock in the Family Table 16: Livestock of PAPs Livestock Type Households % with livestock Cattle 8.8 176 Sheep 4.4 88 Goats 38.8 770 Chickens 29.75 592 Ducks 0 0 No Livestock 18.25 361 Total 1987 100 Source: Field survey and Analysis, October 2021 In Table 16, Goats dominated the livestock distribution in the project area with 38.8%. And also 81.75% of the surveyed households owned at least one type of livestock and 18.25% of the surveyed households didn’t own any type of livestock 4.3.9. Economic Activity and Source of Income Table 17 provided details on the main activities and source of income of the PAPs. The main source of income among the surveyed PAPs was agriculture with 86.7%, while 12.7% was engaged into small businesses. Table 17: Economic Activity and Source of Income among the PAPs Main Sources of Income Frequency % Income from own business (Trade, construction, etc.) 39.6 786 Income from Agriculture 49.6 986 Income from rent of the house 10.8 215 Page 25 of 189 Support from other relatives 0.0 0 Income from sale of items of private property 0.0 0 Total 1987 100 Source: Field survey and Analysis, October 2021 4.3.10. Housing conditions of the PAPS Housing condition was an important variable in studying socio economic aspects of a family because it gave the idea on the living conditions of family members. The Table 18 showed the situation of the PAPs in the visited roads in Gakenke District. About 98.1% of PAPs live in their own houses, while 1.9% live in rented houses. 93.25% of these houses are built in mud bricks known as Rukarakara, while 6.75%are built with wood. 4.3.11. House Conveniences and their Conditions Table 18 summarizes the type of convenience in the house such as electricity, radio, mobile phone, private toilettes, etc. These are indicator of development. All the surveyed households (100%) have private toilette and 72.7% access to electricity. Among the surveyed households, only 21.9% PAPs use solar energy. A significant proportion of the household surveyed have mobile phones 74.8% from different telecommunication companies operating in Rwanda (MTN, TIGO - Airtel). Furthermore, the contractor was informed that almost all households have radio, and some of them have also a bicycle or a moto. Table 17: Housing Conditions House Type Frequen % House made Freque % Owner Frequ % cy in ncy ship ency Cottage/rural 0 Wood 135 6.75 Owned 1950 98.1 house Other 1987 100 Mud bricks 1852 93.25 Rented 37 1.9 (Rukarakara +Cement) Total 1987 100 1987 100 1987 100 Source: Field survey and Analysis, October 2021 Page 26 of 189 Table 18: Conveniences in the Surveyed Household and their Conditions Grid Frequ % Solar Freque % Mobile Frequen % Private Frequ % Electricit ency Energy ncy Phone cy Toilet ency y Function 1454 72.7 Function 430 21.9 Function 1495 74. Functio 1987 100 s s s 8 ns Function 0 0 Function 0 0 Function 137 6.9 Functio 0 0 with with with 5 n with interrupt interrup interrup interrup ion tion tion tion Doesn’t 0 0 Doesn’t 0 0 Doesn’t 164 8.3 Doesn’t 0 0 function function function functio n Doesn't 546 27.3 Doesn't 1557 78.1 Doesn't 190 9.9 Doesn't 0 0 exist exist exist 5 exist Total 2000 100 Total 1987 100 Total 1987 10 Total 1987 100 0 Source: Field survey and Analysis, October 2021 4.3.12. Access to social infrastructures The Contractor made an inventory of basic infrastructures along the 1st priority feeder roads in Gakenke District. The table below presented the number of schools, health centers, churches, markets and public offices by road. Table 19: Number of social infrastructure along all feeder roads in Gakenke District Basic Infrastructures Road ID Road Name Health Center School public office Market Church FR 1 Lot 1 4 7 5 6 4 FR1 Lot 2 3 8 4 5 2 FR3 & 2 4 5 3 4 Lot 3 FR10 Total 9 19 14 14 10 Source: updated Contractor Field Surveys and computation, October 2021 Alongside the selected roads, the community travel from 20minutes to one hour to the social services. During the public consultation together within the district below was the feedback from the community on the social infrastructure to be constructed under the provisional sum: Page 27 of 189 Table 19: Community on the social infrastructure to be constructed under the provisional sum S/N Names Questions during the meeting Response 1 Manirakiza Besides the road, we still have to There is a provisional sum Gedeon travel long distance to school and are under the projects congested 2 Ingabire louise Pregnant women travel distance to The project will construct the Sector’s health center in this hilly small sheath post areas and this causes infant mortality 3 Maniriho Jean Kamubuga is productive area but our Together with the district agricultural produce get rotten due to the project will construct a lack of proper post-harvest handling postharvest infrastructure to the community 4 Hakizimana The road has been widened Additional assets were Valens compared to initial pegs and our valuated and compensated houses Source: Contractor Field Surveys and computation, October 2021 4.4 RESETTLEMENT IMPLICATIONS The feeder roads in Gakenke District passed through scattered settlement, villages and towns. The boundaries of feeder roads expansion had not been transferred on the land. The widening had an impact on houses, agriculture land and other infrastructure facilities. 4.4.1 Loss of Houses The details of houses likely to be affected by road widening was presented in Table 20. The total numbers of houses that needed relocation are 75. These houses will be fully affected. Table 20: Details of House on Road Side Feeder Road Lots Names Houses No. FR 1 Lot 1 28 FR1 Lot 2 27 Page 28 of 189 FR3 & FR10 Lot 3 20 Total 75 Source: updated Contractor Field Surveys and computation, October 2021 4.4.2 Loss of Land The development in the study area brought definitely substantial change in the land use pattern as the road modification/ construction required additional land from private and government. It was estimated that to achieve the right of way, road widening required 4.08 ha for the priority feeder roads improvement. This land requirement for the road rehabilitation changed the land use permanently from barren/agricultural/built up land into road (carriageway, drainage system and tree buffer zone). This impact was permanent and irreversible. Table 21: Land acquisition for road widening Feeder Road Description Length Average Average Average Additional No. existing additional width additional area for 6.0 m and 7 m width for required for road 11.5m RoW the 10.5m (m) RoW (ha) Buranga –Kamubuga – 32 6.3 - 5.2 Base main FR1 Kivuruga-Mbatabata 8.4 5.8 0.2 4.4 2.3 Kabyaza-Nuro- 5.1 6 - 4.2 Kanyiramenyo Base-Masoru-Mukaje 4.7 5.7 1.3 6 FR10 Ruhanga-Biziba 7.8 6 - 4.5 1.01 Gashenyi-Karambo- FR3 11 5.2 0.8 4.7 0.77 Kinoni 69 5.83 2.3 29 Total 4.08 Source: updated Contractor Field Surveys and computation, October 2021 4.4.3 Loss of other structures Due to expansion there was other minor losses. The identified losses include fence, water valve chambers and water pipeline crossing the road. Page 29 of 189 Table 2: Loss of other structures Road Length Loss of live FR No. Water Taps Water Pipes Name (km) Fences (m) FR1 Lot 1 32 0 0 0 FR1 Lot 2 37 0 0 0 FR3 & FR10 Lot 3 TOTAL 69 0 0 0 Source: Contractor Field Surveys and computation, 2021 4.4.4 Loss of plantation Table 25 Summarizes the type of plantation likely crops and trees due to the expansion/widening of feeder roads in the District, considering that around 80% of the needed land is under cultivation of sweet potatoes, bananas, beans and maize the civil works started when most of them were harvested Table 23: Loss of plantation ROAD Length Name (km) Plantation(ha) NO. FR 1 LOT1 32 FR1 L OT2 18 FR3&FR10 LOT 3 19 4.08 TOTAL 69 4.08 Source: Updated Contractor Field Surveys and computation, October 2021 4.5. IMPACT ANALYSIS Analysis of impacts had been conducted. A checklist had been prepared to list the environmental and social parameters and the potential impacts. A typical checklist identifying the anticipated environmental and social impacts due to the project activities were shown in table 26. The impacts have been categorized and analyzed in the following manner: i) Nature (positive/negative, direct/indirect); Page 30 of 189 ii) Magnitude (high, moderate, low); iii) Extent/ location (area/volume covered, distribution); iv) Timing (during construction or operation, immediate; or delayed); v) Duration (short term/long term, intermittent/continuous); vi) Reversibility/irreversibility; vii) Likelihood (probability, uncertainty); and viii) Significance (local, regional, global Table 4: Impact Analysis S/ Activity Potenti Nature Magnitu Extent / Timin Durat Reversible Likeli Signifi No al de Locatio g/ ion / hood cance . Impact n Phase Irreversibl e i) Site Change Negati Medium Small Pre- Long Irreversibl Proba Region Acquisition in land ve Area/ Constr Term e bility al for road use/ Direct Large uction constructio Loss of Distribu n Land tion ii) Acquisition Loss of Negati Medium Small Pre- Long Irreversibl Proba Region of Land Crops ve Area/ Constr Term e bility al Direct Large uction Distribu tion iii) Acquisition Loss of Negati Low Small Pre- Long Irreversibl Proba Local of Land Agro- ve Area/ Constr Term e bility Forestr Direct Large uction y Distribu tion iv) Acquisition Loss of Negati Low Small Pre- Long Irreversibl Proba Local of House House/ ve Area/ Constr Term e bility Reside Direct Large uction nce Distribu tion v) Agriculture Loss of Negati Low Small Pre- Long Irreversibl Proba Region land Agricul ve Area/ Constr Term e bility al Acquisition ture Direct Large uction Produc Distribu e tion Page 31 of 189 4.5.1 Potential positive impacts The line transmission project was likely to generate positive impacts toward people living along the proposed line corridor. The anticipated ones were the following: 4.5.1.1 Employment opportunities During the project implementation, feeder roads rehabilitation works, site installation, staff quarters and offices and any other structures certainly created employment for locals in and around the project areas. Those living closer to the project will be the first one to benefit from that impact. Despite the sophisticated technical work required for the project, there was a need for manpower for the manual work. For this type of work, local citizens were the first to be employed. It was anticipated that the project may be able to draw a large number of the unskilled workforce from the local area. Temporary employment generation in this phase has the potential to contribute to poverty reduction, especially if vulnerable local people were employed such as farmers with limited land or the unemployed. The availability of alternative sources of employment was minimal, although opportunities for subsistence farming are present. Local people are therefore considered to be of medium sensitivity to employment generation impacts. Without measures to promote local employment benefits the magnitude of the impact was moderate as it was affect a small number of people and they obtained skills and experience which extended beyond the life of the Project, the impact was therefore considered to be a beneficial impact of moderate significance. 4.5.1.2 Business Opportunities and increase of income The project created opportunities for business whether they were directly or indirectly related to the project. Special procurement and bidding preferences should be given to local companies whose workers include some of the skills directly attributable to construction such as general laborers, engineers, heavy equipment operators etc. From the jobs obtained from the project, people will be able to create income generating activities or improve the existing small business because of the presence of good roads, electricity and its related facilities in the area. In the process of implementation of the feeder roads project, the agriculture activity will increase that area through the commercial activities also it will increase the household income for the local people. Feeder roads facilitated local people to transport the agricultural products to the markets direct a good impact on prices of agricultural products and livestock farming there was improving the livelihood in the area. 4.5.1.3 Improved health and Education Despite the above indicated positive impacts, the project was likely to have an indirect positive impact to the health and education in the area. The project allowed health centers to be connected Page 32 of 189 to the maintained transport facility (Feeder Road), and hence deliver effectively services to the users. The same illustration applies to the education sector. 4.5.2 Potential Adverse Negative impacts Despite the presence of positive impacts resulting from the project, the latter may also have had some adverse impacts to the people along the feeder roads alignment. 4.5.2.1 Loss of land, crops and structures The implementation of the project was certainly lead to loss of land, crops and trees and where it was inevitable, some houses or other structures will be lost. This was necessitating a resettlement process. Preliminary details about these losses are indicated in table 17. 4.5.2.2 Pressure on local services/resources and Population Changes Due to the project, there was an influx of workers from within the areas and outside the construction region. It was predicted that this Project was result in project-induced in-migration that can substantially change the context in which a project operated. Population density was quite high and there was little space for migrants to settle, thus lessening the likelihood of in- migration and concentration of migrant populations. This kind of increase in vehicle traffic and population can put a strain on a wide range of local infrastructure components such as roads, transportation systems, water, telecom and utilities, medical services, housing, etc. The construction of proposed project needed manpower that had been required for various construction activities. Keeping in view the local demography, it could be anticipated that a great number of workforces will be migrating from outside the project area. There was the potential for significant in-migration from job seekers and camp followers which, due to the existing land, resource and social service constraints and vulnerability of the host population communities, would be an adverse impact on the Project and the local communities. Local people’s vulnerability to in-migration was considered to be medium as they were already poor, and the presence of migrants may somewhat limit their ability to take advantage of Project benefits. The magnitude of the impact was minor as it was unlikely to extend beyond the life of the Project and had been limited to the Project area of influence. Mitigation and enhancement measures was aim to help this be a beneficial impact, however without mitigation, the impact of induced development was considered to be an adverse impact of minor significance. The implementation of the feeder roads project may result the impact related to gender based violence sexual exportation and abuse on the environment as well. To mitigate this, the contractor must recruit local people to prevent labor influx and GBV by conducting recruitment meetings supported by the grievance redress committees along the road at the cell level as they are the one living with community. Page 33 of 189 Having recruited local people might not be enough but within the casual labors, there will be Workers’ Grievance Redress Committees to express their complaints and the women had been represented and weekly meeting, morning briefing had been considered. The contractor prepared a GBV action plan as part of the contractor ESMP and all workers of project like contractors and labors signed the code of conduct. The GRCs also established. 4.6. PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS AND PARTICIPATION Public participation and community consultation have been taken up as an integral part of social assessment process of the project. Consultation was used as a tool to inform and educate stakeholders about the proposed action both before and after the development decisions were made. This participatory process enables the participation in the decision-making process. Initial Public consultation has been carried out in the project areas with the objectives of minimizing probable adverse impacts of the project and to achieve speedy implementation of the project through bringing in awareness among the community on the benefits of the project. The project consultations were made to consult with the public as well as a number of local authorities, to determine their thoughts, opinions and feedback on the impact of the rehabilitation of feeder roads and the most needed social infrastructures in Gakenke District. The PAPs were also provided with relevant and sufficient information on the project prior to its start-up. These stakeholders include the central and local authorities, as well as the population. Socio-economic information was obtained during informal meetings with local authorities during the field visits as well as the information obtained from field survey, public consultation was done upon the availability of the community with a clear plan a week before meeting them in the general community assemblies so called (inteko z’abaturage) that take place every Tuesday of the week country wide These general community assemblies had disturbed by COVID-19 pandemic, the general community assemblies and meetings are held to the cell offices where there was a respecting COVID-19 Prevention measures to avoiding the spreading the covid-19 One of the main concern in different meetings was about compensation of their assets, the feedback was that absolutely that every asset to be affected, and had been compensated, the project explained in details on types of compensation (in kind and cash payment) they all opted for cash payment as the land to be acquired is partial and very small belonging every individual. People who lose houses having enough space wished to stay in the neighbourhood by building new houses around, the second category of people have other residential houses and wanted cash payment, the last category is about PAPs who definitely lose houses and need to move to the settlement in the same village where there are public facilities. All consultations conducted the land valuator attended them to explain the expropriation law clauses. All the compensation cost had been added with by 5% as disruption fees put on valuation sheet during the disclosure. Page 34 of 189 The table 26 provides details of Zones and the way roads have been grouped in the zones. Table 22: Zones of Public Consultation Date of public Number S/No. Zone Cells covered consultation participants 1 Buranga Buranga 24/10/2019 100 2 Mbatabata mbatabata 24/08/2019 120 3 Kamubuga Kamubuga 23/12/2021 92 4 Gashenyi Gashenyi 18/10/2019 250 5 Gakingo Gakingo 02/10/2019 325 6 Gashamba Gashyamba 11/10/2019 246 7 Rutabo Rutabo 11/09/2019 106 8 Sereri Sereri 23/10/2021 78 9 Kanyanza Kanyanza 15/07/2021 55 10 Nyakina Nyakina 12/08/2021 161 TOTAL 1533 Source: Updated Contractor Field Surveys and computation, October 2021 4.6.1 Stakeholders and their engagement in the project implementation Involving stakeholders through participatory direct or indirect consultations was central to completion of the RAP. The stakeholders were those who had an interest in the project, and who had been involved in the further consultative process and whose opinions on the adverse impact of the project the main groups of stakeholders met are: Table 23: Stakeholders and level of engagement in the RAP implementation S/N Stakeholders consulted The level of engagement 1 Community through site Participation in the projects and expression of their meetings complains 2 Local leaders Guiding the community for full engagement and provision of the supporting documents during the compensation Page 35 of 189 2 EUCL and WASAC Implication in the public utilities and relocation where necessary 3 National/Local NGOs on Contribution in mobilization and advocacy, reporting the crosscutting issues severe cases that affects the community During the consultative process, beside the local authorities and ordinary population (mainly PAPs), other social organizations were also invited to attend the communication meetings. They were church leaders and local cooperative leaders. The public consultation for ESIA and RAP was conducted at the same time and the RAP implementation is schedules as follows: Page 36 of 189 Table 24: RAP Implementation Schedule July 2-022 June-2022 May-2021 May-2022 June 2020 May 2020 Sept 2020 Aug-2021 Nov-2021 Aug-2022 Nov-2022 Mar-2022 Aug 2020 Nov 2020 July 2020 Mar 2021 Apr-2021 Dec-2021 Apr-2022 Dec-2022 Sep-2021 Sep-2022 Dec 2020 Jun-2021 Oct-2021 Oct-2022 Feb 2021 Feb 2022 Oct 2020 Jan 2021 Jan 2022 Jul-2021 Schedule of activities: RAP approval Disclosure of RAP on RTDA website and World Bank InfoShop Sensitization of PAPS on resettlement and project impacts as per OP4.12 Formation, operationalization and capacity building of GRCs Validation and disclosure of asset valuation/values to PAPs Signing or fingerprinting approved individual valuation sheets by PAPS Compensation of PAPs in affected sectors Relocation of PAPs Grievance management Livelihood restoration Clearance of road reserve, and progress of works RAP monitoring RAP Completion Audit (to be done at end of project cycle.) Review and approval of RAP Completion Audit by the Bank Page 37 of 189 4.6.2 Public Participation – Methods and Process During these consultations, the communities were explained about the project, its benefits as well as social and environmental risks and impacts and resettlement alternatives available to the PAPs. The participants were encouraged to be open and express their concerns and claims. The presentation highlighted the project background, objectives, expected upcoming activities, social economic information, and environmental information. Moreover, the contractors explained that land would need to be taken and that this would be managed via a resettlement action plan and that compensation would be paid for losses. The people contacted are reported in Table 27, 28 and29: 4.6.3. Findings from Public Consultation Meetings The data obtained from public consultation and views as well as concerns from different stakeholders were given in details in Table 27, 28 and 29. The people who participated in the public consultation, their signed attendance sheets are available in Annex 4 and photographs are put at the end of this part. a) Consultation with District authorities and other government agencies at the district level. As earlier indicated, the District will play a critical role in the project. Thus, during the field visits, District authorities have been consulted for the purpose of raising awareness about the project and acquiring their views/ perceptions on the project. A meeting with District authorities was held on 15/11/2019 at the District headquarters as well as meetings with the Executive Secretaries of Sectors during public consultation meetings on 15/11/2019 in Gakenke district there other stakeholders that are connected to roads component and they were also consulted to work on the utilities along the roads this are EUCL and WASAC and Private Sector Federation (PSF) and other local NGOs as service providers as seen on the list of the stakeholders of Gakenke district in table3 . Table 31 shows details of the consulted authorities. The consultation of people in the borrow pits, quarry sites were also consulted to be aware of the project and its adverse impact and their mitigation measure, the excavation blasting and air pollution will be mitigated by the contractor and RTDA will monitor its implantation and rehabilitation exploited sites. Whatever assets affected will be delineated and will be paid by the contractor Table 25: Authorities Consulted in Gakenke District S/N Names Function Contact 1 Nkuranga Joseph District executive secretary 0788302738 2 Nsanzabandi Charles Division Manager of the District 0788591168 3 Makuza Jean Pierre District Road engineer 0785652885 4 Aline Mpambara District Gender family promotion officer 0788652746 Page 38 of 189 5 Nkurunziza Jean Executive Secretary of Kamubuga Sector 0781528498 Bosco 6 Eugene Uwimana Executive Secretary of of Gashenyi Sector 0781038044 7 RUHASHYA Charles Executive Secretary of Nemba Sector 0788847178 8 DIEUDONNE Executive Secretary of Busengo Sector 0788539830 Uwimana 9 Jean de Dieu Executive Secretary of kivuruga 0785036738 Twahirwa 10 GATABAZI Executive Secretary of Janja 0788894131 CELESTIN Sector Source: Survey, October 2021 The salient features of the meeting are presented below: (i) Views from the District Division Manager The Division Manager of Gakenke District supports and appreciates the “Feeder Roads Project”. He argued “Gakenke district is among the hilly terrain and we have network issues to link business in different centres and other agricultural zones” rehabilitation of the feeder roads will be an opportunity to local people because they will get jobs. Transport will be easier to the local people from home to market centres and the community will get access to the local health centres. People owning land either eligible or occupying must be given fair compensation as stipulated Views from the Road Engineer of Gakenke District The Road engineer of Gakenke District fully supports the “Feeder Roads development Project”. As a member of the project Management team that knew the status of the existing roads, in his remarks during the meeting session, he stated that the project brought a big impact in where terms or conditions where infrastructures were The benefits expected were (i) improved conditions of transporting goods and people; (ii) Opening up of the hinterland and improved access to basic socioeconomic infrastructure. (iii) Reduced risk of landslides trough the vegetation control and erosion thanks to the reinforcement and monitoring of embankments; (iii) Added value of land as a result of improved accessibility as other public facilities second once roads are only passable Page 39 of 189 (ii) Views from the Executive Secretaries of Sectors The Sector level is the key administrative level of leadership in Rwanda as all the information, activities and government policies are coordinated to the sector. The executive secretary had been key informants of the project Executive Secretaries acknowledge the huge benefits that they expected from the rehabilitation the feeder roads in Gakenke District. First they were the one to understand the project and convey the right message to the PAPs. They welcomed the project and participated in the introduction meetings at the district level. The ES of sectors were committed to organize consultation meetings, monitoring of its implementation and introduction of the contractors to the community as assured the contractors full security as the roads rehabilitations mean a lot in terms of development of sectors. b) Consultation with church Leaders During the public consultation, leaders of cooperatives and churches leaders had been consulted with the aim of raising their awareness about the project and getting their views about the project as opinion leaders Church leaders were the second channel the government uses to communicate to the community or when doing mobilization as some them provide services as the government does Table 26: Details about consulted church leaders S/N Name of the Leader Church Contact 1 Niringiyimana Samuel Seventh Day Adventist 0788886867 2 Niyibizi Alexis ADEPR 0785244191 3 Uwingabiye Alexandre Catholic 0782051359 Source: Contractor’s Survey, October 2021 C) Consultation with cooperative society leaders Roads users in rural areas were most of them members of agricultural cooperatives of (coffee, maize, potatoes, pineapple and banana etc…) like others who do transport. During the consultation process, cooperative leaders were consulted to know their feedback and opinions in decision making of their engagement in the implementation of the feeder roads project. Table 27: Details about consulted cooperative leaders S/No. Name of the Leader Cooperative name Contact 1 Hakizimana Andre KOAIGA 0788654321 2 Ndamage Alphonse CTMGA 0780987678 3 Mwumvaneza Valens TUBUBUNGABUNGE 0784345865 Source: Contractor’s Survey, October 2021 Page 40 of 189 d) Consultative Meetings with community As earlier indicated, public meetings were organized and held in different Cells after grouping close villages in one cell. Efforts were made to ensure that all prioritized feeder roads are represented in the public consultation. A total number of 1420 people (956 male and 464 female attended the meetings; and approximately 32, 6% were women the venue and dates are detailed (see in Table 26). The main objective of the public consultations was to gather information on their concerns, perceptions, reactions and fears of the livelihood changes to be brought about as a result/consequence of rehabilitation of feeder roads in Gakenke District. The specific objectives were: ▪ To create awareness of the project; ▪ To obtain beneficiaries’ feedback and concerns on the project; To obtain socio- economic and environmental information on the community After the presentations, the community was given opportunity to give their views, comments and queries. Different community problems were addressed during the meeting in which the local participants expressed repeatedly their main concerns as follows: ▪ Road safety issues; ▪ Lack of jobs and income generating activities; ▪ Very poor road conditions in some villages; ▪ Lack of sidewalk; ▪ Narrow local roads. Any comments or questions raised by stakeholders were responded and recorded. Employment opportunities in jobs associated with the rehabilitation of feeder roads was a theme brought up in the meetings. The contractor explained that positive and negative impacts of the project on people and the environment would be analysed such as air pollution, dust, influx of people, employment, traffic, road safety, etc. The contractor team highlighted that the project will follow government policies in protecting the population. All the participants confirmed that they appreciate the Feeder Roads Development Project. The project received high degree of acceptability in that rehabilitation of the roads will boost local economy due to increased usage of the roads hence more exposure and increased trading opportunities. The data obtained from public consultations and views as well as concerns from local communities are given in details in table 28. Page 41 of 189 Table 28: Summary of Feeder Roads’ Public Consultation in Gakenke District Gender category of issues and opinions by feedback from the project the community are related to: Men loosing crops and land as the only the compensation will be provided and source of income the project will only acquire land at the average of 5-to 7 meters of the existing road Influx related to the outsiders majority of casual labors will come from the local people People who don’t have permanent organization of land week to fast track land title obtaining land titles `women working contracts for women it is requirement that everyone will sign a contract and will be paid according to the number days and day remuneration will be fixed in the contract loss of houses and time for three months period for construction construction as women Source: Primary data genereted through public consultation, updated in october 2021 During public consultation following points have emerged as their recommendations: ▪ The PAPs and other stakeholders consulted were in favor of the project; ▪ The PAPs preferred financial compensation for houses and other properties likely to be affected; ▪ Most of the PAPs were looking forward to get employed by the project, and hope the project implementation to start soon. Detailed minutes of public consultation meetings, signed attendance list of people who participated in public consultation and photos are presented in appendices of this report. 5. RESETTLEMENT AND COMPENSATION STRATEGY 5.1 Institutional implementation arrangements Compensation and entitlements are particular and specific impacts resulting from the project. Article 2 and 28 of Rwanda expropriation law No 32/2015 of 11/06/2015 entitle the landholder to compensation for the value of the land and activities on the basis of size, nature location considering the prevailing market value. Page 42 of 189 The resettlement and compensation strategy primarily include the identification of affected families and land asset inventory of the Project Affected Parties (PAPs). During this exercise, the activities will be the following: I) Notification to affected parties; ii) Agreement on compensation, including agreement and further development of rehabilitation measures; and iii) Preparation of contracts, compensation payments and provision of assistance in resettlement. A detailed of full resettlement action plan will be developed and be implemented under a certain institutional arrangement. The implementation arrangements of the RAP build on: ▪ The arrangements for the overall program management is of Ministry of Infrastructure; ▪ MININFRA will associate agencies at the National, District and Local levels for co- ordination; ▪ RTDA as the main implementing agency will work in close coordination with Ministries and agencies at the National, District and Local levels for co-ordination. An institutional matrix has been prepared in this RAP for the implementation of the Resettlement Action Plan as reported in Table 30. RTDA as an implementing agency is responsible for RAP implementation through the Project Implementation Unit(PIU) at RTDA and together with the District Project Management Team (DPMT) composed of the feeder road engineer, who super heads the works, social safeguards officer who follows the implementation of RAP and the ESHS, and the district road engineer who supports in following up technical part at district level , the director of district One Stop Center, the district land valuer officer; who deals with valuation process and the district agronomist who helped in identification the most priority agricultural zone as one of focus for the project. ▪ On the district side, the district Executive Secretary was the overall monitor of the smooth implementation of the project, besides this, RTDA with the district signed the FRDP implementation agreement. Regarding the social and environmental safeguards at the central level will also support in guiding reviewing safeguards documents. They will also monitor the compliance and compensation process and the capacity of implementing the RAP; at RTDA level the project has three (3) Social Safeguards Specialists and two (2) Environmental Safeguards specialists that support the district to ensure effective implementation of RAP and environmental management plans. Page 43 of 189 Table 29: Implementing Institutions and their responsibility S/N Implementing Institution Responsibility 1 Ministry of Infrastructure Overall Management of RAP 2 MINECOFIN Guidance in accounting and Budget allocation to RTDA for compensation of PAPs’ assets 3 MININFRA and District - Identification of affected families and land asset inventory of the Project Affected People (PAPs); - Verification of PAPs - Compensation Agreements - Payments; - Monitoring and Evaluation 4 Ministry of Environment • Developing the policies and laws relating to expropriation in the public interest • Approving independent land valuers 5 Ministry of Agriculture and Animal • Sensitizing farmers in protecting the Resources (MINAGRI) right of way and proper use of feeder roads. • Participate in the planning and prioritization for feeder roads development. • Monitoring the impacts of feeder roads. 6 The Rwanda Land Management • Mapping affected areas and their and Use Authority (RLMUA) registration • Providing technical assistance to the Project and the District in assets’ identification and valuation 7 Rwanda Transport Development • Implementing agency FRDP by Authority (RTDA) guiding the technical, environmental and social component, co-client of civil works 8 Grievances Committee and Court Grievances management Page 44 of 189 Page 45 of 189 Figure 2: Organisation Structure for Resettlement Implementation GOVERNMENT OF RWANDA MINECOFIN MoE MININFRA MINALOC RTDA COMMERCIAL BANKS/ RLMUA/REMA GAKENKE OSC NGOs DISTRICT SACCOS/PAPs &RDB SECTOR CELL GRC VILLAGE CONTRACTOR PAPs Page 46 of 189 During RAP implementation, RTDA/FRDP played a key role in holding consultation meetings, approving the list of people to be affected by the feeder road project, disclosing RAP and compensation payments, following up the resettlement and compensation planning, implementation and monitoring. RTDA/FRDP has Engineers, Environmental and Social Specialists that look after engineering, environmental and social management issues for the main road contracts. At the local level, Gakenke District authorities played a critical role in supervising the feeder road project resettlement and compensation planning, implementation and monitoring. The key actors on the ground involved in implementation were the individual project Resettlement and Compensation Committees members, which will comprise representatives from RTDA/FRDP and at Sector and Cell level. This Committee will coordinate the implementation of RAPs as well as develop and implement consultation and grievance mechanisms via the District Mayor and Project Coordinator, Rwanda Feeder Road Project. 5.2 Criteria for expropriation and compensation Eligibility for compensation as a result of expropriation is enshrined in the constitution under article 35 and the Expropriation Law. The two laws regulate and give entitlement to those affected, whether or not they have written customary or formal tenure rights. The person to be expropriated is defined under article 2(8) of the Expropriation Law (Law N° 32/2015 of 11/06/2015) to mean any person or legal entity who is to have his or her private property transferred due to public interest, in which case they shall be legally entitled to payment of compensation. WB OP 4.12 requires that those who do not have formal legal rights to land at the time the census begins but have a recognized claim to such land or assets- are also eligible for compensation for the land they lose, and other assistance. Each category in the eligibility matrix has compensation calculations associated with it based on type of lost asset (type of tree, type of crop and yields, etc) (Refer Table 2). WB OP 4.12 requires that squatters (i.e. the PAPs who do not have title or valid claim to the land) are provided resettlement assistance in lieu of compensation for the land they occupy, and other assistance, as necessary, if they occupy the project area prior to a cut-off date established by the borrower and acceptable to the Bank. The establishment of a cut-off date is required to prevent opportunistic invasions/rush migration into the chosen land areas. To be eligible for compensation during the expropriation process, the following have to be considered: • The land owners (per Rwandan law and OP 4.12) where the road will be passing are permanently compensated; Page 47 of 189 • Land owners where campsite is located, water tanks station and drilling sites are fully compensated and the contractor will present the compensation report; • Crops, trees and structures identified within their plot during assets inventory carried out by the professional valuer are compensated. • Tenants or informal dwellers exploiting the unused land will be compensated for all losses other than land and will get relocation assistance • Squatters or informal dwellers who don’t have legal/formal rights will be compensated for their losses either doing business around any assets affected due to contracts’ works will be compensated and given additional assistance The article 26 of the Rwandan expropriation law indicates that persons to be expropriated must provide the proof of rights to land and property incorporated thereon including the land title and documentary evidence that he/she is the owner of property incorporated on land as well as a civil status certificate and a document evidencing his/her chosen matrimonial regime in case of a married person. 5.3 Valuation and Compensation As per the Expropriation Law, all people affected by expropriation must receive fair and just compensation. The calculation of fair and just compensation is to be calculated by independent valuers. Without prejudice to other laws, the value of land and property incorporated thereon to be expropriated in the public interest shall be calculated on the basis of their size, nature and location and the prevailing market rates. In this regard, the article 22 of the Law N°32/2015 of 11/06/2015 governing the expropriation stipulates that Land values and prices for property incorporated on land consistent with the prevailing market rates provided under this Law shall be established by the Institute of Real Property Valuers in Rwanda. However, considering the available information, it seems that the land values and prices for the property incorporated on the land are not yet published. In the meantime, there is an arrangement whereby the valuers determine the prices considering the prevailing market rates, approved by the District council in line with the article 9 of the Law N°32/2015 of 11/06/2015. Nevertheless, this RAP provides the guideline of the above ministerial order. In order to ensure that OP4.12 requirements are met for valuation, these valuation methods are to be adopted for all section of the proposed feeder roads. The following methods of calculation are adopted for assets valuation. a) Compensation for Land Page 48 of 189 Land for land and cash compensation were the compensation options. The replacement of and should be equivalent to productive value, size and located in the community or at a nearby resettlement area, with similar social and physical infrastructure systems as well as secured tenure status. For the purpose of cash compensation, land and properties on land should be valued based on the prevailing market value in the locality (local market price variations as provided by the Institute of Real Property Valuers in Rwanda). In addition, any associated costs of purchasing the land including land rates, registration fees needed to be included in the compensation calculation but covered by the district as is the updating of land title exercise is done by the one stop center at the district and free of charge to the PAP. Where land lost was only a small proportion of total land owned by the PAP, but renders the remaining land as unusable, the compensation provided should be calculated based on the total land affected (the actual land lost plus the remaining unusable land). The area that had been lost for the development of feeder roads in Gakenke District was estimated to 4.08 ha and 10.5 m of RoW were been financially compensated. b) Compensation for Crops and Trees The PAPs had been encouraged to harvest their produce before feeder road development activity. In order to ensure that this was possible, and that appropriate market prices were received for yields, there needs to be sufficient consultation beforehand so that harvesting could have been properly planned. In the event, where crops and trees could not have been harvested, compensation for loss of crops and trees had been provided as follows: • Provision of cash compensation for value of crops and trees lost, as per the Rwandan expropriation law; • Provision of good quality seed or seedlings appropriate for the resettled areas, fruit tree materials inclusive; In addition to compensation for tree and shrub losses, the planting of tree species had been done along the improved roads for the road protection and replacement of tree species lost. c) Compensation for houses and other Structures There were different options for compensating structures on land that will be expropriated. Cash compensation at full replacement value or any other form mutually agreed upon by the expropriator and the person to be expropriated are some of them (Article 35 of the Rwandan expropriation law No 32/2015 of 11/06/2015). During public consultation meeting, many of PAPs requested for cash compensation for their houses. In the project area, 75 houses will be affected by road widening activities and will be relocated. Page 49 of 189 As per the Rwandan expropriation law and results from public consultation, the PAPs in Gakenke District losing houses had been provided with cash compensation at full replacement value to build their new houses. Replacement costs had been based on: • Sizes of structures and materials used; • Average replacement costs of different types of structures based on information on the numbers and types of materials used to construct different types of structures; • Prices of materials used in the structure based on local market rates; • Transportation costs for delivery of these materials acquired for replacing the structure; • Estimates of construction of new buildings including labor required; • Any associated costs including rates, taxes, and registration fees among others. Furthermore, resettlement assistance had been provided in the form of a moving allowance (at full costs of transport expenses, land registration or transfer fees). As the Rwanda is implementing grouped settlement, affected people, living in high risk zones, will be offered plots in selected sites for house construction. e) Assistance to vulnerable people In addition to compensation allowances, the poorest vulnerable people had been facilitated to get reestablishment of livelihood activities (financial credits for equipment, health insurance, etc.). The field survey done revealed that vulnerable group (people with disability, orphan, households headed women and elderly people) represents 10% of the total project site population. The poorest vulnerable groups will be given the option to select any training they wish, which would help them to maintain and/or improve their income generation potential l. The project also worked with the District to ensure that vulnerable people within the subproject area were included among the vulnerable groups getting government support for their livelihoods. The skills training program had been designed during project implementation. Table 30: Actions to be provided for livelihood restoration of the vulnerable PAPs Livelihood Description Comment Time frame restoration options Page 50 of 189 Access to RTDA will closely work with local This will ensure First 6 Months of the medical administration to ensure the continued project insurance vulnerable PAPs receive medical physical health to implementation insurance the PAPs Off Farm Provide training to earn income in This will open up First 6 Months of the Training non-agricultural work, provision of new options for project and facilitation to access financial the PAPs to start implementation credit for equipment other income generating Improved training to generate more First 6 Months of the activities Agriculture production of subsistence crops and project produce cash crops and road implementation maintenance to be employed by the contractor during and after maintenance period of three years Option of Severely affected PAPs and those First 6 Month of the other from vulnerable groups will be project trainings of given the option to select any implementation PAPs choice training they wish, which would help them to maintain and/or improve their income generation potential. The skills training program will be designed during project implementation e) Project related job opportunities Affected persons will be prioritized in gaining employment in the works linked to the feeder roads rehabilitation. RTDA/FRDP and District will ensure that this is properly done. After confirmation of the borrow areas and access roads to the camp site, deviations; there were assets that were identified to be affected and had been compensated due to the activities listed below with the mitigation measures as broken down below: No Activity Possible impact Measures 1. Vegetation clearance Loss of land - Compensation of properties to be affected - Implementation of restoration Page 51 of 189 plan including trees planting 2. Soil excavation Loss of land Compensation of properties to be affected 3. Construction of culverts and Loss of land - Compensation of properties to bridges and construction of and erosion be affected proper cross drainage works - Construction of water channel on the alignments 4. Acquisition of camp site, Temporally loss - Contractor will compensate the storage site, dumping site and of land land owner, borrow areas - Proper implementation of the restoration plan prepared by the contractor and approved by the consultant 5. Operation of construction Air pollution, - Proper implementation of equipment safety issues OSHS plan prepared by the and accident contractor and approved by the consultant - Sensitization workshop 6. Acquisition of dumping site Loss of land, - Proper dumping storm water - Early rehabilitation and land slide - Close monitoring and relocation of HH in the vicinity Payment modalities and responsibilities of all stakeholders The article 35 of the expropriation law N° 32/2015 of 11/06/2015, stipulates that fair compensation can be paid in monetary form in the Rwandan currency or in any other form mutually agreed upon by the expropriator and the person to be expropriated. The article 38 of the expropriation law N° 32/2015 of 11/06/2015, provides that the Monetary fair compensation shall be deposited into the account of the person to be expropriated opened with a recognized locally-based bank or financial institution of his/her choice. Each PAP will be encouraged/ requested to open a bank account before the payment is done. Currently, the Saving and Credit Cooperative (SACCO) is a recognized micro-financial institution based at the Sector level and farmers are encouraged to open accounts in SACCO from their respective Sector because it is very close to their homes. In order to ensure the good governance of the compensation, the different stakeholders perform their respective responsibilities as follows: a) RTDA/ FRDP: Page 52 of 189 • Informing the District that payment was done. The payment order accompanied with the payment lists are released to the District to inform that PAPs were paid through their accounts; • Requesting for financial report from the District; • Conducting regular crosschecking visits to PAPs and banks to ensure PAPs were paid and properly use the compensation. Particular attention is given to those losing their houses and needing to construct new houses. b) District • Following up with RTDA on compensation of PAPs properties. • Requesting for financial reports from the PAPs bank/SACCOs; • Submitting the financial report to the Project; • Conducting regular crosschecking visits to PAPs and banks/SACCOs to ensure receipt of the compensation and its proper use; • Handling complaints or grievance raised by PAPs. • Participate in consultation meetings. • Participate in census and survey activities of PAPs assets to be affected. c) Financial Institution • Transfer of compensation payment to the respective PAPs bank accounts; • Producing the financial report after payment and submitting it to the District. d) PAPs • Opening up bank account in a recognized financial institution of his/her choice; • Ensure that compensation payment is used in the right way for a better livelihood than before. • Raising issue/ complaint related to compensation payment, if any. • Attend site consultation meetings and meetings with the GRCs. 5.4 Complaints Procedure The Article 33and 34 of the Expropriation Law N° 32/2015 of 11/06/2015 provides complaints procedures for individuals dissatisfied with the value of their compensation. Article 33 of the expropriation law stipulates that, within seven (7) days after the approval of the valuation report by the expropriator, any person to be expropriated who is not satisfied with the assessed value of his/her land and property incorporated thereon should indicate in writing grounds for his/her dissatisfaction with the valuation report. However, for record, the following mechanism may be adopted. • Registration of the complaint, grievance or dispute case by the Grievance Redress Committee (GRC); Page 53 of 189 • Processing of the grievance or dispute until closure was established based on evidence that acceptable action was taken by GRC; In the event where the complainant is not satisfied with action taken by GRC, the complainant will proceed to the hierarchy of the GRM to the SPIU then once not sorted out the next will be court of law • The grievance was limited to the specific levels such as community members who are also PAPs mostly farmers and the local leaders have the responsibility of assurance right of the citizen on their assets titles to them. • GBV, SEA and VAC were covered under the works contracts. The monitoring of the RAP implementation and other ESHS compliance cost was captured in the monitoring consultant contract where he/she signed an agreement with NGOs on capacity building and reporting to IOSC and RTDA for handling GBV cases 5.4.1 Grievance Redress Mechanisms Grievance redress mechanisms had been required to ensure that project affected people (PAPs) were able to raise complaints or concerns, without cost, and with the assurance of a timely and satisfactory resolution of the issue. The procedures also ensure that the entitlements are effectively transferred to the intended beneficiaries. All stakeholders had been informed of the intention to implement the grievance mechanism, and the procedure communicated before the starting of civil works. In Gakenke district, 11 grievance committees were formed and set at the cell level. These 11 district were also trained on grievance handling and leaned the channel and limited cases to handle to the other stakeholders like GBV that need higher skills, they only record the case without much details of mentioning the victim. Though the GRC got training by IOSC on gender based violence they are limited to handle this as it was part of tender document and it was covered under ongoing contract. The Grievance redress mechanism was one of the strategies that were put in place to monitor and resolve complaints that may arise during or after the Project implementation by the affected people. The feeder roads development project employed local people through the contractors. Casual labor came from the local community and complaints may arise within the site either related to (delayed payment, illegal contract termination, extra working ours) offended by the contractors, the feeder roads project will guide the formation the workers’ grievance redress committees (WGRC) “RTDA provided a grievance mechanism for workers (and their organizations,) to raise reasonable workplace concerns. RTDA informed the workers of the grievance mechanism at the time of hiring, and make it easily accessible to them. The mechanism should involve inappropriate level of management and address concerns promptly, using an Page 54 of 189 understandable and transparent process that provides feedback to those concerned, without any retribution. The Grievance redress mechanism was one of the strategies that were used for monitoring and resolving complaints that may arise Figure 3: The Grievance redresses Mechanism Structure Picture 1: Election of GRC in Gakenke Picture 2:Training of GRC in Gakenke district Page 55 of 189 Picture 3: Briefing on identification of Additional PAPs to the valuers, contractors Staff and GRC Members a) Established procedures for Grievance redress mechanism The Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) ensures that complaints were received, reviewed and addressed by the elected Grievance redress committee. The Grievance was elected by the Project affected people during the second consultation meeting to be held between the District officials, Project representative and the project affected people. The elected committee were based at the cell level and was made up of at least 7members. The PAPs select and vote for 3 candidates (President, Vice president and women and vulnerable representative); the Village leader was selected by the cell executive secretary and the PAPs, the social and environmental officers from the Contractor, Project and supervising company were also part of the elected committee. All grievances concerning non-fulfillment of contracts, levels of compensation, or seizure of assets without compensation shall be addressed to the subproject GRC and resolved in coordination with the District Administration. In practice, grievances and disputes that are most likely during the implementation of a resettlement program are the following: Page 56 of 189 ▪ Misidentification of assets or mistakes in valuing them; ▪ Disputes over plot limits, either between the affected person and the Project, or between two neighbors; ▪ Dispute over the ownership of a given asset (two individuals claim to be the owner of the same asset); ▪ Disagreement over the valuation of a plot or other asset; ▪ Successions, divorces, and other family issues, resulting in disputes between heirs and other family members, over ownership or ownership shares for a given asset; ▪ Disagreement over resettlement measures, for instance on the location of the resettlement site, on the type or standing of the proposed housing, or over the characteristics of the resettlement plot; ▪ Disputed ownership of a business (for instance where the owner and the operator are different persons), which gives rise to conflicts over the compensation sharing arrangements. ▪ Dispute over offsite impacts (for instance, runoff water from the road causing downstream damages) b) Grievance resolution approach It was encouraged to resolve the issues at Cell and Sector levels, as they were so close to the affected communities, aware of and involved in the whole process. The unsolved grievance at the cell level could been referred to the sector and the District committee. The relevant local administration will then attempt to resolve the problem (through dialogue and negotiation) within 30 days of the complaint being lodged. If the grievance was not resolved in this way, the dissatisfied party can refer the matter to the competent court. Local courts should be used. If not resolved, then the high court or court of appeal of Rwanda remains an avenue for voicing and resolving these complaints. RTDA/FRDP will follow up the aggrieved PAP at each level to ensure that the grievances are resolved. Each sector should identify one PAP to work with RTDA/FRDP, Contractor, supervising firm and the local leaders to ensure that the grievances are attended to in time. The channels of receiving complaints include presentation of complaints via face to face meetings, written complaints, telephones, email communication, third party (e.g., farmers’ organizations, Church, private sector, etc.). c) Grievance Log book Page 57 of 189 d) The GRC (Grievance Redress Committee) ensured that each complaint had an individual reference number and was appropriately tracked, and recorded actions were completed. The log was containing record of the person responsible for an individual complaint, and records dates as shown in the table below in local language as it was filled by the grievance redress committees at the cell level: COMPLAINT FORM IFISHI YO KWAKIRIRAHO IBIBAZO MU GIHE HASHYIRWA MU BIKORWA UMUSHINGA WA FRDP/ COMPLAINT FORM TO BE USED DURING FRDP IMLIMENTATION No A Itariki Uburyo Aho Ubwoko Inca Icyiciro/c Icya Igihe Aho Aho Aho m ikibazo cyatanz ikibaz bw’ mak ategory: koz cyakor bige bigez bige azi cyakiri we/ o ikibazo/ty e - we/ ewe/da ze + e + ze + na we-ho/ means cyakiri pe of y’iki Kwimur how te on imin iminsi imi /N dates on riwe/ complains bazo/ wa/displ com which si nsi 60 a on which place : sum acement plai compla 90 30/ prog m which compla where Ubusabe, mary - nt int was prog pro ress es the int was the request of Rwiyeme was raised ress gres beyo compla receive compl Impunge com za- addr bey s nd int was d aint nge, plain mirimo/ esse ond bey 60+ receive was concern t contracto d 90+ ond d receive Ikirego: raise r 30+ d court case d 1 2 Page 58 of 189 d) Monitoring Complaints The District Project team is responsible for: ✓Providing the sub-project GRC reports on a bi-weekly basis detailing the number and status of complaints; ✓ Any outstanding issues to be addressed; and ✓ Monthly reports, including analysis of the type of complaints, levels of complaints, actions to reduce complaints and initiator of such action. Transport and communication incentives of grievance redress committee is estimated at Frw3,960,000 as described in table below Table 31: Estimate transport and communication of grievance redress committee Unit price Number of Duration/ # GRC set Members per 1 Total amount per meetings per months up in grievance to be paid meeting month Gakenke committee 3000 2 15 11 4 3,960,000 6.5. Monitoring and Evaluation A monitoring and evaluation (M&E) program are required to be developed to provide feedback to project management which will help keep the programs on schedule and successful. Monitoring provides both a working system for effective implementation of the RAP by the project managers, and an information channel for the PAPs to assess how their needs are being met. The arrangements for monitoring the resettlement and compensation activities will fit the overall monitoring program of the entire proposed Resettlement Action Plan for Gakenke Feeder road development project, which will fall under the overall responsibility of the hired independent supervising firm, RTDA and District authorities. The RTDA management will have responsibility for ensuring monitoring is undertaken with the Resettlement implementation concerned team coordinating efforts. Periodic evaluations will be made in order to determine whether: (1) the PAPs have been paid in full and 120days before implementation of the project activities; (2) economic rehabilitation measures have been implemented; and (3) the PAPs have the same or higher standard of living than before. A number of objectively verifiable indicators shall be used to monitor the impacts of the compensation and resettlement activities. These indicators will be targeted at quantitatively and qualitatively measuring the physical and socio-economic status of the PAPs, to determine and guide improvement in their social wellbeing. Page 59 of 189 Suggested monitoring indicators are outlined below and include (and not limited to): ▪ Number and place of public consultation meetings held with PAPs and local authorities in preparation of or during RAP implementation; ▪ Number of PAPs effectively compensated and aggregated amount disbursed compensation (actual versus planned); ▪ Number of complaints: (total received, total justified; total non-justified. This should include the subject matter for all complaints; an explanation for non- justified complaints (total resolved at various levels including the type of agreement reached; total referred to the legal system/ Courts of Law, including a clarification on who initiated (local leaders, PAP or FRDP), the referral and the subject matter. Suggested performance/evaluation indicators include: 1. Total nature and level of all complaints received, resolved; 2. Completion of payment within, or after 2 months of estimated completion date indicated in the RAP implementation plan; ✓ Revival of affected farming activities within 4 months after the compensation payment; ✓ Submission of monitoring reports at the frequency indicated in the M/E of the RAP implementation report or quarterly. In addition, an independent audit will take place at the completion of the RAP implementation. Table 32: Resettlement and Compensation Monitoring Programme Parameter to S.No Impact be Monitored Indicator Method Frequency 1 Payment List Before the start of Amount of construction Money works and Compensation for Compensation Received/ whenever Crops and trees Received Receipt required Payment List Before the start of Amount of construction Money works and Compensation for Compensation Received/ whenever 2 Land Received Receipt required Before the start of Amount of Payment construction House and fence Compensation Money List/ works and Compensation Received Received House Title 3 following up on Page 60 of 189 the affected PAPs during construction of their new homes as required Compensation Counting of Received operational Before the start of public water construction works Number of public Compensation for taps newly and whenever water taps built public water taps built required 4 Complaints Meetings of Monthly Basis Received Grievance Number of committee resolved issues with Grievances and related dissatisfied Mechanism minutes PAPs 5 New land title Collection of Once to every obtained matching title affected land and Number of on acquired for all affected PAPs receive Land Title land to the PAPs their title updating district OSC 6.6. Community Involvement Infrastructure development projects were designed and implemented for the good of the public. It was frequently unavoidable that the implementation had immediate adverse impacts on certain members of the community. Such adverse impacts put respective households or individual at risks. Whenever such negative impacts are foreseen, a resettlement is prepared to address and mitigate against such negative impacts. The World Bank OP 4.12 stipulates that any displaced persons and their communities including any host communities should be provided with timely and relevant information and consulted on resettlement options. The communities and project- affected persons should be also offered opportunities to participate in planning, implementing and monitoring resettlement. The primary objectives to involve communities and to consult with the PAPs are to: ▪ Develop constructive public opinion that will lead to the execution of a fair and participatory project; ▪ Promote an environment for the participation and decision making of the communities in solving their own problems; Page 61 of 189 ▪ Encourage a participatory process of all entities involved in the project’s development; ▪ Develop a community participation and consultation plan for its future implementation of a final Resettlement Plan. ▪ Encourage the PAPs to be open-minded to share insight information about the land tenure, to make known their concerns and claims and to be transparently informed about the project and grievance process for their own rights and for lodging complaints. During the fieldwork, a number of community meetings, discussions, consultations, interviews were conducted within the footprint of the project with households and commercial entities that are likely to be affected by the project, with the local administration, community leaders, District staff, social workers, police officers. Individual interviews/consultations with individual PAPs were conducted, including farmers and commercial entities. 6.7. Approval and Disclosure of Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) As The OP4.12 requires the preparation of the Resettlement Action Plan, this RAP was prepared by the contractors and reviewed by the consultant and RTDA. The Government of Rwanda will submit the document to the World Bank for clearance. The clearance of the RAP will allow the Government of Rwanda disclose it locally on the famous radio and the local newspapers with a higher readership to let the public be aware within fifteen (15) days and the document will be disclosed on the RTDA website. The local disclosure will allow the World Bank disclose it on its info shop. The Rwanda Transport Development Agency will also disclose the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) by making copies available at its head office and in District/ Sectors/ Cell where the project is situated. The copies shall also be made available to the local government’s agencies, the Environmental and Social Group and other stakeholders. When there is a change on the RAP the disclose protocols will be followed. 6.8. Budgets for RAP In the event of a property loss occurring to an individual during the project implementation, this loss should result into compensation and the project has to budget for it. The article 3 (2) of the law N°32/2015 of 11/06/2015 governing expropriation stipulates that he or she should receive just compensation for his or her property loss. This entitlement is based on the figure arrived at by an accredited Institute of Real Property Valuers in Rwanda. Article 4 of this law also stipulates that any project that results in the need for expropriation for public interest shall provide for all just compensation in its budget. Through mutual arrangement, both parties can determine the mode of payment. Article 35 of the Expropriation Law provides that through an agreement between the person to expropriate and the one to be expropriated, just Page 62 of 189 compensation may either be monetary, alternative land or a building equivalent as long as either option equates to fair and just monetary compensation. In case the determination of ‘just’ compensation exceeds in value the alternative land given to the expropriated person, the difference will be paid to the expropriated person. In this context, monetary compensation will be used for the payment of feeder roads PAPs of Gakenke District. Land acquisition and compensation had been undertaken according to national legislation with particular reference to the Law on Expropriation for Reasons of Public Use. The resettlement and compensation of crops, trees, houses and land had been made as per Rwandan law and the World Bank’s policies (OP 4.12); the latter will prevail. Based on field visits, the data on compensation rates had been prepared and summarized in table 40. The estimated cost referred from the published expropriation rates by the Institute of Real Property Valuer in Rwanda (IPRV) 2018) November 2018. However, all the new cases that may arise, the valuation will refer to 2021 updated price by the Institute of Real Property Valuer in Rwanda (IRPV). Table 33: Compensation Rates for Building/House S/N House Building Unit Value (RWF) 1 Mud House Rwf/m2 40,000 2 Residential Brick House Rwf/m2 70,368 3 Commercial Brick house Rwf/m2 70,368 Table 34: Tree Compensation Budget S/N Type of tree/ crop Unit Valuation Rwf 1. Avocado (Young) FRW/Tree 3,000 2 Avocado (mature) FRW/Tree 20,000 3. Eucalyptus (Mature) FRW/Tree 6,000 Eucalyptus (Young) FRW/Tree 1,000 4. Grevillea (Mature) FRW/Tree 5,500 Grevillea (Young) FRW/Tree 1,000 5. Mango (mature) FRW/Tree 10,000 Mango (Young) 2,000 6. Goyava (Mature) FRW/Tree 10,000 Goyava (young) FRW/Tree 2,000 7. Acacia(mature) FRW/Tree 6,500 Acacia (young) FRW/Tree 1,000 8. Macadamia (Mature) FRW/Tree 30,000 Page 63 of 189 Macadamia (young) FRW/Tree 2,000 9. Cypres (Cupressus) (Mature) FRW/Tree 5,300 Cypres (Cupressus) (Young) FRW/Tree 1,000 10. Tea FRW/Tree 3,000 11. Arinus FRW/Tree 4,200 Based on the impacts earlier described, this section presents the budget/cost estimates according to the aforementioned valuation methodologies and unit value rates. The estimated budget /cost for the RAP was summarized in the table 35 Table 35: Estimated Cost/Budget for the implementation of RAP No Impact Description Unit Quanti Frequen Rate Total frw (5% ty cy disturbance allowance inclusive) A Compensation For Loss 1 Loss of Land Ha 39.231 Once 10,775,723/m2 422,742,384 2 Loss of crops and trees Ha 19.5 Once 181,893,336/m 2 354,692,000 3 Loss of house No. 75 Once 1576101/Struct 118,207,600 ure 4 Replacement of electric No. 3 Once 200123.7 600,371 poles 5 Replacement of Water No. 1 Once 200,026 200,026 Tap Sub-total 896,442,381 6 Contingencies 10% 89,644,238 Transport & Meetings 11 Continuo 3,000 3,960,000 Communication for us 11 grievance redress committees Livelihood HHs 1987 Continuo Lump sum 10,000,000 restoration for us vulnerable PAPs and displaced Grand total Rwf 1,000,046,619 The above budget was for assets compensation and the other RAPs cost like GBV, SEA and VAC is to be covered under the works contracts. The monitoring of the RAP implementation and other ESHS compliance cost is captured in the Supervision Consultant contract. Page 64 of 189 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Household socio-economic survey data sheet Microsoft Excel 97-2003 Worksheet Appendix 2: Inventory of affected assets and valuation sheet and socio economic data of PAP in Gakenke Microsoft Excel 97-2003 Worksheet Appendix 3: Valuation worksheet Microsoft Excel 97-2003 Worksheet Page 65 of 189 Appendix 4: QUESTIONNAIRE FOR SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY OF HOUSEHOLDS Questionnaire No__ Name of village________________________ Name of cell___________________________ Name of the interviewer _________________________________ Code of the interviewer_______ Date of the interview____/____/_______ INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………………………………………… … 1. H/H COMPOSITION 1.1. We would like to make the list of both the present and the absent members of your household. By household we mean the people living under the same roof and running the same household N 9. Social group 2. 3. 5.Marita 6.Educati 7.Employ 8. If Sex Age l status onal level ment employe (nu (from the status d 1. 1st degree of mbe age of 5) (aged 5 disability r of 1. and com Married above) 1. 2. 2nd degree of 1. plet 1.Non Employe disability Mal ed 2. Single literate d in the e year 1. 3. 3rd degree of 3. public s) 2.Element disability 2. Widow Employe sector ary Fem d 4. Disabled 4. 2. ale 3. Divorce 2. Employe Page 66 of 189 since childhood d Incomplet Pensione d in the up to the age of e r private 5. Not 16 secondary sector applicab 3. 5. Full orphan, le 4. Student, 3. Self- semi-orphan. Secondary pupil employe d, 6. Single 5. 4. entrepre mother/father Secondary Housewi neur vocational fe 7. Lonely 4. pensioner 6. 5. Employe Incomplet Unemplo 8. Refugee r e higher yed 9. None of 5. 7. Higher 6. abovementione Employe (bachelors Military d d at other ' or servant agricultu master's 7. Not ral farms degree) applicabl 6.Employ 8.Postgra e ed in duate own 9. Not agricultu applicable ral farm 7. Other 1 Relationship Sex Age Maratal Education Emplym Ifemploy Socia with the head status level ent ed l of the status categ household ory 2 3 4 5 6 7 Page 67 of 189 8 9 10 A. HOUSING CONDITIONS A1. What kind of a house does your family live in? Housing conditions 1.In a cottage/ rural house 2.Other (please specify) ___________ A2. What is your house made from? 1. Wood 2. Clay 3. Cement 4. Other (please specify)__________________ A3. Please indicate whether it is own or rented Owned Rented Owned by friends/relatives Squatter/informal settlement Other, please specify_______________________________________- A 4.What conveniences are there in your house, and what’s their condition? Convenience Functions Functions with Doesn’t Doesn’t interruptions function exist 1. Grid electricity 2. Solar energy (local supply) Page 68 of 189 3. Mobile phone 4. Private toilet 5. Other_____________________ A5. Please indicate the energy source used for lighting, cooking, heating. (Tick √ the source and provide the estimated monthly costs) Lighting Cooking Tic Estimated Tic Estimated k √ monthly cost (Rw k √ monthly cost (Rw Franc) Franc) Electricity Gas Wood Candle Charcoal Battery Solar energy Petrol A6. Overall, how would you evaluate your housing conditions? 1. Very good 2. Good 3. Satisfactory 4. Bad 5. Very bad 6. Don’t know/No answer A7. Which infrastructure do you have in your cell? Page 69 of 189 Convenience Functions Functions with Doesn’t Doesn’t interruptions function exist 1. Water supply 2. Public toilet 3. Market 4. Road 5. Other_____________________ A8. Which public services do you have in your cell? Time spent to get there (walking) Less than 30 30 minutes to More than 1 Name minutes 1 hour hour 1.Church/ Mosque 2. Primary school 3. Secondary school 4. Clinic/health centre 5. Area of cultural significance 6. Other, please specify A.9what is your main source of water? Source Tick one 1. Well Page 70 of 189 2. Spring 3. Piped supply 4. Public water point 5. River 6. Rainwater 7. Buy water 8. Other (please specify)________________ A10. How many of each type of livestock does your family own? Type Number Cattle Sheep Goats Chickens Ducks Other (please specify) B. EDUCATION B1. Did any of your household members attend an educational institution (1.kindergarten, 2.primary school, 3.secondary,4. higher educational institution, 5.technical school, others specify.) during the past 12 months? Yes 2. No (Pass on to C1) B2. How many members of No 1 2 3 4 5 6 your HH who attended the one following kind of an institution? / do they attend? /Up to 6 members/ Page 71 of 189 Kindergarten 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Primary school 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Secondary school 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Higher educational institution 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Technical school 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Other (please 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 specify)____________________ __ C. HEALTH and HEALTH CARE C1. Did any members of your household suffer from the following disease/maladies in the past six months (Yes/N0). If yes, please tell us how many of the household members were affected by each? Number of household members Disease/ Malady affected TB Malaria Skin Rash Diarrhea Bilharizia Respiratory infection Gastroenteritis Others (specify)………………………….. C2. Was there any case during the past 12 months when you or any of your household members medical help but didn’t get it? Yes No (Pass on to C3) Page 72 of 189 C3. If yes, what were the reasons for not getting medical help? (INTERVIEWER: Please circle not more than two). High official payment rates for treatment. High non-official payment rates for treatment. Distrust towards medical services. Distance No health insurance Other (please specify) ______________________________________ Don’t know D. NUTRITION D1. How often does your family eat per day? Once Twice Three times D2. How often does your family eat… Per year Per month Per week Per day Meat Fruit/vegetables Dairy Eggs D3. Do you feel the amount your family has to eat is… More than enough Enough Page 73 of 189 Sometimes not enough Frequently not enough E. OCCUPATION AND OTHER INCOME SOURCES OF HOUSEHOLDS E1. Which are the main sources of income of your family? Tick the answer from the list provided. /INTERVIEWER: provide Card D1accepting maximum three answers based on ranking/ Permanent waged employment Short term employment Income from own business Income from rent Self-employment income (not including farming) Income from agriculture Remittances from family members, relatives living/working abroad Income from offspring living in Rwanda Support from other relatives living in Rwanda Pensions/allowances Income from sale of items of private property Money Borrowing Other(Please specify) ____________________________ THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION IN THIS SURVEY! Page 74 of 189 Page 75 of 189 Appendix 5: Photographs and Attendance of Public Consultation Meetings in Gakenke Public Consultation on Lot 1 kamubuga Sector Public consultation for additional PAPs on Lot1kamubuga Sector Page 76 of 189 Appendix 6: List of Participants in Public Consultation Meetings Page 77 of 189 Page 78 of 189 Page 79 of 189 Page 80 of 189 Page 81 of 189 Page 82 of 189 Page 83 of 189 Page 84 of 189 Page 85 of 189 Page 86 of 189 Page 87 of 189 Page 88 of 189 Page 89 of 189 Page 90 of 189 Page 91 of 189 Page 92 of 189 Page 93 of 189 Page 94 of 189 Page 95 of 189 Page 96 of 189 Page 97 of 189 Page 98 of 189 Page 99 of 189 Page 100 of 189 Page 101 of 189 Page 102 of 189 Appendix 5: Minutes of Public Consultation INYANDIKO MVUGO KU INAMA Y, UBUKANGURAMBAGA KWIKORWA RY, UMUHANDA: GASHENYI – KARAMBO - KINONI Itariki: 05 Ukwakira 2021 Akagali: Kanyanza Isaha yo gutangira: 15:00pm Isaha yasorejweho: 16:30 pm Abitabiriye Inama: ➢ Uhagarariye nyiri imihanda irimo kubakwa ( Akarere Ka Gakenke) ➢ Umukozi ushinzwe imibereho myiza muri CHICO ➢ Umuyobozi wa Kagali ka Kanyanza ➢ Abaturage b’ Akagali ka Kanyanza [Abagabo:37&Abagore:29] ❖ IBYAGOMBAGA KUGANIRWAHO 1. GUKANGURIRA ABATURAGE GUKOMEZA KUGIRA URUHARE MUMIGENDEKERE MYIZA YIYUBAKWA RY’UMUHANDA GASHENYI – KARAMBO – KINONI, HANAREBERWA HABWE IBITARAGENZE CYANGWA IBITAGENDA NEZA NUKO BYAKOSORWA KUGIRANGO BIDAKOMA 2. MUNKORA IKORWA RY’UMUHANDA. 3. GUHA UMWANYA ABATURAGE BAKABAZA IBIBAZO BIJYANYE NIBYO BABA BADASOBANUKIWE 4. KWAKIRA IBYIFUZO BYABATURAGE KU IYUBAKWA RY’ UMUHANDA GASHENYI – KARAMBO - KINONI Page 103 of 189 ▪ UKO INAMA YAGENZE Inama yatangiye umuyobozi wakagali aha ikazi abari bitabiriye inama ubundi asaba abaturage gukurikira neza ibiza kuvugirwa munama ubundi atangiza inama kumugaragaro aho uwaruhagarariye rwiyemeza mirimo ndetse numukozi wakarere ushinzwe ikorwa ry’umuhanda batangiye kuganira nabari bitabiriye inama kuri buringingo yari yateguwe kuganirwaho nkuko bigaragara hasi. 1. GUKANGURIRA ABATURAGE GUKOMEZA KUGIRA URUHARE MUMIGENDEKERE MYIZA YIYUBAKWA RY’UMUHANDA GASHENYI – KARAMBO – KINONI, HANAREBERWA HABWE IBITARAGENZE CYANGWA IBITAGENDA NEZA NUKO BYAKOSORWA KUGIRANGO BIDAKOMA MUNKORA IKORWA RY’UMUHANDA. Umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda yatangiye yibutsa abaturage ko igikorwa cy’ umuhanda urimo kubakwa (Gashenyi – Karambo – Kinoni) ari gahunda yafashwe kugirango abanyagakenke boroherezwe ubuhahirane hagati yabo nutundi duce baturanye natwo nkuko bagiye babibwirwa munama zitandukanye zagiye ziba nambere yuko ikorwa ry’umuhanda wavuzwe hejuru ritangira. muriyinama uwari uhagarariye akarere yafashe numwanya ahumuriza abaturage bari bagitegereje inyishyu kubijyanye n’ imitungo yabo babaruriwe nyamara bakaba bagitegereje ingurane yayo, Kuriki kibazo yababwiyeko mugihe imitungo yabo yabaruwe ntampamvu yokugira ubwoba kuko leta idashobora kubambura ababwirako mugihe kitarambiranye bazaba bishyuwe, yakomeje anashishikariza abagifite ibibazo byerekeranye nibyangombwa kubishaka kuko nabyo biri mubitinza kwishyurwa kwabo. Umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda mukarere yibukije abari bitabiriye inama ko hari komite igizwe byibura n’abantu 5 bishyiriyeho abasaba kuyigana igihe cyose bahuye nikibazo giturutse kwikorwa ry’umuhanda byumwihariko kubindi bintu bishobora kuba byakwangirika mugihe cyikorwa ry’ umuhanda nyamara bitarabaruwe yaboneyeho gusaba narwiyemezamirimo gukomeza kugira imikoranire niyo komite kugirango hatazagira umuturage ugira ikibazo kigatinda kubonerwa igisubizo , ubundi yasoje asezeranya abari bitabiriye inama ko nkakarere nabo bazakomeza kubaba hafi ndetse ko hazakorwa igishoboka cyose kugirango imirimo yiyubakwa ry’umuhanda wavuzwe hejuru rigende neza ntawe uhutajwe byumwihariko umuturage. Page 104 of 189 Umukozi wa rwiyemeza mirimo ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage yafashe umwanya yunga muryo umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda maze abwira abari bitabiriye inama ko rwiyemeza mirimo yifuza gokora nabo umunsi kumunsi byumwihari gukorana na komite yabo yokumuhanda ishinzwe gukurikirana ibibazo bigenda bivuka kumuhanda bikagira ingaruka kubaturage, yavuzeko rwiyemeza mirimo icyo akeneye aruko imirimo yakorwa muburyo butabangamiye banyiri umuhanda aribo abaturage avugako, yongeyeho ko nomugihe haba hari ikibazo cyavutes yiteguye gukorana na komite yavuzwe hejuru maze kigashakirwa ikibazo gikwiye ubundi imirimo igakomeza mumutuzo no mumahoro. Umukozi wa rwiyemeza mirimo (CHICO) ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage yabwiye abari bitabiriye inama ko azajya agera kumuhanda kenshi gashoboka kugirango akurikirane niba ntabibazo abaturage barimo guhura nabyo biturutse kwikorwa ry’umuhanda byumwihariko imitungo yabo ishobora kwangizwa nibikorwa bya rwiyemeza mirimo gusa yongeyehoko ikingenzi aruko haba imikoranire yaburimunsi hagatiye ndetse nakomite nkemurampaka (GRC) yokumuhanda kugirango hatagira ikibazo kivuka ntukimenyekane kuko adashobora kugera kuri burimuntu wagize ikibazo nyamara bikaba bishobokako binyuze murizo komite burikibazo cyose cyavutse cyamenyekana kugihe ndetse kigakemuka umuturage atagomye gusiragira. Umukozi wa rwiyemeza mirimo ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage ndetse nabakozi yasoje asaba abaturage gufatanya narwiyemeza mirimo bagakumira ikintu cyose cyateza impanuka, ahangaha basabwe cyane cyane kurinda abana ndetse namatungo kujya mumuhanda kuko ari bimwe mubishobora guteza impanuka zishobora nogutwara ubuzima bwabo tutibagiwe nibyabo, ikindi yongeyeho nuko imyitwarire mibi yabamwe nkubusinzi ndetse nikoreshwa ryibiyobya bwenjye nabyo bishobora kuba intandaro zimanuka abagira inama yokubigendera kure. • UMWANYA W’IBIBAZO N’ IBISUBIZO BYABYO IKIBAZO 1: Abaturage babajije kumazu yabo yegereye umuhanda ariko zikaba zitarabaruwe mumazu azangizwa nikorwa ry’umuhanda kandi mubyukuri bakaba babonako zishobora kuzangirika cyangwa zikaba zanasenyuka bitewe nikorwa ry’umuhanda. IGISUBIZO 1: Kuri iki kibazo, bamazwe impungenge bibutswako ikorwa ry’umuhanda rikurikiranwa umunsi kumunsi kuburyo igihe havuka ikibazo icyaricyo cyose byumwihariko nkinzu ishobora kujya mumanegeka bitewe nikorwa ry’umuhanda cyahita cyigwaho ndetse byabangombwa iyonzu ikaba yanabarurwa ubundi nyirayo akishyurwa nkuko abandi bishyuwe. Page 105 of 189 IKIBAZO 2: Abaturage babajije kubijyanye n’ibyangombwa by’ubutaka baba batarabonera ibyangombwa bya burundu bitewe nuko bagomba gukora ihererekanya bubasha kubutaka nabanyirabwo kandi banyirabwo babamwe bakaba batakiriho cyangwa batari murwanda IGISUBIZO 2: Basubijweko iki bagomba kwegera inzego zitandukanye zibifite munshingano zikabereka inzira bagomba gucamo kugirango babashe kubona uburenganzira kurubwo butaka bityo bakabona uko bishyurwa. IKIBAZO 3: Ikindi kibazo cyabajijwe n’ikijyanye n’igihe ababariwe ariko bakaba batarishyurwa bazishyurirwa kugirango babashe kwiteza imbere bakoresheje ayo mafaranga bazishyurwa.. IGISUBIZO 3: Aha abaturage basubijweko mumpera zuyumwaka wa 2021 abatarabonye amafaranga yabo kandi bakaba barabaruriwe kandi bakaba bujuje ibyangombwa bazaba batangiye kwakira inyishyu yabo kumitungo yabo. • IBYIFUZO Abaturage bifuje ko bahabwa akazi kuko babonaga ko batarimo kubona akazi aribensh, rwiyemeza uhagarariye rwiyemeza mirimo yabasezeranyije ko uko akazi kazakomeza kugenda kaboneka baza komeza kugenda bahabwa akazi. Ikindi cyifuzo cyatanzwe nuko bifuzako umuhanda Gashenyi – Karambo – Kinoni washyirwamo kaburimbo, ubishinzwe mukarere yabasubije ko ibyobyose bikorwa hagendewe kubushobozi buba bwabonetse asoza ababwirako uko ubushobozi buzajya bugenda buboneka imihanda irimo gushyirarwamo laterite nka Gashenyi – Karambo – Kinoni izajya igenda ishyirwamo kaburimbo kuko ari ninyungu nokuri leta. Page 106 of 189 INYANDIKO MVUGO KU INAMA Y, UBUKANGURAMBAGA KWIKORWA RY, UMUHANDA: KIVURUGA- MBATABATA Itariki: 24 Ugushyingo 2021 Akagali: Mbatabata Isaha yo gutangira: 15:00pm Isaha yasorejweho: 16:30 pm Abitabiriye Inama: c) Umukozi wakarere ushinzwe iyubakwa ryimihanda mukarere ( Akarere Ka Gakenke) d) Umukozi ushinzwe imibereho myiza muri CHICO e) Umuyobozi wa Kagali ka Mbatabata f) Abaturage b’ Akagali ka Mbatabata [Abagabo:32 & Abagore: 30] ❖ IBYAGOMBAGA KUGANIRWAHO a. GUKANGURIRA ABATURAGE GUKOMEZA KUGIRA URUHARE MUMIGENDEKERE MYIZA YIYUBAKWA RY’UMUHANDA KIVURUGA - MBATABATA, HANAREBERWA HABWE IBITARAGENZE CYANGWA IBITAGENDA NEZA NUKO BYAKOSORWA KUGIRANGO BIDAKOMA MUNKORA IKORWA RY’UMUHANDA. b. GUHA UMWANYA ABATURAGE BAKABAZA IBIBAZO BIJYANYE NIBYO BABA BADASOBANUKIWE c. KWAKIRA IBYIFUZO BYABATURAGE KU IYUBAKWA RY’ UMUHANDA KIVURUGA- MBATABATA Page 107 of 189 ❖ UKO INAMA YAGENZE Inama yatangiye umuyobozi wakagali aha ikazi abari bitabiriye inama ubundi asaba abaturage gukurikira neza ibiza kuvugirwa munama ubundi atangiza inama kumugaragaro aho uwaruhagarariye rwiyemeza mirimo ndetse numukozi wakarere ushinzwe ikorwa ry’umuhanda batangiye kuganira nabari bitabiriye inama kuri buringingo yari yateguwe kuganirwaho nkuko bigaragara hasi. 1. GUKANGURIRA ABATURAGE GUKOMEZA KUGIRA URUHARE MUMIGENDEKERE MYIZA YIYUBAKWA RY’UMUHANDA KIVURUGA - MBATABATA, HANAREBERWA HABWE IBITARAGENZE CYANGWA IBITAGENDA NEZA NUKO BYAKOSORWA KUGIRANGO BIDAKOMA MUNKORA IKORWA RY’UMUHANDA. Umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda yatangiye yibutsa abaturage ko igikorwa cy’ umuhanda urimo kubakwa (KIVURUGA - MBATABATA) ari gahunda yafashwe kugirango abanyagakenke boroherezwe ubuhahirane hagati yabo nutundi duce baturanye natwo nkuko bagiye babibwirwa munama zitandukanye zagiye ziba nambere yuko ikorwa ry’umuhanda wavuzwe hejuru ritangira. muri iyi nama yafashe numwanya ahumuriza abaturage bari bagitegereje inyishyu kubijyanye n’ imitungo yabo babaruriwe nyamara bakaba bagitegereje ingurane yayo, Kuriki kibazo yababwiyeko mugihe imitungo yabo yabaruwe ntampamvu yokugira ubwoba kuko leta idashobora kubambura ababwirako mugihe kitarambiranye bazaba bishyuwe, yakomeje anashishikariza abagifite ibibazo byerekeranye nibyangombwa kubishaka kuko nabyo biri mubitinza kwishyurwa kwabo. Umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda mukarere yibukije abari bitabiriye inama ko hari komite igizwe byibura n’abantu 5 bishyiriyeho abasaba kuyigana igihe cyose bahuye nikibazo giturutse kwikorwa ry’umuhanda byumwihariko kubindi bintu bishobora kuba byakwangirika mugihe cyikorwa ry’ umuhanda nyamara bitarabaruwe yaboneyeho gusaba narwiyemezamirimo gukomeza kugira imikoranire niyo komite kugirango hatazagira umuturage ugira ikibazo kigatinda kubonerwa igisubizo , ubundi yasoje asezeranya abari bitabiriye inama ko nkakarere nabo bazakomeza kubaba hafi ndetse ko hazakorwa igishoboka cyose kugirango imirimo yiyubakwa ry’umuhanda wavuzwe hejuru igende neza ntawe uhutajwe byumwihariko umuturage. Page 108 of 189 Umukozi wa rwiyemeza mirimo ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage yafashe umwanya yunga muryo umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda maze abwira abari bitabiriye inama ko rwiyemeza mirimo yifuza gokora nabo umunsi kumunsi byumwihari gukorana na komite yabo yokumuhanda ishinzwe gukurikirana ibibazo bigenda bivuka kumuhanda bikagira ingaruka kubaturage, yavuzeko rwiyemeza mirimo icyo akeneye aruko imirimo yakorwa muburyo butabangamiye banyiri umuhanda aribo abaturage avugako, yongeyeho ko nomugihe haba hari ikibazo cyavutes yiteguye gukorana na komite yavuzwe hejuru maze kigashakirwa ikibazo gikwiye ubundi imirimo igakomeza mumutuzo no mumahoro. Umukozi wa rwiyemeza mirimo (CHICO) ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage yabwiye abari bitabiriye inama ko azajya agera kumuhanda kenshi gashoboka kugirango akurikirane niba ntabibazo abaturage barimo guhura nabyo biturutse kwikorwa ry’umuhanda byumwihariko imitungo yabo ishobora kwangizwa nibikorwa bya rwiyemeza mirimo gusa yongeyehoko ikingenzi aruko haba imikoranire yaburimunsi hagatiye ndetse nakomite nkemurampaka (GRC) yokumuhanda kugirango hatagira ikibazo kivuka ntukimenyekane kuko adashobora kugera kuri burimuntu wagize ikibazo nyamara bikaba bishobokako binyuze murizo komite burikibazo cyose cyavutse cyamenyekana kugihe ndetse kigakemuka umuturage atagomye gusiragira. Umukozi wa rwiyemeza mirimo ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage ndetse nabakozi yasoje asaba abaturage gufatanya narwiyemeza mirimo bagakumira ikintu cyose cyateza impanuka, ahangaha basabwe cyane cyane kurinda abana ndetse namatungo kujya mumuhanda kuko ari bimwe mubishobora guteza impanuka zishobora nogutwara ubuzima bwabo tutibagiwe nibyabo, ikindi yongeyeho nuko imyitwarire mibi yabamwe nkubusinzi ndetse nikoreshwa ryibiyobya bwenjye nabyo bishobora kuba intandaro zimanuka abagira inama yokubigendera kure. Page 109 of 189 2. UMWANYA W’IBIBAZO N’ IBISUBIZO BYABYO IKIBAZO 1: Abaturage babajije kumazu yabo yegereye umuhanda ariko zikaba zitarabaruwe mumazu azangizwa nikorwa ry’umuhanda kandi mubyukuri bakaba babonako zishobora kuzangirika cyangwa zikaba zanasenyuka bitewe nikorwa ry’umuhanda. IGISUBIZO 1: Kuri iki kibazo, bamazwe impungenge bibutswako ikorwa ry’umuhanda rikurikiranwa umunsi kumunsi kuburyo igihe havuka ikibazo icyaricyo cyose byumwihariko nkinzu ishobora kujya mumanegeka bitewe nikorwa ry’umuhanda cyahita cyigwaho ndetse byabangombwa iyonzu ikaba yanabarurwa ubundi nyirayo akishyurwa nkuko abandi bishyuwe. IKIBAZO 2: Abaturage babajije kubijyanye n’ibyangombwa by’ubutaka baba batarabonera ibyangombwa bya burundu bitewe nuko bagomba gukora ihererekanya bubasha kubutaka nabanyirabwo kandi banyirabwo babamwe bakaba batakiriho cyangwa batari murwanda IGISUBIZO 2: Basubijweko iki bagomba kwegera inzego zitandukanye zibifite munshingano zikabereka inzira bagomba gucamo kugirango babashe kubona uburenganzira kurubwo butaka bityo bakabona uko bishyurwa. IKIBAZO 3: Ikindi kibazo cyabajijwe n’ikijyanye n’igihe ababariwe ariko bakaba batarishyurwa bazishyurirwa kugirango babashe kwiteza imbere bakoresheje ayo mafaranga bazishyurwa.. IGISUBIZO 3: Aha abaturage basubijweko mumpera zuyumwaka wa 2021 abatarabonye amafaranga yabo kandi bakaba barabaruriwe kandi bakaba bujuje ibyangombwa bazaba batangiye kwakira inyishyu yabo kumitungo yabo. 3. IBYIFUZO Icyifuzo cyatanzwe nuko bifuzako umuhanda KIVURUGA - MBATABATA washyirwamo kaburimbo, ubishinzwe mukarere yabasubije ko ibyobyose bikorwa hagendewe kubushobozi buba bwabonetse asoza ababwirako uko ubushobozi buzajya bugenda buboneka imihanda irimo gushyirarwamo laterite nka KIVURUGA - MBATABATA izajya igenda ishyirwamo kaburimbo kuko ari ninyungu nokuri leta. Page 110 of 189 INYANDIKO MVUGO KU INAMA Y, UBUKANGURAMBAGA KWIKORWA RY, IMIHANDA: GASHENYI – KARAMBO – KINONI & BASE – MASORO - KAJEVUBA Itariki: 16 Ugushyingo 2021 Akagali: Nyacyina Isaha yo gutangira: 15:00pm Isaha yasorejweho: 16:30 pm Abitabiriye Inama: ➢ Uhagarariye nyiri imihanda irimo kubakwa ( Akarere Ka Gakenke) ➢ Umukozi ushinzwe imibereho myiza muri CHICO ➢ Umuyobozi wa Kagali ka Nyacyina ➢ Abaturage b’ Akagali ka Nyacyina [Abagabo:27&Abagore:31] ❖ IBYAGOMBAGA KUGANIRWAHO 1. GUKANGURIRA ABATURAGE GUKOMEZA KUGIRA URUHARE MUMIGENDEKERE MYIZA YIYUBAKWA RY’IMIHANDA GASHENYI – KARAMBO – KINONI & BASE – MASORO – KAJEVUBA HANAREBERWA HABWE IBITARAGENZE CYANGWA IBITAGENDA NEZA NUKO BYAKOSORWAKUGIRANGOBIDAKOMAMUNKORAIKORWA RY’UMUHANDA. 2. GUHA UMWANYA ABATURAGE BAKABAZA IBIBAZO BIJYANYE NIBYO BABA BADASOBANUKIWE 3. KWAKIRA IBYIFUZO BYABATURAGE KU IYUBAKWA RY’IMIHANDA GASHENYI – KARAMBO – KINONI & BASE – MASORO – KAJEVUBA Page 111 of 189 • UKO INAMA YAGENZE Inama yatangiye umuyobozi wakagali aha ikazi abari bitabiriye inama ubundi asaba abaturage gukurikira neza ibiza kuvugirwa munama ubundi atangiza inama kumugaragaro aho uwaruhagarariye rwiyemeza mirimo ndetse numukozi wakarere ushinzwe ikorwa ry’umuhanda batangiye kuganira nabari bitabiriye inama kuri buringingo yari yateguwe kuganirwaho nkuko bigaragara hasi. 1. GUKANGURIRA ABATURAGE GUKOMEZA KUGIRA URUHARE MUMIGENDEKERE MYIZA YIYUBAKWA RY’IMIHANDA GASHENYI – KARAMBO – KINONI & BASE – MASORO – KAJEVUBA , HANAREBERWA HABWE IBITARAGENZE CYANGWA IBITAGENDA NEZA NUKO BYAKOSORWA KUGIRANGO BIDAKOMA MUNKORA IKORWA RY’UMUHANDA. Umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda yatangiye yibutsa abaturage ko igikorwa cy’ imihanda irimo kubakwa ari gahunda yafashwe kugirango abanyagakenke byumwihariko abatuye akagali ka Nyacyina boroherezwe ubuhahirane hagati yabo nutundi duce baturanye nkuko bagiye babibwirwa munama zitandukanye zagiye ziba nambere yuko ikorwa ry’umuhanda wavuzwe hejuru ritangira. muri iyi nama yafashe numwanya ahumuriza abaturage bari bagitegereje inyishyu kubijyanye n’ imitungo yabo babaruriwe nyamara bakaba bari bagitegereje ingurane yayo, Kuriki kibazo cyari gifitwe nabenshi yababwiyeko mugihe imitungo yabo yabaruwe ntampamvu yokugira ubwoba kuko leta idashobora kubambura ababwirako muruku kwezi amafaranga yatangiye gusohoka konabo atarageraho muminsi mike batangira kuyabona , yakomeje anashishikariza abagifite ibibazo byerekeranye nibyangombwa kubishaka kuko nabyo biri mubitinza kwishyurwa kwabo. Umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda mukarere yabibukije abari bitabiriye inama ko hari komite igizwe byibura n’abantu 5 bishyiriyeho abasaba kuyigana igihe cyose bahuye nikibazo giturutse kwikorwa ry’umuhanda byumwihariko kubindi bintu bishobora kuba byakwangirika mugihe cyikorwa ry’ umuhanda nyamara bitarabaruwe yaboneyeho gusaba narwiyemeza mirimo gukomeza kugira imikoranire niyo komite kugirango hatazagira umuturage ugira ikibazo kigatinda kubonerwa igisubizo , ubundi yasoje asezeranya abari bitabiriye inama ko nkakarere nabo bazakomeza kubaba hafi ndetse ko hazakorwa igishoboka cyose kugirango imirimo yiyubakwa ry’umuhanda wavuzwe hejuru rigende neza buburo bwose. Page 112 of 189 Umukozi wa rwiyemeza mirimo ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage yafashe umwanya yunga muryo umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda maze abwira abari bitabiriye inama ko rwiyemeza mirimo yifuza gokora nabo umunsi kumunsi byumwihari gukorana na komite yabo yokumuhanda ishinzwe gukurikirana ibibazo bigenda bivuka kumuhanda bikagira ingaruka kubaturage, yavuzeko rwiyemeza mirimo icyo akeneye aruko imirimo yakorwa muburyo butabangamiye banyiri umuhanda aribo abaturage avugako, yongeyeho ko nomugihe haba hari ikibazo cyavutes yiteguye gukorana na komite yavuzwe hejuru maze kigashakirwa ikibazo gikwiye ubundi imirimo igakomeza mumutuzo no mumahoro. Umukozi wa rwiyemeza mirimo (CHICO) ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage yabwiye abari bitabiriye inama ko azajya agera kumuhanda kenshi gashoboka kugirango akurikirane niba ntabibazo abaturage barimo guhura nabyo biturutse kwikorwa ry’umuhanda byumwihariko imitungo yabo ishobora kwangizwa nibikorwa bya rwiyemeza mirimo gusa yongeyehoko ikingenzi aruko haba imikoranire yaburimunsi hagatiye ndetse nakomite nkemurampaka (GRC) yokumuhanda kugirango hatagira ikibazo kivuka ntukimenyekane kuko adashobora kugera kuri burimuntu wagize ikibazo nyamara bikaba bishobokako binyuze murizo komite burikibazo cyose cyavutse cyamenyekana kugihe ndetse kigakemuka umuturage atagomye gusiragira. Umukozi wa rwiyemeza mirimo ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage ndetse nabakozi yasoje asaba abaturage gufatanya narwiyemeza mirimo bagakumira ikintu cyose cyateza impanuka, ahangaha basabwe cyane cyane kurinda abana ndetse namatungo kujya mumuhanda kuko ari bimwe mubishobora guteza impanuka zishobora nogutwara ubuzima bwabo tutibagiwe nibyabo, ikindi yongeyeho nuko imyitwarire mibi yabamwe nkubusinzi ndetse nikoreshwa ryibiyobya bwenjye nabyo bishobora kuba intandaro zimanuka abagira inama yokubigendera kure. • UMWANYA W’IBIBAZO N’ IBISUBIZO BYABYO IKIBAZO 1: Abaturage babajije kumazu yabo yegereye umuhanda ariko zikaba zitarabaruwe mumazu azangizwa nikorwa ry’umuhanda kandi mubyukuri bakaba babonako zishobora kuzangirika cyangwa zikaba zanasenyuka bitewe nikorwa ry’umuhanda. IGISUBIZO 1: Kuri iki kibazo, bamazwe impungenge bibutswako ikorwa ry’umuhanda rikurikiranwa umunsi kumunsi kuburyo igihe havuka ikibazo icyaricyo cyose byumwihariko nkinzu ishobora kujya mumanegeka bitewe nikorwa ry’umuhanda cyahita cyigwaho ndetse byabangombwa iyonzu ikaba yanabarurwa ubundi nyirayo akishyurwa nkuko abandi bishyuwe. IKIBAZO 2: Abaturage babajije kubijyanye n’ibyangombwa by’ubutaka baba batarabonera ibyangombwa bya burundu bitewe nuko bagomba gukora ihererekanya bubasha kubutaka nabanyirabwo kandi banyirabwo babamwe bakaba batakiriho cyangwa batari murwanda Page 113 of 189 IGISUBIZO 2: Basubijweko iki bagomba kwegera inzego zitandukanye zibifite munshingano zikabereka inzira bagomba gucamo kugirango babashe kubona uburenganzira kurubwo butaka bityo bakabona uko bishyurwa. IKIBAZO 3: Ikindi kibazo cyabajijwe n’ikijyanye n’igihe ababariwe ariko bakaba batarishyurwa bazishyurirwa kugirango babashe kwiteza imbere bakoresheje ayo mafaranga bazishyurwa.. IGISUBIZO 3: Aha abaturage basubijweko mumpera zuyumwaka wa 2021 abatarabonye amafaranga yabo kandi bakaba barabaruriwe kandi bakaba bujuje ibyangombwa bazaba batangiye kwakira inyishyu yabo kumitungo yabo. 1. IBYIFUZO Abaturage batanze icyifuzo cyuko umuhanda Gashenyi – Karambo – Kinoni washyirwamo Kaburimbo nkuko kumuhanda Base – Masoro – Kajevuba bizagenda gusa hano ubishinzwe mukarere yababwiyeko bizakorwa uko ubushobozi buzagenda buboneka kuko ari ninyungu kuri leta. Page 114 of 189 INYANDIKO MVUGO KU INAMA Y, UBUKANGURAMBAGA KWIKORWA RY, UMUHANDA: RUHANGA - BIZIBA Itariki: 02 Ugushyingo 2021 Akagali: Ruhanga Isaha yo gutangira: 15:00pm Isaha yasorejweho: 16:30 pm Abitabiriye Inama: ➢ Umukozi wakarere ushinzwe iyubakwa ry’ imihanda mukarere ka Gakenke ➢ Umukozi ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage muri CHICO ➢ Umuyobozi wa Kagali ka Ruhanga ➢ Abaturage b’ Akagali ka Ruhanga [Abagabo:31 & Abagore:21] ❖ IBYAGOMBAGA KUGANIRWAHO 1. GUKANGURIRA ABATURAGE GUKOMEZA KUGIRA URUHARE MUMIGENDEKERE MYIZA YIYUBAKWA RY’UMUHANDA RUHANGA - BIZIBA, HANAREBERWA HABWE IBITARAGENZE CG IBITAGENDA NEZA NUKO BYAKOSORWA KUGIRANGO BIDAKOMA MUNKORA IKORWA RY’UMUHANDA RUHANGA - BIZIBA. 2. GUHA UMWANYA ABATURAGE BAKABAZA IBIBAZO BIJYANYE NIBYO BABA BADASOBANUKIWE 3. KWAKIRA IBYIFUZO BYABATURAGE KU IYUBAKWA RY’ UMUHANDA Page 115 of 189 • UKO INAMA YAGENZE Inama yatangiye umuyobozi wakagali aha ikaze abari bitabiriye inama ubundi asaba abaturage gukurikira neza ibiza kuvugirwa munama ubundi atangiza inama kumugaragaro aho uwaruhagarariye rwiyemeza mirimo ndetse numukozi wakarere ushinzwe ikorwa ry’imihanda batangiye kuganira nabari bitabiriye inama kuri buringingo yari yateguwe kuganirwaho nkuko bigaragara hasi. 1. GUKANGURIRA ABATURAGE GUKOMEZA KUGIRA URUHARE MUMIGENDEKERE MYIZA YIYUBAKWA RY’UMUHANDA RUHANGA - BIZIBA, HANAREBERWA HABWE IBITARAGENZE CYANGWA IBITAGENDA NEZA NUKO BYAKOSORWA KUGIRANGO BIDAKOMA MUNKORA IKORWA RY’UMUHANDA. Umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda yatangiye yibutsa abaturage ko igikorwa cy’ umuhanda urimo kubakwa (RUHANGA - BIZIBA) ari gahunda yafashwe kugirango abanyagakenke boroherezwe ubuhahirane hagati yabo nutundi duce baturanye nkuko bagiye babibwirwa munama zitandukanye zagiye ziba nambere yuko ikorwa ry’umuhanda wavuzwe hejuru ritangira. muriyinama yafashe numwanya ahumuriza abaturage bari bagitegereje inyishyu kubijyanye n’ imitungo yabo babaruriwe nyamara mugihe inama yabaga bakaba bari bagitegereje ingurane yayo cyane cyaneko aribenshi cyane kuruwo muhanda ugereranyije nokuyindi mihanda ababwirako mugihe imitungo yabo yabaruwe ntampamvu yokugira ubwoba kuko leta idashobora kubambura ababwirako mugihe cyitarambiranye batangira kwishyurwa, yakomeje anashishikariza abagifite ibibazo byerekeranye nibyangombwa byumwihariko ibyubutaka ( Land ownership certificate) kubishaka kuko nabyo biri mubitinza kwishyurwa kwabo. Umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda yibukije abari bitabiriye inama ko hari komite ( GRC) igizwe byibura n’abantu 5 bishyiriyeho abasaba kuyigana igihe cyose bahuye nikibazo giturutse kwikorwa ry’umuhanda byumwihariko kubindi bintu bishobora kuba byakwangirika mugihe cyikorwa ry’ umuhanda nyamara bitarabaruwe mbere, yaboneyeho nogusaba rwiyemezamirimo gukomeza kugira imikoranire yaburigihe niyo komite kugirango hatazagira umuturage ugira ikibazo kigatinda kubonerwa igisubizo , ubundi yasoje asezeranya abari bitabiriye inama ko nkakarere nabo bazakomeza kubabahafi ndetse ko hazakorwa igishoboka cyose kugirango imirimo yiyubakwa ry’umuhanda wavuzwe hejuru rigende neza. Page 116 of 189 Umukozi wa rwiyemezamirimo ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage yafashe umwanya yunga muryo umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda maze abwira abari bitabiriye inama ko rwiyemezamirimo yifuza gokorananabo umunsi kumunsi byumwihari gukorana na komite yabo nkemurampaka ( GRC) kugirango ibibazo bigenda bivuka kumuhanda bikagira ingaruka kubaturage bikemukire igihe kandi muburyo bukwiye, yavuzeko rwiyemeza mirimo icyo akeneye aruko imirimo yakorwa muburyo butabangamiye banyiri umuhanda aribo abaturage yongeyeho ko nomugihe haba hari ikibazo cyavutse rwiyemezamirimo yiteguye gukorana na komite yavuzwe hejuru maze kigashakirwa igisubizo gikwiye ubundi imirimo igakomeza mumutuzo no mumahoro. Umukozi wa rwiyemeza mirimo (CHICO) ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturajye yabwiye abari bitabiriye inama ko azajya agera kumuhanda kenshi gashoboka kugirango akurikirane niba ntabibazo abaturage barimo guhura nabyo biturutse kwikorwa ry’umuhanda byumwihariko imitungo yabo ishobora kwangizwa nibikorwa bya rwiyemezamirimo gusa yongeyehoko ikingenzi aruko haba imikoranire yaburimunsi hagatiye ndetse nakomite nkemurampaka (GRC) yokumuhanda kugirango hatagira ikibazo kivuka ntikimenyekane kuko adashobora kugera kuri burimuntu wagize ikibazo nyamara bikaba bishobokako binyuze murizo komite burikibazo cyose cyavutse cyamenyekana kugihe ndetse kigakemuka umuturage atagomye gusiragira. Umukozi wa rwiyemezamirimo ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage ndetse nabakozi yasoje asaba abaturage gufatanya narwiyemeza mirimo bagakumira ikintu cyose cyateza impanuka, ahangaha basabwe cyane cyane kurinda abana ndetse namatungo kujya mumuhanda kuko ari bimwe mubishobora guteza impanuka zishobora nogutwara ubuzima bwabo tutibagiwe nibyabo, ikindi yongeyeho nuko imyitwarire mibi yabamwe nkubusinzi ndetse nikoreshwa ryibiyobya bwenjye nabyo bishobora kuba intandaro zimanuka abagira inama yokubigendera kure nokumenyesha abayobozi babo uwobaba bakeka ko acuruza cyangwa akoresha ibiyobyabwenjye. Page 117 of 189 • UMWANYA W’IBIBAZO N’ IBISUBIZO BYABYO IKIBAZO 1: Abaturage babajije ikizakorwa kugirango amazi azajya ava mumuhanda atazabangiriza imyaka. IGISUBIZO 1: Abibaza icyo kibazo basubijwe ko ahobizagaragarako hazanyuzwa amazi ava mumuhanda kandi kubusanzwe hakaba hatari inzira yamazi imitungo yaho izabarurwa ubundi nyirayo akishyurwa. IKIBAZO 2: Abaturage babajije kumazu yabo yegereye umuhanda ariko zikaba zitarabaruwe mumazu azangizwa nikorwa ry’umuhanda kandi mubyukuri bakaba babonako zishobora kuzangirika cyangwa zikaba zanasenyuka bitewe nikorwa ry’umuhanda. IGISUBIZO 2: Kuri iki kibazo, bamazwe impungenge bibutswako ikorwa ry’umuhanda rikurikiranwa umunsi kumunsi kuburyo igihe havuka ikibazo icyaricyo cyose byumwihariko nkinzu ishobora kujya mumanegeka bitewe nikorwa ry’umuhanda cyahita cyigwaho ndetse byabangombwa iyonzu ikaba yanabarurwa ubundi nyirayo akishyurwa nkuko abandi bishyuwe. IKIBAZO 3: Abaturage babajije kubijyanye n’ibyangombwa by’ubutaka baba batarabonera ibyangombwa bya burundu bitewe nuko bagomba gukora ihererekanya bubasha kubutaka nabanyirabwo kandi banyirabwo babamwe bakaba batakiriho cyangwa batari murwanda IGISUBIZO 3: Basubijweko iki bagomba kwegera inzego zitandukanye zibifite munshingano zikabereka inzira bagomba gucamo kugirango babashe kubona uburenganzira kurubwo butaka bityo bakabona uko bishyurwa. IKIBAZO 4: Ikindi kibazo cyabajijwe n’ikijyanye n’igihe ababariwe ariko bakaba batarishyurwa bazishyurirwa kugirango babashe kwiteza imbere bakoresheje ayo mafaranga bazishyurwa.. IGISUBIZO 4: Aha abaturage basubijweko mumpera zuyumwaka wa 2021 abatarabonye amafaranga yabo kandi bakaba barabaruriwe kandi bakaba bujuje ibyangombwa bazaba batangiye kwakira inyishyu yabo kumitungo yabo. ✓ IBYIFUZO Abaturage bifuje ko bahabwa akazi kuko babonaga ko batarimo kubona akazi aribenshi, umukozi wa rwiyemezamirimo yabasezeranyije ko uko akazi kazakomeza kugenda kaboneka baza komeza kugenda bahabwa akazi kuko akazi gahari kugeza ubu arako guhanga umuhanda kandi kakaba gakorwa namamashini gusa yaboneyeho kubwira abaturage bari bitabiriye inama ko imiryango ifunguye kubaba bafite uruhushya ndetse nuburambe rmugutwara imodoka cyangwa gukoresha imashini zikoreshwa muguhanga umuhanda. Page 118 of 189 INYANDIKO MVUGO KU INAMA Y, UBUKANGURAMBUGA KWIKORWA RY, UMUHANDA: RUHANGA - BIZIBA Itariki: 26 Ukwakira 2021 Akagali: Gakindo saha yo gutangira: 15:00pm Isaha yasorejweho: 16:30 pm Abitabiriye Inama: Umukozi wakarere ushinzwe iyubakwa ry’im ihanda mukarere ka Gakenke Umukozi ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage muri CHICO Umuyobozi wa Kagali ka Gakindo Abaturage b’ Akagali ka Gakindo [Abagabo:29 & Abagore:33] IBYAGOMBAGA KUGANIRWAHO 1. GUKANGURIRA ABATURAGE GUKOMEZA KUGIRA URUHARE MUMIGENDEKERE MYIZA YIYUBAKWA RY’UMUHANDA RUHANGA - BIZIBA, HANAREBERWA HABWE IBITARAGENZE CG IBITAGENDA NEZA NUKO BYAKOSORWA KUGIRANGO BIDAKOMA MUNKORA IKORWA RY’UMUHANDA RUHANGA - BIZIBA. ✓ GUHA UMWANYA ABATURAGE BAKABAZA IBIBAZO BIJYANYE NIBYO BABA BADASOBANUKIWE ✓ KWAKIRA IBYIFUZO BYABATURAGE KU IYUBAKWA RY’ UMUHANDA WAVUZWE HEJURU. Page 119 of 189 UKO INAMA YAGENZE Inama yatangiye umuyobozi wakagali aha ikaze abari bitabiriye inama ubundi asaba abaturage gukurikira neza ibiza kuvugirwa munama ubundi atangiza inama kumugaragaro aho uwaruhagarariye rwiyemeza mirimo ndetse numukozi wakarere ushinzwe ikorwa ry’imihanda batangiye kuganira nabari bitabiriye inama kuri buringingo yari yateguwe kuganirwaho nkuko bigaragara hasi. (iii) GUKANGURIRA ABATURAGE GUKOMEZA KUGIRA URUHARE MUMIGENDEKERE MYIZA YIYUBAKWA RY’UMUHANDA RUHANGA - BIZIBA, HANAREBERWA HABWE IBITARAGENZE CYANGWA IBITAGENDA NEZA NUKO BYAKOSORWA KUGIRANGO BIDAKOMA MUNKORA IKORWA RY’UMUHANDA. Umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda yatangiye yibutsa abaturage ko igikorwa cy’ umuhanda urimo kubakwa (RUHANGA - BIZIBA) ari gahunda yafashwe kugirango abanyagakenke boroherezwe ubuhahirane hagati yabo nutundi duce baturanye nkuko bagiye babibwirwa munama zitandukanye zagiye ziba nambere yuko ikorwa ry’umuhanda wavuzwe hejuru ritangira. muriyinama uhagarari akarere yafashe numwanya ahumuriza abaturage bari bagitegereje inyishyu kubijyanye n’ imitungo yabo babaruriwe nyamara mugihe inama yabaga bakaba bari bagitegereje ingurane yayo cyane cyaneko aribenshi kuruwo muhanda ugereranyije nokuyindi mihanda ababwirako mugihe imitungo yabo yabaruwe ntampamvu yokugira ubwoba kuko leta idashobora kubambura ababwirako mugihe cyitarambiranye batangira kwishyurwa, yakomeje anashishikariza abagifite ibibazo byerekeranye nibyangombwa byumwihariko ibyubutaka ( Land ownership certificate) kubishaka kuko nabyo biri mubitinza kwishyurwa kwabo. Umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda yibukije abari bitabiriye inama ko hari komite ( GRC) igizwe byibura n’abantu 5 bishyiriyeho abasaba kuyigana igihe cyose bahuye nikibazo giturutse kwikorwa ry’umuhanda byumwihariko kubindi bintu bishobora kuba byakwangirika mugihe cyikorwa ry’ umuhanda nyamara bitarabaruwe mbere, yaboneyeho nogusaba rwiyemezamirimo gukomeza kugira imikoranire yaburigihe niyo komite kugirango hatazagira umuturage ugira ikibazo kigatinda kubonerwa igisubizo , ubundi yasoje asezeranya abari bitabiriye inama ko nkakarere nabo bazakomeza kubabahafi ndetse ko hazakorwa igishoboka cyose kugirango imirimo yiyubakwa ry’umuhanda wavuzwe hejuru rigende neza. Page 120 of 189 Umukozi wa rwiyemezamirimo ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage yafashe umwanya yunga muryo umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda maze abwira abari bitabiriye inama ko rwiyemezamirimo yifuza gokorananabo umunsi kumunsi byumwihari gukorana na komite yabo nkemurampaka ( GRC) kugirango ibibazo bigenda bivuka kumuhanda bikagira ingaruka kubaturage bikemukire igihe kandi muburyo bukwiye, yavuzeko rwiyemeza mirimo icyo akeneye aruko imirimo yakorwa muburyo butabangamiye banyiri umuhanda aribo abaturage yongeyeho ko nomugihe haba hari ikibazo cyavutse rwiyemezamirimo yiteguye gukorana na komite yavuzwe hejuru maze kigashakirwa igisubizo gikwiye ubundi imirimo igakomeza mumutuzo no mumahoro. Umukozi wa rwiyemeza mirimo (CHICO) ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturajye yabwiye abari bitabiriye inama ko azajya agera kumuhanda kenshi gashoboka kugirango akurikirane niba ntabibazo abaturage barimo guhura nabyo biturutse kwikorwa ry’umuhanda byumwihariko imitungo yabo ishobora kwangizwa nibikorwa bya rwiyemezamirimo gusa yongeyehoko ikingenzi aruko haba imikoranire yaburimunsi hagatiye ndetse nakomite nkemurampaka (GRC) yokumuhanda kugirango hatagira ikibazo kivuka ntikimenyekane kuko adashobora kugera kuri burimuntu wagize ikibazo nyamara bikaba bishobokako binyuze murizo komite burikibazo cyose cyavutse cyamenyekana kugihe ndetse kigakemuka umuturage atagomye gusiragira. Umukozi wa rwiyemezamirimo ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage ndetse nabakozi yasoje asaba abaturage gufatanya narwiyemeza mirimo bagakumira ikintu cyose cyateza impanuka, ahangaha basabwe cyane cyane kurinda abana ndetse namatungo kujya mumuhanda kuko ari bimwe mubishobora guteza impanuka zishobora nogutwara ubuzima bwabo tutibagiwe nibyabo, ikindi yongeyeho nuko imyitwarire mibi yabamwe nkubusinzi ndetse nikoreshwa ryibiyobya bwenjye nabyo bishobora kuba intandaro zimanuka abagira inama yokubigendera kure nokumenyesha abayobozi babo uwobaba bakeka ko acuruza cyangwa akoresha ibiyobyabwenjye. Page 121 of 189 • UMWANYA W’IBIBAZO N’ IBISUBIZO BYABYO IKIBAZO 1: Abaturage babajije ikizakorwa kugirango amazi azajya ava mumuhanda atazabangiriza imyaka. IGISUBIZO 1: Abibaza icyo kibazo basubijwe ko ahobizagaragarako hazanyuzwa amazi ava mumuhanda kandi kubusanzwe hakaba hatari inzira yamazi imitungo yaho izabarurwa ubundi nyirayo akishyurwa. IKIBAZO 2: Abaturage babajije kubijyanye n’ibyangombwa by’ubutaka baba batarabonera ibyangombwa bya burundu bitewe nuko bagomba gukora ihererekanya bubasha kubutaka nabanyirabwo kandi banyirabwo babamwe bakaba batakiriho cyangwa batari murwanda IGISUBIZO 2: Basubijweko uwaba afite icyokibazo agomba kwegera inzego zitandukanye zibifite munshingano zikamwereka inzira agomba gucamo kugirango abashe kubona uburenganzira kurubwo butaka bityo akabona uko yishyurwa nkabandi. IKIBAZO 3: Ikindi kibazo cyabajijwe n’ikijyanye n’igihe ababariwe ariko bakaba batarishyurwa bazishyurirwa. IGISUBIZO 3: Aha abaturage basubijweko mumpera zuyumwaka wa 2021 abatarabonye amafaranga yabo kandi bakaba barabaruriwe kandi bakaba bujuje nibyangombwa bazaba batangiye kwakira inyishyu kumitungo yabo. • IBYIFUZO Abaturage bifuje ko bahabwa akazi kuko babonaga ko batarimo kubona akazi aribenshi, umukozi wa rwiyemezamirimo yabasezeranyije ko uko akazi kazakomeza kugenda kaboneka baza komeza kugenda bahabwa akazi kuko akazi gahari kugeza ubu arako guhanga umuhanda kandi kakaba gakorwa namamashini gusa yaboneyeho kubwira abaturage bari bitabiriye inama ko imiryango ifunguye kubaba bafite uruhushya ndetse nuburambe rmugutwara imodoka cyangwa gukoresha imashini zikoreshwa muguhanga umuhanda. Page 122 of 189 INYANDIKO MVUGO KU INAMA Y, UBUKANGURAMBAGA KWIKORWA RY, IMIHANDA: KIVURUGA- MBATABATA HAMWE NUMUHANDA KABYAZA – NTURO - KANYIRAMENYO Itariki: 18 Ugushyingo 2021 Akagali: Kamubuga Isaha yo gutangira: 15:00pm Isaha yasorejweho: 16:30 pm Abitabiriye Inama: Umukozi wakarere ushinzwe iyubakwa ryimihanda mukarere ( Akarere Ka Gakenke) Umukozi ushinzwe imibereho myiza muri CHICO Umuyobozi wa Kagali ka Kamubuga Abaturage b’ Akagali ka Kamubuga [Abagabo:41 & Abagore: 19] IBYAGOMBAGA KUGANIRWAHO 1. GUKANGURIRA ABATURAGE GUKOMEZA KUGIRA URUHARE MUMIGENDEKERE MYIZA YIYUBAKWA RY’IMUHANDA KIVURUGA – MBATABATA & KABYAZA – NTURO - KANYIRAMENYO HANAREBERWA HABWE IBITARAGENZE CYANGWA IBITAGENDA NEZA NUKO BYAKOSORWA KUGIRANGO BIDAKOMA MUNKORA IKORWA RY’IYOMIHANDA YOSE INYURA MURAKO KAGALI KA MBATABATA. ▪ GUHA UMWANYA ABATURAGE BAKABAZA IBIBAZO BIJYANYE NIBYO BABA BADASOBANUKIWE ▪ KWAKIRA IBYIFUZO BYABATURAGE KU IYUBAKWA RY’ IMIHANDA KIVURUGA- MBATABATA & KABYAZA – NTURO - KANYIRAMENYO Page 123 of 189 UKO INAMA YAGENZE Inama yatangiye umuyobozi wakagali aha ikazi abari bitabiriye inama ubundi asaba abaturage gukurikira neza ibiza kuvugirwa munama ubundi atangiza inama kumugaragaro aho uwaruhagarariye rwiyemeza mirimo ndetse numukozi wakarere ushinzwe ikorwa ry’umuhanda batangiye kuganira nabari bitabiriye inama kuri buringingo yari yateguwe kuganirwaho nkuko bigaragara hasi. • GUKANGURIRA ABATURAGE GUKOMEZA KUGIRA URUHARE MUMIGENDEKERE MYIZA YIYUBAKWA RY’ IMIHANDA KIVURUGA- MBATABATA & KABYAZA – NTURO - KANYIRAMENYO, HANAREBERWA HABWE IBITARAGENZE CYANGWA IBITAGENDA NEZA NUKO BYAKOSORWA KUGIRANGO BIDAKOMA MUNKORA IKORWA RY’RYIYO MIHANDA. Umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda yatangiye yibutsa abaturage ko igikorwa cyokubaka imihanda yavuzwe hejuru ari gahunda yafashwe kugirango abanyagakenke byumwihariko abaturage ba mbatabata boroherezwe ubuhahirane hagati yabo nutundi duce baturanye natwo nkuko bagiye babibwirwa munama zitandukanye zagiye ziba nambere yuko imirimo yokubaka iyomihanda itangira. muri iyi nama yafashe numwanya ahumuriza abaturage bari bagitegereje inyishyu kubijyanye n’ imitungo yabo babaruriwe nyamara bakaba bagitegereje ingurane yayo, Kuriki kibazo yababwiyeko mugihe imitungo yabo yabaruwe ntampamvu yokugira ubwoba kuko leta idashobora kubambura ababwirako mugihe kitarambiranye bazaba bishyuwe, yakomeje anashishikariza abagifite ibibazo byerekeranye nibyangombwa kubishaka kuko nabyo biri mubitinza kwishyurwa kwabo. Umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda mukarere yibukije abari bitabiriye inama ko hari komite igizwe byibura n’abantu 5 bishyiriyeho abasaba kuyigana igihe cyose bahuye nikibazo giturutse kwikorwa ry’umuhanda byumwihariko kubindi bintu bishobora kuba byakwangirika mugihe cyikorwa ry’ umuhanda nyamara bitarabaruwe yaboneyeho gusaba narwiyemezamirimo gukomeza kugira imikoranire niyo komite kugirango hatazagira umuturage ugira ikibazo kigatinda kubonerwa igisubizo , ubundi yasoje asezeranya abari bitabiriye inama ko nkakarere nabo bazakomeza kubaba hafi ndetse ko hazakorwa igishoboka cyose kugirango imirimo yiyubakwa ry’umuhanda wavuzwe hejuru igende neza ntawe uhutajwe byumwihariko umuturage. Page 124 of 189 Umukozi wa rwiyemeza mirimo ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage yafashe umwanya yunga muryo umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda maze abwira abari bitabiriye inama ko rwiyemeza mirimo yifuza gokora nabo umunsi kumunsi byumwihari gukorana na komite yabo yokumuhanda ishinzwe gukurikirana ibibazo bigenda bivuka kumuhanda bikagira ingaruka kubaturage, yavuzeko rwiyemeza mirimo icyo akeneye aruko imirimo yakorwa muburyo butabangamiye banyiri umuhanda aribo abaturage avugako, yongeyeho ko nomugihe haba hari ikibazo cyavutes yiteguye gukorana na komite yavuzwe hejuru maze kigashakirwa ikibazo gikwiye ubundi imirimo igakomeza mumutuzo no mumahoro. Umukozi wa rwiyemeza mirimo (CHICO) ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage yabwiye abari bitabiriye inama ko azajya agera kumuhanda kenshi gashoboka kugirango akurikirane niba ntabibazo abaturage barimo guhura nabyo biturutse kwikorwa ry’umuhanda byumwihariko imitungo yabo ishobora kwangizwa nibikorwa bya rwiyemeza mirimo gusa yongeyehoko ikingenzi aruko haba imikoranire yaburimunsi hagatiye ndetse nakomite nkemurampaka (GRC) yokumuhanda kugirango hatagira ikibazo kivuka ntukimenyekane kuko adashobora kugera kuri burimuntu wagize ikibazo nyamara bikaba bishobokako binyuze murizo komite burikibazo cyose cyavutse cyamenyekana kugihe ndetse kigakemuka umuturage atagomye gusiragira. Umukozi wa rwiyemeza mirimo ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage ndetse nabakozi yasoje asaba abaturage gufatanya narwiyemeza mirimo bagakumira ikintu cyose cyateza impanuka, ahangaha basabwe cyane cyane kurinda abana ndetse namatungo kujya mumuhanda kuko ari bimwe mubishobora guteza impanuka zishobora nogutwara ubuzima bwabo tutibagiwe nibyabo, ikindi yongeyeho nuko imyitwarire mibi yabamwe nkubusinzi ndetse nikoreshwa ryibiyobya bwenjye nabyo bishobora kuba intandaro zimanuka abagira inama yokubigendera kure. Page 125 of 189 1. UMWANYA W’IBIBAZO N’ IBISUBIZO BYABYO IKIBAZO 1: Abaturage babajije kumazu yabo yegereye umuhanda ariko zikaba zitarabaruwe mumazu azangizwa nikorwa ry’umuhanda kandi mubyukuri bakaba babonako zishobora kuzangirika cyangwa zikaba zanasenyuka bitewe nikorwa ry’umuhanda. IGISUBIZO 1: Kuri iki kibazo, bamazwe impungenge bibutswako ikorwa ry’umuhanda rikurikiranwa umunsi kumunsi kuburyo igihe havuka ikibazo icyaricyo cyose byumwihariko nkinzu ishobora kujya mumanegeka bitewe nikorwa ry’umuhanda cyahita cyigwaho ndetse byabangombwa iyonzu ikaba yanabarurwa ubundi nyirayo akishyurwa nkuko abandi bishyuwe. IKIBAZO 2: Abaturage babajije kubijyanye n’ibyangombwa by’ubutaka baba batarabonera ibyangombwa bya burundu bitewe nuko bagomba gukora ihererekanya bubasha kubutaka nabanyirabwo kandi banyirabwo babamwe bakaba batakiriho cyangwa batari murwanda IGISUBIZO 2: Basubijweko iki bagomba kwegera inzego zitandukanye zibifite munshingano zikabereka inzira bagomba gucamo kugirango babashe kubona uburenganzira kurubwo butaka bityo bakabona uko bishyurwa. IKIBAZO 3: Ikindi kibazo cyabajijwe n’ikijyanye n’igihe ababariwe ariko bakaba batarishyurwa bazishyurirwa kugirango babashe kwiteza imbere bakoresheje ayo mafaranga bazishyurwa.. IGISUBIZO 3: Aha abaturage basubijweko mumpera zuyumwaka wa 2021 abatarabonye amafaranga yabo kandi bakaba barabaruriwe kandi bakaba bujuje ibyangombwa bazaba batangiye kwakira inyishyu yabo kumitungo yabo. - IBYIFUZO Icyifuzo cyatanzwe nuko bifuzako umuhanda KIVURUGA - MBATABATA washyirwamo kaburimbo nkuko umuhanda KABYAZA – NTURO – KANYIRAMENYO uzayishyirwamo, ubishinzwe mukarere yabasubije ko ibyobyose bikorwa hagendewe kubushobozi buba bwabonetse asoza ababwirako uko ubushobozi buzajya bugenda buboneka imihanda irimo gushyirarwamo laterite nka KIVURUGA - MBATABATA izajya igenda ishyirwamo kaburimbo kuko ari ninyungu nokuri leta. Page 126 of 189 INYANDIKO MVUGO KU INAMA Y, UBUKANGURAMBUGA KWIKORWA RY, UMUHANDA: BASE - MASORO - KAJEVUBA Itariki: 12 Ukwakira 2021 Akagali: Rutabo Isaha yo gutangira: 15:00pm Isaha yasorejweho: 16:30 pm Abitabiriye Inama: Uhagarariye nyiri imihanda irimo kubakwa ( Akarere Ka Gakenke) Umukozi ushinzwe imibereho myiza muri CHICO Umuyobozi wa Kagali ka Rutabo Abaturage b’ Akagali ka Rutabo [Abagabo:32 &Abagore:15] IBYAGOMBAGA KUGANIRWAHO 1. GUKANGURIRA ABATURAGE GUKOMEZA KUGIRA URUHARE MUMIGENDEKERE MYIZA YIYUBAKWA RY’UMUHANDA BASE - MASORO - KAJEVUBA, HANAREBERWA HABWE IBITARAGENZE CG IBITAGENDA NEZA NUKO BYAKOSORWA KUGIRANGO BIDAKOMA MUNKORA IKORWA RY’UMUHANDA BASE - MASORO - KAJEVUBA. 2. GUHA UMWANYA ABATURAGE BAKABAZA IBIBAZO BIJYANYE NIBYO BABA BADASOBANUKIWE. 3. KWAKIRA IBYIFUZO BYABATURAGE KU IYUBAKWA RY’ UMUHANDA Page 127 of 189 UKO INAMA YAGENZE Inama yatangiye umuyobozi wakagali aha ikaze abari bitabiriye inama ubundi asaba abaturage gukurikira neza ibiza kuvugirwa munama ubundi atangiza inama kumugaragaro aho uwaruhagarariye rwiyemeza mirimo ndetse numukozi wakarere ushinzwe ikorwa ry’umihanda batangiye kuganira nabari bitabiriye inama kuri buringingo yari yateguwe kuganirwaho nkuko bigaragara hasi. - GUKANGURIRA ABATURAGE GUKOMEZA KUGIRA URUHARE MUMIGENDEKERE MYIZA YIYUBAKWA RY’UMUHANDA BASE - MASORO - KAJEVUBA, HANAREBERWA HABWE IBITARAGENZE CYANGWA IBITAGENDA NEZA NUKO BYAKOSORWA KUGIRANGO BIDAKOMA MUNKORA IKORWA RY’UMUHANDA. Umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda yatangiye yibutsa abaturage ko igikorwa cy’ umuhanda urimo kubakwa (BASE - MASORO - KAJEVUBA) ari gahunda yafashwe kugirango abanyagakenke boroherezwe ubuhahirane hagati yabo nutundi duce baturanye nkuko bagiye babibwirwa munama zitandukanye zagiye ziba nambere yuko ikorwa ry’umuhanda wavuzwe hejuru ritangira. muriyinama yafashe numwanya ahumuriza abaturage bari bagitegereje inyishyu kubijyanye n’ imitungo yabo babaruriwe nyamara mugihe inama yabaga bakaba bari bagitegereje ingurane yayo, Kuriki kibazo cyitari gifitwe nabenshi yababwiyeko mugihe imitungo yabo yabaruwe ntampamvu yokugira ubwoba kuko leta idashobora kubambura ababwirako vuba batangira kubona amafara kuri konti zabo , yakomeje anashishikariza abagifite ibibazo byerekeranye nibyangombwa byumwihariko ibyubutaka ( Land ownership certificate) kubishaka kuko nabyo biri mubitinza kwishyurwa kwabo. Umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda yibukije abari bitabiriye inama ko hari komite ( GRC) igizwe byibura n’abantu 5 bishyiriyeho abasaba kuyigana igihe cyose bahuye nikibazo giturutse kwikorwa ry’umuhanda byumwihariko kubindi bintu bishobora kuba byakwangirika mugihe cyikorwa ry’ umuhanda nyamara bitarabaruwe, yaboneyeho nogusaba rwiyemezamirimo gukomeza kugira imikoranire yaburigihe niyo komite kugirango hatazagira umuturage ugira ikibazo kigatinda kubonerwa igisubizo , ubundi yasoje asezeranya abari bitabiriye inama ko nkakarere nabo bazakomeza kubabahafi ndetse ko hazakorwa igishoboka cyose kugirango imirimo yiyubakwa ry’umuhanda wavuzwe hejuru rigende neza muburyo bwose. Page 128 of 189 Umukozi wa rwiyemeza mirimo ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage yafashe umwanya yunga muryo umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda maze abwira abari bitabiriye inama ko rwiyemezamirimo yifuza gokorananabo umunsi kumunsi byumwihari gukorana na komite yabo nkemurampaka ( GRC) kugirango ibibazo bigenda bivuka kumuhanda bikagira ingaruka kubaturage bikemukire igihe kandi muburyo bukwiye, yavuzeko rwiyemeza mirimo icyo akeneye aruko imirimo yakorwa muburyo butabangamiye banyiri umuhanda aribo abaturage yongeyeho ko nomugihe haba hari ikibazo cyavutse rwiyemezamirimo yiteguye gukorana na komite yavuzwe hejuru maze kigashakirwa igisubizo gikwiye ubundi imirimo igakomeza mumutuzo no mumahoro. Umukozi wa rwiyemeza mirimo (CHICO) ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturajye yabwiye abari bitabiriye inama ko azajya agera kumuhanda kenshi gashoboka kugirango akurikirane niba ntabibazo abaturage barimo guhura nabyo biturutse kwikorwa ry’umuhanda byumwihariko imitungo yabo ishobora kwangizwa nibikorwa bya rwiyemezamirimo gusa yongeyehoko ikingenzi aruko haba imikoranire yaburimunsi hagatiye ndetse nakomite nkemurampaka (GRC) yokumuhanda kugirango hatagira ikibazo kivuka ntikimenyekane kuko adashobora kugera kuri burimuntu wagize ikibazo nyamara bikaba bishobokako binyuze murizo komite burikibazo cyose cyavutse cyamenyekana kugihe ndetse kigakemuka umuturage atagomye gusiragira. Umukozi wa rwiyemeza mirimo ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage ndetse nabakozi yasoje asaba abaturage gufatanya narwiyemeza mirimo bagakumira ikintu cyose cyateza impanuka, ahangaha basabwe cyane cyane kurinda abana ndetse namatungo kujya mumuhanda kuko ari bimwe mubishobora guteza impanuka zishobora nogutwara ubuzima bwabo tutibagiwe nibyabo, ikindi yongeyeho nuko imyitwarire mibi yabamwe nkubusinzi ndetse nikoreshwa ryibiyobya bwenjye nabyo bishobora kuba intandaro zimanuka abagira inama yokubigendera kure nokumenyesha abayobozi babo uwobaba bakeka ko acuruza cyangwa akoresha ibiyobyabwenjye. Page 129 of 189 2. UMWANYA W’IBIBAZO N’ IBISUBIZO BYABYO IKIBAZO 1: Abaturage babajije ikizakorwa kugirango amazi azajya ava mumuhanda agana mumugezi wa mugobore ( Umugezi ugenda impande yumuhanda Base – Masoro – Kajevuba kuva kuntangiriro kugeza kumpera) atazabangiriza imyaka. IGISUBIZO 1: Abibaza icyo kibazo basubijwe ko ahobizagaragarako hazanyuzwa amazi ava mumuhanda kandi kubusanzwe hakaba hatari inzira yamazi imitungo yahoo izabarurwa ubundi nyirayo akishyurwa. IKIBAZO 2: Abaturage babajije kubijyanye n’ibyangombwa by’ubutaka baba batarabonera ibyangombwa bya burundu bitewe nuko bagomba gukora ihererekanya bubasha kubutaka nabanyirabwo kandi banyirabwo babamwe bakaba batakiriho cyangwa batari murwanda IGISUBIZO 2: Basubijweko uwaba afite icyokibazo agomba kwegera inzego zitandukanye zibifite munshingano zikamwereka inzira agomba gucamo kugirango abashe kubona uburenganzira kurubwo butaka bityo akabona uko yishyurwa nkabandi. IKIBAZO 3: Ikindi kibazo cyabajijwe n’ikijyanye n’igihe ababariwe ariko bakaba batarishyurwa bazishyurirwa. IGISUBIZO 3: Aha abaturage basubijweko mumpera zuyumwaka wa 2021 abatarabonye amafaranga yabo kandi bakaba barabaruriwe kandi bakaba bujuje nibyangombwa bazaba batangiye kwakira inyishyu kumitungo yabo.  IBYIFUZO Abaturage bifuje ko bahabwa akazi kuko babonaga ko batarimo kubona akazi aribenshi, umukozi wa rwiyemezamirimo yabasezeranyije ko uko akazi kazakomeza kugenda kaboneka baza komeza kugenda bahabwa akazi. Page 130 of 189 INYANDIKO MVUGO KU INAMA Y, UBUKANGURAMBAGA KWIKORWA RY, UMUHANDA: KIVURUGA- MBATABATA Itariki: 08 Ukuboza 2021 Akagali: Sereri Isaha yo gutangira: 15:00pm Isaha yasorejweho: 16:30 pm Abitabiriye Inama: Umukozi wakarere ushinzwe iyubakwa ryimihanda mukarere ( Akarere Ka Gakenke) Umukozi ushinzwe imibereho myiza muri CHICO Umuyobozi wa Kagali ka Sereri Abaturage b’ Akagali ka Sereri [Abagabo:27&Abagore:29] IBYAGOMBAGA KUGANIRWAHO 1. GUKANGURIRA ABATURAGE GUKOMEZA KUGIRA URUHARE MUMIGENDEKERE MYIZA YIYUBAKWA RY’UMUHANDA KIVURUGA - MBATABATA, HANAREBERWA HABWE IBITARAGENZE CYANGWA IBITAGENDA NEZA NUKO BYAKOSORWA KUGIRANGO BIDAKOMA MUNKORA IKORWA RY’UMUHANDA. - GUHA UMWANYA ABATURAGE BAKABAZA IBIBAZO BIJYANYE NIBYO BABA BADASOBANUKIWE - KWAKIRA IBYIFUZO BYABATURAGE KU IYUBAKWA RY’ UMUHANDA KIVURUGA- MBATABATA Page 131 of 189 UKO INAMA YAGENZE Inama yatangiye umuyobozi wakagali aha ikazi abari bitabiriye inama ubundi asaba abaturage gukurikira neza ibiza kuvugirwa munama ubundi atangiza inama kumugaragaro aho uwaruhagarariye rwiyemeza mirimo ndetse numukozi wakarere ushinzwe ikorwa ry’umuhanda batangiye kuganira nabari bitabiriye inama kuri buringingo yari yateguwe kuganirwaho nkuko bigaragara hasi. 1. GUKANGURIRA ABATURAGE GUKOMEZA KUGIRA URUHARE MUMIGENDEKERE MYIZA YIYUBAKWA RY’UMUHANDA KIVURUGA - MBATABATA, HANAREBERWA HABWE IBITARAGENZE CYANGWA IBITAGENDA NEZA NUKO BYAKOSORWA KUGIRANGO BIDAKOMA MUNKORA IKORWA RY’UMUHANDA. Umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda yatangiye yibutsa abaturage ko igikorwa cy’ umuhanda urimo kubakwa (KIVURUGA - MBATABATA) ari gahunda yafashwe kugirango abanyagakenke boroherezwe ubuhahirane hagati yabo nutundi duce baturanye natwo nkuko bagiye babibwirwa munama zitandukanye zagiye ziba nambere yuko ikorwa ry’umuhanda wavuzwe hejuru ritangira. muri iyi nama yafashe numwanya ahumuriza abaturage bari bagitegereje inyishyu kubijyanye n’ imitungo yabo babaruriwe nyamara bakaba bagitegereje ingurane yayo, Kuriki kibazo yababwiyeko mugihe imitungo yabo yabaruwe ntampamvu yokugira ubwoba kuko leta idashobora kubambura ababwirako mugihe kitarambiranye bazaba bishyuwe, yakomeje anashishikariza abagifite ibibazo byerekeranye nibyangombwa kubishaka kuko nabyo biri mubitinza kwishyurwa kwabo. Umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda mukarere yibukije abari bitabiriye inama ko hari komite igizwe byibura n’abantu 5 bishyiriyeho abasaba kuyigana igihe cyose bahuye nikibazo giturutse kwikorwa ry’umuhanda byumwihariko kubindi bintu bishobora kuba byakwangirika mugihe cyikorwa ry’ umuhanda nyamara bitarabaruwe yaboney eho gusaba narwiyemezamirimo gukomeza kugira imikoranire niyo komite kugirango hatazagira umuturage ugira ikibazo kigatinda kubonerwa igisubizo , ubundi yasoje asezeranya abari bitabiriye inama ko nkakarere nabo bazakomeza kubaba hafi ndetse ko hazakorwa igishoboka cyose kugirango imirimo yiyubakwa ry’umuhanda wavuzwe hejuru igende neza ntawe uhutajwe byumwihariko umuturage. Page 132 of 189 Umukozi wa rwiyemeza mirimo ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage yafashe umwanya yunga muryo umukozi uhagarariye akarere ufite munshingano ikorwa ry’imihanda maze abwira abari bitabiriye inama ko rwiyemeza mirimo yifuza gokora nabo umunsi kumunsi byumwihari gukorana na komite yabo yokumuhanda ishinzwe gukurikirana ibibazo bigenda bivuka kumuhanda bikagira ingaruka kubaturage, yavuzeko rwiyemeza mirimo icyo akeneye aruko imirimo yakorwa muburyo butabangamiye banyiri umuhanda aribo abaturage avugako, yongeyeho ko nomugihe haba hari ikibazo cyavutes yiteguye gukorana na komite yavuzwe hejuru maze kigashakirwa ikibazo gikwiye ubundi imirimo igakomeza mumutuzo no mumahoro. Umukozi wa rwiyemeza mirimo (CHICO) ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage yabwiye abari bitabiriye inama ko azajya agera kumuhanda kenshi gashoboka kugirango akurikirane niba ntabibazo abaturage barimo guhura nabyo biturutse kwikorwa ry’umuhanda byumwihariko imitungo yabo ishobora kwangizwa nibikorwa bya rwiyemeza mirimo gusa yongeyehoko ikingenzi aruko haba imikoranire yaburimunsi hagatiye ndetse nakomite nkemurampaka (GRC) yokumuhanda kugirango hatagira ikibazo kivuka ntukimenyekane kuko adashobora kugera kuri burimuntu wagize ikibazo nyamara bikaba bishobokako binyuze murizo komite burikibazo cyose cyavutse cyamenyekana kugihe ndetse kigakemuka umuturage atagomye gusiragira. Umukozi wa rwiyemeza mirimo ushinzwe imibereho myiza yabaturage ndetse nabakozi yasoje asaba abaturage gufatanya narwiyemeza mirimo bagakumira ikintu cyose cyateza impanuka, ahangaha basabwe cyane cyane kurinda abana ndetse namatungo kujya mumuhanda kuko ari bimwe mubishobora guteza impanuka zishobora nogutwara ubuzima bwabo tutibagiwe nibyabo, ikindi yongeyeho nuko imyitwarire mibi yabamwe nkubusinzi ndetse nikoreshwa ryibiyobya bwenjye nabyo bishobora kuba intandaro zimanuka abagira inama yokubigendera kure. Page 133 of 189 2. UMWANYA W’IBIBAZO N’ IBISUBIZO BYABYO IKIBAZO 1: Abaturage babajije kumazu yabo yegereye umuhanda ariko zikaba zitarabaruwe mumazu azangizwa nikorwa ry’umuhanda kandi mubyukuri bakaba babonako zishobora kuzangirika cyangwa zikaba zanasenyuka bitewe nikorwa ry’umuhanda. IGISUBIZO 1: Kuri iki kibazo, bamazwe impungenge bibutswako ikorwa ry’umuhanda rikurikiranwa umunsi kumunsi kuburyo igihe havuka ikibazo icyaricyo cyose byumwihariko nkinzu ishobora kujya mumanegeka bitewe nikorwa ry’umuhanda cyahita cyigwaho ndetse byabangombwa iyonzu ikaba yanabarurwa ubundi nyirayo akishyurwa nkuko abandi bishyuwe. IKIBAZO 2: Abaturage babajije kubijyanye n’ibyangombwa by’ubutaka baba batarabonera ibyangombwa bya burundu bitewe nuko bagomba gukora ihererekanya bubasha kubutaka nabanyirabwo kandi banyirabwo babamwe bakaba batakiriho cyangwa batari murwanda IGISUBIZO 2: Basubijweko iki bagomba kwegera inzego zitandukanye zibifite munshingano zikabereka inzira bagomba gucamo kugirango babashe kubona uburenganzira kurubwo butaka bityo bakabona uko bishyurwa. IKIBAZO 3: Ikindi kibazo cyabajijwe n’ikijyanye n’igihe ababariwe ariko bakaba batarishyurwa bazishyurirwa kugirango babashe kwiteza imbere bakoresheje ayo mafaranga bazishyurwa.. IGISUBIZO 3: Aha abaturage basubijweko mumpera zuyumwaka wa 2021 abatarabonye amafaranga yabo kandi bakaba barabaruriwe kandi bakaba bujuje ibyangombwa bazaba batangiye kwakira inyishyu yabo kumitungo yabo. 3. IBYIFUZO Abaturage bifuje ko bahabwa akazi kuko babonaga ko batarimo kubona akazi aribensh, rwiyemeza uhagarariye rwiyemeza mirimo yabasezeranyije ko uko akazi kazakomeza kugenda kaboneka baza komeza kugenda bahabwa akazi, Gusa uhagarariye rwiyemezamirimo yatabwiye abari bitabiriye inama ko ababa bafite impushyu zogutwara ibinyabiziga bakaba banafite uburambe imiryango ifunguye kuribo kobaza bagasaba akazi bakaba bagahabwa mugihe kabanetse. Ikindi cyifuzo cyatanzwe nuko bifuzako umuhanda KIVURUGA - MBATABATA washyirwamo kaburimbo, ubishinzwe mukarere yabasubije ko ibyobyose bikorwa hagendewe kubushobozi buba bwabonetse asoza ababwirako uko ubushobozi buzajya bugenda buboneka imihanda irimo gushyirarwamo laterite nka KIVURUGA - MBATABATA izajya igenda ishyirwamo kaburimbo kuko ari ninyungu nokuri leta. Page 134 of 189 RAPORO Y’INAMA Z’ABATURAGE BO MU KARERE KA GAKENKE UMUSHINGA WO GUTUNGANYA IMIHANDA INGANA NA 69 KM KU NKUNGA YA BANKI Y’ISI RTDA (FEEDER ROADS). Kuva kuwa 8/09/2019 kugeza kuwa 27/12/2019 mu karere ka Gakenke habereye inama zitandukanye zigamije gukangurira abaturage kwita kukubungabunga no gufata neza imihanda ingana na 69 km. Iki gikorwa cyitabiriwe kubufatanye bwinzego z’Akarere (Abakozi kukarere, imirenge, utugari n’imidugudu ndetse n’abakozi b’ikigo gishinzwe gutezimbere taransiporo (RTDA). 4. INTANGIRIRO Umuhanda ni kimwe mu nkinigi ya mwamba mu iterambere ry’igihuhgu cyane cyane i bi mu nzira y’amajyambere cyane mu karere u Rwanda ruhereryemo. , Leta y’u Rwanda yashyizeho ingamba na gahunda zo kuvugurura ubuhinzi n’ubworozi kugirango bitange umusaruro uhagije kandi ugezwe ku isoko utangiritse kandi ubuhahirane bworohe mu biciye mu bikorwa remezo. Abagenrwbikorwa bagomba gutegurwa kugirango bagure uruhare rutaziguye mu ishyirwa mu bukorwa by umushinga wa FRDP. Muri rusange abaturage baganirijwe mu kumva ibitkerezo byabo kandi bamenye icyo basabwa ngo umushinga ugere ku nteg yawo yo kugeza uusaruro ku isoko ndetse banahanhirane, ingingo nyamukuru zaganiriweho ni izi zikuriira: - Gahunda y;umushinga no gukangukira kuwugira uwabo - Ibyiza by’ubushinga ndetse n’ingaruka zavuka nuburyo bwo kuzirinda - Gutegura ibisabwa kuirango abazangirizwa imyaka imyaka bahabwe igurane iwkiye - Amahirwe mu karere ajyanye n’uumenyi ndetse n’akazi muri rusange - Imyitwarire mu gihe cy’akazi - Guhagarika ibikorwa muntu bikorerwa mu mbago z’umuhanda hirindwa guhinga no gutera ibiti bimara igihe kirekire ahubwo bagahinga ibimara amezi atatu - Kwirinda kubaka mu mbago z’umuhanda no kutarenga imbibe Uyu mushinga ukaba uje gufasha Akarere ka Gakenke na Minisiteri yibkorwa remezo mu ishyirwa mu bikorwa ry’umushinga Banki y’Isi iteramo Leta y’u Rwanda mu rwego rwo gusana no kubungabunga imihanda yo mu Turere twa Gatsibo, Nyagatare, Nyaruguuru, Gakenke, Nyabihu na Rutsiro. Page 135 of 189 Ni muri urwo rwego hafashwe ingamba zo gusana no gufata neza imihanda ingana na 69km iri mu Karere ka Gakenke hakoreshejwe ba Rwiyemezamirimo ndetse n’abaturage batuye aka karere badafite ubushobozi buhagije cyane bafite imbaraga zo gukora, kugirango bashobore kwiteza imbere bakoresheje amafaranga bahembwa kandi n’ibikorwa remezo bakoze byunganira mu iterambere rusange ry’Akarere ndetse n’igihugu muri rusange. Iyi mihanda izakorwa mu rwego rwo kugeza umusaruro uhingwa muri aka karere ukagezwa ku masoko ku huryo bworoshye ndetse n’ubuhahirane (gutwara bantu n’ibintu. 5. UKO INAMA ZAGENZE Inama zatangizwaga n’umuyobozi w’ubutegetsi bwite bwa Leta, nyuma agaha ijambo itsinda rya ba rwiyemezamirim barigukora inyigo. Uyoboye Itsinda yafashe umwanya ashimira ubuyo bozi n’abaturage ku mwanya babagenerye kugira ngo babone umwanya baganire kumishinga w’iterambere. Yakomeje aganiriza abaturage kubijyanye n’umushinga, inte go zawo, ibyiza b’umushinga, uruhare rwabaturage mu kuwshyira mu bikorwa, n’ingaruka z’umushinga kubaturage. Ajya, gusoza, yahamagariye abaturage gutanga ibitekerezo byabo byashyirwa munyigo, bizafasha mukunonosora umushinga kugira ngo umushinga uzawe uwiterambere rishingiye kumuturage kandi usubize ibiabzo baibafite bijyanye n`ubuhahirane. Intego z’umushinga zagarunsweho nizi zikurikira: - Gusana no gutunganya imihanda yomucyaro igamije kugeza umusaruro ku isoko; - Guhashya ubukene hakoreshwa gutanga akazi ku miryango y’abantu bakennye cyane; - Kongera ibikorwa remezo mucyaro - Gutanga akazi ku miryongo y’abantu bakennye cyane kurusha abandi; - Kongera ubuhahirane; - Kuzamura ubukungu bw’igihugu; Kubijyanye n’ibyiza by’umushinga, hagaruswe kuribi bikurikira: - Guteza imbere ibikorwa remezo (imihanda) n’inkingi yiterambere rirambye; - Isanwa n’iyimihanda rizafasha guteza imbere ubuhinzi, no kongera agaciro umusaruro uva mubuhinzi n’ubworozi; - Guteza imbere ubuhahirane hagati y’uduce tumwe nutundi; - Isanwa r’imihanda rizatanga amahirwe y’akazi mugihe cy’iyubakwa - Isanwa r’imihanda rizatanga amahirwe yo guteza imbere ibikorwa b’ubucuruzi bitandukanye; - Isanwa r’imihanda rizozorohereza abaturage kugana service zibanze nko kubigo Nderabuzima, amashuri, isoko, insengero, n’ibindi. Page 136 of 189 - Uyu mushinga wo gutunganya imihanda ingana na 195km nta ngaruka mbi ufite, ahubwo ufite inyungu nyinshi twasuzumira mu nzego enye zikurikira: - Inyungu mu by’imari: uyu mushunga uzatuma akayabo ka eshanu yinjira mu mifuka y’abaturage bari basanzwe ari abakene cyane. Ibi bizabashoboza kwikenura mu ngo zabo, kuzigama no kwihangira imirimo ibyara inyungu; - Inyungu ku mibereho myiza y’abaturage: uyu mushinga uzafasha abaturage bazahabwa akazi kuva mu byiciro by’abakene, bityo ingorane bateraga umuryango nyarwanda zigabanuke, kando nabo bumve ko bafite agaciro mu bandi; - Inyungu mu rwego rw’ubukungu: uyu mushinga uzafasha mu kurengera umutungo kamere w’ubutaka, ndetse n’imigezi ntizangizwa n’isuri. Ibyatsi n’ibiti bizaterwa ku nkengero z’imihanda ingana na195km no ku mikingo bizafasha mu kurinda imihindagurikire y’ikirere kandi yongere ibicanywa n’ibirumbura ubutaka. Kubijyanye n’ingaruka izigurirkira nizo zagarutweho: - Iyagurwa r’imihanda, rifite gukore, k’ubutaka, inzu, imyaka, ibiti, n’ibindi bikorwa b’abaturage; - Impanuka mugihe cy’iyubakwa ry’imihanda; - Indrwa zandurira mu mibonano mpuzabitsina - Uruhurirane rw’imico ku batekinisiye bazaturuka ahandi bakivanga n;abaturage Kubijyanye n’uruhare rw’abaturage, abitabiriye inama bagaragarijwe ko umushinga aruwabaturage, ko uje kubateza imbere kandi ko bazawugira uwabo. Basobanuriwe ko igihe cy’iyubakwa r’imihanda, aribo bazahabwamo akazi binyuze munzira zo gishishikariza rwiyemezamirirmo gutanga akazi k’amaboko kagakorwa n’abagenerwa bikorwa b’umusginga. Ikindi, nuko iyo mihanda aribo ije guteza imbere kuko aribo bazayikoresha.Bakanguriwe kuzayifata neza, bakoresha imiganda mukuyitaho kugira ngo izarambe. Abaturage bahewe umwanya wo kubaza ibibazo cyangwa gutanga ibitekerezUko ibibazo byagaragara byakemuka Page 137 of 189 Page 138 of 189 IBIBAZO N”IBISUBIZO IKIBAZO/Icyifuzo IGISUBIZO ICYONGERWAHO Ese ibyacu bizangizwa Ibintu byose bizangizwa n’umushinga Yanyuzwe,kandi yizeye ubuyobozi bwiza bizishyurwa? bizishyurwa hashinye kumategeko y’u komite nkemurampaka igomba kuba igizwe Rwanda. Aha, abaturage n’abantu bizewe basobanuriwe itegeko N° 32/2015 rwo kuwa 11/06/2015 ryerekeye kwimura abantu ku mpamvu z’inyungu rusange. Kandi mu nama ikuriira tuzafatanya gutora komite nkemura mpaka (GRC) Ubutaka bwacu buzishyurwa? Ubutaka bwishyurwa iyo bugiye Yanyuzwe kukoreshwa igikorwa cy’inyungu rusange burengeje 5% by’ubuso bwose bw’ubutaka. Ibi bikaba biri ku byangombwa by’ubutaka inyuma. Byose bizakorwa hisunzwe amategeko Umushinga uzatangira ryari? Umushinga waratangiye ariko Yanyuzwe imashini zizatangira Gashyantare 2020 mumaze kwishyurwa Ni ibiki bizishyurwa? Hazishyurwa imyaka, inzu n’ibindi Yanyuzwe bintu byose biri ku butaka bushobora kuzatwarwa n’umuhanda, hanshingiye kubyo amategeko ateganya. Tuzahembwa angahe? Muzahembwa hakurikijwe icyo Yanyuzwe ushobora gukora kuko hari abafundi, abayedi, abazamu. Ibiciro bisanzwe Page 139 of 189 muzi ni byo bizakurikizwa Gushima umushinga Ni byiza gushima ariko muzageze iyi Yanyuzwe nkuru nziza no kubandi Ba Rwiyemezamirimo Ikibazo cya Rwiyemeza mirimo Yanyuzwe, ariko bizitabwe ho cyane kuko batishyura. cyarahgurukiwe, cyafatiwe ingamba hari mishinga myinchi batwambuye. zizatuma atongera kwambura abamukoreye. Mushyirwa mubikorwa r’umushinga, hazaba hari itsinda rishinzwe gukurikirana imikorere ya Rwiyemezamirimo kandi yishyurwa amaze kugaragaza ko nta deni afitiye abamuoreye n’abamuhaye ibikoresho Ese uruhurirane rw’abantu Abakozi ba nyakabyizi bazaturuka mu Yanyuzwe ntiruzatera imico mibi batanyabiorwa baturiye imihanda nk’ubusambanyi kandi hashyirweho komite nkemurampaka ifasha mu gukemura ibibazo byavuga igihe icyaricyo cyose Muzatekereze no ku masoko Hari ibikorwa by’inyongera ku yanyuzwe kandi yishimye dore ntaho dufite tugurisha muhanda harimo amasoko bidusaba kujya mu gakenke cg n’amavuriro mato azubakwa hafi kuri base yanyu 6. UMWANZURO Intego y’uyu mushinga wo gutunganya imihanda ingana na 69 km mu karere ka Gakenke ni iyo kurwanya ubukene mu buryo burambye, wongera umusaruro w’ubuhinzi n’ubworozi kuko ifumbire izagera ku bahininzi idahenze kandi ugatanga akazi ku bantu benshi. Uzatuma kandi ishoramari ryiyongera wongere ubushobozi bw’abaturage bwo Page 140 of 189 guhahirana n’utundi turere.Ibi bindi byose rero hamwe n’ibindi ntabashije kurondora bikazadufasha kugera vuba ku ntego z’iterambere ndetse n’icyerekezo 2020.Kubera ibi byose rero, uyu mushinga ukwiye gushyigikirwa kandi ukihutishwa. Bikorewe Gakenke, ku wa 27/11/2018 no ku wa 31/12/2021 MUNYEMANA FELICIEN and MUVUNYI Serge Umwanditsi Page 141 of 189 Appendix 7: Interim checklist - Review of E&S Implementation in T&I Bank-financed Works Contracts Project Name Project Number Country Contract Name Contract Duration and completion date Implementing Agency Review Date Current Status (Please No Measure elaborate rather than a “Yes/No”- approach) Contractual Arrangements on site Is there a full-time Employer’s Representative (ER) on 1 site at all times? If not frequency of visits? 2 Years of experience of the ER? 3 Name of Supervision Consulting Firm (SC) Does SC TOR require oversight over ESMP, RAP, and 4 HIV/AIDS awareness implementation? If yes, to the above, does the SC contract provide 5. sufficient resources? If yes, to the above, does the works contract provide 6. sufficient resources to implement all activities? Are they provisional sums or budgeted activities? 7 Name of SC Team Leader The Resident Engineer - RE) 8 Years of experience of RE Does the Employer have an Environmental Unit – if 9 yes, how many full-time technical staff are employed? Does the Employer have an Social Unit – if yes, how 10 many full-time technical staff are employed Contract Reports and Instruments Does the Bank receive Monthly Progress Reports from 11 the RE on schedule? ESMP in place, and cleared, being implemented and 12 documented in the MPRs? Provide dates of Page 142 of 189 submission and clearance and any sequencing of works to accommodate clearance process. Is the ESMP an integral part of the contractors contract 13 with clear activities and costs? RAP or ARAP, if required, completed and RAP or ARAP completion Report cleared? Provide dates of 14 submission and clearance and any sequencing of works to accommodate clearance process. Is there any additional expropriation which will 15 require a RAP amendment? Contractor’s Health and Safety Management Plan in 16 place and approved by ER, and implementation documented in the MPR? Any Citizen engagement activities under 17 implementation? Any Gender-based activities and/or data collection in 18 place Contractor’s Traffic Management Plan in place, cleared 19 by RE, and being implemented? HIV/AIDS Awareness/STI mitigation measures in 20 place? Who is HIV/AIDS service provider? Are they 21 registered with the National Aids Commission? Site arrangements 22 Grievance Redress System in place? Contractor/Cs/ER combined Meetings with affected 23 communities undertaken and how regularly? Number of contractor’s staff provided with site 24 accommodation. Distance of contractor’s base camp vis-à-vis towns, 25 villages, centers of population and environmentally sensitive areas. Percentage of staff recruited from the Project Impact 26 Area vs. brought from outside. Condition of site accommodation and amenities 27 provided. Page 143 of 189 Do out-of-area workers receive any allowances 28 additional to their salary/wages? If so, please describe. Wages paid to casual and permanent works and their 29 compliance with local labor laws. Compliance with local working hours and site safety 30 laws for contractor’s workers. Are Contractor’s staff wearing issued personal 31 protection equipment? Emergency contact numbers for Contractor/ ER 32 shown in conspicuous place? Page 144 of 189 Appendix 8: Gakenke Valuation Report and Practicing Certificate of Valuer Acrobat Document Acrobat Document Page 145 of 189